Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Turns 5

As much as I avoid discussing Slashdot on Slashdot, I figured I'd just take a moment to say that Slashdot is 5 years old now. I've written a Journal Entry with a few more comments on the subject. And yes we know we jumped the shark about a week after we registered the domain name, but we just don't care! Here's hoping we're here 5 years from now doing exactly the same thing with the same folks. (As a side note, due to a data importing bug, we really don't know exactly when we made our debut, but I spent september 97 putting the site together... and when we went live, we didn't even have comments for the first week or so!)

220 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. And Now... by GypC · · Score: 5, Funny

    You get comments almost immediately! First Post!

    1. Re:And Now... by cecil36 · · Score: 2

      I remember a friend telling me that in the early days of /., you actually had a decent length of time to go to a new thread and write "First Post!" before anyone saw the thread and posted something more intelligent. You still have the problem with the trolls lingering around, posting their goatse.cx links. Anyone care for troll stew?

    2. Re:And Now... by dattaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the early days of slashdot, you had sometimes a few hours to get a first post. If it was early in the morning, you had to wait a while before everyone would wake up and the party would start. The first post back in those days was actually a funny joke. Nowdays its about as novel as crapflooding.

      Silly posts commenting on a funny article was the norm back in those days. Now its brutal competition among the pedantic keepers of wisdom and those who can google out gems of knowledge. Comments back then seem trollish today. But its still fun to see how much information thousands of people can pack into the comments section. Slashdot today is quite an impressive collection of concise facts following each article.

      Mispelled words and poor grammar are just tokens of nostolgia.

    3. Re:And Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Congrats on the five years, but you'd think that after five years, the Slashdot bigwigs would have figured out that you have to include not only the time and date on a story, but also the year. There's nothing more frustrating than doing a search on Slashdot, finding an interesting story, and not being sure whether it is from this year, last year, the year before last year, etc.....

    4. Re:And Now... by bedessen · · Score: 4, Funny

      but you'd think that after five years, the Slashdot bigwigs would have figured out that you have to include not only the time and date on a story, but also the year.

      Log on. User Preferences. Change date format to one that displays the year.

      Retard.

    5. Re:And Now... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      I would replace 'facts' with 'mistakes, misconceptions, and outright lies' ... but other than that, you're right.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  2. A Whole Week? by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    when we went live, we didn't even have comments for the first week or so!)

    A whole week before a "First Post" appeared. Bliss.

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
    1. Re:A Whole Week? by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I imagine the first first-post was something witty and insightful like:

      Testing, please ignore.

      First posts haven't improved much since then.

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    2. Re:A Whole Week? by Maddog_Delphi97 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm quite curious about myself.

      I would guess it would be somebody like Commander Taco or Cowboy Neal saying like "I hope this works" as a test of the slashdot code..

      The Wayback machine doesn't seem to bring up a "good copy" of it... did anybody have more luck with this?

    3. Re:A Whole Week? by roguerez · · Score: 4, Funny

      I found it, it goes like this:

      "*VFP!"

      * = Very First Post!

    4. Re:A Whole Week? by Maddog_Delphi97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoops, I meant to say that I'm curious about this, myself..

      This is the best I can do with the wayback machine on slashdot.org circa December 1997..

      http://web.archive.org/web/19971221012817/http:/ /s lashdot.org/

      But it only shows one article and the formatting seems screwed up... has anybody else had any more luck with this?

  3. The secret of ./'s success.... by idiotnot · · Score: 5, Funny

    They didn't buy a Super Bowl ad.

    1. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by pez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In all seriousness, I'd like to submit that the secret of /.'s success is this: users first.

    2. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by MSBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good one! That was definitely a contributing factor but as far as I can tell slashdot was one of the first sites on the web to get threaded discussions right. I mean the child-parent relationship between comments. Sounds pretty obvious but there are still a hell of a lot o half arsed discussion sites out there that have a flat layout for comments that makes it hard for the reader to follow the discussion. This and the fact that the crowd that slashdot caters to essentially comprises of avid internet users is definitely a big contributor to the s site's success.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    3. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      Super Bowl ads are to .com companies as the cover of Sports Illustrated is to atheletes: kiss of death.

      The irony is two sites that quite few people were sure would fail: slashdot and f**kedcompany.com are still chugging ahead (actually doing quite well), while 90% of .com sites have disappeared.

    4. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by Bahamuto · · Score: 4, Funny

      The irony is two sites that quite few people were sure would fail: slashdot and f**kedcompany.com [fuckedcompany.com] are still chugging ahead (actually doing quite well), while 90% of .com sites have disappeared.

      Well at least it was a good atempt to not use profanity on slashdot.

    5. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      My bad. Many apologies for the slip. Wasn't thinking about the html code being visible.

      Mod me down, down, down.

    6. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

      Nice User #

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
    7. Re:The secret of ./'s success.... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

      I guess it's just a matter of taste.

  4. Happy Birthday. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Happy Birthday Slashdot!

    You've taken five years away from my life and I want them back now!

    If not, the penguin gets it :P

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Happy Birthday. by mjwise · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've taken five years away from my life and I want them back now!

      *Hans Moleman voice* oh...I'd only waste them.

    2. Re:Happy Birthday. by troc · · Score: 3, Funny

      and with a user # of 476 we might even believe you ;)

      I remember when this was all just binary data.... oh wait, um.

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    3. Re:Happy Birthday. by Oestergaard · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a 6 digit UID I doubt slashdot took five years of *your* life ;)

    4. Re:Happy Birthday. by gaudior · · Score: 2

      Certainly it could. He may have lurked for a year or 2 like I did, before deciding too sign up.

    5. Re:Happy Birthday. by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

      The numbers you're working with are the post numbers, not the user numbers.

      I posted after him, so my post number is higher than his.

      I kid you not :)

  5. How many other websites have been around this long by qurob · · Score: 4, Interesting


    That are not corporate sites, like Microsoft.com, etc

    I'm talking...ad-supported.

  6. Happy birthday!!! by chrysalis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdot is the site I spent 90% on when I'm connected to the internet. It's the first thing I read every day.

    Slashdot is a source of info, of pure fun and of substancial debates.

    Congrats, Mista Taco!

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:Happy birthday!!! by batemanm · · Score: 5, Funny
      and of substancial debates

      Is this in a secret section that I don't have access to? :-)

    2. Re:Happy birthday!!! by MURL · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot is a source of info, of pure fun and of substancial debates.

      Debates, like how to spell substantial :)

      --
      --- Have you seen MURL?
    3. Re:Happy birthday!!! by Night+Goat · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's that "Apple" section of the site. I keep hearing about it, yet I don't know anyone who reads it! I think it's purely theoretical.

    4. Re:Happy birthday!!! by ElOttoGrande · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We should start a Slashdotter's anonymous (cowards?) club.

      I used to spend a lot less time on the net before I found Slashdot. Then I got this uncontrollable urge to read every story and most comments, every day! Although it's time I could be spending doing things, i'm not sure it's really wasting time either because there's plenty to be learned by observing discussions. I'd say my overall tech knowledge has definately improved a lot since i discovered /. Also, I don't think I would know about annoying things like the DMCA if it werent for /. nor would I know the difference between free and Free.

      You guys (cmdrtaco and crew) have done a great job getting relevant info out to the techies but without too much bullshit (cnet, wired, pcmag).

      Dupe posts, incorrect spelling, and search engines aside, /. is my favorite website for 2+ years now.

    5. Re:Happy birthday!!! by pokeyburro · · Score: 5, Funny

      substancial[sic] debates

      It's not what you're thinking. They're people debating while on some substance. Happens all the time. Carry on.

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
    6. Re:Happy birthday!!! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Funny
      Congrats, Mista Taco!

      It's Commander Taco. He didn't spend 6 years in Taco military school to be called Mista, ok?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    7. Re:Happy birthday!!! by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

      It's Commander Taco. He didn't spend 6 years in Taco military school to be called Mista, ok?

      I suppose on graduation day they rang the Taco Bell?

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  7. wow. by nuhonda · · Score: 4, Funny

    now i can out geek all the geeks i know, by telling them i have the same birthday as slashdot.

    woo-hoo.

    --
    (pretend there's something witty here)
    1. Re:wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are quite mature... for a five-year old.

    2. Re:wow. by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      Yup, but they just let users with UIDs under 500 read/post there. I've been smarting about that one for going on 5 years now (yes, I know the account system hasn't been in all that time, this is humor). Five years of this now, and I've been here since about two months in. Please, someone, shoot me.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:wow. by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      happy birthday!

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
  8. Slashdotted? by conduit4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since theres an article about Slashdot on Slashdot, does that mean Slashdot is going to get Slashdotted?

    1. Re:Slashdotted? by yobbo · · Score: 2

      Hopefully only the journal has been slashdotted...

    2. Re:Slashdotted? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Wouldn't that be autoslashdotting?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  9. Hmmm... by netphilter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On a related note, it would be interesting for someone to study the effects of /. on society, along the same lines as this story. I don't know about anyone else, but /. tends to be one of my greatest joys and frustrations all in one. The ability to voice your opinion in such an open manner can have a staggering effect, and I would be interested to see a study trying to quantify exactly what that effect is.

    --
    "Herbivores eat well cause their food never, ever runs."
    1. Re:Hmmm... by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I used to know where it was. Somewhere on microsoft.com, there was a list of key terms related to the web, and the "slashdot effect" was a key term. Yep, on Microsoft's webpage, it mentioned that the slashdot effect was when a page gets a lot of hits shortly after being posted on a popular news site. The term was thought to have come from a news site slashdot.org, or something...

      ~WIll

      --
      sig?
  10. Congratulations guys by SweenyTod · · Score: 2

    Great effort, to have surivived so long.

    Well done.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
  11. How many? by MouseR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many registered users are there anyhow? Any count on active heads as well?

    Sometimes, I feel like an old geezer having a user ID of 3264, when I see user IDs in the 6 digits range.

    1. Re:How many? by gaj · · Score: 2
      Heh. Yeah, looking at my u#, I can help but think about how many hours of my life I've spent posting and reading here.

      shit.

      I'm never getting that time back, am I?

      Oh, well ... you can't take it with you!

    2. Re:How many? by garcia · · Score: 2

      It was just recently pointed out to me that I had a 4 digit ID. It really meant nothing to me before then.

      I am happy to have been a part of something that has lasted this long. Watching it grow was something special.

      I guess I feel like an old-geezer. I complain like a 90 year old about repeat posts, assholish responses, and boring crap that doesn't belong on the front-page. But with a 4 digit ID that's my right god damn it ;)

      Have a happy birthday!

    3. Re:How many? by TheGreek · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I waited to register. Didn't see the point initially.

      Still not exactly sure what the point is.

    4. Re:How many? by troc · · Score: 2

      The question is, did you start at 1 or at 700,000 or somewhere in between.

      I feel a script coming on.

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    5. Re:How many? by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      I gotta say that's the closest usernum to mine that I have ever noticed. I normally don't even look at the usernum, but in this thread, well...

      Oh, and to slashdot goes the obligatory

      "Hippo birdie two ewes"

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  12. Is it five years only? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Feels like more, and I wasn't even here from the beginning (although this wasn't my first account).

    Five years of
    • AYBABTU
    • Can you imagine a beowolf cluster of these?
    • Natalie Portman naked and petrified
    • Hot grits (down your pants)
    • First post!
    • goatse.cx
    • Page widening
    • BSD is dying
    • Author Stephen King dead at 54
    Like I said, feels like more...
    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:Is it five years only? by SlamMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, you forgot

      "I'd use a mac, but it only has one button" :-)

      and

      "I got a website running on my coke can. Please slashdot it to a smoldering lump now"

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:Is it five years only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


      all the fake Bruce Perens accounts

    3. Re:Is it five years only? by Mark+Round · · Score: 2, Informative

      OOG the caveman. Sheer genius. I only got an account recently, but have been lurking for years - OOG's posts always cracked me up.

      It was the bizzare way that his posts would always be the most rational of the entire thread - but be expressed in a proto-JeffK ALL CAPS rant. And all that stuff about breaking heads - classic.

    4. Re:Is it five years only? by chegosaurus · · Score: 4, Funny

      re: the recent rediscovering of the first emoticon, is it possible to dig back through the archives and find out just who it was that first "imagined a beowulf cluster of these things"?

      Then, mod them down so damn far they can't even get into a damn computer room.

    5. Re:Is it five years only? by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny
      Excellent list, I would only add
      • IANAL, but...
      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:Is it five years only? by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 2

      OOG was good but my favorite was TinMan00. Delusional to the point of psychosis, neurotic as hell, vaugely off-topic but intensely concentrated, there was a certain genius in what he wrote that made me question reality (and truly consider investing in tin foil). I bet I used 20 mod points trying to get this guy up out of -1 purgatory... because a great deal of what he said could have been true and rational, if the universe was only slightly different (and how do we know that the way we see the universe is not just as delusional? A shared delusion is none the less distorted). He would say something poetic and fascinating, but he would then tack on a sig which mentioned alien hoaxes, cia conspiracies and gonadatrophins and get struck down as a troll.

      Insane to realize that I have been waiting for him to post again for almost two years now; I guess he is truly gone for good. Sigh... the torch has been passed; Physics Genius and others must bear the weight of TinMan's absence...

      --
      ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
      where the eye of his telescope has already been
    7. Re:Is it five years only? by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      Excellent list, I would only add:
      * IANAL, but...


      That far predates SlashDot. I searched Google's archive and came up with this first use of IANAL from January 1990, making it more than 7.5 years older than SlashDot. We should remember that before SlashDot there was Usenet and IRC. Much of the culture that is SlashDot has its origins on those older systems.

    8. Re:Is it five years only? by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2
      • The glorious MEEEEPPPT!


    9. Re:Is it five years only? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      "I got a website running on my coke can. Please slashdot it to a smoldering lump now"


      Oh man, now you blew my surprise... I got a website running on a smoldering lump.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Aren't we forgetting someting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We've posted nearly 30,000 stories. Deleted a million submissions. Served half a billion pages." ..and brought thousands of servers worldwide to their knees.

    1. Re:Aren't we forgetting someting? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 4, Funny

      >We've posted nearly 30,000 stories.

      20,000 are unique.

    2. Re:Aren't we forgetting someting? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      "We've posted nearly 30,000 stories. Deleted a million submissions. Served half a billion pages."

      Nad mangled morethan 10 billlion eazy to spel Englesh wurds makking whinny comets that kant bee modderratad down.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  14. And Taco said "Let there be comments." by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonder who got the first First Post?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:And Taco said "Let there be comments." by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 2, Informative

      you can actually find out... using the URL... the sid is the id of the story... but using the search feature, and sorting by date, the earliest story still archived appears to be here... (and it appears someone has found a security hole?)

      I dont know if the archive is completely accurate though... they mentioned data was lost...

      http://slashdot.org/search.pl?threshold=0&op=sto ri es&sort=1&start=28150

  15. Slashdots New Motto by AppyPappy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hauling Down And Stomping Websites For Over 5 Years.

    Every webmasters nightmare.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  16. Repeat? by smnolde · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for someone to submit this story in a week and it gets posted again.

  17. wow by tps12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's amazing to see how far we've come in such a short time. Five years ago we were all still using Linux 2.0, Microsoft was in court with Apple over the look and feel of Windows for Workgroups (well, some things never change, I guess), and Monica Lewinsky was in the papers every day (hey, not news for nerds, but we all live in real life, too...sometimes!).

    Many of us slashdotters have grown as well. From humble beginnings to the dizzying heights of the dot.com boom to the unemployment line (and mom and dad's house again). But it gives us more time to hack on Free Software, so bring it on!

    I'd just like to say "thanks" to Rob & the gang who put in long hours on /code and this site--there's nothing like it anywhere else on the web--and to the great community that makes /. so special. You guys are the best friends (and friends of friends!) a lone hacker could ask for, when he isn't debugging perl in vi!

    Here's to hoping the next half-decade is as good as the last. Cheers.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  18. Re:The secret of ./'s^H^H^H/.'s success.... by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Funny

    There. Better. Too much time in bash lately.

  19. Never forget your first Slashdotting? by BoBaBrain · · Score: 2

    Any record of the first site to be slashdotted?

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
  20. How about a "This day, five years ago"? by cra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With one of the top stories on the same date five years ago featured again.

    --
    This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for higher security.
  21. WayBackMachine by internet-redstar · · Score: 3, Informative
    Nice to have a look with www.archive.org to the old days of slashdot!

    Here is the oldest archived one

    Happy Birthday Slashdot!

  22. Will you be around in 5 years? by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Congrats! I sure hope that you last another 5 five years. But is the site profitable? Could it stand on its own? Could you guys buy it back if VA decides to shut it down?

  23. Well hell by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 2

    Seeing as how it looks like everyone will have to get a post in on this story, I might as well join the club.

    Just for old times sake, anyone still have that "History of the World According to Slashdot" post still floating around?

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
    1. Re:Well hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      from here
      OT: History of the World, part N+1 (Score:4, Funny)
      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 12, @08:12PM EDT (#25)

      2.5 million B.C.: OOG the Open Source Caveman develops the axe and releases it under the GPL. The axe quickly gains popularity as a means of crushing moderators' heads.

      100,000 B.C.: Man domesticates the AIBO.

      10,000 B.C.: Civilization begins when early farmers first learn to cultivate hot grits.

      3000 B.C.: Sumerians develop a primitive cuneiform perl script.

      2920 B.C.: A legendary flood sweeps Slashdot, filling up a Borland / Inprise story with hundreds of offtopic posts.

      1750 B.C.: Hammurabi, a Mesopotamian king, codifies the first EULA.

      490 B.C.: Greek city-states unite to defeat the Persians. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the Greeks "get it".

      399 B.C.: Socrates is convicted of impiety. Despite the efforts of freesocrates.com, he is forced to kill himself by drinking hemlock.

      336 B.C.: Fat-Time Charlie becomes King of Macedonia and conquers Persia.

      4 B.C.: Following the Star (as in hot young actress) of Bethelem, wise men travel from far away to troll for baby Jesus.

      A.D. 476: The Roman Empire BSODs.

      A.D. 610: The Glorious MEEPT!! founds Islam after receiving a revelation from God. Following his disappearance from Slashdot in 632, a succession dispute results in the emergence of two troll factions: the Pythonni and the Perliites.

      A.D. 800: Charlemagne conquers nearly all of Germany, only to be acquired by andover.net.

      A.D. 874: Linus the Red discovers Iceland.

      A.D. 1000: The epic of the Beowulf Cluster is written down. It is the first English epic poem.

      A.D. 1095: Pope Bruce II calls for a crusade against the Turks when it is revealed they are violating the GPL. Later investigation reveals that Pope Bruce II had not yet contacted the Turks before calling for the crusade.

      A.D. 1215: Bowing to pressure to open-source the British government, King John signs the Magna Carta, limiting the British monarchy's power. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy "gets it".

      A.D. 1348: The ILOVEYOU virus kills over half the population of Europe. (The other half was not using Outlook.)

      A.D. 1420: Johann Gutenberg invents the printing press. He is immediately sued by monks claiming that the technology will promote the copying of hand-transcribed books, thus violating the church's intellectual property.

      A.D. 1429: Natalie Portman of Arc gathers an army of Slashdot trolls to do battle with the moderators. She is eventually tried as a heretic and stoned (as in petrified).

      A.D. 1478: The Catholic Church partners with doubleclick.net to launch the Spanish Inquisition.

      A.D. 1492: Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be "India", but which RMS informs him is actually "GNU/India".

      A.D. 1508-12: Michaelengelo attempts to paint the Sistine Chapel ceiling with ASCII art, only to have his plan thwarted by the "Lameness Filter."

      A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).

      A.D. 1553: "Bloody" Mary ascends the throne of England and begins an infamous crusade against Protestants. ESR eats his words.

      A.D. 1588: The "IF I EVER MEET YOU, I WILL KICK YOUR ASS" guy meets the Spanish Armada.

      A.D. 1603: Tokugawa Ieyasu unites the feuding pancake-eating ninjas of Japan.

      A.D. 1611: Mattel adds Galileo Galilei to its CyberPatrol block list for proposing that the Earth revolves around the sun.

      A.D. 1688: In the so-called "Glorious Revolution", King James II is bloodlessly forced out of power and flees to France. ESR again triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy "gets it".

      A.D. 1692: Anti-GIF hysteria in the New World comes to a head in the infamous "Salem GIF Trials", in which 20 alleged GIFs are burned at the stake. Later investigation reveals that mayn of the supposed GIFs were actually PNGs.

      A.D. 1769: James Watt patents the one-click steam engine.

      A.D. 1776: Trolls, angered by CmdrTaco's passage of the Moderation Act, rebel. After a several-year flame war, the trolls succeed in seceding from Slashdot and forming the United Coalition of Trolls.

      A.D. 1789: The French Revolution begins with a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on the Bastille.

      A.D. 1799: Attempts at discovering Egyptian hieroglyphs receive a major boost when Napoleon's troops discover the Rosetta stone. Sadly, the stone is quickly outlawed under the DMCA as an illegal means of circumventing encryption.

      A.D. 1844: Samuel Morse invents Morse code. Cryptography export restrictions prevent the telegraph's use outside the U.S. and Canada.

      A.D. 1853: United States Commodore Matthew C. Perry arrives in Japan and forces the xenophobic nation to open its doors to foreign trade. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Japan finally "gets it".

      A.D. 1865: President Lincoln is 'bitchslapped.' The nation mourns.

      A.D. 1901: Italian inventor Guglielmo Marcoli first demonstrates the radio. Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich immediately delivers to Marcoli a list of 335,435 suspected radio users.

      A.D. 1911: Facing a break-up by the United States Supreme Court, Standard Oil Co. defends its "freedom to innovate" and proposes numerous rejected settlements. Slashbots mock the company as "Standa~1" and depict John D. Rockefeller as a member of the Borg.

      A.D. 1929: V.A. Linux's stock drops over 200 dollars on "Black Tuesday", October 29th.

      A.D. 1945: In the secret Manhattan Project, scientists working in Los Alamos, New Mexico, construct a nuclear bomb from Star Wars Legos.

      A.D. 1948: Slashdot runs the infamous headline "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN." Shamefaced, the site quickly retracts the story when numerous readers point out that it is not news for nerds, stuff that matters.

      A.D. 1965: Jon Katz delivers his famous "I Have A Post-Hellmouth Dream" speech, which stated: "I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the geeks of former slaves and the geeks of former slave geeks will be able to sit down together at the table of geeks... I have a dream that my geek little geeks will one geek live in a nation where they will not be geeked by the geek of their geek but by the geek of their geek."

      A.D. 1969: Neil Armstrong becomes the first man to set foot on the moon. His immortal words: "FIRST MOONWALK!!!"

      A.D. 1970: Ohio National Guardsmen shoot four students at Kent State University for "Internet theft".

      A.D. 1989: The United States invades Panama to capture renowned "hacker" Manual Noriega, who is suspected of writing the DeCSS utility.

      A.D. 1990: West Germany and East Germany reunite after 45 years of separation. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Germany "gets it".

      A.D. 1994: As years of apartheid rule finally end, Nelson Mandela is elected president of South Africa. ESR is sick, and sadly misses his chance to triumphantly proclaim that South Africa "gets it".

      A.D. 1997: Slashdot reports that Scottish scientists have succeeded in cloning a female sheep named Dolly. Numerous readers complain that if they had wanted information on the latest sheep releases, they would have just gone to freshsheep.net

      A.D. 1999: Miramax announces Don Knotts to play hacker Emmanuel Goldstein in upcoming movie "Takedown"

      A.D. 2000: On January 1st Microsoft NZ web site is first to announce that they have survived year 21000 bug. Slashdot community rejoices and lots of people swear the new millennium starts next year. ESR agrees that /. "gets it".

      A.D. 2001: Mozilla release is expected during this millennium, although plans are to integrate it with the upcoming linux-2.4.0-test92-pre17-ac3.1-25.9, which would mean a slight delay.

  24. so we want a timeline! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    whe it went live.
    when the first story that had >100 comments.
    when the first troll appeared.
    when the first post crap started.
    when the hot grits appeared.
    when we were blessed (should I use that word?) with goat-you-know-who..(ICK!)
    when the fist bout of taco-bashing started..

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:so we want a timeline! by diesel_jackass · · Score: 3, Funny

      i like the freudian slip of saying "fist" instead of "first" after you mention goatse.cx

      that is priceless.

  25. You forgot by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 3, Informative

    about the Lone Gunman fiasco.

    --
    >
  26. Submission acceptance rate by Plutor · · Score: 2

    We've posted nearly 30,000 stories. Deleted a million submissions.

    Wow, a 3% acceptance rate. Considering the signal to noise ratio in the discussion, that's pretty good!

  27. Slashdot is all grown up by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I remember back in the day when Slashdot would post stories about degenerate companies that used proxies and firewalls to block people from certain sites and when evil corporations would censor their bulletin boards to erase any dissension. It was a heady time, full of youth and idealism.

    But I'm glad to see Slashdot has matured since then. Now they realize that sometimes banning someone's netblock is just plain necessary when that person is posting non-factual information. If some innocent net neighbors are gagged for a few days, that's simply the price we pay for informational freedom. And deleting posts, while morally abhorrent, is the only way to keep ourselves from accidentally reading a 3 page long "taco snotting" FAQ.

    Thank you, Slashdot, for making the trains run on time.

    1. Re:Slashdot is all grown up by timeOday · · Score: 2

      One time I made a slashdot to NNTP gateway so I could read slashdot with a news reader. I went on vacation for the weekend, and due to a bug the bot (running on a university computer with decent bandwidth) got stuck in a loop hammering slashdot constantly. So they banned that IP. Surely there are some such instances where banning an IP is allowable?

  28. So how did YOU hear about slashdot? by glh · · Score: 2

    Just wondering how everyone heard about slashdot and got "hooked". I remember I first heard about it during my internship in the summer of '98. (So I guess that makes me a vetran slashdot reader). Anyway, a linux consultant geek came in and showed it to me. When/why/where did you first start reading slashdot?

    1. Re:So how did YOU hear about slashdot? by wishus · · Score: 2

      CmdrTaco had written some wharf apps for AfterStep 1.0, and I found /. while looking for those. It must have been late '97 or '98 sometime. I didn't pay it much attention until after college, when I started to care about the news a little more than I used to.

  29. First Posting On the Wayback Machine (Correct) by MarkedMan · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Here is a link to the first posting available on the Wayback Machine. Wayback

    It is from Dec 21st, 1997 and talks about how Netscape may be in danger from Internet Explorer. Can CmdrTaco pick 'em or what?

  30. jumped the shark? by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
    Please excuse me, I'm just an ignorant non-native english speaking buffoon, but what the hell does "jumping the shark" entail, and how did slashdot jump the shark?

    Other than some ridiculous mental imagery (jumping on sharks? eh? *shrug*) I have nothing with this metaphor/proverb/whatchamacallit. Please clue me in.

    1. Re:jumped the shark? by nagora · · Score: 5, Informative
      See this link for what "jumping the shark" means.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  31. No Slashdot on Slashdot? by ari_j · · Score: 2

    Why do you avoid discussing Slashdot on Slashdot? Are you afraid of getting Slashdotted?

  32. Slashdot Birthday -- Drop in productivity by umStefa · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's Interesting, that corresponds with a slow drop in productivity of the Tech sector...

    Hmmm

    --
    Technology is most abused by the very people it was created to help
    1. Re:Slashdot Birthday -- Drop in productivity by torpor · · Score: 2

      No kidding, this is actually serious. /. probably had a *loooot* more to do with the .com busts than most people imagine. In every major company I've consulted for, for the last 4 or so years, there has been a /. reading geek in the midst...

      Conspiracy? I think not.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  33. Then I zone out for a while by md17 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Well, I generally come in at least fifteen minutes late, ah, I use the side door--that way Lumberg can't see me, heh--after that I sorta space out for an hour.
    Yeah, I just read Slashdot, but it looks like I'm working. I do that for probably another hour after lunch too, I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work.

    Thanks Slashdot! Happy B-Day from all the Peter Gibbon's in this world!

    1. Re:Then I zone out for a while by back_pages · · Score: 2

      This is exactly how my work week goes, except I come in 30-35 minutes late through the side door. I just finished writing 8 lines of code that I had completed in my head at least 8 days ago, and I figure I'm done for the week.

  34. Slashdot Exhibits? by dr_dank · · Score: 2

    How about a series of links highlighting great moments in Slashdot history?

    * The first "First Post"
    * First Linux vs. Windows vs. Mac vs. vi vs. emacs flamewar
    * First post lamenting broken business models
    * First post by Wil Wheaton
    * Posts removed by the Scientologists
    * Jon Katz making sense in the pre-September 11 and pre-columbine world.

    Any more suggestions?

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Slashdot Exhibits? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      first posts of:
      Hot grits, Natalie Portman, goatse.cx

      The great trolls:
      Ogg the caveman (or was it oog), Haiku guy. SOmeoen can make this list longer

  35. Argh! (was Re:jumped the shark? ) by CoolVibe · · Score: 2

    ...and of course, happy birthday slashdot! (yeah yeah, reply to myself, sorry... Can't believe I forgot to congratulate the dot)

    1. Re:Argh! (was Re:jumped the shark? ) by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Wait. Are you talking about the dot?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  36. What you mean to say, of course, by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 2

    is that you treasure your little four-dig. "Why... in my day..."

    It's this weird unspoken thing that low-digit users here are like elders. Their posts carry that little extra weight, like the withered old geek has just stood up at the town meeting, or something equally rediculous.

    Anyway, if anyone needs me, I'll be in a bar, trying out my new /. come on lines. Course my karma's excellent, baby. I ain't no troll. Now come here for a sec, you've gotta click here to log in.

    1. Re:What you mean to say, of course, by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      My, those pants looks like they are in need of some hot grits, baby!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  37. 5th BDay party in AA? by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

    I think for keeping Taco gainfully employed she should buy us (each, not collectively, it is cold and flu season) a beer at the next /. meetup in Ann Arbor!

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  38. Three years and counting.... by richlb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I started scanning /. about three years ago. I had just started with a new company, and no other company I had worked for previously allowed lowly employees like me internet access. With slow dial-up at home, this data pipe into my work computer was amazing.

    I found /. through some mention in a Canadian magazine I had purchased at an airport. Now, I'm not techno-geek, but I'm also not a techno-phobe. Yes, I have Windows. But yes, I run Mozilla. I'm kind of "middle of the road" when it comes to computers.

    I've always found the content on /. to be at the very least interesting, and at the very most informative and entertaining. I've learned a lot about computers, programming and technology through this site. But I've also learned a lot about law, public opinion and other diverse topics.

    I may have missed the first two years, but I'll read for the next two to make up. Although I may not always agree with /. posters, it's frequently the most stimulating thing I read all day.

    Thanks, /. and the /. community.

    SIDE NOTE -- because of /., I've managed to use a lot of what I read to my advantage. frequently, my coworkers will come to me for problems instead of bothering with our slowwwwww IT dept!

  39. Congrats! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 2
    You know Slashdot's been around a while when I can look at my UID and feel like a 133t old-timer...:-)

    Well done, everyone -- well done.

  40. Happy Birthday 2 U . . by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 2

    I guess that makes /. a Libra. . .

    How many years is that in Internet time?

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  41. Golden Age by baldass_newbie · · Score: 5, Funny

    we didn't even have comments for the first week or so!

    Is this the 'Golden Age of Slashdot' that I hear so much about?

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  42. /. doesn't delete posts by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    And deleting posts, while morally abhorrent, is the only way to keep ourselves from accidentally reading a 3 page long "taco snotting" FAQ.

    Slashdot generally does not delete comments. Among over 4 million comments posted after the moderation system began, fewer than a half-dozen have been deleted, mostly for flagrant copyright infringement. Other than that, you can get 99.999% of everything posted, even the trash, by reading at -1.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  43. Karma Whoring by iapetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a link to the site. Strange they didn't provide one in the article. Perhaps they're afraid it'll get Slashdotted?

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  44. No backup ?? by tmark · · Score: 2

    due to a data importing bug, we really don't know exactly when we made our debut,

    You mean you didn't backup your database before you did your import ??? And what kind of import could ruin the imported data, anyways ??

    Note to self: never take sysadmin'ing advice from Taco.

  45. First usenet-posting mentioning /. by Goenk · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first usenet posting (or at least the first i could find) that mentions slashdot seems to be this one dated Nov. 11 - 1997. That seems to be fairly soon after the release IMO.

    --
    Incompetence Floats
  46. five years of lost discussions by The+Pim · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Remember how excited we got about google restoring old usenet archives? It's ironic, then, that old slashdot threads are all but lost. You can find and browse them only with some trouble, and searching is almost hopeless. (Have you ever wanted to find an old post of yours? How successful were you?)

    Early slashdot is just as valuable as early usenet, and I think we need to find a way to make it accessible. Isn't there some NNTP gateway code somewhere? Could slashdot export month-old stories for google groups to pick up? I bet the google guys would even help develop a new protocol if necessary.

    Most valuable of all would be to establish a mechanism that other web discussion boards could use, and encourage them to make their archives available. Imagine the power of all your favorite weblogs searchable through one interface. This would be a boon for users and net historians alike.

    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
    1. Re:five years of lost discussions by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2

      "It's ironic, then, that old slashdot threads are all but lost"

      Try a google search on your ID or sig.

    2. Re:five years of lost discussions by The+Pim · · Score: 2
      Try a google search on your ID or sig.

      It's a start, but just that. Google appears to index only full discussions, not individual posts (not sure why, but I've never seen a google hit go to an individual post). So keywords match against all posts (maybe google will prefer hits near your ID on the page...). And you can't filter by all the criteria google groups gives you. A date range is especially useful. What would really rock is to search by author, story keywords, and comment keywords. You know: what was that post I made last year about device drivers, in a story about Linux?

      --

      The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  47. Chips, Dips, Taco and the Dot by pez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who else remembers the days of Chips n Dips? :-)

    As one of the first /. readers, I have to say it's been incredible watching this site grow into what it has become. Congratulations Taco and the rest of the crew; you have not only created a wonderful destination for nerds interested in stuff that matters, but you have also at least in some part created an entire genre of sites. For this, we all thank you.

    1. Re:Chips, Dips, Taco and the Dot by Diabolical · · Score: 2

      I do.. Long before /. became /. is used to visit Taco's pages. Mostly because of his applets...

    2. Re:Chips, Dips, Taco and the Dot by Phaid · · Score: 2

      Ditto. I remember first finding Chips and Dips when I followed a link from some applets site, since I was looking for a nice mixer type app for my Afterstep desktop.

      I don't remember how long I waited to register after the account system was put into place, but it couldn't have been more than a day. I wasn't really thrilled about it at first, but I suppose even back then there were so many posters that things were getting out of hand without some kind of moderation in place.

      Oh well. The ironic thing is that these days, I'm back to posting and reading UseNet far more than I ever do here.

      Still, happy birthday.

  48. I've been here 4 years or so... by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Back when I was running Red Hat 4.2. I have 1300 comments (this is 1301). 1300. At approx 1 to 2 minutes per comment that's 20 to 40 hours spent commenting on slashdot. Shit. I want that day back!

  49. Happy birthday slashdot! by miffo.swe · · Score: 3

    Thanks goes to the people that puts a golden lining on the internet! Slashdot is the best site in the world for techies that wants to know.

    I wonder just how much Microsoft admires /. and envy it?

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  50. Luck be a crossdresser tonight by Graymalkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Funny how this appeared just above the "what is the net doing to you" article. That is some perverse synchronicity.

    I don't even remember my first post or when exactly it was I first registered. I used to think having a UID above 10,000 made me a Jonny come lately. Now I'm like the girzzled old man that shoos little kids off his front lawn. Maybe from now on I'll use a hose instead of my cane.

    Windows still sucks, Linux is still in beta, AMD makes chips worth buying, 3Dfx is no more, AOL is spelled EVIL, Apple is cool again, Be is no longer cool (sorry OpenBeOS guys), Netscape is abbriviated EVIL, Internet Explorer still sucks, Lord of the Rings was finally made into a movie, The Phantom Menace blew goats, Natalie Portman is still hot despite her lack of petrification, apparently all my base are belong to someone, the internet is now aplace where evil cool people hang out, being a geek still gets you beat up, slashdot has advertisements, Rob STILL doesn't acknowlege story submitters and user comments as being important in the slightest to the popularity of slashdot, Stephen King has died several times at various ages, and even I have imagined a Beowulf cluster of naked and petrified Natalie Portmans pouring hot grits down my pants.

    It's been a strange five years. If I didn't like the ride can I get a refund?

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:Luck be a crossdresser tonight by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ooo! If Stephen King is dead, (1) I see possiblities (2) ???? (3) profit!

      Hello, I am Donald King, the nephew of the late author Stephen King. I am writing to you as someone that I have been told I can trust. When he died in a plane crash/junta/falling ice block, Steven King left $66 million (US SIXTY-SIX MILLION DOLLARS ONLY) in a bank account... (Insert the rest of the Nigerian scam. I'm sure most people know it by heart or some other organ of their body.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  51. My First Account by waldoj · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    In early November of 1998, I spent the better part of an hour attempting to make an account on Slashdot. I just couldn't make it work. No matter what username that I put in, and I tried some weird shit, it would complain that "a user already exists with that user name or email address." I knew it couldn't be the e-mail address, what with my highly-personalized address, so I e-mailed Rob asking what was what.

    Well, Rob wrote me back in something like 60 seconds, suggesting that perhaps I already had an account. "Balderdash," I thought, I would certainly know if I'd made an account on a site or not. I'd never even heard of Slashdot until a week previously. But I went to the site, entered my e-mail address in the lost-password form and, lo and behold, I'd made an account at some point. God only knows when.

    So my question is this: who has a user ID close to mine, and when did you make your account? I'd love to check my datebook for around that time and see if I can conjure up when I would have first read /. and when I would have made an account. Sometimes I think I've sleptwalked through entire years of my life.

    -Waldo Jaquith

    1. Re:My First Account by singularity · · Score: 2

      Apparently I first started reading Slashdot in September of 1998. Of course, my UID is significantly lower than yours (when Slashdot seems to have UIDs pushing 600,000 it is all relative, though). I created my account on 3 September 1998 (based on the "your password is" email). I had been reading for several weeks prior to that, though.

      I have absolutely no idea how I first heard about Slashdot. I think it was either a link from a web site or a mention in Usenet. I seem to think it was a link from a web site, something like www.macintouch.com or something.

      My big question is how many of us "old timers" (UID less than 5000 or so) there are still active.

      Pe-moderation, pre-Hot grits, pre-First post, and so on.

      [Sorry, Waldo, you just did not sign up soon enough to qualify as an "old timer" to me... grin...]

      That means I have been reading Slashdot for over four years now... Wow. Feels even longer than that.

      I work with high school kids, and they are always amazed that this "old timer" not only has such a low UID, but also has a Copyleft Slashdot shirt from back when the profits went to the Slash crew (pre-Andover).

      Yeah, I can hang with the best of them...

      In other news, I am wondering when Taco will fix the one big problem I have always had - the inability to back through your old comments on your user.pl page. It shows the 24 most recent, but searching for ones older than that seems almost impossible.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    2. Re:My First Account by Redline · · Score: 2

      Pre-moderation, pre-Hot grits, pre-First post, and so on.

      But not pre-troll. I remember when the user accounts became available, I wasn't going to sign up. I usually just read, not posted, so I didn't need one. But someone said something (wish I could remember what) that irked me so bad I just had to log in to make a scathing reply. So I wouldn't even be here if it weren't for the nascent slashdot troll community.
      Thanks slashdot! Five more years!

    3. Re:My First Account by Nate+Fox · · Score: 2

      I was similar: I waited a bit before getting my account. maybe a week? but that was when 100 posts was a BIG story, before moderation (as you say), metamoderation, karma (and the act of whoring), Signal11 (remember him? with like 270+ karma).

      This was before we had the option of html/extrans, filters on posted comments. I think nested and flat modes were in there from the beginning tho.

      Before ads.

      Before Timothy, Michael, and all the other guys. Just Taco and Hemos. They didnt spell check their posts then, either.

      Back when linux would get mentioned in an article somewhere - that would get a posting on the front page ('theres an article on CNet and they mention linux!').

      Then Slashdot would get mentioned somewhere (wired I think). Then it got famous. and the slashdot effect became what it is now.

      And these guys with user accounts of #100,000 think they remember the 'good ol days'. Damn whippersnappers.

    4. Re:My First Account by "Zow" · · Score: 2

      I got my account (see number above) on October 18, 1998. I remember that I waited a while (like a couple months maybe) after the account system started as I really didn't have a compelling reason to get an account. In any case, extrapolating from the data point provided by singularity, it would seem that your UID is consistent with one issued in November 1998. My guess is that something failed when you first registered, so it displayed some sort of error even though it added you to the database. Make sense?

      -"Zow"

    5. Re:My First Account by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2
      I remember that I registered my /. account for some particular reason. There was some feature I wanted, that I could only get if I had an account. I don't remember what it was that made me register, though I'm glad to sport a 4-digit UID now :) I too would like to have a copy of my first registered Slashdot post.

      If only a I could linearly derate a comment's score based on the magnitude of the UID...

    6. Re:My First Account by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Not all of the "old timers" have such low UIDs. I started reading Slashdot about June 1998. I remember being appalled at the thought of signing up for an account. Eventually, when moderation took hold, I resigned myself to the fact that I would have to register, but that wasn't until quite a bit later.

      Of course, Slashdot was going downhill at the time and I lost interest for a bit. Now, that time is a comparative golden age.

      As for your comment about being able to see older comments, I too would like that. This particular discussion makes me wonder when I made my first post, so to speak.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    7. Re:My First Account by Soko · · Score: 2

      I know it was November 1998 when I created my account - so you were definately before then. I signed up right after the Halloween documents were released by ESR. IIRC, it was a story about those documents on one of the IDC websites that provided the link to /. I've been around here ever since.

      At the time, those documents shook me - made me doubt that Microsoft was less about technology and more about business. To be honest, at first I was all fire and brimstone about how "You Linux guys have such a superiority complex!". However, the seeds of doubt were still germinated by the discussions I read on /. I learned that there were definite reasons why one would use a system not controlled by a single entity, and came to realise the truth that any business interest, left to it's own devices, is devoid of some of the best human qualities - charity, altruism and community. Then Microsoft pulled WinNT support for my beloved Alphas, and I was a convert. (Linux on Alphas still rocks, BTW.) Since then, I have learned that business is not necessarily about better technology, it is all about the bottom line. I am not a socialist, but it still makes me weep to see people look up to a company, rather than an individual, as thier chosen hero and role model.

      Anyways, thanks all of you low UIDers for hanging around, and to Rob for providing a site to do so.

      Soko

      P.S. - Anyone hear from Signal11 lately? ;-)

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  52. \.'s secret weapon by kalifa · · Score: 2
    \. was born in summer 1997: exactly the same time as the desktop wars.

    Now, that's good timing for a business.

  53. Est. 1997 by Coplan · · Score: 5, Funny
    Over 2 million First Posts.
    Over 3 million servers stress tested.
    Over 2 million servers successfully slashdotted.

    Welcome to the home of the 1337 H4X0RS!

  54. All -1's have been archived since 2.x upgrade by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slashdot doesn't archive -1 posts.

    Slashdot has archived comments that had been moderated to -1 since the upgrade to Slashcode 2.x. In fact, the story about the 2.x upgrade is an example of an "archived" discussion with some extant -1 comments. So is Oracle Breakable After All, where more than half of the comments are -1 (due to The Post). It's true that -1 comments before the 2.x upgrade were discarded, but more than half the comments in Slashdot's database have been posted on 2.x. Not even the editors can change that.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  55. Deeper Analysis by Hard_Code · · Score: 5, Funny
    And now for some deeper analysis, courtesy of the University of Maine:

    What are 5-Year-Olds Like?
    How I Move:
    • I enjoy activities requiring hand skills.
    • I draw a recognizable person.
    • I am skilled and accurate with simple tools.
    • I can sit still for brief periods.
    • I enjoy jumping, running and skipping.
    • I have adult-like posture in throwing and catching.
    • I have great physical drive.
    • I like dancing, am rhythmic and graceful.
    • I sometimes roughhouse and fight.
    • I am well coordinated.
    How I Think:
    • I am curious about everything.
    • I am ready for short trips into the community.
    • I know my family name and address.
    • I talk clearly about my ideas.
    • I am self-centered about my ideas.
    • I like to be busy making something.
    • I make a plan before starting a project.
    • My attention span is 12 to 28 minutes long.
    • I can carry over play interests for more than one day.
    • I play on a realistic level in dramatic play.
    • I readily use complete sentences.
    • I count 10 objects.

    How I Get Along:
    • I am becoming poised and self-confident.
    • I copy adult behavior and act grown-up.
    • I am aware of rules and define them for others.
    • I play in groups of two to five children.
    • I am less competitive than at age 4.
    • I am sensitive to teasing and get hurt feelings easily.
    • I like the companionship of adults.
    • I have to be right.
    • I am sociable and like to visit.
    • I may get wild, silly and giggly.


    Crafted with love by a fellow slashdotter! :)
    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:Deeper Analysis by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I readily use complete sentences.

      I guess you're new here. Welcome to slashdot, or as we like to say "Welcom too SlasDhot".

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
  56. Re:Jump the shark by SweenyTod · · Score: 2

    It means something like 'when we started to go downhill', as in get worse.

    Think of your favorite TV show, and when it was getting boring... And presto! Something happens, like somebody dies or a "special" story line is run. It's generally a sign that whatever it is you're doing has just past its use by date.

    I don't know exactly where the expression came from - somebody once said it was to do with Happy Days (the tv show), where the Fonz jujmped over a bunch of sharks, and the show was never quite as good afterwards. I'm not sure if that's true though.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
  57. Irksome by AntiFreeze · · Score: 2
    I've been reading slashdot since damn near the beginning. Hell, I didn't even bother getting an account for a few months because the norm of posters were anonymous cowards -- and most had quite interesting things to say. It's a shame that's changed so much since the early days. Inevitable, but still a shame.

    In fact, I wrote a short rant the other night (literally) in my journal about almost this very subject.

    Although my posting goes through short intermittent spurts, I still read slashdot quite frequently, scanning it for anything which piques my interest.

    The other amazing thing about slashdot is all the clone sites it appears to have influenced. To all you people who compain about slashdot, or its editorial style, I'm sure you can find some little site inspired by slashdot which you actually will like. I think that's a pretty impressive legacy.

    --

    ---
    "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

  58. Congrats for five years. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    To everyone who has helped run Slashdot: congratulations for five years of often thought-provoking reading.

    Though of course your site has a pro-Linux/OpenBSD/FreeBSD stance (which of course means it's antagonistic towards Microsoft), you have to admit other articles on other aspects of technology posted on this website have made for interesting reading, especially the innumerable commentaries posted by various readers of this web page. It is all the more amazing considering that your site is probably one of the longest-lasting web sites on the Internet not related to a business enterprise.

    I salute Slashdot for five years of great work, and have best wishes for many more years of success.

    1. Re:Congrats for five years. by British · · Score: 2

      I found the most entertaining articles on here are ones that don't drone on with the Linux/MS war. For example, there was one about Pinball several months ago worth reading.

      Also, the only John Katz article I read front to back was on the book "Catch me if you can", which I actually went out and bought. Also bought a ZipZap for fun too.

  59. Happy Birthday by rafa · · Score: 2
    It's been a long time since I stumbled upon Chips 'n Dips, and started down the road to /. addiction.

    I've spent far too much time here for my own good, but I've enjoy pretty much all of it. Thanks for a great site. Keep up the good job.

    --
    [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
  60. I'm interested by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
    Slashdot posts approximately 10-15 stories a day. It takes you 25 minutes to reject 30 stories. Lets round that up to a nice easy 1 minute per story.

    Now if we assume there are 7 working hours in a day. That means that if you're working on nothing else then you'll have rejected 420 news articles during that time.

    So my question is, do you actually get 420+ news articles a day? If not, what on earth do you do with the rest of your time?

    (Granted the odd article for NewsForge, but, is that it?)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:I'm interested by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      I sure hope that accepting/rejecting stories is not the ONLY task they have. There is constant maintenance of servers, work on Slash, traipsing around to conferences, etc.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  61. happy birthday by shd99004 · · Score: 2

    I haven't been here since the start, I came here back in 2000 I think. One of my favorite sites on the internet.

    --
    Will work for bandwidth
  62. Double post! by gpinzone · · Score: 2

    <joke>I seem to remember a post about a year ago about a slashdot birthday! When will the double posts end?!</joke>

  63. One thing I'm curious about... by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Are the ads and subscriptions covering the cost?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  64. Why do no stories display the year? by wackybrit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My only main quibble with Slashdot is why aren't YEARS SHOWN ON STORIES!?

    It's great seeing 'October 01'.. but what year is that? Why do Slashdot stories not display the year? It's a pain in the ass when you search for an old story, but all you get is the date and not the year.

    Am I the only one who noticed this yet?

    1. Re:Why do no stories display the year? by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 4, Informative
      My only main quibble with Slashdot is why aren't YEARS SHOWN ON STORIES!?

      It's great seeing 'October 01'.. but what year is that? Why do Slashdot stories not display the year? /i>
      It's not the default, but they easily can. Go to: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=edithome and select a "Date/Time Format" that includes the year.
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    2. Re:Why do no stories display the year? by schlach · · Score: 2

      My only main quibble with Slashdot is why aren't YEARS SHOWN ON STORIES!?

      It's cool, go to your 'prefs' page, the setting at the top is "Date/Time Format", a pull down you can use to select different formatting options. Pick one with a year.

      I remember a couple years ago I had the exact same beef, and figured more people would be bitching about it if it couldn't be changed, so poked around til I found out. =) Judging from your moderation, I'd say it's a fairly common grudge.

      cheers

    3. Re:Why do no stories display the year? by jdavidb · · Score: 2

      I've got the same gripe. The best format I could get was 10:21 AM -- Tuesday October 01 2002.

    4. Re:Why do no stories display the year? by Perdo · · Score: 2

      All stories include a day.

      Put the whole date into Google including the day.

      Like Monday October 12 reveals that date occurred in 1998.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  65. Re:And Now... (OT) by GypC · · Score: 2

    No, that's Shel Silverstein.

    I would attribute it as such, but there's not enough space in a Slashdot sig.

  66. Happy Birthday! by farrellj · · Score: 2

    Gee, Slashdot's membership has certainly grown since I joined...It's been a great ride, and I hope it continues for a long time! Thanx for all the work over the years!

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  67. Where do new users come from? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    There should be a Slashdot poll in the manner of those after-sales questionnaires: 'how did you find out about Slashdot?'.

    Myself, I started reading after Netscape's announcement that Navigator would be free software (five years later, and they still haven't shipped a version that runs fast enough to use :-P). That was following a link from the Wine newsgroup.

    I'd be particularly interested in the split between those who were inducted into Slashdot by their friends or colleagues ('JOIN USSS...') and those who just found the site browsing the web. And of that latter group, how many followed explicit links and how many came from search engines?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  68. Who's still around from the "early" days? by Ricdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As you can see from my user id number, I've been around here for a while. And I didn't even get an account for a while... Anyone with a lower id still around? What do *you* remember from 5 years ago?

    Reminiscing for a minute: Remember when...

    * the Enlightenment window manager was still using DR (development release) in the versions?
    * having to download 50 different graphics libraries to install Enlightenment?
    * the first time someone told you to run "ldconfig -v" ?
    * the first time someone told you to run "rm -rf /, as root" (or similar destructive advice)?
    * a time before GNOME vs. KDE, because there was neither?
    * you were the only kid on your block (in your school, at your job) who knew what an mp3 was?
    * big companies announcing Linux support was a big deal?
    * when XFree86 supported about 10 video cards?

    What else?

    --
    How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    1. Re:Who's still around from the "early" days? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      the Enlightenment window manager was still using DR (development release) in the versions?

      I remember running E on my NT workstation! Don't remember how I did this, but it was most certainly the fault of Slashdot.

      Of course I also remember running MkLinux DR1 on a PowerCC Macintosh Clone at least a year BSE (Before Slashdot Era)

    2. Re:Who's still around from the "early" days? by goon · · Score: 2

      >Anyone with a lower id still around?

      yep.

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    3. Re:Who's still around from the "early" days? by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 2
      They should add a sort option "Lowest user id first"... :-)

      Hm, come to think of it, this might actually be useful!

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    4. Re:Who's still around from the "early" days? by tweakt · · Score: 2
      when XFree86 supported about 10 video cards?
      EXCEPT the Wietek P9100 (Diamond Viper Pro Video), which, for the longest time, it never supported. I know this because my friend had this card, pretty funny... not to him though...
  69. /. memories... by ellem · · Score: 2

    Ahh I remember it well.

    Linux World NYC, a bunch of fat guys answering questions on a Jabba The Hut set. Me wandering over to FreeBSD and seeing the BSD Grrls in red latex. Me posting rants about the FreeBSD grrls in red latex. Getting modded up for my:

    LaTex it's not just for text processing anymore

    post.

    But what I want to know is:

    How many first posts?

    How many Beowulf Clusters?

    How many hot grits down Natalie Portman's pants?

    How many polls w/o CowboyNeal?

    How many karma points do I really have?

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  70. Re:jump the wha? by ellem · · Score: 2
    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  71. break out the party favors! by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2
    *nix:
    perl -e'$\=" ";print ((qw/happy birthday to you , dear slashdot.../,$/)[$_])for(7,0..4,7,0..4,7,0..1,4..7 ,0..3,7)'

    DOS:
    perl -e"$\=' ';print ((qw/happy birthday to you , dear slashdot.../,$/)[$_])for(7,0..4,7,0..4,7,0..1,4..7 ,0..3,7)"

    Next verse of "How old are you now?..." coming in version 2.0. See stores for details

  72. Re:How many other websites have been around this l by krs-one · · Score: 2

    TDN - toolshed.down.net

    ToolShed.Down.Net, its the #1 fan site for the band TOOL, and its been around for 7 years, and I don't even think its ad supported.

    -Vic

  73. slashdotted by Frac · · Score: 2

    the site in question seems to be heavily slashdotted, so here's a mirror:

    Slashdot Turns 5
    Posted by CmdrTaco on 09:00 AM October 1st, 2002
    from the break-out-the-birthday-cake dept.

    As much as I avoid discussing Slashdot on Slashdot, I figured I'd just take a moment to say that Slashdot is 5 years old now. I've written a Journal Entry with a few more comments on the subject. And yes we know we jumped the shark about a week after we registered the domain name, but we just don't care! Here's hoping we're here 5 years from now doing exactly the same thing with the same folks. (As a side note, due to a data importing bug, we really don't know exactly when we made our debut, but I spent september 97 putting the site together... and when we went live, we didn't even have comments for the first week or so!)

  74. Coincidence? by RareHeintz · · Score: 2
    Am I the only one who finds it amusing that this story was posted immediately after this one?

    OK,
    - B

  75. Doing the same thing in 5 years by fobbman · · Score: 2

    "Here's hoping we're here 5 years from now doing exactly the same thing with the same folks."

    We'll accuse you of a repost of old news then, too.

  76. Sounds great! by sehryan · · Score: 2

    "Here's hoping we're here 5 years from now doing exactly the same thing with the same folks"

    YES! Another 5 years of bad spelling and duplicate stories. Long live /.!

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  77. How about adding the year? by Deven · · Score: 2

    Since Slashdot has been around for years, and the stories are archived for years, isn't it about time to actually display the year in the dateline of the story?

    This story already says "Tuesday October 01, @09:00AM" -- if we're spelling out the day of the week and the month, surely we can afford a few extra characters to identify the year for posterity? "Tuesday October 01, 2002, @09:00AM" isn't that much longer, after all...

    (As an aside, it also looks a little odd to pad the day of the month with a leading zero when words are spelled out in full...)

    --

    Deven

    "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  78. Reformatting dates by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    This link provides you with an dropdown of alternate ways of displaying a date. Enjoy!

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  79. Remembrance by red_dragon · · Score: 2

    For old time's sake, I shall now recall one of Slashdot's very first trolls:

    MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPT !!!

    Oh, Glorious Meept, where in bloody hell are you?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  80. New year's resolution by ortholattice · · Score: 2

    Perhaps it's time to Quit Slashdot.org Today! Excerpt: I have friends who were once tremendously productive programmers, until they started reading Slashdot. Then, the endless stream of links, updated a dozen times a day no less (so you don't go once a day to get your fix; instead, you keep a window open and hit reload every twenty minutes or so), steadily seduced them, until they eventually became babbling idiots, dribbling saliva from the corners of their mouths, ranting on the forums about the relative merits of Karma Whores and Anonymous Cowards.

  81. Happy Birthday and thanks for a unique site... by SwedishChef · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh sure... it's not so unique any more but that's because you guys turned back all the code for the site to the community so there are Slashdot clones all over the place. When I first stumbled across /. it was truly unique. It was the first interactive site I found that gave Linux users a place to come to for news about an OS that back then was pretty much unheard of. And then, miracle of the Web, we could even add to the articles!!!

    "Unheard of in 1997?" you ask. Let me give you an example. In 1997 my daughter was a sophomore at the local community college. In a computer course she was given an assignment to write a report on an operating system that was not made by Microsoft.

    Since I was her Dad... and I had used Linux since 1993, she wrote her report on Linux and I helped her. She did a great job but only received a B. The instructor wrote across her paper, "marked down because Linux is a nonexistent system". The instructor thought she had meant to write the report about Unix and got the name wrong!

    So if we've been pushy here on our forum we have good reason. Even now the rest of the media pretty much doesn't understand the Linux movement. They don't understand the "support" issue (I suppose hiring competent people is too much to ask). They don't understand the technical issues (two MS programmers were once given credit for "inventing" symbolic links). And, they don't understand the social issues (we're a community, dammit!).

    I am proud to be a Linux advocate and a /. user. And I want Slashdot to know it. Happy birthday.

    And thanks. :)

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Happy Birthday and thanks for a unique site... by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 2
      The instructor wrote across her paper, "marked down because Linux is a nonexistent system". The instructor thought she had meant to write the report about Unix and got the name wrong!
      Did you correct the guy?
  82. Re:Going down hill!? by nagora · · Score: 2
    I would also suggest this link as a good place to look for info about the term.

    That's what I was going to do too, but there isn't an actual reference on the front page (or even the FAQ) to the Happy Days story.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  83. Reading Slashdot Before Slashdot by x+mani+x · · Score: 2

    I remember regularly visiting "rob malda's linux page" (or whatever it was called) for AfterStep mods and other similar things. Then Rob says, and I'm paraphrasing, "don't read my journal anymore, I got a news site up and running" ... Slashdot!

    Considering how long I've been reading Slashdot, it really surprises me that it's been only 5 years. It really seems longer than that. I agree with CmdrTaco with the hope that this site doesn't change much in 5 years. Even the design of the site (remember the uproar over the grey backdrop in late 1997 ?? ouch!).

    Thanks Rob and everyone else for the great site. I think this is a good time for me to go and drop another $20 to supporting Slashdot. Keep up the great work!

  84. Re:UID contest? by troc · · Score: 2

    He probably paid good money on ebay for that ;)

    Beats buying Everquest characters anyway.

    There's a scary thought, buying "desirable" UIDs in general.....

    Troc

    --
    Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  85. A remark by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

    First Happy Birthday to all of you, those I like and those I don't like. Anyway, it's you have made it together and hope to see this team for some more years. Only hope that some of you over there would be more careful on the quality of the posts...

    And now the remark. 5 years passed and the big huge feature of /. is not comemorating it? Has CowBoyNeal go on holiday? Where's the Pool?

  86. Mod up parent by Raul654 · · Score: 2

    Very funny. Speaking of which, were are all the other people with low user #'s?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Mod up parent by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Dunno. Slashdot was already moderatly big by the time the logins were implemented (remember how at first you were assigned a completely random unchangeable password?). I'd imagine most of the low UIN folks have moved on to greener pastures, gotten a wife and kids, or just forgot their password and had to get a new account.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Mod up parent by BrianH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some idiots forgot their original passwords and had to create new accounts (like me). I remember creating this account and thinking ""A user number in the THIRTEEN THOUSANDS?!?! Everyone will think I'm a freaking n00b!" I don't feel so bad now though :-)

      Unfortunately, most of the early people moved on. Slashdot used to be a very different thing than it is today, with far fewer posts per thread, and with more of an emphasis on discussion than comments. The moderation system kinda did away with that by breaking the linearity of most comments and hiding some others, and the massive influx of new users made those types of discussions unfeasible anyway. When this all happened, many of us whined and complained, but a huge number of users simply left.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    3. Re:Mod up parent by daeley · · Score: 2

      Christ, nowadays *my* user number is lowish. :)

      <old>Back in my day we used to post to /. with flint and steel! And we liked it!</old>

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:Mod up parent by irix · · Score: 2

      Indeed. When I got my current UID it was during a big upswing of account creation (just around the time Netscape was going to be open sourced). I remember feeling like such a n00b when they introduced moderation and my UID was too high to qualify at first.

      I too don't feel so bad now, but I still feel humbled by the 1 and 2 digit UID people ;-)

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    5. Re:Mod up parent by Snafoo · · Score: 2

      I know, I feel your pain.

      My reaction to useraccounts was,

      "Oh, faugh, it'll never take off, no need to register..." I believe I held off for months, perhaps almost a year.

      I *could* have a priceless four-digit number, but nooo :(

      --
      - undoware.ca
    6. Re:Mod up parent by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      I read slashdot for quite a while before getting an account. I think I registered in early to mid 99 - but not really sure.

      I always used to read the articles between tasks at work - no time or interest in commenting way back then.

      but now.... I spend too much time on this site.

      but I still have a high UID considering its about three+ish years old - and /. is only 5.

    7. Re:Mod up parent by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Indeed. When I got my current UID it was during a big upswing of account creation (just around the time Netscape was going to be open sourced). I remember feeling like such a n00b when they introduced moderation and my UID was too high to qualify at first.

      I always just thought, "Eh, I'll never post on here." *cough* 1605 comments *cough*

      I suppose that is low for how low my UID is. Can you believe they're up to 600,000 now?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:Mod up parent by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      Jeez, yer UID's 54 and you've only posted 48 comments? That's less than ten per year?

    9. Re:Mod up parent by dieMSdie · · Score: 2

      I think a lot of folks held off for a long time. I held off for close to a year! I was a regular reader, and one day I really wanted to comment, so I took the plunge. At least I haven't forgotten my password since then...

      --
      Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
    10. Re:Mod up parent by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 2

      Most of them have probably drifted on to other things. I suspect that part of the reason the UIDs are so high is because people drop by, create an account, and then never use it again. (The other reason, of course, is that there are a lot of people reading the site...)

      Slashdot's also changed a bit since the days of user accounts. (And when the accounts were created, it had already gone through a lot of changes.) A lot more people post and comment on things, more stories get submitted (so repeats occur)... The site is now a lot bigger and has lost a lot of the imtimate feeling it had when it was small. That, I suspect has driven people away. I used to post pretty regularly, but my contribusions have been dropping off for some time. (I think I posted more before user accounts than after, for instance.) Nowadays, there's usually already someone who's said what I would have said so I don't need to post. It's also really burdensome to read all the other posts before saying things myself. I almost never make toplevel posts anymore.

      Basically, I think many of those people aren't around because they were attracted to the Slashdot of the time, which doesn't exist anymore.



      --Phil (And I still miss Meept.)
      --
      355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
    11. Re:Mod up parent by Zarf · · Score: 2

      Does 5735 count as a low UIN? I just kinda lurked around for a time before making a login. Then I forgot the password... but in a blaze of inspiration I remembered it again.

      Good thing too, those other pastures smelled funny. Do you have any idea what they spread around over there to make them so green?

      --
      [signature]
    12. Re:Mod up parent by jbrw · · Score: 2

      hello

    13. Re:Mod up parent by MoNickels · · Score: 2

      Not as low as some, but I've been around here a while...

      --

      Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

    14. Re:Mod up parent by kubrick · · Score: 2

      I was much the same -- although I think I remember reading and enjoying /. while the highest UIDs were around 11,000... I always find user registration schemes intrusive, so I put it off for a while :)

      Oh well, it still makes me one of the first 5% of registered users, I guess, seeing comments from users > 600,000.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  87. Re:How many other websites have been around this l by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Blue's News

    It's not quite as popular as /., but it's a pretty widely respected gaming news site.

    As Blue's tagline says: "Established 1995. Over an eighth of a billion visitors since 1997."

    AnandTech and Tom's Hardware are also up there.

    Frankly, a lot of sites have been around since 1997. Find some non-university/corporate sites that have been around for 10 years with (relatively) high hit counts and it's more meaningful.

  88. Another reason to like /. by ThePeeWeeMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The best way to get lots of material for debates is to read /. and the comments at -1. =P

    Also, the best way to get lost is to read /. at -1, but that's another thing altogether.

    Happy birthday /., and please continue to be provocative!

  89. Check again by roystgnr · · Score: 2

    I've got an emailed reply to one of my slashdot posts in January 1998, even though I don't have a user password email until September. I suspect September is just when Rob made permanent user accounts possible, so you may have been reading the site before then.

    1. Re:Check again by singularity · · Score: 2

      Sure enough, you seem to be correct. Searching all of my mailboxes for "slashdot" shows me where I might have originally heard of Slashdot.

      1) A friend of mine wanted a hard to pronounce website and was disasppointed that "slashdot.org" was taken. This was March of 1998.

      2) I was also on the BeInfo mailing list (a mailing list for the actual company, not a fan email list) that talks about a discussion on slashdot about Be. This was August of 1998.

      Later I reference an article in an email I wrote in August of 1998, so I had to have been reading it before September 1998.

      My best guess is that I started in August of 1998, but I am not sure.

      I just realized that I joined the BeInfo mailing list on issue #10, in February of 1996. The last one, about 160 mailings later, was in June of 1999.

      I joined the SmallDog mailing list in January of 1998.

      Does anyone else remember the Yoyodyne mailing list? I was on that list for issue #5 in July, 1995. That list is no more, as well (I think they got bought out by yahoo games or someone)

      I joined distributed.net in July, 1998.

      I was on a Power Computing mailing list, apparently, and have the announcement of their very first computers in April of 1995.

      I joined a Wired mailing list in April of 1995.

      My oldest saved email message (not archived on 3.5" disk somewhere) is an outgoing message from November of 1993. it is actually in response to an email I received, apparently.

      I had been online since 1991, but I only started saving emails around that November of 1993.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  90. Dude, this story was on The Register a week ago! by nobodyman · · Score: 2


    Also, I submitted this story and it was rejected! What gives!!! ;-)

  91. Re:How many other websites have been around this l by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Animation World Network has been continuously up since early 1996. http://www.awn.com/ . Very cool site.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  92. Re:K5 by daeley · · Score: 2

    For one thing, "troll" and "truth" both have the same first letters and the same number of letters: five.

    So do "tripe" and "trash". ;D

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  93. Slashdot on Slashdot by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    It is understandable why you might want to avoid the appearance of blowing your own horn, but perhaps a Slashdot meta-section might keep the myriad complaints about (moderation|metamoderation|karma|layout|...) from cluttering the other sections.

    Yes, I know Brand X has this, but perhaps /. should as well.

  94. Obligatory archive.org link by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2
    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  95. hot grits by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    I am a 2000 newbie, and in the 2 1/2 years I read slashdot I did not experience the hot "grits" and the "np petrified in stone (sic)" trolls. Can an old timer explain me ?

  96. Happy Birthday Slashdot! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    :)

  97. Funny by waldoj · · Score: 2

    [Sorry, Waldo, you just did not sign up soon enough to qualify as an "old timer" to me... grin...]

    *Laugh*

    It's funny how we all set our own threshhold for such things, ensuring that wherever we set our cutoff, it includes us. :) I figure anything under 10,000 is relatively old-timerish; again, a figure that carefully includes myself and few people that joined after me. :)

    I must say that a distinct change over the years has been a loss of community. I no longer see the same names as often as I once did. I now irrationally rely on low UIDs to determine the relative merits of comment, as opposed to saying "hey, isn't that [Nate Fox | singularity | Zow | Noke]?" There's just too many names and too many comments. This is less of a complaint and more of a lament, I suppose, but I do miss that aspect of /.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  98. 2,224th Post. by sulli · · Score: 2

    I'll admit it, I'm a fucking junkie. Got my uid sometime in 2000, and haven't been able to stay away since! Thanks guys for a fun site - despite all the problems, there's nothing else like it.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  99. 35 years in "InterNet Time" by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Internet time is like dog years: seven times faster than non-internet time, as they used to say in the rise and fall of the dot.comony.

  100. Wow, I have made it 4 and a half years... by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe that after all these years of reading Slashdot, hanging here with my uber-low UID number. And I've made it all this time, managing to resist the temptation to post... Four and a half years without a single troll, flame, or even so much as a "me too!"

    Wait a minute...

    DOH!!

  101. Re:How many other websites have been around this l by jafuser · · Score: 2
    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  102. Re:UID contest? by odaiwai · · Score: 2

    And you've only posted 32 comments since then?

  103. Well shit, by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wanted to moderate a couple of really funny posts, but can't let that one uncommented:

    but there are still a hell of a lot o half arsed discussion sites out there that have a flat layout for comments

    In an earlier life, when I was a DECcie we had a corporate network with maybe 100000 users and we had this groupware thingie called VAXnotes. Of course DEC couldn't sell it for shit, but it had a huge impact on the company internally.

    The software was rather primitive. You installed it and created a conference on your box. The format went something like SLSHDT::COBOL for example, discussing the finer arts of Cobol. SLSHDT was the DECnet node, where it resided (limited to 6 chars, but those where the good ol' days).

    Within the conference everybody could create an entry and after that it was just one flat stream of comments.

    There where confererences for every product and every obscure piece of software which this company manufactured and produced. That was nifty, because if you had a Cobol question it wouldn't take an hour until somebody from Cobol engineering jumped in with a knowledgeable and comprehensive answer. But the most interesting part of the whole system where the EI (employee interest) conferences, which ranged from cats through tarrot over DEC issues (HUMANE::DIGITAL) up to Soapbox (damn! I can't even remember the node name...).

    While it was primitive from a "layout" point of view I have never since experienced the power that a network can have on its participants. They where some really, really smart people bitching and flaming away, but sticking together whenever required. At one time we even pledged to get the best hated Soapbox contributor (Jamie, who was a very fat git, NOT!) to a boxbash in Bawston from Reading, UK.

    It was also around that time (1993) when a really, really smart engineer (let's call him Dan K) mentioned something he was working on, something that would change the world, something so fucking (he didn't say fucking, since that was verboten) revolutionary it would blow us out of our socks. He couldn't really mention what it was, but it was later marketed under the term WWW.

    Yep, it was a primitive form of discussion, but it didn't matter, not at all and it was one of the aspects in DECs culture, which made this company so great!

    It saddens me until today, that one of the most important companies in computer history was sold off by a slick guy with a bad hairdo to some box-assembling marketing organisation in Texas.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  104. Jeez... /.'s still a toddler! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    No wonder why it pulls tantrums from time to time!

  105. um - sorry, I forgot to mention by jafac · · Score: 2

    6 years ago, I patented this whole thing. Slashcode, perl-based internet discussion boards, and the dark greenish color in conjunction with grey black and white. And the word "slashdot" and "Cowboy Neal"

    I'll see ya in court buddy!

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  106. You mean "33rd" birthday, and "not yet"... by chrysrobyn · · Score: 2

    By my calculations, Slashdot will be turning 33 In a few months.

    Seriously, thanks for the waste of time. I mean that. My boss on the other hand...

    Come on, "Baby Bells Deregulated" didn't really happen in the past 5 years, did it?!"

  107. Those Were The Days by hotgrits · · Score: 2, Funny

    This stuff is hilarious! A sample story from 1998:

    IBM announces a 25 gigger
    Hardware Posted by Hemos on Wednesday November 11, @10:11AM
    from the why-i-could-put-3/4-my-cd-collection dept.

    Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... "

    Read More...
    64 comments

  108. Re:Only 5 eh? by netsharc · · Score: 2
    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  109. Slashdotted already by flikx · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will the authors cache story content on slashdot?

    (* world ends *)

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  110. GameSpy.com is three years old! by antdude · · Score: 2
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  111. Other funny stuff: by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, and you forgot the infamous Signal 11, founder of the Karma Whore movement. Too bad he retired.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Other funny stuff: by Cplus · · Score: 2

      Signal11 got tired of his karma game on Slashdot and went over to K5. Here's his explanation. Also note that after he went to K5 he actually made much better posts than he ever did here. Sig has since abandoned k5 too.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  112. -1 redundant by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    congrats on five years. how many websites can say they've lived that long?

    and I have to say (this will sound like ass kissing but I've got karma to spare) this is the only site I'm guaranteed to read every day, several times a day.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  113. 5 years by rppp01 · · Score: 2

    I remember being directed to this site back in December of 1997, or January of 1997. I wondered why I should consider registering, so I didn't for a year.
    I then decided to, why not, go for it. I signed on, promptly switched jobs, and lost the login and password (still have the login, I think).

    I am not sure when I created this login ID. I remember, however, when the first post was original. I remember when a decent word processor was what was needed for linux to have prime time. I remember discussing that as an AC in the beginning. Word Perfect 7, I think.

    Anyways. I have enjoyed the site. Thanks guys!

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
  114. Preview by sdjunky · · Score: 2

    Hey, this post was made a year ago. When are these wacky editors going to start reviewing their submissions

  115. To all you wondering how... by Dthoma · · Score: 2
    ...and saying "did you have 600K HTTP GETs worth of free time?" then just think about it.

    You can find the number of users with a binary search. We know that the number of users is between 600K and 700K, so we can just use a binary search using 600K as a lower bound and 700K as an upper bound. With a 100K sized search then I think you should be able to find the exact number of users with no more than 17 requests. NOT 600 thousand. 17.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  116. Times _HAVE_ chaned... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 2, Funny
    (yes, I know, I only joined a couple of months ago...)

    Read this article...

    "I'm not exactly sure why it died, except to say that we got linked from somewhere fairly sizable since we were getting several times the usual number of hits."
  117. ObPost by shogun · · Score: 2

    Happy Birthday to slashdot!

  118. Slashdot light mode by lanner · · Score: 2


    See slashdot in light mode;

    http://slashdot.org/index.pl?light=1

    It helps lower Slashdot's bandwidth but still loads the top banner.

  119. Re:Comments disabled by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    In the case of MsGeek.Org, they WERE wasting my disk space.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.