Slashdot Mirror


Vanishing Mobile Phone Masts

babycakes writes "The BBC has an article about the concealment of mobile phone antennae in the UK, where the masts have been disguised as clock face hands, chimneys and so on. The company behind them, The Undetectables (flash site) aim to 'eradicate this architectural acne' - pics available."

199 comments

  1. But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

    How am I supposed to know to be pissed off when I'm standing right under one and still not getting any reception?

    1. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

      Be like all your favorite super heroes and travel by roof top! Then you could inspect the chimneys and clocks more carefully when you get bad reception.

    2. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Oh don't worry, that feature will still be available.

    3. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Can you hear me now, Robin? Good"
      *whoosh* *swing* *thud*
      "Can you hear me now, Robin? Good"
      *whoosh* *swing* *thud* ...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    4. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Look for the guy who's saying "Can you hear me now? Good."

    5. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by hoagieslapper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Being somewhat of a wireless tech, there is a place we call the 'touch down radius'. It is possible to be right under a tower and not get reception due to not being in the Frenel Zone. I will admit though that I do not know the specs on the antenna they use or what downtilt angle, or anything else along those lines.

    6. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by emmetropia · · Score: 1

      dear lord, the brillant mind that thought up that commercial should be removed from the skull, bathed in disinfectant, and then trampeled by a heard of fat women headed towards weight watchers. Can you hear me now?

    7. Re:But if they hide all the cellular towers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can call your remote bomb with your cell you fucking terrorist!

  2. Ha... by T3kno · · Score: 3

    We have these horribly fake looking metal palm trees all around my house. The first time you look at it you have to do a double take. They're so strange looking that the birds will fly around them. I'd rather look at the triangle antenna.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:Ha... by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Informative

      my thoughts exactly.. Quick search on google comes across this page with *ooooh* pretty pictures.

    2. Re:Ha... by DMBoyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, at least we're replacing nature with something useful...

    3. Re:Ha... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree wholeheartedly. There seems to be a huge movement to outlaw mobile 'phone masts and DTH satellite dishes in the UK, despite the fact that they're both ENORMOUSLY less visually intrusive than the telephone poles and TV aerials that they supplant. Fucking Luddites is what it is.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Ha... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      We have something similar in a park near my place. It sticks out like a sore thumb despite it's pine tree disguise because it's a lot taller than the actual trees around it, and it's perfectly straight, with two sets of branches ringing the top.

    5. Re:Ha... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We have these horribly fake looking metal palm trees all around my house.

      In New Jersey on Rt 287 there is a cell tower with fake leaves on it. It looks like lego. One of the problems is the fake plastic leaves are perfect for squirrels. So there are a lot of squirrel problems at that site.

      omico--

  3. Bleh. by Echnin · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like these guys are just trying to make money for doing something totally useless. It almost seems like a kind of a trend right now.

    --
    Lalala
    1. Re:Bleh. by d.valued · · Score: 2

      Sure, it's functionally useless. Like the top of a car, a GUI, or the handle of a knife.

      Making it pretty isn't about utility. It's about ergonomics and aesthetics. I mean, there's a cell tower I drive by and it has a horrific sign by the mayor bitching and moaning about it. Hiding the cell tower makes it easier to palette and helps prevent this form of complaint.

      Reception problems, thought, are entirely another matter.

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    2. Re:Bleh. by VivianC · · Score: 1

      I know the one you are talking about in Niles. What is the mayor's problem? That sign has caused more accidents than the 'dangerous' tower.

      I'd love to see it done up as a giant palm tree!

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    3. Re:Bleh. by d.valued · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'd like to see the _mayor_ done up as a giant palm tree... ;)

      I think the sign is just an excuse for additional name exposure for the guy, since he's essentially a cipher even in his own town.

      (Nice to meet a local slashdotter.)

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
  4. maybe it is just me ... by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
    but I want to disquise one as an object most appropriate to express my feelings about my local, regional, and national politicians.

    There must be some appropriate gesture....

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  5. Phily area camouflage by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're making them look like big ass trees. The best one is on the PA Turnpike near Willow Grove. It's in the middle of a wooded area. It looks good except, it's easily three times the size of normal trees, oh, and in the winter, it's the only one with leaves on it!!!!

    1. Re:Phily area camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA, I have to see a picture of that.

    2. Re:Phily area camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's dumb. They should camouflage them as assholes, they'd blend right in.

    3. Re:Phily area camouflage by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're making them look like big ass trees.

      And what, pray tell, does an ass tree look like?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Phily area camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to ask, you shouldn't ever find out. Really, you DON'T WANT TO KNOW, so don't ask if you still value your sanity.

    5. Re:Phily area camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learn, live and work at a university where one of the tallest buildings has a cellular tower on the top. Now, every Christmas, the university gets a great big tree, easily taller than most of the buildings and decorates it and lights it up. My thought is that they could just do this to the tower and let everyone for miles around see it!

    6. Re:Phily area camouflage by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      They're the kind of trees that grow in an assclown's yard.

  6. It can't be worse than here... by cheezycrust · · Score: 1

    In my town, they've put the antenna on top of the church tower... and put the cross on top op the antenna. Really, that looks horrible. I guess they've done it for the money the get from the network provider.

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
    1. Re:It can't be worse than here... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, they call those "Towers of Babble".

      No, really.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    2. Re:It can't be worse than here... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      I saw a church recently with a huge white cross in front which also has cellphone antennas mounted on it. I don't know, but I'm guessing that they got the cellular co. to pay for their cross as part of the deal.

      I guess the Romans had unintentional foresight when they chose to execute one of the world's most major prophets on a tall, thin device.

    3. Re:It can't be worse than here... by Milican · · Score: 1

      LOL! Nice....

      JOhn

  7. This antenna cannot be seen by Qrlx · · Score: 5, Funny

    This antenna cannot be seen. Unfortunately, it has chosen a rather obvious piece of cover...

    BOOM!

    1. Re:This antenna cannot be seen by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Excellent Python reference. Well done. :)

    2. Re:This antenna cannot be seen by McCart42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      for those that don't get this joke, watch Monty Python or see this script. You really should see the clip itself though...it's PRICELESS.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    3. Re:This antenna cannot be seen by cpeterso · · Score: 2


      If these antennas cannot be seen, then how can the company's web site have a photo gallery of their antennas? Food for thought.

  8. Rules in the UK by Deton8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sort of thing is more useful in the UK, as there are numerous historical preservation zones where you can't even have a visible satellite dish. In the middle of a town, it's much easier to get permission if the mast is invisible. That, and the local schools won't start bitching about the unreasonably high rate of student's brain tumors if the masts are invisible.

    1. Re:Rules in the UK by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      This issue reminds me of the people who make "cozies" for things. "Goodness! We can't have it look like what it actually is!". I think functional antennae are beautiful, whatever their form.
      On the schools issue, This should put that bit of stupidity to rest. It won't of course, because people are stupid.

    2. Re:Rules in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may think it, but the majority of people doesn't. Same reason why electrcity runs underground in W. Europe. Most people don't find antennae beautiful. And most city planners don't either.

    3. Re:Rules in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the environmental blending is so well done, what happens when someone loses the piece of paper listing where they are all hidden.

    4. Re:Rules in the UK by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we welocme tumor giving towers,, they're everywhere, one right next to a local elementary school, and i've never heard a single person complain,, then again, most people where i live probably don't know what those towers are for, just "Oooh, i can make a call without wires!!" lol :)

      Reece,

    5. Re:Rules in the UK by peter · · Score: 2
      Fox News is not a source I would trust at all. They have a history of distorting things in favour of big business (and the Republican party). (This edition of Counterspin describes some Fox bullshit about 9 minutes into the program.)

      As much as I think it's unlikely that low power non-ionizing EM radiation is harmful, I wouldn't ask anyone to take Fox's word for it. The article provides enough information to do some digging and maybe come up with a journal article, but I wouldn't trust Fox's reporting on anything besides sports results.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
    6. Re:Rules in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. regardless of whether you might get brain tumors or not, I know from personal experience these EM sources aren't that good for concentrating. I don't think there would be much difference but i can imagine its not helping much. If only for the fact that the possibility you're beiing called sometime isn't helping staying interested in whatever it is you should be learning.

      I prefer my jedi senses to those lame cellphones :D

    7. Re:Rules in the UK by perlyking · · Score: 2

      We get fox news on satellite here in the UK and I wouldnt trust anything they said about mobile phone masts.
      I always wonder though if the people who complain about masts have mobiles themselves, or their kids they are trying to protect.

      --
      no sig.
  9. Flagpoles are big for this... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    After all, in this post 9-11 time, who would object to a big flag flying atop a big flag pole?

    1. Re:Flagpoles are big for this... by delphipro · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, quite a few people:
      Dispute over flying flag folds

    2. Re:Flagpoles are big for this... by forsaken33 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what our community did :D Picture a 2 foot diameter flagpole with somethign that looks like one of those little flags you'd fly off your antenna or something. Its kinda funny actually

      --
      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=. amusing....
    3. Re:Flagpoles are big for this... by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it would take a great deal of manpower to care for the flags. Flags are supposed to be removed at night and during inclement weather. A damaged flag is supposed to be replaced immediatly. I doubt many companies would be willing to take on this burden, constant flag maintenance or tons of bad PR. Maybe they could rope some of the local high school ROTC classes into helping out, they seem obsessed with flags.

    4. Re:Flagpoles are big for this... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      While the etiquette of flags isn't a seriously followed up here in Canada, I do consider it a shame when I see tattered, ripped up flags flying atop buildings where the owners are just too negligent to maintain it. Much like having a commercial email account that isn't monitored, flying a flag without maintaining it is much worse than not doing it at all.

    5. Re:Flagpoles are big for this... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      My school's flag is out 24/7, and it usually takes them a month to replace it,,,

      Reece,

  10. Cactii by dirvish · · Score: 1

    I saw a picture of one that was a cactus in the Wall Street Journal. I am pretty sure cactii that tall do not exist

    1. Re:Cactii by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      CACTUS!

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Cactii by swfranklin · · Score: 1
      I am pretty sure cactii that tall do not exist

      Depends on how tall it was - the Saguaro cactus can grow to 50 feet tall.

    3. Re:Cactii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I walked past The Undetectables workshop this morning (down by Bristol docks, just next to Aardman animations studios). In the workshop window there stands a full size black, Imperial Dalek together with a 10 ft tall Mars lander and an innocuous looking palm tree. I dunno about where you guys live, but a Dalek would seem a tad out of place in downtown Brizzle...

  11. South Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i saw the headline i was almost happy to see that SA is not the only country where damn near everything gets stolen ... damn ... nevermind.

  12. is it really that important? by cdf12345 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, I never thought attennas were that much of an eyesore. While I'm all for making them smaller and whatnot, I sure as hell wouldn't make them all cute and crap if I lose performance.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
    1. Re:is it really that important? by bogie · · Score: 2

      Some people might consider preserving Historic cities a notch above your ability maintain a clear signal, while endangering the lives of those around you while you chat in your auto.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:is it really that important? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Instead of making them eyesores, why not make the attenas themselves sculptures? Maybe create different styles of antennas. Why do people think that technology has to be hidden like it's such a bad thing? It's like those wooden computer cabinets that are designed to hide the computer so you don't have to look at it. I would never purchase one.

    3. Re:is it really that important? by cdf12345 · · Score: 2

      yeah especially since I just put in the tinted windows and neon case lights!

      seriously though, I'm all for having atheticly pleasing technology, but I'm not for doing it if the type of service the tech provides is degraded

      --
      Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
    4. Re:is it really that important? by weatherbee · · Score: 1
      Instead of making them eyesores, why not make the attenas themselves sculptures?

      But they already are sculptures. I don't think they're eyesores at all. Antennae are beautiful, dammit! I've never understood the general dislike most folks seem to have for them.

    5. Re:is it really that important? by The+Rev · · Score: 2
      In this country at least (the UK) the general public are worried about radiation from these things.

      I mean people have gotten *really* upset when these things (the un-disguised ones I mean ) are put up right next to schools etc.

      I personally wouldn't buy a house near one of them but now the B*st*rds are secreting them so I buy the house and the should the disguised mast be discovered everyone's house loses value 'coz everyone else is like me & wouldn't buy a house next to a frigging phone mast!!!!!!

  13. First GSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow. When you see an article like this, it makes you glad to be alive in an era when such technology exists. My question is, how do think this will affect the Open Source community?

    This Generic Slashdot Post was brought to you by The_Messenger

    1. Re:First GSP by ahecht · · Score: 0

      Do you think we could make a Beowolf cluster of these?

  14. Perhaps you're right... by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 2, Funny

    But that hasn't stopped Microsoft from trying.

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
  15. Re:Ha...Why don't they use real trees? by cheezycrust · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be possible to mount these antennas to real trees? This would seem more natural to me...

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
  16. And in church steeples by MongooseCN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Down in Cape Cod in Wellfleet, there is a cell phone antennae inside of a church steeple (I forget which one). The church gets paid something like 50,000-100,000$ a year to hold the antennae. The church doesn't do anything with the antennae, they just rent out the space to hold it.

    I wish some phone company put an antennae in my chimney. I could quit working.

    1. Re:And in church steeples by unicron · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Then you could make even more money in 20 years when you and your girl become infertile and your dog only grows hair on his ass.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:And in church steeples by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      It's a transmitter! For talking to God!

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:And in church steeples by sohp · · Score: 2

      Up here just south of Portland, OR, there's a church placed high up on a hillside along Interstate 5. When you drive up close to it, you can see that the very large cross on the front lawn actually is a tower with cell antennae on the upper part of the verticle. It really is a nice commanding view of a long stretch of heavily-travelled highway, and I'm sure the church makes out well for the placement.

    4. Re:And in church steeples by victim · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Kirkwood United Methodist Church in Missouri had to take their rather massive steeple down due to rot. The church was unable to commit the resources for a replacement. AT&T had a replacement built and installed in exchange for antenna rights.

      I'd link a picture, but the web site also rotted away. Trust me, the steeple was an integral architectural element and the building looked silly without it.

      And for those worried about emissions, no need. AT&T phones barely work in the building. I suppose the antennas don't radiate down very well. Of course we are probably cooking the Christian Scientists and the Catholics next door...

  17. NY can use their help.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. they decided to throw some fake looking tree branches on a HUGE tower just outside of NYC.

    Here is the article, but unfortunately I can't find a picture. Article

    I guess it would have slightly blended in if it wasn't 100' taller than the tallest tree.

    1. Re:NY can use their help.. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      The towers that are supposed to look like trees look terrible. They don't look anything like trees. I wonder how much extra expense goes into making them like that?

  18. What if it got too realisitic.... by dhanav · · Score: 1

    What would happen if they disguise one so realistically that everyone actually gets deceived by them. Say a mast disguised as a tree, gets used by lots of birds to build their nests and eventually when some thing goes wrong and they have to repair it, what would happen to all those birds????
    Or more seriously children think of it as normal trees or street signs and play around them and knock one down. Then they will have some serious explaining to do....

    1. Re:What if it got too realisitic.... by Webmoth · · Score: 2

      I'm just waiting for a tree-hugging environmentalist to come along and chain herself to a cell tower... :-P

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    2. Re:What if it got too realisitic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your kids go around knocking down street signs and trees as a matter of course, you should be focusing on discipline rather than reading /. !

  19. The unmentionables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how can you hang you unmentionables on them undetectables?

  20. A fresh lick of paint by vpreHoose · · Score: 1

    The BIG downside to these techniques is cost. At least one network in the UK have said "no more 2G cell sites" due to cost and finite return on 2G.
    That does leave 3G antenna to mount, however they will tend to be at building level, not above and a cleaver paint job can make the antenna nearly indistinguishable from the brickwork, or concrete, behind it.
    Two tins of paint are 100 to 1000 times cheaper.

    1. Re:A fresh lick of paint by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      That would be, of course, what the website (and article) showed. Lots of building-level antennas getting a lick of paint (as well as new moulded . Not antenna towers masquerading as trees.

      anyway.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  21. This has been done here in the US by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Informative
    I can't find a link right now, but some Tele-company has been hiding antennas in fiberglas pine trees (in the northwest) and palm trees (in the southeast) . They aren't movie-prop quality, but chances are you wouldn't see them unless you were looking for them. They fool the wildlife at least.

    They use them in residential areas and national parks. If I find a link, I'll post it.

    1. Re:This has been done here in the US by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here we go Flash free and links to US companies.

    2. Re:This has been done here in the US by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      You can always tell.

      They happen to be at least 20 feet taller than all the trees around them.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  22. The Undetectables (flash site) by cosyne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, flash site is one thing. Has so many useless little files that it throws the browser into spasms where the stop button and mozilla logo blink at around 1 Hz site is a little more annoying. Perhaps their precious little flash animations don't do so well against a friday afternoon slashdotting....

    1. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by RollingThunder · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not sure it's little files - in the headers, there's this line:

      meta http-equiv="refresh" content=";URL="

      Mozilla, at least, seems to treat that as a zero second refresh to the same location. As fast as it loads it, it reloads it. :/

    2. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by yorgasor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It gets better. Run 'top' while you're viewing this page with mozilla or netscape 4. It's really neat to watch the amount of memory being used. After just a minute of the constant reloading, the browser takes up a few hundred MB of memory. It's a really neat trick when you're trying to compile a massive project at work on your machine at the time and all of a sudden you run out of memory.

      --
      Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    3. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by adolf · · Score: 2

      Strange.

      On all of my *nix boxen, all that would happen is that the offending process would die.

      Or, are you running as root?

      Bad user!

    4. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a nickel, kid. Go buy yourself a browser

    5. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by skookum · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree, that is one ghastly site. There is no good reason to use Flash in this case. Did you notice in the BBC article how they included screenshots of a browser window showing the pictures, because they couldn't link to the pictures properly? I'm sure Berners-Lee is rolling in his grave, but since he's not dead he's rolling in his desk chair.

      If you object to this website, let them know:

      mail@undetectables.com
      +44 (0)117 9290400

    6. Re: The Undetectables (flash site) by CvD · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's why my mozilla died, froze and refused to do anything any more... killall mozilla-bin

      sigh...

  23. Picture... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found one that is similar here

    1. Re:Picture... by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Wholly shit is that funny. Thanks for the link.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  24. Re:Ha...Why don't they use real trees? by NickDngr · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be possible to mount these antennas to real trees?

    Cellular antenna and microwave dish alignment are critical. When the tree grows, you lose that.

    --
    Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
  25. Other options by Openadvocate · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are many options and it is great NOT to see these ugly antennas everywhere.
    Here is some examples, fake tress, a fake window, or a cross on a church tower.

    --
    my sig
    1. Re:Other options by ScottForbes · · Score: 1
      Hah. Unless they've changed it since I last saw it (around 1993 or so), somewhere in a ritzy suburb outside Denver, Colorado, up on a mountain ledge with good line-of-sight to a sparsely populated but wealthy area, is a fake house. The antenna is disguised in the "roof", and the "house" is a fancy jacket around the cinderblock hut containing the cellular equipment.

      Everybody wants good cell phone coverage; nobody wants the tower.

  26. Sorry to ask a dumn question by dw5000 · · Score: 1

    but what's GRP?

    1. Re:Sorry to ask a dumn question by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be Glass Reinforced Plastic. I believe its like, if not actually is, fiberglass. The news article defined the acronym, but I am not entirely sure of the material itself.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  27. antennas disguised as chimneys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And were chimneys disguised as something else when they were invented?

  28. More concealment = Less privacy by Synergy2k4 · · Score: 0

    As the towers get much more numerous and hidden as these are 911 operators should be able to trac emergency cell phone calls to the nearest tower to get EMT crews disbatched quickly. Though it could have other uses too.....

  29. Which leads one to wonder... by raehl · · Score: 1

    If a cellular tower disguised as a tree falls in the middle of a deserted forest, does it make any noise?

    1. Re:Which leads one to wonder... by zipwow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet:

      If a cellular tower disguised as a tree falls in the middle of a deserted forest, does it still provide service?

      -Zipwow

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  30. Trees by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    We have these horribly fake looking metal palm trees all around my house.

    The fake palms I've seen in the San Jose/Santa Cruz area aren't so bad. The fake pine tree I saw somewhere was butt ugly. I've known for ages that these things have been being hidden anywhere high, one example being a church getting a nice piece of change for placing one in their belltower.

    This must be a slow newsday, for an article like this to come up, though.

    Funnier was this about face: Opteron To Support Palladium Had me an anxiety attack for a moment there...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  31. Re:Ha...Why don't they use real trees? by cheezycrust · · Score: 1

    I thought trees grow only on the ends - the top, in this case. If you place a sign on a tree two meters above the ground, you come back ten years later, will the sign have 'climbed'? No.

    Other reasons I can think of: The leaves getting in the way, the instability of the tree (compared to normal masts), the fact that they have to stick out of the rest. But who knows what the future will bring...

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
  32. Cell phone tower? Shows how little you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Some people might confuse that for a tree. Some might think they're pretty clever in recognizing it as a cell tower. But they'd both be wrong.

    What you see in that picture is quite clearly an advance covert intelligence unit of Saddam Hussein's dreaded Republican Guard, scouting out the territory for the coming invasion of New York City. We must strike them now, and strike them hard!

  33. Well done by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    I have seen the fake trees they have tried to use in Pacific NW, actually all the way to the Bay Area in CA, and they look pretty fugly. They jump out at you while you're driving and such. But the ones on their site were pretty impressive. I am just wondering how often they are going to have to repaint the things.

    Anyone know how well paint on GRP holds up?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Well done by topham · · Score: 2

      could be worse, you could have a mayor that decides to put fake trees in the center boulevard for no apparent reason.

      butt fucking ugly, and completely non-functional metal trees.

  34. Useless by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    I do not think it is useless. It keeps the original "view" of a certain place. I live in a country that is about completely covered for cellphone usage, but I never have seen a cellphone mast...at least not like the one the pictured in the article. I don't want big ugly towers every 35km, if they can make them invisible it is worth the cost.
    Anyways, the cell-phone users are paying the extra expense anyway and I'm happy with that.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Useless by mgv · · Score: 2

      I don't want big ugly towers every 35km, if they can make them invisible it is worth the cost.

      Fair enough. Personally, I think that they should use something other than fake trees! Like water towers, buildings, and so on.

      Although you only have to put the towers up every 70 km if you want to cover a distance (35 km radius == 70 km diameter).

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    2. Re:Useless by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      I agree it's better to put them on different structures like water towers and large buildings. I personally never have seen a mast disguised as a tree, not around here at least.

      To cover decently you need to put them closer than 70 km to each other. There needs to be some overlap, and not every landscape is flat: I suppose that when you live in a hilly area you need even more masts.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  35. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no kharma coming my way for such a brief post, but this is old news. i saw a news brief on this in some TLC program months ago.

    gotta have some cynical posts if i want to be a "true" /.er ;-p

  36. Will the building's maintainers know about it? by shess · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple years ago, the city I grew up in (Pipestone, MN) repainted (or otherwise maintained) their water tower. While the guys were up there, they took down some antenna, because neither they, nor anyone at city hall, could figure out why they were there.

    Turned out to be a repeater installed twenty years ago by the local radio station, with city permission.

    So now I'm imagining some roofer coming down off the roof and telling the homeowner "Uh, listen, you have a chimney up there which doesn't connect to anything. I think it might be causing your leak, do you want me to get rid of it?"

    1. Re:Will the building's maintainers know about it? by ph1l · · Score: 1

      haha! the last place i worked we had a ee put
      mov networks on the contactors of every piece
      of equipt in the building that used mechanical
      relays.

      some time later we hired some e-lec-tric-i-ans
      to upgrade a fuse box, and they went all through
      the building stripping off the mov networks.

      when i asked what the **** they thought they were
      doing they said "aw, you don't need these
      capacitors any more, we put a new fuse box in."

      but, they were cheap.

    2. Re:Will the building's maintainers know about it? by Quarters · · Score: 2

      It might be a funny story if I knew what the $*(#$* a MOV network was.

      But, thank you. Your story reminded me of my days of college....living in a dorm surrounded by engineering students--me the computer-graphics technology student. I never understood a word those people uttered either.

    3. Re:Will the building's maintainers know about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry, mov networks suck anyway...

  37. A giant penis? by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    I think a giant penis might be what you are looking for.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:A giant penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking an enormous arse with the neck sticking. Not sure if you could do that with just antennaes.

    2. Re:A giant penis? by lizrd · · Score: 1

      And I know just the place to put it

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
  38. But... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1

    Will I still need to wear my tinfoil hat to defend against the mind-altering rays?

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  39. Now if only they would install a "visible" tower.. by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Where my family lives they have no cell reception. There is an old microwave tower with no dish anymore, and the local telephone company doesn't want to install cell service on the existing tower.
    I want to be buffeted by EM when I go home, damit. EM isn't just for city folks nowadays.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  40. More Slashdot = Less intelligence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better lay off a while, you're running a little low there.

  41. Re:Cell phone tower? Shows how little you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What you see in that picture is quite clearly an advance covert intelligence unit of Saddam Hussein's dreaded Republican Guard, scouting out the territory for the coming invasion of New York City.

    They've discovered that, when they disguise themselves as a local telephone monopoly, the US government mysteriously develops a perfect blind-spot to whatever they're doing.

    Iraq itself is preparing to take advantage of this phenomenon by entering merger talks with Verizon.

  42. Self-slashdotting by sahrss · · Score: 1

    I don't know about any of you, but when I loaded up their site in Moz 1.0.1, their welcome page just flickers about 2 times per second as it tries to reload itself over and over really fast! It looks like it must be using a horrid amount of bandwidth.
    Bwahaha...

    My Moz is:
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826

    1. Re:Self-slashdotting by Sadiq · · Score: 1

      Same problem here! It's not just you. These people really don't like life.

      --
      SysWear - Geek T-shirts (UK/Europe)
    2. Re:Self-slashdotting by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      They bungled the meta refresh HTML... instant reloading.

  43. mozilla freakout by erikdotla · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is this site absolutlely freaking out Mozilla 1.1 on Win2K, but it's OK in MSIE? IE opens the flash right away, Mozilla starts some crazy loop.

    Looks like this command:

    Is making it go berserk refreshing as fast as it can. Am I the first/only to see this?

    --
    # Erik
    1. Re:mozilla freakout by erikdotla · · Score: 1

      this command, I mean:
      <meta http-equiv="refresh" content=";URL=">

      --
      # Erik
  44. Portland, Oregon's solution.. by s0l0m0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    seems to be putting more, small recievers on top of utility poles. Reaps several benefits, increased revenue for an already cash straped goverment, and better reception for Portland wireheads.

    Here's a quote from the Willamette Weekly, a local paper, "Health skeptics may protest, but cell-phone users may be headed toward better reception. New cell-phone towers may sprout on utility poles all over the city under a new proposal, spearheaded by Commissioner Sten's office, in which cell-phone companies would pay the city for the privilege."

    josh

    1. Re:Portland, Oregon's solution.. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      yes, and there has never been abuse when a goverment agency become dependent on corporate cash.

      OTOH this is the same city that would run screaming if you wanted to put a 20 cent tax on gas so children can be eduacated.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. Re:It can't be worse than here...[nvws] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, come on, don't you think that's being a bit unfair? :)

    btw: I am looking for a girlfriend

  46. Palm tree Cell Towers by xanra · · Score: 0

    In LA, they have cell phone towers than look like palm trees. They have a very good job with them, too. You really have to stare at them for a while to notice. They are the most noticable on the 405 when you're stuck in traffic.

    1. Re:Palm tree Cell Towers by DrSpiffy · · Score: 1

      They would have to mimic the ugliest possible vegitation. I wish they would prune all the palm trees to look like cell phone towers. That would be an improvement.

    2. Re:Palm tree Cell Towers by jquirke · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Singtel-Optus has some in Queensland, Australia, too. They actually look quite good.

      --quirky

  47. It doesn't beam downwards by cheezycrust · · Score: 1

    Actually, the best place to hide from the waves is under the antenna. The energy is transmitted sideways, so you get the lowest dose if you stand right under it.

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
    1. Re:It doesn't beam downwards by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on the antenna design. You may get unwanted stray lobes of radiation if they've installed it improperly though. I'd rather put my faith in the inverse-square law.

  48. tower site disguised as a tree by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2

    A company named Signal Tower sells cells towers disguised as a tree. You can see pictures of this at the web site.

    P.s. sorry if this was mentioned on the site in the original story. I could not get to that site due to crap flash.

    --
    man .sig
    No manual entry for .sig.
  49. Better yet yet... by raehl · · Score: 1

    If a cellular tower disguised as a tree falls in the middle of a deserted forest, is service area lost?

    1. Re:Better yet yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah terrorist humor at its finest.

  50. Fake Trees, Church Steeples by boatboy · · Score: 0

    A town in Mississippi with a notoriously strict mayor has forced some stuff like this. In one case the mayor didn't like the idea of a cell tower, so she ordered it be made into a pine tree. Except it's about 50' taller than the tallest pine tree around and looks more like an overgrown pipe cleaner. It's uglier than a cell tower.

    In another case, though, a church wanted to build a steeple too tall for the mayor's liking, so they stuck a cell tower in it and got around it.
    True stories.

  51. Dumb by 1006Bonobos · · Score: 1

    On the Hutchinson Parkway leading into NYC there is a tower made to look like a white pine. It is butt ugly and is distinctly not an improvement. It reminded me of a vegetarian friend's Thankgiving dinner. She had made a "Turkey" out of tofu. I much prefer things look like what they are. Generally its best when form should follows function

  52. why not home computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very soon, we will start seeing home computers disguised as a nice plant (apple will take a lead). Then the network router, cable/dsl modem, speakers, amp and other ugly electrical items too!

  53. In the tower of my high school by CoolD2k · · Score: 1

    there is a cell tower in the clock tower of my high school. There are also just 2 classrooms right below the room that contains the equipment. Every once in a while you'll be sitting in class and some guys from the phone company or whatnot will walk through the front of the class and up the stairs to access the equipment.

  54. And why is this interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been done here in the States for some time now. What's the big deal? Where do I sign up to pay you guys so I can keep reading all this fascinating stuff?

  55. This is how they Look Like... by ToKsUri · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ibelca is a Spanish company that also works in that same area of "hiding" antennas. Here you can see some examples of antenna trees just in case you were wondering ;)

    Ibelca

  56. Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's nice to know that here in the UK we have the good sense to hide the antennas in something inconspicuous.

    1. Re:Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vodafone engineers celebrate another successful installation.

    2. Re:Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though some other installations are less convincing.

  57. Not super new by Student_Tech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have read stories of amatuer radio operators playing games with their antennas so they would be harder to see. If QST a few years back they showed a picture of an antenna painted brown to blend in with the trees, no leaves on it however. This also reminds me of the person who used their clothesline as an antenna until the neighbor accidentally touched it while the guy was transmiting....

    1. Re:Not super new by Jonny+290 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in the bottom floor of an apartment building (my apt is actually half underground). I looked at the side of it and said, "Hey. Look at those six runs of 1.5" PVC running down the side of the building for HVAC drainage." I just bought another length of the same color and size PVC, used some brackets to bolt it to the side of the building, and put a 2m 5/8" wave and a multiband vertical VHF dipole in the top.

      I was out chatting with my landlord and watched her stare straight in that direction and not even think about it.

      Keep it QRP, though. :D

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    2. Re:Not super new by NateTech · · Score: 1

      "multiband vertical VHF"... something seems wrong with that. Is it multiband, or is it VHF?!

      ES 73 OM... DE WY0X

      --
      +++OK ATH
    3. Re:Not super new by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2

      2m, 3m (i use it to listen to FM broadcast on my IC-2SRA) and 6M. :)

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  58. Re:Help me QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dunno, but there was an old Twilight Zone about a guy who took a bet that he would stop talking for a year.

  59. Re:It can't be worse than here... Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a church by my moms house that sits on top of the highest hill around. On top of their large building they stuck a big cross. And the cross? It's outlined in neon red. Blight on the landscape advertising their cult. My dream is for a strip club to open up accross the street with a big red neon sign of outlined naked girls
    and see them try to argue. That or get out the bb gun.

  60. What if you dont like clocks by isorox · · Score: 2

    I have a nervous disposition to clocks (usually because I get up late). I like mobile phone masts, but hate clocks. they are an eyesore, and raise my stress levels and body temperature. As I am a member of this minority group I feel that our needs are not being met. This blatent discrimination will be taken up with the european court of human rights very shortly.

  61. Good ./ing by raiyu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Undetectables website is now undetectable.

  62. The one in NYC by RazorRamon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are on I-95 in the NYC Yonkers area you'll see a cell phone tower rigged on top of a yellow brick chimney like that. I saw it a while ago and it was a wierd technology meets old-school type of feeling.

  63. big deal, nothing new here by digitalsushi · · Score: 1, Troll
    I've been doing this for about 23, 24 years now. The proof's in the pudding-


    Tree we did up in Philly
    a clock tower- the hands are the antenna
    ooh, ooh... that aint what you think it is are we good or what?
    this was a government job

    As you can see, I am not impressed. When something that people just havent noticed over years and years becomes news of the day, it's evident that people are just a bit too egocentrical to notice anything outside of their own little worlds. Sheesh. Hidden antennas.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:big deal, nothing new here by perlyking · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you are just pretending to be an expert - they are just images you googled for.

      The "clock tower" for example is from the "Back-to-the-future" film set. The last one is from a landscape site.
      The "tree" is the main page image for http://danr.ucop.edu/devserv/ .

      --
      no sig.
    2. Re:big deal, nothing new here by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Nope, it's just an uncanny coincidence both in physical attributes and URL/file naming irony. Go figure! I'm going back downstairs into my secret lab, be back in a few weeks *peace*

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  64. Other good reason to hide antennas... by atomico · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is the media-fed hysteria going around in some countries, arguing some (never proven) effects in human health. Where I live (Spain), some parents took their children away from school because there were cell masts nearby. Even after the mobile operator disconnected that base station, there were some diehards who did not allow their children go back to school -well, then it must have been antenna aestetics.

    Of course, media have never realised that there are much powerful transmitters of electromagnetic signals everywhere... starting with their very own broadcast signals.

  65. har dee har har by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your idiotic fanaticism elsewhere, bunghole.

  66. Living conditions... by jeffgreenberg · · Score: 1

    What if I want to know that I'm living right near a cellphone tower? Now they're hiding them? What if I choose my housing based on a place that's not right near a broadcast space?

  67. Plenty of good places by barzok · · Score: 2

    I've seen plenty of antannae on the sides of existing buildings, water towers, silos, and other tall structures that were already there. Great idea. Why litter the landscape with poor camoflauge when you can just tack some gear inconspicuously on the side of something that's been there 50 years?

    Helps the the local economy too - if I were a farmer I'd take $500/month to rent the top edges of my silo. Found money, basically. And it's gotta be cheaper than construction, zoning changes, etc. that the phone company would have to shell out.

  68. Re:WHAT THE FUCK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raiders of the Lost Ark quote

  69. Time Difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Monday, 16 September, 2002, 11:44 GMT 12:44 UK"

    I know you're 5-8 hours behind us over there, but still. CATCH UP!

    'News for people who have been away all week'

  70. LA area camouflage by Scareduck · · Score: 2

    We get palm trees and pine trees. But no, they never look out of place -- they're just as fake as the tits on a B-list starlet...

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  71. Re:Ha...Why don't they use real trees? by Forge · · Score: 2

    Ever wonder where those growth rings in the cross section of a tree trunk come from ?

    yes. If you nail a sign to the side of a tree it will rise higher. If it dosn't seam to that just because that tree is growing realy slow.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  72. Dan Bricklin on Cell Towers by frozenray · · Score: 1

    Dan Bricklin has an interesting writeup on cell towers in his weblog, here, complete with some pictures.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  73. California desert by David+Ishee · · Score: 1

    I was in California recently and saw disguised towers around Los Angeles. They were made to look like palm trees. They were OK, but you could definitely tell that they were fake. However, if you went over the mountains and into the desert, they were still disguised a *green* trees. The really stood out compared to the desert area.

    --
    Your password has expired, please login to change it.
    1. Re:California desert by cthulhu_will_rise · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a redwood does NOT grow in Palmdale. I've seen those as well, up Hwy14. What a horrible choice. It's not as though the landscape is benefitting any from using it either. What a wasteland.

  74. An American Site doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a company doing this antenna concealment stuff out of Charleston, SC (They do it all over the US of A). Their URL is www.stealthsite.com.

    Thought you might like to know. The only reason I do is because I did some network admin stuff for them...

  75. Better luck... by KaosConMan · · Score: 1

    Well, I wish them much better luck. In Northern NJ, along the G.S. Parkway, they tried to decorate one up as a tree. Let me tell you- it draws my eye much more than a normal one would. I guess I'm just so used to seeing them.

  76. Mod parent up! by oe1kenobi · · Score: 1

    LOL

    --
    -Richard L. Owens
  77. actually by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    I find, that in many cases, actually being able to see the "cell" towers is a reassurance that, if something were to go wrong, or if someone needed to call you, or someone at your damn work doesn't know how to reboot, you would have coverage, and consequently, would be available to take the call, just my humble opinion. Conversely, on the other hand, (yes redundant I know), in an urban/historic setting, it would be more prudent to obfuscate the "cell" towers.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  78. what bunch of total asshats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make a flash only website ?

  79. Mobile hysteria- media is to blame by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 1
    Of course, this is all being driven by media scare stories. The typical anti-mobile tower story regards a tower being built near an affluent school, with repeated claims for people to "think of the children." Never mind the zero risk of these things, and that the parents all use mobile phones themselves!!

    One article I read was about some woman who lived 100m from a tower, had lined her entire house with tinfoil (!) and complained that her pet mice were getting sick from "the radiation". In her mind, there was no difference between the tower and a nuclear blast... :P

    Here is a URL about media scares.. http://www.psandman.com/articles/chapman1.htm

  80. just hit the stop button by Garinwirth · · Score: 1

    That'll make it stop refreshing the site (obviously), and the Flash will load. Worked for me, at least.

    --

    My IP is 192.168.1.100 Hack it if you want.
  81. If flags are lit they can be kept out at night by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    Which is what I've seen at the cellular 'flagpoles' in our neighborhood. Three side by side by the way...

  82. Re:The Cock Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only fags drink coffee, fag

  83. Re:Cell phone tower? Shows how little you know. by jelle · · Score: 2

    "mysteriously develops a perfect blind-spot to whatever they're doing."

    Sounds like a genuine SEP-field (Somebody Else's Problem). Cloaking for the regular people...

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  84. It's a rock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One near my house is shaped like...
    a rock.
    a big eight foot tall rock. You actually have to look to notice it.

  85. I guess this marks the end of this discussion by alpg · · Score: 1

    There has been a little distress selling on the stock exchange.
    -- Thomas W. Lamont, October 29, 1929 (Black Tuesday)

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...

  86. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    We're mortal -- which is to say, we're ignorant, stupid, and sinful --
    but those are only handicaps. Our pride is that nevertheless, now and
    then, we do our best. A few times we succeed. What more dare we ask for?
    -- Ensign Flandry

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...

  87. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    A traveling salesman was driving past a farm when he saw a pig with three
    wooden legs executing a magnificent series of backflips and cartwheels.
    Intrigued, he drove up to the farmhouse, where he found an old farmer
    sitting in the yard watching the pig.
    "That's quite a pig you have there, sir" said the salesman.
    "Sure is, son," the farmer replied. "Why, two years ago, my daughter
    was swimming in the lake and bumped her head and damned near drowned, but that
    pig swam out and dragged her back to shore."
    "Amazing!" the salesman exlaimed.
    "And that's not the only thing. Last fall I was cuttin' wood up on
    the north forty when a tree fell on me. Pinned me to the ground, it did.
    That pig run up and wiggled underneath that tree and lifted it off of me.
    Saved my life."
    "Fantastic! the salesman said. But tell me, how come the pig has
    three wooden legs?"
    The farmer stared at the newcomer in amazement. "Mister, when you
    got an amazin' pig like that, you don't eat him all at once."

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...