Slashdot Mirror


Recommended Text Editors for Win32?

Dave asks: "I must us a Windows machine at work where I do web development and system administration. I have been looking for a "decent" editor to use on Windows, but thus far have come up short. GVim doesn't do it for me, on linux it's fine, but on Windows it isn't the most stable thing around. I've also tried Windows versions of MicroEmacs and Vile. What do other Slashdot users develop in when they must use a Windows machine?"

277 comments

  1. [xdfgf] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Notepad?

  2. Notepad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously. It's standard, it works well, and on Windows 2000 and later they finally removed that annoying 64KB text limit. Why use anything else?

    1. Re:Notepad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notepad under NT has never suffered from the 64K limit.

    2. Re:Notepad by Telecommando · · Score: 3, Funny

      BAH! You kids and your fancy editors.

      In my day we used edlin AND WE LIKED IT!

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:Notepad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND WE LIKED IT!

      No you didn't.

      --------------------
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

      Stupid lameness filter....

    4. Re:Notepad by mmaddox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pussy. I always used copy con and got it right the first time. :)

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    5. Re:Notepad by Pierre · · Score: 2

      *shudder*

      now i remember why i thought vi was so easy to learn.

    6. Re:Notepad by Captoo · · Score: 1

      I use type and copy con for editing binary files, too! Anybody who thinks these tools are just for text files is a wimp! Why would you even have alt key on your keyboard, if not to enter ASCII codes?!

      You kids these days and your newfangled development tools! Bah! Compilers are rubbish. Just type in the machine code directly, for crying out loud!

    7. Re:Notepad by unitron · · Score: 2

      I don't mind copy con once in a while, but most always I much prefer browse to type. You cna probably find a copy on an old mouse driver disk.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    8. Re:Notepad by JamesR2 · · Score: 1

      The thing about Notepad for me is its there no matter what machine I am on. Only way to come close is an "install-less" editor that I could call up from my machine via a file share. All the mentioned ones have some sort of fancy install.

    9. Re:Notepad by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I use Metapad for a lightweight notepad replacement. It needs no install and translates DOS and UNIX linebreaks.

  3. Multiedit by Caatje · · Score: 0

    http://www.multiedit.com/
    I u'r serious about dos & win programming, this is the best tool.

  4. what's wrong with gvim? by bromba · · Score: 3, Informative

    This Ask Slashdot sounds to me like trolling against gvim. I use it extensively (didn't even bother with trying any emacs-life stuff for Win) under both WinMe and WinXP and it has never crashed on me and I even like it more than the Linux version. I use it for xml and java and html and a few other things. Never had any problem.

    1. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by dimator · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll second that. I have never seen the stability problems the poster mentions.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've hit the nail on the head. This post is a nonsensical troll against Windows gVim. I've used it on WindowsXP and it runs flawlessly. I've even used it on the hellspawn of all OS's- WindowsME- and it, once again, ran flawlessly. If you like vim on linux platform there is no reason you shouldn't use gVim on Windows.

    3. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it adds tab-completion to the Win9x's without the slow cygwin compatibility layer.

    4. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by stevew · · Score: 2

      I use gvim on Win2000 and Win98 all day
      long and don't have any significant problems
      with it? Me thinks the poster was smoking somehting?

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    5. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by dogspac · · Score: 1

      Ditto

    6. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by divbyzero · · Score: 1

      I've used gvim in various versions quite happily on W95, W98, and W2K, and I am having a hard time thinking of any *more* stable application I've ever run on any of those systems.

      --
      But my grandest creation, as history will tell,
      Was Firefrorefiddle, the Fiend of the Fell.
    7. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'd post a troll that stupid. I think he's just had some bad luck.
      I have gvim, which i set as a possible opener of ALL files... (context menu has "open with Vim"). However, I usually just use the plain vi (which is actually just text Vim) inside cygwin. Never a problem, and I don't have to retrain my fingers when i switch from an xterm to local stuff.

    8. Re:what's wrong with gvim? by mhackarbie · · Score: 1

      I run gvim on Win98 and Windows Me on a regular basis and it runs perfectly on both.

      --
      Building a better ribosome since 1997
  5. TextPad 32 by km790816 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I love this editor.

    Adds itself to the context menu in explorer so you can open anything in it.
    Supports huge files.
    Color codes C++, Java, etc.
    Handles indenting and word-wrap well.
    Has an 'always on top' feature.
    Easy to asign file associations from the UI.

    http://www.textpad.com

    1. Re:TextPad 32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the ability to create macros and "tags" in seconds as well as the ability to customize tool bars, has between 20 and 30 add-ons a favorite being DDE Messages and XML formatter, ok show methods has been handy a couple of times.

    2. Re:TextPad 32 by donky · · Score: 1

      It has a couple of annoying issues that my workmates and I experience. If possible avoid this - although it is a great editor, if you know you can avoid these problems.

      1. Occasionally something sets Textpad into a state where the cursor goes missing, the only way to see where you are typing is to alt-tab out of the program and back again or something similar. When Textpad starts doing this, it does it often - several times a day for a week or so.

      2. If you open files in textpad from shares on your LAN, its pretty much guaranteed to completely lock up. I open readme files from one share and it happens - and it also happens if I have Textpad as the application for a given type of file and I view that file in source safe.

      You can work around the second with some effort by using something else in that case, but the first is the worst.

    3. Re:TextPad 32 by Yoho · · Score: 1

      > Adds itself to the context menu in explorer so you can open anything in it.

      To achieve a similar effect for every texteditor, you can drop a Shortcut to the editor into ../Winnt/profiles/username/SendTo ( or wherever it is on your system ).
      Now, when you right-click on a file you can use Send To/Editor to edit it with your favorite tool.
      Whenever I have to use a machine for longer, I tend to do this at least for Notepad, if there is nothing better available...

    4. Re:TextPad 32 by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      I've been a registered user of TextPad32 since version 2.x

      It's the FIRST program I install on a new box!

      WELL worth the $27 US

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    5. Re:TextPad 32 by eric.t.f.bat · · Score: 1

      I agree. The only problem I have with it is that when you're recording a keyboard macro, the Tab key doesn't work (behaves like a no-op, mostly). That's very minor; apart from that it's fine, and I like it enough that I even registered it.

      : Fruitbat :

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable .sig block which this margin is too small to conta
    6. Re:TextPad 32 by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you have an old version - they are up to 4.5. I never have these problems, and open stuff from shares ALL the time

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    7. Re:TextPad 32 by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      *bump* and the such.

      Good program. Behaves correctly, reads and saves unix style newlines, good enough to register.

    8. Re:TextPad 32 by jumpfroggy · · Score: 1

      I have to agree... out of all the editors I've used, textpad is the best one. It does have a lot of nifty little features (like automatic DOS/UNIX CRLF handling), but I'd say the best part was just the text editing itself. Every action just seems to make sense, and it really does help out a lot. I'd try it out. This is the only commercial program I've considered buying a license for, it's that good.

    9. Re:TextPad 32 by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 0

      I use Netbeans 3.3.2 on Windows 2000 for all my Java needs and this annoyance with the cursor disappearing happens with it too. If I minimize Netbeans and bring it back up it sometimes doesn't have the cursor of if I ALT+TAB to another full screen app and come back the same happens. I Have to ALT-TAB a few times or close the editor window and reopen to get it back. On the rare occasion I have to kill Netbeans completely.

      --
      -- Jason
    10. Re:TextPad 32 by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Likewise... I've been using TextPad daily for over a year now, and have never experience either problem described above, even once.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  6. screw that *nix crap by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    honestly this is not a troll

    but on windows use something that is designed for windows and not ported as an afterthought.

    when i have to use a pc to edit (i mainly use bbedit on os x, which is by far and large the best editor i have EVER used) i use textedit

    yeah, it's shareware, but it's not disabled in anyway and the only shareware part is that once in a thousand saves you get a dialogue that says "register or not" and the not button isn't time delayed or any of that crap, you click "not now" and it shuts up like a good piece of software.

    1. Re:screw that *nix crap by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe if you think it's that good you should put your money where your mouth is and buy it?

    2. Re:screw that *nix crap by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Informative
      Open directory project:
      Freeware text editors, mostly for Windows.

      Know of any more? Submit the URL and I'll take care of them.
      Find any on that list that are are no longer free? Email me or update the URL and I'll take care of it.

    3. Re:screw that *nix crap by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Interesting


      UltraEdit32 is great.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    4. Re:screw that *nix crap by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      but on windows use something that is designed for windows and not ported as an afterthought

      Why? This is text for godssake. This isn't a word processor.

      I admit, I'm a vi head. I've spent the time and effort involved in learning vi's nuances and find it to be extremely powerful. Whenever I have to use a Windows editor for anything more than the basics it's extremely annoying.

      Before I started using Unix and vi my favored editor was qedit in DOS. Nice editor for the time, albeit seriously memory limited. And I still have the install disks around somewhere... I think.

      The real question is, why should I use one editor on one OS, one editor on another, and a third editor on yet another? All this leads to is below optimal efficiency and experience on all three platforms. Hell of a lot better to decide on one editor that's available nearly universally and stick with it. Which is why I use vim. And install vim on any computer I own. Sure, if I wind up on someone else's Windows box I'll be stuck with Notepad, but I doubt I'll be doing extensive editing there, so it's doable. And on any Unix box I login to I'll have vi available, which is just a subset of vim.

      It may not have been a troll, but it was even less thought out than a lot of trolls I've seen here.

    5. Re:screw that *nix crap by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      BBEdit is nice, but if you've learned emacs well and have a beautiful environment built up, nothing can compete with the Win32 version of Xemacs. Nothing is nearly as powerful.

  7. Jedit by JumpSuit+Boy · · Score: 4, Informative

    At work we have standardized on Jedit http://www.jedit.org . Good syntax coloring. Lots of plugins: cvs , regex testing , and ton of others. A good macro language.

    --
    Oh really?
    1. Re:Jedit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I second Jedit. I just started using it recently and love it. The plugins are awesome.

    2. Re:Jedit by MaggieL · · Score: 2

      Add my vote for jEdit too. Platform independant, feature rich, works like a champ, and it's free.

      Download, use, be happy.

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    3. Re:Jedit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm like jedit a lot. I have used textpad and like it. However, lately I am using all diiferent kinds of systems. I have a PC at work, I go home and use my Mac (bbedit formerly) and a debian linux box and I've come to use jedit on all of them.

      It's not quite as bad switching around if you work on two platforms, but even then, having the same interface and features across the board is awesome.

      It works great with CVS and ANT too!

    4. Re:Jedit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree too that jEdit has become our choice too.Just tweak java to set the initial heap size to about 8Mb an dmax heap to about 100Mb and this puppy will run really fast

    5. Re:Jedit by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
      I love JEdit, but one major, major thing keeps me from using it: horrible memory management. Like every other Java application, JEdit suffers from obscene memory bloat. It chews upwards of 20 megs right off the line, and eats more and more the longer it stays open. For someone like me, who often leaves an editor open for 20 hours straight while working on absolutely disgusting amounts of code, this is unbearable. After a typical day of coding with JEdit, it often ends up having consumed over 100 megabytes of precious, precious RAM.

      Sigh.

    6. Re:Jedit by pcause · · Score: 1

      Also a Jedit user. If you are doing Web development the XInsert and autocomplete features are great and this app and the plugins just keep getting better.

    7. Re:Jedit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know about the "memory status" selection in the toolbar?

      It frees up unused memory and then gives you the memory used.

      I agree with you--it's the only thing about Jedit that bothers me. But relatively speaking, it really hasn't seemed too bad to me at all. I used to use things like Textpad and Ultraedit, and wouldn't go back at all. Jedit is incredibly powerful, open source, and really fast for a Java app.

    8. Re:Jedit by danpbrowning · · Score: 2

      Yes, that is true, and sad. But I never really notice, what with 512mb ram and all. :-)

      --
      Daniel
    9. Re:Jedit by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

      My problem is that even though I've got 512 megs of RAM and have never, to my knowledge, managed to use all of it, the perfectionist developer in me screams at seeing a single application consuming more than 20 megabytes of it. I guess I figure that if it's using that much memory, it had better be solving world hunger or making contact with aliens or, at the very least, letting me use Counter-Strike voice chat to tell my teammates to "set us up the bomb."

    10. Re:Jedit by danpbrowning · · Score: 2

      ROTFL :-)

      --
      Daniel
  8. Development tools under Windows by eyepeepackets · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...What do other Slashdot users develop in when they must use a Windows machine?"

    First I develop a migrane, then I use lots of tequila. Works every time.

    *comf*

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  9. vim unstable? by honold · · Score: 1, Informative

    i've been using the win32 version for years and years without a single problem. that aside, i'll recommend the following since you're doing development:

    ultraedit - www.ultraedit.com . even though i use vim more than anything, i keep it around for certain tasks and it's worth every penny. you didn't specify whether or not it had to be free...

    cedit - cedit.sourceforge.net . free ultraedit clone attempt. i wouldn't know how it works, because it wouldn't run under xp :O

    my advice is to try ultraedit, and a) if you like it and b) you're a cheap bastard, try cedit.

  10. Notepad of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously though, why don't you just use Linux ?

    I can understand if you _must_ have windows for one reason or another, but you aren't worth too much if your employer doesn't give you a Linux box also.
    Loser !

    1. Re:Notepad of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because every *nix text editor blows.

      Don't give me that Vi or Emacs bullshit either. Vi was OK in 1976, when it was written and Emacs is a steaming pile of shit.

  11. ultraedit by repoleved · · Score: 5, Informative

    WWW.ULTRAEDIT.COM

    1. Re:UltraEdit by Godeke · · Score: 2

      I cast my vote for Ultra Edit as well... small program with a lot of power in the right places. Color syntax highlighting for the esoteric languages I use (user definable) and hex edit for those annoying files.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    2. Re:ultraedit by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

      I second that. UltraEdit

    3. Re:ultraedit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It's a great program, but if you read
      http://www.ultraedit.com/products/story.html
      you might get a little freaked out.
      To quote:
      "As I went to bed that night, I was praying about the situation, and I just felt like saying to God "If you give me 20 registrations tomorrow I will KNOW that I should quit my full time job, that it is your will". As soon as I said this, I was excited, I felt sure it was going to happen. I also prayed for forgiveness if I was wrong to ask - I don't like to try and make deals with God but really wanted his confirmation.

      The next day came, I didn't mention this to my wife. This was between God and I, I would share it with my wife at the end of the day. Needless to say, I checked my e-mail looking for registrations, and I believe I had three in the morning - a good start. I was really excited that day, I called home a couple of times to see how the registrations were going - it was quiet!

      I got home later that day and checked the mail - No registrations! I was disappointed. I checked the fax machine, there was an order for 10! I couldn't wait to log on and found additional registrations - a total of 21!!!

      I am embarrassed to admit, at this point, being a technical person, I mentally noted that 21 was not 20 - I had asked for 20.

      I shared this with my wife, and we just prayed and gave thanks to God, who really had answered our prayers - we knew now that this was the thing to do.

      Later that evening, an additional registration came in - that made 22. As soon as I realized this, I remembered the night before - after asking God for 20 registrations, I had said to myself (I dare not say this to God - but He knows our every thought), I should have asked for 22 as it would be twice the number of the day before. Boy - did I know now that God was in control!!!"

    4. Re:UltraEdit by chrestomanci · · Score: 1

      <AOL>Me To</AOL>

      To clarify, UltraEdit is shareware, and costs $30.

      You can download a 45 day timebomed, but otherwise fully functional copy from here where you can also register your copy and get an unlock code with a credit card, via a secure site

      I have also found it quite good, and use it for all editing tasks at work (I use emacs under linux at home. Once I registered, I found that the author answered my e-mailed bug reports and questions promptly, and was helpful

      The only downside I can think of is that the author appears to be some sort of Christian evangelist, which just rubs me up the wrong way, of course this has no technical impact on the program.

      I hope this is useful

    5. Re:ultraedit by mjstrom · · Score: 1

      Err, so what? Ultraedit is a great program, I've used it for years now. If the author is very religious then more power to him - it doesn't change the fact that it is (IMHO) one of the better text editors that I've found.

    6. Re:ultraedit by drDugan · · Score: 2

      was reading the comments -- hoped somone had mentioned uedit. I can give it a third endorsement

      I use ultraedit all the time (and Linux). In fact old versions of ultraedit work perfectly under wine... but they didn't tear me away from emacs.

      I can't stand vi[m]

    7. Re:ultraedit by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Yeah, the guy is a total freak (this kind of stuff would even offend most religious people I know) and I hate knowing my thirty bucks is feeding his strange little complex, but UE has one great feature lacking in most of the other larger and complex text editors -- it doesn't crash. I can leave it up for days with 50 or 100 large files open, and it just keeps running. No leaks, no weirdness, and small in-memory footprint.

      Also, it had C# language support long before the VStudio.NET beta was stable enough to use regularly. :)

      I used NoteTab Pro for a long time, but it would very rarely crash out, and even more rarely, it would change ONE CHARACTER in ONE FILE to some random thing, which would take forever to track down.

      UE is definitely kick-ass.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    8. Re:ultraedit by erasmus_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      In addition to joining the other posts in praising this awesome text editor, I'm surprised no one has pointed out the helpful ability it has to replace the system Notepad program. Although other programs may have it, this is the only I've seen that gives you an executable to launch itself when someone specifically invokes Notepad instead of honoring your .txt or whatever file association. Easy instructions are in notepad.zip on their downloads page.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    9. Re:ultraedit by rickwood · · Score: 1

      Ian Mead is the man!

      UltraEdit has saved my butt on more than one occasion because it just works.

    10. Re:ultraedit by selan · · Score: 3, Informative
      Another ultraedit fan here. I think this is the only shareware app that I've ever paid for. When I used Windows I absolutely depended on it. Off the top of my head, here are some things that I liked about it:

      • tabbed editing windows
      • color coded syntax highlighting
      • regexp in search and replace
      • toggled hex editing
      • handles huge files easily (I once used it on a file (I think it was >1M) that was so big that it crashed Interdev--not that's it's so hard to crash Interdev, but ultraedit handled it beautifully)
      • etc, etc.
    11. Re:ultraedit by tommck · · Score: 2
      Tom's Intstructions:

      C:\WINNT>rename notepad.exe oldnotepad.exe
      C:\WINNT>rename ultraedit.exe notepad.exe
      You'd think this would work... but NOOOOO...
      Microsoft somehow automagically restores the notepad.exe file!!!!

      Here's a log
      (I put the time in the prompt so you can see that it took about 5 seconds for it to replace the file):
      C:\WINNT> set prompt=$t$p$g

      12:48:19.33C:\WINNT>rename notepad.exe bak.exe

      12:48:24.09C:\WINNT>dir notepad.exe
      Volume in drive C is CRAPTOP
      Volume Serial Number is E07E-7200

      Directory of C:\WINNT

      File Not Found

      12:48:26.37C:\WINNT>dir notepad.exe
      Volume in drive C is CRAPTOP
      Volume Serial Number is E07E-7200

      Directory of C:\WINNT

      File Not Found

      12:48:27.33C:\WINNT>dir notepad.exe
      Volume in drive C is CRAPTOP
      Volume Serial Number is E07E-7200

      Directory of C:\WINNT

      File Not Found

      12:48:28.29C:\WINNT>dir notepad.exe
      Volume in drive C is CRAPTOP
      Volume Serial Number is E07E-7200

      Directory of C:\WINNT

      12/07/1999 03:00a 50,960 notepad.exe
      1 File(s) 50,960 bytes
      0 Dir(s) 16,169,014,784 bytes free

      12:48:29.54C:\WINNT>

      How messed up is that?

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    12. Re:ultraedit by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

      As I said, the zip comes with an instruction file, which you should probably read before ranting about it not working in this forum. Notepad.exe, and most other Windows system files, are subject to Windows File Protection. If you do not replace the file as indicated in the steps, Windows will try to restore the file because it assumes it has been maliciously deleted or infected. Try again, good luck.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    13. Re:ultraedit by KnightStalker · · Score: 2

      Same here. I've registered it twice, once to renew it for version 7. And I've used it to successfully edit binary files that were more than 500M, on an NT machine with only about 32 megs of ram.

      Now if Ian would just release a Unix version, I could get rid of this byzantine Emacs thing. Unfortunately nothing but Emacs can replace UE under Unix. Using Wine almost works, but then I'm out of luck on the Solaris boxen. :-)

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    14. Re:ultraedit by Qrlx · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not saying it's a good thing, but Windows File Protection can be overriden in the registry, and the whole concept is to prevent people, by which I mean users, from trying to see the Secret Message from Bill Gates that only shows up if you del *.dll in C:\Windows.

      Why is notepad a protected file? Hell, why is calc.exe a protected file? That's what I'd like to know.

    15. Re:ultraedit by tommck · · Score: 1
      Hey dumbass... I was not attempting to say that ultraedit's replacement of notepad doesn't work. I was just talking about how my simple "rename" statements should work and was surprised that Windows was replacing it. Relax

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    16. Re:ultraedit by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I took time out of my day to write the original post and explain to you why you were seeing the behavior that you were seeing (remember? "How messed up is that?"), only to be called a dumbass. Oh well, perhaps it might be useful to someone more polite. Have a nice day.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    17. Re:ultraedit by tommck · · Score: 1
      You said that I was "ranting about it not working in this forum". I was not ranting about UltraEdit not working. That's why I called you a dumbass. I did, however, find the information useful. Thank you for the link.

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    18. Re:ultraedit by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

      I am pretty sure that Ultraedit is about the only shareware I have ever paid for as well...and its definately been well worth the money I paid for it...I am getting at least double the amount done that I used too..and the automatic .bak functionality has saved my ass more than once...the only feature I would love is being able to keep multiple revisions vms style....

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    19. Re:ultraedit by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      Ultraedit won me over last summer. Also, one of the only shareware programs I ever purchased (another one I bought, for those the want Windows multi-desktop check out Altdesk) Anyway, it's also tremendously useful if you frequently modify text files over ftp. You can open, work, save all through FTP. I have never encountered anything better.

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    20. Re:ultraedit by Grotus · · Score: 1
      You forgot some things:
      • User-configurable syntax highlighting (for those odd languages that no one else uses)
      • Line-ending conversions
      • ASCII <=> EBCDIC conversions (which is what initially got me)
      • Unicode <=> ASCII conversions
      • Built-in ftp
      • Column mode
      Awesome program for working with data files as well as programming.
      --
      "From my cold, dead hands you damn, dirty apes!" - CH
    21. Re:ultraedit by Cyrano_De · · Score: 1

      Hands down the best editor on windows if you just HAVE to use something other than vi (which comes with the resource kit for NT). Not sure how I got it with 2KPro but from a command prompt vi works like a charm.

      --
      01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01010011 01001001 010
    22. Re:ultraedit by blackula · · Score: 1

      Shut up moron.

    23. Re:ultraedit by PommeFritz · · Score: 1

      Sure thing. Amazingly powerful and stable, and the search/replace in files is worth the registration fee alone.

    24. Re:ultraedit by 0x20 · · Score: 1

      Ultraedit is nice and all, but syntax highlighting is severely messed up. Try editing a moderately complex mixed-HTML-and-PHP page with strings quoted in different ways and you'll see what I mean. It was enough to make me stop using it.

      The following editors kick varying amounts of ass:
      - PrimalScript: very cool. Shareware.
      - HTML-kit: would be best but lacks search-and-replace in files (it's available via kludgy plug-in.) Free until next release.
      - 1stPage 2000: great and free, but eerily resembles HomeSite (really!)
      - NuSphere's PHPedit is excellent. Commercial.
      - ActiveState's Komodo is incredible, maybe the best of all. Commercial.

    25. Re:ultraedit by tommck · · Score: 1
      Ahh... the refreshing voice of reason comes to straighten me out...
      So nice to hear from you

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    26. Re:UltraEdit by Graelin · · Score: 1

      The only downside I can think of is that the author appears to be some sort of Christian evangelist, which just rubs me up the wrong way, of course this has no technical impact on the program

      You too? I registered my copy over a year ago. But a friend of mine, who uses it for ALL his editing needs, refuses to buy it due to that one page on his site.

      Ohh well, to each their own. UE32 is hands down the best Win32 editor out there IMO.

      It lacks only one thing, better project managment. If it had a built-in Bitkeeper or CVS client I'd be totally hooked.

    27. Re:ultraedit by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      UE rocks and keeps getting better, and what better whey to open your explorer.exe file and changing the start button to a "Shit" button !!!! :) Forever grateful for annoyances.org for turning me onto it.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    28. Re:ultraedit by eastern · · Score: 1

      1MB is child's play for UltraEdit--I once loaded a _23MB_ file on a Win98 machine with 64MB RAM and it handled that without any hysterics.

      Of course the one thing that's really different about UltraEdit is developer Ian Mead's belief in God's role in the process of creating software.

      Him and Larry Wall.

  12. EditPlus by elendel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out http://www.editplus.com/
    By far the best text editor I have ever used. All of my development is done in this editor, since I have yet to find anything comparable in either BeOS or *BSD. It has syntax highlighting for virtually everything, and if it doesn't have what you want, you can add it very easily. And you can run arbitrary commands straight from the editor, such as compiling.
    You want it, this thing has it.
    The only drawback for all those free software nuts, it's shareware - free until you pay for it. But well worth the money, if you believe in that kind of thing.

    --

    If I was worried about Karma, I'd eat tofu.
    1. Re:EditPlus by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      I've used EditPlus for a number of years now. It is without a doubt the best text editor on Windows for my needs (though it's not a match for BBEdit on the Mac of course).

      It has a few flaws, but for most things it works very well. I use it primarily for coding (Java, Python, etc). Syntax colouring is excellent, external tools are very easy to integrate (within limits - this is one of the areas I'd prefer more work in, but it's still good).

    2. Re:EditPlus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EditPlus does run under wine on Linux, although it's a bit slow.

    3. Re:EditPlus by fuerstma · · Score: 1

      I fourth the motion for EditPlus. I don't say this lightly, but it's actually worth PAYING for. Wow. Yeah, it's that good. I use it for C/C++, Perl, Pascal (since I despise debugging former co-workers stuff in Delphi, just edit it in EditPlus and then open Delphi to compile changes), PHP, ASP, VbScript and my SQL create statements.

      And I second the guy that says it's not as good as BBEdit for the Mac, which was just sheer joy to work with. But I started to not be able to afford a Mac years ago. Now I'm just one of the Wintel sheep. Baa baa.

      At least I found EditPlus.

      --
      www.jackasscritics.com
    4. Re:EditPlus by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

      I've used EditPlus for three years since early v1 days, and it's wonderful. After spending ages searching for a new text editor, this was the only one I found that worked the way I expected it to, regarding keyboard control (mainly arrow-key movement). I've used it for web development (PHP, ASP) and desktop software development (C/C++, Java), along with any other text files.

      The only thing I wish it had was a scriptable tool-bar and for the clip bar to have a full scripting language like NoteTabPro has. Other than that it is awesome.

      One thing I do like about EditPlus is that the author has added features that users requested. For example, after I used HomeSite for a while I got to like the file/directory tab on the left, so I asked the EditPlus author. He didn't do it immediately, saying that he didn't see the need for it, but I guess others asked for it too as it was added in the next release :-)

      And at $30 it's cheaper than some of the others too.

      If you want something free, stick with NotePad, if you want something good, get EditPlus.

    5. Re:EditPlus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, like, how long did it take you to write the editor?

  13. Multiedit for win32 by schmaltz · · Score: 3, Informative

    very powerful, c-style macros, record keystrokes, language-specific settings/formattings, all the power of emacs but with a friendly (yet not dumbed-down) interface.

    will interface with command-line compilers, also integrates with many IDEs to be the source editor, and respond to the IDE commands etc.

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  14. Text editors... by pb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My absolute favorite programming IDE ever was Borland Turbo Pascal 7.0; therefore, I'm a sucker for any editor written in TurboVision, like RHIDE or SetEdit.

    DOS Edit is still pretty decent in the console; on the GUI side, NoteTab is a notepad replacement on steroids (the "Light" version is free).

    If you download Cygwin, you can compile almost any UNIX-y text editor you want, including my favorite--nano.

    And if all else fails, Ask Google!

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:Text editors... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Heh. I used the Turbo C 2.0 IDE as a general purpose editor for years. It was nice, and the keystrokes were hard coded into my fingers. Eventually, QEdit replaced it as my textmode editor. I also used Sidekick's editor. All three were of the venerable and glorious WordStar lineage (Control K, command). I used WordStar on a Z80 enhanced Apple ][ running CP/M. I also used (5 Karma points to the person who can remember *this* editor) Magic Window to write a novella and many short stories.

      For Windows, I keep a copy of TextPad32 (textpad.com) around in my /pub/system/wbin directory (also burned on a CD), along with a copy of WinZip, ACDSee, and a baker's dozen of other good tools. It's great, and the version I use runs right from the .exe without installation. Not sure if that applies to the current versions.

      For *nix, I just started using Kate as a preferred editor, the first good GUI editor I've found for the platform. I lie slightly on the vi side, but also use emacs (and Joe and even pico) to edit stuff. Call me a polythestic editor user in the *nix editor jihad. I really have yet to find anything that *really* feels good, a la WordStar/Turbo C 2.0/QEdit for modern systems.

      I also used the built in editor in {COMMO} for awhile - thus showing that I will use whatever is handy... including cat > or COPY CON. :)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Text editors... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      Have you not tried NEdit? It sounds like what you'd want in a UNIX GUI text editor...

    3. Re:Text editors... by Electrum · · Score: 2

      If you like WordStar and QEdit editors, then you'll probably love JOE.

    4. Re:Text editors... by pb · · Score: 2

      Then definitely check out RHIDE and SetEdit; all should know about the glory of Borland-style IDEs!

      I used the Control-K commands up through Turbo Pascal 5.5 or so; I'm sure that lives on, or something like it...
      And originally I was stuck with "edlin" and whatever built-in editors were in my programming tools (Turbo BASIC, Turbo Pascal, and later QBASIC and DOS Edit), and used "Leading Edge Word Processing" to write papers. I don't think I really had a stand-alone editor on my C64, but I did have a cheesy publishing program...
      And yeah I used COPY CON for batch files; didn't everyone?

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    5. Re:Text editors... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I tried an early version of RHIDE quite awhile ago - I'll give it another shot. I haven't tried SetEdit (never even heard about it until this article).

      I used Leading Edge WP as well... remember Twin, the Lotus 123 clone? This article is like memory lane.

      As to the other two people who responded to me, I tried NEdit and didn't like it, and I do use Joe (in fact, I mentioned it in the original post).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:Text editors... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I just downloaded and took a look at RHIDE. I can't help but feel *extremely* uncomfortable with a text editor that advises you to suid it as root. I understand that it came from a DOS world, and needs access to the video hardware, but that just... rubs me wrong.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:Text editors... by pb · · Score: 2

      I should probably warn you that RHIDE works *much* better under DOS; I didn't like the Linux port very much, although I think there are some patches out there to make it more stable.

      I haven't really tried SetEdit, but it looks good--I can only hope it's more stable...

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  15. PFE by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use PFE, the Programmer's File Editor. It doesn't even have syntax highlighting, but it's light, fast, very configurable and the macro function rocks (Shift + F7, Do some stuff with Ctrl+Cursor or whatever you want, Ctrl + F7, repeat with F7).

    Regrettably it's out of development, though there still is a bug that sometimes occures: when editing, lines disappear and you should not save the file if that happens. But it does not happen very often.

    The Mode feature is not very intuitive, but once you figured out how it works, it allows you to switch things like line-indenting, wrapping, etc. based on the file type you are editing.

    http://www.lancs.ac.uk/people/cpaap/pfe/

    I don't use other editors because of the time to get used to them... and because of basic stuff like Ctrl+Cursor, where PFE stopps at far more characters than whitespace only. I need this a lot and most other editors don't do this.

    1. Re:PFE by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      I've been using PFE for that long, I almost can't remember ever not using it.

      Other editors have come and gone, yet PFE remains, trusty as ever - only Ultraedit has come close, and that was only because it was a freebie on a magazine CD.

      I do sometimes wish that the macro handling could do more, and I believe there was to be some development in that area (before it stopped completely), but for reasonably simple repetitive tasks it was ideal.

      One thought - has anyone tried getting Alan Phillips to release the code, given that he presumably no longer has the time to carry on?

    2. Re:PFE by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1
      Quote from the PFE Website:
      ...regrettably time will not permit replying to PFE-related e-mail.
      Even if someone did, he probably did not answer :) But I will send him an email. Let's hope he answers anyway.
    3. Re:PFE by MountainLogic · · Score: 2

      This is my old stand-by edit I place on every box. I tend tto use an IDE, such as Jbuilder6 on Win boxes, but it I have to open a source file for a language that I don't have my IDE open I use PFE.

    4. Re:PFE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. Programmer's 32 bit file editor is really good.

    5. Re:PFE by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 2

      Don't know the timeline here, but PFE is the basis of Microchip's MPLab IDE for their PIC microcontrollers. Do we know if he just switched to commercial development for PFE? I still have PFE, started using it from my Win3.1 days. Very good.

      Question for the Ask Slashdot original poster: which MicroEmacs are you using? I've had nothing but success with JASSPA MicroEmacs and nothing but grief from the original UEmacs and its brethren. Also in the JASSPA family is nanoEmacs (Emacs on a floppy!), haven't tried that one yet.
  16. for web coding... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

    HTML-Kit works like a top, and has a great plugin system. I haven't done much much c coding with it, but it does handle auto-indenting and colorization of C/C++ code on top of the popular web programing laguages (Perl, PHP, Java, *Script, and VB code).

    --
    09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    1. Re:for web coding... by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      I'll second that.

      While the UI isn't brilliant it's certainly useable, but what make HTML-Kit great is that it's got HTML-Tidy integration! - Import and tidy up sloppy code (not mine I might add), upgrade to CSS automatically, convert to XHTML in 5 seconds, auto-indent and beautify code, etc.etc. Truly fantastic stuff.

      THAT'S why I use HTML-Kit [grin]

  17. HomeSite and C++Builder by Electrum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For anything web related (HTML, CSS, PHP) I use HomeSite. It works. Great editor, nice syntax highlighting, lots of nice features. I haven't found anything even remotely comparable for Linux, unfortunately. For C/C++, C++Builder is excellent. The syntax highlighting works well and the editor is amazingly fast. Works on files of literally any size with no slowdowns.

    1. Re:HomeSite and C++Builder by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      I haven't found anything even remotely comparable for Linux

      Have you tried Quanta? It rocks. On topic, I also use and endorse HomeSite for Win32, it's pretty slick.

    2. Re:HomeSite and C++Builder by Electrum · · Score: 2

      Have you tried Quanta? It rocks. On topic, I also use and endorse HomeSite for Win32, it's pretty slick.

      I tried Quanta about nine months ago, but the fonts sucked and made it unusable. I set the colors exactly the same as on Windows, and used the same TTF fonts from Windows (which for Courier New, is free from Microsoft). In KDE, there is way too much spacing between lines, and you can't make the fonts bold in the color coding settings like you can in HomeSite (at least, it doesn't work). Also, the editor is missing a lot of important features that HomeSite includes, like the visible margin and gutter with line numbers.

      Unfortunately, it's just not a replacement for HomeSite yet. I took screenshots of the editors in Windows and KDE to illustrate the difference. If anyone can explain how to make the fonts look exactly the same in KDE, then I might try KDE again. For me, this a huge usability problem that keeps me in Windows for my workstation desktop.
    3. Re:HomeSite and C++Builder by whatsit · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Homesite is the best web authoring tool I have found for Windoze. It has good-intuitive shortcuts, bookmarks, syntax highlighting, great online help for html, and good css help.

      Unfortunately, I also have to agree with the statement about *nix lacking a program that even comes close to Homesite. Though, I do have to give props to the author of Bluefish for a good attempt that keeps getting better. Someday, I hope I can use Bluefish instead of paying my US$50 for Homesite.

      --

      user@host:/usr/bin$ whatis ./java
      java: nothing appropriate.
  18. XEmacs by muon1183 · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an emacs user, I feel obliged to point out that xemacs is available for windows, and works quite well. It runs natively under windows, so you don't need to deal with cygwin or any of that (unless you want to, they do have a cygwin version available). And if you're a vi person, you can always run emacs in vi mode.

    --

    There's no sig like SIGSEG
    1. Re:XEmacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. What really bugs me is that I can't figure out how to use EMACS mode in VI!

    2. Re:xemacs by Pedersen · · Score: 1
      Editor of the gods.

      But, I always thought of Loki as one of those less pleasant gods, the kind you'd more or less want to avoid what he gives away...

      Sorry, couldn't resist :)

      --

      GPL made simple: What was my stuff is now our stuff. If you improve our stuff, please keep it our stuff.
    3. Re:XEmacs by jefu · · Score: 1


      I'm an emacs user (with fallbacks to vi for some quick editing tasks) but have used (at one point or another) pretty much every style of editor available (from teco to ed to notepad to who-knows-what), and I find emacs (xemacs or emacs) the most convenient and powerful. I've written elisp to both extend the editor and solve once-off problems. I use it on unix and in windows and would use it by preference on any platform where I need to edit things extensively. Indeed, I find emacs to be a better editor than many language specific IDE's.

    4. Re:XEmacs by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Indeed, I find emacs to be a better editor than many language specific IDE's

      You can come out and say it -- Visual Studio's IDE sucks.

  19. UltraEdit by EvlG · · Score: 2

    I love UltraEdit.

    The hex editing mode is really nice, as is integration into the shell (right click on any file to edit it, text or binary!)

    UltraEdit Does a good job of syntax highlighting, and it has lots of options. It supports large files, is very fast, and not too heavy when it comes to resources.

  20. The Almost-Commercial Solution Is My Best by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

    Ever since downloading the free trial of Allaire HomeSite 4, I've been hooked with the product. Macromedia bought out Allaire (and I think I read that here), and released HomeSite 5, which is hardly different from 4.5, but keeps me with the latest version, which is something I think every self-respecting geek goes for.

    Granted, I haven't actually used the free trial ever since. I've been cracking/patching it since around 4.5.2. It's fantastic. I highly recommend Macromedia HomeSite 5, even if you have to buy it (and your employer would probably be willing to pick up some copies; it's a great complement to Dreamweaver from what I'm told). It allows you to work in HTML, VRML, JavaScript, Java, PERL, PHP.. you name it, if you work with the source, you can work with it in HomeSite. It's highly customisable and comes with onboard preview support for IE and Netscape (Mozilla, sadly, isn't supported).

    --
    Matthew G P Coe
    http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:The Almost-Commercial Solution Is My Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macromedia took out the design tab - why buy Homesite for $50 to do WYSIWYG layout when you can buy Dreamweaver for $200?

    2. Re:The Almost-Commercial Solution Is My Best by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      I never used the Design tab anyway; I hate WYSIWYG website development.

      Besides, I said HomeSite was a complement to Dreamweaver, not a replacement (Assuming you thought I'm advocating HomeSite over Dreamweaver in every way). If you use both for your development, you've basically the two best design products available on the closed-source market. Toss in Flash and Photoshop and you're industry standard.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
  21. my personal favourte by Higman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I prefer ContTEXT.

    It's a great editor for my needs. I do php, perl, html, c/c++, and Java in it. It has a modular syntax hilighter so you can create your own hilighting schemes and/or download existing ones. I also has syntax hilighting for my apache conf files.

    It also has auto indenting, soft/hard tabs, programmable buttons/shorcuts based on file type. I set up one button for compiling, one for running, one for formatting, etc..

    It supports CRLF, LF, and CR based text files so it works with every platform, and you can switch modes whenever you want.

    I also enjoy the tabbed MDI setup, it works really well for me.

    At least give this one a try, the worst that could happen is you don't like it ;-)


    ~higman
    --
    -- [insert sig here]
  22. Code-Genie by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a big fan of Code-Genie... customizable syntax highlighting and whatnot, quite nice.

    1. Re:Code-Genie by davidu · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks awesome!

      I'll give it a try...

      -davidu

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    2. Re:Code-Genie by DeadSea · · Score: 2

      That does appear to be a nice freeware text editor. Another freeware text editor for windows that I like to use is Context - Programmer's Editor.

  23. Emacs forever! by vsync64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I use Emacs on *nix, Mac, and Windows. It works fine everywhere, which means 1 set of keybindings to remember, 1 macro language to learn, and 1 configuration to share between machines.

    One editor to rule them all, one editor to find them...

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    1. Re:Emacs forever! by stevey · · Score: 1

      Seconded!

      You might want to have a look at the GNU Emacs on Windows FAQ for details of Windows specific things, and oddities.

    2. Re:Emacs forever! by Sheridan · · Score: 2
      Thirded!

      Then again, the first thing I do with any win32 machine that I have to use is install GNU Emacs, plus all of the Cygwin tools, including XFree86 (Exceed? ReflectionX? Pah!).

      That way I get my X sessions tunneled right to my desktop over ssh, I have Emacs for all text editing (and the rest). I only wish I could persuade Gnus to talk to our Openmail servers (which are set up for MS Lookout and ccmail clients - perversely I think I might have more joy in this once we're moved off b0rkenmail and onto M Sexchange!).

      Cheers, Mark

    3. Re:Emacs forever! by dhall · · Score: 1

      I have both Gvim and GNU Emacs 21.2.1 running on my w2k laptop.

      So you can have the best of both worlds. The ability to quickly edit any small file, and then an editting environment.

  24. Gvim. by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 3, Informative

    unstable? never had it crash on me and i do most of my web develop ment with it. if im not telneted into my box from a remote site working on it..
    ive never had a problem with Gvim on windows 2k. perhaps its the OS. or need a newer version of Gvim.

    1. Re:Gvim. by u02sgb · · Score: 1
      Yeah, my Gvim doesn't crash either although it does raise a question - have you got Cygwin installled? I found a lot of the functionality of vi depended on command line tools that were installed with Cygwin. Just a suggestion.

      Stu.

    2. Re:Gvim. by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I have reasonably recent versions of gvim installed on WinME + WinXP boxen with no problems whatsoever. Once I fix the defaults back to more like the standard unix defaults it works just like I want it, and I've certainly *never* had it crash.

      Looks like he's using an odd version, or his windows install is so borked it can't run anything reliably, or he's got dodgy hardware.

      jh

      --

      jh

    3. Re:Gvim. by AReilly · · Score: 1

      Just a ditto to all of the above. GVim on W2k-Pro is stable as a rock, and has all of the vi goodness and then some.

      --
      -- Andrew
    4. Re:Gvim. by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2

      Absolutely gVim. I've used Vim 5.8, 6.0, and 6.1 (the gVim executable, not the console versions) regularly on Windows 98SE, NT, and 2K (and Solaris, HP-UX, and Linux, too, both console and GUI versions). It's never so much as dropped a character.

      I have plenty of RAM on all the relevant systems (no less than 96M). If you've got less, try downloading SiSoft Sandra Standard, and check "Windows Memory Information" to see if you're running low.

      I also reboot my Windows 98SE system about once a day.-|

      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    5. Re:Gvim. by tpv · · Score: 1

      Me too
      </AOL>

      Seriously, I use GVim for all my text editing on Windows (and other platforms too).
      Never had a stability problem at all. Some features haven't worked 100% out of the box (mostly things that assume unix stuff) e.g. I had trouble getting :make to work correctly (using ant).

      However the benefit of being able to use the same excellent editor on all platforms far outweighs some of the minor annoyances of Gvim32

      I'd also plug Pepper, since I also own a license for that, and have found it to be quite a nice editor.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  25. EditPlus by jafuser · · Score: 4, Informative
    I use EditPlus for everything that involves text.

    It comes with syntax highlighting for HTML, CSS, PHP, ASP, Perl, C/C++, Java, JavaScript and VBScript, plus you can get user-created "STX" files for many other languages, or write your own. Each token color can be easily configured from a pallete selection dialog.

    My favorite feature though is the built in FTP (File Open/Save/Save As) system, which makes opening a file on a remote FTP server as seamless as opening a file on your local machine.

    Here's a few other features which I felt seemed noteworthy:

    • Regular-expression like search and replace (across one or all open documents)
    • Group files into "projects", which are saved in the config and easily accessible by a "Project" menu at any time.
    • Keyboard macro recording/playback/save ability
    • ASCII chart reference
    • Document templates
    • User-configurable tools
    • On-screen document selector tabs (for quicking jumping between open documents)
    • Can make whitespace chars visible
    • Fullscreen mode
    • Spellchecker
    • IE integration for quick previews
    • Box select/insert/overwrite
    • Reformat paragraphs
    • Monitor clipboard
    • HTML entity conversion
    • Cliptext palette
    • Function list generation
    • Line sort with options for de-dupe, case sensistivity, ascending/descending, start at column, ascii order
    • Split views
    • PC,Unix,Mac EOL modes
    • On-screen line numbers with each line
    • Print Preview (option to include line numbers)
    • All program functions can be reassigned to different keyboard combinations
    • User-configurable toolbar

    Sorry, I guess I got carried away :) I really like this program though, and I've been using it for about three or four years now. It's probably the only program I've ever registered within 15 minutes of downloading :)

    I don't like the default colors and font that come with it. I prefer dark backgrounds, so I always set the background to black, then let the lumance level of all the default syntax highlighting colors to "200". I also don't like the default variable-width font, as I prefer mono-spaced fonts, but I don't like Courier, so I set it to the windows "FixedSys" font. Once I've made these adjustments, EditPlus looks more like a UNIX terminal than a Visual* editor.

    On the occasions I've considered switching to Linux, EditPlus is probably one of the few things holding me back from doing so.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  26. TextPad by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    http://www.textpad.com. Cheap, powerful, fast, & very stable.

  27. xemacs by ultrabot · · Score: 2, Informative

    xemacs. Version 21.4.6. Available as windows InstallShield. Editor of the gods.

    Bow

    Bow

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  28. Here are a few... by Shade1001 · · Score: 1

    NoteTab, Golden Pen and HTML-Kit...

    I'll just stick to Notepad personally, as far as windows is concerned. Other than that, VI forever!

    1. Re:Here are a few... by davecason · · Score: 1

      If you really dig notepad as an editor, you should definitely download the Note Extender:
      Notepad Extender Download Page @ www.code-development.com
      Among other things, it adds buttons below the menus for common functions such as saving a file and it shows you what line number your cursor is on at the bottom of the window.
      It says 95/NT on the download page but I am running without any trouble in Windows 2000.

  29. Xemacs... by kuhneng · · Score: 3, Informative

    Easy to use (menus and buttons until you learn the keystrokes).

    The Installshield installer the folks at www.xemacs.org provide gives you a very capable editor without any painful configuration. Default editing modes are pre-bound to most common file formats.

  30. Visual Slickedit by ebbe11 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Pros:
    • Superb source code browser. The main reason why I bought Slickedit.
    • Runs on most OS'es including Linux and OS/390(!).
    • C-like macro-language
    • The people at Slickedit are very responsive if you're having trouble. This includes support as well as sales.
    Cons:
    • It costs money. A single user license is $299 in USA and Canada, $329 everywhere else.
    • No Mac version.
    See more at www.slickedit.com.
    Disclaimer: I use Slickedit eight hours a day but am in no other way affiliated with the company.
    --

    My opinion? See above.
    1. Re:Visual Slickedit by mlc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I also like this software, even enough that it's possibly the only piece of commercial software I own and use (they have a Linux port, as well as port to many other Unices). Definitely worth the $99 student price.

      It's the only editor I could find that properly supports HTML/PHP as nicely as MSVC++ supports C++ (pop-up function help and other goodies). I also use it for Java, occasionally for C. When I had the misfortune of having to use Cold Fusion for a class once, it supported that too.

    2. Re:Visual Slickedit by LordNimon · · Score: 2

      I also vote for Slickedit. It is by far the best text editor I've seen. It's worth every penny.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Visual Slickedit by thewheel · · Score: 1

      I use SlickEdit on Windows 2000 almost daily, but it's very unstable.

      It crashes at least once a week. It's good about recovering afterwards, but it's still an incovenience. After all, an editor shouldn't crash more than the OS!

    4. Re:Visual Slickedit by ebbe11 · · Score: 2
      I use SlickEdit on Windows 2000 almost daily, but it's very unstable.

      So do I, and yes, I have had it crash on me. But there are months of daily use between those crashes. I've used SlickEdit for Windows since version 4 and I have just upgraded to version 7. During that time I have found Slickedit to be a very stable piece of software.

      It crashes at least once a week.

      Hmm, you have applied the latest patches, haven't you?

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  31. jEdit by rjh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    jEdit (available here) is available anywhere there's a reasonably recent Java2 runtime. On Windows with J2SDK1.4, I've noticed that it takes a fair bit of time to load up, but once loaded it's acceptably snappy--it's never going to win points for speed, but it manages to not be noticeably and/or annoyingly slow, which is good.

    It has bindings for something like 50 different languages, from Ada to SQL and every-other-thing in between. I have been exceptionally pleased with jEdit so far, at least on Win32. On UNIX, jEdit is a little slower, to the point where it enters noticeably and annoyingly slow, but it's still a defensible choice.

    If you do a lot of crossplatform work (I do) and want to keep your basic work environment the same in both environments, you can do an awful lot worse than jEdit.

  32. SlickEdit by AdamBa · · Score: 2
    I use SlickEdit. There is a Visual SlickEdit product, which is a Windows app, but I actually prefer the version that runs in the Command Prompt (because when you exit it, you are right back in the command window so you can compile right then). Unfortunately I don't know if that version is still included with Visual SlickEdit (it used to be a separate product, then it was bundled for a while).

    As an added bonus you can tell yourself you are using a descendent of the very editor that was used by the actual developers of the early versions of NT!

    - adam

    1. Re:SlickEdit by ebbe11 · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately I don't know if that version is still included with Visual SlickEdit (it used to be a separate product, then it was bundled for a while).

      It isn't but since Slickedit has excellent facilities for building from within the editor, it isn't necessary to drop to a command window. Slickedit can grab the compiler output and show it in window where you can double-click on the error and have the code line in question shown in the editor.

      Basically Slickedit contains all the good features found in IDEs without being tied to specific language/compiler.

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  33. Emacs or UltraEdit by DaitanGio · · Score: 1

    I find Emacs very confortable.
    You can install a lot of package you use under Unix (eg. folding, and so on) and it is complete.
    My coworker like a lot UltraEdit, so take a look to it (but it isn't free!)

    --
    -- Giovanni Daitan Giorgi http://gioorgi.com http://www.siforge.org
  34. many editors for many tasks by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    I personally use NoteTab for just about everythnig from note-keeping to times when I need to look at several text documents at the same time. For web development, I quite love Macromedia's HomeSite, but since I can't afford to own a legal copy (shh... don't tell), EVRSoft's 1st Page 2000 is far from being a step down. It's free, it's fast, and it has similar features and feel as HomeSite. (But after kludging around with Cold Fusion, I will probably not go back to HomeSite. ColdFusion Studio still gives me nightmares.) Then for C/C++ development, I'm still looking for the right editor. I'm picking up Emacs on Linux, but for Windoze dev work, I need something with a filename other than MSDEV.EXE. I've come to hate that file with everything in me. But if you're a lazy coder like me, C++ Builder (or Kylix 3 in Linux) is definitely the way to go.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  35. UltraEdit32 by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Informative

    UltraEdit32 does it for me.

    Support for HUGE files, thousands of files open simultaneously, regex search & replace, interactive function listing, syntax highlighting, split window with synchronized scrolling, search & replace in multiple files (with regexes), find in multiple files (like grep), htmltidy built-in, column editing mode, converts to and from dos, mac and unix line endings, hex editing mode, and lots and lots of other stuff.

    definately worth a look.
    jeremiah

  36. vigor by den_erpel · · Score: 1

    If you are using Windows for daily work, the only editor for you to use is vigor or recently vimgor. Seriously, it is the only solution for you >:)

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  37. Just as an exercise... by barrettlight50 · · Score: 1

    ...I ran a couple of common phrases through the M$Word grammar check:

    I must us a Windows machine -- ok
    I must us an Windows machine -- ok
    I must use a Win doze machine -- ok
    All your Windows are belong to us -- ok

    Not bad for a paltry 8.6 mb .exe.

    1. Re:Just as an exercise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 and 4 are caught by my MSWord grammar checker. 3 doesn't technichally break any grammar rules. You must use a machine. It happens to be a "doze" machine. A Win doze machine, in fact. Don't know what to tell you about sentence 1 though. No verb. Hard to call that a sentence.

  38. Textpad by CySurflex · · Score: 3, Informative
    Textpad from http://www.textpad.com

    Mentioned twice before but I figured I'd add my bit:

    1. Regular expression "replace" - very useful

    2. opens (very) large files quickly

    3. I actually paid the shareware fee - for those that know me that should say something...

    4. Hex mode

    Also, not a text editor but a very usefull addition to your toolset is "EasyDiff" and "EasyDiff Pro", which is a powerhouse of text and file system comparisons.

    CySurflex

  39. GVim works well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GVim works very well on Windows, even on ME. If you experience problems, simply post bug reports to the Vim list, instead of flaming GVim on /..

  40. ConTEXT anyone? by unikron · · Score: 1

    I had to use gcc under windows, and this little program helped me (until i got my hands on devc++) but it was ok, and it's got a heckuva colorcoding (even on x86 assembly)...

    I think it's a nice option for windows editors (and it's freeeeeeeee)

    - Unikron

  41. (g)VIM still best by Domini · · Score: 3, Informative

    (G)VIM is still the best generic editor by far in my opinion. It can edit huge files (I've corrected codec tags in 700Mb AVIs), it's fast, and it integrates quite well in the windows environment. And it's (totally) free.

    Well, that depends on the type of editing you do. If it's coding, then VIM is the best - if not, then it's a toss-up.

    Its syntax hilighting, code-folding and command-based editing modes make it ideal... and once you press 'i' and have the backspace=2 option set, it's basically the same as textpad32/notepad/ultraedit.

    PS: VIM is NOT vi! vi was written for a different era. I prefer Emacs over vi, but not over VIM.

    Also, I do prefer the native IDEs when I code in Delphi, Visual C++, Python (here I use Boa-constructor instead of (g)VIM)

    1. Re:(g)VIM still best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not (totally) free.. it has a moral cost.

      Hehe, well, it's actually charityware. :)

  42. Yep, it's da bomb, but.... by kxr · · Score: 1

    TextPad is, as far as I'm concerned, the bee's knees - not just in terms of Windows-based editors. It's probably my favourite editor on any platform. My only couple of gripes (I've mentioned these to Helios, but to no avail as yet)...

    • although the serach (and replace) features are excellent (decent regex support) there's still no incremental search feature
    • syntax colourisation is good, but I'd quite like to be able to use bold, italics, etc in syntax highlighting
    • document classes are based on file extensions (how very Windoze) - and can't be based on (say) a shebang, so unless my Perl scripts are called something.pl they won't get marked up according to my Perl syntax highlighting
  43. I hope you've paid up ... by Clansman · · Score: 1

    As you say, its shareware - you try it, you like it, you buy it. I assume you have paid now that you have used it to save a document over a 1000 times and are raving about it ... :-)

    Maybe it's just that you *sound* like you think of only the button as 'the shareware part' rather than, as the license under which you can trial this otherwise commercial software.

  44. UltraEdit. by noselasd · · Score: 1

    Go try UltraEdit Its a real nice editor. Also runs fine under Wine, if you for whatever obscure reason need to run it under Linux.

  45. Textpad is worth the 27 $ it costs... by software_non_olet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... it's the best programming editor which ever came under my fingers in 35 years.

  46. Emacs (and JEdit) by ianezz · · Score: 2
    Being a long time Emacs user, Emacs is the obvious choice for me. Btw, EShell (now part of GNU Emacs 21) makes a good work to bring a nice Un*x shell on the hosts not having one (i.e. useful if you don't have Cygwin at hand).

    I find also extremely useful the ability of Emacs (thanks to Ange-FTP) to edit files remotely: is is just as simple as opening ``/username@host:/remote/file/name'', and everything (dired and completion included) just works as if it was on a local filesystem, so I don't even have to move from my workstation...

    OTOH, for those who like having everyting and the sink but don't feel comfortable with Emacs, I'd say that JEdit is surely the best choice for them: it is completely scriptable using BeanShell, a Java-like scripting language, and has lots and lots of plugins for additional functionalities.

    1. Re:Emacs (and JEdit) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tramp.sourceforge.net
      Enjoy

  47. SlickEdit by Danse · · Score: 1

    I just think it's better. :) http://www.slickedit.com/home.php

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  48. What I like, is the fact you can choose! by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    I know many people, that think the only text editor exists is Notepad and the only IDE editor is the one in M$VC.

    It's great to see that people here have so many different editors that "just fit them". Obviously I prefer an open source one (on win32 boxen I use GVim) but if you prefer a commercial one, go ahead and use it.

    The thing I like is that people aren't locked down to a specific editor (as I noted with Notepad) but actually do something for themselves and gets a normal editor.

    From friends recommendations: Slickedit and jEdit are very popular.

    --
    ^_^
  49. Ultraedit by fatbitch · · Score: 1

    I have to do all my editing in Windows, but with files located on a Solaris machine with no Samba.

    Ultraedit has a semi-well implemented "Save to FTP site" function which is most useful.

    It also does all the standard syntax highlighting, projects etc and is a fair price (shareware).

  50. Win32Pad by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

    Win32Pad does it for me.

    You chose WIN or UNIX line ending, tab size, auto indent, etc.

    Win32Pad is a feature filled text editor that is written with a programmer in mind. Its main purpose is to provide enough functionality that is missing from notepad without sacrificing file size and performance.

    Freeware, not Free Software though. :(

    --
    Phillip
    1. Re:Win32Pad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did use that until it broke some of my XSLT. Win32Pad is ASCII only and can't handle multi-byte characters. It will break up these bytes and save as such.

  51. gvim rocks by smoon · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using gvim for at least 5 years on windows (NT, 2k, XP) and never had _one_ crash.

    If you don't like the *vi type editors, Xemacs or Gnu emacs work flawlessly on win32 as well. Xemacs is a lot easier to set up (e.g.: getting the Java development environment JDE working), but perhaps you want to use Gnu emacs for political reasons...

    If you want something more windows-centric NOTEPAD.EXE has always been pretty reliable, if a bit slow on large files.

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
  52. araneae by AllMightyPaul · · Score: 1

    This excellent text editor is about to release a new version. Araneae

  53. Re:EditPlus you some forgot a very cool features by sprzepiora · · Score: 1

    it has builtin ftp support that acts as a filesystem so web developers can work remotely. and builtin preview support for web pages.

  54. SciTE by orthogonal · · Score: 1
    I've used Programer's File Editor, UltraEdit, Code-genie, among others.

    SciTe wins hands down.

    Why? Let's start with SciTE is based on scintilla, a free and open source edit control yuou can include in your own code.

    Then let's talk features:

    Use any font you like, proportionally spaced or monospaced (trust me, proportional is beter for code, given the right font)

    Intelligent and configurable lexers for a plethora of langauges (even Apache configs),

    Syntax highlighting (user customizable of course) using colors or fonts or background colors

    Code folding: show or collapse everything between whatever delimits a block of code or some higher hierarchical strructure in your language of choice

    Intuitive font size zooming, for those bleary-eyed late nights

    Per-language configurable Compile, Make, Run, or other commands

    User configurable (or just use what comes included) syntax completion and function hints ("calltips")

    Line numbering and margins, if you want them

    Regular, \escape, and regex search and replace

    Unix (\n) or DOS (\r\n) line endings

    Displays compiler output in seperate pane, with intellegent parsing of, and go to line of, compiler error messages, even in source files not already open in the editor

    User configurable status line

    Configuration via config files, not a GUI (This is a strength, not a weakness -- code-Genie does it too, and it works much better than a crowded GUI once the number of config options gets large)

    A very responsive developer: when I had an issue (the mouse wheel didn't work consistently when set to scroll one page at a time), my email to the developer got a response in less than three hours. Three hours later, the developer had located newer versions of the mouse drivers, and had downloaded and installed them on his own machine to to test. The problem was fixed in the next release; in the meantime I'd compiled my own copy from the source. (My one quibble is that having researched the problem and provided a code fix, my name wasn't added to the conttributers' list :), but that's unimportant next to having been given the application, the source, and several hours of the developer's time.)

    Other than for debugging, SciTE and a make file replace the IDE, and far more cleanly. It also replaces any text editor other than a word processor -- I use it for viewing or editing any text-type file in preference to Wordpad, notepad, etc.

    Oh, and did I mention it's free and open source? And unlike GPL'd code, it can be used in commericial projects?

    But don't take my word for it. Get yourself a copy here: SciTE

    1. Re:SciTE by 1015 · · Score: 1

      Scite is just a frontend for scintilla. Now, scite rocks, but scintilla is one heck of a great editor component! It is used in Pythonwin, and part of the wxWindows framework (wxStyledTextCtrl). Great piece of software, that...

    2. Re:SCITE by fooyu187 · · Score: 1

      right on! SCITE RULES!!! it does a lot of languages and even does apache config. definately the best if you're using windows.

  55. Win32 GVim does it for me by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    It's a good port; it has a proper installer, a native Win32 GUI, and it's fast.

    If it's unstable for you, try submitting a bug report; it's been rock solid for me since the early 6.0 beta's.

    What build did you get? I've stuck with a perfectly good 6.1 beta, but I've heard of some specific builds being dodgy. ATM it's at about patchlevel 90 past release, and I'm sure Bram and co will be very happy to look into any problems you have. Seriously; it should be solid as a rock even in Windows.

  56. cygwin + Emacs by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

    seems like a no-brainer. download cygwin, and then you can run emacs in windows.

  57. Brief-like in house solution by fractalk · · Score: 1

    Two years ago we were using homesite (4.2) for our HTML/ASP needs..

    Problem was: homesite doesnt as much as leak memory, it bleeds it... a lot!

    Instead of rebooting the machines (they were 64Mb with Win98) every 2 hours or so we decided to create an in-house editor.

    The major feature we wanted was suport for some brief-likeness :)

    That was 1 year ago and we all devoted some spare time to the project.

    But now the editor (dubed ProEd) is quite mature and I think that it should be set free (as in speech), or at least free (as in beer)

    1. Re:Brief-like in house solution by jantheman · · Score: 1

      ...but what we really want is:
      Brief (yes, the console one - we can make it - what 160x100 on a big enough desktop - much faster) without none of that nancy GUI crud.
      That works on NT/W2k

      The last incarnation of Brief seemed to not like Win32 environs newer than 3.51 (IIRC)
      Who's got the source for it nowadays? Where's Underware when we need them?

      --
      -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
  58. Re:EditPlus you some forgot a very cool features by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    it has builtin ftp support that acts as a filesystem so web developers can work remotely

    Does anyone know of a Mac OS X editor that has this feature? My hosting provider has FTP-only access for my web site, and frankly, I'm a loser who'd rather write something quick in nano rather than constructing some monstrosity in Dreamweaver and uploading it.

    Long story short, it's kind of redundant doing basic text editing on my local machine and then FTPing - I'd rather take care of it in one step.

    --saint

  59. MS Edit by jrwillis · · Score: 1

    Everything else is just fluff. :)

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  60. Re:EditPlus you some forgot a very cool features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, this is just a dumb idea, but you could make a "/foo/bar/RemoteUpload" dir and write a shell script that uploads everything in that dir by calling a command line ftp client when you trigger it... Then you could stick the script in cron and have it run once a minute or so... os x is basically unix after all... then there's the odd chance your hosting provider will let you NFS mount your home dir...

  61. editplus is the best $20 i ever spent on software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I guess the best $5 i ever spent on software would have to be that first linux cd i got many moons ago from cheapbytes.com, ;-) )

    on unix, i tend to use vim, but when I miss editplus, I've found nedit to be an acceptable substitute.

  62. UltraEdit-32 by Bryan_Casto · · Score: 1

    I've personally found UltraEdit-32 to be a fine low-cost ($35) editor for use in Windows. There are wordlists available for just about any programming/markup language you should need, and the inclusion of column editing, bracket matching, side by side diffs, and a relatively robust macro recorder make this a really good tool.

    --

    Bryan J. Casto
    bryan.casto(a)gmail.com
  63. font by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try lucida sans console, if you have it. it's my favorite win32 coding font.

  64. EditPlus or WinVi by Webz · · Score: 1

    EditPlus was already recommended, but I'll throw in my personal fave. It's WinVi, an open source Vi clone for Windows. The best part about WinVi is that it accepts keystrokes in both NotePad and Vi styles. That is, if you're feeling lazy and need to just cut and paste via your mouse (or similar Notepad method on the keyboard), WinVi has no problem with that (provided you're in insert mode). Otherwise, WinVi is free to use as a functional Vi clone, with magical search and replace as a prominent feature coming to mind. It also features displaying files in Hex mode, if you dig that.

  65. Re:EditPlus you some forgot a very cool features by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    Then you could stick the script in cron and have it run once a minute or so... ...and thus manage to fire my FTP password, in plaintext, across my (soon to be defunct) cable company's network, every sixty seconds.

    --saint

  66. joe by mirabilos · · Score: 2

    Joe's Own Editor:
    http://mitglied.lycos.de/tygs/bsd/editor.php

    Either in a PuTTY ssh session to my OpenBSD server,
    or natively compiled - for example, with the free
    Borland C++ 5.5 Command Line compilers.

    --
    My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
  67. Cold Fusion Studio by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 2

    When I first came on board, I had to learn Cold Fusion. The tools that we use for it are Dreamweaver(evil, evil) and Cold Fusion studio. CF Studio is just incredible, allowing coding and syntax highlighting in not just CF, but ASP, Perl, PHP and others. It can be extended using custom tags, and I love the keyboard shortcuts and custom shortcuts (click a button and it will surround whatever you have highlighted with whatever you want). While you can download a 30-day trial from Macromedia for free, the application itself costs money. But after trying homesite, GoLive, TextPad, Notepad and all the others, I love it.

  68. duh by UberLame · · Score: 1


    Real men use real emacs on win32, not that microemacs crap. Works well for me, never crashed, etc, etc.

    --
    I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
    1. Re:duh by ssoringg · · Score: 1

      Linus uses the microemacs crap :) (on linux, at least).

  69. abi word anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok so its not the best but i am attached to it for win32 work

  70. NoteTab Pro by Eadric · · Score: 1

    I'd definately use NoteTab. The Pro version is worth every penny. It has a tabbed interface, cusomizable toolbar with lots of gadgets, Clipbooks (can range from simple text macros to complete mini-applications with a powerful scripting language), Very fast "Replace All" command, URL and HTML-tag highlighting, Multiple-level undo/redo, Option to show nonprinting characters, Bookmarks, Wrap to column, Line-number ruler, Choice between real/fixed/smart tabs, autoreplace MS Notepad, spell checker, thesaurus, integration with html utilities, plus lots more.

    I've been using it for 5 years have never had any problem with it. All minor version upgrades have always been free (everything after the .). It's lightning fast and just keeps getting better with every release.

    Get it here

  71. Notepad - Here's why. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use notepad. Lots of people do. But, the reason may not be what you think it is.

    So many people use Notepad for the same reason that so many people use Vi. The simple reason is that you can find it on *every* system. If you work in a Windows shop you will likely be working on other machines than your own. These other machines will not have your favorite "SlickEditor" but, they will have Notepad. Regardless of whether the machine is 95/98/NT/2000/XP notepad will be there. The same holds true with Vi. If you work in a *nix environment, you can be assured that whatever machine you use will have Vi. They may or may not have GEdit or Kwrite or even Emacs but, Vi wil be there.

    Of course, if you use only Notepad and then go to a *nix system, you'll have a hell of a time with Vi.

    1. Re:Notepad - Here's why. by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you use only Notepad and then go to a *nix system, you'll have a hell of a time with Vi.

      The reverse is also true at times. I find myself typing ^[:wq! in Notepad all the time. :)

    2. Re:Notepad - Here's why. by JMZero · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but notepad is unusable on NT4.

      Ctrl-F find? Doesn't work.
      Ctrl-S save? Doesn't work.
      Ctrl-B bold? Just joking.

      Seriously, though, it's not like there's a lot of "notepad skillz" to be transferring around. That said, I end up using notepad a fair bit.

      --
      Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  72. jEdit by joeljkp · · Score: 1

    How about jEdit? It's java-based, open-source, with syntax highlighting for some insane number of languages, has a plugin community base, etc.

    http://www.jedit.org

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  73. You wuss. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    Real men only use Edlin.

    1. Re:You wuss. by qurob · · Score: 1


      C:\COPY CON loop.c

      #include

      void main ()
      {
      puts("COPY CON rules");
      }

      ^Z
      C:\

  74. Jedit by BigChigger · · Score: 0

    see subject

    BC

  75. jEdit by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    If you can stand the resource usage (and really, if you are used to Emacs, you have absolutely no excuse :p), try jEdit (www.jedit.org). It is an editor written in Java, and it is excellent. It is extensible with plugins, and is scriptable (but you don't have to use/see any of this if you don't want). It has powerful syntax highlighting, abbreviation/auto expansion, built in file browser, integration with Ant, etc.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  76. UltraEdit by themassiah · · Score: 1

    UltraEdit is some REALLY great software.
    Does HTML tidying, color syntax highlighting depending on what language you're using, has very advanced find and replace capabilities (UNIX regular expressions supported), nice tabbed interface, customizeable tool bar, project management features, built in FTP client, Save To FTP (which is great) along with a ton of other stuff.
    Check it out!> :)
    No, I don't work for them. But I like their product.

    --
    - Sometimes you're the pidgeon, sometimes you're the statue.
  77. VIM by xsbellx · · Score: 1

    First and foremost is VIM http://www.vim.org. There are ports to MANY environments including a Windows OLE version that integrates with Visual Studio.

    Next UltraEdit. It works, has a lot of features (many I don't use but I do know others who do).

    This is ONLY based on personal preference not some detailed analysis of the actual code. Have fun.

    --
    If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
  78. Yuck by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    I've tried to use HTML-Kit, honestly I've tried, but it just seems so clunky and slopped together. Plus its keyboard cursor movement just doesn't seem right to me. So, despite some of its coolness, I went back to EditPlus.

  79. Notepad, Word97, Delphi 5, Program by ka9dgx · · Score: 2
    If it's a quick and dirty text manipulation, web page, whatever, I'll use Notepad. (Which on NT4 and W2k Server handles BIG files)

    If its honest to goodness Word processing, I'll use Microsoft Word 97. (No, I'll NEVER upgrade)

    If it's a program, that's why Delphi 5.0 exists.

    If I need really tricky manipulation, I'll write a program to do it.

    --Mike--

  80. Omnipad by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    I have found Omnipad to be an excellent editor. Here is their decription from their site

    "OmniPad is a multipurpose text/code editor designed to be intuitive, sleek, fast, and feature packed There are way too many features to list here but some of the major ones are: Multiple document interface, syntax highlighting, autocomplete, built in FTP, hex editing, total customization, and many more."

  81. Well, I'd suggest by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

    gvim, but since I just noticed that you said it doesn't "do it" for you, I guess I'm just flapping my lips about in a vain attempt for Karma...

  82. GNU Emacs for Windows by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

    In addition to XEmacs as others have mentioned, you can also get an Emacs for Window straight from the Gnu's mouth.

    http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemac s. html

    The binary install is a zip file, which you unzip and then add the bin directory to your path.

    Also, I highly recommend adding your favorite text editor to Windows Explorer's "Send To" menu, by creating a shortcut in the Send To directory in your Profile directory. This way you can edit files that are associated with other apps without needed to break the file associations.

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  83. XEmacs by alpha264 · · Score: 1

    XEmacs for Windows!

    http://www.xemacs.org/Download/win32/

    I feel much better being sane while using Windows now

  84. Programmer's Notepad by CiceroLove · · Score: 1

    ...is by far the best and most customizabel editor. I use it everyday. It has syntax coloration and allows yout o store oft used text snippets. I dont' think I have typed a mySQL connect statement in 6 months. Programmer's Notepad

  85. use X11 forwarding by fist_187 · · Score: 1

    just get an X client like Xmanager or Xwin32 or something, and set up a linux machine with your favorite editors on it. then X11 forward those apps to your windows desktop (ssh is easist - use PuTTY).

    then, if you mount your windows PC over samba, you'll be editing the files locally. try it, it works really well.

    --
    Somewhere on this page I have hidden my signature.
  86. VEdit by jbolden · · Score: 1

    I personally use GVIM for programming and it works fine as many other posters have mentioned. But I figure I'll throw in another option, I also use an editor called VEdit(http://www.vedit.com/) which runs about $99 and has a ton of cool features for editing all sorts of flat file formats (EBCDIC / Octal / Hex support...), automated unpacking of packed data fields, etc... It has a nice macro language, syntax highlighting for about 40 languages and thus would be a good choice as a programmer's editor.

  87. Cross platform development. by xagon7 · · Score: 1

    I have found that if you are switching between operating systems (Linux/Windows) probably my favorite editor is JEdit. It is written in Java as an Open Source programmers editor. It is quite fast and has MANY 3rd party plug-ins that allow it to go above and beyond most other editors I have used. (Including my daily Delphi IDE). www.jedit.org

  88. Visual Studio by reddog1 · · Score: 1

    Let's face it...I must have turned to the darkside. The IDE with visual studio works decently....... For everything else there is ED for windows http://www.nusphere.com.

  89. Re:PICO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NANO or PICO both are miles better than notepad.

  90. Context by Cuchullain · · Score: 1

    Love it. The syntax highlighting and general simplicity make it a winner.

    I use the macro feature to dump stuff out to SQL and run the script I am working on with one key press.

    It seriously works great, and it is freeware.

    Cuchullain

    --
    "If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not rightly owned if it is not shared." -St. Augustine
  91. metapad by nocent · · Score: 3, Informative

    metapad is my notepad replacement. Small, fast, keyboard shortcuts for save, search, etc, unlimited file sizes. Free as in beer. Excellent.

  92. GVim by dar · · Score: 1

    In this case, I think metooism is warrented. I've used Gvim as my editor of choice on Win98, NT4.0, Win2k, and Linux for five years now and have never had a problem with it. I'm a software engineer and do a _lot_ of typing. I also use it to write email, post to usenet - pretty much anything you'd want to do with text. GVim always come through for me.

    I wonder if you have an unstable machine.

    --
    My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
  93. OmlettePad EX by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

    I use and recommend OmlettePad EX, because I wrote it myself.

    Think of all the things your current editor does that are really cool, and chances are, OmlettePad EX doesn't have them.

    --
    [o]_O
  94. NT Emacs is stable, mature, and featureful by Tom7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    NT Emacs is awesome. I use it on my windows boxes, and aside from some unix-ish features like command-prompt interaction, it is quite stable and mature. It even has decent integration with the shell, letting you (for instance) drag files into the emacs window to be opened.

    I don't know what killer features gvim has that you use, but I assure you they're all there.

    1. Re:NT Emacs is stable, mature, and featureful by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Ability to edit a file without loading the whole damn thing into memory?

    2. Re:NT Emacs is stable, mature, and featureful by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      The only way you could possibly edit a file without reading and writing all the way to the end is to seek to somewhere in the middle while making sure you modify bytes without inserting or deleting any. Is that really useful?

  95. SlickEdit -- VI by rodolfo.borges · · Score: 1

    Many suggested SlickEdit, but they missed an important feature: SlickEdit have a VI emulation mode!

  96. what options do you want? by josepha48 · · Score: 2
    I use textpad, or tknotepad, depending on what you want to do. Textpad is at http://textpad.com/. It has an ascii table, can edit multiple files with tabs, copy, paste, etc, also with indenting, syntax highlightening, macros, diff, and lots more. I use it mainly for the syntax highlightening. It is not 'free', but you can download it and it just give you an annoying message when it starts and sometimes when you save. I like it a lot.

    TkNotePad is something I wrote and it is just a basic text editor like notpad, but it has unlimited undo / redo and a better find / replace.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  97. Zeus? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    This is cooming late, but have you tried Zuess?
    http://www.zeusedit.com/

  98. Epsilon by Engdy · · Score: 1
    I recommend Lugaru's Epsilon. Sure, it's a commercialized Emacs, but it's lightning fast, and comes with binaries for Win32, Linux, O/S2, FreeBSD and DOS on the same CD.

    Verah naaas!

    --
    Siggy Wiggy Figgy Tiggy a bana bo Biggy!
  99. Underware by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    http://www.emsps.com/oldtools/borland.htm

    Ware your brief!

  100. Call me simple by mcgintech · · Score: 1

    I use notepad...but I've only been hacking for 4 months now in perl, so what do I know anyway?

    --

    Uhhhh, yeah, thath dithgustin. [The lady's man]

  101. Open Source editors by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 1

    Any one have any open source editors for Windows????

    --
    It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
  102. WinVi Rocks! by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

    WinVi is awesome. I use it for all my Windoze platform programming needs.

    Having both Windows and Vi commands is a terrific feature, especially you switch platforms frequently. It always takes me a little while to re-adjust, and having both options available simultaneously is fantastic.

    And it's free, in many important senses of the word.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

  103. VIM by Etyenne · · Score: 2

    www.vim.org

    I can't believe peoples recommend emacs ! (humor impaired -> this is a joke)

    --
    :wq
  104. PFE by himself · · Score: 1

    Programmer's File Editor, while no longer under development, rules. Its home page is:
    http://www.lancs.ac.uk/people/cpaap/pfe/
    But you can usually grab it from any of the commoon download sites.

  105. Visual SlickEdit by H20 · · Score: 1

    This is hands down the best text editor for Windows, and it's pretty righteous for all the many other platforms it supports as well. It sports built-in syntax hilighting and tooltip style help for every language from Ada to XML (and I do mean every language -- does your editor know Intel assembler? How about OS/390 Assembler? SAS?). It also has a built-in FTP client, integrated version control (CVS, RCS, Source Safe, etc), a rather diesel calculator, an extremely nice diff utility (DiffZilla), integration with everything from GNU style build tools to Visual Studio .NET, and on and on. Plus an excellent tagging system which can build you an API reference as you code. :)
    I believe the phrase is 'bitching'. Anyway, scamper on over to http://www.slickedit.com and try not to freak too much at the price. ;)

    --
    Blake
  106. Depends on the task by cornice · · Score: 2
    For the quick edit (eg notepad stuff) nothing beats Metapad

    For the bigger project stuff it's either JEdit or XEmacs. Both are stable, cross platform and loaded with features. I'm still trying to decide which one I like best. ;-)

  107. Here's a list by hether · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well there's a great list of editors on PHP.net at http://213.155.159.67/phpeditors/index.php that you might find helpful. The list gives the webpage, platform, license, and reader comments for each one.

    As a web developer who is almost always using Windows, lately I've used Homesite (costs a bunch), 1st Page 2000 (just like Homesite but free) and Crimson Editor. They all work fine for anything I've needed to do.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  108. SCITE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scite, based on scintilla.

    its fast, LOADS of options
    standalone exe (167k) or full installation

    syntax highlighting, autocompletion, folding. etc

    www.scintilla.org

  109. gVim on windows is stable. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Though I hardly ever use my winNT box anymore ( except for outlook ) I've used gVim on windows extensively, and it's pretty solid IMO. Maybe there is something else wrong with this guy's machine ( other than it's OS ) that's causing it to crash gVim.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  110. Why don't you pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a excelent text editor for almost every language for the web, its called AceHTML, this editor for win32 rulez!!

    Its price is about 40 dollars, but its worth to use it...

    you should try it...
    http://www.visic.com/

    Sometimes its better pay for something that is really good instead of getting headaches with free apps that you dont have the time to see the source code...

    This is NOT a commercial

  111. CodeWright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.premia.com/products/codewright/

    it has good tie ins to most Source control
    systems. Good syntax highlighting, with
    code competetion for java

  112. Re:Textpad - Additional goodness by codemachine · · Score: 1

    Other good things about textpad:

    - syntax highlighting

    - document selector

    - ability to add command line tools as menu/keyboard shortcuts, and can capture the console output from them (eg. can automatically add JDK compile and execute commands)

    - can autodetect and display unix or dos text

    - automatically adds itself to the right-click menu in Windows Explorer, as well as the Send-To menu

    - it is nagware, but it hardly bothers you at all if you're evaluating it or too cheap to pay for it

    Basically the above allows Textpad to work well as a very simple development environment, as well as a good all around text editor. It is one of the only programs I miss when I work in a graphical Unix environment, although KDE's Kate bears some resemblance to it (embedded console, document selector, syntax highlighting). If you're going the Cygwin route or refuse to use anything non-Free, I'd give that a try. Of course Cygwin gives the option to use command line editors like vim and emacs as well, which I prefer over Kate for simple editing tasks.

  113. Re:Textpad - Additional goodness by codemachine · · Score: 1

    Almost forgot a few more features:

    - line numbers

    - split view

    - tabbed documents (if you prefer this to the selector)

    - ability to open/save your workspace

    - bookmarks

  114. Re:EditPlus - Small, Fast, Good, Friendly by foote · · Score: 1

    Yes, EditPlus. I'm always surprised when people tell me they regularly work with Notepad. Notepad has no features even a beginner programmer like me would want. It shows text on screen and it searches, and that's about it.

    I use EditPlus for C, Javascript, HTML, Python (also use IDLE for Python), and Perl. NoteTab (not Notepad, the free thing that comes with Windows) probably has more features, but I find EditPlus more accessible. That was subjective and vague, but that's as far as I can explain it now.

    EditPlus has customizable syntax highlighting, user definable cliptexts, line numbering, goto line, bookmarks, auto-completion, column selection, customizable keyboard shortcuts, brace matching, function listing (definable with regular expressions), recordable but not editable macros, column markers, choice of Unix, PC, and Mac line endings, line commenting/uncommenting, spell check, automatic indenting (defined or disabled by user) and more. You can remap the keyboard. And the thing is, you can use almost any feature and perform almost any customization without reading the help. You load it and use it.

    True, it has no scripting language (yet) but you can hook other tools into its menu or toolbars, including Perl scripts, if you want more than simple macros. HTML Tidy is in my tools menu, and it runs on the current file. I run the Borland C compiler from EditPlus and it outputs errors into a separate window, and takes me to the offending line if I double-click an error. That's not revolutionary, but it's better than Notepad.

    EditPlus is not an IDE and it's not for giant projects and large teams. It's not Emacs either. And it's not trying to be Emacs, or any other legendary giant. But it loads in three seconds, costs thirty dollars after an unlimited try-before-you-buy period, and it fits on a floppy. I paid for mine, but when I'm on an alien Windows machine, I download it in a minute, install it in another minute, and use it. The uninstall is fast and very clean, or I leave it for the Windows user if he wants it.

  115. Re:EditPlus you some forgot a very cool features by Grotus · · Score: 1

    Part of the script would be to check for changes. No changes = no connect.

    --
    "From my cold, dead hands you damn, dirty apes!" - CH
  116. jEdit is GPL'd by z84976 · · Score: 2

    ...and it's written in Java, so you can get used to one nice graphical editor for all your java-capable os's.

    http://www.jedit.org/

  117. Re:Notepad kiddies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah! Keyboard? Back in my day, we used PDP-11/20s and had to enter our data through the front-panel flip switches.

    And if we had to edit our file, we physically removed the core memory from the chassis and used a fridge magnet to flip bits around!

  118. Re:Textpad - Additional goodness by atomice · · Score: 1

    I second the Textpad suggestion - it's one of two applications, along with Cygwin, that gets installed on any box I go near. Kate is so buggy it's unfunny so I wouldn't really recommend it when there are better alternatives on Windows. I've never had Textpad crash on me, and it provides all the features you will ever need. It does all this while still maintaining a usable interface that is never too cluttered. I have one (and only one) fault with it and that is that you can't edit binary files. (you can view them as hex though). Given that the program's a text editor anyway, the fact that this is the only issue I have with the program is testament to just how well written it is!

  119. Get standalone Homesite while you still can by Foaf · · Score: 2

    macromedia are still offering a standalone version of Homesite (version 5) but they probably won't for long.

    The official upgrade to Homesite 5 is Dreamweaver which has an editor bundled with it that is very similar to Homesite. Of course Dreamweaver is a lot more expensive than Homesite alone.

  120. Windows editor with Borland editing commands? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    JOE does not have a Windows version. Anyone know of a Windows editor that uses Borland/Wordstar/Control-Key editing commands?

    1. Re:Windows editor with Borland editing commands? by Electrum · · Score: 2

      It works just fine when compiled against Cygwin.

  121. Epsilon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For an outstanding commerical Emacs like editor (and yes it has a keyboard layout for vi) Epsilon I was introduced years ago and have converted everyone who's taken the time to run the tutorial. Multiple modes, extensions, an FTP open/write. You can run the same editor on Windows, or Unix (Linux) systems with the same functionality.
    No connection to the company other than as a customer.

  122. Mod parent up by theolein · · Score: 2

    I use Jedit as well and it is really good.

  123. Windows editor with Borland/Control-key editing? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    Anyone know of a Windows editor that uses Borland/Wordstar/Control-Key editing commands?

    That shortcut key layout saves about 15% in editing time, because you do not need to remove your hands from the home row of keys.

    That shortcut system is intuitive, also, because it uses a "cursor diamond". Control-E is line up (top of the diamond). Control-X is line down (bottom of the diamond), Control-S is character forward, and so on. (The arrow keys also work.)

    Programs that use the control key in this way are meant to be used with a utility that makes the caps lock key a control key. Sysinternals provides Ctrl2cap, for example. The utility is run once only.

    The Borland/Wordstar editing commands allow almost all operations without removing your hands from the home row. Many commands are two keystrokes. Control-Q Control-R goes to the top of the document, for example.

    SetEdit is an example of a DOS editor with these commands. I would like to find a Windows editor.

  124. TextPad, NT emacs by adam-lyle-taylor · · Score: 1

    I use TextPad and NT emacs, depending on the task. Actually, I prefer TextPad, but have two big problems with it that keep emacs on my hard drive:

    1. When editing e-mail, it doesn't handle the reformatting of quotation paragraphs (whose lines start with '> '). emacs is smarter about this.

    2. emacs' latex-mode is smart enough to reformat latex code without breaking up commands and stuff like that. TextPad's isn't.

    Actually, maybe someone out there knows of fixes for these issues? ;)

    Adam

  125. Re:Windows editor with Borland/Control-key editing by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

    Unless you have another Caps Lock key on the right side, swapping with Ctrl is not a good idea. Holding down Ctrl/Shift/Meta and striking another key with the same hand is not only slower (once you've learned to touch-type correctly) but allegedly bad for your wrists.

  126. Borland/Control-key editing is always faster. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I don't understand this. There is always a Control key on the right side. Also, the Borland key shortcuts do not use shift.

    The Borland method is definitely faster, and certainly doesn't have any drawbacks.

    1. Re:Borland/Control-key editing is always faster. by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was thinking of those old xmodmap files that swap the two, leaving you with just one Ctrl key on the left and putting you through risky contortions to touch-type Ctrl-Q Ctrl-R, for example.

  127. SEMware's TSE-Pro is the best... by mfarah · · Score: 2

    in my opinion.

    It's FAST, VERY light (my executable is 150K), full with features, configurable pretty much for everything, contains a macro language that lets you create new commands, and has EVERYTHING without becoming bloated.

    The only downside is that it's a commercial non-free program. But it's worth every single penny, I say.

    Go to Semware, and download the trial version. I can't speak for others, but I love it a lot. When using Windows*, TSE-Pro and 4DOS/4NT are the two programs I use most.

    By the way: Notepad is HIDEOUS. It might be standard, yes, but it's so primitive it becomes heavily restrictive. I carry around with me a diskette with my personal vital tools, text editor included, so I can skip the pain of using notepad on other people's computers.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
  128. Windows native editors? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Yes, thanks, but Cygwin is maybe 300 Megabytes. Yes, I need it anyway, but my customers don't, and I'm wondering if there are Windows native editors.

    1. Re:Windows native editors? by pb · · Score: 2

      So compile it with Cygwin, and then just distribute the binary along with CYGWIN1.DLL; this generally works...

      --
      pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  129. Re:Textpad - Additional goodness by seanyboy · · Score: 1

    Also - has the ability to ... - find in Multiple Files - Search and replace in all open files. This means I can do a regular expression search for some text in a folder, automatically open all files that contain that expression, and then Search and replace in all the open files. V+Powerful, and simle to use.

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
  130. Lugaru Epsilon is a very good Emacs-like editor by nedron · · Score: 2
    Lugaru has been making Epsilon for a long time, though their supported platforms have changed from time to time. Currently, they sell it for Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, DOS, and OS/2.

    It's very Emacs-like and highly configurable. On Windows, it has some nice integration features and I've used it since about '92 when writing code on Windows.

    One of the features is that it supports Brief-style keyboard bindings, in addition to the default Emacs bindings.

    You get binaries for Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2 & DOS for one price.

    You can get more info and a demo at Lugaru's website.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  131. HTML-kit by adamiis111 · · Score: 1

    For web dev, HTML kit is very versatile as it color codes and can format perl and html in a very customizable way. And of course it's free. http://www.chami.com/html-kit/

  132. PDP-11/20s?? New-fangled transistorized equipment! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    PDP-11/20s??? That's one of them new-fangled transistorized computers.

    We had vacuum tubes and punch cards. With enough punch cards, you don't NEED memory.

  133. Re:PDP-11/20s?? New-fangled transistorized equipme by CharlieG · · Score: 2

    Punchcards are nothing more than line replaceable PROM!

    Believe it or not, I bought 2 cases of punchcards last year - makes great geeky notepaper and bookmarks

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  134. EditPlus, TextPad, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommend EditPlus (http://www.editplus.com), TextPad, MultiEdit, HomeSite, etc.

    Frankly, I consider that VI and EMACS are a little weak compared to what is available for Windows.

    This is 2002, not 1965, for God's sake! Get yourself a decent editor!

    1. Re:EditPlus, TextPad, etc. by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      Show us another cross-platform editor that can drive a version control system, read and write multibyte character encodings, and jump to source from error messages out of most any compiler or SGML validator and I'll consider it. Helps if it works over a tty and if third parties can integrate a PIM and newsreader.

    2. Re:EditPlus, TextPad, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is indeed 2002, not 1998. Learn to troll!

  135. the lil spider by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    Arachnophilia 4.0 is my first choice.
    www.arachnoid.com/arachnophilia/
    The older version 4.0, the newer version 5.+ is java based and doesn't seem to work as well.
    I understand the Author's reason for going to java, but the new version can flake out at the worst times.

    Arachnophilia isn't open source, but a modified version of freeware called careware.

  136. Hexedit 32 or Ultraedit 32 are both awesome. by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 0

    I've used them both extensively, and they'll do practically anything. Ultraedit even will do hex math for you.

  137. whe I "must" use a windows machine by shd99004 · · Score: 2

    More like the other way around, but ok.
    You're working with web development... I like to use HomeSite or the free HTML-Kit.

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
  138. Egg Troll Approves! by egg+troll · · Score: 1

    TextPad is 100% approved by Egg Troll. Its small, does everything I want it to, color coding, fast...how can you not love this?

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  139. Epsilon by papaya5555 · · Score: 1

    Epsilon works great for me. Commercial, Emacs-like, but leaner and meaner with a C-like extension language instead of LISP. On *nix, I prefer Emacs, and a few years ago I was searching for a Win32 editor and tried just about everything out there at the time. There are definitely "sexier" editors out there (SlickEdit, Codewright, etc), but I like Epsilon's solid feature set and easy extensibility (and lack of bloat).

  140. www.slickedit.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy it, use it, love it.

    Works on Win32,Linux, BSD,AIX ..... etc etc.

    Its the only one I use.

    Extensible, supports most languages you would
    ever use.

  141. I hate to say it... by Workshop+Alex · · Score: 1

    ...But the editor of Visual Studio with it code highlighting is okay for editing websites...
    I just wished it wasn't a MS product because the rest would be okay too in that case. Purchasing VS just for the editor is a bit stupid...

  142. Metapad by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen a mention of Metapad, my personal favorite editor here, so I'll add it to the list.
    Very small, fast as hell, does everything Notepad does and better. I don't use it for the ultra-fancy things like spellchecking and syntax highlighting, so its speed and agility serve me well.
    There also exists a small plugin for it that will list all of the text files in a directory in an explorer-style, always-on-top window, and automatically open them in the current instance of the editor. Great for editing HTML files or search-and-replace operations.

    And come on... its home page is at liquidninja.com, that name alone has to be worth some bonus points! =)

  143. For What? by BanteringCTO · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit amazed that so many people can reply to your post with so many recommendations when you provided so little information. A "decent" editor for "web development and system administration" leaves a lot of room for clarification. Do you need syntax highlighting? If so, for what languages? Do you rely on keyboard shortcuts, or are you a mouse maven? If using the keyboard is your thing, do you need keymap emulation? If mousing is your way, do you want to be able to configure the menus? Would having multiple files open in an easily accessible manner (ala Kate) be useful to you? Is version management important? Would you rate fast start-up over numerous features? I could go on, but I think I've made my point. There are literally dozens of quality text editors out there, each on geared to a different niche. Which niche are you trying to fill?

    --
    The world of achievement has always belonged to the optimist. -- J. Harold Wilkins
  144. Try Jext by marcus · · Score: 1

    YAJE, give it a try. I have standardized on it for all platforms. It looks the same, works the same everywhere.

    http://www.jext.org/

    Enjoy.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO