Slashdot Mirror


'Computer-On-Glass' Display

bfries writes "Sharp Corp, Japan's largest maker of liquid crystal displays (LCDs), unveiled a screen Tuesday with microprocessor circuitry applied directly onto the glass, enabling it to function like a computer. It uses Sharp's continuous grain silicon (CGS) technology and should be used on some products in 2005."

212 comments

  1. Minority Report by Jezza · · Score: 1

    Wow, sounds a bit like the computers in Minority Report

    1. Re:Minority Report by slipgun · · Score: 2

      unveiled a screen Tuesday with microprocessor circuitry applied directly.... enabling it to function like a computer

      Sounds more like an iMac to me. (Note for the humourless: I am joking, I am aware of the difference).

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    2. Re:Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(Note for the humourless: I am joking, I am aware of the difference)"

      Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any humor in your post.

    3. Re:Minority Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's "humourless"? Where's the humour? Where's the joke?

    4. Re:Minority Report by Ratface · · Score: 2

      Wow - haven't we seen this story already - tomorrow!

      Now the whole of /. is becoming like Minority Report ;-)

      --

      A little planning goes a long way...
  2. I can see the case mods coming now. by Salden · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Coke Bottle PC
    • Casserole PC
    • Fish Tank PC
    Wait, that last one's been done before...
    1. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by tolarianacademy · · Score: 1

      wasn't there a guy who made a fish tank pc on slashdot?

    2. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by billybob2001 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I can see it now:

      Yeah, of course my pc runs on windows...

      The answer? Defenestrate now!

    3. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by Wirr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Fish Tank PC

      I could actually think of a real world application for the fish tank PC, although not as a case mod.

      I would just love it, if the front glass of my aquarium would be a PC. Then I could just touch it, and it would display the water temperature, the pH, the salinity and so on directly on the front. Boy, would that be cool. No more Gadgets which destroy the look of the aquarium.

    4. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like the casserole one, would be self-heating with the way processor tech is going. Might be hard to read the display when it's full of beef stew though :-(

    5. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      The Coke Bottle PC shoudn't have any overheating issues, but the Casserole PC...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    6. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go back to prague.

      and be careful what you throw out the window, your liable to start a war.

    7. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

      Indeed, you should.
      Defenesetration is the wisest path

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Shhh--- Click- that was sharp patenting your cool idea... Either patent it or GPL it before someone else does...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    9. Re:I can see the case mods coming now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA would coume out with aversion that tracks the fish and adds bubble text.. Sim fish chat. COming to a tank near you.

  3. Cool... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just remind me to be excited again in three years. It's interesting, but not really news until there's, at the least, something to look at.

    1. Re:Cool... by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...but not really news until there's, at the least, something to look at.
      • As as Slashdot reader that received the Christmas Victoria's Secret catalogue yesterday, I whole-heartedly agree.

    2. Re:Cool... by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry. A duplicate story will be posted at least quarterly until it matters; and then they'll stop when it's a salable technology. So when the stories about it stop, wait 3 months and buy.

    3. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then Apple will 'revolutionarily' invent it.

    4. Re:Cool... by tunah · · Score: 2
      but not really news until there's, at the least, something to look at

      Or through.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    5. Re:Cool... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So I guess, by looking at the rate the dupes are posted, we should see that computer in two weeks...

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    6. Re:Cool... by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      and then Microsoft will "embrace and extend" the idea and you won't be able to get glass for your house windows any more unless you sign one of their Draconian EULAs.

      *smack*

      --
      - I am made of meat.
  4. Business card computer made of glass? by gpinzone · · Score: 5, Funny

    CRACK!

    1. Re:Business card computer made of glass? by billybob2001 · · Score: 1


      Note:

      "Crack" relates to software.

      The correct term for hardware is "Hack"

      I guess "Crash" would be appropriate though.

      <Picky> :)

    2. Re:Business card computer made of glass? by TummyX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop doing that. I thought you were selling..

    3. Re:Business card computer made of glass? by boomer_rehfield · · Score: 1

      ummm... think literally for a second there billybob....

      ;>

      --
      Carpe Canem - Seize the Dog
    4. Re:Business card computer made of glass? by x0m3g4 · · Score: 1

      "This could be something the size of a business card, perhaps with a wireless function and touch-screen input,"

      Yeah thats just what the world needs, a $2,000 pane of glass to carry in my back pocket.

    5. Re:Business card computer made of glass? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Dont forget - some more dubious celebs and movers use glass panes to cut crack... normally with credit cards/ business cards... Maybe that was being refered to...
      Or the other more painful possibility of leaving a glass business card style computer in your back pocket, with much data, and sitting on it, thus lacerating your backside, rendering your machine useless and your data lost.... Its a future shock alright...
      Still - imagine a computer embedded into a pair of glasses - augmented vision... Retina tracking.. Nice!! Run dasher and a few other items - it'd be awesome...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  5. Won't someone think of the whores? by Bi0h4z4rD · · Score: 0, Funny

    From looking at the photo, I'd be worried that all those circuits running through the glass would take up space for displaying precious, precious pr0n!

    --

    Don't do today what you can put off until tomorrow. You'll most likely find a better way to do it!

  6. Yeah? by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Funny
    should be used on some products in 2005

    Yeah? You think so, buddy? Well, what if we decide not to use it, huh? What are YOU going to do about?

    Who are you to say if we SHOULD use it or not...

    Oh, hold on...that might not be what you meant.

    Somethingwicked, you ignorant slut.

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:Yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just M2ed the Troll mod as Unfair. I didnt catch the joke (not American) but you just have to _read_ the damn post to see its not a Troll but a stream of consciousness.

      I swear, the biggest problem with the moderation system is that i've never had a go :(

  7. How's it look. by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm curious about how these screens look. One of the issues with LCD is the screens appearance. They are often hard to view unless at a precise angle, if you wear glasses, especially polarized glasses, they are even harder to view. Touch screen films make them harder still to view and now they are embedding the actual circuitry in the display. What's the viewing like?

    1. Re:How's it look. by theRiallatar · · Score: 1

      Funny, most LCD screens I've seen in the past year are 80 degree viewable. I'm not even sure I could read the text looking at a CRT from 80 degrees to begin with.

    2. Re:How's it look. by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      All LCD's today are easily viewable from the side. The only screen that still suffers from that effect is the projection screen (big screen TV).

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    3. Re:How's it look. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Laptop screens usually look like shit when viewed from different angles. The color balance and brightness gets all fucked up.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    4. Re:How's it look. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah sorry, I'm not a graphics person. My definition of viewable is I can read 12pt Times New Roman text :)

  8. Glass/Silicon by pubjames · · Score: 3, Interesting


    What is the difference between glass and the silicon crystal used in chips? Aren't they kind of similar?

    1. Re:Glass/Silicon by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Glass is quartz and/or silica not silicon.

    2. Re:Glass/Silicon by Eccles · · Score: 3, Informative

      Glass is quartz and/or silica not silicon.

      Hmm, what gets 5s these days...

      Quartz is silicon dioxide (SiO2), as opposed to pure silicon. It's like the difference between rust and iron.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Glass/Silicon by dhovis · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm going to expand on this a little. I'm a ceramics person, so I'm actually qualified.

      Glass is primarily SiO2 or "silica", but what we go around calling glass has plenty of additives. Most of what we call glass is actually soda-lime glass, so called because it contains ample ammounts of soda (Na2O) and lime (CaO). Those two ingredients help lower the melting point of SiO2 and make it a lot easier to process. Pyrex is a brand name for borosilicate glass and its composition allows it to be very strong and resistant to thermal shocks (this is why you can put Pyrex in the oven without worrying about it shattering). LCD glass is probably different alltogether.

      Very pure amorphous SiO2 glass can be made, but it is much more expensive and is often sold as "fused silica" or "fused quartz".

      True "quartz" is a crystalline (ordered) phase of SiO2, and it is not the only one. Crystoballite and tridymite are two other crystalline phases of quartz.

      In any case, SiO2 is a dialectric, and not a semiconductor, so the computation being done in this story is all contained in the layers on top of the glass and not in the glass itself.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  9. Heat dissipation by mortis_aeturnus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Glass is a very very poor heat conductor. Having anything running at a very low temperature on this would pale any laptop overheating horror stories. This would definately limit the power of the processor you can use. This would make a nice (and slower than 4.77mhz) palm top but nothing more.

    1. Re:Heat dissipation by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends upon your point of reference. Compared to a metal it may be a poor conductor but in a house the glass is one of the biggest causess of heat loss. Why do you think a winfdow feels cold in winter?

    2. Re:Heat dissipation by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They didn't say they were planning on having an Pentium 4 2.8GHz-on-glass - the processing probably won't be very powerful for some time.

      Meanwhile wouldn't it be nice to have a half-inch thick high resolution LCD TV?

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    3. Re:Heat dissipation by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Someone posted a Japanese article that the fish translated. The first generation applications will be for displays like PDA, watches, and portable TV's that will utilize a proprietary 8-bit processor. 8-bit is not exactly a processing giant. Lower processor power, lower heat output.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  10. Quick! Ship it now! Do it now! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    All we need is enough processor power to decompress a JGP. Shit it! Shit it now! We *need* this thing!

  11. Slow Glass by geoff+lane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When storage density reaches about 60 Gbits/sqin
    you can store the all the data for a single pixal for a 90min movie within the area occupied by the pixal.

    Once that's possible you can create dedicated movie "books".

    1. Re:Slow Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a "pixal"?

    2. Re:Slow Glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What is a "pixal"?
      Ba contant. Tha avarage slashdot reader would have said "pixle".
    3. Re:Slow Glass by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      Too bad *PEG compression encodes not "pixals", but chunks of 8x8 pixels IIRC

    4. Re:Slow Glass by The+Spelling+Nazi · · Score: 0
      Ba contant. Tha avarage slashdot reader would have said "pixle".

      Ahhh... a spelling Nazi's treasure trove.

    5. Re:Slow Glass by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      A "Picture Ailment" rather than a "Picture Element"

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    6. Re:Slow Glass by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      Too bad *PEG compression encodes not "pixals", but chunks of 8x8 pixels IIRC

      But who needs compression when you have 60Gb/sq. in.?

      Consider a 100dpi screen. 10000 pixels/sq. in. * 2 hours * 60 minutes * 60 seconds * 24 fps = 1.728 billion individual pixel values/sq in., which gives 34.7 bits per pixel value. Tada, beautiful 32 bit color.

  12. Picture of the product... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't read japanese, but I believe this is a picture of what the article talks about.

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Picture of the product... by mohrt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is the page translated to english.

    2. Re:Picture of the product... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the picture from the article

      --
      Posted Anonymously so people don't say I'm a karma whore.

    3. Re:Picture of the product... by ZipperHead99 · · Score: 0, Redundant


      Click here to translate it.

    4. Re:Picture of the product... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it says Z80 on caption of the foto. If it is indeed a Z80 it wont have too many transistors (20k - 100k max?, don't remember) and also a much bigger footprint than the original chip. these things will therefore not have the heat density of a modern processor, but you would also need a sliding door to fit in a P4. But for apps that don't need a P4 - like a truly portable display with just display decoding logic and 802.11, or a PDA application?

    5. Re:Picture of the product... by alpha_loopy · · Score: 1

      of course, the translation reads like "all your base are belong to us"......

    6. Re:Picture of the product... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      That's neat...

      A Z80 on glass. The Z80 brings back the good 'ol days.

      Let's not forget how the Z80 used to run CPM. But with this invention, CPM can stand for Clear Panel Machine or Clear Panel Microprocessor

    7. Re:Picture of the product... by Xcruciate · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Engrish?

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
    8. Re:Picture of the product... by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

      The article mentions the Z80-on-glass is already being produced for cell phones and PDAs.

      So what's with the "call me back in 3-5 years when it's ready for production"?

      Cheers,
      max

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  13. Mod by BoBaBrain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here is an overview of a case mod for such a system.

    The processing power isn't great, but it did manage to support Wine.

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
    1. Re:Mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The processing power isn't great, but it did manage to support Wine."

      And if this story had anything to do with Linux, that would mean something...

    2. Re:Mod by BoBaBrain · · Score: 1

      It was either that pun or something involving windows.

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    3. Re:Mod by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      Chortle.

      Chuckle.

      Whimper.

      *ut* Gkkkkkk!

      *Plonk*

    4. Re:Mod by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Or the fact that it's a fucking wine glass.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  14. Possible drawbacks... by GnomeKing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now not only can you get your business cards upside down, but you also have trouble telling if the company name really IS japanese, or if your just looking at it from the wrong side

    Seriously though - I can really see this sort of technology being used on phone booths (if it can be made cheep enough not to matter if its vandalised now n then) to make them display moving images while still being able to see through the glass to see that theres someone inside

    It reminds me of a scene from The Time Machine where the hero blokey was talking to the hologram-type-librarian who was shown walking around "inside" pieces of glass...

    1. Re:Possible drawbacks... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can really see this sort of technology being used on phone booths
      How about the front window in cars? Heads-up-display anyone? I may wait on LASIK in hopes that my glasses in 2008 come HUD enabled. :)
      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Possible drawbacks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the slant; unless you have a perfectly vertical windshield, you need something a bit more 'holographic." That said, the night-vision HUDs in those Cadillacs and similar are nothing more than LCD projectors that provide a *very* vague image of the road projected onto the glass.

      Real HUDs use vertical panes of glass, and/or laser systems that can compensate for curved cockpits/windshields, providing that "hanging 10 feet in front of you" illusion.

      The optics for good readability just don't work out, until you can figure out how to make a hologram out of a single LCD panel, which would probably have to be a very, very miniaturized multilayer device to display the equivalent information of a holographic film.

      Without the proper optics, you'll just make yourself nearsighted and grow hair on your palms. Still, this has a number of interesting applications, once they get the cores/on-glass components rearranged into more of a 'border' than a conventional layout. Remember, the liquid crystal itself is just a 'goo' sandwiched in there, so it looks like they're wasting a lot if it covers the chip area as well.

    3. Re:Possible drawbacks... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Automotive HUDs are a big problem, because to present an accurate image, the display controller needs to know where you're sitting in the car, so it can adjust the projection angles to your viewing position, else nothing will line up properly with the real stuff that lies beyond the windshield. This isn't as much an issue with head-mounted displays because they are stationary to your eyes.

      And of course the passengers would be totally confused because from their POV the HUD would be radically off-target.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  15. Orlando Jones is coming to your PC? by Paul+Burney · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe this brings us one step closer to the future library computers in last year's "Time Machine" movie.

    --
    <?php while ($self != "asleep") { $sheep_count++; } ?>
    1. Re:Orlando Jones is coming to your PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderator, if you'd actually seen the movie you'd know that this post is not offtopic. Stop exhibiting your own ignorance as an excuse to mod otherwise good posts down.

      And no, I am not the author of the above post.

    2. Re:Orlando Jones is coming to your PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, I am not the author of the above post.

      Of course you are not. Of course.

  16. How would we... by Crasoum · · Score: 1

    have dual monitors? Network the screens togeather?

    1. Re:How would we... by The+Spelling+Nazi · · Score: 1

      Network the screens togeather No mod points for you! Come back 1 year!

    2. Re:How would we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is a good point. With the circuitry on the glass, coupling small panels could be done with a capacitative method.

      Maybe not the thing for a dual-screen display, but it could make a 'stacked' pseudo-3D sandwich a lot cheaper...

  17. Transparency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i'm interested in how they get the microprocessor transparent. if you can't use the same space for c and lcd, then there's no reason for this combination

    1. Re:Transparency by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's plenty of reason.

      If Palm could make a PDA with one piece of glass instead of glass and PCB, it could save money.

      Every LCD I've seen on a shelf or in a picture has a casing on it. If that space had extra glass with a microprocessor embedded - your LCD screen could be higher quality for less money.

      If you want to go to the extreme of the clear hand-held computer, you will probably still have an area to hold it by and maybe even some buttons for using it, which will provide space for circuits.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Transparency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, put some capacitative touchpads on the glass and you've got... er, yeah, something gay out of Star Trek. But at least the manufacturing costs for it would make sense, as opposed to being driven by coolness-factor. :)

    3. Re:Transparency by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Until they figure out how to print a useful battery on glass, they're definitely going to have some opaque non-glass segments. You can't just embed the battery IN the glass because if you break it a lot of nasty shit will come out.

      Buttons aren't a problem, you can vary capacitance with flexion. (Is that a word?) You can get clear plastic calculators for use on overhead projectors...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Nice for HUDS by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    This would work much better than projecting the image onto a surface.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Nice for HUDS by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Some HUD's don't project the image onto a surface, but actually project the image into your eye. I've seen a HUD built into eyeglasses frames, and it worked by creating a virtual screen of pixels on one retina that subtended some 30 degrees of the eye's field of view. Its screen was pretty cool, consisting of a row of fibers that vibrated back and forth at a known period and a timer that sent the right row of data to the fibers at the right time.

    2. Re:Nice for HUDS by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Nope. Close, I'll give you that, but not there yet. I saw no mention of a Heads Up Display in the atricle, so I'm assuming they havn't worked on that little problem of focas. Imagine trying to read one of these things, and then trying to look through it... you can't do both at the same time. It's the eqivilent to holding your hand a foot from your face and trying to be able to read something on the wall and the writing on your hand at the same time WITHOUT re-focasing.

      Note: The above does not apply if "you only have one eye", and I'm an "insensitive clod".

    3. Re:Nice for HUDS by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your posting assumes that I have [1|2] eyes.
      This blatent anti-Martianism MUST STOP!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Nice for HUDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are technically HMDs, for "head-mounted displays," though it's not much of a distinction; "HUD" doesn't mean much either, though we usually think of the laser-projected, pseudo-holographic variety used in jet fighters. (The 'HUD' used for that Caddy with night-vision was just an LCD or somesuch that reflected off the windshield, with little focal correction... just clear enough to let you know 'something sort of bright is in front of you and maybe you should do something about it.')

      There's a pretty cool company out there making direct retinal projection displays; can't remember their name, but they hired the guy who invented the PCjr and later brought us such wondrous flops as the Amiga 600... so keep your fingers crossed, I guess.

  19. Cool, by blu3b3rry · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That make some cool windows, HUD for cars, and Computer case. Neat stuff.

  20. Digital Photos by Jezza · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well they're talking about ultra-high resolutions for things like photographs, and maps. Of course this is going to need huge storage and processing abiliy if they're going to reporduce photographic quality on anything larger than a really small display. I'm guessing that the display would probably be most useful if it could dynamically change resolution perhaps displaying several resolutions at once, to combine video (HDTV perhaps) a computer output at a "normal resolution" (90dpi or so) and a photo quality section (say 300dpi or better).

    The abiliy to offload some of the processing on the display would be very helpful. I can see that being a very useful display. Still the idea of storage on the display sounds like Minority Report to me. Very cool.

    1. Re:Digital Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I want my computer output at at least 200dpi or so, personally. That way an A4 sheet will be readable when displayed life-size on my monitor.

      Currently, I'm stuck at 120dpi, which means borderline bearable (akin to an 80s dot matrix with a brand-new ink ribbon) if I use a 1:1 zoom ratio [I'm careful to set up my DPI in X correctly, using the DisplayWidth and DisplayHeight options, so that applications written by the clueful know that there are so-and-so many pixels to the inch on my display]

      If only more widget kits used natural units instead of pixels!

    2. Re:Digital Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "exactly" what they're talking about; integrating the signal-processing electronics onto the glass.

      However, it's hard to say how much CPU is needed, or how many analog components they can design/place; you might still need external transformers and filters to turn your 'generic' DTV* signal into something the glasstronics can work with at all. Right now, I imagine they're just trying to handle digital-level signals coming off your GeForce2Go or whatnot.

      --

      *It's not HDTV. HDTV is a generic term. DTV is 'digital TV,' and refers to the morass of garbage the FCC is forcing down our throats instead of promoting further development of multicast technologies and other 'fairness' improvements for webcasting. (Think about it; the average DTV receiver needs the same computing power you'd need to decode a multicast-over-802.11 into a visible display.)

    3. Re:Digital Photos by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Here I was using the term HDTV to describe the resolution. I don't know about the FCC. I imagine this display will cost a fortune, at least at first. I guess this is a display one would like to use for everything.

      I also imagine this could produce some pretty fantasic PDAs with this too. I imagine a Palm using this technology would be pretty cool.

    4. Re:Digital Photos by jafuser · · Score: 2
      Well they're talking about ultra-high resolutions for things like photographs, and maps.

      I'm just glad that they're actually mentioning potential applications which aren't a part of the the current buzzword set. They could have easily shoved in there the usual "wireless devices" drivel...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  21. 1 GHz limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reading up on the CGS link, it looks like the technology has a medium-imposed 1 GHz hard upper limit, since it's not really a single silicon crystal, but a set of crystals ("grains" in MatSci speak) in which some effort is made to blur the lines between the grains (hence "continuous"). My guess is some sort of annealing process. The grain boundaries become
    a problem at 1 GHz.

    1. Re:1 GHz limit by Trinn · · Score: 1

      well once we reach the 1GHz hard limit, we'll almost certainly be producing massively parallel arrays in this material, or more likely simply have a better material. In either case, the 1GHz limit would rarely be a concern.

  22. Science, fiction and aesthetics by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    Chip technology always seemed rather ugly to me. Now these pieces of glass have a quite appealing look like those in the Sci-Fi movies.

    Will we see soon an aqua-themed computer box?

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  23. This gives an entirely new meaning to... by scsirob · · Score: 1

    ... the definition of breaking someone's password or encryption...

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  24. Brain fart... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if the screen was made up of two pieces of glass, with water being passed between them? Water is obviously a proven way to transfer heat and it would be invisible to the user.

    1. Re:Brain fart... by mortis_aeturnus · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem is the rate at which heat transfers in and out of glass. A heat source wrapped in glass will retain more heat because there is more of a resistance to heat flow.
      Having a water medium will only serve to buffer the heat. Heat must escape somewhere. If you insulate water with more glass then the only effect of the water would be a longer time before the circuits overheat since the water only acts to store heat.
      It is better to be able to siphon off heat directly from circuit elements, coating the glass with a better heat conductor than air, or reducing the impedence of the circuits.
      By the way, having an Athlon in your system can very well boil the water (even with the applied pressure of the container).

    2. Re:Brain fart... by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heat must escape somewhere.

      My suggestion was meant to be more along the lines of the water-cooling (with a radiator) that is popular among the overclocking crowd, not just a static pool of water. A display like this could be mounted on a wall, with the pump and radiator in a separate location, connected by a hose.

    3. Re:Brain fart... by mhesseltine · · Score: 2

      I think the parent was thinking about water flowing between the panels, drawing the heat out of the case, and dissipating that heat much like a car radiator, or liquid casemod.

      The only problem I can see with this (no pun intended), would be turbulence of the water might distort the image on the screen.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    4. Re:Brain fart... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      yeah, then some jokester will come along and inject food coloring into your monitors heat sink when you're not looking.

  25. Wow! Now I can really... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..have a Beowolf cluster of Windows PC's !

    *Runs for cover*

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    1. Re:Wow! Now I can really... by goldspider · · Score: 1

      I can already see the mammoth legal battle between Microsoft and Andersen over who has more right to market these (W/w)indows.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Wow! Now I can really... by D4M4DH477X0R · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if it crashs? That'd be alot of glass.

  26. Contacts? by DSL-Admin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to see this implented into contact lenses... Then we could have the interface wired to the optic nerve, and voila! instant computer enhanced vision....

    1. Re:Contacts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice idea but sadly there is no way your eye could focus on an image at zero distance :-(

  27. Here's a picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yahoo news has a picture of one.

    1. Re:Here's a picture by klocwerk · · Score: 1

      8 bit processor...
      It's a NES on glass!

      --

      "You worthless post!"
      -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  28. iTablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the future. The future is iTablet.

    yummy.

    1. Re:iTablet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, you're right. If Apple was smart, they'd grad this technology faster than you could say "iTablet"

  29. Information by e8johan · · Score: 2

    If you can make this cheap enough, imagine the possibilities! Integrate your TV in a glass wall, place info terminals and on-line shopping abilites in the windows of the shows, Integrate timer, thermometer, owen control, etc. in the glass on the kitchen fan... I like the possabilities of this!

    <geek>
    If nothing else, it looks like the PDAs they use in StarTrek are made out of a piece of glass with a handle, this means that we can actually manufacture 'em!
    </geek>

  30. Re:Quick! Ship it now! Do it now! by murgee · · Score: 1

    I hope you don't end up in charge of the tech writing for the product... I can just see thousands of geeks reading the manual (well, maybe not) and opening the toilet.

    --
    mrg
  31. A whole new meaning... by twoslice · · Score: 3, Funny

    to the term my computer just crashed...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  32. Re:Quick! Ship it now! Do it now! by funaho · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Shit it! Shit it now! We *need* this thing!

    Ok this typo just made my morning. Thanks. :)

  33. They're gonna run into prior art on this one! by dave-fu · · Score: 2

    Mostly because Sir Mix-A-Lot said to "Put 'Em On The Glass".
    Oh, wait... silicone, not silicon. Nevermind.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  34. Didn't look like you could use as a display by CutterDeke · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In the picture with the article, you could see the traces on the glass. Do they not show up when this is incorporated into a display?

    I don't see the significance of this.

    1. Re:Didn't look like you could use as a display by Target+Practice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the Reuters article linked below, the picture caption says a glass integrated with 8-bit central processing unit (CPU). I'm a bit confused, therefore, of their usage of the word "screen" later on. Do they mean to call the piece of glass a screen, so to say that the piece of glass is acting like a computer, or that it really is a screen and actually displays something?

      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    2. Re:Didn't look like you could use as a display by truth_revealed · · Score: 1

      The CPU circuittry would be on the perimeter of the screen, I would think.

  35. How about.. by yonnage · · Score: 1

    Computer on Glass which is 3D [monitor] display..

    This will have some impact on wearable computers, imho.

  36. Large Photo in Reuters by hangel · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Large Photo in Reuters by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      Since pictures say a thousand words this one begs a question. How can this not screw up an LCD? Would they fill out empty areas of the glass with fake circuitry to achieve uniform opacity? If the problem I'm pointing out here is real then what's the point? I don't mean to knock their new Si. I know just (barely) enough to understand the significance, but don't see the LCD applications beyond better active-matrix electronics.

    2. Re:Large Photo in Reuters by g00z · · Score: 1

      I hate to be a total star trek dork, but...

      Does anybody else get a wierd vibe from looking at that photo that we are looking at a Isolinear Chip? Just a thought.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  37. NOT A TROLL!!!! It's a joke! It's a joke! by somethingwicked · · Score: 2, Insightful

    See parent. That's okay, I have karma to burn when this gets modded down as well...

    First off, MY username is somethingwicked. Was I trolling myself???

    NO!!! I was making a simple joke about how I briefly misinterpretted the wording of the original comment.

    Does no one remember the old SNL joke I referenced? So MAYBE it wasn't that good a joke, it sure wasn't a troll

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  38. Re:Old news, this was posted on GiZ already by The+Spelling+Nazi · · Score: 0, Troll

    yuo == fagot
    you == faggot

  39. Does it run windows? by Lothar · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of windowmanager can you use? Imaging how cool the "transparent" xterms will look.

  40. Plugging the analog hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This technology would be great for putting decryption directly into the display, wouldn't it?

  41. Vacuum tubes are so retro! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Here's your CRT : http://w1.871.telia.com/~u87127079/crts/coketron.h tm

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Vacuum tubes are so retro! by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      OT, but I've got to note the far-out coolness of that site.

  42. Reminds me of.. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the good ol C64 days when it was common to use screen memory for assembly language routines and flags, etc. When the program ran, you could actually _see_ the memory being toggled and incremented. Pretty neat. I wonder what it would look like these days...

    1. Re:Reminds me of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the hell of it I once put pointed the stack some ways into the video memory, and held some other variables there too. (Did that in 320x200x8bit color and 80x25 text mode.)

      Looked like garbage.

    2. Re:Reminds me of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See this post, or its parent. Probably looks a bit like that. ;)

  43. What about on skin? by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Funny

    circuitry applied directly onto the glass, enabling it to function like a computer.

    Circuitry applied to glass is absolutely fascinating and all, but I want to know when they will come up with a good way for printing circuitry on skin. I want computerized skin damnit. One more potential reason to legitimize orgies..

    1. Re:What about on skin? by CutterDeke · · Score: 1

      Forget on the skin. Try computing through body chemistry a la Stephenson's Diamond Age. Of course, it would suck to be the person that gets overheated and then consumed - talk about overclocking...

    2. Re:What about on skin? by Dexx · · Score: 1

      No, that's not an orgy, it's our office beowulf cluster.. really..

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    3. Re:What about on skin? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      Yeah so when they have circuitry on skin, they will no longer be called orgys.

      more like:

      Hey, ladies - imagine coming over to my place and having a beowolf cluster of us?

    4. Re:What about on skin? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Of course we all know SEX is short for Software EXchange :)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  44. Re:Glass is a Liquid... by klocwerk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually this is a common fallacy.
    Glass is a crystalline structure, and does not warp with age.
    The old windows which people often point to as being thicker at the bottom, are that way because the glass itself was irregular, and was installed with the heavy part at the bottom as it is more stable that way.
    Or so I've been informed by a professional glass-blower who should know such things...

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  45. The story so far: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderator's sole point in life is to find no-good-shits and dump on them.

    Haven't you been paying attention?

  46. I was driving down the road.. by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    and I saw a rock hit the windshield with a loud crack. As one of the cracks slowly grew across the windshield, different parts of the car started malfunctioning until finally, the engine sputtered to a stop...

    I can just hear the engineers... "Well we already have to put circuitry on the windshield for the HUD.. why don't we just go ahead and put the fuel injection computer and all the other electronics there as well..."

    Hey, you think it wouldn't happen? I bet you thought that refrigerators would never have Internet access either...

    --sg

    --
    Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
    1. Re:I was driving down the road.. by Infernus · · Score: 1

      LOL...and as an added advantage, no need for internal heating...just overclock your windscreen!

  47. What are these screens going to cost? by Ruger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A good Flat Panel already cost more than the computer it's hooked up too. When is someone going to come up with a technology that drives the price of flat panels down? IBM announced this new process last year, which I understood would be a more cost effective way to make LCDs that the velvet rub. Is anyone using this process yet in manufacturing?

  48. Re:Glass is a Liquid...Maybe..maybe not by rdean400 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look here for a discussion...Is glass liquid or solid?

    The crux is that glass's structure is not clearly solid or clearly liquid. The explanation for the windows that have thicker bottoms than tops is that the old processes for making glass involved blowing a large bubble and then spinning it. The glass had non-uniform thickness, and was typically installed with the heavy end down.

  49. Just like Star Trek's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isolinear chips

  50. Re:NOT A TROLL!!!! It's a joke! It's a joke! by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

    You know, I think you actually DID troll yourself. And got yourself to reply. Lost karma and all.
    I'm not trying to bug you, I just think it's real funny... you should see the lighter side and recognize it as an acomplishment.
    I, for one, salute you :)
    (Not trolling, it's a joke... and if it isn't funny, hey, yours wasn't very funny either) ;)

  51. Super-fantastic application... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can make my house windows out of these things and project happy people interacting on them. I can fool the whole neighborhood into thinking I have friends.

    [sigh]

  52. Glass? by bpb213 · · Score: 1

    I dont know about the rest of you, but i do believe glass is a liquid.

    I dont know how much the rate at which glass sags (which is minimal, but still there) would affect something like this, especially depending on the thickness.

    If the glass is to thin, your 30 year archivel copy might have sagged enough to expose the silicon (or the circut part, you know what i mean)

    --

    This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
    1. Re:Glass? by f00zbll · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? This paper here attempts to discuss the physical properties in scientific terms and questions the validity of the question. is glass liquid or solid.

  53. Glass is not a liquid. by traphicone · · Score: 2, Informative
    Glass is classified as an amorphous solid. This is to say that glass is, in fact, a solid which does not have a regular or crystalline molecular structure. It is, nevertheless, a solid by classification, and as such can be said not to flow when subjected to everyday forces at everyday temperatures.

    More information.

  54. Word! by xmutex · · Score: 1

    That's awesome. Now I can do lines of coke, code, and surf the web all on one convenient surface.

    --

    jack's bicycle is music to my ears
  55. OLED by john82 · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile wouldn't it be nice to have a half-inch thick high resolution LCD TV?

    A recent submission here on Slashdot noted that OLED screens are closer to this than the prospect of LCD units.

    And considering the additional cost and QC issues, I'd think that separating the control circuitry from the display will have advantages for some time to come.

    1. Re:OLED by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

      Samsung's 240T has already been around for a least a year. It's not 1/2" thick, but sheesh...

  56. Electronic Paper by ek_adam · · Score: 2

    Personally I foresee this coming out a lot sooner than the electronic paper MIT's been talking about for at least five years.

  57. Cool future uses and bad future uses by phorm · · Score: 5, Funny
    The cool
    • Portable (touch-type?) displays you can plug in anywhere. Download new library books by chapter (into temporary memory?).
    • Restaurant tables? TV's: watch the game on your table. Virtual colouring books for kids
    • Forget the coloured contacts. Glasses will come back in style as you get your own mini-HUD
    The bad
    • Billboards, now every office window can be one!
    • Spyglass-capabilities
    • And you thought your palm broke easily when you dropped it
    The ugly
    • Microsoft WindowPanes home edition and the BWOD (Blue Window Of Death)????!!!
    1. Re:Cool future uses and bad future uses by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of people mentioning HUD-on-Glasses, but there is one problem: electronics require power to run, and I don't like the idea of carring 7 lbs of NiMH on the tip of my nose. Even a watch battery would be bulky on the frames.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:Cool future uses and bad future uses by rat7307 · · Score: 2

      think outside the box....make the frames into a NiMh battery or something.....

      --
      Burma?
    3. Re:Cool future uses and bad future uses by phorm · · Score: 1

      A small wire (with pos and neg) running headphone-style to your pocket would be a small price to pay for having a sweetass HUD in your shades :-)

    4. Re:Cool future uses and bad future uses by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the battery's shape or size, it's the content. NiMH isn't something you want close to your skin, might as well run around holding a car battery with the top off, in your birthday suit! Lead acid, yippee.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  58. Cool, but more useful would be computer-on-latex by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Can you say artificially intelligent condoms?

    --
    --- What?
  59. Style! by Malic · · Score: 2

    I think solar recharged PDA's made with this kind of technology would be the COOLEST thing! Just a *mostly* clear tablet with a display floating within.

    Didn't we see something like this in Our Man Flint...? =)

    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  60. 'Liquid' crystal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The LC goo should act as something of a heatsink, and it looks like they spread it throughout the display, even over the chip portions. (Anyone know for sure?)

    The heat generated could actually be beneficial, at least in cold climates. How hot does an LCD have to get before it cops out, display-wise?

  61. Re:Glass is a Liquid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Glass is NOT crystalline. In fact, the DEFINITION of a "Glass" is an amorphous solid, in which the atoms/molecules are in a higgeldy-piggeldy arrangement. Like a liquid, but not moving. Engineers, Physicists and Materials Scientists use "Glass" to mean more than SiO2 Glass - one can make metal glasses "metglasses" by cooling some metal alloys very, very quickly. They have useful mechanical and electromagnetic properties.

    You'll most likely encounter a metglass as a golf-club head or maybe as a transformer core.

  62. Sort of like active matrix LCD by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    They have had transistors on the glass for some time, sounds like just a natural evolution of the same sort of concept.

    Put them on a crystal substrate instead of glass, then they would be shock resistant too.

    Still cool stuff, dont misunderstand.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  63. Funny... by 75bhp · · Score: 1

    I'm browsing at +4 and I've yet to see a thread about how this is the precursor to DRM-enabled monitors and such.

    Everybody got something better to do?

  64. Re:Quick! Ship it now! Do it now! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    Ho problem.

  65. beer glass computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I can finally telecommute from the bar? I can fill my PC with Killian's or Guiness!

  66. Light of Other Days by The+Variable+Man · · Score: 1

    This story just reminded me of this

  67. What's the point? by psplay · · Score: 1

    Not only do these glass panels look upgradeable, the dont use reusable components, and in these days we know technology doesn't stand still, so whats the point in etching it in glass?

    Somehow, I have the feeling that in the future it will be make cheap yet efficient PC Boards and cheap LCD screens that will be the norm, as opposed to n-Bit x-Mhz Car Windscreens.

  68. Re:Glass is a Liquid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    all liquids are crystals, it was proven a few months back.

    I'm too lazy to look up a link, google should find more info if your interested.

  69. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the spelling nazi is an idiot. The spelling nazi needs to take a class in verbal hyperbole and a refresher course in sarcasm.

  70. Dangerous DRM possibilities by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't like this. Think about the possibilities for DRM: this is basically Jack Valenti's wet dream. If the whole computer is directly on the glass, there's no place to jack in. No place to tap the signal. No place to do anything. DRM hardware implemented mere nanometers from the pixels. Let's hope this technology does not come to fruition.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Dangerous DRM possibilities by John+Whitley · · Score: 2
      "Let's hope this technology does not come to fruition."

      Urgh, get me a bucket! I'm gonna spew!
      "No place to do anything."

      What a whiner. I so hate having to debunk upmodded trolls. Sigh.

      First try, reductio ad sarcasium:

      Indeed! No place to upload new firmware, applications, or content. We don't even have to bother with the circuity in this model! We can just paint the glass! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!! It's _completely secure_! Fooled those silly customers, didn't we now!

      Second try, a more serious approach:

      This is no different than a large variety of new printable circuit technologies on the horizon. (E.g. printable on plastic, woven/printed into cloth, etc.) ALL OF THEM WILL EVENTUALLY COME TO PASS. Just like current implementation technologies, none of these have any instrinsic connection to DRM.

      Listen up: the feature sets and marketing profiles of products are determined by what customers will buy, or by what companies guess customers will buy. If customers continue to value of a product market without DRM, then products without DRM will continue to be sold. If customers never value DRM, eventually markets will learn.

      Yes, despite the diligence of those in the know, we may enter a Prohibition like phase regarding IP rights here in the U.S. We may already be there. Yes that sucks. But I believe that continued diligence and basic economic forces will eventually roll over all of that like so many other times that "progress" went burp! in world history. At least we don't have to deal with the Black Plague.

      Moreover, your position holds powerlessness and fear as its fundamental assumptions. How can you stand to think that way? You've already lost!
  71. Transmetta.... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    ...has licensed the tech for their latest processor code named Transparent.

  72. Re:NOT A TROLL!!!! It's a joke! It's a joke! by somethingwicked · · Score: 2

    If I came across as pissed off in my reply, I wasn't at all!!! I immediately found the humor in the situation, but I really felt like a enough other ppl weren't.
    I too found it funny and all too typical for /.

    And you're right, I did troll myself :)

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  73. Excellent.... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    Once again we see technology imitating the movies. I ahve always waited for the glass stip cards that were shown in 2001, star trek and lots of anime which are processors or portions of.

    I am just waiting till I can have the zoom map table from alien and starwars to view detailed maps - or anything else.

    I do a lot of CAD work and would love to have a glass CAD table.

  74. Stacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about making small squares of this stuff that can be stacked into a cube? What if your new motherboard was a 3" pyrex cube you popped into a slot?

  75. Re:Cool, but more useful would be computer-on-late by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
    I can see the ads for it now:

    "With integrated circuits, for her pleasure."

  76. Re:Glass is a Liquid... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    some forms of glass that were used in old windows did in fact change shape i.e. flow over time - causing rippling in their surface.

  77. To quote someone else... by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    If you break it, do you get 111 years of bad luck?

  78. I know the guy by j3110 · · Score: 2

    who invented this. Actually it was a team of two. One of them was a victim of age descrimination by his work, so in his spare time, he and another guy developed this. All he could tell me is the hardest part was getting the material for the contacts to be the right size was the hardest part.(imagine worrying about a half a micron to make a good connection) The second hardest is that the underside of the chip is exposed to RF. You absolutely must buy shielded chips. The advantage of this is cheaper electronics. Glass is cheaper than PCB, especially when you don't need connectors. So watches and the like won't need the extra PCB. Keep in mind as well that glass traces are extremely hard to make more than 1 level. Usually, you have several sheets of glass with connectors on the sides instead. This makes it extremely difficult to put a 370pin CPU on one. CPU bus signals may not like the width or resistance or interference of the glass traces either.

    I saw a few posts argueing about heat problems. You could still put a heatsink on the chips. PCB doesn't conduct heat all that well either. PCB's on the other hand do block more RF. And photons hitting the traces on on a PCB is less of a problem than on glass :)

    All in all, it's a very neat technology and is very interesting. It will save manufacturing costs a lot, maybe even in LCD monitors/LCD TV's or even hand helds. It's not going to be used for a fast computer because the technology to put traces on glass isn't nearly as good as copper that you will find in the average PCB.

    At least that was the case the last time I checked. There might be some good conductors for glass now.

    --
    Karma Clown
  79. computing through body chemistry... by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

    has been done. Think "long division" and the like.

  80. People who use by randomErr · · Score: 2

    People who use glass computer shouldn't throw stones.

    Sorry, just had to day it :)

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  81. Re:Glass is a Liquid... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    You are quite fundamentally WRONG. And a moron.
    The glass does NOT change shape, it never did, if it does in the future the human race will have been LONG extinct and won't notice. Glass is warped in old buildings because the techniques for creating glass windows mostly SUCKED. So the glass started out warped. The bases are thicker so the glass won't FALL OUT. The only time I have actually glass with melt lines is after a massive housefire when we were cleaning the place out.
    Glass MIGHT flow on a geological time scale on the order of a billion years or so, but hell, given that much time what doesn't?

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  82. What about conjugated polymers? by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1

    As plastics can now be made with properties from very good conductors, to semiconductors, to great insulators, and the semiconductive ones can already being made into luminescent display materials, wouldn't it be more sensible to make a storage/computational monitor out of these? That way, you could make the circuitry from plastic, make the substrate from plastic, make the pixels from plastic and make the whole ting flexible.
    If noone has thought of this already, I get dibs on the royalties ;-)

    1. Re:What about conjugated polymers? by Rai · · Score: 1

      ...and make the whole ting flexible

      Like the smart maps in Red Planet?

    2. Re:What about conjugated polymers? by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 1

      I suppose so, but all i really want is a palmtop i can roll up into a tube and hit people with ;P

  83. So one day windows will run Windows? by Rai · · Score: 1

    Or you'll get the BSOD in your glass of orange juice :)

  84. Great! by monoqlith · · Score: 1

    Now, if someone would just develop the autonavigational track cars, I could get to work on ropin' in some PRECOGS.

  85. Star trek: TNG technical manual by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    This is just like the ST:TNG technical manual describes the star trek computers. Spooky, isn't it? /me checks birth records for a Mr. Zephram Cochrane...

  86. Well, it's a darn interesting start by alumshubby · · Score: 2

    ...but it's still quite a ways to go from Neal Stephenson's phenomenoscopic spectacles on Miss Whatshername, the court secretary, in The Diamond Age.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  87. Will they call this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy Fun Screen?

    Do no taunt Happy Fun Screen.

  88. Two words: In-sane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bloody loco, man!

    I cannot imagine how they are doping glass to produce this. I suppose that they are using silicon to make it stick.

    Then again, it sucks to hear about working prototypes that won't be available for at least a few years. This type of products could recandle the markets, but we have to wait. There's an obvious need to perform the proper reasearch, and develop things the right way. But at the same time, there is such a huge gap between conceiving an idea and actually selling a product based on it. There is definitely a lot of work to be done in this area.

    As a consultant I say, screw this, researchers have all the fun.

  89. I get it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ever wonder how in star trek they could always override some security measure by ripping a hole in the wall and rearrange some clear glass looking chips? Now after reading this story, it all makes sense... actually, it still doesn't...

  90. Nice View. by Nordberg · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long before someone makes a window that displays a nicer part of town.

    Madhouse: Satirized for your protection

    --
    *Splort*
  91. As dumb as Minority Report... by TheRealBrewer · · Score: 1

    When the technology gets to that level, why would ANYTHING be "plugged in"? Don't you think wireless will be ubiquitous by then?

    Minority Report made the same dumb mistake when they showed the guy pull the clear "floppy disk" out of one machine and plug it into the other machine to transfer some data. HELLO!?!? What, was their office not networked? Why would anybody need to PHYSICALLY transfer data like that in the future? DUH! Some art director just wanted the technology to LOOK cool. Gah!!

    1. Re:As dumb as Minority Report... by phorm · · Score: 1

      They forgot to go to the network control panel and enable "File and Printer Sharing", I guess? :-)

  92. Ding ding ding... by tgd · · Score: 2

    Give this man a cupie doll!

    1. Re:Ding ding ding... by aminorex · · Score: 2

      kewpie

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  93. Mod parent up, please by KH · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this was exactly the point why CmdrTaco posted the story today. He knew it was going to be posted tomorrow.

  94. Glass is a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MORPHISOLID. (sp?). If you've ever mixed corn starch with water (try 1 part water to ~1.5 parts cornstarch), that's basically the kind of substance that glass is, though much thicker. Yes, glass will start to sag, but usually less than 1/4 inch per 100 years, and by that time we'll be using holograms...

  95. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    It's simply unbelievable how much energy and creativity people have
    invested into creating contradictory, bogus and stupid licenses...
    --- Sven Rudolph about licences in debian/non-free.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...