Slashdot Mirror


Old and New Technology in the Land of None

ninthwave writes "The Guardian has this article on the adventures of piano tuners in the Amazon. I think it is a nice lesson in the age of technology to see the perceived hardships of using technology in areas where the natives are quite happy without. More impressive is the old wooden piano seems to survive better than the new synth but that is horse of a different colour."

227 comments

  1. Piano in the amazon? by itallushrt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who in their right mind needs a piano in the amazon? I'd be concerned with bug repellant than hearing Mozarts 5th.

    1. Re:Piano in the amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      amazingly, the people who LIVE THERE, seem to be able to deal with the mosquitos, and can move on to things to occupy their time.

      Go figure.

    2. Re:Piano in the amazon? by itallushrt · · Score: 1

      That is odd. You mean these people actually are interested in music, the piano specifically, and not in shrinking heads. Who would have thunk it?

    3. Re:Piano in the amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell is "Mozart's Fifth"? His favorite harmonic interval?

    4. Re:Piano in the amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozart: Piano Concerto No.5/Choral Fantasia

      Of course, he was probably referring to the more famous Beethovens 5th.

    5. Re:Piano in the amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is played on organ, not piano, anyway...

  2. phew by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    I almost didn't get to read this story on old technology, one of the tubes in my computer died.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:phew by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

      hmmph you damn new tech lovers... new tech is useless. My babbage engine is going strong and I can read the story...... this is what happens when you migrate to new tech

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  3. What needs tuning... by craenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    The piano? Or the guy who delivers a baby grand piano into the Amazon...

  4. Not exactly apples to apples.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "More impressive is the old wooden piano seems to survive better than the new synth but that is horse of a different colour."

    I found this statement a little lacking in depth. The 'synth' isn't there to replace the piano specifically, it's there to provide a wide range of sounds. The keyboard interface is a very practical one for a classically trained musician to pick up and play. If it were here to replace the piano, it would have to not only faithfully recreate the sound, but it'd also have to provide the same feedback a piano does. When you play a piano, you can feel the hammers hitting the strings. This kind of feedback make it more natural to play. That's why it still has it's place.

    Sorry for the rant, I just found the comparison a little silly. Kind of like comparing an alarm clock to the clock in Windows.

    My comment about the 'keyboard interface that any musician can pick up' reminded me of something kind of interesting. Have any of you seen how the sound for the Simpsons is mastered? The sound guy has a guitar hooked up to a computer. He uses it to time when sounds take place. I thought that was a very unusual use for a guitar, but that's what he could play! I thought that was pretty cool.

    1. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Informative
      The sound guy has a guitar hooked up to a computer. He uses it to time when sounds take place. I thought that was a very unusual use for a guitar...

      Not at all. I have a guitar synth myself, a Roland GR-50. It has a special pickup that you can attach to pretty much any steel-string guitar; it figures out what string and note is being play and uses that to control the synth and to generate MIDI events.

      I've also seen a MIDI "wind controller" that played like a saxaphone, and MIDI "drums" - both standard kit and hand-drums. Each of these input methods has different nuances - for example. with the guitar synth you can only play 6 notes at a time, as opposed to 10 for a keyboard, but bending notes is much easier.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIDI "wind controller" that played like a saxaphone

      I remember when I was in High School that was really popular. I am trying to remember who use to play it all the time. Very rarely see anybody with it nowadays though.

    3. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Actually, the electronic keyboard is more a replacement for the organ. Old time pipe organs can produce many different sounds in many different ranges using stops. The only thing missing is foot pedals (not the sustain and damper pedals but the full octave that Organists play with their feet. Hey that sounds like one of those old bumper stickers - "Organists do it with their feet."

    4. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by pogen · · Score: 5, Informative
      When you play a piano, you can feel the hammers hitting the strings.

      Actually, you can't. The hammer loses contact with the rest of the action before it hits the strings so that it can bounce back and allow the strings to resonate. Otherwise, by holding the key down, you would also be holding the hammer against the strings, giving you a nice "thud" sound.

      But I'm just being pedantic. Yes, the action has a certain feel that is lacking in most synthesizers. There are a few, though, that have come reasonably close.

    5. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. I have a guitar synth myself, a Roland GR-50.

      Do you know how to play the song "Shut the Fuck Up?" Well, you'd better learn pretty quick. Shut the fuck up.

    6. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Not at all. I have a guitar synth myself, a Roland GR-50. It has a special pickup that you can attach to pretty much any steel-string guitar; it figures out what string and note is being play and uses that to control the synth and to generate MIDI events. "

      That's pretty cool! Wish I had something more insightful to say than that, but I don't. It's starting to become clear that musicians have a broader toolset on the PC than most people are aware of.

      Anybody else know of some cool input stuff like that? I've been looking for cheap ways to capture data like that (such as a music keyboard), I want to do a form of motion capture so I can animate stuff in Lightwave more naturally. It beats manually creating keyframes!

    7. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm glad someone else already took up the piano is not a synth issue. i appreciate small children think they're similar, but they're distinct instruments, and hence co-existing nicely.

      now on to pianos handling the bush environment better, well golly, synths are recent creations for modern homes that have climate control. the piano's structure is from the day of the open hearth and soggy little places like london. vastly different technical challenge. that's almost like slippers versus rubber boots.

      i'm not poking fun too hard at ninthwave's contribution, it's just a little amusing to see such an technology unaware statement here. very like the silly Gartner predictions we're poking fun at in the next story, "Human-Computer Interfaces From 2003 to 2012".

      c'mon now. yer a geek. think geeky. get under the surface.

      cheers

    8. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by The+J+Kid · · Score: 2

      that played like a saxaphone

      Sweet! But, ehm, it's Saxophone.

      Each of these input methods has different nuances [..]

      What are the nuances of the "wind controller" then? Only 1 note a time thus no cords...hmmm

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    9. Re:Not exactly apples to apples.. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      What are the nuances of the "wind controller" then? Only 1 note a time thus no cords...hmmm
      I don't play any wind instruments, so I can only guess. I suppose volume would be controled by breath force, as opposed to the less controllable attack-decay of a plucked string or struck key; that is, you could play a long note and vary its volume up and down.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  5. In other news... by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Flamebait
    ... cameras steal your soul.

    Anyways, I might as well try to say something half-ways intelligent...

    We often take technology for granted, assuming that lack of understanding is some sort of mental or cultural deficiency, whereas our general and almost complete in ability to survive if left in the middle of a rain forest without help is somehow a noble mark of civilization. Those who hunt and provide for their own food are somehow throwbacks in a technological society.

    To ensure that this ties into News for Nerds, I'd like to point out that the juxtaposition of high and low technology is one of the central concepts to Firefly. I find it funny when people complain about the rediculousness of low-tech firearms on a spaceship... on the frontiers of civilization.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    1. Re:In other news... by dirvish · · Score: 1

      complete in ability to survive if left in the middle of a rain forest without help is somehow a noble mark of civilization.

      True enough. People should venture out of civilization every once in a while. They need to be reminded that they are animals and that the world outside of our paved-over cities is a beautiful place.

    2. Re:In other news... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not being able to survive in the middle of a rain forest has les to do with our tech as with our reluctance to learn anything about how to survive. Most of the engineers I know would be pretty lost in a rain forest now there are a few of them myself included that would be able to survive barring random act of large agressive animal. Its all about what you decided to learn and our society does not value learing how to survive particularly much. Now persoanly I think everybody that wants to eat (think everybody is included in that one) should go out and kill there dinner at least once. Now I think the big question is would we be happy in the middle of the rain forests persoanly I would say not particularly it's a subsistance lifestyle for the most part.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:In other news... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      I find it funny when people complain about the rediculousness of low-tech firearms on a spaceship</quote>

      Low-tech or not, it'll kill ya, and dead is dead.

      Lets face it, we're still dependent upon the 7 "low-tech" discoveries/inventions of the Neanderthals:

      1. Fire
      2. Farming
      3. Art
      4. Weaponry
      5. Animal Husbandry
      6. Clothing
      7. vi and unix (well, religion, and holy wars in general)
    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also to think that after all these ages and technological advances many people still build their houses out of what really amounts to sticks (lumber), mud (concrete, plaster, drywall compound, bricks, etc), and rocks (cinder blocks, drywall, etc).

    5. Re:In other news... by Zaxor · · Score: 1
      Its all about what you decided to learn and our society does not value learing how to survive particularly much.

      That's just wrong. People in our society learn how to survive...in our society. Here, that means something different than hunting and camping, but it's foolish to say that our society doesn't value learning how to survive, because if it didn't, then it wouldn't, well, survive.

    6. Re:In other news... by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      A little pointer.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    7. Re:In other news... by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      > 7. vi and unix (well, religion, and holy wars in general)

      and then eventually, after tens of thousands of years of progress, finally, emacs.

      Because any editor can wash laundry, but only the best will fold and sort too.

      I had to, a strange supernatural force compelled me.

      --

      -pyrrho

  6. pianos and technology? by nogoodmonkey · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If that article had a point, I never got to it. I was too bored and stopped reading at "Do you have any idea how much those things weigh?".

    It must be a slow news day.

  7. Amazon's hiring piano tuners? by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Funny

    What, Amazon needs piano tuners? I know they've got a big line of products, but shipping on pianos has goto to be expensive!

    Oh, we're not talking about Amazon.com?

  8. Not a hard choice by Nevermore-Spoon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I disagree whole heartedly! I think there is great beauty in this story.

    And the choice between an incredible music instrument or the "luxary" of bug repellent?

    I desire more out of life than a little reprieve from insects

    --
    I have great faith in fools; My friends call it self-confidence. Edgar Allan Poe 1809-1845
    1. Re:Not a hard choice by Greedo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was expecting an interesting read about how this tribe had taught themselves to play a piano, improvising melodies and chord progressions based on their indigenous musical heritage. Coming up with unorthodox techniques, etc..

      Instead, it's the story of a bunch of British folks playing Beatles songs with the villagers, who have been Catholicized and are wearing American t-shirts and plastic flip-flops.

      How sad. And mildly offensive.

      (Oh ... taking a piano into the jungle is interesting. Taking a Korg is dumb. IMHO.)

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    2. Re:Not a hard choice by skivvie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That story did nothing but depress me. Leave these people the f**k alone! They were doing fine for thousands of years living a natural life... and their most cherished possession is a piano?? Please. This paragraph made me wanna punch someone.

      "When our 11-strong team landed at Gunn's Strip, it seemed as if the whole of the tribe had turned out to meet us. But if any of us had been expecting half-naked, blowpipe-wielding savages, we were disappointed. The American missionaries who converted the tribe in the 1950s taught them Christian modesty, and they now favour shorts and T-shirts, largely supplied by visitors and aid agencies. The footwear of choice is the plastic flip-flop."

      Good ol' Christian missionaries.

    3. Re:Not a hard choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the villagers, who have been Catholicized

      Not Catholic. It was the "Unevangelized Field Missions". Seems to be a conservative Protestant group.

    4. Re:Not a hard choice by ianjk · · Score: 1

      I had such high hopes for this article. IMO it blew ass. It depressed me. Turning a village into an eco-tourist site is fucking ridiculous. Overpaid "enviornmentalists" flying into the jungle to see tribes that were converted to christianity? I would rather waste my money and time on Cable TV and Beer, at least then, I am only corrupting myself, not cultures that date back thousands of years.

    5. Re:Not a hard choice by l810c · · Score: 2
      wearing American t-shirts and plastic flip-flops

      Yes, National Geographic used to be much better when they showed more T&A.

      Of course if I had the choice between circa 1979 basketball shorts or one of those weenie slings I'd go with the shorts.

    6. Re:Not a hard choice by nomadic · · Score: 1

      There are tradeoffs. Doing "fine for thousands of years" isn't quite true; their life expectancy was probably around 50-60 years, and infant mortality rates probably were around 50%.

    7. Re:Not a hard choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are primitive things considered sacred?
      Why are changes in a culture be considered 'sad'?

      Christian missionaries do not hold guns to the heads of their prospects. They offer them gifts, medical support, etc. These are compelling, tempting offers. But it's a choice the receiving party makes.

    8. Re:Not a hard choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christian missionaries do not hold guns to the heads of their prospects. They offer them gifts, medical support, etc. These are compelling, tempting offers. But it's a choice the receiving party makes.

      You mean similar to the ways that early settlers offered beads and alcohol to Native Americans? I think we all know how well that turned out in the end.

    9. Re:Not a hard choice by 5KVGhost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why are you offended? Give the natives some credit for their ability to make rational choices. They aren't museum exhibits or zoo specimens.

    10. Re:Not a hard choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was expecting an interesting read about how this tribe had taught themselves to play a piano, improvising melodies and chord progressions based on their indigenous musical heritage. Coming up with unorthodox techniques, etc..

      Instead, it's the story of a bunch of British folks playing Beatles songs with the villagers, who have been Catholicized and are wearing American t-shirts and plastic flip-flops.

      How sad."

      What I find sad is how you think that some tribe has a culture which is pure and good and wonderful, and how Anglo-American culture is evil and bad just because (and it doesn't matter how much you deny it, because deep down in your heart you know its true) it was a culture developed by evil white people. Now THAT'S sick.

  9. Eww... by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    The case was full of insect eggs; she thought that perhaps cockroaches had done the damage and spent a few minutes chasing one adult through the innards.

    Can you imagine when someone plays Beethoven's 5th?

    DONG DONG DONG (squish)

    1. Re:Eww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I'll stick to the programmer's way of de-bugging things, thank you.

    2. Re:Eww... by JJAnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see you do not have a classical education :P. The accepted transliteration of Beethoven's Fifth is

      Da Da Da DUM

      So that should read:
      Da Da Da (SQUISH)

      Note the careful use of CAPITALS to emphasize changes in volume.

    3. Re:Eww... by Wampus+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      I bow before your superior knowlege of music transcription. :-P

    4. Re:Eww... by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      That WAS the original way of "debugging" a computer ... taking the moth out that had gotten fried and shorted out a vacuum tube.

    5. Re:Eww... by unitron · · Score: 2
      Actually the insect in question had gotten between the contacts of a relay, causing an open rather than a short.

      It's not that easy to cause a vacuum tube to short internally, although you can bypass it externally with a short, but I don't think a moth with all the moisture cooked out of it could maintain the conduction necessary for a short circuit very long.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:Eww... by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Well, what can I say, it was a Friday ... :-) Thanks for catching the blooper.

  10. Engineering is NOT high-tech by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Engineering DOESN'T HAVE TO BE high-tech.

    It only has to WORK WELL, with whatever is at hand.

    Inuktitut writing looks cryptic. Yet it was devised by whites, and designed to work well with the writing implements available to the inuit: bones and stones. They weren't forced to use the roman alphabet which they could not transcribe properly.

    Good design and engineering works by using what's available, not shoving down foreign and/or scarce technologies.

    1. Re:Engineering is NOT high-tech by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Whatever works best for the people and the environment is the best. That is why they build houses differently in Africa than we do in Europe and especially in cold areas like Scandinavia. The climate makes it important to come up with better heating system and such. Same thing with many other things.

      I suspect that the technology and the course its taking and how far depends much on the culture, as well. Our technology fits well for a wealthcreating, timesaving society of producers and consumers. Techology has a place and a reason, and it is not its own reason.

    2. Re:Engineering is NOT high-tech by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

      I tried to write something in Inuktitut on that page you linked, but I couldn't write "Hello World!" because there is no h!

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Engineering is NOT high-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inuktitut writing [halfmoon.org] looks cryptic. Yet it was devised by whites, and designed to work well with the writing implements available to the inuit: bones and stones. They weren't forced to use the roman alphabet which they could not transcribe properly.

      Fascinating web page; thanks for posting the link.

      But, I couldn't resist abusing it. I'm very sorry...

      [Cut and paste "http://www.angelfire.com/d20/roll_d3_for_this/inu ktitut-puzzle.gif" if AngelFire pulls its usual shennanigans. Kudos to the first person to decode it. I'd offer you a beer, but you'd throw it at me.]

    4. Re:Engineering is NOT high-tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best I could come up with was "i-lu u-r-l-t"

    5. Re:Engineering is NOT high-tech by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      Agreed. The problem with things today is that people thingk that things have to be "thhe latest" or "the highest tech" in order to work well. Case in point: calssrooms could have high tech whiteboards that wirelessly update notes to everyones laptop. Cost tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, not to mention the cost of the laptops for the students. Or you could use a black board with chalk and have the students take notes. Educational value is higher when people have to write things down themselves, plus you dont have to spend 50000 on a chalkboard.

      --

  11. Old News by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1, Funny

    BBC radio reported this in November. Read it here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2477663. stm

  12. The depressing part of the story by gosand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    An interesting read I guess, but I never really got the point of the story except that it was a heck of a challenge to get that piano delivered. I found this part of the story to be particularly sad though:

    But if any of us had been expecting half-naked, blowpipe-wielding savages, we were disappointed. The American missionaries who converted the tribe in the 1950s taught them Christian modesty, and they now favour shorts and T-shirts, largely supplied by visitors and aid agencies. The footwear of choice is the plastic flip-flop.

    A tribe that small, in that remote of a location, and Christians still feel the need to impose their religion on them. Quite sad.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:The depressing part of the story by sxltrex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you miss the part about how the piano was requested by the tribe for their Sunday church services?

    2. Re:The depressing part of the story by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      Though I am more specifically Catholic than Christian and I have barely been to church in years and thus non practicing, I feel I should mention that no one MADE them accept a religious doctrine. Also, no one made them accept flip flops, t-shirts, ect. They have survived for hundreds of years without Christianity, flip flops and the Simpsons. Though I hear they can't understand why they get to only see the Simpsons once a day and not 4.

      :P

    3. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tribe that small, in that remote of a location, and Christians still feel the need to impose their religion on them. Quite sad.

      Christians feel that no soul is too small to save. You may disagree with their beliefs, but wanting to share what you think has merit with the distant or marginal people of the world isn't terribly 'sad'.

    4. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We feel a need to offer our religion to everyone. It's not imposing at all. If we did impose, you wouldn't see missionaries getting killed all over the world, you'd see missionaries . And how does a pacifist (most missionaries are) impose on anybody anyways?

      I can't wait till the Wai Wai guitarists get Wah Wah. The guitars will be crying wai wah wai wah!

    5. Re:The depressing part of the story by Planesdragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A tribe that small, in that remote of a location, and Christians still feel the need to impose their religion on them. Quite sad.

      Hardly.

      Let's assume, for the sake of understanding the Christian missionaries, that they ARE right, and that life now and hereafter DOES get better if you're a Christian.

      Given _just that_, it makes sense to want to expose as many people as possible to their religion.

      Now, if we discard the "the Christians are right" assumption and simply look at it from a general standpoint, it STILL isn't "sad." It's not like they're requiring them to make pilgrimages to Rome (Muslim tradition) or give up temporal desires (Bhuddism).

      It's a form of charity, which, seeing as most of humanity thinks that clothing is a good thing, can be concluded as more than cultural self-interest and being real honest charity.

      Please, drop your anti-Christian/anti-religion bias. If everyone in the world had computers, you wouldn't call Linux (over BSD or the existing-and-never-upgraded-DOS) advocates "sad" now, would you?

    6. Re:The depressing part of the story by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Share != Force Down Your Throat (Take It Nicely Or Face Eternal Perdition), eh.

    7. Re:The depressing part of the story by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Sad why?

    8. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      You may disagree with their beliefs, but wanting to share what you think has merit with the distant or marginal people of the world isn't terribly 'sad'.

      It is when the "marginal people" are a primitive, easily-influenced people who accept the beliefs because they hold the people teaching them in such high regard. It's like a satanist converting a young child to satan worship. It is not an affirmation of the belief system nor is it an example of free will on the part of the new convert.

      As an advanced (relatively speaking) people, we have a moral duty to not impose religious beliefs on people who lack the sophistication to understand the difference between science and beliefs in the occult (e.g., people rising from the dead, ceremonies in which wine and wafers symbolise cannabalism, people being turned into pillars of salt, etc.)

    9. Re:The depressing part of the story by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

      Wanna save my soul? Then don't butt into my life and try to convert me.
      Instead give me religious freedom, which, ofcourse includes freedom from religion.

    10. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does a pacifist (most missionaries are) impose on anybody anyways?

      Simple.
      "Here have some life saving supplies and some Christian propoganda. And remember, if it wasn't for Jesus's love for you, you'd be dead right now."

      You goofy Christians seem to think that as long as you aren't doing it with guns and bullets that it isn't 'imposing'. You also seem to think that you have to 'save' everyone who isn't a Christian. It just baffles me how anyone can think a diety is good, fair, and equitable when in order for you to qualify to the good afterlife, you have to believe in the diety and accept him as your lord and master, rather than, say, accept anyone who is a good, fair, and equitable person, regardless of what they believe. The former makes the Christian god sound more like Bill Gates than some sort of righteous dude that I'd like to hang with.

    11. Re:The depressing part of the story by Greedo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't mean this confrontationally, but how do you know no one "made" them accept Christianity?

      The fact that someone even attempted to convert them, let alone that they succeeded, is bad enough. What was wrong with their belief system before that some missionary felt it their duty to "save" these "savages"? The history of missionary work is rife with "forced" conversions (Inquisition, anyone?). I realize this probably wasn't the case in the 1950's, but who knows.

      Those American missionaries also taught them "Christian modesty", which could be a thin disguise (in my tin-foil hat world) for "American hegemonic consumerism". Why else would they favour shorts and T-shirts, or ask for an electric keyboard.

      Again, missionary work isn't always about spreading the Good Word. In fact, it is based on the assumption that the indigenous Good Word wasn't Good Enough to start with.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    12. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Sad why?

      Because it supplants the tribe's own belief systems, losing that part of their culture and making the world poorer for the loss. You may feel that teaching primitive, innocent people to feel shame about their own bodies is good. I, and others, do not.

    13. Re:The depressing part of the story by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      What was wrong with their belief system before that some missionary felt it their duty to "save" these "savages"? The history of missionary work is rife with "forced" conversions (Inquisition, anyone?).

      Mmmm. Hmmm....

      I realize this probably wasn't the case in the 1950's, but who knows.

      Ah, right. So you knew your statement was misleading, and inflammatory, but you provided it anyway. And nice use of 'who knows'! After all, perhaps the inquisition *was* in the 1950's! Or, maybe they were whipped with noodles!

      Those American missionaries also taught them "Christian modesty", which could be a thin disguise (in my tin-foil hat world) for "American hegemonic consumerism". Why else would they favour shorts and T-shirts[...?]

      Too right! Why else indeed. Only Americans wear shorts and T-shirts!

      In fact, it is based on the assumption that the indigenous Good Word[...]

      Er. What? The indigenous... oh, forget it.

    14. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's assume, for the sake of understanding the Christian missionaries, that they ARE right, and that life now and hereafter DOES get better if you're a Christian.

      Let's assume that the missionaries are wrong. Let's assume that the local beliefs are right. Let's further assume that the locals' conversion to Christianity angers their gods and causes those gods to put a curse on the village and the crops. Let's assume that the villagers then starve to death.

      You are going on the assumption that there is some reason to believe that Christianity is "right" and that local belief systems are "wrong." That's simply not the case.

      Now, if we discard the "the Christians are right" assumption and simply look at it from a general standpoint, it STILL isn't "sad."

      Yes, it is. These people probably had a rich cultural heritage and religious views that were passed down from generation to generation in stories. Losing that so that they can be added to the Catholic Church's list of conquests is very sad.

    15. Re:The depressing part of the story by zephc · · Score: 2

      When did Muslims start making pilgramages to Rome? I thought it was Mecca. Silly me...

      The point is that an otherwise prospering culture has been given the shiny beads treatment. A couple simple rules to life: Diversity = good, Homogenity = death.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    16. Re:The depressing part of the story by L-Train8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the stupid, primative natives are obviously incapable of thinking for themselves. If they can't tell the difference between a flashlight and magic, then they are going to be easily duped into Christianity . Maybe someone should go in and teach them critical thinking skills and the scientific method, so they can more objectively evaluate the prosthyletizing of the missionaries.

      Another option would be to just leave them alone. However, whether it's missionaries in the '50's or ranchers and eco-tourists in the '00's, the world is getting smaller and they are going to have contact with some outsiders sooner or later. Maybe it's unfortunate, but it is the way the world is.

      --

      Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    17. Re:The depressing part of the story by gosand · · Score: 0, Troll
      I feel I should mention that no one MADE them accept a religious doctrine.

      So answer me this - there are plenty of people in the world. Why didn't these Christian missionaries travel to more populous countries, where their message could be heard by so many more "poor souls"? Why not talk to Muslims, Hindus, etc and save them? Because they aren't suckers, that's why.

      These missionaries are not there to save or help anyone, they are only there to convert people because they have been told by their religion that is what they should be doing. Christians are the oldest form of self-propagating virus. "You can only get to Heaven if you are saved. The only way to be saved is to convince others that they need to accept the Lord Jesus Christ into their hearts." That is why they prey on people who haven't heard the message before, who are gullible to their fancy magical doo-dads. Was I there in the 50's, do I know this for a fact? No, but I know the way religious zealots operate, I have seen it over and over and over. I go with what I know.

      Also, no one made them accept flip flops, t-shirts, ect. They have survived for hundreds of years without Christianity, flip flops and the Simpsons.

      How do you know they didn't make them? I am sure a handgun is a pretty scary thing to someone like them. Or maybe you prefer the image of eternal fire if you don't believe what we tell you to believe. And we believe you should cover your bodies. You'll like these shoes, Jesus wore them! I know you are joking about the Simpsons, but imagine them watching the episode where Homer was the missionary. ("I don't know much about God, but I know we built a pretty good cage for him.")

      You are right, they had survived hundreds, if not thousands, of years without Christianity - so why not let them be?

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    18. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      If they can't tell the difference between a flashlight and magic, then they are going to be easily duped into Christianity

      That's probably true. They may accept the posession of said flashlight as a sign that the holder is wise, powerful, and intelligent. If the flashlight owner were then to teach them about irrigation, food safety, and medicine, while winding in teachings about Christianity as if it is above question, then it is likely that the indigenous people will accept Christianity as factual.

      Maybe someone should go in and teach them critical thinking skills and the scientific method, so they can more objectively evaluate the prosthyletizing of the missionaries.

      An excellent suggestion.

      Another option would be to just leave them alone.

      An even better idea.

      However, whether it's missionaries in the '50's or ranchers and eco-tourists in the '00's, the world is getting smaller and they are going to have contact with some outsiders sooner or later.

      Sophisticated outsiders have a moral responsibility to not try to supplant the indigenous religious belief systems of primitive people.

    19. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't force people to listen or read said propoganda. And if they've lived well for hundreds of years w/o christianity, why would "And remember, if it wasn't for Jesus's love for you, you'd be dead right now." mean anything?

    20. Re:The depressing part of the story by L-Train8 · · Score: 2

      Sophisticated outsiders have a moral responsibility to not try to supplant the indigenous religious belief systems of primitive people.

      Well, I guess the key word there is sophisticated. There are people who believe a book written by middle-eastern sheep hearders thousands of years ago to codify their superstitions is irrefutable fact. Would you consider them to be sophisticated? If not, then do they have a moral responsibility to follow the prime directive?

      Missionaries believe they have a moral responsibility to help people and teach the word of God. Does that make them unsophisticated?

      You selectively quoted me. I said another option is to leave them alone, but qualified that by saying that is not really an option in todays world. The world is a small place, ever hungry for yet more resources. Today, tribes cannot live in seclusion. If it's not missionaries who want to teach them about irrigation, food safety, medicine, and Christianity, it may be ranchers who want to kill them so that trees can be cut down and cattle grazed on the land.

      The transition to modernity may have been started by missionaries, but it will be rapidly eclipsed by other influences, some with much less altruistic motives than saving souls.

      --

      Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    21. Re:The depressing part of the story by Hoeken · · Score: 1

      True, all people do appreciate clothes, but what the missonaries bring along with them is their culture which they force upon the natives along with the clothes. Its like someone coming up to you with a handhold beowulf cluster and saying.. you can have this, but you have to abandon all of your old beliefs and now follow the new way. If you don't, you can't have this mega-fast computer and you are going to be tormented in severe fire for eternity. Have a nice day! (please keep in mind that the natives up to that point would not have much contact with modern technology and could be 'wowed' by the missionaries stuff)

      --
      Educate > Enlighten > Evolve http://www.neuroatomik.com
    22. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      There are people who believe a book written by middle-eastern sheep hearders thousands of years ago to codify their superstitions is irrefutable fact. Would you consider them to be sophisticated?

      In areas other than that one huge blind spot, yes. But that is a good summary.

      You selectively quoted me. I said another option is to leave them alone...

      No, I did not. Please reread my response and you will see that I did not quote selectively.

    23. Re:The depressing part of the story by Samrobb · · Score: 1
      So answer me this - there are plenty of people in the world. Why didn't these Christian missionaries travel to more populous countries, where their message could be heard by so many more "poor souls"? Why not talk to Muslims, Hindus, etc and save them?

      Some of us do just that.

      My church (independent baptist, if you care) supports 33 missionaries; of those, two-thirds are in what would be considered first- or second-world countries. Germany, Ireland, England, Canada, Mexico, India, Thailand, Brazil... a third of them are "missionaries" to the US. Rough work, but the commandment was "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations..." Whether the people of those nations accept or reject the teaching is a matter between them and God.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    24. Re:The depressing part of the story by Greedo · · Score: 2

      Ah, right. So you knew your statement was misleading, and inflammatory, but you provided it anyway. And nice use of 'who knows'!

      Hey, this *is* Slashdot ... not the Harvard debating team. :)

      Too right! Why else indeed. Only Americans wear shorts and T-shirts!

      Okay, let's try that again ... "American-style hegemonic consumerism" would've been fairer. Heck, I wear tshirts! But mostly because I was born in a culture where they were readily available ... the "native dress", if you will.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    25. Re:The depressing part of the story by corbettw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Hardly."

      Hear, hear. Whenever people start shouting how Christians shouldn't convert people to their religion, and that it's wrong for them to do so, I'm always amazed that they are forgetting the central tenet of Christianity: only Christians go to Heaven. Everyone else, no matter how nice you are, goes to Hell. Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Wiccans, they're all bound for eternal damnation according to us Christians, because they reject the divinity of Christ.

      Given all that, it can only be considered cruel to not attempt to convert people (though I'll grant there are better, more civilized, ways of doing it than others...conversion at the point of a sword isn't quite what Jesus had in mind, I'm sure).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    26. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QUOTE
      like they're requiring them to make pilgrimages to Rome (Muslim tradition) or give up temporal desires (Bhuddism)
      UNQUOTE

      You misspelled Buddhism.

    27. Re:The depressing part of the story by JJAnon · · Score: 1

      It's not like they're requiring them to make pilgrimages to Rome (Muslim tradition)

      Hey waitaminnit - the last time I checked Muslims had to make a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina, not Rome. Is this from a new Asterix comic I missed?

    28. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'll go walk into a Church and start preaching about the Prince of Darkness. I wonder how long it'd take for them to call the police.

      Sadly, there are no police officers in the middle of the Amazon.

      Missions and missionaries should be passive. If people want to listen to FUD about any given imaginary friend, let them. Don't walk into their sacred places and start throwing it in their faces.

    29. Re:The depressing part of the story by timeOday · · Score: 2

      It seems your premise is that people shouldn't pollute each other's minds by communicating with each other.

    30. Re:The depressing part of the story by duck_prime · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The point is that an otherwise prospering culture has been given the shiny beads treatment. A couple simple rules to life: Diversity = good, Homogenity = death.
      How insultingly patronizing can you get? The Wai Wai are just as intelligent as we are; they are capable of picking parts of Western culture they want to adopt, and leaving the rest behind. Just like the Japanese. Hell, just like the West.

      Would you be so concerned if some people in, say, California became Buddhist? Aren't you sad that they've been hoodwinked by the mysteries of the East, and their diversity reduced? Give it a break.

      You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that "all cultures are equal" and should be cherished equally. Forget it. These people's precious culture didn't invent writing for them, or medicine, or clothing, or Christianity, but guess what? They like all that stuff. They want it. Don't ghettoize these poor folks into a nice little illiterate culture zoo just so you can be happy that "diversity is being protected". Fuck that. I say offer every last fucking tribe on Earth a refrigerator, some good shoes with arch support, and a writing system if they don't have one.

      Stop treating the Wai Wai as children that you have to protect from our poisonous culture. Give them the respect and dignity that they deserve, and let them make their own choices.

      One last thing... you say "Diversity = good, Homogenity = death". Please clarify. I understand how that works out in agriculture, or heck, even population genetics, but I don't see the relevance to cultural choices. Not trying to troll here, I'm trying to understand what you're getting at.
    31. Re:The depressing part of the story by LaissezFaire · · Score: 1

      Pshaw. Imposition of religion involves 1) Convert or I'll whack you, and then 2) Why don't I stay here and make sure you don't switch away. These folks have chosen to stay Christians.

    32. Re:The depressing part of the story by duck_prime · · Score: 2
      Sad why?

      Because it supplants the tribe's own belief systems, losing that part of their culture and making the world poorer for the loss. You may feel that teaching primitive, innocent people to feel shame about their own bodies is good. I, and others, do not.
      What about teaching them to read? Are you against that too?

      What really saddens me is that you, presumably a Westerner, seem to believe that all cultures are equally valid, and that the only reason you have the ideals and lifestyle you have is that you were born here (for some value of here).

      I like to think that universal literacy, the scientific method, freedom of (lots of things), not getting shot with arrows, etc, are great things, not just my particular tribal taboos. I am genuinely sad for people who don't have these things, and would like to offer them the benefits of our culture.

      They don't have to accept, that's certainly their right, but I think they'll be silly to turn down the things the West has to offer. Doubtless they'll take the parts they like, and skip the rest. What's wrong with that?

      One more thing here, and I want a sincere answer. Why is the world poorer for the loss of cultural diversity? Are you worried about a particular dance no longer being performed? The loss of some pagan religion? The loss of a language (I'll admit, as a linguist that one gives me the heebie-jeebies)? The loss of wearing loincloths? Please tell.
    33. Re:The depressing part of the story by ianjk · · Score: 1

      I say offer every last fucking tribe on Earth a refrigerator, some good shoes with arch support, and a writing system if they don't have one

      do you also say, teach every tribe to be a good, jesus worshiping christian also??

    34. Re:The depressing part of the story by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      Well, I guess what I meant is that no one held a gun to their head and said believe or die. I am with you that I don't like someone's beliefs pushed on me, but I can say no, even if I listen to the whole pitch.

      My wife went on a "mission" when she was a teen. (again, though I was raised catholic, I am not a practicing one at this point - just a disclaimer) They built playgrounds for kids, taught them about oral hygiene, and brought them stuff similar to tee shirts and flip flops. Granted this was Yougoslavia (I know I butchered the spelling) and not somewhere in the Amazon, so their cultural influence was less prominant than if she had done the same in the Amazon.

      Though they were also willing to talk about Christianity to anyone who would listen, that wasn't actually their prime directive while there. They just wanted to help.

      Granted everyone's idea of helping isn't the same.

      But they really did go there with higher priorities than converting heathens.

    35. Re:The depressing part of the story by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you assume that the missionaries in the 50s were Catholic. I don't recall reading that in the article. Methinks you might have a bias/prejudice...

    36. Re:The depressing part of the story by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      First, I have to say,

      "Help me Jebus!"

      that is my absolute favorite line EVER from the Simpsons. I am definitely not what anyone would call a "holy roller".

      Though I would never personally go on a mission (though my wife did and you can read what I said about that as a reply to someone else in this same thread), I guess I would say that you and I would both have the right to travel to the Amazon to teach these folks anything we wanted (personally, I'd choose Pitch (card game) though perhaps that'd have bad concequences like it did with Homer and gambling).

      Though I am not particular to any one religion, or even consider myself a very religious person, I see the value that religion has to many people. Why don't they mission to Muslims or Hindus? Likely, becuase they have God (sigh - yes, I did capitalize that didn't I?) in their lives and thus there isn't as much of a need to save them. That last statement is me playing devils advocate.

      At least in the states, religions have historically competed with each other like retail stores. Believe in my religion or my god says you're going to hell. Well, my belief in a god goes to this extent:

      Religion is good. why? cause it helps people explain the unexplainable. Why did my baby die? not sure, but it must be part of god's plan. Most religions teach the same basoc tennants: be good to your neighbor. don't kill. don't steal. don't sleep with your neighbor's wife, no matter how hot she is when she gives you that look.

      regardless of if there IS an afterlife where you either get to chill with god, allah, budda, ect or some form of hell, or that there is NO afterlife, if everyone took the basic message that religion is supposed to get across, the world would be a better place. Treat everyone like you want to be treated (unless your a person who wants to hurt yourself ;] ) and we should all be generally happy.

      So no, I don't think the missionaries went there hoping to add a new church and thus a new stream of revenue. I think they had intentions of trying to bring religion to a "godless" people (much like myself) and trying to convert a hindu is a lot tougher than converting someone who has never heard of any gods.

      Though you and I may feel this is unnecesary, if one really does believe in a particular god, then it is likely that you'd take pity on those who don't and thus would be unlikely to go to "heaven". You'd likely want to try to save them. After all, you genuinely believe that faith in god will save their souls.

      That being said, I will finish by saying that I prescribe to the Bart method of living life (faith healer episode) where he says that he'll life his life doing whatever he wants and do a death bed repentance just in case...

      :P

    37. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I say offer every last fucking tribe on Earth a refrigerator, some good shoes with arch support, and a writing system if they don't have one
      do you also say, teach every tribe to be a good, jesus worshiping christian also??
      Well, since I'm a Christian, I would sure try. If someone else runs this hypothetical "mision civilatrice" who isn't a Christian, presumably he wouldn't ;)

      The point here is that I'm advocating offers, not mandates. If I really believe my beliefs, I want to share them, be they literacy, democracy, or Christianity. The difference between this and old-school colonialism is twofold: 1) They are welcome to send people to my country on technology- or culture-sharing missions, and 2) There is no coercion involved. If for some weird reason the Amazon Basin people don't want to wear woolen suits, that's okay too.

      If I were afraid of cultural contamination, I would stay home. But I believe that cultures have something to teach one another. Spread the wealth!
    38. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Interesting that you assume that the missionaries in the 50s were Catholic. I don't recall reading that in the article. Methinks you might have a bias/prejudice...

      No. I simply confused in my mind the mention of Catholicism in these threads and what I read in the article. The missionaries were actually part of a non-denominational group called American Unevangelised Field Missions.

    39. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      It seems your premise is that people shouldn't pollute each other's minds by communicating with each other.

      Not at all. When two equals communicate, that's great. But when a group of missionaries ties assistance, education, and religious teachings together in one lump package, it does a terrible disservice to less-advanced peoples (who may not be able to separate facts -- about, say, food safety -- from religious beliefs).

    40. Re:The depressing part of the story by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

    41. Re:The depressing part of the story by Samrobb · · Score: 1
      I think I'll go walk into a Church and start preaching about the Prince of Darkness. I wonder how long it'd take for them to call the police.

      Not long at all - you'd be on private property; if you were asked to leave, and you refused, you'd be trespassing. Doesn't matter if it's a church, a business, or a home. You'd get what you deserved for being obnoxious and confrontational.

      Missions and missionaries should be passive.

      What? They shouldn't talk to anyone about their beliefs? That's kind of the whole point, isn't it? If they're physically coercing people into listing to them, then they'r not missionaries, they're thugs. Otherwise, if whoever they are speaking to has the opportunity to say "No thank you" and walk away, how can you complain about what they're doing?

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    42. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      What about teaching them to read? Are you against that too?

      No. I am in favor of education -- just not religious indoctrination.

      I like to think that universal literacy, the scientific method, freedom of (lots of things), not getting shot with arrows, etc, are great things, not just my particular tribal taboos. I am genuinely sad for people who don't have these things, and would like to offer them the benefits of our culture.

      I agree. And I would add farming techniques, medicine, and birth control to that list of valuable things we can teach.

      They don't have to accept, that's certainly their right, but I think they'll be silly to turn down the things the West has to offer. Doubtless they'll take the parts they like, and skip the rest. What's wrong with that?

      I don't know why you think that they will "skip" anything. Think about this hypothetical situation: Primitive villagers are confronted by people exiting a helicopter carrying walkie-talkies, radios, and computers. The people teach the primitive villagers about irrigation, treating wounds, safely storing food, etc. In with all this, presented as fact, is that there is a "God" that is invisible, all-powerful, created man, and that does battle with Satan. You know the story. The primitive villagers are going to accept that the wise and powerful westerners that arrived there know that this God exists -- probably without question. It's the same phenomenon that allows parents to convince children that Santa Claus exists.

      Why is the world poorer for the loss of cultural diversity? Are you worried about a particular dance no longer being performed? The loss of some pagan religion? The loss of a language (I'll admit, as a linguist that one gives me the heebie-jeebies)? The loss of wearing loincloths?

      I am worried about all of that. And I am worried about the loss of history. Oral traditions tell us much about a culture. When those oral traditions are abandoned because missionaries have "taught" the "Word of God", that's a horrible loss. Yes, I'm worried about dances, religions, languages, and native garb being tossed aside.

      Imagine National Geographic if every person they profiled was basically the same.

      I find it interesting to note your use of the terms "some pagan religion" and "loincloths" rather than simply "their religion" and "native clothing." Were those terms meant to be pejoritive, either consciously or subconsciously?

    43. Re:The depressing part of the story by martyros · · Score: 1
      I'm always amazed that they are forgetting the central tenet of Christianity: only Christians go to Heaven.

      Well, not quite. In fact, I'm glad you refuse to believe in a religion with such a belief.

      Thankfully, that's not what Christianity says; in fact, almost exactly the opposite. The whole point of this Jesus thing is that God doesn't sit there and wait for us to come to him; he goes out of his way, leaves his own comfort, and does whatever it takes (even being tortured to death) to come and find us. If God is willing to give up all his glory and power, and to be treated like scum and tortured to death to bring people to him, there's nothing in his power that he won't do to bring people to him.

      On the other hand, if there were any other way to bring us to him, other than the cross, don't you think he would have done it? If the Jewish traditions, or Bhuddism, or greek mythology or whatever were enough, wouldn't Jesus simply have come down and preached one of those, instead of allowing himself to be crucified?

      What does say is this: Jesus is the only way. If a Bhuddist gets to heaven, it will be because although he doesn't realize it, Jesus has been working through him to prepare him for heaven; and when he reaches heaven, he will recognize the one he'd actually been following all of his life.

      Abraham never knew Jesus' name, or said, "Jesus, come into my heart" or anything like that; but he is considered (by Christians) the father of everyone who has faith in Jesus.

      But of course, although you can frequently get by with incomplete knowledge (people managed to get by for thousands of years without Newtonian physics), it's always better to know the truth.

      I suppose the "all beliefs are OK" crowd are probably also upset that we told them the Earth was round...

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    44. Re:The depressing part of the story by Starman9x · · Score: 1
      A tribe that small, in that remote of a location, and Christians still feel the need to impose their religion on them. Quite sad.


      OK, I don't remember all of my sunday-school stuff, but isn't "the end of the world" (armegeddon) supposed to happen "the moment when every living breathing person on the planet" has been indoctrinated into christianity [or the religion of your choice...] I think there is "an out" in that people still have the "choice" to not follow on with the religion [and, therefore, be excluded from the upcoming 'rapture' party] but they must have been given the opportunity to become christian...

    45. Re:The depressing part of the story by zephc · · Score: 2

      It's that the Wai Wai (and many other cultures) WE'RE treated as children who didn't know any better, and were thus introduced to 'civilization' by missionaries/conqureors.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    46. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      These folks have chosen to stay Christians.

      Because they believe it. A powerful and almost all-knowing bunch of people appeared one day and told them, for a fact, that the Christian God exists and that to not believe in that God would damn them to suffer in hell for all eternity.

      Since these people understood medicine, may have had magic boxes through which voices spoke (radios), and may even have arrived by car or helicopter, sure they believed them.

      That's what is referred to as exerting undue influence. It's the same thing that parents do to get kids to believe in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny: they use their perceived trustworthiness and knowledge to make the child believe.

    47. Re:The depressing part of the story by Lord+of+Caustic+Soda · · Score: 1

      It's the Amazons, 30+ temperature most of time, if they don't wear shorts and T-shirts what are they going to wear? A tweed suit?

      Oh yeah, we all know Americans absolutely dominate the consumer electronics market, and the electric keyboard industry as well, so here's a word for you - Yamaha

      --
      Kill'em! Kill'em all!
    48. Re:The depressing part of the story by Lord+of+Caustic+Soda · · Score: 1

      Even if every outsider try their best to avoid supplanting their religions belief system, all the other ideas they acquire through contact will still lead them to re-evaluate their belief.

      BTW how do you make the distinction between "primitive people" and the other "less primitive people" and know whom to leave alone? You know most of say India is pretty primitive by Western standards, so it's just wrong to introduce them to such alien and unnatural things like computers and programming languages.

      People have the right to learn from others, just because a group of them has been practically cut off from the rest of the world for centuries doesn't mean that isolation should be enforced.

      --
      Kill'em! Kill'em all!
    49. Re:The depressing part of the story by duck_prime · · Score: 2
      Doubtless they'll take the parts they like, and skip the rest. What's wrong with that?

      I don't know why you think that they will "skip" anything. Think about this hypothetical situation: Primitive villagers are confronted by people exiting a helicopter carrying walkie-talkies, radios, and computers. The people teach the primitive villagers about irrigation, treating wounds, safely storing food, etc. In with all this, presented as fact, is that there is a "God" that is invisible, all-powerful, created man, and that does battle with Satan. You know the story. The primitive villagers are going to accept that the wise and powerful westerners that arrived there know that this God exists -- probably without question. It's the same phenomenon that allows parents to convince children that Santa Claus exists.
      Well ... here's the thing. This scenario has been played out many times, especially in Africa. Native cultures do adapt and survive, and they do end up taking what they want of modernity/westernity. There are still scads of traditional religions in Africa (their adherents are referred to in the news as "animists"), coexisting more or less uneasily with Islam and Christianity. I don't think you're giving these guys enough credit; they are NOT children, they are quite as smart as you or me. If they are not coerced, some of them may convert, and some will not.

      (Sigh) I note you don't have any problem teaching them about the scientific method, or "freedom of (lots of things)", which are just as much a cultural construct as Christianity, and whose adoption would change their society. It seems your objection is not so much to changing the natives' society, as teaching them Christianity. Once you concede you want to change their society, the rest is just a matter of taste, isn't it? My mision civilatrice will include free Bibles, yours likely won't.
      Why is the world poorer for the loss of cultural diversity? Are you worried about a particular dance no longer being performed? The loss of some pagan religion? The loss of a language (I'll admit, as a linguist that one gives me the heebie-jeebies)? The loss of wearing loincloths?

      I am worried about all of that. And I am worried about the loss of history. Oral traditions tell us much about a culture. When those oral traditions are abandoned because missionaries have "taught" the "Word of God", that's a horrible loss. Yes, I'm worried about dances, religions, languages, and native garb being tossed aside.

      Imagine National Geographic if every person they profiled was basically the same.
      Let's be careful here ... are you in favor of preserving culture for their sake, or for yours? What's it to you that they become Christian, or do the Tango instead of (insert-native-dance)? Is this just voyeurism at work?

      (As a side note, it is not Christianity that will destroy the locals' oral tradition, but literacy. But I don't want to go there now.)
      I find it interesting to note your use of the terms "some pagan religion" and "loincloths" rather than simply "their religion" and "native clothing." Were those terms meant to be pejoritive, either consciously or subconsciously?
      Loincloths were cited in the original article. Actually, fairly sensible for the climate of the Amazon, if you don't have modern-weave "breathable" clothing.

      And "some pagan religion" means just that ... pagan means non-Christian. "Heathen" is a pejorative. ;) I find it equally ... odd ... that you seem happy that the natives keep any religion *but* Christianity; it sounds like you have some particular animus against that religion. ... Interestingly, this little disagreement of ours does speak to the fact that "Western Culture" is not so monolithic as at first glance.
    50. Re:The depressing part of the story by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that "all cultures are equal" and should be cherished equally. Forget it. These people's precious culture didn't invent writing for them, or medicine, or clothing, or Christianity...

      Cultures can be considered to have different levels of *technology*, but one can't use that to make a judgement as to whether one culture is more worthy of existence than another. Different cultures must be assumed to have equal *value*.

      We don't know for certain, but I think it's a safe assumption that their conversion to Christianity involved a significant erasure of much of their beliefs from before. With that loss of knowledge comes a loss of their identity.

      I guess that's the question: were the priests seeking to *augment* their culture by making new information/technology available to them, or were they trying to *replace* it? Most likely the latter.

      What these missionaries did could be forgivable if they had at least also worked to record these people's original way of life. That way, an interested member of the tribe (who has learned to read) could come to understand his/her history, and therefore get a sense of having a place in the world. Perhaps even to revive some customs that had been frowned upon by the powerful outsiders.

      Let's hope they did, to some extent at least.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    51. Re:The depressing part of the story by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > This scenario has been played out many times, especially in Africa. Native cultures do adapt and survive, and they do end up taking what they want of modernity/westernity.

      Where is the highest rate of AIDS infection in the world?

      Africa.

      Why? Lots of unprotected sex, lots of prostitution. Modern trucks carry cargo across the continent; the truckers visit the local bordellos. Not the only reason of course, but it's one of them.

      Other problems too -- Think Somalia. Rawanda.

      This is what happens when a lot of people lose most their culture all at once, to have it replaced with bits and pieces borrowed from another. Western culture works well because it *evolved* into what it is -- all the little tweaks and balances are in place. When random elements of the one culture are introduced elsewhere at too high a rate, you get large imbalances.

      It'll settle down eventually, of course, but it's sure painful in the meantime.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    52. Re:The depressing part of the story by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      You are going on the assumption that there is some reason to believe that Christianity is "right" and that local belief systems are "wrong." That's simply not the case.

      In that case, the neighboring locals can laugh at the misconduct of this small tribe.

      Yes, it is. These people probably had a rich cultural heritage and religious views that were passed down from generation to generation in stories. Losing that so that they can be added to the Catholic Church's list of conquests is very sad.

      Bullocks. If there's anything worth keeping, it'll be kept.

      Look how well the native americans lost their culture and heritage to the converting of the colonists. (What? They're still around? Gosh!)

      The fact is, if it wasn't missionaries--who, for the ignorant, aren't all catholic--it would be some other entity with a use for the land. Missionares actually care about the people, even if they have a nonscientific judge of it.

      Let's compare the morality of the missionary to that of the exploratory scientist, who only wants them for personal or ethnocentric scientific gain, or the businessman, who only wants them for their market / land.

      Nope, not "sad" at all.

    53. Re:The depressing part of the story by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > What about teaching them to read? Are you against that too?

      It's not about the addition of new elements. It's about losing the old.

      > What really saddens me is that you, presumably a Westerner, seem to believe that all cultures are equally valid, and that the only reason you have the ideals and lifestyle you have is that you were born here (for some value of here).

      All time-tested cultures *do* have equal value. If a culture has allowed a people to survive for thousands of years, it shouldn't just be cast aside because of a couple of new ideas.

      Certainly new ideas shouldn't be excluded, but I don't think the priests who were "helping" these people into the Christianity fold paid much attention to what they were erasing. If they had at least written down what was there before they started making changes, then individuals from the tribe would now have the option to go back and learn their history. Possibly even revive some of the old customs that were stamped out. They'd at least have a much better sense of who they are; they'd have an anchor in the world.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    54. Re:The depressing part of the story by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      It's that the Wai Wai (and many other cultures) WE'RE treated as children who didn't know any better, and were thus introduced to 'civilization' by missionaries/conqureors

      So let me get this straight:

      The Wai Wai are better off not knowing how to write & without the option of using modern technology (such as germ theory) in their culture?

      Spreading civilization is a GOOD thing. Sure, some people often suffer from it--but missionaries (especially MODERN missionaries) have a much smaller chance of really harming the natives than a conquerer does.

      Methinks you might be a self-hating bigot.

    55. Re:The depressing part of the story by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, if there were any other way to bring us to him, other than the cross, don't you think he would have done it? If the Jewish traditions, or Bhuddism, or greek mythology or whatever were enough, wouldn't Jesus simply have come down and preached one of those, instead of allowing himself to be crucified?

      Actually, it's entirely possible that every major religion--not just Christianity--is necessary for us to know God. Sure, I believe that Christianity has the facts right and is the most important, but I still think that God would have done something about the others if they didn't have something work keeping.

      Abraham never knew Jesus' name, or said, "Jesus, come into my heart" or anything like that; but he is considered (by Christians) the father of everyone who has faith in Jesus.

      Jesus, as the Word of God, is the motive force of the Almighty and is the part of that Supreme Being most concerned with us feeble mortal humans.

      IMO, saying "no man gets to God save through Jesus" is akin to saying "no one gets into a car but through the openings in that car."

    56. Re:The depressing part of the story by MrBling · · Score: 1

      Might be considered ot, but wanted to add this link. This quote made me think of this.

      "The fact that someone even attempted to convert them, let alone that they succeeded, is bad enough. What was wrong with their belief system before that some missionary felt it their duty to "save" these "savages"?"

      Take a read.

      Ishmael

      Great read.
      Peace

    57. Re:The depressing part of the story by duck_prime · · Score: 2

      Whoops ... I meant to post that under my own name. Ah well.

    58. Re:The depressing part of the story by MrBling · · Score: 1

      Fixed link.. www.ishmael.org

    59. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I don't think you're giving these guys enough credit; they are NOT children, they are quite as smart as you or me. If they are not coerced, some of them may convert, and some will not.

      Intelligence and knowledge are not the same. When primitive people are in awe of modern visitors, they are very likely to believe what these people tell them -- especially if the tangible part proves true.

      I note you don't have any problem teaching them about the scientific method, or "freedom of (lots of things)", which are just as much a cultural construct as Christianity, and whose adoption would change their society. It seems your objection is not so much to changing the natives' society, as teaching them Christianity.

      Science is not a cultural construct and comparing it to the blind-faith that is Christianity debases it. Teaching primitive cultures about medicine, food safety, irrigation, and so forth improves their lives. Teaching them about Christianity denigrates their religious belief systems for no valid purpose.

      I find it equally ... odd ... that you seem happy that the natives keep any religion *but* Christianity;

      I don't want them to continue any belief in the supernatural, whether it is their native belief system or Christianity. I want them to accept the scientific method and logical thinking so that they question any religion that has them worshipping invisible dieties.

      it sounds like you have some particular animus against that religion.

      Yes, I do. Christianity is why we have a President holding back federal funding for stem cell research that could save countless victims of everything from Parkinson's Disease to spinal cord injuries. It's a major cause of people not understanding science. We have religious zealots fighting against schools teaching evolution. Christianity is responsible for the Crusades and countless atrocities throughout history. I could go on and on, but, frankly, that's off-topic.

    60. Re:The depressing part of the story by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 2

      Well, that's their point of view, but just because you can understand someone's point of view doesn't mean you have to excuse it. Christians can think whatever they want; I think they have no place meddling about in other people's business and ought to leave well enough alone. Of course I understand why they do it: but it's still obnoxious and unhelpful. Why should the rest of us care what Christians think about their mythical "heaven" and "hell"? That's their problem.

      -Mars

    61. Re:The depressing part of the story by TheLink · · Score: 2

      ">Maybe someone should go in and teach them critical thinking skills and the scientific method, so they can more objectively evaluate the prosthyletizing of the missionaries.

      An excellent suggestion."

      Well the missionaries went in there first. They showed their faith and love by their deeds. They put their "money" where their mouth is.

      Some even gave up their lives. In one case a bunch were wiped out by a tribe. When the missionaries' children came back to the tribe on a mission, the tribe were convinced.

      So yeah maybe some "objective" scientist of your preferred beliefs (e.g. nonchristian) should go there and help them.

      Well get on with it then.

      --
    62. Re:The depressing part of the story by corbettw · · Score: 2

      "In fact, I'm glad you refuse to believe in a religion with such a belief. "

      What part of "us Christians" made you think I'm not a Christian? ;)

      And, actually, Christianity *does* teach that only Christians go to Heaven. The various churches disagree on just what comprises a Christian, of course, but they mostly agree that, in order to get to Heaven, Jesus is the key ingredient. "Just being nice" doesn't cut it (read Dante's Inferno for a classical explanation of what happens to nice heathens...their Hell isn't bad, but it isn't Heaven, either).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    63. Re:The depressing part of the story by corbettw · · Score: 2

      "Of course I understand why they do it: but it's still obnoxious and unhelpful."

      Suppose you found someone on the side of the road, beaten and bloody, dying of their wounds. In their blood-loss driven dementia, they claim they need no help. Would you leave them to die, or help them get medical attention anyway? If you called 911 for an ambulance, wouldn't that be "meddling"? Sometimes you have to meddle in other people's business for their own good, it's called being part of a community and sharing social responsibility.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    64. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Even if every outsider try their best to avoid supplanting their religions belief system, all the other ideas they acquire through contact will still lead them to re-evaluate their belief.

      Why do you say that? Step back and look at how, despite all objective and rationale arguments against it, Christianity has survived. It's pretty absurd when you think about it, the concept of an all-powerful, yet invisible, being whose presence cannot be detected or measured by any scientific method. Yet people cling to those beliefs. I see no reason to suppose that the religious belief systems of these tribal peoples could stand up any less well to scrutiny.

      BTW how do you make the distinction between "primitive people" and the other "less primitive people" and know whom to leave alone?

      I just consider what they know, what they don't, what beliefs they hold, their standard of living, and so forth. Sorry, but there's not a dipstick of advancement to which one can refer.

      You know most of say India is pretty primitive by Western standards, so it's just wrong to introduce them to such alien and unnatural things like computers and programming languages.

      {snide remark}
      Then where would we get our H1-B employees? The next thing you know, computer professionals would command the same kind of pay the lawyers, doctors, and other professionals with intellectually demanding work get.
      {/snide remark}

      You are mistaking the teaching of technology and science with proselytizing. While it is good to help people advance, teaching Christian myths and superstitions as fact does just the opposite. It encourages unreasoned belief which is not founded on logic or science.

    65. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Well the missionaries went in there first. They showed their faith and love by their deeds. They put their "money" where their mouth is.

      So you are saying that, if Scientologists went in first, that would mean that Scientology was the most valid belief system? Little did I know that one should judge a belief system by punctuality.

      When the missionaries' children came back to the tribe on a mission, the tribe were convinced.

      And when the eclipse ended, the Chinese people were convinced that their beating of drums and shooting arrows into the sky is what scared away the dragon that had swallowed the sun. Being convinced of something does not mean that it is valid.

      So yeah maybe some "objective" scientist of your preferred beliefs (e.g. nonchristian) should go there and help them.

      Do you think that missionaries invented the vaccines that cured polio and smallpox? Did you know it was scientists, not missionaries, who invented Mectazin, the drug used to prevent the onset of river blindness? How did the missionaries get there? Did God deposit them there, or were they shuttled in by cars, helicopters, boats, and planes developed by engineers? Was it missionaries that developed prevention and treatment methods for AIDS? (No. Instead, the Catholic Church is busy trying to keep condoms away from people at-risk for AIDS.)

      Missionaries use the valuable work done by scientists and engineers to legitimize, to the villagers, the unfounded Christian belief systems that they foist off on them.

      Your argument is what is known as an Argumentum ad Verecundiam or "Argument from respect (modesty)" (Latin). The basis of your argument is that the missionaries did something deserving of respect and admiration, therefore, their belief in Christianity must be valid. It's a common logical fallacy.

    66. Re:The depressing part of the story by duck_prime · · Score: 2
      I note you don't have any problem teaching them about the scientific method, or "freedom of (lots of things)", which are just as much a cultural construct as Christianity, and whose adoption would change their society. It seems your objection is not so much to changing the natives' society, as teaching them Christianity.

      Science is not a cultural construct and comparing it to the blind-faith that is Christianity debases it. Teaching primitive cultures about medicine, food safety, irrigation, and so forth improves their lives. Teaching them about Christianity denigrates their religious belief systems for no valid purpose.
      Do be aware of your own biases. The scientific method is an invention. The idea of "1/2 proof + 1/2 proof = zero proof" (gauss who said that?) came very late in history. The idea of "radical doubt" is a recent invention. You are trying to press your rational atheism on these people just as much as I'm trying to push my own religion on them.

      Hopefully, they (random tribesmen) will enjoy the material improvements to life that Westernity has to offer until we finish arguing over philosophy... ;)
    67. Re:The depressing part of the story by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Yes, engineers and scientists make amazing and powerful tools.

      My argument is basically: a good tree bears good fruit. Fallacy or not, the native people understand that.

      You can give arguments about Scientologists going to help some tribe in Amazon for all you want, but AFAIK that's just hypothetical fruit. Have they flown to the Amazon to give the needy tribes a much needed audit? What fruit have you seen from the Scientologists so far? Good? Bad? None?

      Christians preach love. If they don't show love, then what's the point? That is the main crux of the Christian faith the good news- God loves us, he sent his Son to die for us. And these missionaries actually did that:

      http://www.hillsdale.edu/dept/Phil&Rel/Biography /0 1/08.html

      Sure you can say the missionaries who died for those tribespeople were believing in a fallacy. But if you are results oriented, see evidence of the positive effect on the tribespeople soon afterwards. I'd say that's good fruit.

      Yes, logical fallacy and all that. Logic is useful. Logic can tell me if the tree has theoretical potential. But when it comes to the crunch, I'll still claim it's best to judge trees by their fruits.

      BTW, condoms have a pretty significant failure rate. So to me it is very irresponsible and misleading for certain parties to keep saying condoms = safe sex when it comes to AIDs or other STDs (HepB, HepC amongst other incurable dangerous diseases). Condoms are better than sex without protection, but far riskier than abstinence or monogamy (faithful partners for life).

      Condoms are fine as a barrier against "accidental" life but not as a shield against untoward death.

      --
    68. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Christians preach love. If they don't show love, then what's the point? That is the main crux of the Christian faith the good news- God loves us, he sent his Son to die for us.

      Again, you are mistaking good deeds and the good people who do them as affirmation that the religious beliefs are correct. I have no doubt that many Christians have done many wonderful, generous things. And I don't have anything against most of the morals taught by the Christian faiths. But doing good deeds does not give one moral license to pass on their religious beliefs as fact to unsophisticated, and grateful, tribes people.

      Condoms are better than sex without protection, but far riskier than abstinence or monogamy (faithful partners for life).

      Then why don't you go to sub-saharan Africa and try to educate them? Thanks to the influences of industrialized countries, the men no longer work in the villages as hunters or farmers. Instead, they are hauled by trucks and buses to inner cities where they have sexual liasons with prostitutes.

      Deal with reality. The entire continent is not going to suddenly adopt Christian views about sexual morality. What the Catholic church is doing to stop the distribution of condoms in places like that is pure evil.

    69. Re:The depressing part of the story by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      The scientific method is an invention.

      Critical thinking and reasoned thought is not an invention.

      You are trying to press your rational atheism on these people just as much as I'm trying to push my own religion on them.

      Far from it. I don't feel that I have a moral right to go into their village and tell them that their religious beliefs are wrong. I can give them logical tools and they can come to their own decisions about religion should they wish to consider it. What you want to do is to tell them that their non-Christian religious beliefs are wrong, that, if they continue to worship a God other than the Christian God that they will burn for all eternity in Hell, etc. I do not believe in mixing fact and faith when teaching people. If they want to ask you about your beliefs, then answer them. But don't pass off your beliefs as "the gospel truth" {snicker}.

      Hopefully, they (random tribesmen) will enjoy the material improvements to life that Westernity has to offer until we finish arguing over philosophy... ;)

      Amen to that. ;-)

    70. Re:The depressing part of the story by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Hey, this *is* Slashdot ... not the Harvard debating team. :)

      Oh, but if only it were! I won't sit around holding my breath, though.

      As for American-(style/wise/ish) hegemonic consumerism, there's something in that statement that makes me want to hit you about the head and shoulders with a club, but you're too nice a person! Dammit. I can't tolerate niceness in response to a good, solid flame. It makes some of my wiring go all wonky. =p

      Anyway, I'll express my origional opinion, like some other people said - even if you hear the pitch, you don't have to buy. It holds true for DVD players, and religion! So uh... I dunno. I can't feel bad for the natives, especially when they sit on their rears, and make the Brits carry the piano. =)

    71. Re:The depressing part of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon my pedantry, but the word is 'bollocks' a colloquialism for testicles; not small bulls.

  13. And I bet those "primitives" take good care of it? by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder about people when they consider a people who care for music, and treat an instrument properly "savages", yet the piano in my college residence is ruined with misuse and ugly graphiti carving.

    Who are the savages? Do people in the Amazon write on public pianos too? "For a good time call Zanthia." --- "Hey Zanthia, wanna have a good time!"

    --"NO. And stop calling for me!"

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  14. How sad... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The American missionaries who converted the tribe in the 1950s taught them Christian modesty, and they now favour shorts and T-shirts, largely supplied by visitors and aid agencies. The footwear of choice is the plastic flip-flop.

    No comment necessary?

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:How sad... by corbettw · · Score: 2

      "The footwear of choice is the plastic flip-flop.

      No comment necessary?"

      Hey, if the flip-flop is good enough for Jimmy Buffett, it's good enough for the Amazons!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:How sad... by firewood · · Score: 1
      The American missionaries who converted the tribe in the 1950s taught them Christian modesty, and they now favour shorts and T-shirts, largely supplied by visitors and aid agencies. The footwear of choice is the plastic flip-flop.

      No comment necessary?

      Across the river there is an overgrown area where there once lived another tribe. In a little know accident involving an illegal time machine, Richard Stallman was sent back in time to visit this tribe. During his short stay, he converted many of them of into being true believers of free software. After he left, the men of the tribe spent much time rigging logic elements out of many pullys, rope and levers, so they might themselves experience the rapture of emacs. The women however, left to find places where there were less geeky men. Eventually the reproduction rate of this tribe dropped below the level necessary for their primative agricultural subsistance. The jungle grew back over their land, returning the it to the butterflies and the termites.

  15. all wrong, all wrong! by frotty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're supposed to put a STARBUCKS in a neighborhood when you want to increase the TIF funding attractiveness, not a piano!

    Why does this remind me of some sort of
    "Catholocism spreading to the brutes" scenario of a few centuries ago? Oh, wait, because it is that.

    I guess them savage folks needed to understand the Word of God, I mean, it's our duty to inform them that they're going about living all wrong.

    --
    -- The truth is the only thing that nobody will believe.
    1. Re:all wrong, all wrong! by frotty · · Score: 1

      A second thought - wouldn't that be grand? All of the yuppies would actually get use out of their City Tanks out there in the "new frontier" ... we should demand a starbucks be placed there, all of a sudden there'll be a condo development that's perpetually 90% sold and a [insert Health Food MegaConGlom Chain here]

      Mmm Mmm! 6 grain wheat, incoming. Hey who wouldn't promote healthy living, leaves you a little more energy after the vampiric economic ramifications of supporting massive health food chain stores!

      I think we could cut the Wai Wai in on the deal, too, they could be the health club attendants

      --
      -- The truth is the only thing that nobody will believe.
  16. Pianos and humidity by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember reading an article years ago about people in Japan donating old pianos, mostly to southeast Asia (There had been a boom in piano sales in Japan a while back, when many parents were signing their kids up for piano lessons, but with the boom over, most of these pianos sat unused in Japanese homes).
    The problem was that pianos made for sale in Japan didn't handle the humid climate of southeast Asia and often became warped, as the one in the Amazon did.
    I think it also mentioned some kind of treatment that can be done to the pianos at the manufacture time, to help strengthen them in humid climates.

  17. Oranges to tangerines, then? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People want PIANOs that can produce a wide range of sounds. That's why synths exist. Here are some features on modern day keyboard that prove my point:
    weighted keys: so that it feels the same as a piano. You can't feel the hammers hitting the strings, you can only feel how hard it is to press the keys. Modern synths have this.
    touch sensitivity:Harder hit means more sound...like a piano.
    88 keys:There's no reason that a synth should have so many keys, since it is usually portable, and thre isn't a lot of synth-only music (meaning that the range could be dictated by the instrument). Unless, of course, its a replacement for the piano.

    This doesn't apply to all keyboards because all of these features are rather expensive. But most good keyboard players get their keyboards with all of these features. Saying they're not the same is like saying that a piano wasn't a replacement for the harpsichord (which could only play one volume).

    Interesting how we name our keyed instruments - based upon whatever feature they have that the previous instrument didn't. Pianos where originally called "forte-pianos," and synths...

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, pianos were orignally called "pianofortes," not "forte-pianos." An otherwise excellent comment though.

    2. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how we name our keyed instruments - based upon whatever feature they have that the previous instrument didn't. Pianos where originally called "forte-pianos," and synths...

      What is also interesting is that the EGBDF note-naming convention that we use today wasn't awlays the standard. The notes were originally named Shut the Fuck Up. I'd advise studying this.

    3. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm a professional pianist and I can tell you that you're all wrong.

      • On a real piano, you don't "feel the hammers hitting the strings". There's an "escapement mechanism" that releases the hammer before it hits the strings. There's no mechanical linkage between key and hammer at the actual moment of impact. Inertia carries it there.
      • Harder hit doesn't mean more sound. FASTER hit does. This is how a concert pianist can play for hours without killing his hands and wrists. Want more sound? Lift your fingers higher so they press the keys faster.
      • A synth is not a piano. It's an instument--usually contolled by a keyboard--that can produce a wide range of sounds.
      I cannot perform on a fake piano. It has to be real. No "good keyboard player" has ever learned to play on anything but a real piano. At least none that I ever met.
    4. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      touch sensitivity:Harder hit means more sound...like a piano.

      Wow, how incorrect that is. Lets expand that beyond volume. I use touch sensitivity to bring out other sounds. Harder hit.. plays differnent combinatation of instruments.

      88 keys:There's no reason that a synth should have so many keys

      Wrong again. Depends on the persons playing style. Some people can get away with less, others can't.

      you don't play synths do you?

    5. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by ninthwave · · Score: 2

      I was actually commenting not on the difference between synths and piano's as instruments. I play both and understand a good synth's design but commenting on the durability of a 70 year old piano and a few year old synth. The cult of plastic in instruments does worry me and that was the horse of the different colour.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    6. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Racine · · Score: 1

      Actually, you CAN feel the hammers hit...whatever hammer-action digital pianos hit. My Roland F-90 has a progressive hammer-action, which uses real hammers. Many Yamaha models have this as well, and I suspect the same goes for Kawai, Technics, etc. Of course, this is Roland's lowest model with this feature, weighing in at $1500.

      --
      Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    7. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Racine · · Score: 1

      Also, it is technically possible to play a harpsichord at more than one volume, but the method is not workable during real performances. Basically (and this only works sometimes), if you press a key down very slowly, the plectrum will actually pull the string down further, building more tension, before letting it go, which sounds the note louder. As I said though, this won't work if you have to play anything faster than, oh, 15 bpm or so.

      --
      Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    8. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by WNight · · Score: 2

      How long have good synths been around? Most "good" piano players I know started as children, so likely good synth players will as well. Anyone older than 25 couldn't really have grown up with a synth the way most piano players grew up with a piano.

      Eventually synths will take over. There's no sound difference some good DSP code can't fix and they're much more than just a piano.

    9. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the other eight kinds of people?

    10. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      A "Synth" is an instrument that can create new musicial sounds based on mathematical paramters.

      What you're referring to is a "Digital Piano," which is specifically made to emulate a piano.

    11. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by WNight · · Score: 2

      And a synth can't mimic a piano? It seems that many "piano traits" are things synths should have, like variable-sensitivity keys and such. When synths have that, what's the stop them from loading piano sounds?

      Building a device to *just* emulate a piano seems so limiting.

    12. Re:Oranges to tangerines, then? by Racine · · Score: 1

      10 is binary for '2'...

      --
      Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  18. feedback by carlcmc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but you are mistaken in saying that the feedback of hammers hitting the strings cannot be reproduced. While I might be healthcare, i also play classical music on the piano, and for 2500 you can get a digital piano that has as good if not better feedback as your standard uprights in the same price range. Granted a grand piano is better, but what percentage of people are able to afford a 15k to 20k grand piano?. A digital piano such as a korg for instance never requires tuning, has excellent feed back and record and play back. I suppose you may have been talking just about synths that have keys but no feed back, but i wanted to respond to the misconeption that you can't get great feed back with digital.

    1. Re:feedback by Gsus411 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would love to see some of these digital pianos you speak of. I have played on just about every piano possible, from Steinway grands to no-name uprights from 100 years ago to the most elaborate digital pianos available. A good digital piano may have a better response than a cheap $700 dollar throwaway. But for the $2,500 you mention, you can get a decent upright with better response than any digital piano you can find for any price.

      My $0.02.....

    2. Re:feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but you are mistaken in saying that the feedback of hammers ...

      The one who is mistaken is you, by deciding to post instead of shutting the fuck up, which would have been a much more sensible path the follow. Therefore, it is with a great haviness in my heart that I must say to you: shut the fuck up.

    3. Re:feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A week or so ago, I was banging on a Roland that had a real escapement
      action. It was a whole lot better than other digitals as far as feel,
      but I still found it much less expressive. They aren't cheap either
      at $5K - $10K.

      I think one reason may be the sound of a piano is three dimensional
      and comes out of the instrument in all directions. On a digital,
      everything come out of the same speaker cones. When you get 20+
      strings all working together, it gives you a nice big sound.

      There's also the issues with tuning temperment and harmonic overtones
      that give the piano a warmer more natural sound (assuming you've got a
      good tuner). Sure you can try to get closer with sampling but the
      shear number of possible note and velocity combination makes it a huge
      task.

  19. Re:This makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of half-naked savages have no interest in tickling the ivories. What the heck maybe there will be a Wolfgang von Bushman?

    Damn straight. Just like a bunch of half-naked morons have no interest in tickling the keyboard. Ooops. My bad, that'd make up most of /.'s anonymous posters.

  20. Re:pianos and technology?-Helicopters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more interesting question is why didn't they deliver the piano via helicopter? A much more efficient way to have done it.

  21. New sport: Extreme Philanthropy by Ooblek · · Score: 5, Funny
    A set of hearty do-gooders get this warm, tingly feeling when a bunch of savages want a grand piano of their very own in the middle of the Amazon. These heros set out with visions of a next renaissance in music as these villagers are left with a musical instrument and a desire to learn. Documenting their great struggle in taking this behemoth from the civilzed world to the uncivilized world. Overcoming obstacles like raging rivers and dense tropical jungles, they finally deliver this prize. They leave, intending to come back a few years later. In this time, they expect the musical capabilities of these primitives to mature beyond belief - much like leaving a batch of wine to ferment to perfection in an old oak barrel.

    So our intrepid travelers return and are greeted be the villagers that have apparently just been shopping at Target. Flip-flops, shorts, and even the occasional T-Shirt that has the phrase, "I'm a lion hunter. If you see me running, try to keep up," on the back.

    The cheap-clothing aside, the veteran piano-tuning-commando-squad makes the exhausting 8-mile trek through the jungle to finally visit the prize instrument and to taste the sweetness of the evolved musical talent that should have developed over these past years.

    What they found is that the piano that was donated has almost cracked in half due to the fact the generous donation turned out to be little more than someone deciding not to sell the thing for $5 at a garage sale. (They must have decided they didn't want to move the thing out the front door every Saturday for a month while trying to get rid of it.) The instrument itself was infested with insects and their eggs, probably due to the fact that they generally kept the piano in a storage shed until visitors with cameras decided to show up. This explains all the Target type clothes since it appears that they are really cannibals that would eat visitors without cameras and take their clothes.

    In the end, the savages did learn how to belt out a few Bach and Beetles tunes, but then just wanted a fricking Korg keyboard, "Like we asked for in the first place." I don't see why they didn't just ask for a PC and a net connection so they could just use Kazaa and download all the Bach and Beetles MP3s they wanted!

    1. Re:New sport: Extreme Philanthropy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man I love the Beetles! John Lemon and Paul McCarthy were great.

      Bach was good, too. BTO had some kick-ass songs.

  22. Not sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless the Christian missionaries put guns to their heads, I don't see what's sad about it. They opened their minds to a crazy new religion, which the Wai Wai seem to have adopted. They gave them durable clothing. Big deal.

    1. Re:Not sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just don't get it. If you can't find half-naked, blowpipe-wielding savages in a remote corner of the Amazon, where will you go to find half-naked, blowpipe-wielding savages???

    2. Re:Not sad. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Unless the Christian missionaries put guns to their heads, I don't see what's sad about it.

      Guns aren't necessary when dealing with primative cultures ... scary stories do just fine.

      You don't see what's sad about convincing people they should be ashamed of nakedness? (And "Lord knows" what else they convinced them of.)

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  23. Amazon Jungle by rednaxel · · Score: 1

    It may be not enough to say just Amazon, once it's a jungle, not a country. The facts depicted in the story took place in Guyana. Amazon jungle spreads along several countries, including Peru, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador.

    --
    If you can read this, thank an english teacher.
  24. whadya mean 'surprising' by Traicovn · · Score: 1

    My family owns a baby grand and we love it. On the subject of it surviving better, of course it does. I play the violin and have a fairly old insturment (over 200 years old) and it works great. Not one of those new cheap insturments they make in sweatshops in asia. Very nicely made insturment. Just proves, that something that is made well will last a long time...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  25. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a STUPID article. Can you waste more electrons? Remember, conserving electricity still wastes electrons.

  26. Re:And I bet those "primitives" take good care of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we, living in what we call "civilization" already have everything. We have all the basics like a safe and warm home, food everyday etc. We only have to work to get richer. We're not so much hunters as we are frantic gatherers and traders, scooping up everything we can, even lots of stuff we don't need. Maybe we haven't had many challenges yet. Life is boring. We destroy pianos, subways, walls, cause we can and cause "someone else will clean it up anyway". Maybe we're spoiled, we have everything and don't really have to work for it.

  27. Re:Missionaries suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it horrible how people think cultures that integrate changes have been destroyed?

  28. The Piano ][ by coloth · · Score: 1

    I can't tell whether the strange tone of this piece is characteristic of British writing, or just this author.

    Anyway, the story really should have been about getting the piano to the tribe. If I was writing a short story, the piano would have been the main character--

    An aged instrument is torn against its will from a diginfied, but meaningless twilight in luxury, portaged by sweaty, cursing soldiers through the steaming jungle mud, and deposited amongst a people at whose foreign touch it cringed.

    But, over the course of two years, even as its cladding peeled away in the humidity, and insects came to violate its works, the instrument found a new purpose, straining against its own years to learn a new repertoire, and inspire its new people, as it had long ago inspired its own.

    Ok, bidding for movie rights starts at $20,000. All proceeds to benefit the Indigenous Peoples' Keyboardists' Club.

    --

    Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

  29. Hi tech/Lo tech by swm · · Score: 3, Funny
    I find it funny when people complain about the rediculousness of low-tech firearms on a spaceship

    OK, I'll bite.

    I used to watch Lost In Space when I was a kid. I knew it was hokey, but as long as I accepted it on its own terms, it was good enought for TV.

    Then one year I came home from college, and I was channel surfing, and I stumbled across an old episode. The Robinsons were trapped on some alien space craft, and they were shooting their way out, firing those laser pistols they always carried, and then one of them starts lobbing grenades...and I'm just sitting there thinking...
    ...yeah, that's the ticket. Whenever I'm on board a strange spacecraft, I always lob a few fragmentation grenades around. If their containment vessel can't handle the shock, that's their problem.

    Hissing noise? What hissing noise? Hey...does the air in here seem little thin?
  30. A very tempting choice, but that's all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take It Nicely Or Face Eternal Perdition

    So in other words, "Take It Nicely Or Face Nothing At All". Perdition (ie, eternal damnation) requires you believe in Christian ideas of hell, the soul, and the ability to be forever 'damned'. As the previous poster said, Christian missionaries do not hold guns to people's heads. If you accept their beliefs (or appear to), they -will- give you gifts. But that's your choice.

  31. God I loved the smell of the tubes warming up. . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    in the morning! And in the "old days" we didn't have to waste time and money *adding* lights to our computer cases.

    You want "eerie glow?" I got yer eerie glow right here buddy.

    Plus you could use them to keep your bagel warm and nicely soft.

    Of course you couldn't use them to mill grain like you could with a Babbage machine. There are always downsides to new technology.

    KFG

  32. Electronics don't last.... by freejung · · Score: 2, Informative
    in the jungle. I can tell you that. I live in the jungle and I work with electronics, and the humidity is hell on them, it's no surprise the new synth didn't work out very well.

    Trying to use computers here is a joke, they break amazingly fast. The trick is to use it all the time, so the circuits stay warm.

  33. I have a piano and live in amazon, but i�m lucky.. by the+cobaltsixty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Belem, the largest city within the Amazon Rainforest, with two million inhabitants. For about nine years, i also played piano and almost became a classical pianist. But then i left in order to have more time to spend at the computer.

    There are two piano tuners in my city. One has serious hearing problems, which is weird. The other one looks weird, because hes not brazilian, but russian. But i heard hes a good tuner.

    Keeping a piano is a challenging task. The climate has much air humidity, the wood helps changing its sounds. Also, we have problems with the extreme heat... But anyway, thats not impossible.

    There were two piano factories in brazil, and the most popular, Essenfelder, got bankrupt. The remaing, Fritz Dobbert, still exists. There are in my city two music schools, Carlos Gomes and the Federal University of Para Music School (EMUFPA). I used to study at the later one. They still have a really beautiful Yamaha piano there. When they were about to buy, i've heart they had to make a poll to choose whether to buy a white or a wooden one. Thank god, the wooden is there.

    Disclaimer: I have nothing against people who think theyre trendy about white pianos, but sure Def Leppard making a Video with a white piano is a shame

  34. POOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    poop

  35. Open Source virtual piano tuner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    openDK() lets you use your *NIX system to takedown out-of-tune piano's.

    thankn you

  36. Jersey? by kfg · · Score: 1

    n/t

    KFG

  37. 12:00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A whole nation of people like my Mom. Hmmmm.

  38. Juju magic seems more effective than modern tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "But I could never track down the fault, let alone fix it. I wrestled with the Korg on and off for more than a fortnight, right until the eve of the fundraising concert, when one of the Wai Wai somehow got it working."

    Hmm, all these uber-geeks and no one else found it curious that an unknowledgable aboriginal fixes an electronic device that they couldn't possible understand? Anyone care to explain? Btw, no, I don't buy the "gave it a good whack" excuse.

    yet another x-file ...

  39. I SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our culture infects YOU!

  40. Re:This makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, the "savages" are not half-naked, but in fact prefer shorts, tshirts, and flip flops. Second of all, the tribe itself asked for a piano for their christian services on sunday, so yes, they are interested in "tickling the ivories."

    read the article, you insensitive clod

  41. Obligatory Simpson's Reference by zephc · · Score: 2

    Ah hell, I'll just link to it: "Missionary: Impossible"

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  42. I don't think I've ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seen so many posts from people who haven't read the article. Looks like only 3-4 posters have taken the time to READ it! It's quite an interesting read and I really enjoyed it.

    I hadn't immediately noticed it was written by the Brittish, and when they mentioned it was a sweltering 30 degrees I thought Farenheit! didn't seem that hot to me. Luckily I'm not 100% ignorant, and I figured it out. (I'm not going to tell YOU though, since you didn't read the article!)

  43. Most Important Low-Tech Discovery by duck_prime · · Score: 2
    Lets face it, we're still dependent upon the 7 "low-tech" discoveries/inventions of the Neanderthals
    I don't know if the Neandies had this one, but the sine-qua-non of our existence that didn't make your list is:

    CONTAINERS!

    Yes, the lowly BAG. Hunting and gathering really, really sucked when you had to jam those tubers up your ass in order to free your hands to pick more.

    The mighty BAG made it possible to carry your stuff around. Unfortunately, it made warfare and plunder possible, as it made it possible for other people to carry your stuff around, too. ;)

    Forget this fancy-schmancy "fire" stuff. BAG all the way!
    1. Re:Most Important Low-Tech Discovery by tomhudson · · Score: 2
      You know, you're right. And it's interesting that much of our knowledge of past times comes from pot-shards (containers). Son-of-a-bitch! :-)

      Mind you, this might come under the heading of "tools" in general, oh, wft.

    2. Re:Most Important Low-Tech Discovery by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Yep. Containers or ways to carry stuff. I bet some tribes never really needed fire, but the ability to carry things whilst leaving your hands free was ever important. I'm sure many moms invented a multitude of ways to carry their babies whilst leaving their hands free.

      Still, fire enabled a wider range of cooking/food processing. And that leads to wider types and varieties of food. Mmmmm :).

      --
  44. Re:I have a piano and live in amazon, but i�m luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For about nine years, i also played piano and almost became a classical pianist.

    It doesn't take 9 years to play classical music. What were you playing all that time?!

  45. Re:Juju magic seems more effective than modern tec by Aggrazel · · Score: 2

    No, it was all part of the great Wai Wai:

    "Lets see how far we can string these stupid brits along for great comedy".

    Which of course started with:

    "I bet you can't get them to bring a piano out here."
    "Bet you I can!"
    "Nah, no way."
    "Yeah I can! And I'll even up that, I'll get them to bring a GRANDE Piano, AND we'll tell them our village is flooded!"
    "Hahaha, there's no way they'd be that dumb."

    But of course, my favorite part of the whole story is where all they thought they would have to do is "shout at them" to move the piano.

    "Wai Wai strong, British Weak!"

  46. Too Old... by macbot3000 · · Score: 1

    We just purchased a used piano for our daughter to learn on. In the small amount of research I did before we purchased, I found that there is some consensus that any piano over about 50 years old is not worth anything. This is due to the large amount of moving parts to wear, and the fact that the wood becomes dried out and brittle (as the piano in the story).

    Our 35-year old studio console cost only $1000 from a reputable dealer, including cleaning and tuning.

    Something like this would certainly have made more sense take into the Amazon than a decrepit old grand that was probably donated to keep from having to pay to have it removed! (easier to move too-only about 400 pounds)

    1. Re:Too Old... by shatteredpottery · · Score: 1
      This is not necessarily true. It depends on what kind of wood it's made of, for one. Rosewood, ebony and mahogany pianos can sound perfectly fine even if they're a hundred years old (which is likely, considering how expensive and banned those woods are now, rightly so) because the wood is so dense and well suited to such a construction. Mahogany, in particular, doesn't tend to dry out. The moving parts can easily be replaced when worn; most piano makers still produce parts for their older models. Even a cracked soundboard is relatively easy to repair. It's not unusual to rebuild the mechanism every ten to fifteen years in a heavily used piano. There's a lot that can be done to maintain the mechanism though. Your tuner should be doing this every six months or so, depending upon usage.

      Newer good pianos are generally made of maple, oak, fir, that sort of thing, but it's just not the same, and they do show their age quickly. Some less expensive ones are pine, or even particle board.

      The most important part is the frame, which is usually cast steel. That's what holds the strings (twenty-two tons of tension in a grand!) and determines a lot of the sound quality.

      I've used a 75-year old Bösendorfer that sounds better than most new Böses, and far better than any Steinway, even the German ones. And then there're the old Bechsteins... mmmmmm. Don't get me started.

      --

      A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

  47. Novel "The Piano Tuner" mirrors this story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See John Mason's recent novel, "The Piano Tuner" for a treatment of this exact same topic, except the piano is transported by hand and boat to a doctor in a Victorian-era Burmese jungle, and the piano tuner is British. But the topics of shipping difficulties, culture conflicts, colonialism, and the hazards of humidity to tropical pianos all are nearly the same as this excerpt from the Guardian.

  48. Send those people some iPods! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    And some MadPlayers. I'd love to see what folks raised on tribal rhythms could do with those.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  49. (OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by yerricde · · Score: 0

    one of the tubes in my computer died.

    Given that the only "vacuum tube" in a modern PC is the cathode ray tube in a traditional display, you might want to try looking into an LCD panel with twice the life (even longer if you replace the internal light) one-third the footprint, one-third the weight, one-third the power consumption, and one-third the eyestrain of a CRT. Even though an LCD may cost more up front, you will save money in the long run by going with an LCD.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      (Lacks Sense Of Humor And Completely Misses The Point: -1)

    2. Re:(OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Lacks Sense Of Humor And Completely Misses The Point: -1)

      Are you claiming that it's verboten to submit a serious reply to an obviously bad joke? How do you know that "missing the point" wasn't part of the joke?

    3. Re:(OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >> one of the tubes in my computer died.

      >Given that the only "vacuum tube"

      There you have it, you obviously didn't get the joke, retard.

    4. Re:(OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by yerricde · · Score: 1

      you obviously didn't get the joke

      Either that, or he got the joke and did not find it funny.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    5. Re:(OT) LCDs are three times as good as CRTs by unitron · · Score: 2
      Have you already forgotten about the motherboard with the onboard vacuum tube audio? It was a Salshdot story within the past year or so.

      And speaking of within the past year or so, didn't I see or something recently about a (fictional) novel about a piano in the middle of a jungle?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  50. Tropical Climate? by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

    The temperature was in the 30s...

    In the jungle? Oh wait, that's metric.

  51. I can see a new question for stats exams: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Within an order of magnitude, how many piano tuners are there in the Amazon?

  52. They're people, not savages. by forii · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you assume that the people who live in the Amazon are not able to choose their clothing/lifestyles for themselves? You may wish that some people stay nice and "natural" (perhaps you mean "primitive"?) but I'm sorry that these people who live in the Amazon are probably not as interested in living as museum displays for your pleasure.

    1. Re:They're people, not savages. by ndinsil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every good Slashdotter should know the Prime Directive!

      Seriously, although a strict hands-off approach like the fictional directive is probably not a good idea in these circumstances, rapidly changing a culture can cause serious harm that's often not recognized until later, and usually can't be undone. And missionaries have a long history of carelessness and even intentional destruction.

      Case in point: they used to be able to support themselves; but they've been taught to cover themselves with western clothing that they must get from elsewhere, creating a need that never existed before. How does that do them any good in any way?

  53. They should have used... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    Opporknockety strings.





    Why?





    Opporknockety only tunes once.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  54. Re:And I bet those "primitives" take good care of by l810c · · Score: 2
    yet the piano in my college residence is ruined with misuse and ugly graphiti carving.

    You didn't read the part of the article about where they carved graffiti into their piano:

    'Wai Wai Rulez!'

    'For a good time dial Bong Bong Bing Bong Bong'

    'Tinkatu is a Fag'

  55. Re:Juju magic seems more effective than modern tec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably because the whiteys who jetted to the amazon were piano tuners and not electricians.

  56. Electric Paino vs. Synth by FiloEleven · · Score: 1
    People want PIANOs that can produce a wide range of sounds.
    This may be true, but only in very few cases. The majority of keyboards/synths that have weighted keys and a ful 88-key keyboard are actually electric pianos and contain ~6 sounds, or they rae digital workstations designed for studio use. Most actual keyboards/synths do _not_ have the full range board and do _not_ have weighted keys. In my experience, the only people who want weighted keys are those who are actually pianists that want to be hip by getting into "the digital age."

    As for touch sensitivity, it's an actual enhancement that does not increase the overall size of the unit (as an 88-key board would). It adds expressiveness, as well as more customization options depending on the synth you're using (such as Korg MS2000, which has things like LFO speed and Cutoff patchable to velocity). Support for this hypothesis can be found in that of Aftertouch, which is another key-related parameter. Velocity sense (touch-sensitivity in your case) is how fast you press the key, Aftertouch is actually how hard you press the key, and can be modulated after any velocity effects have taken place. You can't do that on a piano, but it's still key-related.

    People seem to think that synthesizers are just electronic pianos, but they are not. You can use them that way, but you lose much of the incredible sonic potential at your hands.

    most good keyboard players get their keyboards with all of these features
    Wrong. Most piano players get their keys with all of these features. The majority of synth players are just that - synth players. Perhaps they've had some classical piano training or experience, but when one migrates to a synth, one has to change playing styles as well. Compare a violin to an upright bass. They appear to be the same instrument, only one's 50x as large. Playing styles tend to differ, wouldn't you agree? Just because the interface is similar on a superficial level doesn't mean it's the same thing

    I am a synth player, and I don't like weighted keys because their response isn't as fast, limiting playing. 88-key boards are also quite cumbersome - 49 or 61 key boards are excellent for range & space. A piano player has (basically) one sound to work with, and has plenty of control over that sound. A synth player has even more control options and usually at least 128 base sounds to work with, some so radically different they may require a different play style of their own.

    A synth no more a multi-sound piano than is an upright bass an oafish violin.

    Filo
  57. Prime directive by nightsweat · · Score: 2

    But what of the prime directive, man!?

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  58. A funny story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a former piano tuner before joining the ranks of hackers, crackers, and geeks. I've been asked to work on pianos of this condition and worse , but never at the end of a canoe trip. One woman in KY kept her's on the front stoop, uncovered and in the open.Couldn't figure out why after years of alternating hot and cold, snow and rain the damn thing didn't work. Not to mention the cat pee on it too. Now I live in Florida and have seen what high humidity and bugs do to a fine piano. My favorite story is when after examining a new piano I found that mice had chewed up small springs, felts, and other parts of the action. I told her mice had done the work. She replied that she didn't have mice. At that very instant a mouse ran out of the piano and across her shoe tops! LOL!.

  59. Do you have one of those heaters? by TheLink · · Score: 2

    I'm in a hot and humid country (Malaysia) and in many pianos you put a electric piano heater in to help keep the temperature right.

    Might help in your case.

    Not a bar heater - it's kind of specific for pianos.

    --
  60. How to help without getting involved? by TheLink · · Score: 2

    How do you propose to help people by leaving them well enough alone? Or are you saying it's fine for others to help but not Christians?

    Maybe you think the tribes don't need help? Or they don't need more friends in the world? Demonstrate your love for those people, then I will believe that you have their interests at heart if you tell me they don't need our help. I may not agree with you, but at least I will respect you.

    Christians preach love. If we do not show love how can we be Christians? Christianity is about love - God so loved the world that he sent his beloved Son down to die for us.

    If there are tribes turning to Christianity in the Amazon that's usually because Christians are helping them. They aren't stupid, they know a good tree bears good fruit. A useless tree that looks good but bears no fruit or bad fruit is often chopped down and burnt for firewood.

    As far as I see, most missionaries are far from unhelpful or obnoxious. In fact the people they try to help may be unhelpful:
    http://www.hillsdale.edu/dept/Phil&Rel /Biography/0 1/08.html

    As far as I know, it's the missionaries that build schools, hospitals and educate people. It's the secular commercial traders etc who come bearing cannons and opium. You rather the traders reach the natives first?

    In many countries including mine the elite schools are the missionary/christian schools, due to the legacy the "foreigners" laid down. Even the non-christian rich battle to send their children to those schools.

    --
  61. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    If he once again pushes up his sleeves in order to compute for 3 days
    and 3 nights in a row, he will spend a quarter of an hour before to
    think which principles of computation shall be most appropriate.
    -- Voltaire, "Diatribe du docteur Akakia"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...