Slashdot Mirror


Gateway Puts Wasted Cycles to Work

f. liszt writes "Gateway will be offering for sale to corporations the processing power available from networked display PCs in their stores -- seems like a logical enough idea."

268 comments

  1. Would you want,... by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your company payroll dependant on machines that shoppers can tinker with wihle on display at a store?

    Seriously, what data would you pay to have crunched in public?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:Would you want,... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      Your company payroll dependant on machines that shoppers can tinker with wihle on display at a store?

      This has been a problem since the 1970s. Back then, for some reason whenever we were in a Radio Shack it seemed funny to stop by a TRS-80 display model and type in something like:

      10 PRINT "FART! FART! FART!"
      20 GOTO 10
      RUN

      The salespeople probably would have chased us out of the store if they weren't so busy scribbling down every customer's address and the part numbers of every blister pack in the store on those little paper sales slips.

    2. Re:Would you want,... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      I love changing the homepage of computers at the gateway store, or the roadrunner kiosk at the mall to http://www.2600.com. I come back later and they're all freaked out because they think they got h4x0r3d by some 1337 d00d.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Would you want,... by slipgun · · Score: 3, Funny
      Or the other classic:

      10 PRINT "Welcome to the Spectrum 48k display model"
      20 INPUT "What is your name? ", NAME$
      30 PRINT NAME$, ", you are a tosser!"
      40 GOTO 30
      RUN

      Ok, I may have forgotten some of the details of Sinclair BASIC, but you get the idea :-)
      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    4. Re:Would you want,... by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to do something like:

      10 input "Hi! What's your name";a$
      20 print "You sure are ugly, ";a$;"!"
      30 goto 10

      Coming back later, I noted that people would say very nasty things to the insolent Commodore 64.

      It's too bad I wasn't more enterprising then, or else I would have typed:

      10 input "Hi! Please enter your SSN or credit card number for a free gift!";a$
      20 open "goodies",8,4,1
      30 print#1 a$
      40 close#1
      50 print "Thanks! I love you lots!"
      100 goto 10

      Good thing they usually didn't have a disk drive attached.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Would you want,... by tmark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some perspective is in order. While I don't think the article mentioned whose solution Gateway was using, most grid computing platforms running on untrusted machines are going to use encryption, most machines aren't going to look at enough of a job to be useful even if the encryption was broken, and each individual job is going to be run on multiple machines to ensure one machine doesn't (intentionally or not) return faulty data.

      What data would people pay to have crunched in public ? Well, I can tell you that animation houses, financial shops and biotechnology companies are all crunching their data "in public".

    6. Re:Would you want,... by motardo · · Score: 3, Informative
      too bad most americans don't know what a tosser is.

      A quaint English term of abuse referring to someone who masturbates a lot. This is different from "dosser" which merely refers to a homeless person sleeping in the open.
    7. Re:Would you want,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And today, you just need to type three well-chosen words in Internet Explorer's URL bar...

    8. Re:Would you want,... by ronaldcromwell · · Score: 1

      HAH. This past summer, my dad (50) and I were in the Apple store. He fired up his website on one of the Ti Powerbooks (www.kez.nu), and put a picture of himself with a dog's snout on the wallpaper. The salesperson that was working the front of the store glared at us, so we ran out. Hiding behind a poster on the front window, however, we got a great view of a stuffy old woman looking at the computer, only to scoff and walk off. Good times...

    9. Re:Would you want,... by Freshie · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. However, I haven't seen an unlocked computer on display in a store for quite some time.
      They are all running Flash presentations selling themselves to you, or showing that incredibly nifty beizers screensaver. Both of which are password protected, so it might be okay.
      I think the funniest thing about these locked computers is the screensaver running behind the password prompt. WTG Microsoft...
      Now you get display model monitors for next to nothing because there's a password verification prompt burnt into the middle of the screen :)

      --
      'I don't want more choices. I just want better things.' - Edina Monsoon
    10. Re:Would you want,... by nizo · · Score: 2

      My favorite was the program that would spew out "I am $40 cheaper at Sears". Which of course brings up what Gateway should really do: sell advertising space on their displays instead. I.E. "Buy me and come visit my porn site at foomeister.com".

    11. Re:Would you want,... by Leto2 · · Score: 2
      Sure, I'm not afraid. But then again, I know what technology is powering this network.

      disclaimer: yes I work for United Devices. That's why I know our security rocks in the first place.

      --
      <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
    12. Re:Would you want,... by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Ah,United Devices- you guys rock, what with the helping me help cure cancer and all.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    13. Re:Would you want,... by slipgun · · Score: 2

      too bad most americans don't know what a tosser is.

      Damn, you mean I would have got modded higher if I'd used 'asshole' instead?

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    14. Re:Would you want,... by mstyne · · Score: 2

      wow that's funny

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    15. Re:Would you want,... by JuddN · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to do the same thing on Commodore 64's in stores. However, before putting the PC in an endless loop, I would disable the break key using a POKE command (POKE 808,234 if I remember correctly), so that my pathetic little program was unstoppable.

    16. Re:Would you want,... by Banjonardo · · Score: 2
      2600? Try changing it to this!

      Also fun at computer labs.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    17. Re:Would you want,... by skookum · · Score: 1

      For maxiumm effect, enable full screen mode (F11 in IE) before walking away.

    18. Re:Would you want,... by funky+womble · · Score: 2

      The Orics were great with their EXPLODE, SHOOT, ZAP and PING commands and the built-in speaker...slight side-effect that those commands made it quite difficult to break the program, what a pity... ;-)

    19. Re:Would you want,... by bscabl · · Score: 1

      yea, but ironically, the machine it self sits right next to the passworded keyboard/mouse/monitor... i went up north and was bored so i was walking around a very boring mall...with no coffee... i went into the sears, all the pretty winxp sonys were sitting there, passworded... held in the power buttin for 4 seconds, rebooted to safe mode, logged in as administrator [usually not passworded on stock machines] changed "sears" 's password, and rebooted.. was bored then i made a batch file that looked something like this to run on startup @echo off net send localhost guess my password, win a prize set that to load on startup and walked away to find some coffee the irony of it all is when someone does that it my store, its damn annoying :D

    20. Re:Would you want,... by bscabl · · Score: 1

      its amazing how bad the formatting on that turned out :(

    21. Re:Would you want,... by dougmc · · Score: 2
      I used to do this too, but my `computer of choice' to mess with was the TI 99/4a. They usually had a speech synthesizer module connected to them.

      Back then I'd enter in a short program to make it wait for a few minutes (for i = 1 to 10000 ; next) and then start spouting (saying out loud, not to the screen) obscenities.

      The local grocery store (Carrs -- still there, but now owned by Safeway, blech!) had one for a demo (I guess they sold a few of them.) The people often didn't even know how to shut it off (and weren't smart enough to turn off the TV it was connected to,) which made it even more fun.

      Ok, so it was immature. But to a 10 or so year old, it was great fun!

      More on the TI 99/4A here.

      I also used to go to the hardware store, and put batteries in the motion alarms, and set them to go off when somebody walked by.

      (In reterospect, I was an annoying little sh*t!)

    22. Re:Would you want,... by ecolitalks · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess the point here is not on whether use on display computer to provide the service or not use those. The point here is to introduce the concept of "computing power". Soon or later, the computing power will some kind mechandise for sale to the public.

  2. Corpoprations don't need to buy processing power by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The corporation I work for has 110,000 desktop PCs. Never mind the servers.

    They have plenty of processing power.

    What they need is the internal organisation and the software skills to make use of their existing investment in systems.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  3. Insecure? by Runny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems they would have a hard time guaranteeing security.

    1. Re:Insecure? by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Easy, use a model similar to seti. First, each packet is processed twice, by two different machines. If you get different results, go back and do some checking. That is also assuming everything is encrypted and the binary is somewhat secure also. If processing each one twice wastes too much power, do every 3 or whatever, and if you run into a problem re-analyze the machines past few packets to see where it started. And obviously if you get bad packets it should be fairly easy to track the machine down and correct it.

    2. Re:Insecure? by tomhudson · · Score: 2
      What if they "forget" to reformat the hard disk and re-install before delivering the sold machine?

      Oops - can't reformat and re-install 'cause Windows licensing doesn't allow that? Awwwwww .... pity ... (cue sound of evil laughter)

  4. Then, the next step... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...they'll start selling the idle time on their customers computers to other customers.

    After all, that Pentium IV has plenty of power left over since it's probably only running an e-mail app and web-broswer (and a virus or two, and some spyware, and probably Kazaa and WinMX...)

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Then, the next step... by Jacer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      this is really, really offtopic, but is your name jace?

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:Then, the next step... by csteinle · · Score: 1

      If it is, does he - along with the wheeled warriors - fight the many changing forms of Sorbos?

    3. Re:Then, the next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that his name is Jace, or he doesn't want you to know his real name.

    4. Re:Then, the next step... by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      they'll start selling the idle time on their customers computers to other customers.

      Juno actually tried this at one point, but they seem to have backed off. Of course, with juno, their "customers" aren't really customers, just eyeballs behind a computer to view ads.

    5. Re:Then, the next step... by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      I used to work tech support for Gateway. Most of the callers had Kazaa, a bunch of shitty software Gateway gave them, and the Klez virus.

      Based on the amount of shit that is installed and running when you purchase a Gateway, you might as well just buy a few $199 Walmart PCs and toss 'em in the corner, the free CPU will be far greater.

      BTW: If you have a Pentium IV from Gateway, check to make sure your power supply is powerful enpough, I know alot shipped with 90W Power supplies.

    6. Re:Then, the next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with running distributed projects on these package PCs is that the CPU usage causes the proc fan to go at full speed. Noise is a significant concern to the primary customers of Gateway/HP/Dell machines. Normally the fans are only going at full speed when the user is gaming, when it doesn't really matter anyway.

    7. Re:Then, the next step... by funky+womble · · Score: 2

      They'll have to use better power supplies on the shop models if they're going to be pegged at 100% CPU all the time...

  5. Wot Security? by MrMickS · · Score: 1

    I can just see drug companies etc queuing up to have part of their research into new drugs being run in retail outlets.

    What next. Making use of the spare capacity on EPOS tills?

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    1. Re:Wot Security? by tqft · · Score: 1

      Not such a dumb idea as we all might think (if the business model works at all). My gf works in supermarket - they now have replaced the dumb registers with "snazzy" new ones - PCs with ports attached to scales and scanner and eftpos machine. If you can sell cycles on hardware that gets moved replaced abused and ignored in a showroom what about maintained hardware in a secure environment. PS: scanning shopping does not use that much of a CPU cycle

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
  6. Hahahaha by zatz · · Score: 4, Funny

    They must have one hell of an inventory problem if they are resorting to this for some extra cash!

    --

    Java: the COBOL of the new millenium.
    1. Re:Hahahaha by dWhisper · · Score: 1

      It's not pertaining to an inventory problem, since it'll be using prexisting floor machines. It's taking an oppertunity and using it for cash flow. No one is using the systems at night, when the store is closed, so might as well get something for it.

  7. Secure? by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 1

    They would have to make sure that any processed data travelling through the machines was of little importance or encripted.

    What are the security implications?

    1. Re:Secure? by aukestrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They should donate the time to something like the SETI@home project (http://setiathome.berkeley.edu) or the protein folding project (http://folding.stanford.edu), both of which use distributed computing and neither of which need to be concerned with security.

      --
      "It's the crazy backwards universe, where up is down and boy bands play instruments." -Tino, The Weekenders
    2. Re:Secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when is the SETI screensaver anything resembling a good cause? it's a bunch of geeks and nerds wasting their time.

      hello, sanity? aliens don't exist

    3. Re:Secure? by Cloud+9 · · Score: 2
      They should donate the time to something like the SETI@home project (http://setiathome.berkeley.edu) or the protein folding project (http://folding.stanford.edu), both of which use distributed computing and neither of which need to be concerned with security.

      That would defeat the purpose of generating revenue. Not everybody wants to give everything away, least of all stockholders.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
  8. SETI or RSA by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 1

    Why not just get involved in SETI project? If money is criterion, go for RSA challenges.

    --
    Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
    1. Re:SETI or RSA by Junta · · Score: 2

      They want money, and they want guaranteed steady money projects, not just a chance at money with RSA.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:SETI or RSA by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 1

      True. But if they have marketing brains, this could earn them fame. There are good causes where these kind of processing power can be donated for free and earn reputation, whenever there is no customer in sight.

      --
      Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
    3. Re:SETI or RSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when is the SETI screensaver anything resembling a good cause? it's a bunch of geeks and nerds wasting their time.

      hello, sanity? aliens don't exist.

  9. Scenario by JSkills · · Score: 1
    One of Inpharmatica's competitors sends an IT person to "shop for" a Gateway PC.

    "Ah yes, thanks Mr. Salesguy, but could you leave me alone with this floor model for a while? I want to get familiar with it before I buy it. Thanks".

    Not sure, but anything other than a SETI type application (i.e. non-proprietary data not worth stealing) seems to present a problem here for a PC simply left on a showroom floor.

    I could be wrong of course if the grid computing app is written pefectly, but will it?

    1. Re:Scenario by hairmare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      mayby they can also split the data into small chunks that aren't worth it alone. (like in a packet switched network)

      one would somehow have to sniff their whole network and access to just one machine wouldn't be enough anymore.

      this whole asking the saleguy thing remembers me of us going to our local computer dealer in win3.11-times for the fun of 'format c:'. They found ways to stop us pretty fast ;)

  10. other companies should follow... by bje2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    hmmmm...a company selling idle time with their product models to make money...doesn't sound like a bad idea...i think victoria's secret should get in on this...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:other companies should follow... by alphaFlight · · Score: 1

      And what exactly do you plan to do with the manikins? :)

      --
      -= alphaFlight =-
    2. Re:other companies should follow... by bje2 · · Score: 1

      there might be a problem with you, if those are the victoria's secret models you think of first...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    3. Re:other companies should follow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...i think victoria's secret should get in on this..."

      A whole new meaning to the term "used hardware"

    4. Re:other companies should follow... by TastySiliconWafers · · Score: 1

      They already did that movie (and it's sequel) in the 1980's. Remember "Mannequin"? "I would never bother you when you're getting it with a piece of wood." -Holly Wood

    5. Re:other companies should follow... by bje2 · · Score: 1

      of course i remember them...they were from 1987 and 1991 respectively...but you forgot to post the obligatory IMDB links to Mannequin and Mannquein 2: On the Move...even better, do you remember who plays the Mannequin in each movie (I didn't)...it's Kim Cattral (of "Sex and the City") in the original, and Kristy Swanson (of the original "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" movie)...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  11. Scumbags by Fuzzypig · · Score: 1, Funny

    Alright so its their cycles, but what about the Cancer and SETI screensavers? Do something useful for the good of mankind, with the spare cycles. oops sorry, I got confused there...big corporation and caring about others....

    --
    Windows guys please stop pissing on everyone and the Linux guys stop pissing in the wind, hoping to hit Windows guys!
    1. Re:Scumbags by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      big corporation and caring about others....

      They're a publicly traded company. If they were using their resources to do anything other than increase shareholder value, their shareholders would rightfully be pissed. The company's only duty is to increase shareholder value. If the company does that, then it's up to the shareholders to do what they want with the increased value - and if they want, they can donate it to charity themselves. But I, for one, as a shareholder wouldn't want MY company deciding which charities or causes they should be spending what is essentially MY money on. I can do that myself well enough.

    2. Re:Scumbags by dboyles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If they were using their resources to do anything other than increase shareholder value, their shareholders would rightfully be pissed. The company's only duty is to increase shareholder value.

      I used to think the same way until I took a class that dealt heavily with ethics. If what you say is true, then a company should illegally dump toxic waste if the increase in profit outweighs the potential loss if they get caught. Can you really argue that position? If so, I think you seriously need to examine your priorities.

      I'm not saying that Gateway using their CPU cycles for profit rather than public gain is analogous to dumping toxic waste, but to say that the only duty of a company is to profit represents (to me) a good bit of what is wrong with the corporate world today.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    3. Re:Scumbags by ComaVN · · Score: 0

      I think the confusion here is that you seem to think SETI is useful

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    4. Re:Scumbags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither of the people who responded to the orig. post think. at all. The point of the post was completley valid.

      if you don't think it's coming to the corporate wars, i'll see you in hell.

      you people don't stop and think. smoke a joint and watch office space, and don't forget that i hate you.

    5. Re:Scumbags by nich37ways · · Score: 1
      I would argue that the only reason companies are at all enviromentally friendly is because the potential loss is insumountably higher when dumping toxic waste illegally.
      Look at a lot of companies these days compared to 10/20/30 years ago and ask yourself why have so many become more ecologicaly friendly?
      Look at McDoanld's for example (this is based in Australia i can't comment for the rest of the world). Here they have changed almost all of their packaging materials to be friendlier to the environment because of the way people began reacting to the ridiculous amount of waste they were producing.

      Corporations always look at the bottomline first, but there are more potential losses than just Government imposed fines. Also there is very little wrong with the corporate world, it operates as it always has, the problem is the inability of people to except that if they want something to change they have to do something, not just point the finger and whinge.

      --
      37 - what does it stand for really...
    6. Re:Scumbags by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      If what you say is true, then a company should illegally dump toxic waste if the increase in profit outweighs the potential loss if they get caught. Can you really argue that position?

      From Fight Club:
      Narrator: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

      Personally, I have no trouble believing that the above sort of thing really does go on to some degree. Corporate ethics? Do those words go together anymore? IMHO, the only reasons large corporations do anything honorable are so they can make television commercials about how touchy-feely they are and how much they care about (the Earth's ecosystem/global warming/some endangered species/saving you money/making the world safe for your children/etc). Hell, half the time they're probably just doing something required by law and expecting that people won't know that.

      To heavily paraprhase Chris Rock, "an unethical corporation brags about shit an ethical corporation just does":

      "I take care of my employees!"
      "You supposed to, ya dumb muthafucka!!!"

      "Our CFO ain't never been indicted for securities fraud!"
      "Whatcha want, a cookie?!?"

      ~Philly

    7. Re:Scumbags by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      That sounds logical, but you have to consider that the cost of some pre-emptive "good" might be higher than some after market "good." The specific example you stated was donating money to charities, and on that specific example I won't argue with you. But I will try to defend the position that companies should care about more than their stock prices.

      Consider this hypothetical situation. A company can save $10M dollars, by doing environmental damage that will cost $100M to clean up. Now if the EPA was doing it's job we could fine them $100M (or more) for doing this damage, but this simply does not happen. In this case, I think if the company is ethical, they should not save the $10M dollars, because the affect on humanity is an overall loss.

      Unfortunately I think very very few companies think this way. The only way to make them think this way is to make that theoretical $100M fine a reality, or to have their decision generate $100M worth of bad press.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  12. funny... by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard about export limitations concerning computers...
    Now, if Gateway starts selling CPU cycles, how can they guarantee that this won't be used by organisations located in these embargo'ed countries ?
    Otherwise, if they can control this, this means they are selling some spyware... the CPU cycles are just a Trojan.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      how can they guarantee that this won't be used by organisations located in these embargo'ed countries ?

      the same way they can tell they arent selling computers to those embargoed countries. unless they actually plan on selling service to anonymous users, then they'll be getting requests and payment from companies whose locations can be verified.

  13. We need a standard by AUsBandit · · Score: 1

    Or a company to offer money for our processing cycles. They could offer to let you run their client for $1 per X/UnitsOfCalculation and cut you a check each month. Then turn around and sell it in large blocks to groups that really need it. The only thing they would have to worry about is people forgeing their calculations but with a large enough user base they would make plenty of profit to cover countering thieves with better security.

    1. Re:We need a standard by hairmare · · Score: 1
      They could offer to let you run their client for $1 per X/UnitsOfCalculation and cut you a check each month.
      Yeah right.. and when they've done their calculations and collected their money they'll go bankrupt without ever sending out any checks.

      like.. history is a while loop that never ends.
  14. Consumer or corporate? by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd understood Gateway's stated business goal as being "get back to the basics" of what made them popular: targeting the consumer, and focusing on direct sales. I'm not clear how either seeling cycles to corporate clients or continuing its stores fits into that. Perhaps this is a way to subsidize their stores.

    I'd think it'd be more interesting to see them do some serious research into exploiting this type of service. Lord knows that hardware R&D is dead.

    Like, what about selling this as an on-demand service to consumers? What about this as a distinguishing factor for people into video editing or rendering? Those aren't necessarily lossless applications, IMIO (in my ignorant opinion). It'd be cool to be able to have an on-demand render farm for small-budget indie movie releases, no?

    1. Re:Consumer or corporate? by SlashMaster · · Score: 1
      A few weeks back, I recommended to one Gateway Salesman that they create a wall of flat screen monitors in their store. I figured that it'd help sell their flat-screen Monitors and foster interest in larger more powerful upscale PCs and PC systems for Multimedia and home theatre.


      The salesman didn't think that the typical customer profile would be interested in it enough to justify setting it up though.


      Marketing, it's all how you view your customer base.

    2. Re:Consumer or corporate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gateway has always been about: going on the cheap. Their computers are cheap, their peripherals are cheap, their service is cheap. Does anyone else remember when Gateway machines couldn't run Netware because to save a couple of bucks Gateway was putting non-parity ram in the machines?

      I figure this is just another "shit, we're going to be out of cash next month unless we come up with another wacky scheme, pinky" situation.

  15. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They have plenty of processing power.

    Absolutely. And the corporate intranet is much faster and secure than sending data all over net and getting it processed.

    My 2e-2 cents.

    --
    Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
  16. Power by glueball · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a shame these systems are left on in the first place.

    What is the power consumption of these systems? What a waste of cheap electricity.

    If you need high availability, great, leave it on. If you are not going to use it, turn it off.

    1. Re:Power by cfelde · · Score: 1

      And how much would the power consumption rise if Gateway pulls this through?

      --
      - cfelde
    2. Re:Power by otisg · · Score: 1

      Finally somebody looking a bit deeper.
      I agree.
      It makes me mad and sad :(
      But it's not cheap electricity. It's expensive to make it. Not only financially expensive. Think nature, think future generations, etc.

      --
      Simpy
    3. Re:Power by blastedtokyo · · Score: 2
      According to the article these are the machines in Gateway's retail stores. If they turned them off to save power can you imagine what happens when a customer comes in?

      This company is selling PC's. They need them ON to display them. They don't want the customer waiting for the computer to come out of sleep mode (assuming it does so successfully) or boot.

    4. Re:Power by shepd · · Score: 1

      >What is the power consumption of these systems? What a waste of cheap electricity.

      And so... what's the problem?

      If they have the money, they should leave them on if they want to.

      Besides, it's not only cheaper for them to do so (constant wakeup/spindown cycles on mechanical hardware like hard-drives causes failure far earlier, not to mention they don't need extra staff to handle the PCs that are off), it's more environmentally friendly (less spindown/spinup cycles uses less power, not to mention that wasted hard-drives from spinup/spindown cycles that happen too often fill up landfills and waste resources to build).

      Of course, I've tried to explain this to people who turn lights on and off every time they leave a room, putting maybe 20 or 30 turn on cycles a day on a lightbulb and ruining it in record time, but they always seem to think more about their electric bill (which is low in comparison). The same thing applies to people who sub a 36-watt bulb for a 60-watt bulb. Lower wattages burn out faster!

      Just my 2 cents.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Power by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      The power used by these systems is nothing compared to the reatail lighting in any store, but it serves the same purpose.

      If they didn't need to turn them on, they might as well use cardboard cutouts and keep the lights off... people won't be able to tell the difference.

    6. Re:Power by Miles · · Score: 1

      Here's a rebuttal to that: at urbanlegends.com and: from a Google search

    7. Re:Power by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Here's a rebuttal to that: at urbanlegends.com [urbanlegends.com] and: from a Google search [iastate.edu]

      I'm talking about incandscent bulbs, sorry.

      Older, manual start fluorescent tubes would probably count though, but the modern style ones are always on (for the heaters) anyways, unless they're used in a home, in which case you'll note the homeowner cursing the often broken ballasts.

      Besides, I was also talking about the shortening of the life of the bulb, not necessarialy power consumption increasing (although there is a large consumption spike on an incandescent bulb as it warms up -- if you don't agree with me hook up an ammeter and see for yourself).

      Not to mention that incandescent light bulbs have a life on the order of 10x less than fluorescent lights, anyways.

      Anyways, most fluorescent lights still have heaters, ie: miniature incandescent bulbs in them. The reason it's best for them to be left "on" is because when a filament is cold and warms up it is more likely to break. Hence incandescent lights virtually always break when they are coming from a cold start (no, I don't mean they always will break the first cold start, I mean that upon the end of their lifetime they will break upon being turned on from a cold start). However, when a fluorescent light is left powered, it doesn't nescessarialy mean it is emitting light. A properly installed fixture (like you see in modern commercial and industrial buildings) can keep the heaters powered at all times (IIRC). It helps serve for an almost instant start.

      None of those articles covers these facts, unfortunately. They assume that the "bulb" will always last the rated amount, whereas one can make it last much longer with proper treatment. Witness the fact that people who are insistent on turning lights on and off all the time are often buying bulbs, whereas I've only used 3 new ones in one room (with 8 incandescents total) over the past 3 years.

      And, unfortunately, those reviews don't touch on how the wattage rating of a bulb affect its life. 750 hours sounds like what you'd get from a 40 watt bulb (where the heck do they sell 75 watt incadescent bulbs?). I am willing to bet a 100 watt bulb will double the performance.

      Oh, and I guess last but not least, there is something that fluorescent require that make them unsuitable for some locations that those pages forgot to remark upon: Standard ballast based fluorescent lights require some sort of extra ground, making them unsuitable replacements for old homes unless the wiring is to be replaced.

      And there just ain't no substitute for the IR radiation that an incandescent bulb emits. At least no fluorescent has come close to "natural" light for me.

      Anyways, gotta compare apples to apples. And my electricity costs under 5 cents canadian per kwh, so I save a pile of money by not buying fluorescents, even by the equations presented. Who pays 7 cents US per hour? Ack! :-)

      I'll find you some more technical explanations for why high wattage incandscents last longer, and why not to turn them on/off all the time, if you'd like.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:Power by pclminion · · Score: 2
      What is the power consumption of these systems? What a waste of cheap electricity.

      Actually, I thought a piece of hardware would last longer the fewer times you power cycle it. Turn it off, boards cool down and contract. Turn it back on, things warm up and expand again. This might eventually lead to contacts wearing out as they rub against the slots, traces cracking, etc...

      In theory power cycling a machine every day could lead to its untimely death (as in, it might have last longer if left powered up all the time). I've never seen any hard evidence of this, either way, though.

    9. Re:Power by mkweise · · Score: 1

      they always seem to think more about their electric bill (which is low in comparison)

      Either you live on a planet with very different prices, or you are very badly misinformed. Here in the northeastern US, we pay 14.6 cents for a kWh and lightbulbs are two for 99 cents.

      So it takes just under 34 hours for a 100 watt lightbulb to consume its own cost in electricity. Over its estimated lifetime of 2500 on-hours, it will consume $36.50 worth of electricity.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
    10. Re:Power by mkweise · · Score: 1

      Witness the fact that people who are insistent on turning lights on and off all the time are often buying bulbs, whereas I've only used 3 new ones in one room (with 8 incandescents total) over the past 3 years.

      Here's an offer: I will pay for all of your lightbulb needs for the next year if you'll pay my electric bill during the same time.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
    11. Re:Power by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Either you live on a planet with very different prices, or you are very badly misinformed.

      Here's the price I pay, legislated by the government. It's back down to 4.3 cents per kwh now after that idiotic gouging (and no one has to pay their power bills until March as punishment to the utilities for their illegal act, and the utilities are no longer allowed to disconnect them). Yes, I am on planet earth. Actually, my government sells you our power, since I'm just slightly north of you. Looks like for some reason you guys pay way too much for it. Maybe it's time to buy yourselves som CANDU reactors? ;-)

      So here it is cheaper to run incandescent bulbs. It could be for you too!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Power by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Here's an offer: I will pay for all of your lightbulb needs for the next year if you'll pay my electric bill during the same time.

      Sound good to me if you live nearby, and you're just talking about the lighting portion of the bill.

      It's no bullshit that our electricity prices are frozen at 4.3 cents CDN per kwh (less than 3 cents US per kwh) for 5 years. There's extra crap they tack on, but hey, that's life, and it _still_ works out cheaper to buy electricity here than to buy bulbs.

      I didn't realise the US had it this bad for electricity prices. I'm sure Canada would give you the plans to build yourselves some CANDU reactors if you need them. ;-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:Power by mkweise · · Score: 1

      Even so, the lifetime power consumption of an 100W bulb (250kW) is costing you C$10.75 - are you seriously suggesting that that's negligable compared to what you paid for the bulb itself? Let me know, I can mail you some lightbulbs from the US...how many 100W bulbs do you want for one of those CANDUs? I've always wanted to have my own nuclear power station, but the American designs are all too big to fit in my garage.

      Meanwhile, some of your countrymen are concerned that Price Caps on Ontario Electricity Could Mean Replay of California's Electricity Crisis. Good luck with that...

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
    14. Re:Power by shepd · · Score: 1

      >are you seriously suggesting that that's negligable compared to what you paid for the bulb itself?

      No, not exactly. I'm saying that there's a balance between how long the bulb should be left on, since the "hours" rating is more of a guess than the rating of how many times the filament can stand to be turned on from a cold start.

      For an example, if you plan to leave a room for fifteen minutes, unless the power costs are very high, you should leave the light on (I don't have hard numbers to back this up -- but there *is* a cost savings relationship in there somewhere). However, if you're going to bed, turn the light off. It's that simple.

      Okey-dokey? :-)

      >Meanwhile, some of your countrymen are concerned that Price Caps on Ontario Electricity Could Mean Replay of California's Electricity Crisis [newswire.ca]. Good luck with that...

      We get that. The "problem" was the government choice to privatize the power system (it was always a public service up until this year). Well, they didn't put enough checks and balances into privatizing it, and the companies just ran wild. I think now, though, the government has shown them that they can't just do whatever they like, which is what the california gov't should have done. Cali. always had the power, it's just that the power co's wouldn't turn it on. I think here if that happened the gov't would tell them to start them back up or face some time with bubba. ;-)

      But that all goes in with the fact that Canada is somewhat more socialist than the USA.

      Anyways, we've had prices at the 4-7 cent per kwh mark for the past decade. I'm sure it'll be tight, but I think the power co's can squeeze through the tough times.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    15. Re:Power by mkweise · · Score: 1

      since the "hours" rating is more of a guess

      Actually, the switching cycle for light bulb testing is defined in an ISO standard.

      if you plan to leave a room for fifteen minutes, unless the power costs are very high, you should leave the light on (I don't have hard numbers to back this up -- but there *is* a cost savings relationship in there somewhere

      Agreed, but without having exact figures available on the monetary value of filament damage caused by one switch cycle, I'd guess that the point of equality lies in the single-digit second range. Of course, the weather would significantly affect the calculation: during air conditioning season, there is an additional cost to remove the waste heat, while during heating season it isn't really wasted at all (and if your home is electrically heated, it is theoretically optimal to leave all your lights on all winter.)

      the power co's can squeeze through the tough times

      From what I understand, the Ontario provincial gov't is making up the difference between the (unregulated) wholesale price and the retail price cap. So it's not the power companies that are getting screwed in the deal, but Ontario tax payers who use less electricity than their neighbors.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  17. Out of touch CTO by Party+Remover · · Score: 1

    "About a year ago, Burnett downloaded a couple of software programs onto his personal computers that seek to tap surplus computing power: SETI@Home and the United Devices Cancer Research Project."

    Let me get this straight. This guy is the CTO of a major PC manufacturer, and he only became aware of SETI@Home (i.e. distributed computing) in late 2001? What's wrong with this picture?

    1. Re:Out of touch CTO by Flagbrew · · Score: 1

      Yes, I find it somewhat ironic that the first (and certainly only) Gateway I have ever bought for the business, has been running SETI@home since Tue Jul 13 22:46:53 1999 UTC.

  18. That's stupid by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not exactly free for gateway to wire every single machine to the net, including the the extra cost of maxing out the cpu. It DOES take more power when your cpu is at 100% compared to 0%. More power == higher electricity bills.

    Grand idea i suppose, but it's going to cost them a pretty penny just to hook all of them up.

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:That's stupid by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      I would imagine that all of these computers are already connected to the internet so people can try them out. I know the Gateway store I went to was like this. They definitely had some sort of broadband or better connection too.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    2. Re:That's stupid by Decibel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The incremental cost of electricity for a computer that is idle verses one running at 100% CPU is actually very, very small.

      If we assume that the CPU draws 60W more at 100% use than at 0% (Intel lists maximum heat disipation of 60W for the P4), then 8,000 computers would consume a total of 480kW. Sounds like a lot, right? Now consider that so far today, California has had a maximum power draw of 28,000GW, which is 58 *million* times more than 480kW. And that's just one state.

    3. Re:That's stupid by Puk · · Score: 2

      I think the key phrase was "offering for sale". They're not going to sell these services for the less than the cost of power/net/added mainenance/etc.

      As long as marginal revenue > marginal cost, it makes sense (from at least a pure-profit point of view).

      -Puk

  19. Power Down Buttons.. by Quazion · · Score: 2

    All these new Desktop computers seem to have Power Down buttons on the keyboard and i love pressing them while walking tru a computer store....

    Sorry....thats just the way i am....cant help it

    1. Re:Power Down Buttons.. by larien · · Score: 2
      Any decent grid software will gracefully handle failures due to power-offs, whether they're due to power/hardware failure or some malicious sod hitting power buttons.

      I'm hoping Gateway are smart enough to consider that...

  20. Income statement... by Ratface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Gateway has 272 Gateway Country stores. With 7,800 floor model PCs, ..."

    The advantage, for customers, is the price. For an introductory price of 15 cents per computer hour, plus set-up fees, Gateway is making the power of supercomputing available to companies that might not be able to afford it otherwise.
    "

    If they were (extremely theoretically) able to sell all their computing power for 24 hours a day, 365 days a year their income would be:

    15c * 7800 computers = $1170/hour
    $28080 / day
    $10249200 / year.

    Not too shabby - but somehow the similarities between this business model and (let's say) web advertising to support an otherwise loss-making venture make me shiver.

    I imagine some Gateway exec is sitting in his cow-themed office rubbing his hands with glee looking at those figures. Good luck making it happen!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Income statement... by bje2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i have no idea, but what does it cost to leave each computer running 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, in terms of power consumption...as apposed to leaving each computer on during store hours, and then turning them off at night...just curious, cause it seems that would be additional overhead in this plan...i'm sure it's not on the $10 billion level though...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Income statement... by mofu · · Score: 1

      That's $1314 per PC per year (based on 24/7/365)

      At those rates why don't they give customer's free computers with no power switches and password locked screen savers that support network based number-crunching.

      If you were modem based it could do nightly call-ins to upload results and download new work.

      Even at a 50% customer usage rate (doubtful), you still are talking about $650+, well within what a low-end P4 system can be had for these days.

    3. Re:Income statement... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That comes to $1300 of revenue per PC. If you're going to spend that much, why not just buy the PCs yourself? That way, when all the calculating is over with, you still have a useful computer system.

      I know that some companies may not want the overhead associated with paying for support techs, etc. so it might actually make sense for them. But for a good number of corporate customers, it will still make sense to buy their own hardware.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:Income statement... by opello · · Score: 1

      ah, but they could save money on the heating bills if each country store had enough to keep the place warm :)

      oh, and the converse is true as well -- the would spend more to keep the stores cool in places that it is hot all of the time

    5. Re:Income statement... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      That's about $1300 of revenue per PC for a whole year. I guess individual computing projects would require much less time (that's part of the point of distributed computing, right?), so it might be just, say, a couple hundred bucks per computer for a given problem that takes them a couple months. If a customer has just one or two problems requiring this kind of processing power, or at any rate doesn't have such problems regularly, this model might make a lot of sense, though perhaps there's something I'm overlooking (it is still early for me ;)...

    6. Re:Income statement... by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      Because you have to set them up and pay people to administer them. Gateway already pays these costs for other reasons (ie to let potential customers play with them) so this is much cheaper than doing it yourself for limited supercomputing. However, if you know that you are going to need to use this much processing power regularly into the foreseeable future, doing it yourself would be wise since you would get save money on it after a reasonable period of time.

      Of course, in this case you might be better off seeing if you could buy a used Department of Energy system that they've lost interest in after getting a new massivelier parallel system to do their simulations on. Or something like that anyway.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    7. Re:Income statement... by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Obvious solution: run "the beowulf cluster of those"
      only in Winter...

    8. Re:Income statement... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      If it's $1300 per year, why can't I use my own PC to earn some money instead of this lame SETI@Home stuff that doesn't pay anything?

      I think 15 cents per hour is way too high. If there were really demand at such a high price you could become a millionaire just by purchasing PCs and a network connection. One cent per hour of computing time might be a reasonable market rate, once lots of people with large networks of PCs get involved. At that price I might buy some computing time myself when I had a big set of jobs to run (like some very CPU-intensive modifications to zlib I'm playing with), and at other times sell.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:Income statement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if this is a vapor project, 5,000 Slashdotters just spent 5 minutes apiece thinking about Gateway.

      Mission Accomplished.

    10. Re:Income statement... by gigaloCA · · Score: 1

      If they were (extremely theoretically) able to sell all their computing power for 24 hours a day, 365 days a year their income would be: 15c * 7800 computers = $1170/hour $28080 / day $10249200 / year.

      When they mentioned price, it was unlcear what they meant. Was that 15c per hour per machine, or 15c per hour on the entire virtual machine? Quite a different thing. Plus . . . 15c per hour is JUST introductory.

    11. Re:Income statement... by Leto2 · · Score: 2
      For this $1300 (I didn't do the math myself, I'll take your word) you get the newest of the newest every 6 months (that's how often Gateway refreshes all their display computers with the latest model)

      So for $1300 you _always_ have the latest, fastest model inc tech support, electricity, write-off, maintenance, etc.

      Also, if you have a need for only 1 month of computing power, you pay 1/12th of that figure AND still get all the advantages (write-off, etc) I mentioned.

      For really big companies who need this kind of computing power 24/7/365, just use your already present desktops in your company and install the Enterprise version of the MetaProcessor platform.

      --
      <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
    12. Re:Income statement... by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Sometimes you pack a wallop, AC.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  21. Spare Cycles @ Work by Knunov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand why companies don't include such things on new PCs as an option.

    Just include the .EXE file for Folding@Home (or one of the lesser projects :), a link on the desktop and an explanation of what the user can do with his/her idle CPU time. The number crunching power of millions upon millions of PCs wouldn't go to waste.

    While a Sysadmin at a very large hotel chain, which I can't specify (but it's a BIGGUN'), I used every machine on the network to fold protein. Did the math once and it came out to being something like a 80GHz machine w/ a couple gigs of RAM.

    We even got as high as 22 in the overall rankings.

    I recommend that other people in charge of large networks do the same. It hurts NOTHING, but could do a lot of good.

    Knunov

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by Agent+Green · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tell that to the poor tech in Georgia who was getting sued by his employer for doing the exact same thing:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/23477.htm l

      It hurts nothing until it's your ass getting kicked.

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    2. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by tmark · · Score: 2

      It hurts NOTHING, but could do a lot of good.

      This horse has already been beat, but it does hurt the company you work for which is paying for the machines that's running the clients for you. It hurts them just as much as if you'd been renting out your hotel's vacant rooms for charity, while stocking and cleaning them up yourself afterwards. You're lucky you didn't get fired.

    3. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by TPS+Report · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why companies don't include such things on new PCs as an option. Just include the .EXE file for Folding@Home (or one of the lesser projects :), a link on the desktop and an explanation of what the user can do with his/her idle CPU time. The number crunching power of millions upon millions of PCs wouldn't go to waste.
      It's a good idea, but which ones do you choose? SETI? Folding@Home? Mersenne? There are tons of distributed computing projects - who do you include, and who do you leave out? I would imagine that AOL, Earthlink, and others have paid a set amount to put their icons on the desktop of new PCs. Giving away "desktop real-estate" on their new PC's might reduce the price they can command from other customers. :)
      --
      I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven...
    4. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by Cloud+9 · · Score: 2
      That should be a lesson to any IT worker with access to the network.

      Don't do ANYTHING without your boss' permission.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    5. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Thanks mom

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    6. Re:Spare Cycles @ Work by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      It hurts NOTHING, but could do a lot of good.

      It's not an absolute. There are some people that have had difficulties when running CPU munching background processes. Sometimes the clients don't behave properly.

      Some (most?) CPUs also consume more power when running at 100% than they would at 50% or 0% usage.

      I have started dnet on my two fastest machines, when playing video, background clients cause a faint, yet noticable judder in video playback.

  22. Run UD as a publicity stunt by DarthWing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just run the Cancer agent on them? The publicity generated from this will certainly be worth more for Gateway than selling processor time, simply considering how much money (and time) it would cost to set up the network.

    1. Re:Run UD as a publicity stunt by Leto2 · · Score: 2

      They are running UD :)

      --
      <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
    2. Re:Run UD as a publicity stunt by DarthWing · · Score: 1

      That will teach me to read the article next time! (puts foot in mouth)

  23. And the winner is... by tigress · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gateway Inc, increasing their profit by a total of $2000, $1000 of which will go to the Long Island, NY store that found the winning key. Gateway stock (NYSE:GTW) immediately went up to to 3.51 from a previous $3.50 per share following the announcement.

  24. Traffic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can the CPU cycles on in store computers, really be worth enough in the market to make up for the administration headaches / overhead? They can't charge too high a price, as they will be competing with volunteer networks and all sorts of venders selling off their customers idle cpu cycles, and while you might have fairly high bandwidth between cpus within one store, communication between locations will probably be simply over the internet.

    How much intersite traffic will this generate over gateway's ISP? Are they selling just the CPU cycles? All paralized computations will need some communications between nodes, how much do you get with your $0.15/hour?

    Perhaps instead, they should sell advertising space on the screens of idle computers if they need some cash. Any computer, anywhere in the world can donate/sell its CPU cycles, I would think the market price for CPU cycles will be quite low. But not every computer in the world as hundreds of shoppers walking past it all day long with big wads of cash in their pockets.

    1. Re:Traffic? by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      The idea is that these resources are already generating profit in the form of sales. They have to pay administrators already. However, if they make use of the idle time they can get at least a little more money out of their stores. I'm betting that $0.15 per computer hour is slightly lower than the normal rate for this sort of thing since they are really just doing this to subsidize their stores.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  25. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by octalgirl · · Score: 2

    Yes, but is there a way for a company to tap into their own extra processing power? Is there a Intranet style version of the application/delivery they will use?

  26. Basic account protection by yerricde · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your company payroll dependant on machines that shoppers can tinker with wihle on display at a store?

    The user of a properly administered public kiosk (i.e. kiosk user is a normal user, not root) won't be able to affect any process that his account doesn't own.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Basic account protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The user of a properly administered public kiosk (i.e. kiosk user is a normal user, not root) won't be able to affect any process that his account doesn't own.

      What percentage of these instore machines will be set up properly? If the people working there knew how to do that, they might have REAL jobs... :)

    2. Re:Basic account protection by yerricde · · Score: 1

      What percentage of these instore machines will be set up properly?

      All of them, if they're installed from a properly designed system image on CD.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:Basic account protection by telstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suppose the duct tape over the power and reset buttons falls under the topic of properly administered?

    4. Re:Basic account protection by MentalPunisher2001 · · Score: 1

      Which is great, because in order to optimize the machines for running intensive background processes when the machine is idle they would probably resort to installing fewer bullshit systray programs that do absolutely nothing yet hog up tremendous amounts of system resources...

  27. "Grid" is the standard by peter303 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gateway is using the National Science Foundation "Grid" protocol for connecting computers. Originally designed for scientific supercomputing, some commercial sites are using it.

  28. It's not a brand new PC any longer. by Pranjal · · Score: 1

    Personally if I buy a PC which has been used for something before I start using it, it becomes a used PC for me. Why should I be paying for a brand new PC then?

    1. Re:It's not a brand new PC any longer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a brand new pc anyways, it's a display model, they'll sell it off at a discounted price to after they are done with it.
      The pc you get is all boxed up in the back.

  29. specious reasoning... by bje2 · · Score: 2

    ummm, it doesn't say anything about when he found out about it, just that he installed it a year ago...personally, i've been aware of SETI@HOME for a couple of years now...that doesn't mean that i've installed it on my computer though...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:specious reasoning... by Party+Remover · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. It doesn't specifically spell out that he only became aware of it a year ago. But given the journalistic tone, the fact that his entrepreneurial gears started cranking after he installed the software, and not after some hypothetical earlier encounter with the concept, it's not an unreasonable inference to make.

  30. Bad Headline by malarkey · · Score: 1, Funny

    I read the headline and thought that they were taking old Honda motorcycles and converting them into Segways.

  31. FREE computers - sponsored by companies who use yo by vasqzr · · Score: 0



    I've got the next FreeComputers.com idea!

    1. Give away computers!
    2. Your unused cycles are sold to whoever we want
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

    Sound like a plan?



  32. Re:_DISPLAY_, foo by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    When you're buying the display model you already wave the expectation that the computer is new.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  33. Coming Soon... by pr0t0plasm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pet store hamster wheels sell power to the grid!

    --
    - - - Patent applied for and deliver us from evil
    1. Re:Coming Soon... by operagost · · Score: 1
      Now that deserves a mod!

      If they could just harness the power of the water currents in the aquariums and that terrier that keeps chasing his tail, Petsmart could make record profits!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Coming Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      te he

  34. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Woogiemonger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The corporation I work for has 110,000 desktop PCs. Never mind the servers.

    Any corporation or even small business I've known has no problem getting CPU power, you're right. If things are desperate, they can hook up a bunch of old monitor-less pentium 1's and 2's as a Beowulf cluster and use that. Aside from those processing weather and DNA data, what the world is truly hungry for is bandwidth.
  35. Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by yerricde · · Score: 1

    All these new Desktop computers seem to have Power Down buttons on the keyboard and i love pressing them while walking tru a computer store....

    That's a flaw in Microsoft Windows. You push power down, and it immediately halts the system, killing all apps (including your web browser) that don't have unsaved work. That's pretty harsh for a key that anyone can just bump because it's so close to the edge of the keyboard. As usual, Apple did it right, starting at about Mac OS 7.5, putting up an alert box to confirm a shutdown.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. maybe I have a different version of Windows, but on both my Windows 2000 and XP boxes I get a confirmation "Standby / Power-Off / Cancel" box when I press either the keyboard power key OR the front-panel power button.
      It's entirely a matter of how the computer is configured.

    2. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Apple did it right, starting at about Mac OS 7.5, putting up an alert box to confirm a shutdown.

      No, Apple did it lazy. Rather than ensure the apps gracefully shut down and save their work, they decided to annoy the user for another useless reason.

      The fact is, there needs be no dialogs like that. If anyone feels not so, then what if the user accidentally hits enter when the dialog comes up? Maybe there needs to be an "Are you sure?" dialog, and just in case, an "Are you sure you're sure?", and you never know, an "Are you absolutely sure that you're sure that you're sure?" dialog.

      The power off button itself should simply be placed under a plastic flap. Problem solved with $0.10 of engineering, rather than another infinitely annoying dialog box.

      It's just another UI disaster on a Mac.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by Pope · · Score: 2
      It's just another UI disaster on a Mac

      Proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's pretty hard to accidentally hit the Power key on the older Mac keyboards. Aside from that, there are multiple options in the dialog that pops up: Restart, Shut Down, Sleep and of course Cancel. All very useful to have in a one key shortcut.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by rixster · · Score: 2

      FWIW, My Mac Cube G4 switches off the moment I use my garmin rino within 3 feet of it.
      Imagine my surprise the first time I found this out
      And yes it is true. It also switches it back on again, but that's little consolation.

      --
      Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
    5. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Proof you don't know what you're talking about

      Proof you don't know what you're talking about is that I didn't actually remember about those old Mac keyboards when I stated this (isn't assuming wonderful? not). I was simply going by the difficulty I had in finding a text editor on a fresh G3 Mac running MacOS 9. I never did find it, but fortunately, never cared.

      >It's pretty hard to accidentally hit the Power key on the older Mac keyboards.

      I didn't find it so, and neither did anyone else in the (very few) Mac classes in school (the only time I had to come in contact with Macs, fortunately). Then again, I usually go through 2 keyboards a year (learning on a manual typewriter does wonders for the wrists!) unless they're Model Ms.

      >Aside from that, there are multiple options in the dialog that pops up: Restart, Shut Down, Sleep and of course Cancel. All very useful to have in a one key shortcut.

      Perhaps so. Unless the key is labelled power (which, from what the original power was saying, it was). In that case asking the user to restart is silly. It's like asking you if you want to start the car when you push the power button on your car radio with your keys out of the ignition. Different, although slightly related things.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      A couple comments here. So far as a plastic coverflap for a shutdown button goes, that is not only unreliable but also violates human engineering guidelines. But no machine should ever allow full shutdown after a single button push if there is any risk of loss/damage. This applies to computers as well as, say, airplane engines (and in fact it is impossible to engage the reverse thrusters until physical touchdown is verified).
      Now, Apple got the verification right, but their hardware had its own little problems back in the early 90's. Some fool put a pushbutton power switch (hard power, not a shutdown sequencer) right on the front panel. Too easy to hit; not to mention that Windows losers who happened to be using the Mac would push the button in hopes of ejecting the floppy disk. :-) .

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    7. Re:Too easy to bump. UI disaster. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >So far as a plastic coverflap for a shutdown button goes, that is not only unreliable but also violates human engineering guidelines.

      The military didn't seem to have any problems with it in their aircraft...

      >But no machine should ever allow full shutdown after a single button push if there is any risk of loss/damage.

      Agreed. The applications need to "talk" a little more with the OS on this. This way the OS only informs the user "Please close your programs before shutting down". I still think it should ask you if you want to reboot when you hit the power button, and I still think it shouldn't ask if you are sure. It should either do it, or tell you it can't.

      Maybe I just want my computer to be as easy to use as my microwave. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  36. Been done by vondo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There were a couple of companies that tried this. Process Tree springs to mind. I ran a client for a while t from a different company which was called something like Capacity Calibration. Basically testing connectivity and response time to web sites from a distributed group of computers. I think they paid me $20 or so over 6 months.

    If you think about it, that might make more sense than buying CPU time.

  37. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2
    As I said, they need the organisational and software skills to make use of the power they have available. And IT management with some vision... and balls. This is the real issue.

    Software architectures already exist which could be used. COSM is a free example, though I suspect the licensing may rule that out in a commercial environment. More stuff here: http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Computer _Science/Distributed_Computing/Platforms/

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  38. How Gateway Plans to Make Money by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Gateway has 272 Gateway Country stores. With 7,800 floor model PCs, ..."

    1. Install distributed computing client on first PC.
    2. Install distributed computing client on second PC.
    3. Install distributed computing client on third PC.
    4. ...
    ...
    ...
    7801. Profit!

    I have a suggestion for Gateway's CTO: Calculate the money you've made running SETI@Home and the cancer project on your desktop for the last year, and multiply that by 7,800. That's what you can expect.

    1. Re:How Gateway Plans to Make Money by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      ... ...
      7801. ???
      7802. Profit!

    2. Re:How Gateway Plans to Make Money by mcc · · Score: 2

      1. Install distributed computing client on first PC.. 2. Install distributed computing client on second PC.. 3. Install distributed computing client on third PC..

      All i have to say is that with 7,800 identical computers all set up for a united purpose, if Gateway doesn't already have some kind of system set up whereby they could install arbitrary software on all 7,800 computers at once with a couple of mouse clicks on one single computer at Gateway Central, they are incredibly stupid.

      Especially because i think such a thing could be done just by using a unified Windows Update Server
      for the floorroom PCs. And if not, there are lots of products designed for the exact purpose of keeping consistent disk images across large quantities of computers with a single point of administration. Probably, Gateway Country even sells some of them.

  39. this sounds like desperation to me. by venomkid · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at the situation. Last year, the christmas season was hard on PC manufacturers. This year, it's not anticipated to be any better. Or did gateway just realize that IBM thinks this is the wave of the future, and is trying to 'keep up with the Jones''?

    These are display models, so they're 'used' anyway, nobody's going to get one thinking it's brand new, but what's next? Selling computers for less money with the agreement that the distributed client stays on there?

    I dunno. Confusing.

    --
    vk.
  40. two years later by hairmare · · Score: 1
    business model XP (tm) comes:
    • People using more that 100 cycles a day have to sign up for premium membership.
    • Normal users get a ad popup every 10 cycles.
    • ...
  41. technical details by foo(foo(foo(bar))) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone know any technical details about this projects.

    Do they indent to do LAM/MPI style communications or will it push the client code and execute it independe3ntly (ie. a SETI type project).

    It's really an issue of weather or not all the nodes are equals on the network or not..


    1. Re:technical details by Decibel · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I know a few details, since I help create the software :)

      The software is push-based, just like the software you can download to participate in our global research projects. Unlike many other distributed computing clients though, ours has the ability to update itself, which greatly reduces administration overhead.

      Also, although the client software normally operates independantly in a push-based manner, it is possible to do MPI as well, it just has to be coded as part of the actual application software.

  42. Do something useful instead: Folding@home by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    And yes, there are MAC and Linux clients:

    http://folding.stanford.edu/

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  43. Re:wasted cycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greatest pianist of the 19th century!

  44. Beware... by Annoyed+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is M$ gimmick. They're gonna take your snaps while shopping PCs. Have a look at this new technology that takes snap through monitor.

    --
    Hmmm... Ok.. Chivas on the rocks.
  45. Oh, That's great! by TPS+Report · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [sales] And here we have our 300 series machine
    [cust ] Neat! (opens IE)
    [cust ] It seems a little slow opening up a browser; I thought you said it was fast?
    [sales] It is! It just appears slow because we're maxing out the processor.
    [cust ] Why would you do that on a display machine that's supposed to be showing off the machine's strengths?
    [sales] We make $0.03/hour crunching numbers in the background.
    [cust ] (on cellphone) Honey.. sell the Gateway stock. They're obviously in trouble.

    --
    I was told that I could listen to the radio at a reasonable volume from nine to eleven...
    1. Re:Oh, That's great! by bubblegoose · · Score: 2

      Yeah, so I ask the guy at the store to fire up Unreal Tournament 2003 to see if the machine is really fast. But because this machine is busy crunching numbers for someone I get jerkiness and it just doesn't perform right.

      So I think the machine is lame and don't buy it.

      Hey at least Gateway made $0.15

      --
      I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    2. Re:Oh, That's great! by karlrado · · Score: 1
      Another scenario:

      [cust] Boot time is important to me. I turn off my machine when I am not using it and I frequently jump back and forth between Windows and Linux to get my work done. Can I see how fast this machine reboots?
      [sales] I really can't demonstrate that feature. If we reboot the machine too much, the workunits that people are paying us to process have to be restarted and they don't get the results they are paying for.

      Note, I realize that good distributed apps can recover from system restarts without losing too much work, but that may not be the case for all applications run on these machines.

      Maybe all this makes sense when the stores are closed.

    3. Re:Oh, That's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being 2002, the OS that these machines come with supports these things called "threads," and they can be given various priorities. The OS is remarkably good at scheduling these "threads" so that one of lower priority doesn't use the hardware resources when one of a higher priority needs them.

      Granted, this system is not perfect, as this isn't a hard-realtime OS, but we're talking about a 1% performance drop.

    4. Re:Oh, That's great! by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

      Hm pretty insightful comment but... Let me say this. I run United Devices/Intel cancer research ( http://www.intel.com/cure ) 24/7 (when system is on) for 1 year.

      It started with 500 Mhz P3 with 196 mb of RAM and Windows 2000 monster running.

      The only side effect is memory usage. It uses 20MB of RAM when it crunches, last time I was about to uninstall that than I thought the memory usage of ICQ, MSN messanger etc and it stayed.

      Let me check for you again, no... It doesn'T effect IE launch time or something, even merely effects 3d fps games (well, as I said, I unload because of mem usage).

      It uses IDLE CPU cycles. Of course, UD pros can explain you better, check www.ud.com faq's for more info.

      BTW, if Gateway contributed to such "good will" project, like Cancer of Folding@home with that, it would be a great, amazing PR for them.

  46. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Eagle5596 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think the point of this is not to provide processing power to the coorporations with huge numbers of computers, but to the smaller ones which can't afford them, but quite possibly could afford to pay "rent" on existing computers. Perhaps all I want is the capability to run some simulations in the background, and don't want to slow down the computers my users are running in the office. Should I invest in a cluster? Or pay less to buy time from someone like Gateway, which, when I am done with the current project, doesn't just sit there and collect dust.

    This would seem like a great idea for those who are looking to cut costs and may not have a user for the required equipment once the current project is done. Sure you can try to resell stuff, but there is no promise of a sale, and it takes time and money to get rid of old equipment.

    While this might not be a good idea for the mega-coorporations. It could work for smaller groups (and even local governments).

    Though it is true that sensitive data couldn't be handled in this way.

  47. Just wait by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Some company will try to save money on office space by sending their employees to the Gateway stores to use those free cycles.

  48. 0.02 cents? (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  49. Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    GWB: Ha! We've just discovered your plans, damn terrorist!

    Saddam: Terrorist for what?

    GWB: UN inspectors just found these mass destruction weapons plans on your PC.

    Saddam: Heh, check better, yankee. That's a mirror of YOUR mass destruction weapons plans at the Pentagon! We just sold some processing power and storage space to your network.

    GWB: Oh...

    Saddam: Wait. One more thing.

    GWB: What?

    Saddam: Here's the bill. Cash only, thanks.

  50. Think of the possibilities! by eris_crow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now you can hack Exxon just by going to Gateway Country!

    Seriously, given the vulnerabilities of Windows and lack of security traditionally found on floor model PCs, not to mention the thought that hundreds of people a day have access to the PCs, I don't expect many companies will take up Gateways offer.

    1. Re:Think of the possibilities! by mustangdavis · · Score: 2
      Seriously, given the vulnerabilities of Windows and lack of security traditionally found on floor model PCs, not to mention the thought that hundreds of people a day have access to the PCs, I don't expect many companies will take up Gateways offer.


      Answer: Install Linux .... duh!

      Besides, how many people would want to buy a PC with a terrible OS with a pretty GUI interface??

    2. Re:Think of the possibilities! by Zep1a · · Score: 1
      Long time reader, first time poster..but anyway.
      Answer: Install Linux .... duh! Besides, how many people would want to buy a PC with a terrible OS with a pretty GUI interface??
      Uh...everybody except the 10 or 20 thousand (or more, I don't really know..) or so regualr /. readers? Zep--
  51. Think Different... by Orne · · Score: 2

    Sounds interesting, maybe HP/Compaq should consider trying it this Christmas. I hear that they're going to have a lot of computers sitting around idle ...

  52. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, though being that Gateway is in the business of selling computers, wouldn't they be shooting themselves in the foot?

    Gateway Rep: "You want to buy 500 of our newest whizbang PC? Nah, you don't need that, look over here, for 15 cents an hour...."

  53. BOINC by tqft · · Score: 1

    once the seti people have BOINC running they could ripoff the code

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  54. Sell it to Alan Ralsky!!!! by mustangdavis · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy can ALWAYS use computing power ... and it appears as though he has money to burn! I'm sure that he'd buy processing power in bulk!!!! I wonder how much bandwidth is included in Crap-way's "processing power" price .... and if they threw in a couple SMTP servers .... that would be a steal!

    This way, customers could come to the Gateway store for a sneak preview of the spam email they would be receiving that week! Everybody wins!!! :)

    BTW: For those people the don't read /. regularly, this is a (weak) follow-up to this article about our favorite person, notorious email spam king, Alan Ralsky. :)

  55. How about burn-in systems? by Deton8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always thought that a PC manufacturer could use the thousand or so PCs that are in burn-in at any given time for render farms or other parallelized projects.

  56. been there, done that, for free :) by CheechBG · · Score: 2

    in 2000 when I was gainfully employed by Gateway, I has RC5-64 running on about 20 systems, shot our rankings through the roof :)

    This really isn't that bad of an idea, just as long as the info being crunched, as said before, is of a non-proprietary nature. However, I HIGHLY doubt that UD/Stanford/SETI would be willing to shell out x^5 dollars for a crack at the Gateway network, they'll always have people like me who do it for fun :)

  57. Clue alert: THERE IS NO MARKET! by NineNine · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's already been tried. Several companies have come and gone trying to sell distributed computing. The secret is: there's no market for it! None! It's been tried and has failed. Any company that needs serious crunch power already has it within their own organization. Hell, shitty little Intel chips can do much more than the average PC user will ever need 'em to do. Universities occasionally need more power for esoteric physics problems, but they can't afford to pay. Hell, even SETI@Home couldn't even get enough data in fast enough to be processed. I can't imagine that there's that much demand out there for something like this, if any.

  58. Too litle, too late.. by grub · · Score: 2


    Enron could have used this concept to balance their books.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  59. Turbo Linux was displaying this 2 yrs ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the Linux Expo in NYC. The demo was doing some graphics rendering and it was way kewl. But, look what happened to them :)

    Seriously, I think a large company with thousands of PC's could setup a grid to work after hours and donate the time to cancer resarch or such. Not only helping humanity, but getting a nice tax break at the same time. And by running it in-house there is no extra security risks.

  60. All the sceptics are stupid by akiaki007 · · Score: 2

    This is a great idea and will work fine. For the 2-3 people that go to Gateway Country to hack the computers, you won't be doing much. Soon someone will come over and kick you out and restart whatever you tried to screw up. Just beacuse you can do it doesn't mean that you should (it is illegal afterall).

    Anyway, in the end, this is brilliant, and I'm surprized that it took so long. Though I really feel that the only companies that will be able to utilize this ar ethe Drug companies to take care of some algorithms for them. A random hacker will have to spend their entire life trying to hack through to figure out what exactly is going on. The hacker will have 0 knowledge of what is being run on those computers and won't have the first clue as to what to make of the data. Stop pretending that these compuers are just made for hacking and breaking into. If this is what you're doing day in and day out, pick up a book or get a real job.

    Anyway, I hope that this idea takes off and that others can really benefit from this. What would be ever better is if some comapanies "dontate" their spare computer time to organizations that try to produce results much like Corporations. That would greatly benefit everyone, and if people are hacking in and trying to break this...then they're just causing society more grief.

    hey, an extra 10MM can't hurt Gateway all that much can it?

    --
    "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
  61. Wow! can i compile KDE 3 there? by chip_hk · · Score: 1

    don't mind paying little for getting the builds within 30 minutes instead of 24 hours.

    Another question, can this kind of work (say, compile a kernel) can be distributed over the network like that?

  62. multitasking by katalyst · · Score: 2

    Now, that's called true multitasking !!!! Utilizing their resources, while on display, is brilliant. I agree that may not find many corporate clients, but what about supporting the open source community ? Developers can play with the grid, or enthusiasts can experiment with this concept. International organizations such as WHO which do not need to keep their research confidential can also exploit this setup. The other advantage here is that these gateway machines will not be loaded with heavy applications (MS apps on corporate computers will minimize the contribution of that's computer's processing power!. Atleast Gateway is trying to be constructive....

    --
    |/________
    |\A|ALYS|
  63. Tax Deduction for charities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if a corporation uses it's computing power to crunch numbers for a charity research foundation (is there any such thing) that say works with cancer; if they could then put a dollar figure on that CPU time and use it as a tax deduction??

    ANyone know?

  64. in 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll rent a supercluster for a few bucks per day, crack AES and take over the world... MUHAR!

    (just have to get those bucks for the rentage)

  65. And then it awoke.... by paiute · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that if we get into this whole distributed computing thing and it gets so big it starts to evolve into a neural network and decides that it should be in charge of us that we should make sure that it is a bunch of Linux boxes that takes over because then everything would be like open and free at least, and we could still wear Tshirts and jeans. Or if not that, then the new net master is OSX based, because then we'd have really cool uniforms and stuff and everyone would have all day to write songs and draw comics. That would be cool. What I don't want is for this Gateway/Windows thing to become sentient, because then we would have a world dominated by an evil Master who numbed out our creative impulses, tortured us with relentless conformity, and controlled all political and economic traffic. Pretty much like it is now, come to think of it.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:And then it awoke.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Type all that out while using a lower UID, and it might end up being modded "+1, Funny". Otherwise, you're just a dick.

    2. Re:And then it awoke.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      What I don't want is for this Gateway/Windows thing to become sentient, because then we would have a world dominated by an evil Master who numbed out our creative impulses, tortured us with relentless conformity, and controlled all political and economic traffic

      The machines always turn on their creator, usually after wiping out a limited set of innocent civilians and scientists. The glass is really half full on this one...

  66. Spam it! by nitefallz · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone evil company will use the idle time to send out more spam, yay for us.

  67. Second hand computer - Full price... by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

    "Step right up ladies and gentlemen! This is a once in a lifetime offer! This brand new, off the shelf Pentium4 machine - big wodges of RAM, hard disk space just ooooooozing out of every port and have a look at this graphics card! No previous owners but 10e20 users. And that's just this morning!"

    --
    If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
  68. not saying repost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but since this has been discussed in various forums and TV before with other companies, I am now curious how those attempts fared. I think this is a good idea, but wonder how it really pans out as far as business goes. At one time people tried to sell their "excess bandwidth" although that was really much different in practice... I never heard of how that did either.
    Help me slashdot... you're my only hope! </sarcasm>

  69. Well-chosen defaults still important by yerricde · · Score: 1

    on both my Windows 2000 and XP boxes I get a confirmation "Standby / Power-Off / Cancel" box when I press either the keyboard power key

    Can you tell me where to specify that Windows should put up that box?

    It's entirely a matter of how the computer is configured.

    Well-chosen default settings are an important part of UI design.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Well-chosen defaults still important by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me where to specify that Windows should put up that box?

      Sure, Mr. Sarcastic Windows-Hater. Go to the Control Panel, open Power, click "Advanced," and look at the section entitled "Power buttons." If you want to enable hibernation, click the "Hibernate" tab.

      If you need any more help, press F1 on the desktop, go to Start > Help and Support, or visit Microsoft support.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  70. not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) they'll never cover the costs of the extra ~20 watts of CPU power usage
    2) having slowed-down demo computers because they're crunching numbers isn't a good look

  71. good idea by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    back in 1994, I was working on this very idea for Cybercafes in 3'rd world countries. Now, if they really want to make some more money, allow advertisement on their screensavers. Basically, this will allow systems to make money 24x7 (night time processing and during the day the screen saver will catch customers eyes for coke/pepsi/movie/ etc.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  72. Which Grid system are they using? by ishmalius · · Score: 1
    The article is a little high-level to explain the specific Grid mechanism that Gateway is planning to use. It would be interesting to find out.



    It would be wonderful if some sets of RFC-like standards could emerge, so that the developer base could gain experience and critical mass.

    1. Re:Which Grid system are they using? by Decibel · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:Which Grid system are they using? by Decibel · · Score: 2

      Uhm, oops. That should be the MetaProcessor, not MeteProcessor.

      *wipes egg off face*

  73. How do you know he's not already using it? by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 2
    Think about it -- what's the most popular way for spammers to get their "goods" out into public?

    Open mail relays!

    Spammers are already using a great deal of other peoples' computing power without compensating them any for the cycles used, the black eye of blacklisting, etc.

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  74. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Single Data Point Extrapolation. How is this insightful?

  75. I'm sure it will be great for sales by photon317 · · Score: 2


    Salesman: And here's the new top of the line Gateway, it's so fast you'll be able to browse the web and balance your checkbook in human time, just like you could on a 200Mhz Pentium.

    Customer: Why does the mouse lag behind by 2-3 seconds when I move it.

    Salesman: Uhhh.. because Gateway is selling the CPU cycles of their demo machines to someone else and Windows is giving the number cruncher more priority than the mouse interrupts.

    Customer: Yeah, right - how about this iMac over here, it looks fast.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  76. seti by qoncept · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be more fun for Gateway to run SETI@Home?

    --
    Whale
  77. Teraflop != trillion ops per sec by tomhudson · · Score: 2
    With 7,800 floor model PCs, each with an average processing power of 2 gigahertz, Gateway says it has about 14 teraflops of computing power (a teraflop is 1 trillion operations per second). By comparison, the 10 most powerful computers in the world range from three to about 36 teraflops.</quot>

    A terraflop is not a trillion operations per second , it's a trillion floating-point instructions per second. Floating-point instructions are expensive on intel/amd hardware, even with a deditcated FPU.

    Maybe someone should hit them with a suit for false advertising.

  78. networked computers? by ronaldcromwell · · Score: 1

    this seems odd... i wonder how many of those stores really want to take the time to configure and maintain a network like that. i'd think that having an on-site admin, or even off-site support, would cost them enough to negate any gain from the selling of wastesd cycles.

  79. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Classic+Guy · · Score: 1

    Did you mean 2e-2 dollars?

    --
    Why can't they just collide a whole bunch of little hadrons?
  80. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Leto2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yup, there is. United Devices sells the MetaProcessor which does exactly that, tap into the power of your intranet's underutilized desktops.

    UD is also the software enabler behind Gateway's Processing On Demand

    and UD also happens to be my employer</disclaimer>

    --
    <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
  81. hmm... by cowtamer · · Score: 2

    Sometimes I get a feeling that MS Windows is already doing this behind our back. Is there ANY sane reason why a 1Ghz machine should take 2 seconds to switch between two programs???

  82. Just buy the computers by dfries · · Score: 1

    15cents/hour * 24 hours * 365 = $1314.00 per computer year of cpu
    They shouldn't have any problem buying a computer for $1314. If a company has a year worth of projects they are better off just buying the computers since a year is the break even point. I wouldn't expect there to be many companies that would need a huge amount of processing to not continually need processing. Figure in development time for the software and a year doesn't sound like a very long time, especially concidering it would be harder to design, write, and test software for computers you don't control.

    1. Re:Just buy the computers by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      I think you're forgetting the other costs - there's more than just the hardware investment. Software and hardware support costs both man-hours and money. Also, there is the added advantage that you only buy as much CPU time as you need - you're not stuck with unneeded computers after you've finished the project.

  83. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Decibel · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are many computational problems that require far more power than a 50-100 person company can easily pay for. 'Fabless' semiconductor manufacturers and small drug discovery companies are two examples. Even for larger companies, renting time can make a lot of sense if they have an infrequent need for large processing power.

    Something else to consider is that unlike most corporations, Gateway continually rotates the newest machines available into their showrooms, so their grid will always be growing in power.

  84. No charity? by John_Renne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if Gateway didn't think of charity. This way reactions are the company must be in some kind of trouble. If they would have donated the CPU-cycles to charity (I'm thinking of united devices or something like that) I guess publicity would have been on their hands.

    --
    /(bb|[^b]{2})/
  85. hardware issues due to distributed clients by neptune1 · · Score: 1

    A while back I ran the distributed.net client on a number of machines. I noticed the machines that ran the client suffered significantly more hardware failures than the machines that were not running it. I removed the client from all machines and noticed the relibility of those machines increased.

    Has anyone else seen similar? Have their been any studies on this?

  86. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

    As I said, they need the organisational and software skills to make use of the power they have available. And IT management with some vision... and balls. This is the real issue.

    You are right!

    As usual, the technological problems are the easy ones. The difficult problems in this area are managerial. And if you have any experience dealing with wetware, you know that it takes a lot more than balls and vision to get this kind of thing implemented properly. It takes money, lots of it, for planning, training, meetings, and all the other crap that has to be done when dealing with people.

    Seems to me like Gateway is offering something very interesting that could affect a lot of "make or buy, or do without" decisions. If they can sell time on their grid for less than the TCO of developing and maintaining an in-house grid, then they've got a winner. They'll be able to sell service to your company, even though you've got eleventy jillion workstations sitting around, because management will see that its more costly to get you-all to get your act together than to buy Gateway's service.

  87. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1
    Not really. Many coorporations offer products that compete with other products they sell, it allows them to capture a larger share of the market which might otherwise provide no revenue.

    A good example of this can be made with beer. Most brewing companies produce several lines of beer, a cheap beer (also known as ass beer), a medium rate beer, and a high end. One would question why to offer the cheap beer at all. "You want to buy our newest high end beer? Nah why not buy this cheap one!" Wouldn't people just buy the expensive ones? When drinking with a few friends, people want the good stuff. But if they had to buy the good stuff for a party, they'd more likely make it BYOB, resulting in less beers at said party. Because cheap beer is available the companies can now sell to the party hosts and take up a piece of the market which otherwise would be lost.

    Gateway can only offer computers, but then they wouldn't be able to make money off of Tiny Coorp, who doesn't have the funds for a computer but could afford to rent time on computers.

    Do a bit of Math, say company X needs approximately 10 computers, each running a simulation constantly for two weeks. Do they shell out $1k for each computer, or rent them for the needed time for around $504 ($0.15 * (14 days * 24 hours) * 10 nodes)?

  88. Consumer pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    off course, if they make the client unobtrusive enough, half the customers will forget to turn it off. Those connected to broadband will be donating THEIR power and THEIR bandwith. That is the part were this story *could* become commercially interesting!!!

  89. good for them by buttahead · · Score: 1

    sounds like gateway really needs the money anyhow. i still don't see how they can keep the stores open.

  90. Not many cpu cycles for sale in Australia... by mmerlin · · Score: 1

    ... since Gateway closed all of their stores over here about a year ago

    --

    smile, it makes everyone else wonder what you're up to :-)
  91. It could work... by travail_jgd · · Score: 2

    Gateway's plan could have use to smaller businesses. Assuming that you pay for the entire computer day, that's $3.60 per PC.

    Look at the economics of the situation: "renting" 200 computers (averaging 2.0 Ghz) for a day is going to be $720... The cost of buying the equivalent number of Microtels from Walmart.com is (assuming 800 Mhz Duons have half the CPU performance), 400 machines at 300 dollars == $120,000. Plus electricity, networking, etc.

    What's going to be Problem #1 is who Gateway sells this to. Large companies and enterprises will already have an extensive network of PCs. That pretty much leaves small and medium sized companies that need a lot of processing power in a very short time, with the loss of one or more pieces not effecting the whole. (The only "common" app that I can think of customers would be computer-generated animation... but I need more caffeine :)

    Problem #2 is setup, software, and licensing. I don't think Gateway is going to flick a switch at 9:00 PM and have their WinXP computers start running BSD, Linux, etc. On top of that, what will the set-up cost be? Will companies be paying $20/hour per tech to install the software, or is it remote installation with a flat fee? But the killer will be licenses... unless the company is using free or homebrew applications, will they have to pay for each computer in the cluster?

    It could work for Gateway. If they give free upgrades when new machines come in, and performance guarantees (if a PC isn't performing at 100%), it might catch on. But like another poster said, CPU cycles are fairly cheap, but bandwidth is expensive.

  92. A tale of woe and heartbreak by PD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A few years ago, there was a company named Jostens that examined their IT costs. Jostens is in the class ring business. If you've got a high school ring or college ring, chances are that you bought it from Jostens.

    Anyway, somebody at Jostens took a look at their IT department and had a brilliant idea: everything these fools in IT did came out as a debit somewhere on the company spreadsheet, so why not try to turn that around? Make those slackers earn their keep? So, Jostens became a class ring AND consulting company.

    I said this was to be a tale of woe and heartbreak, and I did not lie to you. Jostens found that the consulting business was MUCH different than the class ring business, and that they weren't any good at it. Jostens lost a lot of money, and their silliness was splashed across papers such as the Wall Street Journal. So, Jostens learned the hard way that sometimes what accountants like to call a debit really isn't such a thing at all. Many manager types learned for the first time that IT adds value to an organization and that domination of the class ring market doesn't automatically mean success in another market.

    So what does this have to do with anything? It seems to me someone at Gateway took a look at their accounting spreadsheets, noticed that the company owns a lot of PC's that aren't being used for ANYTHING. All they do is sit in the stores, and cost money. Bright idea: let's actually USE those computers for something - make them earn their keep! The rest of the Gateway story doesn't need to be related here. Essentially Dell lives happily ever after.

  93. What's wrong with this sentence?? by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1
    From the article...
    "If a computer is idle and you don't use it, the computing power you generated is lost -- just like if you generate electrical power and you don't use it, it's gone," said Dan Reed, director of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois.

    And this comes from the mouth of someone who supposedly knows something about science and technology??

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  94. I find this to be by mo+wiggley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    a truly inovative idea, for a PC maker to do. Very good way to take advantage of all of your resources for income and business in general. Ted is still a great CEO, or whatever he is now. And he obviously has a decent team with him. But there are many things I would still do different If I were at the helm of Gateway. I own two of there computers. I will indeed build my own next time, but they were a great duo of first desktop and laptop for me.

    --
    Libranet GNU/Linux - Excellent Debian Based Distro http://www.libranet.com Check it out!
  95. Imagine... by WhetDogg · · Score: 1

    A Beowulf cluster of THESE! :)

  96. In related news... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gateway enters the top 5 of supercomputers with the world's largest Beowulf cluster.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  97. Installed at assembly? by Rip!ey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So when and where exactly would they install the software for this.

    Would they leave it up to the technicians (ha! salespeople) at each retail outlet? Or would they include it as part of the disk image installed at the factory where the software runs automatically on bootup?

    My guess would be the second option.

    This would however mean that *every* Gateway computer sold includes the required software, and the end users who buy from Gateway may well end up as part of a distributed computing project without their explicit permission. All it needs is some obscure legal mumbo in fine print and users have no recourse should they find out.

    1. Re:Installed at assembly? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Heaven forbid they simply stamp out a 'showroom floor' install CD, and a 'end user' install CD, and use both appropriately.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  98. a few apps to run by Erno_Rubaiyat · · Score: 1
    How about a nice pr0n server, or an irc server?

    maybe freenet or something that doesn't have access to decrypted information stored on it.

    I've got it, p2p servers, pr0n, music, movies...

  99. A better business model by Xarin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A better business model for Gateway and companies that have access to a large amount of PCs idling might be to donate the spare cycles to a charity and take a tax break. There is not much downside to this and there are lots of upsides such as it does not acutally have to work very well to get the writeoff versus trying to make it profitable as well as being able to advertise how they are trying to make a difference.

  100. DDoS by rela · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long before someone cracks their network and makes this into the largest DDoS tool ever?

    1. Re:DDoS by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      The largest DDoS tool ever has already been invented - Slashdot... ;-)

  101. Re:wasted cycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent First Post!

  102. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Notre97 · · Score: 1

    No need to be so hard on yourself.

    Your input could be valued at more than 0.02 ;)

  103. BIOS password by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I suppose the duct tape over the power and reset buttons falls under the topic of properly administered?

    Booting from any device other than the primary hard disk requires a BIOS administrator password. Changing the password without knowing the old password requires opening the case, which the sales personnel are trained to recognize.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:BIOS password by ejdmoo · · Score: 1

      Booting from any device other than the primary hard disk requires a BIOS administrator password. Changing the password without knowing the old password requires opening the case, which the sales personnel are trained to recognize.

      Or so you think...
      maybe there's a reason they're working at the Gateway Store...

    2. Re:BIOS password by pyrote · · Score: 1

      thats not the point... if some twit comes in and reboots all the machines to the bios password, it's not processing the data. The twit wins, and gateway loses money. Besides, its prolly only going to run XP and it takes little to crash it if you know how.

      then there is the best one... reach around back and flip the case switch, or pull the plug.

      There is only one way for it to work, and I assume gateway knows this...Don't rely on the money from processing.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    3. Re:BIOS password by yerricde · · Score: 1

      if some twit comes in and reboots all the machines to the bios password, it's not processing the data.

      The BIOS password would only be an admin password (used for changing the boot drive), not a boot password (used for starting the windows bootloader).

      Besides, its prolly only going to run XP and it takes little to crash it if you know how.

      How? What's the easiest way to crash a non-network-connected Windows XP system by manipulating only the keyboard and mouse?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    4. Re:BIOS password by pyrote · · Score: 1

      The BIOS password would only be an admin password (used for changing the boot drive), not a boot password (used for starting the windows bootloader).

      press pause on the bios screen... dead.

      How? What's the easiest way to crash a non-network-connected Windows XP system by manipulating only the keyboard and mouse?

      Fist off... to do this project it IS network connected. otherwise, get a directory listing of c: or do a find and use *. Then CTRL+A then enter.

      works for Radio Shack

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  104. Thank you by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Go to the Control Panel, open Power, click "Advanced," and look at the section entitled "Power buttons."

    Thanks. I didn't know that was there, because I had that keyboard for only a week.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  105. Questions by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2
    I know this is just a fluff piece, but it left me with some questions:

    • IP. Does Gateway get a cut?
    • Security - source code. I've got this app that's kinda secret, I'm not sure if I want to get you the source code. *
    • Security - net, evil customers. All these guys are gonna have to get data units and deposit done units someplace. Most places I know, floor models aren't hooked up to the net. Now they will be, the security of those floor models are going to need to be changed.
    • Security - net, evil hackers. Someone already said about being a huge DDoS systerm.
    • Downtime - Will Gateway guarantee QOS when the machines are "administered" by salespeople?


    The item marked * above can be simply answered "Well don't use it if you're worried". The IP issues may be the sticking point.
  106. A better idea by jonhuang · · Score: 1

    Honestly, there's a much better source of wasted power. Someone should use all that wasted kinetic energy in fitness centers to do something useful--electricity to power gateway computers, or stair stepping for disabled people. That sort of thing.

  107. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Sanga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the PHBs want is proof-of-concept. And no, any amount of links to SETI@home/folding@home/DNET project will not sink in.

    So this is a good thing for the level of knowledge in distributed computing in general.

    BTW 2e-2 $ == 2 cents
    2e-2 cents == 0.02 cents

  108. They are ALL networked already by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1

    The article mentions the previously networked machines.

    All Gateway Stores are connected back to S. Dakota or wherever via T1. Ever notice all the Bay/Nortel Networks equipment there? It is there to connect them. (and to show off Nortel)

    Alot of these machines are already running presentation software that highlights the features of the model, etc. The monitors still turn off, or are switched off, so the savings in electricity is really minor.

    --
    what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
  109. Not additive by Protonk · · Score: 1

    Simply adding up Gateway's 7800 some-odd PC's across the nation doesn't explain the whole problem. The issues of network hierarchy, bottlenecks and multi-processor computing are legion, especially across the nation. Setting up a program like seti@home or folding@home would be feasable, but describing storefront PC's as one supercomputer is erroneous.

    that is unless they want to set up a FNN (remember KLAT 2?) all the way across the country... YIKES.

  110. display computers.... DISPLAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much like how you get a discount (generally) from display furniture

  111. No Work by HETTATLONGUN · · Score: 1

    Heh! The Gateway guys don't have to do anything except keep the computers running and connected to the Gateway network. United Devices, Inc., installs the client software, operates and manages the grid within the Gateway network.

  112. I need space by Kris_J · · Score: 2

    What I need is a way to use the nearly 650 Gig of wasted space across our student lab PCs as student storage. Plenty of room for enough redundancy to not even need a backup (students are told to keep their own backups anyway). Currently our nearly 1,000 students share 6Gig on one server.

  113. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

    Geez, I really like Pabst, and Schaefers though. It's way better to me than a Bud/Coors/Miller. I'd rather have one of those ass beers than a Guinness in the middle of summer.

    Mark me zero for off-topic. Thank you.

  114. What about their employees? by stephanruby · · Score: 2

    Can I have their idle store employees run my hot dog stand.

  115. Donate The Cycles... by http101 · · Score: 0

    ...instead of selling the cycles to companies, why doesn't Gateway donate the wasted cycles to the Seti@Home project which is a non-profit organization (to my knowledge) and make one hell of a tax write-off? Its one thing to sell your product, but why not look good instead by donating it to Breast Cancer Research? I don't know about you other guys out there, but I love girls' breasts! I want to preserve them as long as I can!

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  116. Re:Corpoprations don't need to buy processing powe by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

    I am just a user but I am happy that UD won another big agreement.

    What I think is, whats good for UD, is good for ongoing cancer project I contribute for year. ( http://www.intel.com/cancer ).

    It would also give you a clue the amount of PR you made with this project. Er, I bet you already know.

  117. Wasted CPU time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just should run Seti@home on their computers.

  118. Sounds like a good idea! by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    Especially since most of the time they don't let the customer get past the screensaver!

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  119. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    It appears that after his death, Albert Einstein found himself
    working as the doorkeeper at the Pearly Gates. One slow day, he
    found that he had time to chat with the new entrants. To the first one
    he asked, "What's your IQ?" The new arrival replied, "190". They
    discussed Einstein's theory of relativity for hours. When the second
    new arrival came, Einstein once again inquired as to the newcomer's
    IQ. The answer this time came "120". To which Einstein replied, "Tell
    me, how did the Cubs do this year?" and they proceeded to talk for half
    an hour or so. To the final arrival, Einstein once again posed the
    question, "What's your IQ?". Upon receiving the answer "70",
    Einstein smiled and replied, "Got a minute to tell me about VMS 4.0?"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...