Slashdot Mirror


Cassette-Shell Sized MP3 Player/Recorder

octa-g writes: "USA Today tech reviews is featuring a nifty little cassette sized MP3 player that records analog audio. 'The Digisette Duo-DX can copy cassette tapes in a dual-well tape deck or boombox. Or you can make recordings by connecting an output cable from a stereo source to the Duo's earphone port and holding down the Duo's play and fast-forward buttons.' The ability to record audio straight to the player, or to record some of my old tapes/LPs to MP3 without a computer or other recording equipment intrigues me." This sounds like a good way to add fast-forward to the old car radio.

214 comments

  1. Only terrorists... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    The RIAA is likely to say that only terrorists would be likely to get such a device...

    1. Re:Only terrorists... by JazerWonkie · · Score: 1

      Yeah I mean how dare people take food out of the mouths of artist who put their sweat and blood into those LP's. Like Elvis, or Buddy Holy, or ...

      ;)

    2. Re:Only terrorists... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Ahhh, they list "SDMI Compliant" and "Upgradable, supports DRM" in the "features" section, so the RIAA will probably consider them an "approved device." ... not a pair of features I want ... I found a 32MB model for $60. I'm not sure I want it, simply because of the SDMI/DRI stuff.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:Only terrorists... by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where do you put the digital watermark to keep people from listening to it?

    4. Re:Only terrorists... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Geez, supporting DRM and forcing DRM are 2 seperate things, It will play your mp3s but you can also copy your DRM content from your computer (which won't let you copy it to non DRM devices) But I digress.

    5. Re:Only terrorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the question I have is, can I then copy the files I've made by copying from my tapedeck to this device onto my computer?
      I mean, if it's DRM compliant wouldn't it prevent me from making copies of my own tapes?

  2. This has been out for how long?! by IronTek · · Score: 2, Informative

    This product (or one exactly like it) has been on the market for years now!

    How is this "News for Nerds?!"

    1. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      I think I have seen These as well, however, none of the models I have seen have the input from casset player functionality.

    2. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      a few years...

      I remember looking at one and saying wow.. this would be cool if it held more than 32mb of mp3's

      this just adds a few more 'features' such as analog audio and more memory.. still a neat product tho.

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    3. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it hasn't. The digisette has made other models that look like it, but this is a new model that can record in casette players. Granted, it's still not that great, but it certainly is new. Do your homework before you open your mouth.

    4. Re:This has been out for how long?! by dafozzee · · Score: 0

      I cant find a link right now, but IIRC that device didnt support recording to it as a cassette tape.

    5. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The unit you are refering to has been out for quite a while. The unit being reviewed here is actually quite new, and rather more advanced then what you are refering to.

      This particular device allows you to control playback with your tape deck audio controls, and if placed in a tape recorder, actually allows you to record directly to MP3. This could be a very nice function for college students recording lectures as they can transfer the lectures back to PC for archival purposes.

      This is actually a NEW (as in news) way to present the whole cassette-shaped MP3 player metaphor.

    6. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Around a year, yes.
      I submitted the link almost a year ago :
      • 2001-11-29 08:43:45 MP3 player for tape appliances (articles,music) (rejected)

      so, no : the parent is not a troll but its mod is an idiot.
    7. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This particular device allows you to control playback with your tape deck audio controls..."

      So did the old one.

    8. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be a very nice function for college students recording lectures as they can transfer the lectures back to PC for archival purposes.

      So what, I could use an audio cable and plug a tape player to my pc, and convert the tape into mp3. Which is better -- an expensive and heavy mp3 casette vs. a cheap and light ordinary casette plus audio cable?

    9. Re:This has been out for how long?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finish reading the sentence, dumbass.

  3. Revenue? by egg+troll · · Score: 1

    Is Slashdot now being paid to run stories for products? I hope not, but honestly, I can see no other reason for this story being on Slashdot....

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Revenue? by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

      Unix developers conference or homeless shelter? You decide
      At first glance, definitly a homeless shelter. However, upon second (and oh so sad) glance, I noticed the beer bottles on the table which are decidedly not allowed in most homeless shelters. With great shame I choose : Unix Developers Conference.

    2. Re:Revenue? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      oh conspiracy theory... Let me say, there are GREAT tape decks in some real luxury cars (I even saw a nakamischi on Mercedes SL600) and those people doesn't like to change their decks.

      Conspiracy? lets go on, are you paid to post this comment on slashdot? or I am paid to post this reply to your comment? and if someone replies, is he/she paid to post reply? and so on

      Its a nerd device, slashdot is news for nerds and they make it story.

    3. Re:Revenue? by fermion · · Score: 1
      Although I wonder what the market will be for this product, it is an interesting piece of engineering. People who go to radio shack looking for a way to copy thier cassetes may buy it. On the other hand, I know poeple who can't even copy tapes on thier dual tape players, so there may be little hope. Nevertheless, it does have a cool factor.

      I am much more concerned about the amount of paid advertising for Visual Studio .net. What is there to say about M$ funding /.?

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  4. Not unique, but still cool... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Google turns up several cassette sized MP3 players, including the RomeMP3 player.
    Still, the interface is a new thing, particularly being able to control it through standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.

    -T

    1. Re:Not unique, but still cool... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

      I kinda like the idea that it will work either independantly, or if I'm at a party, I can stick it into the stero so everybody can hear. If it had some kind of display, it would be helpfull, but I guess you can't have everything.

    2. Re:Not unique, but still cool... by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      turns up several cassette sized MP3 players, including the RomeMP3 player.
      And there is another one on the market (perhaps only in Asia?) the MP WOW Both the RomeMP3 and the MP WOW are aparently originally from Korea.

      being able to control it through standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.
      Don't forget (as the clueless article of author noted) "Even the tone controls work" too. (How did this make it past the editor? Obviously the tone controls work since they are manipulating the analog audio stream that has already left the player)

    3. Re:Not unique, but still cool... by donnacha · · Score: 2
      Still, the interface is a new thing, particularly being able to control it through standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.
      No, the RomeMP3 DOES allow control through the standard FF/RW/Play controls on the tape deck.

      From the RomeMP3 Home Page:

      "Transform those fast forward and rewind features into skip features. The RomeMP3 can be inserted directly into your car deck and controlled with the car deck's controls!"
  5. Re:FP FOR US ANONYMOUS CLIT MEMBERS. W00T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we meet in person? An insight like that should be rewarded with a donkey punch.

  6. Here is the product website by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Here is the product website by Tilgore+Krout · · Score: 1
      The DUO-DX 496 web site lists as one of the features:
      • Texas Instruments Digital Signal Processor (DSP) with upgradeable firmware supports new audio codecs and digital rights management
      So it might not be as nifty as it first seems to be.
      --
      main(){char*c="main(){char*c=%c%s%c;printf(c,34,c, 34);}";printf(c,34,c,34);}
    2. Re:Here is the product website by by+hemos · · Score: 1

      WARNING! The parent post contains a link to a disgusting picture of a torn anus.

  7. yet another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So .. what makes this casette-sized mp3 player more special than the others that have been around for quite some time?

  8. analog audio? by garcia · · Score: 1

    What's the point of having a digital device and not keeping it digital?

    1. Re:analog audio? by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      I think the point is to have the added benifit to be able to do I/O with the older analog systems... you know.. backward compatibility. Personally I wouldn't mind being able to do that and convert my casset collection to digital form with ease and not having to bother with wiring my casset player to my PC.

    2. Re:analog audio? by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      No device is completely digital, our ears our analog devices. So all digital audio systems must convert to analog at one point... :-)

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:analog audio? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Your car has a digital audio cassette system? The mp3 audio is naturally digital because there is no way to record an analog mp3. The system outputs analog audio because that's what ever cassette recorder expects to hear. Seems pretty simple doesn't it?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:analog audio? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What's the point of having a digital device and not keeping it digital?
      Bug-compatibility.
    5. Re:analog audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most audio starts life analog.
      All audio becomes analog (or are your ear digital?)

      But the neat thing here that it allows one to use existing older technology and get (at least some of) the benefits of newer technology.

      J. Random doesn't NEED to fiddle around with his car stereo to use this. He can Just Use It. And Mr. Random wouldn't need a computer - just his usual audio gear. But J. Random Jr. could use it with the computer if he so desired. Or how about, just copy the tape collection (one at a time please) to this gadget, and then snarf the mp3s to computer, and have them digitized without much hassle. Ideal? Probably not. But it is one more thing someone can do. Ain't choice grand?

    6. Re:analog audio? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      there are some systems that you can setup like... hmm total 1 cm analogue part.

      Er, CD sends digital data (raw,optical s/pdif) to digital equlizer, equlizer sends s/pdif to speakers via digital (laser) cable and those amps in those speakers perform the amp job and send analogue signal via 1cm pure gold cable.

      Well, for digital lovers, not me.

    7. Re:analog audio? by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      i'm sure RIAA will love this...

      now people will stop buying cd's and just buy tapes and copy them with this thing... kinda hard to copy protect tapes. I guess if the idea cauht on well enough we will see no more tapes for sale and cd's will then cost about $28 a piece.

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    8. Re:analog audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LIFE IS ANALOG!!!

      Move out of the basement, you slashdot lusers.

    9. Re:analog audio? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Not so!

      The RIAA is secret planning a new music delivery system which is implanted directly into your skull! With wires connecting directly to your brain, they will use a digital representation of sound waves to trigger nerve cells to fire and thus reproduce the sound with crystal clarity.

      Satellite delivery of digital music data will beam directly into the small dish-shaped implant in your forehead (the dish may be spray-painted flesh-tone to account for ethnic asthetics).

      Incorperated into this system is a sophisticated digital rights management system "BrainSTRAIN" (Brain Secure Transmission And Integrated Metering). Should you fail to pay your BrainSTRAIN bill, the system, will beam country music to your, gradually increasing the volume until a payment is made.

      FORTUNATELY there IS a solution developed by Canadian hackers who have not yet come under the loathsome grip of the U.S. DMCA legislation.

      Using sophisticated Canadian engineering technology, an advanced signal-blocking device utilizing common, off-the-shelf hardware has been fabricated for cranial signal blocking.

      Referred to by experts as a "TinFoil Hat", this technology may be all that can save us from corporate broadcast tyranny.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:analog audio? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Those crafty Canadians... Makes me proud to be one.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    11. Re:analog audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool I was looking for something like this to record the XM satellite radio in my car... now I won't have to camp out in it anymore when a good DJ set comes on.

    12. Re:analog audio? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      hm, errr speed up your TRS80 COCO or Dragon by a factor of two by telling the memory controller to clock twice as fast ???

    13. Re:analog audio? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Congrats.. You are as old and pathetic as I am.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    14. Re:analog audio? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      old probably... pathetic ? no, don't think so :)

      Actually, we found a way to access the 2nd 32k
      of ram too :)

      Canadian eh ? Canadian wannabe on this end

    15. Re:analog audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, audio starts life as reality. The word "analog" means "simulation". In recent years it has come to be thought of by the mentally lazy as meaning "not digitized", but that's not what it means.

      Look it up.

    16. Re:analog audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LIFE IS ANALOG!!!

      Really? I thought life was real. How profound. Give me a hit of what you're on.

  9. demographics by cliffom · · Score: 0

    said company: how will we reach our target audience with this product?

    money hungry geek: we can post the story on slashdot. that way it will reach everyone we would like it to.

    Fact of the matter is, I would like to know how many of us that read /. still have tape decks in our cars. What else is this thing good for? For 200 bucks, I Would much rather have a unit with an LCD and deal with using a car adapter.

  10. *boggle* by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    This sounds like a good way to add fast-forward to the old car radio.

    ...brining it up to par with all the new car radios that have fast-forward pre-installed...

    "Honey, can you fast-forward NPR to 7:00 am? I want to see what my commute is going to be like tomorrow..."

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:*boggle* by Kaiwen · · Score: 2
      This sounds like a good way to add fast-forward to the old car radio.

      Never did think those kay-sets had much of a future. Down here in the Bayou, we're wait'n on the 8-track version, so all us good ole boys can transfer our Roy Orbison collections. Ain' tha' right, Billy Bob?

    2. Re:*boggle* by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could always use one of those 8-track to casette adaptors. My family had one we used in our Chevy stationwagon. I did get a portable CD player and used one of those line-out to casette adaptors to go into the 8-track adaptor.

      Sounded about as you would expect.

    3. Re:*boggle* by bugg · · Score: 1
      What do you have against Roy Orbison? Comparing a great rockabilly/rock and roll artist to hicks is grossly unfair!

      Seriously, where do you get off in saying that?

      --
      -bugg
  11. Interesting... by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cool! Now if they can just make an track player in the shape of a CD, I'll be back in business, baby...

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  12. Speaking of whores... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't strange that every time there's a Bush in the Whitehouse, we're at war with the Arabs and the economy is in the toilet?

    Somebody must not like those guys

  13. The products exist by Geekonomical · · Score: 1

    For atleast a year now! Still clumsy to use and face stiff competition from devices with more ease of use/Storage Space/and offer the same features one way or the other.

    (You can always plug an ipod or a competing device using a casette adapter)

    1. Re:The products exist by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      Those don't record using a tape recorder. This one does. That's what's new.

  14. the ScreenSavers Digisette review by wherley · · Score: 2, Interesting
    maybe a month ago. cute looking but had some reservations. their bottom line:
    • Pros: Unique and compact form factor; record/encode into MP3; memory expansion slot
    • Cons: No status display; counterintuitive recording

    Their full review
  15. Real time enc? by pete-classic · · Score: 2
    Okay, first, we have all seen this device before.

    Anyone have any idea how this little bitty (and pretty cheap) thing does real time MP3 encoding? From the article:


    Another feature allows the Duo to act as a recording device. Just insert the Duo into a cassette recorder and press the record button and it will convert an analog source into MP3 audio.


    I'm I just out of it, or is that pretty impressive?

    -Peter
    1. Re:Real time enc? by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Probably an ASIC - some hardware dedicated to doing just MP3 encoding. It's also probably CBR MP3s, which are much easier to encode quickly than VBR.

      So to answer your question, no, I wouldn't say it's all THAT impressive. ;)

    2. Re:Real time enc? by tezzer · · Score: 1
      They use a TI chip that does Frauenhoffer coding on the fly. You can view the product announcement from TI here:

      http://www.ti.com/sc/docs/news/2000/00004.htm

      I haven't found the part number for the finished product yet, but pretty cool stuff, no?

      --
      (Celui que tient la peur de devinir nuage)
  16. MP3 Player related question by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Does anyone use an iPod or similar drive-based MP3 player while working out?

    I jog a few miles a day, and I'm thinking about getting an MP3 player because the radio reception where I'm at stinks (and having nothing to concentrate on but actually running makes a mile seem like an eternity). The iPod seems like a good solution, but I'm hesitant to get one because it uses a hard drive and I'm worried that the jostling will damage it in short order.

    The guy at the Mac store in my local mall said that it's not a problem and that people use the iPod for workout tunes all the time, but I'm not sure I believe him.

    Experience, anyone?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:MP3 Player related question by imta11 · · Score: 1

      I bought one and during a downhill part of a 5 mile run the heads crashed into the platters.

      Those mac users lie.

    2. Re:MP3 Player related question by alcubierre · · Score: 1

      I've worked out (running and rowing on an ergometer) with a Sony Walkman for five or six years, and this past April I got tired of buying AA's and making new tapes all the time, and switched to a 10 gig iPod.

      The iPod is light enough that I just carry it in my left hand while running, though I have a high tolerance for lugging around a five ounce object for an eight or ten mile run, due to years of doing the same with a heavier, larger Walkman.

      The only complaint I have is that the iPod crashes if I frequently skip songs while running. So you either have to stop briefly before skipping a track, or ensure there aren't any clunkers in your workout mix you feel you must fast-forward through.

      No problems with sweat or rain screwing up the player, despite daily use.

    3. Re:MP3 Player related question by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      I went for a Nike PSA Play.
      I know it doesn't have HUGE capacity/etc. but you can NOT beat the design of the thing. Plus it's nice that (at least the one I have) it comes with an arm band which for me at least is a much more convenient way of carrying the damn thing.
      It's small, fairly water resistant, and so far has done very well accidentally being droppped/kicked/abused in other ways not mentionable around the gym.
      That's the big thing for me. I'm a clutz, especially around my 9th set for the day. I like something that's fairly impact resistant.

      --
      Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    4. Re:MP3 Player related question by bourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suggest you go to Google Groups and search for group:rec.running ipod. This question is almost a FAQ there.

      As an unscientific recollection of past threads, a minority of people seem to have problems with it, but most don't. Multiple people have recommended slowing to a walk and punching forward and then back a few tracks, forcing the disk to spin up and fill the cache so you can run for another 10 minutes without any disk activity.

    5. Re:MP3 Player related question by pogle · · Score: 2

      Frankly, I love my Philips Expanium 503. Its an mp3-cd player, got it to go on my trip to France and Britain. Doesnt skip, unless you sit there and smack the crap out of it for several minutes, and once you burn several cds you've got limitless music options. Theres also a 401 and 411 model line that uses 8cm cds, made especially for joggers and such. Only 3 hours of music versus the 10hr on a fullsize cd, but smaller and more convenient. Check them out at http://www.audio.philips.com/list.asp?special_keyw ords=expanium+CD+portable

      Oh, and I use Alkaline rechargeables in mine...they last for a good loooong time even with the shock protection on. Just plan on getting better earphones, the ones that come with philips products suck.

      My friend at work who had just got an iPod saw mine, and really wanted it. Especially since it only cost me $130 on sale at Circuit City.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    6. Re:MP3 Player related question by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 1

      I love the Nike PSA Play ... it's tiny, easy to use, etc. It's perfect for working out, for all the reasons described in the parent post.

      Unfortunately for me, the the screw that you use to clip onto the armband/beltclip broke. I've been trying to contact customer support (Rio/SonicBlue) without much success. This seems to be a "known problem" according to some of the reviews I've seen for it ...

      YS

      --
      "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
    7. Re:MP3 Player related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's late and you prolly won't come back to see this.

      Get a NexII from Frontier (do the Google). Wunnerful, Wunnerful. /. truly sucks donkey dick.

    8. Re:MP3 Player related question by asv108 · · Score: 2

      I've been running with an ipod for about 6 months now with no problem whatsoever besides the occasional but rare skip, which is quite impressive considering I hold the ipod in my hand instead of using a clip or case.

    9. Re:MP3 Player related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be the other way around, ie., skip more when when using a clip ? I think hands form extremely good shock-absorbants. At least with my cd player, clipping it anywhere is pretty much not an option; I have to hold it in my hand.

    10. Re:MP3 Player related question by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      I personally use a Rio 600 with a 32meg expansion backpack (the unit itself only came with 32 megs). Its an older player, but it works great and I can't make it skip no matter what I do. If you're interested, I believe Pricewatch can find them for you cheap.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    11. Re:MP3 Player related question by WotanKhan · · Score: 1
      I'm on my fourth "exercise" mp3 player. I perspire a lot, and trail run, a combination which eventually does them in. I wouldn't even think about using drive-based for working out. 128 meg is plenty for several workout session.

      I loved the discontinued Intel mp3 player before it died, fairly happy with my Bantam BA350. One tip, watch out for sweat dripping down the headphone wire.

    12. Re:MP3 Player related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, try holding it sideways!

    13. Re:MP3 Player related question by neurojab · · Score: 2

      Here's what I suggest. Go to eBay and get a rio 500. They're going for $50. Here are some of the reasons why...

      1) Full VBR and all bitrate MP3 support
      2) Great command line linux utilities to transfer mp3s
      3) upgradable firmware (the latest versions add some great features)
      4) SmartMedia support
      5) Long battery life
      6) it's $50
      7) lasts forever
      8) never skips or fades
      9) fast USB transfer. It only takes 2-3 minutes to change music with the linux utilities.

      I put a 64 meg card in mine (giving me 128 megs of space), and with a good encoder (such as LAME ABR) 3 cds worth of music will sound just fine.

      Don't bother with the included windows software though. It's really bothersome. There's a project called rio500 remixed that can interface much better.

      I run for 24 minutes at a time, so I never even come close to running out of tunes. You don't need a hard drive unless you're running across the country.

  17. Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I remember seeing this MP3 players at CES like 3 years ago.

    Am I in a time warp? I was just searching through Slashdot's search feature, and thought I perhaps I had somehow ended up viewing a page from 1999.

  18. Cassette tapes! by qurob · · Score: 1


    Who wants to listen to those? Who wants to re-record that quality?

    Who even HAS those? Mine or melted or were sold at the garage sales.

    1. Re:Cassette tapes! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Lets compare a Nakamichi dragon deck (dolby C,hxpro) using a metal TDK tape with your cool Taiwan made "sony mechanism" deck.

      Dare? .)

      I know CD's taken over but err, be careful while bitching about cassettes.

    2. Re:Cassette tapes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about all the things recorded with a mic. that won't be repeated?

      How about the stuff recorded off-air (say, some Demento stuff?) that is hard, if not impossible, to find on disc?

      How about just plain getting the cassette stuff into a format easier to back up and less prone to physical degradation through mere use?

      While cassettes likely won't be missed when they're truly gone, they aren't quite gone yet.. but folks are working on it.

    3. Re:Cassette tapes! by gaudior · · Score: 1

      Fine. Just how many recordings are available on your fancy cassette tapes? Recordings you have made do not count. The fact is, even fancy tape wears out, and as much as old-school audiophiles whinge about the quality of digital audio, I seriously doubt they can really hear the difference. I'd like to see the results of true, Turing-Test style blind comparisons between cassette and CD. I'm not talking about heavily compressed 96bit mp3's. I'm talking about CD, or DVD audio quality.

    4. Re:Cassette tapes! by ranulf · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      ... metal TDK tape ...
      Recordings you have made do not count.
      I seriously doubt they can really hear the difference.
      I'm not talking about heavily compressed 96bit mp3's. I'm talking about CD, or DVD audio quality.

      So, what you're saying is:

      1. You don't want to make your own recordings, because that's too much effort for you.
      2. Because you can't hear any difference, it can't possibly be better.
      3. You don't actually want to contribute to the discussion about the article because you'd rather troll instead. Clearly the fact that you think mp3 should be excluded from the test is because you know the quality is lower than you'll get from metal tapes.
      or did you have a comment that was actually relevant?

      ... old-school audiophiles ...

      Ah! So you're one of those kids who grew up the the CD-era. Fine. I suppose you think VHS is better than Betamax too. Or are you too busy thinking that DVD is the dog's bollocks without actually noticing all the hideous artifacts everywhere?
      </rant>

    5. Re:Cassette tapes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that oughta take care of that!

  19. I'm holding out..... by x311 · · Score: 2, Funny
    for a portable 8-track/mp3 player. Now that'll be a real invention!

    1. Re:I'm holding out..... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm waiting for the the portable LP mp3 player.

      --
      Why not fork?
  20. ONly thing missing by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Rome that you linked to is seems better in that, you can FF/RW from the tape deck's controls. You also can have an LCD display. Finally, the review complained about the buttons being flush mounted, the Rome offering overcomes this issue.

    The only thing missing from the Rome offering is the abillity to record which will be important to some and not to others.

    1. Re:ONly thing missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOLY SHIT! it displays liquid crystals?

      i wish i had a

      Liquid
      Crystal
      Display
      Display

      or a

      Personal
      Identification
      Number
      Number

      idiot.

    2. Re:ONly thing missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, duh. You need a Personal Identification Number number in order to use the Automated Teller Machine machine, many of which have Liquid Crystal Display displays, now that Cathode Ray Tube tubes are beginning to fall out of favor, and Light Emiting Diode diodes were never really used in them.

      Acronyms get abused in everyday language. Get over it, jackass.

    3. Re:ONly thing missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about you RTFA ? both devices can be controlled from the tape's controls.

  21. DRM and MMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget this, it would have been a nice Mp3 player except for the expansion cards are MMC format. Far too expensive. At this price you might as well get a Mp3 CD player. No doubt this Mp3 player recorder is loaded with DRM software. One can only wonder if your allowed to transfer your recorded files?

  22. TechTV? by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 2, Informative

    This thing was on TV back in June...

    http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/products/stor y/0,24330,2398475,00.html

    Link

  23. More, more by scott1853 · · Score: 1

    Great, another 32MB MP3 player. Gee, a guess I gotta go get another one to sit in a drawer, because this new 32MB model will be so much better than the 32MB models from the last couple years, especially since it will play cassette quality audio in a cassette player. That's innovation, and dammit, that's what consumers want.

    1. Re:More, more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's 96MB, you moron.

  24. multitrack it by nilsey · · Score: 0

    Now if someone could program the thing to act as a multitrack device, that would kick ass.

    portable studio the size of a cassette.

    --
    -- too cruel for schuel
    1. Re:multitrack it by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      roland has had a portable 4 track digital studio on the market for at least 2 years now that is about the size of a walkman.

      please, when you wish for something, go shopping before wishing that it existed, as they usually do already exist and are quite affordable..

      the problem is that the roland device records in uncompressed format so you either need lots of cards, or very large cards. (Or if you are going on a 12 hour recording session.... bring a real recorder or a laptop with a 8 channel 24bit pcmcia card.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:multitrack it by nilsey · · Score: 0

      you missed my point.

      this could turn ANY recording boombox, walkman or whatever into a digital studio.

      which records mp3s by the way which the roland does not.

      --
      -- too cruel for schuel
    3. Re:multitrack it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      origional post:the problem is that the roland device records in uncompressed format so you either need lots of cards, or very large cards.

      Your response:which records mp3s by the way which the roland does not.


      wow... do you also walk down the street pointing at things and saying what they are? as you are really good at pointing out the obvious...

      No boombox can ever be what you want without adding magic or transporter technology to transfigure the circuitry into something it is not.

      wishing for magical things... like "I wish they would make a gasoline that would make my car fly" is foolish while wishing for non magical things like, "I wish they had a flying car" is not foolish.

      please look into wishing for non foolish things..

      anyways, I wish that microsoft would make a patch that would make windows not suck... oops that's a foolish thing :-)

    4. Re:multitrack it by nilsey · · Score: 0

      look dude, from the article (did you read it?)

      quote:
      Another feature allows the Duo to act as a recording device. Just insert the Duo into a cassette recorder and press the record button and it will convert an analog source into MP3 audio.

      The Duo can copy cassette tapes in a dual-well tape deck or boombox. Or you can make recordings by connecting an output cable from a stereo source to the Duo's earphone port and holding down the Duo's play and fast-forward buttons. :unquote

      as i see it, this means that insert the thing into a device with a built in condenser mic and you have a recording studio. (many boomboxes have these, although i'm not sure if that's considered "magic" where you are from)

      but it's not multitrack unless you can sync up with previously recorded material. hence my comment you patronizing nitwit.

      nils

      --
      -- too cruel for schuel
  25. No LCD? by acoustiq · · Score: 0
    And don't bother looking for a liquid crystal display to help with navigation or to show the title of the song that's playing.

    How could you? Would you tear open the front of your car stereo? It's enough trouble just to read the clock while I'm driving, let alone some tiny little letters no larger than the thickness of a cassette tape!

    --

    --
    I romp with joy in the bookish dark
  26. Power it of the tape cogs by brejc8 · · Score: 2

    When the original one of those was released me and my friend were wondering if we could make a copy which was powered by the cogs moving the tape.
    We needed one of the Amulet chips which were silly low power and no power consumpton between playing samples.
    But instead I decided to make one powered by a hamster.

  27. Fixed memory = BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are the MP3 makers going to figure out a removable memory module is better than fixed.

    I already have a few 128 and 256mb Compactflash cards for my camera. Thats a hell of alot more music storage that 96megs.

    I'm still sold on the NEXII. $80 on ebay w/compactflash slot.

    1. Re:Fixed memory = BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kidding, right? Bit rates supported: 32Kbps - 256Kbps I'm sorry but the next can only play encoded files below 256Kbps. So I think i'd pass up on this player and get a mp3 cd based player.
      FWIW Mp3 bit rates range from 16 kbps to 320 kbps.

    2. Re:Fixed memory = BAD by shepd · · Score: 1

      >So I think i'd pass up on this player and get a mp3 cd based player.

      Then you'll be hard pressed to find one that can play 320 kbps. Have a fun time looking though.

      There's absolutely no reason to use 320 kbps anyways. More than enough tests have been performed that show absolutely no difference (except file size) between 320 and 256 kbps. In fact, there is very little difference, and virtually no audible difference, between 192 kbps ABR and 256 kbps CBR with a good encoder.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Fixed memory = BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry bro. I have found many mp3 cd players that play mp3 files at 320Kbps. Anyway you like them vbr or otherwise. Search the web. In fact here is one of many players I have found. Go check this page out....
      http://www.likko.com/en/product/LKM201J-J 4.htm

  28. Nice gadget - but will it sell? by danimrich · · Score: 1

    Nice gadget, really. On the other hand, I doubt I'd buy one as I don't have a lot of tapes. And for car radios, there are cheap adaptors around.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:Nice gadget - but will it sell? by jon+doh! · · Score: 1

      i know i've had some problems with cassette adapters though. occasionally if the tape deck was too hot (or cold) the adapter would get ejected after about 3 seconds of play. took me awhile to find the adapter that wouldn't do that, athough it was the same brand/model as three others that did.

  29. Yeah, yeah, 96MBs by scott1853 · · Score: 1

    What no complaints in the last 30 seconds about my technical spec fauz pas? Lazy ACs.

  30. Interface by acoustiq · · Score: 0
    From the company website: So whether you are at home, at the office or even in your car, our patented interface lets you now download and enjoy your favorite digital audio - wherever you go!

    Patented interface? Wasn't the whole point that this thing acts exactly like a cassette?

    --

    --
    I romp with joy in the bookish dark
  31. more functionality? by AlanMJones · · Score: 2, Interesting


    What if it could simultaneously record and playback?! How about TiVo for radio?

    1. Re:more functionality? by ecrips · · Score: 1

      I wrote one for my computer, records from my TV/Radio card and lets you skip back and forward through the 'live' radio broadcast. Trouble is I sometimes pause it, and leave it for a couple of hours - and come back and find its eaten a gig of ram.
      Cool for skipping the adverts in commerical radio though (or the songs you don't like).

    2. Re:more functionality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what a hard drive is for. disk space is a lot cheaper than ram. (tivo uses a disk cache too I believe)

    3. Re:more functionality? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Skipping forward through a live broadcast is impressive!

      I know what you're meaning tho, just struck me as amusing :)

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  32. Why dont they make? by brejc8 · · Score: 2

    A VHS video casette which has a slot to place a mini DVD.
    It will play DVDs through your video maachine.

    And it would have to be powered using dinamos from the turning of the tape.

    1. Re:Why dont they make? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      heh would be amazing... imagine an engineer getting that idea from this post and actually making it.

      Would you go mad if you see him being a billionaire that way? :)

      (it can be done if a simple problem could be fixed... the size of VHS tape *g*

      Besides jokes, if you can put the DVD to exactly TOP of the cassette, it could be fixed too, just "anti dust" cover of video won't be closed, not a big dealk.

    2. Re:Why dont they make? by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      or why don't they make a dvd player that looks like a vhs tape

      or a cd player that looks like a record...

      or a car that looks like a hot dog. oh wait they made that already.

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    3. Re:Why dont they make? by man_ls · · Score: 2

      I think the only problem is size at this point. The DVD is the same size/bigger than the VHS disk.

      However, the size of the electronics isn't an issue, really. There already exist DVD players with very small footprints and integrated LCD screens that could be adapted to this purpose. Then you'd need a VERY thin strip of magnetic tape in the front, and a record head on one end and an erase head on the other to take the decoded video+audio stream and write it where the VCR can read. Obviously this extra equip is needed, because the VCR can't handle an MPEG stream.

      At this point, you'd have a DVD player in a box...but the cost of the electronics and licensing for said algorithms would cost easily as much as a set-top DVD player to begin with. It might even cost MORE because of the engineering necessary -- not to mention the fact that it will look like pure crap having been decoded and re-encoded twice, before being put into magtape and decoded a 3rd time. That's about 3 format changes right there -- none of which are perfect.

    4. Re:Why dont they make? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Because such a device will need a lot of power to operate (disc spinner + class 1 LASER) while you don't need a lot of power to read and write to an MMC card?

    5. Re:Why dont they make? by Golias · · Score: 2
      I know you are just going for the whole reduce-to-absurdity thing, but here's a thought: a VCR-Cassette-sized digital PVR. Then you could digitally record a show off the air, and watch it in the El Cheapo VCR at the lake cabin.

      Okay, that's still kind of lame... but like George Carlin once said, "if you nail two things together that have never been nailed together before, some schmuck will buy it from you!"

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  33. Time shifting for the radio? by yeoua · · Score: 2

    "Another feature allows the Duo to act as a recording device. Just insert the Duo into a cassette recorder and press the record button and it will convert an analog source into MP3 audio."

    Well, given that mp3's are relatively small, and radio broadcast quality is relatively low, then time shifting shouldn't be too difficult to do (especially when you got ram cards that can do 128 megs and be a bit larger than a stamp and much thinner than this cassette). Wow, that would be quite the product. Put it in your car, turn on the radio and the timeshift cassette. Let it go for like 5 min, and just listen without commercials. Or record your daytime radio show. Or record that one song that you just cannot find the name or artist of (since the station i listen to never ever ever announces who sung it or what it was).

    Damn, now if you could get a radio that did all this out of the box... that would be worth buying.

    Of course, now the RIAA is going to be annoyed by time shifting.

    1. Re:Time shifting for the radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sony has an in-dash MiniDisc player that will do that. it has an automatic 10 second buffer so you have up to 10 seconds to hit record after you missed something

    2. Re:Time shifting for the radio? by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      Great idea... I'm always missing shows like Harry Shearer and This American life because I'm never in the car at that particular moment - would rather listen on my drive to work... 'Car TIVO' might be cool...

      Then again, the car has to be turned on for the 'Car TIVO' time shifting device to work... and my antenna doesn't really work when the car is inside the garage...

      oh forget it.

    3. Re:Time shifting for the radio? by adolf · · Score: 2

      Sony had (years ago - it may still exist) at one point an in-dash Minidisc recorder.

      It was programmable with timers and such to record specific shows on specific stations, but MD lacks the simutaneous play-and-record TiVo-like functionality.

    4. Re:Time shifting for the radio? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Put it in your car, turn on the radio and the timeshift cassette. Let it go for like 5 min, and just listen without commercials.

      Sorry to be negative, but if your commute is 10 minutes, you need to drive the first half in silence in order to take advantage of that feature. With TiVo et al, there are times when you don't want it playing (getting a beer, taking a leek, etc.) which give the cache a chance to fill up for commercial skippage. Not so much when you are driving... Unless you live in a cold part of the country and are one of those people who idles the car for several minutes while the cab space warms up before driving to work.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Time shifting for the radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't work: car stereos can't have the radio on and the cassette output on together, so you wouldn't be able to do this.

      ric

  34. Too expensive... by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    The only place I could see using this is in a car that only has a cassette deck. Even then, you could replace the cassette with an in-dash MP3 cd player for about fifty dollars more. I also really can't see fast-forwarding through 160 megs of Mp3's. Random acess, baby...

    1. Re:Too expensive... by lordkuri · · Score: 0

      $50 more ?

      try about $39 cheaper

      Here

    2. Re:Too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $39 cheaper than a cassette player!? If that were true, they would have to pay you money to take it! I've got a car cassette player in my basement that I've been trying to give away for years now!

  35. Ipod for working out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work out with my ex all the time and she carried an Ipod with her, for running on the treadmill or working out in the weight room. She's using the first gen Ipod and still works fine. Only adjustment she had to make was finding a way hideaway the player while running. She found a workout top with a small pocket in the back. It keeps the Ipod from moving around, and feels unnoticeable while running. If you're looking for an mp3 player while running, I'd suggest a much smaller mp3 player, possibly flashed based, or internal memory, like the Nike mp3 player. It has an arm strap and hold 96MB of mem. Running for hours, any bit of weight on you will feel like a ton, I'd say, lighter the better.

  36. OLD NEWS :( by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    Cassette type MP3 players have been out for nearly two years now.

    Why is this "news"?

    P.S. 8-track fromat is dead - I'll submit the article later OK?

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  37. not worth it... by mclaren_1010 · · Score: 0

    I would rather spend $189 on a cd player for my car thank you very much. for the value its not that great. The features are lacking and a car deck will do more then that.. and how many people out there still have cassette walkmans!! come on...

  38. Old innovations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Innovations are mostly combining two existing devices and joining them together. This is no different. This just provides a cheap alternative for people who want to have an mp3 player with them without having to spend more money on their car audio.

    Another particular innovation I'm looking is Creative lab's Muvo: combination diskonkey and mp3 device. Very clever combination; no proprietary software involved and no learning curve. Plus, you get the features of moveable storage.

  39. Kind of an expensive solution... by decipher_saint · · Score: 2

    ...when you can just hook up a tape deck to your computer and record to an actual cassette.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Kind of an expensive solution... by op00to · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point, bozo!

      #1, it takes AGES to copy all the songs you want to your cassette, and god forbid you left IM noises or something on and someone bloops you an IM.

      #2, you can fit more than one cassette's worth of songs on something the same size.

      #3, i'm sure this thing has better quality (mainly because it doesn't rely on a thin film coated with magnetic particles to store data....

    2. Re:Kind of an expensive solution... by rudiger · · Score: 1

      yes, but a 5$ casette is cheaper than this 189$ device.

      and just think, people could have 10s of these tapes in their car! thing of the possibilities! (oh yea, people have been doing this for years)

    3. Re:Kind of an expensive solution... by bugg · · Score: 2
      I don't think #3 is an accurate assesment. If you've ever used metal tape with a prosumer or better tape deck, you'd know that the quality is excellent- and when everything is new, it (in my opinion) surpasses CD in quality, let alone mp3. Analog means it doesn't have to pass through a DSP or a DAC to be recorded/played.

      The problem with tape is that it degrades with use. New tapes with good decks? No problem at all. DATs are nicer in terms of this in that the quality remains much longer, but then when they do begin to degrade, you're going to notice it (old analog tapes just start sounding progressively worse, they don't drop out).

      --
      -bugg
  40. Not that useful, but not old news. by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but those were pretty useless because all they did was play back. This one actually allows you to record, which it then digitizes. Still not that useful, but if you were trying to record a seminar/interview or something and were just going to convert it to MP3 anyway, this'd be the easiest way to go.

  41. What a 2.2 maintainer would say... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    It sucks, unless there's a model for 8-tracks, cause my '69 pinto doesn't have the juice to run a whopping tape drive.

  42. Nice packaging but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had something very much like this in the early 1970s. It was called cassette tape. You could both record AND play back in an ORDINARY tape deck!

    Price? About $2 for a really good one that stored up to 120 min of music.

    1. Re:Nice packaging but... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      oh noo, it must be digital! you know if it is digital, it sounds better!...

      bwhaha

  43. What the heck?... by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or do i speak for everyone when i say STOP RELEASEING THIS RETARDED FLASH MEMORY BASED MP3 PLAYERS. i do NOT want to hear the same 10 songs over and over. The best you can get in flash right now is 256mb i think, and you will pay out the *ass* for that much flash memory. I think the iPod and the nomad proved that hard disk based mp3 is the way to go, because i won't touch another mp3 player for the rest of my days unless it's at least 5 gigs.

    ok i'm done ranting..

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:What the heck?... by oyenstikker · · Score: 2

      But an ogg player with 640k, that would be something!

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    2. Re:What the heck?... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Where have you been? There's been 512 MB and 1 GB Compact Flash available for a while now. Granted, it's not your whole collection, but it's a nice sized chunk. More then sufficient for running around town. Also, the beauty of compact flash is it's small enough that you could even make a player with stacked slots and still have something the size of an ipod or smaller. I personally think the iPod is what I want for a MP3 player. The kicker here is not the capacity....it's the firewire. USB is slow compared to it. Takes a couple minutes for me to load the 64 MB card I have in my e740 with 10 tracks. I can't begin to believe how long it woiuld take for something larger. Firewire makes it very speedy. Can't wait to get one of my own (5 gig would be fine, 10 GB better....as I would have room to expand....right now everything fits in 5 GB on my machine). What I wish would happen is someone....anyone to make an iPod or a [layer for pocket pc that plays oggs. I have tried pocket ogg on my e740 but it just locks up.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:What the heck?... by gyrojoe · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I think that flash based players are a waste of money because their memory is limited and if you want to buy more it costs nearly as much as the player. I would much rather invest in something with a much cheaper storage media. A MP3 CD player perhaps? Almost everyone has access to a CD burner nowadays so it wouldn't be hard to get a CD made even if you didn't have a burner yourself. All in all, CDs are cheap and easy to come by and in my opinion a much better solution.

    4. Re:What the heck?... by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      lol, calm down man.. first of all... the largest size is not 256 megs.. i believe it's 1 gig... although the price is kinda sketchy but since it's a mp3 player it's worth it cuz i doubt you paid for your music in the first place =) second.. the new xD memory cards are coming out soon, they're the size of a quarter and they plan on maxing them out at 8 gigz. Can you say portable movie player with 10ish nice divx movies on it? or about 1 ish dvd movie the size of the hole in the middle of current dvd discs?

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    5. Re:What the heck?... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Toshiba libretto + 20GB hard drive = great portable multimedia machine

      It's even fast enough to play mpeg video at full screen with the new XVideo stuff in the neomagic driver.

      I wouldn't try to run with it, but it fits perfectly in the area just above my gearshift in the mazda protege. Couple that with an 'aux' adapter for the car stereo and I'm good to go (has anybody reverse-engineereed and created schematics for the hardware used to control/send messages from a kenwood head unit to cd-changer? being able to control the libretto from the head unit would be GREAT!)

      In addition, I can have maps/etc on other screens while driving to a destination. Very nice little setup without a lot of custom hardware/software (I just use xmms with my full collection queued at all times, and if there is a song I want to hear, just 'j' 'typetty typetty type' and I get the desired song)

    6. Re:What the heck?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *love* the compact flash MP3 players. 128MB onboard + 256MB flash holds more than six hours of music, and I just use the same flash cards as the camera uses, so I can keep quite a few albums in play. And the things are so tiny (I use the MyDiva player) and cheap---I'd be really bummed to drop an iPod and break it, even if I was willing to carry something that large.

      And flash just keeps getting cheaper.

  44. Old news by zoftie · · Score: 1

    I have posted links about Rome MP3 player - same as this, 1.5 years ago, but it my story was rejected. Do I have to get my story to big publishing warehouse, before it can show up on ./?

  45. Re:Why does Slashdot suck so much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a fucking life?

  46. Nope because by Lispy · · Score: 1

    if so then there would at least be a link to the company selling these. I wanted to buy one because i always thought about getting something like that but now it was too much trouble to look up the url, no link no biz...

    1. Re:Nope because by JWW · · Score: 3, Informative

      here, I was intrigued enough to look it up.

      digisette

  47. Re:Girl at lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did she have one of those MP3-Cassette things?

  48. Will it get EATEN??? by rMortyH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SO now my tapedeck can eat my MP3's too!

    The question now is whether the RIAA will lobby for the right to remotely cause your tapedeck to eat your mp3s....

    Only for national security, of course!

  49. I disagree by Catskul · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use a cassette adapter to listen to mp3s (and the rest of the audio coming from my computer) and the sound is crystal clear. The low quality of sound you are refering to comes from the magnetic tape itself, not the tape player, so this player should be capable of high quality output. And as the previous post stated, it holds 96 MB and is upgradable to 160... Which is pretty decent. Read the article, maybe you would have caught that.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  50. Cassette adaptors suck by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you ever used one of those cassette adaptors to play you cd player through a car cassette player? They suck. They work by having a cassette head placed next to the one in your car player and magneticly couple. The frequency response sucks and with some players you get lots of flutter and wow if the thing doesn't seat properly and moves around. If the adaptor isn't lined up just right, the thing sounds worse than an 8 track. I can just imagine how bad it will pickup for recording. An FM radio link would work much better.

    1. Re:Cassette adaptors suck by dstone · · Score: 3, Informative

      you get lots of flutter and wow if the thing doesn't seat properly and moves around.

      Wow and flutter are expressed as percentages of variance from the ideally constant speed of the moving tape. Wow are the low-frequency variations and flutter are the high frequency ones (sort of a quivering). There are no moving tapes in the device(s) you're describing, so it seems to me that wow & flutter are not possible. Poor alignment and cheap components could certainly degrade the sound, but I don't think it's wow or flutter you're hearing.

    2. Re:Cassette adaptors suck by skookum · · Score: 1

      True, it's not wow and flutter. But if you've ever used one of those adaptors, you know that the alignment can be a bitch. The two heads have to match up pretty well, otherwise the volume is really low or its just generally really crappy sound. On occasion you have to stick your finger in there and press on the adaptor to move it a bit to try and get better sound. And since the tape deck's spindle is still turning there are things moving in there, and on long trips you often have to do this procedure every so often. Sometimes if it's borderline you can hear the sound come and go repeatedly as the adaptor moves ever-so-slightly if its dummy take-up reels don't line up quite right with the deck's turning spindles. All in all it's not the best solution in the world.

    3. Re:Cassette adaptors suck by Golias · · Score: 1
      Alignment problems happen with ordinary tapes, too. It is a shortcoming of your cheap-assed tape player, not the adapter. If your player properly loaded the adapter properly and securely, you would not have these problems.

      I have a friend who insists on going with an AM/FM/Cassette system, and uses an adapter with an iPod. Why? Because nobody breaks into cars for cassette decks anymore, and the iPod fits in his jacket pocket, unlike a lot of those removable face-plates that CD players rely on, or a freakin' pull-out. By the way, the sound in his car with that set-up is excellent. Better than some CD car systems I've heard.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  51. backwards compatibility ok, but innovation better by pmineiro · · Score: 1

    well, i applaud their work and understand their practical market-driven motivation. however i do not think the cassette metaphor (linear access) is the best way to navigate data of any kind, including music. one really wants constant time random access.

    i think what is really needed is some interface innovation to help people manage thousands of hours of music available from their car stereo in a random access fashion. that's what's holding back car mp3 imho. maybe voice control is the best way, given the attentional demands and safety concerns inherent in driving.

    -- p

  52. good idea for car audio by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    For all those who like to listen to CDs on the road, but haven't found a good, clean solution - this is what you've been waiting for. My car, like many others in its price range, has a cassette deck but no CD player. I don't feel like springing for an in-dash MP3 player yet. The typical solution is to get a CD/mp3/whatever player with a car kit and 12VDC cigarette-lighter adapter. While this works, it leads to the "messy dash" syndrome mentioned in the article, possibility of breakin and theft, and the clincher: it requires user interaction to operate. My current setup requires me to 1) Start the car, 2) Open the glovebox where my mp3 player is, 3) Push "play", and wait a few seconds for it to "boot up", then finally 4) continue driving. If I want to put the player on "shuffle" or something, it takes even longer. It's a small annoyance, but enough of one that I finally decided to rip it all out and listen to the radio instead.

    This device might be exactly what I'm looking for. It hold 96M of audio, which is enough for an hour or so of somewhat-good quality music. There is no intervention, because it starts playing music prompted by the servo in your cassette deck. Theft is unlikely, becuase your cassette deck will very likely keep the whole thing concealed by design. Messy dash? A thing of the past.

    Frankly, I'm sold on the idea, and as soon as I have a spare ~$200, I will probably go pick this gizmo up.

  53. Nothing New But Interesting Design by seinethinker · · Score: 1

    This product has been on the market for a long time. Why the press now? Anyhow, I think the design is definitely interesting and intuitive for the semi-literate PC-using public.

    I think Sony's Mini Disc with USB is a great idea but I deplore the horrible software that comes with it. It is not intuitive and is extremely aggravating to use.What the Mini Disc has going for it is that the hardware and functions are for the most part tight.

    However,the best MP3 Player (DMP) that I have come across is the Frontier Labs Nex II. Awesome product!!

    Initially I bought an RCA Lyra. It was to be a present for my boyfriend. I like to woo my geek with geeky hardware.

    It came with a lot of goodies. It seemed too good to be true and it was.

    It claims to be a MP3 player but you have to use MusicMatch to transfer *cough* convert *cough* music to the player which then stores the song in another format on the player.

    After which, you can't move the song back because it isn't in the MP3 format anymore.

    I bought an MP3 player to play MP3s, correct?

    I ended up returning the product in favor of the Nex II which allows you to move MP3s to it without compromising the format. Nice!!

    Before the Nex II, I did consider a Rio since I love my Rio MP3 CD Player but when you drag and drop the files to the Rio they are changed into an SDMI-encrypted format. You can't get the MP3 back either from this device.

    Just some information that I wanted to share from my MP3 player experiences.

    Note: Perhaps there are ways to get around the obstacles that some of these devices present but is it really worth the aggravation? You be the judge of that. :)

    --
    Truth like surgery, may hurt, but it cures. - Han Suyin, Chinese Physician and Writer
  54. :P by Tazzor · · Score: 1

    I submitted that a year ago :P

  55. Great! Now when the ol' car tape deck... by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    ...decides to eat a tape, it'll eat an expensive MP3 player, rather than an inexpensive cassette!

    I knew there was a reason that I replaced the cassette player in my car!

    -Ed

    docbrown.net
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  56. /. question by Fjord · · Score: 2

    This has reminded me of a question I wanted to ask here but didn't think warrented a whole "Ask /.". I have a standalone MP3 player that goes into my amp, and I have an intercom system in my house that can be tuned to AM and FM. The stereo isn't close to the the receiver for the speaker system, it's about 30 feet (9 meters) away. I've found FM transmitters for cars that allow you to listen to portable CD or MP3 players (or anything that has a phono jack), but none that have the range I'm looking for. Does anyone know of a model that does this, or are there FCC type problems?

    --
    -no broken link
    1. Re:/. question by adolf · · Score: 2

      Ramsey Electronics has a selection of AM and FM transmitters, either in kit form or pre-assembled.

      On the main page is a blurb about their 35-Watt model, which would be sufficient for covering a small town.

      There is an active community (or there was, on usenet) of people who modify their products for various things... it has all the smells and tastes of OSS.

      I picked up their cheapest FM Stereo kit some time ago for less than $50, but never got around to completing it. IIRC, it was advertised to work at a few hundred feet, with several available hacks to double or quadruple that.

  57. overcoming device limitations: by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    This is a very interesting device, however it will suffer from lack of many features that other players of this type provide. Here is an idea - since this player looks like a cassette, provide an optional cassette case - a box that holds one cassette, but this should be a very special cassette case, it would interface with the mp3 player through some port, and will have an LCD pannel and some better controls on the case.

  58. I have one by Zigurd · · Score: 2

    I have one. Plusses: It works. It sounds great. It's cool, and it's faster than burning CDs. It also plays WMA, which does sound (to me) better than MP3s. If you don't have a CD player in your car (and my car limits me to a choice of a couple expensive trunk-mounted changers) this is the way to go.
    The minuses are that higher-bitrate recordings limit you to about 80 minutes of music, unless you get the expanded memory (the newer ones might come with more memory). Recharging the battery is a little inconvenient. And I wish it played Oggs.

  59. mac os on intel hardware! by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    from the specs:

    Microsoft® Windows® 98SE, ME, 2000, XP Operating System, or Macintosh OS9.X or OS-X and iTunes 1.X or higher

    Pentium (or compatible) 166MHz or higher PC

    Also, is $200 a bit high for an MP3 player/recorder that only has room for like an album and a half. Afer all, a 5gig ipod is only $299.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  60. Great Idea by (trb001) · · Score: 2

    This actually is a great idea for one reason...being able to digitize all the stuff I have on old casettes. Up til now, the only feasible way was to take a line out of the headphone jack, connect it to the mic in/line in on my soundcard and try to get the levels right in my recording software (this was NOT easy to do). I can take all those bootlegged concert tapes (legal ones, mind you :) and put them in mp3 format. Wow.

    This will make it 10 times easier, and for that reason alone it's worth it. Being able to take mp3s in my car is another great feature but with CDRs being so cheap, it's not nearly as important.

    --trb

  61. Nifty, Pointless, but nifty. by Phoenix · · Score: 3, Informative

    First of all there is the issue of using flash memory based MP3 players. Unless you're willing to buy added flash cards and pay out the nose for them, it's not the way to go. If I only want to listen one CD's worth of music, I'll burn one and whip out my old Discman. 64mb just doesn't cut it anymore and if you get flash in 256 your poor credit cards is getting raped for a boat load of cash.

    Better options for MP3 playing is the MP3 CD-R(W) and a portable player. For around $100-150 plus the cost of the CD you can jam 300-600+ minutes on a blank disk depending on media type and the compression you use.

    --OR--

    There is the option I went with. I picked up a Nomad 20gb Jukebox for $230. It has 20gb of space on it (I have nearly 500 songs at 256k and I still haven't hit 25% of drive usage). It can record to MP3 on the fly by using the line input on the unit itself. It has front and rear speaker outputs so I can hook it to a set of Harmon Kardons with the sub and front and rear satalites and get really killer sound out of it. The only drawback that I had with the unit was no real way to carry it, but that was solved with my leatherworking skills I picked up in the SCA...made a custom leather belt pouch to hold it, so problem solved.

    Now granted there are those out there that prefer the iPod, or other hard drive based systems, but hte theroy is the same between them. HD is cheaper than Flash...hands down. For my $230 I got 20gb storage. Flash memory for that same amount of storage is going to cost you say $300 for a sony mp3 player that comes with 128mb with it PLUS you would need to purchase 159 additional memory sticks at a cost of $17,600 ($110 each). For just what I'm using in storage (5gb) you're still talking about $4400 in memory sticks alone.

    I don't know about you but if I had that kinda cash I'd be spending it on a Plasma TV rather than MP3.

    The gizmo in the article is nifty and all, but is it going to be worth it or will it fall the way of the MP3 player springboard module in my Visor? IE Sitting in the box that it came in waiting for someone poor fool on E-Bay to take it off my hands?

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  62. Still Needed? by westmich · · Score: 0

    With it getting harder and harder to steal music, is another MP3 player needed?

  63. Bwaaahaha! by bond485 · · Score: 1

    just let them try to plug the 'analog ho'....

  64. Re:Girl at lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you record her voice for me on your new digicasette please!

    Thanks!

    It is much appreciated!

  65. Need to add a generator by d5w · · Score: 2

    If this thing is interacting with the tape drive mechanism in the tape player anyway, why don't they add a small generator to recharge the batteries while it plays? Obviously, I'm asking this more in the interest of technical coolness than practicality, but it would remove the need for a separate wire going from the cassette player to the cigarette lighter socket for long-term play.

  66. Don't buy if you own a 2001 Accord by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Informative

    I owned one and it worked great in my wife's Honda CRV, but in my Honda Accord, the tape deck wouldn't properly align with the heads on the mp3 player. I tried plugging the cassette adapter into one of those Sony cassette -> cd adapters and it worked fine. Of course, that kinda defeats the purpose of an MP3 player that can be used without an adapter.

    The only other thing I didn't like about it was the flimsy battery door. That would definately be a tape job after a few months of use.

    Here is my review of it on Amazon.com

    I was excited to see that the Digisette improved from it's orginal design and made a better tape like MP3 player. Unfortunately, on my Honda 2001 Accord, the tape deck won't align properly with the head in my cassette stereo, causing lots of static and distortion. It's not the player itself, because it works fine in my wife's Honda CRV. Actually, it works if I use an old Sony cassette adapter plugged into the mp3 player.

    Im not an electronic engineer, but I think if Digisette would make the head on the mp3 unit bigger, it would have worked fine. I compared the head of the mp3 to the Sony cassette apadter I had laying around and the Sony head is much bigger.

    Digisette support was very helpful and had me try a few fixed, but none fixed the distortion and static.

    As far as the controls and stuff, everything worked fine. Like I said, if you have a 2001 Accord, I wouldn't recommend it.

  67. don't get too excited... by elb · · Score: 1

    i've been using a Duo-Aria (slightly different model) for over a year, and it makes me scream with agony. the usability is hellish and the product has never worked quite right. the accompanying software is a joke.

    (when i fight it into submission, though, it and audible.com make my hour-long commute much less painful.)

  68. MP3 *recorder* by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, this is the only MP3 recorder out there that can input directly from your tape deck.

    I don't know if those tape adaptors for CD players can handle both recording and playback. Does anyone know if something exists like this and a matching regular MP3 player/recorder that can interface in such a fashion?

    I would personally rather have the mp3 player outside the tape deck then having the player be cooked inside ... those things get pretty hot (particularly auto cassette players).

  69. Why not go MiniDisc? by Ted_Green · · Score: 1

    And forget the whole MP3 thing entirely. Frankly I think the ATRAC3 format is better quality, they're hell of a lot cheaper as far as media storage goes (you can pick up a minidisc for less than a buck)

    Where they lack is in data transfer rates (at max 16x on lp4 from computer to MD and you have to go analog if you want to drop stuff back to a computer).

    If you're just in it for music get a nomad.
    If you like quality or want to record get a minidisc recorder.

    1. Re:Why not go MiniDisc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minidiscs? Come on now. Minidisc is so 1990's. Minidiscs skip when jilted and you can't transfer files back without doing it realtime.

    2. Re:Why not go MiniDisc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jilting? Did your boyfriend dump you for a goat?

      Look, you have to be in an earthquake, or underneath a shuttle launch for those things to skip.

      Your argument makes no sense. You listen to a lot of music while operating a jackhammer?

    3. Re:Why not go MiniDisc? by Phoenix · · Score: 2

      Skip? Not hardly. As much as I use my Nomad I still use my MD player for when I'm out on my bike on the trails. It uses less power and as for skipping, I've never seen it skip and I take some serious trails on my bike.

      You are correct about the limitations of the transfer speeds, but I don't worry about it. Everything I have is on CD and MP3. I only write TO the md player and I can do that at 16x speeds so it's not that much of a bother.

      Either one by themself is good, both together rocks.

      --
      -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  70. Obligatory... by pXgray · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these babies!

    pXgray

    --

    End of Post
    You are at the end of the post. To the north lies the post.
    There is a sig here.
  71. Don't by this P.O.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It uses a TI chipset that includes support for
    PERSONAL RIGHTS INFRINGEMENT technologies. I
    don't know about you, but I, as a natural person,
    and not a corporate entity, and I refuse to support
    those would seek to deny me those rights due
    to all natural persons.

    Copyright is an author's rights with respect
    to A COPY, not the act of copying. A more
    fitting term would actually be "Publishing rights".
    An author must also be a natural person, even though the US judiciary seems to think
    corporations are born of woman, and is only
    granted those publisher's rights to encourage
    disemination of knowledge for the public good.
    (Yes copyright exists to encourage people to
    publish source code! That was the original point!)

    Once you buy it, you own it (doctrine of first sale). After you sell something you legally
    published, you have no further rights with respect
    to that copy.

    Why buy a product designed for making copies,
    that is also designed to prevent you from
    exercising your right to copy?

  72. Beware Nex II Player Bites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody familiar with the specs on the Nex II? Well, it seems from the many posts endorsing the Nex II as the best Mp3 flash card player. The only thing the player has going for it is it has a backlit display, which many manufactures refuse to make standard. Another plus is the ability to add almost any size card. Say 512MB CF card. Very few offer this ability. Sure there is the Diva Mp3 player but no backlit screen. ;-( Okay so back to the specs on the Nex II. You can only play Mp3 encoded between Bit rates supported: 32Kbps -- 256Kbps & VBR. They need to go back to the drawing board and correct this. Mp3 files go up to 320Kbps. No thanks!

  73. 8-Track Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they are coming out with an 8-Track Version that will have double the capacity!

    Rock on People!

    Give it up!

  74. Interesting but silly by nowt · · Score: 2
    Just use your favorite mp3 player (ipod, i2go, ipaq w/scream ;) and add a cassette adapter. Got me to the smokies and back very easily with microdrive/hd capacities and no kludgy U/I.

    --
    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
    1. Re:Interesting but silly by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      True, but it is convenient to not have the unit sitting somewhere loose in the car. Especially if you are like me, and tend to take the curves kinda hard. It's kinda distracting trying to recover the cd player that slid across the floor during the last curve.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    2. Re:Interesting but silly by nowt · · Score: 2
      That's what clamps and duct-tape are for!


      Seriously, yes it can slide depending on your vehicle's interior. Fortunately in my beastie, I have a nice little recessed area where it can safely 'slosh' to a minimum.

      --
      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
  75. Forget fast forward for the tape deck by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Who cares if the tape can fast forward. I want the car to "fast forward". 0-60mph in, oh, 4 seconds or so will do just fine.

  76. Time to Market... by Madd_Hatter · · Score: 1

    I saw this device at ComDex 99 and thought it was one of the best things at the show. The company making it was looking for venture capital at the time to be able to produce them in scale. I tried to get as much information as I could but no one at the booth spoke english real well.

  77. Only good use is due to inflated CD prices by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
    As with all the other things that piss off the RIAA. This would be a great thing to have, as I could buy tapes less expensively than CD's, and then record them to MP3. Nifty.

    Too bad CD's are at least 3x more expensive than they should be. If they came down to around $8-$10 a piece, I'd be inclined to actually buy the stuff...mostly to replace what I had as a kid on tapes..also to replace the stuff I had stolen.

    Do I own the music or the medium when I buy a CD? Why can't I go to a store with only my receipt and get a new CD when one becomes ruined or stolen, or god-forbid, a new format comes out and I'd like to take advantage of it with the music I have already purchased.

    Nifty little device, but it wouldn't have a whole lot of use if the RIAA would get its head out of its ass.

  78. 96 mb? by Laplace · · Score: 1

    Fuck that shit. Give me an iPod with 20gb and an FM car adapter. Load my entire cd collection once then it's rock and roll time!

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
  79. I own a digisette and the one here is slightly new by millisa · · Score: 1

    I own a digisette and have been using it off an on in my 'high quality' '85 chevy wagon for a couple years. (I bought the wagon for 500 bucks and it had a hole in the dash where the stereo should have been. 18 bucks later and I had a cheap tape deck radio that no one in their right mind would steal . . .or suspect there was a 150 buck mp3 player in . . . )

    The old digisette worked fairly well as both a headphone mp3 player and a player that worked in the console. It had all the fast foward and rewind features that this new one has, but the biggest difference is you could not record audio onto it in a tape deck.

    The biggest disappointment I had with the old one (and will have with this one) is the low memory expansion. The original came with 64 meg onboard, and a single MMC slot (which my original docs said was limited to 64 meg). It was enough to hold a cd and a half. This new one has a bit more (an extra 32 on board, but still the 64 meg mmc card limit).


    So, other stuff about this device . . . transferring data to it from the pc took a USB cable. I didn't find a way to get it work under Linux (I did not try hard). The connector on the cable was really touchy and it doesn't stay in that well anymore; they may have fixed it in the new model.


    To sum up, the old one was a pretty good design and perfect for those of us with old cars. It doesn't have the memory you'd like in some of the newer players, but the specialized tape adaptation you can forgive it. It is unlikely you'd want to buy this device if you are just going to use it with a pair of headsets, there are better products out there for this purpose. This new product is probably ideal if you plan on doing analog transfers or hour and half long recordings (the college class application someone mentioned was great), but if you aren't going to record analog, go for the older version.

  80. Maybe I read the article wrong... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    But the way I read it seemed to indicate that the controls for the device were on the device itself. Is this true?

    It doesn't make sense to make it this way, as an alternative would be easy to devise: Put optical (or even mechanical) switches on the inside of the "drive" hole, and add a small piezo beeper to the thing. When the user hits "play" on the tape deck, the device senses the speed of the capstan through the hole, and if it is slowly moving one way, it is playing, fast moving one direction is track advance, other direction is previous track. For each track advanced, beep, so that the user can guage when to stop the advancing to continue to listen to the tracks.

    Not quite as convienient as random access controls, but this device doesn't have them anyhow, and it would utilise the controls already standard on the deck, which are designed from a usability standpoint (and many times for a vehicle, at least with OEM equipment, the controls are designed for ease-of-use while driving).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  81. how to get outside of US by muchandr · · Score: 1

    In Europe, a fancier version called Dual Play is
    available from some British online stores. It goes for 299 pounds, but has more features. (like 256MB Flash and realtime MP3 encoding, to make it a recorder)

  82. WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, you mean, like my Minidisc Walkman has been for 8 years!!???

    A-fucking-mazing!

    Fuck. This computer stuff sure is cool!

    Morons.

  83. And no I'm not a shill for this product... by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

    No, I am not a shill for this product, but I find it has captured my attention every time I hear of it. I don't understand why technology such as this hasn't garnered more acclaim. Why bother owning a portable mp3 player and using a cassette adapter when your mp3 can be found within the cassette adapter itself! I find this to be an amazing advancement in further reducing the size of modern appliances and electronics. Am I the only one who sees the advantage in ripping your favorite songs and uploading them to this easily portable devise that can be played back in your car (for those of us without a CD player let alone one that can read mp3 format)!??!?! The first time I saw a device that could play back mp3's in my cassette deck in an issue of Crutchfield about a year ago, I'm shocked that I haven't seen more of these hit the mainstream.

    --
    I hate all sigs, even this one.
  84. Archos...better? by pfb · · Score: 1
    Archos have been doing this for a while; their machines are based around a toshiba (I think) hardrive. You can get a range from 6 - 20 gig.

    Their 20 gig recorder is USB 2.0 compatible, lets you record "of up to 20,000 minutes of top quality music in MP3 format" and is roughly the size of the ipod.

    "You can record directly from any audio source, including your stereo set, radio, or pre-amplified microphone via the stereo, line-in jack. It will also work as a high-quality voice recorder."

    I've seen them around for $250 and alot less for the smaller giggage.

    --
    -- ribbit
  85. Does anyone know? by johnty · · Score: 1

    What about the sound recording of this thing? Because if it's good enough I regret getting my NetMD, which does not allow you to upload recorded stuff back to the PC.

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  86. Will it fit into my Vic=20 datasette? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause I am getting tired of playing Gorf.

  87. Does it work with Linux? by g4dget · · Score: 2
    If you plug it into the USB port, does it look like standard USB storage? Can you write the MMC cards using Linux or do they have some special format? (Their web site doesn't say.)

    What about the RomeMP3 and MP Wow players? Do they work with Linux?

    1. Re:Does it work with Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing works with Linux. You can stop asking now.

    2. Re:Does it work with Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry, but you must be thinking of that other operating system, Windows. Nothing really works with Windows, since Windows is so flaky, even when a company claims it's supported.

      Linux may not support every piece of hardware, but, unlike Windows, at least some stuff actually works well on it.

      See, happy now?

      (Chances are the Digisette works well on Linux as well, but it would be nice to get confirmation.)

  88. Re:built in mic and audio recording by octalgirl · · Score: 1

    I like the fact that it has a built in microphone, so it acts as a mini tape recorder, but you don't have to spend any time converting to MP3 (like if you want a little clip of something for a web page) and I can't tell you how many times I wish I had a recorder handy when I'm listening to the radio, not just for music, but for something funny they are saying or some strange trivia question I'll never hear the answer to because I'm on my way into work. With this thing you just hit record. You ever notice that there has never been a record button in your car? My Dad told me that a law was passed in the 50s/60s that didn't allow tape recorders in automobiles because ppl would record (steal) the music. I can't find a record of this law, but I wonder if this little thing violates it (if it is still in effect, that is)

  89. Obligatory Why Is This News Post by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I'm not going to flame the product -- in fact, I just bought one. All in all, a good product. Uses cheap, rechargable Ni-MH batteries. Very good sound quality. Uses its own download program, instead of plugging into some flaky "jukebox" software. But.

    Why is this news? Using an analog input to circumvent copy protection is hardly ground-breaking technology. Making an MP3 player that emulates an audio cassette isn't at all new. Nor is it a particularly good idea. It sounds cool -- an MP3 player that you can operate with the controls of your car cassette player. But it doesn't work all that well in practice. Auto cassette players vary a lot in the way their controls work, and you usually can't use all the features of the MP3 player. Plus you have to do without that handy LCD readout.

    All in all, I'd much rather have a conventional MP3 player with a pseudo-cassette adapter. I only bought the Digessette because it had other good features that outweighted the silliness of the basic concept.

    1. Re:Obligatory Why Is This News Post by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      Because it records!

  90. Nokia 5510 does this already by clonmult · · Score: 1

    The Nokia 5510 mobile can record from an audio source ... doubles up as a usable phone as well. Will be trying to get hold of one as soon as my current contract expires .....

  91. Useless by trumpetplayer · · Score: 1

    For the same price you get that fantastic piece of technology, I will get one hundred thousand of cassettes.

    -I'll be able to play my music in the same way (car, home, bla bla bla), I get the same "revolutionary" benefits.

    -Ageing of tapes is quite bad but what's the point when comparing to 96 Mb of storage.

    -The quality is crap for both. If you're happy with the overall quality of MP3s you don't demand much anyway.

    What a piece of shit.

  92. When ... by JSkills · · Score: 1

    When will companies that make MP3 players realize that no matter how light they make them or how many features they add - that 32, 64, or even 96 MB is not going to cut it for anyone remotely serious about music. Why carry a device that allows you to listen to roughly one (maybe two) CD's worth of music. I know it's heavier (after all it is a hard drive), but solutions like the Archos Jukebox with 20 GB are so much more appealing. It hold approx. 500 CDs worth of music in MP3 format and it doubles as a portable USB hard drive, allowing you to store and transport any size/kind of file. And you can use it with a standard cassette adapter if you are so inclined. And obviously, there's the iPod which I hear nothing but greatness about. Sorry to sound like a music snob or something, but I just don't understand who is buying all these MP3 players with such limited space. What is the point?

    1. Re:When ... by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      What is the point?

      The advantages of a solid-state device over a hard-drive jukebox or MP3/CD player are: 1)It's immune to skipping (even with buffering, this happens occasionally with my RioVolt), 2)It uses less power and thus has a longer battery life, and 3)It's smaller.

      My ideal would be a combination of a CD reader unit that could transfer files to a portable solid-state unit (so that you could carry lots of material and access it all without a computer, while preserving the solid-state advantages). However, the industry would probably crap it up with Digital Restriction Management.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  93. Linux Management by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

    This is cool and all but I can't seem to find a Linux utility to manage the tracks.

    Anyone know if this will work with Linux?