Slashdot Mirror


419 Scam Costs Britons 8.4m GBP in 2002

Albanach writes "In this article the Scotland on Sunday newspaper reports figures from the UK's National Criminal Intelligence Service which show 150 Britons were caught out by the Nigerian 419 scam and its variations in 2002, with a total loss of 8.4m GBP ($13.3m US)or around 57,000 GBP ($90,000 US) a head. "

196 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Does that mean by Epsillon · · Score: 1, Troll

    That we're gullible or just easy targets?

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    1. Re:Does that mean by Evil-G · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are around 50 million people in the UK, and only 150 of them actually got scammed by this. Therefore I can only assume that you are one of the 150 gullible easy targets as the statistics show that the majority of us are not :-)

    2. Re:Does that mean by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      :o) Very perceptive.

      Actually, I wasn't trying to be offensive or attempting a troll. I was interested to know if it was a) that we are more gullible than other nations, b) more dishonest and therefore easier to scam in this way or c) a little more desperate for cash to justify any means. I, personally, would go for the latter given the state of our economy and the fact that just about anything costs double in UK compared to the States, for example.

      Another interesting point brought up somewhere else in the thread is if there were adequate protective measures on mail servers, would this have worked at all? Surely those of us in the know would have caught on to the 419 scam fairly early on and could have filtered for it? I have, BTW, on the three domains under my control.

      Reading between the lines of your reply, I can see the real message; perhaps figures from the states would put this in perspective... ;o)

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  2. How about by unterderbrucke · · Score: 2

    The various governments of the world get together and spend the money to educate the public about the Nigerian scam. My relatives delete the e-mail because it's too good to be true, not because they know it's a known scam.

    1. Re:How about by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


      Yeah, and after that, let's fund a billion dollar campaign to educate the world about the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and DNF.

    2. Re:How about by CVaneg · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, and after that, let's fund a billion dollar campaign to educate the world about the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and DNF.

      I totally agree. You just can't teach common sense. Why, just today, I was talking with the finance minister of Uganda as I was transfering control of my entire life savings in a complex attempt to skirt international finance laws, and he said the exact same about the Nigerian scam. Some people are just surprisingly gullible.

    3. Re:How about by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Bah! Uganda is just so January! The hot new development is moving in the direction of Zambia The Scam Industry moves fast, and you have to be a leader in new innovation!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:How about by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Sheesh! Next you'll be saying that the Backhoe Fairy doesn't exist. (Everyone sends me $10, I leave it under my pillow, and she takes away a spammer's connection to the Internet. Trust me. ;^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:How about by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      Still, the amount of money lost is quite a bit. Common sense or not, I think Bush should go after these guys in his 'war against terrorism.'

      Do these guys have anything in common with the Xupiter/Gator/Whenu.com people? I'm wondering if maybe there's some connection that could confirm any conspiracy theories about the internet.

      What would really be freaky is if the RIAA and MS were behind it as well... I'll have to do some research on that one...

    6. Re:How about by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and after that, let's fund a billion dollar campaign to educate the world about the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and DNF.

      Since nobody writes letters from Nigeria claiming to be the Tooth Fairy, I think that this second campaign of yours is a boondoggle. The Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy don't leave the borders of the country with upwards of 80 million a year either.

      As much as we like to see a small number of incredibly stupid and greedy people suffer tremendously, it is still within the public interest that this get stopped.

    7. Re:How about by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Do these guys have anything in common with the Xupiter/Gator/Whenu.com people? I'm wondering if maybe there's some connection that could confirm any conspiracy theories about the internet.

      Yes, they are both run by complete and total shits.

      Scumware is a major problem in its own right. One of the rising vectors for scumware is spam. People are sent spam with active-x components, javascript exploits etc. that try to install the scumware without notifying the user. [Yes toto, they do do that even though they claim that they don't]. Alternatively the user is sent to a web page which tried to download the component.

      The interesting question to me is how these scumware companies make money. Selling demographic information can be profitable, but the figures don't add up. How can it be profitable to spend $3 a user to install a component? Net advertsing is in a slump, few sites can cover their costs. How on earth can the scumware vendors with disreputable business practices get advertisers in this market?

      Something does not ad up here.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:How about by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      I rest my case.

      They ARE terrorists. Probably down with Bin Laden too.

    9. Re:How about by Ponty · · Score: 1

      I wonder how often someone actually responds to these guys but the response (quoting the original) gets caught by the spammer's spam filter.

  3. What did you expect? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2, Funny



    Scurvy makes you think crazy things.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:What did you expect? by freestyle-fiend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the Europeans who migrated to America were far more likely to get scurvy than Europeans who never went to sea, so those scurvy-ridden Brits are now called Americans.

    2. Re:What did you expect? by NortWind · · Score: 1
      Europeans who migrated to America were far more likely to get scurvy than Europeans

      Right, scurvy is out. So what is the cause? Maybe it's the pickled eels?

  4. I wonder... by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if more people in britan just reported it. Americans tend to not report things of this nature out of shame. Anyone know anything about the numbers in other countries?

    1. Re:I wonder... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I'd think brits would be less likely to report it. Stiff lower lip and all that rot.

      Pip pip.

    2. Re:I wonder... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Stiff lower lip and all that rot

      Only if you're standing on your head! It's a stiff *upper* lip you're thinking of.

    3. Re:I wonder... by ndecker · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the "Schwarzbuch der Steuerzahler" (PDF, german, Page 6) ( A yearly publication of a german taxpayers union ) there was a german city called Enningerloh which gave a loan of 285000 DM ( ~ 140000 EUR/$ ) to a poor pensioner so he could complete his financial transaction with nigeria. They expected part of the profit in return.

    4. Re:I wonder... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Right ho what what.

      I misremembered. I guess because lower lip seems to make more sense.

    5. Re:I wonder... by FTL · · Score: 1, Insightful
      > if more people in britan just reported it. Americans tend to not report things of this nature out of shame.

      I suspect the difference is that the UK government is much more protective of its citizens than American governments. In general, North American governments disallow things that are proven to be dangerous, whereas European government allows things proven to be safe.

      The effect is that over here there is a much greater level of trust amongst consumers. So when a scam artist arrives, more people fall for it.

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    6. Re:I wonder... by ipour · · Score: 1

      I don't know the numbers in other countries. After getting two letters in the mail and dutifully sending them to the FBI, I got three more solicitations via internet. I responded to these by sending internet fraud complaints (http://www.ifccfbi.gov).

      Since then I've probably received five more of these "Nigerian" letters via e-mail.

      Hey, you don't suppose.............

    7. Re:I wonder... by daveq · · Score: 1
      LOL. I'd love to meet the person who has $90,000 stolen but was too embarrased to tell the authorities.

      <sarcasm type="stupid"> And keep in mind that being scammed twice would just be twice as embarassing, so they'd more likely not to report it.

      I would pose as the fleeing king of Lower Slabovia (surely you read of the revolution in your great American newspapers? *the confused idiot gives a conciliatory nod*). Then I'd ask if I can stay in the house of this gullible, vain person for a few days. Of course I'd get in without a hitch. Then I'd just take what I wanted at night and drive off in the person's car, all with the security that the the victim would be too embarrased to report it. </sarcasm>

    8. Re:I wonder... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know where I can find a link to that famous song from Handel's Messiah? It's my favorite song from that particular work.

      The words start out:

      "Oh we like sheep, have gone astray....."

    9. Re:I wonder... by bluesangria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What an interesting argument for NOT having your government be a nanny - it ends up with "childish" citizens.

      blue

    10. Re:I wonder... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I didn't see a reference to American numbers in this article. However I expect the American number to be higher.

      What a lot of people don't seem to realize is that part of the appeal of the scam is that the plot to transfer the money leads to a situation where the supposed outside helper can walk away with the entire bankroll instead of just the helper's fee and the supposed owner of the money can't do anything about it because they're stuck in their country or otherwise unable to pursue you for it.

      Not all of the people who fall for this scam are going for the full take, but I expect many are.

      I was going to say that I think more Americans are more likely to go for the scam, but come to think of it I don't know the Brits very well and can't make that comparison. But it is my impression the scam aims at more well-to-do people and that there are more well-to-do suckers in the US than GB.

    11. Re:I wonder... by Threni · · Score: 1

      Proof, then, that your stereotype would be inaccurate. Chalk it up to experience and try again.

    12. Re:I wonder... by Tomun · · Score: 1

      There are certainly lots of Americans loitering in hotel lobbies !

      I'd say that while there are more stupid rich Americans than Brits, the percentages are likely to be similar.

    13. Re:I wonder... by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 1
      if more people in britan just reported it. Americans tend to not report things of this nature out of shame.

      Do you have data to back up that assertion? I could just as easily say "I wonder if this is because Britons are dumb. Americans tend to be smarter about not being scammed in this way."

      I don't actually believe that, but I don't believe what you said either.

  5. That's nothing! by grub · · Score: 1, Funny


    Close to 300 million Americans are caught up in a scam similar to the Nigerian one. See my sig.. :)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  6. How stupid can people be? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I heartily encourage the full prosecution of the con artists, I don't feel all that sorry for the victims.

    I mean, if you're that stupid, it's probably best for society if you don't have any economic influence anyway. Your right to vote should probably be taken away as well. :P

    1. Re:How stupid can people be? by dattaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean, if you're that stupid...

      Not to mention these people are directly supporting the spam industry and making it very lucrative. The victims so richy got what they deserved. Consider that their fine and tax for stupidity.

    2. Re:How stupid can people be? by Sunda666 · · Score: 1

      I know it is not politically correct, but i tend to agree with you. Some people are just that : stupid.

      Unfortunately, if you look closer, they are a vast majority. Hope it changes in the next generations,
      but I think is too much to wish...

      cheers

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    3. Re:How stupid can people be? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would feel some sympathy for them if they were merely stupid.

      However, most the people who fall for it are also dishonest; in most cases they think they're bilking the Nigerian (or Botswanan or whatever) governments. Makes me feel a bit less sorry for them.

    4. Re:How stupid can people be? by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I kept getting these Emails and I was wondering why they bother. I mean everyone must by not be aware of the scam and there is no point to put in any more effort.
      But when Cakes Law v1.0 ("Everyone is a Fuckwhit") comes into play amasing things happen.

    5. Re:How stupid can people be? by chrisseaton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They're not just stupid, they were choosing to take part in illegal laundering of money. The fact that were crossed doesn't stop them being criminals. I would prosecute every one.

    6. Re:How stupid can people be? by KarmaPolice · · Score: 1

      Not to mention these people are directly supporting the spam industry and making it very lucrative. The victims so richy got what they deserved. Consider that their fine and tax for stupidity.

      Yeah, just like lotteries are an extra-tax for people with poor math skills.

    7. Re:How stupid can people be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hell, I bought WorldCom, because someone not smart enough to be a schoolteacher became an EdwardJones broker and convinced me to buy it.

      Everybody is a fuckwit, at least once in their life.

    8. Re:How stupid can people be? by Danse · · Score: 1

      Most of those people don't even know what "laundering money" means. They think they're helping some guy get his money away from a corrupt government and that they'll make a nice chunk of change in the process. I think they really are stupid.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:How stupid can people be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Amen to that!

      People who fall for it have the lethal combination of greed, stupidity and dishonesty, and I'm afraid I can't feel much sympathy for them. For that matter, I wouldn't want them within a mile of a business I was running.

      By getting involved in these schemes on the basis that the messages claim, they are willingly becoming accessories to a crime. What other laws are they prepared to break to make a quick buck?

    10. Re:How stupid can people be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But the problem is that now scammers have economic influence, which is much worse than stupid people having economic influence.

      This is why stupid people should be protected by legislation to some extent - otherwise they can become tools of the dishonest.

    11. Re:How stupid can people be? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      No sensible person is going to expect to get $50,000 in his bank account overnight and not wonder, just a little, whether or not he's breaking a law somewhere. It's just not practical to think otherwise.

    12. Re:How stupid can people be? by Danse · · Score: 1

      It's just not practical to think otherwise.

      Hence the "stupid" label. Not that I don't think greed has a lot to do with it as well. "Greedy" + "stupid" sounds about right for a lot of them. Maybe toss "naive" in there as well in a few cases that I've read about.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  7. important matter by dario_moreno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Sir
    We Do Not Know Each Other But I Am The Son Of The President Of Scotland Yard. I Need Your Help To Recover The Sum Of One Point Five Billion Pounds (Bp 1,500,000,000) Which We Have Recovered In Nigeria. To Proceed Please Send Your Credit Card With The Pin On A Post It...

    (lameness filter preventing to post in upper case)

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    1. Re:important matter by Snaller · · Score: 1

      lameness filter is lame!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:important matter by Dasaan · · Score: 1


      Seeing as you are talking about pounds, I'll be assuming you really mean £1,500,000,000,000 (one point five billion pounds) and not the tiny sum of one thousand five hundred million pounds (£1,500,000,000)
      </pedant>

      --
      XP is basicly 98 with a lot more extra features to hunt down and disable. --Dram
    3. Re:important matter by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Informative
      The best scamming of the nigeran scammers that I have yet seen is here: http://www.haxial.com/fraud/mikeaba.html

      The person who was scamming the scammer got very elaborate, sending fake passports, documents, etc. with the name "James Kirk". It's quote funny.

      I tried the same thing some months back and I actually got the scammer to fax their documents to the FBI electronic fraud group. He e-mailed me back saying he phoned "my number" which actually was the FBI and the woman there said there was no James Kirk ... hehe

      But seriously, if you receive a physical letter and you're in the USA, fax it to the FBI at (202) 406-5031. The Internet Fraud Complaint Centre is worth a visit, and in canada you can forward all such e-mails to wafl@phonebusters com which is Phonebusters which is a fraud specialist group that's federally funded.

    4. Re:important matter by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Seeing as you are talking about pounds, I'll be assuming you really mean £1,500,000,000,000 (one point five billion pounds) and not the tiny sum of one thousand five hundred million pounds (£1,500,000,000)

      Can you explain this?!?

    5. Re:important matter by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Something Awful also pegged one of these scammers with a series of well written and hilarious emails.

    6. Re:important matter by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      In GB, one billion is a million millions. God only knows what a trillion is.

      And then they complain about the US not using the metric standard!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    7. Re:important matter by Panoramix · · Score: 1
      In GB, one billion is a million millions. God only knows what a trillion is.

      I'm guessing a billion billions.

      And then they complain about the US not using the metric standard!

      Well, most countries I've been to use the metric system, and also say "a thousand millions" for 1E+9 and "a billion" for 1E+12. Actually, is there a country, besides the USA, where "a billion" is a thousand millions?

    8. Re:important matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      All the people I know in Britain know One Billion as 1,000,000,000 (thousand million), the only people who think a billion is a million million are the ones who suck at math(s). In old Britain, a billion was a million million but that changed some time ago, along with decimalization, Metricalization, etc-ization. We're no longer cavemen. Anyway, the French have got it worse, "mille", "million", "milliard" don't know exactly but one of them means 1,000 one means 1,000,000 and the other means 1,000,000,000. Your guess is a good as mine :)

      Lets face it a billion = 1 followed by 9 zeros. It can't be 1 followed by 12 zeros, otherwise no one would be a billionaire, and the US economy wouldn't be a trillion dollar economy. and more importantly 2^32 would no longer be Four Billion Two Hundred and Ninty Four Million Nine Hundred and Sixty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Ninty Six.

      Just wouldn't sound the same any other way.

    9. Re:important matter by Panoramix · · Score: 1
      Puerto Rico! :-)

      Very interesting. That is the first Spanish-speaking country that I know uses the word in this fashion. Are you metric?

      According to this dictionary [reference.com], it's mainly the Brits who are different.

      I see. But that dictionary concerns only with the USA and the British. The RAE, for instance, defines "billón" unambiguely as a million millions (with an exception for Norteamérica).

  8. Re:Surprising? by Epsillon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Maybe they should lose theire superiority complex.

    Or not, if that spelling's anything to go by... Just kidding ;o)

    I think it's mainly jelousy on our part. We used to be a world player but now we're reduced to hanging on to the tails of Mr. Bush like some sort of flunkie. Most Americans I have met and spoken to are as intelligent and well-mannered as any Briton, most of the time more so. You just have a propensity for electing to office the same fools we do :o)

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
  9. Never... by barracg8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never was the National Criminal Intelligence Service less aptly named.

    1. Re:Never... by Isofarro · · Score: 1
      Never was the National Criminal Intelligence Service less aptly named.


      That probably explains why they haven't found a thing yet, except for a sighting of Elvis in Tescos.
  10. I'm not surprised.. by antis0c · · Score: 1

    I bet its mostly new users and the eldery. Why a few months ago a colleage of mine received one of these emails and I happened to go over and catch him replying! Lucky him I walked by and explained exactly what it was before he sent all his bank account information. He looked all excited like he was going to become a millionaire until I explained to him it's a scam, and that once he sends that bank account information, he can expect his account to be wiped clean.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    1. Re:I'm not surprised.. by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Strangely, by some sort of dumb luck I'm assuming - I never saw one of these emails until I was helping my dad with something on his box about 4 months ago - I've been on the net since '96 and when I saw it I took it to be a joke - hell, I was rolling on the floor in tears laughing by the end, of course, the amusement dies out after the first time, but hey.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  11. I think the Brtions are not the only ones... by ihtagik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    who have suffered financially due to the scam. However shooting a (Nigerian) diplomat is definitely not going to help things...

  12. US and UK announce new "War on Spam" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    United States President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced today that Nigeria was the latest target country in the "War on Spam." "Too many rich people have had their money unflairly taken away by these evil people." said President Bush. He continued by saying "We shall wipe them off the continent of Australica." Prime Minister Blair stood at his side in solemn agreement. After President Bush finished, Blair corrected Bush's mistakes for reporters including "unflairly" and "Australica."

  13. How about the legitimate dictator's relatives? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've really got to pity the legitimately deposed dictatorial families that must have a way to get their money out of the country.

    They send out email to a select few upstanding citizens, hoping to be able to get their millions out of the country for a small percentage of the money. Then, no one believes that the offer is legitimate!

    Yes, these deposed dictator's relatives are the real victims in all of this! Let's not forget about their tragic plight.

    1. Re:How about the legitimate dictator's relatives? by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Yeah especially the ones with thier shift keys STUCK DOWN...

  14. A sucker born every minute by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I want to know how so many suckers held onto 90K per person for that long in the first place! Youd' think if they would fall for the Nigerian scam, they'd have bought 800 AB-ENERGIZERs or Ionic Breeze air purifiers by now.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:A sucker born every minute by miu · · Score: 1

      Many of these scams target the elderly. The 90k is likely the rapidly disapearing capital that they live on.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  15. Just goes to show by jaymzter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't cheat an honest person. They weren't gullible, they were willing to lie for money.

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:Just goes to show by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

      You are all so mean and unsympathetic!
      It IS possible to cheat and honest person. People tend to build expectations regarding behaviour of others based on how they themselves behave.
      An honest person is less likely to suspect dishonesty.
      This is how I see your average victim in this scam:
      She/he is 70 years old. Gets 1 email (snail mail) per month. Is lonely, getting a bit senile. Does not have anyone they can consult, ask for advice, etc. Maybe used to read the papers, but doesnt anymore. Yes, she/he opens the door to strangers, responds to preposterous solicitations, hands over bank account information. Gee whiz. This could happen to the best of us, in 40-50 years!

      --
      Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
    2. Re:Just goes to show by kmellis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "You can't cheat an honest person."
      Sure you can. The "Western Union" wire-transfer scam featured in Mamet's "House of Games" comes to mind. It goes like this:

      The con artist goes to a Western Union outlet and sits down as if he's (she's) waiting for a wire transfer. Time passes. The mark comes in, someone who is obviously waiting for a transfer and is impatient when they find that it's not arrived. The con artist strikes up a friendly conversation with the mark. They both mention how they're waiting for a desperately needed wire transfer and they're both impatient. The con artist suddenly gets an idea. "Hey", he says, "You know what? If my wire gets here before yours does, what'll you say that I just loan you the $X you need and you can pay me back tomorrow after your transfer gets here?" The mark says, "Gosh, that's really nice of you. And I'll do the same thing for you." Since the con artist doesn't actually have money coming in, inevitably the mark gets his transfer and offers the loan to the con artist. The con artist takes it and walks away, never to be heard from again.

      Now, this is only marginally plausible, but it's the example that came to my mind. Most people these days would politely refuse the offer, but some wouldn't, and some of them would gullibly offer to reciprocate.

      "Mike", the con artist in "House of Games" that demonstrates this con to the psychiatrist, asks her if she know why these are called "confidence games". She responds, "Because someone gives you their confidence?" Mike says, "No. Because I give them my confidence." Which is a brilliant line and also very true.

      Almost every person has some "weakness" or another that makes them vulnerable to a con artist. Often, yes, it's greed and dishonesty. But it can also be generosity, compassion, or simple confusion. And, more often than you might think, it can be arrogance or over-confidence. Some of the people here who are ridiculing all victims of a scam as being "stupid" may be vulnerable to having their overconfidence exploited. Carl Sagan (and others) wrote about how it is that scientists seem to be surprisingly easily tricked by "scientific" fraudsters (paranormalists, etc.). It's because the scientist's overconfidence is taken advantage of; that the fraudsters, like magicians, misdirect the scientist's attention to areas that they naturally focus upon and perform their slight of hand in places where the scientists aren't looking and didn't think to look. A con artist will do the same thing--set up something that looks like a scam to attract the suspicious mark's attention, then perform the real scam in a direction the mark isn't looking.

      Everyone thinks they are immune to being conned. They're almost all wrong.

      That said, there's almost no chance that I could be scammed by a con artist appealing to my greed. I'm automatically suspicious of any potential windfall from any source. But, on the other hand, I'm almost certainly vulnerable to a carefully crafted scam that takes advantage of generosity or compassion like the one I detail above. The only comfort I take in that is that there are more scams leveraging the mark's greed than there are that leverage other characteristics.

      A classic, authoritative book on the history, psychology, and sociology of confidence artists and their cons is "The Big Con" by David Maurer.

    3. Re:Just goes to show by chancycat · · Score: 1

      Read Frank Abagnale's "The Art of the Steal" - it is very possible to cheat an honest person. The fact is that most people are honest most of the time, and when they are cheated, they were still being honest.

      --
      Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
  16. Have we forgot? by xintegerx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People....

    THE 'victims' tooks part in the scam, trying to import and export money while avoiding reporting it and paying taxes.

    Shouldn't all 150 go to prison? Remember, the fraud of millions is also on Brittain's side of the table with its citizens...

    1. Re:Have we forgot? by leeward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that the 'victims' here are the rest of us. I could care less about the people that lost their money. But in the last few months, the amount of 419 spam I get has simply exploded, to the point where it now makes up a noticeable portion of my spam load. And the reason is of course that the scammers have found that the 419 stuff pays.

    2. Re:Have we forgot? by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      I guess depending on whether you use a router/firewall or not, and you cable modem internals, this might not work.

      See if it works at home or at a neighbor's house.

      If it works for anybody, please post what happens cause I won't ;x

    3. Re:Have we forgot? by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      Through my NAT/router it comes up with the /. home page.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    4. Re:Have we forgot? by Eristone · · Score: 1

      Oh heck.. okay..

      578 mod 256 = 66
      291 mod 256 = 35
      762 mod 256 = 250
      662 mod 256 = 150

      C:\>nslookup
      Default Server: honshu.casaichiban.com
      Address: 192.168.10.252

      > 66.35.250.150
      Server: honshu.casaichiban.com
      Address: 192.168.10.252

      Name: slashdot.org
      Address: 66.35.250.150
      Aliases: 150.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa

      Yeah.. I'd close my eyes too... :)

    5. Re:Have we forgot? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't all 150 go to prison?

      For what? Attempted tax evasion? Hell, you may as well arrest the entire country then.

      About the only thing you can accuse them of is terminal stupidity and/or gullibility.

      Fortunately I don't know anyone (personally) that's been taken advantage by this or any other conartist to a significant extent. But I'm sure you'd be the hit of the family if your grandparents lost their life savings to such a con artist and your only suggestions was to throw them in jail.

      Very compassionate of you.

    6. Re:Have we forgot? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      You can't very well hold people responsible for tax evasion when there was never any money, hence taxes, to evade in the first place.

      However, there've been some very interesting cases before the US Supreme Court over whether conspiracy convictions can be obtainable when there was never any chance that a criminal act was going to take place. As far as I know, the issues are still undecided, and technically you can be arrested (in the US) for conspiracy to commit a crime even when that crime simply isn't possible to commit. In this case, you've got that sort of situation.

  17. More information by arvindn · · Score: 2, Interesting


    The 419 coalition website fights the nigerian scam

    scam alert

    A hilarious account of a revenge killing related to the 419 scam

    1. Re:More information by nautical9 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That revenge killing isn't all that hilarious... the murder victim was a simple consul for the Nigerian Embassy, and had nothing to do with the scams - and a secretary was also wounded. I imagine the crazed and confused 72-year old gunman just assumed anyone linked to Nigeria must be in on it.

      Now if the murder victim was one of the scam artists, I'd be dancing a little jig right now.

  18. Some of those are quite elaborate by homegrown · · Score: 1

    My dad got one of the first 419 scams I know of sent to him and it was very well done. They addressed him by his proper name and position (not hard to find out, but still), the letter was long and well written. I was quite impressed; someone had really tried to make this look as authentic as possible, unlike the ones you usually get now.

    1. Re:Some of those are quite elaborate by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1
      Well written??? I have received hundreds, and every one of them has been in broken english, some of the phrases are laughable at best.

      must be that the scammers know me, not going to waste time on actually writing something legible up, instead just filling their quota for the day!

    2. Re:Some of those are quite elaborate by MyHair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have received hundreds, and every one of them has been in broken english, some of the phrases are laughable at best.

      Scamming is about distracting the brain away from the absurdity of the scam. It's a cleverly crafted letter, believe me. The details such as the upper case and bad spelling are distractions; the large amount of money is a distraction--either a temptation for you to steal it all or 'proof' that these people have plenty of money and don't need to scam you, depending on your type. The government employee or royal relationship, the details of why they can't get it out or why it's stuck, etc..

      It's all designed to distract you and to be interpreted different ways by different personality types. Your brain throws out what's not relevant to you and rationalizes the existing information into something you can trust. The brain rationalizes the bad grammar as the fact that they are from Nigeria or that the writer is stressed from being in a hurry or from political strife and somehow that enhances the feeling of trust. In the case of the grandparent post the letter was directed more specifically, probably as a legitimate business case, and in that situation a different approach (proper spelling and grammar, correct title and name) is used to create the distractions and trust.

      Some suckers see an opportunity to steal the whole bankroll; some see an 'honest' chance at getting a large fee for helping these people out (and yet somehow ignore the fact that the people are violating rules and laws in the process); and so forth.

      After making contact the scammers are skilled at presenting plausible-sounding scenarios where the money they need from you decreases or increases as they find out what you're able and/or willing to pay.

      I'm speaking from personal experience and not from reading or traditional schooling: I got conned once on a small time basis ($117 by two guys on the street, but I was 18 and that was all the money I had that week), and in retrospect I see all the ways I discarded some of the information they gave me and rationalized the rest, and how different people would've fallen for the same scam for different reasons; it's quite a marvel what the brain does and how scammers exploit it. In retrospect my guys tempted me with greed, good samaritanism, religion, sex and race relations (political correctness) that I can recall--there was probably more. I fell for the good samaritanism and race relations and ignored the other temptations, but once they find out what you're about they work on trust and confidentiality. The key is to build mutual trust so they can walk away with your money (literally in my case), and for you to not tell anyone else because a third party will almost always immediately see how stupid the whole thing is because they didn't go through the ridiculous brain conditioning you did to arrive at the mental state you're at.

      That con was the most humiliating event in my life. At the time $117 was a lot of money but not so much that I went hungry or lost my home, but the shame and humiliation is for how I fell for something so stupid. 15 years later I can now look back on it as a cheap lesson and thank God it didn't happen later when I had more to lose, but come to think of it I've never told anyone outside the family about it until now. I was living week-to-week then; I can't imagine how people who've lost months or years of work/money would feel; probably suicidal.

      It is hard to feel sorry for people who fell for the 419 scam, and even I had no sympathy for them. But now that I recall my con, you need to realize these con men are very professional and know how to twist your head off of your shoulders and make you believe anything; once you fall for the initial hook they are experts at maneuvering you to the sting.

    3. Re:Some of those are quite elaborate by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      I got conned once on a small time basis

      I don't suppose I could convince you to describe it? If it's really that embarassing, then never mind.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  19. The scam is in the transfer fees. by wackybrit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you could clear out someone's account just from their account number and sort code then anyone could it.. after all, you have to swap these details to send money to each other with Internet banking.

    What the article fails to point out is that these scammers don't just drain your bank account, they actually request you pay certain 'transfer fees' so that they can get the money moved across. These 'transfer fees', inevitably, are thousands of dollars. Anyone paying them is an idiot.

    And that's all this is. I think those scammers deserve every red cent. THIS IS A TAX ON THE STUPID and ignorant, something we should have the state taxing, but if the Nigerians have to do it, so be it.

    This is another 'tax' that, like duty on cigarettes and alcohol, doesn't affect me at all.. so I'm all for it.

    (Notice how the people scammed all actually had thousands in savings.. a sign that the greedy people aren't the poor, they're the already rich)

    1. Re:The scam is in the transfer fees. by cperciva · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Notice how the people scammed all actually had thousands in savings.. a sign that the greedy people aren't the poor, they're the already rich

      Bad statistics. The people scammed all had money (to begin with) because the people running these scams don't bother with people who don't have money.

      Rich people, historically, have been more likely to die in Concorde plane crashes, but that doesn't mean that rich people enjoy flying on Concorde jets more; it just means that the poor never get onto concorde jets in the first place.

    2. Re:The scam is in the transfer fees. by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      Just because you have thousands in savings does not mean that you are rich... just that you know how to save your money.

      Just because one saves for a down payment on a house, does not mean that they are rich.

    3. Re:The scam is in the transfer fees. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      But it is also a tax on everyone else. Whether you think people are stupid or not, it is still a crime and still requires investigation as does any other. Not to mention that money flying out of the country never to be seen again also affects the economy in other detrimental ways.

    4. Re:The scam is in the transfer fees. by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      "This is another 'tax' that, like duty on cigarettes and alcohol, doesn't affect me at all.. so I'm all for it."
      -----------
      Yes, why should you be affected if millions to billions of dollars go to some sort of Nigerian Mafia that probably supports some terrorist group? Why should you care that those suckers cash doesn't stay in your country and make it a better place. Why not make Nigeria a better place for organized crime?

      I guess it doesn't affect you at all.

    5. Re:The scam is in the transfer fees. by wackybrit · · Score: 1

      Yes, why should you be affected if millions to billions of dollars go to some sort of Nigerian Mafia that probably supports some terrorist group? Why should you care that those suckers cash doesn't stay in your country and make it a better place. Why not make Nigeria a better place for organized crime?

      I'm a Libertarian. I think keeping out of the affairs of other countries is a good idea. Leave that to the UN.. oh, I forgot, the UN doesn't ever stick to its guns over unfulfilled resolutions! That's why the US and the UK have to get involved in Iraq's affairs when the UN doesn't bother.

      Okay, got ya now.

  20. What if.. by hexdcml · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if I gave them my bank account with £0? Tell them to deposit into an empty account.. instead of providing your *real* account? Also, can the banks track who makes the withdrawl so the criminals can be caught?

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    1. Re:What if.. by praksys · · Score: 1

      Most versions of the scam ask people to supply some money up front (to pay bribes or whatever). This is a scam run by con-men - there is no way for you to make money off it except by running the scam yourself, and there is no way to avoid losing money except by not getting involved.

    2. Re:What if.. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "What if I gave them my bank account with £0? Tell them to deposit into an empty account.. instead of providing your *real* account? Also, can the banks track who makes the withdrawl so the criminals can be caught?"

      Of course you should be willing to pay the NSF charge when they overdraw your account.

    3. Re:What if.. by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      Also, can the banks track who makes the withdrawl so the criminals can be caught?

      Not very easily in these third world nations due to their laws, buerocracies, inefficieny, and local corruption. That was one of the problems the US faced in tracking down the Al Quida terrorists.

    4. Re:What if.. by horza · · Score: 1

      What if I gave them my bank account with £0? Tell them to deposit into an empty account.. instead of providing your *real* account?

      They will be quite happy with that arrangement, and will deposit the money in the account. After you put up a trivial sum of petty cash to bribe a small civil servant to stamp a document releasing the funds. In fact, now you've already spent that amount of cash, you may as well stump up the only slightly larger sum to also grease the bank official. Etc etc.

      Phillip.

  21. Huh? by stereoroid · · Score: 1

    You want to explain that "scurvy" comment, mate? If it's a reference to the origin of the word "limey", you may be talking about your forefathers, remember...

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's suggesting the victims should use the Twinkie defense. The sad offshoot of which is scurvy.

  22. where to forward this rubbish by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some time now I just forward all of this stuff to:

    419@spring39.demon.co.uk and new.scotland.yard@met.police.uk

    OK, not difficult, but my bit at helping nail these crooks.

    1. Re:where to forward this rubbish by horza · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of the scam when it first arrived in my in-box. I thought it was a joke email, so I replied saying that if they were prepared to pay up front a flight and put me in a nice five-star hotel then we could talk about it. When they actually replied (didn't think they would) and spoke about arranging the flight, I realised that they were a bunch of crooks and I forwarded all my correspondance to Scotland Yard (who politely thanked me).

      I agree with all the above posts that anyone stupid enough to want to get involved in such criminal activity truly deserved to lose every penny.

      Phillip.

  23. Skeptical by bluelan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The $90,000 per head figure is really tough to buy. The only monetary figure they name is a £7,000 loss for a recent victim. That seems about right to me. I'd be really interested in knowing what the median loss was.

    --

    I used to be a narrator for bad mimes. (wright)

    1. Re:Skeptical by MyHair · · Score: 1

      The $90,000 per head figure is really tough to buy.

      That's the reported figure. I'm guessing there's a threshold between shame and desperate hope that you may get your money back. If I lost GBP 7,000 I might realize that there's very little hope of recovering my money for the risk of embarrassment I'd get for reporting it. If I lost $150,000 I might throw ego out the window and hope to God and the government that someone can get my money back; I might even think that the large amount lost makes my loss more important for others to pay attention to.

  24. Stoopid is as Stoopid does... by xA40D · · Score: 1

    Honestly. Hands up if anyone here would accept something too good to be true on face value.

    Okay, those of you with your hands up... have I got a great deal for you. For just 9.99....

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  25. Re:Don't you just love the people of the UK! by caluml · · Score: 1

    I bet these are the same people that voted Tony Blair into office.

    **Any**thing was better than Major.

  26. need to stop spam at source by fermion · · Score: 1
    If this information is accurate, I think this kind of shows the profitability of spamming. England has around 50 million people. If the 419 spammer send email to 2% of those people, then that would be 1 million persons. If only 150 responded, then this is a 0.015% response. In other words, the spammers need one gullible person out of 6000 to make this a rather profitable industry. This is 1/100th the rate that one would need if doing a direct postal mail campaign. One can imagine this kind of money supporting several hundred nigerians.

    Spam is profitable. Current laws allow it to be nearly anonymous. Current laws encourage spammers to lie, cheat, and steal because there is very little chance of repercussions. This goes on through traditional channels, but it often easier to file lawsuits and change behavior because of the tracking of traditional channels. All the filtering in the world in not going to help. It is just like illegal drug or animal trafficking. It is not a problem if 90% of the payload is intercepted. You will make a profit on just the other 10%. We need to apply the rational rules to commercial email that we apply to other commercial speech.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:need to stop spam at source by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      I'm told that the average response rate for spam is much less than that, more like 5 per million. About 3 orders of magnitude less than what they get with snail-spam. Scams, on the other hand, might be more effective to begin with, but as word spreads about particularly sucessful ones, returns would fall off quickly.

      Now if we could get some excellent and widely used spam filters to take the rate down another order of magnitude or two, we'd be getting somewhere. With only a few dozen responses per billion, they'd be hard pressed to pay the bandwidth bills.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  27. Stupid people are everywhere by codewolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I hear news like this I have to remind myself that 50% of the human race is below average intelligence. Usually when I mention this to someone they say "that can't be true!" Then I know that they are one of the lower half. A fool and his money.....

    --
    http://www.codewolf.com - Just good stuff to waste time
    1. Re:Stupid people are everywhere by bytesmythe · · Score: 1
      50% of the human race is below average intelligence.

      Actually, that isn't necessarily true. Observe:
      10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 42.
      42 / 6 = 7

      The average is 7, but only 33.33% of the original addends are below the average, while 66.67% of them are above average.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    2. Re:Stupid people are everywhere by isoteareth · · Score: 1

      Average is not a precise term. It usually refers to the mean, but it can also be used to refer to the median.

    3. Re:Stupid people are everywhere by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      "I see dumb people. They're everywhere! And they don't even know they're dumb."

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Stupid people are everywhere by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 1

      So if they *usually* respond like that (and are hence in the lower half), then presumably well over 50% of the human race is of below average intelligence :)

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
  28. Where is the list? by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    These unfortunate people need help badly. Where is the list of names and addresses? I have this brilliant scheme to recover lost assets, guaranteed no selling, no pyramid involved, just send cheque for GB£20000 to the following Lagos box number marked payable to bearer...

    Seriously, though, has anybody considered how easy it would be to data mine the output from credit cards or supermarket loyalty cards etc. to identify gullible people? People with a big annual spend who buy gold plated hi-fi connectors, or crystals to stop damaging radiation from computer monitors, or some of the more ridiculously expensive "health" foods. Oh wait, I just saw the special offers on my credit card statement. Someone just did.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Where is the list? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Spam is an excellent way to data mine the tards who can be ripped off. So are those low-budget commercials on TV and telemarketing in general. A list of the 1% of the population most gullible is an EXTREMELY valuable thing to an experienced scammer.

      I regularly attend a local 'real in-person' auction here that is held weekly and buy stuff that I resell on eBay. There have been a few instances where 'estates' have been liquidated where it's clear it was a dim old biddy who the scam marketeers had gotten to. Usually there are multiple boxes of that kind of shoddy merchandise crap that such businesses deal in. Cheap plastic do-dads, those 'miracle whatever' products you see on television. Often the items being sold in the estate sale are new and in the box. Sometimes it's obvious it had been going on for years.

      Let's face it, it's sort of a generation-inheritance thing. Foolish old biddies whose husband handled all the finances are very, VERY gullible when widowed. The next generation at random, unless there are direct descendants looking after their parents, are bound to extract all that wealth. The only losers are we in the general tax base, who lose out on all that estate tax income that's been drained out.

      DAMN, I am being cynical this morning....

    2. Re:Where is the list? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though, has anybody considered how easy it would be to data mine the output from credit cards or supermarket loyalty cards etc. to identify gullible people?

      You don't have to data mine, you just have to troll. The bait is silly money making offers. I attended one of those home business conference/sales pitch thingys a while back, stupidly signed up for a couple of them and in addition to wasting money on stupid businesses I got a barage of emails offering more stupid business ideas.

      Once they hook a sucker they put him on the sucker list and sell it to others.

    3. Re:Where is the list? by kmellis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Years and years ago, when I was about 23 or so, I was "recruited" by somone to some sort of insurance selling thing that was actually a sort of pyramid scam. This became more and more obvious as the presentation went on. But, you know, I could have been wrong. So I asked questions. They weren't used to people asking questions. During a break, I asked some of the other people there if they really thought this was all on the up and up and that they were guaranteed a five or six figure income within the first year. "Why wouldn't this be true?" was their universal response.

      To my mind, the idea that you could go and do something trivially easy and become rich makes it self-evidently untrue. Otherwise, everyone would be doing it. However, the people that fall for these sorts of things see it the other way around. They think, "But your skepticism is an example of why everyone isn't doing this, and why people like us--who can see an opportunity for what it is--are the few that make so much money this way."

      Personally, I think this susceptibility is a specific example of a more general problem. The general problem is that people are not even remotely aware enough of how likely they are--on any given judgment--to be wrong. I'm always aware that a) I could be wrong about any specific matter; and b) I am definitely wrong about some significant number of matters at any given time. I'm always looking for evidence that contradicts my always-a-work-in-progress judgment. People that want to influence you and fool you about something, if you're not ever vigilant (and have a prideful fear of being proven wrong), will only need to sumrount that first and only barrier of doubt--then they have you hooked. It's smooth sailing from then on out.

  29. You need my assistance by armypuke · · Score: 1

    Dear Friend,
    I am the son of John Q. Lawyer, a highly respcetable businessman from the country of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I got your contact info over the internet during my search to assist those who have fallen prey to unfortunate circumstances. It is my understanding that you have just recently lost funds equal to ONE MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS($1 million).

    I can help you recover all of your lost funds. This business transaction is 100% risk free. The only thing I ask is 10% of the total amount to cover any processing fees and legal expenses. All I need from you is as follows: 1. Your confirmation of your ability to handle this. 2. Your word that you can keep this business as confidential as possible as all times until we conclude this business. 3. Your telephone and fax numbers for communication. 4. Your full permanent addess. 5. Your bank account number to deposit your recovered funds.

    As soon as I get the above information, I will disclose to you the names of the parties involved and when you can expect for your money to be recovered. I am waiting for your response to enable us to proceed.

    Nzanga JOSEPH (DESIRE) MOBUTU

    --
    Army of One!
    1. Re:You need my assistance by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, you just described a real scam.

      Scammer scams someone, then a while later has a different person contact the scammed person, posing as either a type of law enforcement, or a private non-proift agency for victims, saying that they have recovered some of the money, but they need a security deposit or some such to be able to process the paperwork before the money can be returned.

      Amazing isn't it?

  30. Cried Wolf... by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I feel bad for that one actual Nigerian ex-royal who actually is trying to smuggle out his/her money and make a new life. Who's gonna believe them now?

    Oh, wait...the British, I guess. Nevermind.

  31. Check out Scam o Rama by waxcrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scam o Rama is devoted to receipients of 419 scam letters responding in commical replies. Very funny and entertaining. One guy convinced a scammer to send him a gold sample which he used to buy beer.

  32. Wow! by autophile · · Score: 1
    Where do *I* sign up?

    --Rob

    "Small, green, and split three ways"

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  33. Will Scotland Yard release there addresses? by vrassoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will Scotland Yard please release the 150 e-mail addresses?

    I have some really interesting never-to-be-repeated offers that will interest them.

    1. Re:Will Scotland Yard release there addresses? by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      As if they can afford to maintain their intenet access anymore...

  34. I think these scammers share info, too by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an experiment, my wife replied to one of these scam emails when we first got it. We pretended to be interested in it, and then laughed as we led them on, for at least 5 or 6 emails in a row. "Sure, we'll meet up with you - at this place and time." Then, "Oh, sorry - we weren't able to make it. Hope you didn't wait for us long? Let's try this again." Finally, we just let things get absurd enough that the scammer realized we weren't serious, and gave up.

    Well, ever since then, guess what? We get about one of these scam emails per *day*, all slightly different and from different origins.

    So I guess these scammers resell mailing lists of people who reply to their original scam letters!

    1. Re:I think these scammers share info, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I get one per day, but I've never replied to any of them.

  35. Re:Don't you just love the people of the UK! by Zemran · · Score: 1

    and what was wrong with Mogadon Man ?

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  36. Darwinism. by Shoten · · Score: 1
    Let me see if I have this straight...people who:

    Are willing to participate in a scam to deprive a third world nation of millions of dollars through contract fraud, embezzlement or something similar and who are also...

    B) willing to put a lot of trust in co-conspirators for such a transaction...

    ...are getting rooked for almost 6 figures USD apiece? What's the problem? :)

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Darwinism. by dentar · · Score: 1

      People who are that stupid don't deserve help from the police or the government. Darwinism can fix nearly any problem, if we'd all just let it!

      --
      -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  37. These people make SPAM work... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, you're willing to put $90000 on the table in a scam. You're gullible beyond belief. How many more do you think will pay $10-100 or more for penis enlargements, make-money-fast, diplomas and herbal viagra? One of those famous scientists said something like "Only two things are infinite, human stupitidy and the universe, and I'm not sure about the latter". He's right you know...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. and two to take him... by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Ad infinitum, the world loves a clown.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  39. And the most annoying thing....... by Solitary+Angel · · Score: 1

    I bet BT has seen fit to give all of these *extremly bright* people, who apparently believe anything they read or see on the net, DSL already while folks like me are stuck on dial-up grrrr
    Sorry, I just take any opportunity I can to moan about that ;)

    --
    SA

    --
    SA
  40. Re:Surprising? by xA40D · · Score: 1

    ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS DRIVE ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ROAD

    We do drive on the right side - the left side. Left is right and right is wrong. Could it be simpler?

    Besides, globally are more miles of left-hand drive roads that there are right-hand drive. But there are more right-hand driver cars in the world. So driving on the left means less congestion. Try it sometime. ;-)

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  41. Re:Surprising? by nomadic · · Score: 1

    I sometimes do. It's thrilling, but short-sighted law enforcement officials frown on it for some reason.

  42. Theres a local farmer here who actually went by happyhippy · · Score: 1

    to Nigeria and was held for ransom. They clened out his bank account, and he got his family to pay even more into it for the con men to take.
    He was released soon after the money ran out. He gets laughed at alot by everyone here.

  43. Are there this many dumb people? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Wow, this blew me away...

    If anyone's interested... I have a bridge to sell.

  44. Einstein by interactive_civilian · · Score: 2, Informative
    Kjella said:
    One of those famous scientists said something like "Only two things are infinite, human stupitidy and the universe, and I'm not sure about the latter". He's right you know...
    That would be Albert Einstein, who was known to say a great many things (and that is only a small sample.

    One of my favorites (which isn't listed on that page above) is: "I have reached an age where, if someone tells me to put my shoes on, I don't have to."

    :D

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  45. Classic e-mail and responce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dogbert answers Scott Adams e-mail a snipet from his news letter (I'm Anonymous coward, since United Media sues everyone)

    Dear Mr. Adams,

    I am writing to you with utmost urgency from Lagos, Nigeria. This is an investment opportunity that you will not want to miss. Ten million dollars in gold bullion has been discovered in a bank account in my family's name. But due to our current cash flow situation, we cannot afford the outrageous bank processing and legal fees to take possession of this gold which is rightfully ours. I am proposing that your kind self wire me $10,000 U.S. to cover these fees, and in return you will receive one million dollars wired to your account after we take possession of the gold. Please respond. Time is of the essence.

    Swinhar

    -responce-

    Dear Swindler,

    Mr. Adams doesn't know much about Nigeria, but everything he has heard would lead him to believe that your offer is an excellent investment opportunity with no downside risk whatsoever. Unfortunately, all of Mr. Adams' money is already tied up in the Nigerian court system and he does not have the cash to pay his attorneys to get it back. I propose that you wire Mr. Adams whatever money you do have, then he will free his money for your use. He will also send you a free toaster for doing business with him. It's a win-win scenario.

    Sincerely, Dogbert

  46. Could this be a hoax? by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

    I'm suspicious of this story for 2 reasons:

    1) How could anyone STUPID enough to buy this scam actually have acrued so much money to start with?

    2) How could they work a computer with webbed fingers and plankton in place of their brains?

    Oh yeah... 3) Profit!

    1. Re:Could this be a hoax? by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Most people near 65 years old have managed to put away at least $100k. This could be equity in their home or just their retirement savings. These people keep sending money until they can't possibly send anything more, and then realize they have been conned. These are likely the same people who spend 10% of their earnings on lottery tickets as their retirement plan.

    2. Re:Could this be a hoax? by graxrmelg · · Score: 1

      1) How could anyone STUPID enough to buy this scam actually have acrued so much money to start with?

      Ever heard of inheritance?

  47. How stupid can people be? and other rhetoricals by chloroquine · · Score: 1

    Well, they say that the lottery is a tax on the mathematically and statistically illiterate. I guess this is just another kind of tax. The only problem is that at least with taxes, a certain proportion usually goes to some good things. Like my salary.

  48. Stupid by armypuke · · Score: 1

    The latest breed of scammers are just plain stupid. They don't know enough to delete any .mil email addresses from their spam lists. The number of 419 scams being sent to .mil email addresses goes up everyday. The military is well known for responding with excessive force to ensure problems are taken care of. Some young punk sitting in an Internet Cafe in Nigeria is going to be in for a surprise when a smart bomb crashes through the front door.

    --
    Army of One!
  49. Nigerian 419 scam by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    It actually a group of people doing it. I have been lucky enough to be targeted by them, and now I get their emails or varations on it daily. Not sure why my work email which never gets spam gets these.

    The only thing I can think of is the foreign tech support offices I email. Or a vendor email list im on.

  50. Remember by cbdavis · · Score: 1

    "A fool and his money are soon parted".

  51. HAHA! by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    I wish I knew that many stupid rich people.

  52. You should learn about statistics. by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 1

    I am 6 trillion times smarter than everyone else. So 99.99 % of the world population are of below average intelligence.

    What you mean is below median intelligence.

    --
    Moritz
    1. Re:You should learn about statistics. by kmellis · · Score: 1
      codewolf wrote:
      " Every time I hear news like this I have to remind myself that 50% of the human race is below average intelligence. Usually when I mention this to someone they say 'that can't be true!' Then I know that they are one of the lower half. A fool and his money.."
      ...to which Moritz Moeller responded:
      " I am 6 trillion times smarter than everyone else. So 99.99 % of the world population are of below average intelligence. What you mean is below median intelligence."
      Yeah, from where I'm standing, codewolf has demonstrated that he's the one in the bottom 50%. Further, the people that are skeptical of his statement are right to be skeptical.

      I just love this kind of thing. There's almost nothing more delightful to me than seeing someone arrogantly proclaim their superiority while actually demonstrating their inferiority.

      You see it a lot on Slashdot, actually.

    2. Re:You should learn about statistics. by firewood · · Score: 2, Funny
      he's the one in the bottom 50%

      Join him. The above poster didn't specify whether it was a mean, median or modal average, nor the digits of accuracy of the number 50.

      My experience is that the hypothesis about stupidity is true, even for very large values of 50 (50%).

    3. Re:You should learn about statistics. by kmellis · · Score: 1

      That's being overly generous. "Average", in everyday usage, is understood to be synonymous with "mean". All schoolchildren know how to calculate an "average", very few people understand what a "median" is. For this reason, while it's the case that people will use "average" as synonymous with "mean", no one ever uses "average" as synonymous with "median". Writers (and speakers) always specify "median" when that is the idea they're trying to communicate. I was not wrong to assume that is what he meant.

  53. Guess what. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    You CAN clear out someone's account, just from their account number and sort code.

    If you have access to the US electronic banking system (not hard to do, there is paperwork & security checks, but it's not that hard, many small businesses do it), you can drain someone's account with just their account number. yes. really.

    Yes, obviously you can go to jail if ytou do this without permission.. but they ask questions after the fact.

    It takes 48 hours for funds to clear. If someone doesn't notice, in time, that the funds were wired away, they could quickly be wired somewhere else.

  54. Negotiate by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried to negotiate with him? I found him to be a reasonable man. When I mentioned the I was also in negotiations with the Nigerians, he DOUBLED my percentage. Wow!

    I just can't get "girl who runs computer" out of my mind.

    1. Re:Negotiate by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Pretty good deal, considering you were at 51% to begin with, right?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    2. Re:Negotiate by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      No, I was offered less. It was initially around 30%. What makes you think you know anything about this anyway? It was a private offer, extended to ME only. Something is fishy here...

  55. Re:I agree totally! by wackybrit · · Score: 1

    You dipshit. The whole point is that you can't be scammed easily. You have to actually be dumb enough to fork over the money by your own will. This is not the same as a hacker getting your CC number and draining it. This is like a stranger coming up to you and saying 'Can I borrow $100,000? I'll pay it back later.'

  56. Re:How about the payback angle? by nwanua · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Now, I'm not jusifying these criminals who defraud people. Personally, as a Nigerian, I am embarrassed to get these letters as well, and once in a while I send a scathing reply (which I bet is promptly deleted)

    Don't forget that "no truly honest person falls for these scams". The greedy fools who wanted to defraud the Nigerian government got defrauded themselves, and they have the gall to complain :-D

    But one thought constantly crosses my mind when I hear people complaining about these crooks. I am ever surprised that no one talks about colonization, slavery, land grabs, and all the other "scams" the nation of Britain pulled on Nigerians for centuries. And don't forget that those scams were sanctioned by the British Government itself :-)

    No, I'm not bitter... part of that was our fault. But when enteprising young men from Nigeria (much like British "entrepreneurs" in the late 1800s and early 1900s) decide to fleece Britain or America, fooling the locals from those countries, I must admit it makes me chuckle just a little bit :-)

    Yes some American and British victims are "innocent", and I realize a few people have actually died while pursuing these quests for illegal money, so I'm not trying to belittle the situation; governments should continue the crackdown on these perpertrators, and their foolish victims. Yes the victims; what ever happened to aiding and abbetting a crime? That should make them delete those emails quick!

    I hope I have been able to add another dimension to your thoughts when you read about 419 scams.

    Nwanua.

  57. What kind of name is that? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    The "National Criminal Intelligence Service"? Are they providing a service to the general public or to Criminals?

  58. maybe this should be an ask slashdot.... by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    I have a (non-illegal I think) idea to combat the 419 Nigeria scam, it goes like this. Everyone is welcome to forward their emails to a domain setup specifically for this(nigeriascam.org), all emails are parsed by a program to discern it is a scam and the sender of the original email (the scammer). Then an automatic reply is sent informing the scammer that I'm very interested in helping them with their money problems and please contact me further. The replies are parsed and the conversation continues until they give up or realize we're wasting their time. The goal of this is to waste their time, since they're likely a real person reading through most replies (at least the positive ones that make it past their mail filters). The secondary goal would be to collect information about them from various tactics which I won't reveal at this point (is there a copy of /. in Nigerian?).

    There are 2 main problems I see right now. First is getting the time to write the thing (in perl), and second the reply addresses could/would give it away to the scammers, if they track the messages sent, or if they catch on to the several domains I use to reply from. A possible work around to the second is to setup mail accounts on various free servers and have them forward, or get other like minded people to donate free accounts on their mail server that simply forward email to an address at my domain, which has no MX entry ... yet...

    Please respond to this thread with your comments on this idea, or if you're willing to help me out.

    ---end of main thread, more rambling about ideas after---

    Ideally we could use several mail servers and just put them all in the MX entries for the domain, even several domains, since we don't need to worry about forwarding emails to correct accounts each mail server could be configured to think it's the best MX for the domain and parse/reply locally, thereby speeding up transmissions.
    We could also record the information collected about the scammers and submit it monthly to the FBI/secret service. I believe information we could gather could be IP addresses with times on that IP (usefuly for locating a person in meatspace), names and phone numbers (names will likely be phoney, but phone numbers may be correct). Data integrity assurances will be needed to ensure any evidence collected is admissable in a court.
    Care will need to be taken to ensure nobody abuses this to harrass non-scammers, a human must be available to be contacted for complaints due to abuses of the system. Reply messages should be kept short, sweet, and be highly randomized, and replies to the replies should be monitored for false positives in the first round.
    I'm not sure the legal standing of an idea like this, there may be SPAM laws that cover these uses of email.. although since the emails are generally replies and this is definetly not a commercial endeavour, I think we're safe here.

    There is no real useful information at nigeriascam.org as of yet, so don't /. me..

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  59. Actually... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2, Funny

    I understand they don't clean you out right away. They actually string you along for a while and get you to raise some more funds to cover "unforseen complications" or bribes or some such nonsense. Once they've bilked you out of a lot more than the value of your actual bank account, then they vanish. A woman in the US (CA I believe) actually embezzeled her law firm's ENTIRE CASH RESERVES to give to these d!ckwads. The firm found out when their settlement cheques to clients bounced!

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  60. Down with SPAM!!! by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Just another of the hidded costs of spam. Most people who go in the internet just take in stride the fact that 80-90% of mail received will be junk. However, for some grandmother who started using the net, this will all be new to her.

    I say the anti-spam forces take this as another reason to get legislators to make UCE illegal.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  61. Scamming the scammers by ohzero · · Score: 1

    Having heard about the scam a while back, and having received more than 50 of these things over the last couple of months, I decided to pick one and respond to it in order to both see how far the guy would go and also to tie up his time so that he couldn't scam as many people. The results were fairly interesting and they are as follows: 1. There were a total of about 10 emails exchanged, in which things like "official" passports identifying the guy who I was supposedly interacting with were sent to me. 2. I was able to get him to make two international phone calls to me. I'm sure the phone card was stolen, or at least payed for in GBP. 3. Doing the basic math on the number of gullible people in the world, the number of these guys doing this type of stuff, the number of emails and phone calls sent and received to/from me with this guy... basically results in the fact that I saved at least 3 people from actually losing an undetermined amount of money. I'd be happy to post the email thread if anyone is interested. MH

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
  62. I am the backhoe fairy. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send me ten quid or a 5 gallons of diesel and I'll cut the fibre for you. Throw in a couple of cans of Guinness and a Tom Yam Chicken with Fried Rice and I'll bury the spammer while I'm backfilling the hole.

  63. Re:Tax on the stupid !?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I must strongly disagree.

    The typical victim is an elderly person, retired, lonely, starting to loose touch with reality, strongly believing that everyone is honest because everyone was so darn nice with them for the last many years. You would be surprise how many elders are happy to simply hear the phone ring and to talk to any phone marketer, no matter what they sell.

    85 years old "good person" from a rural background where everyone knows and help everyone else, suddenly thrown in the global IT world can easily get scammed. Ever spent some time in a retirement home?

    It is easy to say "They are gullible and got what they deserve" when you listen to the news every day, read the Internet, know what the "Enron Scandal" is, live in a big city where people shoot guns in the streets every week. 90% of the industrialized/western population had a better view of life in the last century.

    I am from Montreal the North American capital of phone scams. Typically "You won a Cadillac, but you have to pay for the tax." Once the check is received, "We forgot to mention, you have to pay for shipping fees also." Then it's border tax, and then more.

    The statistics are horrible, with more than 90% of the victims in the "confused elderly" category. More than 60% of the victims will even fall for it more than once; they just wait 6-12 months and call again. Phone list of the victims sells for a small fortune.

    Some scammers call pretending a bad number, but will make social conversation with the lonely elderly and make friends over a period of weeks, then pretend an urgent trouble "I will lose my house, am forced to quit school... I don't know what to do or where to go for help!" At then end "I thought we where friend I guess you are just a selfish person".

  64. OT: Sig by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
    In SOVIET RUSSIA, all your hot grits are belong to us! Launch every Natalie Portman for great PROFIT!!

    You need to work a beowulf cluster into there somewhere.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  65. Re:Don't you just love the people of the UK! by caluml · · Score: 1

    Erm, I don't think that was due to Majors skill, or Blairs ineptitude. If you're in power as the economy starts to take off, as long as you don't make any huge mistakes, you're in luck.

  66. Kinda like spam by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    All they need are one or two suckers out of the n million messages they send out to keep their operations going.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  67. My Small Time Con by MyHair · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't suppose I could convince you to describe it? If it's really that embarassing, then never mind.

    Okay, but realize it will probably sound completely stupid to you; it even sounds stupid to me; it sounded stupid to me as soon as I realized that my money was gone.

    I don't recall all the details, but here is the gist of it:

    I was 18 and driving home from either school (college) or work. While driving past a small old-fashioned grocery store two blocks from my house a black man (I'm white) waved me down asking for help; I don't recall why I stopped; I think he had money or something in his hand that attracted my attention. (Note that non gullible people would've driven by; us suckers wander out of the crowd and identify ourselves to a troll like this, so they already know they have someone they can work with.)

    He spoke poor english and wanted some help with money; he had a thick roll of it which later I figured out must've been a roll of blank paper with a couple of $20's on the outside to make it look like a couple thousand. (Showing the money is the first hook attempt: the man appears naive and vulnerable; some might want to take advantage and either steal the money or earn a helpers fee, some like me just want to help him not lose it. It also implies that he's not trying to steal money from you since he obviously has plenty, or at least that's how my brain worked.)

    The details escape me, and this story unfolded (and was surely adapted to my vulnerabilities) throughout the con even after the 2nd guy joined in, but it was something like this: He was a sailor or something and had to get back to his ship (and this in the middle of North Texas; wtf?), but for some reason he needed to put his money in a safe place, and it wouldn't be safe if he took it with him. he And didn't trust U.S. banks. Oh yeah, he was a foreigner, too. There was probably some story about family or something that needed the money, but I don't recall exactly.

    Okay, so some of this story was started, and I parked my car in the grocery lot and was following him inside (I don't recall why exactly, but it was to help him somehow; maybe to help him understand how to get a money order or something.) On the way in a second man (also black, but it doesn't matter) came out of the store and the "sailor" asked him for help, too. (I never had any clue these guys knew each other until the money was gone.)

    So now from my ponit of view there was a person in need and two strangers trying to help him, and the two helpers didn't see eye-to-eye on everything.

    Again, details escape me, but between the three of us we came up with that the "sailor" needed to put the money in a bank, but we had to demonstrate to him that the banks and we helpers were trustworthy. During this process the 2nd guy briefly introduced topics such as a pastor down the street and a whorehouse down the street; at the time my brain dismissed these items as completely irrelevant and I steered the discussion towards more relevant matters. (Later I realized he was trolling different possible con scenarios to see where I'd bite...so he could tell by my reactions exactly which direction in which to proceed with the con.)

    I only had a few dollars which wasn't enough to demonstrate trust, but they asked if I had a paycheck to cash or something and I did; I had just been paid and hadn't cashed the check yet, but the check was at home. So they convinced me to cash the check; we all 3 got in my car and drove 2 blocks to my house; the second guy told me not to tell my Mom (I was living with Mom and told them so when they asked if I lived with someone), and stupidly I didn't mention it to her; I dutifully went in the house and got my paycheck while two con men sat in the car probably discussing strategy and contingincies.

    Then we all drove to a bigger grocery store that would cash my check; this was North Texas in 1988 and on the way there was an intersection where the Ku Kux Klan were demonstrating dressed up in their sheets and waving signs. The "sailor" screamed "the killers!" and shivered in the back seat...an effective method (on me) of generating sympathy. Somehow us two "helpers" calmed him down.

    One of the guys accompanied me into the grocery store where I cashed my check.

    After returning to my car, the second guy, the other "helper" gave me his wallet and the "sailor" and I walked around the grocery store (out of sight from the "helper" for a few minutes) to demonstrate that the second helper trusted us. I think this was the helper's idea, and I thought it was stupid but the "sailor" seemed to like the idea and was in hook, line and sinker.

    While walking around the building the "sailor" kept expressing amazement that the guy trusted us to do this.

    The second demonstration of trust was that I gave them my $117 and waited for them to walk around the grocery store. After this the "sailor" would supposedly trust us enough to put his money in a safe place of our recommendation (a bank or money order...I don't recall the exact plan).

    Of course you know the end of the story...I never saw them again after they rounded the corner with my $117.

    What's horrible is the slow realization that you've been connned. There I was, sitting in my car alone. I had a bad feeling in my gut as soon as they rounded the corner; it briefly occured to me to drive around and check on them, but no, that would ruin everything that we'd worked on so far my brain told me. So I sat. A minute or two passed, and alone in my car I started thinking about how absurd this was, but I hadn't quite realized it was gone yet. I waited and waited and after I was convinced they had been too long I drove around the store and they were no where to be seen.

    I can't tell you how humiliating it is; the worst part is realizing how obvious it was the whole time and yet my own brain seemed to be what conned me more than those two. I even realized at the time that some of the discussion was way out of left field, but I--not the scammers--was able to dismiss or rationalize it away. I went home and was in a mixed state of frustration, fury, embarrassment, etc.. I was on the verge of tears. Mom could tell something was wrong and was very worried. It was hard to speak, but I told her what happened. I don't think I told anyone else for at least a few months, and I never told anyone outside of the family until now.

    Actually, I hadn't thought about it in a while. It used to be a source of internal shame for me; I suppose I'm finally "over it" after 14 or 15 years. And in retrospect I have some valuable insights out of it for a fairly cheap price. Not that I'd thank them if I ever saw them again....

    Now that I think about it, these guys almost never quit talking; I think the idea was to throw too much information at me for me to stop and think about what I was doing; I was too busy rationalizing some of the information and discarding the rest as irrelevant.

    These guys were small time, and in retrospect I'm possibly lucky that they didn't outright rob me or take my car, too. The car was traceable, so I suspect they just wanted the cash, and I suspect they would've robbed me in certain scenarios but I was gullible enough that they were able to walk away with the cash easily. It took me over a week to earn that money and it took them probably an hour or two to con me out of it.

    You and I could point out countless errors in judgement and alternative action after reading the above scenario, but the con men are good at distraction and manipulation. I suspect there was a thrid guy who might've posed as the pastor if I had gone that route or who might've driven a getaway car at the back of the grocery store.

    In reading about other scams, greed seems to be the biggest and most effective hook. Greed, religion (proving your faith through helping a brother) and good samaritanism seem to be the most common hooks. Actually sometmies I think these are combined: maybe the target wants to be a good samaritan but is also distracted by the possibility of getting a piece of the money at stake.

    Distraction and confidentiality are importatnt, too. They need to keep you thinking about what YOU want out of the "deal" so you don't stop to think how absurd the situation is or ask someone else for advice. In the 419 scams the greed factor and the 'fact' that breaching confidentiality will make the deal impossible or even dangerous for the other party work to keep the target focused on money and practical details and pitfalls and a seemingly guaranteed "lottery win". I'm guessing many targets are also distracted by thinking what they're going to spend the money on.

    Since my guys brought up sex and religion I suspect those are common distractions if the target indicates interest. I've heard of small time scams where "brothers" bilk a lady out of money for "tools" and such for their trade, and I read an account of someone who played the game to see what the 419 scammers would do, and that conversation went religious as the scammer claimed deep spiritual beliefs.

    Sex is probably a distraction reserved for small time scams; I'm not sure how that would work in a more sophisticated scam. Actually I'm not sure how that work work small time; I suppose that might end in an outright robbery or leaving the John/target waiting for a woman (or man) in a room while the scammers take off.

    I think the art of conning is to entice the target with several types of bait and then work up the story based on his preferred bait and then watch what the target does and follow; I think the con is mostly directed by the target's own expectations and rationalizations and the con men are along for the ride.

    Going back to feeling sorry for these "idiots" who got scammed...I had little or no sympathy for them, either, but now I'm reconsidering that. The con is a troll for targets, for the weak or gullible, and fruequently--though not always--for the greedy. It's still hard to feel sorry for the greedy, but the gullible and well-intended get hooked, too. Once you've been hooked I think it's fairly easy for a pro to get to the sting.

    Coming up with an outrageous analogy, if people were leaving bear traps (the snap-onto-your-leg kind) around, most people would be smart enough to avoid them. But there would be a small few who would be distracted or just ignorant enough to step into one. (Let's ignore kids since these types of scams we're discussing seem to be unable to target kids.) To the rest of us the traps are just an annoyance we can step around like deleting a 419 email or passing by the man selling Rolexes or whatever. Should we laugh at those who step in the bear traps and say it's their fault for being stupid and applauding Darwin selection?

    1. Re:My Small Time Con by jorlando · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That kind of con that you told is very common in Brazil... lots of variants... sometimes about a lootery ticket that the person (the con artist) don't know how to exchange, sometimes somebody with a large check willing to exchange for a very smaller value so can go home (usually a small country town) earlier... and even being a very known anecdote everyday somebody falls into that con.

    2. Re:My Small Time Con by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing your experience.

      I was like you for most of my life (20 years) & through similar experiences have almost concluded that when a stranger starts to talk to me in a warm and friendly way it could be only for 2 reasons:
      1. Selling something to me.
      2. Conning me completely.

      I almost wait for either their "sales pitch" or their "con pitch" ignoring the rest of the chatter. Needless to say, i give them a wrong name, place of work and anything they ask about me.

      This might sound like I am paranoid/cynical or even xenophobic but neither of it is true. My only fear is about losing my own guard.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    3. Re:My Small Time Con by colorblind · · Score: 1

      MyHair --

      Thanks for sharing. Really.

      Have a great week.

  68. Totally unfair by xxxMicrobexxx · · Score: 1

    Hey, what gives, I have been trying to bait them without success for aabout a year. What am I doing wrong? :P

  69. scamming the scammers Re:important matter by wadiwood · · Score: 1


    I like this one

    scamming Elvis
    this guy actually cost the scammers some money.

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  70. Economic Natural Selection by mabu · · Score: 1

    I don't mind this scam a bit. I consider it intellectual natural selection. Any moron that is foolish enough to fall for this scam is doing everyone else a favor by being separated from his money in a most appropriate manner.

    I have a theory. The same people who fall for this scam also spend money on plastic surgery, Lincoln Navigators, dog sweaters, high-end California Cabernet, Hootie and the Blowfish albums, Mike Tyson pay-per-views, Prozac for their children, and George Foreman grills. The Nigerians are inadvertently doing civilized society a favor.

  71. Bitterness by Goonie · · Score: 1
    No, I'm not bitter... part of that was our fault. But when enteprising young men from Nigeria (much like British "entrepreneurs" in the late 1800s and early 1900s) decide to fleece Britain or America, fooling the locals from those countries, I must admit it makes me chuckle just a little bit :-)

    You may not be bitter, but from what little we hear about African politics and foriegn relationships I get the distinct impression that bitterness at whitey seems to be a fairly strong factor in at least some African countries' dealings with the west.

    To give a pertinent example, the attitude of your country's government and that of the South African government towards Zimbabwe and the recent actions of its leadership, are very hard to explain.

    As the situation is reported here, Mugabe is a violent thug who resorted to violence and fraud to win himself another term of government. His policy of taking land off white farmers and handing it over to black party cronies who have no idea how to farm the land is, as reported here, starving and improverishing his own people and bringing the economy of Zimbabwe to a complete halt.

    Whilst I'm not familiar with the details, I do have a vague idea of how the farmers got hold of that land in the first place, how they live a lifestyle that most Africans could only dream about, and how they treated their employees in the past. However, sending the farms to lie fallow has led the country to economic ruin and the possibility of famine, forcibly seizing property without compensation (not to mention encouraging general lawlessness) is guaranteed to deter the foriegn investment which is an excellent way to improve living standards, and rather than helping the great majority of Zimbabweans these properties have been transferred from a few rich white people to a few rich friends of Mugabe.

    Now, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK led the push to have Zimbabwe suspended from the Commonwealth. Yes, this is a largely symbolic slap on the wrist, but even that was fought tooth and nail by some of the African members of the Commonwealth. And now South Africa and Nigeria (along with Australia, a three-nation panel set up to monitor the situation in Zimbabwe) want to let Zimbabwe back in again!

    It has been suggested in a couple of articles that part of the real reason that they want Zimbabwe readmitted is that at least there's a sneaking admiration for Mugabe for, well, sticking it up whitey, even if it is, aside from being brutal, disasterous for his country.

    What's your take on the Zimbabwe sitation, and the reactions from other African governments? Am I being horribly racist? If there's another explanation for what's going on, what is it? Is the situation misreported in the West?

    Oh, and, by the way, I do realise that Zimbabwe is a fair way away from Nigeria, but it's a hell of a lot closer to you than it is to me (I'm Australian).

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  72. Re:How about the payback angle? by sfe_software · · Score: 1

    ...governments should continue the crackdown on these perpertrators, and their foolish victims. Yes the victims; what ever happened to aiding and abbetting a crime?

    Well, technically they didn't assist in an actual crime. The "crime" didn't actually exist.

    Certainly the "victims" intended to assist a criminal activity, but in the end didn't commit an actual crime. I personally think that, given the circumstances, those who were scammed got what they deserved, and have no right to complain.

    I also have to wonder about the statistics. If I were stupid enough to fall for a scam like this, I certainly wouldn't tell anyone about it. I'd just cut my losses, kick myself in the ass a few times, and try to forget that it ever happened. I suspect more people may have fallen for the scam (possibly with smaller amounts of money) that aren't reflected in these stats, for fear of being though a criminal for one (the fact that they did intend to assist in illegally obtaining money), and for being seen as an idiot...

    --
    NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
  73. Need a new standization test by hhknighter · · Score: 1

    Remember the good old days when you studied for standardized tests like SATs?

    Maybe the world should incorporate a system where people are given a standardize test to determine their (lack of) common sense before letting them on the web.

    Seriously, I have been wondering how these zebra $hit phocktards get their funding, now I know.

    Are these scammers considered as con-artists? Considering these operations seem so effortless.....

  74. They're stupid so they deserve it? Come on! by seefried · · Score: 1

    Every time I see a a discussion of a scam like this I see messages suggesting that if people are too stupid to do fall for a scam like this then they somehow deserve it.

    I cannot begin to express how angry this makes me. Who can honestly justify this morally? The justice system should exist to protect the stupid and the ignorant.

    I see little difference between taking advantage of someone who is stupid and taking advantage of someone who is inexperienced. And I know that most people would be horrified if I suggested it was ok to take advantage of young children (for whatever purpose.)

    What is it that makes people feel it is justified? I'd really like to know. Reply to this. Let me know. Because I don't see any reason why it is.

    Sean

  75. Re:Your fucking stupid by grub · · Score: 1


    a) it's not "Your fucking stupid" it's "You're fucking stupid", assbreath.

    b) I said "Close to 300 million" not "300 million", read what I wrote.

    c) I'm not counting any illegal alien relatives as I'm not an American.

    Why oh why to I bother replying to AC chickenshit losers?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  76. Darwin Awards for the financially inclined? by Jouni · · Score: 1
    Someone should set up a page for this kind of stuff, except it's no longer funny when you think about 419-spammers laughing all the way to the bank...

    One of those keen 419-folk promised to fax me some financial documents today; I helpfully provided them with the fax number to the local police branch for international business. I told them to put them to the attention of "Rahanpesu", that's money launder in Finnish. :-)

    For burning your money, KLF still stands out as the uncontested classic with the one million UK pounds.

    Jouni

    --
    Jouni Mannonen | Game Designer, Consultant
  77. Dumbest criminal on the planet. by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 1

    Actually this is the funniest scamming of the scammers I have ever read. It also gives you a succinct lesson on how scamming works!

  78. ALL WILL BE WELL AT THE END OF THE DAY by Mauler · · Score: 1, Funny

    IMMEDIATE ATTENTION NEEDED : HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

    FROM: GEORGE WALKER BUSH

    DEAR SIR / MADAM,

    I AM GEORGE WALKER BUSH, SON OF THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH, AND CURRENTLY SERVING AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS LETTER MIGHT SURPRISE YOU BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT MET NEITHER IN PERSON NOR BY CORRESPONDENCE. I CAME TO KNOW OF YOU IN MY SEARCH FOR A RELIABLE AND REPUTABLE PERSON TO HANDLE A VERY CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS TRANSACTION, WHICH INVOLVES THE TRANSFER OF A HUGE SUM OF MONEY TO AN ACCOUNT REQUIRING MAXIMUM CONFIDENCE.

    I AM WRITING YOU IN ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE PRIMARILY TO SEEK YOUR ASSISTANCE IN ACQUIRING OIL FUNDS THAT ARE PRESENTLY TRAPPED IN THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ. MY PARTNERS AND I SOLICIT YOUR ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING A TRANSACTION BEGUN BY MY FATHER, WHO HAS LONG BEEN ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN THE EXTRACTION OF PETROLEUM IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND BRAVELY SERVED HIS COUNTRY AS DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.

    IN THE DECADE OF THE NINETEEN-EIGHTIES, MY FATHER, THEN VICE- PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOUGHT TO WORK WITH THE GOOD OFFICES OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ TO REGAIN LOST OIL REVENUE SOURCES IN THE NEIGHBORING ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN. THIS UNSUCCESSFUL VENTURE WAS SOON FOLLOWED BY A FALLING OUT WITH HIS IRAQI PARTNER, WHO SOUGHT TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL OIL REVENUE SOURCES IN THE NEIGHBORING EMIRATE OF KUWAIT, A WHOLLY-OWNED U.S.-BRITISH SUBSIDIARY.

    MY FATHER RE-SECURED THE PETROLEUM ASSETS OF KUWAIT IN 1991 AT A COST OF SIXTY-ONE BILLION U.S. DOLLARS ($61,000,000,000). OUT OF THAT COST, THIRTY-SIX BILLION DOLLARS ($36,000,000,000) WERE SUPPLIED BY HIS PARTNERS IN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA AND OTHER PERSIAN GULF MONARCHIES, AND SIXTEEN BILLION DOLLARS ($16,000,000,000) BY GERMAN AND JAPANESE PARTNERS. BUT MY FATHER'S FORMER IRAQI BUSINESS PARTNER REMAINED IN CONTROL OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ AND ITS PETROLEUM RESERVES.

    MY FAMILY IS CALLING FOR YOUR URGENT ASSISTANCE IN FUNDING THE REMOVAL OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ AND ACQUIRING THE PETROLEUM ASSETS OF HIS COUNTRY, AS COMPENSATION FOR THE COSTS OF REMOVING HIM FROM POWER. UNFORTUNATELY, OUR PARTNERS FROM 1991 ARE NOT WILLING TO SHOULDER THE BURDEN OF THIS NEW VENTURE, WHICH IN ITS UPCOMING PHASE MAY COST THE SUM OF 100 BILLION TO 200 BILLION DOLLARS ($100,000,000,000 - $200,000,000,000), BOTH IN THE INITIAL ACQUISITION AND IN LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT.

    WITHOUT THE FUNDS FROM OUR 1991 PARTNERS, WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ACQUIRE THE OIL REVENUE TRAPPED WITHIN IRAQ. THAT IS WHY MY FAMILY AND OUR COLLEAGUES ARE URGENTLY SEEKING YOUR GRACIOUS ASSISTANCE. OUR DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUES IN THIS BUSINESS TRANSACTION INCLUDE THE SITTING VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD CHENEY, WHO IS AN ORIGINAL PARTNER IN THE IRAQ VENTURE AND FORMER HEAD OF THE HALLIBURTON OIL COMPANY, AND CONDOLEEZA RICE, WHOSE PROFESSIONAL DEDICATION TO THE VENTURE WAS DEMONSTRATED IN THE NAMING OF A CHEVRON OIL TANKER AFTER HER.

    I WOULD BESEECH YOU TO TRANSFER A SUM EQUALING TEN TO TWENTY- FIVE PERCENT (10-25 %) OF YOUR YEARLY INCOME TO OUR ACCOUNT TO AID IN THIS IMPORTANT VENTURE. THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL FUNCTION AS OUR TRUSTED INTERMEDIARY. I PROPOSE THAT YOU MAKE THIS TRANSFER BEFORE THE FIFTEENTH (15TH) OF THE MONTH OF APRIL.

    I KNOW THAT A TRANSACTION OF THIS MAGNITUDE WOULD MAKE ANYONE APPREHENSIVE AND WORRIED. BUT I AM ASSURING YOU THAT ALL WILL BE WELL AT THE END OF THE DAY. A BOLD STEP TAKEN SHALL NOT BE REGRETTED, I ASSURE YOU. PLEASE DO BE INFORMED THAT THIS BUSINESS TRANSACTION IS 100% LEGAL. IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO CO-OPERATE IN THIS TRANSACTION, PLEASE CONTACT OUR INTERMEDIARY REPRESENTATIVES TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE MATTER.

    I PRAY THAT YOU UNDERSTAND OUR PLIGHT. MY FAMILY AND OUR COLLEAGUES WILL BE FOREVER GRATEFUL. PLEASE REPLY IN STRICT CONFIDENCE TO THE CONTACT NUMBERS BELOW.

    SINCERELY WITH WARM REGARDS,

    GEORGE WALKER BUSH

    Switchboard: 202.456.1414
    Comments: 202.456.1111
    Fax: 202.456.2461
    Email: president@whitehouse.gov

  79. i always wondered how that scam worked. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    about five years ago i was walking down the street in downtown berkeley when a similar version of that scam started happening to me. . . after travelling for a few years thru mexico, central america, and western & eastern europe, i always get a bit sketched out by complete strangers who come up to me and don't ask for something outright (e.g. pen, piece of paper, spare change, cig, a light, directions). . .

    in the berkeley scenario i forget the specifics but a dude came up and asked for help "donating" a huge wad of "cash" (probably paper with a bill on the outside) to a charity or something. . . i remember he had some sorta "official" letter of some sort stating he had to spend the money before he returned home and was absolutely adamant about not going to anything like a cop or bank. . . in fact, i think he also didn't want anything to do with white people or something too. . . anyway, after trying to help him out for a bit a 2nd dude came up and joined in on the conversation. . .

    when the wad of cash first made its appearance i remember alarm bells going off in my head and when the 2nd dude came up i remember thinking, "okay, this *has* to be a scam but how are they planning on taking my money?". .. i was never in any real danger as i was on a relatively busy street at dusk so i half wanted to sorta stick around to see when the scam was actually gonna kick in. . . after a while i figured that, to be safe, i oughtta just bail and then made my exit by telling the 2nd dude that he seemed to have things under control and left 'em. . .

    thing was that up until your post i couldn't figure out how the scam would've worked even if i believed 'em. . . only thing i could think of was that they'd lead me down some side street (or give me a ride in a car) and just rob me outright. . .

    you're right tho', getting scammed sucks, psychologically as well as monetarily. . . in europe i got taken by a scam (that's been tried on me several times since) where you're on an average sidewalk (i.e. not deserted but not totally bustling either) and a dude comes up with a map and asks for directions somewhere. . . basically what happens is you help him out (or not, if you don't know your way around) and then he gets all friendly and talkative asking where you're from and how long you're travelling and shit like that. . .

    well while you're distracted by talking to your new "friend", another dude in everyday street clothes walks up and says he's a cop (or secret service, control, immigration, military, whatever), flashes you some bogus ID, and demands to see your passport. . . then he demands that you empty out your pockets and acts all, y'know, gruff authoritarian cop like with the attitude that he could throw you in jail if he wanted to. . . sometimes a third dude then comes up and acts as an additional distraction and when the "cop" says you're clear and gives you back your shit in one big confused lump, the first thing you make sure you get back is your passport. .. then you check and make sure your credit cards and whatnot are there. . . *then* you check to see if you got all your cash back, which, of course, you don't, but by then all three of the perps have taken off. . .

    i was in prague when i fell for the scam but i've been approached like that in vienna, munich, and paris. . . to me, the scams where someone poses as a cop are always disconcerting 'cuz growing up in the US i've kinda got it ingrained into me that when someone says they're a cop and even shows you his ID, you don't just turn and walk away. . . i do it now if the cop was preceded by someone asking for directions but it still feels weird. . . it's a similar feeling to, say, the first few times you pee in your wetsuit while out surfing - it's so ingrained into your psyche to not pee in your clothes that it's hard to do at first. . .

    btw, in prague there *are* plainclothes "control" officers (complete with a wallet badge that looks like a toy) who check to see if you've got a ticket for the tram/bus/metro. . .

    1. Re:i always wondered how that scam worked. . . by MyHair · · Score: 1

      How did you avoid the map scam later? Did you just refuse to help the guy with the map, or did you call their bluff with the fake policeman?

      I've never heard of the scam I got hit by; I always assumed it was something just those guys cooked up, but at least two of you say you've heard of it. Is there a site on the internet that lists these types of cons? I felt like I could sniff a con out fairly quickly after falling for the first one, but if I got hit by the map guy/policeman con in a foreign country I might have fallen for it for fear of authority. I'd like to read about these and the defenses for them.

      thing was that up until your post i couldn't figure out how the scam would've worked even if i believed 'em. . . only thing i could think of was that they'd lead me down some side street (or give me a ride in a car) and just rob me outright. . .

      I can't help but think some of the alternate scenarios would have involved them robbing me, but then again maybe they had other twists and turns at the ready. I suspect part of the reason they do cons instead of robbery is that they're far less likely to get caught due to the fact that they don't threaten or force you to get the money and they know you'll likely be too humiliated to tell the police afterward. (I think my Mom called the police afterward, but there wasn't much they could do since I didn't know who or where they were and I gave them the freakin' money.) There's probably a power rush from messing with people's heads, too.

      By the way, thanks to everyone who replied. I was afraid of some "you're so stupid" flames but instead got some really good replies.

  80. Re:email is a dangerous tool. by Ponty · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Apache/IIS? Those are webservers. What the hell do they have to do with people responding to junk e-mail?

  81. Median is not the same as average by dachshund · · Score: 1

    50% of the human race is below median intelligence, you nitwit :)

  82. Re:Stupid people are everywhere ... with more legs by gfreeman · · Score: 1


    Yeah, yeah, and I have more than the average number of legs.

    I have two legs, and the average is slightly less than that.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  83. http://www.nigeria-connection.de by enough2000 · · Score: 1

    there you can find 309 different versions of the story - enjoy! :-)

  84. Re:How about the payback angle? by tcr · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not bitter... part of that was our fault. But when enteprising young men from Nigeria (much like British "entrepreneurs" in the late 1800s and early 1900s) decide to fleece Britain or America, fooling the locals from those countries, I must admit it makes me chuckle just a little bit :-)


    Really, pal?

    Well, I use my email filtering service to send all email originating from Nigeria to the bitbucket.

    Assuming ISP's start doing the same en masse, let's see what your "enterprising young men" are doing for the future infrastructure of your country.

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  85. Darwin awards by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    We should really have financial Darwin Awards for people who lose huge amounts of money through their own stupidity and/or greed. The article in The Register suggested the UK police shouldn't even waste time investigating these frauds.

    It's a bit like throwing pennies into a fountain and then complaining that the water defrauded you!

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  86. This is no funny thing by leeet · · Score: 1

    While we may laugh at people getting "scammed", let's not remember that this money doesn't go in nice people's pockets.

    This money mostly funds war and terrorism.

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  87. Are the Brits that blonde? by haraldm · · Score: 1

    Given the fact that this scam has been around for ages (at least since 1988, for one), and that the number of variations is very limited, I really wonder why this scam is still a success. Are people so gormless (a.k.a. dumb, foolish, dopey) that they still fall victim for it? Oh my god.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  88. Re:What did you expect? You tastless prick by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Feel free to call this troll. He's lives with his mom, and that's her voice in the answering machine message. Every time Mr. McDaniel decides to troll, another copy of his personal info will be posted immediately afterward.

    Dear Bowie J. Poag

    WTF do you think you are accomplishing by posting this guys personal info? Sure you may not like him, disagree with him or what not, but taking the time to track down his personal info, and posting it shows a level of compulsiveness that I think requires some professional help.

    If you don't like the guy.. Fine, deal with it in the real world. Don't waste my time, and all the other productive slashdot posters time with this crap. You're showing the maturity of a 12 year old, no I take that back, I know 12 year olds that can behave more maturely than you.

  89. Yesterday... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... I went to the Post Office to send an small parcel.

    After paying and all the formalities I was told to leave it in a counter in full view of everybody (the office was full of people, the workers in the counter could not possibly be chacking that nobody steals the parcels all the time).

    My gut feeling said this is silly, nevertheless 3 more people came left their own parcels and left.

    Another example? Some big supermarkets here have an scanning system with which yourslef scan the priece of each product of your shooping, then in the cashier you hand over the scanner that is read by the machine that produces your bill. They randomly check people once in a blue moon, but the important part is tha they trust that people will mostly do the right thing.

    In some busy train stations you can just take your newspaper and drop your money in collection boxes for that purpose.

    Call it childish, but it feels immensily beeter to live in a society where you know you can trust people most of the time.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  90. Don't be stupid. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You can't prosecute anybody for the intent of commiting a crime, you can only do it for the commission of one.

    At least in civilized countries it is like that.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Don't be stupid. by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      Attempted murder?

      The intent to kill someone - it doesn't matter if they actually did kill them.

  91. And shooting diplomats... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... helps the effort how, wise boy?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  92. In which planet do you live? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Can you, oh source of wisdom, mention which law they broke? I did not know that falling for an scam was illegal in your place of residence (where is that, the Moon?).

    Hell, I also wish I don't have to pay taxes, I dream about ways of hiding my money from the taxman, nevertheless I reluctantly pay my taxes every time. Should I go to jail for wishful thinking?

    They may be griddy an unethical people, but that is not a crime until you brake the law.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  93. Oh yeah, lets bring mob rule. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And lynching while we are at it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  94. Wouldn't you know... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    My wife got this at work today:
    FROM: DR. GILBERT GUEI
    E-MAIL:gguie@rediffmail.com
    I AM DR. GILBERT GUEI, THE FIRST SON OF LATE ROBERT GUEI, EX-MILITARY HEAD
    OF STATE OF IVORY COAST, WHO WAS MURDERED ALONG WITH THE INTERIOR MINISTER
    ON THE 19TH OF SEPTEMBER 2002.
    I CONTACTED YOU BECAUSE OF MY NEED TO DEAL WITH PERSONS WHICH MY FAMILY
    AND I HAVE HAD NO PREVIOUS PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH. SINCE THE MURDER OF
    MY FATHER, I HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO ALL SORTS OF HARRASMENT AND
    INTIMIDATION WITH LOTS OF NEGATIVE REPORT EMANATING FROM THE GOVERNMENT
    AND THE PRESS ABOUT MY FAMILY. THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT OF LAURENT GBAGBO
    HAS ALSO ENSURED THAT OUR BANK ACCOUNTS ARE FROZEN AND ALL ASSETS SEIZED.
    IT IS IN VIEW OF THIS, THAT I SEEK YOUR CORPORATION AND ASSISTANCE IN THE
    TRANSFER OF THE SUM OF FIFTEEN MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS (US$15M)BEING
    THE VERY LAST OF MY FAMILY FUND IN MY POSSESSION AND CONTROL. AFTER THE
    MURDER OF MY FATHER, THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT SEIZED ALL OUR PROPERTIES AND
    FROZE ALL OUR ACCOUNTS BOTH LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL.
    MY ONLY HOPE NOW, IS THIS CASH MY FATHER CAREFULLY PACKAGED AS ARTIFACTS
    WITH A SECURITY/FINANCE COMPANY IN THE NETHERLANDS. THIS SUM OF US$15M CAN
    EASILY BE WITHDRAWN OR PAID TO A RECONMENDED BENEFICIARY. THE SECURITY AND
    FINANCE COMPANY BASED ON MY INSTRUCTION OR THAT OF MY LAWYER WILL RELEASE
    THE FUNDS TO YOU WITHOUT ANY HITCH. YOU WILL BE PRESENTED AS MY BUSINESS
    PARTNER WHO WILL BE FRONTING FOR ME IN SUBSEQUENT VENTURES AND IN TRUTH
    YOU WILL BE FRONTING FOR ME, IN THE AREAS OF BUSINESS YOU DEEM PROFITABLE
    AND NECESSARY.
    TO SHOW MY PREPAREDNESS AND APPRECIATION TO CONDUCT THIS BUSINESS WITH
    YOU,I SHALL GIVE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY 25% OF THE TOTAL FUNDS AND 5% FOR ALL
    EXPENSES INCURRED DURING THIS TRANSACTION, WHILE THE REMAINING 70% WILL
    BEFOR MY FAMILY AND ME AND THIS WILL BE USED FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSE IN
    YOUR COUNTRY UNDER YOUR MANAGEMENT.
    PLEASE I NEED YOUR FULL SURPPORT AND C-O-O-P-E-R-A-T-I-O-N FOR THE SUCESS
    OF THIS VENTURE. I PLEAD WITH YOU TO TREAT THIS VENTURE AS URGENT AND
    CONFIDENTIAL. THIS IS A SENSITIVE ISSUE, WHICH DEMAND HIGH DEGREE OF
    SECRECY. YOU SHOULD PLEASE HAVE MY CURRENT POLITICAL STATUS IN MIND.
    ALSO ENDEARVOUR TO FORWARD ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO MY E-MAIL ADDRESS
    gguie@rediffmail.com IF YOU PROVE YOURSELF TO BE INTERESTED AND
    TRUSTWORTHY, THAT YOU WILL NOT RUN AWAY WITH THE WHOLE FUND.
    IT IS PERTINENT FOR ME TO MENTION THAT PRESENTLY, I AM IN THE NETHERLANDS
    AS AN ASSYLUM SEEKER.
    I AWAIT YOUR URGENT RESPONSE.
    YOURS TRULY,
    DR. GILBERT GUEI
    It seems they've moved on to the Ivory Coast!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  95. It's just more evidence.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    If people in Nigeria want to feel safe, they should not allow the scammers to operate out of Nigeria. Since international law is taking too long, vigilantism is on the increase.

    I don't support vigilantism, but something has to give. I think this is what will continue to happen. The same thing will probably happen to spammers, too. I know milder stuff has already happened to spammers (like that one website where the guy broke in and grabbed all the naked pictures of the spammer lady he could, and posted them).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  96. Okay, let me restate. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying any scammer can get his hands on it, but you certainly do not have to be a large , or public, company.. it requires relatively simple background checks, someone in the US with a clean tax record to sign up, and a couple grand as a security deposit.

    I can assure you I'm not mistaken about this. I am not talking about the same system you use to make bill payments; I'm talking about a nationwide electronic funds transfer system, that allows direct withdrawl from accounts using only an account number & name.

    I can assure you many, many small, private companies have access to this system.

    Things don't work the way you think they do.

    You are correct that they don't have access to your balance details.. but they DO have access to attempt to withdraw funds via EFT from your account. It's like processing a cheque, but electronic.

    Joe average can't do this in five minutes, but with a few thousand dollars and some easy setup time, it's not hard to do.