Slashdot Mirror


System Optimization Guide for Gamers

Mr.Tweak writes "We have written a comprehensive System Optimization Guide targeted toward Gamers looking to get the most out of their systems for all of today's latest highly demanding PC games. Take a few minutes of your life and read this System Optimization Guide for Gamers where TweakTown promises you will find something of use which will have you gaming at full speed in no time."

287 comments

  1. Pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Now we need a system optimization guide for pr0n. Get the most out of it!

    1. Re:Pr0n by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now we need a system optimization guide for pr0n. Get the most out of it!

      They're called "Girlfriends".

      Ah, sorry, forgot where I was for a second there...

    2. Re:Pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a search for pornzilla on google.

  2. Nothing new by thealpha · · Score: 0

    Was looking for the Holy Grail, but it wasn't there. It is a nice all in one spot to find everything about tweaking a box though.

  3. Their Next Guide by kammat · · Score: 3, Funny

    How to Tweak your Webserver to Survive a Slashdotting

    1. Re:Their Next Guide by Card · · Score: 0

      Here is an analysis of the Slashdot effect and how to prepare for it.

    2. Re:Their Next Guide by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Prepare for it? Don't you mean "How to hold back the tears when your 233mhz personal webserver finally gets something worthy of ./ on it and gets melted in the ./ing" ? :-d

      PS. I'm still waiting for my first ./ing

    3. Re:Their Next Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heres your dot slash! ./././././

    4. Re:Their Next Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, ya'll will be happy to know that TT will be boosting their servers to 3 total. One will be a bad ass XEON system using one of ABIT's(yes, ABIT's) bad ass server mobos. We are also hoping to load the beast with plenty o'memory. This simply our main database server. Keep an eye on TT to see the changes.

  4. Had to be said... by mackstann · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They oughtta think about applying these optimizations to their webserver!

    Seriously though, this story JUST appeared and still their website is taking a minute so far to load..

    1. Re:Had to be said... by RogueProtoKol · · Score: 1

      more than 3 minutes to load so far, this has the be the fastast ever slashdot, there were no comments when i first went to the link, and i still haven't seen it! anyone here actually read it and can highlight some good points?

    2. Re:Had to be said... by dr.Flake · · Score: 2

      Now ten minutes after posting,

      "server could not be found" ....

      How does one use google-cahce to find a site?

      too bad.

      --
      Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  5. Screw tweaking by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to spend days tweaking my settings, getting the latest drivers, etc... SCREW IT!

    The only way to really get performance is to get good hardware. No amount of tweaking your old Geforce 2mx is going to get the same performance as a Geforce 4 ti4200 even with the worst system settings... Prove me wrong people!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Screw tweaking by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Delete your pagefile. Have every possible service running.
      Now, run your game while doing a continuous virus scan.
      I can guarantee that your "fast" system will run much slower then an optimized "slower" system
      On the plus side, it is a great way to increase your frustration level.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    2. Re:Screw tweaking by mczak · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is quite obvious - how much faster is a GeForce4 ti4200 than a GeForce 2mx? 4-5 times? But, I'd bet a reasonably tweaked system with a GeForce4 ti4200 beats a wrongly configured system (e.g. no VIA drivers installed etc.) with a GeForce4 ti4600 (all other components identical) any day.
      There are also other advantages to tweaking than pure performance. For instance, if you don't switch on dma mode for your dvd-drive (AFAIK, WXP is the first Windows to do it automatically), chances are dvds will stutter when you play them, no matter what hardware you have.

      mczak

    3. Re:Screw tweaking by scalis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not proving you wrong since you are absolutely correct.
      However, replacing a GeForce2 card with a GeForce4 card might not give you the perfomance boost you might think.
      If you take a closer look at the systems most providers of "test results" use to actually test the hardware on, you wont find your average AMD T-bird 1000.
      Most of theese new gfx cards from ATI and Nvidia more or less require enough raw CPU and memory power to be able to provide the GFX card with enough data to actually make a difference.
      I am not saying you are wrong, just that you should think about what harware upgrades you do and that they might not provide anything in terms of increased performance.

      --

      True ravers don't need drugs
    4. Re:Screw tweaking by slow_flight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, how long have you been married? It's hard to justify the cost of constantly upgrading to the latest and greatest to "she who must be obeyed" when she knows damn well that "all you do is plays games on that thing." She really doesn't care that I'm limited to a 7 car field in Grand Prix Legends, and that I automatically drop to the back of the field on every start since my old PIII can't hack it.

      It is routine for me to start with a fresh re-boot, followed by killing just about every process running just to get barely adequate performance. The one thing consoles have going for them is that you don't have to dick around like this to get them to work.

      --

      Karma: Professionally Doomed (mostly affected by inability to keep opinions to self)
    5. Re:Screw tweaking by Tingler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Awesome reply!

      Are you sure you are not a (L)user I support?

    6. Re:Screw tweaking by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would hardly call the inverse of this as "tweaking".

    7. Re:Screw tweaking by appleprophet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tweaking isn't a replacement for buying new hardware, you're right. However, that's not the point. People tweak to optimize their existing hardware - to make their current hardware run as fast as possible. While a tweaked out GeForce2 MX will always be slower than a GeForce4 Ti, a tweaked GeForce2 MX will (hopefully) be faster than an untweaked one.

      Take overclocking, for example. It's not uncommon to hear stories about Northwood 1.6 GHz P4 being overclocked to speeds around 2.4 GHz. That is quite a signficant performance boost. While a brand new 3 GHz P4 will obviously be faster, the point is that compared to the original system without any tweaks, you get more speed without spending additional money.

    8. Re:Screw tweaking by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you sure you are not a (L)user I support?

      Heh, quite sure. This is actually culled from real-life experience from someone I did have to support. The woman is question did a lot of her own "fixes". Like deleting the pagefile (to increase disk space), running virus scan non-stop (can't be too careful, can we?) and starting up every service she could (what if I need it?)
      I forgot to mention that, according to this person, you should compress all files on your C drive (smaller files run faster)
      It took me a while to get her system working normally again, and it took even longer to explain why all of her "tweaking" was a bad thing.
      An idiot with a little bit of knowledge and admin rights to the local machine is a dangerous thing.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    9. Re:Screw tweaking by Ironica · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I know what you mean... my husband just doesn't like it when I go out and spend money on hardware. "You've got a perfectly good GeForce 3 and it's barely a year old! Why the heck do you need a GF4?"

      Just do what he did... find a girl who likes computers. ;-) (Too late for you, but for those playing along at home...)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    10. Re:Screw tweaking by SnowDeath · · Score: 1

      Actually, its only about 3.61 times faster than a GeForce2 mx.

      Tom's hardware VGA chart

    11. Re:Screw tweaking by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If you're running NT you can't delete your page file. Or more to the point it's supposed to recreate it automatically. And if you turn off paging or lose a non-system disk with a paging file on it, your system won't boot. I got the proof of that the hard way by changing some drive letters with partition magic. Luckily I still had the drive I had copied my system to so I was able to set them back to something sensible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Screw tweaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An idiot with a little bit of knowledge and admin rights to the local machine is a dangerous thing.

      Very true. Just ask Microsoft's Palladium department.

    13. Re:Screw tweaking by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I forgot to mention that, according to this person, you should compress all files on your C drive (smaller files run faster)

      I've been curious about this for a while with the on-the-fly compression that NTFS has. Since disk access is so damn slow, and processor speeds are blazingly fast nowadays, is it possible that by decreasing the file size, you could actually be increasing performance?

      Since it only has to load a certain percentage of the initial file size, then very quickly decompress it into memory, it seems logical, but something about it just doesn't seem right... Obviously it wouldn't work well with some files (already compressed files, etc), but what about files that you get a 50% reduction out of?

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    14. Re:Screw tweaking by Psmylie · · Score: 2

      Good to know about not booting if you remove the pagefile drive, thanks. We actually have a few machines here with the pagefile on a seperate drive or partition (don't look at me, I didn't set them up that way).
      You actually can have no pagefile in NT, but only by setting the min/max size to zero. It'll throw an error msg at you every time you log in, though.

      I'm sure none of us are still running NT, though, right? We all work for nice corporations who realize that we should have up to date software and hardware, right? Sure, and maybe purple flying pigs will shoot outta my butt.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    15. Re:Screw tweaking by Psmylie · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that any advantage you would have by loading a smaller file would get eaten up pretty quickly by the extra step of decompressing it, especially if the OS decides to use the swap file to decompress it. I'm probably not the best one to ask, though, seeing as I have no idea for sure, and I'm just talking out of my butt right now.
      In the case mentioned above, all I can tell you is that by compressing her whole C drive, her system ran so sloooowly that might have been faster to just reinstall the OS (NT4.0, in this case) instead of decompressing everything.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    16. Re:Screw tweaking by NoInfo · · Score: 2

      Heavens, no-- if you find a girl who likes computers and it doesn't work out, guess what she'll want custody of. The kid? Ha!

      Say good bye to that beautiful new P4 3.0Ghz, 2.0GB RAM, Radeon 9700 Pro machine.

      There's only one greater pain than to have 'truly loved and truly lost'. And that's to have 'truly fragged and truly lost'.

    17. Re:Screw tweaking by Random+Frequency · · Score: 2, Interesting

      higher throughput off the disk for reading the files == lower latency.

      Its great if you're doing map development for quake. Compress all the files, cuts your load time by 3/4.

      If you don't change the file (often) its a speed boost.

    18. Re:Screw tweaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, if you dont put FSAA and dont use high res, the 4x performance increase will look more like 40-50% faster... Don't get blinded by the raw performance in 1600x1200 if you dont go that far

      -Marton

    19. Re:Screw tweaking by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

      Actually, Windows 2000 Pro doesn't do this either. It's incredibly annoying the way the OS handles this error condition, too.

      First you log in, the Windows tells you there is no swap file and tells you how to create a swap file. Then immediately upon clearing the error message, you get logged out, so you can't set up a swap file.

      I discovered this when trying to use ghost to migrate my filesystem from a 23GB Maxtor drive to a 60 GB WD, and not running sysprep beforehand. I guess ghost didn't copy over the swap file when it copied everything else.

      It's SO annoying that Windows can't just create a swap file on its own to recover from it being deleted. It can re-create the #@)*$# Outlook Express files every time I delete them, and it shouldn't even need virtual memory in order to run, but yet it can't recover from having the swapfile deleted.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    20. Re:Screw tweaking by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

      I fragged your wife... she wasn't even that good, really.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    21. Re:Screw tweaking by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Ahem.
      A computer is the sum of it's parts.
      If you have a bad mboard, cheap, leaky RAM, a 1000RPM MFM(;))HD that is 98.3% fragmented, A Cyrix processor, A sound card that was gotten from a trade representative that isn't quite like anything else......
      You graphic card will make amazingly little difference.
      Of course, on identical systems, with differing Vids, you will get a difference in some graphics performance benchmarks.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    22. Re:Screw tweaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't always true. Last month I had the displeasure of working on a Compaq 1.4ghz. This thing was a Wal-mart special. You'd think a 1.4ghz would be much faster than my own 600mhz machine. But it wasn't- not by a long shot. It was slower than hell. I was tempted to format the damn HDD, but I knew the owner would kill me if I did that.

      There are plenty of poor souls out in the world chugging along on systems so poorly configured that a computer three times as old with optimum settings is faster.

    23. Re:Screw tweaking by racermd · · Score: 1

      To summarize:

      "Any computer (or any other type of I/O system) is only as fast as it's slowest part."

      It's a modification of an old addage that a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link ("goodbye!"). Since the speed of a computer can change over time due to dynamic loads on various subsystems (CPU, memory, disk, etc.), any one of the core subsystems can bring the whole system to a grinding halt and preventing any other data from being processed.

      In this case, I'd rather have a properly config'd system with a 450MHz processor and a GeForce2MX than a poorly config'd system with a 2.2GHz processor and a GeForce4 4600.

      What am I thinking?! Gimme the better hardware. I'll reconfig it myself... [drools]

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    24. Re:Screw tweaking by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention that, according to this person, you should compress all files on your C drive (smaller files run faster)

      Its actually not an implausible idea. Data transfer operations from disk are a magnitude slower than from memory. With CPU performance outstripping disk performance in improvement, there may come a time where the CPU & memory operations to decompress data from disk would be result in more data retrieved in less time than for uncompressed data to be retrieved from disk. Mind you, I don't believe that is currently the case with the current consumer technology, and there is no benefit from extracting data already compressed (like images).

      I do suspect that when this scheme first came out (in the MSDOS era), that some machines did not suffer a serious performance hit, because disks performance was THAT slow.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  6. boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the whole reason most of us got into coding was to squeeze more outta the machine, dusnt this article belong on newbie.org ?

  7. ohh yea!!! by sHu_pAc · · Score: 1, Funny

    slashdot effect!!!!! What I really need is a guide that tells me were i can find a ATI 9700 pro for lke $100. Now that would really be worth reading, :)

  8. why tweak when you can cheat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just install aimbots, speedbots, and wallhacks. You will outperform anyone with a faster pc, faster connection, better video card...

    1. Re:why tweak when you can cheat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to think that cheating will let you beat players of skill.

      Oh, how entertaining.

  9. Is it really worth it? by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note : Due to something respected Doctors and Scientists are calling "The Slashdot Effect" I have not read the article.

    Honestly. Do I get my membership to "Club Nerd" revoked because I'm not interested in water cooling my PC, airbrushing the case, or fitting ass-loads of neons?

    When I do game (which is a little rare now-a-days) I would rather just have decent hardware, and not have to worry about over-clocking, heat sinking, over-binging on jolt, and the associated woman repelling habits.

    Is there something wrong with me?...

    1. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is there something wrong with me?...

      Yes. You apparently have a job and are willing to pay for convenience, both of which are anathema to good slashbots.

    2. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The worst stunt I ever pulled was running a p133 at 200 mhz INSIDE A FREEZER (with mucho duck tape to let the relevant cables going in and out without losing insulation). It worked for quite a while. I realized it was rather pointless although it made for a few laughs to the few people who even know what overclocking was. I decided it's really not worth my time when I figured that it's often cheaper to buy the next better processor than spend god knows what in cooling devices.

      That said, it remains my honest opinion that anyone who wants to cool down things inside his pc case and puts glowstrips and/or neon tubes in it (increased heat) is a moron and should be laughed at. What's next, a Stirling engine running as a kinetic cooler on top of the heat exchange?

    3. Re:Is it really worth it? by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yes, you're rational. That's rather abnormal today.

      It's akin to the losers you see with $600 rice burner cars with $20,000 worth of stereo, ground effects, lighting, and huge exhaust tips to make them sound like they have an engine ... well, a lawn mower engine with a megaphone, but ...

    4. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst stunt I ever pulled was running a p133 at 200 mhz INSIDE A FREEZER (with mucho duck tape to let the relevant cables going in and out without losing insulation). It worked for quite a while. I realized it was rather pointless although it made for a few laughs to the few people who even know what overclocking was. I decided it's really not worth my time when I figured that it's often cheaper to buy the next better processor than spend god knows what in cooling devices.

      That said, it remains my honest opinion that anyone who wants to cool down things inside his pc case and puts glowstrips and/or neon tubes in it (increased heat) is a moron and should be laughed at.

      What's next, a Stirling engine running as a kinetic cooler on top of the heat exchange? I suppose that 3x1r3m3 cooling makes sense if you already have the fastest processor around and really need to squeeze the extra juice out of it (world domination plans tend to be very CPU intensive), but come on.

      I could understand running a celeron 300 at 450 because it brought your good machine almost up there with the best stuff you could buy (and which costed about 2x what you paid for), but overclocking these days is done mostly for the l33t factor of it, however much is still there.

      (Now overclocking PDA's... that's another matter ;) especially older ones which probably can do with running a bit faster, e.g. the pc110 palmtop 486)

    5. Re:Is it really worth it? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      That's why they made cold cathode tubes. Heat is not an issue with them.

    6. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cold Cathodes are not called that because they run cool. They are called that because they dont have filiments at the ends of the tube that are used to kickstart the tube into starting by heating the gas inside the tube. a cold cathode with enough wattage will get warm. just nowhere near as warm as an incandescent bulb

    7. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other bad thing about cold cathodes and other types of flourescent lighting in a PC case is the inverters they require. Inverters can be electrically noisy as hell, leaking a shitload of electro magentic interference into your case, which may affect system stability.

    8. Re:Is it really worth it? by FurryFeet · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's next, a Stirling engine running as a kinetic cooler on top of the heat exchange?

      Dude, I already did that and got 3.33 GHz out of my old Pentium II. Am working on cooling the Stirling engine with liquid nitrogen. When I'm done, I'm sure I can crank that baby up to 3.34.

    9. Re:Is it really worth it? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is there something wrong with me?...

      No, not at all. The solution is found in a counter-intuitive place, however: console games.

      I was a big PC gamer in the nineties, tweaking and upgrading and tinkering with drivers, DOS boot-discs etc etc. During that time, the requirements of the "real-world" apps I was running on my PCs were keeping pace with the expanding game requirements. Sure, I might be upgrading six months earlier because of Quake, but I knew that the performance for the next release of Lotus 123 would appreciate it as well. Meanwhile, I read about all the consoles, saw the "super mario" and other four-color franchises grow, and figured these were toys for the high school kids.

      Me, I was an adult, and I had an Adult Game Machine -- a PC! (*ahem*)

      Then one day around the release of the G4 card (at circa $500) I realized that, unless I switched careers over to astronomy, there was never any reason I could justify that my business apps would ever benefit from all that graphical goodness. Since my time spent gaming with anything more sophisticated than blocks was becoming less and less (twin toddlers), I figured my gaming days had reached their natural, evolutionary end.

      Okay, okay, I actually ended up buying two G4 cards, but that's not my point, hear me out...

      I bought a console. X-Box, specifically, but the brand does not matter for purposes of this discussion. And it's great! The games look great, it sits in my LIVING ROOM, plugs into the home theatre 5.1, and there are titles available that appeal to just about every member of the family. Most have multi-player mode which allow for spouse co-op or dad v. kid(s) play.

      I now play games as much as I did five years ago, but see my wife and kids more while doing it. There are, of course, some games that suffer from "dumbing down" due to the absence of a keyboard, but just as many or more which benefit greatly from being controller-specific (esp the Diablo-esque "Baldur's Gate" and its ilk). Best of all, I'm done: No monitor upgrades, no new cards, no registries to comb over, no OS's to flush every five months, it's all brilliant. You take a game out of the box, pop it into the console, and you're playing immediately.

      And someday, when XBox 2 comes out, and I've played all the XBox 1 games worth playing, what's it going to cost me to "upgrade" to a new console.... $200? $300? Seems like that might be livable...

      Yeah, I know, for those of you who have been playing on consoles for 20 years, this is old hat. But to a PC-diehard like me who has only recently stepped into the light, these are womderful times.

    10. Re:Is it really worth it? by Vaulter · · Score: 2


      Heh, it reminds me of the story posted several years ago about the guy who essentially created a jet engine in his garage in order to use the (atomization)? to cool his beer. By the time the beer was cold, the garage was like 150 degrees.

      --
      I don't have a sig...Do you??
    11. Re:Is it really worth it? by Simon+Kongshoj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, neon tubes use electrically excited gases rather than chemical processes or heated solids. The effect on heat is therefore marginal. Don't believe me? Go hold your hand a few centimeters from a neon tube. Even on direct touch most neon tubes are just very slightly over the temperature of the surroundings. Cold Cathodes also have virtually no heat output. Also, if you're water-cooling your system, case heat is less important than it is with air-cooling.

      That said, I think some overclockers are way over the top too. When the price of your cooling kit exceeds that of the hardware it is cooling, I think something is really wrong with your sense of proportion... But hey, if they have fun doing it, who are we to stop them?

      --
      Six sick .sigs, the Number of the Beast!
    12. Re:Is it really worth it? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      So what are you using to heat up the other end of your stirling engine...cold fusion?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    13. Re:Is it really worth it? by copec · · Score: 1

      I've been into DIY jet engines based on turbo chargers for a while, the guy was using the propane tank in a cooler to cool his beer. The jet engine really had nothing to do with the cooling of the beer.

      Those engines suck propane so fast, that the evaporation in the tank makes then cool down to negative temperatures.

    14. Re:Is it really worth it? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      I too am facing the same decision. For the longest time now I have looked down at consoles as kid toys while enjoying my adult gaming PC. My how times have changed. I dont think its the ability to play in the living room thats making me want to hop the gaming platform fence (Got a nice game/mp3/divx box hooked to the tv), but the actual games. Used to be that games came out for PC and then got stripped down and ported to the consoles. Now i'm debating shelling out for an xbox or waiting for an emulator in order to keep my TV-PC alive for another generation.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    15. Re:Is it really worth it? by Gandhi1980 · · Score: 1

      Oh well. The consoles are coming up with an answer to everything, but I'm still a PC Gamer. Like you mentioned, the consoles have great graphics. They have great games. They are multiplayer. They are cheaper. They are easier. And they are even starting to run online.

      BUT UNTIL THEY HAVE GAMES THAT RUN WITH A KEYBOARD AND MOUSE, I'M NOT BUYING ONE. HAH.

    16. Re:Is it really worth it? by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      If they do, I hope your Caps Lock is broken :)

  10. Abridged Tweaking Guide by cyt0plas · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Get dual P4-3.06GHZ proc system w/ heat pumps.
    2) Get radeon 9700
    3) Get really large RAID-0 array.
    4) Get linux

    --
    Contact Me (got tired of viruses emailing me).
    1. Re:Abridged Tweaking Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the number of Linux compatible games these days.....four?

    2. Re:Abridged Tweaking Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) Profit!

    3. Re:Abridged Tweaking Guide by Technician · · Score: 4, Funny

      5) Get WINE.

      If that doesn't get you up to speed, Pull out a cork and slow down with friends.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Abridged Tweaking Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, don't get a P4 3.06GHz, they're a rip off. Intel Pentium Xeons are the way to go for top speeds... they cost substancially less than a top P4, with significantly higher performance..

    5. Re:Abridged Tweaking Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that funny. I spent about $100 on a water cooling rig, much higher than just a heatsink. But my rig will work on AMD or Intel and far more efficiently. Its also much quieter than the heatsink with the turbine mounted on top.

  11. Slashdotted! by 0x20 · · Score: 4, Funny
  12. Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! He has a guestbook! Let's troll!

  13. Those Masochists by BoojiBoy0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Please... Kill our Server

    --
    I know the secrets of the video game champs
  14. What they should have done... by rastachops · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1) Write a "Hold to withstand the /. effect 2) Then write the tweaking guide Their server is /.'d already! :'( Is the article any good, or is it just a load of "remove stuff from startup" etc? Also is it a Linux or Doze tweak guide?

  15. Already Slashdotted by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Mr.Tweak writes "We have written a comprehensive System Optimization Guide targeted toward Gamers looking to get the most out of their systems . . . /blockquote
    Since Mr. Tweak doesn't seem to know much about getting the most from his web server, I have got to wonder about the rest of it...
    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    1. Re:Already Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I have been getting is "host not found" and when using the "host" command to the name servers under tweaktown's whois entry, neither of the name servers seem to be responding. So maybe we /.d them instead of this guys web server....

  16. Priceless by jcm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cost in time for Mr.Tweak to send in /. article about his site: $2

    Cost in time for Hemos to post article to /. for Mr.Tweak: $2

    Cost of server able to handle /. load: Priceless

  17. Forget Tweaking by EXTomar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (I couldn't read the article...slashedoted already)

    Unless its an super easy reversable change forget the tweaking stuff on Windows.

    Its just to easy to screw up your system. A less than optimal system still plays WC3 fine on good hardware. Trying to squeeze another 5% smoothness out during 5% of the gameplay isn't awe inspring. What is worse is that you could screw up your system or driver and then you have a non-functional game machine. Reinstalling Windows isn't fun when you were expecting to meet up with friends and play some WC3.

    Hardware has more of an influence on performance than mucking with frindge software elements. For my game machine, I just want it to work. If I have to tweak something then I'm better off replacing what is flaking out.

    1. Re:Forget Tweaking by rschwa · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...A less than optimal system still plays WC3 fine on good hardware. Trying to squeeze another 5% smoothness out during 5% of the gameplay isn't awe inspring...

      WC3? Well, considering the Minimum specs on the box when it came out in '95 were 486 DX/50 and 8 megs of ram, then yes, I think Wing Commander 3 will play fine on any machine made in the last 3 or 4 years without tweaking. Might have to scare up a copy of DOS, though.

    2. Re:Forget Tweaking by DaBunny · · Score: 1

      C'mon, it's just a typo. I'm sure he meant W3C. Tweaking the WWW, now there's a challenge for you.

    3. Re:Forget Tweaking by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Perhaps he meant the OTHER WC3, War Craft 3.

    4. Re:Forget Tweaking by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      Sorry to say, but if you manage to screw up your pc that bad with just some performance tweaks...what are you doing here? I mean, setting the correct fixed swapfile size on another disk, correcting swapfile usage using msconfig, setting your L2 cache in the registry, disabling unused services...this stuff is trivial and I'd say quite hard to fuck up. Plus doing all this gives you at least a 10% faster machine. Which is worth the hour (due to restarts) you put into it.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    5. Re:Forget Tweaking by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      5% my ass...try200%+

      I remember making a few tweaks to my geforce 256 and going from 30fps max to 70 something average...all with 3 settings changes...I think there is a differance there

      --
      Bottles.
  18. Quick Question... by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where's the line between a system tweaked for gaming and a gaming console?

    Isn't a gaming console, in essence, a system tweaked for gaming?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. A gaming console is something that gives a good (not necessarily best due to the long life time of 2-3 years) performance over price ratio.
      It is also a system level optimization so that you don't have bottleneck at a single spot (except in bragging rights marketing reasons), otherwise you are paying for performance that you can't get.

    2. Re:Quick Question... by 0x20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the line is drawn at the twelve button mark. If you have more than 12 buttons on your mouse and joystick combined, it's a gaming console.

    3. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a gaming console, in essence, a system tweaked for gaming?
      No becuase good consoles don't have a bloated OS underneath them (Yet).

    4. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if its an xbox

    5. Re:Quick Question... by ManUMan · · Score: 1

      Pewww... my Gravis GamePad Pro only has 10 buttons. It would be a shame to have to work on a game console all day long.

      --
      If you are never moderated, do you really exist?
    6. Re:Quick Question... by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
      Isn't a gaming console, in essence, a system tweaked for gaming?

      Yes, exactly. However, it's so tweaked that you can do nothing BUT gaming on it. With a PC, even when it's tweaked for gaming, it'll still let me play some music while I post on Slashdot, or whatever.

      Doug

    7. Re:Quick Question... by RichardX · · Score: 1

      I think the line is drawn at the twelve button mark. If you have more than 12 buttons on your mouse and joystick combined, it's a gaming console.

      In that case the Atari Jaguar was a supercomputer! it's joypad had at least 7148 buttons. And it was roughly the size of yer average office building. And you could trick your friends into trying to make phone calls on it!

      Ahh, they don't make 'em like they used to.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    8. Re:Quick Question... by aWalrus · · Score: 2
      A gaming console works on a TV, which roughly has a resolution of 640x483. My really old Matrox G200 (gathering dust now) could deliver decent performance for a wide host of games at that resolution.

      A PC system tweaked for gaming can deliver astounding frame rates at 1600x1200. That is the main difference. Try to hook up your 17" monitor to a console (can't be done, but would be nice) and you would soon see the limitations of a console.
      --

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    9. Re:Quick Question... by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1

      Isn't a gaming console, in essence, a system tweaked for gaming?
      No. The hardware for a specific model of gaming console is fixed. For the most part, the developer knows the exact hardware that the game will run on, and can program the game accordingly. For PC's, there is a lot of variation between different models, making it a greater challenge to predict how a game in development will perform.

      --
      No data, no cry
    10. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can be done, via a scan converter. Afried of mine plays his xbox on a monitor. Svideo in,vga out.

    11. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh! I have a five button mouse and a nine button joystick. :)

  19. Next week by pctainto · · Score: 1

    How to use your newfound tweaking abilities to find a girl that is impressed by your skills.

    --
    I think my principles are reachin' an all time low
  20. It's not JUST the hardware by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would really be nice, as long as we're wishing, is that game producers would rethink the whole coding. So many games are bloated and buggey, and work only with this OS or that card. How many times have one of us installed a game and something else quits or starts acting strange? Whatever happened to "Write Once, Run Anywhere"? And how about (this is the last, I promise) more tools to add our own real-world stuff in the game easier. There are car and furniture and carpet dealers whose face I'd love to see in UT.

    1. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by A+Vengrow · · Score: 1

      DAMN STRAIGHT!!! I too have found it odd that some games seem to require a 750 p3 or athlon with video hardware acceleration as a minimum. what the fuck? the amount of games being released every year has plummeted, and one would think that they are spending all this time makingthe game better, faster, and less buggy. complete oppostite is happening. they release a game, and then for months on end they release updates and patches for you to download. dosen't any one ever do it right the first time? fuck! the gaming industry is just as bad as the record industry !

    2. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by JavaJoint · · Score: 1

      > So many games are bloated...

      A comment that applies to lots of 1.0 releases...

      Just guessing here (as far as games go), but with most commerical software, the pressure is ON to SHIP THE DAMN THING. The emphasis goes on killing the biggest bugs, and all sorts of patches and quick fixes often creep in towards the end. Oh, and feature creep...

      There's a balance:

      * can have it totally optimized, with lots of features missing, and ship now
      * can have it somewhat well-debugged, and bloated, and ship soon
      * can have it 12-18 months from now, very optimized, and well-debugged

      Just can't have it totally-optimized, totally debugged, and on-time!

    3. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      Whatever happened to "Write Once, Run Anywhere"?

      It's being adhered to more closely than ever before, at least in the realm of game coding.

      Why, back in the old days, you had to write your own sound subroutines for each and every soundcard on the market... SB, SB Pro, SB16, Gravis UltraSound, PC (blech) Speaker... thanks to libraries like DirectSound, coders don't have to worry about that crap any more, and can focus on the game engine itself. Same thing happened with video hardware (particularly 3D accelerators) and input devices.

    4. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whatever happened to "Write Once, Run Anywhere"?

      I'm sorry, that tag is deprecated. You should use the newer "Write Once, Debug Everywhere" instead.
    5. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by Moonshadow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're not a game developer, are you? Probably not a really serious programmer, either. Heck, I'd be suprised if you're a coder at all, really.

      Here's a hint: games aren't "hello world" apps. Their complexity and required level of interaction with hardware makes it extremely difficult to do something perfectly right the first time. In the case of a PC game, you have a program that is going to run on an incredibly diverse array of hardware configurations. With a console, this isn't an issue - you know what hardware you're programming for. Game developers, as a rule, do a damn fine job of releasing a game that performs well on most systems out there, then they patch it to accomodate for the systems that weren't handled in the lab. Game requirements continue to increase because hardware is developing further. Games get prettier and prettier. Example, UT2K3. Very high polygon counts, high-res textures, huge arenas, incredible physics system, gorgeous lighting, etc. You think all of that could be done on a p133? Hardly. That stuff takes CPU cycles, and lots of it.

      The reason better hardware is required is because these games are designed around that hardware. Great looks are a big selling point for a lot of gamers (I know I'll get someone saying it's about gameplay, not graphics, but let's be honest: people will buy a pretty-looking game. I agree that gameplay is important, but graphics don't hurt.), and game devs are doing their best to make games look as good as possible. If you don't like the hardware requirements, go play with the original Quake engine. It's fast, and will run on most machines out there today with no problem, but good luck developing a game that wows anybody. Modern game standards require that kind of hardware.

      Go try writing a game some time, then come back and whine about those lazy game devs.

    6. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2

      Do you have any idea the amount of work that has to be done during a game? With the advent of somewhat realistic physics and the need for better and better AI, it's no surprise games need more and more CPU power.

      Now, lets look at graphics hardware. Have you ever sat down and calculated how much CPU would be needed to match even a TNT2 in terms of applying even bilinear filtering to a scene? Forget things like anisotropic filtering or pixel shader effects. Hell, Vertex shaders alone suck up a lot of CPU power if done in software. Plus the memory bandwidth required puts using the CPU out the window.

    7. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee. that comment is so much more funny when YOU regurgitate it.

      Write once run anywhere is one of the things that Java IS good for.

      The problem with using Java for video games is the garbage collector. There is no call to pause it. There's only a call to force it to start up.
      The JVM decides on its own when to free up memory, and it can occur in the middle of a game's rendering sequence.

    8. Re:It's not JUST the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'games are so complex, so you have to put up with bugs' like is a whole load of bull: most games are full of bugs because most game development is done with both eyes to the bottom line.

      This is not really the fault of the game dev companies: if you start budgeting 'properly' for a game from the get go (say, 10 devs, 10 qa, 2-3 years) *NO* publisher will give you a contract, which means that most game dev companies will pitch ridiculous schedules that have no hope in hell to succeed (above game with 5 devs, 2 qa in 6 months) and then keep getting 'extensions'.

      The problem is that the scheduling is done with an eye to this death march schedule, so things get coded badly (I want to see who can code properly after 2 weeks of 14-16 hour days sleeping in the office) just to 'make the milestone' to get payment from the publisher so developers can get paid.

      This makes a game that would have taken 2 years, sometimes take 4, and sometimes ship after 14 months and being followed by 8-9 months of patches.

      While there *are* patches that can't be done until the game is out (small % of users with weird configs, really strange things that nobody really has tried) most bugs are of the 'I didn't have enough time to QA because the final build was cut at 6:30am 15 minutes before the courier was coming to pick up the gold master' type, and that's really what pisses us pc gamers off.

      How many times do you see patches come out *before* the game is even on the shelves? This happens because after the GM ships, and people get some sleep, they come back in the office and find out several 'paper bag' issues that were missed in the caffeinated crunch week before shipping.

      Games can be coded mostly bug-free, unlike what the poster above is saying, games are *by far* not the most complex software you might end up working on (maybe the hardest, because many times it's an undocumented spaghetti mess, but not the most complex per se) it's just that producing a bug-free game is much lower down in priority than producing a game spending the least amount of money.

      this was kinda ramblish, but I hope you get the point...

  21. Simple by hardcode · · Score: 5, Informative

    How does one use google-cahce to find a site?

    Search for cache:whatever.the.link.was on Google

    Unfortunately this article doesn't seem to be in the cache.

    Ho hum said pooh as his web server melted!

    hardcode

  22. since it's a game tweaking guide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    4) Get linux

    How many frames/sec do you get in XBill with that sort of setup?

    1. Re:since it's a game tweaking guide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL!

      I bet you'll be modded down. :P

  23. The Site Needs a Eula by puto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So they have written a manual for non technical people to really screw up their systems?

    I can feel the pain already.

    1. They reccomend futzing around in the bios. BIOS is a no no even if you know what you are doing. Most people who really know hardware stay outta the BIOS unless it is absolutely necessary. The standard settings are usually the best, and unless you need to free an IRQ, or change the boot device, leave it alone. Anyway these days BIOS kinda maintain themselves. Flashing the BIOS as well, Christ on a rubber crutch, don't get me started. Unless you really need some feature don't do it.

    2. Overclocking? With AMD high ends running at such low prices why? The cost spent on all the fancing cooling devices can be used to just buy a better CPU. I dont overclock, admittedly I did drop 35bucks on all copper heatsink with heat pipes, to cool the new Athlon, but i think it looks cool,(like anyone is ever gonna see it anyway). LAst thing you need to do is get some newbie burning up his chip/board/ setting the curtains on fire, voiding his warranty.

    I think this whole article is really bad advice for the non technical person. Because any tech worth his salt would not advise any of this stuff for a few more FPS.

    I would say the best advice is quality hardware and don't pinch pennies when buying it. Aside from the ultra high end video cards, stuff is really cheap these days.

    Here is my guide to a good system. I judge it by having the case cover on and how often do I have to get in there and open it up. New computer three months old, burn in 3 days, I havent had the case off since. And I am a hardware nut.

    This whole tweaking thing is like the ricers. Just spend the money that you would have dropped on fans,pumps, copper, heatsinks, on the high end stuff to begin with.

    Puto

    Imagine the support calls.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    1. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by IshanCaspian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's up with this constant need in our society to baby-sit the recipient of information? If someone doesn't understand those things, then they are accepting a certain risk when putzing around with them. If you read this guide and screw something up because you didn't know what you were doing, well, too bad. The mere existance of dumb people should not require smart people to talk like friggin lawyers all the time.

      Life is painful when you're stupid.

      --

      But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    2. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, usually the BIOS settings are set to the most conservative settings. Most hardcore gamers DO want to tweak their BIOS to get better performance. Case in point - you just purchased a rather expensive stick of Corsair PC3500 RAM. The default BIOS settings do not enable bank interleave, the CAS latency is 2, the FSB is 133 (ok you may need to unlock the muliplier on your cpu to play with this), the precharge is 6T, etc. You can gain a significant improvement in performance by adjusting these.

    3. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      Not on a modern MB... they'll query the SIMM and ask it what settings it likes. And use them. Anything beyond that is called "overclocking", and frankly, you buy so absurdly little with most OCing it's not worth it.

      Yeah, I've OC'd before, and while it was stable at the time, it wasn't 3 years later. I've got a system that's pretty much unusable now because it was run over the limits of design... it would make a great fileserver, but it's just not stable.

      I could probably squeek a bit of additional performance out of my brand new ASUS Nforce2 MB, but it's just not worth it. I've looked at the default timings - and they're exactly what Corsair said they're qualified for.

    4. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by mondoterrifico · · Score: 0

      You have a point on Bios flashing, as it is possible to leave yourself with a dead board, but your comment about tinkering around with the bios is incorrect, or at least merely your opinion. Your comment about the standard or default settings as being the best is not born out by practical experience.

      Most abit boards ship with rather slow default settings in the bios, and setting them correctly can garner up to 1500 more 3dmarks.
      Just my 2 cents.

    5. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by spinkham · · Score: 2

      Or like I like to say to ricers:
      "Ya know how to make that ride faster? Crush it and buy a 'vette!"

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    6. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      1. BIOS tweaking is nothing to fear. In some cases the default settings are quite incorrect. If you know what you are doing, tweak away. If not, don't.

      BIOS updates, however, should be undertaken with caution, as there is a risk (an unfortunately timed power failure, for one) and they do spell out exactly what they updated so you can see if you even need it.

      2. Some of us overclock because our MB won't accept any newer processors and replacing the MB, reinstalling the OS, troubleshooting various quirks for weeks on end (a thousand curses on you, VIA), doing all the things that Mac users laugh about - it's just not worth it. Yet.

    7. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by blincoln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BIOS is a no no even if you know what you are doing.

      I have to disagree on this. Sometimes changing settings in the BIOS is necessary (both of my Athlon system motherboards default to 100MHz FSB even with a 133MHz FSB CPU installed, so I've had to manually reconfigure that). OTOH it's also useful for changing things like boot order, num lock on/off by default, checking CPU temperature when you've installed a new chip, disabling onboard audio if you've got an add-in card, et cetera.

      Anyone who is incapable of or uncomfortable with changing BIOS settings should be treating their PC like I treat cars - something to be bought as a whole instead of building from pieces, and which is serviced by professionals. I'm not saying this is a bad thing. We all specialize in different areas.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 2

      Flashing the BIOS as well, Christ on a rubber crutch, don't get me started. Unless you really need some feature don't do it.

      That's odd... I just flashed my mobo and video BIOSes and got almost a 10% performance increase...

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    9. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      BIOS is a no no even if you know what you are doing.

      In other words, you don't know what you're doing.

      If you buy a motherboard, there's a 90% chance the default for AGP prefetch and Fast Writes is 'off'. That can cause between 30-50% performance loss on the hardware you just paid good money for. They're off by default for compatability, but your mid-range to high end video card will perform like crap unless you go in there and turn them on. Some moterboards set things like CPU bus speeds through the BIOS, so if you don't go in there and change the setting, you'll run your CPU at 25% slower speed.

      If you build the system, the BIOS is an essential utility. You can't just ignore it and never go in there.

    10. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by dan+g · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Not on a modern MB... they'll query the SIMM and ask it what settings it likes.

      And that could be wrong. When I asked Corsair tech support why the BIOS was detecting my CAS2 memory as CAS2.5, the reply was: "Nope, that's normal. The SPD is programmed to JEDEC defined standards which is only 2.5. You have to manually set it to run CAS2 in your BIOS."

    11. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by i7dude · · Score: 1

      it all boils down to the fact that many of us older folks like to spend our limited free time doing other things, and also, we dont have to beg our parents for a new xp 2200+..well, ok...some of us replaced begging our parents with begging our wives...which, is possibly much worse...err...man...i wish is was 15 again...

      dude.

    12. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so tired of the "I'm mature and you a kid" argument. While I'm sure there are some parents that will do this, I can't imagine there are very many. Even well to do folks would likely fly of the handle if their kids burnt something that casts hundreds or thousands for a friggin game.

      Here's a hint: most people into serious system modding/tweaking are adults. They buy individual components and make a box instead of getting a Dell. Hell most guys I know that have a hot box have given their kids the handmedowns instead of the other way around. Most importantly, maturity != age. Most adults act like 8 year olds when they don't get their way and no one knows who they are and there are little repercussions, like over the internet.

    13. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This whole tweaking thing is like the ricers. Just spend the money that you would have dropped on fans,pumps, copper, heatsinks, on the high end stuff to begin with.

      The difference here is that a good cooler (peltier, heat sink, fan) will cost you upwards of $50. Assuming a $1000 PC (about average now right?) that's 5% of the cost of the car. It will give you perhaps a 5-15% increase in performance due to overclocking. CPUs are generally rated at or near their performance maximum so you can't overclock them that far.

      With a car, you might spend $2500 on a turbo kit or an engine swap. Assuming the car costs $18,000 that's about 14% of the price of the car. Doing this will generally net you around a 40% performance increase, because car engines are seldom if ever run at or near their limits in a stock vehicle. They are designed for longetivity. Well, at least the Japanese engines are, and we're talking about rice, right?

      Or put another way; I can spend $8000 getting a 1997 or 1998 S14 240SX (Nissan.) Then I can spend $8000 on a SR20VET 2.0 liter turbo motor with a six speed transmission, putting me up to 257bhp with a six speed. If I spend another $4000 on tires and $5000 on engine upgrades and related equipment (injectors, fuel pump, cams, header, intake, ECU reprogramming, rocker arms) I can have 400hp on stock internals (Crank, pistons, rods, valves) as a reliable daily driver for ~$25,000. This is a RWD car with 5-link rear, 53/47 weight distribution, and I'm talking 17" wheels here, the whole shebang. That will absolutely massacre any production (more than, say, 500 cars) automobile ever sold in the US with the possible exception of some exotics (MODERN lamborghini and ferrari for example). The vehicle will also feature all the creature comforts like leather, ABS, air bags, et cetera.

      This is just the Nissan example. You could do this with Honda or Toyota to (but why would you want to) :) Incidentally that's less than the price of a new 300ZX TT (when they were still available) and less than the price of the BASE MODEL 350Z. It will blow either of them away, as well as anything else you care to name which is less than $100,000 and is stock, and it'll get 25 freeway in the bargain.

      As to the "rice" items which people put on their cars, like big exhaust tips or a wing on a FWD car which never goes over 80 mph, or an aero body kit; All of these are useful if you are going fast. Well, not the big exhaust tip, unless you also have a big exhaust. I used to have a 2.4 liter I4 with no turbo making 180 rwhp in a 240SX improved touring car, largely due to a big header and a 3" exhaust. Neon and shit is never useful, except for winning shows perhaps.

      Essentially, this is NOTHING like import performance. Performance tuning for gamers is also nothing whatsoever like ricing your car by adding all kinds of cute doodads because that doesn't improve performance at all (unless you've done the engine and suspension up as well) but performance tuning of your PC does.

      Next time you feel like talking about something you know nothing about, consider the fact that some people on /. DO know a little something about cars and will shut you down.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 2

      In case you don't understand why the ricers laugh so loudly at you when you tell them that: no corvette will beat a well-tweaked CRX, unless the course is either downhill or very long and straight. The corvette will probably have a higher max speed, but it will take a lot longer to accelerate because it is so heavy.

      --
      ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
      where the eye of his telescope has already been
    15. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by puto · · Score: 2

      My comment concerning cars is that I would say that 90% of all the modded cars you see do not have any engine mods other than maybe a loud exhaust.

      My point is that a large percentage of bios tweaks, overclocking, rarely result in a big improvement. Maybe a little bragging rights.

      I was making fun of people who mod cars, but you gotta admint there are many civics out there where the rims are worth more than the car. That the aggregate total could have bought them a nicer vehcile, one worth modding.

      I have a 95 VR6 Volkswagen Passat. Chipped and Turboed. I am pulling 330 hp's of the sucker. And it hauls some serious ass and looks damn good. The money was spent on the engine and exhuast. It sits om 17 inch BBS rims, not flashy. Yokahamas cayse they are sticky. As for the exterior? Stock hunter green paint, no tail, no neon. Nothing that says steal me for the parts, hey Mr. Policeman pull me over as a usual suspect in my crack mobile. My little yuppie mobile with balls as my old lady calls it.

      See I am a nerd at heart. My ride is a wolf in sheeps clothing. I agree with you on imports, never owned an american car, though I like the new explorers.

      Oh paid 13k for the passat(1996 with 20k miles) and 1500 for the engine upgrades. I got all power, leather, killer ride for a grand total of 15 grand(added the cost of the rims). And my insurance is on a sedan. I am gonna buy a 2000 soon for the wife.

      So I do know a little about cars myself. Probably not as much as you do cause I am in my 30's now and dont pay much attention to them any more. And your point is valid.

      But you forgot a couple production cars sold in the us that kick ass. That are not so modern.

      1963 Jag XKE 12 cylinder 0-60 4.5

      1970 Hemi Cuda This 425 HP rating was only at 5,000 RPM. But the Hemi was easily capable of living at 6,000 RPM where the dyno registered closer to 500 HP.

      These are two of my personal faves. Get crappy gas mileage, but kick ass totally stock, and there are many more production muscle cars that did and didnt cost a whole lotta jack. And although I love the imports, aint nothing like low end american torque. Mom's 1980 vette with an l-82 bored out is a dream on take off. Ever sat behind the wheel of a Chevelle?

      Back to your 25000 dollar car. My 15000k passat has 330 hps, hauls ass, looks good, lets me cook most people at a light if i feel like it. And sometimes I do when the 240's, civics, and what have you are racing their engines at a light, giving me the finger for driving the speed limit. Times when that nissan or honda pulls up with the bass thumping. And i look at the wife and she knows to let her boy do this thing. She calmy reaches in the cd case and puts in the my special drving cd. The one with real rock and roll on it. La Grange by ZZ Top is my preference on these occasions. Cause it starts off slow and then crashes into you.

      So you see I guess I do know a lot about cars. Having tinkered with everyone I ever owned. And I was making fun of the ricers, or people who modded cars. I was making fun of the tails, rims, tires, but no show.

      Oh yeah, my proudest car mod? 1990 Miata 275 horsepwer, no after effects, utility white, nothing cosmetic done at all. Was real fun to go down to palm beach and freak nsx, beemers, and the luxurty car owners out.

      I know you are trolling, are about 18-22 years old.

      And one last lesson maybe this 32 year old geriatric can tell you. Unless you have unlimited funds(which you dont if you are modding nissans) rule one i always learned is. NEVER SPEND DOUBLE THE MONEY ON A CARS BOOK VALUE. Cause if you wreck it, the insurance will only pay book.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    16. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by ikea5 · · Score: 0

      $50 for cpu heat sink/fan, $30 for GPU's hs/fan, $20 for an extra case fan, $10 hs for north bridge. That's $110 jsut for air cooling so far. Plus did you really spent $1000 on you last computer? My new computer cost $600 and it comes with a 17 incher. And whats up with some people who buy a $60 oem Duron and slap on a cheapo $20 hs/fan on it in order to "save money" over the retail package CPU which only cost $15 more and comes with a hs/fan standard?

    17. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Well, my apologies for making assumptions about what you know about cars. For the record I am 25 years of age, and you're right I'm poor as hell. My car, a 1989 240SX Fastback, is stock, and somewhat beat.

      But comparing the appearance mods of a rice car to the performance tweaks is still ridiculous -- because one is performance-related and the other is just for looks. In fact the performance tweaks of your PC don't enhance the looks, whereas many automotive tweaks (anything outside the motor, diff, or other similarly sealed and tucked away unit) enhance the looks AND the performance. Of course adding a big body kit which increases downforce will decrease the usefulness of most cars as it increases drag, so in fact it is frequently an opposite situation.

      Incidentally I wouldn't try to run a hemi cuda at six grand. Mopar made incredibly strong motors but there are too many cubes involved there, you're likely to shake your bottom end apart. I had a '60 Dart Phoenix with the big block 318 (318 was a B block up to '63) and I wouldn't even do it on that.

      Finally I don't know about honduh and toyota scenes, but Nissan owners most commonly have cat-back exhaust and intake with cold air, and sometimes underdrive pulley. The 240SX owners seem to be the most likely to have a turbo swapped onto their original motor out of the various import tuners, honda owners most likely to have a JDM engine swap. Lots of 240SX owners with SR20DETs now, so common that I keep expecting to see them in the auto shopper...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by puto · · Score: 2

      Hey man In 89 I almost bought that 240 but opted for the Miata instead cause of the drop top, and I liked it cause it was little like me. I am 5'4 and all my cars generally are small. The Passat is the biggest I ever owned but the seat jacks up high. The other in the running was the volks corrado with the first VR6, had a spoiler that ran up after 45 miles an hour was reached.

      Hey man, I am poor as dirt as well. IT is not the best place to be now and I whore my networking ass out doing websits. They are horrible, I have no talent, but it pays the bills.

      Honda makes a great car and the wife had a celica for years that gave her no trouble.

      Recently I was looking at buying a 99 jetta and the guy wanted 3000 grand over book. The car was cherry, but not three grand cherry. I asked him why so much and he told me that is what the rims and tires cost when he bought them plus the flourescent kit(this i saw after the fact). I told him that he could just give me the old rims and i would pay him book, not even argue. And he could keep the lights as well He told me no, that if I wanted the car I had to buy the rims. 17's on a jetta. I told him that he could keep both sets and i would come over with my own rims and tires. Still no. That was two months ago and the car is still for sale. He called me this weekend and said he would drop a grand. I told him no. Kicker is, he bought the rims on time.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    19. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by CMRichar · · Score: 1
      Life is painful when you're stupid.

      Unfortunately, no, life isnt painful when you're stupid. Life is painful when you're the guy that has to deal with the stupid person who just burned his cpu trying to overclock it while using a bottle of Evian for a watercooler.

      Sure, we MIGHT be able to teach them better, but it requires the ability to listen and comprehend instructions, which, i believe, at least 75% of the general populace doesnt have. //EndRant;

      --
      "Good night, good work, sleep well, I'll most likely kill you in the morning." - Dread Pirate Roberts
    20. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      NEVER SPEND DOUBLE THE MONEY ON A CARS BOOK VALUE. Cause if you wreck it, the insurance will only pay book.

      Surely that depends how you insure it? Costs more obviously, but I specifically list the most expensive modifications on my insurance so mine is covered for well beyond the listed book value.

    21. Re:The Site Needs a Eula by Taldo · · Score: 1
      The difference is that Riceboys are morons.

      They're the classic expression of not simply 'style over substance...' but actually 'psudeostyle at the EXPENSE of substance.' They're focused on mods that make their cars LOOK fast, instead of making them actually faster. (Come on. A two foot tall stainless steel spoiler? Please. Go spend the money daddy gave you to mod your car on some physics classes. You can meet girls at the junior college too... and you don't have to have a stupid looking car to do it.)

      Cars that have actual performance mods aren't riced out. But aw MAN ya gotta have dem decals!!!! You'll get an extra 5hp out of them!!!!

      If you want to talk computers... at least most casemodders don't insist that their mods make the computer faster... and tweakers actually get results.

  24. Whoops by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slip of the click there... While waiting for the preview to load I accidently clicked 'Submit'. Now I can never fix the post :-(

    Anyone else notice how slow /. has been lately?

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
  25. Go figure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His DNS provider has his nameservers in the same /24...
    (216.52.121.X)
    That is NOT a smart thing to do. M$FT did that once.

  26. Re:Just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    fuck off troll, some people like games, most of them are also geeks, get over it.

    average age of Slashdotter's should be somewhere around 25, right? If so, why are there so many good god damned stories about GAMING on this site?

    theres an age limit for gaming now? fuck, no-one told me about it.

  27. Welcome to... by barspin · · Score: 1
    ...Monday's first Slashvertisement!

    ...oh, wait, it's already been slashdotted into oblivion...

    If you want to look like a complete momo, submit a link to your inadequately prepared site to slashdot.

  28. More like a disclaimer by Xformer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kids, don't try this at home.

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  29. Security? by Schik · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I love one of his first suggestions -

    "I recommend only one account (the Administrator) for fastest performance... If you have only one User account (as recommended above) and you leave your password field blank you shouldn't be prompted for a username and password each time you bootup XP. This is the fast way to bootup."

    So only have one account, the Administrator account, use it all the time, and don't put a password on it. Great advice.

    1. Re:Security? by jedie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That'w why it's "System Optimisation Guide for Gamers" and not "System Optimisation Guide for Super Secret Information Server Security Systems"
      What? Someone is going to log into their PC and uninstall quake 3?
      I don't think that people who follow a guide with such a title care that much about security anyway.

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
    2. Re:Security? by rschwa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ..What? Someone is going to log into their PC and uninstall quake 3? ..

      Last week my brother was setting up a machine for his mother in law, left the admin password blank to make it easy for her to log in, left it running for 4 hours while it downloaded service packs over his cable modem.

      He came back and it had 2 different DDoS bots loaded on it.

      I laughed at him.

    3. Re:Security? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 2

      Even if he had set an admin password, Win2k has so many vulnerabilities out of the box, it prolly would have happened anyway. He should have downloaded sp3 and any patches he needed on a secure box, burned it to CD, and not put the box on the net until he had it patched up.

    4. Re:Security? by rschwa · · Score: 1

      I know, that's what I told him after I finished laughing. I've been trying to get him to set up a firewall box.

      He might not have even noticed if he hadn't gotten a windows messaging popup spam telling him to come check out someone or other's hot body. He called and asked me if I'd ever seen something like that, and I bet him a dollar he had at least one rootkit installed already.

      I told him to format and reinstall and see if that didn't teach him his lesson.

    5. Re:Security? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I laughed at him.

      I laughed at him too, just now. Thanks for the best chuckle I've had in days.

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    6. Re:Security? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      A root kit doesn't need to be installed on your machine to get nailed by those windows messaging popups, they're directed at your machine over TCP to the windows messaging port, which is open by default.
      These are annoying, but they are not a serious security threat even if you don't know how to stop them.
      If you're running XP, turn the personal firewall on and those disappear immediately.

      --
      No Comment.
    7. Re:Security? by gruhnj · · Score: 1

      Not having an admin password does not help, but sounds like what he really needed to do was put a decent firewall on the box. They cant hack it if they cant find it...

      No Firewall and No Other User account makes computer something something. Get Attacked? Dont mind if I do...

      PFC Gruhn
      U.S. Army, Fort Lewis

    8. Re:Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Last week my brother was setting up a machine for his mother in law, left the admin password blank... He came back and it had 2 different DDoS bots loaded on it

      In case anyone doesn't know, Win2k shares all your hard drives with full read/write access as C$, D$, etc. These shares can be only be accessed using the admin password, so that's why choosing a good password is so important (you can unshare the drives, but they seem to come back when you restart Windows).

      You should also disable the filesharing service if you don't need it (otherwise, anyone on the internet can see your MAC address, Windows version, and the names of any shared folders/printers - and they can run a brute-force attack on the admin password).

    9. Re:Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that administrator account has all kinds of extra stuff running that interferes with performance. Use a "Power User" account for gaming.

    10. Re:Security? by Artemis · · Score: 1

      Dear god, you must have just joined the Army, I've never seen anyone put their Name/Rank (especially *PFC*) on non-military email after their first year in, enjoy your hooah while it lasts.

    11. Re:Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just installed W2K on an old drive last night. This was my first windows install in two years. Before I had managed to get 3MB into a download of nVidia's drivers I got hit with one of those popup spam things...

      It freaked the shit out of me.


      For fuck's sake how do people actually use their computers?

    12. Re:Security? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      No, Win2k only shares out the drive that windows is installed to.

      And unless you are on a LAN with login scripts, I'd get that 'unsharing' problem checked out. That's just not a normal single-PC environment you have there.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    13. Re:Security? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even if it's just a basic Linksys single-port router between the (broadband) modem and the PC (or hub, depending on your situation.)

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  30. Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to tweak the hell out of my hardware. It got boring after awhile - between that and just getting things working, I'm much happier just to insert a disc into my Gamecube and just play games.

    Console gaming is rapidly catching up to pc gaming:
    Internet multiplayer support? Check (although Nintendo is dragging their feet here)
    Awesome graphics, surround sound? Check
    Play in your comfortable living room? Check
    System = same price as a mid range pc video card? Check
    99.9% problem free? Check
    Largest selection of games? Check

    I still play games on my PC, but I find I do it less and less over the years, and only in areas that my console lacks (ie/ Gamecube has next to no role playing games).

    I think between this and the four noisy fans I have in my PC right now, my next one will not be bought with gaming in mind. Maybe a tablet PC :)

    About all the PC has is a lot more choice/freedom in hardware (though not really - usually two or three companies producing the top gaming hardware). Those of us with money can get a slightly better gaming experience (well, audiovisual experience, anyway) - but even that has the price of incompatibility.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    1. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
      consoles are increasingly competing w/ PC's on all of the PC's traditional selling points (online play etc.)
      but there is one reason PC gaming will never die - user mods and content

      Unreal 2003 comes with the full featured level editor they used to design the actual game!
      that right there was enough to get me to buy it without even trying the demo (and yes, the editor is &%$!#@ amazing)

      until consoles can give me something like this, i'm going to have to stick w/ owning both - consoles for fast arcade style action, PC's for letting me screw around with the guts of games I buy (arguably more fun than playing them)

    2. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by Mantrid · · Score: 2

      Consoles tend to drift behind PC gaming, then make leaps to catch up as each console comes out. An up-to-date PC will always beat the latest console it seems, but of course, at what price?

      But where there's the same game with the same options, the consoles are usually more fun. Except for FPS - I don't think I can play any FPS with a controller anymore (though Vice City's FP aiming weapons I'm getting used to, and Timesplitters wasn't bad).

      But I'm glad I have both, and PCs don't usually need too much tweaking it seems. Although games like Morrowind, etc. can sometimes be real bears.

      I think if I was limited on cash, I'd stick with a modest PC for regular stuff and spending my gaming dough on a console.

    3. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      It's more about what kind of game you want to play than anything else.

      FPS, RTS, Turn-based strategy (e.g. - Civ), and MMORPG are best on PCs. The controls do not lend themselves to the little hand controls on consoles. These kind of games evolved on the PC.

      Driving games, shoot-em-ups, platform games, and fighting games are best on consoles. Their controllers are great for this kind of thing, and they largely evolved from the arcade, which is the same audience consoles were originally aimed at.

      RPGs are something of a toss up -- they're usually fun on both platforms. Ditto Flight Sims, which essentially require a separate control system on either platform. Driving games often do too, but even so the console versions are generally better.

      Basically, decide which kind of game you enjoy playing more and go for it. The other big advantage of a console system is that if you have friends over a lot then you're more likely to play head-to-head games on it than on PCs -- PC games just don't do well for multi-player-on-the-same-box generally.

      It used to be that PCs were the only real choice for playing online, but as you mention, that's changing. I don't forsee the game types on each system changing dramatically though - the ones the PC rules in are usually because of the more complex controls needed. Maybe once consoles come with keyboard/mouse standard, but not until then.

    4. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2
      FPS, RTS, Turn-based strategy (e.g. - Civ), and MMORPG are best on PCs. The controls do not lend themselves to the little hand controls on consoles. These kind of games evolved on the PC.


      I'm playing Metroid Prime right now. Awesome FPS. The controls are a bit hard to learn (being a mouse and keyboard guy myself) but I learned. Turn based strategy works fine on console, just no publishers (I first played civ on my snes). MMORPG - just look at Phantasy Star Online - you have to buy a keyboard, but it's lots of fun, or so I am told. There are a few RTS on consoles, but not enough.

      RPGs are something of a toss up -- they're usually fun on both platforms. Ditto Flight Sims, which essentially require a separate control system on either platform. Driving games often do too, but even so the console versions are generally better.


      Consoles can come with more complicated controls like that new one for XBox (the name escapes me). And you can get mice and keyboards for the ps2 (and keyboards for the gamecube).

      Someone already touched on the big thing I missed though - modifiable content is just not that big on consoles. Yet. :)
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    5. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Very good point. Additionally this means that you get more gaming for your dollars. Look at the people that bought Half Life and have played CS for the last (?) years on the same old hardware.

      However, I wouldn't doubt that eventually, console gamers will be able to mod content. Of course, those consoles are going to strongly resemble PC's.... hmmm... :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    6. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Halleluja, say it loud! Say it proud!

      Or whatever it goes like. Other good example, Morrowind. The new expansion pack is PC only. All the mods and stuff? PC only. All my favorite games are like this. Recently Mafia had a great mod. Turn all the fake car names into the real ones. Like to see this done on a console.

      As for the original posters claim that the hardware is coming closer to the PC, dream on. How much memory does an X-box have? 64mb. My vid card has twice that. Yeah so my pc is a lot more expensive then a console. A porsche is a lot more expensive then a trabant. You get what you pay for.

      And for every game that needs a patch there are the great patches that add to the life of a game. Grand Prix Legends wich was constantly upgraded to support newer vid cards. Halflife wich got a increase in its polygon count for the monsters. Free levels for Tomb Raider, eat that console owner :)

      As for playing in the living room. I don't know how most other people play but for FPS and racing games I need a desk like setup. I guess this is a matter of preference.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    7. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by silvaran · · Score: 2

      Two words: Metroid Prime. If you've played it (Gamecube), you'll know what console FPS is all about.

      I played Red Faction II on the PS2 with a keyboard/mouse. It was better than using the controller, but it still seemed kind of clumsy (the movement with the mouse was slow to respond). I find the best console games are ones that are designed directly for that specific console -- instead of having multi-platform engines adding bulky overhead to an otherwise fine game. Additionally, games targetted to a specific platform can take advantage of features only that platform has. Kind of the opposite of the Java philosophy, but when I have a game running at 20fps on a console with graphics that could arguably run at 60fps, I notice a difference (a la Gran Turismo 3)...

    8. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Heheh, for the record, this wasn't intended to be a pc vs console thread though it was inevitable given what I wrote in the top post :)

      Modding is cool and all, but it's not beyond the realm of possibility in the console world and unfortunately there are a lot of mods that just suck - hardly an excuse against modding in general, but I personally have only played a handful of good mods (and despite what I have said, I play a lot of PC games - just less and less every year).

      That reminds me of another nice thing about console games - NO PATCHES! Heheh, except occasionally a bug will make it into a console game, and then we're screwed.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    9. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 1

      Well, along your lines of the 'different genres on different platforms' remark, I'd say RPG's are the best example of that difference. Yes, they exist on both console and computer gaming, but the genre has evolved into almost entirely different entities. On the console side, we have the(SquareSoft led) move towards interactive movies... Highly linear plot, a focus on gorgeous graphics... The leveling up/combat determined by menu driven stat based system being the only connection to the original pen and paper RPG's that, in theory, inspired the genre. On the computer side of things, you have things like Morrowind. Open ended, focusing a lot on the role playing aspect of role playing games... You will see games that venture in the other direction on each platform(a console styled RPG on the PC, or a more open ended less console style game on consoles), but the trend does hold true for the most part... The best selling console and PC RPGs tend to 'match their platforms archetype'...

    10. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      You are wrong: yes, at one point there will be additional content for consoles (that's what the HD is there for, right?) BUT you will never be able to create one on a console. If you've ever programmed or done 3d moddeling, you'd know that. Not until consoles change so much that they resemble pc's...at which point the point is moot.

      And as for the "no patches"...I seem to remember that a recent xbox game needed one, which got d/l-ed on the hd...:)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    11. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      Maybe I'm just not L33T enough, but I think that console versions of First-Person Shooters suck. I think the mouse+ASDW combo is pretty hard to beat. Maybe some people are better on a console, but I really doubt it.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    12. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2
      You are wrong: yes, at one point there will be additional content for consoles (that's what the HD is there for, right?) BUT you will never be able to create one on a console. If you've ever programmed or done 3d moddeling, you'd know that. Not until consoles change so much that they resemble pc's...at which point the point is moot.


      Actually, there are console games that do allow modifications - RPGMaker for playstation and snes is an excellent example of one. Mariopaint is another. They're not very sophisticated, but it can be done. I am a programmer and I would argue that modding on a console is possible, just not very practical with the currently available tools. But given that consoles are basically closed computers, it is not outside the realm of possibility.

      Despite that, I can easily foresee people designing the mods on their PC and running/testing them on their consoles. I did this when I was programming a Gameboy program a few years ago. Many people on the Internet have translated japanese video games as well, which can run on the actual consoles (though targeting emulators).

      The only problem is that consoles are comparatively "closed" systems and the programmers of games would have to release their tools to the world at large. It's a stark contrast to the very open gaming world on the PC.

      And as for the "no patches"...I seem to remember that a recent xbox game needed one, which got d/l-ed on the hd...:)

      The XBox isn't a console. It's a crippled computer. :) Patches are far less common in a console environment though.
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    13. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      What with game platforms all being programmed in C++ these days, and becoming easier and easier to code for in general (requiring less direct hardware manipulation... except the PS2) we are seeing more and more PC games on consoles. This is bound to work the other way (and it has been) where we see more and more console games on PCs. The PC is better suited to run console games than vice versa because it is more powerful and you have more freedom of controllers, rather than less as we see on consoles.

      The one place consoles win we all know about, providing a stable and reliable platform which doesn't change. Developers like it, it's good for gamers. But the games which actually push the envelope are on the PC.

      Also, until a console system has a keyboard and mouse I refuse to play first person shooters on it, which is 99% of what I play anyway. The remaining 1% is mostly retro gaming and can be handled via emulation... on my PC :) I do occasionally trot out one of my older systems (like saturn, genesis, SNES, or NES) so I can play something on it, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by hvatum · · Score: 0

      >I think between this and the four noisy fans I have >in my PC right now, my next one will not be bought >with gaming in mind. Maybe a tablet PC :) What are you going to do with a tablet PC?! Even if its running Linux I still don't see the point in it, its just a Capable laptop that someone ripped the keyboard off of to save a few bucks on manufacturing. Thanks but no thanks, when I pay 2,000 dollars for a computer I expect it to come with a keyboard!

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    15. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      As for the original posters claim that the hardware is coming closer to the PC, dream on. How much memory does an X-box have? 64mb. My vid card has twice that. Yeah so my pc is a lot more expensive then a console. A porsche is a lot more expensive then a trabant. You get what you pay for.

      Ok, you've got 128 MB on your video card. Name ONE PC game, available to buy now, that looks better than anything available on the PS2, Gamecube, or XBox. Can't? Sounds like all that extra hardware you've got isn't helping you out that much.

      Rationalize your spending all you want, but at the end of the day your hardware still isn't playing games that are any prettier than a console.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    16. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2
      Morrowind and OFP.

      I grant you that perhaps it depends on what you mean by "prettier". If you mean flashy, lots of lens flares and light effect, well you might be right, not my type of game. OFP goes for long range detail. Being able to switch the distance to 4km and see a tank platoon come all the way into range during dusk is great but it lacks the visual drama that most consoles go for. Different styles/tastes I suppose.

      So is my vid card worth it? Well when I try the same on a lower specced machine it will not draw to the same distance or with the same texture size. Since I like the huge distances and the sense of immersion it brings it is worth it for me. As for having to rationlize my spending, I am sorry to dissappoint you but pc hardware falls into the hobby department for me and I am old enough to be able to afford it easily.

      Don't try to impose youre tastes onto mine. I never claimed that Consoles are better or worse then a pc. Just different. But when you try to claim that consoles can outperform a top of the range PC you need to take a reality check. If you don't trust me, I wouldn't, go ask the developers of games that come out both for PC and platform. You will almost always find that the PC version has better graphics.

      But it will be very easy for you to convince me. Show me the OFP version for the X-box that they are producing and show me the same draw distances that I can do on my pc. Until you can I will claim that my pc, and those of most dedicated gamers, wich costs more then all consoles put together, will outperform any off them. I am ready to be proven wrong. Are you?

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    17. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by dsyu · · Score: 1

      Splinter Cell for the XBox will have download-able additional content via XBox Live, similar to PC game "upgrades" that are mostly content-based. Other XBox games have been announced that will do similar "upgrades".

      Many EA Sports games that have on-line play also have the ability to update their rosters to be up-to-date (e.g. NBA Live).

      Some console games have the ability (albeit crude in some cases) to create new content and share it. Tony Hawk 3 & 4 have a skate-park editor, TimeSplitters 2 has a level editor.

      No true way to create full-out game "mods" for console games yet, but with things like the XBox having a built-in HD and connectivity, it's feasibly and even likely to happen.

      For another poster who complained about lack of keyboard and mouse support, the PS2 supports USB keyboards and mice, and some games actually support them (again TimeSplitters 2 comes to mind).

    18. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by parliboy · · Score: 2

      Morrowind, PC on Amazon: 26.99 Morrowind, PC on XBox, 49.99 Dragon's Lair 3D, PC: 28.99 Dragon's Lair 3D, XBox, 49.99 If I'm primarily renting games, then consoles are gonna be just great. If I'm buying and I'm a gamer who enjoys playing many games, then my long-term best investment is PC gaming. The cost can add up over time.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    19. Re:Tweaking is lame - somewhat OT by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Don't try to impose youre tastes onto mine. I never claimed that Consoles are better or worse then a pc. Just different. But when you try to claim that consoles can outperform a top of the range PC you need to take a reality check.

      Well, you did claim that your "Porsche" outperforms my console. That to me means "better." I own both, personally, and also count gaming as a hobby which I can easily afford. However, given my experience with each medium, I always feel sheepish when I upgrade my PC. It just doesn't get you much bang for the buck. The only way I feel justified in my purchases is the fact that I also like to tinker with code a bit, and having nice hardware gives me something good to play with (even if I don't need it).

      And if you count draw distance as the only measure of graphical quality (which I *highly* doubt would be as much of a problem on any modern console as you think it is), then this discussion is pointless. I'll point you at Starfox Adventures, DOA3, Metroid Prime, or Rogue Leader and challenge you to come up with something that objectively looks significantly, or even noticeably better on the PC. You'll start counting polygons (or some other meaningless metric) and miss the point again.

      It sounds like you're into the wrong type of games for consoles, anyway. But my challenge stands -- I've got a $150 Gamecube and a $600 PC (a conservative estimate -- and definitely much lower than some 'hardcore' gamers' machines). There aren't any games that look so good that they justify that much of a price gap.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
  31. Irrelevant by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article might matter if you're a student who inherited your family's old PC and want some hope of playing new games on it. Otherwise, it's irrelevant. You can buy a nice 2.4GHz Pentium 4 with a GeForce 4 for under $1000. Actually, you can go below $800 pretty easily right now, if you keep your current monitor. PC performance has been leveling out lately, and the capabilities of what now sells for $800 have barely been scratched.

    I'm a game developer. I used to do high-end 3D game development on a P2-450 with 128MB of memory. I shipped commercial products on that system. It was a tad slow, but that was more because of swapping than anything else. Then I moved up to a P3-866 with 256MB. Now that was a nice system: very fast, no swapping, no complaints at all. Again, I shipped commercial products on that system, and meanwhile the gamer kiddies were all moaning about how you can't survive without anything below 1.5GHz or whatever. Heck, Dell advertising claims that a "low end" 1.8 GHz P4 is good for internet browsing and email. Then I moved up to the typical 2.4GHz system that everyone is buying these days. I can't really tell the difference. Compile times are faster, but they were pretty quick anyway.

    Bottom line: If a game runs crappily on a system like this, then the developer should be put out of business. There's no excuse. Why mess with this stuff anyway, when you can buy the hassle-free game console of your choice for significantly less than a Radeon?

    1. Re:Irrelevant by natron+2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This article is not nearly as irrelevent as you think. Not everyone has $800-$1000 just laing around to buy a new PC. Sure you could go and get it financed though Dell, and pay an outrageous interest rate. Everyone I know has a computer and I do not know anyone who has anything over a 1.8GHz. Hell, I am still running a PIII 1GHz (and no, I did not inherit this PC from my parents). It is just not feesable for most people to slap down nearly a grand for a new PC, when the one you have will run everything pretty damn good. I am sure if you did a /. poll you would realize that most people do not have the latest systems. So therefore, this article is very relevent.

    2. Re:Irrelevant by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. I run a 866 with 512MB (RDRAM) and I have no problem running TWO copies of Everquest through the magic of EQW. I always hear people bitching and moaning about how their system is struggling by and I just wonder what they are doing wrong.

      I bet a good defrag would make more difference for most people than upgrading their processor.

      On a related note, I'd love to see the peformance test of an 866/512MB system versus a 1.8/128 system, or a similiar test of a 1.8 with a (what is it, 10something RPM) versus a 2.4 with a 7200 RPM or 5400 (?) RPM drive and see which performs better for the average user.

      My hunch is INTEL and AMD wouldn't be happy with the results. When are they going to finally start putting out other components that are fast enough for the good chips anyway?

    3. Re:Irrelevant by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok. So let me get this straight. Developers should stop making more complex games just because you don't want to have to upgrade your system? I take it you're not getting DooM ]|[. The games that tax a system do it for a reason: they look better than console games! And what are you talking about with incompatibility? What are you running, a Voodoo 5?

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
    4. Re:Irrelevant by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Hell, I am still running a PIII 1GHz (and no, I did not inherit this PC from my parents). It is just not feesable for most people to slap down nearly a grand for a new PC, when the one you have will run everything pretty damn good. I am sure if you did a /. poll you would realize that most people do not have the latest systems. So therefore, this article is very relevent.

      And if you read my post carefully, I said that I couldn't tell the difference between a 866MHz and 2.4GHz for developing 3D games, and game players don't need nearly as much capability.

    5. Re:Irrelevant by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Ok. So let me get this straight. Developers should stop making more complex games just because you don't want to have to upgrade your system? I take it you're not getting DooM ]|[. The games that tax a system do it for a reason: they look better than console games!

      They look better because:

      1. A monitor is clearer and higher resolution than a TV.
      2. A GeForce 3 or 4 is practically a second CPU, one that's independent of the rest of your system (with 128MB and 8:1 texture compression, bus speed is a non issue) Plug one into a 400MHz system and you'll get the same graphics.

      I think that so-caled "high end" PC gamers don't have any kind of handle on what performance means or where it comes from.

      Also note that high-end PC games are selling very poorly. Doom 3 will be the exception, because all the fanboys will buy it, but try listing 12 PC games that require hardware T&L and have sold more than 100,000 copies each. Heck, try listing 5. Or 3. High end PC gaming is all but dead.

    6. Re:Irrelevant by tincho_uy · · Score: 1
      Why mess with this stuff anyway, when you can buy the hassle-free game console of your choice for significantly less than a Radeon?

      Warez, obviously!

      Now, on a more serious note, I find that consoles have quite shitty input devices... I mean, pads are nice but, at least for FPSs, they're not even close to ye olde keyboard & mouse

    7. Re:Irrelevant by Simon+Kongshoj · · Score: 2

      I completely agree. I think the inflated hardware requirements of modern games only serve to turn gamers into mindless consumers who have to keep buying more hardware to get high on the latest fix of benchmark scores. If these people did their work right, the upgrade race would be a lot less furious than it is, and we'd have less stress and annoyment to deal with.

      --
      Six sick .sigs, the Number of the Beast!
    8. Re:Irrelevant by archivis · · Score: 1

      A good game shop won't require it - but will have it there for those who can use it. Is it dead? No, people have just realized not everyone has a T&L card.

      Stuff will still go up, it's the nature of the beast.

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    9. Re:Irrelevant by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      Actually, you can go below $800 pretty easily right now, if you keep your current monitor.

      Wow, that's only 4 times as much as an Xbox!!!

    10. Re:Irrelevant by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      You haven't played UT2k3 with full Karma, have you? That's when you realise what's being done with the extra Hz.

      True, it might be because of lack of programming skillz, but you most definitely see and experience the difference between 866 and 2400.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    11. Re:Irrelevant by randyest · · Score: 1

      Here's one: Battlefield 1942. I couldn't care less if there are more. B1942 is amazing fun.

      --
      everything in moderation
    12. Re:Irrelevant by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      ad 1) duh, that takes a lot of extra power to fill, too
      ad 2)Absolute bollocks: with todays GPU's, the cpu is the bottleneck. A 400 hz cpu can't send enough info to the gpu to fully utilise the graphic card's processing power. Start reading some tech sites.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    13. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wouldn't know because he developed Space Invaders and still thinks that's the biggest CPU hog ever..

    14. Re:Irrelevant by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      A 400 hz cpu can't send enough info to the gpu to fully utilise the graphic card's processing power. Start reading some tech sites.

      On modern GPUs with lots of memory, there's no need to transfer every bit of data to the card. You upload your world, the card renders it. The world lives on the card. So do the textures. With 64MB or more, 8:1 texture compression goes a long way. Remember, the PS2 has 4MB of video memory, period.

    15. Re:Irrelevant by Stormie · · Score: 2

      Remember, the PS2 has 4MB of video memory, period.

      ..and a fast enough bus to DMA the entire contents of main memory into vram every frame without breaking a sweat.

    16. Re:Irrelevant by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      I'm not only talking textures here...I'm also talking vertex information. Which is where the bottleneck crops up.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  32. [Karma Whore]Full Text (Rather long) by Randolpho · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are quite a few links that I'm not posting. Sorry. This is just the text. And be thankful, too! I had to wade through 10 very slow links! :)

    I've written a few game-specific tweak guides for TweakTown in the past and in each of those guides I've had to cover some common ground such as where to find the latest drivers and how to update them, the best BIOS settings, general Windows optimization, and overclocking issues. It usually took up 1-2 pages of each guide and quite honestly would essentially be a repeat of the same information you may have seen in one of my previous guides.

    This got me thinking "what would a lazy tweak guide writer do in this situation?" The answer came to me in a blinding flash of unoriginality - write a general system optimization guide which you can refer to often, and which is easy to manage and update because the information is all in one location. And so this guide was born.

    As you read through the guide you may think some of it is a little obvious, or may be a little "untechnical". The truth of the matter is this guide is aimed at a wide audience, from people who have just starting using a PC, through to people who think Prof. Stephen Hawking is a nice man but a little dim.

    Remember this is only a guide, and a simple central resource at that. If something is not mentioned here, be proactive! If you follow the links provided you'll see that there's a wealth of greater detail awaiting you if you want to know more about a particular item. If all else fails and you still have a thirst for knowledge, use trusty ol' Google to search for more information. That's what I do.

    If you're already thinking "Why should I bother going through this guide, I just want my game to run faster man!" then you've missed the point. A lot of gaming problems are actually nothing to do with the game itself. In most cases it's a general system optimization issue of some sort. Do yourself a favour, take a few minutes of your life and read the following and I promise you'll find something of use which should have you gaming at full speed ASAP.

    System Optimization - Page 2 [Hardware Setup]

    Ok the layout for this guide is simple - we have to start at the very heart of your PC and work our way outwards from there. That means starting with the hardware, then moving on to the BIOS and ultimately the software such as operating system and drivers. If you really want a tight, fast, stable rig then you will need to shore up each department. The latest drivers won't do anything if the problem lies with a faulty graphics card, poor overclocking or incorrect BIOS settings.

    Where I refer to other guides/utilities/sites I highly recommend you take time out and read them. I don't just throw in links for the hell of it - this is stuff I use myself to optimize my system and so far it's worked extremely well for me, so I'm sharing the wealth.

    Hardware Setup

    The first thing to do is to make sure that your PC is physically operating correctly and that no hardware is faulty or badly set up. Just because your computer boots up into Windows and everything seems ok, doesn't mean your PC is set up 100% correctly or that the hardware is working to its fullest potential.

    - How Do I Know What I've Got?

    If you've bought a pre-built computer and you have no real idea exactly what's "in the box" then the first thing you have to do is get all your system specifications. Ideally you should have a listing of each component, its manufacturer/brand, model number, and details such as amount of onboard memory. If this is not available to you, or you just want to be sure, download SiSoft Sandra 2003, which is a free benchmarking and system information utility, and run the relevant modules such as Mainboard Information, Video System Information, Sound Card Information, etc. There you'll see the exact specifications of the components, and you should note these down for future reference.

    You should also note if you've got a pre-built PC and little knowledge of PCs in general, that the following information can potentially be harmful to your system, so please don't open up your case, fumble around, break the pins on your CPU, then email me angrily saying you're going to sue. Read, read, read...then do!

    I recently built a PC and foolishly forgot to connect one of the obscure power connectors on the motherboard. Others with the same motherboard tell me it's a common mistake, but my PC seemed to be working fine initially. It did explain the occasional crashes I got in games though, and once I plugged in the extra connector - no more crashes.

    By now the above example's got you thinking "so why am I listening to this guy?" My point is that it's easy for anyone to make a mistake when building a PC. Overlooking a connector, not setting a dipswitch correctly or not using the right type of cable are common mistakes. You can be thankful that one of the PC world's authorities, Tom's Hardware, has a recent 2-part guide on building your own PC which I recommend to everyone:

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/02q3/020904/i nd ex.html

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/howto/02q3/020918/i nd ex.html

    Even if you still think your PC is rock solid, there are a lot of great tips in those guides. Pay particular attention to their instructions on how to properly connect a hard drive and CD-ROM/DVD drive. This is something I see done incorrectly by a lot of first-time PC builders, or for people who've added drives to an existing pre-built machine. The optimal primary/secondary master/slave configuration is very important to getting the best performance out of your drives.

    This is one area I believe is either "over-blamed" or "under-blamed", depending on whether you're new to PCs or a "veteran". The new tend to think everything that's going wrong with their PC is due to faulty hardware. The veterans are convinced there is a setting somewhere which will fix that dead hard drive. The truth lies somewhere in the middle: PC hardware components are just like any other electronics devices - they can malfunction, or be damaged through abuse, and eventually they will just plain stop working.

    How do you determine whether your hardware is faulty or not? It's not always easy, but try following these basic steps:

    1. Read software tweak guides such as those linked to in this guide to optimize all the software and BIOS settings. If that doesn't improve the situation then that's the first indication that it is hardware-related in some way.

    2. If you've overclocked your PC components, set them all to their defaults. For starters, the overclocking itself may have damaged a component (see Overclocking section), but sometimes a component which is overclocked too far can behave in a faulty manner. Remember that overclocking automatically voids your warranty, so at the very least don't expect support from your PC dealer if you mention the component is or has been overclocked.

    3. Try the drastic step of a full reformat of your hard drive and then a clean reinstall of your operating system (see Operating System section). This should resolve a lot of problems. If it doesn't then the remaining areas of exploration are the configuration of your PC components or the BIOS settings.

    4. Go through your BIOS settings carefully (see BIOS Optimization section) and if in doubt, or if you're still having problems, choose the "Load Fail-Safe Defaults" option.

    5. If you've reached this step, it's time to open up your PC and refer to your components' instruction manuals, and/or the guides linked above, for correct setup. It may well be that a badly set switch or missing/incorrect cable is the source of your problems, or perhaps a build up of heat. While you're in there, look for any signs of extreme heat such as scorch marks, a burnt smell, or strange noises. Remember to completely switch off and unplug all your hardware before opening anything up, and to avoid damage to components from static electricity, wear a special wristband or ground yourself by touching the power supply box first.

    6. Once you've exhausted all of the above options and you still suspect a component is faulty, it may be hard to determine which one. If in doubt don't attempt to repair or muck around with an item yourself. Take your entire PC to an authorized dealer or specialist PC technician. Sometimes it's better to cut your losses and get something fixed correctly or replaced under warranty than to wind up losing all your data or suffering a destroyed component just because you decide to play PC Doctor one afternoon.

    System Optimization - Page 3 [BIOS Optimization]

    BIOS Optimization

    The BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) is a program held on a small chip on your motherboard. It provides the instructions for what your PC should do as soon as it turns on. Your BIOS is independent of your operating system, which means that it is not affected by which operating system you use, or which version of drivers you've installed, or what your settings are in Windows for example. The BIOS supersedes all of that, and your drivers and operating system will load well after the BIOS has loaded up. The BIOS basically controls a range of hardware-related features and is the "middle-man" between your CPU and all the attached devices in your system.

    All of this means that if there is an incorrect setting in your BIOS - that is a setting which is not optimal or correct for your hardware configuration - then you will have problems regardless of what you change in Windows, or which driver version you install.

    - POST

    As your BIOS starts to load, the first thing it does is the Power-On Self Test (POST), a diagnostic program which checks your components and makes sure everything is present and working OK. POST is usually extremely fast - blink and you'll miss it. You will only really notice it if it stops when encountering an error. POST error messages can be a bit obscure, but usually give you a lead as to where to look in your BIOS settings. A quick general guide to what the POST error beeps mean is here, but a more accurate indication is found in your motherboard's manual.

    If you have no POST errors you will see your PC's startup screen, which shows such information as your BIOS type (e.g. Award), the key to press to access your BIOS settings (e.g. DEL, ESC or F2), the type of processor and its speed, RAM amount and RAM test, drive information, and so on. Note if any of this information is clearly incorrect, it may be that your hardware is extremely new and hence not recognized correctly by the BIOS, you've overclocked your PC too far, or you have bad BIOS settings.

    At this point, if you quickly press the indicated key (usually DEL) repeatedly you can access your BIOS settings. If your BIOS has a password then you'll have to enter it first to access your BIOS settings. If you've forgotten the password, then try the following site.

    - BIOS Settings

    Once in your BIOS, there are a range of settings and they will differ based on which motherboard chipset and what type of BIOS you have. I cannot possibly cover them all here, nor can I give you the best settings as this will depend on your individual hardware configuration. What I can do is point you to this excellent Definitive BIOS Optimization Guide. The guide covers what each setting actually does, and when used in conjunction with your motherboard's user manual arms you with the information you need to figure out the best settings for your individual hardware configuration.

    I do want to make special mention of RAM related settings, as it is almost a form of overclocking if you choose RAM timings which are faster than your RAM supports by default (see the above BIOS Guide for an explanation of RAM timings). Usually, your RAM default timings are determined by SPD (Serial Presence Detection). You can change these timings to increase RAM performance, but this can often cause problems along the same lines as overclocking other components (see the Overclocking section). Just keep in mind that if you're having any problems it could be the RAM timings as much as anything else.

    - BIOS Updates

    The BIOS is actually written on an EPROM (Eraseable Programmable Read Only Memory) chip, which means that it can be updated with new information. Motherboard manufacturers often release new BIOS versions which can improve performance, stability and compatibility, add new features or modify existing features, and fix known bugs. These new BIOS versions are available for download on the manufacturer's website, and I've provided a link to the support sites of the most common motherboard manufacturers below:

    - ABIT

    - ASUS

    - DFI

    - EPoX

    - Gigabyte

    - Intel

    - Iwill

    - MSI

    - Shuttle

    - VIA

    Go to your manufacturer's site, download the latest BIOS for your exact motherboard model and follow the instructions on the site to "flash" (update) the chip on your motherboard with this new BIOS. A word of warning - flashing the BIOS can be tricky. If something goes wrong and your PC won't boot up then you may have to take your motherboard to a dealer to have the EPROM chip replaced, so when updating your BIOS follow the instructions to the letter. In particular, make sure your PC is not overclocked when flashing the BIOS.

    If you're feeling game, there are enthusiast-modified BIOS out there which may provide added functionality and performance beyond manufacturer's specifications. One place to download such BIOS is BIOSMods, but remember that playing around with BIOS is a risky thing, so take care.

    It's important to have the latest BIOS simply because it can help improve your PC's performance while at the same time ensuring that any known bugs with the hardware have been resolved.

    System Optimization - Page 4 [Overclocking]

    Overclocking

    I'm going to run through the basics of overclocking, and the impact it has on games. If you're a veteran overclocker bear with me.

    - What Is Overclocking?

    Overclocking is the process of increasing the clock speed of a component of your PC. The "clock" referred to is a specialised oscillator pulsing with a frequency that determines the rate at which a processor can perform instructions. A 2 Gigahertz Pentium 4 for example has a frequency of oscillation of around 2 billion pulses per second. The theory of overclocking is simple: increase this clock speed and you'll increase the rate at which instructions are performed - ergo you have a faster PC.

    This is similar to the way in which increasing the revs on an internal combustion engine means it can work faster. It's interesting to note that just like the engine, a PC which is now running faster will often also require more fuel (voltage) and cooling to perform correctly, otherwise just like the engine you risk overheating, a shut down, or even permanent damage. At the very least, it is well known that overclocking - depending on component tolerance and cooling - will reduce the life of your components, even if this is as trivial as getting 5 years out of a CPU instead of 10. On the other hand, if done correctly and within reason, overclocking will give a noticeable system performance boost for at most the cost of some extra cooling.

    In practice system overclocking is usually done by increasing the Front Side Bus (FSB) speed in the BIOS. The FSB is the main pathway between your major system components, and as the FSB speed increases, information is transferred back and forth more rapidly as all your major components work off this bus speed. However there are certain problems with increasing the FSB. To start with, some components running off this bus, such as your AGP graphics card and PCI devices (e.g. Sound card) operate at a much lower bus speed by default, so your motherboard has special Dividers/Multipliers to maintain the PCI and AGP bus speeds at or close to their default (typically ~ 33Mhz for PCI and 66Mhz for AGP).

    As you increase the FSB, your CPU speed will increase. Your RAM speed may also increase (depending on the memory divider/multiplier), which increases the amount of information the RAM can transfer back and forth with the CPU (referred to as Bandwidth). This improves performance but increases the stress on your RAM. At the same time, depending on your PCI/AGP dividers, the bus speeds on your graphics card and PCI devices may also increase. These devices can malfunction at higher bus speeds. All the while, as your system speed increases, at some point certain components, particularly the CPU but to some extent the RAM and AGP port, will require more voltage to fuel this increased performance. You can increase the voltage through your BIOS, but greater voltage equals greater heat, for which the standard cooling on your components - typically a metal heatsink with a fan on top - will no longer be adequate. Now you begin to appreciate the delicate balancing act which is overclocking!

    For more information on FSB overclocking, check out our FSB Overclocking Guide, and for more on how heatsink cooling works, try our Heatsink Theory Guide. That's just the start. If you're interested, start searching for more information on overclocking.

    - How Do I Overclock?

    The main components which can be overclocked successfully for higher overall system performance are your CPU, RAM and Video Card. Now before you think I'm going to begin covering the actual steps required to overclock your PC, believe me it's too long and detailed and varies too much from system to system to be covered here. Some good starting points for finding out more are Beginner's Guide to Overclocking at Overclockers.com, a good site to pursue this topic, and this basic Overclocking Help Guide. We also have a Beginner's Guide to Overclocking nVidia Video Cards here at TweakTown which will show how a video card can be overclocked. Note that along with the utilities mentioned in that guide, I highly recommend RivaTuner for overclocking and tweaking your nVidia based video card.

    The main aim of covering overclocking here is to give you some guidance on the impact of overclocking when optimizing your system, particularly for gaming.

    - Overclocking and Games

    Overclocking is a strange thing indeed. It's as much luck as it is science. Two people with identical systems will achieve different levels of overclock successfully (i.e. with stability and performance) due to factors such as different build qualities/dates of the components, different environmental conditions such as ambient temperature and humidity, different BIOS versions/settings, and finally different operating system and driver settings.

    It's important to remember therefore that even if you've heard of "the same" machine as yours running at much higher speeds, your system could be limited by a number of factors and therefore you just might be pushing it too far in trying to reach this "guaranteed" speed.

    Any time you overclock your system you are pushing it beyond specifications, so don't be surprised if this manifests itself in some very strange and unpredictable ways. Everyone who overclocks is familiar with some of the more noticeable problems of an unstable overclock: system freezes/resets/crashes to desktop, Windows blue screen errors (also called the Blue Screen Of Death - BSOD), registry corruption errors, PC not loading up or stopping part-way through loading, PC not even getting past POST (with beeping errors), and so forth.

    While some of the above are clearly due to overclocking, some people don't realise that less frequent freezing/resets, strange application behaviour (not starting correctly, crashing to desktop at some point, flickering, graphical glitches, strange AI behaviour), corrupt downloaded files, corrupted files copied to/from the hard drive and/or CD/DVD-ROM, badly burnt CDRWs etc. are the more subtle signs of overclocking-related errors. This is something you should not put up with. There's no reason why your system can't be stable 99% of the time, especially if you run a recent operating system like Windows XP.

    System Optimization - Page 5 [Overclocking (Part 2)]

    Overclocking (Continued)

    - Stress Testing

    There's a point at which your system is "over"-overclocked for the combination of components and cooling you've got. The trick is determining exactly when is "too far", especially with the somewhat misleading guidance from some overclockers along the lines of "If it's not on fire, it can go higher". Here are some helpful free tools which should help you determine whether your system is acceptably stable at your current level of overclock:

    - 3DMark2001SE - A graphical benchmarking tool, can also be used to determine whether your system will be stable for gaming. Run it on default settings, and under Options>Change tick Looping. Now, start up the benchmark, let it run for two hours or more (the longer the better), and come back to see the results. Your PC should still be running the benchmark when you come back, and the on-screen graphics should be clear without any glitches. If your PC has frozen or rebooted, crashed back to the desktop, or you can clearly see texture flickering and "sparkles" (dots appearing randomly) then your system is overclocked too far. Try additional cooling, and failing that simply scale back the overclock on either your video card and/or your CPU.

    - Codecreatures - Another good graphical benchmarking similar to 3DMark, which also doubles as a stress test for your system. Run the benchmark several times and again if your system crashes or displays anomalies then you've overclocked too far.

    - Prime95 - A program which will effectively stress test your CPU. Once you've installed the application, to run the actual stress test run Prime95.exe and choose the Just Stress Testing button. Next, under the Options menu select Torture Test to start testing. Also read the document Stress.txt that comes with the program when you get the chance. It will explain more about CPU stress testing and how Prime95 helps uncover instability. The program recommends running the torture test for between 6 - 24 hours. A heavily overclocked PC may crash within a short while of running the test, however if your PC lasts over 6 hours it should be stable enough for gaming.

    - SiSoft Sandra 2003 - Sandra is a benchmarking and system information utility which is quite handy. Once you've installed Sandra, it has a range of modules for providing system information, but some are primarily for benchmarking and stress testing. Run the Burn-In Wizard module and you'll see that it allows you to select any or all of the 6 major benchmarking modules in Sandra. If you then continue, it will allow you to choose the number of times you wish to run these tests, or to simply run them continuously until stopped. I recommend running all but the File System and CD-ROM/DVD benchmarks in a continuous loop for at least 2 hours to test for stability. As always, if your system crashes or freezes at any point you know something's not right with your overclock. If you want to pinpoint the problem, try running individual modules on a loop (such as the CPU Arithmetic Benchmark by itself) and if there's a failure you'll have a better idea of which component is to blame.

    - DocMemory - A memory testing utility which can identify RAM-specific problems by stress testing your memory. You will have to install the program on a floppy disk, then reboot your system booting from this floppy. Upon reboot it will start DocMem and default to the Stress Test mode. Simply choose the Test button to start the testing. If you have any crashes or errors then it's quite clear the problem is with your RAM.

    Of course, if you have any current games with a demo mode or a benchmarking utility (such as Benchmark.exe in Unreal Tournament 2003) then I suggest running those for a lengthy period of time as well to see how stable your system is in a 'real world' gaming environment.

    The aim of any system, overclocked or not, should be a combination of stability and performance, not one or the other. There's no point having a blindingly fast system if it crashes most of the time. Forget PC benchmarking "drag races" or bragging rights, the ultimate aim of a computer for every day use is to run your programs quickly and dependably. By the same token - and the reason why this guide was written - there's no point having great hardware if you're not going to work it to its full potential, so I am by no means saying that you shouldn't overclock - just that you should do it correctly.

    System Optimization - Page 6 [Operating System]

    Operating System

    We've worked our way from the hardware to the software, and the most important piece of software on your system is the Operating System (OS). The OS is the interface between you the user and the hardware and peripherals of your system. It takes your inputs and converts them into information the hardware can understand, and vice versa.

    For many years this was a Microsoft OS by the name of DOS (Disk Operating System). It consisted of plain black screen with green or white text, and the only input device was the keyboard. DOS holds some fond memories for the older ones among us, but Windows - although the earlier versions were somewhat unstable at times - is infinitely more friendly and easy-to-use.

    Quite obviously optimizing your OS is imperative to a fast stable system. Below I provide resources and advice on how best to do that for your particular OS.

    - Linux

    In recent times an alternative to Windows has sprung up in the form of Linux. Now you can call me all the bad names under the sun, but I'm not going to cover Linux optimization in much detail here. If you want to optimize Linux, try a site like TuneLinux or this article at Tom's Hardware about Windows Gaming on Linux as your starting points.

    Unfortunately I simply don't have the knowledge or experience to provide you with much Linux guidance.

    - Windows Optimization

    Like it or not, Microsoft Windows is the most popular operating system at present on personal computers. There are several versions of Windows floating around on PCs out there, the most common ones being used for gaming being Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition (SE), Windows Millennium (ME), Windows 2000 and Windows XP (Home and Pro).

    I don't want to get into a debate over which OS is best for gaming, as that is a topic of contention amongst geeks which I can't resolve here. Suffice it to say that unless you've performed a clean reformat and install of each OS on your current system, thoroughly tweaked the OS and run benchmarks on each then you won't ever truly know which is actually the fastest or the best for you. Results from other people will differ based on their exact setup, level of overclock, optimization of the OS and BIOS, etc. In the end it all depends on what you can afford, what features you're looking for, what type of interface you like, how large your hard drive and memory is, how new your hardware is, and so forth. Everything that follows is my personal view based on experience and research.

    - Windows XP (Home & Professional)

    I personally use WinXP Pro and so it's only natural for me to have recently completed a comprehensive Windows XP Tweak Guide for it. This guide brings together all the main known performance tweaks, and without being modest, I highly recommend you read and follow the guide from start to finish to optimize XP correctly. I also provide links to other Windows XP tweaking resources in that guide, so there's plenty more XP tweaking to discover once you've read the guide. Below I address three common questions about Windows XP:

    - What is the Difference Between WinXP Home and WinXP Pro?

    Well effectively there is no difference whatsoever for performance and gaming purposes. The main differences are that XP Pro has a few extra utilities/functions for administering networks, such as the Group Editor. If you have WinXP Home you are not missing out on anything, and in fact if you have a standalone machine at home (i.e. you're not connected to a network), XP Home is just as good as XP Pro for your purposes.

    - What is the Difference Between OEM, Upgrade, Academic and Full Versions of Windows?

    There is no difference - aside from price and packaging - between any of these versions in terms of performance or content. These are just different methods by which Microsoft can target particular markets. OEM means Original Equipment Manufacturer and an OEM copy of Windows can only be sold with the first-time purchase of several major hardware components (basically a PC). The upgrade edition is based on the assumption that you own a valid earlier version of Windows. The upgrade is the same as the full edition, and you can do a full clean install on a reformatted hard drive using the upgrade edition. The only difference is that during the installation it will ask you to insert your earlier version of Windows to verify that you're entitled to the cheaper upgrade edition. The Academic edition is again identical to the equivalent standard version, however you can only purchase it if you are an educator or a student.

    - Which File System is Better - NTFS or FAT32?

    This is another contentious topic, and the answer depends on your requirements. From the Microsoft Windows XP manual comes this advice:

    Use FAT32 if:
    - Your hard drive is smaller than 32GB.
    - You want to install more than one operating system on your computer.

    Use NTFS if:
    - Your hard drive is larger than 32GB and you are running only one operating system on your computer.
    - You want enhanced file security.
    - You need better disk compression.

    Essentially NTFS is a newer, more stable and much more secure file system which has several benefits FAT32 doesn't. For example, if you format your hard drive in NTFS and password protect it, no one can access the information on the drive without the correct password, even if they physically steal it. As for the speed difference, well for larger drives it is negligible. In my opinion the benefits of NTFS, and the similarities in speed with FAT32 make a strong case for formatting your drive in NTFS, unless you have a very small drive or want to install more than one OS on it.

    - Windows 2000

    Windows 2000 is extremely similar to Windows XP, quite simply because XP is based on Windows 2000. Many of the tweaks and issues covered in the WinXP section above will apply to Windows 2000. However here are some Windows 2000 Tweak Guides which should help you if you run this OS:

    - Tweak3D Windows 2000 Tweak Guide

    - Rojak Pot Windows 2000 Hints and Tips

    - ClanKiller's Windows 2000 Network Tweak Guide

    - ClanKiller's Windows 2000 Speed Tweak Guide

    - WinGuide's Windows 2000 Tweaks

    - Tweaker's Asylum Windows 2000 Tweak Guide

    The above guides should cover the bulk of your Windows 2000 tweaking needs. However there is one question which is often asked by Windows 2000 users:

    - Should I Switch from Windows 2000 to Windows XP?

    From my research and experience, I have seen that Windows 2000 and Windows XP are similar in speed. Windows 2000 used to have issues with compatibility for games as it was originally designed for professional (office and server) use. However with the release of three Service Packs, the latest being Service Pack 3 (SP3), the OS has no major compatibility or performance issues, just like Windows XP.

    I personally believe that Windows XP provides more flexibility in interface customization, additional features and built-in support for the latest peripherals, however I don't think anything really warrants switching from Windows 2000 just yet. If you're happy with Windows 2000 stick with it. If you're using any other version of Windows, or choosing an OS for the first time, I would recommend Windows XP because it has excellent stability and memory management compared to the Win9X/ME family, and quite simply because Microsoft and the major developers are focusing their driver support and compatibility efforts towards WinXP.

    System Optimization - Page 7 [Operating System (Part 2)]

    Operating System (Continued)

    - Windows Millennium Edition

    In most respects Windows Millennium Edition (ME) is the same as Windows 98 Second Edition (SE). It does contain some additional features and some hidden updates (such as some modem tweaks) from Win98SE, but in most cases any tweak guide for Windows ME should apply to Windows 98SE and vice versa, and to a significant extent Window 98. Windows ME is much maligned because of the cosmetic nature of its "upgrade" from Windows 98SE. A lot of this is unfair however, because Windows ME can be just as fast as Windows 98SE given the right tweaking, and in my experience is just as good for gaming as the older OS.

    Here are some Windows ME specific tweak guides, although all the Windows 98/98SE tweak guides further below can be used for Windows ME as well:

    - TweakTown WinME System Tweaking Guide

    - TweakTown WinME Modem Tweaking Guide

    - Tweak3D WinME Tweak Guide

    - Tweaker's Hideout WinME Tweak Guide

    - WinGuide's WinME Tweaks

    Remember to check the Windows 98/98SE guides below for more tweaking information, and again for Windows 98/98SE users, read through the above WinME guides as many tweaks will apply to you.

    - Windows 98 / 98 Second Edition

    Windows 98 Second Edition (SE) was released around a year after the original Windows 98 was released, and added a range of features and updates to the original Windows 98. Basically you can download Windows 98 SR1 (Service Pack 1) which will add all the important features and updates to the original Windows 98 - minus some of the additional user interface updates of Windows 98SE. If you're running Windows 98, make sure you download SR1 and all additional updates from the Microsoft Windows 98 Downloads Site otherwise you may have major compatibility and performance problems with the latest games and applications.

    Even if you're running the newer Windows 98SE it's vital that you update your OS by using Windows Update, or by going here. Because these operating systems predate some of the newer technology, they have limitations in terms of recognising or correctly utilizing some new hardware or newer configurations. For example, the Windows 98/98SE/ME family all have issues with managing more than 512MB of RAM efficiently - see this Microsoft Knowledge Base Article for more information. Quite obviously some of these problems are inherent in the design of the OS and can only be "fixed" by upgrading your Windows. Many others require the updates or tweaks to overcome.

    There is a vast range of Windows 95/98/98SE (commonly referred to as Win 9X) Tweak Guides available. Some are listed below:

    - Tweak3D Win9X Tweak Guide

    - Tweak3D Win9X Shell Tweak Guide

    - WinGuide's Windows Tweaks

    Remember that you can refer to the guides under the Windows ME section as well for more tweaking information.

    In the end Windows 98, 98SE and ME will be phased out and you will find support for these OS harder and harder to come by. It is a sad fact of life that whether through deliberate obsolescence or simple technological progression or both, you will need to upgrade your operating system. This has already happened to Windows 95 to a major extent and that is why I don't cover it here. It is simply not a viable gaming platform anymore if you want the best performance, stability and compatibility on a modern PC - MS has dropped support for it altogether and so have most developers and manufacturers.

    - General Windows Optimization

    No matter which version of Windows you run, there are some simple tips which will give you the best performance:

    1. As much as possible, start with a clean full install of your OS of choice. That is, I strongly recommend against "upgraded" installations. If you want to upgrade (say from Windows 98SE to Windows XP), do a full reformat of your hard drive and install the new OS. Believe me, it makes a difference.

    2. If you have replaced any major system components such as motherboards, CPUs or even graphics cards, I recommend a reformat and reinstall. This is particularly true if you've changed the brand of the chipset (e.g. from Intel to VIA, or from ATi to nVidia). While your system should operate correctly because of the plug-and-play nature of new systems, your performance is not optimal unless you do a clean install of your OS with the new component(s).

    3. If you've installed Windows XP, and you want to convert to NTFS from an existing FAT32 file system, I highly recommend reformatting in NTFS for optimal performance. You can convert from FAT32 to NTFS without a reinstall (see my WinXP Tweak Guide above), but the cluster sizes will not be optimal and hence your performance will not be at its best.

    4. No matter which version of Windows you run, always run the Windows Update function (under Tools>Windows Update in Internet Explorer 6, or click the Windows Update Icon) as often as possible, as many critical updates are necessary to maintain a stable, secure PC environment. The older your version of Windows, the more vital it is that you run Windows Update regularly. If you cannot run Windows Update then either you have a pirated copy of Windows, in which case I cannot help you, or if you have a legitimate copy try this link to get to Windows Update. If you want to download updates and save them for later installation and archiving, try the Windows Update Corporate Site.

    5. If there is a Service Pack available for your version of Windows, install the latest one. You may hear rumours about SP1 for Windows XP "ruining XP". If SP1 does cause you problems then it's highly likely your current install of Windows is not very sound. Ideally you should start with a clean install of your OS, then install the latest SP for best results. If you can't do that then back up all your important data first, then install the Service Pack just to be safe. I have upgraded my existing XP Pro with SP1 and found no problems in over 2 months of use. There are no tricks to installation, just run as intended. These Service Packs are essential if you want your machine to be up to date and function as intended.

    6. If you have any problems with Windows and the answer is not in one of the above guides, your best bet is to search the Microsoft Knowledge Base. It is a rich and revealing source of information on a range of Windows problems, and if you spend a bit of time on the Knowledge Base it may save you hours of frustration.

    Well that's the basics of Operating System optimization. Next up, we look at the drivers which are so essential to keeping your system performing well.

    System Optimization - Page 8 [Device Drivers]

    Device Drivers

    A Device Driver (or simply Driver for short) is a program which controls a specific hardware device on your system. Your OS should already have built into it all the drivers necessary to communicate adequately with devices which were around at or around the time your OS came out. The issue then is why should you update your drivers? Updating a driver may be required due to one or more of the following basic reasons:

    1. Your device may be much newer than your operating system.
    2. Your device may have features which were not activated in the original set of drivers.
    3. Your device may have "bugs" (problems) or incompatibilities which can be reduced or resolved by means of software driver updates.

    The truth of the matter is that now that almost everyone has some form of internet connection, manufacturers are willing to rely on regular driver updates to address the above issues. This may mean that a piece of hardware or software may well leave the factory with known issues/incompatibilities or with features which aren't quite working right. The manufacturer then depends on the end user updating their driver over the internet when these issues are finally sorted out and a new driver is released. It's not an ideal situation but that's where it currently stands.

    More commonly though, because some games are released with new and sometimes not thoroughly tested features, certain hardware - particularly graphics and sound cards - will require driver updates to properly utilize these features.

    As you can see, it is extremely important that you have the latest drivers. Not so much for the sake of "having the latest", but because a great many problems in games and applications are actually resolved in the latest drivers, particularly if the game or application is a popular one.

    - Microsoft WHQL Certified and Non-Certified Drivers

    Before we go any further, it's important to note that some drivers have been "certified" by the Microsoft Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL) for use with Windows. Other drivers may not have this certification, and you may receive a warning about it in Windows. Without getting into a big anti- or pro-Microsoft debate here, suffice it to say that "non-certified" drivers are safe to use on your machine. WHQL certification is a quality control exercise Microsoft has introduced to ensure driver compatibility with Windows, but it is extremely expensive for developers to get each and every driver they release WHQL-certified, so often drivers are simply not certified. Also WHQL certification does not automatically guarantee that a driver will fix your problems. It simply means it's had an extra level of testing to make sure it doesn't have any major problems in a Windows environment with a range of hardware. The upshot of all of this is that you can safely ignore whether a driver is WHQL certified as long as it's from a reputable company, like those I link to below.

    - Beta Drivers

    When software is being developed it undergoes various levels of testing, including alpha and beta (pre-release) stages. A beta driver is a driver which is not officially supported by the manufacturer, but often these drivers are "leaked" onto the internet and in recent times can even be downloaded directly from the chipset-makers website (see links below).

    While beta drivers can certainly help resolve problems, you should be wary of them due to the fact that they have not been fully tested - and in fact they're often released so that the public can be the guinea pigs at no cost to the developer. As long as you back up data regularly, and if available to you, you use System Restore or some other method to protect yourself, installation of a beta driver is not a giant threat. Just remember that if things do go wrong the drivers are officially unsupported, and in some cases if they're leaked you will not receive much sympathy from technical support.

    - Video Card Drivers

    Your video card drivers have a large bearing on your graphics performance in games. Certain anomalies in newer games such as flickering or missing textures, objects appears inside another, garbled text, etc. can often be resolved through driver updates. In any case, if you contact a technical support area chances are the first thing they'll ask you is to update your drivers, so do that first and foremost.

    There are two types of video card drivers you can download - manufacturer-specific drivers and reference drivers. What's the difference? Well modern graphics cards are based on a reference chipset design by one company which is then used by another company (perhaps with some features added or removed) to manufacture the final video card which sits in your machine. For example, nVidia will produce the GeForce FX reference chipset design, which will then be bought by particular manufacturers such as ASUS who may then decide to use faster memory chips on the final card they produce, or add Video Out capabilities, and so forth.

    Because most manufacturers do not currently deviate much (if at all) from the reference design, you can usually download and install the reference driver from the chipset designer's website without any problems. The manufacturer will also have a modified (and usually older) version of these reference drivers which are customized for your exact video card, and will utilize every feature on your card - such as any video out capabilities. For most people I would recommend using the reference drivers as these are the latest and hence have the most recent bug fixes. If you have any problems with the reference drivers (such as inactive features on your card) switch to the manufacturer's latest set.

    Below are the links to the driver download pages for the most popular chipset makers:

    - nVidia

    - ATi

    - SiS

    - Matrox

    - S3

    You can also download a range of official and unofficial (beta, leaked) drivers from the following 3D graphics websites:

    - 3DChipset

    - Guru3D

    - VideoDrivers

    - ABitboy

    Finally, if you want to download manufacturer-modified drivers, the following are some of the more popular video card manufacturers' support sites:

    - Abit

    - ASUS

    - Creative

    - Gainward

    - Gigabyte

    - Hercules

    - Leadtek

    - PowerColor

    - X-Micro

    Note you can also download new BIOS for your video card from the manufacturer's website (where available). Generally speaking you shouldn't need to update the BIOS on your video card, but the procedure is much the same as flashing the BIOS on your motherboard - take extreme care.

    System Optimization - Page 9 [Device Drivers (Part 2)]

    Device Drivers (Continued)

    - Microsoft DirectX

    DirectX is a set of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) - such as Direct3D - built into Windows which allows software developers to access complex multimedia functions with greater ease. What that means is that most games require DirectX to run in Windows as they were designed around it, and most recent games require DirectX version 8.1 or higher. Version 8.1 of DirectX is already built into Windows XP, so if you have an older version of Windows you'll have to download and install the latest version of DirectX. Most recent games also include the version of DirectX they require on the game CD, so check there first. You can download the latest version of DirectX - currently 8.1b - at the Microsoft DirectX Home Page.

    There are newer beta versions of DirectX currently available around the internet, such as DirectX 9.0 Release Candidate 1. There is also a DirectX 9.0 Uninstaller available in case things go wrong. My recommendation is to stay away from non-official versions of DirectX, as it is such a crucial part of Windows (and extremely difficult to uninstall properly) that if anything goes wrong you may have to completely reinstall your Windows. Better safe than sorry in this case.

    If you want to know which version of DirectX is currently running on your system - and in fact a whole lot more information about your system components - go to Start>Run and type "DXDiag" (without the quotes). The DirectX Diagnostic utility will open up, and you'll see your DirectX version near the bottom of the first screen. You can use DXDiag to change some of your hardware settings and test and troubleshoot your multimedia components. Very handy indeed.

    - Sound Card Drivers

    Just like your video card, your sound card needs the latest drivers to ensure peak operating efficiency. The following is a list of driver download links for the major sound card manufacturers:

    - AOpen

    - Creative

    - Guillemot

    - Hercules

    - Turtle Beach

    If your manufacturer is not above, try one of these general sound card driver sites:

    - Driver Zone

    - Gold Files

    There are often additional utilities and demos which you can download for your sound card which may help increase the usefulness of the card. These should also be available on your manufacturer's site, or on the installation CD provided with your sound card, so hunt around.

    - Motherboard Drivers

    Your motherboard is just like any other piece of hardware - it requires drivers to operate correctly. While your OS will contain drivers which support most motherboards without a problem, it's strongly advised that you update your motherboard drivers to get the best performance and to fix any known bugs and compatibility issues. Motherboard driver updates go hand-in-hand with BIOS updates.

    Just like graphic cards, motherboards are based on a reference chipset which may then be altered by the final manufacturer - and often is. However it is recommended that unless you have a very unique chipset (such as so-called "hybrid" chipsets) that you use the reference drivers from the chipset designer, with links to the download sites for these drivers provided below:

    - VIA (also see TweakTown's VIA Driver Guide/FAQ for more information)

    - Intel

    - SiS

    - nVidia

    General sites for downloading motherboard drivers include:

    - Guru3D

    - Motherboards.org

    For manufacturer-specific drivers, check the links provided for motherboard manufacturers in the BIOS section above.

    - Hard Drive, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and CD-RW Drivers

    For most purposes your Hard Drive, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and CD-RW will not require a driver update as such, because the motherboard drivers (see above) for the controllers connected to these drives are sufficient. However, you can download Firmware updates which act as both a driver and a BIOS update. Just like your motherboard and graphics card, your drive has a chip onboard which contains information on how to communicate with your system and also contains information on the best way to manage the drive itself, such as controlling drive speeds during read/write, and management of error checking and protection checking procedures.

    Firmware updates are typically available from your drive manufacturer's site and require a similar procedure (and caution) as flashing the BIOS on a motherboard or graphics card. The following are a list of common hard drive manufacturers:

    - IBM (also refer to this site for IBM Drive Firmware updates and information)

    - Maxtor

    - Seagate

    - Western Digital

    For CD/DVD/CDRW drives try the manufacturer's website (there are too many to list), or the following excellent general site to obtain new firmware for your drive:

    - The Firmware Page

    It is not essential that you update your drive's firmware, except in circumstances such as the IBM 60GXP and 75GXP drives which are prone to crash without a firmware update, or if you have an older CD/DVD/CDRW drive and you want to make sure it remains compatible with newer software/hardware.

    Other peripherals such as digital cameras, optical mice or printers may well have driver updates which you can download and install, but usually the drivers which accompany such devices on their installation CDs are sufficient, and if you run a newer OS like WinXP, most current peripherals or devices are supported straight out of the box without even needing to install additional drivers.

    System Optimization - Page 10 [Conclusion]

    Conclusion

    Well by now you're probably sick and tired of your PC and you want to trash the entire thing and replace it with a Mac. This is a very dangerous line of thinking, and I would urge you to seek professional psychiatric help before even thinking of buying a Mac. The truth is that a PC is a complex machine, made of up several different components of varying age, quality and function. Top that off with an operating system which is designed to be compatible with near infinite combinations of hardware and software and of course you need to spend some time and effort optimizing, customizing and maintaining your PC. It's a lot like a motor vehicle - every once in a while something goes wrong and it has to go to a mechanic. Even if nothing goes wrong it has to be serviced regularly to keep everything in tune. A PC needs the same sort of attention.

    Hopefully this guide has been some help in giving you a central resource for PC troubleshooting, maintenance and optimization, particularly when it comes to gaming. Modern PC games push computer hardware and software to its absolute limit, and while you may be able to run older games on your PC without a problem rest assured that a cutting edge game will bring it to its knees and uncover a weak link in no time.

    I want to thank all the sites I've linked to for providing a wealth of information and resources for PC users. I want to state categorically that there may well be errors in this guide, although I have made every effort to make sure everything is accurate. I guarantee that this guide will be kept up-to-date and I'll be continually refining and adding to the content to make sure it remains useful. If you find an error or a dead (non-working) link, or if you have some feedback, please email me (click my name at the top of the guide) and let me know. I try and respond to every email I get. You can also jump onto the TweakTown Forums and discuss any of the topics in this guide in the relevant forum.

    Now if you've been referred here from another guide, it's time to get back there and continue your tweaking!

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:[Karma Whore]Full Text (Rather long) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thanks, but it wasn't all that useful as the article apparently covered mostly the very basics and referred to the links (which are missing in your post) for the actual tweaking tips.

    2. Re:[Karma Whore]Full Text (Rather long) by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty worthless article to slashdotters. The jist of the article is: (1) Find out your equipment; (2) update your drivers and Windows.

  33. Why I've pretty much gone console by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Used to be I would never own a console. Not gonna happen, not gonna do it - my PC is faster, better, has a hard drive -

    Then I played Final Fantasy VII, and got hooked into consoles. Now, I prefer them. Why? True plug in play.

    Buy/Rent game.
    Insert into PS2/GameCube/Xbox/Gameboy Advance.
    Turn on.
    Play.

    That's it. Granted, there are some games that don't "console" real well - I'm still not sold on FPS games on the console (though the developers who make their games keyboard/mouse compatible get kudos in my book), and games like Starcraft are just not happening (though there are some wonderful turn based strategy games), but overall, my console gets a bigger workout than my PC does for games these days.

    What would make it better? Well, I wouldn't mind if Sony would make the PS3 with a built in hard drive (goodbye, memory cards!) and keep the USB (for keyboard/mouse FPS, online games, and when they start making Command and Conquer style PS2 games that I like), and include a VGA output by default (or a real adapter rather than a third party hack). Then I could just plug it into a monitor, and the only computers I'd really need would be my PowerMac and my Linux Server in the corner.

    1. Re:Why I've pretty much gone console by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on the PnP aspect of consoles, that is their forte. However, I'm *NOT* ditching my PC for games until the following happens:

      1. I can use a mouse and keyboard for FPS and RTS games. That includes the ability to customize the keyboard and mouse game command mappings.

      2. The console in question functions a bit like a PC and allows me to install, without limitation, software of my choosing. They don't have to allow me to run that software while licensed titles are running, I'm not looking to create a security nightmare for anyone. However, it's a bit ridiculous that a $200 XBOX can't even run Angband or MAME. This would allow me to move my *whole* gaming experience into the living room where it belongs without the need for a laptop.

      To be honest, I think consoles have gotten a lot better. Now that they play DVDs and have hard drives, they're really close to where I want them. They just need to open up just a little more and let us do things other than just generate revenue for the producers, and I'll be there.

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    2. Re:Why I've pretty much gone console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, it's a bit ridiculous that a $200 XBOX can't even run Angband or MAME.

      Actually.. it can, check out:
      MAME-X.

      Whether Microsoft is allowing it to, is a completely different story.

    3. Re:Why I've pretty much gone console by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      "I wouldn't mind if Sony would make the PS3 with a built in hard drive (goodbye, memory cards!"

      I'm not real keen on console games, but I know people who do and a big part of their activity is taking the memory cards over to their pals and being able to show them cool stuff, continue saved games etc.

      Without memory cards the options would be reduced to;
      Either you and your pals have consoles with an internet connection and you leave yours on and connected when you leave the house.
      Or floppy disks in the console.
      Or a console memory cards *AND* a hard disk.
      Seems the most sensible option to me.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  34. Tweaking is useful, to a degree by quantax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a zealot tweaker, I disagree that tweaking is useless. First off, if someone thinks they are going to double the speed of their system with some tweaks, thats ignorance. Tweaking serves two purposes for games: performance and quality. You know how often you can goto a support forum for a new game and see people saying, "Why does ___ run so slow?" and they dont realize they have all of the default game graphic settings on, which probably including shadows, realtime lighting, antialiasing, anistropic filtering and such. Understanding what these settings do can GREATLY improve your experience. No, this is not like buying a Radeon 9700, but thats $320, and this is free w/ a little time. Saying that tweaking is useless is like saying that recompiling your kernel is pointless if it works. Don't whine about people bothering to make the most of their hardware, no one is forcing you to do the same.

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    1. Re:Tweaking is useful, to a degree by aliens · · Score: 1

      I agree, some people blow a gasket when I tell them that I overclock, etc. It's not like I'm messing around on your boxes.

      Also, upgrading video drivers sometimes can give you substantial performance increases. I know somewhere there's a database of the Nvidia drivers compared in benchmarks.

      Also, the number of computers out there being bogged down with spyware and other taskbar crap, I feel like I'm making up for their poor states with my tweaked to perfection box.

      jmho

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
  35. WC3 by sterno · · Score: 1

    Wing Commander 3 plays just fine on my old P2/266 with 128MB of Ram and a Voodoo1 video card :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:WC3 by sharkey · · Score: 2

      my old P2/266 with 128MB of Ram and a Voodoo1 video card :)

      Hell, it does pretty good on my P200-MMX, 64MB RAM and ATI Mach 64.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  36. Feed the frenzy by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2
    Thanks to Intel's "let's go for Mhz over performance" attitude, you can barely tell the difference between a PIII-800 Mhz and a P4-3 Ghz.

    But pseudol33t "gamerz" have to have a reason waste big money buying the newest CPU and graphics card. It's group therapy for spendthrifts..."See! The red line goes past the blue line on this website! This justifies my spending $500!"

    Flipping a few switches in your BIOS isn't gonna make your computer that much faster (unless you have one of those 486's with the "TURBO" button).

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Feed the frenzy by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Mine was in turbo by default. When I pressed turbo it would actually go slower. that sucked.

      --
      Why not fork?
    2. Re:Feed the frenzy by ciupman · · Score: 0

      I tend to agree ... the performace diference is not that huge. Also, it's so damn stupid having Quake running at 240 fps ... or even Ut2003 Running at 90 Fps ..
      The human eye can't tell the diference from 60 fps up .. (for some even 30 fps)

      And even so the games don't improve in quality .. In the console world it's another story.. games are made for that hardware .. and thats it.. Programmers tend to give more slack to their creativity to compensate for some lack of visual goodies they could achieve with better hardware... there games look a lot better and funnier to be played..

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    3. Re:Feed the frenzy by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 0

      You're right, it is stupid to have Quake running at 240fps. But if your machine is capable of running Quake at 240fps and you limit it to 60fps you will mitigate fluctuations when the gaming gets intense. You can even play reasonably well on a slower computer if you lock down the fps even lower; to a point where you smooth out the spikes. Its not that bad to play at a constant 30fps as long as its predictable. Its when you're running at 100fps and then you drop to 19fps and then back to 100fps when it gets to be frustrating.

      --

      -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

    4. Re:Feed the frenzy by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2

      Why do you people never pay attention? With an average framerate of 90, you're likely to get points where the framerate could drop quite low, even into the teens. Also, what map runs at 90FPS? What if you want to play a bigger map?

    5. Re:Feed the frenzy by ciupman · · Score: 0

      To simplify what i said back there ..

      people nowadays only look towards the eye candy in games (and that relates to the number of fps you achieve)...
      where's the freaking game quality and originality?

      I'm not saying eyecandy is bad.. but look at this example .. Doom3 ... Whoa .. beauty .. all that technology.. Then you will start playing the game (this is one of many possible previews, might not be like that), and what a lump of manure ..;) the gameplay sucks .. it's so fast that you don't even have the time to retain all of that eyecandy.. kill monsters one after the other .. and stay stupid in the end of the game (reminds me Return to Castle Wolfenstein)..

      I would still buy a new addon to Half-life (still the best in it's domain, great story and which engine is old as hell) than the new Doom3 that would require the new Gforce fx (about 500 Us)
      to run at a measly 29 Fps (www.tomshardware.com)

      And if you want to play bigger maps .. reedit those .. and add some fog ;)!!! (lack of resources leads to creative thinking ...)

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    6. Re:Feed the frenzy by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I look at two things: frames-per-second, and how high I can crank the resolution.

      If I can run GTA3 at 1600x1200 AND keep the fps up, then I've made good choices in harware and tweaking.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    7. Re:Feed the frenzy by ciupman · · Score: 0

      I think games should be better developed to avoid those kind of fluctuations .. it shouldn't be the buyer responsability to avoid those ... like "if you want steady 60 fps just buy a gforce fx ".. that sucks .. Another thing, games should be reviewed by it's minimum fps, example: "... in worst conditions this game stays at 30 fps ..." not "... its average fps its 30... " well, i can do this in GTA with a tnt2 .. but i have to look down (in the game) to achieve those 30 fps... and the gameplay simply sucks

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
  37. Write once, run anywhere = slow by IshanCaspian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you write a game you have to write to a certain architecture. The fast way to do something under one API is often totally incompatible with the fast way to do it under another API. When you have some virtual machine running interference between the program and the CPU, like java, it always results in a performance hit.

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:Write once, run anywhere = slow by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Performance hit? Lesse, a 2.4ghz machine with 1gb of RAM shouldn't really CARE if the game is written in Java. It just shouldn't matter. Radeon 9700 or GeForce4 Ti in it and a 10krpm HD. That's a gaming rig, and it's a relatively common gaming rig. You could run an all Java version of every game that came out this year on that thing and I SERIOUSLY doubt you would notice the performance hit...
      And even if you would... how about someone redoing a bunch of semi-classic games in Java just to see it done? Quake II, Warcraft II, SimCity 2000, stuff like that. Just rewrite it all in Java!

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    2. Re:Write once, run anywhere = slow by IshanCaspian · · Score: 1

      You want to benchmark hand-optomised x86 assembly against java? Do you know how many times a game engine must perform a matrix multiplication per frame? Now try adding even the overhead of a couple stack pushes and a function call to each one of those. Yeah, sure, the last generation of games may be able to deal with it, but instead of wasting performance on portability, let's get real-time dynamic terrain modification or ray-traced lighting or something. 3D math in realtime = assembly. Period. Anything else is wasting processor power.

      Besides, look at all of the games that get ported to other platforms...Quake 3 for example. Java has been around for some time, why do you think nobody has ever written a major commercial game in java? Why do you think Carmack would rather port quake 3 more than once than do the whole thing in Java?

      --

      But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    3. Re:Write once, run anywhere = slow by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2

      For one, no, that's a high end gaming rig. Secondly, do you know what kind of power you need for all the eyecandy and (especially) physics and AI? More than we have now...the more powerfull pc's become, the more realistic the physics become, the better the AI gets.

      Also, remember this well: you can do what you propose, but to write it like that would take way longer than the current 18 month average dev cycle. Which would make games prohibitively expensive and would make technological evolution too long to trickle down into new games.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:Write once, run anywhere = slow by Horn · · Score: 1

      It used to be the case that assembly was needed to make the top end games but with the strength of today's optimizing compilers and all the extra cpu cycles that developers can play with theres no point to waste time writting assembly. Even the great Carmack has said that its not worth his time to get down and dirty in asm to get a few extra fps. Which would you rather have, a devloper spend two weeks rewritting the text rendering portion of an engine in assembly to squeeze out a bit more performace or have the lighting or AI improved. Its simply not worth the time and effort.
      Also, a game written on top of a VM could be a possibility sometime soon. Quake 3 had one and many other games do as well (although they're normally called scripting engines instead of virtual machines).

  38. Slashdotted by dereklam · · Score: 0, Redundant
    TweakTown promises you will find something of use which will have you gaming at full speed in no time.

    Now if only TweakTown promised they would find hints of use which will have them serving pages at full speed in no time.

  39. Short list of parts for an optimized system: by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) ASUS A7N8X Deluxe nForce2 chipset motherboard
    2) Fastest Athlon XP you want to spend money on, Athlon XP 2400+ at minimum
    3) Pair of Corsair DIMMs, PC3200C2 or higher, 256meg or 512meg each
    4) Thermalright SK7 or SLK800 copper heatsink
    5) Arctic Silver 3 thermal compound, follow the application instructions on their website
    6) Fastest GeForce4 Ti (or Radeon 9700 Pro) that you want to spend money on, I'd go with one of the new Ti4200 8X cards and save up for the GeForceFX (next year)
    7) Seagate Barracuda V 120gig IDE HD, the SATA version if it's available and has Linux drivers by the time you're ready to buy, alternatively a Seagate Cheetah 15K.3 SCSI drive and controller if you have way more money than me
    8) Lian Li aluminum case of your choice
    9) YS Tech rheostat (adjustable) 80mm fan for that Thermalright heatsink, or the highest RPM 80mm fan your ears can tolerate
    10) Pioneer DVR-105 4x/2x DVD-R/RW drive, just because.

    Substitute an ASUS A7M266-D and pair of Athlon XP 2400+ chips modded for MP operation (until the real MP 2400+'s are available) if you like. That's what I did. It's soooo nice. Make sure you get 266MHz FSB CPUs if you go this route as that's all the board supports.

    1. Re:Short list of parts for an optimized system: by clarkc3 · · Score: 1
      6) Fastest GeForce4 Ti (or Radeon 9700 Pro) that you want to spend money on, I'd go with one of the new Ti4200 8X cards and save up for the GeForceFX (next year)

      Alternatively, try convincing 3dlabs to finally start releasing 'gaming optimized' versions of drivers for their cards. of course the $1000+ for the latest wildcat card they put out is a bit expensive

  40. Something useful by inteller · · Score: 1

    Ok, now that he provided bait to get his server /.ed, maybe he can provide some real tweaking advice, like secret registry hacks or something. This was nothing but basic advice and a bunch of links. Woo hoo never seen that one done before...

  41. Another guide you should have written first by Pac · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "Website Optimization Guide for Would-be Slashdot FrontPagers"

  42. Jeez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is all this crud really necessary? I still have my 1.1Ghz, it started with 128Mb, and new games were slowing down, I "borrowed" some memory up to 512Mb, it flies again. To all you whinging kiddies, " boo hoo, my daddies 2.5Ghz with 6 Terabytes of memory wont run Unreal2003", I run it on a 1.1Ghz with 512Mb and a TNT2 card, even a a res of 1024. Christ, people just need to learn a little bit of patience and a little know how, but no, people just want it now, and they want it done by someone else so they dont have to think!

    At the end of the day, K.I.S.S.
    (Keep It Simple, Stupid!)

    1. Re:Jeez... by ciupman · · Score: 0

      Tnt2 .. yeah right ..!!!
      You should write a guide like .. "How to play Ut2003 at 5 fps .. with my Tnt2" Oh ..maybe you just didn't get it .. Ut2003 is a FPS game .. not a Riven or Myst alike game... has anyone told you this? ;)

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
  43. Console gaming is .... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Awesome graphics, nope TV's too crap ,low res, low frame rate.

    Internet multiplayer support, but no lan parties?

    Play in your comfortable living room, and my PC is, umm, in the living-room where my hifi used to be.

    System = same price as a mid range pc video card, check, games at twice the price check.

    Largest selection of games? hmm.... I still play low-fi games, and have a huge selection of low-fi PC games.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Console gaming is .... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2
      Awesome graphics, nope TV's too crap ,low res, low frame rate.
      I get a solid 60 fps in metroid prime and the graphics blow away anything I have seen recently on PC (Doom 3 excluded :). There's more to good graphics than hi-res. Consoles always lag a bit behind PC's, but considering most of us buy mid to low range video cards for our pc's anyway, you get more bang for your buck in the console world.

      Internet multiplayer support, but no lan parties?
      You've never had a Super SMash Bros. Melee tournie with your friends, have you? In any case, you can hook consoles together too (no examples off the top of my head). Console gamers have had LAN parties for years, but we just called it "come over and play some (nintendo|sega|neo geo|whatever)"

      Play in your comfortable living room, and my PC is, umm, in the living-room where my hifi used to be.
      You sit on your couch with a monitor on a pedestal in front of you with a keyboard and mouse balanced on your lap? I think you missed my point...

      Largest selection of games? hmm.... I still play low-fi games, and have a huge selection of low-fi PC games.
      I'm talking about new games, but if you want to compare back catalogues, I think the PS1 has, what, several thousand games by itself?
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Console gaming is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I can play Dark age of Camelot or Star Wars Galaxies on my couch, from a console, be able to actually *type* to communicate with people, and use a keyboard/mouse combo to move instead of some clunky D-pad or stick style controller I might consider switching my gaming platform..

      Till then, sorry, but I'll just have to stick with a PC

    3. Re:Console gaming is .... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2
      When I can play Dark age of Camelot or Star Wars Galaxies on my couch, from a console, be able to actually *type* to communicate with people, and use a keyboard/mouse combo to move instead of some clunky D-pad or stick style controller I might consider switching my gaming platform..


      Actually, you can use a keyboard (such as in Phantasy Star Online) - you have to import it though. I imagine it's a bit clunky having to switch from controller to keyboard constantly, but it's still possible.

      Of course, you could always just use a headset too, though that might get a bit chaotic in a MMORPG environment.

      Personally, when I do game on the PC, I always use a headset and Roger Wilco and don't mess with talking via the keyboard - it's far too distracting.

      My best multiplayer PC gaming experience was coop System Shock 2 with Roger Wilco. It was just incredibly immersive.
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    4. Re:Console gaming is .... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
      Get a PS2. Look at the lower left-hand corner of the box. See two USB ports and a firewire port. See USB keyboard/mouse. Plug them in.

      Admittably, you'd have to find a game that supports such a style of control, but as PC-style games come out for consoles, if such a control is beneficial, you'll likely see it offered. Consoles are becoming more like specilized gaming-specific PCs daily. So it's quite likely that in the future, you might be able to play a game like Dark Age of Camelot from your couch on your PS2, typing to chat with others and using a mouse to move around.

      I don't know about the other consoles (since there's no Final Fantasy out for them yet :)), but I'd imagine that the X-Box has USB ports as well and that the GameCube has the ability to have a Nintendo-specific keyboard be plugged into it. (What, me have something against Nintendo - never.) So yeah - being able to type on a keyboard through a gaming console to others across the world isn't so far fetched.

      I expect that it'll take until the next generation of consoles before such features become well fleshed-out (mostly online play), but a console is becoming more like a PC in the capabilities it offers to gamers.

      Although why you'd rather type than just use the voice-chat features that the X-Box Live service offers is beyond me... (The PS2 might offer something similar, I don't know...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  44. Mr. Tweak. by BitHive · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't worry about Mr. Tweak, he's some teenage kid in Australia. Anyone who used to read the [H]ardOCP (I stopped several years ago) will remember him as the kid that threatened to sue Kyle for not linking to his crappy website. Of course, he didn't just threaten Kyle directly--he sent his complaints to a whole bunch of hardware site webmasters. He's just another one of those dime-a-dozen specials.

    1. Re:Mr. Tweak. by ICMP_FRAGMENT · · Score: 1

      Shit, when I was running boomgames.com, I remember that crackhead taking my age-old test results from a cooler and blatantly ripping them without my permission, saying "We're too lazy to do the tests ourselves, so here are the numbers BoomGames got:"

      I think another reason he hated Kyle is because Kyle called him on it and informed me when Mr. Tweak asked for a link in Kyle's news.

  45. Slashdotters priorities by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1

    Articles on Alternative fuels/vehicles and high speed trains stay readable right from the get go.

    An article on getting a few extra FPS's out of RtCW or Unreal Tournament and the server is reduced to molten slag.......

    Guess slashdotters are more concerned with fragging their opponents than real life. :)

    PS. Ive been trying to get to the site since I saw it posted. I want my FPS!

  46. Optimizing? by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, having a GF is a wonderful way of optimizing Pr0N, but it's a LOT like optimizing your system.

    In fact, one of the best ways to optimize your system(GF) is to marry her. Performance increases dramatically and the cost drops significantly.

    The problem though is that once you have a wife, the negative effects of optimization start happening, like kids.

    Then they scream that their saggy (you know whats) are all your fault, she's tired all the time, you get interrupted by crying/fighting children, etc.

    The solution then is to get a new GF (And dump the old). This costs money.

    Repeat this cycle enough times and soon you'll be back where you started from :-(

  47. Please specify OS in article desc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't get to the site (/. effect).
    Took a bit of reading through the comments to find out that it was an XP tweaking guide...totally worthless...

    In the future please, please include what OS this type of stuff is for so I won't waste my time.

  48. A guide on mirroring ./'ed sites?? by mustangdavis · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I could use one right now....

    I'd mirror this for everyone, except it doesn't appear to be possible to get a copy of the original article!!

    Grrr ..... hard to make comments about something you can't read!!!

    There goes a chance to be a karma theif ....

    Instead of writing articles about optimizing game systems, perhaps we should learn how to optimize our web servers first :)

  49. In soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the system tweaks, optimises and plays games with you!

  50. Drivel? by TheToon · · Score: 1

    What a collection of self-evident drivel... Basically he's saying that overclocking can make your system unstable, you should check your BIOS version, driver version and not run too much beta stuff. And maybe overclocking can increase performance, unless it makes your computer crash....

    Yeah... helpful.

    --
    //TheToon
  51. Need to tweak for webserving! by ruiner13 · · Score: 2

    It seems they need to tweak their server for webserving instead of gaming, it would appear it could not handle the dreaded slashdot effect. Would have been an interesting article if their server wasn't on fire right now.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  52. Far from "comprehensive" by xchino · · Score: 2

    This article had no mention of Linux, Mac, or any other Non-Windows tweaks. I've seen better tweaking guides at geocities pages, so I don't see where they get off calling their guid "comprehensive". Maybe they should substitute "Yet another" for "comprehensive".

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  53. Money is the issue by fain0v · · Score: 1

    The only time I ever tweaked my system was when I was in college. I had time to tweak but not the money to buy better hardware. These days the opposite is true. I have the money to buy better hardware but not the time to tweak. I prefer the latter. Now if only I still played computer games.

  54. When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds? by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 1

    A true nerd will optimize his system, no matter how long it takes. When did everyone around here become a "white collar" nerd? I understand that most of these tweaks are... well... misguided, but half of the readers here act... well... afraid of tweaking there systems. What happened to the days of the computer cowboys? When did everyone lose their enthusiasm, their drive for computers? BTW, if you are afraid to go into the BIOS, I pity you. You can actually gain a lot in terms of performance with BIOS tweaks. And flashing a BIOS? Piece of cake. Try soldering resistors onto a video card to up the voltage. Now THAT's nerdy!

    --
    Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
  55. Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the things you want to do as a Linux gamer who really cares about getting the last few FPS out of a box should be to set up dedicated gaming sessions as part of the login process. This means that the only thing running in the box will be whatever minimal services you need, X and the actualy game you are running.

    If you use gdm for your logins, then create a script named, say, 'Quake3' in /etc/gdm/Sessions which has contents like:

    #!/bin/sh
    exec /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession /usr/bin/Quake3


    Make sure this is executable (chmod 755 /etc/gdm/Sessions/Quake3) and you should be set.

    Then when you login to your box, choose the Quake3 session in the top left and type in your user name and password as normal. The game will launch immediately with nothing else running at all. The main benefit of this is that you free as many of the resources available to be dedicated to game playing.

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    1. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The game will launch immediately with nothing else running at all.

      Not even the kernel?:)

      *Johnson

    2. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by cslarson · · Score: 1

      This means that the only thing running in the box will be whatever minimal services you need, X and the actualy game you are running. I thought this was a really good post. One question: Is it necessary to include lines in the script that kill certain processes that are started automatically, such as print servers, etc. Any direction on doing this (okay, okay, I'll learn myself)? How much of a performance boost could this achieve, if any at all? I had major problems trying to play games on linux. granted i only have a 500mhz compaq armada e500 with 310megs of ram, but I love it, and was able to play most games fine in windows. much pain was dedicated to learning kernel settings, linux drivers, etc., and I'm glad i did learn (got video-divx working great), but nothing ever ran like I thought it should (never could play TuxRacer, or any of the Tron based games). I haven't tried the new ati linux drivers, as I'm running win98se again for school reasons, but I plan on being back in linux soon (gentoo).

    3. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike windows, Linux (and other OS, too) is very optimized for having multiple processes "waiting". E.g. the printserver, if not used, burns almost no CPU cycles at all, so killing it is really not necc. (Unless you are BOFH and playing on the print server and people in your office try to print megabyte-heavy postscript files in the background - but then killing the lpd will only result in other nasty things like support calls to your desk..)

      It uses some RAM, so if you have less than 128 MB killing it might help a bit - but only a bit. It probably doesn't use much memory anyway, and if it does, it will get (efficiently) swapped out and stay there.

      I am not sure if having an extra gaming session is neccessary at all. Even KDE doesn't hog much CPU when running in the background...e.g. not more than a few fractions of a percent...

      HTH HAND!

    4. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One question: Is it necessary to include lines in the script that kill certain processes that are started automatically, such as print servers, etc. Any direction on doing this (okay, okay, I'll learn myself)?

      Use serviceconf or similiar to edit runlevel 4. This runlevel is not normally used for anything. Make it so that no services at all run in runlevel 4. Then edit /etc/inittab and add something like this at the bottom:
      y:4:respawn:/etc/X11/prefdm -nodaemon

      This will make runlevel 4 a graphical runlevel.

      Now when you want to play a game, switch to runlevel 4:
      init 4

    5. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never had to bother disabling anything when I used to play games on Redhat 7.3. However, Redhat 8.0 seems rather sluggish in comparison. Sometimes when playing a game it actually misses key presses, which can be very annoying at a vital moment. I find disabling the gnome crap and any services helps alleviate this problem.

    6. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't work for me. I have to also edit the Xsession script to tell it to load Quake3 when I give it the Quake3 parameter.

    7. Re:Linux Gamers (can) have it easy by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Linux gamers have it easy because they only have like 5 games to choose from.

      After that they have to start running some bastardized software to get the game to load.

      Linux is one big tweak.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  56. Re:When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but this wasn't a guide for those true nerds. This is a "general system tweaking guide", and anyone who could actually follow his tips without getting themselves into serious trouble already knew everything he said. Guides like this only help newbies wreck their systems.

  57. Bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they need to read the doc about 'Optimizing your server for the Slashdot effect'

  58. Re:When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I quit being a nerd after working in IT for several years. Now, I really want to spend as little time in front of a computer as is humanly possible. I can't stand the damn things. I'm still a geek, but a different kind of geek.

  59. They might want to tweak their server first... by dogas · · Score: 1

    It didnt even try to load up the page. Perhaps if they overclocked the server's video card, got a water cooler + copper heat sink, and mucked around in the BIOS, they'd get a 3.3423% increase in load capacity.

    --
    'When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.' -HST
  60. This book is a far better optimization guide... by Patoski · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was disappointed with the depth of this article. I expected lots of little hints and tricks that I didn't know about but instead found most of the material was common sense stuff for anyone who had been around computers for any amount of time.

    If you *really* want to get deep inside the guts of optimizing a Windows box I can think of no better guide than O'reilly's.

    Optimizing Windows for Games, Graphics and Multimedia by David L. Farquhar

    This book is currently out of print and is getting a little long in the tooth (published in 1999) but the internals for Windows doesn't really change that radically from a tuner's perspective. This book isn't a mere collection of little tricks but gives you a more fundamental understanding of Windows and how to trim the fat. The Amazon user rating system gives it 5 stars and rightfully so. To top it off you can pick up a used copy for about $8 or so at half.com among other places.

    This is really a great book for anyone looking to get the most out of their Windows machine or just trying to understand the black box that is Windows. I used some of the tricks mentioned in this book on my wife's old p233 laptop w/96MBs RAM. Her Win98SE box has been going for almost two years now w/o any serious stability or performance problems. Granted, she's not a niddler and only does a certain set number of tasks on this laptop but I think that's pretty darn good for a Windows 98 box.

    --
    G. Washington on Government "it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
  61. Oh Good! A Linux Tweak Guide! by da_Den_man · · Score: 2
    Oops....just another wannabe trying to spout rhetoric that any moderate user would already know.

    And for Windows OS's only, from what I read on downloading SiSoft (or do they have a Linux version I don't know about?)

    Of course when I AskSlashdot about whether or not people have written to the major gaming magazines about covering the Linux Gaming world, it was denied to even be asked...hmmmm

    Has anyone thought that if they were to do as I have and WRITE the major gaming magazines and manufacturers to include Linux as a platform for coverage that they may see the interest is out there?

    --
    You keep going until you die..."Me".
  62. Easy solution. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Don't marry a bitch.

    1. Re:Easy solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too late for me.... save yourselves while you can....

      Of course, I'm posting this anonymously....

    2. Re:Easy solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another solution: go gay. I think homosexuals were put on this earth to give all the potential future life-strangling wifes some competition. :)

  63. Here's how to do it simply. by analog_line · · Score: 2

    Aside from getting the best hardware you can afford, if you want the best performance out of your gaming machine, don't do anything else with that computer than play games. Don't even install any other software (save Mozilla for downloading patches, etc) but the base operating system. Anything else you install can have hidden stuff that will reduce your performance. All this extra tweaking crap is closing the barn door after the horses have already ran.

  64. monitor on a pedestal? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Nope, It's on a TV stand ;->
    RF keyboards and Mice are handy, no leads running accross the living room.
    oh, and I have a rocking chair.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  65. why you'd rather type? by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Well
    my typing's quick, but my spelling is poor.
    My speech is, ummm.... incomprehensible at times and I frequently sound like a cave man.

    I think I'll stick to the keyboard, at least I can be understood that way, well maybe just about.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:why you'd rather type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'll stick to the keyboard, at least I can be understood that way, well maybe just about.

      Overestimating yourself, arent' you, son?

    2. Re:why you'd rather type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a coward filter, I make sure they can't understand me.

    3. Re:why you'd rather type? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      While playing a game? Yeah, maybe in an online chat it might be better, but while playing any game where you can't pause good periods of time while chatting, it's nice to be able to actually speak to other teammates instead of having to find a corner to hide in while typing out your message. This applies to most games, where chatting means that you aren't controlling your onscreen character while other people are. Chatting can kill you...

      Of course, with a console, maybe you could be typing your message while still moving around with your controller... who knows...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  66. That's beautiful, man by GedLandsEnd · · Score: 1

    The mere existance of dumb people should not require smart people to talk like friggin lawyers all the time. Can I quote you on that? I think this is gonna be my new sig...

  67. Re:When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happened to the days of the computer cowboys? When did everyone lose their enthusiasm, their drive for computers?

    When we grew up and had to make our living off them. When we had to spend long periods of time at freinds homes or parties fixing terribly mangled setups.

    Or, more specifically, when we started to get a life.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  68. The 80's called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want their car back.

  69. Re:Oh Good! A Linux Tweak Guide! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just how many games are there for linux? 3? Iknow I'm oversimplifying, but I don't hear much about linux games, especially here, except for the purpose of serving. Show me a couple of aisles of linux games and Ill learn linux. Tell me to look around, and i'll ask why. If there was that many games worth it, then there would be more talked about offerings than tux racer.

  70. Dammit! System Optmization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they meant a system as like a computer game, optimizing the code for that. Or analysis of a multivariable function to find optimal results.

  71. ricers by chupe · · Score: 1

    1987 US CRX Si specs:
    91 bhp@5500rpm
    1953 lb
    0-60: 8.5 sec
    1/4 mile: 16.7
    top speed: 115 mph

    According to the same site, a CRX with an aftermarket supercharger and intercooler (and one would assume beefed up tires, suspension, drivetrain to handle the extra torque) can do a 5.7 0-60 and a 14.8 1/4 mile. And even after all that money, it still looks like a shitty old Honda. Now:

    Corvette LS1 | Z06:
    350@5600 | 385@6000
    3214 lbs | 3115 lbs
    0-60: 4.6 sec | 4.0 sec
    1/4 mile: 13.22 | 12.6
    top speed: 175mph | 171mph

    Unless by "well-tweaked" you mean "full-blown tube-chassis racecar running high boost and nitrous with few or no original parts," you're talking out your ass.

    --
    nothing good can come of this
  72. Show me a game that's worth the trouble by mkweise · · Score: 1

    today's latest highly demanding PC games

    I'd rather stick with yesterday's intelligently designed PC games. Either I am getting old, or today's games are getting dumber at twice the rate that they're getting prettier. (Or, most likely, both.)

    The last game that seriously impressed me was Jagged Alliance 2, and that runs just fine with no tweaking at 166MHz. I bet I'll have more fun playing Zork than you will with any of today's latest highly demanding games, and the most enjoyable part of your evening will probably be the tweaking.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  73. Re:When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. After working 8-10 hour days the last thing I wish to do is tweak my box and then spend 3 hours undoing it from a erd disk, etc.

    Why mess with shit that works for a 5 percent gain? It's not worth the possible downtime if it breaks.

  74. Emacs by Bake · · Score: 3, Funny

    Holy crap, I didn't reallize Emacs was a gaming console!

  75. Science Fiction holds all the answers! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    You have to reverse the polarity. THEN it will run cool. Reversing the polarity can solve many of life's problems, particularly those created by technology.

    For instance, I was late for a job interview once, and I reversed the polarity on my digital wristwatch. After moving backward through time for a bit, I had plenty of time to get to the appointment on time.

    Reversing the polarity... it really works!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  76. Girlfriends and gaming by indros13 · · Score: 1
    You know, I'm fscking sick of having some self-righteous former nerd making some off-the-cuff comment about giving up Linux/casemods/tweaking/overclocking and "getting a real life" so I can get a girlfriend. My GF will appreciate who I am, tweaking and all--and I won't have to do "macho" things like post "give up tweaking" comments to News for Nerds sites.


    Offtopic? I didn't bring it up.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  77. FUCK YOU MODS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny mods for two lame, tired, old jokes rolled into one? I hope I get this in metamod.

  78. Re:When did Slashdot readers stop being true nerds by buck_wild · · Score: 1

    What kind of geek relies on one computer for all their needs, anyway? Can't risk the downtime? What gives?

    A true geek would ahve the requisite backups, either software or hardware, to replace the bulk of what would break should the tweak fail.

    I'd like to think that having the necessary knowledge, prior to begining the task, is what keeps my computers out of the dumpster. Basically, if you don't know what you're doing, you probably shouldn't be doing it. And if you don't know what you're doing, you've probably been out of the game too long.

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  79. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    .. I used to get in more fights with SCO than I did my girlfriend, but
    now, thanks to Linux, she has more than happily accepted her place back at
    number one antagonist in my life..
    -- Jason Stiefel, krypto@s30.nmex.com

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...