Slashdot Mirror


Harvesting Capacitors for Backyard Munitions

Diabolus writes "This is the tale of a man, a bunch of disposable cameras, and his techniques for harvesting lots of capacitors to build a gauss gun. Insane..." A basic capacitor tutorial is probably in order.

260 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. So where's the gun? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    No pictures of the final product?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:So where's the gun? by Caradoc · · Score: 2

      I'll second the request for pictures/description of the finished product.

      I built a very small gauss gun in high school, played with capacitors (and other high voltage devices, like the infrared viewer I built), and generally had all kinds of fun.

      But I wanna see this thing fire...

      --
      Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
    2. Re:So where's the gun? by laserjet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reading. You shold try it some time.

      If you had, for instance, you would know he is not done collecting enough capacitors yet.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    3. Re:So where's the gun? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I'd say the title "Harvesting Capacitors for Backyard Munitions" is a little misleading then, if it doesn't include instructions on building those munitions or at the very least the plans of the munitions. This could have easily been titled "Harvesting Capacitors to put in a black plastic bag" and the article wouldn't have had to change one bit.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    4. Re:So where's the gun? by coyul · · Score: 2, Informative

      No pictures/videos at the site mentioned in the article, but here's a different site with videos of a capacitor-powered gauss gun in action:

      http://www.powerlabs.org/multistagecg.htm
    5. Re:So where's the gun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good point, the guy that made that page about harvesting capacitors is obviously a dickhead because Slashdot can't help but sensationalise.

      Next up, Katz writes a blistering report on how the media manipulates people through deceptive headlines! Get ready to boo the bad guys everyone!

    6. Re:So where's the gun? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      He hasn't even planned it yet... personally i am building my own gauss gun using caps from a different source.

      I have been collecting old computer power supplies for a while now, mostly old AT style 230-250W supplies... these can be had fairly cheap if you know where to look... people throw away old computers all the time and i have been collecting the caps for SOME type of electronic gun anyway.

      I have been able to get caps of usually lower voltage but higher capacitance rating so my plan will be very similar to this one. I know that to plan for a project like this is very difficult for someone who is NOT an electric engineer such as myself. I want to do this safely so while i gather the materials i am reading into how to do this right and NOT kill myself.

      If anyone has any other pages on this subject i would appreciate it if you could reply so maybe i could gian some knowledge from others to do this right...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Well by Disevidence · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think a Gauss Gun is overrated, as i remember a research team built it in the early 90's, with little fanfair. It sucked.

    About time they started back to lasers, methinks.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    1. Re:Well by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Truly your intellect is staggering.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  3. Anti-slashdotting.... by billbaggins · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yes, the bandwidth is horrific, so I've shrunk all the images to a much smaller size (160 wide) instead of their usual 640 and 320. If you want to see this and actually make out the pictures (and read the text in them), come back in a week or so when the traffic has dropped and I've put the full-res ones back. Assuming I don't get firewalled off first :)

    And I bet it still won't work....

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by billstr78 · · Score: 1

      wierd how this comment was up before the first posts. Maybe Taco is warning sites before they are linked. Too many people with smoking Celerons linked to ./ probably complained and forced some policy through.

    2. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by magicslax · · Score: 1
      wierd how this comment was up before the first posts. Maybe Taco is warning sites before they are linked. Too many people with smoking Celerons linked to ./ probably complained and forced some policy through.

      I don't think you could make my cool-running celeron server smoke if you tried.

      No, wait! I take it back!

      /me watches server combust as the traffic spikes then gradually subsides as countless bored nerds discover there is no actual "content."

      Seriously, wouldn't this be the sort of warning sites like that need? Props to /. if this is the case.

    3. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's probably Diabolus (the submitter) who's webpage the story is about anyways. My guess is he didn't have anything better to do than report about himself.

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    4. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by billbaggins · · Score: 1

      More likely the site owner submitted it to Slashdot himself, and so knew it was coming...

      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
    5. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by billstr78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. The ./ employees probably did not have much else in ther submit box to throw up at this time of night. This site is seriously lame and laking in any cool geek content that ./ is so famous for. wtf?

    6. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this proves you right? He says that he's working on a "PhD at Adelaide University, Australia" and the submitted article is from that school. There plenty of equally fascinating *laugh* material in the root web for the truly bored.

    7. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by Diabolus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, it's not my page - it is a guy that I know from Adelaide Uni though and I let him know in advance that he was in for a /.ing :)

    8. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by Restil · · Score: 2

      It doesn't take very long to realize you're getting slashdotted if you're paying attention.
      If he were properly motivated (and I'm sure he was), he could have the "slashdot friendly" webpage version prepared in under 5 minutes.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    9. Re:Anti-slashdotting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Yes, I was warned. No, it wasn't me that submitted the story.

      It goes like this: friend on IRC says "I'm gonna kill your box tonight, log on to watch the carnage". Thinking he's about to do some security evil, I ifconfig down when going home. Get annoyed phone call that night saying "but I was only going to slashdot you, have you no trust?". Next day, query /. eds and get mail from michael@slashdot saying "your page is scheduled to go live in 3.5 hours". Loads of warning, so I had the "Hello Slashdot" up 2 hours before it actually hit slashdot.

      Preparing the low-res version took literally 2 minutes, I already have software to make jpeg thumbnails from directories of pictures.

      Actually, the traffic isn't so bad now, so if you want to see the hi-res version, it is available. Only go here if you're interested, otherwise use the original link.

  4. Speaking of capacitors... by errorlevel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember taking apart the Data Checker system that was manufactured by National Semiconductor in 1979 which I acquired from my highschool. It had some of the largest capaciters I've ever seen. The largest one was probably around 4 inches in diameter. If only I had had this guy's idea first.... :)

    --


    The Moo went "Cow!"
    1. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by muon1183 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it's not the size of the capacitor that really matters. I own several capacitors that are over 6 inches in diameter, and they are far from my most powerfull. In fact, the capacitors in camera flashes are more powerfull. You can even get capacitors the size of garbage cans (they're about 3 feet high and 2 feet across). My friend and I we're concidering buying one just for the shock factor (no pun intended). However, the most powerfull capacitor I have seen is actually no biger around than a quarter and about 1 cm high. It's capacitance ... 1 Farad (a massive amount if you know anything about capacitors, maybe it's time for better units, see prev article).

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
    2. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, check the voltages on those "powerful" "quarter-sized" capacitors before you go and build one of these based on capacitance alone. I bet if you add it up, they turn out to have the same energy-density as the other ones.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by Jeremiah+Blatz · · Score: 1

      "power" = volts * farads. The guy who built the electromagnetic can crusher used 120uf (that's picofarads) caps, but at 10kV. Those puppies have a lot of juice. That said, I did manage to dig up a 1 farad (12v) cap at some point. I charged it up to test it, then discharged it using the head of a hammer. The heat from the spark welded (soldered?) the capacitor to the head of the hammer.

    4. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by evilpenguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Surface area determines the "charge" (which you measure in coulombs) a capacitor can hold. The maximum voltage (which is the difference in energy between the electrons on one plate and the other plate) is a function of the dielectric between the plates (how good an insulator it is -- ceramic is better than vacuum which is better than air, etc.)

      How big a spark you get is a function of the latter. How long that spark might last is a function of the former. The voltage you get out of a capacitor is always the voltage you put in (minus resistance losses). Capacitors are voltage rated because a high enough voltage will break down the dielectric and spark inside the capcitor. Some chemical capacitors, like many electrolytic capacitors, will break down with a rewarding explosion. Some, like ceramics, will maybe make a bit of a "pop" and then either become shorts or open.

      I've probably made things clear as mud...

    5. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by silverhalide · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A really fun trick is to take one of those 300v guys (make sure it's a low capacitance), charge it up, and toss it to your unsuspecting friend standing across the room. When he catches it... Wham! A afternoon of good fun.

      But those little camera caps are chicken feed. Try on a 2700 Farad Capacitor on for size!

    6. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by phriedom · · Score: 1

      500 Amps!

      Holy Moley.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    7. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by essell · · Score: 1

      As long as we're in the business of getting technical, 120F = 120 microfarads.
      picofarad is signified by pF

      --
      i swear my userid used to be lower.
    8. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      From Google:

      Tecate Industries manufacture the PB series. A 4 Farad capacitor measuring 24x18x4.8mm (approx 1x3/4x1/5 inches), and a 10F capacitor measuring 24x33x4.8mm. 2.5VDC, 1A.

      Cooper Electronic Technologies have the B series which offer 1 to 50F capacitance and are capable of 35A at 2.5V. They are the size of a AA battery.

      Perhaps next time you should make an effort to check things out before "calling the bluff"?

    9. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by paranoidia · · Score: 1

      I actually have a 1 farad cap. that's maybe 2 cm long, and 700 mm diameter. Powerful little bugger. It only handels 2 Volts though. So technology has really gotten these things pretty damn small, holding a damn lotta charge. I got this thing in a physics set in my physics class at college.

    10. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

      and it wasn't the "heat of the spark" that did the welding.

      it was the current passing through the electrodes and the head of the hammer that melted them.

      but that's a small detail. :-)

    11. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

      that's cuz that's how much they cost. try to find a 1 F cap that is 24V+
      they aren't cheap.

      granted "street wires" and the like get their hands on them, gold plate the contacts, slap their label on them and double the price.

    12. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by sysadmn · · Score: 2

      500 Amps!
      2.5 V :-(

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    13. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by Tellarin · · Score: 1

      > It's capacitance ... 1 Farad (a massive amount > if you know anything about capacitors, maybe
      > it's time for better units, see prev article).

      for those who don't get it

      in tech school some 10 years ago, my teacher said
      that those where impossible
      he said one would need to split Earth in two to get this capacitance! :)

    14. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1
      Surface area determines the "charge" a capacitor can hold

      ... that AND distance between the surfaces, AND the dielectric material. :)

    15. Re:Speaking of capacitors... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Well you need to check your own work, or at leaest the units on these. these are 4mF I think. not 4F
      No. You didn't even check the links did you. That's four Farad. The others I mentioned were ten Farad, and one to fifty Farad. Just because you have never heard of such a thing does not mean they don't exist.
  5. Uhhh.... by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

    Hello Slashdot!
    Yes, the bandwidth is horrific, so I've shrunk all the images to a much smaller size (160 wide) instead of their usual 640 and 320. If you want to see this and actually make out the pictures (and read the text in them), come back in a week or so when the traffic has dropped and I've put the full-res ones back. Assuming I don't get firewalled off first :)

    Anyway, have a read and a laugh at some geekiness.


    Umm... something smells fishy around here, and it's not his wife!

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    1. Re:Uhhh.... by laserjet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I thought she smelled rather pungent myself.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  6. backyard... by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    harvesting lots of capacitors to build a gauss gun. Insane...
    not quite insane when he needs the gauss gun to protect his backyard from being invaded by the government...

    i did enjoy how he prepared his website from the slashdot invasion.

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:backyard... by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2

      Actually, don't knock old tech. I'd feel safer in an F-18 than in an Osprey. ;-)

      Actually, the president of my old college had a great story about how old tech can be superior in performance. He was a former Deputy Dirctor of the CIA, and had some stories he was willing to tell about some of the declassified things he was involved in. One of them was the study of the first MiG fighter we got our hands on.

      Back in the 60s we were afraid of these new MiG fighters the Soviets were using--they performed significantly better than out own fighter jets of the day. We couldn't figure out what it was about them that made them more maneuverable and faster, but among other things we were scared that they had more advanced onboard electronics.

      We finally got our chance to find out when a Soviet pilot took a MiG to Japan to defect to the U.S., and my college president's team was called in to disassemble, photograph, and reassemble everything before the Soviets came to retrieve their fighter the next day.

      So, do you know what those sophisticated electronics we were afraid they might have developed were? Vacuum tubes. Yep, those early MiGs that outperformed our own fighters were still using vacuum tubes, a technology ten years out of date; our fighter electronics had long been transistor based. The advantages of the MiG turned out to be nominal design differences and nothing more--no super-sophisticated technology at all.

      So, don't knock it 'cause it's outdated tech. The proven F-18 can still kick the ass of many newer more sophisticated designs when ity comes down to brass tacks.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    2. Re:backyard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually, the vacuum tubes weren't just "technology ten years out of date" at all. they were parts of backup systems which would operate under conditions which would render transistors useless (e.g. EMPs generated by nuclear explosions, i think). so that design actually was an advantage.

    3. Re:backyard... by maetenloch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep, those early MiGs that outperformed our own fighters were still using vacuum tubes, a technology ten years out of date; our fighter electronics had long been transistor based.

      However, vacuum tubes are highly resistant to the effects of a nuclear EMP which would have been a big concern in the 60's. The irony is that had there been a nuclear exchange the tube-based MIGs would likely have still been flyable while the 'better' American planes would have had their electronics fried.

    4. Re:backyard... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They won't have to invade his backyard, they'll just shut down all of his credit and turn off all of his utilities. A few days without cable and he'll be begging for mercy!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  7. Even more than his mad scientist skills by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hello Slashdot! Yes, the bandwidth is horrific, so I've shrunk all the images to a much smaller size

    I'm amazed by his ability to fight the slashdot effect!

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  8. IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't it, oh, I don't know, kind of illegal to manufacture weapons that far surpass anything the army currently has, or will have in the next 20 years? =P

    1. Re:IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      No I don't, actually, since I'm a Canadian.

      I'll assume you're talking about the right to bear arms? Well, sure, but not ANY arms.. to the best of my knowledge there's no provisions in the U.S. contitution allowing for the ownership of weapons that are capable of melting tanks. =P

    2. Re:IANAL, but.. by billstr78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a, pretty sure the Army has munitions far more sophisticated than a bunch of camera capacitors strung together in parrallel today. I don't think anyone has even concieved of what they will have in 20 years. The military has always required the most cutting edge technology to develop weapons. This is not cutting edge.

    3. Re:IANAL, but.. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      actually, yes. "arms" means the same thing as "any arms"; and many arms manufactured today can in fact "melt tanks".

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      Erhm. So who are we ragging on here, the U.S. or Canada? Your foolish troll jabber needs clarification.

    5. Re:IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      Does the army currently carry gauss guns? I doubt it.

      You're right though, I should have been a little more specific in my wording. They likely are able to obtain such weaponry, but they're not activley using anything like it. If you put a disgruntled lunatic with a gauss gun againt 5 grunts with m16's at close range, I'd put my money on the on the lunatic any day. =P

    6. Re:IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      Wow. That I didn't know.

      So, given the inclination and funds, I could, as an american, obtain things like rocket launchers, and RPGs?

      What's the stance in the U.S. on privately owned nuclear ICBM's?

      /me ph34rs his southern neighbors

    7. Re:IANAL, but.. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      They do have them in development, but, seriously, capacitors are not the answer. I remember a company formed by UT grads that made these giant power storage devices for railguns. I think they were basically just an electric generator attached to a giant flywheel. The device would spin-up, then flip on and discharge all the stored momentum into a gun. I think these are going to be used on battleships in the near future. Anyways, I was referring to handheld rocket launchers, which contain vast amounts of stored chemical energy, not to mention the explosive charge. One would have to be insane to duplicate this with miniature capacitors.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    8. Re:IANAL, but.. by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      Heh. Well, I was thinking more along the lines of video game gauss guns.. you know.. massive electric arcs shooting out in all directions.. everything in it's path being instantly immolated.. 150 yard range..

      See what an over-active imagination + an unhealthy level of Sci-Fi intake can do to a guy? =P

    9. Re:IANAL, but.. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      As long as those "funds" went towards finding a good constitutional lawyer first, yes. Unfortunately, an ICBM doesn't qualify as an "arm", though :)

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    10. Re:IANAL, but.. by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      He was American propaganda pushing the ownership of guns to kids who would grow up into responsible gun owning adults. ...but in the meantime, they must first mature from manic, gun-toting adolescents ;) You don't hear about many Canadian teachers being shredded with igloo block slicers now do ya?

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    11. Re:IANAL, but.. by maetenloch · · Score: 1

      So, given the inclination and funds, I could, as an american, obtain things like rocket launchers, and RPGs?

      What's the stance in the U.S. on privately owned nuclear ICBM's?


      Privately owned ICBMs are probably forbidden as unlicensed destructive devices. However, you could build your own breeder reactor as one enterprising teenager did in Detroit in 1995. As far as I could tell from the article having your own reactor per se is not illegal. He got into trouble for contaminating the neighborhood and not handling the waste properly. Kids, definitely do not try this at home or in the backyard.

    12. Re:IANAL, but.. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, given the inclination and funds, I could, as an american, obtain things like rocket launchers, and RPGs?
      What's the stance in the U.S. on privately owned nuclear ICBM's?


      As long as they are non-functional as weapons, yes. You may NOT own a functional WMD.

      Many private citizen vet organizations own tanks, old rocket launchers, etc. There are a number of non-weapons capable fighter aircraft in private hands, all the way from WWI biplanes to a guy restoring an early model F-16. And I believe there is a privately owned MiG-29.

      "Demilitarize" it, and you're ok. Basically, the BATF says anything over .50 cal is a no-no.
      This is "Importation of arms, ammunition, and implements of war", but the same rules probably hold for domestic products.

    13. Re:IANAL, but.. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      If you put a disgruntled lunatic with a gauss gun againt 5 grunts with m16's at close range, I'd put my money on the on the lunatic any day. =P

      ahhh...but the lunatic has to get in close range first. The grunts will try to prevent that at all costs. At least one will hang back. Then all bets are off.

    14. Re:IANAL, but.. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I'm using mine to build a gauss gun ("it's not a fucking rail gun!") which uses faraday's/lenz's law to repel a small copper ring. I have no actual experience with Gauss guns, but I think they are basically solenoids, using an electromagnetic coil to propel an object. As for the device you describe, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to be near one when it goes off!

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    15. Re:IANAL, but.. by Capsaicin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you see the Second Amendment there in the U.S. Constitution?

      1. Adelaide is not yet in the U.S.

      2. I can't see how his building the gun is reasonably related to the maintainance of a state militia. So the 2nd amendment wouldn't apply anyway.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    16. Re:IANAL, but.. by billn · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think he's referring to something like a Particle Projection Cannon, or a Lightning Gun (high voltage discharge across an ionized path of air). Hellloo Battletech.

      --
      - billn
    17. Re:IANAL, but.. by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know with the military issue guns, they aren't banned. You can still buy a tommy gun if you really want, but you have to pay an extremely high tax on fully automatic weapons, and register a certificate with the ATF.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    18. Re:IANAL, but.. by BomberMonkey · · Score: 1

      This kind of gauss cannon wouldnt compare to stuff the US can make, and the idea is already well documented. Also, he's doesnt have the REALLY crazy capacitors (I have access to ones that are 1F, 10kV, but they're "kinda huge") and he doesnt have the budget for some really insane power switching. The army would also develop some seriuosly cool ordinance for it too.

    19. Re:IANAL, but.. by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

      1) The prefatory clause does not limit the application of the main clause.

      2) "Militia" meant simply all male citizens of age and condition to be fit for military service. It wasn't necessary to be in any sort of organization, if you could potentially fight you were a member of the unorganized militia. "Well regulated", in 18th century military terms, meant "well equipped".

      So the "militia" clause expressed a hope (not a law) that the citizenry would arm themselves suitably for military operations, just in case it became necessary to call on them. (And many indian wars, as well as the successful defense of New Orleans against British regulars in the War of 1812, were conducted primarily by men who joined up for just a few months.) The binding main clause says simply that the federal government should not interfere with individuals obtaining and owning "arms".

      However, the US Supreme Court has always dodged cases that would require directly defining the limits (if any) on "the right to bear arms". It came closest in "Miller vs. US", where it decided that there is no right to own a sawed-off shotgun - confusingly, this decision went a ways down the road of misinterpreting the first clause, but then finally decided that the weapon in question was not covered since the military doesn't use shotguns. By the same logic, "Saturday night specials" (the cheapest, lowest quality handguns) wouldn't qualify either, because real military forces prefer weapons that don't blow up in your hand when properly used. The real problem at this point is that this reasoning seems to imply that you should have the right to buy and keep in your home a standard infantry weapon - nowadays, that's an assault rifle that can empty a 30 round clip in under 3 seconds. But we have laws not only forbidding these, but forbidding anything that even looks like them...

      By the way, in Switzerland every able-bodied man is a member of the military reserve, and the government GIVES him a military weapon to take home. And the Swiss don't use them to massacre their neighbors. Is it because the Swiss are that much better behaved than Americans, or because they know the neighbors are equally well armed???

    20. Re:IANAL, but.. by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      [....]but then finally decided that the weapon in question was not covered since the military doesn't use shotguns.

      Actually, they didn't decide even that. The Court said that "it was not within judicial notice", meaning that no one had presented evidence that sawed-off shotguns were used in the military. However, sawed-off shotguns were used by the US Army in the trench warfare of World War I and were used as late as the Vietnam conflict.

      No one showed up to present the defendant's case (the decision says "No appearance for appellees"). So, the the government presented their evidence, unopposed. The Court actually remanded the case back to a lower court for further proceedings, but the US Attorney apparently recognized what would happen and cut a deal with the remaining living defendant.

      The Court's decision pretty much turns on a Tennessee court decision that large concealed knives were not used in "civilized warfare". That case also relied on the phrase "for the common defence" in the Tennessee constitution (at the time) -- a phrase not present in the 2nd Amendment and was explicitly rejected by the Senate during debate on the Bill of Rights.

    21. Re:IANAL, but.. by tgibbs · · Score: 2
      The prefatory clause does not limit the application of the main clause.
      Amazing how many people manage to ignore what would seem to be a matter of basic grammer. In such a carefully written document, it seems clear that if the framers really meant to say, "...the right of militia members to keep and bear arms..." they would have done so.
    22. Re:IANAL, but.. by monkeydo · · Score: 2

      Wasn't it just a tax issue anyway? I mean you can own any length shotgun you want as long as you have your $5 NFA stamp (subject to the unconstitutional laws of some of the more socialist states) Of course most people (cops included) don't realize that a shotgun with a pistol grip and a 6" barrel is legal (and quite a lot of fun) if you pay the tax.

      I agree that anti-gun people using Miller to defend their position is stupid, since the Court basically said that the 2nd Ammendment *only* protects the right to own military grade hardware.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    23. Re:IANAL, but.. by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      Its only $200, so compared to the price of most automatic weapons, silenced weapons, or other National Firearms Act (NFA) weapons, its really not that bad. The hard part might be getting your local sheriff to authorize your NFA permit, though, if he/she is a tightass about that sort of thing. Luckily, here in Orange County, we have Sheriff Kevin Beary, a diehard fan of 2nd Amendment rights, so I wouldn't rule out getting approval on a bazooka around here. :) In fact, a friend of mine has three full auto AK-47 assault rifles and a silencer for one of his 9mm pistols that are all legally owned, so its not really a big deal in many areas.

    24. Re:IANAL, but.. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Do we really need more sophisticated weapons to blow up caves and bomb wedding parties?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    25. Re:IANAL, but.. by markmoss · · Score: 2
      Well, the US militia in the 18th & 19th centuries were not totally disorganized. One more time, it wasn't a matter of how the active militia was organized - but that the milita was defined to include everyone who appeared suitable for military service, whether or not they ever attended a meeting. If you were an able-bodied white male in the right age group (something like 15 to 45), you were in the militia.

      I agree, the second should be re-written - not because it's meaning is all that foggy, but because there is an underlying right that the Founding Fathers never imagined any government in the English tradition would ever infringe - but now it's being infringed widely. E.g., the old farmer in the UK who is now doing 10 years for defending himself against burglars. He was repeatedly burglarized - and I suspect beaten, that being SOP by many UK burglars nowadays - until he illegally obtained a shotgun and shot the next bunch. In Australia, home invasions have skyrocketed since the gov't confiscated honest peoples' guns, and in some US states, you can keep a long gun in your house but it's almost impossible to use it in self-defense without facing both criminal charges and civil suits for abusing the poor criminals. So if I could rewrite the Bill of Rights now, the very first article would start:
      The right of the people to defend themselves, individually and collectively, shall not be infringed"
    26. Re:IANAL, but.. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Hand grenades are also standard issue so I guess they should be legal also.

      As for Switzerland since people keep the weapons at home and aren't walking around with them I'd say the lower crime rate is due to economics and culture, not gun fight fantasies.

      In the glory days of the Mafia, mobsters used to get killed left and right and they were all heavily armed. Guess it didn't matter.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    27. Re:IANAL, but.. by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Of course most people (cops included) don't realize that a shotgun [serbu.com] with a pistol grip and a 6" barrel is legal (and quite a lot of fun) if you pay the tax.

      Ye gads! How do you fire that thing without breaking your wrist? Or do you only fire it when the alternative may be worse than a broken wrist? (For those that didn't follow monkeydo's link, it's a pistol with a 6 inch shotgun barrel.)

      IIRC, in those laws concerning the minimum barrel length, part of the definition of rifle or shotgun is that there be a shoulder rest - whether permanent like most long guns, or folding or detachable. I don't see any place to attach a butt, so that weapon would probably be classed as a handgun of monstrous caliber.

      Didn't the Hague and Geneva conventions ban shotguns from military use? Certainly in 1904 or thereabouts when the first of these conventions started, the military wasn't using shotguns. The big argument was about dum-dum bullets, which were pretty useful in colonial wars against people like the Zulus or Moros. Anyway, a shotgun (long or short) makes a good military weapon only in very special circumstances - but put troops in those circumstances long enough and they'll obtain a shotgun whether it's allowed or not. (And since Vietnam was officially a "police action" no matter how much it seemed like a war, and cops do use shotguns...)

    28. Re:IANAL, but.. by esper_child · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of these at WWII re-enactments and model shows. It is quite amusing being actually ALLOWED to fire these things off.

    29. Re:IANAL, but.. by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      One hell of an interesting article. Too bad it all ended like that, right up until the EPA took down the reactor, it seemed he'd have a bright future ahead of him.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    30. Re:IANAL, but.. by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Wasn't it just a tax issue anyway?

      Yup, it was. It's a $200 tax for the weapon in question and that was quite a bit of money back then, especially for a couple of dirt-poor moonshiners.

      The Court had already made that decision in Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U.S. 506 (1937), which basically says the Court is "not free to speculate as to the motives" for the law. But, the Congressional Record clearly shows that Congress was indeed concerned that it violated the 2nd Amendment. They were assured by the Attorney General that a punitive tax measure would withstand Court scrutiny, since the Harrison Narcotics Act had already succeeded.

      I agree that anti-gun people using Miller to defend their position is stupid, since the Court basically said that the 2nd Ammendment *only* protects the right to own military grade hardware.

      Yes, but the lower courts (the 9th Circuit is the worst offender) stretched it into meaning that it only protected the states. Other circuits followed their lead. The Supreme Court rarely takes a case except to settle conflicts among the lower courts, so they haven't had occasion to overturn any of them.

      What is really stupid is that the entire premise of constitutionality of gun control hinges on a dubious interpretation of a decision in which the defense didn't even make an appearance. And, that decision was based on a precedent set by interpretation of a provision in a state constitution that was demonstrably different from the 2nd Amendment in the very aspect that justified their decision.

      In the academic world, there is basically very little debate about intended meaning of the 2nd Amendment -- the individual-rights interpretation has become the "standard model". There are numerous people supporting gun control that admit it is correct, and one openly expresses concern that allowing the 2nd Amendment to be nullified so easily puts other aspects of the Bill of Rights at risk.

      I think it will change in the next decade or so. It will depend on what the lower courts do and who is appointed to the Supreme Court. But, the issue will eventually return to the Supreme Court, and the evidence for the individual-rights interpretation is too strong to be ignored.

    31. Re:IANAL, but.. by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      It really doesn't bite as much as you'd expect. Use of the foregrip however is mandatory if you don't want a split lip. I've only shot 00 buck through it, but supposedly it's pretty accurate with slugs.

      The Hague convention did ban the use of shotguns, so they just started calling them "trench rifles"

      The "Shorty" isn't really a pistol, it is just a *very* short pump action shotgun, with a pistol grip stock and a fold down forgrip. Since it never had a shoulder stock it isn't a shirt barreled rifle or shotgun, it's an AOW legal to make and own. In Texas you can even carry it around with you no permit required.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    32. Re:IANAL, but.. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      In a hospital being treated for cancer?

    33. Re:IANAL, but.. by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Most nuclear scientists before radiation was truly understood shortened their lives significantly, but their experience wasn't negated because of it. With his extraordinary understanding of chemistry and his basic understanding of nuclear physics, he could done some real good in a professional research environment.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  9. other sources by altaic · · Score: 1

    Some friends of mine and I have been discussing similar ideas. It turns out insane asilums usually have their own power plants which have sizable capacitors. Some years ago many were closed down and you can loot em if you watch your backs. =)

  10. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No, you get them used from a photo lab. They're "recycled" but in practice the lab gets next to nothing for them. Then Kodak puts a new roll of film in them, slides them in a new cardboard box, and sells them again for full price. Sweet deal.

    Make friends with the lab tech and you'll have all the disposable cameras you can handle.

  11. Electrical Engineers vs. Mechanical Engineers by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mechanical Engineers build can crushers with moving parts.

    Electrical Engineers build can crushers with no moving parts.

    However, whatever the discipline, no mad science lab is complete without a Furby Testing Program.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Electrical Engineers vs. Mechanical Engineers by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      20kA through 12 gauge wire without it instantly vapourizing? I don't think so...

      Picoseconds. Believe it, I've seen magnetic can crushers fire. (I've also been allowed to play at length with a tesla coil excited by a junked 50kW AM radio transmitter, but that's another story.)

      Calculate how many amps are flowing through that photoflash in the disposable camera in your hand when you press the button. The wiring is usually like 26 gauge, and it doesn't melt in that time.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  12. On testing the gun.... by jonman_d · · Score: 1

    (23:49:57) Me ok if I like blow a hole through my wall will my insurance cover it?
    (23:50:12) Leahana: umm if it is intentional.. maybe not
    (23:50:18) Me: :-/
    (23:50:26) Me: ok I better go get the dog then
    (23:50:34) Me: It's better to test on a moving target anyways

    Anyone else willing to bet this will be modded -1: Cruel?

  13. Sounds like something from Fight Club.. by 56 · · Score: 1

    Remember in Fight Club, making explosives from soal, and also the fact that you can use nondairy creamer as an explosive. Cameras as gauss guns, damned cool.

    1. Re:Sounds like something from Fight Club.. by antirename · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, I know, but it's getting late. Are you at Taco Bell at 3 in the morning? Are you ready to leave, and not worried about getting kicked out? Take the non dairy coffee creamer, tear off the corner so about half of the closed end is now open. Take the creamer in your right hand, and a lighter in your left. Hold the creamer packet at arms length and up, and invert it so that the creamer flows out. When the dust cloud starts to poof upward (think inverted mushroom cloud) strike the lighter directly underneath it. I won't describe the effects in detail, other than think grain silo explosion. And yes, the other effect is that they usually kick you out.

    2. Re:Sounds like something from Fight Club.. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      All I got was a puddle of half-and-half and a wet lighter...oh, NON DAIRY creamer! Ooops...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  14. Re:umm by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    isn't it easier to read the damn article instead of making assumptions.

    There you will learn that instead of buying tons of cameras, he is friends with a local store that would rather give them away/pitch them than go through the hassle of sending them back to Kodak for reuse.

  15. some other cool things to do w/ capacitors by lingqi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    fry a diode, for example

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:some other cool things to do w/ capacitors by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      and is no longer operative because the magic smoke has escaped

      I used to have a can of that on my repair bench for when it escaped from whatever I was working on.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  16. Sounds like... by JanusFury · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds like a whole lotta effort just to win at Half-Life.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  17. Flux? by jcsehak · · Score: 5, Funny

    No info on flux capacitors? Damn, guess I'll never get back to the 2030's...

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Flux? by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you call radio shack and ask if they have flux capacitors in stock, they'll tell you they're out, but they should be getting some in about two weeks

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Flux? by namespan · · Score: 2

      Damn, guess I'll never get back to the 2030's...

      No, you'll just have to travel at 60 minutes/hour like the rest of us.

      Besides, I hear society is going to collapse when the unix time type runs out in 2037 anyway....

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:Flux? by Tsian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I work at Radio Shack... we'll tell you that because its easier then explaining why They don't exist. I mean come on, if your coming to *me* for parts, thinking a flux capacitor exists is the least of your problems...

    4. Re:Flux? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      (* Actually, I work at Radio Shack... we'll tell you that because its easier then explaining why They don't exist. I mean come on, if your coming to *me* for parts, thinking a flux capacitor exists is the least of your problems... *)

      Dude, make one up quickly in the back room and sell it to them for 300 bucks. When they come back complaining, ask them if they have a degree in nuclear physics. When they say, "no", then politely take it back, minus a 95 dollar restocking and time-diffusion recharge fee, which you pocket.

    5. Re:Flux? by Tablizer · · Score: 2


      Dammit, I thought it said "Floss Capacitors". Now the Novicane is starting to wear off, and it smarts.

    6. Re:Flux? by 2g3-598hX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, I hear society is going to collapse when the unix time type runs out in 2037 anyway

      No it will be far worse than that, time_t will overflow and go back to 0 and society will instantaneously jump back 2^32 seconds - To 1970!

      Get your bell bottoms out people...

    7. Re:Flux? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      No it will be far worse than that, time_t will overflow and go back to 0 and society will instantaneously jump back 2^32 seconds - To 1970!

      Oh my god, not another crappy seventies revival...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    8. Re:Flux? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      > No info on flux capacitors? Damn, guess I'll never get back to the 2030's...

      Yes, you will. It just that the trip will take at least 28 or so years....

      -Ed

      docbrown.net
      Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    9. Re:Flux? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Anyone else see the irony in 'Doc Brown' replying to the flux capacitor comment?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    10. Re:Flux? by buford_tannen · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      --
      Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen
    11. Re:Flux? by Marvin_Berry · · Score: 1

      Okay, this is getting silly now.

    12. Re:Flux? by Tsian · · Score: 2

      A $95 stocking fee! Are you insane! We'd go out of bussiness if we charged that. I mean my GOD, it'll cost atleast $125 to restock that!

    13. Re:Flux? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      Of course it is....it's /.

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    14. Re:Flux? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      No :)

      -Ed

      docbrown.net
      Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
  18. cheap yes, but practical? by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, so he's got a bunch of "basically" free caps. Now what? Solder a bunch together?
    Seems like a lot of work for a huge mess of solder and wires for what would amount to a fraction of what a single car-audio capacitor would put out.

    Am I missing something, or is his time worth nothing?

    Karma: Excellent
    WTF?

    --

    1. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Car audio capacitors aren't normally rated at 350 V.

      The energy stored in a capcitor is 1/2CV^2.

      Higher voltage gains you a lot more than higher capacitance.

    2. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by Louis_Wu · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Karma: Excellent
      WTF?
      Does this get rid of the karma cap? Or just make it hard to tell when you've hit it? I had ~38, and I'm now "excellent", so if I hit 50, will I be "Most Excellent"? (And then George Carlin will appear in a telephone booth to take me through time. "Party on dude!")
    3. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by shepd · · Score: 5, Informative

      >Am I missing something, or is his time worth nothing?

      Yes, you are missing something.

      Car audio capacitor: 16-20 volts @ .1 F.
      Camera flash capacitor: 330 volts @ 120 uF.

      Now lets see, using the formula E = 1/2 * U^2 * C, how many joules are in each capacitor.

      Car audio capacitor: E = 20 Joules
      Flash capacitor: E = 6.534 Joules

      Car Cap: $40 or $2 per joule.
      Disposable camera: $5 or $0.76 per joule.

      Camera caps are far cheaper, and this guy got them for free.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, you are missing the fact that most 'car audio' capacitors are 'rubbish' (to be polite) and are simply a method or removing money from peoples pockets.

      For his purposes he requires an actual high capacity, high discharge rate capacitor, not an easy thing to create.

      The challenge is having a VERY low ESR (effective series resistance), as well as a low inductance, and using a massive number of parallel capacitors is certainly one of the only economical ways of doing this. a LOT of care is also needed in how they are connected up to keep the inductance down.

      You can, for example, by multi-farad 'supercaps', but these have charge/discharge rates in the milliamps and are used for memory backup and other purposes, you can also get kilovolt rated caps with very low capacitance, but it is very hard to get medium voltage very low ESR high energy caps, primarily because they are lethal. They are used in radar installations and a few other high energy 'toys'.

    5. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by dioxide · · Score: 1

      bass caps are one half to one farad, not .1
      us $100 to $150 unless you ebay them

    6. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by Uberminky · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know anything about car capacitors, so perhaps this is a useless answer, but.... capacitor banks, rather than single large capacitors, are used in high-current circuits because they can crank out a whole lot more current a lot quicker when you have lots of small ones in parallel. This is frequently done even on small bypass capacitors in circuits -- rather than putting a few thousand microfarads on a motor, you might put several 470uF caps, for instance. The response is much quicker. So not surprisingly, this is the way you always do experiments that require frightening amounts of juice.

      --

      The streets shall flow with the blood of the Guberminky.

    7. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

      To get even better performance, all you have to do is rig up a high ESR, extremely high capacity capaciter. This will give a multi fire gun, everytime the low ESR caps fire, you will have to high capacity dude charging these again, and most high caacity caps can provide much faster charging tht batteries :-)

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    8. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Yes, capacitor banks are used for things such as magnetic toroid based fusion experiments. MIT has/had a room full of the things for that purpose.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Now if only somebody could tell me why my +50 karma was replaced by "Karma: Excellent"

      Beats me, but why not try this for now? :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:cheap yes, but practical? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Yup, you're right. I've not actually installed one, I just know 1F is a HUGE capacitance.

      Redoing the calcs for 1F gives us 200 Joules for the car capacitor, which puts our cost/cap ratio comparison at (using your $100 price -- but, BTW, a local shop near me sells them for $79 CDN, but that's a surplus place, though):

      Car cap: $0.50 per Joule
      Camera Flash Caps: $0.76 per Joule.

      However, with the camera you get to use the camera for pictures first, which is probably worth $0.26 per Joule :-)

      Not to mention that if they're free you can't beat that!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  19. insane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    and his techniques for harvesting lots of capacitors to build a gauss gun. Insane..."

    wrong - guy's from australia

    1. Re:insane? by alatesystems · · Score: 3, Funny

      Capacitors, Australian for bored.

    2. Re:insane? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we know about Australians inveting guns.

  20. Forget Photoflash Caps - Get oil-filled HV Caps by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    isn't it cheaper to just buy caps insted of disposible cams

    This place has a great supply of large high-voltage oil-filled capacitors salvaged from all sorts of stuff.

    High voltage capacitors can be tough to get - Radio Shack doesn't stock many of them, and sometimes you have to buy them in bulk, which puts them out of range of most experimenters.

    Microwave ovens are a great source of parts if you want to play with stuff like this, but it's worth noting that there's stuff inside microwave ovens which can kill you if you look at it the wrong way.

    A full-wave rectifier made of microwave oven diodes, or a voltage doubler made with microwave oven diodes and capacitors, can be connected to an old microwave oven transformer for all sorts of fun, but can provide more voltage and current (ie. more power) than an electric chair. Be careful.

    This sort of setup is great for charging up those 1uF 10kV oil-filled plastic capacitors (or doorknob capacitors) you might be able to scrounge up by looking in the right places. Oil filled caps are great because they tend to be self-healing. Blow a hole in the oil dielectric, and more just flows into place to fill it.

    They're great for spot-welding.

    Please don't do this if you don't known what you're doing, and I can't take responsibility for telling the wrong people stuff they can figure out from reading an electronics textbook.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  21. A level up by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

    Go a level up & check out the two exam* jpgs - good laugh!

  22. In unison, "Nothing"... by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful if you try this; those capacitors hold a fair amount of charge.

    My brothers and I played with some of them in the kitchen at a family gathering a few years back. One of them is in the biz, and had more used, disposable cameras then he knew what to do with. We were bored and trying to rig up something ad-hoc (as I recall, we were using whatever we could find in the kitchen--rubber bands, tupperware, etc.) Our wives were in the dining room with the everyone else, and we weren't being very structured about it.

    Things were going fairly well until we accidentally shorted something. There was a loud bang, a flash, and one of us jumped back, knocking over a pile of pie tins.

    All conversation in the dining room stopped, and after a moment our mother's voice called calmly: "What are you boys doing in there?"

    Without missing a beat we all replied, in unison, "Nothing!"

    It was like old times.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by mons · · Score: 1
      Things were going fairly well until we accidentally shorted something. There was a loud bang, a flash, and one of us jumped back, knocking over a pile of pie tins.

      sooo, this is how you do the gauss jump, hummmm, now I just need to load half-life and look for some rubber bands and tupperware.

    2. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Aerog · · Score: 2

      I can only help thinking of the "famous" quote.

      Are you boys cooking in there?
      No, Mom.
      Are you boys building an interocitor in there?
      No, Mom.

      Bonus points to anyone who knows the source

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    3. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by dustmote · · Score: 1

      Aargh! Now that's going to bug me all day until I remember what it was!

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    4. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      I dunno if it's famous, but sounds like something that would be on "Malcolm in the Middle".

    5. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1

      If you can have that much fun by accident, just think how much you can have on purpose! I made a small hollow cube (OK, a box) that can be easily picked up with one hand. I covered it with aluminum foil connected it to a three microfarad capacitor such that grabbing any two opposite sides of the cube will cause the victom to be grabbing the two leads on the capacitor. I charged it to somewhere around 300 volts. My electronics instructor asked "What's this?" and picked it up. He wasn't amused. The rest of the class was, though. Nowadays, that thing would probably have gotten me expelled.

    6. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1
      Philo knows the answer. :) ... but can your interocitor withstand a sudden charge of sixty thousand volts? ;)

    7. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1
      My freshman year, I bought some used power supplies from the lab at my EE class. They each had 3 167000mfd 12V caps. Once they were charged, you could touch a screwdriver across the terminals and it would be instantly welded right onto the terminals. :) Made pretty big sparks too. :)

      I also tried making a 20kv glass plate cap once for my tesla coil... Worked pretty well until I got a few big discharges and blew a few panes to pieces. :) ALWAYS wear your safety glasses! :)

    8. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Aerog · · Score: 2

      I hope you had a nice trip, Dr. Smith
      . . .'cause it's time to die!

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    9. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by picoears · · Score: 1

      MY friends and I were playing with these a while ago. Its fun to charge them and then jump it with a paper clip (which is jammed in to the eraser part of a pencil for safety.) The things spark like crazy. btw its unsafe and dangerous and your own fault if you get hurt with them (don't even think about blaming me, reader. You stupid little jerk!)

    10. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by 3Cats · · Score: 1

      MST3K the Movie. Parodied "This Island Earth"

      Where's my prize?

      3C

    11. Re:In unison, "Nothing"... by Aerog · · Score: 2

      You get bonus points. As tempting as it is, don't spend them all in one place.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  23. Why do you think it is, that most of us are... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Why do you think it is, that most of us are illiterate? So that the government can trample on the constitution of course? You'd think the most important thing they could teach in school is what our 'rights' are. Do they? NO!... I'm not entirely sure I know what a right is. In my Windows Professional Certification course, we learn there are two kinds of rights: Logon rights and privileges... and I had thought that privileges were separate from rights.

  24. Terrorist threat from cameras by Random+Bystander · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean we won't be able to take disposable cameras on to planes any more?

    Imagine the memo to baggage scanning technicians:
    "WARNING: Any passengers attempting to take large numbers of disposable cameras on board any flight is a terrorist. These cameras can be used as a weapon by assembling a gauss gun from their parts. Call your appropriate superviser IMMEDIATELY if you have any suspicions"

    1. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      u can very easily turn a disposable camera into a stun gun, replace the film w/ a large (film roll size) cap and then replace the flash bulb w/ wires going to leads on the end of the camera

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      (* Imagine the memo to baggage scanning technicians: "WARNING: Any passengers attempting to take large numbers of disposable cameras on board any flight is a terrorist. *)

      Imagine all the things they would start banning if McGyvor worked for Al Quieda.

    3. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by ethereal · · Score: 1

      MacGyver

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    4. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by lugonn · · Score: 1
      Roman Alphabet?

      Did you mean Phoenician? That's the alphabet used in the english language.

    5. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by BitterOak · · Score: 2
      Actually, I'm as annoyed at all the silly airline restrictions now as the next guy, but one thing which always surprised me, even before September 11, is why they allow cameras with electronic flash in carry-on luggage at all.

      It takes just one flash capacitor to act as a detonator for plastic explosives. I'm frankly amazed (and somewhat relieved) than no one has done this up to now.

      If it were up to me, we'd stop x-raying people's shoes, throwing away their nail clippers and plastic cutlery, and require any flash equipment, including those on disposable cameras to be in checked luggage.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    6. Re:Terrorist threat from cameras by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Did you mean Phoenician? That's the alphabet used in the english language

      No. Roman alphabet is correct. Look at Roman inscriptions and look at Phoenecian ones. Roman letters are exactly the same as ours.

      Now archaeologists think the alphabet originated in Egypt, then spread to the Phoenecians, Greeks, Etruscans, and finally the Romans.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Backtrack to the parent directory by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    poke around, and you will find some interesting things, including a cpu cooling system using, among other things, a Hyundai Charade (Nippon Denso) radiator.

    just slightly radical

    http://obelix.cs.adelaide.edu.au/

    ;-)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Backtrack to the parent directory by mallie_mcg · · Score: 1

      a Hyundai Charade

      Do you mean Hyundai Excel or Dihatsu Charade? I poked around a bit and could not find exactly what you are talking about. Being from Australia, Adelaide at that, there is definately no Hyundai Charade sold here!

      --


      Do the following really mean anything? SCSA MCP CCSA CCNA
      --I'm not actually after an answer!
  27. Very Effective by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    those disposable camera caps do pack a punch- i remember discovering them back in jr. high. my hand went numb on a partial charge and my friend got knocked on his ass, but we did rig up an effective stun gun...

  28. Disp. cams. by epsilon720 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, one time I got a bunch of disposable cameras from the photo shop for free for a project. They're a hell of a lot of fun to play with. You can charge the capacitor as if you were going to take a picture and then discharge it with . If you use something with a low conductivity (such as metal) it will make a satisfying pop with a little arc. Just don't use your body. I made that mistake once and it literally knocked me on my ass. (This capacitor is about 1/3 the size of an AA battery, if I remember correctly. Deceptively safe looking.) I never tried them as makeshift tazors, but the thought did cross my mind...

  29. some comments by lingqi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    while this is cool and geeky as f*king heck... it's a bit over done.

    1) you can buy capacitors for less trouble. true, large 330V caps does cost money and he is getting this for next to nothing, but i think it's better to shell out a couple hundred bux for components for that gauss gun instead of subjecting myself to hours upon hours of de-soldering and discharging capacitors and getting flashed.

    2) if you *really wanted*, you can also pull caps off old TVs, or any CRT in general; and they can go up to 20kV! heck man... for self-mutilation fun, doesn't 20kV sound better than 0.3kV? (erm... becareful when you do this. those caps can hold charge for like 20 years)

    3) you can achieve the same with a large (i mean gigantic) low voltage capacitor, which would actually handle more current anyhow. (car) Audiophiles probabbly know what i am talking about. there are 10-15V capacitors for your huge woofers that carry up to 10 FARADS. nope you did not read this wrong... 10F, no m,u,n,p; straight up 10F. if you wanted the high voltage, either build yourself a HV transformer (easy) or salvage one from a junkyard (you know, ignition system).

    but otherwise, rock on. i would like to see the 5kJ gauss gun in action someday, preferably tested on a furby or something

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:some comments by BomberMonkey · · Score: 1

      2) Old tv's are a lot harder to come by than old cameras, and again, those caps probably aren't made to discharge quickly. Discharge current is the whole point.

      3) The same effect won't happen with a low voltage car thing and a step up transformer, because the (large) inductance of the transformer coils will sharply reduce the rise time. For a gauss cannon you want one very short, very big pulse.

  30. How to build an EMP bomb 101. by cb0y · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. get a 5 farad capacitor, WHERE you say? TRAMS have em, they are huge.

    2. charge up to 1 million volts...

    3. surround the device with explosives like a nuke.

    4. when charge is 100%, detinate...

    5. result... large/fast discharge of electrons.

    1. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      4. when charge is 100%, detinate...

      ... by holding those little wires together. :P

    2. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, your list has no "collect panties" step in it. Something must be a-miss.

    3. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by Dave9876 · · Score: 1
      1. get a 5 farad capacitor, WHERE you say? TRAMS have em, they are huge.

      2. charge up to 1 million volts...

      Umm, minor detail I cap of hat size wouldn't have a very high voltage rating, 500V if you're lucky. Above that, and it'll likely arc across the dielectric letting out the "magic smoke".
    4. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by Dave9876 · · Score: 1
      Oops, s/hat/that/ :o)

      Should have done a better job proofreading.

    5. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by tzanger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm, minor detail I cap of hat size wouldn't have a very high voltage rating, 500V if you're lucky. Above that, and it'll likely arc across the dielectric letting out the "magic smoke".

      You can hit a million volts by placing lots of 'em in series to build up the voltage withstand. Of course, you reduce the capacitance with each series connection, so you make a string long enough to withstand the voltage and then parallel strings to get your capacitance up.

      At 1MV, 5F is one *whack* of charge. Wow my mind hurts just thinking about it.

    6. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by gregor_b_dramkin · · Score: 2

      That'd be a real kick in the family Joules. A million people at once saying
      " Cool! umm ... "
      (say it fast and remember your physics)

      You could build this out of ordinary car audio capacitors ... about 12 million of them. At $100 each, a mere $1.2 billion would suffice. Get out the platinum card and head to Best Buy.

      --
      You can never equivocate too much.
    7. Re:How to build an EMP bomb 101. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "get a 5 farad capacitor, WHERE you say? TRAMS have em, they are huge"

      I heard of one guy at my university (who is now a TA & Masters Student) that built a ~1 farad capacitor (which is HUGE, the capacitors on your mobo are likely x10^-6 farads) in his dorm room when he was an undergrad out of a whole lot of 2 L pop bottles and some chemicals and such. If you do some searching you can find instructions.

  31. tales from college by KingPrad · · Score: 1
    My dad told me about some fun he and the other physics TA's had in college. They scavenged giant capacitors the power company had thrown out - really monstrous things, holding unbelievable charge. The rigged them up together and charged the whole thing. Then they would wait...

    Eventually some unsuspecting person would wander down the hallway carrying books or something and as he passed the room the TA's would discharge all the capacitors, making a huge *BOOM* and watch the person leap into the air and throw their books all over the hallway.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  32. fun fun fun by meatpopcicle · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh!

    I remember the days when I used to take those cameras apart to get the film and battery out and get zapped by the capacitor. My arm went numb the first time.

    Later on we would purposly charge the capacitor and then throw pennies on them to watch the sparks fly.

    Some of us even charged them and zapped others with them.

    Them were the days....

    --
    "You're on my side and the dark side, like Lando Calrissian?" --Gimpy, Undergrads
  33. I have a *neat* capacitor by prizog · · Score: 2

    I have a very large vacuum capacitor which I'm not sure what to do with. It looks really neat (images: http://novalis.org/images/photo/vacuum_capacitor/) . The glass is about eight cm in diameter.

    Does anyone know anything about things like this? Is it worth anything?

    1. Re:I have a *neat* capacitor by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 1
      * Um, no - it is not worth anything. How about you give it to me and I will properly dispose of it? *

      J/K I have no idea what the hell it is worth (if anything).

      --
      Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
    2. Re:I have a *neat* capacitor by prizog · · Score: 2

      Seventy-five bucks plus shipping, and it's yours. Otherwise, I'll e-bay it when I get bored of it sitting on my desk.

  34. Fun With Capacitors by deathcow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember my friend and I in 1992 to sitting around and playing with capacitors. We were even getting paid. We were hooking them up reversed polarity on a small DC power supply. They EXPLODE. We were doing small caps. Big caps would be too scary. We were putting them in the McDonalds quarter pounder with cheese styrofoam boxlets that were sold back then. Remember those? They add to the effect. I will always have that mental image of DC power leads running out of a closed McDonalds QPw/C container.

    1. Re:Fun With Capacitors by Linux_ho · · Score: 2

      Umm, caps shouldn't explode from doing that. You were probably playing with diodes.

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    2. Re:Fun With Capacitors by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      Um, you aren't a EE. Hooking a polarized cap, such as an Aluminum Electrolytic or Tantulum cap to reverse polarity will cause it to explode.

      Ceramic capacitors (the cheap ones) don't explode, though.

      A diode won't explode unless you put way too much voltage across it.

    3. Re:Fun With Capacitors by deathcow · · Score: 2

      They were electrolytic's, which do explode. There are some mondo-sized electrolytic caps out there (huge). They would be damn scary to try that with.

  35. Re:With all that idle time on his hands... by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
    he'd make more difference contributing his time to free software projects (coding, testing, or documentation) than trying to create weapons.

    For goodness sake, it's not really a weapon, anymore than a hobby rocket is. Sure he could hurt someone with the little copper disk, as he could with a blunt stick, but I really doubt his motivation is to create feasible weapon.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  36. Rubbish huh? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    I have a .1F cap in my car so the lights don't dim when the bass hits.
    How is it rubbish when it will weld a nail to a piece of metal? (Very fun, I suggest you try it sometime.) Maybe it won't work for his application, but that doesn't mean it won't work in mine. A chemical battery just doesn't respond fast enough. I suppose you could buy more batteries(maybe) or a special purpose battery but a cap is a valid solution, often a good one. Have you ever played with a car amp that needs 1000 watts?

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  37. Horrible Story Time by Monkelectric · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ok, when I was 17 (long ago, but not too long) I went on a band trip to Hawaii (you laugh now, but did you school send you to hawaii?:). The school gave us packs of junk, chewing gum, deck of cards, and disposable cameras as a goodwill gesture (I gather). I was the section leader for the tenor sax players -- if you've ever met any tenor sax players you know they are the bigest screwoffs in the world (I've often wondered -- does being a screwoff make you choose the tenor sax as an instrument, or do you become a screwoff after choosing it?).

    Anyways, I was responsible for 4 complete goobers and one gorgeous blonde (who really dosent have anyhting to with the story, but I just want to mention her), which was not an enviable task. They got bored on the plane to hawaii and took apart their disposable camera ... well low and behold they figured out about the only thing you can do with a broken disposable camera is shock shit or get shocked. After some dumb luck (getting shocked in the first place) and some trial and error, they figure out if you touched these leads and pressed that button youd get shocked ... so the next step was to walk around the plane getting people to hold the leads so they could shock them (someday Id like to know why you would hold two leads a 14 year old asked you to).

    So one afternoon our scheduled activity was to hang out in this park because thats damn cheap :) and well now you have to know about the director ... he was this big fat, raunchy, disgusting fat fuck who happened to be one of the best directors in the nation, and he had this even fatter and even rauncher wife their two skinny (but soon to be fat kids). The wife was horrible annoying and the kids were even worse, the whole band was sick of them. Meanwhile in the park, the band was getting pretty restless, shocking eachother with cameras actually became entertainment :) So these guys I am responsible for are shocking eathother, Im hitting on the blonde (amy hays if you're out there... ;-) ), and oie of the directors sons walks up and he says "Hey what are you guys doing?" (the kid couldn't have been more then 6 or 7) One of the worst jerkoffs in my section gets this HUGE grin on his face and he says, "I'll show you. you touch this and this, and then press this button" Meanwhile I look over and see whats going on, as Im screaming "nooooooooooooooooooooo!!" in slow motion like the matrix, the kid shocks the crap out of himself and I swear he almost pissed his pants as he took off running. We never got in trouble so I dont suppose he told his father :) but we were paranoid the whole rest of the trip.

    on an unrelated topic, couldn't this guy just buy a couple 1 farad capacitors? Those are pretty popular with car audio buffs, they run maybe between 100 - 200$ a piece, I think that would be so much easier then getting UV burns like this guy is describing :D

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Horrible Story Time by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      I was such a stupid dweeb back then that I probably would have zapped the gorgious blond instead. Girls were like a fascinating toy that I didn't know quite what to do with. It was the case that bad interaction was better than no interaction, I would calculate.

      Of course, now I am not a stupid dweeb anymore. My therapist assures me of that all the time.

    2. Re:Horrible Story Time by Gannoc · · Score: 2
      if you've ever met any tenor sax players you know they are the bigest screwoffs in the world

      Oh man, if I had a nickel for every wacky tenor sax story I have.... woooo-eeeeee.

  38. Re:anybody else get this? by brad3378 · · Score: 2

    > I get this:
    Karma: Terrible (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)
    Obviously there's a bug in the system. -13 karma isn't terrible, it's a badge of honor.


    I caught myself laughing out loud to that one!
    Does that mean I am now a troll?
    Somebody must have turned down the thermostat in hell!

    Karma: Excellent
    WTF?

    --

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Re:Yep... by Procrasturbator · · Score: 1

    I never thought anything would make me sentimental for the good old comforting goatse.

  41. That Sinking Feeling of Being Slashdotted... by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It doesn't take very long to realize you're getting slashdotted if you're paying attention.

    Yeah. First, you notice that kmail seems to be taking longer transferring mail than usual.

    Then, you click on a webpage link, and your usually-quick DSL feels like dialup again.

    The hard drive in your webserver is scratching so much, it's hard to think; it sounds like you're compiling a kernel and making a divx at the same time, but it's pages being served and visits being logged.

    You fire up top and are greeted by a whole screen of httpd daemons and CGI.

    Congrats, you're being Slashdotted.

    It's actually kind of fun.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  42. Re:Robots by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* Does anyone else think a Gauss gun, or similar EMP device would....winning robot wars? *)

    I would like to see explosives and guns allowed on those things. Of course there could be no live audience, but it would make for great TV.

    Robots machine-gunning each other. Now *there* is pure geek male testosterone at its best......better than the 3 stooges.

  43. a basic gauss gun ?? by yuri82 · · Score: 1

    "A basic capacitor tutorial is probably in order." how about a basic gauss gun tutorial ?? i bet most of us know what capacitors are and i'd say 99/100 of those want to build one of these gauss thingies... :D

    --
    Who is this Karma guy and why is he bad ??
  44. Marx Generator Story by fdiv(1,0) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in high school, a friend and I made a Marx Generator from about 7 of these capacitors. The flash tubes in these cameras make wonderful spark gaps, BTW. It took about 30 seconds to charge up the thing, and the output from it lasted for mere picoseconds, but dang was it cool.

    P.S.: Word to the wise: just the task of putting a load across the output terminals can set one of these things off. I was moving one of the terminals with a metal screwdriver and I accidently touched the other contact with my other hand. To this day I do not know how I managed to survive that one.

    --
    --- "...And everybody died!!! Except for me, of course...you know why? Because I had my tray table up...and my seat ba
    1. Re:Marx Generator Story by jafuser · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. I wonder if a parallel array of Marx Generators might come in handy in these gauss gun experiments...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  45. Re:offtopic: hmm Karma has changed on /. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    It means that you no longer need to obsessively track your karma as if it were the price of your WorldCom stocks. Karma now simply gives a general indication of other's opinions regarding your posting, moderating, story submissions, ability to annoy editors...

    It's a Good Thing(tm) and I bet it will deflate the karma issue just as changing story ids from initiating at 1 for each story deflated the first post madness (not that the fp'ers have gone away, it's just a lot less important to most people what sequence number their post "gets").

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  46. a reply to some comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi, slashdottee here.

    First of all, there are no pictures of a gauss gun, because it doesn't exist yet. I have the parts for an inverter to charge it, but have not yet assembled it. Not having had much experience with switch mode power supplies, I'm just hoping it doesn't burn down.

    For someone else's (working) effort, check out powerlabs.org

    As to those who think car capacitors, etc might be better, they have a very low voltage rating (eg 15V). E=0.5*C*V^2, so even with a farad the energy isn't that great. Secondly, they are made from *thin* foil and have crappy current ratings, not much good for generating 10kA for 1ms. These are photoflash-rated caps, intended for 1ms discharge times - thick foil, good dielectric and some actual quality control.

    Lastly, the capacitors will have to discharge through an inductor, even if it is only a couple of turns. Lack of voltage means the current rise is too slow (dI/dt = V/L) and so a low voltage, high capacitance bank will not discharge fast enough. Slow discharge means the ring has moved away before it receives much energy.

    I'm also missing large silicon devices to actually discharge the thing. SCRs that can handle 10 or 20kA are not common and seem to cost many hundred of dollars. If anyone's got a spare one, please tell me! Otherwise I will have to make do with lots of smaller devices from surplus shops and build it multi-stage with messy triggering.

    As for energy, consider 0.5*m*V^2. Given about 3 to 5kJ and about 2g of mass, you figure it out. It will be lucky to get 1% efficiency, but still. If it works well, I might have to look into firearms licensing. Big deal.

    To those who say "you're a dickhead, that's lame", well, fair enough. Its not for everyone, and this page wasn't put up for the express of having it critiqued by /. bottom-feeders. I guess you could say "that's just sad", but if you're not an eleceng then you're not going to get what's interesting about this stuff.

    1. Re:a reply to some comments by ndevice · · Score: 1

      have you considered discharing through your flash lamps instead of a thyristor, or flash lamp supplementing your thyristor? I'm not sure if it would work or not and you will lose power and not get the full voltage drop and probably burn them out in the process, but you already have them and it'd look pretty neat to have the flash go with the projectile.

    2. Re:a reply to some comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would not recommend fooling around with microwave ovens in any form, as someone suggested. There is a 4,000V power supply in there which *will* kill you, quite reliably, if you get across it. Much more reliably than standard AC mains power, in fact, because unlike, say, the 30,000V found in a colour TV set, the current from a microwave oven power supply is MUCH higher.

      If you want some high-voltage capacitors, some of the electronic junk shops should still have them from the days of valve electronics, when they were exceedingly common. I recall as a teenager connecting up something like 3,000 microfarads at 600V and charging this up to 380VDC from a 230VAC mains supply.

      This, when discharged, produced especially satisfying results when the target was a small piece of magnesium ribbon, placed under water in a plastic cup.

      The high current vaporised the magnesium which explosively reacted with the water to destroy the cup in a most satisfying way. I imagine that aluminium wire would also work quite well.

      Alas, the innocent experiments of youth would probably today have me rounded up as a terrorist, since amongst other things we also made gunpowder and nitroglycerin (which we never detonated because we were too scared to!).

      Anyone planning on fooling with high voltages and high energies should be aware that even modest voltage and energy levels can cause fatal heart arhythmia if the shock coincides with a vulnerable point in the heart's electrical cycle. I would strongly recommend that you wear insulating gloves while working on any circuitry and be exceedingly careful. Also be aware that capacitors which have been abruptly discharged can then spontaneously recharge without being reconnected to a power source. This could cause a potentially fatal shock, so you should always connect the capacitor terminals together when working on any circuitry.

    3. Re:a reply to some comments by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I'm not an EE so forgive my ignorance, but why not just drop the cameras in a buck of water over night. It seem to me that, that should discharge those capacitors and drain the batteries sufficiently that they won't recharge.

    4. Re:a reply to some comments by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      Otherwise I will have to make do with lots of smaller devices from surplus shops and build it multi-stage with messy triggering.

      For all the effort you're going through, I'm surprised you're only planning on a single-stage. I looked into gauss guns a few months ago and came to the conclusion that multi-stage is definately the way to go. Triggering isn't that bad, just a few pulsed LEDs and photo-receptors along the barrel. I gave up when I realized I couldn't afford the SCRs and capacitors (the lingering feeling that I was going to kill myself probably didn't help either). Good luck.

    5. Re:a reply to some comments by wdnspoon · · Score: 1

      because that would break things.

    6. Re:a reply to some comments by Courageous · · Score: 2

      ... made ... nitroglycerin ...

      You know that was really stupid, right? :)

      C//

    7. Re:a reply to some comments by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it seems like it might be easietr to just build your own damned caps.

      I mean... its a bit painful but its very easy to do, and you can make it into exactly what you want, rather than salvaging and all that work discharging, desoldering etc etc.

      I would much rather build a paralell plate cap out of Al foil and low density polyethelene sheet than deal with all those caps and solder.

      Plastic is cheap... Al foil is cheap... mineral oil is cheap...

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:a reply to some comments by MrScience · · Score: 1

      I made gunpowder at my High School once. Someone told on me, and as I was riding my bycicle home the cops pulled me over. Asked me if I had a license for the bike (of course not), and confiscated all my supplies. The license turned out to simply be a registration form that the police "recommended" you fill out. And the gunpowder worked. Kind of. When mixed with fireworks. :)

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  47. Re:Rubbish huh? (flamebait) by bcrawford · · Score: 5, Informative

    Grandparent correct, As the owner of a few car audio shops, nothing made my day more than selling stuff to kids who thought they needed it. The sales pitch was always based on some fragment of truth then a wild jump to a $200 solution. In the case of the caps, the fragment of truth was that the voltage at the back of the car dropped when the amp sucked some current. The REAL answer is both of the following: 1: thats how electricity works 2: the effect can be minimized by making sure your connections are solid (the drop is caused by resistance, NOT the fact that your battery cant keep up to the demand.. the battery can run your starter at a couple hundred amps)
    The real answers arent all that profitable, nor are they very cool, so we sell you big caps, and your friends drool with envy at your new equipment while you pretend to hear a big difference in the sound. The same principle drives the music/clothing/other industries... 'the dumbest buy the mostest'

    Have you ever played with a car amp that needs 1000 watts?
    No, and neither have you. 1K watts is about 1.5 HORSEPOWER. In recent years, many manufacturers of car audio equipment have been competing for your money by putting really large numbers on the cases of thier devices just because it makes kids buy them. Take the average radio.. a good one claims to do 40 watts per channel, on a 12 volt powersupply and a 4 ohm load, the maximum possible output wattage is 36.. and thats assuming a 100% efficient amplifier (which doesnt exist)

  48. Re:IANAL... if recall by pkinetics · · Score: 3, Informative
    I did a little research a few months ago cause a friend was building a bear rifle.

    According to the ATF it is not illegal to make your own gun provided it is not a semi automatic and the person is not making it for sale and the person is allowed to possess a firearm.

    A7) Does the GCA prohibit anyone from making a handgun, shotgun or rifle?

    With certain exceptions a firearm may be made by a nonlicensee provided it is not for sale and the maker is not prohibited from possessing firearms. However, a person is prohibited from making a semiautomatic assault weapon or assembling a nonsporting semiautomatic rifle or nonsporting shotgun from imported parts. In addition, the making of an NFA firearm requires a tax payment and approval by ATF. An application to make a machinegun will not be approved unless documentation is submitted showing that the firearm is being made for a federal or state agency. [18 U. S. C. 922( o), (r), (v), and 923, 27 CFR 178.39, 178.40, 178.41 and

  49. Re:Is anyone else enjoying the irony? by billn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yer an Anonymous Coward, you'll take it and LIKE it. Besides, it doesn't affect you, now, does it?

    --
    - billn
  50. Karma: Excellent by richie2000 · · Score: 2
    Now if only somebody could tell me why my +50 karma was replaced by "Karma: Excellent"

    Mine too... I wonder what the new ranks may be; CmdrTaco, Excellent, Great, Good, Average, Below-Average, Loser, Whiner, Troll, goatse.cx and Bill Gates? :-)

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:Karma: Excellent by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I think that El Taco has finally done what I've been saying he should do all along: don't have a karma cap, but for very high karma don't display the actual number. Which allows you to chalk up good karma in order to survive a few bad moderations, but doesn't let you see the actual karma value and boast about it.

      Now if I could only get back my moderator/meta-moderator access, I'd be in good shape.

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  51. Completed gauss gun projects by gerardrj · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's a site that goes in to the math, theory and formulas of a gauss gun. At the bottom of the page there are some links to completed projects. There's an image of a completed gun on the top of the front page.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  52. Re:offtopic: hmm Karma has changed on /. by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    It's a Good Thing(tm) and I bet it will deflate the karma issue just as changing story ids from initiating at 1 for each story deflated the first post madness (not that the fp'ers have gone away, it's just a lot less important to most people what sequence number their post "gets").


    Uh bull shit;

    most /. readers tend to be a little bit, err, fanticaly devoted to the mathmatical arts.

    And you see, we LIKE keeping track of meaningless numbers. For one thing it tells how close I am to getting my +1 rights removed so I knwo when exactly to stop telling as many people to Go Fuck Themselves quite so often and ease up on the language a bit;

    besides I get to (used to get to?) do nifty statistical analysis on the numbers (in my head of course, not gonna spend time to write anything down, yeesh) and figure some shtuff out;

    such as if I made a net karma Gain or Loss from posting a pro-MS post. So far in the past I have seen strong chances of me getting a net moderation UP after a thread then down, rather cool actualy. :-P

  53. Pop a Cap in someone by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 2


    Here's a new weapon idea!

    How about building a device that charges these small flash caps and then fires them out as projectiles. Anyone unfortunate enough to get hit with the contacts gets "knocked on their ass" as many experimenters have discovered.

    I'm gonna pop a 0.22 Farad cap in your ass sucka!

  54. Gauss Guns by ctar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here are a few different Gauss Guns, including the one from Half Life!

    Yes, I did just pilfer these sites from Google, but didn't see any other references linked so far, soooo.....

  55. Please don't give the kids any more ideas... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    /. has a fair few "younger readers" [well heck, I'm only 20! :-], with the sorta mindset that sees...

    If you're not an electrical engineer or trained technician with experience with such voltages, do not attempt this for yourself.

    And reads...

    Might wanna be careful where you put your fingers, mmmkay?

    Perhaps now would be a good time for taco to lower the the time threshold on dormant account termination.

    Ali

  56. Re:Yes there is! by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    Clever. I hope you die. Dammit, that was foul.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  57. Re:Anti-dotslashing.... by snake_dad · · Score: 1
    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  58. Re:offtopic: hmm Karma has changed on /. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    this is exactly why Karma is now reported generally. This and the phenomenon of capped users complaining that they're dropped to 48 karma with a +5 post that is lowered 2 points afterward.

    Karma was the goal. Now it's a general indicator. I like it.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  59. Re:offtopic: hmm Karma has changed on /. by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    this is exactly why Karma is now reported generally. This and the phenomenon of capped users complaining that they're dropped to 48 karma with a +5 post that is lowered 2 points afterward.

    I didn't bitch much about that, more of making sure I stayed safely above 25 karma so as to keep my +1 Bonus of Kickassness!

  60. Legal and profitable by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Next week we'll see an article on eleceng geek defense contractor startup.

  61. None of which is actually relevant... by Arker · · Score: 2

    With certain exceptions a firearm may be made by a nonlicensee provided it is not for sale and the maker is not prohibited from possessing firearms. However, a person is prohibited from making a semiautomatic assault weapon or assembling a nonsporting semiautomatic rifle or nonsporting shotgun from imported parts. In addition, the making of an NFA firearm requires a tax payment and approval by ATF. An application to make a machinegun will not be approved unless documentation is submitted showing that the firearm is being made for a federal or state agency. [18 U. S. C. 922( o), (r), (v), and 923, 27 CFR 178.39, 178.40, 178.41 and

    None of which is actually relevant, seeing as this is not a firearm. There may be applicable laws (I'm sure there are, but probably not any) but the stuff you are referencing simply doesn't apply to gauss guns anymore than it does a homemade crossbow or staff-sling (either of which would probably be comparable for destructive capability with this guys gauss gun, if he ever gets it working, btw.)

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  62. Aerogel Supercapacitors by shoemakc · · Score: 1

    Have folks seen these yet?

    http://www.cooperet.com/products_supercapacitors.a sp

    Very interesting for low voltage applications. Wicked high capacitance ratings at very, very low ESR.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  63. Active Server Page Outlawed? by shoemakc · · Score: 1

    go figure, I post the link

    http://www.cooperet.com/products_supercapacitors.a sp

    and slashcode splits up the 'a' and the 'sp'. Damn open source hippies.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  64. As my advisor said by IdahoEv · · Score: 4, Funny

    My EE advisor in college was fond of saying:

    "Any diode can be light-emitting ... once."

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    1. Re:As my advisor said by Mignon · · Score: 2

      Any joke can be funny ... once.

  65. Other Capacitors? by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    Ive already that you ruled out car capacitors, and for good reason. I was wondering if the large capacitors inside microwaves or TV would work for you purpose?

  66. What ? by doru · · Score: 1

    No Beowulf cluster joke ?!

  67. Re:Rubbish huh? (flamebait) by BomberMonkey · · Score: 1

    Some of the class A amplifiers (ie, not push-pull) include their quiescent power in the numbers on the box: 300W speakers! output 6W for each sattelite and 30W for the center channel.

  68. cpu cooling using a car radiator by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    poke around, and you will find some interesting things, including a cpu cooling system using, among other things, a Hyundai Charade (Nippon Denso) radiator.
    • Do you mean Hyundai Excel or Dihatsu Charade? I poked around a bit and could not find exactly what you are talking about. Being from Australia, Adelaide at that, there is definately no Hyundai Charade sold here!

    one of the parts mentioned here is labeled as such

    http://obelix.cs.adelaide.edu.au/album/cooling/ind ex.html

    although his working version does use something else

    http://obelix.cs.adelaide.edu.au/album/cooling/ins talled/index.html

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  69. ... they really do have legit uses by Artful+Codger · · Score: 1

    The capacitors in disposable cameras are great for use in tube audio circuits, which have DC voltages in excess of 100v. The capacitors usually sell for $1, $2 or more through parts outlets otherwise. A basic circuit can have several capacitors, so the savings are substantial.

    It's very easy to modify the flash unit to be triggered by anything, for instance a motion detector or alarm switch, so you can add a pseudo-camera to an alarm system, for added scare-off factor.

    You can create flash panels or bars that will slave off your camera's own flash.

    Combine with LEGO Mindstorm to create a papparozzibot, for taking remote pix of dangerous celebrities.

    --

    ... plans that either come to naught, or half a page of scribbled lines...
  70. Nope. Used disposables = free by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    90% of the cost of disposables is the film and the developing.

    Photo labs often have huge boxes full of used cameras, just ask for a few. :)

    Officially they're supposed to send them back for recycling into new cameras, but it seems that their rewards for doing so aren't very great - So they usually are willing to give away a bunch for free.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  71. Wrong (liar) by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    Liar!
    Even if you really do own a few car audio shops, you obviously sell crap, but I doubt you even own a single decent car amplifier. There are car amps that put out 1000watt RMS continous power. Go to a car audio competition. Or just buy a decent amp and hook up a current meter to it. If something draws even 15A at 12V it needs more power than 40 watts (and I'm talking about amplfifiers, not head units or wanna-be (walmart) amplifiers. You know nothing about amplifiers.
    Any car audio amplifier has an internal power supply section that raises the 12V to some higher voltage, allowing it to put out more power than you claim.
    Now about caps... An alternator does not put out perfect DC. Go read a little bit about electronmagnetic induction. You obviusly know less than I did when I was in 5th grade.
    Maybe some kids buy caps, who don't need them but that doesn't mean they're worthless. Allow me to demonstrate: I have an amp right now that requires about 30A continuous power. Assuming this amp was 66.7% efficient that current draw is actually (assuming I was using it to produce a pure sinewave):
    30 + 20 sin (wt) Amps
    where w is the angular frequency and t is time (And ignoring the amplifier's internal power supply caps). That means that at at some times, that amplifier is drawing 50A. Let's assume I had a perfect voltage source in the front of my car.
    I order to get the same level of power supply ripple (measured at the +12 terminal on the amplifier) I could either install wiring suited for 30A and a capactior, or install wiring suited for 50A.
    Keep in mind that this analysis does not include the batteies internal resistance, the beneficial HF noise filtering properties of a capacitor, of the filtering of power supply ripple from the alternator.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  72. Capacitors can be fun.. by nolife · · Score: 2

    High school electronics class was a fun time..
    I used to charge up small capacitors and place the leads between the pages in my books. When walking the halls between classes, I would pull them out and shock people. Our halls were pretty crowded so you could be very covert. We also used the capacitor tester as a wimp detetector. Five or so people would hold hands with the end people each getting one of the charging leads. Another person would slowly turn up the voltage until someone wimped out and let go. Normally that person also got a little extra from the resulting arc.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  73. Re:Rubbish huh? or The Theory of Car Audio Amps by nomso · · Score: 2, Informative
    Take the average radio.. a good one claims to do 40 watts per channel, on a 12 volt powersupply and a 4 ohm load, the maximum possible output wattage is 36.. and thats assuming a 100% efficient amplifier (which doesnt exist)

    Well, you are right about the 36 watts. But many car audio amplifiers use inverters these days, allowing them to increase the voltage manyfold. Thus they may have fifty plus volts to play with (no pun intended) and can output many watts... but usually these are not RMS (continuous) watts, but PMPO or some crap like that.

    --
    there is no spoon
  74. Too much work... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    ... you can buy 200 250V/120uF caps from digikey for around $1.15 per if you buy 200, or $2.15 in one-sy quantities. The time necessary to disassemble all the cameras is probably worth more than that to me (although I probably wouldn't have enough drive to build the gauss gun anyway).

  75. Re:umm by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Exactly right. But at least they're a good source of free AA batteries for us photolab monkeys.

  76. and chemical engineers by rhadamanthus · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Use simple chemistry and a lot less effort!

    Fill a can with a little bit of water and set it over a flame until the water begins to boil. At this point most of the air has left the can and been replaced with water vapor. The can will not implode yet, since the water vapor exerts about an atm of pressure on the inside of the can. However, if you submerge the can at this point in an ice bath, the vapor rapidly condenses and the can implodes by itself. Quite neat. You can make cans "jump" several feet once placed in the ice bath...

    -----rhad

    --
    Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    1. Re:and chemical engineers by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Fill a can with a little bit of water and set it over a flame until the water begins to boil. At this point most of the air has left the can and been replaced with water vapor. The can will not implode yet,

      Of course! Chemical engineers build their own can crushers.

      Do any of the other disciplines do this, that we can think of? Aerospace? Civil? Structural? Software?

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  77. Re:the Swiss are MUCH better behaved than American by markmoss · · Score: 2

    You could do surgery on the sidewalk there [in Switzerland] without causing an infection.

    A slight exaggeration, I'm sure, but point taken. There must be _some_ Swiss criminals, but the worst thing I've ever heard a Swiss accused of was a sort of bureaucratic crime - just keeping any money deposited by (probably dead) German jews before WWII in Swiss banks unless someone could actually prove he was the heir...

    I do wonder though, how much of their good behavior comes from every man going through boot camp (for centuries), how much from the knowledge that your neighbors have as much firepower as a regular infantryman (although I've heard that a Swiss who uses his military weapon without authorization goes to prison longer than the average American murderer), and how much from other factors...

  78. A story from High School... by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was a senior in high school, a group of us would hang around in the ahlls before calss and talk. Most of us were "mad-scientist wannabes", and we would discuss our current projects (one guy was trying to make napalm, IIRC).

    Anyway, there was this one sophmore who hung around with us, who was always trying to immitate our projects (usually badly). He was ok, I guess, and it was usually funny to listen to his recent mistakes/problems (like accidently land-mining his room in the middle of the night with exploding paper strips.)

    The hallway at our school were long, with lots of glass, and metal rails running along at about waist height. Usually, all the students would lean against the rails before class.

    Well, one guy in our group had torn apart a disposible lighter and had gotten the electronic igniter out of it. He would touch the wire to the railing, and when he pushed the button, everyone touching the rail would get a shock (very minor shock). It was irritating and fun!

    Well, this sophmore decided to "one-up" us, and managed to get hold of the igniter from a gas stove. The thing was about 10 times as big as the small igniter, and produced a nice, fat spark when pressed.

    IIRC, he managed to shock himself, while the rest of us stood around laughing. I think he finally gave up on trying to shock anyone with that.

    -Ed

    docbrown.net
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  79. THIS, dudes, is how you build the EMP Weapon by lperdue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using mostly stuff I have lying around in my garage workshop this weekend, I can fry most of the chips in the average server farm, telephone switching facility or the radios used by police, fire and emergency services. If I did it right, I can 86 all of the above at the same time.

    Indeed, I can zap all the control circuits in a modern fly-by-wire jumbo aircraft and make it do a ballistic imitation of a large brick. If I time things right, I can bring a fully fueled jet down right in the middle of San Francisco.

    Can you say "9/11?" Sure you can. So here we are, nine months along, and those who are supposed to protect us are as clueless as ever.

    I could create total electronic chaos and another 9/11 with a homemade, explosively pumped, flux compression generator, and I can do it with data I found on the Internet, including some very helpful stuff from the Los Alamos nuclear lab web site.

    We're talking here about an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapon, the neutron bomb of electronic circuits. A garage EMP bomb is amazingly easy to build, especially with a 15-minute Google search.

    Undoubtedly you have read about the EMP weapons we used in the Gulf War and Yugoslavia to take out air defense electronics. What you may not have read about is a 1995 incident when Chechnyan rebels used one to fry security circuits in 1995 to gain access to a Soviet facility.

    Yeah, I've tried for months now to get anyone in power to care. Local law enforcement said it was not their table and to call the Feds. The FBI agent on duty in San Francisco was totally clueless ... said someone would call me back. Not.

    I used to work for U.S. Senator Thad Cochran. So I called one of the staffers I knew, and she referred me to the White House Liaison for Home Security. No call back there, either.

    But maybe an EMP weapon sounds too much like anti-gravity boots and close encounters with Airstream trailer communities in the Mojave and that's why nobody returns calls and nothing gets done.

    But realize this: the NATO document mentions the use of an EMP weapon by Chechnyan rebels. Al-Qaida includes many Chechnyans among the hard-core fighters, thus the usefulness of EMP weapons has surely been transferred to the bad guys still out there looking for an opportunity to make another big splash.

    So, I couldn't just let the non-responses from the FBI and Homeland Defense be the end of the matter. With a little more digging on the Web, I located a DOE phone directory last week and called the folks who are head of security for the national nuclear labs. I actually got a call back and forwarded the information (below) via e-mail. I got a form e-mail reply, but the Los Alamos page (http://www.lanl.gov/dirac/) is still up there.

    Why is the Los Alamos page important? Because it gives me a good look at an actual physical configuration of a real bomb that works. Taken together with the other web pages, it gives me an excellent chance to build a bomb that works.

    Perhaps having the data out there for anyone is a victory for open info on the net, but then how easy DO we want to make it for terrorists? Where is the line between the free flow of information and discussion and giving folks easy access on how to build weapons?

    EMAIL TO NATIONAL LABS SECURITY FOLLOWS

    >Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:15:26 -0800
    >To: marc.hollander@nnsa.doe.gov
    >From: Lewis Perdue
    >Subject: links
    >
    >Very nice chatting with you. Below are the major links I mentioned.
    >
    >Some detailed background on the threat can be found in a NATO Parliamentary Assembly report at:
    >
    >http://www.nato-pa.int/publications/comre p/2001/a u-221-e.html
    >
    >I quoted from this report at the end of this e-mail. But particularly relevant is the following from that NATO report:
    >
    >"38.The possibility of terrorists using EMP weapons has been raising alarm for at least a decade among defence analysts. According to Winn Schwartau, an information warfare specialist, rudimentary EMP devices have been assembled by US Department of Defense consultants within two weeks at the cost of $500. Such devices, capable of disrupting computers, medical equipment and cars, could be placed in a van or even reduced to fit into a suitcase. Criminal organisations in Russia have been accused of using EMP devices to bypass alarm systems. According to the Russian Armed Forces, Chechen rebels might have used similar technology to disrupt Russian electronic communication equipment."
    >
    >As I mentioned to you, I can describe how such a device could be used to cause another 9/11-type disaster.
    >
    >links:
    >
    >THIS IS A KEY ONE: http://www.infowar.com/mil_c4i/mil_c4i8.html-ssi
    >

    >THE FOLLOWING may seem harmless, but the principles for forming metal, apply directly to an EMP weapon, both in learning how to acquire the capacitors for the construction, and because the electromagnetic pulse formation is very nearly the same.
    >
    >http://www.mse.eng.ohio-state.edu/~daeh n/metalfor minghb/tabofcont/index.html
    >
    >THE FOLLOWING ARE SOURCES FOR THE PULSE POWER CAPACITORS NEEDED ... and monitoring sales could be an early warning. If you can get the manufacturers to look for suspicious purchases it could be a good tripwire.
    >
    >http://www.nwl.com/
    >http://www.ae rovox.com/
    >http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~wiley/ ppti2.htm l
    >
    >
    >YOU'LL WANT TO FOLLOW LINKS FROM THIS PAGE:
    >http://er6s1.eng.ohio-state.edu/~daehn/hyp erplast icity.html
    >
    >SOME OF THOSE LINKS INCLUDE:
    >
    >Manufacturers of Pulse Power Equipment
    > Maxwell-Magneform
    > IAP Research
    > Elmag, Inc.
    > Pulsar Technologies (welding / crimping)
    > Manget-Physik (German Mfr. of Electromagnetic Forming Hardware & MagnetoPulS® Technology)
    > Kharkov Polytechnic University, Ukraine (research and equipment)
    >
    >Other sites related to high velocity deformation and/or hardware
    >Pulse Power Equipment
    > Richardson Electric (ingitrons)
    > Maxwell Technologies
    > Pulsed Power Technologies, Inc.
    > Pulse Power Switching Overview
    > Fantastically Dangerous Cap. Bank Experiments
    > Aerovox Corp. (capacitor mfgr. )
    > Darrah Electronics (solid state switching)
    > Contents of IEEE Pulsed Power Conferences
    >
    >High Velocity Forming and Pulse Power Applications
    > EMF Industries, Inc. (assembly with EMF is highlighted)
    > Sparktec Environ mental Corp (uses sparks for water purification)
    > Dana Corporation Develops Improved Magnetic -Pulse Process
    > Electroimpact Home Page (mfr. of electromagnetic dent removers etc.)
    > CONTENTS PAGE - RESEARCH AT SSAU (1997) (Russian welding, etc.)
    > Simple Analysis from J. Krauss Electromagnetics Book
    > Robert Hahn at IWF, Technical Univ. of Berlin (in German)
    >
    >IF YOU WERE DESPERATE FOR C-4 or Semtex for your EMP device, and didn't have a source for the ready-made stuff, you could try here:
    >
    >http://www.phreak.org/archives/The_Hack er_Chronic les_II/pyro/miss2.txt
    >http://www.strange-days.de mon.co.uk/anarchy/bomb/ bombs-1.html
    >
    >FINALLY ....
    >
    >New material continues to be posted on the Web. If you do a search for "flux compression generator" you will find more listings than just the ones above.
    >
    >
    >NATO Parliamentary Assembly
    >http://www.nato-pa.int/publications/comrep/2001 /a u-221-e.html
    >
    >37.Yet another threat seems more imminent. As Ehlers indicated in his report, computer systems and all electronic devices can be seriously damaged by weapons producing electro-magnetic pulses (EMP). High Power Microwaves (HPM) or EMP bombs and High Energy Radio Frequency (HERF) guns can radiate intense pulses of electro-magnetic energy capable of severely damaging computers, radar and all electronic equipment. They can even destroy circuits, microprocessors and other components. These weapons are well-known in Russia, where extensive studies were conducted during the Cold War. The US Air Force used EMP and HERF weapons successfully in 1991 against Iraqi radar installations, and in 1999 against Yugoslav electronic infrastructure.
    >
    >38.The possibility of terrorists using EMP weapons has been raising alarm for at least a decade among defence analysts. According to Winn Schwartau, an information warfare specialist, rudimentary EMP devices have been assembled by US Department of Defense consultants within two weeks at the cost of $500.

    Such devices, capable of disrupting computers, medical equipment and cars, could be placed in a van or even reduced to fit into a suitcase. Criminal organisations in Russia have been accused of using EMP devices to bypass alarm systems. According to the Russian Armed Forces, Chechen rebels might have used similar technology to disrupt Russian electronic communication equipment.
    >
    > 39.In his book Cybershock, Schwartau considers some possible effects of a well-orchestrated EMP attack upon Western infrastructure:
    >
    > Wall Street or other banking systems can be attacked, causing repetitive failures resulting in financial losses. Also past records can be wiped out by onslaughts of electromagnetic pulses; aircraft avionics and guidance systems can be overloaded by targeted HERF, causing potentially deadly conditions; medical equipment can fail under the attack of intense energy spikes, putting human lives in danger; communication nodes can be burned out by intense microwave radiation; municipal emergency services can be made inoperable by debilitating wide-band microwave jamming; power lines and transformers may serve as efficient conductors to transmit huge current to victim businesses and sub-stations, causing regional black-outs.
    >
    >40.The ability to build EMP weapons is apparently quite widespread, yet there are no international controls over the import and export of the related technologies. Defensive techniques, although in some cases expensive, have been partially deployed in the public sector (especially to protect military assets), but remain extremely rare in the private sector.

    1. Re:THIS, dudes, is how you build the EMP Weapon by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "I could create total electronic chaos and another 9/11 with a homemade, explosively pumped, flux compression generator, and I can do it with data I found on the Internet, including some very helpful stuff from the Los Alamos nuclear lab web site."

      The powers-that-be probably ignored you because you sound like Lex Luther.

      If the Chechnyan rebels ever threaten my home town I'll remember you warned me.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  80. Re:the Swiss are MUCH better behaved than American by RKloti · · Score: 1

    FYI, there are violent crimes in Switzerland. Not that many, but they are there. In 2001, there were about 160 offenses involving the death of the victim (murder, manslaughter etc). Half of them were committed with firearms. Practically nobody uses a selective-fire assault rifle for a planned crime, since it is too large, heavy and cumbersome, not to mention LOUD and not exactly easy to hide.

    As for prison sentences, well, I'd be very surprised if anyone got a longer prison sentence for a crime in Switzerland than in the US. Swiss law forsees much shorter prison terms across the whole spectrum of crimes than does American law (as do most European legal systems) and judges tend to give out laughably short sentences for all but the most serious crimes. The only crimes for which a life sentence is possible are murder, mass-kidnapping [terrorist style] and genocide.

    The political left has long been pushing to abolish the tradition, though a parliamentary subcommittee recently voted down a proposal that would have kept the weapons at barracks.

    Swiss gun law is a little bureaucratic (as is pretty much everything in Switzerland...) but liberal by European comparison. The requirements to get a WES, a one-time certificate that allows you to purchase up to three fire arms (that can be issued as many times as you like, as there are no limits as to how many firearms you are allowed to own, nor how much ammunition):

    1. 18 years of age
    2. Swiss citizen or resident with a class C residency permit (others need permission from their nation's embassy)
    3. No serious criminal offences on record
    4. No illnesses that make weapon misuse particularly likely, such as alcoholism, heroin addiction or paranoid schizophrenia

    Provided you meet those requirements, the WES (Waffenerwerbschein) is practically guaranteed (if you don't get it despite meeting the criteria, you can challenge the decision in court). There is no license, the WES is only required for purchasing, not possessing a firearm. Firearms can be confiscated if misuse is considered likely, IE if you threaten somebody, or if you are, for example, diagnosed with a some kind of severe mental illness. Permanent confiscation requires that you are compensated, even if the confiscation is as a result of a prison sentence, unless the weapons themselves were used in the crime.

    Carrying weapons is another thing entirely. You are allowed to carry a weapon in your home or business with further ado, and licensed hunters can carry a gun while hunting as well. But carrying a gun (concealed or not) for other purposes requires a permit which is *difficult* to get. Apart from the WES requirements, you also need to have reason to carry a weapon, which is defined in the weapons code as being to protect yourself, somebody else or an object and to pass a theoretical (gun and related laws) and practical (target shooting) test. The reason requirement, while it sounds fairly open, is in practice fufilled only by those who are at especially high risk. AFAIK, people should, if they can demonstrate that they are reasonably responsible and are capable of handling a firearm, be allowed to carry firearms in public. (which they were in many cantons, before this firearm law came into power). Apparently, concealed carry, though illegal without a license, is quite common amoung youth, for whatever reasons.

    It's worth noting that practically every other country in Europe requires you to demonstrate a necessity in order to merely own a firearm.

  81. Build Your Own Laser, Phaser, Ion Ray Gun... by ebonkyre · · Score: 1
    Build Your Own Laser, Phaser, Ion Ray Gun and Other Working Space-Age Projects
    by Robert E Iannini (1983)

    Books In Print shows two active records:
    ISBN 0-8306-0604-1
    ISBN 0-07-156069-6

    I have this book (somewhere) and it has all kinds of interesting projects/plans, including a 20mW CO2 laser, and a 6MW(!) pulse generator - I don't recall the duration of the 6MW pulse, so I can't tell you the joule output, but it's enough to explosively vaporize any Radio Shack component of your choice...

    --
    "Time is an abstract concept devised by carbon-based lifeforms to monitor their ongoing decay." - Thundercleese
  82. Re:Rubbish huh? (flamebait) by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Really? They really sell capacitors that are supposed to smooth out the transients at the input of the power amplifier? P. T. Barnum was right! OTOH, I once created an "L" filter using a coil and a capacitor because the alternator whine was so annoying.

  83. Failure to understand basic electronics by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    You draw more current @ 12V. Duh. It's okay not to understand EE. Just don't act like you do.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
    1. Re:Failure to understand basic electronics by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      And most car audiophiles are pretentious wankers.

      That's very mild terminology. I can think of a few things I'd describe our local car "audiophiles" as, and none are as pleasant as "pretentious wankers."
      These arseholes come in at 2 in the morning blasting their stereos. Their rice-buring piece of crap with a 14.20 qualifying time (hah, my '70 mustang is in the low 13s, stock engine, and weighs 1000 pounds more) written on the side window. They hit the gas, and it sounds like my dad revving his lawn mower, only put out through a big-concert PA system.

      You hear the BOOOM BOOOM of their barely-qualifies-as music, and listen to the trunk rattle, they sit ther for a few minutes, revving that whopping 2.0L engine up to 6000 RPM, and I'm sitting in my apartment praying the engine throws a rod.

      To top it all off, it's 2 A.M., I've got insomnia, and I've already taken my medication, and can't have another dose for 20 hours.

      Complaints to the police department, and aparment management do nothing, because the state has an $800 million budget shortfall, and the landlord is hurting for tenants.

      These are the same people that go 50 in a parking lot where kids play, and the guy in the next building passed me at over twice my speed (I was going 60) on a highway that had a hit-and-run accident a few weeks earlier. I notice he's got a funny dent on his bumper, too. I'm tempted to call the police to report him as a drunk driver, but the local police don't take it seriously, even if the guy is driving at 120 miles/hour.

      And yes, I've seen the amp and caps and speakers in his car. A true "audiophile," when the only quality you are looking for is loud and obnoxious.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:Failure to understand basic electronics by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      You're not thinking of car audiophiles, you're thinking of car bass addicts, whose only gauge of how "good" a system is is how loud the bass gets. Those are the people who decide what to buy based on what the popular rappers rap about in their songs.

      There is such a thing as a car audiophile, and they will talk on and on about the sound stage, et cetera just like any other audiophile. However, car audio is so much more difficult than home audio that it doesn't make as much sense The car is driving through so many different places that the environment is constantly changing as long as the car is in motion. If you can make soemthing sound "good" in a that environment, then you are doing very well.

      By the way, there are enough car audiophiles who want to be able to enjoy classical or jazz or whatever music in their Porsches. And if they spend $80,000 on a car and they like listening to music in the car, they can and do spend $8,000 on a system. Of course, many of these people are "pretentious wankers". They could easily get a system 90% as good for $2,000.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  84. Re:Simpson's did it! well not them by caffeinepilot · · Score: 1

    There is a capacitor gun in Legacy of Herot by Larry Niven Jerry Pornelle and Steven Barnes

    --
    If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. - God used to be my co-pilot, then we crashed into a mountain
  85. Oh, do shut the hell up! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Why is it every story here there is some asshat whinging about people soending their own free time on projects other than Linux?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  86. Gauss gun regulated as a firearm? by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    As for energy, consider 0.5*m*V^2. Given about 3 to 5kJ and about 2g of mass, you figure it out. It will be lucky to get 1% efficiency, but still. If it works well, I might have to look into firearms licensing. Big deal.
    If you live in the UK, yeah, you'll need a license. IIRC, Their regulations are based on the energy of the projectile.

    If you live in the USA, then read up on exactly what BATF does and does not regulate. You are in the clear, unless your local community has their own restricitons.

  87. So this one time, at band camp... by radish · · Score: 2


    OK, so how comes I'm the first person to write that? ;)

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  88. new meaning by Castaa · · Score: 1

    This guy gives new meaning the the phrase "Point, click and shoot."

    --
    Chew: You Nexus, huh? I design your eyes.
    Roy: Chew, if only you could see what I've seen with your eyes.
  89. left hand is better by halfelven · · Score: 1

    (subj)

  90. In High School we used to.... by nortcele · · Score: 1

    We had a shop class where we worked on cars and such, and took the condensers off the old motors to charge them up. (they have just one wire with the case being the othor conductor) Then we would put them in some girl's locker. A charged up condenser will make a spark almost a 1/2 inch long when the wire is discharged to the case. These girls didn't have a clue and start screwing around with it. Invariably they would be holding the case when they got around to touching the end of the wire. BAM! Condensers will hold a charge for quite a while, so whenever we saw one around, you would discharge it before picking it up and messing around with it.

    Needless to say, all the girls in the grades around us now know what a condenser is.

  91. I think mine is legal then by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Well, the one I built is 30mm but it isn't a semi-auto so I guess it is ok.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  92. Re:GO TO: PowerLabs Gauss Gun Research by red_gnom · · Score: 1

    If you want to see a powerfull gauss gun in action or make one, go to:
    PowerLabs Gauss Gun Research.

  93. Re:Watch a video of it in action. by red_gnom · · Score: 1

    The video of projectile perforating a can with speed of 240km/h is here:
    coilgun.mpg

  94. Re:Rubbish huh? (flamebait) by Jacer · · Score: 1

    it's called an inverter you twit. you're obviosuly not an EE...maybe you've taken physics 1 in high school, but you are no EE

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  95. Discharge idea (instead of silicon)... by nomel · · Score: 1

    Just an idea for how to discharge...

    Wouldn't a hefty switch work? I know that peak currents would probably be lower because of the formation of the arc (have to have the reed(?) move FAST!) and you will probably fry any electronic device within a couple meter because of the emmisions, but it could handle it.

    When I say hefty, I mean something like a hefty screwdriver or crowbar (i know you'll be collecting all you life and get it to 1 or 2 MA) attached to a large spring, manually triggered.


    ###/
    / O-----
    /
    /

    "/" = screwdriver
    "#" = spring
    "o-" = contact and wire (contact should probably be replaceable...heheh)

  96. Why bother? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I had access to high explosives I'd just blow up the thing I wanted to destroy and save myself the trouble of screwing around with EMP. Hell, if I had a nuke and wanted an EMP bomb I'd put it on a rocket (if you can get/build a nuke you can get/build a rocket too) and detonate it in the ionosphere and generate one hell of an EMP pulse via nature! This actually happened once in a high altitude nuke test to Hawaii.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Why bother? by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      proton bomb....

      No, you would want a neutron bomb.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  97. Re:Robots by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

    I would rather see real autonomous robots doing battle. I would also like to see them change the name of the current show to remote-controlled car wars.

    --
    word.
  98. How about using some other king of trigger? by mbessey · · Score: 2

    > I'm also missing large silicon devices to
    > actually discharge the thing. SCRs that can
    > handle 10 or 20kA are not common and seem to
    > cost many hundred of dollars. If anyone's got
    > a spare one, please tell me!

    High-current SCR's are expensive, that's for sure. Do you really need a fast cycle time, though?

    I know somebody already suggested a mechanical switch. Given the energy levels you want, it's probably not very realistic to use a knife switch.

    A liquid-metal contact switch at least wouldn't weld itself together every time you closed it. Good luck finding one of those that's a) in your price range, and b) not full of Mercury, though.

    Have you considered a spark gap? Since your working voltage is (relatively) low, you could use a triggered gap as a switch. Sort of like the flash tube, but built a lot more rugged.

    Take a look at some of the web pages out there devoted to voltage cascades, Marx generators, and Tesla coils. Maybe someone has a solution figured out already.

    Or, how about a vacuum tube? Peak current might be an issue there, too, but the voltage range seems about right, anyway. I'm no vacuum tube expert though.

    -Mark

  99. Re:40 Watts by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

    Take the average radio.. a good one claims to do 40 watts per channel, on a 12 volt powersupply and a 4 ohm load, the maximum possible output wattage is 36
    The radio you describe is the same bridge output amplifier that a few years ago was rated at 12.5 watts per channel, or 25 watts for 2 channel or 50 watts for 4 channel. It's the same voltage into the same load. Nothing has changed but the numbers.
    Because people tend to by things by comparing the fancy numbers on a spec sheet, lots creative writing has been done to seprate fools from their money.
    #1 Rate peak power instead of RMS average watts.
    Explaination; Music is not DC heating power. If you take the maximum DC voltage and figure the power based on load resistance, you can get a high number. In the example given, 40 watts was tossed out. It was pointed out that that number refuted with a supply of 12 volts. It wasn't figured at 12 volts. The charging system provides about 14 or more volts. Redo the math with this number.
    An audio waveform is not a sine wave. The peak possible voltage is not provided to the speakers 100% of the time. In the '70's some good stuff was rated at RMS power at a specified distortion level. In the above case, 40 watts is only possible with the engine running and the speaker voltage never leaving peak values. In short a very distorted square wave output. Not pleasant music in my book. A 6 Watt RMS rated amplifer at 0.1 THD is a much more powerful amplifier. My favorite amplifier is rated 25 watts RMS per channel at 0.04% THD into a 4 ohm load. Some amplifiers are rated to provide their rated output only a very low speaker impedances. 2 and one ohm are common. Almost half the power rating for these as they can not provide the voltage needed to properly drive rated power into a 4 ohm speaker. Needless to say, that rating will misslead most newbies in the audio field. The don't understand why my 50 watt amplifier uses 8 AWG wire with a 20 amp fuse. They are also supprised when I connect a scope and show it provides more unclipped peak to peak voltage to the 4 ohm speaker than most amplifiers rated 200 watts. Yes the honestly rated 25 watt amplifer is a bigger and higher power amp. That rating is not a peak power rating. Learn to compare apples with apples. Is the spec peak or RMS? Is that rated into 4 ohm, 2 ohm, 1 ohm? Is that rating guaranteed at 11 volt supply, or does the amp need to be under the hood getting 14 volts direct with no power distribution system to provide voltage loss due to resistance and distance? If you have a 200 Watt RMS into 4 ohms rated amplifier, I'll be looking for serious hearing protection! The car audio market is "let the buyer beware". The specs on paper are deliberately missleading. Borrow a scope and a dummy load. Find out how much Peak to Peak voltage the amplifier will deliver before before clipping occures. Don't buy anything that will not put out at least 40 volts for a small amp and 80 volts for the super thumpers. Half these values for brige mode amps. I have seen stuff rated at 120 watts that are powered by an 8 amp fuse. 12 X 8 is only 96 DC watts in at the point the fuse will blow. (commenly spouted spec for cheap underdash EQ-boosters) Some power is lost to heat in the audio conversion from DC. How much is left for each speaker? How are they expecting to get 120 watts out with only 96 watts maximum in? That rating is not RMS average music power! There is some honest stuff out there. However bring your pocketbook. It isn't cheap!

    Now onto the function of caps. Music has it's peaks and valleys. The resistance of the electrical distribution system is finite. It includes the wire, battery internal resistance and alternator internal resistance. Current draw over a finite resitance provides a voltage drop over the resistance. This is well defined in ohm's law. The current drawn by an amplifier is not constant. It varies. Simply the more the current draw over a fixed resistance the more the voltage drop. Because of this the voltage drop varies as the current drawn varies. The wiring can have it's resistance reduced by using bigger wire, battery resistance can be reduced by adding more batteries (and placing one close to the amp to shorten the wire from battery and amp).
    To provide the maximum voltage to the amplifier at a music peak, the loss in DC voltage at the peak current draw can be acheived by providing the peak current from a local capicitor instead of through a long wire to the trunk. A big capacitor can provide the short duration high current the amplifier demands on a music peak, preventing the high current peak on the DC distribution system and it's associated peak voltage drop. A good scope will tell you in short order if the money is worth it. Watch the voltage drops on high power music at the amplifier with and without the cap. Saving a 1/2 volt peak drop may make a diffrence in a competition, but most people won't need it. Don't even consider adding a cap if your music peaks drop the supply voltage at the amplifier less than 1/4 volt. You don't need it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  100. 40 MJ is feasible by MuppetsCmdr · · Score: 1

    Some industrial strength inverters (AC/AC) for induction motors use an inner DC-link (at a few kilovolts). Storing something like 40 MJ (Yes, fourthy megajuoles)
    Now there's some energy to release ..

    --
    -- Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  101. Re:Simpson's did it! well not them by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 1

    Hey! I just read that book about three weeks ago. I guess I subliminally stole the idea from them. Rats! Grendels!

  102. Multiplication error? by Tekkie+Jim · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that 1uf is equal to 10 to the minus 6 farads. C must be expressed in farads for this formula. I calculated .6534 joules for the flash capacitor,and 0.000002 joules for the audio capacitor. The audio capacitor is hardly worth the effort at any cost.

  103. Why buy cameras? by Sebastopol · · Score: 2

    I'm totally missing something here.

    Aren't a bunch of cameras more expensive than just _buying_ big caps? And where would we get bags of disposable cameras?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  104. How about . . . by The+FooMiester · · Score: 2

    Parking lot lights and other high intensity discharge lighting systems contain high current(to 55microfarad) capacitors. If you're looking to buy them here's Advance Transformer's catalogue for that sort of thing. Capacitors start on page 46. Their main page is http://advancetransformer.com

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  105. What defines a gun? by Skevin · · Score: 2

    I didn't know there was such a law.
    I'm in the process of converting a WGP Autococker into a CD/DVD Launcher - specially flattened barrel, tightened on one side to impart a spin - to launch Compact Disks with a burst of CO2. Although the CD's need to be loaded by hand, one at a time (up until recently), I can reliably attain ~550 ft/s. This is enough to cleave thick pieces of styrofoam/cardboard or aluminum cans in half... or embed itself into soft wood like Eucalyptus trees. Against harder targets, such as rocks, the rounds simply undergo fragmentation and splinter into tiny plastic chunks. I don't know the effects against animal matter yet, because the contraption is notoriously inaccurate and squirrels are annoyingly fast.
    At higher velocities (~700 ft/s) the rounds begin to fragment in the "barrel".
    Now, here's my question: I've put together a rudimentary feeder/hopper that now lets me use my CD Launcher in a semiautomatic fashion, and believe me, having played paintball for four years straight, I can pull that trigger pretty fast. Is it a gun? Does it need special attention from the ATF?
    Let's thicken the plot: I'm slapping together a solenoid-actuated electric trigger frame (similar to a Sandridge) to convert my paintball^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H CD gun to a fully automatic weapon. I estimate a ROF of ~13 CDs/second. (maybe *now* I'll be able to hit that pesky squirrel) My anticipation is that it still won't do any damage to brick walls, bronze statues, and masonry of quality craftsmanship, but will absolutely *shred* old wooden fences, thrown-out sofas, and squirrels. Will it need to be registered with the ATF then?
    BTW, I once thought of calling it my Assault Ordnance Launcher, or AOL for short... the idea being that people would soon become afraid of my AOL CDs...

    Solomon

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  106. Prospectful...student? by EK_ARC · · Score: 1

    I'm concidering taking Electrical Engineering in College next year. I havn't had acess to many electronics in my youth, so I havn't had much experience with picking things apart and experimenting. My father is a basic Electrician, and has a number of basic electronics books lying around, do you think these would be a good start for someone beginning to take an interest? I'm mainly interested in robotics. Once I know what I'm doing, maybe I can look into working with these Cameras, and try to make them useful. Any info is higjly appreciated, hope to see some of your articles soon, thanks.

    1. Re:Prospectful...student? by alizard · · Score: 2

      Yes. Start now. The more you know when you start the program, the more advantage you can take of the facilities offered to you. Get serious about getting started now and when your fellow classmates are learning Ohm's Law, you can be building stuff.

  107. Re:Dude, where's your tin foil hat? by karlm · · Score: 2
    The poster does seem a bit paranoid... but lightning strikes are much longer in duration and a lot of the EM power generated is low enough frequency that the plane's skin acts as a faraday cage. The Russians did some research on this stuff and created some crazy stuff. Supposedly for a small fraction of a second, some of their devices woudl generate more power than all the rest on man-made electrical energy on the planet at that time. Of course, the Russian devices were quite involved. They used an explosively pinched inductor (stored energy remains constant as inductance rapidly approaches zero -> current rapidly approaches infinate) to charge a specially shapped copper chamber and then vaporized this huge capacitor in a controlled manner (using TNT). Basically, my understanding is that this second stage was a Marx generator. (Copper vapor filling the spark gaps. Not sure what they used for the large resistors.)

    In any case, you one can generate much more power than a lightning strike without using as much energy. Also, if designed properly, some portion of the mechanical energy from the chemical emplosion gets converted into additional electrical output. A short durration and short distance arc also ends up generating much more of its EM radiation in a frequency range more destructive to aircraft.

    If one were to have the TNT to make an EMP bomb, one could think of much simpler ways to take out jetliners, not all of which would require bypassing airport security. Supposedly Al Qaeda looks at action movies and the internet for ideas, so let's no enumerate the possibilities here. Let's just take it for granted that if someone has 5 or 25 lbs. of TNT, EMP bombs are not the biggest threat the FBI should be looking at.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  108. Minor correction by karlm · · Score: 1

    I meant more power than all other man made electrical power at the time. I didn't mean to imply that I was comparing Watts to Joules.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  109. Re:40 Watts by Technician · · Score: 2

    I just had to dig out the scope and check my claim to back up my 25 watts RMS is bigger than 40 watts Peak claim. Here is the facts. The amplifier is a Pioneer GM120 amplifier. I cranked it up into clipping with a load. I measured the output voltage Peak to Peak with a scope. (Tektronics TD 220 for those interested) The singel ended output clipped at 40 volts Peak to Peak. (clips at + and - 20 volts) That is for an amplifier rated 25 watts into a 4 ohm load at 0.04% THD. To provide this voltage, it uses an inverting switch mode power supply to provide the + and - voltage supplies. To match this in a bridge amplifier, (40 watt in-dash example) the supply in the unit would have to provide over 20 volts so each leg (+ and - speaker lead) swings 10 volts over and under their 10 volt DC rest voltage, or it would need a supply in the deck to supply high current to the output of + and - 10 volts for a bridgable or + and - 20 volts for a single ended output. They don't put that kind of power in-dash. It would fry itself due to lack of proper heatsinks. The Pioneer amplifier swings a full 40 volts peak to peak on it's output. The in-dash unit will drive one lead (-) to ground while the other (+) swings to the supply voltage providing a swing of 24 volts P-P of one speaker lead refrenced to the other (14 volt car power). There is no way the 40 watt in-dash unit can match the 25 watt Pioneer with only a 12-14 volt single ended power supply. Remember that doubling the power into into a load is only 3 db gain. Doubling the voltage increases the power 6 db. (doubling the voltage into a resistor also doubles the current). With that in mind the 25 watt Pioneer is well over twice the power of the 40 watt indash unit into a 4 ohm load. 40 V P-P from the Pioneer is quite a bit more power than the 24 Volt P-P the in-dash unit provides.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  110. Re:40 Watts by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    Interesting.
    I never have brought my scope out and measured the voltage that my amp(Boss REV-1035starts clipping at.
    Maybe I'll go do that at lunch today.
    It's rated 250 RMS @ 4 ohms into two channels @ 0.01% THD, but I think that spec is a little generous. It is possible given the amp's 40A fuse but it would need to be 87% efficient, which I doubt.
    Anybody else have any real rms vs. manufacturer rated RMS measurements they've done?

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  111. Re:offtopic: hmm Karma has changed on /. by cetan · · Score: 2

    I think it's really funny that my comment get's marked off-topic when /. has, on purpose, not provided a place where it would ever be on-topic.

    Isn't development supposed to make something LESS lame over time? Why does /. shoot itself in the foot so often?

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!