Slashdot Mirror


Transatlantic Model Airplane Flight to Begin Shortly

dtmos writes "An update on this old story -- Maynard Hill's attempt to fly an 11-lb. model airplane across the Atlantic (from Newfoundland to Ireland) is due to begin tomorrow night, Newfoundland time. This would be the first transatlantic flight by a true model under FAI rules (this plane was too large to qualify). News and updates, background information, some technical info."

164 comments

  1. You`re not going to cover your by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    costs with an 11lb payload (including weight of plane)...unless perhaps its carrying heroin. Still, i`m sure evil bearded terrorists are watching this with great interest...

  2. I work with one of these guys... by staggerlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...he's in the General Services department at National Geographic (and a better code and hardware hacker, in all senses of the word, than anyone in our IS group). This guy's spent months trying to build a GPS that would fit on your watch face.

    The funny thing here is that he went to NG to offer them coverage - he wasn't looking for funding or anything - and they declined, saying there wouldn't be enough interest. Well now it's in the Post, it's on /. and to cap it all off, who's doing a TV special about it? Discovery. Ain't that a swift kick in the crotch.

    Congrats, Foster - clear skies =)

    --
    "I woo women with my sensuous and godlike trombone playing."
    1. Re:I work with one of these guys... by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad he hasn't learned basic rules of HTML:
      http://www.home.earthlink.net/~barrettjf/Images\TA M%201_map.gif

      Backslashes and spaces. Pfft. (fixed in the link above).
      (-:

      That said, someone else prolly did the site.

      S

    2. Re:I work with one of these guys... by paiute · · Score: 1

      Of course they weren't interested. There aren't any bare breated natives involved.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    3. Re:I work with one of these guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also know this guy. He's my brother. And he's been taking simple things apart to build new and creative things all his life. If anyone can do it he can.

  3. Track their progress online by joshua404 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here Looks very cool!

  4. Good luck by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Troll
    A tiny plane like a model will never make it across the Atlantic because airplanes don't scale down. Lift (==control) rises as the square of the size whereas weight rises as the cube. So when you have a tiny plane it is mostly lift. Which sounds great, except that human reaction times and amounts are grossly oversized to control something so unstable. Flying around the backyard is fine, choppy winds and extensive times are another.

    And don't even get me started on the inadequacy of the power source to last that long. Crazy dreamer.

    1. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tiny plane like a model will never make it across the Atlantic because airplanes don't scale down. Lift (==control) rises as the square of the size whereas weight rises as the cube. So when you have a tiny plane it is mostly lift. Which sounds great, except that human reaction times and amounts are grossly oversized to control something so unstable

      That assumes that they don't use denser material to build model planes.

    2. Re:Good luck by AlecC · · Score: 1

      And if you read the article, most of the travel is due to wind. They only need lift - meteorology will do the rest.

      And I would suggest that they have checked out the duration of the power source by flying it over their back yard for that amount of time - hardly a major proposition.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    3. Re:Good luck by dohcvtec · · Score: 1
      most of the travel is due to wind

      From the technical background of the project:
      No tailwind will be needed although there probably will be one.
      they have checked out the duration of the power source by flying it over their back yard for that amount of time - hardly a major proposition.

      Again, from the article:
      His models currently hold records for ... duration (33.67 hrs)...

      So, to recap, this flight will not be aided substantially by tailwinds, although the more tailwind the better, and it will also set a new distance record.
      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    4. Re:Good luck by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lift is a function of the shape of the wing's airfoil, the size of the wing, the angle of attack at which the wing is flying, and the speed of the airflow over the wing. It does not equal control and I have no idea what you mean in terms of it rises as a square. Two wings of exactly the same square footage can have different lifting capabilities based solely on the aspect ratio of the wing (ie the length compared the width). That is why you may have noticed that gliders have long skinny wings- they maximize the lift for the given amount of area.

      The choppy winds will pose less of a problem in many respects also. The "choppiness" is caused by different aircurrents affecting the aircraft simultaneously. In a 747 moving at 600kts with a 200' length, you are going to intersect numerous sheers of aircurretns repeatedly, bouncing the plane around and causing the "choppiness". A slow tiny thing like this model just isn't going to have that problem.

      Personally I wish them well. They are undertaking a great challenge, and I would love to be there with them!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    5. Re:Good luck by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      And how do you explain that 4 years ago a 13.2kg model make it across the pond. Seems that your logic is flawed...

      Johan Veenstra

    6. Re:Good luck by redneck_kiwi · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never flown R/C airplanes. I have been flying for about 2.5 years and several of my friends and I will continue to fly *precision* aerobatics even in winds gusting to 20mph. Sure, light weight does affect controllability, however a properly built and trimmed plane is extremely controllable.

    7. Re:Good luck by dilger · · Score: 1

      Human reaction times don't matter much:

      After the plane is guided by remote control to a cruising altitude of 500 feet, it will be put on autopilot, to be steered by GPS signals and an onboard microprocessor.

      I learned this by reading the National Geographic News article referenced in the post. Ah, the magic of reading before posting!

      cbd.

    8. Re:Good luck by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why I have a micro ELECTRIC 24" span R/C plane (http://www.f3x.com/electrics/stingersp400.htm)tha t does 100mph. So according to your theories, if we built one full size it should go mach 1 and fly for hours... Somehow your theory doesn't add up.

    9. Re:Good luck by AGMW · · Score: 1
      I have been flying for about 2.5 years

      Isn't that some kind of record?

      Better watch out for those DVT's bud!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    10. Re:Good luck by owenc · · Score: 1

      I used to fly them a bit too. They are a great hobby for anyone who wants to try it out. The hardest part for me, wasn't the flying part, it was rebuilding the things if you lose control or interference causes your transmitter not to work. :(
      I'm not much of a builder either, so I eventually had to give it up.
      Model Helicopters look interesting though

    11. Re:Good luck by dougmc · · Score: 2
      Flying around the backyard is fine, choppy winds and extensive times are another.

      Obviously you have no clue, `PhysicsGenius'. Actually get some experience with model airplanes, and come back later.

    12. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of the power source surviving the trip, the researchers who are attempting this feat have extensively tested and tuned the 10cc four-stroke engine being used in this attempt. The fuel load is carefully calculated such that barring excessive headwinds, the model will maintain power for the duration of the trip.

      You, sir, obviously did not read the article and have no idea what you're talking about, but your primitive attempt to sound knowledgeable is quite amusing. If I had mod points, I would mod you +1 Funny)

    13. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I didn't get my email back with a password and my screen name.

      I really hate to differ with you but in the next two years your gonna see some things that would make James Bond's hair curl. Like tiny videos on the back of a fly and engines that won't leave a radar signature. There are a whole bunch of neat projects coming our way that will not only improve security but will open up new doors into what we do now in our daily lives. You should do a little research on the net.

      BTW I'm StarCad and my email is starcad@arizonamodeler.com

    14. Re:Good luck by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Well, Maynard Hill has records like 500 kilometers in a straight line, 33 hours duration, and 8 kilometers of altitude gain to his credit...that crazy dreamer must have one hell of a backyard.

      rj

  5. amazing by tps12 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm continually stunned by what mankind can accomplish in this day and age. A century ago, crossing the Atlantic meant going by steamship. A century before that it meant sailing, and hoping you weren't boarded by pirates. A few centuries before that it was impossible! Now we can do it with a model airplane; what next?

    This is truly a technological tour de force. If anyone has any doubts as to the future of humanity, I suggest they need look no further. We are thriving, healthy, and accomplishing more than any species ever has before. I would do anything to see what we'll do a century from now...hey, if things keep going as well as they have been, I might still be around!

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We are thriving, healthy, and accomplishing more than any species ever has before. ... and destroying our environment, our basic source of life, everyday. For Christ's sake, the profits of a couple of friends of George W. Bush is more important than trying to save our environment from fatal changes (Kyoto).

      Don't be afraid about the our planet dying because of us, it will simply change. The problem is it's us that won;t survive these changes.

    2. Re:amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quote:
      --

      Karma: Positive (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)
      endquote:
      Not anymore...

    3. Re:amazing by ncc74656 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What's really amazing is how the parent post got modded down as flamebait. WTF? Here's some real flamebait for you: the crack-whore moderator responsible for that should be taken out back and shot. The gene pool needs some chlorine.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  6. Weather?? by phil-trick · · Score: 1

    Have you seen the weather here?
    It will be saturated before it gets here!

    Check http://www.met.ie/

    Phil

  7. At last! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stuart Little will be able to visit his relatives overseas!

    1. Re:At last! by cca93014 · · Score: 1

      No, dude, Stuart Little could easily fly a plane.

    2. Re:At last! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      yeah, but could he shoot down Iceman? NO! So, like, HA!

  8. Obligatory Simpsons quote by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Smithers: It's a nice model Sir..
    Mr. Burns: Model?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  9. Air traffic controller by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    As the airplane approaches Spain... Air Traffic controller: "Unidentified plane, identify yourself" Air traffic controller turns to coworkers, "This can't be a plane it's too small, what's going on here." Unidentified Aircraft: "Umm... I just took off from here and I'm coming back to land, I ran into this strange green light and I think I shrunk."

    1. Re:Air traffic controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily it is flying away form the US, or else it would be shot down on sight.

    2. Re:Air traffic controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't even show up on radar you stupid ass. At 11 lbs it's about as big as a bird. They block that shit out.

    3. Re:Air traffic controller by doctor_oktagon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, if it approaches Spain all the Air Traffic Controllers will be on strike!

    4. Re:Air traffic controller by vofka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Err - no...

      Commercial ATC Operators don't 'see' the aircraft on screen, they 'see' a transponder signal (known as a 'squawk') which is sent by the transponder unit when the ATC Radar strikes a detector on the aircraft. Only Military Radar Operators actually 'see' a true radar return signal.

      --
      Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
    5. Re:Air traffic controller by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 1

      And if it approaches France they'll be on vacation. (Août-ga!)

      --
      spawn_of_yog_sothoth
    6. Re:Air traffic controller by ToiletDuck · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect. They can and do see a radar return. How else could they control an aircraft with an inoperative transponder, or an aircraft that doesn't have one at all? A transponder is NOT required equipment on all flights, even in controlled airspace.

  10. What next? by EatHam · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm continually stunned by what mankind can accomplish in this day and age. A century ago, crossing the Atlantic meant going by steamship. A century before that it meant sailing, and hoping you weren't boarded by pirates. A few centuries before that it was impossible! Now we can do it with a model airplane; what next?

    Ha. I won't be impressed until they can do it with a paper airplane.

    1. Re:What next? by zCyl · · Score: 2

      Ha. I won't be impressed until they can do it with a paper airplane

      Can I use a motorboat and a bit of string?

  11. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by MobileDude · · Score: 0

    >>or imagine what would happen to the United
    >>States if someone flew a 1000lb pilotless bomb
    >>into the 2002 Oscars!

    If that ever occurs, you'll find me in the streets dancing with the Palestinians.

    --
    10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
  12. Ok and by xbrownx · · Score: 1, Troll

    This is important how?

    Is some great scientific breakthrough being made?

    What are the implications and how can this be used in the future?

    1. Re:Ok and by damu · · Score: 1

      It might not be a breakthrough but let me know when every joe blow accomplishes this:

      Quote:"The TAM model will be flown by a pilot using standard R/C hobby gear to a planned cruising altitude of about 1500 ft. There it will be put into an autonomous mode, steered by global position satellite signals and an on-board microprocessor. The flight of about 1950 miles is expected to take about 45 hours at 45 mph. No tailwind will be needed although there probably will be one. The position of the airplane, as well as technical data about altitude, speed, engine rpm, and some autopilot functions will be telemetered to satellites and returned to monitors on both sides of the ocean. On arrival at its destination, an R/C pilot will take over control and land the model."

      dam(u)

      --


      Useless sig.
    2. Re:Ok and by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      You know, every advancement made in technology doesn't have to be a cure for cancer or something. There is more to life than the big things like that. Yeah, this is basically a few model airplaners playing with their toys, but why shouldn't they? If they are the first ones to do it then they should get the glory. You may not be able to see any major advancements coming from this, but you never know what may come from it down the road, good or bad.

    3. Re:Ok and by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Or you'll see one of these things with a camera on it flying around and snapping pictures or anything the RC pilot wishes.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  13. This is a good thing... by decarelbitter · · Score: 1

    for the environment! Smaller planes is less polution!

    1. Re:This is a good thing... by af_robot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Smaller planes is less polution!

      So did you meant sexual pollutions or environmental?
      In any case, it was told so many time,
      SIZE DOES NOT MATTER!!! :)

    2. Re:This is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't what your girlfriend said last night.

  14. Not that amazing by yeoua · · Score: 1

    It's not that amazing. The blasted thing is a model plane... still uses fuel, still can fly on its own accord. Wow...

    Call me when they do the first transatlantic paperplane.

    And don't cheat and use a paperclip on the nose.

    1. Re:Not that amazing by GutBomb · · Score: 3, Funny

      if you launch a paper plane from mir it is not going to fily very far at all. ocean water will destroy the paper.

    2. Re:Not that amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > hmmm, What about a paper airplane in space? From mir, launch a paper airplane.

      Your airplane might get a little wet...

    3. Re:Not that amazing by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure there are still microscopic bits of Mir floating in the atmosphere somewhere.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  15. Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0
    I really respect the achievement. And then my active mind realizes that, in 2010, how much better will that little plane be? Good enough for drug trafficers to move those things accross the atlantic. 11 pounds (weight) of Extacy (a drug that is a little pill, for those who don't know) is a LOT of $$$ and can you tell me NORAD or similar type of costal radar arrays can track that thing? The stealh bomber was cosidered invisible because it was the size of a bird or small model plane. Well this thing is the size of...

    So seriously, someone tell me why, in 2010 (if not 8 years sooner) drug trafficers won't be using these things around the world for cross-country drug moving? The US coast guard is good at catching planes, but a model plane can fly in anywhere, as is practically "stealth" by comparison (size, noise, heat sig). With GPS worldwide, and even more accurate in USA (due to localized removals of accuracy-blocking) it can land on the beach at 3:00am for a pickup. NUTS!

    1. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      No, the bomber was not invisible because it was the size of a bird. The bomber is huge. It was invisible because it had the radar signature of a bird.

    2. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      good. Maybe it'll stop this ridiculous "drug war" once and for all and spend the money on something else. Oh, and stop giving up rights and liberty left and right. Oh wait, I'm being rational and honest and admitting we'll never "win" this war and so hoping for a quicker defeat. I'm UnAmerican (I'd say unUSian, but ,as noted, I don't give a shit).

    3. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but I fail to see how this will have any major effect. Anyone that wants these drugs can find them fairly easily. Bringing in a few model planes with 11 pounds of coke or something isn't going to change things much. The big problem is people bringing in 30 or 40 pounds in their tires or gas tanks, and drug trafficing cessenas that make it to the states. Until the DEA can catch all of these guys, the little 11 pound planes aren't going to make much of a difference. When they can catch all of the other methods of bringing narcotics into the country, then they will need something else to do, so they can try to catch model planes/boats/submarines that have a little bit in each of them.

    4. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two reasons. First off, 11lbs is the plane, not the payload. Secondly, the stealth bomber is stealthy beacuse it gives off no distinct signature. It is "self contained" in terms of control. Unless you teach mice to fly your drug planes, you will need at least a video feed/transponder/tracking signal back to the pilot. Which means it is no longer "invisible" in the EM spectrum and can be found quite easily (not to mention targeted and shot down). What we need to worry about is a plane made out of some stealthy material that can hold a pilot, payload and feul and has no radar signature.

    5. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by AlecC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As already said, the stealth bomber is untrackable because of extensive use of stealth technology to make it radar invisible.

      I once saw a copper-coated table tennis ball which, it was claimed, was used to test the anti-intruder radar. The placard claimed it was throw out of a high-altitude aircraft and tracked by radar as it fell to earth, beint blown this way and that by the wind. When it landed, they sent a man out to pick it up - which he usually did.

      Sealth technology has a big impact on flyability. I would expect that this plane, unstealthed, would have a radar crossection bigger than my table tennis ball, and stealthing it would ruin the range.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    6. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're referring to the 1st gen stealth aircraft, modern stealth aircraft don't look like the F117 "wobbly goblin" and definitely don't have the flight dynamic problems assoiciated with it. The F117 was developed when the 3d radar analysis software was in a relatively primitive state and could only deal with flat planar surfaces (and not may of them). The B1 is a 2nd gen product of the software capable of handling the complex compound curves of the airframe.
      For a look at 3rd gen, just look at the new ATF.

    7. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a copper coated ping pong ball is basically a metal object with huge amounts of reflectivity.
      a plane like this is probably composite and mostly plastic for the important stuff...very little metal. its definitely NOT going to show up on radar.

    8. Re:Well, talk about an increase in drug traffic... by fabiolrs · · Score: 2

      The stealth bomber is not invisible, its radar cross section is much smaller than conventional airplanes, many newer radars are able to track it. Its smaller radar signature only makes enemy radars not so efective in terms of range...

      --
      Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
      http://www.morroida.com.br
  16. Power for their engine by Damion · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they remember to wind that rubber band up really really tightly...

    --
    Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by frog51 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the risk of sounding like a troll, there are some issues here:

    1000lb is a bit more than 11lb, and in fact can be already done. That is why the military have radar, guns and missiles. The clever bit here is that this is very small. Very impressive if it makes it all that way.

    What would happen to the US if a bomb did go off at the Oscars? Very little. Yes it would be a disaster/massacre of innocents, but it won't affect the economy like the twin towers attack.

    This is not a useful model for any type of private cruise missile. Spy plane, maybe. Secret courier, yep. Heavy weapon, erm...nope.

  19. The doomsday people... by Uttles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have been asking about using this for bombs... Well, the US already has these that carry bombs, we're using them in Afghanistan. As far as this actual plane goes and any citizen trying to use one, it could never carry a bomb. It could, however, carry some sort of airborn biological weapon, but there are numerous examples of how hard it would be to actually hurt someone with a small amount of bio warfare.

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:The doomsday people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "never" are you so sure?
      Just scale it up a bit.

    2. Re:The doomsday people... by mlosh · · Score: 1

      Jef Raskin (of MacIntosh and "The Humane Interface" fame) wrote a detailed essay about this. He seems to be a model airplane enthusiast.

  20. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by Xentax · · Score: 2

    Plus, why would terrorists try to do something like that pilotless? It's higher-tech (meaning harder to acquire and costing more), and (for a while yet) less reliable than a suicidal but reasonably-well-trained human pilot.

    I don't think we'll see a pilotless terrorist bomb/plane anytime soon -- it'll be crazy guys at the helm of a Cessna -- or a Jetliner :( -- for some time yet.

    Xentax

    --
    You shouldn't verb words.
  21. 11 pounds... by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    of in-flight peanuts.

  22. And NG! by writermike · · Score: 1

    [NG] declined, saying there wouldn't be enough interest. Well now it's in the Post, it's on /. and to cap it all off, who's doing a TV special about it? Discovery. Ain't that a swift kick in the crotch.

    And NG is writing articles, too. Imagine that, NG having to play catch up!

    Bart: The ironing is delicious.
    Lisa: The word is "irony."
    Bart: Huh?

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  23. But... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    With all the "good" actors/actresses dead, the MPAA will have to charge us even more money for even worse movies. This would be very tragic indeed.

  24. GPLed do-it-yourself kit by tramm · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Since Slashdot is now 100% robotics stories, you might be interested in building your own autopilot kit for model airplanes and helicopters. It isn't perfect yet, but we're getting there.

    The hardware design and source code are all GPLed and available. The most recent releases have an OpenGL helicopter simulator for you to play with as well.

    --
    -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
    1. Re:GPLed do-it-yourself kit by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Sure, but can you make them out of LEGO(tm) blocks?

      If not, there's no point in putting it on Slashdot.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:GPLed do-it-yourself kit by Zurk · · Score: 1

      the main challenge is being able to autonomously control the heli indoors..i.e. avoid hitting walls with rototr blades etc.
      follow the horizon autopilots have been done to death in most of the UAV competitions.
      object tracking/scene recognition is the real challenge.

    3. Re:GPLed do-it-yourself kit by snatchitup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are you using a MAX231. Doesn't that require charge pumps (Capacitors). Live a little and spend the extra $2 on a MAX233 that doesn't require the pumps. Space is a valuable commodity here.

      Save some money by doing it scrapping the more expensive ATMega163 (though a great choice over the newbie PIC processors and Basic Stamps).

      If you go with the AT90S-8515 you still get plenty of I/O, PWM, Serial I/O, though you'll have to hand code some A-D conversion. Maybe that's why you're going with the 163?

    4. Re:GPLed do-it-yourself kit by tramm · · Score: 2
      snatchitup wrote:
      Why are you using a MAX231. Doesn't that require charge pumps (Capacitors). Live a little and spend the extra $2 on a MAX233 that doesn't require the pumps.
      I wish the MAX233 were available in a DIP10 -- power, ground, Tx/Rx 1, Tx/Rx 2 -- rather than the DIP20. It is larger than the 231 with the two charge pump capacitors.
      Space is a valuable commodity here.
      If I could do SMD work by hand, I would!
      If you go with the AT90S-8515 you still get plenty of I/O, PWM, Serial I/O, though you'll have to hand code some A-D conversion. Maybe that's why you're going with the 163?
      The 163 offers a hardware multiply, self programing memory, an ADC, twice as much memory (both flash and SRAM) and a few more timers. We're using all of those features. The price at DigiKey is only two dollar difference between the 8515-8 and the 163.

      Thanks for the suggestions! Sign up for the mailing list -- we can always use help with the engineering side of things.

      --
      -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
    5. Re:GPLed do-it-yourself kit by jaylen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great idea... just I hope the coders are not surprised when Bin laden etc (whoever) use a swarm of bomb laden remote helecopter bombs using this design and source code.

      And I wonder who the FBI et all would hang for it?

      *smiles wryly and sadly*

  25. Cheating by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here we go again! Just like the baloonist flew "around the world", we have another fake world record attempt at "crossing the atlantic".

    The "around the world" baloon flight was no more than a circle around antarctica.

    Traditionally, I think "crossing the atlantic" means crossing THE WHOLE THING. From US east coast, to Europe's west coast. I'm sorry, but Newfoundland to Iceland doesn't cut it. Granted, flying a model plane over that distance is an admirable feat, but I don't think it would qualify for a world record.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:Cheating by Just+Another+Perl+Ha · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummmm.... I think you'd better get those eyes of yours checked out. The target is not Iceland... but rather Ireland. Albeit, there is only one character difference in the names.

    2. Re:Cheating by demaria · · Score: 2

      If the distance between newfoundland and iceland is further then the distance of the current longest model airplane flight, then isn't it a world record?

      Keep in mind, just this week somewhere in California a world record was set for most simultaneous breast feedings.

    3. Re:Cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen jackass;

      First, RTFA. Newfoundland to Ireland
      Second, you do realize its still the Atlantic regardless of it borders w/ the US.

    4. Re:Cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Newfoundland to Iceland

      Ok, thanks for your input Mr. Magoo.

    5. Re:Cheating by Keeper · · Score: 2

      Last time I checked, crossing something doesn't require taking the longest possible path...

      You start in a body of land on one side of the atlantic. You land in another body of land on the other side. You've crossed it.

  26. Heading Westward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice that all the telemetry data indicates the planes are heading 280 degrees? That's no shortcut to Europe.

  27. Does it have a little model by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    Charles Lindburg pilot figureen?

    Anyone interesting in getting into model airplanes, esp. the new 'parkflyer' electrics (if you can't stand glow fuel, caster oil 'slimers') should read up at RC Groups - you can get a pretty good flight at the local soccer field with nice, quiet parkflyer electrics. I've just finished something called a Wing-E and it's a ball to fly in my nearby school yard, get's at least 10 minutes of aerobatic fun off one battery charge.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  28. Excellent! Now, try that without a power plant! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, i guess the next OBVIOUS step is a plane that can cross the Atlantic on nothing but thermals and tailwinds!

    I mean, when you can keep an unpowered plane aloft for 36 hours, why not? Well, so far the straight-line distance record is only 226km, but with a GPS autopilot, and a thermal detection unit (get the scientist working on the tube technology immediately!), who knows!

    FAI RC Model Records for Gliders

    Lift!

  29. The rejected plane was small too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Span: 9.67 feet
    Length: 5.67 feet
    Height: 2 feet
    Wing Area: 6.1 square feet
    Gross Weight: 28.9 pounds
    Cruising Speed: 43 to 55 mph
    Range: 1,875 miles
    Service Ceiling: 15,000 feet

    From: http://www.museumofflight.org/collections/craftdis play.html?ID=1

  30. Words of wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Words of wisdom from the site[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/ 08/0805_020805_transatlantic.html#related]:

    "If the plane uses too much fuel per hour, the engine will run fine, but they will run out of fuel. If it uses too little, the engine can stall out, and if it does the plane will crash."

    What kind of engineer tells this to the audience?

  31. Ocean Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you refering to the same ocean water that is causing those nasty rust spots on MIR's quarter panels?

  32. What's with the engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Engine RPM: 0"

    I take it that's not good then?

  33. my inspiration by chill182 · · Score: 1

    This article makes me want to drive my radio shack remote control car across the US. All goes well until its run over by a semi.

  34. Predator/Darkstar by saider · · Score: 1

    We already have planes with this capability. Predator/Darkstar can stay aloft for almost a day and have a significantly longer range. Not to mention that they take off and land by themselves and can carry missiles.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    1. Re:Predator/Darkstar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your talking apples and oranges.

      Predator (the smallest of DoDs UAVs) does not fall into the "model" category (11 lbs or less including fuel). Predator has a payload of 450lbs!

      The design considerations that these guys had to deal with are completely different.

    2. Re:Predator/Darkstar by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      If you'd READ THE FREAKING ARTICLE you'd see that planes like the Predator don't fit the requirements to be classified as a MODEL AIRPLANE.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  35. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What would happen to the US if a bomb did go off at the Oscars? Very little.

    There might even be some rejoicing.

    Yes it would be a disaster/massacre of innocents, but it won't affect the economy like the twin towers attack.

    More like a massacre of ignorants. Damn Hollywood elites. In fact, it might even help the economy by getting rid of some of those overpaid snobs. The bad part is it probably might not be enough get rid of the MPAA problem.

  36. Where do we send the money? by paganizer · · Score: 1

    Where do we send the money for the "51" prize?
    I figure it's got to be organized, the competition to send a unmanned R/C plane with a wireless webcam over Area-51 is just too geeky to pass up.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:Where do we send the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in! I'll chip in $100 towards the prize fund for successful completion.

      (Yeah, I know this is an anonomous post, but set it up, and I'm there!)

  37. Good Use as Cheap Military Drones by sqlzealot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The military is currently spending millions of dollars on next gen drone technology like like the Predator and Global Hawk when stuff like model airplanes has been under their noses the whole time. If this can fly to Iceland it can certainly fly around Afghanistan for a day or two. This model airplane couldn't have cost more than a couple thousand to make. Stuff an satellite phone and a webcam in there and you have cheap drone for less than $10k. You could buy hundreds of these for the price of one of those big drones. Imagine them swarming the skies, looking for baddies. Lot harder to avoid and hide from than one big drone. Big plus is model airplanes are SMALL! Give a pair to every special forces unit on the ground and they have quick intelligance in a pinch. Too bad military procurement is controlled by expensive-toy-loving generals and profit-seeking industrialists.

    sigless

    --
    "Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out."
    1. Re:Good Use as Cheap Military Drones by sqlzealot · · Score: 1

      Here is link of efforts to convert old Cessnas to drones. Lot cheaper than $4.5 mil.

      --
      "Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out."
    2. Re:Good Use as Cheap Military Drones by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Give a pair to every special forces unit on the ground and they have quick intelligance in a pinch.

      Hey, good idea. We should also give this idea to Operation TIPS. Imagine how much more efficient their snitches could be.

      And I understand x10 is coming out with a model airplane version of their wireless camera... (if they're not, they should!).

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    3. Re:Good Use as Cheap Military Drones by dougmc · · Score: 2
      Even if X10 doesn't do it, there's lots of companies out there who will sell you model airplanes with small transmitting cameras. In fact, it's scary how many people are trying to fill this niche ...

      Especially since it's a simple matter of buying the plane yourself, building it yourself, and then buying and installing some sort of wireless camera yourself. No need to pay somebody else to do it -- this is hardly rocket science.

    4. Re:Good Use as Cheap Military Drones by john82 · · Score: 1

      Sure the Army would love nothing better than to buy a handful of really expensive recon platform when they could get a thousand cheap disposable ones instead!

      What an incredibly stupid thing to say.

  38. This morning's launch scrubbed by Das+Kamikaze · · Score: 1

    From the site:

    Latest 09:20 EST 8/8/02 -

    Last night the launch site at Cape Spear was covered with heavy fog--zero visibility and ceiling zero. Launch has been scrubbed and the team is looking for another opportunity.

  39. Re:Cheating....NOT by pythorlh · · Score: 1

    Dude, That's IReland...not ICeland. BIG difference.

    --
    Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
  40. Fun little electric RC plane. by MoTec · · Score: 1

    I've got a couple of these Hobby Zone Fighterbird's http://www.hobbyzone.com/fighterbird.html It's lots of fun because there is an IR or some other sort of sensor and transmitter on it so you can dogfight.

    A couple friends of mine have 'em too and we've wasted waaaay too many hours 'shooting' each other down.

    It's not as advanced as some of the newer park fliers but it sure is easy to fly, cheap, and lots of fun!

    1. Re:Fun little electric RC plane. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      there is an IR or some other sort of sensor and transmitter on it so you can dogfight.

      Interesting -- has to be better than the cut-the-paper-streamer-with-your-prop type dogfights -- the props are so slow even tissue paper jams them up.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  41. 11 lbs.... by Heem · · Score: 2

    If this thing weighs only 11 lbs, including fuel, I'd venture to say it only has 1 to 1.5 gallons of fuel in it, MAX. Now, I don't know much about model aviation and how efficient their engines are, but even with the very light weight, thats quite a distance for that amount of fuel..

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:11 lbs.... by AGMW · · Score: 1
      If you read the article you will find the bit about the airbourne re-fuelling. It's gonna pull up behind the USAF tanker plane and fill up 7 times during the journey.

      Maybe :-)

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    2. Re:11 lbs.... by Magus311X · · Score: 2

      Well, I have a few nitro RC cars. Let's look at one.

      ~1HP on 20% nitromethane blend.
      Fuel tank: 75cc
      1 gallon = 4546cc or about 60 tanks of fuel

      My car has a top speed of 68mph or so (and can hit 60 in around 4.5 seconds when geared to do it). But to maintain sane fuel economy... it has to sit around 22krpm, or around 35mph. It can go on that for about 10 minutes (though maybe 12).

      Or 6 tanks per hour
      Or 10 hours
      10 hours at 35mph = 350mpg

      Keep in mind that this is a high-performance, fuel sucking, 35krpm peak, engine. It also doesn't have the weight of a bottle of nitro either on it. But I think 300mpg is possible. 1HP could move 10 pounds (car and fuel) that I would surmise.

      -----

  42. RC plane =? assassination weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could equip the RC plane with a bomb and a webcam and one of them wireless network cards and fly it into a political leader from across the Atlantic all while sitting at your computer in your underwear...

    1. Re:RC plane =? assassination weapon by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 2
      You could equip the RC plane with a bomb and a webcam and one of them wireless network cards and fly it into a political leader from across the Atlantic all while sitting at your computer in your underwear...

      wireless network you say? you must have better Pringles technology than available round these parts

  43. They're ignoring Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Notice how on their web page: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~barrettjf/ they have American, British and Irish flag but they left out Canadian one.

    Well, they're taking off from Canada, Canadian gov has helped them out by securing the licenses for the flight and they even persuaded Ireland on their behalf to open up their airspace for this (previous model airplane flight had to go further north to Scotland because Ireland refused the license).

    And this is the thanks they give? Pfffft!

    1. Re:They're ignoring Canada by Ratchet · · Score: 1

      No they aren't, the Newfoundland flag is the first one shown on the page (depending on how you read things of course). The last time I checked, Newfoundland was still a part of Canada.

    2. Re:They're ignoring Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically it's still a part of Canada, without the last 'A' in it.

      (the EHHHHHHHH :)

  44. I love this quote! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Finally, the tiny receiver buried inside the plane's fuselage made contact with the guidance satellite orbiting thousands of miles above, and the laptop came to life.

    I could write a whole B movie based on that quote : )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  45. Re:Name of the plane!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this up. It's funny. Come on! Is it powered by farts?

  46. Autonomous Trans-atlantic Soaring by g00bd0g · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dynamic soaring has just recently come into a practical reality. It is an absolutley insane way to have some fun. http://www.reeseproductions.com/mpegs/QuickTime/LT 1large.html
    I have heard some very serious discussion from Joe Wurts about developing Autonomous Dynamic Soaring aircraft able to cross the atlantic, like the albatross.
    http://www.reeseproductions.com/mpegs/ QuickTime/LT 1large.html

  47. Re:[Trolling Stones] oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All by the Doors.

    1) ?
    2) LA Woman
    3) Hello, I Love You
    4) Riders on the Storm
    5) Touch Me

  48. Re:Excellent! Now, try that without a power plant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you don't get thermals in the middle of the Atlantic.

  49. Which is what Dynamic Soaring is all about by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

    Dynamic soaring has just recently come into a practical reality. It is an absolutley insane way to have some fun. http://www.reeseproductions.com/mpegs/QuickTime/LT 1large.html
    I have heard some very serious discussion from Joe Wurts about developing Autonomous Dynamic Soaring aircraft able to cross the atlantic, like the albatross.
    http://www.reeseproductions.com/mpegs/ QuickTime/LT 1large.html

    1. Re:Which is what Dynamic Soaring is all about by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

      whoops the 2nd link was supposed to be:
      http://www.wfu.edu/albatross/atwork/dynamic_s oarin g.htm

  50. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Once it goes down to -1 nobody can see it to mod it up.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  51. Re:From the April 2001 /. postings by AGMW · · Score: 1
    Er, yes actually I do - and I'm not anonymous either dammit!

    It seemed a reasonable comparison of this year's factoid with last year's jokette.

    Those Mods must be off their Rockers!

    --
    Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
    handmadehands.co.uk
  52. mod parent up please :) by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    this is useful stuff!

  53. 100 rpm? i think now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you go to thier status monitor, it says that the engine is turning 100 rpm, anyone familiar with model "glo" engines knows that this is impossible, these things idle at 2000 rpms. in my helicopter, its got an 8 ounce tank that lasts 6 minutes.

  54. New hobby time! by T3kno · · Score: 2

    Where do I get the plans to build one of those gliders? That was awesome.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  55. Less than that even by SimJockey · · Score: 2

    Another article I read indicated a fuel consumption of about 2 oz. per hour. Using a nominal 40 hr of flying time, 80 oz = .625 gal. Which would be about 3.5 - 4 lb of fuel.
    Nice fuel consumption of 1900 miles per 0.625 gal or 3000+ mpg!!!

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
  56. Newfoundland time by coolerthanmilk · · Score: 1

    Meaning half an hour later, right?

    1. Re:Newfoundland time by RobinH · · Score: 2

      Meaning half an hour later, right?

      Meaning 1.5 hours later than Eastern time, or a half hour later than Atlantic time.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  57. Re:PaperPlane over the Atlantic ... by AGMW · · Score: 2, Funny
    That means we can fill a bowl with water from the Atlantic and fly a Paperplane over it - Hey Presto - We've flown a PaperPlane over the Atlantic ...

    Won't mum be pleased!

    --
    Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
    handmadehands.co.uk
  58. Imagine the fisherman... by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... floating along in his rickety fishing vessel in the North Atlantic hundreds of miles off the coast and probably as far from any other human being when suddenly he looks up and sees....

    nnnnneeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr......

    this little red plane buzzing by.

    One of two things will happen. Either he'll jump overboard... or he'll finally give up the sauce.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Imagine the fisherman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a question. If you are on a boat and this thing flys overhead to you realize its a model airplane 500 feet up. Or, because of its small size do your eyes just tell you its a regular plane 5000 feet up?

  59. This has already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 1990s their was a remote controlled aircraft that did this. It had a two gallon tank on it. In fact you can go to the Boeing Air and Space Museam and see the aircraft on display. I have seen in myself.

  60. Go back and read the article... by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 1
    "The plane's weight is evenly divided between structure and fuel"

    This site generally has comments about articles that are posted somewhere else. People usually go read them and then come back to make informed comments about what they read. But somehow you missed that part.

    --

    -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

  61. Entrepenueral opportunities by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can lay our own trans-alantic cable.

    Looks good on paper at least.

  62. Clifden by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2

    I'm staking out a place in a bog near Clifden.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  63. Why does fog matter? by Elvis+Maximus · · Score: 2

    The site says the launch was delayed due to fog. If the thing is running on GPS-assisted autopilot, what difference does fog make?

    --

    -
    Give me liberty or give me something of equal or lesser value from your glossy 32-page catalog.

    1. Re:Why does fog matter? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      The flight plan calls for manual control until it's cruising at 1500 feet.

      rj

  64. Global Hawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not too shabby either.

  65. A real terrorist weapon this isn't by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    The model described in the article isn't any kind of real terrorist threat due to its limited payload capacity and slow speed.

    However, that doesn't mean that creating a low cost cruise missile isn't beyond the means of even the smallest terror group or nation.

    Check out The Low Cost Cruise Missile for a pointer to where the real danger lies.

    1. Re:A real terrorist weapon this isn't by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      The model described in the article isn't any kind of real terrorist threat due to its limited payload capacity

      You don't need alot of Ebola to mess someone up, and it doesn't take much radioactive crap to have a building torn down. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  66. avion carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now is the time to bring back the idea of birds carrying letters across the country and stuff. Except you can use model airplanes. Really small ones. Guided by satellite and shit.

  67. GPS? by standards · · Score: 2

    So does anyone have any info on the GPS componentry of their craft? I'm interested in different but related projects, but I have a tough time learning about the GPS modules that are available...