Slashdot Mirror


Starcraft

Denise M. Clark writes "The existence of extraterrestrials has long been a subject of heated debate between scientists, scholars and stargazers who've spent many an hour studying the night sky and the universe beckoning beyond. Scientific proof of whether distant life forms and existence are legitimate is yet another bone of contention between UFOlogists and skeptics alike, and while it's easy to make jokes about Area 51 or Roswell, there is certainly a basis for those jokes and rumors. Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument." Read on for Denise's encapsulation of a book which undertakes to explain what several of those somethings may have been. Be warned: the base assumption of this book seems to be not whether there are aliens, but what they are like; among other things, the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens. Unidentified Flying Objects: Starcraft author Der Voron pages 139 publisher PublishAmerica rating 10 reviewer Denise M. Clark ISBN 1591297389 summary A good book about UFOs, especially for those who want to start learning UFOlogy.

In his book, Unidentified Flying Objects: Starcraft, Der Voron has offered an extremely well-researched and detailed report of incidents that have occurred all across the globe, from many different eras. Ancient writings may have been the first indication that 'we are not alone,' and Der Voron cites several of these sources as examples. Such statements originate from many different countries and in different continents, from ancient times to contemporary, from Indian tales of events that took place in the wilds of Kipling country to experiences related by a German artillery gunner during World War Two. Reports of 'unidentified contact with objects of undetermined origins' have been filed in government offices from the plains of South America to the fjords of Norway and the steppes of Asia.

Highly annotated and illustrated with fascinating examples of starship models and their possible makeup, armaments and defensive mechanisms (according to some data belonging to U.S. government research on alien starcraft), this ambitious work offers a wealth of documented information on not only Starcraft, otherwise known as 'Flying Saucers,' but the types of extraterrestrials that have flown them. All aliens are not created equal, as their many varied depictions and origins in historical writings attest. The author's use of a plethora of written documentation ably enhances his description of personal civilian and military accounts of those who have had some kind of interaction with these objects.

Also explored in great detail is the intelligence of our sea life, mainly as that intelligence relates to dolphins and the octopi of our deepest oceans, and how they, in turn, can be used in the search for extended knowledge of the universe surrounding our planet. How and why these creatures have gained such highly specialized communication skills and how it is that an octopus can experience an event and not only remember it, but learn from it, is explored, and commented upon as it relates to man's search for a higher intelligence.

While replete with scientific data, terms and information, this work by Der Voron is nevertheless highly readable and extremely illuminating for the common reader with no prior knowledge of extraterrestrial existence, while at the same time it provides hours of reading material and documentation to keep the more knowledgeable busy.

Der Voron's conscientious effort to dig deep for his sources shows in his detailed reports, and his data gathering and willingness to share that information is a challenging endeavor in which he has aptly succeeded. The existence of extraterrestrials is an immensely interesting topic, one that will be explored for years to come, and this work can provide an invaluable asset to any stargazer's bookshelf.

If this review intrigued you, you may want to see this interview with the author of this book in Weekly Universe. You can purchase Unidentified Flying Objects: Starcraft from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

343 comments

  1. I'm an idiot by SledgeHBK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps it's just me being hung over or too lazy to read the actual story, but I started to think I'd see something about the Zerg.

    1. Re:I'm an idiot by mallfouf · · Score: 1

      I fell you. I thought the guy wrote a book about the starcraft universe.

    2. Re:I'm an idiot by ThrasherTT · · Score: 2

      I wonder if the editor thought the same thing, didn't read it, and posted it!

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    3. Re:I'm an idiot by Shanep · · Score: 2

      I was hoping that it was a story on a proper Starcraft 2, not one of these 3D jobs.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  2. No mention of Zergs? by EvilEddie · · Score: 0

    What kind of book on Starcraft doesn't mention the zergs?

  3. Ummm... by drfishy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Starcraft? Can he use that?

    1. Re:Ummm... by Psmylie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if he builds enough supply depots and a barracks.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    2. Re:Ummm... by The_Shadows · · Score: 1

      We need more Overlords!

    3. Re:Ummm... by jedie · · Score: 2
      I don't know man, IANAL or anything but "Starcraft" is about the same as "Car".

      If I made a game and called it "car", it would be kinda silly to assume nobody else can use that name..

      otoh.. windows and apple prove me wrong...

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
    4. Re:Ummm... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      Do you use the word "starcraft" in everyday conversation?

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    5. Re:Ummm... by jedie · · Score: 2
      what?! you don't?!

      BLASPHEMY! :p

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
    6. Re:Ummm... by JVert · · Score: 1

      Well since we are on the subject of cars there is a trailer manufacturer (or distributor) called starcraft. Alsmost every weekend you can see a trailer with the words starcraft on it. Now do I instantly think of a silly game?

      Duh! of course I do! I think its inapropriate to mention starcraft without clear indications that it is not affiliated with blizzard. Going off the wall but seriously, who cares about another UFO book?

    7. Re:Ummm... by Spuffin · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, Chevrolet made a van called Starcraft in the late 80s/early 90s. :)

    8. Re:Ummm... by Marc2k · · Score: 2

      Are you talking about an Astrovan? ;)

      --
      --- What
    9. Re:Ummm... by Spuffin · · Score: 1

      I'm wrong, but I still don't mean an Astrovan :) Just did a little bit of googling and apparently they only make conversions. I remember one in my neighborhood that was a Chevy but apparently they can convert any van into a STARCRAFT! woo.

    10. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be the most unintelligent post ever. What does the frequency of use have to do with anything? I haven't used the word car in a conversation in a long time. I happen to drive an SUV and I refer to it as a truck.

    11. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a company that makes boats called Starcraft. My uncle's boat is made from them. Quality boats.

    12. Re:Ummm... by tx_mgm · · Score: 1

      Do you use the word "starcraft" in everyday conversation?

      i believe there is even a type of van thats called a starcraft too...the word isnt copyrighted or anything (or is it trademarked...i can never tell the two apart) except for in the case that you make a game with that title...just my thoughts on it

      --
      Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
      -Dr. Weird
    13. Re:Ummm... by lvdrproject · · Score: 1

      The word "starcraft" makes just as much sense as "space ship", "spacecraft", or "starship". It is a CRAFT that navigates the STARS. How many of these words do you use in everyday conversation, though?

  4. Book? by Xaleth+Nuada · · Score: 1


    Good video game at least ;^) Not sure how well that'll translate into the written word.

    Mod appropriately

    --

    I read Slashdot for the .sigs
    1. Re:Book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably just as well as this literary gem: Doom: Hell On Earth

  5. Zerg Rush by n3rd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    To first post!

    1. Re:Zerg Rush by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      Bah! Protoss rulez! :)

      Especially the guy who goes "my life for hire" when you click on him.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Zerg Rush by drodver · · Score: 1

      "Auire" (sp?), not "hire"!

      "My life for "

    3. Re:Zerg Rush by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      It certainly sounds like "My life for hire". Kinda appropriate too, considering you have to pay to construct those little soldiers.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:Zerg Rush by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      I always thought the best phrase from that game was "Sacrafice me!"

    5. Re:Zerg Rush by dalassa · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always thought it sounded like "My wife for hire."

      --
      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
    6. Re:Zerg Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's "My life for Auir." Auir is the Protoss homeworld. Auir is pronounced "Eye-r"

    7. Re:Zerg Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Aiur", not "hire".

    8. Re:Zerg Rush by Magius_AR · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, he's saying "My life for Aiur"
      Aiur is their home planet.
      And the unit name is the Zealot.

      Magius_AR

    9. Re:Zerg Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like terrans because of the tanks and nukes.
      I like protoss because they have the carriers and arbiters.
      I like the zergs mostly because of their guardians and lurkers.

      But really, it's fun to play with them all at the same time too...

    10. Re:Zerg Rush by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I was going to point this out, but then realized that I didn't want to give away how little of a life I had, or just how much of my brain is filled with obnixiously useless trivia.

      You've blown both our covers. Thanks.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:Zerg Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that completely useless fucking post.

    12. Re:Zerg Rush by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Also in WarCraft III, one of the Undead Acolyte's "pissed" sayings is "My life for Auir - er, I mean, Ner'Zhul." I think it's the same voice actor who plays both units.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    13. Re:Zerg Rush by SparkMan · · Score: 1

      HAHA I always thought the exact same thing. The first time I saw Starcraft my friend kept repeating "My Wife For Hire" over and over.

      Even when I figured out what it really meant I still pretended it meant the first thing... made the game more entertaining. OK so I have simple pleasures.

      --

      -- laws are the opinions of politicians --

  6. What a Loon by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Informative

    A Google search on this guy reveals that he's just another wacko looking for conspiracy theories.

    1. Re:What a Loon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denise? Looks like a girl to me. Can google provide you with information on gender?

    2. Re:What a Loon by gstatton · · Score: 1

      im assuming you hh

      --
      http://www.whateversclever.net
    3. Re:What a Loon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Book reviewing can be quite a scam. Some do it for faked promotion. Others do it to get lots of free books they can resell at the nearest used book store for cash, as in untaxed cash.

    4. Re:What a Loon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A conspiracy, loosly defined, is any time two or more people get together to take action in secret.

      The world is full of them, and if you think it's not, you are terribly naive.

      Really.

    5. Re:What a Loon by Jeff+Binder · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, a Google Search on his book reveals a lot of computer game sites. Odd.

  7. got me excited by digiplant · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I almost was ready to sacrifice my vacation to the blizzard gods. mmmm, zerglings.

  8. I wonder by ideonode · · Score: 3, Funny

    an octopus can experience an event and not only remember it, but learn from it

    Off topic, yes, but I wonder how they know this? What cognitive research has been carried out on octopi? Octopus-Ink blot tests, I'd imagine ;)

    Also, how do they know that goldfish only have a three-second memory span? Do they observe goldfish watching MTV all the time?!

    1. Re:I wonder by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, how do they know that goldfish only have a three-second memory span? Do they observe goldfish watching MTV all the time?!

      Anyone who had MOPY knows goldfish can remember much longer than three seconds. Mine eventually developed an intense combination of grudge-holding and fear.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:I wonder by zoward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, octopi are quite intelligent. I remember seeing (on the Discovery channel) intelligence tests where octopi were given sealed mason jars with crabs in them to figure out how long it would take the octopus to figure out how to unseal and/or unscrew the cap. Answer: not long.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    3. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You prod or shock the goldfish. For about three seconds, it will avoid repeating the set of actions leading to the shock (e.g. swimming to the top left of the bowl to get at a fishy flake).

      Then it randomly goes and does it again.

      Stupid.

      Although, not really- in a watery environment, environmental threats really won't stick around in the same spatial location for long - humans will wait hours, weeks or months before trying somthing twice. So the energy expenditure that in humans goes toward memory upkeep is better steered somewhere else in goldfish.

    4. Re:I wonder by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Informative

      Taken from here. "The most dramatic evidence for octopus intelligence came in 1992. A pair of researchers in Naples, Italy, Graziano Fiorito and Pietro Scotto, used conventional means--food as a carrot, mild electric shock as the stick--to train a group of captive common octopuses to grab a red ball instead of a white one. The scientists then let untrained animals watch from adjoining tanks as their experienced confreres reached for red balls over and over. Thereafter, Fiorito and Scotto reported, most of the watchers, when offered a choice, pounced on red balls. In fact, they learned to do so more quickly than had the original group. The octopuses, according to the researchers, were doing something invertebrate had never been known to do before: learning by watching."

    5. Re:I wonder by Papatoast · · Score: 0

      Saw an episode of Discovery whith researchers working w/ octopi. Seems the critters were very fond of a certain snail. So, the techs put one in a glass baby food jar (sans the label) screwed the lid on and put it in the tank w/ the octopus. The octo unscrewed the jar and got the snail in about 3 minutes. Pretty damn amazing.

      --
      We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
    6. Re:I wonder by 9jack9 · · Score: 1

      Of course, on the Internet, no one knows you're a octopus.

    7. Re:I wonder by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Except for the marketing types... and not only do they know you're an octopus, but they know what subspecies you are, and which kind of mason jar you like to get your lobsters and crabs out of.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:I wonder by wobblie · · Score: 1

      Octopi are extremely smart; here's an anecdote for you.

      I have a friend who is a fish enthusiast and used to work in a pet store that sold fish. One day they got an octopus, and put it in a (so they thought) tightly covered tank.

      The employer noticed many of his fish were going missing and, thinking that the employees were stealing his fish (many were worth a lot of money), put a video camera in to tape what exactly was going on at night.

      It turned out the octopus was escaping its tank, crawling over and into the other ones, eating the fish, and crawling back into its own tank.

    9. Re:I wonder by seven89 · · Score: 1
      The octopuses, according to the researchers, were doing something invertebrate had never been known to do before: learning by watching.

      Then there is still hope for the Republican Party!!

    10. Re:I wonder by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The actual point of that experiment was to prove that octopi can learn from observation. What they did was give one octopus jars with crabs in them until it learned how to unscrew the caps. Then they put another octopus in a tank sharing a glass wall with the first one. They gave the first octopus more jars to open while the second octopus watched intently. When they gave the second one jars to open, it knew how to open them right away. That was one of the cooler experiments I've seen.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    11. Re:I wonder by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2

      You omitted the important part:
      A second octopus was allowed to watch through a window. When given a the same (refilled) jar herself, it took even less time to open.

      Thus, octopi have demonstrated the ability to learn without first-hand experience. (A feat beyond the grasp of some primates)

  9. As we all know by Violet+Null · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not the aliens that are going to be the problem, it's that our rebel leader will sell out one of our psychic operatives and leave her to be captured by the aliens.

  10. Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing is unique in an infinite universe. Including humans.

    1. Re:Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in an infinite universe *everything*
      is unique.

  11. man couldn't be genetically engineered by aliens by utoddl · · Score: 5, Funny
    among other things, the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens.

    That couldn't be the case; it would violate the prime directive!

  12. What a let down by sl0w · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just when I thought a book was written based on the thick storyline surrounding Blizzard's excellent RTS game. :P

  13. Why bother with this crap by xagon7 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ray Kurzweil has hypothosized that the chances for intelligent life are very slim, as they would have already spread their intelligence throught the universe, as we "should" within 300 years. ....well...at least its a good read.

    http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=m em elist.html?m=3%23534

    1. Re:Why bother with this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've never understood the point of this argument. It's as useful as a 15th century European saying "If there were people on the other side of the ocean, they'd have come here already, so therefore there is nothing across the ocean."

      Another huge problem with this type of reasoning is that there's no reason to assume another world developing life wouldn't have internal strife the same way we do, and may have the same geopolitical obstructions to building a meaningful space program.

  14. What about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to hear the opinion of the Protoss on his origin theory.

  15. It was a good game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the book neglected to go into the past of the Zerg and the Protoss. I mean, they do share some common history, and fans of the games know some of it, so why not explore it? Also, there was no real need for so much Terran history. They're us afterall.

  16. fake argument by glMatrixMode · · Score: 1

    while it's easy to make jokes about Area 51 or Roswell, there is certainly a basis for those jokes and rumors.

    that amounts to say 'there are certainly UFOs looping around the earth'. Whee, one more book I won't read.

    --
    War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
    1. Re:fake argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ARE UFOs, actually. Plenty of them. The questions is whether those UFOs can be identified as alian spacecraft or something else.

    2. Re:fake argument by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "that amounts to say 'there are certainly UFOs looping around the earth'. Whee, one more book I won't read."

      The problem is that the UFOs are cloaked. We can't see them until we start building missile launcers.

  17. Reviewer Only Person Caring About this Book by Nintendork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In that google search, there's a handful of reviews posted on other sites. All the reviews are by this same person (Denise M. Clark). Is this guy the writer of the book, posting reviews under another name to try and get some publicity?

    1. Re:Reviewer Only Person Caring About this Book by warmcat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well spotted, dork. Not sure why timothy thought this was news for nerds. Maybe he hasn't done the accept-the-Scientologist-Lady's-offer-of-a-persona lity test-so-you-can-stare-at-her-breasts thing.

      Denise M Clark ... an anagram of:

      Seminal Dreck

    2. Re:Reviewer Only Person Caring About this Book by JoseMonkey · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Denise M. Clark ought to get together with Gail Cooke. Denise writes hundreds of reviews for the same product, while Gail writes one review for hundreds of products!

  18. MISLEADING HEADLINE by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    Damn...and I thought it was a book about this Starcraft.

  19. Last line is a beaut... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny


    Assumes people are genetically engineered by Aliens.

    RIIIIGHT, okay pass the pills, pass the needles and pass on.

    Next on Slashdot "Creationism explained", "Why computers are actually alive" and "Einstein, what a moron".

    News for nerds, or bollocks for brains ?

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Last line is a beaut... by 9jack9 · · Score: 1
      Actually, genetic engineering by aliens might explain a lot about the collective phenomenon known as "wives", as any married man could probably attest.

      To be fair, my wife would probably argue that husbands are proof that genetic engineering could not possibly have taken place, because the male of the species could not possibly be the result of intelligent engineering.

    2. Re:Last line is a beaut... by antis0c · · Score: 2

      Yep, who are we to question science and the truth. I for one still believe the Earth is flat, and I'll be damned if I surcome to the thinking that WE revolve around the Sun, for clearly you can see the Sun revolving around US.

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    3. Re:Last line is a beaut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Close your mind. That's what the aliens want.

    4. Re:Last line is a beaut... by kvn299 · · Score: 2

      And you forgot:

      How to catch a computer virus while having cybersex.

    5. Re:Last line is a beaut... by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the world you believed revolved around you.....

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    6. Re:Last line is a beaut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm?
      What's your point?
      That choosing to believe that we are visited by aliens is somehow on the same level as the astronomic discoveries you mentioned?

      Or are you saying that the way to truth is to challenge accepted doctrine ?

      Perhaps you forget that the challenges to accepted doctrine which you used as examples were based on observations and reasoning.

      Repeated observations.

      Logical reasoning.

      Your decision to blindly swallow the "alien conspiracy" theories is your own, but don't try and peddle it to us as a form of scientific questing.

      If you can provide any evidence to support your belief - please do so, and I will repeal my own beliefs. But until then - go away.

      (Karma sux - post AC)

    7. Re:Last line is a beaut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you moved to SOVIET RUSSIA?

  20. Don't forget killer whales... by Swannie · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Also explored in great detail is the intelligence of our sea life, mainly as that intelligence relates to dolphins and the octopi of our deepest oceans, and how they, in turn, can be used in the search for extended knowledge of the universe surrounding our planet. How and why these creatures have gained such highly specialized communication skills and how it is that an octopus can experience an event and not only remember it, but learn from it, is explored, and commented upon as it relates to man's search for a higher intelligence."


    Don't forget about killer whales, if we don't work hard to ensure their continued existence as a species, aliens may send a probe out looking for them...


    Swannie

    --
    :q!
    1. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humpbacks.

    2. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by mishac · · Score: 1

      ummm....I believe you mean humpback whales. I cannot believe that I'm correcting a irrelevant star trek reference...

    3. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by Swannie · · Score: 1
      Doh you're right! Good thing Karma isn't based on accuracy. ;)


      Swannie

      --
      :q!
    4. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by superdan2k · · Score: 1

      "Don't forget about killer whales, if we don't work hard to ensure their continued existence as a species, aliens may send a probe out looking for them..."

      Man, I can't decide if there should be a "Trekkie Troll" mod, or not. You probably have dozens of them frothing over the insignificant blip in here, but not willing to sacrifice their Karma to correct you.

      Heh.

      --
      blog |
    5. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by Junta · · Score: 2

      Not Killer whales, humpback whales.

      Killer whales aren't even endangered or anything, they are doing great in the wild still...

      And they also aren't technically whales....

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    6. Re:Don't forget killer whales... by calethix · · Score: 1

      humpbacked... people?

  21. And I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    that when I read this I'd see something about theBubbler.com. We have aliens in Wisconsin. I know, when I worked in the stone quarry before getting my programming job at Plexus, I worked with a ton of illegal aliens from Mexico. Of course, if you really want to write a book about aliens, then you might as well write about some of the geeks that frequent Slashdot or the Wisconsinites who frequent theBubbler

    1. Re:And I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn!! I like theBubbler.com. Didnt see much about aliens, but I could see how a green blob of green goo from space would want to visit the beer and cheese state. Funny!!

  22. Isn't the term... by eWarz · · Score: 0

    Isn't 'Starcraft' trademarked or something? Does he want vivendi on his ass?

  23. Debate by Jormundgard · · Score: 2

    If scientists are having heated debates about the existence of aliens, and not about more likely problems of the world, then I'd be a little worried.

    1. Re:Debate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, why do people always try to make this argument? Would you like every scientist in the world to only work on what is deemed "the biggest problem?" Answers to some problems come from the most unlikely sources, so it is a good thing to have scientists investigating all sorts of things.

    2. Re:Debate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists are people - not a class of public servant. Some work for money, some for pleasure, most a mix, I'd wager...

      Aliens are interesting. If I were a scientist, and I was being blamed for the "evils" of the world, I'd say FRELL it too, and study aliens.

  24. Something had to have happened ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny
    Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument.

    Well, heck, how can you argue with impeccable logic like that. And lots of things did happen. Sun rose, sun set, grass grew, leaves fell. Obvious signs of alien visitors. The signs were right in front us all the time.

    1. Re:Something had to have happened ... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Well, heck, how can you argue with impeccable logic like that. And lots of things did happen. Sun rose, sun set, grass grew, leaves fell. Obvious signs of alien visitors. The signs were right in front us all the time"

      Next time we will be reading a review of his book detailing how on Dec 21, 2012, Elvis will crash an alien space craft into the Loch Ness Monster.

    2. Re:Something had to have happened ... by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Heh...what happened is a lot of people saw a chance to pick up some cash...

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  25. Whoops by drodver · · Score: 1

    Ack!

    "My life for [protoss homeworld's name]"

    Forgot /. eats pointy brackets for lunch

  26. All my inspiration comes from Demotivators by Hard_Code · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are we alone?

    "If you find yourself struggling with loneliness, you're not alone. And yet you are alone. So very alone.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  27. Actually by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Octipusses are smarter then hell. I am not a researcher, but ive see some info on this. They can do problem solving, learn stuff, and come people put them in the range of dogs and cats for intellegence. Their brains are huge for their size.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Actually by Gropo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last year I caught a Nature special (or something) regarding the Indoenesian Mimic Octopi that caught my attention like no other creature ever had before!
      It's capable of mimicking a crab, sea snake, flounder, lionfish, and other species have other abilities. Absolutely floored me.

      I think that "IN UNDERSEA INDONESIA, OCTOPI GENETICALLY MANUPULATE THE EXTRA-TERRESTRIALS."

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  28. Now that everyone has a camcorder by gelfling · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are markedly fewer alien sightings.

    What makes us so fucking special that someone would pack the whole brood into the starcruiser and trudge all the hell way over to this 'hood to gawk at a bunch of monkeys?

    1. Re:Now that everyone has a camcorder by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "What makes us so fucking special that someone would pack the whole brood into the starcruiser and trudge all the hell way over to this 'hood to gawk at a bunch of monkeys?"

      They want to learn about the human emotion known as love.

    2. Re:Now that everyone has a camcorder by disappear · · Score: 2
      They want to learn about the human emotion known as love.

      But for that you need a camcorder...

    3. Re:Now that everyone has a camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I agree with the author, but your question would be similar to what makes monkeys so special that some people would travel all around the world and spend their entire lives studying them (monkeys)?

      I'm afraid you don't have to look very far to find people who fit the criteria. Curiousity maybe? A need to analyze everything? There could be plenty of motives.

      On that note, I think the whole alien/UFO visiting earth thing is probably untrue.

    4. Re:Now that everyone has a camcorder by Karel+Capek · · Score: 1

      Well, Iain M. Banks' "State of the Art" discusses this point to some lengths. And it offers up another solution to the Fermi paradox: The aliens are actively hiding from us.

    5. Re:Now that everyone has a camcorder by Alpha+State · · Score: 2

      I guess since the invention of the internet the aliens can observe our "love" without bothering to enter the atmosphere.

  29. It must be wrong by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) The guy sounds like a sub-atomic particle. Muon, Voron...

    2) He names his book after a popular video game containing alien characters. Coincidence?

    3) In the book, he assumes things that aren't known to be true, such as "Aliens exist". This allows him to avoid things like, eh, facts.

    4) It was reviewed on Slashdot, home of unbiased content!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:It must be wrong by dutky · · Score: 2
      1) The guy sounds like a sub-atomic particle. Muon, Voron...


      Or, maybe he's actually an alien himself: Voron, Vogon, ...

      2) He names his book after a popular video game containing alien characters. Coincidence?


      My GOD! You mean it's not just a game?!? Those aliens are damn sneaky.

      3) In the book, he assumes things that aren't known to be true, such as "Aliens exist". This allows him to avoid things like, eh, facts.


      Facts, schmacts: the real benefit of assuming the unknown or unprovable is that you don't need to be bothered with any actual thought!

      4) It was reviewed on Slashdot, home of unbiased content!

      I thought that was Fox News: Fair and Unbiased (so much so, they need a logo proclaiming it)
    2. Re:It must be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This allows him to avoid things like, eh, facts.


      Facts have little bearing on the truth ... unless, of course, some of them are correct.

      To believe that in the entire universe, our little planet is the only one in which the correct chemicals combined to create basic organisms which in turn evolved into complex lifeforms ... well ... that is an awfully small view of large large large issue.

      Here is my fact ... It happened here on Earth, therefore the probability of it happening is > 0.

      Now, whether or not we've been "visited" by advanced life forms is another question. I'd like to belive that we are not the pinnacle of evolution ... that there is something out there more advanced than us ... but proof is somewhat lacking.
    3. Re:It must be wrong by jck2000 · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe he's actually an alien himself: Voron, Vogon, ...
      A German alien -- Der Voron.

    4. Re:It must be wrong by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      Here is my fact ... It happened here on Earth, therefore the probability of it happening is > 0.

      Sorry, the probability of life arising on other planets is not affected by the fact that life arose on this planet. Its like a coin toss, even though the coin you just tossed ended up heads, the probability of the next one being heads is still 50%

    5. Re:It must be wrong by ctimes2 · · Score: 2

      Ah young Jedi... you have fallen into his trap!
      He said It happened here on Earth, therefor the probability of it happening is > 0.

      He didn't say anything about it happening on other planets. And actually, it's kind of a compelling argument - It DID in fact happen here... Of course, if it's already happened, is it still a probability? (In which case he has poor english skills...)

      --
      My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
    6. Re:It must be wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But if the probability of the coin landing on "thorax" or "feet" is zero will you ever get either of those results in an infinite number of tosses?
      A chance however remote is still a possibility. 1/10^90 > 0. The probability of life arising on other planets is affected by the fact that life arose on this planet because we must include Earth in our "polling data".


      Claiming that "the probability of it happening is > 0" is just a pedantic way of saying, "It could happen."

    7. Re:It must be wrong by Repton · · Score: 2

      1) The guy sounds like a sub-atomic particle. Muon, Voron...

      ...Moron?

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  30. UFOs - a skeptics view by richieb · · Score: 5, Informative
    For a more skeptical treatment of UFOs I recoment this book: UFOs: The Public Deceived. Philip Klass is an aviation expert and a member of CSICOP.

    Remember "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".

    --
    ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    1. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      This rather huge site takes a semi-skeptical view. Brother Blue has been away for a long time, but somebody put up the whole archive. Believe It or Not!!

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    2. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Klass is an idiot. He makes small cash off books and other products his peddles. The real proof is online.

      www.ufovide.com

    3. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Remember "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".

      Since you're quoting Carl Sagan (who often said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"), I would suggest a great book of his that talks a lot about UFO's (or lack thereof) and skepticism in general: The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by urbazewski · · Score: 1

      "The weight of the evidence must be in proportion to the strangeness of the fact."

      I believe the quote is attributed to LaPlace, but a cursory google search didn't confirm it.

      annmariabell.com

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
    5. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by richieb · · Score: 2
      The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

      It's a great book. I have the hardcover edition. :-)

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    6. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      You take that back, or I'll have the invisible dragon in my garage eat you!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    7. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Oh, and moderators? Don't mod that comment unless you've actually read \i{The Demon-Haunted World}.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forward me to your leader.

    9. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I do not think it was LaPlace. Try this google search. It searches for the exact quote and the word Sagan. You can see it is attributed to Carl Sagan all over the place, in some places referred to as Sagan's Law.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      Remember "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof".

      No, they don't. They require the same level of proof all scientific hypotheses do... that's why it's called the Standard Method. You don't change the rules just because you're uncomfortable with the conclusion. This is THE Classic Skeptic Trick, and one that has been peddled so successfully by UFO skeptics over the last half century that it has become accepted, even by scientific types who should know better, as common sense. Einstein once defined common sense as the collection of predjudices acquired by age eighteen.

      It's the same line the Moon-Landing-Hoax people always drag out. Nothing you show them is good enough to prove such an "extraordinary claim". Same with the Flat Earth Society. This is a fallacious line of reasoning which gives the skeptic carte blanch to arbitrarily dismiss standard, acceptable forms of scientific evidence as "not extraordinary enough".

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    11. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok.
      So what are extraordinary claims?
      That appears to be the question here.
      To me, a moon landing is not an extra-ordinary claim. A moon landing HOAX is.
      Same with a Flat Earth. The flat earth doesn't fit with *any* observed data - therefore the Flat Earth people will have to come up with some extraordinary evidence to support their claim.

      It's not a line of reasoning, it's a catch-phrase.

      (Karma sux - post AC)

    12. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Hast · · Score: 2

      Yeah, "The Deamon-Haunted World" is a great book. On this topic he talks a lot about how different parts of the world have different aliens. Also the appearance have changed with time.

      In the 40-50 when alien sightings began to be popular again in the US they looked Scandinavian. (Tall, blond, blue eyes etc.) Not until quite lately have they turned into the now archetypical "grey". If you study mythology from different parts of the world you'll find that IIRC in Africa they are often in the shape of animals. And other continents had their own style.

      Sagan also writes a lot about some similarities between abduction stories and child molestation. In that in both cases you can often make the "victim" believe things which hasn't happened. This is particularly true with children of course. (And hence the strict demands on child psychologists to be good at their jobs.) But making someone think they have been abducted is quite easy if the person is susteptible.

      The book also discuss a lot of other topics regarding science and para-sciences. (Such as cases of Uri Geller and those types.) I bet you'd learn more by picking it up than by reading the book reviewed in the article.

    13. Re:UFOs - a skeptics view by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      You've completely missed the point, even as you are MAKING it. "Extraordinary" is a subjective, malleable term, that's really a question of dates. Yesterday's extraordinary is today's normality. Extraordinary is in the eye of the beholder. Anyone can declare they find something extraordinary. Extraordinary has NO SCIENTIFIC MEANING.

      "To me, a moon landing is not an extra-ordinary claim. A moon landing HOAX is."

      That's what you BELIEVE. Others BELIEVE that a hollywood set, and lying politicians, are less extraordinary than a round-trip to another celestial body. That doesn't make either an absolute truth, which is why science is not beholden to people's BELIEFS. Science is the impersonal, objective study of FACTS. Our subjective beliefs do not change the valuation or merit of facts.

      A spherical earth WAS an extraordinary claim when everyone "knew" it was flat.

      Galileo's claim that gravity accelerates all objects equally WAS extraordinary when everyone "knew" that heavier objects fall faster.

      Saying the Earth revolved around the Sun WAS an extraordinary claim when everyone "knew" the Earth was the centre of the Universe.

      Saying we could land on the moon WAS an extraordinary claim until we demonstrated how to do it.

      I can go on, and on. And on, and on, and on. History is full of radical ideas being laughed at by people, because their BELIEFS differ, not because of actual scientific study.

      Speaking of beliefs, *I* firmly believe that one day, when extraterrestrial existance is an accepted fact, someone will add to the above list, "Extraterrestrial visitations WERE an extraordinary claim when everyone 'knew' we were alone in the Galaxy".

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  31. Need new Icon by oddjob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly, we need a new icon for this type of story. What picture would work for "you've got to be fucking kidding".

    1. Re:Need new Icon by mtm_king · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Moderators - mod above post up

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Need new Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about the picture from the homepage of the goatse.cx assholes. all puns intended.

    3. Re:Need new Icon by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Clearly, we need a new icon for this type of story. What picture would work for "you've got to be fucking kidding".

      Why not use the same one as the Microsoft stories?

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    4. Re:Need new Icon by freeweed · · Score: 2

      How about something from this page? http://www.hellocat78.1hwy.com/.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Need new Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is everything on the box written in Japanese (the page says it was never intended to be sold outside of Japan), except for the words "OFF" and "ON" on the vibrator itself? Does that make a bit of sense? Or did I just not read enough of it and the whole thing is BS? (I don't know that much about Japanese culture, so I wouldn't know how likely this thing is to be real.)

    6. Re:Need new Icon by tomzyk · · Score: 2

      Wish I could find a picture of it, but I'm thinking the handicap sign from the movie "Johnny Dangerously" would be perfect. In the same style as your everyday handicap sign, it shows a guy making a crazy-face... (ARGH! Already did a big search on Google images and couldn't find anything.)

      --
      Karma: NaN
    7. Re:Need new Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At http://www.fark.com, they use a 'dumbass' sign.

  32. not really an objective review by Goronguer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It doesn't bother me that "the base assumption of this book seems to be not whether there are aliens, but what they are like," but it does bother me that the reviewer's base assumption seems to be not whether the information in this book is even vaguely factual, but how detailed and interesting the information is.

    The quote "Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument" is a perfect example of the logical fallacy at work here. This is what is meant by "begging the question."

    This review could have been made much shorter by just quoting a book review that has been (perhaps apocryphally) said to have been written by Abraham Lincoln: "For people who like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing that they like."

    1. Re:not really an objective review by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      The quote "Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument" is a perfect example of the logical fallacy at work here. This is what is meant by "begging the question."

      Hardly. Something must have happened. It may have been a freak atmospheric event. It may have been random mass hallucinations. It may have just been a few clever hoaxers. And, it MAY have been aliens.

      We don't know WHAT it is, but since we have Events Recorded in Memory, SOMETHING sure the hell happened.

      The logical error would be an overextension of evidence to a faulty conclusion (like assuming that since we can breathe on the ground, we can breathe anywhere above the water), not begging the question--heck, it's not even a question!

    2. Re:not really an objective review by mithras · · Score: 1

      "Begging the question" is a phrase that has a specific meaning, which is probably why the poster put the phrase in quotes.

      There are many types of logical fallacies, and "begging the question" is one of them. When someone is "begging the question" it means that they are starting their argument by assuming the thing that they are trying to prove.

      Back on topic: the author of the book in question begins with the assumption that aliens exist, and then proceeds to examine evidence in favor of that assumption, and concludes that aliens exist. IOW, he "begs the question." And, why, exactly, is this on Slashdot?

    3. Re:not really an objective review by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Back on topic: the author of the book in question begins with the assumption that aliens exist, and then proceeds to examine evidence in favor of that assumption, and concludes that aliens exist. IOW, he "begs the question."

      I still disagree.

      He takes "aliens exist" as a given, and goes on to examine what they are like based on the "evidence," as it is.

      This ISN'T a book that purports to ask "do aliens exist?" It's a differnet question entirely.

      Sorta like a book that describes how .NET will change the world isn't asking if .NET will change the world--it's just a propaganda piece/review for .NET.

    4. Re:not really an objective review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still disagree.

      Well, you're still wrong. So just be quiet.

  33. uh-huh by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    highly readable and extremely illuminating for the common reader with no prior knowledge of extraterrestrial existence

    In other words read this book, and you'll know ET exists, too.

    I have no doubt there are UFO's. I think it's far more than likely there is life "out there." But conspiracy theories about simmering gov't schemes to keep us from the truth ... make me ill. How can we go from the scientific proposition that extraterrestrial life and exists to the unscientific speculation and leap of faith demanded in these volumes?

    Also explored in great detail is the intelligence of our sea life

    OK, there's a creative twist. Methinks they needed more pages to call it a book.

    The author's use of a plethora of written documentation ably enhances his description of personal civilian and military accounts...

    "Plethora" actually means excess or superabundance. Here the plan appears to be that if you pile enough of it on...

    Forgive me for skepticism, but speculations like these are not a whit different from theories that man did not land of the Moon or that President Bush orchestrated 9/11, and so on. They sound kind of interesting, suggestive evidence can be shown, but the web of speculation leads nowhere. I'm tired of con artists like this.

    I emphasize that these people are not mere wackos, if they are wacko at all. They are scam artists who do not deserve your money. Visit the good old library instead, or drink deep of the wonderful nonsense available for free on the Web.

  34. If you liked this book by Hanna's+Goblin+Toys · · Score: 3, Funny

    You'll also enjoy this similarly excellent piece.

    1. Re:If you liked this book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and at $103 + S/H, what a deal!

    2. Re:If you liked this book by mobets · · Score: 1

      I chuckled when I saw the title, but my amusement was replaced by confusion when I saw the price. How can they charge $103 for a 112 page book?

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    3. Re:If you liked this book by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      How can they charge $103 for a 112 page book?

      Didn't L. Frank Baum write The Wizard of Oz books? This book is probably very rare and is, obviously, only of interest to collectors. That's probably why it is priced at almost $1.00 per page.

      codemonkey

    4. Re:If you liked this book by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck is that book so expensive? $103 for a 125 page paperback about Santa Clause written for 4-8 year olds???

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  35. Oh God, No! by MoThugz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How did this get categorized as Space news? Until there is hard evidence that UFOs actually exist, then it will forever be viewed as a fragment of a person's imagination.

    Even if UFOs really exist, what makes people so inclined to believe that they are chariots of alien civilizations? And while we're going paranormal, why can't we consider alternative reasoning such as UFOs could possibly be ghosts from the future. Do ghosts have to be from the past to be considered as ghosts in the sense of the word?

    However, like most people I think that a more logical explanation for UFO sightings is that it is some glitch in the sky... strange manifestation of star/sunlight, mini auroras, heck even mutant glow-in-the-dark birds for all it could be.

    Seemed more feasable if compared to a Starcraft theory IMHO.

    1. Re:Oh God, No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean figment of one's imagination, not fragment?

    2. Re:Oh God, No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what bugs me about you holier-than-thou-skeptics. If the *proof* of UFOs existing is being withheld from the public, how does one prove their case to the skeptics?
      Just look at what the U.S. government has done. Infected black males with venerial diseases and withheld treatment over their lifetimes to study effects; or, inject people with radioactive chemicals and do the same thing as previously mentioned; run brothels in (1960s) San Francisco and slip LSD in client drinks to study the effects; conduct nuclear tests west of Los Angeles to study how far the winds will carry the fallout... Oh yeah, make U.S. soldiers experience the atomic bomb close up? You know, so they die of leukemia? Yep, no conspiracy at all.

      When politicians refuse to address the issue; when the government keeps everything a secret for no good reason, shouldn't that raise your red alarm that you are being lied to? What of Barry Goldwater's comment regarding the infamous "Hanger 18"?

      How come the majority of the data collected from the Viking probes are no longer retrieveable? Do you really believe the government is so stupid (NASA) to not back up their data? How about that probe a couple of years ago that blew up because some engineer at NASA used English measurements instead of Metric? Uhm, hello, what scientist and what engineer involved in the space program or the military uses English measurements? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the US Military switch to Metric back in 1956? Really, if you believe those excuses, I'd like to sell you large tracts of land in Lemuria...

      Or...even better...how people believe condoms will protect against HIV transmission when the virus is so many microns smaller than the walls that make the latex condom up...

    3. Re:Oh God, No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The skeptics need to realize something, it's in our best interests to hope that inter-stellar travel is achievable at some point in an intelligent species history, and if it is it would pretty much mean we've likely been visited on at least one but likely many more times during the rather short history of human intelligence on our planet.

      Recently while watching Taken I was struck by how interesting the underlying story was and thought to myself what would happen if you stuck this same story back in history say, oh let's just say 2000 years or so, give or take a year or two. Well, you'd come up with this special person with special powers annointed from above!! (sound familiar?)

      At that time, such powers would be seen as God like, or this person could be the "Son of God", etc., the idea of extra-terrestial beings was beyond our ancestors at that time.

      So, here we are today, we live on a planet where a shocking majority have absolutely no trouble believing in a "creator" or some "God" even though there is absolutely zero proof other than "faith" and yet these very same beings cannot believe life exists outside our planet or if they can believe it's possible refuse to believe any of them travel and possibly have visited us before.

      Almost every story in the religous writings on this planet are just as explainable to alien intervention as they are to any "God" figure. If you ask me the alien theory is much more logical and likely, after all, we naturally skew stories as they are retold over time, many of the "miracles" could be achieved by technology not yet available in those days.

      I also have trouble believing that 2000 years ago there were several "prophets" sent to earth, or given messages directly from "God", but apparently this all stopped and in these modern times we've either been abandoned or those past stories are exagerated slightly or something.

      I've been watching the PBS specials on Islam, like every other religion it seems to be little more than a cult. Mohammed was a leader yes, but getting messages from a divine source I'm not so sure about. Although they claim he was a simple man who couldn't read and write he had also traveled extensively in other areas and learned about other religions, I think he just used this knowledge to offer hope to his people and try and bring peace to the warzone he called home.

      I see no proof of any God or creator (although some claim us being here is proof), I have however read the more interesting sighting stories, the ones that even to this day have no answer and were observed by more than one reputable person. There's some interesting questions here.

      Think of it this way, IF inter-stellar travel is possible then the chances we have been visited are likely 100%, after all, any species who attempts to travel between the stars are likely explorers just like our early ocean travelers and just like our current and future astronauts. They will seek out life bearing planets to find out how that planet is progressing and to see for themselves how other intelligences grow.

      If inter-stellar travel isn't possible mind you, then we're doomed just like any other intelligent beings before and after us, we will never be able to escape the eventual death of our star and therefore any proof of our existance will eventually be lost for all time.

    4. Re:Oh God, No! by cbv · · Score: 1
      They do exists, just as you said, they aren't alien.

      Make that "They do exists, just as you said, they aren't necessarily alien"

    5. Re:Oh God, No! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And while we're going paranormal, why can't we consider alternative reasoning such as UFOs could possibly be ghosts from the future.

      McCoy asks: "Why would a ghost need a spaceship?"

      Anyhow, I would rank aliens as more likely than ghosts, because they don't require supernatural explanations, just advanced technology. IOW, 100% proof of ghosts would upset the current scientific establishment more than 100% proof of aliens.

      How did this get categorized as Space news? Until there is hard evidence that UFOs actually exist, then it will forever be viewed as a fragment of a person's imagination.

      That is kind of too all-or-nothing (boolean) IMO. I tend to break the power of evidence into 5 categories:

      1. I am certain beyond a reasonable doubt that X is true
      2. X is probably true
      3. I hesitate a conclusion, but the mystery deserves more study
      4. Interesting mystery, but not worth investigating
      5. Mystery is probably nonsense and a complete waste of time

  36. And why is this here? by Badgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only motivation I can figure out is that the book shares part of its name with a popular RTS. This is more off topic than our usual off topics.

    The ancient astronaut theory, though not DEBUNKED, has often rested in shaky evidence, assumptions, and outright hoaxes. The Dropa hoax being a classic one - and toss in Strichin's bizarre mutilation of mythology, or Von Daniken's questionalbe ideas . . . the support for it isn't enthusing.

    A good look at some of the Fortean Times issues will go a long way into putting these theories in perspective.

    What's next, one of David Icke's books here? Bring on the Reptillians!

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:And why is this here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I certainly found the article title confusing.

      "there is certainly a basis..." No there isn't. End of discussion. I don't have time to debate flat earth theorists either.

    2. Re:And why is this here? by richieb · · Score: 2
      The ancient astronaut theory, though not DEBUNKED, has often rested in shaky evidence, assumptions, and outright hoaxes.

      One of the properties of a scientific theory is that in principle you can present evedence to refute it. What evidence could I present, in principle, that would refute this theory?

      If there is none, then it's not a theory. I just a fairy tale, like Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny...

      Wait, did I tell you I was abducted by te Easter Bunny.....

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    3. Re:And why is this here? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The ancient astronaut theory, though not DEBUNKED, has often rested in shaky evidence....

      I am always skeptical of such evidence based on "patterns" or "looks like" kind of things. The human mind is very good at finding patterns that are purely coincidental. When I was a kid, there was a part of the wall texture (splatter-like) that was a splitting image of snoopy on a skateboard. Every morning I would wake up and see ol' snoopy right there. (I couldn't find Elvis, though.)

      Similar things happen with ancient artifacts: people see stuff that resembles modern technology or modern sci fi, and go ga ga over it.

      If you look at millions of temple drawings designed by creative people with active imaginations (or smoked too many mushrooms), some of them are *bound* to look like astronauts or rockets just out of the laws of probability. The rocket is perhaps just a giant penis.

      That would be great if somebody found a moon crater-set that looked just like a penguin, Linus, or Stallman. People would then create religious cults around them........oh wait, slashdotters *already* do that :-)

    4. Re:And why is this here? by Asprin · · Score: 2


      The ancient astronaut theory, though not DEBUNKED, has often rested in shaky evidence, assumptions, and outright hoaxes.

      One of the properties of a scientific theory is that in principle you can present evedence to refute it. What evidence could I present, in principle, that would refute this theory?

      If there is none, then it's not a theory. I just a fairy tale, like Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny...


      Ok, we're getting dangerously close to tickling one of my personal pet peeves, so before I fly off the handle and chastise a number of you in a gentlemanly fashion, let me just point out a couple of things:

      1) A *LOT* of folks don't get this -- even a number of people who have some formal scientific training -- but PROCEDURES and EXPERIMENTAL METHODS are the only things that can be "scientific" or "not scientific" based on how they are conducted. When the words "scientific" and "unscientific" are used to describe theories, proofs, evidence, principles or explanations, there is almost always sloppy and incorrect thinking involved somewhere, regardless of what Hollywood is telling you.

      2) The scientific method demands that any observations or evidence be accompanied by similar observations on appropriate control groups. Furthermore, such observations or evidence must be independently verified before any facutal conclusions can be drawn.

      In short, we may or may not be observing visitors from other worlds, but until we have reproducible evidence and control groups, none of this can be considered science. BTW, so you don't think I'm picking on you just to be a jerk blowing off steam, Mathematics and Computer Programming aren't science either. The results are valid, but must be measured for correctness by a different yardstick than the scientific method.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    5. Re:And why is this here? by richieb · · Score: 2
      In short, we may or may not be observing visitors from other worlds, but until we have reproducible evidence and control groups, none of this can be considered science. BTW, so you don't think I'm picking on you just to be a jerk blowing off steam, Mathematics and Computer Programming aren't science either. The results are valid, but must be measured for correctness by a different yardstick than the scientific method.

      No problem. Thanks for taking time to explain. I was just being lazy.

      You're right about Math, an computer programming is just engineering. I always liked math because there you can get as close as possible to "absolute truth", even if it's only relative to some axioms. Science and engineering are a lot messier.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    6. Re:And why is this here? by Asprin · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it sucks having to actually "touch" things. :)

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    7. Re:And why is this here? by Badgerman · · Score: 2

      One of the properties of a scientific theory is that in principle you can present evedence to refute it. What evidence could I present, in principle, that would refute this theory?

      If there is none, then it's not a theory. I just a fairy tale, like Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny...


      Nicely said. I threw out the word "theory" too casually. I should have called it a speculation or concept.

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  37. Free Summary by GhostHater · · Score: 1

    They have a free summary (cliff notes) of this book at Worksucks.tk

  38. Just what I was looking for. by Xandar01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can use this Starcraft book to hold up that rickety table in my Startcraft RV. That will keep the PC still while I play my Starcraft game. This is just what I needed so I could enjoy the ultimate Starcraft gaming experience!

    --
    Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
  39. Re: is google necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a search engine necessary to find out that someone writing "non fiction" with the assumption aliens exist is not quite right in the head? This is news for psychos, not nerds.

  40. I remember that, too! by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    From a dozen years ago, in bio class I think. Really amazing.

    Now, what I really wanted was some footage and nervous response from the perspective of the hapless crustacean. Can you imagine? No! No! Go away! Argggghhhhhhh!

  41. Carl Sagan Was 1/4 Space Alien! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what the translated crop circle in my wheat fields says!

  42. Genetic Engineering... by scruggs_style · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens"

    If I'd engineered most of the people today, I'd be embarrased to admit it.

    1. Re:Genetic Engineering... by Neon+Elephant · · Score: 1

      If I'd engineered most of the people today, I'd be embarrased to admit it.

      Is it any wonder, then, that we're having to search for intelligent life?

      --

      --
      "'quines' quines" quines "quines"
    2. Re:Genetic Engineering... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --If I'd engineered most of the people today, I'd be embarrased to admit it.--

      Why do you think all those Aliens are so sneaky?

    3. Re:Genetic Engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you think God feels?

    4. Re:Genetic Engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, I feel for whomever did so when I stroll into Wal-Mart...don't have anything to do on a free day? Try counting teeth amongst customers at the nearest Wal-Mart...

  43. Proof! by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Scientific proof of whether distant life forms and existence are legitimate is yet another bone of contention between UFOlogists and skeptics alike,

    A bone of contention, in that there isn't any. As Sagan said, all it takes to prove this is one artifact -- doesn't even have to be magical hi-tech, just having a different isotopic balance than terrestrial would be proof of extra-terrestrial origin. But in the thousands of claimed "contacts", not one single artifact has been left -- not an alien cigarette butt or Coke can. It's obviously a massive conspiracy.

    Fucking kooks like this is why real SETI gets such a bad rap.

    1. Re:Proof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rumor has it that when SETI was testing its algorithms, it used usenet and web sites for test data.


      It found no signs of intelligent life.

    2. Re:Proof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the evidence is withheld by government authorities, then you cannot prove their existence by your own criteria. That is circular logic, you tool...

  44. Proof of Elvis by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The poster claims:
    > it's easy to make jokes about Area 51 or Roswell, there is certainly a basis for those jokes and rumors. Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument

    Lots of people speculate and argue that Elvis is still alive. Something must have happened to engender such speculation and argument. Therefore I have proven that Elvis is not dead (or is undead).

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Proof of Elvis by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here is the logical proof:

      1. Elvis is Big. (given, observation)
      2. Big is Beautiful. (given, cliche)
      3. Elvis is Beautiful. (Transitive Property, 1, 2)
      4. Beauty is Truth. (given, poetry)
      5. Elvis is Truth. (Transitive Property, 3, 4)
      6. The Truth is Out There. (given, The X Files)
      7. Elvis is Out There. (Transitive Property, 5, 6)

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    2. Re:Proof of Elvis by dracken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Elvis is alive.

      If there is a proof proving elvis is alive, elvis can be accepted to be alive. This is the proof. So elvis is alive.

  45. ET Isn't the Only Unusual Phenomenon Going On Here by 9jack9 · · Score: 1
    A Google search for "Denise M. Clark" yields 10 pages of hits, most being book reviews of various types.

    Even more interesting, a Google search for the phrase "The existence of extraterrestrials has long been a subject" gives 3 pages of hits.

    I guess that doesn't necessarily invalidate the book review, but it does show that this isn't a review from a slashdotter to the slashdot community, which is what I thought the slashdot book reviews were. Maybe I was wrong, I dunno.

  46. Area 51 by photon317 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    The accepted non-lunatic-ufo-watcher explanation of Area 51 is that it's an Air Force testing grounds for top secret new aircraft - the next generations of things like the SR-71. I believe slashdot had some coverage not that long ago about the unveiling (finally) of the Aurora test craft, which matches many of the "spacecraft" description from Area 51 watchers. Aurora is nifty, but it's clearly not alien inspired, just human engineered.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  47. What next? by The_Shadows · · Score: 2

    The obvious sequel to this book will be:

    Starcraft: Brood Wars

    Zergling Rush!!!

  48. UFO stories: can't even assume they're not made up by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...I was having a discussion with an intelligent, but credulous acquaintance who had just read a book by someone from one of the "respectable" UFO organizations (APRO or NICAP, I don't remember which).

    He was extremely impressed by a very detailed report on some UFO fragments that had been shown to be some kind of metal of such extreme purity that it could not possibly have originated on Earth. The metallurgical tests had been conducted by a respected scientist in some university in South America.

    I was arguing that with UFO reports, you cannot rule out the possibility that they were just made up in whole cloth. He thought this was unlikely. I suggested that we try to contact the scientist who had done the tests and find out what he had to say.

    Of course, the book itself was written in a popular style without any formal citations or references you could follow up... just a line or two mentioning "Professor so-and-so in the Department of Metallurgy at the University of Sao Paulo," or wherever it was.

    Well, we were at the University of Wisconsin, which has a fine library, and with a little investigation we found that the library actually had _the faculty/student directory_ for that university, and it was only a couple of years old.

    Needless to say there was no listing for the cited "scientist," and, indeed, no department that seemed to match the department in which he was supposed to have worked.

    My friend was shaken, but not convinced. After all, this wasn't some fly-by-night organization we were dealing with, this was APRO. (Or NICAP).

  49. You humans are missing the point! by new+death+barbie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Look, people -- and I use the term loosely -- the truth is right before your eyes! Is is OUR fault that you only have two of them? (Well, err, yes, it is, actually, sorry about that.)


    Look closely: Der Voron. DER VORON. Is that a HUMAN name? By the Great Sceptre of Nebulon, what does it take with your species?


    You'd think that you would have clued in with Erik Van Daniken, but, noooooo. SO WE'RE TRYING AGAIN. And we'll KEEP trying until somebody down here finally gets it right!

    Look, I'll spell it out for you: The whole reason for the secrecy is... oops, boss is coming...sorry, got to go.


    LOOK TO THE SKIES. WAIT FOR THESE SIGNS: YIELD. DO NOT WALK. DEER CROSSING.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  50. Re:UFO stories: can't even assume they're not made by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

    I forgot to say: this was in the seventies...

  51. Distance Between Spacefaring Worlds? by reallocate · · Score: 2

    You know, no matter how you run those numbers, I keep wondering why anyone would bother to visit us, even if they could? What's here for them?

    That's particularly so if we assume that the speed of light cannot be exceeded. Given that, I'd be interested in seeing some speculation on the average distance between spacefaring worlds. Great distances between these worlds would dampen chances for discovery, much less travel.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Distance Between Spacefaring Worlds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With God, nothing is impossible brother. If he could create the Earth in seven days and man in one day, imagine what he could do to bend and warp space? I believe it's possible to travel faster than light if you are God, just not if you are a man. He imposed limits on us because he knew we wouldn't be able to handle the power that he has. Little by little he's let us learn more, which is why we have computers, and the internet and... nukes. We've proven with nukes that we will use power unwisely just to further our personal state. That is why we cannot yet travel into the future or across the galaxies. But... as we evolve into more benevolent and intelligent beings, we will slowly gain those powers as God sees fit. Do you think that the neanderthal man of the past could have dealt with a Pentium? Or even an X-Box? No, of course not. God saw at that time that we were not ready for those kinds of things. But since we have evolved (with his guidance) into beings that CAN handle them, we now have them. This is all according to his plan. Read your bibles my brothers, and you will see what I speak is the truth. God created all and has dominion over all. So.. in an indirect way, God created all of the greates OSes: Linux, Windows, MacOS, BeOS, even the little Amiga OS. If it wasn't for him, none of this would exist. Be thankful brothers, and rejoice in the knowledge that God IS the ultimate coder. He created us, computers, the aliens, and even George W. Bush. And many many more... Don't poo poo these ideas, because they are the truth. It may be difficult to accept, but accept it on faith. You must believe.

    2. Re:Distance Between Spacefaring Worlds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dig the whole story except the "you must believe" at the end.
      How about "you must evolve into more benevolent and inteliigent beings"? Isn't that the ultimate goal in your little speech?
      Or do you consider that can only happens if you believe? Or maybe it will happen anyway, according to the plan?
      also what was the point of tearing the tower of babel down and not the space station?

    3. Re:Distance Between Spacefaring Worlds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tower of babel was offensive to the creator. It wasn't the technology itself that offended him, but the sentiment. God will continue to dress down men who claim that they will "be like god" or "be a god". That is why KMFDM's albums didn't fare too well in the long run. The song Godlike offended the creator.

  52. UFO underpants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    1. Claim that the missing link can't be found because the missing link is an alien.
    2. ...
    3. Profit.

  53. Der Voron by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    Amazingly close to der Moron.

    1. Re:Der Voron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazingly close to der Moron.

      Which, in turn, is an anagram for Morderon - surely an evil name. Not that we need such extraordinary evidence: Der Voron is an anagram for Donor Rev. I don't know what Rev means in this case (most likely it's short for reverend, and I therefore deduct that he donates priests for the heathen ritual sacrifices our alien invaders are known to take part in).

      Most likely, this book is just a decoy for our alien occupation force's real motives, which is to fight at Satan's side on the second coming of Christ.

      Oh, well - I better post anonymously so I don't get modded into oblivion for this troll^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h can escape or alien masters.
  54. OT, but similar by LenE · · Score: 2

    If Denise Clark is this guy's pseudonym, he should learn from Jon Katz, and just post reviews or treatises of oddball logic under his own name. Before long, he will have legions of devoted fans.

    -- Len

  55. Flim flam by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

    I'll just stick to real, factual intellectual works that will actually expand my horizons about science and astronomy. Among the books I own are "The Demon Haunted World", "Cosmos", and "Billions and Billions by Carl Sagan - "A Breif History of Time" by Hawking, and "Black Holes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne. Why anyone would waste their time on such utter non-sense and psuedo science is beyond me.

    1. Re:Flim flam by JordoCrouse · · Score: 1

      Why anyone would waste their time on such utter non-sense and psuedo science is beyond me.

      Now, if you will excuse me, I have to go get in line to watch Lord of the Rings.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    2. Re:Flim flam by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      The problem here is that The Lord of The Rings is fiction and admits it openly. It is not trying to pass itself off as fact.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:Flim flam by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

      But Star Wars had a partially nude Carrie Fisher and now sports Natalie Portman in skin tight, white vixen uniforms. No alien fish-like humanoid from Beta Hydri can contend with that.

  56. Alien Manipulation? by Alethes · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Alien Manipulation? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Fun with Scientology.

      Walk into the cult indoctrination center, walk up to the first person you see and yell "ARRRRRGGG!!! You're crawling with Body Theatans!!!!!." then puch them in the face and say "Next time you give your house away give it to me you pussy."

  57. This explains everything ... by airrage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy: The Universe.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  58. hmmmm by praetorian_x · · Score: 0

    among other things, the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens.

    Hmm, funny. I thought modern man was genetically engineered by God...

  59. Dragons be here by Choco-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For as long as man has realized that there are boundaries he can see, but can not effectively explore, his imagination has run amok and placed all manner of fanciful creations into them. "dragons be here" can be found on unexplored maritime areas on old maps, yeti signs are found in impassible mountain ranges, and sirens in the ocean depths.

    This doesn't mean that there aren't monsters in these areas, mind you, but rather than man's propensity to create them in his mind usually results in more monsters than actually exist. The unexplored regions of space today are no different than the middle of the atlantic 400 years ago.

    1. Re:Dragons be here by Synn · · Score: 2

      I wish I could mod this up. Humans have been creating fantasies forever. I think it's part of our nature that we want to live in a world full of wonder, excitement and danger. When the world is dull and boring, we make crap up.

      Today we have terrorists lurking behind every corner, 3 years ago the world was going to explode because of the Y2K bug. Meanwhile ghosts inhabit the old house down the street and aliens are impregnating our women and mutilating our cattle.

      I guess it keeps life from being boring.

    2. Re:Dragons be here by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      Pssst.... I got one of those in my garage.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    3. Re:Dragons be here by Suidae · · Score: 2

      While making an accurate map of a small town (for the pizza delivery guys) in texas, I thought it would be entertaining to put in a map dragon. While searching for a nice looking one, I ran across some web pages stating that the whole map dragon thing was actually pretty rare, only a few authetic antique maps had them.

      So, is the map dragon thing really more fiction than fact?

  60. Anal probe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groan... not another book extoling the virtues of anal probing...

  61. Reviewer a shill or a nut by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Egad, this woman does like this book. No fewer than 13 reviews: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (repeated here and here), 14?.

    My first thought was the Denise M. Clark was a shill, but if she is, she's incompetant. By using the same name over and over, it becomes easy to track her down. My next thought was that she was a UFO nut trying to spread the word. Possible, but she has reviewed many other books.

    My new theory is that she's desperately trying for fame through the unlikely technique of publishing reviews on as many sites as possible. (Check out her web page, "The on-line home of author/reviewer Denise M. Clark". Either that, or she's a space alien here to prepare us for use as slaves and food for her hideous grey masters. If it's the former, she's wasting our time. If it's the latter, I suppose that would could as news for nerds.

    1. Re:Reviewer a shill or a nut by Nintendork · · Score: 2

      Nice information. I find it interesting that Slashdot isn't listed under her links page. Timothy is such a tool.

    2. Re:Reviewer a shill or a nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock her, she has the same birthday as me.

    3. Re:Reviewer a shill or a nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      She has spent the last two weeks bombarding me with requests to publish her review in my now defunct magazine. For some reason, WE'RE OUT OF BUSINESS didn't seem to phase her. She was so adamant that we publish her, she got Der Veron to start begging. Both of them are super shady sounding. Just this morning I got this from him (gender?):

      "I am thinking over how to help your edition to re-start... Perhaps the following way could be successful? I have a photo of my close friend, she is 36, but looks 20 years old, and people often think her 14 years old daughter is her sister. How about publishing a little article about this woman? Her specialty is IT support spec. (Note: there is absolutely nothing that might be considered as "erotic" on this photo.)"

      Still, have to give them credit for the size of their collective huevos.

    4. Re:Reviewer a shill or a nut by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      This is obviously a ploy to prepare us for telepathic biotinkering for the upcoming Shadow war. It's published by der Vorlon, fer chrissakes....

  62. Beer, yum by johnlein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When it comes to UFOs, I don't hold much of them or people that believe in them. I lived in the aria of EAFB in CA and there where some rumors of the military having one there and if you drove up towards Las Vegas you could see sings for ALIAN FREE JERCKY. I'm not quite sure what that was supposed to be. As to "something happening" I can only say that nothing happened where I lived, there was nothing and is nothing But there is of course on reason some people see UFO. BEER The reason for my typos, bad grammar and even posting to a topic this bad, isn't beer the greatest?

  63. Unidentified? by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    Unidentified Flying Objects: Starcraft

    Unidentified? Is this guy on crack? Just click on the Stargate and it says exactly what kind of Protoss units you can create.

  64. Re:ET Isn't the Only Unusual Phenomenon Going On H by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
    A Google search for "Denise M. Clark" [google.com] yields 10 pages of hits, most being book reviews of various types

    Well, one of these is her website,, ("The on-line home of author/reviewer Denise M. Clark -- If you love action in your romance, this is the place for you!") where you find she has some kind of "editorial services" in that you can get her or her friends to review your book.

    And an article on the book is at an even weirder site, weeklyuniverse.com, with some extracts on how aliens genetically engineered Cromagnons. (They must have, because there is no missing link!).

  65. What a Loon by Cpt_Corelli · · Score: 2

    He is also trying to sell the concept of a film at this address

    Why don't we just ask him what he is up to? His email address is: dervoron@linkeseite.zzn.com

  66. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" by Slartibartfast · · Score: 1

    Carl Sagan said it first, and I agree. I -want- to believe in extra-terrestrial life forms; I fully support and believe in SETI.

    However, until I see -proof-, not silly "the government is out to get us" conspiracy theory stuff, I ain't buyin. Show me a radio signal from a remote star! Please! That's something that would be both very hard to fake, -and- something very hard to hide. Barring something along those lines, or equivilently hard to forge, and easy to prove, I ain't buyin.

  67. What about the Brittish goverment by Sarin · · Score: 2

    weren't they supposed to make some ufo-related documents public a few weeks ago, I read something like that on slashdot, anyone got a link?

    1. Re:What about the Brittish goverment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing it on the BBC and there wasn't much news. Here's a BBC story that didn't say much. A google search for Rendlesham turned up a much better article here.

    2. Re:What about the Brittish goverment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the files themselves, see The Smoking Gun.

  68. This is filthy... by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    If UFOs/aliens exist, prove it. Show me the "starcraft". Show me the alien. Give me the proof, and then I'll believe it. Science is not based on secondhand accounts and shady eyewitness reports (at least, not the good, solid science). As another poster pointed out, using this same logic, I could prove Elvis is still alive:
    (1) There are eyewitness accounts of Elvis walking around after his death.
    (2) QED, Elvis is alive.

    That's ridiculous. That's not science, and that's not how human knowledge progresses.

    "UFO-ology" and "cryptozoology" don't deserve to have "ology" attached to them.

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  69. Engineered by aliens? by jhughes · · Score: 2

    Well, that would explain a lot about my family....

  70. Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, but.. by maynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... *sigh* Since I've admitted this on /. and around the net before, I might as well make a fool of myself and admit it again. In September of 1994 I saw a silver disc shaped object in broad daylight perform outrageous maneuvers. Yes, I was completely sober. No, they weren't lights in the sky. No, it wasn't a balloon, helicopter, or airplane at an odd viewing angle.

    What I saw:

    At the time I had just moved to Cincinnati and was driving back from a flea market with two other friends. We had just stopped at a gas station to fill up the van in which we were driving. The driver (a female) stepped inside to pay the bill while my other friend went inside to take a leak. I stepped outside and walked away from the van (and gas pumps) to smoke a butt.

    Looking past the road was a large grass covered crest which dropped down and then much farther back came up into a tree covered hill/mountain. I noticed what I first thought was a silver balloon, about the size of a quarter of my thumbnail at arms length, bobbing and spinning sort of, just hovering. As I was watching it began to descend, wavering like a leaf, coming down back and forth very slowly. It was at this point that I thought that it was behaving strangely, so I watched closer. It abruptly stopped and hovered for a bit longer. Then it jumped toward me (determined by it growing larger in my field of view to maybe half to two thirds my thumbnail), jumped straight up at high speed, and then abruptly crossed from the left to the right of my horizon in a large arc, diminishing in size as it moved until it disappeared from a point into nothingness (which I take to mean it moved farther away from me as it crossed the sky). This happened *very* fast - a second or two, no more. What struck me about the last abrupt movement is that it didn't appear to accelerate at all. Since I must assume it behaved under the laws of physics, this means the acceleration was so fast and at such a high G-force, that it happened outside the limitations of my awareness - which would certainly have crushed any occupants inside.

    Since I have only one pair of eyes, and the object was far enough away to be focused at infinity, there's no way to determine distance or size. I have NO FUCKING IDEA what I saw. No one else saw it and I have no way to "prove" that what I saw is anything but a mirage or some other visual illusion and/or artifact of the eye. Like all eye witness accounts (whether in court or in circumstances such as these) lack of corroboration should equal disbelief on the reader's part. I would only request that those who reply to this at least assume I am telling the truth about the events I witnessed, even if you believe that what I saw is some sort of visual illusion or misinterpretation of the events.

    All I will say is that I believe I witnessed a physical object move in ways I've never seen anything else move, prosaic aircraft or not. I did not see any occupants inside the object, nor was I "abducted" or any of that shit. This statement does NOT mean I believe aliens are buzzing our skies. But it has decidedly shaken what was once my opinion that UFO's aren't even worth discussion time, never mind scientific analysis. I'm quite bothered by what I saw, and more to the point I'm bothered by the instant assumption that those who see these kinds of things are a kook for simply having viewed and publicly stated their accounts. Which is why I'm reluctant to post this. I bet I'm not alone. But WTF, this is just /. And honestly, I think there would be value in trained University scientists conducting a new investigation into this phenomena, preferably privately funded. I have no idea what this is about, but now I think something worthy of investigation is going on.

    JMO,
    --Maynard

  71. This guy has flawed arguments, very flawed. by zaqattack911 · · Score: 2

    I'm all supportive of the possibiliy of Extra-Terrestrial life.

    However, this guy really doesn't go about things too intelligently. As, soon as I read the following quote in the post I realised this is a total waste of time.

    "Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument."

    So let me get this straight... because a few people started a rumor about area51, and others promptly fell victim to these rumors.. that means SOMETHING must of happened? Right...
    Are you telling me because so many religions believe in god, that this means there must be some sort of god?

    Like anything else, our race feels lonely... some people NEED to believe in god, just like they need to believe in aliens. It's not about proof, or science. It's about hope.

    I (and others) are simply comforted by the idea that there are other curious civilizations out there, that are alone the way we are.

    --Zuchini

  72. Fermi's paradox by s20451 · · Score: 2

    That's a minor modification of Fermi's paradox. The great physicist Enrico Fermi observed that an intelligent race should be able to colonize a galaxy-sized region of space in around 1 to 10 million years, even without faster-than-light travel.

    The argument runs like this: one planet sends colonies to several neighboring star systems, then each of those colonizes their neighbors, and so on. The region of colonization expands cubically with time (because the radius of colonization is directly proportional to time).

    Fermi said, since 1-10 million years is very short with respect to the age of the galaxy, we should see evidence of intelligence everywhere. So, if intelligent life is common, where is everybody?

    We can make all kinds of arguments like: alien intelligence leaves no trace of itself, isn't interested in us, or isn't interested in exploration. However, the one data point we have (ourselves) is very bad at cleaning up after itself, isn't shy at all about going after resources wherever they exist, and is very keen on exploration. There's no reason why other intelligence would be significantly different.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Fermi's paradox by saider · · Score: 1

      Intelligent life may very well be out there, but it doesn't need to be technilogical. There are a good many human cultures that did not advance and were fairly static with regards to development. Then there are the other species who posess a high degree of intelligence, yet lack any technical ability.

      My guess is that we are the first technilogical species.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:Fermi's paradox by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      There are many unexplained artifacts lying around this planet alone. Who knows what we'll find when we finally go and visit the rest of the Solar System.
      Fermi's Paradox relies on the fact that, if there are super-advanced extra-terrestrials out there, we'll be able to spot them, or understand what they've left behind, which is not necessarily the case.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  73. kekekekeke ^________^ by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    fu stfu i sed no zerg rush wtf!!!!1!!!

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  74. Starcraft II by Captain+Morgan · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed the first game so much, wonder when Blizzard is going to make a second one... I've even been playing through the original games single player missions again under Wine.

    Chris

  75. Starcraft: by Isbiten · · Score: 1

    My life for aidur! Oh wait we are talking about the game right? :)

    --
    I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
  76. Alternative ideas for a slow news day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    /. REALLY needs to start posting porno on slow news days. I for one prefer my masturbation to be physical not mental.

  77. No doubt? by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have no doubt there are UFO's.

    If you mean UFO's like, "hey, what the fuck is that dot in the sky?" I agree.

    If you mean UFO's like, "wow, look at that tractor beam pulling up Homer Simpson, no wait, too tractor beams," then I have to wonder how you have NO DOUBT they exist.

    I mean, there is no legitimate evidence whatsoever.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:No doubt? by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, there is no legitimate evidence whatsoever.

      Hey -- you saw it on TV, didn't you? The Simpsons has been my principal news source for a dozen years now. The rest is just cartoons.

  78. There already is a topichumor by yerricde · · Score: 1

    What picture would work for "you've got to be fucking kidding".

    How about a bald bare foot?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  79. Nut. by ctimes2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Either that, or she's a space alien here to prepare us for use as slaves and food for her hideous grey masters

    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
    1. Re:Nut. by stubblehead · · Score: 1

      She's all about conspiracies herself. I'm sure he lends her a hand when she comes out with something new herself. His wife perhaps? (I still think the book looks interesting - and short enough to 'steal' by reading in the chain-store's nooks.)
      BTW - Kang [D] in 2004!

      --

      Rock!
  80. Re:Umm, Just Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about Studio 54???? How many aliens have been there?

  81. Re:Questions evolutionists don't want to answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey - mod this guy up - "insightful"!

    -doh!

  82. Re:Why do people go to the zoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That or they just find it amusing to put on the fancy dress costumes and buzz the planet.

    Hell maybe it's just one immortal alien on a mission.

    PS: If you don't get the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy references, go read one of the pre-requisites for visiting a geek haven.

  83. Do the research....don't be a weenie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you nerds watch Star Wars and Star Trek, and you like open-source. Do you like an open mind?

    Disclosure Project

    Zecharia Sitchin

    Richard Hoagland

    1. Re:Do the research....don't be a weenie by maddogdelta · · Score: 1
      Do you like an open mind?
      Unfortunately for the ufo crowd, their definition of an 'open mind' is "accept my explanation or nothing!"

      A 'closed' mind sees the lights in the sky, watches it head towards the airport in the same pattern as the daytime aircraft flight, and assumes it is an aircraft. The ufoers hoot and hollar about how it must be a ufo.

      this guy is a crackpot. If he has real evidence for his ufo, i want to see it. Otherwise, ignore him.

      Also, the concept of ufo's landing on earth isn't new. the loony-tune (with apologies to bugs) von Daaniken claimed the same thing.

      And it's all hooey.

      "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" Sagan. The whole book requires a lot more proof than they want to offer.

      --
      -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:Do the research....don't be a weenie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above guy obviously didn't read the links.

      You don't have to freak out, dude. It just means we're probably not alone.

      more Sitchin with videos

      more stuff, too

      the Dogon Tribe

      More on the Dogon

    3. Re:Do the research....don't be a weenie by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      Do you like an open mind?

      A mind is like a wound, if its too open it'll get infected. Seriously, you should practice your critical thinking skills a bit.

    4. Re:Do the research....don't be a weenie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out:

      10th planet

      "legit science"

      That sounds like Science to me. So, we'll be open-minded skeptics. We'll collate information and wait for verifiable proof. That's science.

    5. Re:Do the research....don't be a weenie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. Spawn More Overlords. by zrk · · Score: 5, Funny


    You've not enough minerals...

    1. Re:Spawn More Overlords. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the Protoss...Zerg people are more proactive. Instead of whining like the Protoss, they give a real solution: "MINE MORE MINERALS!"

    2. Re:Spawn More Overlords. by lvdrproject · · Score: 1
      You must construct, additional, pylons.
  85. Even better. by juuri · · Score: 2

    There is another special that shows an octopus navigating a maze on a daily basis. The octopus gets faster and faster each day because he remembers the layout. So the scientists then place moving gates and walls. The octopus quickly learns the timing of these to enable himself to get to the end of the maze (and to the food) in as fast a way as possible.

    Octopus are damn smart. Compared with Kia birds they may be the next most underestimated animal on the planet.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Octopus are damn smart. Compared with Kia birds they may be the next most underestimated animal on the planet.

      Well, not by H. P. Lovecraft, apparently.

  86. Already covered on ST:TNG by coldmist · · Score: 2

    ST:TNG had an episode where Picard went traipsing off looking into microscopic anthropology, or something like that, that his professor was researching when he died.

    Picard runs into Klingons, Romulans, etc. and they have a showdown in a cave where Picard and Beverly plug a chunk of junk into the tricorder that then produces a video from our "parents" who "seeded" our galaxy with DNA to start all of the races in ST.

    So, now that it's all cleared up, what is this guy trying to come up with now that Roddenberry didn't "discover" first?

    Coldmist

    --
    Don't steal. The government hates competition.
  87. Well, yeah.. by howlingmoki · · Score: 1

    >"the author claims that modern man was genetically
    >engineered by aliens"
    >If I'd engineered most of the people today, I'd
    >be embarrased to admit it.


    Why do you think the aliens are *HIDING* from us?

  88. Now, where did that coffee filter go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know that the spectrometer reading from Pioneer 10 of Jupiter - and beamed back to earth via radio - is accurate and correct?

    There are some things you will know in your lifetime, there are many more things you will not know, and there are alot you will think you know, but, in fact, do not.

    Scientific method is one thing. Closing your mind to possibilities is another.

    Do UFOs exist? Yes - we have Radar and thousands of visual and video and still photography sightings and recordings to prove it.

    Can we make absolute conclusions about them being controlled by some intelligence? No. Can we come to the conclusion that alien intelligence does not exist based on what we know about UFOs? No.

    Limiting yourself to hypotheses you agree with, and excluding those that you disagree with is not the scientific method. At some point in every science you must establish what you believe about the system in question (measurement at the subatomic level, and seeming contradictions for example). Understanding this contradiction is the essence of life.

    "The more you learn, the less you know..." - George Harrison - The Beatles (may he rest in peace)

  89. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were the aliens big breasted, like Troi??

  90. Both sides should be slapped with a wet saucer by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Klass is an idiot. He makes small cash off books and other products his peddles. The real proof is online.

    What I have noticed is that most people who publish on this subject are too polarized. It is hard to get the full story.

    I think this comes about because mostly extreme statements and opinions sell. A conclusion-free book is not "compelling". Therefore, either you paint everybody as a saucer-happy hullicinator, or propose top-secret cover-ups if you want to sell books. The skeptics over-emphasize the silliness of "bad" cases, and the believers over-hype the bad cases. Both seem to ignore the best cases for some reason. Probably because they are kind of boring in comparison, dispite being better documented or better observed (more independent witnesses).

    The only author who seems to take a more balanced view is Jacques Vallee. But even he seems to speculate too much, having some funky pet theories.

    I think the subject deserves serious-minded scientific attention. The military-sponsered studies appear to be an attempt to rid itself of being the official handlers of the subject (probably out of embarrassment and press attention they don't know how to handle) rather than people genuinely curious.

    Even Carl Sagan falls victim to some of the "traps of skeptics". He "over thinks" about what alien technology or beings should look like and act. He will say things like, "The abductees must be wrong because the alien medical tools are too bulky. They should have smaller tech if they are advanced." This is sloppy reasoning because we have no idea what such tech would really be like. Perhaps that instrument packs 10,000 medical exams/procedures into one device. (It is not proof for, but not against either.) And, his attitude is Holier-Than-Thow.

    It is such an emotionally-charged subject that getting the real scoop is tough. Too bad.

    1. Re:Both sides should be slapped with a wet saucer by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Even Carl Sagan falls victim to some of the "traps of skeptics"...

      I forgot to mention that Sagan is no longer living. Also, his most famous book on the subject is Demon-Haunted World.

    2. Re:Both sides should be slapped with a wet saucer by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I suggest you go check out Tom Mahood's Blue Fire site. It has not been updated since the late '90s, but he spent a lot of time investigating various area 51-related stuff, and has put a lot of his findings online. He's a skeptic of the whole "alien saucer" theories, but has some interesting ideas of his own about what was going on at area 51.

      Check out his "Hunt for 928" page - He spent a couple of years tracking down a crashed spyplane. Very cool.

  91. Re:UFO stories: can't even assume they're not made by babbage · · Score: 2
    Very interesting. In APRO / NICAP / whatever's defence, it's possible that they were, with all good intentions, citing a supposedly reliable source and everyone just didn't do their homework -- the UFO people may have accepted the original source without verification, and the original source may have in turn gotten it's information from other, also unverified sources. And so on up the chain of researchers until you get to the one original person who, accidentally or as a hoax, got the information wrong.

    Really, the New Scientist article is quite good, and I can see where this probably happens all the time, whether it's in hard science, social science, or in this case pseudo-science. People don't take the time to check that their sources are being accurate or honest, and so misinformation easily spreads...

  92. Re:What if we aren't the only intelligent... by lugonn · · Score: 2

    ...life this planet has produced capable of utilising technology. Maybe all the "Aliens" are a previous species from this planet that relocated to let us evolve in peace. Just as wacky as any other theory.

  93. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  94. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    ...nor was I "abducted" or any of that shit...

    Not that you know of, you mean.

    Does a large dish antenna pop out of your ass at inopportune times?

    You might have been abducted by an alien.

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
  95. Not forgotten by evenprime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    UFO-loon Denise M. Clark wrote about a UFO book that discusses "the intelligence of our sea life, mainly as that intelligence relates to dolphins". Slashdot user Swannie attempted to make a humorous startrek IV reference by adding "Don't forget about killer whales". Others have pointed out that this was an inaccurate Trek reference. I'd like to add that it was also silly because killer whales are in the family delfinidae; i.e. they are dolphins, and as such were not "forgotten" by Ms. Clark's statement.

    FWIW, I think it is safe to assume that either Ms. Clark or the author of the book she reviewed is fond of David Brin's Uplift Wars series, and in particular the intelligent dolphins in his book Startide Rising. They ought to expand their reading just a little and familiarize themselves with Brin's essay from Otherness where he talks about the public's refusal to accept that language research has simply not shown dolphins to be as clever as we wish them to be.

    For interested parties - This is a very cool book. It is an odd combination of short sci-fi stories grouped by topic along with intelligent non-fictional essays that discuss the same issues. Brin uses the above cetacean language example as a jumping off point to discuss Americans' obession with behaving as though other people's ideas, even ones that are not supported by the facts, ought to be treated like they equal merit.

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
    1. Re:Not forgotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, mice are the smartest creatures on Earth. If they run down the wrong path in a maze, it throws off human scientific knowledge. Remember, the answer is 42...

    2. Re:Not forgotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UFO-loon Denise M. Clark wrote about a UFO book that discusses "the intelligence of our sea life, mainly as that intelligence relates to dolphins". Slashdot user Swannie attempted to make a humorous startrek IV reference by adding "Don't forget about killer whales". Others have pointed out that this was an inaccurate Trek reference. Evenprime contributed that killer whales are dolphins, then hypothesized that Ms Clark read some of David Brin's work, but should read more of it. He further went on explaining why "Otherness" was such a great read.

      I like califlowers.

      Your turn.

  96. Verner's Singularity may answer Fermi's Paradox by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    We can make all kinds of arguments like: alien intelligence leaves no trace of itself, isn't interested in us, or isn't interested in exploration. However, the one data point we have (ourselves) is very bad at cleaning up after itself, isn't shy at all about going after resources wherever they exist, and is very keen on exploration. There's no reason why other intelligence would be significantly different.

    The answer may lie in what I call the "technological horizon" (no discontinuity implied) or Verner Vinge calls the "technological singularity" (discontinuity implied but not necessarilly required). Given the exponential increase in human knowledge and technology (stoppable only through the fall of civilization or the widespread adoption of intellectual property law, patent law in particular, something which arguably most intelligent spieces would be smart enough to avoid), it may be that the period of time when a species would be interested in physical exploration of the universe is relatively short (measurable perhaps in mere decades), before their interests (and their very existence) moves on to another state beyond, or perhaps orthogonal to, our current ability to comprehend.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Verner's Singularity may answer Fermi's Paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what you're saying is that the aliens are too smart to want to do anything but (silently) chill on the homeworld? As in...


      1. Faster than Light Travel.

      2. ???

      3. Nano-Hydroponics d00d!


      Riiight...

  97. Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ZERG RUSH LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    kekekekekekekek ^__________________^

  98. This book will set you free!!! by revery · · Score: 1

    Read this book and know your otherworldy legacy.
    I have always known that I was special. I have know this in the darkness of my childhood bedroom, in the silence of my high school isolation, in the stirring of hormonal urges beyond the reckoning of men. Beneath my skin flows the blood of aliens. Within my cells the DNA of the Starborn has lain dormant. But no more.
    Even know, as I begin to know my latent powers, I am unprepared for the weight of their significance. My hearing has become supernatural. Many are the nights I lay in bed listening to the thump of bass, unsure if it is from the apartment above me, in a home blocks away, or the headphones of my neighbor. I am changed. My eyes have become perfect. I can see heat, it's soft waves distorting the air above pavement. I see small particles in the air, tiny creatures framed against the blue sky, spots of light appear before my eyesordinary man could possess. At times a shiver after glancing at the sun, no doubt my eyes analyzing its roiling surface. I have senses that no mortal could possess. Sometimes a chill passes through my spine and bumps appear along my arms, my hair stands on end. Somewhere in the universe a great things has happened and my alien blood cries out in despair. I yearn for the cosmos.
    Der Voron has given me hope. No longer must I feel alone, perhaps these things that I have felt and seen are not unique to me. Perhaps my isolation is at an end. Alien brothers, reveal yourself without fear of reprisal. I welcome you with open arms.

  99. Disinformation Campaign by mcd7756 · · Score: 1
    To: Earth Monitor Liason HQ
    From: Operative "Bob"
    Level: Highly Sensitive - Do not forward

    Another book has come out dealing with some of our operational mistakes. This one has the usual mistakes though.

    Unfortunately, this one was reviewed on slashdot, a large internet bulletin board site. A number of the participants have way too much time to think about this and have made some insightful comments.

    So I've taken the precaution of inserting the usual misleading messages about Natalie Portman, Beowulf Clusters and the MPAA. This should cause the topic to drop off in a day or two.

    "Bob"

    PS - Please send down a computer technician specializing in archaic systems. I've been having problems with this device posting to the wrong addresses.

    --
    Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
  100. Re:UFO stories: can't even assume they're not made by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    He was extremely impressed by a very detailed report on some UFO fragments that had been shown to be some kind of metal of such extreme purity that it could not possibly have originated on Earth. The metallurgical tests had been conducted by a respected scientist in some university in South America. I was arguing that with UFO reports, you cannot rule out the possibility that they were just made up in whole cloth. He thought this was unlikely.

    IIRC, it was the purity of the material rather than the content. It is tough (at least when they found it) to manufactor the given substance to such purity. However, with a big enough budget, it was *not* out of reach of current technology, some researches had condluded.

    It is indeed curious how such a pure substance made its way to a not-so-rich area of the world, but not "proof" of anything. Perhaps a secret superpower plane crashed or exploded, spreading around high-tech materials. Bleep happens.

  101. Insightful ++ 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your DNA belong to us!

  102. Good book for the common man! by Jackson+Five · · Score: 1

    "Der Voron is nevertheless highly readable and extremely illuminating for the common reader with no prior knowledge of extraterrestrial existence" That's, what, the whole planet?

  103. What a load. by ctimes2 · · Score: 2

    Let's take a walk down Denises' review and look for a few key mistakes:

    1) extremely well-researched and detailed report; Highly annotated and illustrated; a wealth of documented information; a plethora of written documentation ably enhances his description; Also explored in great detail; replete with scientific data; provides hours of reading material and documentation;

    All this and more in 139 fun filled pages of nonsense! Do you really believe that in a book almost half the size of Stephen Hawking's 'the universe in a nutshell' we get the science of intelligence, intelligent life, explanations for UFO's (along with not only documented 'events' but replete with diagrams and POSSIBLE starship models and what they're made of! WOW!) and the science to back it up? I scoff, but only because my horoscope says star people are stealing my brainwaves.

    2) How and why these creatures have gained such highly specialized communication skills

    Yes indeed. Somewhere in those 139 pages is the answer that oceanographers and biologists everywhere have been looking for for the past umpteen years. Right. The book is listed under both 'self help' and 'entertainment'. I suggest you get more of the first, and realize the impact the second has had on your sense of reality.

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
  104. They learn from others. by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    A someone else mentioned, they did "lobster in a sealed mason jar" tests with octopi. Octopi averages less that 30 minutes to figure out how to get the jar open and get the lobster. They did another, even more amazing test: they put two tanks side by side, one with an octopous that had learned how to open the jar and in the other tank a octopus that had never seen a jar before. They gave the lobster in a jar to the experienced octopus and it opened the jar in 30 seconds. The other octopus watched this event with interest (probably wanted that yummy lobster!). They then gave a lobster in a jar to the new optopus. He opened it in less than five minutes, mimicking the technique used by the experienced octopus.

    This is one of the very few repeatable cases of a non-mammalian life form learning from the experience of others.

    The octopus (and its close kin) are among the most intellegent non-mammals on the planet. Rivaled only by the corvids (ravens, crows, magpies, etc...).

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  105. Der Voron? by LenE · · Score: 2

    Does anybody else think that his parents gave him that name? Also, did anyone else notice that his two names are inseperable in the review? This guy is probably the leader of one of those doomsday cults.

    -- Len

  106. X-Files, 3x20 Jose Chung's "From Outer Space" by cotyledon · · Score: 1

    MIB: Even the former leader of your United States of America, James Earl Carter, Jr., thought he saw a UFO once, but it's been proven he only saw the planet Venus.
    Roky: I'm a republican.
    MIB: Venus was at its peak brilliance last night. You probably thought you saw something up in the sky other than Venus, but I assure you, it was Venus.
    Roky: I know... what I saw.
    MIB: Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness, let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception, yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing? Mr. Crikenson, your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus, because if you do, you're a dead man.
    Roky: You... can't threaten me.
    MIB: I just did.

    Roky: This is what they wanted me not to show anyone. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go pack.
    Mulder: If we have any questions, where can we find you?
    Roky: You won't find me.

    Mulder: "I sat in my stalled truck frozen in terror, watching as this third alien attacked the other two gray aliens. And then it happened... the thing that forever changed my life..."
    Behemoth: Roky! Roky! Be thou not afraid. No harm will come unto thee.
    Roky: What do you want with me?
    Kinbote: Your efforts are needed for the survival of all earthlings.
    Roky: How can I do that?
    Kinbote: Come. I shall showeth...

    Mulder: ...thee. Before I knew it, I was aboard the hover vessel, and was heading not into outer space, but into inner space, towards the Earth's molten core, for that is the domain of the third alien, whose name, he soon told me, was lord Kinbote."

  107. Listen to Lister by CPIMatt · · Score: 1

    "Rimmer, there's nothing out there, you know. There's nobody out there. No alien monsters, no Zargon warships, no beautiful blondes with beehive hairdos who say, "Show me some more of this Earth thing called kissing." There's just you, me, the Cat, and a lot of floating smegging rocks. That's it. Finito."

    -Lister from Red Dwarf

  108. Re:Actually, "octopi" is not a word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "octopuses" or, if you want to get all classical and pedantic, which apparently you do, "octopodes".

    At least you guys skipped the oh-so-highbrow double "i" for once... Thanks for that.

  109. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  110. Re:Der Voron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm, at least I don`t need a voice in my head to tell me how to mod - MORON.

  111. They might already be dead. by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    It's not really that simple. We always seem to assume that intellegent life will be living in our galaxy at the same time we do. Other than the "first biillion year limit" (there simply wasn't enough heavy elements in the universe for the first billion years to support technological societies), there is no reason to assume that any alien intellegent species will be alive today.

    Homo sapiens sapiens have trod upon this planet for some 70,000 years. In a universe 15 billion years old that is less than the blink of an eye. Tenns of millions of intellegent spieces may have risen and fallen into extinction long before we arose.

    We may also be the first intellegent species to ever make it this far (not likely, but you never know). Consider that life has slithered across this planet for the last 3.5 - 4 billion years and we have only been around for 70,000 of those years.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:They might already be dead. by goid · · Score: 1



      I thought we had been on the Earth for quite a bit longer than 70K years.

      The documentary I saw about a year ago suggested 1.5 million years, with modern man being in the last few 10 thousand. Is that what you are talking about?

      --
      "Star Wars Moral Number 17: Teddy bears are dangerous in herds."
  112. How about a serious discussion by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

    The author is a nutcase and a crank, so is the reviewer.

    Nevertheless, it would be nice to have a serious discussion on the possibility of extrasolar life.

    A number of points (I'm a biologist) that need consideration:
    1) How narrow is the range of conditions that would allow life to arise? We have exactly 1 observation on this point, the Earth.
    2) How broad are the range of conditions under which life might persist, once formed? Again, we have only the earth to look at, but the range of conditions found on the earth, were life is found, are broad indeed.
    3) When these conditions exist, how likely are the events required for life to form? To endure? Evidence indicates that life began fairly quickly in the formation of the early earth - therefore, we are inclined to believe that these events are LIKELY. The confidence we can have in this estimate is very much open to debate.
    3) Once life has formed, will it always evolve into complex life? It took aeons (billions of years) for complex life - which I define as Eukaryotic single celled organisms, which are our immediate single-celled acnestors - to arise on earth - therefore, we are inclined to believe that these events are UNLIKELY, if they happen randomly. It is possible that other events (the oxygenation of the atmosphere, for example) are effectively precursors to the rise of complex cells, and these pre-requisite events might just take a long time, but still be LIKELY. I don't think so, though.

    My best guess? Yes, extra-solar life exists. However, the first extra-solar life we find will be boring to anyone other than a micro- or molecular- biologist.

    Some features of the earth which might be key to any of the above:
    a) An early solar event caused the formation of dense planets fairly close to the sun.
    b) Our moon reduced the number of large objects that have struck the earth's surface throughout it's history.
    c) The earth's temperature has always been such that liquid water can exist on the surface.
    d) The atmosphere and photodensity on the early earth were such that complex molecules could exist in shallow water without being totally shredded by radiation.
    e) Nonetheless, the atmosphere and photodensity were such that radiation triggered chemical events still occurred in shallow water with some frequency.
    f) The earth has a seismically active core, which releases chemicals (such as certain metal ions) which might be relatively scarce otherwise, and which helps to counteract certain effects of erosion, and to sustain others for longer periods.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  113. Lotsa stuff happens at these places. by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Area 51 is simply a military test site for skunkworks aircraft. Sure, there are UFO's all over that place. They're not alien spacecraft, but simply unidentified flying objects, super-secret military aircraft.

    And the whole "alien spacecraft" meme is about the best cover story the Air Force could ever want. If everyine is trying to figure out what planet all of these weird looking UFOs are coming from, no one is trying to figure out what black-book aircraft they really are. AND the speculation has caused the former USSR to waste millions and millions of dollars researching the possibility that alien spacecraft are here.

    The beauty of this is amazing.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Lotsa stuff happens at these places. by ronfar · · Score: 2

      My Dad experienced this first hand when he was in the airforce. He saw something on radar (he was working in radar at the time) that was moving too fast. Later he surmised that it was a Blackbird (although it was long enough ago it could have been an Archangel or other classified high speed military plane). None of this was explained to him at the time and it was literally a UFO (Unidentified Flying Object). The Blackbird wasn't declassified until many years later. That was when he put two and two together.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  114. we require more minerals by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

    what's up with this non-starcrack starcraft shite on /. i just wanna hear about ghost.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  115. Something *did* happen in these places... by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

    > Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument."

    Yeah, the fact that human brains interpreted the events. Excellent pattern-matchers, those.

    And remember, when you apply a pattern-matcher to random data, the device *will* trigger occasionaly. Here's an at-home experiment for the kids: turn your TV to an empty channel (or whatever it takes to make it show static/snow). Stare at it for a while, and look for a face. You will see one eventually.

    --
    "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  116. whoops by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Whoops I just realized you were talking about the other quote you gave, not mine. Doh!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  117. Proof of alien intelligence by Craig3010 · · Score: 1

    As the great philosopher Calvin put it, "Sometimes I think the surest sign of intelligent life out there is that none of them have visited our planet." Or something like that...

  118. Re:Actually, "octopi" *IS* a word by gmahan · · Score: 1

    from www.m-w.com (Mirriam-Webster):

    Inflected Form(s): plural -puses or octopi

    It's a shame to see such embarrassing errors when getting access to a dictionary is such a simple matter these days.

  119. In Related News . . . . by 9jack9 · · Score: 1
    . . . modern man was genetically engineered by aliens . . . .

    In related news, Reuters reports that a group of forward-thinking and well-respected scientists and theologians who also acknowledge that life on earth was created by extra-terrestrials are expecting the impending birth of the first cloned human, see the Reuters article: Sect Says First Cloned Baby Due in Weeks

    For those of you too lazy to move your index finger, the entire article follows:

    Sect Says First Cloned Baby Due in Weeks

    Fri December 20, 2002 10:32 AM ET

    MONTREAL (Reuters) - A Canadian cult that believes in free love and that life on earth was created by extra terrestrials said it could deliver the world's first cloned baby on Christmas day.

    But the announcement by the Quebec-based Raelians sect was greeted on Thursday with anger and skepticism from experts in the field.

    "I am personally disgusted," said Arthur Leader, chief of reproductive medicine at the Ottawa Hospital. "It shows disrespect for human embryos and it demeans our humanity," he said.

    Brigitte Boisselier, a bishop in the sect, said their company, Clonaid, cloned a human embryo last March and a baby girl is expected to be delivered within the next two weeks and possibly on Christmas Day.

    "We are well advanced and the first baby is due for the end of this year. We think it will be a healthy baby," Boisselier told Reuters.

    She said 10 human embryos were cloned last spring, with five miscarrying. The four other cloned babies are expected next year.

    Boisselier, 45, is a biochemist associated with the Raelians, a cult that believes life on earth was genetically created by visiting extra-terrestrials.

    I'd comment on the whole free-love/aliens thing, but that would probably be too far off-topic.

  120. Correlates of UFO Reports Percapita/Square Mile by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try the competition to find the best predictor of UFO report frequencies by State. Its the closest to basic science you're likely to see for a while in the area of UFOlogy.

  121. Do you think Blizzard will sue? by vortoxin · · Score: 1

    Blizzard does have a line of books named after the Starcraft video game, so I can see them going after the publisher or author. They have already won a case where no one else could name a movie Diablo.

    Who knows, maybe they can use the court winnings to assemble a team to make an actual Starcraft sequel instead of this Starcraft:Ghost fiasco.
    Urge to kill rising.

    --
    When I was your age we didn't have music file sharing utilities. We had to go out to a store and shoplift the CD.
  122. Dammit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will Blizzard stop this nonsense and print "Unidentified Flying Saucers: Starcraft II"?

  123. a few points... by witts · · Score: 1

    These are a few thoughts that have taken me quite a long time to appreciate, maybe some of you will find some use or food for thought. 1) it's very, very easy to be a skeptic. almost brainless to say, "I don't believe it, show me more proof!" Think about the last time you crossed the street: you look both ways and start walking. But, you could stand there on the corner frozen stiff and demanding more proof before taking the first step. After all, maybe a really fast car is about to race down the road and kill you. This is completely silly thinking, which is my point. You reach a comfort level and step into the street. But skeptics, whether it be Bigfoot or UFO's, can always ask for more proof. It's the safe thing to do. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, I agree. But we need another one-liner to know when to stop doubting and allow for the possibility of something extraordinary being true. Right now, there is no easy rule for this, we all just stand with hands on our hips asking for proof. Some skeptics won't believe until a UFO lands on THEIR front lawn and rings THEIR doorbell. Hey, if it happens to their neighbor, they can always ask for 10 types of proof, it's the safe way to play it. But not always correct! Just because it didn't happen to you, doesn't always mean it didn't happen at all. 2) Science is really ass-backwards about these "fringe" topics. Most scientists care about their reputations and getting published more than doing really ground-breaking research. Furthermore, any scientist who dares to even slightly investigate these topics faces brutal ridicule from their peers, who only care about their rep and getting themselves published. This causes a vicious circle because we all parrot the phrase "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" but anyone who tries to gather proof is brutalized and thought a fool. Nice loophole, did Congress & lawyers invent this bizarre system?? Be a skeptic, just don't be a lazy, do-nothing skeptic who knows topic 'X' is a fraud, even if they've never looked into themselves. In summary, the best thing that could possibly happen is for the scientifically rigorous doubters to stop bad-mouthing their peers, roll up their sleeves, and do their own unbiased research, with no regard for success or failure. Until the scientific community grows up a bit, I doubt it will happen and we are all the worse off for it.

    --
    pot.kettle(black);
  124. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by KjetilK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, I don't think people should be so anxious about telling these kinds of things. I'm a card-carrying skeptic, but I and most people I know will listen with interest to such stories.

    My reaction to your story isn't "Nah, that's impossible, BS" it is just "OK, but it is hard to see how this could be used in an investigation". You can't get a better answer than "I don't know".

    Also note that the Condon Report which is still looked upon by most skeptics as the most comprehensive report on UFOs have a case which remains unexplained, and conclude that there is evidence for an extraordinary object (this is the single case they come to that conclusion for).

    Those claiming to have a better explanation than "I don't know" will raise some eyebrows and if they offer a ahem, exotic explanation, they may see some ridicule, but I don't think any real skeptic will look at you as a kook for telling this story.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  125. Out in the Cold by Malicious · · Score: 1

    Strange how Blizzard would go after (sue) a movie, named Diablo (a well recognised, common, dictionary word, meaning the Devil) But would ignore a book called Starcraft.....

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  126. Please. by pogen · · Score: 2
    Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument.

    As you may have read today, absolutely nothing extraordinary happened to the men who opened King Tut's tomb, yet we still had to endure 80 years of speculation and argument about the mythical "mummy's curse."

  127. Completely agree... by maynard · · Score: 1

    ... My type of story is worthless to any investigation. In fact, all first hand accounts are worthless. Interesting results from any new scientific research will be found from satellite surveilance photos, weather balloons, radar, and other such objective instruments. The past fifty years of conducting interviews and then processing these with stats have been a complete waste of time. --M

    1. Re:Completely agree... by KjetilK · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well not completely worthless, because if one starts to see a pattern, it may be possible to set up experiments. It is just that these things are awfully hard... :-)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    2. Re:Completely agree... by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it's completely worthless either. If you can get it into a *completely* interpretation-free format (e.g. take out "physical object", replace with the aspects that lead you to that conclusion), it could be regarded as real data for any of these phenomena:

      - UFO's
      - Atmospheric events
      - The way our visual perception mechanisms work.

      The last one being the most likely, I'd tend to think. But of course that's just as wild a guess as saying it's a UFO.

      But anyways, I don't think anyone can call you a kook (who's not a jerk or even a kook themselves) when you present your observations without insisting upon any particular interpretation. As you have done quite well here.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    3. Re:Completely agree... by maynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. But I swear it had "definition". But that I mean that it didn't just look like an eye "floater" smear (cruft floating in one's eyeball), it actually looked like an object that reflected sunlight with a shadow underneath (the object, not the ground - I couldn't see that). Beats the fuck out of me what I saw. But you're right about the interpretation part. It's a one off event (non-repeatable) that's so strange it doesn't fit into any "normal" recognizable phenomena, which makes interpretation meaningless.

      Like the other guy, thanks for writing seriously without a knee-jerk response. I don't know what I saw, but I'm pretty sure I know what I didn't see. That pretty much sums it up. :)

      Best,
      --Maynard

  128. If only.... by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    among other things, the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens
    I wish they had engineered in a gene that required we have actual proof of something before we believed it was true.

  129. Freaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >among other things, the author claims that
    >modern man was genetically engineered by aliens

    did they also took care of engineering the rest of the animal kingdom? how many different animal species are out there on earth? a million? seems like those aliens are a bunch of bioengineering freaks; why don't they get a real job?

  130. Hmm... wrong review.. by ronfar · · Score: 1
    I was expecting to see quotes such as:

    "You want a piece of me, boy?!?"

    "Absolutely."

    "Battlecruiser reporting."

    "Need a light?"

    "Never know what hit em."

    "Can I take your order?"

    Sigh.. oh well...

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  131. Occam's Razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe those who are skeptical, yet scientifically minded should consider Occam's Razor with repect to the question of UFO's and life beyond earth. In short, The simplest explanation is that life in the Universe is abundant, and probably pollinates, if you will, in a Universal sense.

    What is SIMPLER? That we are the ONLY life in the Universe and we developed on our own through an accident. We are alone. Never to be repeated. A Universal, biochemical FLUKE.

    OR

    That life manifests all over the Universe, and Intelligent forms of life develop on potentially millions of planets, and that SOME of them have developed technology to travel to other systems. Some of them left stuff where they went. Probably multiple places.

    OR

    A magically, all powerful God created the WHOLE Universe and then made one planet and put us on it. And we are alone.

    It's a tough one.
    Occam's History

    Another page

    1. Re:Occam's Razor by F34nor · · Score: 1

      You must also remeber that SETI has looked at 70% of the sky and hasn't seen anything we understand.

      You must also remeber that they think the Galatic habitable zone is a much narrower band in the Milkyway.

      You must also remeber that even w/o FTL it takes 370 million years to colonize the whole galaxy.

      So where are they?

      Why don't they call?

      I have this gnawing fear that something REALLY nasty just happened and they are all dead. e.g. Vernor Vinge "A Fire Upon the Deep"

  132. Godwin's Law was Re:Why bother with this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they reached the singularity and went poof along with John Sheridan, the First Ones, Amelia Earhart, and Judge Crater. Big whoop.

  133. Re:What if we aren't the only intelligent... by Apreche · · Score: 1

    My personal whackball theory was that aliens ARE humans. I mean the odds of any species in outer space being able to locate our small ass planet AND get to it are very very small. And the odds of that species being remotely humanoid are even smaller. This leads me to randomly guess that aliens are super-evolved humans from the future travelling into the past. The whole abduction thing is just so nobody knows/believes it, and that way they wont fudge up history, just study it.

    It's as crazy a theory as any, and I likes it!

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  134. Re:man couldn't be genetically engineered by alien by werfele · · Score: 1

    Since you brought up Star Trek, it might be worthy of mention that modern man actually was genetically engineered by aliens in the Star Trek universe, along with many other intelligent species. The common origin is the excuse for all those prosthetic foreheads.

  135. Debate with a Mormon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got in a debate with a Mormon. Basically I said your religon is a sack of steaming shit made up by a jackass. I went about it in a fun way. First I made her read the "Diamond Age" then I said what if religon is just Aliens infecting "messias" with nanotech swarms that latch onto the neurons and give visions and etc. etc. etc. So that all religon is just aliens fighting for market penetration? The "Christians are the sucker heads of KLD*&#" the hindus didn't really have to hide behind anythign they just laid thier cards on the table, and on and on.

    1. Re:Debate with a Mormon by NightEyez · · Score: 0

      I think the book is Snow Crash, not Diamond Age. Snow Crash was the drug that induced religous like behaviour.

  136. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father tells a similar story.

    He was walking through a lit parking lot one hazy evening, and he noticed these cream colored blobs off in the distance. They were swooping back and forth, and performing maneuvers no aircraft could possibly handle, at least not without turning the pilot to gel. He stood there watching for several minutes, because he was certain he was seeing real live UFOs.

    Then one of them swooped down and ate a bug that was circling one of the parking lot lights.

    He's had a rather skeptical view of UFO claims since.

    Remember kids, lighting and atmospheric conditions can make even ordinary events like birds looking for an easy meal look odd.

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
  137. Lots of interesting patterns to find... by maynard · · Score: 1

    the problem is correcting for differences from anecdote to anecdote in your source data. And unlike a controlled experiment, increasing your data set of eye witness accounts only increases the noise throughout your dataset. I'm pretty convinced that what I saw was a physical object, but I wouldn't base any formal conclusions on it, or any other number of accounts. So, from a personal standpoint, yes I think I saw a real thing. But from a factual standpoint I think it's worthless with which to form a factual conclusion.

    We pretty much agree though. And thank you for not writing a stupid knee jerk response.

    Cheers,
    --Maynard

    1. Re:Lots of interesting patterns to find... by Hanna's+Goblin+Toys · · Score: 1

      As they say, "the plural of anecdote is not data".

    2. Re:Lots of interesting patterns to find... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as they also say, "just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not true".

  138. Space aliens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would aliens from outerspace come here? Out of the uncountable billions of stars, why this particular one?

    On the other hand, there certainly ARE ufos. You have seen them yourself. If it is flying, and you don't know what it is, it's an unidentified flying object. I got hit in the head by a UFO at a rock concert once.

    Now, I can think of one type of alien that would necessarily know of us, and would want to know more about us- TIME ALIENS.

    Note that the Rosewll aliens are slender, green, and with long fingers and big eyes. Considering that merely two to five million years after pre-humans decended from the trees we are just tinkering with genetic manipulation, what will a post-human look like in TEN MILLION YEARS? I would guess that plant genes could make us no longer need food, that we would engineer big brains (and big heads to hold them), long, thin fingers to easily manipulate small objects better than we can now, big eyes to see in low light/ see smaller stuff w/o a microscope, etc.

    In short, the aliens are out uber-grandchildren from ten million years in the future.

    Either that, or swamp gas

    -steve mcgrew
    mcgrew.info
    theFragfest.com

  139. God by matt_fk · · Score: 1

    "among other things, the author claims that modern man was genetically engineered by aliens. " Actually, this is something that could be probable. At least from a christian point of view, the God in the Sky concept.. Heaven? Where did you think that is when you were a kid? Up. Know what I mean? "Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument." Exactly.

  140. The problem is.... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

    Mankind grew up trying to explain everything in a self centered way. Religions sprang up that separated God, man and animals. Christianity for example teaches that God made man in his image and all of the animals were put on Earth for man. In this belief system, mankind is very much on center stage and it is somewhat unthinkable that God would have created another race on some distant planet. I think that man's early beliefs are still with us today.

    We really don't have enough information yet to tell if life is rare or abundant in the universe. Is life on our planet a one in a million or one in a trillion chance?

    I liked the part in the movie 'Contact' where Jody Foster is explaining that if only one planet out of some very high number (I don't remember exactly) had life and if only one of those had intelligent life and so on that there would be millions of races in the universe.

    It is a bit vain to think that we are anything special. However, even if there are millions of races in the universe, the universe is a VERY big place. Such great distances may separate us all that meeting beings from other races is impractical or even impossible.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  141. Re:Occam's Razor (nitpick) by Genus+Marmota · · Score: 1
    I think what you're really invoking here is the Copernican Principle. Occam's razor would have one avoid multiplying entities (i.e. postulating more things to explain the ones we see) unless you have to. In this case, you're arguably violating that rule, since you're positing some new entities (aliens).

    The Copernican Principle, OTOH, is (roughly stated) "you're not special." Thus if your explanation of the observed movements of the planets requires that you just happen to be at the center of all this motion and observing it, it's not very plausible.

    The argument "what are the odds that we're the only life in the whole frikkin universe?" seems to me more an argument against "specialness."

  142. For Auin! by Twintop · · Score: 2

    See, everything was going good, then Acturus had to send Kerigan down to get killed...now she's back as a Zerg and has pissed Tassadar off...this won't end well.

  143. Necessity.. by budalite · · Score: 2

    After careful consideration, I decided that it really does not matter if aliens, BigFoot, or even God(s), really exist or not. If they really do exist, they have so little apparent power to affect my life (as long as I do not buy anything their followers are selling, anyway) that they effectively do not affect my life. Without evidence of any effect on my life, much less evidence of existence, these things do not touch my life. So I don't think about them, unless I get to join a /. discussion on them. I have this same thought, when prompted, about any other similar thing that requires "belief". H0-ho-ho.

  144. Re:What if we aren't the only intelligent... by lugonn · · Score: 2
    But why would they want to travel to the past? Time Travel is kinda pointless because of paradoxies.

    I've read some stuff on the net that says the 'greys' are from the 4th planet of Zeta-Reticuli 2. One star in a binary star system about 37 light years away. Here's the link. The map is some very convincing evidence.

  145. Next on Slashdot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuri's Revenge: Inside the Secret World of Psychics

  146. #4 by teh*fink · · Score: 1

    that's john keats (1795-1821), from his poem "Ode on a Grecian Urn."

    you know x-files but not that? what is this world coming to? ;P

    --
    "I DARE you to make less sense!"
  147. If there are intelligent extraterrestrials... by cwsulliv · · Score: 1

    we'd better hope they never make physical contact with us, and they'd better hope we never make physical contact with them. The historical record shows that contact between different human cultures has generally resulted in a disaster for one or the other. Is there any reason to believe the situation would be any different between humans and aliens?

  148. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

    Didn't someone else post on /. about seeing an absurdly huge flying object move about in the night sky? It was an equally interesting first hand account (and the witness similarly did not jump to conclusions about what he saw.)

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  149. Interesting how this topic turns on the blowtorch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does this topic always encite such a repulsive response?

    Could it be that when faced with a true enigma, we do not know how to be dispassionate because what we really fear is admitting that we don't know all the answers?

    How nice it must be to wander through life secure in the knowledge that you have all the answers. If you work hard at it, you can become bigotted and develop a proper level of righteous indignation as well. Keep up the good work.

    Don't fear the reaper. It is all epsilon.

  150. Thou by Karel+Capek · · Score: 1

    Completely off topic, but I felt compelled
    to correct the misspelling of this archaeic
    form of the 2nd person singular prononoun.
    It's still alive and well in Icelandic, in the form of "ú" and to a lesser extent in other scandinavian languages and german, as "du".

  151. Use even a modicum of imagination by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    So what you're saying is that the aliens are too smart to want to do anything but (silently) chill on the homeworld? As in...

    Good Lord.

    Stop reading space opera tripe, read some Greg Egan or Verner Vinge, and grow your imagination a little.

    The speed of light may well be an ABSOLUTE LIMIT, with no clever circumvention (wormholes, what have you) possible. However, their may well be vastly more interesting domains that are accessible (hacking into the stuff of which the universe is made at its lowest level, accessing, or constructing, alternative universes with vastly different physical constants ... and no, I don't mean 'sliders-like' alternative histories, I mean completely different continuua, etc).

    Perhaps the ability to access or construct a realm in which quantum limitations and speed of light limits do not apply (making vastly greater, perhaps infinite, computational resources availabel to them, to which they could upload their minds. Obviously causality would prevent them from using this as a short cut across our space, but it might free them from the doomed burnout that faces this universe, and free their minds to grow without bounds.

    Of course, someone on the far side of the technological horizon is going to imagine vastly more, but even in these few moments I've managed to think of something a little more intriguing than FTL or whatever nonsense it is scurrying around your little mind.

    It is entirely possible that emergent intelligences shake off the physical limits of this universe like an embryonic reptile would the shell of its hatching egg. It may not be able to make the egg any larger or more amenable to its conditions, but it is entirely capable of breaking out of it and moving on to greener pasteurs.

    In which case intelligence could be reasonably common, and yet Fermi's paradox would be answered.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  152. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a similar story of my own. It happened in late May of 1978 in the mountains above and behind Los Angeles. I was on a three day hike/camping trip with three other guys. In the early afternoon of the second day one of the guys and I decided to climb over the ridge behind our campsite to see what was on the other side. When we cleared the top, we had a great view to the South and East whereas from camp the view was pretty much just surrounding mountains. As we were enjoying the view, we both noticed something small and indistinct sparkling in the sky a few degrees above the horizon toward the East. Over the course of maybe 30 seconds while we watched it got apparently closer/bigger and appeared to be maybe 45 degrees above the horizon. We assumed that it was moving generally in our direction as it didn't move much relative to the peaks in the background. We were able to very clearly see a featureless and generally silvery-white disc-shaped object clearly outlined against the blue sky. The sun was to our backs and we could distinctly see sunlight reflecting from the object and could then tell that it was moving toward our left (North). It passed out of sight behind another ridge or mountain. While it was in sight we talked about what we were seeing and both sighted at it along our arms to get some suggestion of size, position relative to the background, and position relative to the horizon. We agreed that it was about the same size as our thumbnails at its largest apparent size. It was in sight for a total of maybe 45 seconds total. The motion was smooth and continuous. It didn't jerk or hop around or wiggle from side to side or anything of the sort. The only sound we heard was wind blowing in the trees. When it was gone we were shaken. When we started to tell the other two guys about it, they wouldn't hear it, accusing us of fabricating the story. After we got home we tried telling a couple of other people with the same result. We decided to just shut up and pretty much have. I don't have a clue what it was

  153. Oh, please by xihr · · Score: 1
    Something had to have happened in these places and many others throughout the globe to engender such speculation and argument.

    This is a form of logical fallacy called ad populum. The fact that a lot of people think something does not make it true, nor does it even mean there's good reason to believe that it's true. According to polls that are routinely conducted, an embarassing number of Americans think that the Sun orbits around the Earth, rather than the other way around? Does that then mean that their case warrants consideration? After all, if enough people think it, there must be something to it.

    The fact that there have been so many claims and absolutely no verifiable evidence is a strong indication on general principles that your skepticism meter should be dialed up to maximum.

  154. Re:UFO stories: can't even assume they're not made by cbv · · Score: 1
    He was extremely impressed by a very detailed report on some UFO fragments that had been shown to be some kind of metal of such extreme purity that it could not possibly have originated on Earth.

    AFAIK, even today, scientists are not able to flawlessly reproduce Wootz (ultra high carbon steel, first produced in ancient India and the base for Damascene steel) - so clearly it must have come from outer-space... Gee, get real.

  155. altered ego by dotslashdotdot · · Score: 1

    Yes, of course there are extraterestrials!

    Universally true for all beings:
    I'm necessary, all the others are extra...

    Ba, Dum Bump --- Splash!

    --
    It is now time to flip off your computer.
  156. "the plural of anecdote is not data" by maynard · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with that statement. --M

  157. SUVs are Evil. repent! repent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  158. George Bush was engineered by Aliens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Premise: Humans were engineered by aliens
    George Bush is Human.
    Therefore George Bush was engineered by Aliens.

    I wonder if there is an Intergalactic court where we can sue the aliens for screwing up so badly..

  159. UFCB by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Do you mean figment of one's imagination, not fragment?

    Unidentified Flying Chunks of Brain? Eeewwwww!

  160. pointless speculation by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    While I know it's pointless to speculate about this sort of thing, I can't resist. Had you considered the possibility that you were merely seeing something silver falling at an unknown distance? Perhaps something thin. Let us, for the moment, put aside question of how it might have gotten there. (Although falling from a passing plane comes to mind.)

    If it were thin, then as it fluttered in the wind, it might have appeared to change size rapidly. The main thing, is you *should not* assume it's an object unless you're really sure. You seem pretty sure about that, so the next part, is to not assume that you have any idea as to what sort of object it is. To even consider that it might be some sort of "craft" is assuming an awful lot.

    But then, I could just be full of sh*t. Maybe it was Loch Nessie flying around in her special 5-dimensional glider with her favorite co-pilot Elvis. :-) Who knows. Best thing is not to take anything weird that happens too seriously. Who was it that said, "The world is not only querrer than we suppose, it is queerer than we *can* suppose."?

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  161. both books have elements of it, but ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    Diamond Age is the right reference here. Haven't read it in a while, but there are some memorable orgy scenes, where data (and more) is being ... passed along between processors.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  162. Re:Not that I believe aliens are buzzing Earth, bu by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    Hell. That's nothing.

    One time we were camping in Yosemite. Slowly I became aware that there was light coming into the tent. I put my head out and basically, above the tent, was a floating round object. When I say object I mean something about 100 ft across. The weird thing is that it was semi-transparent but glowing. I could see moonlit clouds through it and yet there was definitely something there above me. It was about 80 feet away. There was no chance I could have been mistaken and I woke up my friend who saw it too. I even have photographs though they came out underexposed and fogged up in a really weird way.

    But in my case I admit to making this shit up.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.