Slashdot Mirror


Simpson's Cast On Bravo This Sunday

droopus writes "So, what does Dan Castelleneta look like? (He's a kinda weasly looking bald guy.) See Dan, Hank, Harry, Yeardley, Julie, Nancy and the rest of the Simpsons cast this Sunday at 8PM (EST) on Inside the Actors Studio on Bravo. According to the website: "In anticipation of the landmark 300th episode of The Simpsons, James Lipton sat down with the series' accomplished ensemble to meet the actors behind the voices in order to discover how they have managed to create such a wealth of believable and beloved characters." I saw a quick preview, and seeing that thin, weasly bald guy go "Aggggggh, donut" was alsolutely hilarious. Watching Nancy Cartwright morph effortlessly from Bart, to Nelson, to Ralph is waaaaay cool. My TiVo is set for this one. One hitch: it's on at the same time as the usual new Sunday Simpsons episode, so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both."

264 comments

  1. Re:FP by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow, another post on basic netiquette. Would you like a cookie?

    --
    -insert a witty something-
  2. writers by ianmalcm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if any of the writers will be on the show too. Most of the success has relied on excelelent writing. I think this is the first time ever the voice actors have been allowed to do their characters on a television show other than the cartoon itself. James Lipton sure knows how to negotiate for his guests!

    1. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if any of the writers will be on the show too.

      Well, seeing as how the description doesn't say they will be, it's probably reasonable to assume that they won't be.

    2. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually they were on conan once, too.

    3. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, plus the fact it's the ACTOR'S studio... not the writer's studio.

    4. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Harry Shearer was on 'The Panel' a TV show in Australia and did a number of character voices.

      Cheers

      -Trem

    5. Re:writers by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Some of them have been on Conan at least once. Really amazing people, can't wait for the show tomorrow~!

    6. Re:writers by jewf1sh · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is not true. There have been several occasions where voice actors from The Simpson's have been on Late Night with Conan O'Brien, and they have done the voices there. I remember seeing an episode with both Dan Castellaneta and Harry Shearer, where both of them did their respective voices.

    7. Re:writers by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Well, Conan O'Brian has this late night TV show that you could watch -- he was one of the writers you know.

    8. Re:writers by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      They've always been allowed to do the characters' voices, but they're not allowed to create new material. So Dan Castellaneta can't (for instance) endorse some product in Homer's voice. He is, however, allowed to say 'D'oh!' or 'Mmm, donuts' as much as he likes, because those phrases are already Homer-canonical. Nonetheless, whenever any Simpsons voice artist goes on a radio show, they _always_ try to get them to say something like 'I'm Homer Simpson and you're listening to QXFR radio'. Never works.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    9. Re:writers by theguru · · Score: 1

      99x in Atlanta has a drop of Dan saying "You are listening to 99X. In your face 98X!". He also played the fish quiz as Homer on the morning show. (The fish quiz is where they get famous guests to name as many kinds of different fish as they can in 15 seconds.)

    10. Re:writers by Richard5mith · · Score: 1

      I've seen the cast on many UK TV shows, heard them each on different radio shows and they always do the voices. Dan C was on Danny Baker's radio show many years ago and went through the collection, and Harry Shearer was on something a couple of years ago doing the same. There was also some show where they had pretty much them all on there.

      Watching Dan doing Homer's voice is really weird, since you can hear Homer's voice, but you're not actually watching somebody bright yellow say the words. :)

    11. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, multiple Simpsons characters have endorsed one station I listen to (Dan and Nancy).

    12. Re:writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a biting, incicive wit you have.

    13. Re:writers by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Two of the guys were on Conan once. They played out a whole scene with about 15 characters.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    14. Re:writers by slasher_14 · · Score: 1

      In mid 2002 Harry Shearer was on a television show in Australia called The Panel.

      He was asked (and did) many of the voices he does including Mr Burns and Smithers.

      One of the things he did was record and answering machine message for one of the hosts that went like this (slightly paraphrased):

      "Hello, you've reached Glenn's house. Unfortunately he is busy at the plant right now, but he'll call you back soon"

      I don't know if this was because he was on Australian televison and not in America, but he used the voices and said a lot of different stuff. He didn't endorse anything, just used them in jokes and stuff.

      It would be great to be the voice of a Simpsons' cast member, as you could get jokes every time by doing their voice.

    15. Re:writers by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
      I wonder if any of the writers will be on the show too.

      I don't think they've had any writers since 1993.

  3. Same Time by viper432 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats right... put a show about the Simpsons on at the same time FOX is showing the real thing...

    1. Re:Same Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the funny thing is the show about the simpsons is probably more interesting than the simpsons themselves.

  4. Real fans know what they look like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or some of them anyway, since many appeared on the original home of the Simpsons, the Tracey Ullman Show.

    1. Re:Real fans know what they look like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I remember that show. Dan Castanella looked pretty good back then, but I've heard he's aged alot...

  5. First Informative Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all things Simpsons, head over to http://www.snpp.com.

    1. Re:First Informative Post by EricWright · · Score: 1
      Dude... don't make me sue you for copyright infringement!!! 8*P Thpppt!

      Oh wait. You dropped the word 'on' and added a link. I guess you're ok ;)

  6. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid that that would be a shit-load of bandwidth.

    It takes long enough for my TV to render one channel, much less try to grab all 75+ at once.

  7. Re:haha! by Lxy · · Score: 1

    Ok, before I get flamed, someone posted at the same time as me:

    Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both.

    My gripe has been answered, please ignore my idiocy.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  8. 25 gigger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://web.archive.org/web/20001219170800/slashdot .org/articles/98/11/11/1011216.shtml

    Man, I'm bored.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow. People don't even read the submissions anymore, much less the actual articles.

    I quote:

    One hitch: it's on at the same time as the usual new Sunday Simpsons episode, so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both.
    1. Re:RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One hitch: it's on at the same time as the usual new Sunday Simpsons episode, so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show at midnight so fans can record both.

      I think this may be more likely towards "west coast timezone" viewership and less likely for "thoughtfulness."

  11. Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by TibbonZero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, I remember some Ask Slashdot or something about having a Tivo like system based on Linux for recording either 4+ or 16+ streams. I guess this gives a little validity to wanting to record at least two streams anyway. And hell you might even like something asides from just the Simpsons, and want to record three things at once. :)

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      Umm Microsofts Ultimate TV can handle two streams, so with it you could record two shows at one. I believe it's the only system to offer this in their first version. Perhaps Tivo will have it in their next?

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    2. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm Microsofts Ultimate TV can handle two streams, so with it you could record two shows at one. I believe it's the only system to offer this in their first version. Perhaps Tivo will have it in their next?

      I believe the DirectTivo variant has had two tuners for a while. Since the dish receiver and Tivo are in the same unit, it made a lot of sense to go ahead and throw in a second tuner.

      For a stand-alone unit, this is a bit more difficult. My (now dead, first Philips version) Tivo didn't even have *a* tuner, unless you count tuning in channel 3 or 4 for the RF input. But even so, and even with two, only one could be your cable box/dish receiver, the other could potentially be an antenna or (non-pay channel) cable input... though certainly possible.

      My next PVR will most likely be a DirectTV w/Tivo built-in for just this type of reason (plus just being able to channel surf while something else is recording would be nice).

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    3. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by gvonk · · Score: 1

      DirecTivos can already do this. They can record one program off the digital feed and one off the analog going in the back... both at the same time.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    4. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by Fished · · Score: 1

      You can do this using MythTV.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    5. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      DirecTivos can already do this. They can record one program off the digital feed and one off the analog going in the back... both at the same time.

      DTiVos are not capable of recording analog signals at all (unfortunately), but they do have 2 digital sat. tuners. And since the data is already digital there is not much overhead in recording both at once. The real difficulty for TiVo is that it's AI system needs to be able to plan on using both tuners at once, which is not as easy as it sounds. Incidentally, TiVo does a pretty good job of it, but occasionaly it does silly things like recording same channel on 2 tuners at once. But nice thing about TiVo is that you get updates every now and then which fix things like that.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    6. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Ah, oops. My bad. I forget about these dual-LNB things. :)

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    7. Re:Reason for Multi Channel Tivo devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTiVo can record two streams at once.

  12. Writers on 'Inside the Actors' Studio'? by Snuggly_Soft · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha! Well played! Maybe someday they'll have "Inside the Writers' Studio". Until then, the voice talent is who belongs on this show. I'm taping it. In Betamax. By the by, a "Writers' Studio" show would be fascinating.

    1. Re:Writers on 'Inside the Actors' Studio'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, and a writers show with old writers would include Conan o'Brian. As much as I like the guy, I think the attention might be a little too much on him.

  13. Re:Somewhat Offtopic, but informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you guys are getting good!

  14. PARENT GOATSE.CX POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seeing hate that thing

    1. Re:PARENT GOATSE.CX POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't beat them, join them!

      Try loving somthing you try so hard to hate.

      It is much easier to love it. SO LOVE IT YOU FUCKTARD!

    2. Re:PARENT GOATSE.CX POST by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      I seeing hate that thing

      Me no function beer well without

  15. Re:James Lipton Is My Cousin by TrekkieGod · · Score: 2, Interesting
    He displays no intelligent(sic) whatsoever and only sucks up to whatever actors or actresses he has on

    Oh, that's exactly why I enjoy watching him...I find it hilarious to see Lipton saying things like "your performance in That Famous Movie was absolutely awe-inspiring" while ignoring true interviewing opportunities, such as when Jack Lemmon admitted to having been an alcoholic at the same time he portrayed one. Lipton just stared blankly at him, and changed the subject after the ackward silence.

    Could be worse...he could have made the whole interview about that, and then advertise it as "Jack Lemmon tells his deep, darkest secrets"

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  16. Jesus christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who watches the simpsons anymore?
    And how is this anything but an outright ad?

  17. I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think his impersonation of James Lipton is much more entertaining than Lipton himself.

    1. Re:I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1
      An interview of that magnitude, would no doubt be, "scrumtrulescent".

      --nude

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    2. Re:I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In heaven, you'll be playing the role of Zack."

    3. Re:I'd rather see Will Farrell interview them. by gleam · · Score: 1

      It's much more entertaining to see James Lipton (farrell) interview James Lipton (real). I can't remember where it was that they did it--in the actor's studio, or in rockefeller center.

      In any case, it was, as Mr. T(ea) would put it, "A DELIGHT! HA HA HA HA!".

      -gleam

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
  18. Re:James Lipton Is My Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mate, I'm going to refuse to watch Tony Blair's impersonation of a poodle in the forthcoming episode, I mean that shits already been done in George Micheal's video.

  19. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is a sick freak?

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, she's a scientologist. Close enough.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just wait for the repost some days from now.

  20. Re:"fans" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I weigh 150, how about you endomorph?

  21. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by absurdhero · · Score: 1

    That is what TV Tuners are for. You could get an extra tuner and hook it up. You could buy a few tuner cards for a computer and record them all at once.

  22. F. Murray Abraham by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Homer: ...but we're gonna miss Inside the Actors Studio. F. Murray Abraham's on, Marge. F. Murray Abraham!

  23. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I dont understand is ALL frequencies are running through that wire going in to the TiVo. Why cant you just do a stream record of the WHOLE analog signal (ad converter) and then re-play all channels when you want to?

    Because the required bandwidth would be obscene. That, and I don't believe we even have any existing technology to simply capture a collection of mixed radio signals and somehow (digitally or analog) store them...

    But think of the amount of information contained in each signal. Even if you ignore everything but the video, how do you store all of the detail for 100+ channels (or even just a few)?

    Those are only a couple of problems with the theory... I'm sure there are many more, but that's the obvious reason.

    --
    NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
  24. Nancy Cartwright? by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is she the one who's a member of a criminal nut cult?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Simpsons producer Mike Reiss spoke at my school about the Simpsons among other things. He said that she's the reason they haven't really made fun of Scientology (if mention it at all?). Cartwright refuses to let them.

    2. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1

      That's why South Park is so much a better show -- they don't let Isaac Hayes dictate what Trey and Matt write (ref: episode about Blanetology.)

    3. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by Newtonian_p · · Score: 1

      Here's a link from an official scientologist site confirming it as well.

      --

      There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

    4. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      south park sucks balls which i present compared to the simpsons.

    5. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      Oh you're full of shit.


      Both are excellent shows but any current South Park beats any current Simpsons (Except the medical marijuana episode Weekend At Burnsies).


      I'm not comparing early Simpsons to current South Park. Just current seasons.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    6. Re:Nancy Cartwright? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      she's the reason they haven't really made fun of Scientology (if mention it at all?). Cartwright refuses to let them.

      I think I'm having a ``Poochie" flashback...

      ``You look like you have something to say Scientology... do you?"
      ``Yes, I certainly do..."
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. Doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One hitch: it's on at the same time as the usual new Sunday Simpsons episode,"

  26. Re:FP by Archangel824 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think "Would you like a chocolate covered pretzel? (Grins idiotically)" is a bit more funny.

  27. Hmmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  28. Ha-Ha by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

    My TiVo already knew it repeats......Ha-Ha

    1. Re:Ha-Ha by Snuggly_Soft · · Score: 1

      Get busy TiVoing, or get busy taping. Consider yourself corrected.

  29. Notice... by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that they don't have the current writers for the show on his program. That would turn into a lynching.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  30. Hank Azaria by calyxa · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I watched Mystery Men with a friend the other night who had never seen it. she commented on how occasionally she could hear traces of Prof. Frink's voice in the character of The Blue Raja, played by Hank Azaria. throughout the film, it's hard to get a grasp on Azaria's "real" voice. for most of it he's faking a British accent.

    -calyxa

    --
    Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
    1. Re:Hank Azaria by onosendai · · Score: 1

      For the best "grasp on Azaria's real voice", get some old (mid 90's) 'Mad About You', Azaria played Nat the Buchman's neighbour (and dog-walker).

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Who doesn't know what the cast looks like? by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    People who weren't watching the Tracey Ullman show.

    That's who.

  33. Someone proposed this in the last 2600... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Send a digital cable signal straight into your computer and dump the raw data on your hard disk, then play it back through a tv tuner. You can play it back as many times as you want to grab whatever channel(s) you want.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Someone proposed this in the last 2600... by Raster+Burn · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a software tv tuner? What software supports file input? I guess you could make some fake V4L device.

    2. Re:Someone proposed this in the last 2600... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      problem is that digital cable is not just one stream of bits (if it were your disk probably couldn't keep up anyway) - it's a bunch of 'qams' each about as wide as an analog channel each of which carries a stream of bits representing 6-10 tv channels - when you switch channels on a digital feed you tune to a qam then select the bits you need out of it's stream. So your tuner could save 6-10 channels at once but you'd need as many tuners as the cable company has qams to get them all

  34. Best Actors Studio ever by meltuschman · · Score: 0

    Like the comic book guy, get it?

    1. Re:Best Actors Studio ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Please explain.

  35. Will Ferrell, Scrumtrulescent! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Ha!

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  36. suck my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck James Lipton's ass, too.

  37. Entertainment Weekly's Article on 300 episodes... by antdude · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I saw this article a few days ago and thought it would be perfect for /. story.

    Link: The Family Dynamic -- "We pick the 25 best (and 1 worst) ''Simpsons'' episodes ... As the landmark series' 300th show approaches, we look back at Homer and Co.'s most hilarious, inspired moments (Television, 1/31/2003)."

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. Lisa / Yeardley Smith by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeardley Smith (the voice of Lisa) is kinda cute in a geeky foreign way... I saw an interview of her a few years ago. Apparently more than a few guys have told her that it's their fantasy to make love to her while she screams the famous "More More More!" Lisa Simpson line.

    1. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      She was on "Hermans Head" years ago.

      She looks like Dr. Ruth.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> She looks like Dr. Ruth.

      if you ignore yearley's nose, she's pretty hot

    3. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Informative
      She was also on Dharma & Greg as Marlene, Greg's secretary.

      Eh, why are we listing stuff. This is the Internet, it's all in the Internet Movie Database

    4. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woof woof! Yikes! Voice work is good for her... And for US!

    5. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Aronymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anyone ever see her as a little kid on the Square One TV math show on PBS? I'm revealing my relative youth here (maybe not, Slashdot seems full of teenagers who might not know what Square One is), but on the detective story segment on the show (called "Mathnet" as a parody of Dragnet, I think), she played the caretaker of a gorilla that had gone missing. And the detectives she hired used math to find it, as expected. Getting back on-topic, Ms. Smith sounds EXACTLY the same now as she did then, in the eighties and when she was a little kid. Not like that's some big revelation, but when I first started watching the Tracy Ullman show and later on Herman's Head (which starred both her and Hank Azaria as major characters), I couldn't shake the association of that voice with that of the "Mathnet gorilla girl." ....Well, after some quick googling, apparently it looks like Square One is being shown on the Noggin educational cable channel. Found that bit of info on a site dedicated to the show.

    6. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      Whoa! You remember that too? I love the last part of the gorilla series of Mathnet... the gorilla was climbing on one of the letters of the Hollywood sign. I knew "George Frankley" would find him!
      Man, it's been years!

    7. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Wow, thanks for the link. Who woulda known that she played both Lisa Simpson and Jackie Simpson ?

      Seriously, thanks.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by gvonk · · Score: 1

      THAT IS AMAZING. I remember that specific episode, and even though I was 8 or 9 when I saw that show and had no idea who Yeardley Smith was, now that you remind me, I remember that and can somehow tell that that was her. Maybe it's just the power of suggestion, but damn.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    9. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I clicked on that link, IMDB had this in their "to the left of the info promo spot":

      <picture of a young you know who>
      Classic Celeb
      Remember when he had a nose? See more in IMDb's Photo Galleries.

    10. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember Herman's head, Yeardley is a little hottie. I'm not sure why I think she's hot but I'd hit it! Would YOU hit it?

    11. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by sootman · · Score: 1

      I've always thought she was *really* cute. She and Hank Azaria were both on the Fox sitcom "Herman's Head" for the year or two it was on. There was even a joke once--on the show, she said something like "People keep saying I sound like that Lisa girl on the Simpsons!" She was also in Maximum Overdrive and had small parts in a few other movies, too.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    12. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by 68K · · Score: 1

      She has a fan club, which you can find at www.wcat.com/ysfc - I'm the one responsible for it.

      Hasn't been updated in forever, but people interested in her and her work will find lots of useful info. I've also included a 'diary' of the day I met her at the London Animation Art gallery a few years ago. It was nice to chat with her for a couple of minutes. Dunno if I'll ever get the opportunity again.

      Cheers,
      Steve.

    13. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Her character on Mathnet was named "Jane Rice-Burroughs."

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    14. Re:Lisa / Yeardley Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeardley Smith did a nude scene (well, topless anyway) in the movie Ginger Ale Afternoon. Kinda sexy in a geeky, chubby sort of way.

  39. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by josh+crawley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ---That is what TV Tuners are for. You could get an extra tuner and hook it up. You could buy a few tuner cards for a computer and record them all at once.

    Dont you see getting 2 of the same unit somewhat redundant, when 1 can read the signal? WHat I'm suggesting is a 'smart tuner' that could read multiple channels and possibly record many of them at once. After all, every channel is going down that nice coax from your antaenna.

    Oh well. Food for thought, stuff that might matter.

  40. Re:"fans" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There is no 'n' in fat losers geeze learn to spell...

  41. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some sick freaks out there. I don't want to know what Nancy Cartwright gets asked to do.

  42. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Raster+Burn · · Score: 1

    Very interesting thought. I'd really like to know this too!

  43. Dan Castellaneta by Otter · · Score: 4, Informative
    So, what does Dan Castelleneta look like? (He's a kinda weasly looking bald guy.)

    Married With Children fans will remember him from the "Dance Show" episode, where Peg went dancing with Marcy and had a flirtation with a gay guy, whose husband (Castellaneta) went complaining to Al.

    Incidentally, how stupid does Bravo have to be to put this on in that slot? Why not Sunday at 10 pm?

    1. Re:Dan Castellaneta by maladroit · · Score: 5, Informative

      And L. A. Law fans will remember him as the guy who worked at an amusement park, wearing a Homer Simpson costume. He was fired from his job when he got sick and took off the costume head. Of course he was suing, this was L. A. Law after all.
      The best parts were when he would put on the costume and talk in his Homer voice, and the jury of Homer Simpsons was a nice touch, too.
      imdb says it was an episode in 1992.

    2. Re:Dan Castellaneta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Dan also in another episode of "Married" as a salesman at a mortuary? It's the one where Al's TV hero "Fuzzy" died and he wants to be buried right next to him (but of course Peg has other plans and ruins Al's afterlife... the show was a classic). The dance episode and the mortuary episode where a few seasons apart so I don't think anyone would make a connection between the two characters.

    3. Re:Dan Castellaneta by gleam · · Score: 1

      It was never a question for me.. he went to my high school, so when i got there (a number of years later) his picture was up on the wall. he's been spotted walking down the street a few times, too.

      for what it's worth, that reality show, "high school reunion" is also all grads from my high school. I'm kind of ashamed to admit that, though.

      for that matter, ernest hemingway was a graduate, and ray kroc (founder of mcdonalds corp) was a drop-out. Yay.

      -gleam

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    4. Re:Dan Castellaneta by WesternActor · · Score: 1

      I also seem to remember him on an episode of Friends. I think he played a zookeeper or a zoo caretaker or something (this tied in with Ross in some way, but I don't remember exactly how). And, of course, he appeared a number of times on The Tracey Ullman Show. He's very talented... they all are.

      --

      --Matthew
      "If the lights of Broadway blind me, I won't mind..."
    5. Re:Dan Castellaneta by PocketAces · · Score: 1

      Dan was also in the episode "Death of a Shoe Salesman" where he plays the Funeral Director at the store/cemetery where Al wants to be buried next to his hero, Fuzzy McGee and his mule Dadgummit.

    6. Re:Dan Castellaneta by stubblehead · · Score: 1
      Because the show is always on at that time slot. FOX wouldn't move 24 just because Flatliners was showing on TNT at the same time. I don't believe FOX and Bravo have the same corporate ties (I could be wrong) so no need to promote the other guys. How often, besides major sporting events, do you hear, "And don't forget to tune into [their station] after watching [show] on [a different station]!" Never.

      God bless The Simpsons, in a non-religous kinda way.

      -e

      --

      Rock!
    7. Re:Dan Castellaneta by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      He played the Zoo janitor who informed Ross that his monkey was still alive, after the zoo manager told Ross it was dead.

      "The zoo? You believe what the zoo tells you?"

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  44. Marge Costume by Inexile2002 · · Score: 4, Funny

    One halloween, a friend of mine got up green tube dress, white choker pearls and did her hair up like Marge. We went to a halloween party, and seriously I've never seen one girl get hit on so many times at a party. Nor have I heard so many attempted Homer-isms as pick up lines.

    1. Re:Marge Costume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds fun. :) But Marge's necklace is red!

    2. Re:Marge Costume by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  45. "so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show" by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Thoughtfully? Bravo like all cable shows runs the same 4 hour block over and over. It'll be rerun ad-nauseum like every other cable show with 6 episodes.

    [RANT]
    Why do they keep adding cable channels and trying to force me to pay for them, when they dont even bother with enough original content for the ones they have? Eg; I've seen the same stupid hitler documentaries a bazillion times. Do they really need "History International"?
    [/RANT]

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:"so Bravo has thoughtfully repeated the show" by hawkfan · · Score: 1

      Yes, because its 3:30 am and theres an infomercial on the main {hist,dsc,tlc} chans and the secondaries have actual content.

  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course Nancy Cartwright has no trouble shifting between different characters. According to her religion^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcult, she's infested with the souls of dead people & aliens, many of whom were blown up 75 billion years ago by the Galactic Overlord Xenu in volcanoes by H-bombs.

    Because of this, and other dirty deeds done by the cult of $cientology, I personally boycott The Simpsons, JAG, Dharma & Greg, South Park, and other TV shows and movies that employ $cientologists. (And yes, my local affiliates and the networks know why I don't watch their shows!)

    1. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, were you as I happy as I was to see Nicole split from Tom? I hear it's because she was more Catholic than Scientologist and they just couldn't have that sort of thing!

    2. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Wow, I didn't know Cartwright was a scientologist. Bummer. Lotta people are nuts, tho.

    3. Re:Well, no kidding... by garethwi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a bit over the top isn't it? These shows have scientologists working on them, true, but they aren't promoting the thing.

    4. Re:Well, no kidding... by Misch · · Score: 1

      You decide for yourself. [ALL Capitals changed to lowercase letters to escape the lameness filter. Interesting that a $cientology page would be stopped by /.'s lameness filter, don't you?]

      http://www.scientology.org/scnnews/scn_new.htm

      "kirstie alley opens church of scientology mission in wichita"

      "travolta fever"

      "faith in scientology keeps him going"

      "on the record: isaac hayes"

      "bart simpson's voice credits her recent career success to scientology"

      "straight, no chaser"

      "eduardo palomo says that a book gave him his success"

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    5. Re:Well, no kidding... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are in BIG trouble Mr Anonymous Coward.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, who are the people on those shows who have fallen prey to that particular cult?

    7. Re:Well, no kidding... by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Isaac Hayes has no control over the content of South Park -- there has been a blatantly obvious diss of Scientology episode (Blanetology.) Considering the utter fear everyone has about Scientology (and rightfully so) I am happy that Matt and Trey didn't let it control them at all.

    8. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hire Me! [paulmischler.com]

      Yeeeeah, right.
      let's start talking about Scientology and include personal details in the message...

    9. Re:Well, no kidding... by dinivin · · Score: 1


      That has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. Believe me, most religions are just as much cults as Scientology is. Do you boycott every show that has a non-atheist on board?

      Dinivin

    10. Re:Well, no kidding... by ellem · · Score: 1

      Dude that chick from JAG is so hot that if she was a baby eating Thelemist I still watch her!

      Further, I don't care what the cast members of The Simpsons believe in becuase I still believe it is "The Best Show... Ever."

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    11. Re:Well, no kidding... by kongjie · · Score: 1

      Wow, that must take a lot of research. You check the credentials of every actor and crew member on the shows you watch? How about the network itself? The corporation? The stockholders?

      And the main motivation you list is because her cult thinks that 75 million years ago there was a galatic overlord? How does that count as one of their "dirty deeds"?

      Let me get this straight: you don't think that Scientologists should be allowed to seek employment? Your point of view fits in perfectly with the wild accusations that Scientologists level against their detractors.

    12. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there's that other show that employs people believe in a big invisible omnipotent man in the sky who watches you every minute of every day, as well as a big red monster who lives in the bowels of the earth. Even wierder is that they believe that after you die some portion of your body that doesn't exist is transported to one of these magical places for ever and ever. Fucking wierdos.

    13. Re:Well, no kidding... by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 1

      I think we should all boycott any TV show, or any other enterprise (no, not a pun) for that matter, which employs people who profess a religion we don't like. The people who profess the religion we don't like should be hounded out of most professions, and be required to wear, say, some kind of symbol on their sleeves to identify them. They might be invited to move into new homes where they can all be together, and their own homes and possessions be given to people we do like. Most likely, the people who profess the religion we don't like will ultimately just disappear in some mysterious fashion, out east.

      Sound like a plan?

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
    14. Re:Well, no kidding... by torpor · · Score: 1

      Your point of view fits in perfectly with the wild accusations that Scientologists level against their detractors.
      ... and isn't, incidentally, too far off from Mr. Ashcrofts point of view.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    15. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't understand Scientology and its "dirty
      ntology has gotten stronger than ever. __________
      If I don't buy hip-hop albums does that make me a
      Keep in mind that above all else scientology is a
      And no it doesn't take alot of research. Google fo
      Finally if YOU would have no problem with a Moonie If you don't understand Scientology and its "dirty
      ntology has gotten stronger than ever. __________
      If I don't buy hip-hop albums does that make me a
      Keep in mind that above all else scientology is a
      And no it doesn't take alot of research. Google fo
      Finally if YOU would have no problem with a Moonie

    16. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many ^H's, kid.

    17. Re:Well, no kidding... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to play Devil's Advocate for a moment... Ding! Ding! Diing! Hey, extra ball!

      Um... where was I...? Boycotting is a proud American tradition. There is nothing wrong with boycotting any product for any reason (sane, insane or completely mental). It's a form of free speech and is part of our American Way!

      When, of course, you force others to join you against their will (e.g., jamming the TV station signal) does it become wrong.

      If the poster wants to boycott anything related to clamheads, then let him or her. Of course, you couldn't pay me to miss out on all those "Welcome Back, Kotter" reruns.

      I boycott all states who have drunken philanderers as Senators.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    18. Re:Well, no kidding... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      A response from Fox:


      In regards to your specific comments about the show, our research shows that one person cannot make a difference, no matter how big a screwball he or she is.


      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    19. Re:Well, no kidding... by the+Epopt · · Score: 1

      I know for a fact that Scientologists have contributed to the World Wide Web. Don't forget to boycott that, too.

      --
      I moderate at +3, Highest Scores, and I always mod down.
      If you don't like it, vote me off the island.
    20. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd boycott you, if you weren't a fucking anonymous coward.

    21. Re:Well, no kidding... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      I've never seen her, but if she's a baby-eating Thelemist, dude, I'm there! That is such a turn-on.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  48. Damn kids these days. by majcher · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello? Haven't any of you people seen the Tracey Ullman show? Nobody remembers Herman's Head?

    Excuse me, I'm just going to sit here and yell at the kids to get off my lawn now.

    1. Re:Damn kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scary thing is, there might be teenagers (just barely) reading your post who are Simpsons fans, yet weren't even born when Tracey Ullman was on.

      Gack, now there's kids on my lawn too.

    2. Re:Damn kids these days. by puto · · Score: 1

      The old Tracey Ullman's were brliiant, the orginal Simpons were so funny, especially with Homer being horribly cruel to bart.

      Hermans Head! Wow, that was a great show. Hank Azaria as his dirtbag friend. All those nutty people in his head. Truly an original and funny sitcom. Herman getting a date with the real Marsha Brady.

      Also remember Flying Blind with Tea Leone and some other guy? About a jewish kid who falls in lover with a goy redhead model. Really funny show. Fox in its ealy years, such fond memories.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    3. Re:Damn kids these days. by pgrote · · Score: 1

      Herman's head was a great show!

      A couple of great links about the show:
      A Complete Overview

      A Big Resource

    4. Re:Damn kids these days. by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Um, time to take another look at the first Simpsons episodes. They sucked compared to how the show evolved a few years later.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    5. Re:Damn kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When that show was on I think I had just started little league.

      Now sit down and be quiet, Grandmpa, before I put you in a home.

  49. Re:James Lipton Is My Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why the only "celebrity" interviewer worth watching is Glick.

  50. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by PotPieMan · · Score: 1

    You can't tune into two radio stations at the same time. For the same reasion, a TV tuner chip can't tune into two TV channels at the same time. You know, circuits and all.

  51. Re:Entertainment Weekly's Article on 300 episodes. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Ah, I missed this one! Thanks. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Hays · · Score: 1

    Well, it would take proportionately more bandwidth than a single channel. Each channel runs at 6mhz, and the total cable can carry 330, 450, or up to 750 MHZ total.

    So even if those were just 1's and 0's coming at 750 MHZ, you simply can't write that fast to your hard drive.

    But it's actually some analog stream that you'd have to convert to digital form, and I don't know what type of overhead that involves.

  53. Wow by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Funny

    yeah.. sure you did.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  54. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Jerf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That, and I don't believe we even have any existing technology to simply capture a collection of mixed radio signals and somehow (digitally or analog) store them...

    Sounds like what radio telescopes do, and what SETI@Home analyses.

    That said, the bandwidth is obscene (as you mentioned), the TiVo hasn't got the processor power to handle that much data (even the lowest scale cable subscription). I didn't do the calculations but I'm pretty confident that even if the TiVo did have the processor power, the hard drive would not be able to write more then five or ten channel's data at a time. And even if it could, the amount of data would overwhelm even a hacked TiVo with a hypothetical terabyte of hard drive space. (I don't think they've been hacked that high but I could be wrong.)

    Guestimate such a drive at a thousand hours (1 Hr. = 1GB or so; it's not perfect but who cares?) and call the cable subscription about 70 channels at the least (that's what I get here w/ Basic Only), and you're looking at a whole 14 hours of storage. (Coincidentally that's how much my 1st-gen TiVo stores of just one channel... ;-) ) Real drives are of course smaller and many people have more then 70 channels.

    You could certainly build a machine capable of doing this but I'm guestimating you're getting into the tens of thousands of dollars to aquire the processor power and the massive RAID-like array needed to compress the stream to a decent size, not to mention the price of the memory bus that can move that much data around. Again, radio telescopes do this stuff so I know it must exist somewhere... but if it's rare enough, the fees associated with the fact that it's a custom solution every time could start pushing you into the hundreds of thousands or millions+ to build a box that just eats the cable signals and stores some decent amount.

    (You can shuffle some of the cost by changing the specs of the system, such as needing less processor power if you don't compress, but then you need to spend more on the drive array to up the throughput. If you're on a DirecTV service, all the data is already compressed but you're still going to spend a lot of money on that drive array.)

    In conclusion, do not hold your breath expecting to see this in consumer electronics anytime soon.

  55. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Hays · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    (most?) TV tuners can't, right, but there would ideally be a way to get the entire signal before the tuner skims off an individual channel. But a 750 megahertz analog signal would still be bandwidth prohibitive in a modern day computer.

  56. Re:Entertainment Weekly's Article on 300 episodes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ah, I missed this one

    Have you considered applying to be a slashdot editor ?

  57. Surprised they are going to do the voices by McQuaid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember reading somewhere a few years ago that in their contracts, it restricts them from doing the character voices in public or on something televised. There was an episdoe of LA Law where Dan Castelleneta plays a character who works at an amusement park as Homer Simpson. Throughout the show you hear the Homer voice but only when he's in the costume. I thought that was a way of getting around their restriction in their contracts.

    Anyone know if they actually had to get permission to do the voices for this ep of actors studio?

    1. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Funny
      I remember reading somewhere a few years ago that in their contracts, it restricts them from doing the character voices in public or on something televised.

      Ages ago I worked for a pop-media magazine. I was friends with a reporter who did an interview with Dan Castellaneta, and at the end he persuaded him to do answering machine messages for a few of us on the tape he used for the interview.

      Sad thing is, it was almost impossible to get people to believe it was the real Homer! Everyone thought it was a passable fake but nevertheless obviously a fake.

      Anyway, that's public, isn't it?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by goon+america · · Score: 1

      They probably let them do the voices because they are doing it ostensibly to promote the show, and I believe aren't getting paid for it. It's a different story if they just wanted to use the voices and get paid for it in some other context.

    3. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 1

      Hank Azaria performed the voices of Mr. Burns and Smithers on the Australian talk show, "The Panel". I don't think their contracts could prohibit live performance entirely.

      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    4. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heary Shearer and Dan Castelleneta were on Conan doing all their voices a couple of months ago. I taped it and had a friend rip it. I'm sure others have done the same.

    5. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Hank Azaria do those voices, when they are Harry Shearer's characters?

    6. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fox told Paul Krassner and Castellaneta that they couldn't release a Homer simpson introduction to Krassner's audio book/album. You can still get it on web in real format here:

      click

    7. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 1

      Oops, my mistake. It must have been Harry Shearer.

      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    8. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by decaying · · Score: 1

      That wasn't Hank, it was Harry Shearer who had previously worked with some "Panel" members on Frontline.

      From memory he did an answering machine message for Glenn Robbins

      --
      ----- One piece short of Legoland
    9. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by blake182 · · Score: 1

      I presume the way they were able to do the voices during the interview is by having the useless clips of the actual show being shown over them while they're "in character", thus negating most of the useful aspect of the interview (showing them as actual people speaking as the characters). As if any of us need to be reminded what the characters look like, or what episodes they were in.

    10. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by MisterKoffee · · Score: 1

      I noticed that during the interviews with the characters (after the interviews with the actors), everyone else was shown on camera doing their character voice(s), but we never actually got to see Julie Kavner do Marge, Patty or Selma. Instead, they showed clips from the show during her characters' interviews.

      I saw Julie on a late-night show years ago, and she refused to talk like Marge--said it would "ruin it" for the audience, or something like that. I wondered if Julie's off-camera-ness tonight had something to do with this, but then I noticed she had left about halfway through the show, so maybe her character interviews were done separately. Hmm...

      --
      ...a market economy is the only way that you sustain a high enough average level of wealth that we can afford to be arti
    11. Re:Surprised they are going to do the voices by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Anyone know if they actually had to get permission to do the voices for this ep of actors studio?

      Well, considering that two of them were on Late Night with Conan O'Brien several weeks ago, I'd say whatever restrictions that might have been placed on them, has since been lifted.

      Conan had them adlib Homer getting examined by Dr. Hibbard.. Well, I can say one thing... impressionists should NOT be allowed to ad-lib!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:"fans" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a girl, that's just about right for me. If you're a guy, I laugh at you! Come on! BRING IT ON!!! :) Hey, unless that's KILOS? Woops...

  60. Re:Nancy Cartwright is a scientologist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot Sofia Milos from the Sopranos.
    Citizen Commisson Human Rights.
    Steve Berra.
    Kelly Preston.
    Mimi Rogers.
    Martin van Haselberg ( bette midlers husband )
    Giovanni and Marissa Ribisi
    Many new people in the cult do NOT understand the truly wacky things that LRON the nut cooked up and called it a religion. So be nice. On the other hand , 2nd generation scienos like Erika Christesen and the masterson brothers( Danny and Chris ) deserve no such consideration.

  61. Programming Schedule by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1
    Who's bright idea was it to schedule this show on Bravo at the same time as the 300th episode it's honoring?
    Wouldn't they rather show it at 9pm (because there's a second episode at 8:30pm) and have a trailing message saying:
    "For more Simpsons entertainment, tune into the Bravo channel now for Inside the Actors Studio with the men and women behind The Simpsons"
    or something along those lines...
    1. Re:Programming Schedule by umofomia · · Score: 1
      Who's bright idea was it to schedule this show on Bravo at the same time as the 300th episode it's honoring?
      Actually, the 300th episode is next Sunday. Besides, Bravo's going to reair this at least a dozen times.
    2. Re:Programming Schedule by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Actually, the 300th episode aired last Sunday, February 2nd. For some bizarre reason Fox is marketing the show's 302nd episode as the 300th.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
  62. You insensitive clod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get Bravo.

  63. She was an actress on Herman's Head series... by antdude · · Score: 1

    I remember her acting on Herman's Head on Fox.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  64. ...but wish they didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate seeing the actors. It ruins the illusion.

    Homer is homer, don't corrupt the imprint.

  65. DirecTiVo owners get both at once by Splork · · Score: 3, Informative

    DirecTiVo owners can record both at the same time.

    1. Re:DirecTiVo owners get both at once by balister · · Score: 1

      Well, only if you have a dual LNB hooked up. DirectTivo has two tuners so you can record two programs at the same time, this is a very useful fature!

      Philip

  66. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
    Bandwidth, baby, bandwidth.

    That copper coaxial carries a hell of a lot of crappy content, 24/7. Storing it digitally in a form that you could pull a decent image out of would take much I/O.

    The problem with digital, see, is it likes to get it right, every time. Analog is much more forgiving, and will let you manipulate it as much as you like, giving up some quality every time. With digital it's all or nothing.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  67. 24 channel TiVos by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

    Umm Microsofts Ultimate TV can handle two streams, so with it you could record two shows at one. I believe it's the only system to offer this in their first version. Perhaps Tivo will have it in their next?

    UltimateTV (rest in pieces)was a DirecTV only device, like DirecTivo. And like DirecTivo it had a huge advantage of being able to record the digital DirecTV stream in the native MPEG2 form. (which, BTW, means it can (and does) do Dolby Digital 5.1 on some channels). Well, since this means it is not doing MPEG encoding, the overhead for recording a show is relatively low - so they had ability to record more than one show at a time. So from the very first DirecTivo units, TiVo build the hardware to support 2 Tuners.

    I think they stopped at 2 because each tuner (for technical reasons I will not go into) required a dedicated LNB (device receiving data from satelite - the "eye" of the dish) and the best available dishes at the time had only dual LNB's. Since then multi-switch technology came out allowing one dish to be used with quite a few DTV receivers, but that is another story.

    While hardware was there, the early DTiVo software did not use it. Only around time UltimateTV came out, TiVo added the software to support the second DTV tuner. All DirecTiVos are now capable of recording 2 shows at same time.

    To make things nicer, an additional reciever charge from DTV is $5 regardless of the type of device, and you do not have to pay extra subscription charge for 2nd and on DTiVos (DTiVo's subscription is $4.99 per month regardless of number of DTiVo's per household or free if you order their top of the line package).

    Further, even the identical DirecTiVo models are able to coexist in same room with unique remote control codes (up to 9 devices for most, plus 3 for sony, which uses different codes)

    So, theoretically you can build a home system with 12 DTiVos (9 phillips, 3 Sony) with total of 24 tuners between them recording perfect DTV quality for the hardware price of the units ($200-$400 each) plus multiswitch(s) (who knows, probably $100-$300 total) plus one DTV subscription ($35-$87 per month depending on channels)plus 5x11=$55 per month for extra receivers (I wonder if DirecTV will freak out if you asked for 11 additional receivers).

    Now, good luck figuring out which show goes on which TiVo though. Plus you'd probably want to invest in quite a few JP1 universal remotes ;-D

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  68. Midnight re-airing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like slashdot aren't the only folks who make dupes.

    1. Re:Midnight re-airing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee Jimmy, What's Taco's favorite system call?

      I don't know Johnny what is it?

      int * dup(int filhandle);

      Funny jijijijijijiji

  69. I've seen them live and it was great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just remember last summer at the Montreal Comedy Festival. Seeing the whole gang (in person) doing a show just with the voices. Amazing.

  70. Re:Well, no kidding...It seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no legitimate group named narcanon.

    The legitimate group is Narcotics Anonymous.

    There's a reason why we say NarCONon.

    $cientology is just trying to get "recognition" by having a name that sounds like legitimate groups like Al-Anon,

  71. You guys are all turds.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude the voices were originally actors on the Tracy Ullman Show. That's where the Simpson's got their break.

    For fucks sake learn some history instead of spouting like fucking 12 year olds. Oh...wait...you are a bunch of fucking 12 year olds...never mind. Carry on then, carry on...

  72. Re:Waaaa! I don't get Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont get Bravo

    Me neither. They're suppose to be an artsy station, but they play alot of crap.

  73. Billie Jean by La.swamprat · · Score: 1

    She was also in the movie Billie Jean with Helen and Christian Slater.

  74. OOPS by Aronymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, according to an online bio, she wouldn't have been much of a kid in the late 80s. Having been born in 1964 would make the chances of that quite slim. But dang if she didn't look 12 on Square One TV.

  75. Re:Well, no kidding... Celebrity status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their celebrity status gives the cult an air of legitamacy. Their celebrity status is used by the cults front groups to trick the unsuspecting public into getting involved with scientology and the rantings of the L. Ron Hubbard.

  76. Re:Nancy Cartwright is a scientologist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drugfreemarshals.org

  77. Canada? by hoser · · Score: 1

    Anyone know when it'll be shown in Canada? We have a channel called Bravo up here, but it's not the same one as Americans get.

    --


    hoser: Slashdot reader since 1987.
    1. Re:Canada? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Since the channels are different and Bravo Canada won't be showing it (I don't even think there is any relation to the US Bravo network), with any luck someone will (hint hint hint) bag it , encode it, then throw it on sharereactor ;P

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:Canada? by DrLazer · · Score: 1

      It won't be this month, because it's Actors Studio Leading Ladies month on Bravo Canada. Tonight's guest: Mary Tyler Moore.

      Not quite the same thing.

      --DocL
      ---

      --
      If it wasn't for half of the people in this country, the other half would be all of them -- Col. Stoopnagle
    3. Re:Canada? by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 1

      Canada's "Bravo!" station (note the '!') does indeed show 'Actors Studio,' but according to their web site they won't be showing the episode with the Simpsons cast this month. Maybe we're on a delayed schedule up here, and we'll get this episode later. I don't know what relationship, if any, there is between the two station.

      --
      "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
  78. OT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OT? Whatever....

    1. Re:OT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By OT you mean Off-Topic, not Operating Thetan, right?

  79. One problem with your theory by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    Why cant you just do a stream record of the WHOLE analog signal (ad converter) and then re-play all channels when you want to?

    Because you'll never want to. When will you want to watch 75+ channels of crap? It's bad enough that you can record one channel at a time!

  80. My brush with Nancy Cartwright, Scientologist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It was a few years ago in Sydney, Australia. As has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread she's a Scientologist. The local AO (Advanced Org - god I know too much about these whackos) had spent over a hundred thousand dollars to open a "Dianetecs Center" on the main street in town, right in the middle of all the movie theaters, video arcades and fast food joints. To that end they constructed a huge two story volcano with a bigscreen TV embedded in it on top of the awning in front of Planet Hollywood (how apt).


    I happened to be on the sreet on opening night and was witness to what followed. There was a large rent-a-crowd of local Scientologists gathered in front of a stage setup on the street, with many more inside the theater they had rented for the evening, in addition the street was packed with the usual Friday night revelers who where all totally perplexed. All of a sudden the loudspeaker came on, and Bart Simpson's voice blared out "Hello, Sydney!" The the video hookup from inside went live and she appeared on the screen, welcoming everyone to the opening. Shortly after Kate Cebrano (tubby Aussie songstress and devout Scientologist) came on stage to annouce the big opening, blah blah blah to the bafflment of the most non-Scio crowd present, then she and the tuxedo wearing tanned yank Scio out from head office began the countdown to the "grand opening". Drums rolled, they hit one - I should mention at this point thaty it had been raining - nothing happend. these two fuckwits are standing on a damp stage in front of what looks like a two story paper mache science project while the only sound is the passing traffic and the noise of hundreds of cinema goes trying to push through the crowds of the faithful to get to their movies. After much running around, swearing and thumping the pyro guys get TWO roman candles to sputter to life as Cebrano and captain Dickhead from LA clap and go "woo.", and the local devotees clap wildly on queue. You know, with so may OT-III's and above present I'd have thought their Thetans could have put on a better lightshow - but what the fuck do I know, right?


    Anyway, the point is: Nancy, you got busted going "Bart" to promote your "Church". Betcha thought no-one stateside would ever find out, huh?

  81. Re:My brush with Nancy Cartwright, Scientologist.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Interesting postscript to this story - the Videowall that was supposed to run 24x7 with the word of Uncle Ron was so high up and faint you could barely see it, and that was when it was actually working - the Dianetics center was actually a tiny room accessable only from an alley off the main street and it was always closed. To top it all off the bloody volcano BURNED DOWN a couple of years later after an electrical fault. And they whole time it was up there, for all the money they spent on it, there was no way to tell it was meant to advertise Scientology...


    Morons...

  82. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    Or, you could see what the cable companies use. The SEND the digital signal(s) over the cable in the first place, and not all of it is live feed (which would have to be handled anyway). Of course, for the cached feeds, they have to receive them, too, but probably on multiple antennas. Not such a custom solution after all - there's probably one or more in each market. I believe the thingy is called a cable head-end, and is basically a mainframe kinda computer. That probably doesn't do much to solve the price issue, but it's oviously possible - it's their business, after all.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  83. Actually... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much like the animated characters they play, none has aged much in the past 13 years. Apparently, FOX owns some magic drug they insist their actors take. The folks on 90210 were also forced to take it (although at a much lower dose), which is why they were in their junior year of high school twice.

  84. Bravo in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is a dumbed down fake mockney gansta channel which shows the shit shows from the US. The only passable show is GamePad3, a computer gaming show, which shows the 'latest realeases' from 6 months ago.

    And why am I suspicious that the article writer works at FOX? You only get that tye of review from a PR phuckwit acting as Joe Public on the internet.

    1. Re:Bravo in the UK by droopus · · Score: 1

      A)Uh, no, I don't work at Fox

      B) The show I mentioned is on barely-watched Bravo, not Fox.

      C) The Simpsons needs little promotion: it's Fox's biggest show ever.

      D) Notice my relatively low five digit /. number? It would take quite a fuckwit to lurk on Slashdot for four or five years just so I could post about an obscure show in a few years.

      E) Moron.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
  85. link to article and photo of the volcano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The unveiling of the billboard

    And it's destruction article confirm's the use of Bart Simpsons voice at the launch...

  86. James Lipton impersonation by lukateake · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen BOB ODENKIRK do his stand-up impersonation of James Lipton? Best. Impersonation. Ever.

    "I would just like to thank my wife for doing me the small favor of... redefining the universe."

    1. Re:James Lipton impersonation by DrLazer · · Score: 1

      Patton Oswalt's Lipton bit is vicious; while the impersonation isn't close, the phrase "stench of failed actor" is tossed around. And of course, I highly recommend it.

      --DocL
      ---

      --
      If it wasn't for half of the people in this country, the other half would be all of them -- Col. Stoopnagle
  87. Re:Yep by lukateake · · Score: 1

    If I were you I would embrace the freedoms that allow you to get "high" and come back to /. to pontificate. ;-) Kidding! Seriously though, I have always had an uneasiness with the term "Homeland Security". It reminds me too much of Der Fatherland.

  88. Harsh comments on beloved people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nancy Cartright and Danny Castelleneta deserve ALOT more respect than this, especially by THIS crowd which obviously worships the show by their fanatical knowledge. Those are some very mean and unnecessary comments about Nancy's religion and Dan's and Yeardley's appearances considering all the laughs these people have brought you folks over the years. Without Nancy and her "wacky" religion America would never have "Ha ha" burned into its collective consciousness. Without that "weasly" looking Dan, America would never know the magic of the words "D'oh" and dozens others. Without that "nerdy" looking Yeardley we would never have that intelligent foil to Homer's idiocy as well as a constant source of moral outrage. So I would please hope you consider any slam against the Simpsons voice actors is a slam against America and we are far to young and dumb to defend ourselves against such onslaughts.

    1. Re:Harsh comments on beloved people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I didnt know that they wrote the episodes.

      feckwit.

    2. Re:Harsh comments on beloved people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mel Blanc had nothing to do with Bugs Bunny's success either did he? Writers write, big deal. Ever hear of ANY of the writers of your other favorite shows? NOpe. You watch Friends for the dumb mannequin like actors, not the writing.

      F-wad

  89. Chuck Jones had nothing to do with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bugs Bunny's success did he?

  90. Re:James Lipton Is My Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that James Lipton is able to get so many big-time actors to appear on his show, it would seem, is that he refrains from focusing on the...umm..."quirks" that some actors have. That would be left for folks like Conan - although I'd sure love to hear him get out of character : "so Hugh, why is it you like to get stoned and pick up hookers?" But, the whole foundation of the show is that there's no bullshit personal questions or ambushes. It would appear that the show's objective is about the vocation of acting, as far as I see it, not sensationalizing.

    I didn't see the Jack Lemmon interview, but having seen the show maybe two dozen times, I'm surprised that the next question wasn't "so how did that affect the way you played the part?"

    I don't set my schedule around his show, but it is appealing for that fact that it's not produced, presented, nor targeted for the average, mindless, (more disparaging adjectives) "TV Viewer."

  91. Here here! by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of all these whacko relegions running amok on my TV. Look at em all, you got yer scientologisgts, yer christians, yer jews, yer muslims, yer bushists, yer hindus. It's enough to make a guy sick. You'll all see the truth when Marshall Applewhite comes back. Just wait and see, Hale-Bop is coming back and we'll all be taken to the Physical Kingdom Level Above Human. Where's my applesauce?

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  92. Hank Azaria had a big part in Birdcage... by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 1

    ...with Robin Williams and Nathan Lane. He was the shoeless "maid" with a Spanish accent who was supplying Lane with "pirin" tablets. He was soooooo funny--also (speaking for my two X chromosomes here) extremely cute.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
    1. Re:Hank Azaria had a big part in Birdcage... by xjerky · · Score: 1

      Plus he was on the Fox show "Herman's Head" for several years. (Why I remember this I have no idea.....)

      Anyway, he used his normal voice in that movie.

      Plus there was "Tuesday's with Morrie", a poignant TV movie with Jack Lemmon, 2 years before his death. That was played completely seriously.

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  93. I'm not saying you're wrong about this... by WesternActor · · Score: 1

    ...but which performer(s) on South Park are Scientologists?

    --

    --Matthew
    "If the lights of Broadway blind me, I won't mind..."
    1. Re:I'm not saying you're wrong about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but which performer(s) on South Park are Scientologists?

      Isaac Hayes, apparently. I would've thought he was more of a Funkologist (with mad science), but what do I know.

  94. Re:FP Ninnle tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only reply to messages asking questions about Ninnle linux!

  95. Re:My brush with Nancy Cartwright, Scientologist.. by Feng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Add to this the incident where pranksters broke into the projector room and projected porn on to the big screen. It attracted a small crowd and stopped traffic on George St. The cops had to break into the room again to stop the projector.

    I never knew that it was a Scieno propaganda tool but now that I think about it the volcano makes sense. The only time I saw something on the screen was the banner advertising Dianetics strapped over it when the screen stopped working.

    --


    --- if y cn rd ths y cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmmng!
  96. PARENT HAS THE CORRECT ANSWER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yeardley Smith got in some trouble for doing voices at a book signing unrelated to Fox but they're more than welcome to do them when promoting the show. There's also supposedly a clause about the things they can say (i.e. they're not supposed to do radio station specific promotions like "You're listening to 96.5! Doh! (in Homer voice)).

  97. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's mostly offtopic, but a very accurate depiction of exactly what governments around the world, in particular the US, have been doing since 9/11, with the war on terrorism as the excuse. What you Americans are doing to yourselves is sacrificing all your freedoms so that you can keep your freedoms, and very few of you seem to have caught on to the paradox. How long will it be before an alliance of countries, Germany and Japan included, ironically, will have to fight back against your government to free you up from the oppression you are digging yourselves into?

  98. Re:Hank Azaria - Also boinking Phoebe in Friends by W1BMW · · Score: 1

    You can see him occasionally on Friends, using his real voice. I still crack up at Mystery Men, even though my friends all hated it. /zim

  99. Re:Waaaa! I don't get Bravo! by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    Me neither. They're suppose to be an artsy station, but they play alot of crap.

    I didn't realize there was a need to delineate the two.

    --Joey

  100. Just For Laugh by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 1

    I live in Montreal, Canada.

    Here we have something called, Just For Laugh Festival. It's a two weeks long festival featuring humorists from around the world. Last years' included a show called In The Fless with the Simpsons. It was a live reading of an epidose from the cast of the Simspons followed by a live Q&A with Matt Groening himself.

    It's not really related to tonight's show but it can answer some concerns you had about publicly doing the voices.

    And it really is funny to see Castalneta going D'Oh! and Hmmmm.

    Matt Groening is a funny guy too. His father is actually called Homer, is mother Marguarette, sister Lisa...which leaves him to be incarnated in Bart...which is really just brat with mixed up letters.

    He did not answer in which state Springfield is.

    1. Re:Just For Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Springfield is Eugene, Oregon.

    2. Re:Just For Laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The state's name is shown on the state's flag, you nitwit! It's "not just another state".

  101. Re:Yep by TheKey · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, what? You want me to stop fucking everything and start crying about the Patriot Act sequel? Come on, man. We can't like the Simpsons and not hate where this country (USA) is going? I don't agree with any of these laws any more than you do, but there really is just nothing I can do about it - at the moment, anyhow.

    Well, .. I don't really know what to say. I think your depiction of future America is a bit extreme though. And, you know, there were people - not necessarily jews - who didn't like where Germany was going.

    --
    My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  102. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the brute force approach and throw money at the problem. To record 70 odd channels at once for up to 2 days, purchase 70 60-hr TIVOs for $299, a signal splitter/amplifier system ($200, est.), cables, power system, and a storage rack. Total cost for hardware: $22,000. Subscribe to service provider for TV and TV for 70 boxes ($12,000 yr. approx.)

  103. Worst Posting Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if Jesus Christ himself were to be interviewed by James Lipton, I wouldn't last a minute hearing the lame questions that eminate from the pie hole of that blue card reading hack. Please, never again mention this show.
    Yours truly,
    Gene Shalit and Rex Reed

  104. "Aggggggh, donut"? by njord · · Score: 1

    What the hell kind of onomatopoeia is that? I've always heard "mmmmm, donut"...

    1. Re:"Aggggggh, donut"? by david_420 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's the drooling sound.

  105. Re:Well, no kidding... Celebrity status by torpor · · Score: 1

    Well, duh.

    Celebrity status is also what keeps you chained to your television set for hours and hours every day, idly wasting away your life, doing nothing but focusing exclusively on the content that corporate entities want you to focus on...

    Geeze. How hard is it to think outside the box?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  106. Re:Well, no kidding...Scientology is a cult. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not a religion.
    Nice try.

  107. Homer's Paul Krassner Intro by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Last year Dan/Homer introduced Paul Krassner at a speaking engagement in LA. Krassner wanted to put it on an album but after reviewing the material, Fox declined. They don't seem to restrict him from posting it on his web site. Check it out. Unfortunately it is in Real. You'd think Krassner would distribute it in Ogg Vorbis.

    I thought they reported this here, but a cursory /. search returned nothing.

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
    1. Re:Homer's Paul Krassner Intro by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Great intro. However, Paul Krassner could have done a better job transcribing, I noticed several errors. Nothing major, but dammit if you're gonna put Homer to text do it right!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Homer's Paul Krassner Intro by Choron · · Score: 1

      Cool link, but frankly the next is not that funny, try doing it without Homer's voice and it will sound just plain.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  108. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All religions have aspects of them that must be taken on faith. Noone is disputing that fact about religions. The difference is that the so called scriptures of Scientology were written by one person , L. Ron Hubbard. One person whose sole intention was to avoid paying income tax. Look up Operation Snow White. Educate yourself. Take care of scientology now or accept scientology influence on your childrens education.

  109. David Cross, not Bob Odenkirk by extra88 · · Score: 1

    Those two guys work together so often, it's easy to get the names mixed up. David Cross did his Lipton impression in a stand-up thing shown on HBO.

    David Cross: The Pride is Back

  110. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, there are some TRULY paranoid reactions to scientology.

    This is what happens when you allow your politicians to call for national prayer time and whatnot. The same small minded retards who get all bent out of shape over 'patriotism' (gotta have the best country in the world!) can now also get bent out of shape over religion (there can be only one!).

    Grow the fuck UP. You don't want anything to do with scientology? Fine! DON'T have anything to do with it! But don't treat other people's beliefs as diseases that need to be cured. Your beliefs are probably quite repugnant to someone as well.

    For the record, I am no scientologist... I think it's fucking stupid to believe 'religious' writing from a science fiction author. But I don't see any reason to force my opinion on others.

  111. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if you could travel faster than light...

    With a radio transmitter beaming The Simpson's show signal into outer space, you could conceivably travel to the point in the show you wanted to watch by traveling faster than light between some point in the universe and the transmitter.

    Maybe the universe is one big TiVo being watched by supraluminar beings?

  112. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Educate yourself. People caught up in a cult do not have beliefs. They have orders. The orders come from the leaders of the cult.
    Noone is saying there can only be one religion. YOU sound you need to grow the fffk up.
    Look up Lisa McPherson
    See what would happen if you were to copy some their 'beliefs' on the internet. YOU would be sued. Scientology does not have beliefs they have trade secrets, that you have to pay to read.

  113. Re:Yep by TheKey · · Score: 1

    How is this a motherfucking troll? I was pointing out that we just can't end our lives when a new law we don't like is mentioned. We can't just stop fucking everything and go protest. Some people like the simpsons, and they're going to comment about that. A very valid point. Don't moderate comments "troll" just because you don't agree with them. Lord almighty.

    --
    My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  114. Re:Not Simpsons related, but..... by absurdhero · · Score: 1

    I don't think that is possible because a tuner tunes itself to a certain frequency. it does not receive them all at once and filter out everything but what it needs. My understanding is, the actual tuning hardware adjusts to a certain frequency and amplifies those waves only. To get multiple signals at once, you would have to find the highest common factor of the two (or more) waves and do more tuning and filtering from there.

  115. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, being sued isn't a problem with the religion, it's a problem with the legal system. I don't honestly think I could be sued in my country for such an act, but I don't have access to any scientology material to test the theory.

    Regardless, you still seem to think you know what's best for everyone, which is the major problem. Anyone who joins a 'cult' and follows orders blindly is obviously not bright enough to think for themselves - do you advocate we kill all such people? Or do we just suppress their desires, and... well...give them orders?

    There are plenty of laws to stop activities that are harmful, so what harm is done to you if some people with low self-esteem want to do what someone else tells them?

  116. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google for fishman affidavit.
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/index.ht ml
    And yes, if your country has a legal system you can and will be sued and harrassed by scientology if you post this information.
    And sadly MANY intelligent people get suckered into scientology, only because the general nature of the cult is hidden from view by people that choose to remain ignorant like yourself.
    Criticize them openly. I dare you.

  117. Since when? by kongjie · · Score: 1

    You'll have to bring me up-to-date on the history of "insane" boycotting "for any reason" being a "proud American tradition".

    Are you saying it is RIGHT to boycott WB because they have too many shows featuring African-Americans? Is it right to boycott Outback Steakhouse because they make donations to the Special Olympics and you think that the mentally retarded should be euthanized?

    I never said the poster didn't have a right to boycott; but is the basis of his/her boycott ethical? Is it decent? If you're for free speech and the freedom to pursue your preferred religious faith, then it becomes problematic if you suggest that believers in a certain faith should not be allowed to obtain a certain kind of employment.

    1. Re:Since when? by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      You'll have to bring me up-to-date on the history of "insane" boycotting "for any reason" being a "proud American tradition".

      I believe he was referring to the matter of free speech.

      Are you saying it is RIGHT to boycott ...[various examples]

      I think he was not saying what is right, but more of what one has a right to do.

      ...but is the basis of his/her boycott ethical? Is it decent?

      Doesn't matter. One has the right to boycott what one wishes. If it is an unfair/unreasonable boycott, then additional voices can be raised against it.

      Hey, that'd be a meta-boycott!

      Imagine what a beowulf cluster of meta boycotts could... ouch!

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    2. Re:Since when? by kongjie · · Score: 1

      Yes. Well-said and I agree that is what s/he was saying.

      While I believe we have the right to boycott anything we wish, I feel our responsibility to use that right in an ethical fashion is of great importance. Americans have a tendency to assert their rights first and consider the consequences second.

      That is a bad thing, IMHO.

    3. Re:Since when? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      You'll have to bring me up-to-date on the history of "insane" boycotting "for any reason" being a "proud American tradition".

      Because the tradition of free speech extends to the freedom to say stupid, immoral, countercultural or downright insane things.

      Are you saying it is RIGHT to boycott WB because they have too many shows featuring African-Americans? Is it right to boycott Outback Steakhouse because they make donations to the Special Olympics and you think that the mentally retarded should be euthanized?

      It's not right, but you have the right to do it, if you so choose.

      If you're for free speech and the freedom to pursue your preferred religious faith, then it becomes problematic if you suggest that believers in a certain faith should not be allowed to obtain a certain kind of employment.

      The fact of the matter is, the original poster, however misguided he or she might be, is exercising his or her rights, and is not infringing on anyone else's rights. "Problematic" != illegal.

      We should use _our_ rights of free speech to inform the poster that his or her motives are questionable, which is what you have done.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  118. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already did criticize them openly, and I fear nothing. I have already met these people handing out leaflets and blathering about "IQ tests". I would say these so-called 'smart' individuals that get sucked in are not quite as smart as you think, but merely egotistical. Any intelligent human can reason through something for themselves - those that don't deserve what they get.

    But regardless, you are trying to set yourself up as some kind of 'moral authority'. "Yes, this religion is good. No, that religion is bad, we must destroy it!" You cover yourself by claiming that it's a 'cult' instead of a religion, which apparently makes it okay.

    So what happens the next day, when you decide to label Islam a cult? Many members of that religion do stupid things because they're told to... should we abolish that one next? How about christianity? That caused the crusades! Millions of people killed because their religion (or the liars running it) told them to... do we eradicate christianity for you now too?

    Where does it end?

  119. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah the folly of youth. I leave you now in your self-righteous puddle of naivete.

  120. Re:Well, no kidding...Scientology is a cult. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh
    All religions are cults.

  121. Re:Well, no kidding...Smarty pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha!

    Paraphrased: I can't refute what you say, so I'll take a superior air, and trust that others' paranoia will support me in my xenophobia. I will also dismiss your opinion, in a desperate attempt to look more intelligent.