Slashdot Mirror


Batteries Powered by Leftover Food

Lazyhound writes "Technologists at the University of the West of England in Bristol have come up with a cheap, organic battery that can run on household leftovers, and be manufactured for just £10." There's also a New Scientist article. The New Scientist would like to point out that they broke the story, and the BBC followed up.

237 comments

  1. Quick someone, post a Back to the Future by Adam+Rightmann · · Score: 0, Redundant

    quote, for easy kharma.

    --
    A. Rightmann
  2. Filed under brilliance for... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Troll

    a battery that uses E.Coli to break down food.

    Smart people, smart. I assume that either the case is indesctructable or that the strain of bacteria is modded to be harmless?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by bmongar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why? We are exposed to harmful bacteria all the time, almost all of us have e.coli in our intestines. That is why we wash our hands after going to the bathroom. Or after hadeling raw hamburger or chicken. Just make sure people know that they will get a tummy ache if they eat the stuff.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    2. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sigh ... E. Coli gets such a bad press it's unbelievable.

      Most strains of E. Coli are harmless in normal concentrations, and indeed live in your gut without causing any problems at all. Students at universities/colleges worldwide use it in concentrated culture all the time without any special precautions. Only E. Coli 10571 (iirc), a weird mutant strain, poses a food poisoning risk.

      Bob

    3. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      True but its definately not a selling point. Recall the consumers typically are not knowledgeable past CNN.

      Its like Mc Al Qaeda [sp?] not a good name for a restaurant!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by bhny · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the Czech Republic children are given E. coli to help prevent allergies.

    5. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wash our hands after going to the bathroom....

      Maybe when I do #2, but I'm not likely to pee all over my hands... what BS...

    6. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 1

      E. Coli is guilty by association,
      judged by who he knows
      He can't keep all his friends out of trouble, when they got no place to go

      --
      --JonnyBlog
    7. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by crashcane · · Score: 5, Informative
      The strain you are speaking of is actually E. coli O157:H7, also known as Enterohemorrhagic , E. coli (EHEC).


      I also think it is a bit of stretch to say that this is a "weird mutant strain" since there are plenty other types of E. coli that can cause diarrhea via food poisoning (including the closing related Enteropathogenic E. coli. Incidentally, O157:H7 doesn't seem to hurt adult cattle too much, it just seems to have a really bad effect inside us (particularly children and elderly).


      Brian.

    8. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by hughk · · Score: 2

      E. Coli is extremely well used as a research and teaching tool. It makes me cringe when I hear the press talking about it as a cause of food poisoning. Certain strains as you say are definitely not nice but without a friendly strain of E. Coli, we wven have a problem as the gut can more easily be colonised by nastier strains.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    9. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Absolutely - ignorant media hype at work again. The pricks almost always get science wrong. The worst thing is that so many people fall for it.

      The real reason that Escherichia Coli gets such bad press is a mere side effect of that it's such a common and incredibly populous inhabitant of a healthy human intestinal tract. That's what makes it such an excellent indicator of untreated sewage content.

      When you're investigating possible sewage pollution, there's no point beginning with looking for the rare stuff that's dangerous in needle & haystack concentrations. No, you're better off counting the numbers of something that you're guaranteed to find, and extrapolating from there.

      Of course, the media then jumps to the conclusion that, because a high E. Coli count probably means Really Bad Things are in the water, E. Coli itself becomes a Really Bad Thing.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    10. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny
      That's why I prefer conventional batteries...

      nickel-cadmium, lead-acid, nickel metal hydride, carbon-zinc, lithium... ummmm, it makes my mouth water.

    11. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Newander · · Score: 1
      Maybe when I do #2, but I'm not likely to pee all over my hands... what BS...


      It's also very unlikely that you'll get feces on your hands when you pee.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    12. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, certian types of E. Coli bacterica live inside human intestine, as humans we have a mutualistic relationship with them. Without them, it would not be possible to extract nutrients from food we eat. The 'bad' type of E. Coli bacteria you're thinking of actually kills the beneficial bacteria in your intestines, and causes food to rot inside your digestive tract.

  3. Ideal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If your leftovers consist of sugar cubes and carrots. I mean, come on!

    1. Re:Ideal by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dunno about carrots, but with sugar cubes, fruit and a little yeast, you'll get something with power in a few weeks, fer sure! Maybe the carrots are to stop you from going blind?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel idea by sirinek · · Score: 3, Funny


    I bet you could power a HUGE beowulf cluster (sorry had to) if only you could harness the gas from everyone eating taco bell. Now theres something to do if you have leftovers. Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation. Should be interesting!

  5. Wow! by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Funny

    On a leftover Twinkie, you could get power forever!

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The problem is a Twinkie has a half-life of 4.7 billion years, so you don't get alot of free neutrons to power a fission reaction, so you have used Pu-239 enriched Twinkies, which just aren't as tasty as the off the shelf Twinkie.

  6. This will be messy by cpt.haddock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice invention, but nowadays batteries are used mostly in cell-phones, PDA's, etc. With the trend of miniaturising these, I can already see the mess, trying to pry sticky leftovers in my cell-phone :(

  7. It brings tears to my eyes. by fractalk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Now snif, snif, I can finally take that road trip with only a laptop and 200 liters of soda that I always dreamed of!!

    if only they make a satellite dish that works on pickled weiners...

    1. Re:It brings tears to my eyes. by wd123 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the crossword puzzles, spider-man comics, and mama's homemade rhubarb pie!

      --
      "question = (to) ? be : !be;" --Shakespeare
    2. Re:It brings tears to my eyes. by hiei · · Score: 1

      And remember to stop off for some more pickeled weiners and a diet chocolate soda.

      --
      Upgrade your grey matter, cause one day it may matter
    3. Re:It brings tears to my eyes. by ngoy · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't mean "pricked" wieners? Are there channels other than 594-599? Shango

      --
      --ngoy
  8. clarification needed by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    i think i already know the awnser, but the article says "Chemical reactions inside the cell strip electrons from the hydrogen atoms to produce a voltage that can power a circuit.

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.


    so does the e.coli eat it's excrement (hydrogen) and produce electricity? i'm guessing it's the cell in the battery that does this...

    secondly - let's sterilize the hell out of our current landfills, and introduce this bacteria to them! same thing goes for our mouths - no more cavities!

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:clarification needed by StephenK · · Score: 1

      There we go, turn the land fills into power plants!

    2. Re:clarification needed by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      People are already doing this. One of my friends helped design a gas-reclaimation system at Fresh Kills, siphoning off the various flammable gasses that are generated by all the decomposition and using them to generate electricity.

    3. Re:clarification needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, it's the (electrochemical) cell in the battery that turns the hydrogen produced by the (biological) cells of E. coli.

      Sounds like your basic H2/H+ fuel cell, just with the twist of a built-in source for hydrogen.

      Introduce this bacteria to landfills? Fine, if the hydrogen can be collected efficiently. Fine, if the heavy metals and poisonous organics don't kill off the desired bacteria. This is a really nifty idea, but it's got a while to go before it solves the world's energy supply problems.

    4. Re:clarification needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article stated that multiples had to be connected together to generate the power for the bulb. How many is "multiple"? Two or twenty?

  9. Finally by ksplatter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Moms Can't yell at Kids anymore for not eating their dinner. I can see it now.

    Boy: "Mom I don't want to eat my dinner!"
    Mom: "Fine son well at least refresh the batteries in my Vibrator"
    Boy: Sure Mom!!!

  10. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by GnomeKing · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation. Should be interesting!

    Honest dear - if I stop farting in the car, we'll never make it there by 8pm!

  11. "Power hungry" ??? by Tord · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guess this gives a whole new dimension to the words "power hungry equipment"...

  12. Is everyone done? by ksplatter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Come on everyone. Get all of your Back To The Future jokes out now. It's not that often that a reference like this comes along.

    Question: Can the batteries be charged with Old Cellphones?

  13. Re:Similar by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Or this one? F33R!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  14. Re:I have the superpower by AUsBandit · · Score: 1

    So when my house burps will it say excuse me? In the future when our lamps are shining to bright will our house doctor come for a vist and tell the house "take 2 of theese and call me in the morning"?

  15. Awesome by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0

    So now I can finally clean that 6 month old rotting chinese food out of my fridge and put it to good use!

    --
    This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
  16. Re:Flux Capacitor by kylus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I guess the most important issue is whether or not this device will generate the necessary 1.21 gigawatts of electricity? :)

    --
    --Kylus
    Idiot-proof something, and Life will build a better Idiot.
  17. Great! by mkelley · · Score: 1

    Now I have something else to do with those leftover cabbage rolls, I threw out on the way to work.

    --

    m.kelley
    life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
  18. Re:I don't get something -- by paranoos · · Score: 1

    What I took from the article is that their goal is to get it to work with regular food instead of refined sugar cubes, which they call refined fuel. Their next step is to work with carrots.

  19. Mr Fusion by adamx12 · · Score: 0



    Oh sure, you can use table scraps to power the flux capacitor, but the engine still runs on gasoline.

  20. Re:I don't get something -- by morgajel · · Score: 1

    refines as in not having OTHER stuff added to it.
    say, throwing it that week-old cake, + a bunch of other chemicals.
    that would just take the fun outta it.

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  21. At last! by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally i have use for all pizza slices all over my desk. Must be a godsend for geeks.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  22. What if you have a big appetite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens if you eat everything and have no leftovers? Is this gonna lead to people deliberately wasting food so they can break it down for power?

  23. Re:I don't get something -- by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, they don't want more refinement, they want less. As in you stick the raw sugar beets or sugar cane inside.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  24. Potato clock by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember wiring potatoes into a clock I had as a kid, so this really is nothing new. The ability to harnass food is grand and all, but the food gets pretty smelly after a few days.

    --trb

    1. Re:Potato clock by OpCode42 · · Score: 1

      I must remember to get a potato clock.

      Otherwise, I wont get to work for nine o clock. ;)

    2. Re:Potato clock by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Sorry, this has nothing to do with the potato clock at all. The energy for a potato clock doesn't even come from the potatoes. It comes from the electrodes "dissolving" into the potatoes. The electrodes are consumed in the process.

      The article describes a microbial fuel cell that is totally different.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:Potato clock by spectrum- · · Score: 1

      I have one of those potato clocks, you can use many things - lemons for example.

      The other main problem is everytime I need to change the food (which is pretty often) i have to re-set the time and date. That can get pretty annoying after a while.

      So for this technology to ever be usable it would have to have a secondary power source. Maybe 2 sets of foods at different stages of composition.

  25. Interesting by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Troll

    1 W = 1 J/s. 1 kcal = 1 Cal = 4000 J. Therefore, if I want 3 kW of power continuously (which is about how much an average US home uses), I would need to feed my HomeStomach(TM) Generator less than 3/4 Calorie/second. My suggestion is to stock up on Tic-Tacs.

    1. Re:Interesting by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Further extrapolation:
      40W bulb * 8 hours = 40 J/s * 8 hr = 1,152,000 J
      50g sugar * 4 Cal/g = 200 Cal = 800,000 J
      Aren't they off by a factor of 2?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just go away?

      All you do is post total shit.

    3. Re:Interesting by mblumber · · Score: 1

      You're assuming 100% efficiency. Rarely would i expect any more than 25% efficiency out of a battery of this type.

      --
      Anyone who posts about bad moderation are themselves off-topic and should be moderated accordingly.
  26. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation.

    So that's why they call those big tailpipes on the backs of sticker-laden Hondas "fart pipes"!

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  27. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by kingOFgEEEks · · Score: 0

    more like: what's this little tube sticking out of the seat? Just stick it up your arse, and here, have another bean burrito... long trip to california.

    --
    mechanicos ergo cogito
  28. Re:I don't get something -- by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

    I guess what I was trying to get at was that I would probably pay for a model that ran on refined sugar right now. I don't care about waiting for other foods, refined sugar is good enough for me if it can run my laptop.

  29. From the article... by OpCode42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Inside the battery, which is the size of a personal CD player, a colony of E.coli bacteria produce enzymes which break down carbohydrates and release hydrogen.

    I dont know how comfortable I would be with on eof these in my home...

    1. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, if you prefer having a fuel tank in the backyard, like a lot of people do where I live, feel free to do so... As for me I'd rather have energy stored in the form of food rather than in any flammable liquid or gas.

      From the article, I'd guess the hydrogen is continuously reduced to water to produce the electricity: no accummulation of explosive gas.

    2. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think he meant he wouldnt feel good having e.coli - a fucking FLESH EATING bacteria in his house - retard!

    3. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ. Learn what the hell you're talking about. Nearly every strain of E. Coli is harmless, and even the nasties don't eat flesh. I've held it in my bare hands. Twit.

  30. Re:Great for UPS!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now you just need to invent ferrous pizza.

  31. Re:Huge implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main aspect of this energy source is that it completely suppress the need for combustion. Instead it uses slow, catalyzed, controlled chemical processes that use a lower amount of initial energy.
    It also suppresses the need for fuel tanks at all. Lost in the wild ? Collect some grass / plants + your picnic leftovers, and toss into the engine. Away from gas stations ? Empty your kitchen's trash into it. If it's possible to buile a small powerplant like these easily as the article claims, I'll be among the first to do so, and will install it in my house so I'm no longer dependent on the Electricity company.
    All that's left is the need to go to the grocery store more often. Or you can start farming. Apart from that: complete independance (well, except for the fact that I'd still need an ISP).

  32. how will this affect thanksgiving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leftover turkey sandwhiches for a week or two is the best part ;)

  33. Different foods by BaronVonDuvet · · Score: 1
    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    So could something like a sheeps eye see you through the week? :-)

    Presumably different waste food will be more suitable for generating power. This could be very useful if it somehow could join with your existing home power supply. That or it could power your waste disposal unit. If not then it could have some uses for things like camping. This could definitely prove useful in the future. It's a very good idea.

  34. no more gasoline by alexc · · Score: 2, Funny

    woo hooo we can now get rid of the internal combustion engine!

    1. Re:no more gasoline by spectrum- · · Score: 1

      The internal combustion engine will run on much more than just gasoline - it'll run on many forms of other oils, ethanol and BMW have long been pioneers in the development of Hydrogen power for the internal combustion engine.

      Realistically the internal combustion engine is gonna be with us a long time yet... for all its (undeniable) deficiencies some of us still quite like it too!

    2. Re:no more gasoline by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Informative

      There has been a case recently in the UK of people running their Diesel cars off cooking oil thus saving 40p per litre. Police set up a 'frying squad' to sniff out cars which smelt like mobile chip shops, and local supermarkets rationed sales of cooking oil.

      It's quite ingenious, though highly illegal...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:no more gasoline by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      It's quite ingenious, though highly illegal...

      Why the hell is it illegal? This must be a UK thing. I can't imagine this flying in the US.

      If I had a car that I could run off of cooking oil and save money in the process, I'd do it, laws or no laws. Talk about the public outcry if they started busting people for not using gasoline over here.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    4. Re:no more gasoline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dang, forgot password...


      There *is* a car you can run off cooking oil, if you drive a diesel. Do a google search for biodiesel. I know of people who do it here (Australia). It's cheaper and cleaner, and they get the waste oil from a fish and chip shop, so it saves that being dumped in the ocean or whatever.


      Go for it!

  35. Re:Flux Capacitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wouldn't like the idea of Mr. Fusion digesting all the leftovers of Sunday lunch from a large family!

    Or your typical sysadmin/slashdotter.

  36. Re:Could the Colis be outcompeted? by spectrum- · · Score: 0

    That gives me an idea - what a great way to deal with dead people. Why put them in a graveyard or cremate them when you could make them into a battery!

    "whoa! granny is powering my webserver!!"

  37. Re:Flux Capacitor by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it only needs to generate those gigawatts for a very short time. After all, energy = power x time.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  38. So when does the time machine come out? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Ok, so they can turn food into power, now all I need is a delorian that goes back in time and I'll have a perfect life!

    --

    ~ now you know
  39. We have the infrastructure now!!! by siasl · · Score: 1

    Hasn't one of the big problems with fuel cell tech for cars, getting the hydrogen while you are "on the road". Think of it. Every septic tank in America could be a fuel depot!! Convert your "outflow" to "cash flow"...

    1. Re:We have the infrastructure now!!! by Maran · · Score: 2

      Suddenly, all that "important septic tank information" spam I get is just another variation on "make money fast".

      Maran

  40. Re:Could the Colis be outcompeted? by fractalk · · Score: 1

    It sure would bring a whole new meaning to the words "dead battery".

    And to juice a brick! too.

  41. Two important questions... by Noryungi · · Score: 2
    From the article:

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Two questions:

    • What's the price of 50g. of sugar? Is it less than the cost of producing the same amount of energy with a conventional power station?
    • 40W of power is how much in terms of computing power? In other terms: how long would 50g of sugar power the average laptop?


    This being said, this is truly interesting!
    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Two important questions... by theskov · · Score: 2, Informative

      50g sugar is about 5 cents.

      50g gives 40 watts for 8 hours = 0,32 Wh. Where I live that's about 7 cents worth of electricity.

      But the really interesting part is of course how it compares to conventional means of disposing garbage. And I'm pretty sure that 0,32 Wh of portable electricity is quite a lot better than the power output from burning 50g of sugar (or placing as part of a large smelly pile...)

    2. Re:Two important questions... by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the price of 50g. of sugar?

      I can nip down the supermarket and buy a bag of sugar for 54p (0.54GBP). This bag contains 1Kg of sugar. So 50g. of sugar would cost under 3p.
      So threepence worth of sugar would keep my 40 watt light bulb on for eight hours.

      If electricty is charged at 6p per Kw/h (can't remember exactly, not got electricity bill on me) then the cost of lighting that 40w bulb is just under 2p. So there's not a lot in it!

      However this is mere nitpicking and missing the point entirely. At the moment they're using sugar in the prototype. They intend to refine the bio-generator to use first carrots rather than pure sugar, and move on household waste. STUFF YOU THROW AWAY and is therefore worthless. At that point, the running cost is effectively zero.

      So not only would this reduce the amount of rubbish thrown away by the average household, but it also reduces environmental damage done by power generation.

      Just don't throw your old antibiotics in it!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Two important questions... by asavage · · Score: 2

      You could buy sugar in bulk for much cheaper, and It probably doesn't need to be as high quality as table sugar so money could be saved on refining. But yes the whole point is to be able to throw garbage food into this instead of a compost, garborator, or even worse the trash.

  42. Brits can take some food from between their teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of that leftover food stuck between their blackish-yellow rotting teeth would really supply some fuel. Whay do Brits have rotting teeth? Even wealthy parasites like the royal family have disgusting filthy teeth. Is that old hag the queen mum still alive?? I always hated that parasite.

  43. Re:Thanks, but I'll wait for Mr Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try your digestive tract

  44. Let me know when.... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Let me know when it can produce 1.21 gigawatts!

  45. stinking tech? by BACbKA · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the smells of the rotten food can be contained within the case of this "organic battery". If not, it will hardly be usable within an apartment, nor will a portable version (like many previous posters considered) be possible to sell.

    --

    VKh

    1. Re:stinking tech? by Gonarat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I imagine they will build the device so the actual reaction chamber (artifical gut?) would be enclosed. The hydrogen gas generated by the bacteria is converted to electricity and water vapor. Assuming rotten food is used, there will be waste from that. This leads me to the (obvious) question -- what kind of solid waste will this system produce and how will it be removed from the unit? We all know what the solid waste output from humans and animals is, so will the solid waste output from this unit be similar? I can see it now -- cleaning up dog crap, changing the litter box, and cleaning out the "organic battery" crap! I csn see it now -- "Honey, I got to take the car out to take a dump!"


      Oh well, if the price is right, I guess I can handle disposing of a little more crap...

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    2. Re:stinking tech? by BACbKA · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the artificial crap at all (the volume it occupies and the hassle of its removal). I am more concerned with the artificial fart to smell :-)

      --

      VKh

  46. Re:Using myself to fuel the car by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm. I like the idea.

    I have no idea how this could work, but imagine uh nanobots or something that ran around your body using your fat for energy, and doing something useful, like uh strectching the muscles and whatever else nanobots do.

  47. I went there by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

    I went to the Univeristy Of WOE (as we called it), there was a pizza shop inside the bar, with the mess that is left on the floor at the end of each night drinking i suggest they could power the entire univeristy for a whole day (including the 24 hours MUD rooms, sorry i mean computer rooms.

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  48. 'Energy content' has a whole new meaning by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Many foods have the energy content on the label - so many kilojoules per portion. Of course only the dieting industry would really care about that for choosing what to eat. But now, you can calculate how much battery life that corresponds to!

    According to the article, a sugar cube packs about a megajoule of energy: given the current price of sugar, how does that compare with other energy sources? It seems reasonably competitive against mains electricity, though dearer than oil or gas.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  49. The engine will run on carrots?! by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    Team leader Chris Melhuish told New Scientist magazine said that although the new MCFs run on sugar cubes, the team aims to move on to carrot power.

    Great... no matter what color car I buy, it will eventually turn orange.

  50. 50 grams - 40 watts????? by snatchitup · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Let's do the math. 50 grames = 12 1/2 servings. Or, 12.5 * 15 = 187.5 C (That's big C calories or really kilo-calories).

    40 watts * 8 hours = .32 Killowatt Hours.

    A KW Hours costs about .06 here. So we're talking about 2 penny's worth of energy.

    A round cylindrical sugar container of the coffee area variety has 567g's so were talking about 1/10 of a thing of sugar which costs about $.50.

    So, the sugar costs 10 cents but the same energy produced by a power plant costs .02 cents.

    So, when the greens step up the argument of, big business is squashing new alternative energy sources, maybe there's sound economic reasoning on the part of the neysayers.

    1. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      Well... your cost analysis is correct, but the power would be generated from stuff that would normally be sent to the trash and lost totally.

      so any power generated is gravy. the whole idea is to eliminate the need for refind fuel, and utilize the waste. I made another post outlining some problems I saw with this concept though; its not perfect.

    2. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      I didn't have the time with the conversions and everything. I wanted to compare the calculation of Calories v. KWHrs.

      If it's way off. Then there's further reason for skepticism.

    3. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by endoboy · · Score: 1

      Your comparison to grid electricity costs isn't really apt... consider instead the cost of batteries

      a typical AA alkaline battery (my data comes from Duracell) gives about 2.3 Volt-Amp-hours, which is equivalent to 2.3 watt-hours, or 0.0023 kWh. Guessing that you're paying 50 cents each for AA cells, that comes to about $215 per kWh....

    4. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by greenhide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I can get a 2 pound -- oh hell, let's call it one kilogram to make the conversions easy -- for about a buck. So, each gram costs $.001. Fifty grams, then, costs 5 cents, not fifty cents.

      I don't know where you're shopping, but you're paying too much for sugar.

      It gets even better when you buy it in bulk. Also, consider that you would no longer necessarily have to use sugar that was intended for human consumption. With that in mind, I'm sure there's probably "waste sugar" -- maybe its discolored, maybe it got contaminated in some way -- that still is suitable for the battery. That might be cheaper.

      Also, don't forget that the ultimate goal is to use leftovers, not pure sugar.

      Finally, you're using the traditional "free-market" technique of *not* looking at *all the costs*. Continuing to use traditional power plants running on oil means that we're constantly having to defend our "interests" in the middle east, spending billions and billions of dollars on military equipment and personel. This military intervention is what keeps our oil prices low. Thus, part of that cost has to be figured in to the cost of the electricity, and at that point the sugar wins hands down, I think.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    5. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally, you're using the traditional "free-market" technique of *not* looking at *all the costs*. Continuing to use traditional power plants running on oil means that we're constantly having to defend our "interests" in the middle east, spending billions and billions of dollars on military equipment and personel. This military intervention is what keeps our oil prices low. Thus, part of that cost has to be figured in to the cost of the electricity, and at that point the sugar wins hands down, I think

      Yes! Invade Hawaii!

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    6. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

      Someone already tried that.

      They got nuked.

  51. The potato clock is a different deal... by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 5, Informative

    The potato clock is just a battery, not a fuel cell. You stick two dissimilar metals into any electrolyte (such as the juice in a potato) and you get current. Heck, with one of those kits, you could stick the electrodes into your mouth and generate current.

    On a related note, because the amalgam fillings in your mouth contain two dissimilar metals (silver and mercury), and saliva is an electrolyte, you could conceivably power your cell phone with your fillings. I am NOT making this up, there are documented medical cases where galvanic reactions involving amalgam fillings have been observed, e.g.: "Dr. William Cheshire, a physician at the Mayo Clinic, reports on a case where a woman's trigeminal neuralgia (tic douloureux) was traced to a galvanic reaction between an amalgam filling and an adjacent gold-alloy crown. Consumption of tomatoes and other acidic foods produced intense jolts described as being like those of an 'electrical battery'." (The abstract is here.

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  52. What about the MASS? by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    Chemical reactions inside the cell strip electrons from the hydrogen atoms to produce a voltage that can power a circuit.

    Ok, so hydrogen - electron = proton right? Well what do they do with all of the protons? Protons are where all of the mass is, and it seems unlikely that you can just keep feeding food into a cell without having to... well, um... take it for a walk.... right?

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    1. Re:What about the MASS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The electrons go back in in the other wire

    2. Re:What about the MASS? by guybarr · · Score: 1


      Well what do they do with all of the protons?

      oxidized to water ...

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
  53. Other movie Reference by uberdave · · Score: 2

    Yes, Mr. Fusion was the first thing that popped into my mind, followed by the robot powered by slugs, followed by the Matrix. The microbes are not going to care whether the leftovers are pizza, or people, right?

  54. Finally, It has a use by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 3, Funny

    I now finally have SOMETHING to do with my moms MEAT LOAF

    --
    --JonnyBlog
  55. Real men of genius by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny



    Today we salute you Mr.regardless-of-topic-lets-post-beowulf-cluster-r eferences.

    Without paying any attention to the story at hand you stay true to your mission of spreading the gospel of the Grendel slayer.

    Grendel slayer

    Be it virus spreading lego men, Jon Katz fanclub winamp skins, or coffee grinders running Red Hat...
    running Red Hat
    ...you can imagine them all in multiplicitous clusters.
    clusters baby
    So next time you're browsing slashdot ignore all the posts blasting Python, Perl or patent lawyers just set the threshold to -1 and do a search for the hero of the Geats, then think for a minute Geats and Gates? Is Beowulf a prophecy?

    1. Re:Real men of genius by t8k_it_ez · · Score: 0

      This post deserves a 6, Funny! (I know it only goes up to 5 but it's that funny) I've heard the ads that have the same kind of script, funny as hell, man.

    2. Re:Real men of genius by jack1323 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot should have a POST-OF-THE-YEAR Award for all the different categories--well, at least for Funny.

      And this post would win hands down.

    3. Re:Real men of genius by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      no offence, jack, but your post isn't funny, the parrent otoh, is pretty good, it would at least make the finalists ;)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  56. Biased article! by shrikel · · Score: 1

    Gosh, why is slashdot always so Eurocentric? Anybody mind converting those pounds into dollars?

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    1. Re:Biased article! by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      hmmm perhaps it cos some of us are european (who use the Euro in the main part) only the UK uses the Pound.

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    2. Re:Biased article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah,

      contrary to popular belief, the US is not the center of the world, its a sort of handicap for most of us.

  57. waste removal by cowtamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate to point out the obvious, but how will you remove the digested food from the battery?

    (Of course, this is not a problem for backyard generator type of systems, but might be for your laptop)

    1. Re:waste removal by malkavian · · Score: 2

      Fear when you hear the words on the train..
      "Damn, my battery's crapped out again!"

    2. Re:waste removal by satterth · · Score: 1
      I hate to point out the obvious, but how will you remove the digested food from the battery?
      Its gonna spit it all over your cloths.
      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  58. Third World fuel by bryguy5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The benefits of this are enourmous in a place like Papua New Guinea where subsitance farmers don't really have a true cash economy and as such don't have any way to adequately pay for kerosene or "zoom" - motorboat fuel as I like to call it. Solar is to expensive, but fruits and vegitables are really cheap and plentiful.

  59. 2 * 800,000 = 1,200,000? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Troll
    Nice math, yourself.

    I think sugar has about 5 Cal/g so that's 250 Cal = 1,000,000 J. Keeping in mind that "4000 J/C" is an approximation, their numbers are right.

    1. Re:2 * 800,000 = 1,200,000? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      You're assuming 100% efficiency. I was not. I was assuming that 1,600,000 J would need to be consumed to produce 1,200,000 J of useful work (75% efficient). That's wantonly optimistic - those critters are probably more like 20% efficient, if that.
      Your estimation of 1W = 4000J is fairly close - my text shows 1W= 4184J.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  60. Re:Use in remote places by StephenK · · Score: 1

    Great, now akll we need to do is make a flash light, fill it with sugar and it's ready to go.

  61. If food, Then why not other organic material? by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 1

    With fall arriving here in the North East of the United States, I'll soon have a back yard full of leaves. Would this technology work for this type of organic material as well, or should I go ahead and shred them up with the lawn mower and use them as mulch & compost?

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  62. Great idea by griblik · · Score: 1

    Think of all the furnaces and landfills this could replace. I always thought the gas burners over a landfill were wasted energy.

    Dump the waste into a industrial version (ok, might take a few years to develop), and hook it up to the power grid. Even if it doesn't provide a whole lot of energy, it's more energy we have to play with that doesn't come from fossil fuels.

    Of course, there's still the problem of what to do with the leftover waste. And someone's going to have to sort the organic stuff from the plastics (I had some bad jobs in college, but...)

    Good idea tho. Turns useless waste into useful energy. I'd buy that for a dollar.

    --
    Warning: May contain nuts
  63. Re:Prior Art-Driving to work everyday 4 over an hr by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    -Quote- I've been running my fridge that way for years now! -/Quote-

    That is exactly how I run my car too... Half eaten sandwhich over here, some chips on the seat, open soda cans between the seats, etc.

    I still cant figure out why I can't have a second date with a chick tho. Go figure?

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  64. How long would this take? by wwwssabbsdotcom · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly from Biology, these bacteria will take several hours to get some gasses going from digesting and then you get to wait for such power. Could be good for having a vat of food waste in a drum outside the back of a country cabin maybe, then you'd have to have it heated, too? At what temperature will E-Coli die in a pile of rotting food? Then, you'd have to "dump" the waste at some point, but then what comtaminants is the user exposed to?

    --
    Relive the BBS Past - One Byte at a Time! www.ssabbs.com
  65. New common line at business lunches by McFly69 · · Score: 1

    "Are you done done with your sandwhich because my laptop's battery is running low?"

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  66. cash from the trash by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

    I think what you're missing here is the notion of efficiency. Ostensibly, the ElectroStomach is producing usable energy from what would otherwise be trash. So the cost isn't a factor, since you'd already purchased the fuel to begin with, and were only going to throw it away.

    If you imagine how much food goes down garbage disposals or gets dumped into landfills, there's conceivably millions of kilowatt-hours worth of power being lost. Reclaiming that power would be revolutionary.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    1. Re:cash from the trash by snatchitup · · Score: 1

      So is sunlight. It hits the Earth, and if it isn't captured by a solar panel (or a crop, or a plankton), it's just wasted.

      But, the cost of making the solar panels, say, enough of them to cover the state of Arizona far outweighs the benefit of maybe a few megawatts.

      Also, we also have to know the speed of the process. Energy isn't necessarily what we're after here. We're after power. They say they can get 40 watts continuously from granulated sugar. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on that. But, most of the trash isn't going to contain nearly the energy density of sugar. For that reason, I think you just aren't going to be able to get energy out of the process at a fast enough rate to be a real power source. The energy seeps out of this trash, but it bursts out of something like burning coal.

      Since the enrgy comes out much slower, then the size of the process has to be bigger. I would guess that to compete with a 100MW natural gas plant taking up about 2 Square Miles would take at least 200 - 2000 square miles of a trash plant.

  67. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And that little top-up of food generates 1.21Gigawatts

    That's Jiggawatts.
  68. Re:Flux Capacitor by olclops · · Score: 1

    Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.

  69. Re:Don't count on seeing it in your home anytime s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never fear. It also sounds just as inefficient and impractical as all solialistis solutions. ;-)

  70. Mr. Fusion not Flux Capacitor by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    One this baby gets up to 88mph, you're going to see some serious shit.

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  71. What's that smell? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    Nothing, just the battery on my new laptop. I found something green and furry in the back of the fridge, and decided to see how long it would support a Quake3 fragfest.

    (and you thought lan parties smelled bad after 3 days with no showers...)

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  72. Re:Huge implications by thesadmac · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the people who sell the oil aren't going to be quite so happy about this. I'm sure they'll do everything in their power to prevent the rollout of devices like these.

  73. Re:Don't count on seeing it in your home anytime s by joshsisk · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard much about these "solialistis solutions", can you expound on that?

  74. Re:Could the Colis be outcompeted? by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They would probably sell granules like the ones they sell for septic tanks, to "refresh" your battery.

  75. Eco tax evasion? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

    Will the British government bust people who use these batteries for evading the UK's fuel tax? They are busting the drivers of "grease cars." The oil mafia will crush alternative fuels at every turn, and they have governments in their back pockets.

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:Eco tax evasion? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Actually I think you'll find that the fuel tax goes into the economy (and pays for road maintenance, etc) and NOT to the oil companies, and one of the reasons it's so high is to try and persuade people to use public transport more - which is a good thing...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    2. Re:Eco tax evasion? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying that the fuel tax itself is a bad thing, or that tax revenue is handed to the cartels, but using the fuel tax as an excuse to squash the pioneers of alternative fuels is absolutely doing the bidding of the oil cartels, who won't tolerate any competition. The UK could tax cooking oil used as fuel, instead of busting people who use it. I suspect that the fossil fuel cartels won't like bio batteries any more than "grease cars." It may take the oil wells running dry before alternative fuels are taken seriously.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  76. Ever notice.. by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    the Y-shaped flux capacitor looks like a flushing toilet? Doc got the idea when he hit his head on one.

  77. Good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure beats sending the food to a starving third-world country as my parents always threatened to do.

  78. 146% efficiency??? Something smells funny here!!! by endoboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their numbers contain a little of the stench usually associated with products containing Ecoli---

    -lets do a little math...

    The article claims 8 hours @ 40 watts from 50 grams of sugar: 40watts=.04kW :: .04kw*8hours=0.32kWh=1152kiloJoules

    according to the domino box in my hand, 4grams sugar=15 Calories, so the sugar contains 12.5*15=187.5 Calories :: 187.5Calories = 785 kiloJoules

    So-- they claim to be getting 1152kJ output for a 785kJ input???? 146% output is impressive, but not likely.

  79. Don't leave things over by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    If you have leftover it simply means you cooked too much!

    Sure this is a good idea, but it only uses the energy in the food - i.e. all the time you use to cook it, decoration etc. are still completely wasted efforts. I'm sure the battery would still work if you put the "raw materials" in it i.e. eggs, meat, vegetables, sugar, grain etc.

    Cooking it then feeding it to a battery instead of eating it just makes no sense to me. Unless they make a battery with a sense of taste.

    1. Re:Don't leave things over by kingOFgEEEks · · Score: 0

      by that reasoning (bear with this one):
      you shouldn't bother putting eggs in... they're a waste of the chicken's energy. just put the chicken into the battery... but the chicken is a waste of energy, since the chicken had to eat grain. Therefore, just put the grain into the battery... but the grain is a waste of energy, since it's a processed plant seed. Just put the plant from your backyard in.

      In the end, you still throw out your leftover food, which is a waste.

      --
      mechanicos ergo cogito
    2. Re:Don't leave things over by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      They are wasted energy, but not wasted efforts because the chicken - seed - plant - sun chain occurs naturally and does not require any human effort.

      You have to do something (i.e. cook) to waste the energy to make leftover food. Now that's wasted efforts.

  80. Efficient? by photon317 · · Score: 2


    They gave a rough figure of 50g of sugar powering a 40W light bulb for eight hours.

    40W x 8hrs = 0.32 kWh
    50g * 2.204623 = 0.110 lbs
    Cheap bags of sugar at netgrocer are $0.66/lb.
    0.11 lbs * $0.66 = $0.073
    1/0.32 = 3.125
    $0.073*3.125 = $0.23

    So by my rough calculations, if you bought bags of sugar to feed the fuel cell for house power, you'd be paying $0.23/kWh, which is significantly higher than I pay for electricity here in Texas.

    Their currently technology only uses pure sugar. They're working towards carrots they claim - but I would imagine the efficiency can only decrease from the raw sugar efficiency per dollar unless the fundamentals of their technology improve.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Efficient? by syphax · · Score: 1

      Nice calculation.

      I differ with your conclusions, though- $0.23/kWh is expensive relative to utility power, but it seems incredibly cheap given the small scale of the unit. If you can do $0.23 without trying too hard, I'm guessing that there is room for improvement.

      Also consider that you don't need to necessarily feed it food-grade sugar...

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
  81. methane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ---a long time ago now I built a very simple but quite functional methane digester. I used just a scrap oil drum and a washtub and some cheap hoses. The starter fuel to produce the methane was a combo of farm animal waste and some weeds and rotten apples I had-just whatever biomass I had handy. Lived on a ranch then, had a lot of "stuff" to experiment with. Anyway, it worked so well and made so much gas I am still amazed this technology isn't in more widespread useage now. Well, I am not amazed actually from watching the shenanigans of the power monopolies. The gas could be burned directly as a replacement for natural gas or propane, or perhaps now used in conjunction with a fuel cell. There are x-hundreds of thousands of small digesters in use around the world now, primarily for cooking and lighting, and a few hundred large operations in the US, at municipal waste treatment plants and a few on some large farms, but really, there's a technology that needs more adoption. The coolness factor is it can be scaled from very small to whatever size you want into the commercial sized levels. It is beyond easy to set one up near as I can tell compared to a lot of other alternative tech out there. Granted, not directly in your laptop, but there is no reason that it couldn't be adapted to a normal building sized unit that went to making electricity with the gas and use it that way. The various waste/biomatter stuff gets made, no reason to not use it. I honestly don't know the name of the bacteria involved though. It's anerobic digestion-decomposition in the absence of oxygen, as opposed to aerobic decomposition, ie, a "compost pile", or like I think is used in the tech in the article.

  82. Does it get full? by Red+Leader. · · Score: 1

    Fueling this thing with sugar is one thing, but fueling it with food scraps is an entirely seperate problem.

    What happens when the devices becomes full of un-usuable material? When it is full, and you clean it out - can you buy a little replentishing vial of new E.coli? Will you have to replace the redox chemicals?

    How long would it take to get one of these going? That is, if you wanted to use it immediately, would you have to jump start it with sugar and drop some other food in so that the decomposition process could begin? As anyone with a compost bin knows, decomposition is pretty slow process and may only yeild sufficient quantities of enzymes after an initial growing period.

    Here's one guy hoping these guys can overcome the obstacles.

  83. Re:Osmolarity by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    refined sugar + water = a pretty cheap power supply to me, even if i do have to carry the water around. airlines will give you all the water you want, which, coincidentally, is probably where this battery would be most successful to start off with.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  84. Re:Use in remote places by volve · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think that sitting in the middle of a forest, in a tent, but with an 8-hour 40w bulb, kind of defeats the point of going on a camping trip in the first place?

    This device, as useful as it sounds, will probably never make it to the mainstream, thanks to Duracell and Energizer... why have a renewable power source when for the same price you could carry around heavey chunks of metal that are illegal to through in the trash!

    That just sounds like crazy talk to me...

    -VolVE

  85. get out to the country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    --honestly, not flaming you-but please, take a holiday and spend a month out in the countryside and do some farm work. You really need to get some basic education to where food comes from and how we as humans are tied to the earth. Animal manure is spread on fields. there's your answer. You can touch it and not die. Really. Humans have been exposed to this "contaminant" for millenia. You'll appreciate the education you get, really. This is a small rant, but this is the reason there's such a schism between the urban elitist and centric laws that get passed and how they are contantly dumping on the rural people we have every year, especially in the US. I constantly get reminded of this with events like this post. Tech education is one thing,learning to use the subway and the stereo and the ability to open packages of food from the grocery store is Ok as far as it goes, but real world outside where the sun shines and the plants grow and the animals live education shouldn't be neglected, at least some basic 101 "how things work" education. all people need this, everyone, I don't care how rich they are or what their jobs are, IMO everyone needs to know and have an appreciation for real-world "nature" besides a drive in the park and watching discovery channel. this needs be hands-on doing it. Really, take a month and go work on a farm someplace, it'll be worth a degree to you in practical balanced knowledge. You won't get a piece of paper with a "certification" on it, but the education will be just as real.

  86. Consistent voltage? by darketernal · · Score: 1

    When I first saw this, it reminded me of the mechanism (it was called "Mr." something) that Doc Brown was using to power his super-delorean in Back To The Future... :P

    But what I'm wondering how consistent the voltage it provides is like.. I say this because my MP3 player loves to die on me before the batteries actually do because of its voltage needs that alkalines can't consistently provide.

    "Hey, Mike, got a recharge for my MP3 player?"
    "I think there's an old brownie in my pocket..."

  87. Mandatory ex-wife joke by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well that means my ex-wife will never have to worry about having a dead battery in her car ever again. She's got enough MacDonalds french fries stuck in the seat crack to crank the engine for *days*. And still have enough Joules left over to light Las Vegas on Christmas Eve.

  88. Will it run on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stale, flat beer?

  89. Re:Use in remote places by volve · · Score: 1

    through == throw /. is going to kill my spelling... bah! -VolVE

  90. Re:That's nice and all.. by greenhide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, the advantage might be that currently most people don't compost, as they have no reason too. Food scraps make up a decent amount of landfill waste, but it's all mixed in and can't be separated out.

    However, if people had a incentive for composting, they would put all of their waste into the battery located in the back of their house, say. While not all of the scraps would be gone, it would probably decay much more quickly than it would in a landfill, and it would generate some electricity.

    Waste management crews could pick up the waste once it had been decomposed, filter it, sanitize it, and sell it as a fertilizer or soil filler.

    The improvement is that chemical batteries actually add to our trash volume and these might reduce it.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  91. Re:146% efficiency??? Something smells funny here! by CompaniaHill · · Score: 1

    You're confusing physics "heat energy" calories with "nutitrition" calories -- the two unfortunately use the same name but are measuring different things.

  92. The Power of Cheese by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to a calculation someone did concerning the energy density requred for a "laser pistol" and comparing it to a can of Potato Cheese soup. It's about the same.

    Never underestimate the Power of Cheese!

  93. I can see it now... by MrIcee · · Score: 2
    Med Centers for batteries...

    NURSE: I'm sorry, there's nothing we can do.

    OWNER: But my laptop was just fine a few minutes ago? What happened?

    NURSE: Your organic batteries have food poisoning.

    OWNER: Oh my lord... what can I do!?!?

    NURSE: Nothing... he's dead now Jim.

  94. Whoa by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of these!!!!

  95. Re:146% efficiency??? Something smells funny here! by endoboy · · Score: 1

    no I'm not... those are "nutritional" calories....aka kilo-calories

    if it were thermal calories, 187.5 would be equivalent to .785kJoule

  96. The above is not redundant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the first to mention Mr Fusion. The timestamp is there for a reason, numbnuts.

  97. drunk, loser batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not capitalize on bad situations, turning them into something useful? Next time you or your buddies gets sloppy drunk, then try to have a "Designated Energizer" to collect the liquid feces and vomitous that will soon explode from your body and make use of the high acidity of said liquids contrasted with the actual alcohol left over (if there is any) to form cheap batteries. While your friends won't fell any better physically, they will know that their foolishness served not just as an embarrassment for the entire human race but also served to reduce the environmental impact of energy use. Plus, why not recoup a little money from the costs of cleaning your carpet, upholstery, seat covers and clothes? Our bodies have produced this bounty, so why not harvest it and enjoy the benefits?

  98. Extra picky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not so sure about that - when we learn
    that Mr Fusion is connected to the DeLorian,
    it's also revealed that the car can fly. Is
    the flight gas powered or garbage powered -
    that's not revealed.

  99. This Is Not New Stuff! by SniffleBear · · Score: 1

    ENERGY bars and ENERGY drinks have been around for a while!!! Someone gimme a Red Bull and I can run a bike generator for a few days :)

  100. A battery that eats... by witchman · · Score: 1

    So basically we have a battery that produces energy by eating and digesting. What strikes me as funny, is that fact that all of the news reports leave out the mention of what comes next for all things that eat and digest...waste disposal. So I'm now going to have to carry a pooper-scooper and little plastic baggies for all of my battery powered items!?

  101. Battery Waste? by Atomizer · · Score: 1

    Sounds like these batteries will need to poop sometime or another. Maybe you could hook a large one, enough to power your house, up to the sewer.

    Wait. Stick with me here. Maybe you could do it backwards, and have these batteries eat poop, and produce leftovers for the waste. Then they could power the fridge to store it and the microwaves to reheat it.

    Just like that South Park episode...

  102. Re:Using myself to fuel the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like you got yourself a renewable resource there...pretty lean machine...so to speak

  103. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    harness the gas from everyone eating taco bell.

    So, theorectically, a Slashdot Meetup could be used to combat rolling blackouts.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  104. Partytime ! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    ... Now nobody dies anymore of no food. You just play on by reusing your pizza-leftovers ...

    gives an entire new meaning too .. sorry ... "I have a smelly battery !" ...

    Maybe if you play long enough you make enough peniciline to heal the next stack of "dead" batteries...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  105. A use for all the stuff in the back of the fridge by Kyrn · · Score: 1

    which looks as if it's about to gian it's own intelligence and escape!

  106. Sugar power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Someone should introduce this technology to Cuba. Castro would be transformed over night from third-world despot to first-world sugar sheik.

    Well, maybe not , but he could probably afford to bring back streetlights or domething.

  107. Re:A few considerations by hamsterboy · · Score: 1
    1. The reason you would connect batteries in series is to increase voltage. Two AA batteries (1.5V each) in series gives a total voltage of 3V. Most residential light bulbs (in the US - not sure about UK) run on 120V; it would take a lot of AAs to get this, but the organic cells probably do better than 1.5V - my guess is 3-5V.
    2. The article says that each cell could be produced for around 10 GBP (about $16), so I'm guessing not very much.
    -- Hamster
  108. Re:Flux Capacitor by wraithgar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, the flux capacitor is a real thing. The term was borrowed for the movie cause it sounded cool. Obviously the real one isn't related to time travel ;).

    It was the point of many jokes for the quarter of my electronics class when we dealt with capacitors and inductors.

  109. Food shortage by McFly69 · · Score: 1

    WE all know there is a oil shortage expected to occur in 20 or 30 years. If this idea takes off, can we expect a food shortage instead? Thinking that people just grow food so it can decompose for batterys.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  110. Food is already fuel by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

    Food to fuel isn't a new idea. The human body already manages that conversion just fine.

    Calories are measurements of the amount of heat energy. Guess that means the higher-calorie foods will be more useful for charging this battery.

    Refuel at McDonald's.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
  111. Read the article by delphi125 · · Score: 2
    Team leader Chris Melhuish told New Scientist magazine said that although the new MCFs run on sugar cubes, the team aims to move on to carrot power.

    "It has to be able to use raw materials, rather than giving it refined fuel."

    I think you missed the point. At present, they probably do add water to the sugar. But they are aiming to process household wastes (carrot peels, sewage) rather than refined sugar (a pure carbohydrate like, er, petrol/gasoline).

  112. Re:Flux Capacitor by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

    The drawing that they used for the capacator was for the time travel one, not the real world one. Guess I should have been more specific.

  113. here's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the fact that you will not get said certification or credentials is the very thing that drives fools from real knowledge. Those who wish to learn or beaten down until they submit and only go for letters next to their name. It is a sign of a good instructor and good student when actual education is put above all else so that a degreed (or certified) individual really is worth what that paper says.

    Academia is everywhere today and it has replaced the majority of common sense and "hands on" knowledge that is both the backbone and brain of modern society and it's success.

  114. Back to the Future! by Tadrith · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Am I the only person here having visions of Christopher Lloyd stuffing garbage into the back of a Delorean?

    1. Re:Back to the Future! by Mark+Clements · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no.

  115. do you keep your spare change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    because by that argument (on the surface) it is inefficient to collect, consolidate and turn in the change from a perspective of the energy it takes to bend over, keep it in your pocket till you get home, store it in some area or container, etc.

    I agree fully that it would be foolish to use less efficient production methods simply because it is local. However, it seems your measure of efficiency is not including total cost of ownership and operation. If a household spends 50 USD for a device that requires only 10 dollars (per year) maintenance but yet through its production of electricity saves the household 200 dollars (a year) then that is a good investment. You mentioned automobiles and that is a good analogy. While I myself commute to work on mass transit I understand the definite drawbacks (mainly lack of freedom, potential to be really late to work or from work to home because of a limited transit schedule, no guarantee of sitting room, etc) However other factors have made me decide that it is indeed beneficial to keep using mass transit.

    If people set up a cheap system that actually turns "trash into treasure" then how can that be bad? That is not to say that cities should not use a similiar technology (if it works) that not only increases the amount of fuels but kills two birds with one stone in the case of trash, biological waste, etc. Yeah, I think many have heard of small operations that utilize anything from the heat from composting (killing two birds once again) to capturing the methane from pig and cattle farms. This seems to be different in that it is smaller scale, the very thing you claim is bad. While it would be 'nice' if a transparent system (to the end user) was set up on any more efficient, cleaner, cheaper method... the ability to gain benefit from what was once just thrown away will be the very thing that will drive such technology... its just human nature.

    Now, my question is how long will it be till I can squat over my car intake after eating a viscious burrito in order to have a "free" trip to the pub?

    Oh, one other thing... you bring up a good question, "What are the benefits to localizing the energy generation?" and I am reminded of how short sighted people say things like (in regards to computing) "640k ought to be enough for anybody", "client server topology will replace any peering or thin client system in the future", etc. The thing is just that you don't know what the future will bring, but what you should observe from history is that hardcoding systems often causes more problems than are solved. I can see situations where it would be foolish to centralize production and those where it would be the best thing to do. As for cleaning, I guess that would be a question aimed at experts in septic and reclaimation systems.

  116. liquifying tool. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    They'd probably sell you a liquifying tool. Probably a cheap miniature blender.

    They could give them away as sort of a promotion... "Buy this battery pack and we'll throw in a Fuelizer(tm) for free!"

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  117. Re:Use in remote places by grimsweep · · Score: 2, Funny

    The nice part about this battery is, 'What happens if it runs out?'.

    Simple. I have no idea about plants, but I imagine woodland creatures are bound to have some degree of the appropriate susbtances in them.

    Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of an 'Energizer Bunny'.

  118. Read Moonbase. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    Isaac Asimov's Moonbase is a story about nanomachines, their uses, and the violent public backlash. (Those people were called "nanoluddites")

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Read Moonbase. by Argon · · Score: 1

      Not Isaac Asimov - it was Ben Bova. He also
      wrote Moon War, Jupiter and similar sci-fi novels.

    2. Re:Read Moonbase. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Doh! And they were sitting on my desk at the time...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  119. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by sirinek · · Score: 2

    *laugh* too true. I'll bring it up at the next meetup here.

    And I just *love* your sig. Easily in my top 3 favorite Slashdot sigs. ;)

    siri

  120. Big deal, I already do this. by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    I've been making hydrogen and sulfur for years now....especially on tuesday morning after Monday Night Football, beer and nachos.

    They should just make a device you fart into...that would be much more efficient.

    -ted

  121. Gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I finish installing this in my home, I actually *want* all my relatives to send me fruitcakes for the various holidays!

  122. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    how much energy I could get out of the poop my cat makes each day instead of using leftover food?

  123. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by I.AM.BLORT · · Score: 0

    however the byproduct of this is very likely to be a brownout :)

  124. Re:That's nice and all.. by dcunning · · Score: 1

    Actually the US power grid (and, really, the majority of power grids) are highly ineffecient. (Don't have a link, but you can find several articles to this end on MIT Tech. Report and Wired in the last year.)

    Combine this with the net energy loss of hauling your fuel in from several hundred million points (houses, offices, apartments, resturaunts, etc.) and you only increase the waste (especially since you'd probably have two sets of garbage trucks roaming around) and the energy lost due to the fact that food will be partially (mostly?!) broken down by the time it gets there (unless they start carting off your food wastes in refrigerated trucks) and you see the issues with your plan...

    Actually, if you read up a bit, you'll find that, while a little nervous about the economic impacts on current power generators, power grid owners tend to be quite optimistic about distributed power production.

    Also, have you ever sat down and figured out the amound of energy lost when you try to shove a huge current down a tiny wire (and even the big/fat powerlines are "tiny" when you look at it this way.) I forget, but there is something like an average of 20% loss of power between a big gerenator and the substation in your neighbor hood. Stand under a high voltage line: where do you think the energy for all that buzzing and crackling is coming from? Stand closer and ask yourself where all that heat is coming from. But not too close... ;-)

  125. Re:Huge implications by GooberToo · · Score: 2

    Umm. Wouldn't juicing take out most of the sugar? After all, when he said carrots, I immediatley assumed the purpose of using carrots was because of their high sugar content.

  126. Re:A few considerations by archeopterix · · Score: 1
    The reason you would connect batteries in series is to increase voltage. Two AA batteries (1.5V each) in series gives a total voltage of 3V. Most residential light bulbs (in the US - not sure about UK) run on 120V; it would take a lot of AAs to get this, but the organic cells probably do better than 1.5V - my guess is 3-5V.

    Voltage is not as important as power - there are quite efficient voltage converters, you can avoid stacking batteries using one of those (at a cost of some power loss). The thing that matters is power - you cannot 'convert' power. We still don't know how much power can such a battery yield.
    The article says that each cell could be produced for around 10 GBP (about $16), so I'm guessing not very much.

    That is only a partial answer - the article does not state whether the chemicals get used up. If they are only catalysts, then hooray - you buy them once and only refill sugar. If not - back to the original question.
  127. If it breaks down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do I take it to a GP, GI, ENT,proctologist, or Radio Shack? Can it burp or fart?

  128. Re:Huge implications by archeopterix · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This has more meaning then you might think for the economy. The idea that a country will not have to import oil any longer to maintain its power systems / gas requirements is just as important as the savings for the individual from not having to go to the gas station.

    Too optimistic - we don't even know if a battery produces more energy than it is needed for its manufacturing, let alone smelting a thousand tons of steel without turning a continent into a carrot monoculture.
  129. Yes! Invade Hawaii! by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 1

    Wow, personally had i the karma to burn i would mod you to -1 Flamebait/Troll you.... cause *Newsflash* We _already_ did that, and tried to do that in Cuba as well at the behest of the Hershey Corp (as well as others). Please try to add a bit of history to your obviously small repetior(sic).

    1. Re:Yes! Invade Hawaii! by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      My joke was based on the fact that Hawaii is now a state (as of 1959) unless of course you are pushing the agendas of groups like The Hawaiian Kinkgom.

      Fact: *ALL* of the U.S. was 'taken' from the indigenous peoples by 'invaders'.

      Sugar production is one of the things Hawaii is known for. Now, while I could have said "Lets invade Louisianna" it wouldn't have been as funny, because far less people know that Louisianna is a large sugar producer.

      It was a joke that was not meant to offend anybody. I didn't make any kind of derogatory remarks towards any culture or ethnicity, so don't try to play Political Corrctness games.

      There are plenty of groups claiming that the U.S. (and/or Canada and Mexico) don't have sovreignty in a particular region of the Southwest, Pacific Northwest, Florida, Texas, Vermont, and a whole slew of other places.

      Now, how can you judge me of being unaware of history from 1 line of text? Research indicates George Washington most likely didn't have wooden teeth...but it makes for some funny jokes.

      You accuse my comment of being trollish, but yours is what exactly? If I hadn't already commented in this discussion I would use my moderation points to mark you down.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  130. Re:Great for UPS!!!! by Myco · · Score: 2

    Easy -- make the dough out of grains genetically engineered to absorb iron from the soil.

  131. Carrot not enough by Felipe+Hoffa · · Score: 1

    The carrot needs to have enough sugar (sweet carrot) and you will also need to have light cargo and a hungry donkey.

    Fh

  132. The sound of 100,000 E-Coli cells dying: by SkOink · · Score: 1

    "Damn, this bread is a bit moldy."
    "Well, just feed it to the TV, dear."

    You _do_ know how they found penecillin, right? :)

    --
    ---- I'll take you in a Hunt deathmatch any day.
  133. No, buying a bag of sugar to power this thing... by big_oaf · · Score: 1

    ...is not cheaper than buying the power from the local power company. Not that anybody would think it would be, but I did some calculations just to see how much more expensive it actually would be.

    I used their 40W light bulb for 8 hours on 50g sugar ratio, and I used google to determine the going rate for a Kilowatt-hour and a 5 lb. bag of sugar. I determined (all rough estimates, mind you) that running a 40W light bulb for 3 days would use 1 lb. of sugar and cost $.52(USD), where running the same light bulb for the same amount of time with grid power would cost only $.19(USD). The article says that the researchers are trying to make it more efficient, so maybe someday we'll all be off the grid thanks to E. coli. Weird.

    --
    -- My hovercraft is full of eels.
  134. I do love the BBC by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    I love that the picture in the article is a plate of leftover food... like we don't know what leftover food looks like.

    Then again, considering how much we Americans eat, maybe we don't know what it looks like, and the pic's just a favor done for us Yanks across the pond :)

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  135. If this feeds an aibo... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    the circle is closed.

  136. Re:Carnivorous Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have those idiots never watched tv? This is not cause for excitment.. !

  137. Re:hmm by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    I think there's a tropical flower that does something like that. It has a huge blossom that smells like rotting meat. I can't remember if it eats the flies or is pollenated by them, though... I think it may just get pollenated by them.

  138. Re:Flux Capacitor by orangeaaron · · Score: 1

    And do we all have to dress like Doc from the 2nd episode?

  139. Re:Using myself to fuel the car by spoon42 · · Score: 1

    What do you do?

    Liposuction!

    What is that?

    Fat reduction!

    KITH rules. rule. whatever. :)

    --
    --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
  140. Physics for dummys by jbaker · · Score: 1

    P=workdone/time
    5 calories/gram of sugar (being nice here)
    1 calorie=4.184 joules (not kilo joules. If you yankees worked in metric like everyone else in the world we wouldn't have this problem)
    therefore 50g of sugar has 5*50*4.184=1046 joules
    once again joules not kilo joules.
    P=workdone/time
    therefore assumming 100% efficiency (good luck) the maximum power obtainable over eight hours is
    1046 joules/(8*60*60 seconds)
    =36mWatts. Oh my god this is great we can run a 36mWatt light bulb for 8 hours with 50g of sugar.

  141. Powered by Leftover Food@Work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a few leftover cookies, brought to the office because they were stale, and hungry employees being paid less than a dollar over the mininum wage have been eating them when they get hungry. You can have them, however, but I would imagine that the tiny, tiny lightbulb powered by such an arrangement would hardly suffice to provide enough light to allow our employees to look over the "want-ad's", having realized that the "monopoly money" that we get paid won't pay any real-world bills.

  142. Obligatory matrix reference by Trogre · · Score: 1

    So how many BTU's of body heat do these microbes generate?

    So now do we call them E."Coppertop" Coli?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  143. Re:Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I finally have a use for all that old pizza stacked up in the corner of my room......

    Dont forget about the backwash left in the Mountain Dew cans as well.

  144. Re:Correction to correction by ipsuid · · Score: 1

    Actually, it is Gigawatts. Giga is supposed to be pronounced with a soft "G", making it sound like a J... Someone, somewhere, many years ago said giga with a hard g and it stuck.

    --
    It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
  145. So, Homer was right after all... by GRH · · Score: 1

    First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women...

  146. Oil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Anything to reduce the dependency on oil, I guess...

  147. If you have a sweet tooth, better move to Canada by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 1

    If you like it in bulk, you can have 112,000 lbs of sugar for US$ 8,176, or about 7.3 cents/lb, if you don't mind picking it up in New York. (Bring friends.) But that's only if you are going to export it. If you live in the U.S., you have to pay $24,371 (21.8 c/lb) because we have to protect our domestic sugar beet industry from the insidious international sugar conspiracy that threatens the very pillars of our civilization. Or, because the farmers lobby has too much pull in Washington. I forget which one it is.

    --
    --
  148. Maybe because the article was brittish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are all american articles giving prices in US$, whu can't they give it in S$ so I don't have to convert everything#)(/)

  149. Why is this funny??? by cpt.haddock · · Score: 1

    I thought the days of McCarty (the communist hunter, if I recollect correct) were over.

  150. Re:Carnivorous Robot by Fesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh. This is how that'll go down...

    A Light Snack (C)Stephen Notley

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  151. Good work, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody said anything about calories. We are talking about Calories.

  152. Re:hmm by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    i wonder what the bastard will smell like.. if it isn't pleasant, might take a while to gain acceptance.

    then again, if it smells like garbage, maybe it could attract flies, and maybe the flies could feed it.. ah, that would be funny.


    Many people already use home composters and vermiculture (earthworms) as means of disposing of (non-meat) food waste. If taken care of properly, they do not smell and do not attract flies. I do both, and there is no smell and there is little work involved.

    I suspect that the jonk-powered battery will similarly work without odor. In fact, I suspect that would be a design requirement.

    guac-foo.

  153. Re:Correction to correction by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

    many years ago said giga with a hard g and it stuck

    We still say a hard g! In Holland people talk with an hard g, and does it suck? No, it's funny because nobody else can pronounce it :)

    --

    If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
  154. Re:Flux Capacitor by byron150 · · Score: 1

    The Marine's are allowed to touch Electrical things??????? This is NOT GOOD!!!!!

    --
    -Never believe in the end of something great, send it to sub-committee for further study!!! - ME
  155. Let's go to the tape by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    Doc: Alright then. Let's get the Delorean and get ourselves back to the future!
    Marty: (casually) Oh Doc, I tore a hole in the gas tank. We'll have to patch it up and get gas.
    Doc: (Freezes in place) You mean we're out of gas?
    Marty: (still casual) Yeah, no big deal, we got Mr. Fusion, right?
    Doc: Mr. Fusion powers the time circuits and the flux capacitor. But the internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has. There's not going to be a gas station around here until some time in the next century. Without gasoline, we can't get the Delorean up to 88 miles per hour.
    Marty: So what'll we do?


    The power source for the hover conversion is implied to be gas, but, hey, we need a new branch for physics for the hover technology anyway.

    And no, I found it on Google.
    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Let's go to the tape by stud9920 · · Score: 2

      But what's a flux capacitor anyway ? I thought fluxes were supposed to be inductive, not capacitive...

    2. Re:Let's go to the tape by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      I thought fluxes were supposed to be inductive, not capacitive...

      Yeah, sure, stationary relative to the nearest major mass they are, but when you get up to 88 miles per hour, then you're gonna see some serious shit.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  156. Re:Huge implications by Cybrr · · Score: 1

    And/or compete to become a market leader in sustainable power. While they're still profiting off oil, they could figure out better fusion reactors.

    --
    Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  157. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Or you or I must yield up his life to Ahrimanes. I would rather it were you.
    I should have no hesitation in sacrificing my own life to spare yours, but
    we take stock next week, and it would not be fair on the company.
    -- J. Wellington Wells

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...