Slashdot Mirror


Seiko TV Watch is now 20 years Old

TheGreatOrangePeel writes "In 1982 the Seiko "Television Watch" became available to buy. Now, 20 years later, the watch has become a bit of a rare item to find. When it was available new, it contained the following: 1-1/4" LCD Screen on wristwatch, Shirt pocket receiver, Case, Earphones, Owner's Manual." Apparently the small wonder is still the smallest TV commercially produced.

133 comments

  1. Yeah. by Ferrum · · Score: 1

    I want a TV watch

    --
    Live in hope. Die in despair.
  2. 20 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...and we haven't come up with any new ideas since.

  3. But can you view watchmedance.com with the watch? by thedanceman · · Score: 0

    I don't think it lets you tune into websites such as http://www.watchmedance.com

  4. Casio remote watch by Calimus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the real questions is, will the remote watch work with the the Tv watch?

    --
    Trying to be different, just like everyone else.
  5. My watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has a clock! It tells the time *AND* the date. It's incredibly useful. I look at it dozens of times throughout the day.

    1. Re:My watch by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      ha! MINE has a light AND a countdown timer for timing my dinner! It's like a technological wonderland compared to yours...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  6. Its not really a TV on a Watch, tis a LCD by TheDick · · Score: 1

    Wait, pocket receiver? So the whole thing DIDN'T fit on a watch, and they had to hide the bulk. Today, they wouldn't use a wire, they'd use bluetooth from pocket to wrist :)

    --

    1. Re:Its not really a TV on a Watch, tis a LCD by balloonhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bluetooth? But then it's release would be delayed too long. And it wouldn't work anyway.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  7. i am guessing by lingqi · · Score: 1, Insightful
    nothing-else-going-on dept

    a *really* slow news day.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  8. Remote control watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a number of watches that allow you to program them to act as a TV remote control. Not as cool as a TV watch, but it'd still let you play some fun practical jokes. "Who keeps changing the channel!?"

    1. Re:Remote control watches by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 1

      Back in middle school, when we watched movies in band class, my friend had one of these. It was so funny watch ing the teacher get frustrated after he would start the tape, only to see it pause or stop 30 seconds later.

      --
      Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
    2. Re:Remote control watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to do that with my calculator.

    3. Re:Remote control watches by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Funny kind of calculator you have... Well, it works well with Palms.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
  9. The watch was fine ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was the giant dish you had to wear on your head that was a bother.

    1. Re:The watch was fine ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That, or the giant cable you had to drag along.

  10. How can I masturbate with this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well fuck, I can't masturbate to erotic TV commercials if the TV is mounted on my friggen wrist... it keeps moving back and forth, back and forth...

    Masturbation requires concentration, which this device does not allow.

    1. Re:How can I masturbate with this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't you have two hands?

    2. Re:How can I masturbate with this thing? by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, imagine trying to watch scrambled porn on that tiny LCD screen... it's impossible!

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    3. Re:How can I masturbate with this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be easier. It's like taking a very large blurred image, shrinking it down to a small size and the image quality seems to be increased.

  11. You can buy one by Jim+Buzbee · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:You can buy one by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      You can buy one here.

      Foiled again. Here I was preparing some smarmy comment about how many people would be driven to search for the watch on eBay ... guess I'll have to think up a crackpot post claiming that rvrtrader is none other than TheGreatOrangePeel, queuing the story on /. to boost bids ... oh, wait, did I type out my thoughts again?

    2. Re:You can buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's at $192 and there are still 3 days left. That's about what I paid for my 19 in. TV.

  12. I wonder by Flaken2000 · · Score: 1

    how many they have sold since it's introduction. I'm guessing not many.... who wants to watch tv on a 1-1/4" LCD screen?

    1. Re:I wonder by balloonhead · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not because we want to; because we can

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  13. They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My organization is known for studying the viability of certain technology products, including televisions.

    We've found that the next place a TV makes sense is within cell phones. With phones getting high quality displays, it's relatively inexpensive (power/space/$) to add a television tuner.

    We found smaller devices were not economical, due to the fact that most people already carry around a cell phone as a device.

    We've also found that cell phones are displacing the sales of watches, as most modern cell phones have a server-synchronized clock built in.

    Over time, we find that the cell phone will shrink into a watch-sized device - but that will take at lesat two more generations of development. Battery life and size is, as always, the limitation.

    1. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by cmowire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've got me on the watches being replaced by cell phones. I'll buy that one. But I won't buy the watch-sized cell phone. Unless the phone is somehow implanted, anything smaller than an existing phone isn't going to be convenient for people to talk into or dial out of.

      I would believe half of the cell phone on the wrist and the other half of the cell phone in a headset. But I think the next step is to combine the cell phone and the PDA.

    2. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We've also found that cell phones are displacing the sales of watches, as most modern cell phones have a server-synchronized clock built in.

      I stopped wearing a wristwatch a long time ago for just this reason. What's also interesting that I never though of before is that we went from pocket watches -> wrist watches -> and now back to pocket watches!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by balloonhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      Combining the cellphone and PDA? Wow, that would be an exciting new step. It's a shame that no one has thought of it or indeed done it already.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    4. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by cmowire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've done it, Mr. Troll, but who uses them right now? How long did it take to go from wanting a pocket computer (Sharp Wizard, various Radio Shack pocket computers, Newton, etc, etc, etc,) to actually HAVING a usable pocket computer that caught on (PalmPilot, iPAQ, etc.) for widespread usage? At least 10 years.

      This is what I am referring to -- the time when it goes from geekazoid toy to part of life for a good percentage of non-geeks.

    5. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by White+Shade · · Score: 2

      even with all my magical techno-gadgets, I still have a nice analog (you know, with hands..) watch strapped to my wrist, cuz it's just so much easier to tilt my wrist and look down rather than go digging around my pockets to find my cellphone...

      Simple, Functional, and Quick are still important rules of design, which are being ignored with frightening regularity due to the the modern addiction to feature creep/bloat.

      --
      ìì!
    6. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      I still wear a gold analog wristwatch, but that's because I'm an ape who likes shiny things.

    7. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, hello, that's the problem of PDAs, not the combination. It's not like PDA-using people are balking at the very idea of combining the two things.

    8. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Einstein!
      This cell-phone/tv gizmo that you want to research already exists:
      http://www.cellular.co.za/samsung_sch_m22 0_tv_phon e.htm

      Sorry to blow your business plan ;)

    9. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not an ape, you're a WOP

    10. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, not to be overly single minded, but...
      This already has been around for a while:
      http://www.cellularaccessory.com/neopoint. html

      Not to mention that pdq brick and numerous other attempts that have not quite caught on yet.

      I'd still be using the neopoint (synchs with outlook, sends email, etc...) if the dang power adapter had not broken, sigh...

    11. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wear a watch, or carry a cellphone.

      For one, I don't want to carry anything extra with me.
      Second, I don't care what time it is. When I really have to know it's fairly easy to find out the time anyway. There are clocks almost everywhere!

    12. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by balloonhead · · Score: 1
      I'm not trolling - (well, I suppose that's always arguable depending on whether you agree with me or not). The cellphone / PDA convergence thing has been going on for a while now - while handspring's visorphone (PDA add-on) and Treo and similar could be argued as you say to be geek only toys with no market penetrance, most high-end cellphones now have PDA capabilities, with extensive address books, very capable note-taking (and dictation taking) and calender abilities, and calculators - the biggest selling point of PDAs (which are really just electronic filofaxes). The thing they don't have is modifiable software but I believe the newer ones have Java. Some even use Palm OS.

      So to be short - they are now being produced and starting to reach high-end mass market - which will be tomorrow's low-end mass market. Which was my original point.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    13. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      Ha, shows how much YOU know! I've never even BEEN to Rochester, let alone cruised it in an IROC. So there!

    14. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one step ahead of you. I still find digital watches a pretty neat idea.

    15. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by gusnz · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure these combination devices are all that they're cracked up to be. We've had the technology to do it for ~20 years, as this article points out, so why haven't they caught on?

      Personally I own both a wristwatch and a cellphone, and am not planning to ditch either. When I just want to know the time, I don't really want to be interrrupted by new text messages in a furious cascade of beeps - especially in a boring (and quiet) lecture theatre :). Or when out sailing and the gun goes off, you want to start your countdown timer without navigating through a pretty GUI menu.

      I'm not saying it's impossible to build smaller devices -- you're right, batteries and also keyboard sizes are the only real limitations (although this would be cool on a mobile), and some are probably economically feasible.

      But they all run up against the K.I.S.S principle -- most people prefer devices to have single, simple functions, so they can be used and upgraded/replaced easily on their own. And if one breaks or runs out of batteries, you still have other toys to pass the time :).

    16. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2

      We've also found that cell phones are displacing the sales of watches, as most modern cell phones have a server-synchronized clock built in.

      I know I'm on a geek site but...

      Many people, like myself, don't wear a watch to tell the time only. For instance, I wear a movado, it has *no numbers* and *no strokes to mark anything*. You don't tell time on that thing, you take a rough estimate :)

      What the watch does very well is look nice. I get compliments from random people, chicks mostly, constantly. I've discovered a watch is one of the first things a girl will look for in bars,clubs,etc. to figure if you're worth the trouble.

      Sometimes it's good to take your geek hat off for a bit : )

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    17. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by fliplap · · Score: 1

      Its too bad that cell phones are replacing watches so frequently these days. Personally, I still have a watch just because I like how it looks and the convience of not having to reach into my pocket. My watch is a Titanium Skagen though, so its really more of a piece of jewelery to me.

    18. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by dpp · · Score: 2
      But I won't buy the watch-sized cell phone. Unless the phone is somehow implanted, anything smaller than an existing phone isn't going to be convenient for people to talk into or dial out of.

      You might well be right, but people are investigating ways to get around this. There's a prototype phone where you stick your finger in your ear to listen to vibrations, and talk into its wrist mic (no, really! :-).

      --
      This post is strictly my own opinion and not necessarily that of my employer.
    19. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Most phones have a jack that you can plug an earpiece/microphone into, and come with such a device. I know that when I used mine, I had a dramatic increase in my ability to hear and people's ability to understand me.

      It'd just use one of those with a wrist phone.

      --
      -no broken link
    20. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Saeger · · Score: 1
      ... so its really more of a piece of jewelery to me.

      Well then, you took the wind right out my reply. :)

      At least you can admit you're more concerned with the fashion than the functionality. I can understand where you're coming from... but the watch could just as well be a manly-looking bracelet (unless you're also habitually 'addicted' to the act of looking at your wrist to tell time.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    21. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I've discovered a watch is one of the first things a girl will look for in bars,clubs,etc. to figure if you're worth the trouble.

      Most guys aren't looking for shallow gold diggers.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    22. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Or hey, how about "glovephone" that's got a speaker sewn into the thumb, and a mic on the pinky.

      People'd think you're crazy. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    23. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by guhknew · · Score: 1

      But I won't buy the watch-sized cell phone.

      Or, perhaps, it could just be a device you pin to your shirt and tap to talk, a la star trek.

    24. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need numbers or ticks to tell the exact fucking time, you are an idiot.

    25. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by plumby · · Score: 2

      What about the Nokia Communicator. It's been around for at least 3 years (possibly more) in some form or other.

    26. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by danimrich · · Score: 1

      The cellphone-tv combo would have certainly been a nice gadget for the Football World Championships. Hey, maybe it's ready 'till 2006.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    27. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by cmowire · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but it brings new meaning to the phrase "Talk to the fist"

    28. Re:They can't build them again (economically) by balloonhead · · Score: 1
      I'm not so sure about the communicator - it's sort of a mini-laptop combined with a phone rather than a PDA (if you're thinking of the same one I am - I'm at work and the site is blocked by the admin). But there are plenty PDA-featured phones in the European and Asian markets at various stages between simplified PDA and stripped down laptop.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  14. wow. by dbretton · · Score: 1, Troll

    this is cutting edge stuff. .amazing. .snore.

    Hey Taco, if I email you some interesting info on the Great Wall of China, will you post it on slashdot?

    Apparently it's still the only man-made object that can be seen from space. So it must still be newsworthy, right?

    seriously, I know I'm trolling. But this post has to be among the worst I have seen.

    1. Re:wow. by Sc00ter · · Score: 4, Informative
      That would be wrong

      http://www.snopes2.com/science/greatwal.htm

      "If we take "space" to mean a low Earth orbit such as the one travelled by the Space Shuttle (roughly 160 to 350 miles above Earth), the Great Wall claim fails twice. First of all, it's not the only object visible from that distance: NASA's Earth from Space photographic archive (particularly the Human Interactions section) shows that pictures taken from low orbit reveal human-built structures such as highways, airports, bridges, dams, and components of the Kennedy Space Center. Secondly, even though other objects are visible at this distance, according to Shuttle astronaut Jay Apt, the Great Wall is barely discernable, if not invisible"

    2. Re:wow. by astrosmash · · Score: 1
      seriously, I know I'm trolling. But this post has to be among the worst I have seen.
      Whatever. You're such a troll.

      The watch is cool and everybody knows it. But thanks for contributing -- it's good to know that you don't get it.
      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    3. Re:wow. by [JP] · · Score: 1

      If the Great Wall can be seen from space then I guess all man-made objects with a width of more than say 10 meters are visible as well.

      Doesn't matter how long it is.

      If you glue a 10 meter long strand of hair to your neighbours wall and then walk away 50 meters, it will most probably be invisible to you.

      On the other hand, if there's irrigated, fertile green land on one side of the Great Wall and barren yellow desert on the other side I guess you know where the wall ought to be. But you still can't see the actual wall.

    4. Re:wow. by mtec · · Score: 1

      You can see Rosie O'Donnell from space.

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  15. Re:wow. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently it's still the only man-made object that can be seen from space.

    Actually, that's an urban legend.

  16. Here's a Better Slashdot Story... by dbretton · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    dbretton writes:
    click here

  17. sounds cool until.. by Xzzy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ..you read the article and realize the thing had a walkman-sized reciever you gotta carry around too (source site was hosed, that's a mirrored copy).

    Seems to me one of the other portable TV's would be a lot more convenient, especially considering the improved screen size. Which you know, is probably a real darn good reason why it never cought on. ;)

    Still, having a resolvable display in the early 80's was doing pretty darn good, even if it ended up being little more than a neat hardware hack.

    1. Re:sounds cool until.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you wore that today, people would think you were a wired suicide bomber. Strange cables everywhere...

    2. Re:sounds cool until.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you are a filthy Arab would they think that.

    3. Re:sounds cool until.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it, the jewish yoda talk makes me laugh.

  18. Asians are Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Asians are so inventive that they can turn a tv into a watch."

    -Reggie White (football player turned preacher for you anti-sports geeks)

    1. Re:Asians are Amazing by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      You can find an AP story about that speech here. Still one of the all-time great self-immolations.

  19. You need a small transmitter for a small watch. by User+956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Combine this with the world's smallest TV transmitter, and you're all set.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:You need a small transmitter for a small watch. by Miska · · Score: 1

      attach the tansmitter to the tv out on your laptop and you can watch the movies you want, on the go! ...oh wait...

      .

      --
      -
  20. wow I was wrong by Brigadier · · Score: 2



    I remember talking about this in grade school all this dick tracy stuff. I touted it as being impractical and expensive, which it was but in retrospect were these guys ahead of there time or what. Well there is an museum peice for you. Put it right along side the star treck communicators.

  21. not on ebay. by User+956 · · Score: 2, Informative

    the watch has become a bit of a rare item to find.

    tell that to this guy who's selling one for 200 bucks.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  22. Who wants to stare at their wrist? by StandardCell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I mean, it's a cool idea, but how long can you possibly stare at a tiny little screen for to watch something? And what would require such urgency that you need to carry a television around? I get enough eye strain staring at a 17" monitor a good chunk of the day, never mind doing the same thing on a small display.

    If it's a sports event like hockey, forget about seeing where the puck is going. Academy awards results can come via text messages. 3G networks will make streaming video possible over phones anyway. Reception can't be that great on a little watch. For portable TV, I have my 4" Casio screen, and then only if it's used sparingly.

    That's not to say that it's not interesting technology or that we shouldn't commemorate it. I used to have a Pac Man video game watch (the one with the joystick, not the buttons), and I wish I still had it because it was neat. But, like all thing in life, we have to move on to what's modern and better. I'll probably be playing video games on the go on my cell phone soon, and so will I be watching tv and video, if not on my multi-function multi-emulator PDA.

    1. Re:Who wants to stare at their wrist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? This got a flamebait mod? It is now considered socially unacceptable to politely question the relative worth of a tiny TV that sits on your wrist? Are tiny wrist-TVs some sort of sacred institution, such that even questioning their value to mankind is some sort of offence against one's fellow man? Sometimes, Slashdot downright confuses me. Let me guess: I'll get a flamebait mod for this.

  23. Who says? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says the US doesn't get the cool stuff? http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/03/2019216.shtm l?tid=137

  24. Re:wow. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case, slashdot WOULD post it as a story.

  25. Want one? by jfroot · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's one on Ebay for auction.

    1. Re:Want one? by jfroot · · Score: 1

      Guess I should stop reading at 5 before I make comments.. :)

  26. Re:Why MySQL Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mwhahaha... The site euclid.nmu.edu is running Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.8.5 OpenSSL/0.9.6b DAV/1.0.2 PHP/4.0.6 mod_perl/1.26 on Linux. FAQ


    The Linux takes last place, again.

  27. Speaking of Watching... by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 1

    It's always nice to get a visual confirmation of a through-slashdoting. "Warning: Too many connections in /staff/WWW/Dept/web/deadch/pn_714/html/pnadodb/dr ivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 108

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /staff/WWW/Dept/web/deadch/pn_714/html/pnadodb/dr ivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 108 mysql://deadch:@euclid/deadch failed to connect Too many connections
    " And I remember seeing a couple of these back in the day (TV Watches), nice idea for the gadget lover, but even then seemed kind of a waste for us practical people that prefer calculators on our watches. =P

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
  28. I Sold Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a salesman at Bel Air Camera in Los Angeles
    in 1982 and I remember selling these silly things.

    Actually I remember selling ONE. It was bought by
    David Hearst... Patty's brother. He wandered
    around Westwood looking at the stupid thing and
    bumping into people.

    1. Re:I Sold Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing them at Sears as a child. They were locked in a glass case. Ah, the 80s.

  29. offtopic... by mocktor · · Score: 1

    splat, there goes another site that uses a mysql backend.

    <preach>
    why don't people stick a line of code in their scripts that checks system load and disables databasey stuff while the system's getting hosed?
    </preach>

  30. the inevitable slashdot effect ... by jms258 · · Score: 1

    Captain Slash strikes again!! Warning: Too many connections in /staff/WWW/Dept/web/deadch/pn_714/html/pnadodb/dr ivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 108 Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /staff/WWW/Dept/web/deadch/pn_714/html/pnadodb/dr ivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 108 mysql://deadch:@euclid/deadch failed to connectToo many connections http://www.cybercurator.com/ also deals with the seiko watch ... couldn't find a googled cache of the link in the article, or an archive.org mirror. -jms258

    1. Re:the inevitable slashdot effect ... by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to sound like a troll, because I have no favorites, but why is it I see "Too many connections.." slammed websites that run on PHP/MySQL all the damn time, yet I don't remember ever seeing that on an ASP/SQL Server site? :\

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  31. Don't forget by Noodlenose · · Score: 1

    Belgian Highways....

  32. Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks like the link is Slashdotted. You can check out more about it at this site:
    http://www.tvhistory.tv/Smallest%20TV.htm

    (Got it from the ebay add posted above)

  33. LOL. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe the moderators woulnt be so quick if they werent Anonymous too.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  34. Imagine... by ath0mic · · Score: 1


    a beowulf cluster on these.... ugh, nevermind just force of habit.

  35. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a bracelet with an lcd display, and when it rings, you take it off your wrist and it unfolds to an ear boom phone. ta-da

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sounds like you've spent too much time watching Transformers. ;)

  36. The dudes counter on the page has gone up by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    by 600 in 20 minutes

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  37. Way to steal a story by Space+Coyote · · Score: 2

    Come on, a story mentioning this thing showed up on the eternally spiffy memepool just a couple of days ago. 5:1 odds the article poster got it from there without giving proper credit. Show some manners, people.

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    1. Re:Way to steal a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The writer did site the source. Click "Source 01" and "Source 02" under "Notes".

      (BTW, two of the links at memepool about this are the same as what "Source 01" and "Source 02" lead to. I suppose it's hard to say what's really going on here.)

  38. Daft but very impressive by DiscoBiscuit · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it was a novelty item then and now, but even with its pocket receiver, it's still an amazing item for its time. Most electronics look obsolete less than a year after they're introduced - this baby still looks cutting edge today (well it does if you pretend the receiver wasn't there!)

    I remember as a kid when I got my first radio watch, and I was in love with it. Big ugly cheap thing, which could only pick up one band (medium wave) and its sensitivity was so poor that it could only pick up one local station that was very strong.

  39. Wake me up when... by Photar · · Score: 1

    you can fit a cell phone into a hearing aid.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  40. retina tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know its old technology when retina tv hits the shelves.

  41. get the straightdope by lingqi · · Score: 2
    click here.

    some quotes:
    ...Gemini V astronauts Gordon Cooper and Charles Conrad were able to spot, among other things, a special checkerboard pattern that had been laid out in Texas, a rocket-sled test in New Mexico, and the aircraft carrier that would later pick them up in the Atlantic, along with a destroyer trailing in its wake...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  42. But is it cable ready by MBCook · · Score: 2

    That's neat, but it should at least be cable ready! Or have RCA jacks so I can run linux on my xbox, keep it in my backpack powered by a fuel cell, and use X on my wrist-watch TV during commercials. Best of all, by the time all of the above is available, I might be able to afford it within only a few lifetimes.

    This would be cool, because I would assume that by now they could get it alot smaller (electronics part, not the screen because why would you want it?)

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  43. Dumb Terminal by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    The idea of putting the main proccessing power (or tuner in this case) in a separate box is good. Technically, all the watch is is a screen, surely you could connect almost anything to it - a camera, a dvd player or even a computer. If you designed something like this with a touch screen, then you're set. I want to see a cheap, thin LCD touch screen (on a watch or in a star-trek style pad) with some kind of wireless system (bluetooth, infra red etc) or atleast a cable. You could then use it to access other devices while they're in your pocket or briefcase, such as your mp3 player, dvd player, laptop, camcorder or tv tuner. You could even use a wireless base-station. Basically it would be a dumb terminal, but a very cheap, tiny, and portable one. Obviously you'd need to sort out compatability between products, but it would make life so much easier.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  44. As seen on memepool.com by perky · · Score: 2

    This was up a few days ago on the excellent memepool.com. Go take a look - you might like it.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  45. the best place for a small TV screen is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the best place would be a small screen embedded in your eyeglass frame up in the corner. Boring meeting, just glance up! Tiny screen plus REAL close to the eyeball might work! Tv on one screen, web browser on the other eye, keypad and mousestickthingee* on the wristwatch.

    *technical geekspeek lingo

  46. Seiko? by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn it was Casio that made these! Maybe they came out with one too?

  47. use your other hand dude by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    And wear a glove so it feels like someone else is doing it.

  48. Computer Watch by BoxJockey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminded me of a watch I had long ago...It was a PDA/Organizer Computer Watch. It actually had a version of GW Basic in the rom, and 256k of RAM, I believe. Here's a british version on ebay http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =941378559

    --
    "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things."
    1. Re:Computer Watch by BoxJockey · · Score: 1

      Here is a picture and small description of the Seiko Wrist Information System model UC-2200 I used to have.

      --
      "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things."
  49. Not so small by shepd · · Score: 2

    And not so good either. With a small brick sized battery and antenna pack, these were hardly the portable pieces they seem to be.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  50. Digital Watches are neat by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    I still think that digital watches are a neat idea.

  51. Guess Guinan from ST:TNG has perfect receiving ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... guess Guinan from StarTrek TNG has perfect and clear image .. with that dish on her head ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  52. cynasim is gooooood by gedgod · · Score: 0

    cynasim is gooooood

    --
    life, the universe and everything? = 42
  53. Reggie was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing was...he was right, everybody knew he was right, but he shouldn't have said it.

    Its like coming out in public and saying "Man, no matter how smart and powerful women become, I still think of them naked with me banging them"

    Every guy thinks that, *BUT YOU CAN'T SAY IT!"

  54. Has anybody ported Linux to it yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we can do another story here on it so that people can mention something about a beuwolf cluster.

    God, this place is so friggin predicatable sometimes.

  55. Problem is, it's still TV by mtec · · Score: 1

    I firmly believe TV is our 'circuses' and that fundamentalist Muslims are our Huns.
    I dumped my TV 6 months ago and I challenge all of you to do the same.

    The first week is pure hell.

    The second week you've got the shakes but you only think about it when Seinfeld reruns are on.

    After 3 weeks you begin posting heavily to /.

    {note: for this to work, you have to give the TV away}

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    1. Re:Problem is, it's still TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like giving the TV to some other poor sucker is the answer.

  56. Re:I don't want one... by Technician · · Score: 2

    It'l be obsolete in the US in 2007 unless it comes with a digital tuner. Analog broadcasts are to end. I don't want to pack a VCR or DVD along just to use the watch. I want one that will work at the ball park to watch the replay.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  57. claiming technology developments that are false by geekster_2000 · · Score: 0

    by a japanese corporation fits the enron profile !

  58. Where can you find them? by waynev · · Score: 1

    Last year I made an effort to see if I could track any down. Seiko doesn't produce them anymore, and I could find any used ones for sale. I remember James Bond using one in Octopussy, and tried to find some places that might have some left over. If anyone know of a place to get one, please let me know.

  59. Deep Linking by Snover · · Score: 1

    OH MY GOD! YOU JUST DEEP LINKED EBAY! I bet the Danish would be interested in this.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  60. Poor Ford Prefect... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    ...they blew up Earth before he got the chance to buy one.