Slashdot Mirror


Light-Emitting Polymer Displays

BlackSol writes "Yahoo is covering a very cool piece on the development of roll-up screens. Possible uses from home televisions, to tele-watches, and military uses such as real-time satalite fed maps in the field."

271 comments

  1. Multi-layer tv? by Ignavus+Anonymous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this open the possibility for 3D tv using multiple transparant layers?

    Or perhaps the multi-channel edition where you have a book with 100 pages: every page is another chanel. Nice and convenient during the commecial breaks :)

    --

    --

    1. Re:Multi-layer tv? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why go through the extra expense and trouble of having 100 pages of channels when you could just have one page and change channels by pressing a button?

    2. Re:Multi-layer tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to Euro-trash to reinvent the wheel. This stuff was done by HP (or one of the other computer makers) in the USA a couple of years ago, but there is a problem with the technology. The LEPs don't last all that long. Blue was the shortest life span, the company could literally print these out like you print a document.

    3. Re:Multi-layer tv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use paper? it is light, cheap and the image lasts for hundreds/thousands of years.

    4. Re:Multi-layer tv? by ShadeARG · · Score: 1

      100 pages does seem a bit excessive, but one extra page would be nice. You could change channels on your virtual screen, and then fade out your physical screen and sync it back up to the the virtual to make for some nice fade-ins.

      But seriously, if you stack up let's say about a centimeter worth of these pages, then you would be able to look around the "physical" page and see all the remaining pages in a true 3D representation. Using this innovation, you could play real 3D games, not just games drawn out to appear 3D on a 2D screen.

  2. Yahoo doesn't cover stories... by ellisDtrails · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... Reuters does. How about some editorial?
    -- ellis D. trails

    1. Re:Yahoo doesn't cover stories... by ellisDtrails · · Score: 0

      Offtopic?
      "Yahoo is covering a very cool piece on the development of roll-up screens..."
      This is not true.
      The story comes from Reuters.
      Yahoo doesn't "cover" stories. The opening text of the story is misleading as usual because of a lack of editorial.

      -- ellis D. trails

  3. YEY by osirisnoche · · Score: 0

    Cool, this could have some interesting applications.

    --
    I'm married to a great woman, I have no kids, and I like billy goats, you gotta problem with that?
  4. such a good idea? by tps12 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this technology sounds cool; after all, with a light-emitting display, you could light a room and browse the web with the same piece of equipment. However, I question whether it is a good idea from a safety perspective. I foresee people being blinded by these things. Any thoughts?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:such a good idea? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      How? Do you even have the faintest idea of what can be harmfull to the human eye? This type of display just emits light on the visible spectrum. Period. No high-intensity, no coherent (as in laser) light...just plain old light. So now explain to me how this could blind a person.

      Damn, I think I just fed a troll...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:such a good idea? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Depends on type of light and all, he may have been thinking of CRTs which can cause serious eye strain, but that is (mostly?) due to the beam scanning way in which they work rather then the nature of the light itself.

      LCDs should not have this problem, but then again it all depends on how crisp and clear they are, no artifical display to date has the same resolution as Real Life(tm)

    3. Re:such a good idea? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      I think this technology sounds cool; after all, with a light-emitting display, you could light a room and browse the web with the same piece of equipment. However, I question whether it is a good idea from a safety perspective. I foresee people being blinded by these things. Any thoughts?

      I think since it can be printed on clear plastic there is a good chance to replace fluorescent light tube or just place these in powerline-tethered connected squares across the ceiling and do away with single-point light sources entirely.

      I personally think that given the nature of this light emitter it would make a fantastic wall-trim light. Print out a long strip, which is stuck to the floor trim on the wall (with a painted over thin metal conducting strip at one end to make the circuit. Just trim and glue to end of the strip to the final conducting spot and plug in to light (but a built-in deal would be more professional looking).

      Then when going to another room during the night you'd always have a lighted pathway between the rooms.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  5. 20 Foot screen by walker2030 · · Score: 0

    i would love to put this on my wall and make a 20 foot screen to watch my movies on

    --
    Got Athlon?
    1. Re:20 Foot screen by The+Monster · · Score: 2

      I've been waiting for this technology since I saw Arnold Schwarzenegger's apartment on Mars in Total Recall. This is what convergence is all about, and it's why BG started buying up the rights to digital reproductions of art works a few years back.

      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  6. Here's a good idea by HiQ · · Score: 4, Funny

    "People are talking about weaving displays into clothing. Will there ever be a mass market for that? I doubt it. But it will probably be seized on by someone."
    Well, as long as it's a touch screen, I'm happy :)
    {and slowly a song from the Who sets in: See me, feel me, touch me...}

    1. Re:Here's a good idea by The+Creator · · Score: 1
      Well, as long as it's a touch screen, I'm happy :)

      Or stupid teletubby(tm) outfits.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
  7. woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you say Big screen home theater.. without a projector?

  8. Holy Toledo Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I could wrap my pr0n around me......

  9. More info anyone? by Zordok · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's their website: http://www.cdtltd.co.uk/

    I wonder if these can get high enough res. to be useful for laptop/handheld displays? That would sure be handy...

    -Zordok

    1. Re:More info anyone? by jethro200 · · Score: 1

      i'm guessing that they will be - if they are as serious as the story makes it seem about how soon the roll-up TVs are coming out, and about how well they are predicted to do, they will have to have pretty decent resolution for anybody to buy one, especially after the dawn of HDTV.

  10. and then came... by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    the obnoxious ceareal box animations...

    1. Re:and then came... by Enigma23 · · Score: 1


      "the obnoxious ceareal box animations..."

      Haven't we already seen this in "Minority Report"?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  11. The uses.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Funny

    There are many uses for this in areas with political instability. Now instead of having to go through the problem of making new flags and banners every time an area changes hands, you can just have one of these up each flag pole, and just change the image as the situation warrents. I can see applications for this on the west bank / parts of Africa already.

    1. Re:The uses.... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      then would simply h4x0ring the flag win the battle?

    2. Re:The uses.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: ACs will be ignored.

      Awwwww... you're IGNORING me. You don't know how much that hurts.

    3. Re:The uses.... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Irak could use it. At the flip of the switch it would turn into war colors and at the first sign of any americans turn white again.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    4. Re:The uses.... by tubs · · Score: 1

      Or how about putting it all over the walls of your house?

      No more decorating! Hurrah!

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    5. Re:The uses.... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      You must be the same guy that posted the article. Irak and satalite, together at last.

      http://www.somethingawful.com/~jeffk

  12. billboards by des09 · · Score: 1

    I am having visions of minority reports billboards, then again, perhaps not. What a cracker target that would be for defacing.

    when are the prices on screens going to drop radicaly? If these are printed wouldn't theey be much cheaper to produce?

    --
    .sigless since 2003
    1. Re:billboards by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      You still have to feed data to each pixel.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  13. The cost of innovation by LaserBeams · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Roll-up televisions will allow viewers of the future to flip their sets out of sight like projector screens and will come with a similar price tag to bulkier boxes."

    Does anyone else find this a little silly? The plastic film costs maybe a few dollars, the printing process probably no more than $25 for a moderately sized set, and then another $50 (retail) for an acceptable interface/controller module.

    Alright, who wants to pay $1000 for a 48" screen that probably cost almost exactly the same to make as a 12" screen (for only $150)?

    --
    Karma: \Kar"ma\, n. [Skr.] (Buddhism) One's acts considered as fixing one's lot in the future existence.
    1. Re:The cost of innovation by LaserBeams · · Score: 1

      And further... I see this happening in a lot of newer technologies. You pay significantly more for something that is actually only a minor tweak as far as engineering is concerned.

      I know they need to be made profitable, but marketing these days is getting ludicrous. Some people would only want a 12" screen, some would only want a 80" screen, but they'd be used for basically the same purpose, and would really have no differing value. So why should one person be forced to pay for mocha-triple-chocolate-maraschino-creme-de-la-crem e lattes for the entire marketing division for a year?

      I could only see realistic price differences in regards to resolution.

      --
      Karma: \Kar"ma\, n. [Skr.] (Buddhism) One's acts considered as fixing one's lot in the future existence.
    2. Re:The cost of innovation by NodeZero · · Score: 1

      I can understand a little why prices might be high (not extremely high) but there is a need tp make a profit. I don't know how much research and development went into this technology but that needs to be considered as well. All in all though, a lot of companys take it too far and become greedy. Why sell the super thin rollup tv with awesome resolution (that only costs.. lets say $200 to make) for $500 when they can sell it for $1500?

      --
      - "My name is Legion, for we are many" -Mark 5:9
    3. Re:The cost of innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because all a company has to do to recoup its RESEARCH investment is sell the thing at $5 more than it costs to build it.

    4. Re:The cost of innovation by plover · · Score: 2
      You're missing a basic but important point in manufacturing arrays of electronic components: Size Matters.

      Given that manufacturing is never 100% perfect, that means some (hopefully small) percentage of pixels will be defective. When you're talking about a 2.5" camcorder display with 240 x 180 pixels, if .0001% of pixels are faulty, that means one out of every 23 screens will have a bad pixel. If you then translate that into a 17" computer monitor with 1600 x 1200 pixels, then every monitor will have two bad pixels, on average. And if you translate that to a 48" screen with 4600 x 3400 pixels, each screen will have 16 bad pixels.

      --
      John
    5. Re:The cost of innovation by sysadmn · · Score: 2

      Wow, they're at least 18 months from having a commercially viable process, and you already know how much it's going to cost them to make it. That's pretty impressive.
      Given that so much about this is new (substrate, chemistry, packaging), I'd bet it will be years before they get yields like the (mature) technologies today. Low yields, need to pay for R&D, and warranty costs (no historical data, higher incidence of claims) all drive the price up.
      Besides, most consumers don't care what an item cost the manufacturer to make. They compare it's price to the cost of substitutes. If this has a price similar to the traditional alternative, people will consider it.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    6. Re:The cost of innovation by dubiousmike · · Score: 1
      Size Matters.

      You chicks are all the same.

    7. Re:The cost of innovation by Eccles · · Score: 1

      And if you translate that to a 48" screen with 4600 x 3400 pixels, each screen will have 16 bad pixels.

      Yes, but as the screen resolution increases, a bad pixel matters less. I'll happily take such a screen with hundreds of bad pixels, as long as they're not clustered too closely.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:The cost of innovation by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Wow, they're at least 18 months from having a commercially viable process, and you already know how much it's going to cost them to make it. That's pretty impressive.
      Given that so much about this is new (substrate, chemistry, packaging), I'd bet it will be years before they get yields like the (mature) technologies today. Low yields, need to pay for R&D, and warranty costs (no historical data, higher incidence of claims) all drive the price up.


      Umm, printing proccess, they are likely just working on tweaking the chemistry of it all, but printing dyes is printing dyes once you have your dyes and materials down, and there is /no/ reason to suspect /any/ flaws in the proccess. Humans have a fair bit of knowledge in how to print things. :-D

  14. Adaptive Camo, anyone? by CommieLib · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Weave this bad boy into a full body suit, mount micro cameras throughout, project the image seen behind.

    Voila! Predator. From twenty feet or so, anyway.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by roadkill999 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Great idea. Do they ship to Afganistan?

    2. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by Myco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, no. Well, it depends how good of camo you're talking about. What I'd like to believe is that technology like this can create a true "stealth suit" which creates a duplicate image of whatever's on the other side, effectively making the wearer invisible. But keep in mind, this is still a 2D display and you can't project a different image to viewers at different viewing angles. Not yet, anyway. Maybe eventually. The other big obstacle to this approach (microcameras, etc.) is that the shape of the suit would change as the wearer moves. So you need unprecedentedly high-res, low-latency motion tracking for every point on the wearer's body.

    3. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The main problem with this is that you would have to blend in from all angles....

      If you were just worried about the frontal side or if you were in a very repeating field of grass or something similarly "bland" then there would be greater effect. Probably would be better than regular camo.

      But a man standing up in clearing is just as likely to be seen if he is projecting his own background as if he were wearing camo.

      And lets not forget shadows....

      Now if you wanted to have camo that would determine a good set of colors to be based on the surrounding average colors... THAT is probably easy and probably even better than trying to project the exact image of what is around you.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    4. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      Score:4, Interesting?
      more like funny.
      how the hell can you match up what someone is seeing behind you? you would need the perfect distance and angle up and downwards for this to work. think about it. and if theres two people it would only work for one of them. youd need hundreds or maybe thousands of cameras all over the suit with a supercomputer built in to figure out the angles and distance the person is away from you. then you got the problem of your arms and legs etc not being a flat surface. all of that would need to be calculated to make the image proper to the viewer. AND THIS WOULD ONLY WORK FOR ONE PERSON LOOKING AT YOU. add a second person and the whole idea is dead.
      it just wouldnt work. not in the next 20 or so years anyways

    5. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Umm...NO....

      Adaptive camouflage needs to change the spectrum of light *reflected* from the object being concealed. An emissive display such as this one wouldn't work so good in say...the dark! (Unless you want to light up so they know where to point the guns...)

    6. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you hide the cameras? You'd need so many of them that they'd be noticeable.

    7. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I kind of expected to get a funny mod on this. I have, however, seen some amazing demos of camouflage implemented simply by lighting up a vehicle on a ridge to blend in with the sky.

      True invisibility can only really come, IMHO, with true refraction, i.e., bending the exact light that has bounced off the background around the object. Anything else is going to have some kind of detectable artifact. What this kind of implementation could do really well, however, is break up the outlines that compose the visual artifact that our brains resolve as a human being / tank / helicopter.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    8. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by brad3378 · · Score: 2

      > Weave this bad boy into a full body suit, mount micro cameras throughout, project the image seen behind.

      No way man!
      Mine is gonna show 6-Pack Abs. ;-)

      --

    9. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're expecting it to make someone completely invisible, forget it - it's not gonna happen in our lifetimes. But, if they use light sensors and an array of cameras to interpolate the best colors on each side of the person or thing wearing it, it might be a little more like a chameleon, which changes only its color to blend in better. A blurred representation of the colors and a dimming effect for low light situations (or automatic shut-off when the surroundings are dark) could produce an improvement over current camouflage technology. It would take a while to develop it... and billions of $$$ from Uncle Sam, to make it feasible. I think the bugs could eventually be worked out.

    10. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by paulcammish · · Score: 1
      Voila! Predator. From twenty feet or so, anyway.

      Or maybe Ghost In The Shell, anyone?

      Just need the 'hot cyborg chick' to wear it - that might take some time...

      Google seems to be working well as the self aware AI, tho... Google sets is just scary...

      At current rates, im going for September next year before it decides to run off and hides somewhere when it gets bored of searching for things...

    11. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by KrancHammer · · Score: 1



      Despite all the people talking about viewing angles and how impossible it would be to duplicate the background for every potential viewer, adaptive camo of this type is possible, because you don't need to perfectly duplicate the background. Camo is truly effective only if the person not wanting to be seen is still. Gillie suits, modern "splotch" design camouflage uniforms and the like are perfectly useless if you are moving, because the number one thing that catches the human eye is movement. All the adaptive part of the camo would do is make the camouflage that much more effective, if it could generally replicate the color and shading of whatever the person wearing the suit was lying in.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    12. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by edrugtrader · · Score: 1, Troll

      they already do this with some tanks that DO adapt to view angle. if i told you more i would have to kill you.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    13. Re:Adaptive Camo, anyone? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember The Tick?

      There was a bad guy on there that had a suit like this, but I can't remember much about it. Just this:
      (super hero lifting something heavy voice) "Can't....do....plaid!"

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  15. Wrinkles by tsa · · Score: 1

    I think roll-up TV (or a rollup notebook!) is a very nice gimmick, but what I'm always afraid of is that after a few days wrinkles appear, which will be quite difficult to remove. Does anyone know if this problem is addressed by researchers?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  16. Applications by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Salesperson - We have this lovely floral design...

    Spork - Digital.

    Salesperson - This one comes in great pastel colors.

    Spork - Digital.

    Salesperson - Damn it! The morons in electronics get the commisions for digital wallpaper! Buy the damn Pastel!

    Spork backs slowly away.

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  17. Cheater's Heaven by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Make a pair of pants out of this stuff, and you can have the pants flash cliff-notes during exams.

    Well, I am scrapping plans for #2 Linux pencils to focus on the pants now.

  18. Paper maps can be good, too by dave_mcmillen · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . military uses such as real-time satellite fed maps in the field.

    Better make sure those satellite connections are really secure:

    "All right, men, the enemy stronghold is dead ahead. Charge!"

    [ten minutes later] "Uh, Sarge, we must have gotten turned around somehow, now it's directly behind us."

    [fifteen minutes later] "Now it's saying we're in South-Central L.A. Stick together, men."

    1. Re:Paper maps can be good, too by UID30 · · Score: 1

      1 word ... BSOD

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:Paper maps can be good, too by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 2

      How about unrolling giant tv screens on the battlefield, and then showing videos of trucks and men moving by. Then the enemy can shoot at the tv images of soldiers and knock them out one by one. Great decoy.

  19. A new use.. by iONiUM · · Score: 1

    roll-up screens
    For my fruit roll ups? It's already got red!

  20. eh...uber indeglo? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    fuck that d00d, gimmie some movie-poster sized versions of that stuff to tack on my wall. or maybe i could stick some underneath my partially transparent tibook's keyboard! then i could finally see the damn keys in the dark... displaying porn on my keyboard would be nifty though :)

    probably a cheaper solution....they have indeglo watches...they have indeglo "nightlights....do they make poster-sized versions of the stuff? or is there a maximum size as to how larger it gets before you can't run current safely across the stuff (some sort of gas mixture i would assume)

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:eh...uber indeglo? by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Look in digikey. It's called electrolumonescent plastic. You can buy it in 12" square sheets, and you can build the inverter for ~$10 worth of parts.
      The chip that drives the inverter is the MC33441 , and the datasheet tells you everything you need to know to build what you just described. The chip is tiny! I have some right here, and I can fit 4 of them on a dime. You shouldn't have any trouble squeezing it under your keyboard. (Good luck soldering to it though :)

    2. Re:eh...uber indeglo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy small bottles of glow in the dark paint at hobby stores. Just put a small coat (so you can still see through it) on each key, and charge it up :)

  21. Philips Research page on flex displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Philips Research page on flex displays by jdclucidly · · Score: 1

      That is actually incorrect.

      The Yahoo! article is discussing Light Emitting Plastics/Polymers, not Flexible LCD. I don't see a page on Philips Research that discusses the current state of their research in to this area.

  22. Lifetime? by 216pi · · Score: 2, Informative

    according to this (rather old (2001)) paper, lifetime of polymer dislpays is around 10.000 hours against usual TFTs living around 50.000 hours.

    Let's assume they doubled it since 2001, its 20.000 hours.

    Unless they produce them for the half of the costs of usual TFTs, I wouldn't like to throw away my TV every 2 1/3 years...

    1. Re:Lifetime? by David+Off · · Score: 1

      The challenge is to reach 100,000 hours for TV use (this is the standard for CRTs). There was an article on BBC Click Online saying they hoped to reach this target in 5 years.

    2. Re:Lifetime? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Dude, turn off the set. If you spend 24/7 watching TV you should really consider spending any loose change you've got on a life ;-)

      Honestly though, I've got a digital projector I use to watch movies and TV and the rated lamp life is 1000 hours. I've owned it for 3 years and have about 600 hours on the lamp. Of course, the lamp is $500 so I don't leave it on just to keep me company while I do other things.

      10,000 hours is a lot of TV watching, IMHO.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  23. One step closer to stealth camo by absterge · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is an array of miniscule cameras interwoven with the display layers to pass image ~through a body. Might work real well for flat, static things, like buildings. Less well for Predator and Snake, but workable.

    --
    Try my nuts to your fist style!
  24. I think by af_robot · · Score: 2, Funny

    that most geeks being blinded by doing some other thing... :)

  25. New Wave Flight Charts? by Hoskald · · Score: 1

    How difficult would it be to use this tech to make an interactive flight chart? Add in the GPS and you have a single chart for all flights as well as a moving map! This would save a lot of weight and clutter in the cockpit as well help streamline the cockpit management chores...landing? just touch the destination airport and suddenly you have a large scale approach chart! No more flipping through the flippin' book while trying to set up the approach!!

    Got get my hands on some of this stuff!

    --
    For the sake of Peace, the Sword.
  26. Rollup laptop? by ortholattice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just add a roll-up keyboard and you almost have one. Not sure about the mouse or CPU...

    1. Re:Rollup laptop? by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Too hastily, the previous poster (yours truly) wrote:

      Just add a roll-up keyboard and you almost have one. Not sure about the mouse or CPU...

      Of course, the CPU would be IBM's Linux wristwatch.

    2. Re:Rollup laptop? by crazymennonite · · Score: 1

      Hey, just make it a touch screen, but make sure you require the use of certified cleaning material. You think printer companies make a ton on ink....

    3. Re:Rollup laptop? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Transmeta should switch to designing roll-up processors for roll-up laptops.

    4. Re:Rollup laptop? by gaudior · · Score: 2

      Add touchscreen, or data glove tech, and you don't need a mouse either.

  27. A new media for X10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap....now I am going to be walking down the street and have X10 flashing pop-ups on my shirt.

  28. Cell Phones by rob_hines · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever seen Earth: Final Confilct. Admittedly, a pretty lame, soap-opera-ish show, but one of the tings I liked was the technology. How about a flexible screen that rolls up in an expandible phone. Like the globals they use on EFC. Hmm, specs for a global: Magnesium frame Dual Mode, supporting GSM, or any 3G 4 inch roll-up touch screen PalmOS 5x 32M RAM Intel X-Scale 400Mhz SD slot Integrated Bluetooth Integrated Camera That would be the last phone I bought...

    --

    ----

    Rob.
    ---
    "Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
  29. hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    can someone post some information on these satalites mentioned in the article.. sounds interesting.

  30. Now I can... by daemones · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...hide interactive porn in my physics textbook just like I could comic books. Thanks science!

    --
    Alas, Babylon.
  31. I've seen this story a long time ago. by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

    I've read about this technology a long time ago. It was hyped to be the technology to replace LCD monitors in the near future. Now it's the near future, and LCD monitors are still around, and still expensive! But how cool would it be to roll up your 27" monitor and take it to your LAN party?

    1. Re:I've seen this story a long time ago. by David+Off · · Score: 1

      There are some mobile phones coming out this year with Polymer screens. The display is really really sharp on them. Ok the Telco's wet dream of everyone watching pay per view movies on their phone handsets over GPRS is daft but the display clarity really blew me away, you can read them from any angle too. Which may not be good for computers but is great for TVs.

      Oh they are currently using glass rather than plastic so they will break if you try to roll them.

  32. How about Active Camoflage? by farrellj · · Score: 2

    No need to have separate Desert/Jungle Camo suites, just turn a dial, and it becomes the one you need. Or, if the power requirements are to much for a personal version us it on buildings, vehicles, tents, etc.

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:How about Active Camoflage? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      Except that the 'Light Emitting' bit might be a dead giveaway, especially in low light.

      HH
      --

    2. Re:How about Active Camoflage? by SignoffTheSourcerer · · Score: 1

      Well, they are transmissive, not reflective displays, so i think this might be a problem. And hope something doesn't go wrong with it, you wouldn't want to stick out glowing bright green in the dark.

      --
      Ordo Militum Unix.
    3. Re:How about Active Camoflage? by Choco-man · · Score: 1

      battelle has been working on this for some time. the problem lies with durability. battle conditions aren't exactly a sterile, soft environment. what happens when you get rained on or scratch the suit on the underbrush you're crawling through, or if a bullet hits you and breaks the circuit?
      adaptive camo is only useful if you can actually use it. current tech restricts usage of it to unrealistic lab conditions. of course it will certainly improve with time, but it's not ready for primetime quite yet.

    4. Re:How about Active Camoflage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desert/Jungle camo suites? What is that, like an office space with desert or jungle decor?

      What I want is a suit made of this stuff so that I *never* have to change my clothes, and thusly never have to shower, just like the majority of linux users. I simply press and button and it looks like I'm wearing completely new clothes.

    5. Re:How about Active Camoflage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And hope something doesn't go wrong with it, you wouldn't want to stick out glowing bright green in the dark.

      Gives "blue screen of death" a whole new meaning.

  33. Many interesting applications... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...for this technology.

    Cheap HUDs for autos (Heads Up Display) and bike helmets is an obvious application.

    Televisions everywhere. (Okay, this could really suck; who wants to see ads for Cheer everywhere you go.)

    And the big one: Wrap-around, full vision wearble displays. Granted, I'm stretching here, but one can dream, eh?

    If this technology really works well, it could solve a great many problems associated with computer displays (size, heat generation, cost, etc.)

    Lot's of really cool technology coming soon, makes the current despond somewhat more tolerable.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:Many interesting applications... by twisted_pickle · · Score: 1
      If this technology really works well, it could solve a great many problems associated with computer displays (size, heat generation, cost, etc.)

      I'd like to see some kind of "sticker" or something that you can put in your glasses to use as a HUD. Something that doesn't make you look like a freak.

      --
      4-bit adder: A snake made of 1's and 0's
    2. Re:Many interesting applications... by web_angel_tr · · Score: 1
      If this technology really works well, it could solve a great many problems associated with computer displays (size, heat generation, cost, etc.)

      I think not!!! Probably it will cost a lot more than other technologies and even if one can make it cheaper then everything else on the market you could probably not use it becourse of a to low refresh frequency.

      --
      There is no such thing as gravity. The Earth just sucks.
    3. Re:Many interesting applications... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2


      Well, no new technology starts out mature just as full grown chickens don't come out of an egg. (Oy, that's a crappy analogy.) Give the technology time to mature and then see what it can do. I don't know about you, but when it comes to technology I'm becoming more and more careful about either using or implying the superlative.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    4. Re:Many interesting applications... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Woo, funny picture. I'm not wearing that in public (or in front of the cat either.) The wearable displays have gotten much better thought over a short period of time and are improving rapidly. IMO, portable/wearable computers aren't all that useful until all the H.I. factors have been successfully challenged and beaten; i.e., usable yet unobtrusive. That includes both output _and_ input. Getting a decent keyboard or other input device might be even more challenging than the display.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  34. Affordable CAVE type system? by cordsie · · Score: 0

    Imagine wallpapering your room with this stuff and hooking it into some kind of CAVE type engine. Affordable holodeck.

  35. Not just for computer screens... by altgrr · · Score: 1

    ...an article in Computer Shopper recently reported that the development could, were the cost of production to decrease sufficiently, result in animated displays being produced and used in things like product packaging - but who really wants animated cornflakes?

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    1. Re:Not just for computer screens... by zebs · · Score: 1

      Could just imagine going to a supermarket and seeting all the animated packagings. I think a lot of people would find it highly confusing/annoying.

      Could be interesting if you're tripped out on drugs or something.

  36. apparel by khold · · Score: 1

    Thats great, forget pr0n movies when you can order a pr0n movie t-shirt, great for watching pr0n on the go!

    --
    rm -rf sig
  37. Welcome to the Diamond Age by Myco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No mass-market for these screens on clothing? Hmm. Show of hands, who has read Niel Stephenson's _The Diamond Age_, with its vision of a future immersed in nanotechnology, and especially in a pervasive atmosphere of ever-changing displays (mostly ads) on damn near every surface.

    Imagine seeing a cityscape where every inch of every skyscraper is a billboard. Sound far-fetched? Read the article -- this is about printing televisions. These things are going to be cheap. Look at the end result of a technology such as the printing press becoming widely available -- we now have reams of printed matter everywhere we look. An active display technology that is so convenient to use and cheap to produce has just as much potential, if not more, for becoming pervasive and used everywhere.

    I think the biggest question for widespread use of these things, on a commodity level rather than an appliance level (toilet paper, not PDAs), is power. I don't think anything on the market today is truly a satisfactory answer to the question of how to power ubiquitous flexible displays like these, but we're close. See a very recent slashdot post (no link, so lazy...) about flexible solar cells being developed. Also, there is an incredible push for greatly improved battery technology, and great steps are being made there.

    Ultimately, there will be two kinds of uses for this technology. The first one we'll see will be the sort that is more or less permanently installed, and can therefore be plugged into the wall all or some of the time. Even the skyscraper-as-television fits into this category. But at some point you'll need batteries or solar cells or some other power source (some wacky nanotech?) to power more "disposable" applications like animated handbills, greeting cards, movie posters, etc.

    End result: advertising is about to get a lot more annoying. Let's just hope they haven't got paper-thin speakers to go with this.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first one we'll see will be the sort that is more or less permanently installed, and can therefore be plugged into the wall all or some of the time.

      That's what I want. I mean, ActiveDesktop is cool, and all, and I've got webcams and wether reports and traffic cameras and the like on my desktop, but at any given moment maybe 90% of my screen is covered with windows. And if I were to hook up a third monitor, I'd want to use it as more desktop space, not as a permanent "information poster."

      But, if I could have a 3x2 foot "poster" hanging on the wall of my office, plugged into the USB port on the computer, and feed data to it, then that'd be great. I could put up webcams, stock tickers, anything that'd be interesting to see but not important enough to keep in a foreground window.

      It'd be great to be able to simply glance up and say "ugh, traffic's getting bad, I'd better head home soon."

      So, where do I sign up?

    2. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must...regain...control...of...brain.

    3. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest question for widespread use of these things, on a commodity level rather than an appliance level (toilet paper, not PDAs)

      Toilet paper! I could wipe my ass with that damn Dell kid:
      "Dude, you're getting my feces! **wipe wipe**

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by Myco · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person on Earth who has not seen this ad campaign? I also never saw the "Wazaap" commercials, except when I saw people looking at them on Adcritic or whatever. The things that happen when you download all your TV shows rather than watching them on the set. Quick, somebody sue me.

    5. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by jafac · · Score: 2

      aw - if these things were everywhere like that - spouting ads, then I have a formula to counter it:

      hacking+pr0n=no more ads! :)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

      Imagine being able to ... ...add a "window" into any cube. ...have a real time weather map. ...have a real time network map. ...have signs and placards in public places that change language every 10 seconds... or at the push of a button. ...as a teenager, have several poster in your room that immediately change as soon as your door is opened and don't change back until you hit a hidden button ...cubes with walls made out of this material could be in whatever internal color scheme/desktop theme you wanted and you could "hang pictures" on your "walls" that were nothing more than graphics files complete with frames. You could then hotel into any cube and get your pictures/home office effect/whatever. ...the police could change speed limits like in the Dukes of Hazard but easier. ...Walmart could change the prices of their merchandise without that singing smiley face guy. ...The seat back in front of you on a plane could be a full sized monitor for your ultra-personal computer. ...Keyboards that change character mappings and actually show the new characters. ...Harry Potter -esq pictures that move. ...Debit/Gift cards that show their running balance. ...Wall phones like in Spaceballs ...Don't repaint the inside of your house..... just change its color from the computer. ...Large Screen TV? Try the wall over here... no over there... no...that picture. ...Can you say psychadelic bed sheets?

      Ok... I'm done for now...

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    7. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i remember correctly, the article you mention about the flexible solar cells was talking about this same technology! in short, light emitting polymers generate electricity when light is shone on them; they emit light when electricity is passed through them.

    8. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by jareth780 · · Score: 1

      I think the most practical use for these screens is as telescreens in obscure and difficult-to-reach places, like the inside of toilet-seats. That way when I'm taking a whiz my girlfriend can still reach me.

      "I told you never to call me on this wall! This is an unlisted wall." - President Skroob, Spaceballs(1987)

    9. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by Shimatta1 · · Score: 1

      "I think the biggest question for widespread use of these things...is power."

      I can just see it now...the new, guaranteed weight loss jogging suit.

      It'll display whatever you want, as long as you keep pumping those generators on the heels of your shoes. Slow down or stop for too long, and it shuts off and goes transparent. How's _that_ for incentive to keep moving? ^_^

    10. Re:Welcome to the Diamond Age by Myco · · Score: 1

      No, this was one less than a week ago about solar cells made of lots of tiny spheres embedded in an aluminum sheet.

  38. Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I doubt that a roll-up tv screen or monitor will ever be practical. Firstly, every pixel will have to be driven and that requires an electical connection. A 1024 X 768 will require atleast 786,433 electical contections, and wires made of metal. I expect serious problems with metal-fatigue induced conductor fractures, for roll-up displays. I'll admit that the ribbon cable inside a printer goes through a lot but it doesn't have a quarter of a million conductors either.
    This has a lot of cool potential applications, but roll-up displayed will not be marketable

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Myco · · Score: 2
      Do the conductors have to be metal? They could ultimately be made of something more resistant to mechanical fatigue. Buckytubes spring readily to mind, though they've still got some R&D to be done before they're practical for an application such as this.

      I think you're underestimating materials science here. There have got to be good solutions to something as simple as metal fatigue. High redundancy, fancy lattice structures, exotic semiconductors or conductive polymers or ceramics, I don't know... something.

      Sorry, I don't like wet blankets on cool ideas. Nothing personal. :)

    2. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by sirsex · · Score: 0

      Maybe we can get Bluetooth in every pixel!!

    3. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by The+Creator · · Score: 4, Informative
      A 1024 X 768 will require atleast 786,433 electical contections

      Actually the minimum is not x*y it's x+y(well 3x+y anyway, or better x+3y for rgb). If you imagine all other contions being set to high impedance. One pair at a time used to illuminate a pixel and a scanning techinque used. That only makes it 3328 connections.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    4. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by DavidYaw · · Score: 1

      3/4 million? not hardly. Don't forget, you don't have to light up all the elements, you just have to fool the human eye into thinking you've lit up all the elements. For arrays of lights, one very common wiring method is row-anode, column-cathode. The column inputs are set for that row, and the row input is strobed. Do this 46,080 times a second, and you've got your 1024x768 at 60 Hz. One conductor per row and column = 1792 conductors, not 3/4 million.

    5. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by spacefrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Metal? Metal you say?

      Conductive Polymers should solve that whole problem pretty well.

    6. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by CanadaDave · · Score: 2

      The metal will roll up fine. It is so thin that it is like paper. As long as the radius of the roll is not too small it will be fine.

    7. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      I think it could be fewer than x+3y if more complex logic can be built into the display somehow and if it can handle high bandwidth - VGA and DVI connections are 15 or fewer pins. There are a myriad ways to count all this.

    8. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Morky · · Score: 1

      "Man will never fly to the moon."
      - Clive Rodney Fark, 1959

      "Man will never fly to the moon without a rocket."
      - Clive Rodney Fark, 1971

    9. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Creepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The original logic should be 2359296 connections, one each for RGB and 1024x768.

      A little more on this subject...

      If you use scanlines, you could get away with a single wire carrying a signal (or a signal and power if power is being distributed over the same wire) and decode the signal at each pixel and distribute power (for intensities) at the contact point into the RGB plastics. That would reduce your calculation down to... 1792 connections (x+y) since some decoding is happening at the contact points.

      The disadvantage is you'd need decoder logic for every pixel, but this may be easier and more producable than individual wires. If the decoders were good enough, you could reduce the wires further by having 4 pixels decoded for each wire (providing the wire meets at a single contact point for the four pixels. A four pixel connection point without scanlines reduces the number of wires to 196608 for continuous updates (such as the original example) and with scanlines you halve the values in each direction ending with 896 wires (512+384).

      Fast scan conversion with long "burn" times would likely not be noticable (update takes a fraction of the "on screen" time - probably less noticable than a TV), and if some memory is available for each pixel and a clock is used, one could double buffer the display, and have a near 0 update time.

      I'm sure there are other possibilities. My main point is that wiring isn't the only option for each pixel or pixel component (RG or B), as long as there is enough space to stick in a small amount of circuitry to do some decoding at the end.

    10. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Creepy · · Score: 1

      You're not separating your RGB, and LEP has separate R,G, and B components (like colored LED displays). Increase that timing by 3 times as much or increase the number of conductors to 1024+(768*3)=3328, assuming you're passing the RGB on the horizontal with vertical scanlines (pass goes left to right or right to left, unlike your TV's up and down - for up and down, it's 1024*3+768=3840 conductors).

      Still, much less than 3/4 of a million :)

    11. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Oops - I meant LCD displays.

      At least I didn't say LSD displays :)

    12. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets get serious by CSZeus · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, most people claimed that PC's would never happen due to the immense size requirements for Vacuum tubes. Then stuff got smaller and more 'flexible'...

  39. Animated T-shirts anyone? by Te1waz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I'd like one of a Penguin stomping on MS HQ...

    Better still, if the material could be made thin enough and safe to implant under the skin you could have animated tattoos you could reprogram at will.
    (I'd go for a penguin stomping on MS HQ again)

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
    1. Re:Animated T-shirts anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have Animated flexible Linux lamps made from a similar technology now. www.exoticlights.com
      Follow the link for Linux Lamps. We are working on getting them on shirts and keeping them working for long periods of time. It isnt there yet but it will be soon.

  40. Minority Report by efedora · · Score: 1

    So that's where they got those cereal boxes in Minority Report.

  41. Printing Circuits by icb1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the other pretty cool technologies being developed by the guys at Plastic Logic (a spin off company created by the same people from Cambridge University who formed CDT) is the ability to create full electronic devices by using an inkjet printer loaded with a cartridge of these conductive polymers. It would be pretty cool to be able to see a useful device on a web page, download the circuit, print it out of your inkjet and then have the working device straight away.

    1. Re:Printing Circuits by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. seems like the right time to me to completely throw that intellectual property concept in the waste basket. I mean, when hardware gets as copyable as software....

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  42. Definitely cool by gwizah · · Score: 1

    This LEP screen are definitely cool to look at, but how does this affect the desktop display market? If we are talking about fast-moving tv quality images, Then a desktop monitor made from a LEP can't be far behind.

    --

    There is no spork.
  43. Refresh Rate? by Slothrop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't seem to find anything about what kind of refresh speeds they can get from this, or energy consumption. Has anyone seen any current figures released by these people?

    Regardless of how cool this could be, it'll be a dud unless it makes laptops last longer and has at least equal moving image quality compared with LCD screens.

    1. Re:Refresh Rate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert (yet) but I understand that the energy consumption on these things is really good. Quantum efficiencies are as high as 1-2%. LEPs are emissive whereas LEDs require a backlight. Furthermore LEDs polarise the backlight so you throw away half your intensity straight away. LEPs have no viewing angle problems either, of course.

    2. Re:Refresh Rate? by bedessen · · Score: 2

      I don't think this technology is meant to compete with high quality LCDs. It's meant to compete where cost is the biggest issue. They are not nearly as concerned with resolution, refresh rate, or lifetime as they are with cost. The goal is to produce a cheap process which can be integrated with current manufacturing methods used to create packaging. The holy grail of this field is to be able to produce an entire system (display complete with driver, logic, memory, power source) in this process, using high volume, nonprecision techniques. I wouldn't expect to see this in a laptop, it's a different market.

      Think flashing Doritos bags, cereal boxes with animated cartoons, etc. There's a lot of money to be made by calling attention to your product amongst a number of similar looking products. Just look at the boxes of kids' cereals these days: fancy inks, vivid colors -- they've even started incluing free CDROMs on the cereal box.

  44. Or, Feed In Some Porn... by Myriad · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and Voila! The Body You Never Had - from twenty feet or so, anyway.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  45. better watch out for by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Screen burn, or bad pixels,

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  46. No limit to lenght. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    Exciting all the ladies out there, could be the though that there is NO LIMIT to lenght. The fesabillity of having a monitor that is 10 feet long and wraps arround is applicable with this tech... just print the screen on a long roll of plastic. flight sim, quake, vr for medica/military, pr0n... next best thing since Color TV? I'm excited (not just cause I typed p0rn) but because this could REALLY be a huge change for computers. Hooray! The new phone books are here! The new phone books are here!

  47. Mmm... by bythescruff · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I think we'll see a lot of innovation," said Fyfe. "People are talking about weaving displays into clothing. Will there ever be a mass market for that? I doubt it. But it will probably be seized on by someone."

    So I'll finally get to shag someone in an AOL-style video-minidress - mmm, ohh...

    --
    Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    1. Re:Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh there will be a mass market for this - ravers.

      I really want a top like this, with a small mic in it, that produces a winamp style visualisation over the whole shirt.

    2. Re:Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, you could screw a chick while watching pr0n on her dress.

  48. Fun Trick by prof187 · · Score: 1

    Put one of these on a wall and then show the image of a door or passage and watch as the unsuspecting people walk right into it.

    But more seriously, maybe something like this could be a replacement for windows (the things made of glass, not the OS). If there are cameras on the outside, this could just show the image on the wall. Make places more secure anyway, if there are no windows for people to break in through. I think that this would be able to succeed over current TVs because from the way it sounds, you can make some very large surfaces with it.

    --

    My other sig is an import.
    1. Re:Fun Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Even better, slap one on the side of a mountain with a picture of a tunnel and watch people go right through to the other side.

      Hmm, this could revolutionize the construction industry...

    2. Re:Fun Trick by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0

      Pfft,

      The road runner has been doing this for years.

  49. Skintight display by Myco · · Score: 2

    This could be cool... change your clothes with the push of a button. Wear a new face (probably not a very realistic-looking one until the technology matures, but we're dreaming here...). Wear the skin of your favorite porn star. With adaptive padding it could modify the underlying shape as well.

    1. Re:Skintight display by Creepy · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't exactly change your clothes, but you could change the LOOK of your clothes. In other words, if your clothes are dirty and stink like a sewer, they still will. I also suspect something that would statically change clothes color/fit/etc would be more realistic, unless you want continuously updating clothes (imagine the tie-dye...). Now T-shirt advertisers, on the other hand, are probably drooling...

      my biggest worry would be laundry, - my wife has enough hand wash/line dry crap as it is.

    2. Re:Skintight display by Myco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speaking of such things, imagine if someone hacked in to your t-shirt. How long would it take before someone told you that you had goatse dot cx on your back?

    3. Re:Skintight display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that would suck, although it'd be funny if it happened to someone else.

  50. Adaptive Camouflage by roadkill999 · · Score: 1

    Weave this bad boy into a full body suit, mount micro cameras throughout, project the image seen behind. Voila! Predator. From twenty feet or so, anyway. Multi quidem facilius se abstinent ut non utantur, quam temperent ut bene utantur.

  51. Until... by The+Creator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone illuminates the whole area with a light that blinks at such a frequence, that you suit(due to the latency) is out of phase. : )

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  52. Sweet! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until I goto work and when I sit down at my chair I slide forward into a "cave" and its a "U" shaped enclosure and my desktop is all around me.

    I could apply this to the walls and ceiling of every room in my house.

    I can see it now. Someone needs to setup a camera pointed at the sky in a part of the world with no light pollution (middle of the saharia?) and beam the image to a satalite so I could display it on my ceiling!

    I could lay on my back and watch TV without sitting up!

    I'm very excited about this! (if you couldn't tell!)

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Sweet! by geoswan · · Score: 2
      "...needs to setup a camera pointed at the sky in a part of the world with no light pollution..."

      Um, that would be Chile. There are a whole bunch of internationally sponsored telescopes built on the crests of mountains on the coast of Chile. The prevailing winds have blown all the way across the Pacific Ocean, so it is has had lots of room for the turbulence to damp down. Hawaii is the second choice for constructing new optical light telescopes.

    2. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I could lay on my back and watch TV without sitting up!"

      I have an old VR headset that I hacked to hook it up to the tuner on my VCR. I've been watching TV in bed like that for years now.

  53. The Whitepaper by jdclucidly · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is Cambrige Display Technology's white paper on how Light Emitting Polymers function.

  54. A good use for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whouldn't they make great wallpaper.

  55. $1000 for 48" ? by rohanreed · · Score: 1

    Have seen how much current 48" screens cost? I'd be glad to pay that. It doesn't matter how much it cost to make. We will never get any product without a huge markup.

    I'm sure I could find a nice new 14" monitor for my PC for only $60, but I'm gonna spend the $350 for a nice 19".

    Sorry to break it to you but size does matter.

    --
    At least I know where my towel is.
    1. Re:$1000 for 48" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to break it to you but size does matter.

      Self: ... looks down...

      oh damn

    2. Re:$1000 for 48" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're getting screwed on that 19" monitor. I bought a 19" MAG from BetBuy...for $140 US.

  56. This is a marketing dream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the cost to produce these things were cheap enough, this would make those marketing folks drool.

    I can see it now...billboards, posters, on t-shirts, shoes (probably a nice little Nike commercial built next to their logo), and even as a free toy in my box of Lucky Charms.

  57. More technical info on LEP by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 2

    Cambridge Display Technologies has a nice article
    describing the underlying physics and some technical issues involved with developing the material.

    --LP

  58. satalite? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Just think, if you were using Microsoft products - just about any of them - you`d just press F7 and they`d go `er...do you mean satellite?`.
    Doesnt Linux software have a spell checker?

  59. Conductive Polymers by Keighvin · · Score: 1

    A quick search of reveals that along with the light emitting polymers, those capable of conducting electricity are also available, awaiting practical application.

    Challenges to overcome still include transmission speed and resisitance - this has even been featured on before.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  60. The market will determine the price... by PseudoThink · · Score: 1

    The first manufacturer to bring this (or any) technology to market can charge whatever they want to (provided that people will actually pay their asking price), since you won't be able to get the product anywhere else. Once competition comes into the picture, prices will drop as they compete for your dollar, approaching the actual cost of production. It's the simple concept of supply and demand, not rocket science.

  61. Philips research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Philips has been working on flexible displays for quite some time:
    http://www.components.philips.com/InformationCente r/Global/FArticleSummary.asp?lNodeId=670&channel=6 70&channelId=N670A1891

  62. Article on Adaptive Camouflage by roadkill999 · · Score: 0

    I saw this amzing article about adaptive camouflage.......click here

    1. Re:Article on Adaptive Camouflage by roadkill999 · · Score: 0

      Hey, they took my link out. Thats not fair. The article was so cool. Email me if you want a copy.

    2. Re:Article on Adaptive Camouflage by Jacer · · Score: 1

      will you email me the article? tsunamisunrise@hotmail.com thanks!

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  63. Rollup screens = ultimate portable PCs by pieterh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been dreaming of my ultimate portable for some time, and this - roll-up screens - was all that was missing. I have a roll-up waterproof keyboard that works quite well. Imagine the guts of a notebook PC (no CD, keyboard, screen), a kind of brick the size of a stack of CDs. Fits into your pocket. You can add a flat battery underneath for portable use. You can plug in a roll-up screen and keyboard when you're on the road. At the office you dock it into your main notebook or desktop - synchronizing all your data, updating your email, etc.

    1. Re:Rollup screens = ultimate portable PCs by g.a.g · · Score: 1

      Good point - this combined with the OQO from earlier this day should really make the OQO much more versatile (no more VGA screen limit).

      --
      Hurricane Application Group, Dept of Meteorology Control, Ministry of Proactive Defense
    2. Re:Rollup screens = ultimate portable PCs by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And with a GPS card and some topographic maps... voila! A hiker's (or forester's, or geologist's, etc.) wet dream. Add some software to render the map in 3-D and do cross-sections and you would have one extremely useful product.

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
  64. Wanna bet? by BeBoxer · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not just the individual pixels which are made with polymers. It's the individual traces also. In fact, the whole field of polymer semiconducters is starting to ripen and bear fruit. The sheets of plastic they print won't only have light emitting portions, it can include power traces and even decoding logic! There might be a copper ribbon cable to connect the entire display to whatever external source provides data and power. But the entire display will be made from polymers.

    This really is amazing technology. The circuitry is basically printed out using ink jet style heads. Actually, one of the article says that it actually plots the traces out ala a good old fasioned plotter as opposed to line-by-line like a printer. It's not hard to imagine that this stuff will lead to a rebirth of the homebrew electronics hobbyist. Even if you couldn't afford to buy your own plotter, a prototyping shop which owned one should be able to produce custom circuits to your own design in an extremely fast and cheap manner. Imagine a semi-conductor Kinkos! Could be cool stuff.

  65. Polymer! by Jonsey · · Score: 0

    We've got things made out of plastic, that could, someday be used to display images or text. With all the things plastics can do, imagine the possibilites for these lighted ones!

    Though, personally, I always though putting directions on the condom's wrapper was sufficient.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  66. Just imagine... by antirename · · Score: 1

    Roadside bulletin board telling you to stop smoking... or letting you know where the next strip mall was... loglo, anyone? Maybe stephenson is a prophet :)

  67. Obligatory remark by SpacePunk · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Obligatory remark by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Don't have to - just go to Times Square and look at the videotron.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  68. Michael Marshall Smith saw it coming. by GothChip · · Score: 1

    It's just like out of Only Forward. Soon we could be walking down the street and the walls could be colour co-ordinating with our clothes as we walk by. That would be so cool.

  69. For the geek in you by cDarwin · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    Socrates was asked where he was from. He replied not "Athens," but "The world."

  70. Red Planet? by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

    Does this strike anyone else as a Red Planet type thing, or am I thinking of the wrong movie? I know it was Mars and I think it was the Val Kilmer movie. I remember them being able to pull out a floppy looking screen that overlaid the landscape and was supposedly fed from the last data they got from their (defunct) orbiting craft ...

  71. You're forgetting the optics by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2

    Many of the ideas mentioned here require optics to work properly.

    My first quibble is that nothing in the article suggests that this display is transparent. Most of the posts here assume plastic = transparent. Not necessarily.

    Secondly, the optics are always going to be a problem, until we have some form of holographic display.

    For example, a HUD is only useful if it's focused well out ahead of you - near infinity - and the ONLY way to do this is with substantial, and large, optics. I've BUILT a HUD before - I know what I'm talking about. A transparent display simply won't do any good for you. And to do a DECENT HUD, you have to have a very bright display - able to be seen in bright daylight, brighter than the background material. Finally, the optics of the primary lens MUST be as large as the viewable area - because the rays are parallel to appear focused at infinity, the width/height of the area where your eyes can see the image is exactly the same as the size of the lens. So you can see that a cheap display won't help a lot, and a transparent display is pointless.

    Also, a wearable display is a neat idea - but only if you focus it so your eyes can see it. Again, the transparency is no good if it's too close for your eyes to focus. Take a photographic slide, for example, and mount it three inches from your eye. Should be great, right? Super high resolution, bright clear colors, transparent... NOPE. You can't even see the image; it's just a dark blur obscuring your vision. You MUST have some optics to focus the image where your eye can focus on it.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:You're forgetting the optics by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, yes, I see the problem with HUDs. Perhaps this technology can help with holographic displays by serving as the screen upon which banks of lasers paint images with the screen providing color information. Granted, lots of software work here coordinating information with pixels, but not much more complex than the cathode ray tube/software combination technology we already use.

      Anyway, cool technology all the same but I really don't look forward to the day when I can't get away from constant ad bombardment -- it's already really bad and getting worse all the time, ugh.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  72. I wonder by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    If you could make color / style changing cloths from this?

    of course, the next question; could you make it transparent ... Chix could flash their breasts when that "special someone" was checking them out !

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:I wonder by fgb · · Score: 1

      I know what hackers will be doing in the future. :-)

      Does that dress come with a firewall?

  73. Nature's End by lazarus · · Score: 1
    In the sci-fi book Nature's End by Whitley Strieber and James Kunetka, they describe a computer called the "IBM AXE" which has a roll-up display. I always find it interesting the way time has a habit of proving the sci-fi authors correct. The book was written in 1986 and is set in the year 2025.

    If IBM comes out with a computer with a roll-up display in or around 2025, I think they should call it the IBM AXE.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  74. Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine... by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2

    Get real. Aside from the power cord, *MY* TV has two conductors for input. Okay, I'll give you a hint. It's called RF. Not good enough? What about ethernet, 8 pins. Want true video instead of digital data? How about the 15 or so pins on a VGA display? If the decoding electronics are embedded, you don't need lots of connectors.

    If you can afford the millions of transistors for the display electronics, you can afford a million more for the decoding too.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  75. Don't assume this is transparent by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the posts here assume plastic = transparent. Yeah, that would be nice. But it's not necessarily the case here. Nothing in the article suggests that this display is transparent.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Don't assume this is transparent by mblase · · Score: 2

      Nothing in the article suggests that this display is transparent.

      Good, 'cause it'd be awfully hard to see what's displayed on it that way.

    2. Re:Don't assume this is transparent by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Universal Display Corp has a movie clip of a transparent, flexible screen.

      Too bad its monochrome green.

  76. Need good touch input by kmahan · · Score: 1

    Wonder if anybody has solved putting a touch panel over the screen? If they could make one with sufficiently high resolution then you'd have quite the system.

    The roll up screens they had in Red Planet were great. Well, that and AIMEE. (and Ms. Moss)

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  77. Anyone see Minority Report? Screens everywhere. by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A number of the comments here about advertising and the proliferation of displays reminded me of Minority Report. Everywhere the characters went were advertising displays - wrapped around the walls of stores and malls, moving billboards, even animated cereal boxes (John Anderton angrily tosses one aside after being bothered by the distraction at one point). Obviously Spielberg has the same vision of the future as many of you.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  78. I think e-ink just died. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

    Anyone agree?

    1. Re:I think e-ink just died. by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 1

      This technology still has the problem that transmissive LCDs(Laptop/Flat screen LCDs) have in that it's unreadable in sunlight. So this will replace Laptop LCDs while E-Ink still corners the market with replacing reflective LCDs(Gameboy Advance, m505, new iPaq) and "static print technology"(ink on paper).

    2. Re:I think e-ink just died. by pagercam2 · · Score: 2

      No, e-ink is competing for the same goals and may get there first. E-ink has better characteristics for books, newspapers, posters (Ads), maps, i.e. the image is static for at least a few seconds. E-ink doesn't need to be refreshed set the pixels and it stays. Oled's are for active displays, i.e computer screens, TV's etc.... They can and probably will split the market. Motion on OLED, short period static on e-ink.

    3. Re:I think e-ink just died. by mattm76 · · Score: 1

      Not from what I've read on the technology. Laptops require a backlight whereas these do not. Motorola actually employed a 3 color oled display in one of their cell phones a couple years ago which I had no problem at all viewing in sunlight. But those were large led's, so I guess the verdict is still out for the tiny ones that will be required in graphic display devices.

    4. Re:I think e-ink just died. by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to challenge you on that claim that Motorola's OLED screen was viewable in sunlight. OLEDs give off light, some of different colors(i.e. red, green, blue to make a full color display). They do not, however, absorb or transmit external light differently when an electric current passed through them. That would be necessary for them to be viewable in sunlight. They would need to absorb wavelengths of the sunlight(similar to how ink works) instead of emitting wavelengths of their own. Also the reason they don't require a backlight, is because they ARE the backlight. They still are viewable only because they give off light, not because they transform it. The brighter the ambient light, the more washed out the display. Maybe they are so bright that even sunlight can't wash them out. That would be impressive.

  79. Bad link. Here's the right one. by ivan256 · · Score: 2

    Ah, crap. I pulled that link out of my bookmarks, and it's out of date now. For the datasheet, go here: http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MC33441-D.PDF

  80. A printable screen... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want to be able to go into a store and say 'I'd like a screen 120" wide by 67" tall', and have them print it for me there on the spot, laminate it together, then just sell me a little re-usable "connection" module that clips on the edge of the screen to power/activate it.

    If you want a different size screen, you just toss out the old one, keep the module and get a new one printed up.

    And it's starting to sound very, very possible...

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  81. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Keighvin · · Score: 2, Informative

    The issue isn't signal delivery, it's pixel addressing. To get the right charges to the right place for production of the image.

    CRT's (TV's and Monitors) fire a magnetically redirected electron beam for its addressing. This makes it a very analoque device when you break it down, albeit a very high precission one.

    LCD's are addressed via a crosshatch scheme and do have actual pixels for a change.

    Unless that crosshatch or something similar can be reproduced, then yes it will take a high wire:pixel ration to get the job done.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  82. Paper Thin Speakers: by Tarindel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DailyNews/f lat_speakers010418.html

    They've been working on them for a while now.

    It'll be really interesting when they manage to bundle the paper thin speakers, the paper thin monitor, embedded solar cells, and wireless networking all together into a single paper-thin sheet. Then you basically have a multimedia device that you can take and hang just about anywhere. And you thought telephone poles in the major cities were bad now... Just wait till they all play slide shows and video footage of someone's missing animal while playing sad music to tug on your heartstrings, beamed from said person's house nearby...

  83. Just -7 years away! by rayd75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read a number of articles on these and other flat, flexible displays such as "digital paper". It's amusing that all of this life-changing display technology is just months from everyday use... and has been for the past six or seven years.

    1. Re:Just -7 years away! by mattm76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, these are the displays of tomorrow. So, you better get up early and get that digital newspaper before the neighbor's dog does his business on it.

  84. Paired with oQo.... by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 1

    Paired a 17 inch one of these, the oQo computer mentioned yesterday may be a good deal cooler.

  85. So which is it? by swagr · · Score: 2

    The technology stems from the discovery in 1989 of the compound p-phenylenevinylene which glows greeny-yellow when given an electric charge.

    A little tweaking over the following decade produced compounds to emit blue and red light: the roll-up TV was born.


    Makes sense to focus on those specific wavelengths.

    With the flick of a switch the display could convert to infra-red ...

    I know you can't mix RGB to get infra-red.
    Is this LEP Vapourware?

    --

    -... --- .-. . -.. ..--..
    1. Re:So which is it? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's what they meant (although, that would be cool, and you can get IR LEDs, so maybe it's a possibilty in the future). I think they mean you could switch to a different satalite feed, like an IR feed for instance.

  86. Re:Every Building a Billboard... by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Imagine seeing a cityscape where every inch of every skyscraper is a billboard.

    Haven't been to Tokyo have you?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  87. rather have fold-up by lingqi · · Score: 2

    roll-up stuff is fine and good until you have to carry something around -- i believe a very important aspect of this technology is its portability. however, if i decided to carry my 42" roll up screen around (say, on a road trip), it would still not fit into my briefcase because when it's rolled up it will be a large tube around 30 inches long.

    however, if such technology can be made so that the material can be folded (like paper) and does not cause distortions of the pixels at the edges of where i fold -- i am all for it. fine, everywhere i look there will probabbly be billboards because of this technology. but then, i can carry around my own and display stuff i want to see instead.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  88. When can we expect to see animated Tattoos? by DeafDumbBlind · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love to have something like that .
    Play video clips, etc.

    --


    Jesus used to be my co-pilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.
    1. Re:When can we expect to see animated Tattoos? by azadrozny · · Score: 1

      You don't have to worry about a tattoo with your girlfirends name. If you break up, go back to the shop and have the image reprogrammed!

  89. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use row+column pins for the whole screen.
    Or, perhaps use row+column pins for a 1/64 section of the screen combined with 6 pins for selecting which 1/64 of the screen region you want to use.

  90. Lay Report on LEP's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did a lay report on this subject a few years ago for a university project. Have a read; I wrote it with a view to be easily digestible for the general masses :)

    http://www.chemsoc.org/exemplarchem/entries/2001/w illiamson/index.html

    You will need a Chime plugin for viewing the 3D molecules.
    http://www.mdlchime.com/chime/


    regards,

    Mark

    1. Re:Lay Report on LEP's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? You have graphs of electron orbitals and you think that its "easily digestible for the general masses"? Try again...

  91. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " do have actual pixels for a change."

    What? CRTs don't? Let's tell all the manufacturers to remove that shadow mask and those stupid stripes of phosphors, (which give you sub-pixel rendering for free) they don't need em!

  92. Blue polymers perfected? by babymac · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been following the development of CDT for some time now. The last I heard, they hadn't yet perfected a polymer for the color blue. They would degrade and die within a couple thousand hours of use. Considering the fact that normal CRTs last a lot longer than that, I don't see LEPs becoming popular or practical until this problem is overcome. Does anyone know anything about further development in this area?

    --
    "War makes me sad." - Me
    1. Re:Blue polymers perfected? by Blackjax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >They would degrade and die within a couple
      >thousand hours of use. Considering the fact
      >that normal CRTs last a lot longer than that,
      >I don't see LEPs becoming popular or practical
      >until this problem is overcome

      This may not matter depending on the selling price of the display. A couple thousand hours of use translates to around a year of regular use. If the cost to produce something like this allows them to sell a unit comparable to a 19" CRT for less than say $75 I think they have a winner. Economically it works out. You replace a monitor every 4 years or so anyway. With something like this you would simply have more but cheaper upgrades, the total cash outlay would be the same. The difference being that you keep getting newer, better, and possibly cheaper versions each year, whereas with a CRT it just keeps getting more obsolete.

    2. Re:Blue polymers perfected? by AtariEric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not neccessarily... if you can buy them at $20 for a pack of ten, would a short lifespan matter that much? As long as the lifespan wasn't inconveniently short, the cost may mitigate those problems. Not to mention, if they do die of faster than CRT's, producers may be more interested in making them, knowing that you'll be replacing them (and paying the manufacturers) more often.

      --
      Don't trust any concentration of power.
  93. Hmmm I know one I'd like.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd love to buy a roll of TV, change the channel to WB, and then use it as TP.

    Who knows? that could displace Nielson ratings!

  94. Already have the sound covered... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

    http://www.e4engineering.com/item.asp?id=45870&typ e=news

  95. Why is it . . . by CoffeeDregs · · Score: 1
    . . . that all these high tech gadgets get related to watches?

    Cool light emitting screen things? Think of the wonder watches (and prOn)!

    UWB? Think of the wonder watches (and prOn)!

    Super batteries? Think of the wonder watches (and prOn)!

    - Dregs

  96. Roll-up TV? Why? by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would I want a roll-up TV screen? Ever since I moved my 4 computers out of my living room and into the second bedroom, my living room has appeared empty. Now I'm supposed to roll-up my TV when I'm done watching? Maybe if it's on remote control, but otherwise, forget it. I like it the way it is.

    I like the "Maps in the field" kinda thing, though. Kinda like Red Planet.

    It's kinda cool watching some things from Sci-Fi come to reality. I just wish they'd get working on the damn holodeck. Talk about the ultimate in addictions. I'd never leave.

    1. Re:Roll-up TV? Why? by cr0sh · · Score: 2
      I'll tell you why:

      Recently at my work a demo of a pretty cool projector was given (it was small, lightweight - about the size of a book, and had great res - too bad I didn't find out who made it, but I couldn't afford one anyhow). While the projector was something to behold, the screen it was being projected on was even better.

      Imagine a tube with one side slightly "flattened" - this side had two "feet" that rotated perpendicular to tube, so that the tube was well supported. You sat the tube on the feet, flat with the floor, pull the handle on top and the screen unrolled - let go, and it just sat there, seemingly by magic. Grab the handle again, pull up slightly, then let it slide in the tube, fold the feet, and walk away.

      It was a great presentation system, all in all - the screen was pretty cheap (for what it did) - $300.00 for 60 inch diagonal.

      Now, imagine if instead of it being a simple projection screem, it was instead really THE SCREEN - maybe the video jack on the end or something. Can you say swwweeeetttt?

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  97. What about eInk, etc.? by frumiousbar · · Score: 1

    Is the power consumption of this technology low enough that eInk and the other related efforts will be obsolete even before they are commercially released?

  98. Some more uses... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    ALL roadsigns adapt to current conditions. (Detours, construction, accidents, the Fair, the Fair!)

    Change the appearance of large items at will - make your house 'look' scary on Halloween, Waving flags and fireworks on the 4th. Give your house a stone wall, garden, or 'trees'. Make your house 'transparent' or 'invisible' for parties, exhibitionism or to get 'away'! (Screens on both inside and coutside of course.) Change 'wallpaper' at whim, decorate by era, place, or fetish. Make your apartment look like its huge! Play a 'real' game of quake, or nethack!

    Your car could be a different color every day, or adapt 'styling features' (camo trucks for hunters or the army) 'fake' turbo for all the Rice-Boys out there.

    Put 'windows' to the outside world or made up world in your office or cube. Your 'desktop' could be your desktop! Video conferencing could be far more personal, and body language would become useful.

    A VR Holodeck of sorts could be be possible, embed into all surfaces in a room.

    One *real book - any book contained within!

    Graffitti could become an accepted artform. Leave it there a week and then *poof*

    Learn to dance with the 'magic' footprints appearing at the proper times and positions.

    The Hoover dam could be the biggest theater in the world!

    Of course, by the time this comes to pass, the **AAs will probably have legislated that a user cannot view these screens without pervasive advertising. The Hoover dam will play McDonalds and Disney commercials 7 out of 8 hours, some 'Avatar' will follow you around offering product suggestions every two minutes, and someone will get pissed at you for something and hack your house, car and t-shirt to show goatse.cx at random intervals.

    Don't want to think about that on the Hoover dam

  99. Wraparound VR shades ala "Wild Palms" by Dillenger69 · · Score: 1

    if this technology can be made fine grained enough you could certialy put it inside wraparound shades. That would give you 3d VR glasses with periphreal vision. Not nearly as sophisticated as the ones in Wild Palms, but damn close. Periphreal vision is the key to convincing VR. I'm suprised nobody has tried something like that outside of creating a "Cave" environment.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  100. Pr0n! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Now you can stick a large display on the ceiling, for that simulated mirror on the ceiling effect with the porno actress/actor of your choice! (not responsible for emotional damages in the event Ron Jeremy appears upon your ceiling)

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  101. Rollup porn stars! by groundhog00 · · Score: 1

    Ya.. like commercial use will be first... lets try porn... porn is going to get the first distributions. porn made the internet.. oh wait.. thats either Cmdr Taco or Al Gore.

  102. Re:Roll up TV Screens? lets Xuse nanotubes!X by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

    >A 1024 X 768 will require atleast 786,433 electical
    >contections, and wires made of metal. I expect
    >serious problems with metal-fatigue induced
    >conductor fractures, for roll-up displays.

    Ever heard of nanotubes?

    OK, so nanotubes can't be produced in consistent batches today -- but, assuming that's not fixed in the next couple months, there are plenty of non-brittle conductive options... the usual solution at large scale is a metal-plastic alloy, and I'm sure that the boys who came up with the screens can come up with a power solution :P

  103. Trippy! by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Okay... imagine walking into a house or building where every squaare inch of ceiling, floor, and wall was covered in this stuff -- put some sort of display on it like one of the more funky visualizations for winamp and you can't tell me that simply being inside such a place wouldn't be a most interesting sensation. :)

  104. ebook reader by pigpen_ · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone will FINALLY build a decent ebook reader with this tech. OF course it will probably use proprietary software and have DRM gargargar like all the rest of them, but this would be great for an ebook reader.

    --
    Zambozay! My brain must've been eatin' a sandwich!
  105. PROBLEM WITH 3D TVS USING TRANSPARENT LAYERS! by necro351 · · Score: 1

    It would be possible except that each layer's transparency would have to be near 100% accurate. If there is any light diffusion, then the "backward" pixels in the z axis would become fuzzy and unclear after shining through so many layers. I assume you were implying a cube of plastic, maybe 1024x1024 with 1024 layers? The most backward pixels would have to go through 1024 layers unscathed! And still be clear enough to not overlap any of the other pixels just fractions of a millimeter away! Good luck either way I suppose.

    --
    --"You are your own God"--
  106. And you thought the WWW was ugly... by mblase · · Score: 2

    End result: advertising is about to get a lot more annoying.

    If you thought gratuitous Flash animations on the Web were obnoxious, you just wait until the marketing industry sees what they can do with these things.

    I mean, forget about blink tags. We'll be able to blink the side of an entire public bus.

    1. Re:And you thought the WWW was ugly... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      I mean, forget about blink tags. We'll be able to blink the side of an entire public bus.

      Yeah...lucky we have the Land Transport Safty Authority (or whatever you USers and UKers have) to stop that sort stuff.

      But once you step inside...

  107. Reading device. by camfucius · · Score: 1

    I could see a time when you no longer buy a book, magazine or newspaper, but instead buy(or download) a data cartride which is then inserted into your electronic reading device. The reading device would consist of a couple of pages of this stuff, something to read the data and some sort of navigation system(flip to page XXX, next page,...). You could possibly even integrate the ability to write on this electronic pad so that you could save you comments, highlight and other such things.

    You could even have different, convieneint sizes. Novel size, newspaper size, magazine size and possibly texbook size.

    That would be pretty cool...

  108. SnowCrash Here We Come by Papatoast · · Score: 1

    YT is ready for this sh*t!!

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
  109. good english... by djcatnip · · Score: 1
    "Will there ever be a mass market for that? I doubt it. But it will probably be seized on by someone."

    "seized on?" Bless you?

    --
    I make these: http://beatseqr.com
  110. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Eccles · · Score: 1

    LCD's are addressed via a crosshatch scheme and do have actual pixels for a change.

    Internally? Yes. Externally? DVI and VGA inputs with ~20 wires, providing the pixel data in essentially serial fashion. The LCD's internals convert the stream to crosshatch signals. So no, you do not need thousands of wires.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  111. Wearable TVs + Giant Idiots = ... by phallen · · Score: 1

    Teletubbies!!!

    My God, has our society come to this? Teletubbies as the dawn of a new age; LaLa, the technological Jesus.

    --
    If Slashdot is where the spelling-challenged go when they die, I'm in heaven.
  112. Tech-Factor? Sy-tech? Mid 90's Fox show... by phallen · · Score: 1

    This technology makes me think of a mid-90's show that was on Fox for a while: Tech-Factor, or Sy-Tech, or something like that? It was very cyberpunk.

    People's "laptops" were cylinders about he diameter of a soda can, and about a "keyboard" wide. They unrolled the screen one side of the tube and the keyboard from the other. When they "folded it up" it made a sound like you were raising those pull-and-let-go blinds. That would be cool!

    --
    If Slashdot is where the spelling-challenged go when they die, I'm in heaven.
  113. Widespread implementation of solar power cells? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    Interesting points. This might lead to an greatly expanded adoption of solar cells to power these, which in turn would drive the cost of the cells down and efficiency up...

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  114. Billboard theft by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What a cracker target that would be for defacing.

    Or for stealing. There isn't much use for the LED scrolling banner thingies at home, nor is stealing one of the jumbotron type things in Times Square an option. However, if they have these things everywhere, small poster-sized ones would work nice as a TV at home and wouldn't last too long on the streets.

    I'd say that for a billboard, they will use smaller polymer displays which will be cheaper to make than one mondo 24'x32' display. Say 48 -4'x4' screens. Now, there's a tempting target- you might not have much use for a 24'x32' screen, but all those smaller screens, think what you could do with them?

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Billboard theft by arb · · Score: 1

      I'd say that for a billboard, they will use smaller polymer displays which will be cheaper to make than one mondo 24'x32' display. Say 48 -4'x4' screens. Now, there's a tempting target- you might not have much use for a 24'x32' screen, but all those smaller screens, think what you could do with them?

      Yeah - you could steal say 48 of them and build a mondo 23'x32' display at home! ;-)

  115. I can think of a better use.... by Alethes · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Weave this bad boy into a full body suit..."

    TELETUBBIES!

  116. UV resistance? by Fatgnat · · Score: 1

    Plastics aren't known for standing up well to sunlight for extended periods--I wonder how this stuff will do.

  117. His name is Neal Stephenson by Bobtree · · Score: 1

    Please have some respect.

  118. Creating a holodeck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One could use this ultra thin things as wallpaper for a room. The first version of a startrek-like holodeck.

  119. Wallpaper! by C60 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've been waiting for this one for a long time. Once this is mass produced how long do you think it's going to take until someone turns it into addressable wallpaper for your home? Screw rolling the thing up, just return the wall to your favorite pattern/color when you're done watching TV.

    Now you go and take this stuff and combine it with the See-Through, Paper-Thin Speakers and you've got your media where ever you go.

    Just makes me wonder how long it's going to be until movies are made from a central perspective, like IMAX in your home.

    At the very least it should be a cheaper method for bringing those remaining 34,940 movie theatres into the digital age

    --
    Karma: 0 (But I wield a mean +10 Vorpal Apathy)
  120. flexible lcds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't this old news?

    I'd swear that I saw an article in 1998 about flexible lcds by Xerox. As a matter of fact they had a rollup thing, and IIRC were displaying a newspaper.

    1. Re:flexible lcds by muck1969 · · Score: 1

      I believe that Xerox's technology involves magnetic micro-beads ... but only black and white.

      --
      m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
  121. Val Kilmer already thought of this by charliedontsurf · · Score: 1

    Anyone see Red Planet? (I actually don't think anyone did; it wasn't tooo bad).

  122. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never heard this term 'crosshatch' in talking about LCDs. What does it mean? Do you mean multiplexed?

    There are some pretty amazing chips inside a LCD monitor that drive the transistors on the glass, they're called gate drivers. These are bare silicon dies with microscopic pins on them that are bonded to the flexible lead that goes to the glass. Little metal balls provide the roughly 600 connections per IC that go to the glass. The signals swing from 0 to 40V in a non-linear fashion, the gate driver is essentially ~400 D/A converters that are latched in serially. That's right, an analog signal is where the rubber hits the road in a LCD.

    There are lots of gate drivers around the glass, and the other chip is the source driver. These are less complex and are just a demultiplexer with drive to the right row.

  123. From what I read 4 years ago... by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

    CDT (Cambridge Display Technology) was touting LEPs as the next LED that is capable of high refresh rates and the ability to see from angles, all because the technology doesn't use a backlight but instead the plastic itself emits light.

    Among some of the other advantages I remember highlighted was the ability to create strange pixel configurations, low power usage, and a relatively inexpensive manufacturing process.

    We'll have to see what promises it will live up to...

    Semiconducting Polymers on Display

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
    1. Re:From what I read 4 years ago... by new500 · · Score: 2

      . . .

      From that pdf you linked above, page 3, penultimate paragraph, er . . . I cite verbatim :

      "It is all about transferring low-level intelligence to everyday products," says Friend, adding that in the not-too-distant-future, "Your yogurt container will be able to tell the yogurt it should have been eaten a few days ago."

      wtf is the yogurt supposed to do, complain to the person who bought it?

      Beats the crap out of reading up on LEP display tech just thinking about that one . . .

  124. Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. Now there will be a two-step process for going to war with the United States:

    Step 1: Blow up the Army's "map satellites".

    Step 2: Attack while 50,000 US soldiers get lost in the desert holding a useless piece of translucent polymer.

    If the satellite TV goes on the fritz, not a big deal. If 50 US soldiers die because some platoon leader couldn't get artillery coordinates off his "broken" map, well that's a bit of a problem, eh?

  125. Re:Does YOUR TV have 786k wires incoming? Not mine by Eccles · · Score: 1

    I have never heard this term 'crosshatch' in talking about LCDs. What does it mean?

    Ya got me. My point was that display devices are all driven from external sources by a relatively few signal wires. The internal workings of LCDs really aren't important, so I assumed the other fella was right about that for the sake of argument.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  126. BBC Radio - 11 July by 80N · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BBC's Radio channel 'Radio 4' featured CDT in their 'Material World' programme on 11 July. It can be heard here using a Real Audio player. The web-page summarising this transmission is here.

  127. CDT wins MacRober Award by 80N · · Score: 1

    CDT won the 2002 MacRobert award for innovation in engineering for this technology. Details here.

  128. A light-emitting display? Well... by nmnilsson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Polymer or otherwise, light-emission sure is a nice feature for a display :-)

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
  129. Imagine the application... by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    for the pr0n industry!

    You want to enhance your appearance? You want to "advertise" when out for a night on the town? Why bother with transparent flaps, when you can just put your favourite pr0n star's anatomy in just the right place to catch that cute girl or guy's eye!

  130. Re:Sensitivity to water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These screens are very sensitive to water and currently *have* to be shielded behind glass. So all this talk of roll-up screens is premature.

  131. New Camos by muck1969 · · Score: 1
    Weave this stuff into fabric, plug it in, and you've got dynamic camoflauge

    One could make animated cereal box ala Minority Report

    Video rentals could have a video preview on the box in the store ...

    Reprogrammable banners

    Looks like LCD is going the way of the dodo bird.

    --
    m.mmm..myyy ... sssissxxxtthh bbboottle offf mmmmmoouunnnttain ddeeewww.. in thhe pppassst ffffif
  132. DING DONG! OLED TOLED FOLED! by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    How can no one mention the OLED TOLED and FOLED! Essentially what we are talking about here are those technoligies but possibly for proprietry reasons they have resorted to other names

    Kodak
    FOLED

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  133. instead of glass by snaphu · · Score: 1

    i have enough mixups cracking my head on a really clean window becuase i didn't see it, hopefully this stuff is durable enough to hold up (against my head)

  134. How would you like a clue? by BluBrick · · Score: 2

    The infra-red that they are talking about is merely a representation in visible wavelengths. Even if it did manage to output IR from RGB signals, it wouldn't be much use. You don't really imagine that people can ACTUALLY see infra-red do you? (or ultra-violet, for that matter)

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  135. Re:rolling mat.... by smallblackdog · · Score: 0

    offtopic? I object! man. I was talking about what i could use the new technology for. That is pretty much centered around the foldy screen - the topic of the article. Twat moderators.

    --
    Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
  136. Re:Sensitivity to water by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Uhmm.... Okay... so you have to put it behind something water-tight. That shouldn't _HAVE_ to be glass, should it? I would expect anything waterproof would do. Why couldn't they coat it in something like laminate plastic? (Or some other water-tight and flexible substance)

  137. Oh, Great.... by GodLived · · Score: 1

    Wearable screens means one thing,

    We Could All Look Like Teletubbies!!

    gack...