Slashdot Mirror


Korea World Leader in Broadband/Technology at Home

bozoman42 writes "67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband, some at 32Mbps! In fact, according to the Guardian Article, Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life. But there may be downsides. (Especially as covered here last week.)"

298 comments

  1. But there may be downsides... by MattRog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, like living next to North Korea.

    --

    Thanks,
    --
    Matt
    1. Re:But there may be downsides... by bsignorelli · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or like having your dog go missing. Then going outto eat soon thereafter....

    2. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know they were talking about South Korea? I noticed this during the world cup. Since when did South Korea become Korea?

    3. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I have that speed. and let all the downsides go to ......

    4. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      How did you know they were talking about South Korea?

      maybe by reading the fucking article.

      "Not many people would have bet on South Korea becoming the world's leading nation..."

    5. Re:But there may be downsides... by User+956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How did you know they were talking about South Korea? I noticed this during the world cup. Since when did South Korea become Korea?

      Probably around the same time Taiwan became officially recognized as "China", by the US Government

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    6. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So The Guardian mentions it but slashdot doesn't.

    7. Re:But there may be downsides... by panurge · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Well, you presumably live next to Mexico. Or Texas.

      But this is being written on a Samsung lightweight notebook connected to a Lan on which sits a Samsung workgroup printer, and I paid for them myelf. Those guys are doing something right.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    8. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you don't think it's about North Korea? It's a communist nation that oppress and starve its own people. Capitalism, liberties, free trade are things they have never experienced.

    9. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like living next to North Korea.

      Canada and Mexico know how they feel.

    10. Re:But there may be downsides... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Fortunately, the Mexicans or Texas do not have weapons of mass destruction or have interests to invade my country and possibly use them. Former President Clinton called the North Korea/South Korea border the scariest place on Earth.

    11. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you do realize that any state or country having any kind of chemical or medical industry has the capability of producing "weapons of mass destruction".

      It's not like chemical weapons are difficult to make. You can probably get the instructions from google.

      Clinton called the North Korea/South Korea border the scariest place on Earth.

      Yes and we all know the american politicians NEVER try to demonize others for their own political agendas *smirk*

    12. Re:But there may be downsides... by thegrommit · · Score: 2

      Yes, shame the poster and "editor" forgot to mention that the article is talking about South Korea. The situation is rather different in North Korea.

    13. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hehe...

      amen brother

    14. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's sort of a given, isn't it? Good things=South Korea. Bad things=North Korea. I'd call that a stereotype if it weren't for the fact that it's completely true.

    15. Re:But there may be downsides... by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hmmm, you've never actually BEEN to Texas, have you? Apparently, neither has Clinton, because if he had ever put his pants back on long enough to come here, I promise you, he would have been right scared.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    16. Re:But there may be downsides... by (v)Jargon(v) · · Score: 1

      I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad. Whose demands does the fucking US adhere to? Just remember it was the bloody imperialists from the West that divided the country as they did with Vietnam,India-Pakistan, and Palestine. Can't say too much good about those situations as well, now can we??

    17. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad.

      North Korea is much like a homeless person desperately committing violent crimes on street corners: They have nothing to lose. That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes: Israel, the UK, Russia, the US- All have "something to live for", so to speak, so their nukes largely are retaliatory. Mutually assured destruction, if you will. North Korea, on the other hand, seems like the kind of nutbar country that would take action knowing full well that it would be obliterated: What's there to lose?

      If you're looking for a great example of anti-Americanism, I would hardly consider North Korea a good choice: A despotic, shithole of a country where millions continue to starve to death while the leadership builds giant monstrosity of buildings in a desperate attempt to portray itself as a successful nation.

    18. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. yes, it was necessary to read the article.

    19. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [i]I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad. [/i]

      No, I think the mass starvations, dicatorship, killings, recruiting from orphanages at the age of 6 for SF troops, terrorist bombings of jetliners, kidnapping of foriegn citizens, and sending death squads into South Korea is what makes them 'bad'.

    20. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So we learn that "Israel, the UK, Russia, the US"
      have nukes that are retaliatory. How so! The
      concept of mutual retaliatiotion implies that
      two countries are on the opposite side, and are
      enemies. Does Israel have nukes so they can retaliate against the
      US, or against the UK? Does the US have the
      same "retaliatory" nukes to send towards Britain?
      NO, of course not. Since we consider that Israel
      has Palestine as its enemy, how can you claim that
      the Israel's nukes are retaliatory against Palestine
      who has no nukes.


      Same think with US and Britain. Are you claiming
      that the nukes of both counties are retaliatory
      because US is the enemy of UK?


      (Me thinks that CNN does the thinking for you.)

    21. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey shithead...

      Israel developed nukes in the 1960's (with the assistance of the United States, Tiawan, South Korea and South Africa...)

      In 1973, Israel was nearly defeated by the combined armies of Syria and Egypt.

      Clue check moron: the nukes are not there to deter the Palestinians.

    22. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey fuckface, how many nukes does egypt or syria have combined?

    23. Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Your rabid anti-American attitude clouds your judgement to such a degree that you espouse an admiration for a country that starves its people......


      I fervently hope that you represent the future of the 'revolution'......we have nothing to fear from the likes of you.

    24. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The concept of mutual retaliatiotion implies that two countries are on the opposite side

      What country doesn't have enemies? Never did I say, btw, that nukes are retaliation for nukes.

      Nuclear weapons, with an appropriate delivery mechanism, basically say "you cannot defeat me without enormous cost". If Iraq somehow defeated the US conventionally (as absurdly ridiculous as that is), then there would be several thousand warheads headed their way to obliterate the country. Nuclear weapons have little battlefield value apart from defensive (because what use is conquered land if it's a nuclear wasteland?)

    25. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this place is filled with idiots, guns, and idiots with guns. Even the mosquitos pack pistols here.

    26. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're taking the postwar occupation of Korea WAAAAY out of context...to the point where I have a feeling you honestly have no idea what happened. Japan occupied Korea during World War II. When the war ended, the plan that had been drawn up during the last months of the war went into effect, which was that the Soviet Union would administer the area north of the 38th parallel and the United States the area south. The Soviet Union installed a communist regime in their area, suppressing all other political parties. The United States created a pluralistic government with MANY different voices in it, including even a communist party. South Korea refused to go along with the North's plan for elections to reunite Korea because of the stifling of any party other than the Communist party in the North. To put it shortly, the blame for the divided Korea rests completely on the shoulders of the Soviet Union.

    27. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas would be okay if it weren't for violent niggers, drunk mexicans in trucks/vans with the tires that try to trip the car in the next lane, and stupid rednecks.

      I guess if they were all removed Texas' population would shrink by about 75%.

    28. Re:But there may be downsides... by slow_motion_boy · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but that made no sense at all.

    29. Re:But there may be downsides... by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

      Not doing so doesn't make them bad. Allrighty then. I guess opressing, starving and killing the people doesn't make them bad, either. They have basically no civil liberties. They are extremely poor and starving because free trade and capitalism is a big no-no. Just remember it was the bloody imperialists from the West that divided the country Well, if it weren't for the North Koreans getting help from China and pushing the border back south again, the whole country would probably have been a liberal democracy. Communism is NEVER good in ANY way.

  2. Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Multiplayer games are absolutely huge in Korea, people have played themselves to death. And there are examples in real life beatings because of stuff that happens in multiplayer games.

    SIG: Don't support Redhat until they support basic democracy in the dictatorship China vs democratic Taiwan issue. It's an evil company.

    1. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are also a huge number of Internet-cafes in Korea for the ones not having broadband connections.

      Most use internet-cafes to play multiplayer games.

    2. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact: More people play multiplayer games over the internet in Korea at one single time than everybody else on the planet combined!

    3. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Information for people interresting in Redhats disgusting abandonment of basic freedoms to please communist China:

      For example:

      1: http://newsforge.com/comments.pl?sid=27087&cid=296 30
      2: http://newsforge.com/comments.pl?sid=27141&cid=299 68

      Redhat is not a company that supports freedom, boycott them!

    4. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by keyed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are two reasons why there are real life beatings because of the multiplayer games: 1. They take the games very seriously. 2. Korea's a densely populated and relatively small country (compared to the US) so they can physically meet the person they're playing with/against. I'm sure that there are people in the US who would do this, but it's kinda expensive to catch a plane to go beat up some other kid. Not everyone can get a wad of cash like Jay and Silent Bob ;) I remember reading an article on this and the police had a term for these beatings, an "offline PK."

    5. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is offtopic, not informative

    6. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by vicviper · · Score: 2

      Where was that guy that played himself to death?

    7. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by ++good-duckspeak · · Score: 1
      Not everyone can get a wad of cash like Jay and Silent Bob ;)

      Sorry to be pedantic here - bu the proper term is fat wad of cash.

      Thanks!

      --
      Why is Triangle Man so MEAN?
    8. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1
      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    9. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell do you know about China aside from what you read in the "US" and "British" news?? Don't meddle in other people's countries unless you've actually lived there, or been in the shoes of a good majority of the citizens. I can't say it's wonderful over there, but democracy isn't exactly the perfect ideology either. How condescending!

      You think the US would be happy if some other super power strongly advocated that hawaii or alaska become a sovereign nation because 80% are of japanese, eskimo, or south pacific decent? Don't even pretend to understand the world's politics. Your biased information has mislead you.

      China wasn't exactly tyrannical towards taiwan. The people don't contribute a cent to the tax dollars of ROC, their business laws are localized, it's fairly "democratic" and "capitalistic" (things such as prostitution and drug smuggling are more proliferated as a result), Taiwan has its own govt elections and so forth, and they have the protection of China. The only reason why taiwanese politicians want to separate from china is because they'll have more control. The US is threatened by china somewhat, so they want to separate that big country into as many pieces as possible. Why dont' you take a look at india/pakistan, germany (before 1989), iraq/iran, afghanistan, korea, vietnam for some stunning examples of how to keep countries torn so that you can achieve instant super power status and more directly eliminate threats? Tibet provides china with great mountains as its borders, it's a very strategic piece of their land. Maybe splitting countries into smaller pieces is mainly a british ideology, but it bloody works, and the us is in love with the idea of splitting tibet or taiwan or anything else that they can get their hands on. And if you ask 80% of the people of taiwan (including all my 50 relatives that live there), they don't want to split, you know why? Because they're all from china!! So please get the facts straight, don't go assuming you're knowledgeable about the taiwan situation because you don't know the half of it, the news media is biased, entirely so. Taiwain's got some greedy, power hungry politicians that have the ear of the us. It's like a little wimpy kid that talks big and makes threats just because he's got big friends behind him, how pathetic, world police, give me a break! I don't see china meddling much in Taiwan's affairs aside from watching over her from time to time. To china, it's their people, their country, end of story. Nobody wants their land taken away, can you even understand that? Why don't we split nyc from the US and south florida and some parts of california and montana, make them all independent nations? I'm sure new york city could benefit by setting its own world trade membership status. How about indian reservations, you think the us govt was happy to issue those?? Horse shit! That's a different category altogether, that was stolen land! Taiwain has and will always be China's.

      Must you go on with your propaganda that china and communism are evil? I've seen too much china bashing here. So what if their laws aren't the same as yours. Get used to it, that's why we have countries (plural). Not everyone wants to be assimilated into the US/democracy, even if it means driving a mercedes and being rich or being able to voice your opinion without the fear of being locked up. That's not for everyone, and remember that it's only an ideology, nothing's perfect. Take the terrorist attacks on sept 11, not exactly a pretty price to pay for democracy now is it? You think someone would attack the us if they weren't so democratic-happy? You think anyone's going to terror attack Beijing anytime soon? That communist govt would have the shit kicked out of anyone even resembling a terrorist well before the attack, including their families (hmm, sound familiar? the idea of the iraq invasion??). So a supposedly democratic nation isn't so dissimilar to a communist one, hmmmmmm.

      Ideologies aren't always perfect, I admit that I could only live in a democratic country, but that's personal preference and years and years of bias. Plus China's changing, slowly, it's a neo-communism, not like the USSR's where people were just terrified by the idea of it. The ideal of communism is somewhat romantic believe it or not, a social structure where no one person is better or higher in status than any other. However, the idea doesn't always get translated so cleanly. And that's where human-nature's instinct to have his tiny-inexhaustible voice heard comes into play. Politicians become like dictators and greedy as hell. Take mao for instance, that bitch ate like a fucking king while half his nation was starving! Absolute power corrupts absolutely, as the saying goes.

      I've got myself in trouble here because i've left many holes in my argument for rebuttals/flames, but one thing for certain is that most of the people in taiwan don't really want to separate from the mainland (not because of fear), and it's harmful propaganda that makes that whole situation a real problem for US-China relations in the future. So try to understand what the real situation is before passing judgement that wasn't yours to begin with; it was probably just some cocksucking politician's idea to begin with who's laughing maniacally right now about the thought of taking over a whole country all to himself by using gullible people like you to proliferate his evil ploy.

  3. That's the truth. by User+956 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband...But there may be downsides.

    Yeah, I think this guy figured that out.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:That's the truth. by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Was it just me or did everyone reading that linked-to story think:

      "And ? What game was it that he was playing non-stop?!"

      Probably EQ I suppose, but I want to know!

      graspee

  4. Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband. There's a big difference there, and it's very impressive. I'll bet that 67% of Mexican Internet users are connected to broadband, and it's around 0.1% of their population.

    1. Re:Slight rewording by plone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article said that 67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband, not 67% of Korean Internet USERS. That means that 67% of the homes are wired with broadband. The actual percentage of population of people who have access to broadband is therefore much higher than 67% since Households usually constitute more than a single person.

    2. Re:Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I realize you're only using Mexico as an example, but I assure you that with a population of about 100 million in Mexico, way more than 100,000 people have Internet access. Telmex has been very successful in selling dial-up access and has TONS of customers. DSL and cable are slowly but surely making their way. But on top of that you find small Internet cafes all over the place. These are very popular among people who can't afford the service at home, or who need access to services like scanning, color printing, CD burning, etc.

    3. Re:Slight rewording by plone · · Score: 1

      Having reread what you said, I just realised that I redundantly repeated what you said. Aces for my lack of comprehension skills.

    4. Re: Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      starting to be jealous

    5. Re:Slight rewording by comic-not · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhh ... no. For the mathematically challenged, if an average household equals 2 persons, then 67% of the persons have the access, not 134% as you seem to be indicating. Of course, the percentage may change if there is a clear correlation between household size and migration to broadband, but it does not depend on household size as such.

      --
      Existence usually comes as a surprise (Idem)
    6. Re:Slight rewording by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2

      Nope. Assuming all households have the same number of residents, 67% of households = 67% of population.

      In fact, if poorer South Koreans tend to live in households crowded with more members, and tend not to be able to afford broadband, that could represent a lower percentage of the population.

    7. Re:Slight rewording by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I'm an American but have lived in Mexico for the last 7 years. My Mexican sister-in-law camps online at 56k and has about 3000 MP3s last time I asked her...

      Of course, I'm writing from Mexico on my DSL line. But most people in Mexico don't even have a phone.

    8. Re:Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was troubling that this person came up with this theory, but even more troubling that people modded it up

    9. Re:Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and mobile networks suck in the U.S because it's a big country.. Can't you people just accept that you're not the leaders in every area of life, tech, economy, etc.

    10. Re:Slight rewording by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
      The article said that 67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband, not 67% of Korean Internet USERS.

      That's all well and good, but I don't need broadband to my house, or to me... Where I'd really like it, is connected to my computer. Thanks.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. That would be North Korea... by ethnocidal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As opposed to South Korea, the focus of the article.

    Or did you mean the United States' potential development of new nuclear arms in violation of a Congressional ban?

    Funny old world!

  6. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    South Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life.

    North Korea is involved in the development of nuclear weapons in violation of international treaty?

    Please read the article and your link again, as there is a big difference between the two countries.

  7. Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by release7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Last week, they published a report highlighting a number of Korea's advantages. These include the government's vision and commitment...

    Ingredients for happy society:
    Add: one ounce of capitalism, one ounce of socialism, a pinch of communism

    Not everything in the world is black and white, especially when it comes to determining which "ism" makes the greatest number of people happy.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

    1. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      thank you for making this post

      amazing as it is, there still are posts on slashdot that truly deserve the +1 insightful

    2. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you just stupid or is it deeper than that?

      Socialism. Communism. Yeah, it's done wonders for North Korea. People on the verge of starvatian. Maniac Maoist society.

      Right next door is South Korea. Capitalism, democracy, and -- let's face it -- some very heavy-handed police state rule. But an infinitely more successful country.

      The way leftists re-imagine reality to suit their purposes is sickening.

    3. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by CheeseCow · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      It's the people IN the countries that count, not who's leading it. ;)

    4. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Ever thought that the simple reason that more Koreans have broadband is a cultural difference? I'm in the US and the only reason that I don't have broadband is because I don't care.

    5. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Add: one ounce of capitalism, one ounce of socialism, a pinch of communism

      Umm, the Communist half of Korea is one of the poorest and most repressive places on Earth. The article is about South Korea, which is effectively a different country. Think east and west Germany before the Berlin Wall came down.

    6. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you don't even know what socialism means, retard

      there are several countries that have been influenced by socialism and are succesful extremely succesful today.

      I suggest you go to your local library and try to understand the difference between totalitarism and socialism. once your pea sized brain got that far you can then try to retrain that pea inside your head to understand that socialism as an idea is not the big bad boogie man your pathetic government has brain washed you to think it is

      but then, you being an average idiot from the US, I don't expect you to be capable of digesting new information by yourself, to do your own research, or formulate a single intelligent thought of your own

      the fact is, someone as fucking stupid as you should not have been even allowed to be born, instead you should have dried up in the jizz rag, that's where you belong

    7. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for not overreacting.

    8. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Umm, the Communist half of Korea is one of the poorest and most repressive places on Earth.

      You're not getting it. The implication is that the various 'isms' should be mixed together. North Korea can be considered to represent the totalitarianism and poverty of Communism in isolation. America could be considered to represent the plutocracy ("corporatocracy") of Capitialism in isolation (though America is mildly or more-than-mildly socialistic in a number of ways). In fundamental ways, plutocracy is not that different from Communism, except that the leaders are not even theoretically concerned with the welfare of the people.

      For successful blends of the three, think Canada, Australia, or Western Europe. Do you think that the average American is happier than the average citizen of these other places? Think again.

    9. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by nulleffect · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Canada and pretty much all of Europe are socialist countries, do you?

    10. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your efforts to try to educate the braindead, like sql*kitten here

    11. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      You're not getting it. The implication is that the various 'isms' should be mixed together.

      But North Korea has everything to gain from the South in terms of prosperity and freedom, and it is unclear what, if anything, the South would gain from the North. Really, the North Korean leadership have no bargaining chips apart from their army; their country is destitute and dependent on foreign aid to prevent mass starvation. Why do you think North Koreans frequently attempt to defect to the South but no-one wants to go the other way?

      For successful blends of the three, think Canada, Australia, or Western Europe. Do you think that the average American is happier than the average citizen of these other places? Think again.

      It's hard to say. In the short term it's very easy to buy the voter's favour with subsidies and welfare, even the ancient Romans knew this, but they called it "bread and circuses". The question is a long term one; how happy will the heavily taxed Western Europeans be when they reach their own retirements and find that the cupboard is bare?

    12. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate when people (Americans) talk about having achieved perfect freedom, democracy, society, etc.,
      as if we are some kind of enlightened ones.

      Truth is 99.9% of the history of mankind has been undemocractic and unfree, and the U.S. has only been at this for 200 years now. We all still have alot to learn..

    13. Re:Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      jesus how fucking dumb can you get? he's saying that the current south korean society has already been affected by socialism. he's not saying the south koreans should go to north and try to adhere to anything they're doing there right now.

      as for western europeans, I don't even know where to begin, you sound so fucking dumb... the effects of socialism are not "short term", the first people who paid for it are already enjoying their retirements. It's been going on for decades.

  8. Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunatley BT refuses to upgrade rural exchanges for ADSL, and people are very angry at this. The town of todmorden recently made the headlines for being the first town to reach the threshhold of being upgraded. I live in an 'unupgraded' town, but I dont really care about BT, because Im happy with my cable modem from telewest. The cable companies are more determined than BT to supply broadband, but they can only cover where their cable network goes.

    Satilite broadband is becoming popular too, but its expensive, one way and low latency.

    1. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by cruachan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Satellite's now two way. I'm in the Scottish Highlands with a satellite connection courtesy of Bridge Broadband (a reseller of course, Hughes Satellite Systems underneath).

      Bandwidth is 512kbs UNCONTENDED down and 2Mbs burst contended. Only 150kbs up, but that should improve soon. It's expensive to put in, but with a pipe that size share the connection with a few neighbours and it's no more expensive than BT's ADSL offering.

      Latency is only a problem if you want to play games. Notice that because the line is uncontended I've actually got considerably more bandwidth than you get in practise from ADSL.

    2. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean high latency? Low latency is a GOOD thing and not common with satellite...

      --
      Luke-Jr
    3. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by digithed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are correct when you say that there is a huge demand for broadband in the UK, but the really sad thing is that what is being offered to fill the demand is already out of date. In this day and age ADSL can hardly be described as 'broadband' as it is in most cases only 512Kb/sec. The UK government is dreaming if they really believe that everyone having an ADSL connection will make the UK the most competative place in Europe for e-business. By the time they have managed to roll out ADSL to the majority of the population, most of the rest of Europe will already have installed fiber networks and consumers will have 10Mb/sec connections. Sadly, at the moment, the UK governement either doesn't have a clue or doesn't have the inclination to even start talking about fiber networks.

      I am from UK, but I live in Sweden in a town of approximately 120,000 people (small by UK standards) and I have a 10Mb/sec ethernet connection in my appartment for which I pay 300kr per month (about £25 or $30). ADSL costs the same as this in UK and in most cases is 20 times slower. Why can't UK get its act together? And before people start talking about BTs monoply causing problems please considered that Telia in Sweden also have about the same kind of monopoly position as BT in UK but this does not seem to have hindered the roll out of high speed consumer broadband in Sweden!

      --
      Steve Brammer
      (From UK but currently living in Västerås, Sweden)

    4. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2

      This is very true.

      I remeber when BT were first flexing their 'Broadband' initiative. I live in one of the cities which they actually advertised specifically as being broadband enabled, yet my exchange was not. They did practically the whole city, yet overlooked my exchange completely - and every time they gave me an estimate date for getting the exchange done, it came and went without any news. How the hell can they specifically use the name of my city in advertising, as a 'broadband enabled city' when it actually wasn't?

      After waiting a YEAR AND A HALF on dialup, ntl: began their huge cable rollout.. they dug up our street and posted leaflets about their service. So I took up broadband with them and I couldn't be happier! I have been running their 512k service for over a year and it has only ever been down 3 times.

      Screw BT.. they can never get anything right, and they are responsible for the shameful state of the UK's internet ability - they should have been busted up by the government a long time ago :|

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    5. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      because BT is privatised and has responsibilites to shareholders? Plus they way overpaid on the mobile phone 3G licences

    6. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Only 150kbs up, but that should improve soon.
      That's OK. All the US cable internet companies have reduced upstream at 128kbps. For whatever reason they prefer us to stick with downloading.
    7. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BT have always seemed to drag their heels when it comes to keeping their exchanges up to date with the latest technology.

      And that's for the past 20 years.

      Back in the 80's home computer users complained when the US moved to 9600 baud, and UK was still
      stuck at 2400 baud. Anyone remember BT Gold?

      Then ISDN was the "Next Big Thing", and users complained they couldn't get an ISDN line
      installed quickly enough. From what I remember, it usually took two engineers half a day to correctly load balance the line (one engineer
      at each end of the line tuning various capacitors
      and resistors - I never understood why they
      couldn't have self tuning circuits).

      Breaking up BT into little pieces wouldn't make
      much difference. All the other ISP providers are
      only interested in the urban areas.

    8. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 4, Informative

      Telia also is privatized and has responsibilities to its shareholders.

      The reason it exists cheap broadband in Sweden is that an entrepreneur startad a company called Bredbandsbolaget (The broadband company) and started to connect people with 10Mbit/s broadband.

      Others followed suit...

      This message was brought to you by a broadband user in Väasterås, Sweden.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    9. Re:Theres a huge demand for broadband in the UK by digithed · · Score: 1

      Then the question must be...
      Why doesn't some entrepreneur in UK start a company and connect people woth 10MBits/s broadband? What is the reason that this is possible in Sweden and seems to be impossible in UK??
      --
      Steve Brammer
      (From UK but currently residing in Västerås, Sweden)

  9. It's obvious why they're doing this... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're doing it so that people can die at home, surrounded by their family, instead of at internet cafes.

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:It's obvious why they're doing this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!! shame the mods are retards, man, that was hilarious.

    2. Re:It's obvious why they're doing this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must admit I thought it was a poke about the N Korea nukes situation until I remembered about the Internet cafe guy :) Maybe the mods took it the wrong way too...

  10. They may be on to something by Haxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    In 2000, the government launched its Cyber 21 program, to train a million housewives in IT use in 18 months

    -Haxx calls Korean Airlines for a flight to korea to find a wife.

    Imagine discussing port security during intercourse.

    1. Re:They may be on to something by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Imagine discussing port security during intercourse.
      In Korean...
    2. Re:They may be on to something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT stands for Information Technology, not Inhaling [Haxx's] Testicles.

  11. South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure North Korea has so many internet users. Why not just add South before Korea? Wait, then you wouldn't see all the jokes about North Korea.

  12. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life.

    I read slashdot's story, and it doesn't say anything about "South Korea". It mentions "Korea". Go ahead, it's right up there ---^

  13. Why is this shocking!? by prichardson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

    1)The South Korean government is encouraging technological growth, while the US is still realing from P2P networks and people exercising free speach.

    2)South Korea is relatively new, like Europe and Japan, South Korea recently (relativel) rebuilt its industrial base. The US has NEVER had a serious conflict close enough to home to neccesatate major rebuilding. This means that our stuff is old compared to theirs.

    So you see, it is not only explainable, it is logical that South Korea would lead the US, and the rest of the world, in the people having cool toys and making cool tech toys.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "P2P and free speach [sic]."

      Why are these always used in combination? Pirating products is not free speech.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Why is this shocking!? by jandrese · · Score: 3

      No, but stopping pirating has the side effect if stifling free speech. You don't think everybody is out fighting for their right to pirate Warcraft III do you?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is shocking is that the citizens of the US have brought this upon themselves by electing leaders that are obviously more beholden to big money interests than those of the people. There is no real technical reason why this would not be possible in the US today.

    4. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Joey7F · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is P2P and Piracy always used in combination? Don't equate a technology with a behavior.

      --Joey

    5. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      exactly

      americans are too hung up on the whole free speech issue. free speech is important, very very important, but americans tend to take it to the level of ridiculousness (therefore devaluing the whole concept)

    6. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's not. But does the merest possibility of saying a copyrighted phrase justify having your toungue cut out?

    7. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the main factor. US, big. South Korea, small. US, dispersed. South Korea, dense.

    8. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2)South Korea is relatively new, like Europe

      Off topic, I'm sorry.

      Europe relatively new? Erm, I'm sure that's not /quite/ accurate.

    9. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P2P Stands for Peer To Peer.

      Why are you assumming P2P has anything to do with pirating products?

    10. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're wrong, it means Pirate To Pirate

    11. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tshak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

      You forgot:
      3) South Korea is smaller then the average US state and therefore very easy to wire for broadband.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    12. Re:Why is this shocking!? by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

      The US has NEVER had a serious conflict close enough to home to neccesatate major rebuilding. This means that our stuff is old compared to theirs.

      I hate to nitpick, and I agree that it has little impact on your infrastructure-rebuilding argument, but are you familiar with a little tiff we like to call our civil war? Certainly, it didn't destroy any outdated telephone lines, but, NEVER is a STRONG word.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    13. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Izeickl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Alot of Europe has very old infrastructure, far more so than the US, think about it, the US is basically European expats + some other continents. The US on the whole does NOT have a long history compared to a great deal of the world, + it has a huge land mass for building new infrastructure, the US can afford to build new while keeping the old, places like the UK which is basically the size of Florida -have- to reuse old buildings as we can not afford to demolish all/rebuild and dont have the space for simply building all new extra. Also although countries in Europe etc were more involved in getting hit by Wars the rebuilding was done 50 years ago and it was not a total desimation of citys thus requireing total city rebuild.

    14. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      P2P has had little legitimate success. That's why P2P and piracy are related. Like knifes. You use them to cut things. It would hardly be a stretch to say "All knifes are meant to cut things" just like "All P2P clients are meant to distribute copyrighted work".

      Certainly you can use a knife todo other things just like you can use P2P for other things. Problem is people only seem to want to use P2P for wrong things.

      And its not like people can't share their ideas in other ways.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    15. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while the US is still realing from P2P networks and people exercising free speach.


      Korea has very little to lose from P2P networks. You think those games they are playing to death were all written in Korea, by Korean companies? Most of them were developed in the U.S. or Europe, which is where the big debates on P2P really are.

      As for them being so great for wiring most of their relatively small country for broadband...well...I imagine the U.S. and Russia are world leaders in having something called "open space", which is a wonderful concept allowing you to actually have MORE than a few feet between you and about 20 other people.

      Population density is overrated.

    16. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah and considering that all the people are evenly spread out throughout the whole american continent, rather than mostly concentrated around the large cities really explains the difference.

      Not.

    17. Re:Why is this shocking!? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      I remember visiting a little church in a little town in the Riviera (France) area during a vacation, and learning that it had existed before the Mayflower had landed.

      My USified brain couldn't handle the idea of a building which had been used for the same purpose for that long, and just kind of shut down until we left that town...

    18. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy, pirating is free speech. Its just not protected free speech. This is why there can't just be a law for copyright, there also has to be a clause in the constitution allowing that law, because it does infringe upon free speech.

      --Greg

    19. Re:Why is this shocking!? by nulleffect · · Score: 1

      Uhh, Lineage is from Korea.
      Most American and European game companies have large bases in Korea. And, Korean government's piracy crackdown has been called oppressive.

      P2P is being hotly debated in Korea. A roar of public complaint emerged when Soribada, a popular P2P network, was shut down by the court.

    20. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      South Korea is not that small, heck Seoul has about 20 million residents. I can't think of any US city with that many, maybe I'm wrong. I don't think NYC or LA have anywhere near that number of people. Of course as a country its smaller, I believe their total population is around 35 million people but there aren't too many places bigger than the US as a whole. We still are behind in a lot of ways but also ahead in some too.

    21. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiring has nothing to do with the number of people, and everything to do with the geography. Your point is irrelevant to this conversation.

  14. Re:They lead? by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Funny

    He means South Korea.

    I got these Korea at a glance, 15 Fun Facts! Let me tell you, there are a lot of reasons to move there aside from the high bandwidth penetration:

    1) Korean women are hot.
    2) Don't look at me like that. Seriously, they are muy en fuega.
    3) I'm not chauvenistic. The female anatomy is a thing of beauty. Especially in Korea.
    4) It's not a fetish thing. Sheesh.
    5) They have lots of technology and stuff, unlike Thailand. Also, Thai women (while hot) have AIDS. Seriously, man, you're risking your life.
    6) Government less fascist than Singapore or China, and getting less fascist every day (unless it's more, I forget). Although, there's this one Singapore chick who does this really funny webcomic. I would totally do her.
    7) No, it's the Japanese who are into the cartoon porn.
    8) Whoah! Evidently, Koreans also like the cartoon porn.
    9) Korean cartoon porn is totally nasty.
    10) Anyway, Korea doesn't look like a giant mall. Japan creeps me out - stainless steel fucking everywhere.
    11) All Koreans are nerds, and totally bad ass at the same time. Swear to god, I knew this one guy in my engineering class who could do a backflip and kick out ceiling fixtures - he was 27 and he'd never kissed a girl. They won't even notice how much of a nerd you are. Swear to god.
    12) No, he was totally not gay. His parents had arranged a marriage for him with... holy shit, he was so gay. How could I not have seen it? God damn, we were like in the locker room together all the time.
    13) I don't have a problem with it! He's a cool guy. Leaves more Korean women for me, heh?
    14) What?
    15) In Korea, you can pick up chicks by playing video games and drinking soda that's been laced with speed. I swear, that's what pickup joins are like in Korea. Dude, I read it in the nytimes.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  15. Wow... by SIGBUS · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wonder spammers like South Korea so much. I keep wondering if I'm going to have to blackhole all of Korea on the mail server that I run.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Wow... by cloudmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, blackhole all of Korea (North and South). That cut a bunch of spam out of *my* mail servers...

  16. The leaders in broadband... by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and all their boxes are routing SPAM TO ME!

  17. Umm the downside is.. by Suppafly · · Score: 0, Troll

    Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life. But there may be downsides.

    Living in Korea..

    Just its not too bad if you like soccer.

    1. Re:Umm the downside is.. by comic-not · · Score: 1

      and kimchi. Can't do without that.

      --
      Existence usually comes as a surprise (Idem)
    2. Re:Umm the downside is.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      its not a troll, nor flamebait. Its true.. Living in Korea sucks. I know several people from Korea and several of my profs are from Korea. It sucks.

    3. Re:Umm the downside is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supper Fly is right. Living in Korea sucks for Americans, because Koreans don't like foreigners. You think Japan is racist? They're the damn ACLU compared to Koreans.

      And they're not wimps like in Japan either. Get in trouble in Korea, and you are in BIG trouble. Better than China though, where it is easy to find yourself dead.

    4. Re:Umm the downside is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes, whereas the U.S is not racist at all...

      been lynching niggers lately?

  18. Measuring the speed of light by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    After reading this article, I got to thinking about computer networks a bit in detail. Normally, we all worry more about software and more tangible things rather than the bridges that link our computers to the Internet.

    I just gave an assignment that dealt with relativistic calculations and using c, the speed of light, which is equal to 3x10^8 m/s.

    What I got very curious about was the following -- "Is there a way to measure the speed of light, precisely, with a computer network?"

    The answer, I think, is a resounding YES!

    I believe that if I can simply reflect packets of data between adjoining computers on an Ethernet (perhaps here in my lab) and measure the time it takes to complete a round trip, then my collegues and I could use a few simple electromagnetic equations to compare electrical signals in cable with visible light, thus measuring the speed of light to a very precise value!

    Who would've thought the Ping utility would be so handy!

    --

    Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    1. Re:Measuring the speed of light by Pave+Low · · Score: 0, Troll

      very interesting. you should do a paper and have this published in the leading physics journals. your valuable insights have made slashdot a more intelligent place for physics minded people like you and me.

      --
      SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    2. Re:Measuring the speed of light by BabyDave · · Score: 2
      Great idea ... but sadly not original - several people have already had the same idea. Don't let that stop you having a go though. See for example this paper on arXiv for hints on how to do it. Or try a Google search - leads to many helpful resources.

    3. Re:Measuring the speed of light by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Much obliged for that link, but I feel sick to my stomach. Do you know how difficult one has it when trying to think of original physics theorems?

      --

      Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    4. Re:Measuring the speed of light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you can't. The hosts over which the packet travels will need some time to read it from their network interface and forward it again. You might also experience buffering delays if the network is congested.

    5. Re:Measuring the speed of light by Yarn · · Score: 1

      It's been done. Don't forget that signals don't travel at the speed of light in optical fibre. Around 1.5 is what was used in the earlier experiment.

      PS: I have just earnt my MSc in Optics from IC.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  19. Interesting to Note... by Eidolon909 · · Score: 5, Informative


    I live and work in Seoul and while its true that most people seem to have broadband at home it doesn't seem like they use it all that much. Its also incredibly affordable, very fast and extremely reliable.

    With that said, Internet Cafes (PC Bangs) are a huge business here. They are literally everywhere. Its very difficult not to walk in a busy area and not see multiple PC bangs. So while all these people have internet at home, they still go out to the Internet Cafe to play games and spend extra money when they could easily do so at home.

    I'm sitting in a PC Bang now, it has about 40 stations and half of them are in use. Mostly men in their early to late twenties. Most of them are playing Starcraft: Broodwar or one of numerous Diablo II clones. The handful of women in here are playing cards or using chat software. I will play Warcraft myself shortly.

    Anyhow, my point is that all these homes are wired yet people still flock to these cafes unnecessarily. I mean, in the afternoons these places are filled with middle and high-school kids and then with adults all through the night. Most are open 24 hours.

    So 67% of Korean homes may be wired, but I'd say an even greater percentage of the population are internet users, I don't know a single korean who doesn't have an e-mail address or an IM id.

    1. Re:Interesting to Note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is the work situation there? What chances does a farang have of getting a job (specialized IT skills, speaks only english)

    2. Re:Interesting to Note... by Eidolon909 · · Score: 2, Informative


      You can get a job with a foreign company quite easily, the IT job market here is very good. In all sectors. It does depend on your skills though and what are you want to work in. But there are plenty of programmers and other professionals that don't speak a lick of Korean.

      It usually just needs to be a foreign company though, or a Korean company that deals in foreign business. Domestic trade and you'll need korean.

      By the way, farang is thai for foreigner, in Korea you're a waygook.

    3. Re:Interesting to Note... by mickwd · · Score: 1

      "Anyhow, my point is that all these homes are wired yet people still flock to these cafes unnecessarily."

      And why do we go out to (normal) cafes / restaurants when we have food at home ?

    4. Re:Interesting to Note... by zenyu · · Score: 2

      I don't know a single korean who doesn't have an e-mail address or an IM id.

      I ran into an old friend a few years ago on the subway, we chatted it up and then as her train was leaving I asked for her e-mail so I could get back in touch with her. She said she didn't have one and I was so befudled that I didn't catch her phone number as a the train pulled out.

      That is I could also almost say that in the US, even though millions of Americans don't even have e-mail. Hell I only know a couple people without broadband, even though most people don't have it here yet.

    5. Re:Interesting to Note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the food in restaurants doesn't taste like a nerd cooked it.

    6. Re:Interesting to Note... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Mostly men in their early to late twenties. Most of them are playing Starcraft: Broodwar or one of numerous Diablo II clones. The handful of women in here are playing cards or using chat software.

      Ah, so this is insidious government plan plan for population control: turn all the young men into computer geeks.

    7. Re:Interesting to Note... by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 1

      Ah, so this is insidious government plan plan for population control: turn all the young men into computer geeks. It worked on us, didn't it? And most of us Slashdotter aren't Korean. :)

  20. I guess that explains the spam by fadden · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now I know why half the spam in my mailbox is related to kornet.net. It appears the Koreans have taken it upon themselves to compete head-to-head in the great international spam delivery market.

    Dropping all of Korea and China off the edge of the e-mail world is sounding better and better. It's bad enough that they're (probably inadvertently) relaying US spam through, but now I'm getting large piles of spam in languages I can't even recognize.

    1. Re:I guess that explains the spam by Caradoc · · Score: 3, Redundant

      So Korea leads the world in broadband connections... They also lead the world in open relays and in spamming people with messages they can't even read.

      My own mailserver doesn't accept incoming connections from Korea - at the time I inserted korea.blackholes.us into the dnsbl list, I had received ONE legitimate e-mail from Korea, and over four thousand spams from Korea.

      "Buh-bye, Korea." I'll take them out of the filters as soon as the logs indicate less than once bounce per week instead of 30-50 bounces per day.

      --
      Specialization is for insects. - R.A.H.
  21. North / South Korea by jez9999 · · Score: 0

    So when exactly did North and South Korea divide then? I know there was a civil war... any historians?

    1. Re:North / South Korea by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      The 50s IIRC, there was (actually still is) a civil war the North was for Communism the South for capitalism. The south was supported by the west and now theres a border across the middle of teh country that is heavily armed. They've been at ceasefire for decades now......

  22. I don't doubt that they watch VOD more by keyed · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Having got broadband internet, Koreans use it much more. Dr Heejin Lee, a lecturer at Brunel University, says Koreans rack up an average of 1,340 minutes per month, which compares with the UK average of 382 minutes. The high usage stems partly from it being fast enough for video on demand: people can use it to time-shift TV programmes, or catch up with episodes of soaps they have missed. Also, 54% of Koreans play online games.
    Their TV stations do VOD the right way. You can watch any show up to that they've aired for up to a week and without commercials. My mother, who lives in San Antonio, TX, and knows nothing about computers, watches these after she gets home from work. The quality of the video streaming isn't that good at times, but that probably has more to do with the fact that it's being streamed from Korea. It doesn't bother my mom too much as she watches the news and old style music shows that she liked when she left Korea 20+ years ago.
  23. Weird world of Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is some strange paradox here. Korea in fact is two Koreas. They started just in the same line and nearly with the same problems but today they seem to make a difference like Earth and Moon. We have the North with its rich resources but backward economy, its hunt for nukes, militarisation and lack of Internet (probably with exception of some bureaucrates). And we have the South that was considered to be more poor in resources, but which, in the end, is becoming the top technocratic country in the world. Yes, the South was also highly militarised and had nukes from the US. But the same went for the North with USSR.

    I just wonder what will happen when someone will try a real reunification. What will happen when a North, which still cannot give up its dependency on someone else, with an economy in shambles and one of the biggest armies in the world meets a South which a big part of the world depends on, an economy that gives envy to anyone and carrying a more pacifist mood than ever?

    North - What do you mean by "using Internet"?
    South - What do you mean by "not using Internet"?

    1. Re:Weird world of Korea by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For a historical example, just take a peek at East and West Germany, or virtually all of the Eastern Bloc countries, and the reunification thereof. While there was much doom and gloom about the trouble that would result, it looks like they did a pretty good job, and much of Eastern Germany got pulled up by its bootstraps to a similar level that West Germany had enjoyed.

    2. Re:Weird world of Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Europe never went the same way as some other countries. Even the huge backslash in Russia is nothing compared to what happened in some other places. The blistering fury, which blowed while Eastern block tried to reach its Western brothers/cousins, was mainly due to the fact that they were not so backward as it seems. Frankly, in the first years after Perestroika, things changed so fast that people joked that in this mood we "will reach and overcome America in its own remedy - Capitalism" (this didn't happen but that's another story). Besides, Europe was always crazy about technowars and the main problem was that a good part of it went once again in the technowar run after having a good dose of it in WWII. Europeans are very much alike and that's a reason why they don't love each other. But that's also the reaons why they can understand each other faster than anyone else.

      However Korea is something completely different. They were for long under the grip of Imperial Japan. They suffered two of the most bloody wars of the 20th Century. One of them nearly turned the whole world again into war. Besides, Korea was not top in Science neither Technology. When South started its Long March it had a population in misery, ruled by one of the most bloody dictatorships and suffered several drawbacks from it. Its economy suffered from several problems and it had frequently serious inflationary hickes. It also as an endemic social/political conflict that frequently rises to clashes. Its politicians are also known to be severly corrupted and fall frequently into scandals.

      However it is a fact that Korea is one of today's economic world powers, sometimes it even overshadows its past colonist, Japan. And its technological progress is on the top among many countries. Not many countries managed to reach such level. So I take the hat to these guys.

  24. Fast and impressive, but is it free? by twitter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Are these networks free or gimped like US? Can the average Korean set up web, email, ftp, cvs services at the end of that fat pipe? If so, they will surely kick the world's ass in software development. If not, entertianment is nice but their net will be disipative.

    Here in the US, broadband "internet" is becoming more and more like cable TV. Unilaterally changeable service contracts ban useful services, ports are blocked and upload rates are artificailly reduced. It's mostly because of bad laws which alowed the regional bells to stomp fledgling DSL competition and other bad laws which essentially give cable operators exclusive franchises in huge areas. Rather than embracing the communications possibilities of wires in our homes and networks we have built, we plod along with pay per minute, voice only, long distance telephony.

    Has Korea learned from our mistakes or will they repeat them?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Fast and impressive, but is it free? by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you're saying has been true so far, but probably won't stay that way. There are already nationwide ISPs like Congent willing to offer 100Meg ethernet for about a thousand a month and this isn't DSL, it's real ethernet and it's the same speed up and downstream. It's true the existing players have done just that --played the American consumer for a sucker. But it will change and the most likely candidate for that change is wireless mesh networks. Seeing as how Taiwan is gearing up to push down prices on wireless hardware this should be happening in the next year or two.
      Of course until then, this story is a sad testiment to the lies perpetuated by the scandalous telecoms players in the US. It's too bad the American people are too complacent to elect leaders that represent their interests. Here I refer, among other things, to the recent commerce department attempts to force the FCC to limit all 802.11 products to indoor use. That is a scandal that goes right to the Bush administration. Give that guy enough rope and he'll hang us all.

  25. This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Joey7F · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthl ights2_dmsp_big.jpg

    If you think the Koreas are anything alike, look at that picture to see what communism does to a country. The divide almost looks too perfect.

    --Joey

    1. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Jhan · · Score: 1

      Uhm... You do realise that the city lights have been added manually? If this is anything like Living Earths map (it seems based on it), the simply added a dot for each city with brightness based on population. North Korea looks like a case of "No Data".

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    2. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It has more to do with stupid dictatorship than with communism. In my country (USSR) the energy supplies, the quality of life, life expectancy, literacy and all other measures of civilization were WAY higher during the commie rule than they are now. I'd give capitalism another 5 or 6 years in Russia. If it won't bring in some dramatic improvement in the ways people live (I can't see it happening) there will be a landslide return of communists to the power and a fast nationalization of all private property without any compensation. Then we will have reliable enegy supplies, good public transit, ambitious space program, low infant mortality, high literacy, world-class education, broadband in every household and true democracy under the scarlet banner with hammer and sicle.

    3. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I know it was manipulated but I thought they just made the lights clearer.

      Hmmm...

      --Joey

    4. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      According to this, it is from composite photographs:

      http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html

    5. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      It had to be from composite photos, seldom is the world completely cloudless ;)

      --Joey

    6. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by xjerky · · Score: 2

      And never is the world without the sun shining on at least a part of it at any time :)

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    7. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, Cuba shows up just fine.

    8. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by octalc0de · · Score: 1
    9. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention the world is not flat

    10. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they seem to have electricity in china too

      but checkout australia!! that must be one stronghold for evil communists!

    11. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. I'm a slashdot moron. Can you please point out where on the map I should be looking if I want to see North Korea?

      What about South Korea. Is it far from North Korea?

    12. Re:This is offtopic (sorta) but interesting! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Okay, I don't know if you are trolling, but what you are saying is outrageous and false. First of all, your country isn't the USSR since it doesn't exist anymore. Perhaps you mean Russia, perhaps Belarus, Ukraine, etc. The old USSR was not some sort of idealistic Marxist state, it was more or less the most brutal dictatorship around at the time, running under the facade of Communism. Russia, at least, is certainly pretty fouled up these days, mostly due to the same cronyistic system from the Communist era being applied to assign ownership of previously nationalized factors of production to a tiny subset of the population, and the fact that Russia's economy was built to produce domestically and could never compete in a globalized arena (free flow of goods and services) because of the fact that most goods produced during the Soviet era were markedly substandard.


      There is a reason (okay, many reasons) that Communism fell. It should stay dead, frankly. Your countrymen need to pull themselves out of the broken way of thinking and working they are stuck in, shut down organized crime, and work on evening out the standard of living while encouraging REAL entrepreneurship and innovation. Trying to retreat back into the shell of Communism is unlikely to achieve this - it's possible, but quite difficult to run away from the global economy once plugged in.

  26. Re:They lead? by comic-not · · Score: 2, Funny

    high bandwidth penetration



    Is this some secret korean technique, perhaps vividly depicted in those korean cartoon pr0n magazines you refer to?

    --
    Existence usually comes as a surprise (Idem)
  27. Statistics like this... by Recca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    are probably why North Korea is giving strange information that seems contradictory to other policies before. They're trying to change to a more open and capitalist government. North Korea has made other announcements besides nuclear weapons. They also disclosed the abduction of Japanese during the 70's and early 80's. Information here. Anyway, back on topic, North Korea has realized that nuclear weapons do not serve any good day-to-day purpose, because unlike video games using nuclear weapons in a recreational manner is highly illegal and non-productive in a down economy.

  28. More S.Korean Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who are interested and not overtly offended by the source of the information, the CIA Fact Book for South Korea is available.

  29. Jack Schofield??? Nooooooooo not him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why you listen to anything that this guys says.

    If he isn't being paid by M$ he should be. Read his other articles...

    A hard sell for cuddly new XP

    The mother of all operating systems

    Sun sues Microsoft from inside a glass house

    To name a few ... I don't think you'll find a bad word said about Microsoft. Nice to know.

    1. Re:Jack Schofield??? Nooooooooo not him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy is an idi0t. He is an editor one of the guardian weekly IT suplement, and it is really, really bad and always completely outdated before comes out

  30. Gosu ^^ by jedie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Think about the fact that Korean gamer's can become official "sportsmen" with corporate sponsorship etc.

    Game finals are even brought live on TV there.

    Gaming IS a sport there, look at "starcraft" the prizes you can win in the rounaments are insane.

    But that trend is starting to rise in the west too: think of CPL for instance, it's a worldwide event with international clans fighting for the first place (internationally!) in FPS games. And some clans even have dedicated fans nowadays, some players even have groupies (I kid you not: pretty girls, who take pictures with their webcams ofthemselves in their bra's holding a paper with the name of their favourite CS player for instance).



    In a way I think that's a logical evolution in the world of sports: why would sport have something to do with only the physical? Look at chess, and snooker etc.



    I mean, dedicated gamers even behave like real life jocks: they have the whole "yeah we're so 1337" thing going and act real tough (online that is ;))

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
    1. Re:Gosu ^^ by prelelat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know what I think it would be kind of cool to watch some FPS games and other RPG games on tv. You could even call it Unreal TV. I'm sure that some Network will come up with it here in some respect in the future. It would probably be a big thing. Host tournaments to see who gets to be on the show and then have a big game of ctf or CS with some of the best players in the world(the internet allows for anyone to play).

      I would go and watch that anyways.

      What do I know I don't even run linux anymore...

    2. Re:Gosu ^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      pretty girls, who take pictures with their webcams ofthemselves in their bra's

      Link?

    3. Re:Gosu ^^ by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      theres plans going on to create a 30,000 capacity multiplayer stadium in the US which is a step in that direction

    4. Re:Gosu ^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont give me that chess is a sport garbage just because its a 'recognized' Olympic sports.

      One handed surfing for Pornikova pix is more demanding for the cardio vascular system.

      And how does the thread get modded to a 5?
      Being redundant and repeating last weeks theme is considered worthy?
      Mod with you head not with you ass.

    5. Re:Gosu ^^ by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      ". And some clans even have dedicated fans nowadays, some players even have groupies (I kid you not: pretty girls, who take pictures with their webcams ofthemselves in their bra's holding a paper with the name of their favourite CS player for instance)."

      I've been playing cs for years and have gotten pretty good, and I just have one question... Where can I get some of these? If any gamer groupies are reading this, despamify my email address and contact me please;)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    6. Re:Gosu ^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's news to anyone that it's possible for computer geeks to get laid once and awhile (I hope).

  31. So what? by Omkar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In urban India (where I'm unfortunately banished), the internet has become just another method of communication. Access is taken for granted. his despite the average computer here is a pentium1 with hardware sold under false pretenses. Broadband is unheard of. Most people access the internet at cybercafés How does pervasive broadband access measurably improve on this situation? Sure, flashy content is enabled, but I don't think anything fundamentally changes.

  32. Re:Corea not Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Uuuu. Just a note near-offtopic but which I think it deserves attention. "C and "K", in many European languages, have nearly the same intonations. For Spanish, Portuguese and French the correct name is Corea. At least for Russians is "Koreya". Germans seem to use the term Korea. English don't make a big difference between "C" and "K" but they seem to highly prefer to use "K" in names.

    The correct name for Japan is Nippon and it seems that this is the way Japanese name its country. Besides Koreans and Japanese have completely different alphabets and intonations from us, Eurasians. So I don't get the reason why Japanese would be so pecky with one letter. I know that Japan and Korea have lots of problems between each other. However this story seems to have a reason completely different from what you state. The first europeans to reach East Asia were the Portuguese. So they named it Corea. But that was nearly 450 years ago and a lot of water went on since then. Today English is the main language in the world and Russian had lots to do with Korea (the Russian "C" is latin "S" btw). So I wouldn't be admired to see that this was the reason for the shift.

  33. And we eat cows... by jedie · · Score: 0
    Think about it... the people in India must think we're monsters and that we're all going to hell (or whatever they call it)
    Don't judge a culture by it's eating habbits... there are cultures who eat bugs and other slimey stuff: in the west we eat snails, mussels, oisters, shrimps, squids etc.

    I actually wonder what dog tastes like.
    Also Iwouldn't mind tasting:

    • kangaroo
    • Ostrich
    • snake
    • crocdile
    • any exotic animal that lives in a zoo ;)
    Don't let the "icky" factor stop you from trying stuff. Because one day you may find out it is toolate to TRY, and then you'll die knowing that you'll never know...
    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
    1. Re:And we eat cows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      tried ostrich and snake, not bad

      would like to try kangaroo

      also remember there's a large group of people who think that pigs are one of the most filthiest animals around and would never eat them (I guess to them its the equivalent to eating rats)

  34. This would never work by Nazmun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For one thing Light isn't moving in a straight line in fiber optic cable so the speed of light is considerably slower when moving from one place to another.

    Also the ping utility would be terribly innacurate for someting like this. It would also involve delays in processing at each computer, the slightest delay would be extremely harmful for something like this.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  35. Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by wyndigo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Japan launched 3G phones first, and broadband is equally prevasive here. Obviously, the author didn't check their facts. I probably just sounds better to say Korea, which has a back water image for some reason, than to compare to Japan. Still its more accurate to say large parts of asia (taiwan, korea, singapore, japan) are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes. Its easy here because due to population density the last mile problem disappears.

    --wyn

    1. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah I just thought I'd post and add to this. I've lived in Korea for the last 5 years.
      Yeah Japan had 3G phones first. I don't think broadband is quite as pervasive in Japan, but I don't have any hard statistics. And yeah the population density has a lot to do with the ease of implementation. But it's still damn fast. I usually snicker at my friends back in Canada when they tell me about their ADSL services.

      You can run web,ftp, etc etc services from your home end.

      The spam is a big problem, the government is trying to figure out solutions to it. Though it's the government, so don't expect a speedy (or logical) response to the problem.

      I didn't bother creating an account, cause man I'm dumber than a post and rarely even read the forums here.

    2. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by ahfoo · · Score: 2

      No, it's not just a density isue. It's about the market in the States being screwed by a collusion of government and telecoms monopolies. I now live in the far northern tip of Taiwan miles from any small town and I still get 512K DSL for thirty bucks a month and no hassles. Next year we're supposed to be upgraded to 1.5Meg just like they upgraded us from 256K earlier this year. This is not limited to high density areas by any means.
      The funny thing is I know so many people in the States who are under the illusion that there's some technical limitation that's preventing them from getting cheap broadband. It's like the people who thought the California electricity crisis was about the costs of power generation. Guess again.

    3. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes.

      Can we watch the lingo here? Everyone seems to be saying... 'Because the use of technology X, this other country is better than us'. The fact is, cynicism is a good thing. The fact that Koreans, Japanese, et al., ar willing to spend great gobs of money on hi-tech devices and services does not say that they are doing better than anywhere else.

      I think the total number of people with internet access (period) could be used as mark of technological advancement, but that's because there is a great deal of information available online. Just because Koreans can now watch streaming video, and play UT on big pipes, does not make them better off. In fact, their tendency to irationally spend money seems to make them much worse off IMHO.

      The same could be said of cell-phones. The coverage of cell technologies might indicate the communications level of a country, the number of Gs only means that people are willing to pay more for toys.

      Before anyone mentions how useful technology can be for some, we are talking about the populous here. You know, the people that spend $600 for an iPaq so they can have a battery-sucking MP3 player with a color screen... The people that pay several-hundred dollar cell-phone bills, so they can talk to their friends while they are driving to work.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  36. The slashdot summary is incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you read the article this points to, some broadband connections are 8mbs not 32mbs, and they hope to have 20mbs connections out by 2005.

  37. bah! by newr00tic · · Score: 0, Redundant


    32mbps!?!

    connections @ 640 baud-rate should be enough for everybody..


    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  38. Spam spam and spam by mosschops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish they'd spend as much time and money controlling the amount of spam leaving Korean networks, rather than getting more (ab)users hooked up with insanely fast connections.

    I still use Spamcop to report most spam I get, but it's hard to know whether it actually does any good for mail originating in the Far East. Do they not have any responsibility to their peering networks?

  39. BIG Difference by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    Your not limited to chatting via text only...

    If your a mp3 pirate, you can download ten songs per minute rather then 1 song per 5 minutes.

    Also the speed difference between while loading web pages is huge. So the WEB is far more enjoyable when your not waiting forever for pages to download.

    Of course if you want to be limited to text communication using transliteration then it's fine.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  40. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ninjas are like totally fucking badass!

  41. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, "they" don't call themselves "Corea", that is the french spelling of the country's name. they used that in world cup so that the name would be Corea-Japan World Cup rather than Japan-Korea World Cup.

  42. I can believe it... by imlepid · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago I had a Korean studen living with me and he was surprised to see I did not have broadband! (I was still using dial-up then.) He said that DSL was available to almost anyone who wants it in Korea. I was kinda skeptical at the time but I guess they have a pretty good system.

  43. Now, this explains why... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    ... I get so much spam in Korean!!!!

  44. Dude I'm moving to S. Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine - 16 player halo games w/ no lag!

  45. We need that here, by HanzoSan · · Score: 5, Insightful



    It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:We need that here, by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

      I live in the USA and they have a couple near my place. I haven't done any studies but it seems like a bunch of humbug teenagers smoking and drinking, and in practical terms is the same environment as an arcade - which I wouldn't really view as good or bad.

      I think the reason a place like that exists is I live in a Chinatown. Non-asians maybe don't like going to public computer places, or arcades, because it's more economical just to use their computer at home.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:We need that here, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, because there's nothing to do here after all the underage clubs and raves were shut down.

    3. Re:We need that here, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call spending all your free time glued to a computer a good "social environment".

    4. Re:We need that here, by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



      We need to put them in ghettos not suburbs. ChinaTown? China Town is a Chinese Ghetto, I think the other Ghettos need to catch onto this idea.

      Non Asians who arent rich usually dont have a computer.

      You live in Chinatown so I already know you arent rich, perhaps you have a computer but my point is if these little clubhouses were everywhere it would help alot of these kids who have no parents watching them.

      They'd be safer online than on the streets.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  46. Shows effects of US intervention too.... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And if it weren't for the *EVIL* United States, there would be a single Korea and it would be one massive hellhole instead of half hellhole and half really nice place to live.

    Right now the US has tens of thousands of troops right now helping the South Koreans hold of a million man North Korean army. With the news that North Korea has broken the treaty that gave them economic aid in exchange for giving up nukes, it should be increasingly obvious that the current US foreign policy that is heavy in, ahem, consequences, is not so naive after all. What is naive is the idea that you can solve all your problems with mean people by just talking nice to them.

    I wonder how if South Vietnam would be doing as well as South Korea of the US had succeeded in defending it.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:Shows effects of US intervention too.... by maw · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Your conclusion may be true, but your reasons for it are suspect.

      You assume that the only reason North Korea is the way it is is because it's a "communist" country. That may be the case, but it may also be the case that they are they way they are in a reaction to events and people around them.

      In other words, would they be in the same situation if they had been left alone? Maybe, but it's hardly given.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    2. Re:Shows effects of US intervention too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that 50 years ago, intervention was a good idea, and that a continued commitment is a good idea.

      I agree. However, this is an example of Direct Intervention. Compare this with non-direct intervention, eg the training of guerilla/terrorist groups, supported coup's, arms deals, etc.

      Also, don't even fucking MENTION Vietnam like it was the same fucking situation. The US didn't have the support of the local populace, they carpet bombed when they couldn't win on the ground, they basically fucked it up.

      Fucking moderators, drivel like that doesn't deserve a 4.

    3. Re:Shows effects of US intervention too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the drivel is up to five now :(

  47. You act as if capitalism is any diffrent? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    Capitalism is currently leading to Socialism anyhow, big companies, big government, class warfare.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  48. Bullcrap by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bullcrap. I'll prove it. GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT IN THE WORLD!! THE DMCA MUST BE ELIMINATED! WE MUST KICK EVERYONE WHO VOTED FOR IT OUT OF OFFICE! LONG LIVE COMMUNISM! (continue ad nausium)

    Stifling free speech my butt. You have no clue what stifling free speech is. Why don't you go to China and try to pass out some copies of the Torah, Koran, or the Bible. Or go to Cuba and try to critize Castro. As the secret police are carting you butt off to jail (or worse) you would realize there is no "stifling" of free speech here.

    Yes, there is some battling going on with the DMCA and issues like bnet, bug reporting, is code=speech, etc. But in the grand scheme of thing these are piss-ant problems that could actually be solved if you convinced enough people that they need solved. That is the nice thing about living in a Republic. SSSCA got stopped because people organized and spoke up. Heck, the web royalty act that RIAA sabotaged is getting push back by Jesse Helms of all people

    So please, quit with the doom and gloom until you have something substantial to doom and gloom about.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:Bullcrap by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Because I'm being trolled I'll be brief:

      <sarcasm> Yeah, I agree, we should wait until we're living in an opressive regime similar to China or Cuba before we do anything. </sarcasm>

      Free speech isn't an issue that you can wait until it gets bad before you address (because once you have no free speech, you loose your ability to address problems). That is why it is important to keep these problems contained before they get out of control.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  49. In my book... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Korea ranks second... as a source of spam, only led out by China. My book, you may ask? It has several pages... /etc/sysconfig/iptables and /etc/postfix/access.db to name but a few. Follow that up with korea.blackholes.us as an entry in maps_rbl_domains in /etc/postfix/main.cf and I don't see the Korean spam.

    If the bloody Korean ISP administrators would simply block incoming packets on ports 6588, 1080, 8080, and 3128 at their border routers, half the spam problem from that nation would halt.

  50. Actually you'd be amazed at how little fools see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good education is not the facts one has but the ability to
    find & use unfamiliar ideas.Instead of paying teachers to
    traumatize children with their own deficiencies, a good
    set of textbooks or...good bandwidth.You can send those
    teachers & lawyers to be reeducated so they might
    earn livlihoods without destroying the culture in which they live.

  51. (OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes

    You do realise that there is only one nation which has actually used nuclear weapons in war - and its not any of the countries in the so-called 'axis of evil'.

    If you still don't know the answer, visit this site

    Tim

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    1. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I also realize that it's foolish to take modern philosophy regarding nuclear weapons and transpose them into World War II, where it was largely an unknown (and there was zero fear from the "enemy" regarding it given that they knew nothing about it. Much of the peace of the past 50+ years has to do with the fear factor put into play at Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Is it better to kill people the old fashioned way using explosives that obliterate them into scattered pieces?

    2. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Metaldsa · · Score: 1

      he may be trolling but he is right.

      I lived in Japan for a brief stay but even they knew their government was corrupt. The army of hiroshima alone slaughtered 300,000 civilians in china right before WWII. We killed 200,000 civilians with the bombs. Now no one believes that killing a couple hundred thousand civilians is good by any means. But when you watch 15 year old girls training with spears (because they don't have enough guns) to stop a US invasion of the mainland, I don't think any intelligent person disagrees that the two atomic bombs saved lives (American and Japanese).

      Sometimes you have to be a monster to help make the world a better place. And if you don't think Japan's imperalist government desired a "regime change" then you should talk to my two Malasian roommates. Their grandmas had to shave their heads so japanese soldiers didn't rape them. Both Germany and Japan had whatever came at them and any citizen that didn't revolt is partially to blame. 911 could even be seen as our atonement to our previous fuckups in the middle east.

    3. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 0, Troll
      You do realise that there is only one nation which has actually used nuclear weapons in war - and its not any of the countries in the so-called 'axis of evil'.

      Ahhhh, yes...I seem to recall it had something to do with dragging your sorry asses out of a war that we didn't start and didn't want. Seems the .uk folks couldn't fight their way out of it and had to call on the Americans. Hurt your national pride a little did it?

      If you still don't know the answer, visit this site

    4. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by RestiffBard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am well aware that the United States is the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in was. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We do remember that. Trust me. There is a shitload that the United States has done that I'm not totally copacetic with. There is also a shitload that I'm totally thrilled about and proud of.

      Why is it that when people try to down the United States they forget instantly all the good shit we've done?

      I figure we should get mege kudos for ending ww I and WW II. So next time someone reminds me that the unites states eneded ww II with two nuclear bombs I'll remind them that we did exactly that. ended those wars.

      fuck did anyone forget that with out the united states Germany would most certainly be what we call europe now?

      are we about to start a war in Iraq? No. We're going to finish one. Do I like bush? hell no. Do I hate Saddam? yeah, I kinda do.

      sorry. got pissed off.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    5. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      US didn't finish any WWII by dropping nukes. It finished its war with the Japanese Empire. It's not like the Germans and Japanese were close allies or anything, not like, say, Austria or Italy. BTW, Japan did not officially surrender unconditionally, just accepted the terms of the Potsdam Agreement. The reason for this was that Japanese military officials believed they could have kept fighting and won the war.

      Germany surrendered May 8. Japan surrenders Aug 15, 6 days after Nagasaki and a week after Russia declares war on Japan (which it was obliged to do following Yalta in Fenruary). Japanese did not fully surrender until Sept 16, when Hong Kong fell. The Potsdam Conference begun after the surrender of Germany on July 16 (and after succesful test of the nuke), and Japan did not participate.

      A good description of the surrender of Japan is here: http://www.ww2pacific.com/surrender.html

    6. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by kir · · Score: 2

      OK. Boom.

      But, I'm sure you realize that the U.S. then REBUILT Japan (where I now live). For Christ's sake -- comparing the nukes in WWII to Bush's "axis of evil" is ridiculous.

      The U.S. dropped a bunch of bombs AND A BUNCH OF FOOD in Afghanistan. You do realize they're the only ones to actually ever do that (as far as I can tell).

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    7. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do I hate Saddam? yeah, I kinda do.

      you hate the leader of some foreign nation you've never been to? that's odd. I can't figure out any reason for any normal person to HATE the leaders of some other country.

      Why exactly do you hate him?

    8. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AND A BUNCH OF FOOD in Afghanistan.

      oh please...

      are you actually so fucking stupid that you thought those drops were in anyway helpful or compensated for the loss of human lives in afghanistan?

      how fucking stupid are you?

      the whole thing was a pathetic propaganda effort, the amount of help was pathetic and inadequate, and well, completely useless.

      you americans are so fucking stupid, you believe every fucking thing you see on CNN, try to fucking use your brain since you've been given one

      PS. you're the ones who helped destroying the country during cold war in the first place and then left it in ruins. so now you repay by couple of useless food drops.... well, let's all fucking hail the U.S.

      fucking morons

    9. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      except the war in europe had ended long before you dropped the nukes in japan

      maybe you should take some reading lessons, retard

    10. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      Now I know why Slashdot invented the term Anonymous Coward. How fitting.

    11. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The one sure way to get marked "Troll". Disagree with some long-haired, leftist freak extolling the virtues of North Korea and other repressive regimes while bashing the very guaranteers of their 'right' to speak freely.

      Imagine a world without the US, assholes.....I mean really imagine, not just imagine what Chomsky tells you it will be like but really imagine a world run by Hitler and Stalin and Kim Il Jung. Prefer that?

      Troll my ass, go back to Internet school and learn what troll means.

    12. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a pretty big difference between 'leaders of some other country' and 'militarily-backed puppet dictator originally put into place by the CIA to unify Iraq and bring cheaper oil to the USA.' The minute he quit being a puppet and kissing American ass, we bombed him to remind him he is still a little pup in a big, worldwide doghouse. Now he's gonna get bombed again, because he forgot how bad he got raped last time.

      Personally I don't support this fake war on Iraq, nor did I support the 'war for oil' (see Desert Shield/Desert Storm), but when puppet dictators don't dance when you yank their strings, you gotta smack them around. I'm sure a well informed commando squad could take him out but it'd probably destabilize the region to ill effect. There are alot of angry Islamic radical factions that wouldn't mind running the pathetic strip of desert that is Iraq.

    13. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it was wrong for Americans to hate, say, a certain German dictator c. 1940?

    14. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      bullshit this comment is insightful

      sum total of us military action in the twentieth century : not an iota of good effect, and much grief and suffering

      i thank the usa for jazz music, it's many dissidents, it's wonderful and many-stranded modern literature...

      i don't thank the usa one bit for entering the first or second world war or 'saving the world from itself' as you seem to think america has done

      take your arrogance and shove it

    15. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Too bad more Americans won't say this publically.

  52. You sound the typical American attitude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes, we are the number one country and everybody is the 2nd class. Down on others.

    Don't you know this is the reason why Americans are not liked. It is the American attitude.

    I don't think George Bush Jr is knowledgeable. Just think of 32 million American living below poverty. Who needs mass destruction? We are in the process of moral decay here.

  53. Oh, so that's why... by Priyadi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... we receive so many spam from them

  54. LOL Not a troll! by Tokerat · · Score: 2

    My girlfriend is Korean and when she read this she died laughing. She printed your post and it's haning on her wall in her dorm room!

    Oh yea, she promised to show me what "Korean High-Bandwidth Penetration" is all about later tonight...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:LOL Not a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the korean girlfriend...and boy did he love that bandwith penetration. Korean pride! ;-)

    2. Re:LOL Not a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      look,

      no body believes you've got a korean gf, you little schitzoid nerd

    3. Re:LOL Not a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, yeap. :) besides, everyone knows thai girls give the best blowjobs.

      How do I know? Because I am a master of oriental pickup lines and have fucked girls from all over the far east. You must believe me, I've typed it here on slashdot! I will have one of my many hoes reply to this to confirm this.

    4. Re:LOL Not a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the thai hoe. Yeah, me rub this guy wrong time.

      And he say he rike row-bandwidth penetration better, because high-bandwidth makey he dick rike hot dog in hallway.

  55. Re:They lead? by zebs · · Score: 2

    I got these Korea at a glance, 15 Fun Facts! Let me tell you, there are a lot of reasons to move there aside from the high bandwidth penetration

    Penises have higher bandwidth than cable modems What? They cum more than everyone else?

  56. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been through all this a couple of times with Korean friends and I mainly agree. But there is one thing that you say that is utterly wrong:

    English don't make a big difference between "C" and "K" but they seem to highly prefer to use "K" in names.

    How about Canada, Cambodia, Colombia, Congo, Cuba...
    It seems like the rule is that for the name of countries, "C" is prefered before "K". It could be a coincident. Or it could have been because of the russians, but following standard english naming conventions Korea should have been spelled Corea.

  57. What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can having too much broadband be a downside?
    Even though there are people dying playing video games that cant be too bad.
    Its just Korea's new way of population control.

  58. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucking christ, that's like reading the title of a newspaper article and claiming to know what the content of the actual article.

    i don't care what the little piece on slashdot said. the slashdot header clearly makes references to the Register article which, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is speaking about South Korea.

  59. nukes are bad. full stop. by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Is it better to kill people the old fashioned way using explosives that obliterate them into scattered pieces?


    Yes, you don't poison the land and seas for thousands of years to come and create the massive problems that a hideously irradiated planet would have to face up to. All weapons are bad for sure (they reckon it will take 400 years to clear Cambodia of landmines at the present rate), but some are really, really bad.


    Mind you some people make *lots* of money out of selling them.



    1. Re:nukes are bad. full stop. by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 2

      Have you been to Hiroshima lately? It looks pretty good- in fact, it looks better than some other Japanese cities because all the buildings are less than 50 years old*.

      There's no detectable radioactivity- a simple fission blast is moderately clean, as far as nukes go. It does NOT turn the target into an uninhabitable wasteland. In fact, the damage from a nuclear power-plant meltdown would be much longer-lasting than from an atomic bomb. (The shear volume of radioactive material is so much greater).

      (*Ok, honestly, Japanese buildings were never meant to last. Plenty of other cities got 100% flattened by conventional weapons, too)

    2. Re:nukes are bad. full stop. by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but without Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we wouldn't have a million Anime epics depicting massive destruction via a mushroom cloud or the ever-popular white semi-sphere of death.

      You gotta wonder just how deeply ingrained those bombings are in the current Japanese collective unconcious.

  60. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha!
    I laughed so hard I started crying.

  61. "Dear Leader" Kim Jong Il by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to South Korean intel reports, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has a IQ in the genius range (150-160) and is a computer wizard. I'm sure he's a multiplayer fanatic.

    1. Re:"Dear Leader" Kim Jong Il by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, he's that punk-ass that used to play Urban Terror using OGC to wallhack and autofire/autoaim. I think he went by |raped-your-ass| or something like that.

      I hate that guy.

  62. PC bangs? by anarchima · · Score: 0

    Now please tell me, why do they feel obliged to use the word "PC bang" in every single god damn sentence?

  63. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I nearly fell from the chair laughing!!!

  64. Re:Corea not Korea by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

    To add to the parent post they used the French spelling because the official language of FIFA is French

  65. Re:But there may be downsides...here too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, we say the same thing about living norht of the Excited States.

    zach

  66. (-2; Overrated) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtua|Mod Version 0.0.1-3
    --
    Your comment is currently scored -1.

  67. Hahaha!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >in violation of international treaty

    Like that's supposed to mean anything?

    The rules are: treaties are only good
    if the US wants to respect it.

    Feel free to express yourself but you can
    stop adding terminology that serves only to give it some importance.

    zach

  68. Koreans and open source by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    I've always wondered about this. For a long time Korea has had extremely high amounts of online time spent per-user. Presumably, that means lots of experienced techies from dicking around with computers so much.

    Yet I hear surprisingly few Korean names among major open-source developers. Korea has a name for pirated software, and that's about it.

    Why no *good* benefits coming from all that online time?

    1. Re:Koreans and open source by blowhole · · Score: 1

      No, you've seen the type throughout high school. Those dweebs that play computer games 24/7 but don't know jack crap about computers. Those are the truly sad nerds. All the bad without any of the good (if you consider having l33t skillz "good")

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    2. Re:Koreans and open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of console gamers fall into your definition of "truly sad nerd." They play games and care nothing about the hardware or how it works.

      That's why PC gaming is less popular among the mainstream: PCs are only for "good, curious nerds."

  69. Hmm, which statistic is correct? by 5lash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok there's a big difference between "Some 67% of Korean households now have broadband" (As said in the article), and "67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband" (As said in the /. post). Anyone know which is correct? I heinously doubt that 67% of Koreans have broadband, its more likely 67% of internet users.

    1. Re:Hmm, which statistic is correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 67% of the whole population, I believe. I lived in Korea myself, and they no longer HAVE dial-up services. In Korea, local phone calls are not fixed rate, so if you're hogged onto a phone line for a long time, it costs more than the broadband subscription. Besides, there are apartment buildings which offer free broadband connection to the residents in the building, so there's no need to use the dial-ups.

    2. Re:Hmm, which statistic is correct? by Isle · · Score: 2

      It is 67% of households, you always measure in percentage households. I recently read (properbly the same survey) that Denmark and Sweden yet again was the two countries with the highish internet connectivity. But the number of households with internet is still in the area of 70-80%.
      This must mean that in S.Korea around 100% of all internet connections are broadband.

  70. Re:Corea not Korea by luuc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know what "Korea" is in Korean, but it may be spelt with a K because of the transliteration. Unless of course the sound of "Korea" in Korean is totally different (like Nippon). Japan I think comes from Latin. C is preferred by Latin-style languages K is preferred by Germanic-style languages. English is normally classified Germanic, but has lots of Latin roots, like from Old French

  71. The CIA offends? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Why would the CIA World Factbook offend anyone? it's a tremendously good resource.

    One thing the US government is really good about is putting out lots of free data archives that it's spent money building. There are *excellent* resources available to the world:

    The USGS puts out really great maps and elevation maps for free. Not something you can produce on your own easily.

    NASA puts out some of my favorite stuff -- images, huge quantities of data.

    The Farm Security Administration has some really nice old photographs.

    The Library of Congress has tons of really nice stuff.

    The Smithsonian is one of the greatest museums I can imagine.

    The US government is one of the most steady and highest-quality provider of useful content (and ad-free!) available to the Internet.

    I kind of wish there was some site that listed all the US government sites as a sort of tree...make it easier to browse through them.

  72. Oh.. V�ster�s by Mindjiver · · Score: 1

    What do you think about Västerås then?

    Not everyday I see my hometown mentioned of slashdot. =)

    Oh well.. back to some boring x86 asm then.. =)

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
  73. North Korea invaded without provocation... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

    Your forgetting that it was North Korea that invaded South Korea---without any provocation. The reason why we haven't "left them alone" is because they *invaded* another country who is our friend. Also, don't forget that North Korea and South Korea are technically still at war. Are you actually arguing that South Korea would have been better off had we just let the North invade and take over?

    Second point is that there is no such thing as a vacuum in world politics. Everybody pretty much has an interest in everyone else's affairs. Even more so when they see them as a potential threat.

    We tried isolationism in the earth 20th century. For outcomes see World War I and World War II.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:North Korea invaded without provocation... by maw · · Score: 2
      I'll repeat myself: my problem was not with your conclusion, but with how you arrived to it. In other words, I think communism would probably suck to live in, but I also think that faulty logic sucks, and sometimes I call people on it. (If False then True is logically consistent.)

      Are you actually arguing that South Korea would have been better off had we just let the North invade and take over?

      No. Where did you get that idea?

      We tried isolationism in the earth 20th century. For outcomes see World War I and World War II.

      Oh yeah, how could I forget that US isolationism was the cause of the world wars? Come on.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    2. Re:North Korea invaded without provocation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how did you dare to forget that the US is the center of the fucking universe?! don't you realize that nothing on earth happens without the approval of the US.

      you will be assimilated

  74. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saying "Korean women are hot" makes no sense. It's like saying "white women are hot." They are equally true, UNLESS you have a fetish (not necessariyl a bad thing, it just means you have a preference for su=omething out of the ordinary, for whatever your definition of ordinary is). It's ALL good, my friend, any way you can get it.

    Except for the uggos. *cough* Margaret Cho, er, ahem.

  75. What about Japan? by arjscott · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although the technology mentioned in this article is still far from the reach of most western countries, Japan already has it all.

    High-speed internet access has been common for many years. 10 megabit cable is now common for home users. 100 megabit is also available.

    NTT Introduced FOMA 3G mobile services way back in early 2001.

    HDTV has been available for at least 4 years. I first saw an HDTV broadcast in 1998.

    1. Re:What about Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have no idea what your talking about if your thinking japan. Japan DOESNT have it all. south korea and japan have been fighting for 3G phone rights but there's lost of disputes on who is ahead because of 2.5 issues and lots of splitting hair details. HDTV saturation is hardlly anything worth talking about. Digital TV is far less important compared to Broadband saturation. The biggest diffrence are the two countries use of broadband. South Korea is slightlly ahead but most of the huge diffrences can be seen by going to south korean portals. Theyre highlly broadband intensive which reflect the broadband culture. Japan along with a few Euro countries have a lot but they have fundamentally diffrent social and economic designs implemented in their networks

    2. Re:What about Japan? by DiscoDave911 · · Score: 1

      I live in Japan and I can tell you that very few of the people I know people have broadband internet service. Most people think it is too expensive or are just not interested.

    3. Re:What about Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got to be kidding.. Japan 8M ADSL is only about US$20 monthly.

      I am sure an average person spend that much money a day in Japan.

  76. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not completely correct.

    Korea themselves did adopt the original Portugese spelling of "Corea" for official international use. Japan changed the spelling for the exact reason pointed out by the parent poster, and also because the Japanese wanted to standardize western spellings of Japanese words - there is no contention about the pronunciation of a hard "K". After the war, Korea decided not to change the spelling, since the world had already adopted the official Japanese spelling.

    And "Nippon" is an archaic term used mainly when speaking nationalistically, but I wouldn't expect many people to know that. On top of that, you're still wrong that this (actually, "Nihon") is the only "correct" name for Japan. Japan is the WEST's name for Nihon, just as "Germany" is AMERICA's name for, what, Deutscheland (or however it's spelled in their alphabet). To Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, etc., the "correct name" for Japan is in Chinese characters. They all pronounce the name differently, but the different pronunciations in the different languages are unimportant, since they are all equally right. The name is the CHARACTERS.

  77. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Korea (romanized from Korean) - Mingook
    Japan (romanized from Japanese) - Nihon

    The word "Japan" comes from "Zipangu," the name given to Japan by Marco Polo.

    Korea, had it not been invaded and occupied by Japan, would be known to the West as "Corea" today.

  78. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. In fact, changing the order in which the countries' names came was the reason that JAPAN changed Corea's name to "Korea."

    See posts above.

  79. nukes are not clean by fantomas · · Score: 2

    How come all those servicemen who were at nuclear tests are putting in legal cases? How come all those people died in terrible agony? Have you read any stories from the survivors (and yes I know the Allies were responsible for another charming act of war atrocity with conventional weapons at Dresden).


    I really, really hope this never happens, but I'd be interested to hear your position about how you'd feel about somebody letting off one in your country. It could happen, the world is crazy enough and there are enough poor people with not enough to lose, as another poster has commented.


    It does strike me as very ironic that the one country that's used nuclear weapons is one of the most keen to make sure other people aren't allowed to possess them, while they reserve the right to maintain their own arsenal. Lots of people find that a bit hypocritical to say the least.


    1. Re:nukes are not clean by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      "It does strike me as very ironic that the one country that's used nuclear weapons is one of the most keen to make sure other people aren't allowed to possess them, while they reserve the right to maintain their own arsenal. Lots of people find that a bit hypocritical to say the least."

      Ironic, maybe. Hypocritical, perhaps. But to allow Iraq and/or NK to get their hands on nukes would be insane.

    2. Re:nukes are not clean by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I have an idea.

      Quiz the nations bordering or within striking distance of a tactical nuke if they'd trust Iraq, North Korea, or any other rogue nation if they want that country to possess nuclear arms. I doubt you'll get a "yessir, that's a fine idea" out of anyone. We tend to be somewhat responsible with nukes in the US while other countries with nothing to lose don't really give a shit about Mutually Assured Destruction. The fact that we lit a pair off when the technology was new says nothing about what we've not done since that time.

      Hypocracy and government are as tightly entwined as Calvin and Hobbes. Whatever country you live in, no matter where it is, I can guarantee that your government doesn't shine very brightly under the light of scrutiny. Everyone's guilty of something, and no government is perfect. Strong nationalism on the public's part can lead to denial which generates the 'idea' that their government is perfect and everything's dandy, yet the reality remains in striking contrast.

    3. Re:nukes are not clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! I wish I had your way with words, my friend.

  80. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want 32 Mbps! That's it i'm moving!!

  81. Re:Well bless their hearts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AHAHAHAHAHAHA....you've been looking at the same pictures I have.

    Hey, where'd the stairs go? I was climbing those!

  82. In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have a small penis, and capitalists have large penises. Otherwise you wouldn't be so frustrated.

    1. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually my penis is quite large

      capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive, pea brain

    2. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You post on slashdot and are extremely frustrated. You clearly do not have a big penis. If you did you would be using on a woman (or a man if that's your thing), not posting rants against capitalists on slashdot.

    3. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      my rants are not targeted against capitalists

      my rants are targeted against fucking retards such as yourself

  83. Re:They lead? by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

    And they aren't the only one to violate and / or try to sabotage international treaties. (Not that I'm defending North Korea, it is probably one of the most horrible places to be on this earth.)

  84. if it cost $20 a month for DSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the US would have a subscription leader in DSL... but NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, some marketing gurus at those SBC/Verizon/etc just make it too expensive for the common folks to subscribe.

  85. Re:Corea not Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whatever, but the reason you saw "Corea" during the world cup was the above (as explained by FIFA officials afterwards)

  86. Here's why by ChrisWong · · Score: 2

    Here's why South Korea is so wired:

    1. 80% of the population live in urban areas.

    2. About half of these live in humongous high-rise housing complexes.

    That pretty much explains why it was so easy to wire up the place for broadband.

  87. Re:Corea not Korea by tkny · · Score: 1

    corea or korea. the correct way to describe south korea is "dae han min gook" (please don't make any 'gook' jokes) which translates to 'republic of korea'.

    also, as a story i used to hear from my dad... japan and korea has had many conflicts over history. he mentioned that japan opted to name corea as korea because the 'k' comes after 'j'. sounds racist, but i haven't found any truth to this statement.

  88. But they're all SPAMMING FAGGOTS by vandan · · Score: 2

    Why do I get so much spam from kornet.net and other Korean networks?
    The reason they all have broadband is that a handful of stupid Westerners (I'd say they would be Americans) are replying to their spam and buying penis enlargements and such, and funding the broadband explosion.
    I am maintaining a list of IP address of spammers, which can be found at: http://enthalpy.homelinux.org/spammers.txt and I assure you, they are 90% Korean arse-lickers.
    The other 10% are from UUNet.

  89. Re:They lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, dude... that's the funniest shit I've seen in months.

  90. North Korea is the strangest place on Earth.. and by bewilderness · · Score: 1
    A year ago I didn't know anything about North Korea and I was basically just another geek, although I have always been interested in human rights.

    However, around six months ago I read a horiffic account of her six years in the North Korean prison system by a woman named Soon Ok-Lee and I was so appaled and so angry that something like this could go on on this planet that I suddenly became very interested in North Korea. I have a lot I'd like to share, so please forgive me if this post is quite 'information dense'.

    First, I'd encourage all of you to read Ms. Lee's account. There is a condensed version of it at this URL (caution, not for children.. it may even give you adults nightmares..)

    US Senate Testimony of Ms. Soon Ok Lee North Korean prison camp survivor

    There are many other defector testimonies available too. They make fascinating if chilling reading, as does anything having to do with North Korea. All I can say is that North Korea is an enigma of sorts. An entire country operated like a cult. It is a cult in which to question the insane narcissistic ruler Kim Jong-Il is often to die. You dont believe me? Read her story!

    Which brings me to the reason why I am posting. Kim Jong-Il's hold on North Korea, I think, is fragile. It depends on a very tight "blockade on information' coming in to the country. Can Slashdot readers think of any way to get news of the outside into North Korea ? Because if we could.. we could rid the world of a madman comparable to PolPot or Hitler or Stalin..

    For some background on NK's techniques of control, read the following:

    The Official Propaganda In The DPRK: Ideas And Methods

    The Repressive System And The Political Control In North Korea

    Here are some other resources: Two other defectors stories..

    http://monthly.chosun.com/html/200201/200201280001 _1.html

    http://monthly.chosun.com/html/200006/200006130003 _1.html

    NK Human Rights website

    North Korea's strategy

    Anyway, please check them out, and please do something for human rights in North Korea today. They are human beings like ourselves and they are suffering.

    I daresay that any of us outspoken geeks who found ourself suddenly transplanted into North Korea would soon find ourself in the position Ms. Lee. found herself in. Except that she lived and we would die for that ill-considered remark. She was one of the only people to ever be released from an NK death camp. She risked (and is risking) her life to tell her story.. Maybe we can help in some way.. Breaking the blockade of information coming into North Korea would help destabilize Kim Jong-Il. With all the technology available to the West, there has to be away.. And it would be nonviolent, since eventually HIS OWN PEOPLE would kill him..

    He is one of the most evil people who have ever lived. Dont fall for the lies.. He is fooling so many people... he will never 'open up' he is afraid the world would find out about his crimes and NK's 'killing fields'. It is all an act. A lie.

    One idea I had was to float toilet paper into North Korea on leaky balloons.. Most North Koreans have never seen toilet paper. Lets show them that the rest of the world is not trying to kill them. We want to help free them.

  91. wootah by korea · · Score: 1

    I knew it! Go korea. :)

    --

    --

    "pain is weakness leaving the body."
  92. Well, duhhh... by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Just because 67% of the homes have broadband doesn't mean that 67% of the homes have good system administrators :-) Actually, the early problems weren't homes, but schools, which ran a standard software distribution that had lots of holes in it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  93. First Order Logic... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 2

    If you going to start getting First Order Logic about it then please at least define the predicates.

    Basically this is my argument. North Korea and South Korea pretty much started out the same. Same people, same general geographic local, same wartorn post-WWII state. One adopted a communist economy, one a non-communist economy. The communist one is a hellhole. The non-communist one isn't.

    Of course one country does not make a proof. Maybe it was a freak occurance. But a similar thing happened in Eastern Europe. And there is a wealth of documented evidence that communism makes your country a hellhole. I don't see which proposition you think is false.

    Brian

  94. Ease of serving content is the real diff, plus TV. by billstewart · · Score: 2

    One difference is that broadband internet lets you get more TV-like services, compared to the limited range of opinions on government and corporate TV, though satellites have already done much of that. But the more important difference is that having a broadband connection at home means you can easily put up your own web site, and distribute as much content as you've got disk drive for. In some places, like parts of the US, the broadband companies discourage this, but in most of the world you can run your own servers.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. hmmm.. comic strip time... by fantomas · · Score: 2

    The term "rogue nation" concerns me, it is just too comic strip/ kids playground language to be taken seriously. The idea that some of the most powerful decision makers in the world think we're playing cowboys and injuns or cops 'n robbers is downright scary. I think you make a fine analogy by mentioning Calvin and Hobbes. The USA is a damn sight better option than most of these countries, but is sure aint perfect. I think we're in agreement, we have a responsibility to keep our elected representatives accountable, to remind them that they are representing us, not just being voted in to be let loose with a lot of toys. Democracy shouldn't mean a once every four years (or how often you vote for your reps) responsibility, and then you throw away any personal involvement.


    As you well mention, it would be a far better option to find a way to make sure the 'other countries' have something to lose. I think a lot of the craziness in the world is coming from people who have been so f**ked over by the big boys that they just have nothing to lose any more.

    1. Re:hmmm.. comic strip time... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Actually 'rogue nation' is a valid diplomatic/governmental term. Sure, it may sound childish after hearing it on CNN for the 8 millionth time, but it's still a valid descriptor of nations who either don't have a stable, recognized government in place, or who choose to ignore UN and other requests for various things. Being rogueish means doing your own thing (like plotting against your neighbors and stockpiling biochemical weapons) and not really giving 2 shits about what anyone says.

  96. rogue as a correct term - interesting by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Ok, serious request, not just a wind up. Do you have a URL reference to where it is used in a serious context, e.g. UN documents etc. Over here (UK) it has just been taken as part of the comic strip language that Bush uses (and scares the hell out of us). All part of the blurring between b-movies and b-movie language to describe very real, very serious situations. Trouble is the word simplifies things too far.


    This will probably annoy you (so apologies in advance) but one of the reasons Bush etc don't do themselves any favours with some of their allies, like in Europe, is they belittle their value by using this language. For example, to be technically correct, your example "Being rogueish means doing your own thing (like plotting against your neighbors and stockpiling biochemical weapons) and not really giving 2 shits about what anyone says." could actually apply to the USA. The USA stockpiles weapons of mass destruction and terror, definitely has plotted against and overthrown its neighbours on several occasions, and does not really give 2 shits about what anyone says. I think most of us want to believe in the USA, but the people at the top could try a little harder in their words and actions. Remember a lot of Europeans and people of other nations of Bush's age have had first hand experience of war as a terrible experience in their own home town, have been on the receiving end of terror-wars, and so are a lot less inclined to simplistic movie- language to describe these encounters.

  97. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    You can not get anything worthwhile done without raising a sweat.
    -- The First Law Of Thermodynamics

    What ever you want is going to cost a little more than it is worth.
    -- The Second Law Of Thermodynamics

    You can not win the game, and you are not allowed to stop playing.
    -- The Third Law Of Thermodynamics

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...