Slashdot Mirror


Knoppix for Rapid Desktop Deployment

heretic108 writes "From first boot to full desktop in 20 minutes! Knoppix has shot into the spotlight as a GNU/Linux distro suitable for demonstrating quality Open Source Software, standing out for its ability to self-configure itself into a vast range of hardware, and to run entirely off a CD boot without interfering with any existing system setup. That, plus its fat catalogue of pre-installed desktop software. But OSS enthusiast David McNab has poked a bit deeper, and found that Knoppix can install itself to disk, resulting in a completely configured GNU/Linux desktop system, ready to use, in 20 minutes, hassle free. CD no longer needed! Best of both worlds - use as a GNU/Linux demo disk, and if the user likes it, it's a snap to install permanently. I can't think of any distro that comes close to this, for ease and speed of setup. I found McNab's short Knoppix Installation Howto which gives a very brief and easy guide. With this rapid setup ability, Debian-based Knoppix makes a great contribution to the catalogue."

331 comments

  1. It will never catch on by CatWrangler · · Score: 5, Funny

    No Blue Screen of Death? No individual user licenses? No aborted installs? No minesweeper? Who actually would use this newfangled thing?

    --

    ---
    When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    1. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's open source; noything is stopping u from adding x-minseweep (or k-mine, or whatever clone u like) and doing a mkisofs/cdrecord/upload.
      u could evn include tetris if u like.

    2. Re:It will never catch on by Cybersonic · · Score: 0

      actually it has KMines... who needs minesweeper? :)

      --
      Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
    3. Re:It will never catch on by cscx · · Score: 1

      How correct--they need to get used to "Kernel painc: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!" and a page of gobbledegook preceding it.

    4. Re:It will never catch on by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Now that I'm booting Linux I'm beginning to miss the good old Windows BSOD.

    5. Re:It will never catch on by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      running out of excuses for not getting your work done eigh?

      --
      You never know...
    6. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What someone really needs to develop is a BSOD simulator that would kick in at arbitrary times and force a loss of data and a re-boot. This would be extremely useful in making any MS users more at home with Linux.

    7. Re:It will never catch on by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Yep. Maybe I should switch to Windows ME.

    8. Re:It will never catch on by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      I've never had a kernel panic in 5 years of using recent Linux kernel versions. And the WinNT kernel crash blue screen is just as cryptic as any kernel dump.

    9. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What someone really needs to develop is a BSOD simulator that would kick in at arbitrary times and force a loss of data and a re-boot.

      And include it with the Kazaa spyware :)

    10. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporates can not afford to train peoples to use KMines instead of MS-minesweeper.

    11. Re:It will never catch on by colinramsay · · Score: 1

      Goddamn! I'm actually jealous... I wanna use Linux. But I get so sick of having to reboot to Windows to use Flash.

    12. Re:It will never catch on by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      Actually, i think that Macromedia has released a flash player to be used with Mozilla under Linux

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    13. Re:It will never catch on by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      That's what I keep Netscape around for. Flash works just fine on Netscape for Linux.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    14. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running knoppix right now. It has KMines, Penguin Minesweeper and XBomb.

      If you've a hankering for reading licenses, you can always go to the KDE about dialogs. There's just one for every K-app, so we're probably still a bit behind windows, but it's close.

      For aborted installs... just 'accidently' kick the power cord out. Works for me.

    15. Re:It will never catch on by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      Also works well in Opera for Linux (both Flash 5 and the Flash 6 beta)

    16. Re:It will never catch on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suse came with a BSOD emulator, but all it did was put up a windowed blue screen.
      I guess you could reboot to complete the illusion.

    17. Re:It will never catch on by colinramsay · · Score: 1

      I meant create Flash... sorry :/

    18. Re:It will never catch on by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      I installed it on my laptop and it's an awesome distro.

  2. Deja-BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So, is this kind-of the same idea as the net-bsd bootable cd-rom that boots into KDE,which demonstrates teh power and flexibility of BSD-licensed software?

    1. Re:Deja-BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I googled with no luck. Got linkage for downloading?

    2. Re:Deja-BSD by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Try here:
      ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/knoppix/
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  3. wonderful, but by dollargonzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if it is so wonderful, how come other distributions not use similar hardware detection? we have seen linux distros go in and out, people complain and complain about hardware detection, but we have yet to see one of the bigger distributions adopt a system similar to what knoppix is doing. i mean the worst thing that could happen is could detect the wrong hardware (tough, but possible) and you will have to remove the modules. but otherwise, seems like a win win situation.

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:wonderful, but by damiam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Other distros do. Mandrake, Red Hat, SeSU all have superb hardware detection. Knoppix is different only in that it detects hardware on startup, which is the only way to make a CD-only, no-install distro.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:wonderful, but by kh0ng · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good question. I saw knoppix three weeks ago, when another student gave a Linux/UNIX-Intro. I liked it and thought that, since it was based on it, Debian would be similiar. You can expect how surpried I was when I tried to install Debian. Knoppix might be based on it, but in terms of userfriendlyness its far ahead.

    3. Re: wonderful, but by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative


      > Other distros do. Mandrake, Red Hat, SeSU all have superb hardware detection. Knoppix is different only in that it detects hardware on startup, which is the only way to make a CD-only, no-install distro.

      FWIW, since around 7.0, Red Hat has re-detected hardware on startup, and will notice if anything has been added, removed, or changed.

      I don't mess with SuSE much, but I vaguely remember that they have been doing it even longer. (Don't quote me on that part, though.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:wonderful, but by spitzak · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why not always detect hardware on startup? It takes long enough to boot anyway, and if this works we could feel safe changing *any* hardware in our machines without worrying that it won't reboot.

      If it screws up, then an advanced user could probably store some files that modify it (I guess this requires that it correctly detect the disk and file system these files are on...) Ideally the files should be of the form "If you are detecting xyz, well stop because you are wrong, the hardware really is this..." and not of the form "Don't try to detect xyz because really the hardware is this..." That way if the user pulls the misdetected hardware they can reboot because it will still check for the replacement hardware.

    5. Re: wonderful, but by wfrp01 · · Score: 1

      Don't quote me on that part, though.

      Why would anyone need to quote you? You posted your thoughts to a public forum. ;)

      --

      --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
    6. Re:wonderful, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Other distros do. Mandrake, Red Hat, SeSU all have superb hardware detection."

      actually, the month or so ago when knoppix was first mentioned here i tried it and four other disk distros on four boxes. knoppix was by far the best for auto-detect. only one box couldn't find the net. there was some trouble with printers, but hell, that's all. very impressive, and more so that none of the other distros had even good detection. even suse was bad, which really surprised me.

      so the original poster has a point. knoppix does appear to be using superior hardware detect, at least for "pop it in and relax", which is the idea of these things.

      be worth looking into what they're doing different.

    7. Re:wonderful, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT found ALL my hardware even my built in sound!
      KRS

    8. Re: wonderful, but by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      It's an expression, no need to be a smart ass.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    9. Re: wonderful, but by spongman · · Score: 2
      you quoted him. why?

      That should answer your question.

    10. Re: wonderful, but by wfrp01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The smiley was to help the humor impaired. Apparently it wasn't sufficient.

      --

      --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
    11. Re:wonderful, but by jearlcalkins · · Score: 1

      Superb??? In the Pepsi, side by side taste test ... I booted up the KNOPPIX CD on my RH 7.3 server to see gorgeous X and a happy XFREE86 library for the first time. The KNOPPIX CD spanked RH's hardware detection.
      Samba works great! SSH works great! Apache works great! KNOPPIX knocked off my socks.

    12. Re: wonderful, but by bruthasj · · Score: 2

      It's called kudzu. If you want a fast boot, turn it off. If you're going to upgrade a piece of hardware, turn it on.

      For example, I took a hard drive with redhat installed on a 1U server with a souped up configuration and plugged it in to a barebones network computer that used some sucky Cyrix chip and a bunch of different hardware.

      Redhat came up, ran kudzu and the rest of the system ran. It was slower than snot, because of the CPU, but the software did the job.

      Try to do that with other OSes and you'll be hating life.

    13. Re:wonderful, but by fwarren · · Score: 1
      You should try running the windows network brower for the xfce desktop. xfsama

      It comes up, finds the master browser on your network and gives you a list windows/smb machines on your local network. All without performing any configuration.

      It works so well, I nstalled xfce on my RH 7.3 system so I can run it.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    14. Re:wonderful, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can expect how surpried I was when I tried to install Debian. Knoppix might be based on it, but in terms of userfriendlyness its far ahead.

      Of course. Debian is power-user friendly. Certainly not user-friendly.

    15. Re:wonderful, but by mog · · Score: 1

      Where do you go to school? I gave a presentation on KNOPPIX at school a few weeks ago. Just find it funny, is all..

  4. This has been out for a whil by dk5sm5luigi · · Score: 1

    I have been using knoppix for months. I know this has been out for atleast a year and it is the greatest thing I have ever used.

  5. oops by dollargonzo · · Score: 2

    one exception ofcourse is mandrake, but i have tried it, and well, it doesn't seem to work that well. perhaps the newer versions are better.

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:oops by ChaoticSilly · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake since 8.0 & have never had any problems with hardware autodetection. I might be considered a little biased since I built my desktop with Linux in mind but, then again, everything but the winmodem in my Compaq laptop is detected fine also. Now if I could just get a good S3 driver that supports 3d acceleration & doesn't crash X when I try to run Xine, I'd be happy.

      I've considered bringing a Knoppix cd to work to run Linux without having to convice the sysadmin to let me install it, but the 3 or 4 bsod's a day on the win98 machine gives me a great excuse to take smoke breaks. :)

  6. Including non-free? by Vagary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This might be a bit off-topic, but hey, at least I'm not wasting your time with an Ask Slashdot:

    Can someone point me towards a live-CD that includes Flash, RealPlayer, and the ability to play as many multimedia files as possible? OpenOffice and some kind of Gecko browser are also required.

    The reason is that Windows is just not cutting it on my girlfriend's computer. She's having all sorts of weird technical problems so I've decided something needs to be done. Unfortunately, my Debian is so wacked out and constantly tweaked into a semi-usable state that she doesn't trust Linux. So what I need is something she can use for a few weeks -- still accessing her docs on her Windows partition -- until she's sold.

    1. Re:Including non-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before asking questions about the linux flavour you decide on, you might want to have a look here, first.

    2. Re:Including non-free? by Lostman · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you should try Knoppix eh?

      Knoppix is a livecd that autodetects and sets up most devices automatically upon boot, it includes open office, mozilla (konquorer [sp?] as well), OODLES of games, graphics programs, utilities, fun programs, and just plain "cool" things. It doesnt contain Flash nor Realplayer (at least I never got them to work), but it does play most of my multimedia content I had on my hard drive (divx, mpegs, avi, etc).

      It autoconnects to internet if you have the ability to use DHCP so thats a big plus. You can access the hard drive from the desktop, open papers/etc from there...

      Best thing -- it doesnt change ANY files on the harddrive! No worries about a "livecd" turning into a "pseudo installation" to run. There IS a way to put a swap file on your hard drive but its buried in menus and I wouldnt even bother with it... Knoppix runs fast, reliable, and just looks nice.

      (And the desktop? You can change it of course.. but I am sure you knew that =)

    3. Re:Including non-free? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

      " So what I need is something she can use for a few weeks -- still accessing her docs on her Windows partition -- until she's sold."

      Dude, there's no need to sell your girlfriend just because she uses Word.

      graspee

    4. Re:Including non-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a Mac? :)

      Seriously, just backup her data and reinstall her Windows OS. Then don't allow her to install any weird crap on it.

      Between all my win boxes and my relative's/friend's win boxes I keep an eye on, there are very rarely any problems unless some 3rd party spyware trash sneaks its way on.
      As a person who spends most of his waking hours in front of windows boxes, I've only seen 1 BSOD in the past year, and it was caused by faulty hardware.

      FUD The Power!!

    5. Re:Including non-free? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      Wait a sec, I need a reason to convert someone to Linux?! You must be lost: this is *Slashdot*.

      But seriously, her problems are more niggling than just BSODs and I've observed them with fresh installs of 98, 98SE, and ME in the last 4 months.

    6. Re:Including non-free? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      Believe it or not, she's trying to write a *thesis* in *Word*! Crazy, I know. I'm banned from mentioning BibTeX whenever she starts complaining about citation management. And she's already wasted days thanks to proprietary formats. It's a wonder people manage to get any work done in Windows...

    7. Re:Including non-free? by MyHair · · Score: 2

      ...with fresh installs of 98, 98SE, and ME...

      There's your problem right there. Windows 2000 (and I presume XP) is much more stable than the Win9x's. (Yes WinME is a Win9x.)

    8. Re:Including non-free? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Believe it or not, she's trying to write a *thesis* in *Word*! Crazy, I know. I'm banned from mentioning BibTeX whenever she starts complaining about citation management. And she's already wasted days thanks to proprietary formats. It's a wonder people manage to get any work done in Windows...

      I just wrote a novel in Word, and the only problems were due to my (18 months ago, when I started) inexperience with Word on such big documents. Trust me--it's a tool that will get her job done, provided she takes the time to figure it out. (http://www.mvps.org/word for more info.)

      If you want to move to a proprietary-free format from Word, save to HTML. Even with all of the buggy formatting, any competent web browser should be able to read it. (And if you want to scrub the HTML page of the office-code, Microsoft has a downloadable tool to do just that.)

    9. Re:Including non-free? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why do people (including Microsoft) always feel the need to point out just how much better the current(-ish) version is than the old one? In one year, you'll still say "There's your problem right there, Windows 2003 is much more stable than Windows 2000".

      If someone shot you last week, but only stabbed you this week, you don't have to thank them.

      -Paul Komarek

    10. Re:Including non-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stick with Windows. Reformat her system and install Windows 2000 or XP. (Hey, XP Home is $89, and it includes everything you need to run a perfectly functional, STABLE desktop that will run all of your programs, connect to the network, etc.)

      What really bothers me about your post, though, is that it sounds like you make no effort to troubleshoot the system. Granted, Windows 9x and ME don't have the troubleshooting tools (like the Event Viewer) that 2000/XP do, but you should have at least made an effort to figure out what the problem was, instead of just blaming Windows. You're a Debian user, yet Windows has "weird technical problems" and you don't get to the bottom of it? I don't get it. It's quite possibly a hardware problem that won't be resolved by a software upgrade. You need to make the effort to figure out the problem before you go reformatting anything.

    11. Re:Including non-free? by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      Uh... sorry if this has been mentioned before, but if you're having problems with *fresh* installs it may be a hardware problem masquerading as a software problem. Oftentimes a flaky piece of hardware -- especially the motherboard -- will cause all kinds of errors that look as though they're software-related but aren't. Something to look into if Linux doesn't solve the problem.

      Best of luck,
      sparrow_hawk

    12. Re:Including non-free? by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      In fact linux could possibly help to track down a hardware problem. Windows will usually just BSOD while linux will spit out a bunch of error messages. At work we had a computer that was struggling with WinNT on it. After we built a better machine to replace it. I put FreeBSD and found out it had bad RAM. I forgot the error message I was getting, but I wasn't able to get past the second bootdisk of the install.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    13. Re:Including non-free? by MyHair · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do people (including Microsoft) always feel the need to point out just how much better the current(-ish) version is than the old one?

      The commenter's original problem was that Windows kept crashing. He was looking for an alternative that his girlfriend would be happy with. No one could come up with a suitable Linux distro given his requirements, and one person suggested he buy her a Mac or just reinstall Windows and not let her install the addin crap. He said he had the problems even with fresh installs of Win98, Win98SE and WinME.

      I have 7 years of professional experience with Win95, almost 3 years of professional experience with Windows 2000 and Windows NT and various experience with the other Windows versions. Windows 2000 is much more stable than what he used and fills his girlfriend's needs.

      I am pro GNU/Linux, but it's not for everyone, and it's not a multimedia desktop OS for someone who doesn't want to tinker, and if you want Real Player, Flash and "the ability to play as many multimedia files as possible" (from the original question) then any distro of GNU/Linux or *BSD requires much tinkering.

      Personally I think she'd be better off with a Mac. I have a serious woody for Mac OS X, but I don't run it because Apple hardware is just too darn expensive. If someone has the money to burn I'd recommend a Mac with OS X now.

      By the way, Microsoft says the latest version is better because that's how they make their money. God forbid everyone finds out that Word 95 makes docuements just as well and easy as Word 2002.

      In one year, you'll still say "There's your problem right there, Windows 2003 is much more stable than Windows 2000".

      Not me. Windows 2000 is the best Windows I've seen so far. Screw XP. It's Win2k with DRM and eye candy.

      If someone shot you last week, but only stabbed you this week, you don't have to thank them.

      Cute, but show me a desktop OS that you can convince my users to use and my Fortue 500 company IT staff will support and convince the world that MS Word .doc files and MS Excel .xls files are not reasonable standard document formats and you'll be my hero. Give the original poster a GNU/Linux live cd with Flash, Real and massive multimedia support and you'll be his hero. Of course you'd probably get sued by Macromedia and Real Networks, but oh well.

      I did overlook one possibility for his girlfriend's problems: It might be the hardware. It could be a flaky power supply or bad RAM, and then no OS will help his problems. In fact a true 32-bit OS would exacerbate a hardware issue.

    14. Re:Including non-free? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I haven't used Windows since about 1999, and have better stomach health because of it; so I can't comment from personal experience. But from what I hear from my wife, a software developer, Win2K still costs her a lot of time in reboots and lockups. Note that she is using almost exclusively Microsoft software and certified drivers at work (in fact, all might be), but she still has lots of problems. The machine appears to be in fine condition.

      But her machine crashes less than it did with Nt and certain combinations of service packs! Woohoo!

      That last bit was sarcasm. And it might not be true.

      -Paul Komarek

    15. Re:Including non-free? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm defending Windows, because I'm not, but . . .

      Probably because that's the exact same thing that Linux advocates say when someone says that Linux is hard to install, or has an inadequate desktop or doesn't support hardware properly etc. They tell you that you're just out of date. The NEW distributions are much better.

    16. Re:Including non-free? by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      er word crashes about every other character above 50 pages if you have more than font changes for formating...

      Not to mention the type behind of 10-15 characters at that length.

      you say this is perfectly acceptable from a $300 word processor? I have a bridge to sell you...

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    17. Re:Including non-free? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      There may not be one already, but you may be able to build one. I would say start by getting one of the live-CD images and on a hard disk partition with sufficient space, make a blank ISO image large enough to put all the necesary files in. copy over the contents of the live-cd image and mount the new image so you can start modifying things.

      If you have VMWare, or Bochs, you may even be able to test your builds in a virtual machine.

      Once you know that everything works (It sounds like you mostly just need to install a Flash and RealPlayer package) burn the new image to a CD. Check to make sure that the CD does boot and performs as expected, then give a copy to your girlfriend.

      I am not saying that this would be easy, just that it is possible.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    18. Re:Including non-free? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      I think the take-home part of the lesson is:

      1) Most people happy with Windows don't care much about crashes.

      2) Most people happy with GNU/Linux don't care much about installation or desktops.

      I know which compromise I'd rather make. =-)

      The above summary is woefully inadequate, of course. There are things like functionality, application support, customer support, performance, etc. to consider. All the same, I think the above points provide a useful contrast.

      -Paul Komarek

    19. Re:Including non-free? by TheBracket · · Score: 2

      Speaking as one who has published a 400 page Master's thesis with Word (as well as a great many 100+ page short papers), I have to say that you either have serious system problems or are full of it. Word handles hundreds of pages without issue on a properly setup NT4, Win2k or WinXP system. Admittedly, if you are too dumb to use style-sheets, it slows down a bit.

      --
      Lead developer, http://wisptools.net
    20. Re:Including non-free? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      Yes, this is exactly why I want to try Linux before I start blaming the hardware. Windows not only acts weird on its own, it doesn't respond deterministically or clearly to hardware problems.

    21. Re:Including non-free? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      What version of Windows is she running? The Linux-advocates in the crowd isn't going to like this, but maybe you should install Win2K on her computer (considering it has enough juice to run it), it's really a stable and nice OS.

      Otherwise, maybe a re-install? Yeah, that's Windows, it gets flaky with all the spyware out there. Also, don't count out hardware problems.

      Damn, I sound like f'ing MS-Support, recommending reinstallations.. real OSes don't need no reinstall.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    22. Re:Including non-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting, seems to me word has been around since before 2000

    23. Re:Including non-free? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I'm just imagining MS not doing that. "Windows 98 is really much better than Windows 2005! You mustn't upgrade NOW! And all for zero price - you can't get a better offer than that. Just think of all the features you'll keep by not upgrading! And your current version is far more stable!"

    24. Re:Including non-free? by fwarren · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with word problems.

      I was once hired by a company to take several of there manuals that they did in Word 5 on Macintosh and update them to Word97 on windows.

      Let me tell you, it was a hoot. Each writer had there own "look". Trying to get everything down to one format with a consistant style was fun.

      Of course, let's not forget that if you have an embed eps graphic on the Mac, when you bring the word document over to windows, the whole 300k of eps is still there, but the only thing that will display on screen or print, is the thumbnail image.

      Once we had converted the original eps into a decent wmf file, life still was not good. When you try to build a master document, built up of 15 subdocuments, needing a decent Table of Contents and an Index. Then toss in 30 or 40 half page size graphics. All the files corrupt.

      My work cycle became.

      1. Backup All documents that are part of the manual (keeping older backups around).
      2. Do a little editing, or work on the styles.
      3. Save Document
      4. Reoload documents and check for corruption
      5. Continue working till you realized you missed something that had corrupted earlier.
      6. Roll back to a previous backup where the problem did not exist.
      7. Try making same chagges again
      8. Back to step one. Even in the Windows/DOS world, WordPerfect would have been better. It does not eat up it's subdocuments like word does. However, I could not convince management that it would be cheeper to purchase 3 or 4 copies of WordPerfect and retrain their chemists and tech writers to use that, than to constantly be rebuilding the document from the point where word last meltdown.

        Bart Bucks are not legal tender

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    25. Re:Including non-free? by fwarren · · Score: 1
      Well I see three possibilites
      1. Rebuild the Knoppix CD with flash and RealPlayer
      2. Follow the link the top of the page, and install Knoppix on her hard drive (20 minutes or so) and then download and add Flash and RealPlayer to the system.
      3. Download and install some other linux Distro on her box.
      I would think that option 2 above would be the quickest and easiest, plus while you are making some room for Knoppix, you can make a swap partition.

      I have to say, the real rub for me with Knoppix is the lack of flash and Realplayer. I am almost tempted to drop the KDE Office apps (a quick way to make room) and install Galeon, Flash and RealPlayer. May even burn my gpg keyring on there to and have my ultimate portable system.

      Bart Bucks are not legal Tender

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    26. Re:Including non-free? by zzzmarcus · · Score: 0

      Lycoris comes with Flash player, RealPlayer, Xine and xmms installed from the get-go. It also comes with Mozilla, but not OpenOffice. It instead uses KOffice.

      I just installed it in under 45 minutes. It automatically detected my windows network as well as my windows partition.

      It really does, in my opinion, live up to it's claim of making linux usable for everyone.

    27. Re:Including non-free? by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      I don't know how dedicated you are to the cause, but it is possible to "re-master" Knoppix.

      Basically, you boot Knoppix; copy it to a source partition; customize it however you want; and create an ISO image of the source partition. There are detailed instructions in the "forums" section of the Knoppix web site. It takes about 3 2-gig partitions and about an hour or so of disk-grinding, but it can be very rewarding.

      I've been using custom Knoppix discs to boot thin-clients for an X app server (a la Linux Terminal Server Project). It's just a pilot project at this point, but it's been very successful.

    28. Re:Including non-free? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      er word crashes about every other character above 50 pages if you have more than font changes for formating...

      What version? What OS? What system specs?

      Not to mention the type behind of 10-15 characters at that length.

      Better question--what FONT are you using, and what view is she writing in?

      She should use styles for all formating, NOT allow word to create styles, and be doing the main writing either in "normal" view or a single-colum "page layout" view. Unusual fonts, heavy graphic elements, or odd column layouts can cause slowdown--but that's a user problem, not Word's problem.

      I've got a Duron 700 with 128 MB of ram, running Windows XP and Word XP. No problems here, unless I open six seperate programs, tell them all to do something that takes several seconds if they're by themselves, and switch back and forth rapidly--which is a foolish thing to do if I can avoid it.

      Please, stop spreading FUD and start figuring out what the problem is. Word can work with large files--but not if you're running a very old (6.0 or older, I think) version or running on very old (less than Pentium 133* or NT with too little RAM) hardware.

      (I've had Office 2000 running acceptable on a P133 laptop with 32 MB of ram and Win95; it gets a bit buggy with very large documents, but that's a RAM problem, not a word problem.)

    29. Re:Including non-free? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      I was once hired by a company to take several of there manuals that they did in Word 5 on Macintosh and update them to Word97 on windows.

      ! Ouch!

      Let me tell you, it was a hoot. Each writer had there own "look". Trying to get everything down to one format with a consistant style was fun.

      Of course, let's not forget that if you have an embed eps graphic on the Mac, when you bring the word document over to windows, the whole 300k of eps is still there, but the only thing that will display on screen or print, is the thumbnail image.


      Double ouch!

      What the @#$ were they using EPS files in documents for? Anything--ANYTHING--would be better than that! PNG, JPEG, BMP even!

      Once we had converted the original eps into a decent wmf file, life still was not good. When you try to build a master document, built up of 15 subdocuments, needing a decent Table of Contents and an Index. Then toss in 30 or 40 half page size graphics. All the files corrupt.

      I think the problem is in the users, not in Word. Probably be a better idea to train them on how to use Word properly and consistently; If they used Styles instead of manual formatting, it'd be simple to align all of the proper styles.

      (And, as I understand it, "Master Documents" are the worst feature in Word. I don't use them myself, at home or at work, so lucky me.)

      Were the task ongoing, I'd suggest using HTM (or TXT) as an intermediate format. The best cure for file corruption is to go to a format that you know is clean, and rebuild the document from "scratch." Probably be easier than trying to fix all of the mistakes...

    30. Re:Including non-free? by sniggly · · Score: 2

      Did you dl & try knoppix on her pc yet? Youve created a long thread here and you owe it to us to let us know :)

      I'm downloading it now to show my girlfriend, whose employers are considering lindows :( so i hope this will make her and them drop their jaw and want it.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    31. Re:Including non-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intresting enough I just wrote a script on a XP machine running word XP to make 700 pages of random (moderate complexity with a few inline images) text, and all the bugs are still there. This was on a fairly powerfull machine.

      Your claim that 6 programs running in the background is excuse for a *word* processing program to get 1-2 seconds lag is appaling, posting a letter to a word processor should require nothing more than a bounds check and moving a image onto screen memory + adding it to whatever file format word uses to store stuff.

      If you solution to the fact the wordprocessor sucks is to use stylesheets, why don't I just use a real typesetting program then? That makes little to no sense.

      You are aware word is a display program, not a typesetting program right? Opening the same file in different versions of word can give wildly different printouts.

      Also your claim that "Very Old" is 6.0 is dubious. As well as I can remember version 1.0-5.0 wern't free, and they were worse off than Word XP was just a moment ago. People still drag apple in the mud for making poor choices in the 90's, I think people should be allowed to drag MS in the mud for the same.

    32. Re:Including non-free? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      No: part of the reason that I'm desperate for a solution is that we're currently living 3 hours apart. If I lived in the same town it wouldn't be a problem trying out all sorts of different configurations. But every time I tried a new version of Windows that was it for 2 or 3 weeks.

      I've told her that she should find a new geek, someone who can fulfill her needs, but she's sentimental... >:)

    33. Re:Including non-free? by martums · · Score: 1
      Stick with Windows. Reformat her system and install Windows 2000 or XP. (Hey, XP Home is $89, and it includes everything you need to run a perfectly functional, STABLE desktop that will run all of your programs, connect to the network, etc.)
      As a Windows 2000 Sysadmin (and Linux Advocate, not trying to start a flame war, I've seen the light, relax), I'd recommend against Win XP Home. I've heard enough horror stories to believe that the differences between XP Home and XP Professional are vast (more than lacking RDP & able to join a domain, etc.). Home users always seem to get a halfway OS from M$. Doh.

      I recommend to both friends and business clients, (who don't have in-house IT), that anyone looking to put Windows on their desktop should install one of the 'Professionals', either Win 2000 (of which I manage over 500 clients running) or Win XP Professional (which I have at home & at work and am reasonably pleased with--though it's no 2000 for stability).

      As MSDOS-based GUI's go, avoid them like the plague, though if you have to settle, take Win 98 Second Edition. When Windows is required, use an NT-based Windows, NT5 aka 2000 is fine. We have inifinitely fewer BSODs with 2000 than with NT4. Its the patching that makes you crazy.

      And Knoppix is bloody awesome.
      --
      Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety
    34. Re:Including non-free? by knopper · · Score: 1

      Problem with Flash and others is, they are not legally allowed for REdistribution (please read the "redistribution license" - not the "end user license" of these programs. Some also fall under so-called "software patent" issues, and are therefore non-distributable in some countries).

      Same problem for Java-SDK and other programs that can otherwise normally be downloaded and installed without charge by end-users. But their license design would make the CD non-distributable.

      The software on Knoppix is not entirely 100% GPL (the collection as such, and the Knoppix-specific programs are, though), but all packages included in the download-version should be "freely distributable for non-commercial and commercial use". There are also some "non-free" Debian packages included which match this goal. For being sure that download and usage of each individual software package is allowed and legal in your individual country, please read the package licenses and ask your local lawyer. ;-)

      Regards
      -KK

    35. Re:Including non-free? by sniggly · · Score: 2

      I've heard more women complain about their lack of a geek boyfriend. Apparently the combination of skill and gender is in demand!

      Note from the home front: my gf was very impressed with knoppix and the cd she burned to show it at work never made it back home.

      Note from the ubergeek front: i got frowned upon and am supposed to pocket a credit card sized CD with linux installed. You can't have a linux rescue cd boot disk if it doesnt reside next to credit & atm cards. Ohwell, live & learn!

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  7. How much? by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much is one of these frontpage /. ads? Please contact me, I may be interested in buying one.

    1. Re:How much? by CatWrangler · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask how much it costs, ya can't afford it. ;)

      --

      ---
      When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    2. Re:How much? by Link310 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It typically costs at least a few hours of downtime on your server, and possibly a surge in bandwidth usage.

      /. is not responsible for increased bandwidth usage due to a slashdotting or any costs incured.

      Please submit ads using the "submit story" link on the side of the page. Things to include:
      * A simple way for people to bash microsoft.
      * Something that can be turned into a beowulf cluster.

    3. Re:How much? by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 3, Funny

      frontpage /. ads? FRONTPAGE?!?
      Taco you TURNCOAT.
      So THAT'S what that server migration a few days ago was all about... /me whips out nmap

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    4. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll have to talk to Taco about that; but I do know that they come with 5 free Karma points! :)

    5. Re:How much? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      How much is one of these frontpage /. ads?

      How much does one anonymous /. account cost?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is /. supoosed to post about ?

      You have to keep the mix interesting.
      knoppix is a genuine Linux phenomenon.
      glad you are not editor.

    7. Re:How much? by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

      How much is one of these frontpage /. ads? Please contact me, I may be interested in buying one.

      Basically, you have to not sell out, at all. Debian may not always be the latest and greatest, but they have a history of being "free as in freedom" in a way that none of the other distros have been.

      So I applaud some extra publicity for the upstanding folks who keep debian running for the sake of the community.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  8. Knoppix is just that good... by Lostman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just my own little story how Knoppix helped me.. =)

    My fiancee was volunteered to teach a class in algorithm design and c++ programming at the highschool she teaches at (for honors credit) -- the problems, though, were numerous.

    She had to deal with:
    1) NO funds available for purchasing of any programming utilities
    2) Computer ADMIN not allowing her to install ANY programming software (borland freeware, DJGPP, etc) to disk
    3) NOT allowing students to write (even temporary files) to the hard drive...

    We looked at a LOT of different ways to handle these problems. Finally we decided that maybe using a linux livecd and having a disk with gcc/g++ for each student. Looked at a few different types that were mentioned on slashdot but NONE seemed to work well... until we saw a VERY old article that some user mentioned Knoppix.. went to it, d/l'ed it, burned to disk, popped it in and rebooted...

    *WOW*

    Knoppix comes fully loaded with office utilities, games (PLENTY of games), graphics software, but most importantly DEVELOPMENT software already on it. We were in love with it (in truth, my other box is still running it from cd just bc we liked it =) -- even more important was that it ran without the need for ANY files or ANY changes to the hard drive.

    It discovered all devices hooked to my computer and actually had them working (AS WELL as the internet connection from "straight to cable modem" or "over network using ICS" setups we have at my house).

    She took it to her school, popped it in, rebooted the computers (after fidgeting with bios to allow boot from cd, laugh) and QUICKLY came up with the Knoppix desktop. It certainly didnt take more than a min or so to bootup...

    Most surprising thing was that for a "ran from cd" linux it was REMARKEBLY fast. Lets just say I was VERY impressed with Knoppix and recommend it for ANY new person. Without the threat of "ruining their computer," they can just pop in knoppix to try out linux... if they hate it, pop it out and its finished.

    So in the end, fiancee's school didnt have to shell out money, didnt "screw up the computers" (sigh), have a setup for students to write and compile programs, and exposed students (and teachers) to Linux. I would say the entire situation was a big WIN =)

    1. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank YOU for your MOST interesting POST.

    2. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by ensignyu · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... might want to customize it to not include all those games (for the classroom) :P

    3. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      She had to deal with:
      ...
      2) Computer ADMIN not allowing her to install ANY programming software (borland freeware, DJGPP, etc) to disk
      3) NOT allowing students to write (even temporary files) to the hard drive...

      What the fuck? What are the computers there for if not for the students to actually use them?

    4. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      this would be an example of the school's administration insisting that the computers be "secure", and causing them to be rendered all but worthless. Hell, it was like that at my high school too.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    5. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by Lostman · · Score: 2

      AFAIK their choices come from 2 parts
      1) They dont want to frigg up their systems with apps like AIM, ICQ, etc so they dont allow anything to be ran... zero tolerance for software it seems =)
      2) I believe they had an incident a few years ago when they still allowed students to write to hard drives. Without going into any details, lets just say that the admin strongly believes that students should not be ablet o change the hard drive in any way.

    6. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by Lostman · · Score: 2

      Thought that myself... but, like any highschool class, there are periods where they have free time. She figures the games will be there for that -- besides, it will be obvious if people arnt putting forth effort in their work as it should be turned in (their disks) every day.

      Now the INTERNET applications it has -- huge amount of them but not the kind the school probably wants students playing with -- just gotta make sure they dont start firing up the wrong internet apps heh..

    7. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Knoppix rocked my world in a recent forensic investigation. I needed a distro that could detect a scsi controller and let me copy a hard drive, bit by bit. Knoppix performed like a charm, totally blowing away Trinux. Plus, I got to play 'Frozen Bubble' and Mahjongg while the bit-copy ran. My only complaint is that it froze (both in Konqueror and shell) when searching an NTFS partition, but I know that the NTFS drivers are buggy, so I hold no grudge - in fact I'm impressed that it worked as well as it did. These guys rule.

      M.

    8. Re:Knoppix is just that good... by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      2) I believe they had an incident a few years ago when they still allowed students to write to hard drives. Without going into any details, lets just say that the admin strongly believes that students should not be ablet o change the hard drive in any way.

      That is such a horrible policy and a great way to ensure the kids learn nothing about computers in their time at high school. As a programmer, nothing pisses me off more than a facist admin who doesn't understand that the computer I use exists for the purposes of me getting work done, not for the purpose of always being in a known state so he can blissfully spend his days playing Quake3 online. Luckily the really good admins do understand this. And I'm not knocking admins in general here, a good one is worth his weight in gold.

  9. Big Deal by Krueger+Industrial+S · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Windows XP ... "first boot to full desktop" in 18 minutes.

    1. Re:Big Deal by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Never having run Windows XP, could you tell me if it will run from the CD without touching my hard disk? I might be interested in trying it out, but I don't want to loose any data in the process.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Big Deal by CatWrangler · · Score: 1

      That is if you don't bother to read through your license agreement first though before the install. Did you know that Bill Gates owns your left kidney now?

      --

      ---
      When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    3. Re:Big Deal by uchian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but installing Windows XP is the equvalent of only installing the Linux kernel, XFree86 and the KDE packages. Once you add the time on to install all of the games, Office software, development tools, etc that Knoppix already comes with, that installation time doesn't look nearly as impressive.

    4. Re:Big Deal by kbielefe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sure, if you consider notepad and Internet Explorer to be a "full" desktop.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Big Deal by R3 · · Score: 1

      WinInternals guys have something like that, it's called ERDCommander, but it costs money.
      Check it out at:
      http://www.wininternals.com/

    6. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My email address is copyrighted. Expect a lawsuit if you redistribute it in spam.

      Fuck you, biaaaaatch.

      dl75jdwq02@sneakemail.com Lameness filter encountered. Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

    7. Re:Big Deal by dynamic_cast · · Score: 1

      So use VMWare then

  10. Knoppix==Awesome by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Knoppix is a GREAT distro. I regularly give it to people to try out Linux. It also makes a great recovery disk. I can go anywhere and pop it into a PC with a CD-ROM drive and it boots giving me all the tools I need.

    What? Your Windows 2000 server's dynamic disk has crashed, again? No problem. Insert Knoppix. Copy /mnt/WINNT to /mnt/GoodDisk. Have a nice day.

    1. Re:Knoppix==Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copy /mnt/WINNT to /mnt/GoodDisk. Have a nice day.

      Nice day? It would be a nice day if instead of copy you did mke2fs ;)

  11. one of the pleasant things about knoppix by timothy · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... is the sheer number of packages included on a *single* CD ROM. It's incredible. (Plus, they tend to be quite recent versions, and with some programs, like the excellent and promising Scribus, that's important because progress is rapid.)

    Also, if you want to show someone the sheer variety of free and Free browsers available with Linux, Scribus has konqueror, mozilla, dillo, not to mention text-based ones as well.

    It's an amazing distro -- demoware that really works. Anecdote: I have used Knoppix, from the CD, as my only OS for several days when using a borrowed laptop on which I could not politely do an OS swap. Except a slight slowness with the CD up-and-down-spinning, it was hard to tell I wasn't just using a recent Debian system installed normally.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  12. self-reply with a correction by timothy · · Score: 1

    2nd instance of "Scribus" in above post should of course be "Knoppix." Scribus is not emacs.

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  13. Uhh... by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    Have you tried Knoppix? Did you read the article? I would think that Knoppix would fit your bill perfectly.

    Did I just get trolled?

    1. Re:Uhh... by Vagary · · Score: 2

      It's missing Flash, RealPlayer, and Gecko. Why didn't you just recommend I install VMS? Or perhaps you didn't bother to read my post...

    2. Re:Uhh... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      well, it isn't missing Gecko. It has the lizard on it I'm pretty sure.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Uhh... by Vagary · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you're right, sorry. Galeon'd be nice, though.

  14. I'm grabbing it now. by boy_of_the_hash · · Score: 1

    Sounds quite cool actually, this is just the sort of thing that some people (my boss) need to be shown. Differs a little from SUSE live-eval if it can be installed. And the great thing is I can just hand my boss a cd and tell him to try it.

    Hopefully windows problems will be a thing of the past for me soon.

  15. knopix worked great on my laptop...... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    except it used the OSS sound system and the OSS module for my soundcard does not work...if it used ALSA I would be very happy.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:knopix worked great on my laptop...... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      How the hell is that off topic?

      Knoppix is debian based, it should hold up. If you install knoppix to HD, then follow the instructions you get also on knoppix. It is not offtopic, so I hope the meta moderators read the context.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:knopix worked great on my laptop...... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well..unfortunatly, actualy, even ALSA won't work. VIA are biaches. arg.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  16. VMWare by HeelToe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One really neat use of this would be to bundle VMWare into the CD dist so that you could actually drop the CD into a machine you don't trust (maybe your employer's?) to be free of keystroke loggers, etc.

    Use Linux for any "private" work you want to do, use encryption tools (ssh, tunneling, etc.) to get out your corporate firewall to a trusted machine, and then simply run your other operating system inside VMWare for doing your work.

    Does Knoppix make it easy to add new things into the cd image?

    1. Re:VMWare by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      VMware is commercial software, so that won't happen. Is there an open-source alternative???

    2. Re:VMWare by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      I realize VMWare is commercial.

      As an end user wanting what I described above, can I add VMWare to my *own* Knoppix CD ISO?

      This would rock to be able to go to work and have a trusted environment for web browsing, personal email, etc., and drop into the corporate (untrusted) OS to do my work.

    3. Re:VMWare by bstadil · · Score: 3, Informative
      Does Knoppix make it easy to add new things into the cd image?

      Yes, As long as you keep inside the size limit. I removed some of the Demos on the ISO and included a brainwave relaxing program AutoZen to run on my my Girlfriend's Windows machine. Worked fine.

      WmWare workstation is only 11Meg so you should be OK.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
    4. Re:VMWare by Gumber · · Score: 2

      Cool idea.

    5. Re:VMWare by t · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I too thought this. For the lamers, yes I have a legally purchased copy of vmware. What I wanted to do was to combine knoppix with vmware and an appropriate version of windows. Vmware has the lovely feature of working in non-commit mode. This allows you to screw around, launch trojans, virus etc willy nily and just quit vmware whenever you feel like it and be exactly where you started. No roll-back or backups utilities required. I have used this for an obnoxious dsl installer that wouldn't tell me the info I needed, more relevant to the cable modem installer article I guess.

      unfortunately... licensing, size etc of windows is ridiculous.

      win98 I believe will sit in less than 400MB, but from what I recall win2k can hit 800MB. fubar. The only way I think this will work will be with dvd-r's. I imagine that would be ideal for a company that does testing, have your employees use a knoppix-like dvd with win98/me/2k/... for testing. Perhaps lnx-bbc could be used for this purpose since they target the biz card cds which are only around 50MBs.

      I also wondered if it would be possible to have vmware run the installed version of windows on the harddrive in non-commit mode. (This doesn't solve the keystroke loggers etc... problems)

      I also wish vmware would fix the fucking problems with audio in multimedia. How goddamn hard could it be?

    6. Re:VMWare by tzanger · · Score: 1

      One really neat use of this would be to bundle VMWare into the CD dist so that you could actually drop the CD into a machine you don't trust (maybe your employer's?) to be free of keystroke loggers, etc.

      Two problems immediately come to mind

      • A hardware dongle that logs keys isn't circumvented
      • Now you need a "CD#2" for your windows image

      Let's face it -- it's a company computer. If you don't want them reading your private shit, don't use the company computer for it.

  17. (OT) OSDN advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much is one of these frontpage /. ads?

    175,000 banner impressions for $1,000.


    Given the title, Offtopic moderation is Redundant and will be M2ed as such.
  18. I've got to respect this.. by Raleel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not normally a debian zealot, and by me using the term zealot, you can figure out what I think of people who constantly tell me that I'm wrong for using redhat and mandrake. That having been said, I've really got to respect this. Well done.

    Personally, I don't care about having 10 different editors, but I'm sure some people do. I can almost live entirely off of the redhat 8.0 personal desktop (I have other machines to compile on), save for the lack of mp3-ability out of the box (freshrpms, I love you) and dvd-ability (again, go freshrpms). But the ability to do something like this, be able to just install it on to a hard drive, type a single command for updates, no registering or anything, and continue on, is very nice.

    I think this years install fest will see a lot more debian installs than it will redhat or mandrake because of this.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  19. No writable hard drive? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    3) NOT allowing students to write (even temporary files) to the hard drive...

    You probably just broke that rule by booting Knoppix, which uses a swap file on any machine with less than 128 MB of RAM.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:No writable hard drive? by Lostman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrongo buckaroo!

      Read the knoppix documentation... it does not, by default, install ANYTHING to ANY hard drive.. you have the option to put a swap file ont he hard drive but you have to select it =)

      Look down the page http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html and you will see about what it does and does not do. NO installation or modifying of the hard drives are necessary -- with computers without necessary ram it will run SLOWER but it will still run.

      Besides, its a worthless argument =) Their computers most definately have 128 mb ram...

    2. Re:No writable hard drive? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Read the knoppix documentation... it does not, by default, install ANYTHING to ANY hard drive

      OK, if Knoppix doesn't mount the hard drive, then how do students save their work to hand it in?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:No writable hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dlido

    4. Re:No writable hard drive? by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Floppy disks?

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    5. Re:No writable hard drive? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      from what I read, knoppix does support various network file systems. If the user can mount their file system from the teacher's server, or another server on the network, why use a local file system for storing their work? That also resolved the issue of where you sit in class.

      --
      You never know...
    6. Re:No writable hard drive? by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of floppy disks? Schools tend to love them...

    7. Re:No writable hard drive? by Vagary · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, schools teach children very carefully about saving everything to floppies. Unfortunately most teachers fail to mention that you should have your work saved to more than 1 floppy! I remember ScanDisking for mere sector scraps the floppies of many a future teacher while living in residence...

    8. Re:No writable hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix creates icons on the KDE desktop for each hard drive--when you click on the icon, the drive is mounted. I don't remember if the defualt is to mount rw, but if it isn't, it is easy to do (mount -rw /dev/drive, or right-click drive icon/properties/unclick mount as read-only). Or you could use Samba, or /dev/fd0, or CD-RW (but I doubt the schools have those).

    9. Re:No writable hard drive? by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 2, Informative

      Knoppix doesn't mount the hard drive

      Think again dildo. Have you ever used linux, or even knoppix for that matter? Just because there's no swap file, doesnt mean that it doesnt MOUNT the drives. It doesnt modify the hard drive but it DOES mount every volume it can. Precisely why it makes a good diagnostic tool and recovery agent. Try it some time, and see if you can read your hard drive.

      -D

    10. Re:No writable hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix DOES mount USB CF card readers like the Microtech ZIO and generic equivalents, as does SuSE 8.0 Live. 15 bucks for the reader and whatever for the CF card.

    11. Re:No writable hard drive? by Lostman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Excellent question... I will hope you still read this but its a bit after this was posted so shrug...

      Students each have a disk that they have their source code on (they write the code to the disk). We compile onto the disk and the executable remains on the disk. Students turn in their disks (along with algorithms (ie their funny little flowcharts)) to be graded.

      It was a good question... we STILL have to have a disk even though now we dont have to put the development apps on there... I say it was a very good trade. =)

    12. Re:No writable hard drive? by ylikone · · Score: 1

      The harddrives get mounted and icons put on the desktop for browsing them. It is true that they are mounted read-only... but you can fairly easily go the properties and set it to read-write. (re-mount it read-write) The default is not to allow writing so that people won't accidentally screw up data on their harddrives.

      --
      Meh.
  20. There's another one by OrangeHairMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's another Debian-based bootable distro, called LNX-BBC. It is only 50 megs, but you can still install Debian from it and apt-get all the packages you want.

    http://www.lnx-bbc.org/

    1. Re:There's another one by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 2
      This thing is fantastic. It's amazing the things you can fit into 50 megs - basically every command line program you'd want except Emacs and man pages, plus minimal X support.

      For a really quality experience, modify the image to boot to a win95 boot disk image with stuff like fdisk and format, and include loadlin and NTFS dos drivers on the image. You can then use it to fix just about any system. Best of all, it still fits on a credit card sized CD that I keep in my wallet.

    2. Re:There's another one by zanshin993 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but there hasn't been a release since August 2001.

      Is the project dead or stagnating or somesuch?

  21. I had the same thought... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    but got confused by the debian logo. So is knoppix a commercial distri?? In that case this is def the ad of the day...

  22. Wow, for once I'm ahead ... by thempstead · · Score: 1

    Wow, for once I'm ahead of the crowd. I finished downloading the latest iso about 2hrs before this was posted here ... how long before the Knoppix site is Slashdotted ?

    t

  23. For rapid desktop development? by WetCat · · Score: 2

    Is it only me who misread the article header?
    A rapid desktop deployment for Debian system is not "news that matter", a working rapid desktop development system - a competitor to Kylix can be that news...

  24. I can beat that. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    20 minutes? Bah. My old vintage 1975 Sol-20 boots SOLOS from ROM in under a second. I can install a new OS ROM in seconds, it is conveniently provided on a ROM cart that pops in and out of a slot in the back. I can load BASIC or ASM-80 from Cassette Tape in under 2 minutes.
    Yeah, yeah, before you mod this down, just think a sec, I'm only trying to show how ludicrous this "time to first boot" is, as a measure of an OS.

    1. Re:I can beat that. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      What exactly does SOLOS do? I bet you can count the significant functions of the operating system on one hand. Knoppix on the other hand is linux, which does more shit than you can reasonably discuss the ramifications of in 64k.

      I had a kaypro 4 which ran cp/m, hardly the oldest computer around but it illustrates a point. CP/M does jack shit; It does nothing but provide a system through which other applications can be loaded. It loads fast, but who cares? It gets kicked out of memory when you load an application. It hardly does anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I can beat that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AmigaOS also boots in less than 10 seconds. For that time you get just about anything you might need in a modern OS (with the obvious exception of memory protection which AmigaOS never had). Certainly you get multitasking. a complete GUI, and all the device support you could possibly need (HD, network, videocard, soundcard, ...).

      Obviously this is somewhat unfair, as AmigaOS loads mainly out of a 512K ROM, but neither should you fall into the trap of thinking that Linux cannot be improved in this regard. I happen to think modern boot-times are ridiculously long, and any work done to shorten that is welcome.

    3. Re:I can beat that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I could dig up my MSX from the attic, connect it to a TV, and boot it in much less than 20 minutes ;-)

      And the MSX(2) takes a comparatively long time to boot for an 8-bit machine. The scrolling MSX logo takes 1-2 seconds, the floppy-seek takes about as long, so total boot is something like 6 seconds...

    4. Re:I can beat that. by sakusha · · Score: 2

      SOLOS has a full VT-100 terminal, this CPU was used daily on the FedWire banking system, it was used to transfer millions of dollars every week. Sometimes CPU power is irrelevant. I also used it to write assembly language programs for process control, running a variety of motors and measurement devices in a lab.

    5. Re:I can beat that. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      My point is that the OS provides very few services. I could write a vt100 terminal emulator with relatively little trouble, and I wouldn't consider myself a programmer by any stretch. Linux, on the other hand, is equivalent to an old-timey OS *and* a whole bunch of applications with nothing but the kernel and init. In fact, if you have the kernel, init, and the bourne shell, you can (with a lot of documentation) get from that point to basically anywhere, given enough time and skill.

      So time-to-load is significant when your OS does so much. SOLOS might load in nanoseconds but it doesn't do what a modern OS does.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I can beat that. by macshit · · Score: 2

      So time-to-load is significant when your OS does so much. SOLOS might load in nanoseconds but it doesn't do what a modern OS does.

      Hmmm, well, how about linux? My embedded boards boot linux (2.4.x or 2.5.x) to a shell in less than a second -- and much of that time seems to be the timing loop that computes `bogomips' and the time required to send all the boot messages to the serial console (running at 115200 baud).

      [oh, also, these boards are pretty pokey, by modern standards: the fastest one has a 200MHz processor, the slowest 50MHz (the latter with no cache, and lots of wait-states for main memory access!)]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:I can beat that. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I would assume that you're removing a significant number of drivers and other crap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:I can beat that. by macshit · · Score: 2
      Well, it's just like any linux system, I've configured in those drivers that I use -- and in this case, that doesn't include disks :-).... but you're right, the fact that it's not reading stuff off a disk probably accounts for a lot of the speedup.

      When my desktop debian systems boot, the major obvious time hogs during initial startup I've noticed are:
      1. BIOS
      2. X + Gnome stuff
      3. Postfix

      (1) is by far the worst, and is probably mostly unnecessary; I assume it's caused by 15-year-old crap legacy code + ultra-conservative operation (long timeouts etc) intended to deal with crap legacy devices. (2) I guess is unavoidable (right now anyway); X & Gnome are just big bloated systems. (3) Confuses me, I don't know why a MTA takes so long to start up (though I love Postfix generally); probably whatever it's doing could be safely done in the background though.

      I think a desktop system that just got rid of the legacy BIOS and used something a bit more reasonable would be much more pleasant to boot...
      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    9. Re:I can beat that. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Well, the sad thing about the BIOS is that it's all real mode code, operating systems which always run in protected mode never use the BIOS after boot. Most modern operating systems also re-initialize all PnP hardware so the BIOS' efforts there are wasted as well.

      There's that linux bios project that replaces the BIOS with a kernel image, but it only runs on a small subset of hardware, so it is of limited usefulness. It's a step in the right direction.

      It would be nice if any init scripts which were not depended on by anyone (gentoo, at least, has dependencies recorded in init scripts. I don't know if any other distribution is doing this) would be started asynchronously. Even better, I can envision a scenario in which one item (say, a MTA) is needed only by a ML Manager (for example) and therefore the MTA init should only hold up the MLM init.

      X is bloated for sure, but I don't suppose it's more bloated than Win32's GUI, it's just slower. :)

      If you want a good laugh disassemble your PC's BIOS sometime. You'll see a lot of XOR reg,reg operations. XOR of a register with itself is the fastest way to clear it on x86; Motorola has a clear register operation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:I can beat that. by macshit · · Score: 2

      BTW, I should note that this is one huge advantage of the aforementioned embedded systems -- the reset vector jumps directly to the kernel in ROM, no BIOS at all. Just about the only thing it does before the generic linux startup is write a few critical control registers (memory refresh etc) and copy the kernel's data segment to RAM.

      I guess you can tell, I really get a kick out of pressing the reset button and BAM! up pops a shell prompt... :-)

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  25. Mini CD Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could someone please tell me if there is a MiniCD (185Mb) version of knoppix 'round ?

    TIA

    1. Re:Mini CD Version by marathonmannen · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is KiX. You will find it in the contrib directory on the knoppix mirrors or somemore info in German (you might want to babelfish it ;-)

      --
      Live's to short - do another mile.
  26. Knoppix is kool... by dcuny · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I got a copy from CheapBytes. Very cool. I've handed out more than a dozen copies since then. People are a lot more willing to try it out once they find out it won't touch your hard drive (unless you want it to).

    It's come in handy a couple of times, like when my hard drive flaked out. I talked my non-techie wife through setting up KPPP and KMail over the phone so she had internet access. (Fortunately, it was just a loose cable)

    I've used DemoLinux before that, as well as the SUSE demo CD, but Knoppix is much nicer. The only feature I miss is DemoLinux's ability to anchor part of the file system to the hard drive...

    All in all, a very nice distribution.

  27. This is just what I have been looking for. by man_ls · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've just gotta say, thanks Slashdot. This is what I've been looking for.

    One of the major reasons I was very reluctant to try Linux out (I'm a dedicated Win2K admin) was that it would require me to re-partition a disk for an ext3 filesystem.

    Well, seeing as how each and every one of my drives are NTFS Dynamic Volumes, there's no chance in hell that Linux is going to be able to read (or even repartition) them, and neither will most other software. So, it's a total wipeout if I wanted to try it.

    I'm downloading the ISO of this right now; I can get a chance to use Linux without *installing* Linux this way. In essence, what I've wanted for a long time.

    1. Re:This is just what I have been looking for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - once you install it can you tell us how it went? I also have only NTFS and don't want to reformat to try Linux.

    2. Re:This is just what I have been looking for. by jbolden · · Score: 2

      I use Knoptic and NTFS. Knoptic reads but not writes NTFS fine. As for its use as a Linux distribution its slightly worse than an installed version of the major Linux distributions as a desktop. For server apps the major distributions are much better.

      A strong recommendation for something that takes no time to install. Only problem I've had with it is that the destkop doesn't handle passing arguments to the kernel at boot time the right way.

    3. Re:This is just what I have been looking for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... can't you use Partition Magic or something to free up just a little bit of space (a couple of Gigs or so) for a ext3 partition?

    4. Re:This is just what I have been looking for. by Jezral · · Score: 1

      No. NTFS Dynamic Volumes are different. PM can't alter them.

  28. Re:Deja-BSD - and more by vik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, but it comes with 2GB of apps, boots into KDE, GNOME or WindowMaker, and even sets itself up as a PXE boot network server for diskless machines.

    To be honest, it also impresses the pants off Windows users and is very likely to convert them to Open Source software. There they are used to Windows products and have been told Linux is too hard. Then along comes this CD, they insert it, boot, and a fully-fledged Linux app with OpenOffice, Mozilla, network, sound and lots of toys rises before them without them having to type or do *anything*.

    That's why I put it on the NZ PC World cover disk.

    Vik :v)

  29. Rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think a very important and under-valued use of this is as a rescue disk.

    Sure other distros have bootable CD's, but they are only partly usable. This thing seems to have a bunch of stuff that will make recovery much easier.

    Who knows... I'll try it out and see. Too bad some of the older systems can't boot off CD (often those are the ones you need to recover!)

    1. Re:Rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: You can boot Knoppix using a floppy disk for those systems who dont allow booting from a CD-ROM

  30. Knoppix name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is pretty bad - why not "Suck My Knoppix"?

  31. Must Knoppix use the hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only have a 100% NTFS formatted drive. Linux cannot reliably write to NTFS. I don't wish to reformat or resize partitions. Can I run Knoppix directly from the CD and use a big RAM disk or something?

  32. irresponsible by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Do not, I repeat do not force a nontechnical person to use Linux. Your job as a "computer person" that your friends and family trusts is to make the computer experience easier, not harder.

    Yes, Windows sucks. If it's having that many problems, see if you can roust up a copy of Win2000 or WinXP. But if you force your girlfriend to use Linux, she will probably end up frustrated and hating it (and maybe even hating you).

    Then, in a few years, when Linux is ready for the desktop (if that happens) then she won't want to try it.

    If you really think Windows sucks too much for her to use, maybe you should look into getting her a Mac. Forcing nontechnical people to use Linux is not the way to win friends, or spread good feelings for the operating system.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:irresponsible by Vagary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you have a good metric for testing whether Linux is ready for the desktop? I'm not sure that it is, but it's got to be better than the shit she's struggling with now.

      We're starving university students, therefore Macs are entirely out of the question (she's wanted a Mac ever since reading Microserfs). I doubt her aging hardware's ability to run Win2k (or else I would have already tried it) and so it's even less likely to handle XP. But really, should a new computer be required just to word process, web browse (including multimedia content), and listen to music? (Seriously, that's all she does. But for some reason WindowsME can't even do that.)

    2. Re:irresponsible by uchian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do not, I repeat do not force a nontechnical person to use Linux.

      Wha? No, wrong. My mother ain't technical and can use Linux just fine.

      What you should say is do not force a non-technical person to ADMIN a Linux box. But then again, you shouldn't let a non-technical person admin any box unless you want to have to fix it every other week. I have to keep cleaning all of the games off of my Aunt's computer because she doesn't understand the concepts of "limited hard drive space" and "uninstalling stuff" no matter how short I make the words I use.

    3. Re:irresponsible by Apreche · · Score: 1

      WindowsME, that's the problem! Use windows 98 SE. Other than 2000 professional it's as good as it gets in terms of windows. ME was a downgrade if anything from 98. Some Microsoft recruiters were at the job fair here, and even they came out and plainly admitted that ME was a big mistake. Just back up her files to CD-R, format the drive, install 98SE, apply service packs, install word97 or openoffice put backed up files back on hard drive. All done! I guarantee it will crash far less than ME.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    4. Re: irresponsible by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Do not, I repeat do not force a nontechnical person to use Linux. ... Yes, Windows sucks. If it's having that many problems, see if you can roust up a copy of Win2000 or WinXP. But if you force your girlfriend to use Linux, she will probably end up frustrated and hating it (and maybe even hating you).

      Yeah, Linux is really weird. You click an icon and a program runs. Or if you can't find an icon for the program you want, you click a button and a menu pops up to let you select one. Girls shouldn't be exposed to such mind-boggling exercises.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:irresponsible by kubla2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nice troll!

      Linux not ready for the desktop? Have you read the article? Have you tried the cd? It's amazing what a good distro can do.

      Setting up printing as is as easy as clicking through a wizard, same with changing video settings, scanners, etc, etc, etc. How the arse do you justify spreading this kind of FUD? Do you get confused because the widgets look a little differently from your win98 desktop?

      In the last several months, I've given away about 20 knoppix cds directly (indirectly, by running Linux training courses for which students use Knoppix, I've given away many more). It's all down to experience. Once users get used to a slightly improved (and hence, different) way of doing things, they're all over Linux.

    6. Re:irresponsible by cornice · · Score: 2
      "Do not, I repeat do not force a nontechnical person to use Linux. Your job as a "computer person" that your friends and family trusts is to make the computer experience easier, not harder."

      Huh? Isn't this a bit over the top? The guy can do the install and make sure all the right apps are installed and configured. He can get the networking right. He could even install Crossover and Win4Lin (If you have to reboot Windows it might as well take 15 seconds) if necessary.

      Sure, Linux may not be able to fit into every fat32 formatted American mind just yet but it is stable and it is easy to use. Aside from the install and the interoperability issues (because MS Office won't play nice) Linux makes a fine desktop. (Yea, I know Linux is quick and easy to install. It's just that Linux installs offer more choices than most. People usually don't like choices when it comes to the computer.)

      "But if you force your girlfriend to use Linux, she will probably end up frustrated and hating it (and maybe even hating you)."

      Wow, that's a bit harsh. Boot a CD, loose a girlfriend. If that's all it takes then she won't last long anyway. I get your point but I think it applies more to Wal~Mart PCs. Those don't come with Debian hacking boyfriends.

    7. Re:irresponsible by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Multimedia web browsing is one of the most CPU intensive application jumps to go mainstream in a long time. The only reason the 8 meg of ram 386's aren't usable today is web browsing. Other than that virtually everything else the mainstream user wants worked fine under Windows 3.1. Anyway the system requirements for Win2000 are not that high if she has 64 megs I think its a doable switch.

      The big problem is that:

      a) She likes windows products: flash, real, quicktime, word

      b) She is not technical

      c) You can't mention a single advantage of Linux for her uses

      Anyway if she really wants a Mac you may want to check out the used powermacs on Ebay. For a grand you can get a system as good as the modern iMacs that comes loaded with software.

    8. Re:irresponsible by llamaluvr · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you really think Windows sucks too much for her to use, maybe you should look into getting her a Mac
      Modern Wedding Anniversary Gifts:

      First - Clocks
      Second - China
      Third - Crystal/Glass
      Fourth - Appliances
      Fifth - Silverware
      Sixth - Candy/Iron
      Seventh - Desk Sets
      Eighth - Bronze/Pottery
      Ninth - Linen/Lace
      Tenth - A MacIntosh

      I think that's a little more commitment then our buddy is looking for here. Maybe a low-end PC would be okay for a "just thinking of you (and your computer troubles)" gift, but a MacIntosh? That's at least the equivilent of an engagement ring (and costs about the same, too!)!
      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    9. Re: irresponsible by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2
      You click an icon and a program runs.

      Sometimes. I have enough trouble myself getting Linux GUI programs to work reliably. Even stuff like Open Office will sometimes open a huge window that takes over half the screen, without revealing the close widget. Or when Mplayer ignores your preferences and won't respond to clicking the radio button? Do you want to explain to your girlfriend to how to kill and restart processes on the command line? How about working out dependency conflicts?

      Girls shouldn't be exposed to such mind-boggling exercises.

      You need to respect the fact that not everyone ones to mess around with their computers all day. Most people want the path of least resistance between them and the task to be done. They don't want to fight with conf files, GUI apps that lack consistency and maturity, and no tech support.

      If you are there for her to fix the computer all the time, then it might be okay. But realize that the crashes that come with Windows are much less of a problem for the nontechnical than wrangling with the complexities of Linux.

      Also, an environment like KDE which has the look and feel of Windows, but doesn't have the full functionality, can bring expectations. When the desktop looks like Windows, but doesn't work exactly like Windows (such as cut and paste), it is very easy for people to dismiss Linux as merely a third-rate Windows impostor. Which hurts your credibility as the "trusted computer person" and unfairly hurts perception of Linux.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    10. Re:irresponsible by scmason · · Score: 1

      It is amazing some of the microsoft propaganda that peoiple will buy into! Have you tried Mandrake 9.0 or SuSe 8.x yourself? It auto configures everything! My wife, very non-tech, has been using Linux for years. Our computer never crashes, our documents never get mangled, our drivers are never 'outdated'. It is amazing that they say it, so you repeat it! This is a myth that needs to stop somewhere! And soon.

      --
      "I am a patient boy. I wait I wait I wait. My time is water down the drain..." Fugazi
    11. Re:irresponsible by korgull · · Score: 1

      It seems like you haven't tried any Linux distro over the past two years and don't like to try it yourself anymore.

    12. Re:irresponsible by sniggly · · Score: 2

      Same here, my mother hadn't used computers since DOS and so all graphical desktops were new to her. Same learning curve be it windows or linux. Linux is cheaper, KDE3 extremely jazzy and Knoppix should have debian apt get so when sshing into her computer i can install whatever just fine.

      Oh and she doesnt get BSOD and wont have to pay for XP or Win2k just to avoid BSOD.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    13. Re:irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I use Linux every day. A snappy demo can't make up for the day-to-day hassles of dependency problems and broken GUI programs (name one Linux GUI program that does exactly what you want, 100% of the time. The only one I can think of is Netscape 3 Gold. )

      An easy installation is nice. A flashy demo is cool. But I'm not using anything other than as a cheap server until there's some serious improvement.

  33. It was on NZ PC World by vik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got Knoppix onto the cover CD of PC World in New Zealand and I hear there is a possibility it may go on the Australian version - write encouragement to the Ed and ask if it can be had from the Kiwis (the answer will be yes, I guarantee it :).

    We had to cut it down to 350MB to fit the sponsor's Windows games and so forth on the CD too (thanks Eaden at Opentech) so no OpenOffice, but the reader response we got was incredible. See this and search for "Knoppix" for the feedback.

    Vik :v)

  34. Knoppix as a Christmas gift by oob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After reading the comments here Knoppix has just become my default Christmas gift to friends and family. The opportunity to quickly and easily expose new users to Linux without altering their current environment is a magnificent opportunity to "spread the gospel."

    I'm planning to bundle the CD with two sheets of paper, one showing how to start and use it and explaing that it won't interfere with the ordinary function of the computer concerned and the other David McNabb's HDD install HOWTO.

    Then in January I'm going to apply for a position in the marketing department of AOL, I'll have all the required skills :)

    1. Re:Knoppix as a Christmas gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I'm not one of your friends. What a fucking cheapskate.

  35. No. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    No Knoppix does not require a hard drive at all. Inserting the CD and booting Knoppix creates a RAM disk for swap space and symlinks to the rest of the OS on CD. Knoppix runs entirely from RAM and the CD. Knoppix does not touch your hard disk!!!!

    However, Knoppix does a great job of detecting all present disks and sets up the FSTAB to allow you to access any of the disk partitions. This is read-only acess by default. Knoppix creates desktop icons for each of the disk partitions. Should you need to access data on the hard disk(read-only by default) simply click the icon and Knoppix auto-mounts the partition, ext2/3, fat, fat32, NTFS, what have you.

    Knoppix is awesome and WELL worth the download! Although I suspect that the mirrors are being Slashdotted right now. :(

    1. Re:No. by mixmasta · · Score: 1


      Good lord why would you use a ram disk for swap space? Don't you see the contradiction there?

      Better to have no swap than to make a ram disk for it.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
  36. Easiest Debian install??? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


    Has anybody tried this install yet?

    How easy to install is it compared to the progeny installer, the new Debian graphical installer and the old, infamous, text installer?

    Could this be the easiest Debian install ever (one can dream)?

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    1. Re:Easiest Debian install??? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, just try Libranet. Easiest Debian install you don't have to pay for. Download the 2.0 version for free, edit the /etc/apt/sources.list to testing or unstable, apt-get update, apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade, and you're done.

    2. Re:Easiest Debian install??? by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      I installed this on my laptop using the packaged HD install utility (this was a month and a half ago, wasn't aware of anyone making a HOWTO until today). It was really simple, and only took about 15 minutes. The installer is in German, but I can read German, so there was no problem. I'm currently working on an English translation of the installer.

  37. OT: VMware alternative by ism · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is BOCHS, but it emulates every x86 instruction, rather than being optimized for specifically running an OS. The developers (in the FAQ) do not recommended for the purpose you intend. I have not tried it.

    Plex86 touts itself as *the* free (as in speech and beer) alternative. I have not tried this either.

    Connectix makes Virtual PC, which is not free. I have not tried it.

    1. Re:OT: VMware alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand, it's highly unstable right now.

    2. Re:OT: VMware alternative by hysterion · · Score: 2
      On Mac hardware, there'd be an excellent free alternative: Mac-on-Linux.

      (Allows you to tun your Mac OS 9 on top of Linux PPC -- similar to OS X's Classic environment. IIUC, Plex86 would do the same for Wintel... right? Given the potential audience, I never quite understood why there isn't a Win-on-Linux. Is it that much harder?)

      Which leaves the question, is there anything like knoppix for the PowerPC?

  38. This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
    God,

    Gentoo is neat - but if you compile it all...

    I'm on day three of install and config - Single 733MHz+ 1GB RAM and a 1.5Mb net connection!

    Thought I'd finally dig into this guy, 'cos I was intrigued by out-of-the-box EVMS.

    Looks like my next install will be Knoppix. Just to keepa broad perspective on things!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! by Shelled · · Score: 2

      Two and a half of those days are probably KDE and Gnome. :)

    2. Re:This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run FreeBSD and compile everything from source. If you want something that takes forever to compile, try Mozilla. Not as long as KDE/Gnome, but takes far longer than anyother single package (that I use at least). If only there was a phoneix port...

    3. Re:This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! by fwarren · · Score: 1
      That is why, when I get my new box. I will slap an old 4 gig drive in it, put it on my network, and start a gentoo install/compile.

      I will keep using my old system, and once gentoo is running on my new box, I will just copy the partition from my 4 gig drive over to the 60 gig drive I normally use.

      As much as I want gentoo, I can't afford to be without a system for 3 or 4 days waiting for it to compile everything, and yes I want KDE and GNOME.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    4. Re:This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      ya but it runs so nice and fast once you get it on.my portage has gone to hell in a handbasket but everything i got on runs so quick i still havent formated in frustration.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  39. Laptop? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    Has any /.ers installed Knoppix on a laptop? Hopefully w/ wireless? Redhat8 and Mandrake9 keep dropping packets using my wireless connection and it's more than a little frustrating not to even be able run apt-get update or up2date. I tried my trusty Libranet 2.7 but it hangs every time on pcmcia while booting and never completes booting.

    1. Re:Laptop? by skeedlelee · · Score: 1

      "I tried my trusty Libranet 2.7 but it hangs every time on pcmcia while booting and never completes booting."

      I haven't tried putting it on a laptop yet (though I AM downloading for such a purpose). The readme I checked mentioned that there is a nopcmcia option (there's also a noscsi) for getting around some hangups when booting. I think this may be good news/bad new for you though. I'm guessing that this is a recurrent problem for some people and the best way to get around it is to diable the pcmcia. Which brings up the potential bad news... hope your wireless card wasn't pcmcia...

    2. Re:Laptop? by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      I have tried installing w/out PCMCIA but after PCMCIA installs the same problem comes back. After using Libranet I want to kick myself every time I use an RPM based distro but so far I can't get my wireless pcmcia working in Libranet. What laptop are you using? Dell Inspiron 8100 ehre

    3. Re:Laptop? by skeedlelee · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if you understood me the first time, I was a bit lame on the specifics. The -nopcmcia was for Knoppix. Here's from their readme (ftp://source.rfc822.org/pub/mirror/knoppix/KNOPPI X-FAQ-EN.txt)

      "Q: Auto configuration doesn't work on my computer, or the computer hangs at boot. What should I do?

      A: It might work if portions of the auto configuration are skipped. This can be specified with "knoppix noscsi" or "knoppix nopcmcia". If the problem can be identified -> please send the exact error message and when possible a proposed solution using the web form at http://www.knopper.net/kontakt/! Sometimes the output of "lspci ; lspci -n" is very helpful, especially if the problem involves incorrectly identified graphics cards."

      As far as what laptop I'll be using, its an old (P1) Vaio. Here's hoping its easy. Mostly I just want an environment where I can goof around with learning programming without having to worry about screwing over my desktop (with a partially completed thesis on it). As a result my standard are pretty low (sound is optional for example).

      I've found the Linux on Laptops helpful (at least in convincing me to try it).

      http://www.linux-laptop.net/dell.html

      They also have a bunch of case studies of installs on various laptops... one for me... eight for you. The third one in particular meight be helpful. Someone installing Debian, having trouble with pcmcia. No talk of installing a pcmcia wireless card though (6th one talks about a wireless card, but it was internal and trouble free to install). Good luck.

    4. Re:Laptop? by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I loaded this on my Dell Inspirton 4000 with Belkin 802.11b PCMCIA device in it, and it all works fine. I installed Knoppix to harddrive using the packaged HD Install utility (it's in German, but so what, I can read German, and if you can't, use the fish). It all works great though!

    5. Re:Laptop? by IVI4573R · · Score: 1

      I put it on my laptop, works great with only 2 problems. I can't get the display to change to 800x600 in text mode (has 1024x7something virtual display which sucks and doesn't work), and I can't get my nic working. I use a PCMCIA D-Link Card, and it freezes on boot after detecting the card and trying to set up the network. I have had porblems with this nic in redhat before too, and i havn't tried it in any other linux distro. Works in windows ok though.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    6. Re:Laptop? by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      By textmode you mean the framebuffer resolution? That can only be set up by passing the respective vga=??? at boottime. Works with Knoppix, too.

  40. SuSE do by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative
    SuSE do an excellent Live CD. It can be downloaded from their FTP site and has pretty bootup screens, latest KDE with custom artwork, Mozilla, OpenOffice etc.

    Some other stuff it does well - it'll store swap, config and home directory on files in the first windows harddisk with enough space it can find. That means you can in fact use it as your primary OS if you're happy with not being able to add new software and slow bootup times. You can reconfigure, write docs and so on, and it'll all be saved to disk.

    1. Re:SuSE do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SuSE 8.0 Live is sweet and makes a great portable Linux toolkit. As a noob I enjoy it because I can learn without screwing anything up. I realise most /.ers dream in code, but for the rest of us live CDs can be useful while learning.

  41. PC World (NZ) put Knoppix on its companion CD by gavinjolly · · Score: 0

    Every copy of the magazine had a bootable Linux distro (with some apps removed for space). There were some very positive comments from first time users.

    Two months before the PC World distro I downloaded Knoppix and tried it out on my 2 PC's here at home. On my daughters PC it detected everything. On my PC it would not detect sound but hey, I had a great time discovering Linux for the first time. Still couldn't get my cable modem to work but I know I can one day. I wouldn't have tried Linux otherwise.

    Now I have downloaded 2 other distro's of Linux. I have entered play mode due to my experience with Knoppix. Time to set up a server at home.

    I have a new work opportunity at a clients office. I need to bring a my own PC workstation. It needs to be runnning a web server (Apache) and database (mysql) for an idea we want to develop. I am going to build a Linux box that runs on their windows network. The fact I am even trying this is due to playing with Knoppix. I may even use Knoppix for this as I know it can be run from a HD also.

    --

    The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

  42. Uhh... again by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    Check out Knoppix. It has Galeon. It was up to Gnome 2.0, although KDE is the default desktop, but recently Knopper fell back to an earlier version of Gnome because he was having a lot of problems with 2.0. I would expect him to return to 2.x once the bugs are worked out.

    The only thing it doesn't have is Flash and Real Player because of licensing issues with those products.

    1. Re:Uhh... again by Vagary · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      No Galeon:

      $ lynx -dump ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/knoppix/packages.txt | grep galeon
      $

      And Flash and RealPlayer are vital for her. I'm going to have trouble enough convincing her to live without QuickTime...

    2. Re:Uhh... again by kubla2000 · · Score: 2

      And Flash and RealPlayer are vital for her. I'm going to have trouble enough convincing her to live without QuickTime...

      xine now does Sorenson quicktime. xine is included in Knoppix. There's a mozilla plugin in the works.

    3. Re:Uhh... again by Idou · · Score: 1

      "And Flash and RealPlayer are vital for her."

      Poor COLLEGE students? Shouldn't you introduce her to .avi, divx, and a little friend known as P2P?

      Mplayer will play the above formats, and I have had the best luck with gtk-gnutella.

      Ofcourse, being a Mandrakemember I just downloaded the rpms using urpmi (you have to download plugins for the .avi and divx from another server because of legal issues). Of course, Mandrake doesn't have a Live version yet . . . maybe they should (and their are howtos out there that explain in detail how to roll your on Live ISO from any distro).

      Sorry I couldn't be more help and don't listen to the clueless posts about upgrading her Windows (=$ for hardware, which you don't have.) . Your situation seems ideal for Linux, and what do you have to lose if you are using a live CD!? If she doesn't like it she can just take it out . . . If you upgrade her computer with Windows, and it doesn't work out you will look like a complete ass. Good luck.

      --
      Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    4. Re:Uhh... again by Vagary · · Score: 2

      >Poor COLLEGE students? Shouldn't you introduce her to .avi, divx, and a little friend known as P2P?

      Alas, none of those have good web integration. She needs RealPlayer for listening to online radio stations and watching movie trailers. And I think Flash is just kinda required to see the whole net nowadays.

      >(and their are howtos out there that explain in detail how to roll your on Live ISO from any distro)

      There are? Point me to em! I'm not finding anything definitive (eg: discusses hardware detection) in Google...

    5. Re:Uhh... again by scabbers · · Score: 1

      > Alas, none of those have good web integration. She needs RealPlayer for listening to online radio stations and watching movie trailers. And I think Flash is just kinda required to see the whole net nowadays.

      well I dont use knoppix right now (tried it once and was enthralled) but with my debian woody I use all this: realplay-plugin in my galeon, flash 5...
      Flash 6 and quicktime-plugins via the crossover-plugin which has annoying adverts for bying the full version, but it works.

      this should all work with knoppix, too, as its debian-based.

    6. Re:Uhh... again by kyhwana · · Score: 1

      Unforuantly xine/mplayer only does SQv1 of sorenson, the older codec, not V3 which is what most of the trailers and such use these days. It's still in the works of being REed.
      mplayer/xine will play the rest of the codecs that quicktime uses.

      --
      My email addy? should be easy enough.
  43. Developing for Knoppix by PauloSousa · · Score: 1

    I loved Knoppix the first time I used it. No more partition choices, distributions choices, updates, etc...

    I just download the ISO every week or so! Instant upgrade!

    The problem is that it doesn't support my language and keyboard on the boot loader (PT).

    I tried searching for the source code in the knoppix site so that i could change it, but didn't find any source code for the boot loader options!!!

    Maybe i just don't know how to search the web...

    Does anybody know how to change the bootup screen?

    1. Re:Developing for Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're more probable to get an answer when asking this in the official (bi-lingual) Knoppix forum at http://www.linuxtag.org/forum/.

    2. Re:Developing for Knoppix by PauloSousa · · Score: 1

      I have already made several posts on that forum, but nobody answered! :-(

    3. Re:Developing for Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, get rid of that "angry fruit salad" :)

    4. Re:Developing for Knoppix by KesterHabermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the moment I am developing a tool for customizing KNOPPIX boot without remastering.

      Here's the current development snapshot

      Notice: The tool is still under development and far from complete, but it will already serve the advanced user.

      Kester.
    5. Re:Developing for Knoppix by PauloSousa · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      I'm gonna try it right now...

      Paulo Sousa

  44. a RAM disk for swap space by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

    "Knoppix creates a RAM disk for swap space"

    Excuse me? Aren't swap space supposed to be for when you don't have enough RAM, so that you transfer a part of your RAM to the swap on the HDD?

    Very useful that, to transfer part of your RAM to the swap on the RAMdisk to save some space.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    1. Re:a RAM disk for swap space by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, that's right. Remember that Knopppix was initially intended as a demo CD. The most important criteria was for it to not use a hard drive. But, Linux really likes to know that it has a swap partition even if it doesn't really need one. Knoppix fools Linux into thinking it has a swap partition by creating a small one in RAM. Knoppix also loopback mounts a crompressed file system tree which is accessed via symlinks in the / (root) tree but, the tree is a RAM disk. It is a beutiful piece of trickery to get Linux to run with NO HARD DRIVE AT ALL!

    2. Re:a RAM disk for swap space by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Ok, it makes more sense that way.

      However, when I read your post and saw a swap partition on a Ramdisk without any justification it made me laugh because it really sounded stupid (I thought you made an error).

      Thanks for enlightening me.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  45. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard about Knoppix a couple weeks ago, and tried it. I like it, but its so slow on my crappy CD-ROM on my old p200

    So now I can finally install it to a drive yay.

    One question though: My monitor on my old pc sucks, it cant handle high resolutions, so i used alt+ctrl+- to reduce the resolution to 800x600 which works, but the desktop area is still larger, so when you move the mouse to the side,the desktop scrolls and whatnot. How do you change the desktop resolution??

    1. Re:Thank you by fwarren · · Score: 1
      At boot time, when you are prompted with the boot prompt

      boot:

      Type in knoppix screen=800x600

      I have also found mousewheel is really nice to add as well.

      Bart Bucks are not legal tender

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  46. Include Knoppix with magazines! by Fragmented_Datagram · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be really slick if computer magazines started including a free Knoppix CD. People could try out Linux for the first time without touching their current installation.

    1. Re:Include Knoppix with magazines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they already have. See the above post.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44029&cid=45 84 549

  47. Maybe a stupid idea but... by DopeRider · · Score: 1
    Would it be possible to take a snapshot of memory just after a sucessful first time boot and just load it for "speed boots"?.

    If you don't change your hardware, it could work, couldn't it?.

    1. Re: Maybe a stupid idea but... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > Would it be possible to take a snapshot of memory just after a sucessful first time boot and just load it for "speed boots"?.

      DEC was working on that for VMS over a decade ago. Don't know how it turned out, though, 'cause that's when I got out of the VMS environment.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Maybe a stupid idea but... by damiam · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what the Hibernate feature in Win2K/XP and the swsusp feature in Linux kernel 2.5 do. Many laptop BIOS's also havbe it built in.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  48. Impressive, but... by be-fan · · Score: 2

    I'm quite impressed at this distro, and I do realize how hard it is to autodetect the wide range of hardware that Linux supports. However, I still find it humerous that back in the day, the time it took to install BeOS was almost entirely determined by the speed of your CD-ROM drive :)

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  49. Re:Including non-free? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And she's already wasted days thanks to proprietary formats.

    Huh? Exactly how do "days" get wasted because of a proprietary format?

    If you're going to lie, at least make it plausible.

  50. sorry, I meant by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Try it some time, and see if you can read your hard drive.

    Somehow I left out the "read-write" in grandparent. Sorry.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  51. Re:Deja-BSD - and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then along comes this CD, they insert it, boot, and a fully-fledged Linux app with OpenOffice, Mozilla, network, sound and lots of toys rises before them without them having to type or do *anything*.

    Then they want to install a new application or, heaven forbid, a permanent install. And then they realize all the Linux rumors -are- true: it's generally a pain in the ass. I hope permanent distro makers take HUGE lesson from Knoppix, but for now, Knoppix is a tease that doesn't reflect the realities of a full-time Linux (read: permanent install) user. It shows potential, and nothing more.

  52. Re:Including non-free? QWZX by Vagary · · Score: 2

    She works on the thesis both from home and the library. Maybe she's not paying attention when the format conversion boxes pop up but for whatever reason she's shown up at either place and realised that the latest copy is in a format that can be read at only one of the locations. As a result, she either has to merge diffs or find something else to do until she can get back to a converter.

  53. Un-Freakin-Believable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always used windows, just because I've never had the time to setup, learn, and play with linux although I've always wanted to. I am now posting this in Konqueror running Knoppix. I burned the ISO, booted from the CD, and I was running linux in under 5 minutes. Linux is now officially easier to run than Windows. I'm incredibly impressed.

  54. initial concerns by AndrewR81 · · Score: 1

    knoppix sounds promising but there are a few inital questions that come to mind with regards of using it as your main OS:

    If it boots and runs off CD, does that mean I can't use my cd drive?

    If I change some settings, won't they be lost when I reboot?

    Lastly, what package manager does it use? If I'm not mistaken, knoppix is based on debian .. does apt-get work by default? (as someone who uses debian mainly because of apt, this would be great)

    I have looked through the knoppix FAQ, but didn't see answers to any of these. Although I will probably try knoppix regardless just cause it sounds so cool :)

    1. Re:initial concerns by dcuny · · Score: 3, Informative
      If it boots and runs off CD, does that mean I can't use my cd drive?

      Unfortunately, that's correct.

      If I change some settings, won't they be lost when I reboot?

      It will allow you to save some of your settings to floppy. For example, I can save my network settings. However, I have to run the network setup tool (under the Knoppix menu) to get them to work.

      Lastly, what package manager does it use?

      I think so, although you can ckeck Knoppix forum for a definitive answer. The people have been quite helpful there.

    2. Re:initial concerns by Sharth · · Score: 1

      Debian based = *.deb files. dselect / dpkg / apt-get is your package manager.

  55. You can save anything you want in Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a problem, because there is a Preferences option in Knoppix. With it you can save your configuration choices and any files of your own, or just one or the other, by saving that request on a floppy and on boot you just type "knoppix floppyconf" and everything is there. It means there is only one floppy to worry about. Your work survives. If you don't do that, there is nothing saved, including your screensavers, icon choices, background, etc. But with the Preferences option, you can save it all if you like or just some of it.

    It's truly wonderful. If you must have a Windows box because you have a pointyheaded boss, and I do, it lets you use your operating system of choice without annoying anyone in charge by doing permanent things. But it's permanent to you, if you like. Only downside is, you can't play CDs, but I don't do that when working anyway.

  56. good use at school by exism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've personally used Knoppix off and on in my C++ class at school. All the computers run Win98 along with Borland something, anti-virus, and some sort of lock down software. With everything they have on there it takes an extensive amount of time to even compile a simple program. I seem to make everyone a little jealous since I can compile any program in a fraction of a time it takes them, besides a screen/vim/gcc setup without X is much more productive then the Borland crap. On another note, when I got braver, I used parted on the knoppix cd to resize the windows partition and installed a copy of debian. I didn't install and bootloader and just use a floppy to boot it up. When the school year is over i just resize the partition back and no one will ever know. :)

    --
    ~ j campbell
    1. Re:good use at school by man_ls · · Score: 2

      I'm going to do this.

      But:

      How do you compile in Linux?

    2. Re:good use at school by burns210 · · Score: 1

      we have a very similar setup at my high school. The lockdown software is likely called Poledit, and it comes free (undocumented) in the win98 cd. if you are interested, you can easily unlock the system.

    3. Re:good use at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood why schools insist on attempting to make the computers unusable just because they forgot to purchase a multi user os...

      then again I never understood how windows could possibly be appropriate for a highschool enviroment either.

  57. Linuxin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linuxin is another Debian-based Linux live-cd with an installer (log in as user:install / pass:linuxin)

    http://linuxin.paislinux.net

  58. Re:initial concerns/two out of three answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Yes, you can't, unless you read the original story and follow instructions to make Knoppix permanent.

    2. No. You can save. There is preferences option to save or not, by using one floppy and booting up and at boot prompt type "knoppix floppyconf". Everything is then saved. There is a list of choices of what to save and you choose which settings you want to save and which you don't. You can update at will by just putting the floppy back in and saving again.

    3. I don't know. Haven't tried yet.

  59. Mandrake Control Centre in Knoppix?? by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    After reading the nicely written article, I realised it mentioned Mandrake Control Centre. Could this be how it is so good at autodetection??

    1. Re:Mandrake Control Centre in Knoppix?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its the KDE Control Centre - Dude!

  60. Re:Uhh... again-Changes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually you should be able to (assuming you have access) convert the iso to a mountable filesystem. Add or subtract what's needed (keeping total size to one cd) and converting back to a burnable iso.

  61. Can be very useful, but... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    A bootable Linux CD like Knoppix can be very handy when you are stranded out of reach of a Linux box.

    Case in point: I went away this weekend to a fairly remote part of the north Devon countryside, armed only with a Win98-powered Toshiba laptop with built-in modem (and an external modem). I hoped that I'd be able to dial up to my ISP (handy emergency ISP for those in Britain: 0845 206 6050, username totalserve, password totalserve), download the Putty ssh client and read my mail. I was expecting some maybe-important messages.

    In one of the bizarre screwups that occasionally reminds me why I normally use Linux and not Windows, I could dial up and ping things but not make HTTP connections to any host. I tried to investigate but there wasn't much I could do. Definitely a software problem (like I said, DNS and pinging were fine), and hard to investigate with only vanilla Win98 tools.

    Realizing this I remembered the Knoppix CD I had at home. If only I had brought it with me! So I telephoned home and spoke to my brother, asked him to find the CD ('what? you don't keep it in a case? won't it get scratched?' - no, CD cases are AFAICT superfluous) and post it to me. 'Stick it to a bit of card', I said, 'and post it to me first class'.

    That was on Thursday evening and I knew that the CD could not arrive until Saturday - that's today. I thought it had failed to arrive, but it eventually got here late in the morning. Sure enough the disc was stuck on to an octogon of cut-out cardboard using a single strip of masking tape across the diameter. (That's the kind of rough yellow tape that doesn't stick on very hard.)

    I eagerly peeled off the masking tape, it was a bit harder to remove than I had expected but I peeled off the tape up to the hole at the centre of the disc. Then I peeled from the centre towards the other edge - and instantly the tape ripped off and with it the silver backing of about a quarter of the CD. I'm left with just transparent plastic where the silver has peeled away. I know that CDs have insane levels of error correction, but of course it would be futile to try sticking the tape back again in roughly the same place and seeing if the CD still works. (I tried it anyway.)

    Like that story where the last man on earth's glasses get smashed when he enters the library. That's the cliche that came to mind.

    So the moral of the story is: Debian and Knoppix may be very stable and robust Linux distributions. But the CDs on which they are distributed are quite literally 'flaky'. Don't try sticking them on to things with tape!

    Epilogue - I found that the Windows installation sensibly had the original .cab and setup.exe files lying around in c:\windows\options, so I reinstalled Win98 from that. That is how I am able to post this message to Slashdot.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Can be very useful, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must be using CDR's then.

      Pressed CD's have the reflective surface imbedded in the plastic.

      I freaking hate commerical companies that distribute stuff on CDR... that's so cheasy.

    2. Re:Can be very useful, but... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I thought it was a pressed CD because it had printed writing on it. I can't complain about cheesiness because I got the disc for free at some conference.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  62. I'm not dead yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, It not dead. Just read the mailing list if you want to see how "Alive" it really is.

    They are redoing the entire file structure so that everything can be compiled from the source, and there will be no more binary files from other distros. They are also implementing a new downloadable packaging system called gar.

    I have used it for the past 3 years, and very little needs updating.

    -Bruce K.

  63. HP Omnibook 4150 by hopbine · · Score: 1

    I can run the CD based version on just about any PC EXCEPT the HP Omnibook 4150 - and thats the only reason that I cut the CD. Yes I did try all of the options.

    Still on a no-name PC it looks great.

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
    1. Re:HP Omnibook 4150 by PauloSousa · · Score: 1

      I ran Knoppix on an hp Omnibook xe4500.

      The problems I found was that the internal ethernet card was not detected and i had to specify the option "screen=1024x768" at the boot prompt!

    2. Re:HP Omnibook 4150 by hopbine · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll try that

      --
      Semper ubi sub ubi
    3. Re:HP Omnibook 4150 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same problem here.

      An earlier version knoppix [10-09-2002] seems to run (without sound though, but otherwise fine) using the noagp switch.

      The lastest knoppix version [30-10-2002] won't even run even using all the known autodetection switches.

      I've submitted a bug report. Hopefully things will be mended.

  64. How Knoppix saved me hundreds of dollars... by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 1

    One of my acquaintances had a laptop he was looking to sell, which worked out well, since I was in the market for a laptop. The only snag was that it didn't work -- it wouldn't boot or install an OS. So I told him that I would come over and take a look at it -- sure enough, it seemed to have a hard drive problem -- easy enough to tell, because the hard drive made this funny noise every time it tried to spin.

    Obviously it would have been stupid to buy the laptop at that time -- I didn't have a chance to make sure everything else was working, and didn't have a chance to demo it. So I just grabbed my Knoppix CD and popped it in. It worked perfectly the first time (of course). I got to test the whole system minus the hard drive, and run some hard drive checks while I was at it. Everything else in the computer was fine, so I told him that the hard drive was busted and that essentially disables the computer, but I could replace the hard drive.

    So he says that his conscience "wouldn't be clear" if he sold me a broken computer -- so he offered to offload it for 300 bucks. Far be it from me to argue with him (in my poorness).

    And that is how I saved around 700$ on a laptop (the 'puter usually costs around $1k on ebay).

    Cheers,
    ~Tris!

    --
    -----[0_o]-----
    We are not amused.
  65. live test by sireenmalik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To test the new computer i was buying (and getting), i took my Knoppix CD along.

    I bought the box which caused the least trouble!

    Knoppix was more than helpful :)

    --


    Voltaire: God is dead.
    God: Voltaire is dead!
  66. Floppy size and reliability by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I will hope you still read this but its a bit after this was posted

    I read all replies to my comments. It's a Slashdot messaging feature.

    Students each have a disk that they have their source code on (they write the code to the disk). We compile onto the disk and the executable remains on the disk.

    Wouldn't the temporary files created by the compiler exceed 1.4 MB, the capacity of a "high-density" 3.5 inch floppy disk? Or is one of the objectives of the course to optimize a compilation job for minimal size of intermediate files and of executable files?

    And what does the grader do when he or she receives a disk that has bad sectors on it? Floppies tend to develop them rather quickly.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Floppy size and reliability by dougmc · · Score: 2
      Wouldn't the temporary files created by the compiler exceed 1.4 MB, the capacity of a "high-density" 3.5 inch floppy disk? Or is one of the objectives of the course to optimize a compilation job for minimal size of intermediate files and of executable files?
      Knoppix (and later Redhat distributions, for that matter, don't know about other distributions) create a RAM disk equal to one half the size of your RAM. For Redhat, it's not used unless you explicitly use it (and the memory isn't actually used unless you put something on the RAM disk) but for Knoppix your /tmp and /etc directories are put into this RAM disk. So you have space for temporary files (plenty of space, if you have a decent amount of RAM.)
      And what does the grader do when he or she receives a disk that has bad sectors on it? Floppies tend to develop them rather quickly.
      Floppies suck. This is always a problem, not restricted to this one circumstance. Hopefully the students know to make more than one copy ...

      Knoppix, on the other hand, rocks.

  67. is there a way to configure it by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    i would love to use this at my school to show them the power of linux, yada yada, but might have problems hosing hard drives, etc.

    is there a way to configure it so that i can get a remote x session from my desktop in my classroom. i know i can init 3, and get it from there, but i would like to drop it in, and have it automagically get X. it would be an awesome sell.

    or is this just a case of RTFM?

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  68. Swap Space on an existing partition? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

    Knoppix mentions that the system will run faster if it can create a swap partition on the drive of the computer it's installed on.

    Why is it that swap space can't be used on an existing partition? It seems that it'd be to knoppix's advantage if it (optionally) allowed you to use an existsing FAT32/NTFS/EXT2 partition for temporary swap space while it runs.

    I mean, Windows does this and look at how great it runs!

    OK, I was just kidding with that last part, but I'd still like to know why this hasn't been done :-)

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    1. Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? by Jerf · · Score: 2

      There are two different kind of swap "spaces": Partition-based and file-based.

      File-based is what you are used to, and what Windows tends to use.

      Linux uses partition-based. It's faster, since you don't have to deal with a filesystem, and more space-efficient, same reason. However, it does mean that it completely consumes your partition and fills it with what will look like random garbage to anything trying to access it like the partition has a filesystem.

      Thus, there is technically nothing stopping you from using a windows partition as a swap partition; in fact, I once did that as a joke, on purpose. But you should be aware that you will completely and unrecoverably blow away anything residing on that partition the moment you use it. (Later I re-partitioned the disk to shrink the swap down, as using the whole Windows space as swap was too much. It was just sort of funny, the idea of Linux using Windows as a scratch space...)

    2. Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? by Peaker · · Score: 2

      Linux supports file-based swap space.

      I just read some manpages and figured out one way to do it, though I'm not sure its the "right way", because its just something I sketched up now:

      Use dd to create a swap file of the wanted size:
      dd if=/dev/zero of=SWAP-FILENAME bs=512 size=SWAP-FILE-SIZE/0.5K
      Use mkswap to convert the file to swap format:
      mkswap SWAP-FILENAME SWAP-FILE-SIZE/0.5K
      Use losetup to set up a block device that accesses the file:
      losetup /dev/loop0 SWAP-FILENAME
      Ofcourse you can use loop1..7 in case loop0 is busy.
      Use swapon to enable the file swap space:
      swapon /dev/loop0

      Congratulations, you have enabled file-based swap space!

    3. Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can do it even easier ... (one less step):

      dd if=/dev/zero of=swapfile.dat bs=1k count=x
      mkswap swapfile.dat
      swapon swapfile.dat ... that should work if you're running recent tools.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? by McKing · · Score: 1

      there are instructions on the knoppix FAQ for doing just this. mkdosswap

      --
      If only "common" sense was actually that common...
  69. Very Impressive. by Schnapple · · Score: 2
    Myself, I accidentally found Knoppix when I was looking for the UT2K3 Demo LiveCD from Gentoo. I fired it up and ran it on my system. VERY impressive. Runs like a dream, and more importantly, it does what what Windows has done all along - it detected and used everything I had. I was online with DHCP, it knew my video card, everything.

    But like I said, I had this confused for the UT2K3 disc, so I was looking for that and couldn't find it. This is when I found out what probably most "avid" PC users experienced with Windows find out, and is probably the real #1 threat to Linux on the desktop - the fact that it's all very different, and compared to Windows, difficult. I mean, with a Mac versus Windows you of course know there are differences in things like interface and file system structure, but after some work you've got it down. The way Linux uses and organizes files befuddled me, and I can suddenly see why most people are turned off by Linux - it doesn't seem worth it to learn a whole new paradigm when the one you're most comfortable with is used by 90+% of the world and (from a business standpoint) is more profitbale anyway.

    So perhaps what is needed next is a good "So you've only ever used Windows..." guide. (and if one already exists, feel free to point to it)

  70. gnome compile by urmensch · · Score: 0

    :)
    yeah yeah they are huge. but it only took me about 5hours to compile gnome2 without patying strict attention.

  71. Where the FUCK are the KDE3 debs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obligatory post each time Debian comes up on Slashdot. If more and more people post this every time, then MAYBE the Debian project leaders would pull their heads out of their asses long enough to bring sid into the modern world.

    Naah, I don't believe that one either.

    1. Re:Where the FUCK are the KDE3 debs??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your Knoppix copy. :-)

  72. Trusted computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say, this seems a far more healthy approach to 'trusted computing' than the one M$ and Intel are pushing...

  73. kppp non dialer by zogger · · Score: 1

    --serendipity. Just so happens I received a knoppix 3.1 cd. This afternoon I tried it out, loaded fine, cool. Check the menu, lotta kde apps. Tried to get online, normal external US robotics serial port modem. nada. 2.5 hours later I shut that thing off. I have yet to be able to get online with that kppp thing, read every HOWTO I could find, adjusted stomped chomped and romped everything they said to try, zip, nada, more or less useless to me without being able to surf with it.

    I know one million guys will now say they get online flawlessly, it's automagically delicious that all they do is use thought control, that it washes their car and does their laundry too,yada, yada, yada, but it's been my experience the kppp dialer just slap don't work for way too many people. I've tried it before on mandrake and on redhat, it never_dialed_one_time. I cruised around and googled, it's a common problem it appears, goto any forum where folks having trouble with it, they get told to read the same manuals that say the same 4 things to try that's it. Phooie.. too bad, too, it has a ton of apps on their, but internet connectivity is job #1 as far as I am concerned with any modern OS release. They can skip the eye candy and the 689 other apps if the net isn't there and EASILY. Keyword EASILY. this is 2002, there is zero reason to do nothing besides clik and fill in the blank and get online with the connection of your choice anymore, it just shouldn't be this weird and rely on massive tweaking.

    Gimme a GNOME based cd like this, with redhat's GUI dialer from 7.1 and 2 and I'll buy it. Yep, it ain't a purty dialer, but dadgum if finds your modem and sets it up and you hit connect and she dials out. And NOT the dialr wannabe from 8.0, I took that off my drive as well and put 7.2 back on, that sucks too.

    This run from the cd is a great concept, I am just soured on kde apps now, not even gonna bother from this experience. next installzero any kde goes on my machine. Must have a good ten or 12 hours total trying to make kppp work total on different distros, that's enough, I got something that works and spend my time doing what I want to do. Not a coder here, so that's that..

  74. The Old one was better by hhawk · · Score: 1

    I have been running Win2000 PRO. The one MS doesn't recommend for "consumers." (Consumers should use ME or XP).

    It has been very stable on 3 machines over 2 years; I had NO crashes; on par with my NetBSD and other 'Nix boxes.

    I just got a new machine that had XP Home Pre-Installed, and I've given it a test drive for the last 3 weeks.

    Guess what, at least 1 crash a DAY! No wonder they didn't want consumers using 2000; Going from 98 or ME -> XP would be feel good for users; going from Win2000 -> XP wouldn't feel good!!

    At least I have options if I need an OS that doesn't crash out; it's too bad MS hasn't given consumers that same choice!!

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  75. Every PC an Idrema! by runlvl0 · · Score: 2


    I was looking for the UT2K3 Demo LiveCD from Gentoo. I fired it up and ran it on my system. VERY impressive. Runs like a dream, and more importantly, it does what what Windows has done all along - it detected and used everything I had. I was online with DHCP, it knew my video card, everything.

    Maybe I'm just a 'tard who didn't think of this earlier, but what a boon for game developers! "HERE you go! Just like your PS2, dump this CD (with live Linux filesystem & game of the week) in your PC and hit the power button..." Now, a REAL reason for game developers to develop for Linux! Control of the *PC* platform - no DLLs, MSIs, or DX crap to work with - THIS is the environment that your customer gets, every PC an Idrema with a live filesystem + app on CD. On the surface, it seems like a great leap back, but it appears that the benefits outweigh the fs overhead on each CD.

    What a fsking GREAT idea! (Or am I missing something? Besides hardware, I mean, this is supposed to be somewhat tolerant in that regard, anyway.) It seems to work for Gentoo and Epic Games, anyway.

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
    1. Re:Every PC an Idrema! by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Interesting
      well not to make you sound any less the genius, but you're not the first person to think of this, at least not that's posted it on Slashdot anyway.

      The idea is not without merit, and it would solve some problems but introduce others.

      To run a game this way would mean that the end user can't do anything while they're playing the game. No e-mail checking, no downloading with Kazaa, no way to quickly get back to your desktop (short of rebooting), etc. The notion of multitasking is gone. In may ways this would be like the good/bad old days of rebooting just to play DOOM.

      It also means saying goodbye to DirectX. Since we already have UT2K3 and all things Quake running on Linux already it's far from impossible, but many developers don't want to kiss DirectX goodbye. While Epic and id are two companies that favor cross-platform compatibility over ease of tools, many other developers think otherwise (witness Neverwinter Nights).

      Back in the pre-DirectX days the developer would have to code for every concievable piece of hardware. DirectX shifted most of this burden to the hardware makers, but to do this LiveCD route would make the developer have to do it again. Not sure how big a problem this would be nowadays (since it might not be such a big deal to just throw every driver in history onto the disc) but it might be another Big Hassle for the developers.

      Finally, this means that game developers would have to either become geniuses on making bootable Linux distros in addition to games, or else get cozy with Linux distro makers. Heck, this might even cause political distro wars as to whom gets used. Plus this probably won't do anything to further Linux on the desktop (if that's your bag).

      But I can see this as an interesting option to do in addition to the install and run in Windows/Linux option. Kinda reminds me of when Windows wasn't popular yet and Adobe Photoshop 1.0 (I think) came out with a Windows Runtime.

  76. One Thing... by andrew_mike · · Score: 1

    Knoppix doesn't recognize my Audigy card. Is there a driver for this on the CD or am I SOL?

    --
    Being a smartass is a much better thing than being the alternative.
    1. Re:One Thing... by man2525 · · Score: 0

      It found a driver for my Extigy. Not sure if this helps.

  77. Knoppix rocks! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    I just discovered Knoppix a few weeks ago, and I must say I'm impressed. I've never had a Linux distribution install so cleanly and easily, self-configuring everything. So many apps are included, and the KDE desktop looks great. Other distributions have a long way to go to catch up to this piece of work, which is even more impressive considering it runs live from a CD. Knoppix is the perfect introdution to Linux for someone who just wants to check it out, but you can get real work done with it too. I've been using it to run my favorite Linux apps on my Windows laptop. It's been really handy. Now I want to give a copy to all my friends who have been wondering about Linux. Great work!

    1. Re:Knoppix rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knoppix ist the best Debian based distribution from Germany. It is really great for educational purpose.

  78. It's got style, personality, charm... (-: by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    Kernel painc: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!

    Haven't had one of those for aaaaages (and always on dodgy hardware). But you've got to admit, it is a lot more exciting (and informative, even the dumbest user knows the system has a problem!) than a nicely centered F0AD:4C696C6C message.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:It's got style, personality, charm... (-: by cscx · · Score: 2

      I'm partial to the STOP error myself ... "A problem has been detected and Windows has been
      shut down to prevent damage to your computer."

      Damage? Like, what? Would my hard disk have caught fire had it not shut down?

  79. Funny you should say that -- Cool Linux CD by ptbrown · · Score: 2

    Another auto-configuring live CD is Cool Linux CD. It's based on Red Hat 7.3 with XFS support, uses IceWM, and contains OpenOffice, Mozilla, Opera, Sylpheed, Pan, Xchat, Licq, mplayer, xmms, and VMWare.


    I wouldn't just hand it to a Windows user and say "try this". The hardware auto-detection works well enough, but you still have to login and start X manually. Since it uses RH's configurator, it will initially display the standard RH desktop while setting up then it restarts into IceWM. But once you've got it running and explain that there is no "Explorer" or "Start" button, it's dead simple.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
  80. And Konqueror by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Add its path to the plugins search list, click refresh, done.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  81. Problem booting Knoppix with PCMCIA Nic by IVI4573R · · Score: 1

    I got Knoppix so that I didn't have to use hd space on my laptop. It works fine wtihout the nic, everthing is perfect. So I try booting with the nic in and blam, it freezes after detecting it. It detects it as the right model but when it tryes setting up eth0 it freezes up. Also does it if I put the nic in while alread booted up, text and gui. the nic is a D-Link DFE-670TXD Fast Etiernet 10/100 PCMCIA card. Any ideas?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:Problem booting Knoppix with PCMCIA Nic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW try Knoppix 2.2 if 3.1 barfs, or SuSE 8.0 Live Eval. I've had one or the other boot where the others would hang, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to explain why they do it.

  82. NZ customer? by Derf+the · · Score: 1

    What month, if it is still on the news stands I'd be interested in buying a copy. Win98 user looking for 1st step to the far side. The other kind of !st Post

    --
    No. You can't look at my Sig; it's mine, and I'm not showing you.
  83. kppp frustrations by timothy · · Score: 1

    I can't guarantee that this is the problem you're having, but the problem I got stuck on when first trying kppp was that I didn't explore enough of the tabs in the setup utility. Specifically (and please don't be mad if you have, it's just a thought), have you gone through the several choices for modem location, trying to dial after selecting each one? Like a lost object, always in the last place you look ...

    Since I've misplaced the power cord for my ThinkPad, this is being typed instead on my iBook, or I'd look at the kppp configuration better and try to remember the other hangups I had with it, but now it's been a while since I've had to configure kppp other than changing the phone number :)

    kppp is really a nice dialer once you have it going.

    Tim

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:kppp frustrations by zogger · · Score: 1

      --thanks for the reply. yes i tried it on every tty place in the menu, I tried the different flow control settings, authentication, yada yada, went through the entire thing and tweaked and changed as many different variables as possible. Like I said I am missing something crucial, but not able to find the info I need on any of the info or man pages for the device. I searched google at various forums and I know now I'm not alone,m it's a common problem. some folks rigs it seems to work admirably, others it's just useless. I honestly don't know what else to try with the thing. When I first tried mandrake I had the same problem, posted on their forum, got zero help. It's that kppp thing, ain't no using it easy. thewvdial on redhat with their older version GUI front end works flawlessly, finds the exact modem, sets it up, it dials connects hand shakes done. Tkaes two minutes tops. KPPP I got over ten hours minimum into, that's enough, I have a version of linux that works. And what's annoying now is that redhat "improved" it in 8.0, it isn't the same, will only look for the modem once. It finds my modem with kudzu on boot, then insists on installing a "standard modem" that refuses to dial. Phooie. And now it DON'T work for me, so like I said I reinstalled 7.2 and started on updates again. No fun on rural dialup modem. Too bad on the knoppix I was REALLY looking forward to using it else I wouldn't have bought it, same with the new redhat, but it's as useful to me as any other AOL coaster set now, waste of money to buy them. Thousands of apps with rank useless "automagical" wizard account set up dialers.

      Now I could understand it if I had some extreme weird hardware, but gimme a break a name brand ibm pc and a us robotics external serial port modem is about as standard and normal as you can get, and it worked swell with 7.1 and 7.2, so whatever they changed thanks for nuthin. Knoppix, oh well, maybe there will be an actual manual for it some time. I tried at KDE looked at the KPPP pages, no help for whatever it is. I know it's one tiny thing, but DANG I went up and down the list of tweaks over and over again thinking I was missing something and I sure as heck can't find it.

      and I bet serious folding loot I'm not the only one with this problem, deal is, any n00b you hand that thing to, to 99% of people an operating system and OS means "internet", all work should cease on those things until "the internet" works twice as good as mac or windows or at least on par, and it sure don't. Score so far for me with linux distros is only 50% work to get online, sort of dismal considering use of mac and windows since mid 90's when I started using the net has always run 100% online when it was asked to do this small thing. To be fair windows has hosed connections for me with those lamer irq settings conflicts (wazzup with that stupidity anyway?), pretty bogus coming from classic mac background, pick modem from list open ppp window, put in phone number and add in IP for the isp, hit dial, it's always worked with OT/PPP, never failed one time.

      BUT, don't kde got one thousand cute apps with K in the name!

      Not impressed, they can have 999 of them "K" apps back for a dialer that works as advertised. I guess I stick with this old redhat for awhile. I don't MIND learning command line at MY PACE, but if ya can't get online at all it makes it sorta hard to go google for answers don't it?

      Thanks again and No I ain't mad at you whatsoever. I can readily see a lot of folks successful with it, oh well, that's reality. this makes 4 different attemtps with kppp, every time I try fresh i think this time I'll see what I have been missing, but after yesterday i realise I'm not, there's some serious bug that affects my connection, it's a combo that for some reason is odd but happens. therer ain't nuthin left to tweak, but ya need to be online to submit them buig buddy things, catch 22. I'm just not gonna fool with it until they release a version that I can see from reports works much better and not just have prettier GUI.

    2. Re:kppp frustrations by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      Off hand, I'd say try a couple of things:

      Look for the proper serial port:
      dmesg |grep tty
      It's going to be one of those, probably /dev/ttyS0
      or S1. Make sure your "Modem device" is set appropriately.

      Try 57600 first, and then click "Modem" and "Terminal". After the terminal comes up, type "atz" to try to reset the modem. If this works (you'll get the OK reply) great, you're talking to the modem, otherwise try a different serial port and potentially speed.

      One thing-- you DO have permission to access that serial port, correct? If in doubt, try running kppp as root until you fix the permissions/group membership so you can do it as a user.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
  84. CD is OVERBURN by Danathar · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are interested in burning this puppy to a CDROM. The ISO is 698MB, so if you do not have a CDROM that will do Overburn you will NOT be able to make the CD from the ISO

    1. Re:CD is OVERBURN by IVI4573R · · Score: 1

      Most CD-Rs now a days are 700MB, and for the most part they can be overburned to about 712MB or a little more. If you get a 700MB disc you should be fine unless you have an old ass burner that will only burn the old 650MB discs.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  85. Can it boot of a USB key? by slantyyz · · Score: 1

    I don't know where the state of bootable USB keys is at, but if you could boot it off a USB key (with 256MB or 512MB) that would be cool. Yeah, the older machines don't allow you to do that, but can you imagine how cool it would be? And you'd be able to write data as well.

  86. Does it really fit on a CD-R? by jejones · · Score: 2

    I just grabbed the latest .iso, and it's not wanting to fit on the CD-R. (I figured those have a standard size...) Has anyone actually managed to burn one of those on a CD-R, and if so, how?

    1. Re:Does it really fit on a CD-R? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to use a 700MB (80 min) CD-R.

  87. cd-rw? by timothy · · Score: 1

    I know it costs more (esp. looking at purchases vs. existing, "free" floppy drives), but CD writers are no longer expensive, and make a much more durable medium for temporary storage. External USB CD-RWs can be had for $75, less if you look around ...

    With just a couple of these in a classsroom (annoying as it would be to have to hook them up much), you could have something nicer than floppies .... floppies = annoyance and data loss.

    If you should try this, I suggest putting a small USB extension on end of the cable towards the computer, and plugging into each machine only the end of the extension, to reduce wear and tear.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:cd-rw? by dougmc · · Score: 2
      Problem is that CDR's are not as easy to write to as floppies. Yes, packet writing software can make it almost seem like a floppy, but there's still issues. Zip disks would be better, but they 're not perfect either (especially since they're not found on most PC's.)

      For the classroom that was using Knoppix, the best bet is probably to have the students mount a NFS or SMB share, and put their programs there. Either that, ftp them to a file server, or upload them with a browser.

      NFS isn't ideal, because every student has the same UID, and therefore could read what other students turned in. The best bet is probably to make a web page that requests your name and lets you upload (turn in) your program, and just hit it with Mozilla (already on Knoppix.)

  88. Stop! I might damage myself! by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Funny
    Damage? Like, what? Would my hard disk have caught fire had it not shut down?

    Perhaps a Windows install might have succeeded. Is that damaging enough for you? (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  89. Have you tried the kde website/ftp server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  90. Why EPS in documents? by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

    EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) is a vector graphics format: PNG, JPEG and BMP are pixel-based (raster?). They *aren't* the same!

    You would have to be pretty stupid to start saving graphs and so forth in PNG/JPEG in a a document.

    --
    http://blog.grcm.net/
    1. Re:Why EPS in documents? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) is a vector graphics format: PNG, JPEG and BMP are pixel-based (raster?). They *aren't* the same!

      No, but for a print document at a sufficiently high resoution, they might as well be. Except that the raster-based ones will work easier.

      You would have to be pretty stupid to start saving graphs and so forth in PNG/JPEG in a a document.

      No stupider than someone using EPS to do the same thing.

      Office has native graphing features, that translate fairly well across versions--and if you're in doubt, you can just make a new one. And you can even update it natively!

    2. Re:Why EPS in documents? by t · · Score: 1
      My god you are confused. The printing world lives and dies by postscript. EPS has an infinite resolution. You can print it on your shitty inkjet or go to a print house and get poster size versions. Do you even know anything about dpi/lpi/etc...? I've been using latex for my papers for the last 10 years, during most of that time I have used eps for my figures because it always works beautifully.

      And note that my figures do not "translate fairly well across versions", they translate perfectly. Yes PERFECTLY. I started on a mac eons ago, and currently use a linux box, but I have typeset my papers on windows also. Everytime I did that, they worked perfectly without having to import/convert/update/fix.

      It's sad that people like you turn to windows to fix problems that have been fixed for over a decade.

    3. Re:Why EPS in documents? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      My god you are confused. The printing world lives and dies by postscript. EPS has an infinite resolution. You can print it on your shitty inkjet or go to a print house and get poster size versions. Do you even know anything about dpi/lpi/etc...? I've been using latex for my papers for the last 10 years, during most of that time I have used eps for my figures because it always works beautifully.

      Good for you. But making a thesis is not part of the printing industry any more than some guy writing an office macro is part of the software industry.

      If someone already has office, has to have charts, and is using office already, they might as well use office to make their charts.

      Failing that, if they must import the charts graphically, and they're suffering lag times in the software, the first thing to do is try a different graphic format. Open the EPS in whatever you made it in, save it as a format meant for inclusion in an electronic document, and watch your problem go away.

      If you need infinite resolution, you can always go back to the original.

      And note that my figures do not "translate fairly well across versions", they translate perfectly. Yes PERFECTLY. I started on a mac eons ago, and currently use a linux box, but I have typeset my papers on windows also. Everytime I did that, they worked perfectly without having to import/convert/update/fix.

      Wait--you're claiming that your complex document you made on an "ancient" Mac, which includes charts and text and all that, can be opened by both Linux and Windows, and printed out to look exactly like it did on your old ancient system? You can print it out on a mac, print it out on windows, and print it out on Linux, overlap the three, and not see any inconsistencies?

      If so, Goody for you. If not, stop using absolutes when you don't mean them.

      Going from a working Office file to a new version of office is seamless--I routinely open files created in older versions and the changes are simply not noticeable (I'm only saying that because I'm not willing to make a claim of "perfection" that I have neither the time or the inclination to back up.)

      But if you're patching together badly written files from a different program in a new program, it's inevitable that you're going to have to fix some things. Them's the breaks.

      It's sad that people like you turn to windows to fix problems that have been fixed for over a decade.

      You say that like the default state isn't windows. Once one is allready using a system, it's proper form to learn how to fix problems using that system. Throwing out the system because you don't understand it is foolish--and underdogs like Latex and Linux can't afford to do that, because then people will stick with Office and Windows, because they know them.

    4. Re:Why EPS in documents? by t · · Score: 1
      The problem of "suffering lag times" was fixed long ago. Much of the software that produces eps files also produce a low-res image for the purposes of quick viewing. (i.e., the benefits of a png/jpg without sacrificing the benefits of the eps format) Like I said, those problems have been fixed, it is not my fault that Microsoft decided that they didn't want to use the standard interchange format for graphics.
      Wait--you're claiming that your complex document you made on an "ancient" Mac, which includes charts and text and all that, can be opened by both Linux and Windows, and printed out to look exactly like it did on your old ancient system? You can print it out on a mac, print it out on windows, and print it out on Linux, overlap the three, and not see any inconsistencies?
      Yes I mean exactly that. You obviously know nothing about what TeX really is or what it set out to accomplish. There can be differences, but such differences are not necessary or by accident, rather they were by desire. For instance, Knuth updated some of the fonts about a decade ago to fix some deficiencies. For instance the horizontal arrows were made thicker so that they would show up when xeroxed. See here for more detail. Note that even these so called "dramatic" changes do not affect the overall document, only the indivdual characters involved are affected. I can understand that if your entire world is MS Office that such a system is unfathomable to you.

      Going from a working Office file to a new version of office is seamless
      You do realize that the phrase "seamless" is an absolute don't you? One of the definitions of "seamless" is "perfectly consistent and coherent".

      btw, Linux doesn't really have anything to do with Latex. I've been using Latex since before most people (including me) knew Linux existed. Many of the software environments for latex also work better on Windows than they do on Linux. The best environment is probably on the MacOS, I forgot the name of it.

      And finally, discarding the best solution for the problem simply because the current system exists can also be quite foolish.

    5. Re:Why EPS in documents? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Many of the software environments for latex also work better on Windows than they do on Linux. The best environment is probably on the MacOS, I forgot the name of it.

      And finally, discarding the best solution for the problem simply because the current system exists can also be quite foolish.


      Very well then.

      Point me in the direction of a windows-native latex program, with an on-the-fly spellchecker, and I'll give it a whirl. ;)

    6. Re:Why EPS in documents? by t · · Score: 1

      I don't use windows. miktex maybe? But judging from you response, you still have no idea what latex is. Latex is not wysiwyg.

    7. Re:Why EPS in documents? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what Latex is. I've considered giving it a trial run, but the UI's I've seen are about as comfortable as Mozilla's HTML editor--less, actually. (Properly done HTML is a WYGIWYM system, just like Latex; its' just meant for a differnet final medium.)

      Anyway, as for WYSIWYG... Unless you do your typesetting online, WYSWIG is a preference, not a requirement. The important thing is how it comes out in the end... and how easy it is to get that final result.

      I'm in the lucky position where I don't need to bother about the final end right now, so I can play around with things like Latex--but as I've been using an on-the-fly spellchecker for almost seven years now, and as there's no technical reason why a Latex editor can't have one, I think I'll simply hold out on that little experiment until I can find the right tool.

  91. Is this an easy way to install Debian? by isdnip · · Score: 2

    I'm probably late to post in this thread, but if anybody knowledgeable reads this...

    I tried Knoppix to see if Linux would work on an old laptop that I recently picked up. Very nice, though it didn't ge the sound going. But the hard drive install is intriguing. It's based on Debian, which is famously hard to install. Once Debian's in place, though, it's said to be very easy to maintain, using apt-get. I use Mandrake now and while urpmi is supposed to help, it's no apt-get! Indeed it still leaves me in dependency hell more often than not, when trying to install a package not included in the base distro.

    So would Knoppix on HD be a nice shortcut to a working Debian system? If so, it could be a killer tool for the Debian world, and I could try it on my "spare" partition (where I last had Gentoo, a nice hack in is own right but talk about hard to install...).

  92. So close... by macshit · · Score: 2

    This thing is fantastic. It's amazing the things you can fit into 50 megs - basically every command line program you'd want except Emacs and man pages, plus minimal X support.

    Geez, only one more zero and they could have fit in emacs too....

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  93. Knoptic reads but not writes NTFS fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note: not only Knoptic but all linux distro, it is still not supported to write to NTFS file systems.
    http://go.to/mamamia

    1. Re:Knoptic reads but not writes NTFS fine by jbolden · · Score: 2

      There are patches that allow write but they are supposedly quite flakey. Anyway the question was being asked in a distribution specific way and so I answered that way though I agree this is more of a kernel thing than a distribution thing.

  94. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am using Knoppix right now.
    It found my both my obscure NIC card and obscure sound card. Browsing NTFS works great. (I sure hope it is not writing to NTFS!)

    It's amazing - you can even turn a computer without a hard drive into a dedicated web browsing node.

    I am still trying to figure out how to get better than 1024x768 resolution on my NVidia card under Knoppix. Is it possible?

  95. On USB-keychain? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

    Can you make this run from/boot from a USB-keychain (those that has uptowards 1 GB of flash-RAM)? Okay, the ones I've seen are USB 1.1, so it's slow as hell, but at least you'd be able to have easy writable storage, and once you had it running you could store your preferences.

    And why yes, I did submit this as an "ask slashdot" with a lot more detail, but it was rejected :-/

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  96. This could be very useful in pre-hardware sales! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever wanted to buy a laptop, but were afraid to dump out 1500$+ dollars becuase you were in doubt that all the features would be supported in linux? If you aren't going to install anything on the equipment, I doubt you'll hear an objection from your compusa, bestbuy, etc.. when you aren't going to install anything, yet able to demo it there in the store.

    I wonder why the handhelds don't have a mini-cdrom drive in them, hmm...

    Those handhelds sure would be inexpensive if someone decided to make the main drive a mini-cdrom drive, eh? Heck, you could have one mini cdrw and one mini cdrom, ie.. one to boot off of, and one to store your data, hecky, it sure would beat the sh*t out of the flash/microdrive combo!

    Do you ever get the feeling these electronic/computer makers just want to stick it up your arz; and make it the most expensive device possible? They remind me alot of congress, BURP!!!!!!!!!!

  97. Re:Deja-BSD - and more by shellbeach · · Score: 1
    Actually, when I demonstrated Knoppix the windows users here (it's a science reseach lab, and most of them have PhDs, so we're not talking entirely stupid people here) gave the following comments:

    So ... why is all this stuff free?

    They like starting every program name with "g" or "k", don't they?

    How come it can't do ... [insert various task here, such as instantly browse our network, etc]

    Don't get me wrong, my jaw was on the floor when I saw how fast it started up, autoconfigured everything. etc ... BUT ... it does have a number of problems, and it's far from perfect (try desktop=gnome, for eg)

  98. Re:Deja-BSD - and more by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    That will change when they re-write the installer. Have you checked the board(s) lately?

    http://www.linuxtag.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?boa rd =knoppix-en
    .

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??