Slashdot Mirror


Salvaging Defective DRAM

An anonymous reader writes "Ever wonder what happens to DRAM that fails quality assurance testing during manufacturing? Turns out a lot of it ends up as 'downgrade' memory and ends up in OEM memory modules. Last resort: use it in an answering machine, where the sampled audio can be very tolerant of bit errors."

211 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. And that's why. by anonymous+coword · · Score: 0, Funny

    The site is now slashdotted, because it used defetive ram.

  3. Now there is a new excuse.... by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Oh you left a message on the answering machine, naah I didn't get it must be the defective DRAM chips they use. Now you've managed to track me down using a detective agency I'll be sure to send you the cheque next week"

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  4. *Long String of Curses* by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You just explained a lot about my fricking answering machine! I thought that no one ever called! And now I find out it is low grade ram? My god! I may really HAVE a social life!

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:*Long String of Curses* by Palos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, you've been missing out for a trip of a lifetime to disneyworld, and all kinds of other important calls...

    2. Re:*Long String of Curses* by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The messages come through, they just sound like this...

      Hi, this is ___ael. Give me a call at 55_12__. Talk to you latter.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    3. Re:*Long String of Curses* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woops. False alarm.

    4. Re:*Long String of Curses* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like

      Hello, we are ___ng a satellite ins______ion special in y___ area. blah blah blah.

    5. Re:*Long String of Curses* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >talk to you 'latter?'

      how do you talk to someone latter?

    6. Re:*Long String of Curses* by attackenn · · Score: 1

      From answering machine with downgraded DRAM: "I've thought about what you asked me last night, and ___, I w_____ marry you. I _____ you."

  5. obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is also the reason PC hardware is so cheap.
    It doesn't have to pass any real quality standards.

  6. Did I ever wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ever wonder what happens to DRAM that fails quality assurance testing during manufacturing?

    No. I figured they forgot about it.

  7. Finally a reason by Willow_mt · · Score: 1

    I knew there was a reason why I hated answering machines...now I actually have it! :)

  8. I had a great reply but... by rickthewizkid · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I forgot it. Musta been that defective OEM memory module I had implanted in my skull...

    -RickTheWizKid

    1. Re:I had a great reply but... by rickthewizkid · · Score: 1

      Hey... it was supposed to be *funny* - not flamebait!!! :)

    2. Re:I had a great reply but... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Hey... it was supposed to be *funny* - not flamebait!!! :)"

      If your name was D.A.R.Y.L., it might be...

  9. Alternatively, you could use the... by Ari+Rahikkala · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Alternatively, you could use the... by Spoing · · Score: 3, Funny
      You don't want the bad ram patch.

      I don't want the bad ram patch.

      You realize it is a mistake.

      That would be a mistake.

      You have better things to do with your time...that are less risky. You will go home and reconsider your life.

      Excuse me, I need to go home.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    2. Re:Alternatively, you could use the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad RAM?

      I think somebody needs a timeout.

  10. bad ram patch for linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Summary: This page proposes an approach to support RAMs with defective addresses, This may open interesting business perspectives, where those RAMs can be sold under a white label for less money rather than discarded of without any profit.

    the url is:

    http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/

    1. Re:bad ram patch for linux by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      From the looks of the article, they are already sold for less money rather than discarded...

  11. Yes I was just sitting here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    and I suddenly though, hmmm what happens to that defective DRAM, I open up Mozilla and what do I find an answer to my question.

    1. Re:Yes I was just sitting here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be that link prefetching at its best. :)

  12. Kilofeet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf, ok how about the milifeet.

  13. Oh well by JWyner · · Score: 0, Redundant

    At least now I know why my answering machine sucks so hard.

    --
    "Owning a computer is like having your very own TV -- with a built in radio!" - Ed Helms
    1. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing your answering machine with your mother. No wait, they're both incomprehensible, and they both suck hard.

  14. Buying ram on the internet..... by Ogrez · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the prime example of why I tell people I know not to buy ram off of the internet unless its from a major company that has good support. To many people buy 15-90 day warranty ram because its cheap, and when it fails they are upset that they have to replace it. If you pay a bit more money you get lifetime warranty ram... and why do you think they are willing to warranty it that long, because they know it works. people dont understand the testing process and think they are getting the same product buying cheap ram, as opposed to inexpensive ram...

    --


    Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
    1. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Boo+Robin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true. I'll never buy generic RAM simply because it is more likely to malfunction. I've seen this happen to many of my friends. I'll stick with my Kingston RAM. The extra price is worth the warranty and the ability to sleep knowing my RAM won't mess my computer.

      --
      'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
    2. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so how can the average user make the distinction ?

      high priced shite ram is the same price as quality ram how can the average consumer tell the difference if we leave price out of it

    3. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Back when I was in college, I bought a relatively expensive 128MB memory chip from a company I found in a magazine. The warranty was only for like 30 days, but it was like $20 cheaper than their competition. I called them up, and received the chip about 30 days later. I didn't even try to put in the chip for a couple weeks because I needed a friend to help me out (hardware scared me back then, and still is one of my biggest weaknesses).

      Once I did finally get the chip in my machine, it never worked. I called the company one time before the warranty period was up, and they gave me the rigamaroll (waiting for support for several days, etc). I never did get the chip to work, and I never did get my money back. I've chalked this one up to my own stupidity.

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    4. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Ogrez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Im a sysadmin by trade... and although I might chance 90 day oem ram if the price is right in my home machine, in my production servers I use Crucial, or Kingston. As far as the average consumer... How do they determine if a car is good, what criteria do they use to determine what new stove to buy? They do some research..If more people did a little research when they bought computers, or computer parts, they wouldnt have half the problems. Instead they listen to the sales people, or they buy the cheapest thing they can find and then wonder why their system locks up.

      --


      Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
    5. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If only that was the worst of it.

      Generic RAM is also in the habit of mis-reporting it's capabilities in SPD. The problem was so bad with 512M sticks back when that was the biggest available, many BIOS would automatically disregard SPD and choose the slowest settings when a 512M stick was detected.

      Better brand names don't appear to have that problem.

    6. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by LordDragonstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If more people did a little research when they bought computers, or computer parts, they wouldnt have half the problems. Instead they listen to the sales people, or they buy the cheapest thing they can find and then wonder why their system locks up.

      I wish more people would do this and not just for memmory, but for any big purchase. It's one of the truly great aspects of the internet, fast cheap research.

      --
      sig: There are two mistaakes in this sig.
    7. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      like every other post on slashdot: memtest86 is your friend. get memory from online person, stick into a machine, run memtest86 for a few days. (or few hours depending on how paranoid you really are.)

    8. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1

      Fry's sells this stuff too. It's funny because a coworker tried to buy one and the salesman didn't really want to sell it. The disclaimer is pretty clear; "they operate normally in most systems." Does normal include occasional crashes?

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    9. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but with stuff like RAM, it's a game of statistics. Someone who bought less than 10 sticks might have gotten "lucky", but they also may never stress their system hard enough to expose the RAM errors, or they might run something like Win95/98/ME that will happily keep running even if stuff is seriously wrong.

      Case in point, I had a bad processor once on a Win 98 box. I never knew it until I tried to install Linux, and it would crash during the installation. So I thought it might just be bad drivers or something with Linux, I tried to install win2k, blue screen half way into the install.

      In Win98, it worked pretty normally, except for some really weird problems I chalked up to DLL problems. (Things like programs crashing only when I clicked a certain option, repeatably).

      Anyway, research is a great thing to do before any purchase, just beware anecdotal evidence.

    10. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      From my personal experience, I never had any prolems with inexpensive generic RAM from MWave. I was even able to set CAS to 2 (They were DDR-SDRAMS rated at CAS of 2.5) and played hours of War Craft 3 without any problems.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    11. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Funny, I'm able to sleep because I've got a $5000 home security system and a German shepherd, but hey, whatever floats your boat, buddy...

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    12. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I know not to buy ram off of the internet unless its from a major company that has good support.

      I have to disagree.

      You can do quite well by simply buying very inexpensive RAM...that's rated higher than the RAM you're trying to get. Instead of buying brand name, expensive PC100 RAM, I bought cheap, generic PC133 RAM. No problems, all good...cheap.

    13. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Boo+Robin · · Score: 1

      Great thing about being a 16-year-old kid is that I don't really care much for the security of my house. My parents can worry about that. On the other hand, the computer is more important to me and thus gets more of my attention. So yes, ensuring my computer will run the next morning is important to me. Since I have more invested in it then anything else. I'm not going to compromise my computer by buying cheap products. I prefer to keep the things I have money invested in running. Mind you, this means I have to spend extra cash for more expensive components. But it is all worth it in the end.

      --
      'Give me one more medicated peaceful moment'
    14. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've chalked this one up to my own stupidity."

      You mean the RAM or your post?

    15. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they invented credit cards. Dispute it.

    16. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad nobody told the consumers about the bad electrolyte the manufacturers were using some time ago in the capacitors of a lot of the mainboards out there. Victims included customers of all brands of motherboards, because it were the capacitor manufacturers (*except the japanese ones*) that f***d up this time!

      Just to say, brand names don't always guarantee quality.

    17. Re:Buying ram on the internet..... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Erm... isn't Crucial just Micron with better packaging??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. Use memtest86 by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and read its documentation to find out how to make Linux skip any defects it finds.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Use memtest86 by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Run the full test through a few times. On slow machines, this can take a day or three.

      About a third of all the machines I've delt with have had memory errors at some point in thier lifespan. Most of those errors were only found after a day of tests.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  16. I swear to god.. by Bush_man10 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Either all the ram that is bad ends up in answering machines or in my computer. I'm aftering going through my fair share of ram in my days.

    --
    "I believe in everything in moderation. Including moderation." -Dean DeLeo, Stone Temple Pilots
  17. recycling the chips by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recall seeing an article awhile ago where companies were buying defective memory, and running them in these external testing units,which would identify which chip(s) on the stick were bad. I'm assuming they'd then unsolder the bad chip and recover one from another module. At that time some of those sticks had 8 chips on each side, so you could recover 15 good sticks from 16 bad ones. Considering the price of memory a few yrs ago, it was probably a worthwhile venture. Nowadays though, it's probably not worth anyone's time.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:recycling the chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a high quality 512MB stick is $90, and a broken one is $10, then that still means prifit.

      Just because it's 512MB now and back then it was 16MB doesn't mean that fixing broken stuff doesn't result in making money.

      But maybe more so, all chips on the stick are from the batch of wavers that jack sneezed on, meaning you may not be able to reconstruct any working sticks...

      (that, and high quality sticks have 4 or 6 layers, on which it's kinda hard to desolder and solder without damaging the pcb).

  18. What about the rest of the computer? by ISPTech · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting for the computer graveyard market to ramp up. Where does the rest of defective computer systems go?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Defective hardware is distributed to the nearest geeky friend, i myself have a shelf and a spare desk with drawers full of old/non working hardware. I'm sure you average /. reader has at least this if not a spare room full of old 286 boxes.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      I'm sure you average /. reader has at least this if not a spare room full of old 286 boxes.

      Not me. That's what friends and charities are for. I'm about to get rid of a few system boards, speakers, 1-2 Sun boxes, SCSI equipment (CDs, small drives, cables), and excess cables (network, power, otherwise).

      The oldest thing I have is a 1.2M 5.25 floppy drive...strictly for data recovery.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    3. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Actually, I got rid of the 286's, but I still have an old 386 server with 36 whole whopping megabytes of RAM. 4 Megs in those little 30 pin modules and 32 on 2 cards that each have about the size of a Voodoo 5500 on steroids...and ofc, you guessed it, somewhere one chip is broken :-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    4. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      You should sponsor a geek. I've played with a few bsds and linux localy, but I still havnt gotten to play with any fun sun machines :(

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    5. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I can't recall where it was right now (I'll have to scour my bookmarks later), but I've seen some very old Suns going for about $5 (plus Shipping if you can't make it to the store).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Where does the rest of defective computer systems go?

      I'm pretty sure that it is all being sold on eBay right now.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      I can't recall where it was right now (I'll have to scour my bookmarks later), but I've seen some very old Suns going for about $5 (plus Shipping if you can't make it to the store).

      That's about what some of them are worth. That said, if someone is reading this and in the Washington DC area, let me know. No promises, though if there are no takers from my short list I'll be glad to let you have it.

      Post here if interested...

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    8. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that the average /. reader was using all of these old 286's to create a beowolf cluster.

    9. Re:What about the rest of the computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I used a P166 for a footrest.
      Stylish!

  19. Using broken RAM with Linux - BadRAM, memtest86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    BadRAM is a Linux kernel patch for defective RAM modules support. With defective RAM, I mean RAM which has some bits wrong at some (known) addresses.

    Normally, such RAM is considered useless and thrown away; the larger RAMs get, the higher the chances of failing addresses. With ever growing RAM sizes, it would therefore be pleasant to have an alternative to discarding of defective RAM chips.

    By the way, memtest86 is a free x86 memory diagnostic, which can be configured to produce BadRAM patterns

  20. Re:Cheap memory. by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1
    Does this mean the manufacturer like compaq, and hp and maybe even dell equip a large number of their PC's with this substandard RAM?

    It sounds like yet another reason to stay away from compaq.

    --
    Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
  21. Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Audio quality on answering machines dont have to be that great. Because of the ability to resell defective DRAM overall costs of both answering machines and high quality DRAM has gone done.

  22. Maybe that explains a few things... by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 1

    Tech support is busy right now...please leave a message and we'll get back to you...

    --
    As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
  23. uh, no by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    if it didn't pass quality standards, then how else would they figure out which ones are defective?

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:uh, no by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
      "if it didn't pass quality standards, then how else would they figure out which ones are defective?"

      Sell it all and wait to see what the consumer returns.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:uh, no by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Sell it all and wait to see what the consumer returns.
      Ah, the Best Buy approach. I recently had to exchange a 256K stick of memory 3 times before I gave up and ordered it from crucial.com
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  24. well by odyrithm · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sh*t you not.. they make great keyring fobs! just dont let your gf see it ;)

    --
    moo
    1. Re:well by garbs · · Score: 3, Funny


      just dont let your gf see it ;)


      No problem with that happening with most of the slashdot visitors.

    2. Re:well by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Amen...I have two whole sticks of memory on my keys...and a third on another keyring.
      One's a SIMM, one's a 256 MB SDRAM DIMM (PC100), and one is a PC100 128 MB DIMM.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    3. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're all gay? woohoo. i was right. i was right all along!

    4. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      just dont let your gf see it ;)

      Dude, if you have a pc-board keyring fob, this problem is totally irrelevant.

      Rob

    5. Re:well by catch23 · · Score: 1

      why use useless memory as a keyring fob? get a small working usb drive as a keyring fob! it's better looking and you can actually use it for something!

    6. Re:well by wik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention, give you hell at the airport. The security guys in Pittsburgh told me to put my keys in the little bucket, then when they looked closer, told me to put them through the X-ray machine.

      They were looking at the old 256k SIMM PCB (all chips removed) and asking "is that a computer chip"? Funny how they pointed at that and missed my Intel keyring fob with a real processor die on it.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    7. Re:well by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I've had a dead memory keychain for about four years. I fly typically about two round-trips a year, and this past year I've flown more (including El Al, a.k.a. Just Because You're Paranoid Doesn't Mean They Aren't Out to Get You, and an international flight less than two weeks after Sept. 11, 2001). I have never been given any grief about my keys at the airport. They never even seem to notice it.

      Memory keychains are nice for opening boxes, too. And to the grandparent poster, my girlfriend thinks it's cool.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    8. Re:well by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Hmm I'm suprised you got that through

      *note to terrorists, if wishing to hijack planes, use sharpened RAM sticks*

    9. Re:well by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      bah.. several of my gf's saw my ram keyfob, and wanted one for their keys. My current gf gave me a couple Cray system boards as gifts.. I have my X-MP and Y-MP system boards at work.. and she keeps her Y-MP board on our key pedistal by our front door. Damn, those Y-MP system boards are heavy.

    10. Re:well by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Why not let your gf see it?
      I've had 1/3rd of an old-school 32 pin SIMM as my keychain fob for quite a few years now (the ring goes through the hole.) The SIMM only had 3 chips on it, on one side, so it's nice and compact, and still had a nice geek appeal.

      It's actually helped me find people with similar interests. I had my keys in my hand one day while getting a sub at subway, and the guy behind the counter (probably about 17) said something along the lines of, "Cool, old school RAM. Haven't seen that for a while." We then had a little talk about back in the day (I'm only 21), since there were no customers in the store.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:well by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      Why not let your gf see it?

      They ask to many questions, then every so often come out with "whats that again?", it can get tedious. ;)

      --
      moo
    12. Re:well by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      And to the grandparent poster, my girlfriend thinks it's cool.

      I should of explained my reasons for saying "dont let your gf see it", mine use to keep asking every so often "whats that again?" and after the 20th time you have to draw the line and part with it(the fob not the gf ;), oh and shes not at all stupid, she just switches of when ever computers come up.

      --
      moo
  25. Some updates to the article... by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are some things in the article that are pretty out of date:

    To reduce the test time, parallel chip testing usually is accomplished with eight to 16 chips in a row.

    That's pretty low parallelism; there are memory testers out there that test over 200 devices at a time right now. And even the older, more common systems are probably testing 64 in parallel.

    A special ink jet color marks the good dies.

    This hasn't been true for years. Each device's pass/fail status is stored in a database, along with all other test results, and the whole process is automated enough that good die are binned out automatically. No need to physically mark the chip.

    Due to the imperfection of the process, a percentage of the DRAM die contains some faulty cells.

    That percentage is 100%. At modern memory sizes, you never get a perfect device without going through repair.

    1. Re:Some updates to the article... by aeoo · · Score: 1

      At modern memory sizes, you never get a perfect device without going through repair.

      Can you please explain what do you mean by "repair"? I thought after the chip comes out of the lithography process, you can't change it, other than via fib process, which is very slow and only used for development. What am I missing here?

    2. Re:Some updates to the article... by IvyMike · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain what do you mean by "repair"?

      DRAM manufacturers include a small amount of extra memory on the die; there are a few "extra" rows and columns on the die. There is also a system of fuses which allows you to remove a row or column from the main array, and and also replace it with a row or column from the redundant area. These fuses are blown using a laser, prior to packaging.

      The manufacturer tests the device, identifies the bad cells, and then "swaps" out a row or a column with a good row or column from the redundant area.

      This is a little vague; manufacturers are very guarded about revealing the specifics of how they do this. Some manufacturers may have a smaller number of redundant cells, but have a very flexible system of row/column swapping. Others may dedicate more memory to the redundant system, but have a more restricted (but less complex) sytem of swapping in rows and columns. For example, restrictions on "even" or "odd" rows being swapped with the same type from the redundant array. In reality, the systems are usually way more complicated than just rows and columns (half rows, restricted use rows, pairs of rows, etc) but you get the idea.

      In a modern DRAM device, every device needs to go through this process. (It's much cheaper to devote a small space to redundant columns and go through repair than to try to make a device that had a 0% cell failure rate.)

  26. Re:Ever wonder? by yintercept · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, have you ever wondered what happens to all the defected people that get produced?

    They end up on earth.

  27. I have it by acidrain69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been waiting for the computer graveyard market to ramp up. Where does the rest of defective computer systems go?

    It's in my closet. All of it. The whole market. I'm waiting for the entire tech market to crash, so I can flood the market.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  28. Use it for Linux ;-) by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
    I vaguely remember reading about a kernel patch that analysed faulty RAM, worked out what was wrong with it, and then modified the virtual memory handling so that you could carry on using it; at reduced capacity anyway.

    Needless to say I find this very cool indeed, but I'm not sure I'd want to run it on my high availability, mission-critical web server for a bank ;-)

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by gordyf · · Score: 1

      I dunno, sounds like it'd be good if it were able to detect the error, carry on with what it was doing, and alert the sysadmin to the problem, who can then schedule downtime to fix it, rather than having an unexpected hardware error in the middle of something important ...

      Then again, isn't that what ECC memory is for?

    2. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Informative
      I dunno, sounds like it'd be good if it were able to detect the error, carry on with what it was doing, and alert the sysadmin to the problem, who can then schedule downtime to fix it, rather than having an unexpected hardware error in the middle of something important ...

      No. The idea of the patch wasn't to stop it crashing, you probably can't do that; the idea was to analyse it when the system booted and work around it then- it's perfectly possible to send the admin an email summarising it though.

      There's something very cool about the concept of buying a tonne of memory for a tenth of the price and suddenly having a system with nearly four gigabytes of memory ;-)

      Then again, isn't that what ECC memory is for?

      No. AFAIK ECC memory can correct only bit errors within a word; but addressing errors slip right past it. The patch can handle addressing errors, blocks that just don't work, blocks that mirror back to the same location etc. etc.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      badram... search this current page for it - lots people have mentioned it.

    4. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by SailFly · · Score: 1

      Definately check out:

      http://memtest86.com - very strict memory checker, free project.

      http://fgouget.free.fr/misc/badram.shtml - article about using bad memory.

      http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/download.ht ml - BadRAM module for Linux, BSD, etc. Use this to specify the areas of bad memory so you can use the DIMM.

    5. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No. The idea of the patch wasn't to stop it crashing, you probably can't do that

      Bzzzzzzt! Wrong, buddy!

      I remember working with a DEC VAX 11/750. It had roughly the processing power of a 286, though it's hard to compare the two.

      It was the size of a large, commercial dishwasher, and had a stack of other boxes that together were about the same size that were the three 350 MB Hard Drives.

      The fault tolerance on this computer simply boggles the mind of anybody used to the Linux or Windows world.

      It would dynamically detect and remap areas of the hard disks going bad. It would dynamically detect, correct, mark, and log areas of RAM that were going bad - it would even tell you which CHIP on the memory card (about the size of a dinner plate) the error was on, with zero downtime, while it was running!

      It used a method not unlike ECC to determine "bad" and would map around bad RAM or disk sectors as a basic function of operation.

      It was so good, that one time, when it crashed (due to the air conditioner failing) that when we brought it back up, most people's sessions were preserved on their terminals, and just started working again, right where they left off! Despite the computer having been OFF for several hours!

      Sorry, but you haven't seen fault tolerance in a computer until you've seen it on an older DEC VAX. I can only wish that anything like that was available today.

      It probably is, but I sure can't afford it.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    6. Re:Use it for Linux ;-) by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      Bzzzzzzt! Wrong, buddy!

      Uh no. You may be able to harden the OS against a memory failure but this won't be a 100% cure against all memory failure.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  29. I am seeing a lot of this by acidrain69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are a lot of peeps complaining about substandard ram. If you had RTFA, you'd realize that the downgrade ram is reconfigured to skip the bad parts in the chips, so that it comes out as a normal module. Just because there is a faulty bit or 10 in a modules, doesn't mean the reast of that module is bound to fail. It could just have been an imperfection in the silicon or the circuit process.

    The downgrade ram has to pass further tests to insure the detours around the bad parts worked.

    Granted, I probably wouldn't use this stuff in a mission critical server, but if you are buying for a mission critical server, you should be getting ECC registered with lifetime warranties anyway. Now for a small web or file server, or even a desktop, I'd use this.

    Other people have mentioned memtest86. This program is your friend. Don't even bother with BIOS POST tests of RAM, just use this every once in a while if you REALLY want to find the problems. Too bad it won't run on my alpha server :(

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the chip is half-bad, there are good chances that it has defects in the other half. Usually, it's a problem with the process and not just random quirks. It's just that one half works better than the other. In fact, many windows crashes are not caused by Windows, but by bad RAM. And good luck finding anything with memtest86. Once, I ran that program for about 3 hours on a machine with bad RAM. It didn't find anything. When I replaced one of the sticks, all the problems went away.

    2. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are a lot of peeps complaining about substandard ram. If you had RTFA, you'd realize that the downgrade ram is reconfigured to skip the bad parts in the chips, so that it comes out as a normal module. Just because there is a faulty bit or 10 in a modules, doesn't mean the reast of that module is bound to fail. It could just have been an imperfection in the silicon or the circuit process.

      You have made a statement that makes it very clear you are a very educated layman, not someone in the field. What you've said is true to the first order, but not inherantly true.

      Wafers have what can be measured as "defect density", and observe a phenomena called "defect clustering". Defects are not always hit or miss, open or short, some of them are latent or resistive. As the part ages (diffuses), electromigrates or observes hot electron effects, all parts will decrease in quality. Downgrade RAM, so to speak, would be most likely to have additional cells fail due to the above effects -- because it had failures that made it marginal in the first place. Testing methodologies at higher quality manufacturers build in guardbands to make sure that nobody ever experiences the defects when used in-spec. (This is why many overclockers lose their chips after only a year or two, they cause latent defects to surface and suddenly the chip won't even operate at nominal frequencies; the guardband effect also explains to a great degree why many chips can be overclocked in the first place.)

      I'm not dis'n you, just trying to fill in a few more holes.

    3. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      You have made a statement that makes it very clear you are a very educated layman, not someone in the field. What you've said is true to the first order, but not inherantly true.

      You caught me :)

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    4. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "If the chip is half-bad, there are good chances that it has defects in the other half."

      Actually, no that is not correct. Errors are caused by a localized defect which affects what is really (in human terms) a small point on the die. A particle of comtaminant, for instance, only a micron or two in size.

      Ever wonder why NAND FLASH (used in Smart Media, Compact FLASH, etc) are cheaper than NOR FLASH (called linear FLASH, used for BIOS and other code storage, etc)? Because not only is it designed to be fault correcting, but the spec allows for up to a certain number of sectors to be completely bad (uncorrectable by the on board ECC bits). This means higher yeild since many more get to pass in spite of defects.

      J

    5. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Well, I once had an old 386 motherboard that I had gotten for free. It was populated with a huge bank of those 1M x 1 bit DRAM chips. It had a whopping 4 megs of RAM total, which was a substancial amount at the time. I got it for free because of 'problems running Windows' that it had.

      Turned out that it had a single 1M x 1 chip that was defective in the second megabyte of RAM. I found it using a DOS based RAM test program. It had to run over a half an hour before the failure would occur. The reason the machine was tagged as 'having problems running windows' was because the memory failure wouldn't occur for DOS programs that only used the first 640K.

      I didn't have a memory chip layout diagram for the motherboard, so finding the individual chip was a matter of trial and error using the topology of the board and the failed memory bit pattern. I had to try swapping out several chips before I found the one that caused the failure. Them were the olden days, of course.

    6. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      no, you buy a mission critical server that uses hot swap ram and failover ram.

      My compaq ML-530 has 12 Dimm slots for it's ram each pair of two are redundant.. I.E. 2 256 meg dimms makes 256 meg of ram everything is duplicated in the other. PLUS there are a set of 4 backup dimm slots that get activated when one is detected to fail and then I can open the box and remve the one with the red LED on next to it's slot and pop in a new one, tell the server that a new one is installed and activate that slot again.

      Mission critical uses hardware that is NOTHING like the consumer level junk most of you have. Hot swap PCI slots, hot swap RAM hot swap SCSI.... etc...

      basically if you cant hot swap everything then your server is low quality.

      and yes, the only thing I cant hot swap is a processor, but it can disable up to two of them before it is in a next one that dies is a fail mode. (4 processor Xeon motherboard)

    7. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You have made a statement that makes it very clear you are a very educated layman, not someone in the field.,
      You have made a statement that makes you sound like a cocky jackass. Your post would have been fine without that sentence, wouldn't it? It's perfectly possible to be clueful and to be polite, both at once.

      (And in case you think you weren't being impolite, I ask again: Was that sentence necessary?)

    8. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >When I replaced one of the sticks, all the problems went away.

      The big question is:

      Did you replace it with an identical type and speed of RAM? Or did it perhaps have fewer chips?

      memtest86 may not detect overclocked RAM, and on some boards, if the RAM is double sided, the extra "stress" on the bus of a poorly desgined board may be enough to cause errors when reading or writing the RAM.

      I've seen other strange effects that only happen to windows, such as a board that detects a full complement of 384 MB of RAM in the BIOS (1 each of 256 MB and 128 MB) but only 128 MB in windows. Moving the RAM about on the board would cause windows to _sometimes_ detect the rest of the memory. Swapping the 256 MB stick with another machine's 256 MB caused both machines to reliably detect and use the memory.

      While I never bothered with memtest86, I'm betting it would see the same amount of memory as the BIOS.

      Can you tell I hate modern memory modules yet? :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      I only buy Samsung ram for example because they know good quality. Also they have great ddram -3200 while other ram manufactors are not starting to introduce it.

      I would rather pay an extra $15 per module then put up with blue screens of death and Linux kernel panics.

    10. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by shepd · · Score: 1

      If it's what I think it is, it's a boot disk without an OS that runs it's own single program that puts random (or sometimes structured) patterns in memory and compares them with expected results.

      Or am I wrong about that? Perhaps I'm thinking about the one from a Sun (or was it SGI?) engineer, but there could be another.

      I know memtest86 is good, it's most likely a windows memory detection bug that caused the problem, and unless memtest86 has the same bug, I bet it wouldn't have any trouble finding the extra memory (which works just fine, considering neither box has locked up for any memory-related reasons, from what I can tell). Unfortunately, unless I decided not to run windows on the box, this wouldn't help. :-/

      But yes, I agree, memtest86 is pretty good. And free! :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by kcelery · · Score: 1

      if some part of it is bad, you can quick identify the problem and replace it. The is a 128M ram in one of our machines that was running perfectly most of the time, but the machine hung up randomly. It did not happen too often, sometimes once a week, sometimes several times in the afternoon. The problem usually disappear right after reboot. First window 98 was suspected, then other hardwares were replaced. The symptom finally disappear after the RAM was replaced.

    12. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      In fact, many windows crashes are not caused by Windows, but by bad RAM C'mon, don't you mean bad RAM is caused by Windows repeatedly crashing?

    13. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by tintruder · · Score: 3, Informative
      If the chip is half-bad, there are good chances that it has defects in the other half. Usually, it's a problem with the process and not just random quirks.

      Not true. All processes are subject to variation.

      When a wafer is produced with hundreds or thousands of discrete die on it, some are always better than others. For instance, in the 5" process where the first Pentiums were fabricated, you could have a yield of 60%-80% good die with those 60%-80% spanning a whole range of marked chip speeds. Same process, same wafer, different mhz. Different price when sold.

      If you've ever seen a fab in production, you would also see steps where manual (vacuum wand) handling is needed. Even in the filtered air of a clean room, the open movement of a wafer handled like this often leads to particles becoming affixed to the surface. The smaller the process (e.g. .09u vs..9u)the more damage a single particle can do.

      Process washings with chemicals or pure water do a good job of assuring no (well, few) particles stay affixed, but even so, some steps of metrology show that all cannot be avoided.

      Will a single particle hurt a single die? Maybe. Maybe not. It depends on where it lands and at what step in the process.

      Once the die are tested for yield and function and sorted by this performance, they are sold in batches.

      Not every die is tested completely though, but rather a restrictive set of "tell-tale" measurements are taken on most (at good fabs) and exhaustive testing done only on a small sample. Lots of statistical analysis helps know what to test and how hard to test it.

      Move to the final assembler, and all sorts of production glitches can cause bad modules. Primarily though, either minimally qualifying RAM or random sample tested RAM makes it into generic modules. Still, all the other components, the circuit board, connectors and solder itself can contribute to problems.

      In any case, the bad part in any chip is likely local because even minimal QA testing will eliminate obvious or widespread failures.

      Of course, piss-poor process does yield chips more prone to failure by breakdown of the traces or local thermal failure due to bubbles, impurities, or poor assembly.

    14. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have made a statement that makes it very clear you are a very educated layman, not someone in the field.

      You have made a statement that makes it pretty clear you're a fucking tool.

    15. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I agree on all but one point. RAM errors will usually cause Windows to die repeatedly during boot (NT, 2K, and XP kernels do a RAM check at boot), but bad RAM is well under 0.1% (one-of-a-thousand) the cause of most windows crashes in my experience.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    16. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *AC re-reads it, thanks to the state-saving loveliness of Opera* You've just given me a positive feeling, thanks :-).

    17. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by mykepredko · · Score: 1
      I've worked a bit with memory and memory tests and there are a couple of things that I can add here.
      1. I've always heard of this practice as being called "Yield Management" and is very common. I don't know why the article doesn't use this term.
      2. It is very prevalent - and not only in memory. There are a lot different devices that are shipped with known problems - chip designers often design in redundancies that can be activated when the chip is wired to the lead frame.
      3. The best memory test there is is the operation of a (true) operating system. A deterministic test just does not provide the randomness required to bring out errors. This is why all manufacturers test PCs/Systems running the operating system before shipping them to customers.
      4. One of the reasons why SDRAM was adopted so quickly and aggresively by PC manufacturers (along with processors with large caches) is the block reads and writes, which like deterministic tests, results in much lower failure rates than the random reads and writes you would get if the processor accessed the memory directly. SDRAM and processor caches created an improvement in system reliability without increased testing.
      5. Your statement "If the chip is half-bad, there are a good chance that it has defects in the other half." is inaccurate. If it were true, then in the case where one chip had a defect you would have to assume that all the chips on the wafer are bad (because what is a defect in one half of a chip is the same distance to features on another chip, the only difference being is where the wafer was diced). Carrying this on to its logical conclusion, then if there was one defect in the silicon ingot, then no wafers or chips could be manufactured from it.
      The company (Celestica) has invested literally tens of millions of dollars in SDRAM test including coming up with pseudo-random patterns that match the reads/writes of an operating system.

      myke
    18. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by alienw · · Score: 1

      RAM tests are not very reliable. A certain cell that gets reset when another (adjacent) cell is written to will probably not get detected with a simple ram test, but it will bring havoc to a program if it is loaded into that space. Also, RAM tests cannot detect memory errors caused by bad motherboard design or random errors.

      Basically, if you get random crashes/bluescreens/segfaults on your machine, it's probably RAM. Sometimes, it might just be something like gcc segfaulting every once in a while, with no apparent cause. Other times, it may be corrupted files, weirdness, bad archives, etc. It's actually quite similar to what happens when you overclock.

    19. Re:I am seeing a lot of this by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but outside of the ultra-cheap "uncle's friend made it from spare parts" PCs this is rare. Maybe I just have higher standards, but I don't let my clients mix RAM vendors inside the same box. I had a machine that got RAM errors like you were describing all the time, and I had to underclock the FSB. If you stick to Intel or VIA chipsets, keep your PCs clean, and don't mix RAM parts you will be a happy geek forever after.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  30. How to identify DIMMs using bad RAMs by udif · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's quite simple. Really.

    DRAM chips are usually have either 4, 8 or 16 bits per word. In order to construct a DIMM, 64 bits are needed. This means that with 4 bit DRAMs, you need 16 chips, with 8 bit DRAMs you need 8 vhips, and with 16 bit DRAMs you need 4 chips. usually you will see only the 4 or 8 bit DRAMs, because these occupy less board area for the same capacity. 16 bit DRAMs are only used for low capacity DIMMs.

    When your DIMM supports ECC, it's 72 bits wide, which makes it more complicated. Usually its made of 18, 4-bit chips, or 9 8-bit chips.

    (back in the 30 and 72 pin SIMM days, when memories were 8 or 32 bit wide, you could see ECC SIMMs that use 3 chip for 2x4+1=9 bits, or 2x16+4=36 bits).

    If you see DIMMs with 12 chips, This is usually a cheap OEM SIMM using partially good DRAMs.

    The Best way to identify such a DIMM, is to write down the marking on ALL the chips on it, and look them up in the internet. You then sum up all the DRAM bit widths, and see what you come up with:

    If its 64 bits, its a normal DRAM.

    If its 72 bits, its probably an ECC DIMM.

    If its more, it's probably a DRAM using partially good DRAMs.

  31. Re:Cheap memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it means that the "no name" ram you buy, that for some strange reason is cheaper than the large brands, is sub-standard...

  32. Does it get worse? by Looke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder, does RAM faults develop over time, or are they introduced in manufacturing? That is, if you have some bad RAM, and correct it with Linux BadRAM, can you then be reasonably safe you won't get more faults?

    Dead pixels on LCD screens are like this, if you don't have any dead pixels, you'll never get any. But how about RAM?

    1. Re:Does it get worse? by Ogrez · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, RAM will develop faults from use. Its just not very common, Mostly caused by overclocking, voltage spikes, and power surges.

      --


      Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
    2. Re:Does it get worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hrm. maybe on a HA machine, if it was composed of nodes, you could have them taken offline every X amount of hours then automatically run memtest86 on them.

    3. Re:Does it get worse? by Spoing · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If you run memory tests for long enough (1/2 through to ~3 days), you will find a much higher failure rate. ECC not included, of course.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    4. Re:Does it get worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is only because the test failed, not the device.

    5. Re:Does it get worse? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      That is only because the test failed, not the device.

      Nope...I've tested memory testers professionally. The memory (or a related memory subsystem/connector) is almost always at fauly...not the tester. If you want verification, I'd be glad to charge you for it...

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  33. Ram a lama ding dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article also gets us closer to answering the question "Who put the ram In the rama lama ding dong?"

  34. I figured by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    it was put onto eBay.

    As a tip to Linux users with bad ram, try append="mem=fooM" where foo is an amount of ram below the broken area.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:I figured by AvitarX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reel advice for Linux users with bad ram.

      Run memt86 and use the output for the badram patch for the kernel.

      that will actually work and cut e vary minimal amount of ram out.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:I figured by alienw · · Score: 1

      Umm... you never actually tried that, have you? Memtest takes about 20-40 hours to find the bad clusters. I'd rather pay $30 for a new module.

    3. Re:I figured by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Badram requires a simple download, dd to floppy, booting off the floppy, and making sure it started up okay. Then, you can leave it alone for a day while you let it make passes.

      Anyways, assuming you are buying new ram and you want to be sure its okay, you'd have to do the same thing. And some older laptops have integrated onboard memory - the badram patch can work around that.

      I have a 64M proprietary memory stick for an old toshiba laptop that will be arriving soon in the email - I will be using badram to test that when it comes.

    4. Re:I figured by ksuMacGyver · · Score: 4, Funny

      Arriving in the email!!! Wow what will they think of next? No wonder you have problems with it. Your ink jet probably is set to too low of a resolution to print the circuit, for more help on setting up your printer check out linuxprinting.org

      --

      Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

      Interested in AI? MACR
    5. Re:I figured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      256mb PC100 takes me ~20-30 MINUTES, so I dont know what kind of ram you use!

    6. Re:I figured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you testing bad RAM? I've found that good RAM is tested quickly, but for bad RAM Memtest86 will print a message for each address. For some reason, it prints to the screen slowly, meaning that if there are hundreds or thousands of bad addresses, it could take hours/days to print them all (when this happened to me, it was actually because of a bad memory controller on the motherboard - the Badram patch couldn't work around the problems, so the motherboard had to be replaced).

  35. Clive sinclair did this in the 80's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Sinclair Spectrum used half working 32k memory chips for cost reasons. In the later models, the computer used the same system, even though by then they were using mostly working chips as the cost of memory had fallen.

    You can get an extra 16k on most speccys by soldering a couple of links.

    1. Re:Clive sinclair did this in the 80's. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      Nice call! Not quite right though I think...they were half-working 64k chips, eight of them giving a working memory of 32K. Adding that to the basic 16K supplied by the eight 4116s gave you the 48K.

      They were made by Texas, and if memory serves they were marked TMS4532H and TMS4532L - the "H" or "L" said (surprise!) which half of the chip was working. The expansion board carried eight of the same type, and a link on the PCB set which half to address.

      I'm not sure what you mean about getting the extra 16K, as there wouldn't be enough address space to hold it. (However a mate of mine did fit real 4564s to his with some kind of bank-switching circuit, but obviously only software he wrote himself could use it.)

      Bear in mind though that my Speccy knowledge ran out after the Issue 3 boards, so maybe the Issue 4s were different. Still don't see how you'd fit it in the address space though without bank-switching as used on the Spectrum 128.

      (Pauses to remember when 4116s were *IT*, and cost something like GBP12.99 each... =8^) )

  36. Lost messages by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    I'm not surprised that they use crap parts in answering machines. I've bought three digital answering machines over the years, and each one went flaky and died within a couple of years. Each time one died, I returned to my original General Electic dual-tape machine.

    Eventually, I learned my lesson: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. My mechanical answering machine is now 18 years old and running fine. I have no plans of ever replacing it again.

  37. Uses for defective DRAM by lakeland · · Score: 1

    If you happen to get hold of some defective DRAM then there is an excellent kernel patch called badram. This will allow you to mark off all faulty bits and use the ram with no performance lost. So provided you've got enough slots, you can have 4G (or 3.99G) at no cost!

  38. who needs IRC by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    when you can get help on /.!?

    My server, and its cheapass ram, thank you.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  39. Alternate subject by hexdcml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else read the title as "Salvaging DRM"? Hmmm, for minute there I thought answering machines were DRM protected.

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    1. Re:Alternate subject by Ashran · · Score: 1

      Psst! Dont tell the RIAA!
      People might randomly call other people to leave copyrighted songs on their answering machines!

      --

      Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
  40. I just figured it was at Fry's by Artifex · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, I've had some of their OEM memory as part of a package deal, and it was very nasty stuff.

    What's worse, before they would take it back, they wanted to "test" it, testing being limited to a couple runs of PC-Doctor, which is totally lightweight.

    To make a long story short, they refused to take it back the first time, later it blew up my motherboard. They replaced the motherboard (it was part of the package) and sent me home, where I discovered my Athlon XP was also damaged. I took it up there, and they wanted to run PC-Doctor on it, but the "technician" (hah!) cracked the CPU while putting it in a "test board," so "oops, I guess we're replacing that."

    P.S. One of the guys at the return desk who I got to know quite well told me, when I asked him why the "test boards" they were using always changed, that he thought they were boards that belonged to customers. Whether that meant boards in for repairs, or returned boards, I don't know or care - either is bad news.

    P.P.S. This was at the Fry's in Wilsonville, Oregon. There is also an idiotic troll in the service department there who, after ignoring me waiting at an empty counter for 10 minutes while he chatted on the phone, wanted to charge me for a "missing" monitor stand on a monitor I was returning, refusing for 15 minutes to look in the bottom of the box under the styrofoam because monitor stands always come attached to the monitors, didn't you know? He finally looked when I demanded to talk to the manager, and of course it was there. I had a long discussion with the manager anyway over his, and their, incompetence (I reminded him of the memory fiasco) but the troll was still lurking there the last time I dropped by for consumables, which is all I will ever buy from Fry's, now. You can't miss him - he looks like he'd feel more at home in a raincoat, instead of his cheesy lab coat, roaming a playground on a sunny day.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:I just figured it was at Fry's by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

      There is a very simple way to avoid dealing the morons who work at Fry's - buy retail pack items. Then, if something goes wrong, you deal with a company that has a reputation and would like to keep it. And price the disparity between OEM and retail is a lot less than what it once was.

      Got turbomachinery???

    2. Re:I just figured it was at Fry's by Artifex · · Score: 1
      There is a very simple way to avoid dealing the morons who work at Fry's - buy retail pack items. Then, if something goes wrong, you deal with a company that has a reputation and would like to keep it. And price the disparity between OEM and retail is a lot less than what it once was.


      Well, when I got the replacement memory, I paid the upsell price for overly-marked-up Mushkin, which seems to have worked out fine. But as far as the memory goes, the original faulty sticks were no-name but had a lifetime or one-year or whatever guarantee, not the 90-day. They were just being jerks wanting to test it.

      My first mistake in all this was thinking that their "package deal" was really all that much better than what I could have done through the Internet, and for wanting my new system parts right away instead of in a couple days.

      Really, when I lived in Oregon, if I'd have had a good selection of vendors locally, I wouldn't have been at Fry's, anyway. Also, Oregon has no consumer sales tax for regular goods, so Internet price + shipping was often close enough that I stopped bothering with Pricewatch and IBuyer for most things. But Fry's, unfortunately, had the widest selection that I knew of.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:I just figured it was at Fry's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This was at the Fry's in Wilsonville, Oregon."

      Oh, and I thought I was the only vicitm of their stupidity, lack of interest, and trolling! How are your recovering from that experience?

      It's funny, because I bought OEM RAM from them and it still works! Must be luck of the draw...or the various insults I gave the sales rep...:-p

    4. Re:I just figured it was at Fry's by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Big man for slamming him on Slashdot were he can't defend himself.


      Ooh, look at the Anonymous Coward trying to lecture me over this.

      What are you, an object lesson?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:I just figured it was at Fry's by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      He probably didn't look under the monitor because your a known sneaky-fuck.

      How does that work?

      Surely if he thought he was dishonest, the first thing he'd do is look in the bottom of the box for the missing item?

      What did he think the guy was going to do - bash him on the head while he was looking in the box?!

  41. Use it on Slashdots servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that no-one from the UK can get in all weekend! Actually, its been pretty crappy all week. What's that all about then?

    1. Re:Use it on Slashdots servers by PapaSMURFFS · · Score: 1

      You might be intrested to know that the routing problems which were plagueing the UK lately are still there in part. Don't blame slashdot for being down when its only your ISP's messed up... and now so this doesn't go 'off topic': Maybe their routers use some of the RAM? :b *phew* hate it when I get modded down for going off-topic

    2. Re:Use it on Slashdots servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok..well, i`m using freeserve.

      and i`m posting A/C so i don't get modded down..but i dont really care if i do anyway...but still i do it! strange but true!

  42. Re:Ever wonder? by mythr · · Score: 1

    You can be more specific than that. They end up in Congress.

  43. Annother take on answering machine memory by wumpus2112 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nine rings for (faulty) ram chips doomed to die. Wumpus

  44. now i know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i had a digital answering machine. funny thing with this was that the outgoing message recorded sound quality used to degrade over time! to this date, i have no idea how this could be the case. was it because of defective RAMs?

  45. To be quite honest... by HaloZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...no, I never really did wonder what happened to DRAM that failed the everpresent quality-assurance testing. Never really occured to me. So nyar.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  46. Re: Central servers at the telco by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why I stopped using answering machines and started using the voice messaging at the telco. Millions of little plastic boxes eating up electricity in millions of homes is bound to be less efficient than voice messaging at a central server.

    The services at the telco let people leave messages when I am on the phone.

  47. Re:Is Gentoo the new Slackware by Homebrewed · · Score: 1

    There is a very simple way to avoid dealing the morons who work at Fry's....

    I call it http://www.crucial.com.
    Micron RAM, cheaper than OEM, free shipping.

    Seriously, with so many first-rate retailers on the net, there's *no* reason to do business with crapholes like Fry's.

  48. Re:Cheap memory. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    You'll have better luck trying to install the keychain ram then you would OEM ram. =)

  49. The only reason I can think of is expediancy... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    It's because they're THERE and most of the time, if you know what in the hell you're doing, you can get out of there in one piece. With the mail-order places, you have to wait a while. Sometimes that's just not an option. So you spend a little more than you would on the mail-order parts (like Crucial- which I'd reccomend to anyone that could afford the wait time) and get the premium parts from Fry's and go on.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  50. Re:Cheap memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    No Most major manufacturers use quality ram.

    Compaq and IBM both use Kingston Memory. They also like to jack up prices for their "rebranded" Compaq/IBM ram which is just really a Kingston module with an even higher price.

    Toshiba uses Samsung. I'm not sure about manufacturers like Dell or Gateway.

  51. Re: Central servers at the telco by great+throwdini · · Score: 1
    Millions of little plastic boxes eating up electricity in millions of homes is bound to be less efficient than voice messaging at a central server.

    From a big-picture perspective, probably. However, voice mail is always(?) an added-value service for which the phone co. will charge on a monthly basis (at least that is my experience). From the vantage of the cheapskate user, it makes more fiscal sense to purchase a simple answering machine once than pay for voice mail service each and every month.

    If it's that important to reach someone, people will call back.

  52. Crucial by Artifex · · Score: 1

    Yah. Crucial was my main memory supplier for a while, and now that I've learned my lesson with Fry's, I'll go back to them.

    I just won't take their word for how many sticks can fit in my motherboards, because they've been wrong twice for not counting the banks on the sticks they suggested.

    I've tried Mushkin, but only because they were the best named sticks Fry's had when I was there, and the only 2-3-3 PC266s in stock. Mushkin's cool, but historically way overpriced. I wouldn't even have recognized the name except for the advertising on Anandtech.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:Crucial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i still like kingston....

      sure beats the prices HP or Compaq/HP want to charge for equiv RAM...

  53. Huh...that explains by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    why putting high quality ram (crucial, mushkin, etc) in an oem box (starts with a D, ends in ell) and the machine gripes about it.

    I can see it now: Error 13.2, good memory in a PoS OEM machine. Strike f1 to setup and f2 to continue. /rolleyes

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  54. RTFA !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Devices that fail QA are SCRAPPED!!!!!!! The Binning happens well befor QA testing, starting with Waffer probe, which IS NOT QA testing, continuing on to Final Testing, which IS NOT QA testing. After binning, the devices then go to QA testing. Failurs at this point are scraped.

    One would have figured that at least some precentage of the /. readership would have a passing familiarity with STANDARD semiconductor processing. What the artical talks about is nothing new as far as process is concered. The only difference here, is that the class C parts ( which have PASSED class C QA testing) are sold to a company that specializes in the binning operation. BTW, after binning, these companies do their own Final and QA testing.

    Nowere do QA failure continue with production processing.

  55. ECC worth it? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Granted, I probably wouldn't use this stuff in a mission critical server, but if you are buying for a mission critical server, you should be getting ECC registered with lifetime warranties anyway. Now for a small web or file server, or even a desktop, I'd use this.

    I've always been a bit dubious as to the value of ECC memory, and whether it might not just be a bit of a sales tactic. Yes, I realize that it's theoretically possible for solid state storage to spontaneously fail. But it's also theoretically possible for any number of other things to break, and spontaneous RAM failure seems very, very low on the list of things to worry about.

    I can't help but think that ECC memory is more useful from a marketing standpoint than a practical standpoint.

    1. Re:ECC worth it? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

      But it's also theoretically possible for any number of other things to break, and spontaneous RAM failure seems very, very low on the list of things to worry about.

      Well, the thing about RAM failure is that, unless you do something like ECC, you won't detect the errors until it causes a crash. Probably, you'll lose some data to corruption first. The other thing is that RAM errors can be induced by bad power or other transient problems. Finally, it does happen, so better safe than sorry - you're spending $2k on a server, so why cheap out on a $50 part?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:ECC worth it? by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 3, Informative

      ECC isn't there for the tiny chance that one, and only one, chip on the module would catch fire and die. It's there so that any random "bit rot" (single-bit errors) is caught and corrected before it causes damage. All RAM is susceptable to this; it can be caused by cosmic rays (!) or by radioactive decay (can't remember if it's alpha or beta) of minute quantities of radioisotopes in the chips' substrate. While it will only happen once in every ten years or so on average, it does happen and can cause a system crash. ECC is about reducing the possible risk (it would have to flip 3 bits simultaneously to fool ECC RAM).

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    3. Re:ECC worth it? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      It's there so that any random "bit rot" (single-bit errors) is caught and corrected before it causes damage.

      That can't be right, though. The system *bus* doesn't have ECC, and by virtue of its far greater area, would be much more vulnerable to errors induced by interference than the RAM.

    4. Re:ECC worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      System bus(and SRAM) is driven by transistors. So its kept in 1 or 0 state rather forcefully, a single particle hitting it is not likely to change its state. DRAM on the other hand is a really huge ass array of really tiny capacitors. It's a small wonder it works in the first place and you only need a minuscule amount of energy to change single bit's state.

    5. Re:ECC worth it? by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Like the Software Raid FAQ says:

      Question 13)

      Answer:

      Question 14) Why is there no question 13?

      Answer: If you are into system administration, it pays to be a little paranoid. Can't hurt right?

      That's paraphrased, I was too lazy to go copy and paste.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  56. tha~s a re_lly go@d article by hedley · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wo~nder when we wil+ see tho&e defec%ive ch)ps in ou! deskt{p mach?nes?

  57. HP HP-UX memory. by hopbine · · Score: 1

    In spite of what some other posters are saying, in the large HPUX server market, HP memory is much more reliable than Kingston memory, it's also much more expensive. Having said that I have seen more memory failures attributed to non-HP memory (not just Kingston) than anything. If your downtime is not worth more then go for less expensive memory. I have also seen a client try to install his own memory and detroy a system board in the proccess. No it was not covered under the HP warranty.

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
    1. Re:HP HP-UX memory. by Teancom · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is this "Kingston" memory of which you speak? AFAIK, Kingston does not make ram, they throw other people's die on their modules (and sometimes they just buy the modules whole). It's pretty much a crap-shoot of whether or not you're getting samsung, hynix, micron (who just signed a deal to start selling to them again), or etc. So saying kingston memory is crap would be akin to saying dell makes crappy hard drives...

      Not a flame, just a clarification :-)

    2. Re:HP HP-UX memory. by hopbine · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are of course correct. The point is, as you say, pretty much of a crap shoot. Maybe that's why some people are very happy and some are not. BTW I don't know whom HP buys their memory from !

      --
      Semper ubi sub ubi
  58. Another former use for bad RAM by ellbee · · Score: 1
    In the 80s some guys I knew in our Storage group designed a super-whizzy ECC chip that could handle multi-bit errors. It was too slow for use with CPUs, but was perfect for solid-state disks, which they sold at a huge markup since the RAM was so cheap. Then digital answering machines claimed the DRAM slag heaps.

    ellbee

    --

    You can't fight in here - this is the war room!

  59. Badram by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    This is probably a good place to mention badram, the linux kernel patch that lets you use slightly defective memory modules.

    You can use memtest to generate a list of bad areas in ram, and the badram patch reserves those blocks of memory on boot such that nobody can ever use them, effectively giving you a working stick of ram, only a little bit smaller than it is marked for.

    If you're like me, you have a couple of cheapo sticks from who knows where that don't exactly work, and this patch is perfect for reviving those sticks.

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  60. Dude, yer gettin' a DELL by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Turns out a lot of it ends up as 'downgrade' memory and ends up in OEM memory modules.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Dude, yer gettin' a DELL by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Actually Dell is one of the few OEM's you can trust.

      They are more expensive then the el-cheapo ones but they only use things like crucial or micron ram, asus motherboards, reliable intel chipsets and so on.

      Dell makes alot of money from bussiness and small bussiness customers and support and quality is critical for them. Other oem's like gateway are another story. If my parents wanted a new computer I would most certainly recommend a dell.

      They also get bulk discounts for being so big so buying a dell with all the higher quality components is not that more expensive then building your own pc using cheap parts.

  61. have you ever owned a Dell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure why you think Dell is particularly at fault. I've owned 4 Dell machines and built 2 others. The Dells have run completely without fault for as long as 7 years with daily use.

    I've built three machines using HIGH quality parts. Intel (brand) mobo, ASUS mobo, etc. The asus mobo was flawed and caused instability and more or less did not function as you would expect, TWO intel mobo's (850eMV2) died on me. Yes, dead, and yes, they were really dead. Dead PNY Geforce4 4200, dead Wester Digital 80gb special edition, and three DOA floppy drives. This massacre was from building 3 computers and all either DOA or soon after dead parts. My other components were top notch as well, Antec power supply and other such premiums.

    I have the highest respect for Dell, I've never had a single problem with one of their computers, the four I own run 100% all the time. I've known dozens of people that build their own computers, and many with very high quality parts, and none approach the stability of a Dell.

    And for your information, just because these faulty chips are labeled "OEM" doesn't mean companies like Dell use them. You can buy the ram they use off their website and it's high quality like any other.

  62. Re:Cheap memory. by Stonent1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dell uses Micron and Infineon (Siemens) for SDRAM and DDR. For RDRAM I think they mainly use Toshiba. I always recommend Crucial to people because it is just the retail branch of Micron. Lifetime warranty and I've never had a failed stick.

  63. I have this problem right now! :( by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I'm using a loaned Celeron 433 with an LX or EX chipset (no tool seems to be able to tell me, and I can't be bothered ripping the case off)

    I'm using 2x128mb SDR dimms (PC100 or 133 I beleive) running at only stock Celeron FSB speeds of 66mhz.

    the ram is coming up as faulty all over the wazoo in memtestx86 and I'd love to know if MS has implimented a way of "reserving" dead ram spots so I can still use the PC reliably as it's a bit shaky? ? - is there a way at all, as I really don't want to replace even only 30$ worth of ram in a loaned box :(

    Also - the dimms are single sided 8 chips per side (IIRC) and I was thinking maybe that setup isn't actually properly supported by the LX / EX chipset? - it's a CRAPPY hard to find jetway Celeron only board (quite a POS) - does anyone recall if there was an issue with double / single sided only ram back in the LX / EX days?

    Thanks a tonne fellas
    - Scott

    1. Re:I have this problem right now! :( by unitron · · Score: 1

      You could try temporarily swapping that RAM to another board and other RAM to that board and see if the problem migrates or not, but under the circumstances I wouldn't be surprised if the real problem was a mobo with capacitor disease, although it seems more common in BX or psuedoBX boards.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:I have this problem right now! :( by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      No this problem is specifically ram - machine was good with a single, double sided (16 chip) 256mb chip approx 1 month ago.

      I just need to know if XP supports a method of excluding areas of ram, once I can do this, I might be able to make the box reliable again ....... sigh.

    3. Re:I have this problem right now! :( by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...was good...chip approx 1 month ago."

      I've got an Abit BX6 that was working just fine a month before it suddenly started dying earlier and earlier in the boot process until it wouldn't boot at all. I've got a Soyo BX board I bought used that seemed to work fine when I first got it and was dead as a doornail a day later. Just because something was working is no guarantee that it still is working. The best way to screw yourself over when troubleshooting is to make assumptions.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  64. HELP by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to get the badMEM program to be used on a boot disk. Reason I ask is, linux wont complete install on system (Red Hat 8), there is bad memory I would like to stop from being used so the install can complete.. Windows install crashes as well. Memtest shows bad areas. The memory is stuck on the MOBO, so I can't simply take it out. Any idea on how to get badmem loaded on a boot disk??

    1. Re:HELP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Badmem is a patch, therefore you'll need a patched kernel dropped on an installer disk. The howto is with the kernel docs, but essentially, you'll want to make a boot floppy with a patched kernel compatible with your dud boxen, and then boot it using installer as your root device. Or something like that.

      You'll need a running box to set up the above, or a helpful soul to donate some time making said kernel.

  65. Re: I bought that by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    I actually bought two of those because it was so cheap. I let my system run continuously for 24hours with a RAM testing program that loads on boot. No errors detected. I figure if it passed that test I don't have anything to worry about and it was a good deal. Still, it's probably slower than my old PC133 RAM, but more ram is usually better than less, slower RAM due to disk caching.

    I would still like to bye a gigabyte of name brand memory, but that would cost me well over $150 now.

  66. Re: Central servers at the telco by iamthetrollofdeath · · Score: 0

    COUGH COUGH *plug* COUGH COUGH!!!

    I'm just messing, voice messaging is good^^

    --
    I am the troll. So go ahead and hate me.
  67. test your memory - free utility by SailFly · · Score: 1

    check out memtest86. I have used it to check memory when doing troubleshooting on problem machines.

    One option will generate the memory specs you can use with Linux to tell the kernel which memory spots to avoid. Although the idea of avoiding problem areas of known 'bad' memory sounds nice, I wouldn't use it in my machines.

  68. Re:Cheap memory. by m0ta · · Score: 0

    I must be the only person in the world who got a bad stick of memory from Crucial...

  69. Re:Ever wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, normally a surgeon injects a saline solution into the mother's womb so they die horribly before they're even born. Other times they'll be allow partway out of the birth canal, only to have the back of their heads cut open with scissors.

    Remember: killing defenseless innocents is your *right*!

  70. Hmm by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    Offtopic, but I have a board in my closet that used to be my main machine a while back. It had 3 32meg DIMM's in it. If I pulled any one of them, Win2k would blue screen. I couldn't take any ONE of them out and replace it, or it would blue screen on boot. Strangest thing.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  71. Re:Ever wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them are also used by VA Research for their nefarious purposes. One of those nefarious purposes is trolling at Slahshdot.

  72. Re:Cheap memory. by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    I work on Toshiba laptops, and whenever I look up a part number to add or replace RAM for Toshiba laptop it's almost always Kingston. I get all my part numbers off the Toshiba web site. Accessible only by authorized Toshiba Techs.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  73. Memory test for Windows users by i · · Score: 1

    I can recommend MemTest from HCI Design (free):

    hcidesign.com/memtest

    It find errors not found by Memtest86 (which runs outside windows). (These were real errors, I had problems with memory that Memtest86 doesn't found).

    You had to let it run for some time though.
    (My experience is with ver 1.0, it's now at 1.2.)

    --
    Mundus Vult Decipi
  74. Someone called for you. by benedict · · Score: 1

    His name was Jim-- no, Joe. Anyway, his number is
    555-653 ... 635 ... 563 ... dammit.

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  75. Re:Cheap memory. by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

    Bad sticks happen to everyone at one time or another, it's just really rare with Crucial. The big thing that they excel at, however, is the excellent customer service. I bet you had a warranty replacement stick in your hands fairly quickly.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  76. Micron Technology by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1

    Micron has a subsidiary that has been doing this for years.

  77. How old are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your mama" jokes are awful funny... No wait, they're just awful.

  78. Re:Cheap memory. by m0ta · · Score: 0

    Oh of course they replaced it. Pretty quick too. Just it's funny how everyone told me Crucial never comes D.O.A. and the first time I ordered from them I got a bad stick.

  79. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    XXXI:
    The optimum committee has no members.
    XXXII:
    Hiring consultants to conduct studies can be an excellent means of
    turning problems into gold -- your problems into their gold.
    XXXIII:
    Fools rush in where incumbents fear to tread.
    XXXIV:
    The process of competitively selecting contractors to perform work
    is based on a system of rewards and penalties, all distributed
    randomly.
    XXXV:
    The weaker the data available upon which to base one's conclusion,
    the greater the precision which should be quoted in order to give
    the data authenticity.
    -- Norman Augustine

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...