Slashdot Mirror


How To install Neverwinter Nights on Linux

Joe Barr writes " As soon as I saw the news that BioWare released a beta of a Linux client for its popular and successful Neverwinter Nights title, I downloaded the beta (registration required) and went shopping for the prerequisite retail Windows version of the game. Before I proceed, let me offer this brief warning: Neverwinter Nights is the mother of all timesinks. Do not follow my path unless you have nothing important you want to get done for the next week or so."

242 comments

  1. Installing Neverwinter Nights on Linux by Original+AIDS+Monkey · · Score: 0, Funny

    1. Unistall Linux
    2. Install Windows
    3. Install Neverwinter Nights

    --


    =======
    P.S. Bite! You've been bitten by the Original AIDS Monkey! You have AIDS now!
  2. Finally.... by shoptroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally... Not a post regarding the new RFC and IP stuff. Thank god 4/1 is over! (And this could be 1st post, i doubt it though)

    --
    Insert Sig Here
    1. Re:Finally.... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have to agree there... April 1st is a pain in the ass. I mean sure, post one story (the whitespace one was cool), but to post them all day, and ostensibly the same idea? Sad.

      Anyhoo, on topic, given how long the poor saps who bought NWN (because of it's promised Linux support down the line) have waited, for Bio to provide NO kind of installer or, by the looks of things, no information either... The word "afterthought" comes to mind.

    2. Re:Finally.... by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Well, it is still beta..

      But given that there is still a lot of life left in the engine [ie: the next XP's, and games from bioware will probably use it], it looks promising for linux!

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    3. Re:Finally.... by Jelloman · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh it was April Fools! I thought ThinkGeek was broken, I kept trying to buy one of those USB George Foreman grills.

      I guess I can just take my PC cover off and grill up a burger on my GeForce 4 card.

  3. I'm scared by forgetmenot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm scared to read the article. Is April fool's over yet?

    1. Re:I'm scared by Klugheitsucher · · Score: 1, Funny

      Everwinter nights should have been released on April first. That game is the biggest joke I have ever had the opportunity (I use that term loosely) to play.

    2. Re:I'm scared by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      depends where you live. It's still that accursed day for me.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:I'm scared by t0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why BioWare can't provide an installer is evidently something they choose not to discuss beyond a vague mention of legal restrictions. The word on the street -- unconfirmed by any primary party -- is that the license between InstallShield and BioWare prevents BioWare from providing another installation tool. That may or may not be the case, but I note that InstallShield offers a multiplatform version of its installer and that it runs on Linux. Perhaps that is what BioWare will use when it offers the retail version of the game for Linux.

      Seriously, the guy writing the article has no idea how much stuff costs. The Linux InstallShield license would probably cost BioWare more money than they would make on the Linux port.

      Just be happy it runs at all.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    4. Re:I'm scared by kubrick · · Score: 1

      The Linux InstallShield license would probably cost BioWare more money than they would make on the Linux port.

      Sure, but Bioware were promising multiplatform out-of-the-box for quite a while before the release of the game, and a number of people probably pre-ordered based on that advertised feature.

      They've probably lost money on the port(s?) anyway, and they've lost the goodwill that they abused by saying one thing and doing another (they were coding the game all the way through with little to no consideration of other platforms, as demonstrated by the farce when they were looking for audio systems to port to, not knowing that Miles had had a Linux port out for quite a while).

      Maybe they could buy back a bit of goodwill by not also requiring that purchasers have access to a Windows box -- and it would make them think twice about making promises they can't live up to.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    5. Re:I'm scared by t0ny · · Score: 1
      but Bioware were promising multiplatform out-of-the-box for quite a while before the release of the game

      No, they were saying they *wanted* to do it. Just because people at large saw an intention as a promise does not make Bioware the bad guy.

      Besides, IT WORKS ON LINUX!!!! So stop whining about the lack of a linux-native installer, and count your blessings that they threw you a bone at all.

      They've probably lost money on the port(s?) anyway,

      So telling them to throw more money down the drain is pretty good advice. But most people have Win32 platforms to do their real gaming on, and already purchased that version. I dont think Bioware spending, say, $50k on something that will net them another $10k in sales can be justified.

      Linux people just dont seem to be able to grasp the necessity real businesses have to make money; the real world doesnt work like your family, and when daddy didnt buy you a new car for your birthday, and you whine to grandma and have her buy it for you (hypothetically speaking). The real world has people providing for themselves, and wasting resources on stupid shit is a good way to go out of business (like Enron, or Ion Storm, or whatever).

      and they've lost the goodwill that they abused by saying one thing and doing another (they were coding the game all the way through with little to no consideration of other platforms, as demonstrated by the farce when they were looking for audio systems to port to, not knowing that Miles had had a Linux port out for quite a while).

      And we see just what the Linux community's good will is worth. Looking for approval from habitual complainers seems to be a losing proposition, and they thankfully didnt really pursue it to any great extent.

      Also, they never said one thing and did another. They said they wanted to have it work on Linux, they probably worked on it unpaid and in their spare time, and its out there now. Instead of saying "WOW, thanks BioWare! You guys are the goods!", all they get are complaints that they didnt do enough. Next time, they should just say "you'll get nothing, and like it".

      Maybe they could buy back a bit of goodwill by not also requiring that purchasers have access to a Windows box --

      There no intelligent reason for them to make your holy war their own, especially since the Linux community's good will is worth next to nothing.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  4. jesus h. christ, just run windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    seriously

    how far are you willing to go to avoid "big bad M$"?

    1. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jesus mods +1 holy

    2. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay... I build my own systems so don't have a license for Windows... so um, you going to let me pirate a copy then? Or are you just advocating it? ^_-

    3. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You know, a lot of people use Linux because they like dicking around with computers. I don't consider a game fully played unless I've done *something* interesting to it. So, if the path to making things run is interesting and fun, it's all good.

      If you just want the game to run, ya, Linux is probably a worse platform than Windows for game playing, and probably will be for at least several years to come.

    4. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      How much does MS's latest piece of crap cost? $80 for WinXP Home? And NWN costs $35? No game is worth $115, plus shutting down background processes, rebooting, partitioning my harddrive to accomodate Windows and it's proprietary filesystem is totally unreasonable.

    5. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one game that does not yet run under Linux. I don't play this game very much for several reasons:

      1. I don't like crashes. I actually hate them. I left the windows world for that one reason. I really hate when I'm busy doing something (gaming or programming, doesn't matter) and suddenly BSOD, and then I can just start over. So if a game really needs windows, I'm not going to play it very often.

      2. Rebooting takes a long time. And doing it twice (before and after playing) does not make it better. Plus I need to stop whatever processes I have running, I cannot let "make World" run when rebooting to windows to play a game. Under Linux I can play while waiting.

      3. All the trouble with DirectX etc, to make the game run. I am not an MCSE, and windows is not userfriendly enough for me (am I really stupid?), so making a game run under windows is random luck for me. Under linux, almost every game just work, and even if I find one that doesn't, I have a reasonable chance to figure out what is wrong.

    6. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by master0ne · · Score: 0

      i agree!, and its $80 for the UPGRADE, meaning you would have to already have a full version lyeing around. i beleave last time i checked XP pro full was like $300+, and i think home was a bit cheeper, but still thats ridicoulous!

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    7. Re:jesus h. christ, just run windows by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Do not feed the trolls. Nothing to see here, move along people.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  5. Best April Fool's joke yet by XaXXon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Haha. Like the Never Winter Nights Linux client will ever come out.

    What's next? How to install Duke Nukem Forever on Linux?

    1. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by boola-boola · · Score: 1, Informative

      Haha. Maybe you're a little bit behind the times, but the Linux client beta has been out for a while now. You can download it HERE. (you need to be logged in to download it)

    2. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's April 1st at 8:40PM Central. Why have I not seen a, "Duke Nukem Forever Released" slashdot header?

      I wonder if somoene in the Taco Gang is deathly ill? I can think of no other explaination myself.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by Sepper · · Score: 1

      Why have I not seen a, "Duke Nukem Forever Released" slashdot header

      Because they rejected my article :(

      You might as well check the Duke Nukem site (www.3drealms.com) because They DID relase the code for Duke Nukem 3d... As well as Duke Nukem Forever (Atari 2600 Edition)...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    4. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by FPCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Won't, Jesus Saves... And takes Half Damage be more appropriate here?

    5. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by Scutter · · Score: 1

      What's next? How to install Duke Nukem Forever on Linux?

      Perhaps you haven't realized that it is out. At least on the 2600...

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    6. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by mandolin · · Score: 1
      It's April 1st at 8:40PM Central. Why have I not seen a, "Duke Nukem Forever Released" slashdot header?

      Because nobody would believe it, no matter what day it was

    7. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      No, Jesus has at least one level of monk and therefore has evasion. So when he saves he takes no damage.

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    8. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by Arethan · · Score: 1

      Probably because Freshmeat.net already beat them to the punch.
      ;)

    9. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Good question...Perhaps Duke Nukem which is taking forever has been so beaten to death it just ain't gonna fool anyone anymore.

      Perhaps they should release next year on April 1? No-one would ever believe it :).

      StarTux

    10. Re:Best April Fool's joke yet by RealUlli · · Score: 1
      Haha. Like the Never Winter Nights Linux client will ever come out.

      Please don't tell my box about that - no windows, but a runnning nwn...

      Cheers, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
  6. Really? by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Neverwinter Nights is the mother of all timesinks.

    You're kidding right? You're posting to slashdot claiming that some game is the mother of all timesinks? Hah!

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:Really? by boola-boola · · Score: 5, Informative
      ...in related news, Gentoo now has an ebuild for NWN, though you will have to manually unmask it to install. :-)

      /* end shameless plug */

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say you masturbate 1 time a day for an average of 20 minutes a day from the age of 15 till you can't get it up at 65. That would be about 253 days of masturbation. For the average slashdot reader that's a VERY conservative estimate.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      ..in related news, Gentoo [gentoo.org] now has an ebuild for NWN, though you will have to manually unmask it to install. :-)

      Sweet, is there somewhere I can download the RPM for it? ;-)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    4. Re:Really? by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      Pff... I just got totally sucked into Deus Ex. Damn... 3 days in a row, finished all endings.

      *YAWN* I better not play this game... I will never sleep!

  7. Timesink is right by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is very true. Even if you're not a D&D type guy (and really, who on /. isn't), the game will eat away at all available free time you might have. Couple that with the near-infinite replayability of the thing and you've got something worth getting (even if you gotta buy the Windows CD for the data).

    A quick check of the NWN modules section on Bioware's site shows over 2000 player created ones. Carry on then. I don't anticipate I will be seeing you around here much from now on. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Timesink is right by lewp · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not a D&D guy (never knew anyone into it, never played it myself outside NWN) and I still loved NWN. I played it on Windows (and will continue until Linux is a decent gaming platform), and the game simply rules.

      Intermixing it with random bouts of Chrono Trigger and the FF series on ZSNES makes my gaming life complete. Of course, I play some Counter-Strike too.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    2. Re:Timesink is right by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

      Even if you're not a D&D type guy (and really, who on /. isn't)...

      In all seriousness, I've never played D&D. I've never even seen the game in person. The closest I ever came was to watching the D&D cartoon on Saturday mornings 20 or so years ago.

      Really, seriously.

    3. Re:Timesink is right by be-fan · · Score: 1

      and really, who on /. isn't
      >>>>>>>
      Me. As a result, I hate pretty much every PC RPG out there. I keep trying the occasional one, and I still hate them. Call me a lamer, but I like console RPGs a lot more. If I wanted to crunch mind numbing stats all day, I'd get into sports :) That said, I still found NWN pretty amusing. That says a lot about how Bioware was able to reach out to a broader audience with NWN than your traditional D&D fan.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Timesink is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a fun game
      Graphics are very, very polished indeed ... but...

      Hmm, don't know about replayablity, i found controls and ai very frustrating.
      1) henchman fail to follow orders - follow dont f****n run off, forget about telling them to stay put since they wont even use ranged attacks if you do.
      2) cant reach target - hmm how about taking a step to the left and a step forward
      3) hero wont move if you happen to click on an area he cant walk to.
      4) tomi - says i can open that chest - why the f**k doesnt he , must be busy picking his nose
      5) dont let your inventory fill up ( note empty bags are ignored anyway ) or you will lose weapons when you use the quick keys to change weapons - had to scour a level to find my axe and bow.
      6) pathing AI needs more work, had the devil of a time getting to an anvil to put something on it.
      and plenty of times when he got confused on something duhh, what shall i do masta.
      mind you i supose it was handy when the dragon got confused and stopped moving round the rock outcrop :( etc
      7) inventory is a hastle items keep dropping into first slot when quick equiped

      NOTE - most of these i saw on the windows version when i tried it when it came out ( bows head in shame ) count the updates - yeah i expected these to have been sorted by now.
      A mate had similar problems running current version in windows.

  8. Yeah... by phrogeeb · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believed "President Bush's War on Iraq is incredible hoax culminating on April 1st with a Soldier's Ball open to Americans and Iraqis in Baghdad hosted at the Jewish Community Center" before this one.

    --

    ------

    "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

    1. Re:Yeah... by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1
      ...with a Soldier's Ball open to Americans and Iraqis in Baghdad hosted at the Jewish Community Center...

      Didn't you hear...soldier's don't have balls...

      BEFORE everybody gets pissed at me, please don't. This was not intended to do any harm and I mean nothing in paticular by it. I know people who are in the war right now, and those guys definitely got balls. (Bullets are scary.) It's just a joke.

  9. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's better anyways

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LiNuX R0x0rZ d00d!

      But at least it doesn't suck as bad as BSD

      <duck>

  10. But on GENTOO, it would be...! by Otter · · Score: 1
    Sorry for that but I just got my first Gentoo install up and running and -- now I understand why their users jump into every distribution/packaging/Joe Barr-tediously-explaining-how-to-install-something article to proselytize.

    I'm trying to fight the impulse but suspect I'll be one of them very soon...

    1. Re:But on GENTOO, it would be...! by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On Gentoo, it's exactly the same as any other distro. Debian and Gentoo both have great package management systems, but for applications that can't be packaged, they're useless.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  11. In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you think NWN is a huge timesink, then you've obviously never played the original Baldur's Gate. We're talking about a magnitude scale of at least 4 here.

    At the end of Baldur's Gate, after having thuroughly explored every nook and cranny of the world, I'd accumilated 212 game days of play. That's approximately 2 hours per game day: 424 hours. (If I recall the conversion properly.) That's 17 and 2/3rd days, straight. Now, consider your average person sleeps 8 hours a night, it equals roughly 26.5 days of gameplay, not taking into account things like bathing, eating, and work.

    And that statistic doesn't even begin to take into account the many hours spent saving, loading, and replaying sections of the game that are all but impossible to perform well. I'd say that, realistically, you can easily double or triple my figures.

    In contrast, it took me less than a week to beat NWN while going about school, sleeping, eating, and other various activities.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by moonbender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice calculation, but you're probably quite off: the number of game days includes the time your characters spend resting. IIRC, the minimum time your party sleeps is 8 hours, and more, if your healing capacity requires it. How much of your total time is spent resting I couldn't say, but chances are it's a significant amount. For me, it is.
      Of course, there's no doubt the original Baldur's Gate was an incredible time sink. I played it daily for two months, too. Same goes for BG2, I think. Took me one or two weeks to play through NWN with a friend. However, I have not yet touched on any of the expansion modules, although I intend to: many are considered to be better than the original campaign, which was already good but did not come close to BG's drama.

      (On a sidenote, neither of these games is the ultimate timesink. If I was to name one, I'd name EverQuest - or any other MMRPG for that matter. We're talking months of actual in-game time here - not me though.)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Stormie · · Score: 1

      In contrast, it took me less than a week to beat NWN while going about school, sleeping, eating, and other various activities.

      You played all 2000 community-created modules in less than a week? You iron man!

    3. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by StarTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yet another person who missed what NWN is all about; The single player is not the main part of the game, unlike Baldur's gate (really great game too)...And I managed to also finish the Official Campaign within a week, but something I found:

      http://www.neverwinterconnections.com

      And then

      http://www.layonara.com

      There are some amazing modules and even semi persistant worlds available, even with different rules and game items/monsters.

      Yes the Official Campaign is kind of short, but still very good. Would be nice to end up on the side of evil for a change, something that was not part of it.

      The new expansion is supposed to add a lot more feats and spells to the game, along with a longer more involved Official Campain. Its called Shadows of Urentide.

      Oh I forgot the toolset, which partly thanks to Borland's floundering around won't be natively supported in Linux nor Mac...Buit openknights.sourceforge.net are trying to create their own tools to cover this omission.

      Overall, the wording still very very much stands as it is: Huge Time sink.

      StarTux

    4. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others have already mentioned this, but I'll reiterate as I'm amazed your post has been modded highly and the responses haven't: you're dead wrong as you're only comparing the single player games. You beat the included single player NWN campaign and it's less immersive then Baldur's Gate (although it's still pretty good). True. So?

      The replayability of NWN comes from the multiplayer (I meet with an online group once a week where we actually roleplay, and I play on persistent servers as well), the user developed mods, and the fact that you can always start developing mods yourself.

    5. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by isorox · · Score: 1

      not taking into account things like bathing, eating, and work

      Given the average slashdotter is either a

      1) Student that doesnt bathe, eats at his computer, and doesnt work until 2 weeks before finals
      2) Sysadmin that doesnt bathe, eats at his computer, and babysits a server with no need to do anything

      that's not really relavent

    6. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the game has been out for aprox 10 months, during which I have averaged 2 hours a day either playing or module building, so that comes out to over 600 hours (this is being very conservative, since I have been unemployed for 3 months now I have probably put in more hours than that just this year). The fact is NWN is a basic game engine around which you can build just about any RPG you want. Look at the vast amount of modules out there, throw in all the Persistant worlds, and you have as many hours of gameplay as you want. If you base your opinion of NWN on the single player campaign then you are missing most of the fun.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, where is the linux version of Baldur's gate? Does it run better that NWN?

    8. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1
      bla bla bla ...while going about school, sleeping, eating, and other various activities.

      Thou hast a far greater willpower than I.

    9. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah. This is nothing compared to the 30 days I spent on my warrior, and the 30 days I've spent on my priest (which were both deleted by the fuckface admin on discworld) in the discworld mud game.

      I feel sorry for those everquest bastards with multiple characters that have real life months in each character.

    10. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by dj_paulgibbs · · Score: 1

      Whilst i'm not saying the toolset, DM client and all is a neat idea, I expected (at least) a better campaign that shipped with NWN, that with what it did. Ion Storm might just as well go - here's a copy of 3dsmax, here a mixing deck, here's the source to the Unreal Engine, here's a bucket load of textures and a copy of UnrealEd - then stick *that* in a box and expect you to buy it - leaving you to create the game by yourself.

    11. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that for $50 sounds like one hell of a deal!

    12. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a Linux user can only leech this content - not create any.

      Bugger 'em.

    13. Re:In the words of the Duke: Not Hardly! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Well... I may have forgotten to eat or go to class a couple times... here or there... or such. :)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. Really?! by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 1

    Cool! Now I don't have to pay Microsoft $300! Where do I sign up?!

    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
  13. Moderator points by deadgoon42 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Slashdot picked a hell of a time to give me mod points.. I think I'll mod everything -1 Troll

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  14. wow a much better story than DUKE 3D GPL RELEASED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats right, duke nukem ##$@^@ 3D source code released under the GPL at www.3drealms.com you can download the source at http://7thguard.net/files/duke3dsource.zip and other mirrors listed at 3drealms web page. but hey, for whatever reason slashdot doesnt consider that newsworthy yet.

  15. Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't even get it to run under Win2k. I'm not even worried about a Linux port at this point.

    *snort*

  16. The real timesinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Browsing pr0n sites having sex and masturbation are the real mothers of timesinks. I lose hours viewing porn, I lost a job because of a sexual incidence on the jobsite, and my showers take 35 minutes thanks to masturbation.

    1. Re:The real timesinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to learn time management. I view porn while masturbating in the shower. Now, if I could only find a women, maybe I could have sex, too!

  17. Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who pays for Windows?
    It comes with all my PCs!

    1. Re:Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you've paid the microsoft tax.

  18. I'm not a linux user but . . . by sixdotoh · · Score: 2, Troll

    isn't this kind of stupid to post instructions for how to install a game on /.? aren't we supposed to be nerds capable of such?

    --

    This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    1. Re:I'm not a linux user but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Linux thing ... you wouldn't understand.

      Linux user # 223034 since 1996

    2. Re:I'm not a linux user but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about the little budding nerdlings? Maybe they aren't there yet.

    3. Re:I'm not a linux user but . . . by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      I guess this comment was intended as humor not insult, but...

      Like yourself, not everyone here is a Linux user, and not everyone here is especially computer literate. I am not a computer science major and my knowledge of Linux goes as far as getting Slackware on my 486/DX80 to run a few years ago (though when I get home I intend to change that...)

      However, I am a die-hard videogame addict, and that is why I am reading this post. If I were at home now I would currently be fuelling this addiction by using these step-by-step instructions because I don't have the expertise. Why would I do this when it is apparent I have a Windows platform? Because I don't know how and I have to change that, I guess. I would love to know how to work my PC properly but I just don't know how, beyond basic maintenance/repair.

      My 2 cents.

    4. Re:I'm not a linux user but . . . by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Any opportunity is a good opportunity to pimp Linux gaming.

  19. Re:Content Missing by Pharmboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    belive "Nazi-ism" like opineon is as legal as in the US put ther cant be any "NAZI" partie.

    I think the article was covering the potential pitfalls that most of use would fall into, including where warns to read the directions, because he didn't and cost him time. It was ok. I even read it and I don't give a damn about the game.

    Can't remember the source of this one:

    Take my advice.....I'm not using it.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  20. Where to play by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Having played NWN to death on the Wintel platform, just a helpful hint to some. Playing multiplayer on public servers which allow client-side characters to be imported, I find, is utterly boring and pointless. It's WAY more fun to go old school and get you and a group of your buddies with the software together on your own server and play. For best results, obviously you'll want to come up with your own maps and adventures, something the packaged toolset is absofuckinglutely fantastic at doing.

    The reason I speak out against these kinds of public servers is that, first and foremost, you'll be playing against the biggest most idiotic cheaters ever. That and nine times out of ten it's just the servers admin fucking around and killing everyone because he's made his character into a dragon. So play with your buddies, you'll have a more enjoyable experience and it's easier to track a cheater down and punch him in the face.

    Just my 2 gp.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Where to play by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      I ran/run a server for a while (opened to the public) that only allowed server side characters.

      The module was a remake of the classic Bard's Tale and it was/is more than half way done. (more info)

      Interest in it has died down since the PC players seem to have grown tired of it (it is, after all, about a year old). But those that did play were limited to the types of items available within the Bard's Tale universe.

      This created two types of players, those that got pissed because they couldn't find insanely powerful items and those that were happy because the game was exceptionally hard for a single player to wander around in.

      I would probably get back to work and finish/polish the whole thing up if I didn't think interest in it was almost totally dead. Or I might would give the project up to someone else to finish if they can convince me they'll do it justice.

      Either way, I think Neverwinter Nights was an awesome game, and I did sink hundreds of hours into it while I was into it the deepest.

      But I definately agree, don't play with groups that allow client side servers unless you want to play with grossly overpowered players in invariably stupid campaign worlds.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Where to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try putting a little X in the checkbox labelled "HIDE LOCAL VAULT" on the screen with the in-game server list and you will suddenly find a plethora of servers where client-side characters are not permitted.

      Neat huh?

    3. Re:Where to play by MattW · · Score: 1

      Where to play?

      City of Arabel.

      That's where my time goes.

    4. Re:Where to play by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      Or, play on a server with server vault. Local vault is horrible, and SOME server vault games are still bad, but there is at least some hope for them.

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    5. Re:Where to play by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Yes of course server vault's the better of the two, but at least if you run the server yourselves you're not at the mercy of some kiddie somewhere in the world who'll just pull the plug on the server and your characters disappear. That's about my only issue with online play.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    6. Re:Where to play by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not sure I'd want to play a game with anyone who would punch *anyone* in the face over something in a game at all.

    7. Re:Where to play by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      I agree. The only times I've played on random servers with people I don't know, they've all imported characters with GLOWING FISTS OF DOOM +2 or something and totally rape everything in sight (Including village NPCs). No fun if you're actually looking to build your character from scratch with others.

      And just like most game servers out there, the admins log in about three hours into game play and slay everyone for no reason.

      I don't mean this as a generalization for every server. There are some run by really good people who don't import characters and act maturely as admins. It's always more fun if you play with people you know in real life.

    8. Re:Where to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, better yet, play on an NWTactics Server. Fun and fairly even!

      Hooray!

    9. Re:Where to play by startled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with everything you said, except about coming up with your own adventures. The high-rated modules at planetneverwinter (or bioware links to them and, um, someone else-- nwnvault?) are great, and much better than what you're likely to make your first few times out.

      Aside from that, yeah. Private servers all the way-- the pubs are only for when your buddies aren't around.

    10. Re:Where to play by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Heh, I agree there are lots of really good mods to download and play. The toolet has a hefty learning curve, that's for sure. My first few attempts were (lets not sugar coat it) pathetic. After playing around with the toolset and looking at some downloaded mods seeing what they've done, you can get pretty good at coming up with the basic framework of a fun adventure. Besides which, using the GM tools, if your map looks a little boring you can just ambush the party with a bunch of nasties. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    11. Re:Where to play by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      However, I have a friend who plays women characters and is constantly getting hit on in the game. Being able to hit *anyone* has put some of that behavior in check. She sees this as a feature not a problem.

  21. Re:Well.. by FPCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm... Linux, D&D, can it be any nerdier?

  22. Just run Windows! Do it now! by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You're right! Just roll over. Give in. Do what they tell you. Don't try for something better. Give your money to monopolists. Vote with your dollars! Tell the world that it's OK to just become one with the Borg!

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by pseudochaotic · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you don't you may be a terrorist!

      Using Finnish software instead of quality American engineered software...

      --
      And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
    2. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by cerberusti · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean there are actually people who PAY for windows... wow. ( =

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    3. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by NineNine · · Score: 1

      No! Don't run Windows! Just commit 1/3 of your short life to learning esoteric, useless commands in order to play a game! That's muuuuch smarter.

    4. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, god forbid you have to actually learn, or remember anything, to use a computer. Who is the idiot that thought of that?

    5. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by MsGeek · · Score: 1
      Yeah, right. How hard is this?
      1.)Open the console. It's that cute little TV thing on the KDE Kicker.
      2.)Type this at the prompt:

      [you@yourmachine]$/usr/local/games/ut/ut

      That's it! That's all you do! There's no step 3! There's no step 3! (Note: this example is for Unreal Tournament. Command given at the console may vary depending on game installed.)

      Now go back to jacking off to your pr0n site. :P

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    6. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bite me. I love linux and have been using it for years but to make that statement is just lame.
      Yes, Window is a massive conspiracy by the US Government. ALL HAIL BILL. The man behind George W.

    7. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by servanya · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU! Very good point.

      Windows has it's place. And that place is for game playing.. and for people who don't want to learn linux. Why fight it? Its not like you have to pay for it.
      Just use it for what its better at, but for christ sakes, don't pay for it!

    8. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We happen to find value in owning the software we use on a day-to-day basis, and this is all. I suppose some people just use Linux because they do hate Windows, but many of us use it because it offers something that Windows doesn't.

      Today, you can get more games for Windows than any other OS thanks to Microsoft's monopolistic foresight and Apple's lack thereof. That doesn't make it a "better" gaming OS. And this doesn't necessarily mean we should use it.

      Interestingly enough, the only reason you proud theives can copy Windows is because Linux is around. I guarantee if it weren't around, XP Professional would require registration.

    9. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, come on...if you still can't start up a game by just booting up and clicking an icon, Linux should deserve to die.

      Note that this isn't meant to be flamebait, just an observation on what a modern OS should be able to do; you don't type anything into your remote control now, do you?

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    10. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is fscking flaimbait for sure , who the hell modded this interesting?

    11. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by NightWhistler · · Score: 1

      Yes, if only there were some graphical environment in which you could click icons to start programs...
      That would really make things better...

      And it could be called.. hmmm.. KDE? ;-)

      --
      PageTurner Reader: open-source e-reader for Android with cloudsync. http://pageturner-reader.org
    12. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by mormop · · Score: 1

      I run Windows for games and Linux for work. I just can't break the AOE II Habit but christmas saw the arrival of Combat Flight Sim 3 (another gaming weakness is CFS).

      Usual thing, stick disk in, autorun brings up the GUI and on it goes. Install finished, run game, machine locks solid. Reboot. Read docs, disable virus checker and firewall (after disconnecting from net) machine still locks.

      Get latest drivers for vid card, no change.
      Get latest drivers for every component in PC

      No different.

      Ponce around in Bios changing various settings after spending a fair amount of time talking to helpful Irish guy at Microsoft game support.

      Go into msconfig and disable as much as poss with no change.

      Dump Win98 and go for 2000. No change.
      Dump Vid card and replace with one from office PC.
      No change.

      Change motherboard with borrowed one and use video card from office.

      It works!! Only took my whole weekend up cost me the price of a 64MB GeForce2 MX400 and an A-Bit KG-7.

      Simple as that. Thank god you can just click on an icon and let Windows take care of it for you.

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    13. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on now... Is it really anyone's fault but your own that you didn't already:

      Get latest drivers for vid card
      Get latest drivers for every component in PC

      Your 'poncing around in BIOS changing various settings' implies that you had previously spent some time in there screwing with things you didn't understand.

      Your complaint boils down to the fact that you couldn't easily get this program to run on your outdated, poorly maintained, and probably misconfigured system. With that approach, I believe you could have trouble with just about anything, be it Windows, Linux, or your automobile.

      But of course, that couldn't be YOUR problem, now could it?

    14. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Why should I spend time dicking with computers when I can pop a CD into my PS2, and spend the time I would have wasted "learnign about computers" getting laid or doing something, ANYTHING other than playing with some dumb computer.

    15. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what that boils down to is ..
      Rebel against microsoft, just cos it's 'cool' too...

      how sad.

    16. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by mormop · · Score: 1

      I've been working in computers for years (and using them since 1981)to the point of setting jumpers and DIPs on all peripherals back in the days when DOS was modern and have servers running in Universites and Biotech companies across europe. I know how to set up a PC and have never had a problem with any other Windows game MS or otherwise.

      Spec of Original Machine:

      ABit KT-7
      Athon 1200
      512MB PC133 SD-RAM
      SB-Live 1024
      Elsa Gladiac 511 Geforce 2 MX400
      Adaptec UW SCSI Card
      Yam SCSI Rewriter
      Twin ATA100 Maxtor Hard Disks

      Ohhhh so very out of date I must remember to take advice from such luninaries as your good self who obviously know everything.

      BTW before this I'd been running 98SE for a long time with no problems other the odd blue screen (normal really). CFS3 didn't want to work with the machine from the start and despite spending a significantly costly amount of time on the phone to MS they didn't manage to find anything that'd cause it to lock up either.

      The point that was being made was that even MS games fall over occasionally due to whatever hardware/software clashes may exist deep within the machine so the original posters claim that any OS that doesn't boot and run a game at the click of an icon is crap obviously comes from someone with so little brain and actual knowledge on the subject that they should shut up and find some books to read.

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    17. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by mormop · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, sorry forgot. MS don't make errors do they that's why you never see any bug patches or service packs for Windows.

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    18. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by master0ne · · Score: 0

      open console (depending on windowmanager) type game name in console (usualy sompthing like tribes2, ut, or ut2003) i learned how to install,use, and some what secure linux in less than a month, im still now sure how to even begin securing windows! and the windows installers leave sompthing to bedesired... like customizeability... and why waste your time using a platform thats only good for one thing anyway? Windows is only good for games. the only reason windows is good for games is because there are lot of games for windows. Winblows = sux

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    19. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by master0ne · · Score: 0

      before this I'd been running 98SE for a long time with no problems other the odd blue screen (normal really).
      Umm, i dont think any unexplained system lock is or ever should be considerd normal. just another example of MS brainwashing people again..., other than that, good post and kudoz to mormop!

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    20. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by mormop · · Score: 1

      Hehe

      Well I did mean normal for Win98 not computers in general.

      Having said that I do get the odd app keeling over in Linux. Early mozilla was quirky but 1.3 seems to be stable. Apart from that no complaints really. Mandrake 9.1 managed to pick and prep every bit of hardware including my Philips webcam (normally a pain) so I've no complaints.

      --
      Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
    21. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by mink · · Score: 1

      I can just see the short film at Machinma now.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    22. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why the hell are you even on Slashdot. The only people who come here should love computers more than they love people. I know I do.

    23. Re:Just run Windows! Do it now! by servanya · · Score: 1

      XP pro DOES require registration, unless you get a site license copy...

  23. Very pleased with nwn by Vicegrip · · Score: 2, Informative

    Installed flawlessly and took me about 15-20 minutes to copy stuff around. I've already logged countless hours playing my dwarf and monk....

    I wonder how hard it would be to re-write their game editor in qt..

    Thanks Bioware! My rebooting time has been drastically reduced.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    1. Re:Very pleased with nwn by TopherC · · Score: 1
      I wanted to add that I have enjoyed the game a lot, too. I had no difficulties installing or running the game in Linux, but I already had a Windows installation on another partition (naughty me!).

      The game has a few flaws -- IMO a fair number of bugs still and the original campaign is fairly bad compared with other games like Baldurs Gate.

      But, it can be very fun to play if you're with a group of players that are at least trying to roleplay. Neverwinter Connections helps a great deal in organizing such games.

      I think that Neverwinter Nights is the first true CRPG ever. The Dungeon Master client and toolset add the final key ingredient that seperated roleplaying games from character-based computer games. Together these allow games to be played where the game world can react to anything you say and do. Before NWN one could role-play their, say, Diablo character if they really wanted to. But that would be something a player did on their own -- the game world itself would never respond to it. Anyway, having played the Diablo and Baldurs Gate series and many others, I can say that NWN is completely different if you're playing with a dedicated group online.

      BTW, the Aurora toolset is not being ported to Linux or MacOS. I see that someone did some work get the toolset working under wine, but I don't know what the current status is. I haven't been brave enough to try it with wine yet, since 95% of my past attempts at getting anything to work under wine have failed. Does anyone know what's up?

  24. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmmm... Linux, D&D, can it be any nerdier?

    You're new to /., right?

  25. welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to last year! must be fun running linux and waiting months for a decent game to be 'ported'.

  26. So obvious... by Senator_B · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is obviously a hoax, everyone knows you can't play games on linux. Linux is the plaything for college computer guys and hackers, not gamers! Duh!

    1. Re:So obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is the plaything for college computer guys and hackers


      No, what you are referring to is called a Dick, something which you seem to have no knowledge of at all.

  27. Doesn't work for me. by dunham · · Score: 1

    Dog slow in 16bit mode and simply prints "Error" in 24bit mode.

    My best guess is that I need NVidia's drivers, but that probably won't be an option anytime soon on my 2.5 kernel.

    1. Re:Doesn't work for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, there's patches for that... look it up on google.

    2. Re:Doesn't work for me. by rossz · · Score: 1

      You definately need an up-to-date nvidia driver. I couldn't get it to run until I upgraded.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    3. Re:Doesn't work for me. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Try here. The patches were updated within a day of the official driver release. They were in Gentoo's ebuilds before I woke yesterday. The initial problems with DevFS kernels was resolved by this morning. God I love Linux...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Doesn't work for me. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need a 32 bit processor to run the game.

      How did you get a web browser to run on a 16 bit processor anyway?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  28. Re:Well.. by windex · · Score: 0

    A Beowulf cluster driven NWN server, touting an impressive "BSD is dying!" campaign?

  29. Timesinks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the case of nwn it's more like timestinks.

  30. Now everybody gets the benefit of... by Jiles · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aribeth's 'jiggly bits'. Wheeeeeeeeeee!

    1. Re:Now everybody gets the benefit of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd let her practice her craft on me for damn sure.

  31. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good. When can I play this "Beowulf" game on my powerbook?

  32. Not an April Fools Joke! by Colin+Walsh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfortunately this had to be posted today of all days...

    Anyways, the Linux Client really exists (you can even check the packets coming from Bioware, the 'evil bit' is set to 0! :) and the game is a blast. It's also good to see that news of the installer is getting out, as there are many people who don't know about it.

    -Colin

  33. Strait to the point by dark-br · · Score: 3, Informative

    As the article fails miserably to do that...

    Where to download the Linux NWN instaler:

    Here or here or here.

    MD5SUM for the files: b72d9ec2b9c43e7e3cd39bec22afbe7c

    You will need to download these extra file to play in your language:

    French
    German
    Italian
    Spanish

    Unzip into your nwn directory and move the files to their correct case. ie.

    mv dialog.TLK dialog.tlk
    mv dialogF.TLK dialogf.tlk

    Notes:

    This installs the 1.29 English version by default. See above to play in your language.
    The beta2 binaries are included.

    CDROM Mount Point

    If your cdrom mount point is not listed below, you will have to set an environment variable first.
    These are the mount points: /mnt /mnt/cdrecorder /mnt/cdrom /mnt/dvd /media/cdrecorder /media/cdrom /media/dvd

    If your mount point is not listed here, before you run the installer, from a shell, type export SETUP_CDROM=/path/to/cdrom/mountpoint.
    Replace /path/to/cdrom/mountpoint with where your cdrom gets mounted.

    Temp Directory

    This installer uses close to 1GB of space in /tmp during installation.
    If you have limited space in /tmp, change your temp directory to somewhere where you have more than 1GB free.
    eg. from a shell, type export TMPDIR=/home//

    If any of these apply to you, do them otherwise Neverwinter Nights will not install.
    If any of these do not apply to you, then you can just run the installer.

    1. Re:Strait to the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is EXACTLY why Linux is a failure on the desktop.

      The PROCEDURE for installing a game or a video card or networking or ANYTHING is akin to brain surgery!

      Linux has a long long long LONG way to go...

  34. Gentoo one step ahead by doktr+thunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    *just in case you were wondering, portage already has an ebuild for NWN server, for all those people getting their nwn running in lin

  35. Bah! Timesink? by carambola5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try minesweeper.

    "I almost got it last time. It was down to one or the other!"

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  36. Gnome bluetooth support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article: In a window under Red Hat 8.0's Bluetooth GNOME with a resolution of 1024 x 768

    Wasn't aware that RedHat 8's Gnome had blue tooth support. That must be yet another april fools joke. Can you say overkill? :-P

  37. MOD PARENT UP +5 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject

  38. Repeat after me: Server vault only by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    Please don't lump the many *fantastic* public servers into the steaming heap of dog feces that are the local vault servers.

    Local vault == Bad

    Server vault == Good

    If you really want to waste some time, hop on to Richterm's Retreat sometime. I played the single player NWN campaign for about 7 days, RR for about 7 months...

  39. Gentoo can even wrap "impossible" programs by Jerf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .rpm, .deb, and .ebuild (gentoo) are AFAIK all script-based, or at least have scripting capabilities, so there's no such thing as an "application that can't be packaged". If the app couldn't be packaged, then you couldn't install it by hand, either. (Debian even supports asking the user for input as part of the install process.) .rpm and .deb, by convention more then anything else, are supposed to be binary-only packages. There's nothing technically stopping them from compiling source code (except perhaps that you aren't supposed to need a compiler on such systems).

    Ebuilds, on the other hand, embrace compiling source to the near exclusion of all else, so for those packages that can't be wrapped into a nice binary that will work for everyone, an ebuild can still be created. In fact it is common practice to make such wrappers, and ebuilds for other uncommon situations as well.

    For instance, Sun no longer allows automatic downloads of its Java distribution, so Gentoo has an ebuild that asks you to download the Sun-provided tarball and put it in a particular place, then proceeds to open the tarball and put it in the correct place, also allowing you to have full packaging system support for uninstalling it. This is harder to do with .rpm and .deb, if not essentially impossible.

    Ebuilds are a superset of binary packages, such that they can package anything you could install by hand, simply because they are a higher level. (This is where the sandbox support comes in real handy, since you don't have to specify what files were installed and what files to uninstall; the sandbox picks it up automatically and I expect all packaging systems to pick that up eventually.) Of course, there's a price to pay for that in compile time, since virtually by definition it's impossible to have this flexibility and still distribute binaries*, so it's not like it's a absolutely superior method in all cases. Tradeoffs just like anything else.

    *: People keep talking about having a "package repository" for Gentoo which would function as a giant multi-person cache of Gentoo compiled packages, which you could then grab instead of compiling. Nobody AFAIK has made any progress beyond suggesting it, because even with just the obvious configurations (the four or five main processor types, the three or four good optimization settings from conservative to ultra-aggresive, the three or four obvious USE settings from conservative to everything) mulitplied by 10 or 20 gigabytes for a pure install means that nobody can afford to host it, and people would still find it too limiting.

    1. Re:Gentoo can even wrap "impossible" programs by frohike · · Score: 1

      For instance, Sun no longer allows automatic downloads of its Java distribution, so Gentoo has an ebuild that asks you to download the Sun-provided tarball and put it in a particular place, then proceeds to open the tarball and put it in the correct place, also allowing you to have full packaging system support for uninstalling it. This is harder to do with .rpm and .deb, if not essentially impossible.

      When you're done plugging Gentoo, do some actual research on Debian. :) This is exactly how a number of packages in non-free work (RealPlayer, a couple of different JDK installers, etc...)

      I see no reason besides convention that this couldn't be done with RPMs as well. They have pre and post install scripts, and they could simply print something on the console pre-install telling the user to download something, then unpack it into the proper place when they continue. Not as consistent and friendly as debconf (or whatever Gentoo probably has) but it's possible. Or they could even put it in the RPM description and assume the user did it or refuse to install.

    2. Re:Gentoo can even wrap "impossible" programs by damiam · · Score: 1
      mulitplied by 10 or 20 gigabytes for a pure install means that nobody can afford to host it

      Debian's archives have 20000 packages each for 12 architectures, and they seem to have found plenty of mirrors.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Gentoo can even wrap "impossible" programs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the four or five main processor types, the three or four good optimization settings from conservative to ultra-aggresive, the three or four obvious USE settings from conservative to everything

      This is the problem with Gentoo people. You actually think those settings make a difference? Really, I can't believe how many ignorant geeks there are out there.

      Just try different settings, do some benchmarking. Don't do things like "Oh, it feels really fast". You'll find out that messing with compiling all that crap and screwing with all those compilation settings isn't worth it. There is practically no difference when using different compilation options for 99.9% of applications. The standard i386, -O2, and other normal optimizations work for everything.

      Sorry but Debian is the way to go.

  40. You know, there are other reasons to run Linux... by jobeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not just cuz everyone's an MS hater. Personally, I don't really mind MS, with the exception that it's a pain in the ass to get infected with Code Red, Nimda, etc etc.

    I run Linux on my laptop and Windows at home. Why? Because it's different, it's interesting, mainly. And because I have a higher control over my system and as a Computer Scientist, I can actually see some of the things we talk about in those stupid classes in action. As I watch the kernel compile, I see mutex functions and remember the operating system course I took 2 years ago. I see gcc compile and I remember that class I took on assembler.

    It's also kind of neat to have a fully customizable desktop, with weather conditions and wireless network link quality displayed in the 'panel'. Litestep with Windows used to be neat for this kind of thing, but for me, it never quite seemed as stable as explorer was.

    Also, what happens when you've used Windows for 10 years straight and you get a job at some company that uses some form of Linux? I'd think it'd be nice to be able to sit down and get to work without having to complain to IT you don't know how to use this non-Windows crap.

    So geez, get a grip. We're not all MS-avoiders. :)

  41. See I told TSR this would happen by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let non humans be paladins, and they crumble at the first temptation. Stupid traitor Aribeth... ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:See I told TSR this would happen by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      What is this about? Did you just give away the end?

      Hmm, I was wondering what was up with the "evil-Aribeth" portraits and music.

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    2. Re:See I told TSR this would happen by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Nah...but he did give away the middle :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  42. Re:Bah! Timesink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xyzzy, enter, shift.

    It's really fun seeing the looks from other people in the lab when you open up the biggest minesweeper map and proceed to mark every mine, before you reveal any of the spots. And since the timer doesn't start until you reveal a spot, you can blow away any score...

  43. Re:Bah! Timesink? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mine sweeper tourmants where big a a certian bank I used to work at.
    IT was pretty funny, every time a new record was set, I maged to beat it by 1 second. hehe, they eventually wised up to the .ini files. then I created my own minsweepr, it had only 2 buttons. I called it the "Cut to the chase" minesweeper.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Stick to Windows by CowardNeal · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    All that time and energy wasted getting it to run on Linux. Stick to the mainstream.

    1. Re:Stick to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whuffor?

      In Windows the games work.

      In Linux, everything else works and the games are coming along, too.

      Perhaps if you move fast enough you can be among the last on your block to install / learn Linux.

  45. Re:Well.. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, play a Monty Python module.

    "The palandrome for Bolton is notlob"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  46. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1

    [BEGIN RANT]
    Seriously...the amount of people on this board who bash MS...it gets annoying. Yes, there are things you can do with Linux & not with Windows. Yes, Bill Gates is filthy rich and I'd love to have his money and I'm jealous as hell.

    But...fuck...just trashing on MS 'cause "everybody else is doing it" is...I'm not sure what. Stupid is the only word I've got.
    [END RANT]

  47. That would have been a good one..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....if you weren't able to easily install NWN in Linux for like a month now (granted you knew where to get the Linux client). You've been able to install it for about 6 months....getting full functionality, well, that was another story.

  48. NWN isn't just the Single Player Game... by Drakantus · · Score: 1

    The single player campaign in NWN is just the beginning. There are hundreds of servers to play on, thousands of modules to download, and a full-featured toolset to create your own game if you want.

    --
    I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
  49. In addition by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    touting an impressive "BSD is dying!" campaign?

    Set in Soviet Luskan, where DRAGON slay YOU!
    You must rescue Natalie Portman* from the clutches of the evil (Bill Gates/RIAA/MPAA/other /. baddie)...

    *Actually, I prefer Natasha Stillwell as far as geek girls go.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  50. great port by kain_wiz · · Score: 1

    after a few little problems with install nwn on linux i can confirm that bioware has made a great port for a great game, some tip for nb:
    of course enable agpgart kernel module, dri and glx for xfree86 server
    if you have a ati card you should try this fix:
    http://mschoder.bei.t-online.de/nwnati.tar.g z
    otherwise the nwn executable may not work.
    from: http://www.linuxgames.com/
    A mysterious man with a hexeditor and a dream posted to the NWN forums saying that he has made an unofficial patch which fixes some of the problems ATI users have been experiencing with the game.
    the thread is here:
    http://nwn.bioware.com/forums/viewtopic.htm l?topic =204654&forum=72
    good playin'

    --
    kain kuht.it wizard
  51. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by jobeus · · Score: 1

    Hey man, I even started my post out with "I've got nothing against MS and run it on my desktop."

    Why you bitching at me? :)

  52. As far as I have to by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1, Troll
    I take the whole "Windows vs Linux" debate very seriously, both professionally and personally. I can't bring myself to buy a Microsoft product. I know what kind of company they are, I know their history, and I have seen the competition. If the only downside to not using Windows is the ability to play every game upon release, then I can live with that.

    It is more important to me not fund an arguably evil monopoly, pay idioticly high prices, get locked into licensing schemes, be subject to a myriad of viruses and security issues, and be unable to have full control over my system.

    I purchased this copy of Redhat 8.0 for $24 after my corporate discount. With it I recieved applications for IM'n, word processing, web browsing, web development, application testing (for free), database development and testing (for free), image and video manipulation - and for a little extra a year I can play my games with WineX. The alternative: $140-$200 for an OS that would have demanded of me more powerful hardware, anti-virus software, personal firewall software, and the need to purchase my basic office applications, image manipulation tools, web development tools, and database software.

    I choose intellectual integrity and savings in excess of $2000 over the ability to play the newest games.

    1. Re:As far as I have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to fund them. Just pirate windows like everybody else does.

      Some people and their principles.

    2. Re:As far as I have to by s.a.m · · Score: 1

      I hate to troll a bit. I'm not one to defend MS, heck I bash them every chance I get. But what you said there was plain stupid. Sure more powerful hardware, yes you gotta have it or else it won't run properly. I just gotta point out that my leet celeron 266 is running just fine on XP for me to play NWN :)

      But the fact implicated you have to buy a firewall software, or anti virus, or purchase office apps, or image manipulation tools, web dev tools and database software shows your ignorance to the subject. Just about everything you just stated is avaible for free, and not just free as in beer, but in speach as well.

      You're starting to sound like someone who's been using MS OS's to long and are blind to see the things you need are right in front of you.

      Don't wanna pay for virus software? AVG works well and is free. I reccomend that to anyone who asks. Gimp runs on windows, so does a whole bunch of office applications that you'd want. Free web dev tools? Umm last I checked there were a whole bunch and last I also checked you CAN run mysql on win32.

      I'm not saying I support MS for all of their actions, but what I CAN say is I don't support people who go around speaking a bunch of crap.

      Mod me down if you want because it seems like I defended MS. It will just prove that you don't think with an open mind.

    3. Re:As far as I have to by minus9 · · Score: 1

      How long will it take to download that software over a 56K modem? With that $24 copy of Redhat he has all that software and much much more.

    4. Re:As far as I have to by reanjr · · Score: 1

      At my workplace, it would take about 30 minutes.

      And our linux servers run Debian anyway, so we're in the same boat there.

  53. watching does bring so many things to mind by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I watch NT go to blue, and it reminds me of that time the dog threw up in the front seat of my Rambler.

    Watching Linux boot makes me think of that time my girlfriend slowly....uuummmneeever mind.

  54. Re:Well.. by Gogl · · Score: 1

    What, like this one? Very good mod, I hope he comes out with part two soon.

  55. Re:Well.. by StarTux · · Score: 1

    To get full marks one must link to it:

    http://nwvault.ign.com/features/reviews/data/104 60 29457628.shtml

    StarTux

  56. remind me of Zelda by jeepee · · Score: 2, Funny

    did you see this screenshot of the game,

    they have stolen those hands and coming out of the wall from zelda 1 on the nes :-)

    1. Re:remind me of Zelda by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      they have stolen those hands and coming out of the wall from zelda 1 on the nes :-)

      Those are Bigby's Hands... Did Gary Gygax (or whoever came up with those) borrow the hands from Nintendo or the other way around? I think it's more likely that they both come independently to the conclusion that "Giant hands that throw people around are cool!" - not an entirely far-fetched idea =)

  57. Just run what's convenient by vondo · · Score: 1
    I've played the game on both. It has nothing to do with "avoiding" Windows or MS software. It does have to do with not rebooting my machine and having to restart all my apps when I come back to linux.

    I simply get more done under linux; Windows is for playing games (for me).

    I haven't tried loading a Linux saved game under Windows. Anyone know if this works? (The reverse does).

    1. Re:Just run what's convenient by afidel · · Score: 1

      All data files are supposed to work both ways, whether they be modules, hak's, or save games.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  58. NO, IT WAS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an april fools trick, yes, thats what it was, those pictures, are uh, nope, I can't figure a way out of this one, they forshadowed it way too much.

  59. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get full marks one must link to it:

    Which you failed to do.

    there.

  60. *sigh* by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this works under Lindows?
    As soon as installation can be snagless without needing a /. article to neccessitate play, Linux will gain the foothold it needs with the commons. I'm sure PC cafe's would love it if they could run StarCraft and Counter-strike just fine on a Redhat or Mandrake distribution for a LOW LOW fee.

  61. You Can by Bruha · · Score: 1

    It's called WineX made by Transmeta I believe or transgaming not sure which.

    Google it :)

    1. Re:You Can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of buying the game and the OS (and getting support), I buy the game and a subscription to WineX that might allow to play the game, hopefully with few glitches, and probably much slower (crappy ATI drivers)? Sounds great, and just like the rest of Linux.

  62. A solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    disable unneeded services. Disable your hardware manager, since you will likely not need it (how often do you add new hardware?). Disable your eth0 interface from coming up - you can start it in 2 seconds later if you need it. Edit you /etc/inittab and remark out all but your first two tty's.

    Should half your Linux boot up time.

  63. Oh so not true by TheNumberSix · · Score: 1
    Neverwinter Nights is the mother of all timesinks.
    This person obviously never played Everquest. Holy Moly! What happend to 1999? I think I lost 2000 too.

    One minute I was planning a Y2K party, my friend handed me an EQ CD, and the next thing I knew there was a war with Iraq. It took me half a minute to figure out that I slipped forward instead of back in time!
    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
    1. Re:Oh so not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god that is so true, i lost 2 years over EQ.

      cant remember but i think i had like 120 - 130 days played.

      And thats 24 hours days.

      Some had more than 360 days.

  64. Her jiggly bits... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    ...were added to distract you from her absolutely terrible voice acting. Apart from a couple of voices (ex., Linu), the acting in NwN is pretty bad (with Arwen at the bottom of the list). And, following Bioware tradition, they make you listen to the same lines over and over and over again. If I hear Tomi say "Aww, I can pick that open easy!" again, I'll grab a baseball bat +5 and pay Bioware a visit. How hard would it be to have 5 or 6 versions of each line?

    BTW, if you don't have the game and are looking for a real RPG (à là Ultima 7), this is not it. NwN is a lot more like Diablo than like Ultima. There's no food, dialogs and "quests" are very simplistic, NPCs just stand in the same place day and night (they don't have jobs, don't go to the pub, etc., like in U7), and the scenery is very repetitive. The editor doesn't really help there, either, you are limited to existing "tiles", and there's no easy way to create custom architecture or objects. Some monsters are nice, and combat can be fun, but this is not a very intellectual game (at least not the default campaign).

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:Her jiggly bits... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Umm you are wrong on almost every point, if you want to be forced to eat food to keep up stamina just look for a server running the HCR or hardcore ruleset, this set of community created scripts has an option to require rations. Dialogs and quests are as complex and deep as the module creator would like to make them, there are scripts out there that allow things like a lamp lighter to make his rounds and return home when done, kids playing tag etc. If you want to make custom architecture or objects you just need to make a hak pack, there are 100% free tools for using 3D Studio Max to make them from Bioware and there are community tools for other programs. NWN is not so much a game as it is a game engine where everything is laid out to allow the enduser community to edit almost every aspect of the game. I know I will be getting a lot out of NWN for at least a couple more years.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Her jiggly bits... by Jiles · · Score: 1

      Some monsters are nice, yes. Have they fixed the trolls yet?

    3. Re:Her jiggly bits... by Jiles · · Score: 1

      It's not a particulary good engine though, is it? I mean c'mon a modern, funky 3D engine with no sky? NWN is broken, I mean you can cast 'Call Lightning' inside? WTF? Trolls were severly nerfed as well and the amount of AoO you get is obscene. Further to this some of the rules are hardcoded into the engine, so there will most likely be no D&D 3.5E additions for the expansion packs - you'd think they would have learnt after the Infinity Engine - God knows BIS had a hard enough time adapting it for 3E. I've decided not to make any comments of Bio's apparent inability to provide an interest CRPG story that's devoid of meaningless hack 'n' slash and fed-ex quests.

    4. Re:Her jiggly bits... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      ...were added to distract you from her absolutely terrible voice acting.

      Agreed, Aribeth was tolerable only in the last chapter. But, well, paladins are dull =)

      BTW, if you don't have the game and are looking for a real RPG (à là Ultima 7), this is not it. NwN is a lot more like Diablo than like Ultima.

      But it certainly is more like a "real" RPG than Diablo or Nethack, and has the potential to be used for real RPGs!

      There's no food,

      Which is, in my opinion, only a good thing. But if you want food, get any module with Hardcore Ruleset or the other cool script packs - resting requires bedroll and food rations.

      dialogs and "quests" are very simplistic,

      Yep. Though I did enjoy some of the quests that didn't involve combat at all, for example, the defense attorney quest in ch3.

      NPCs just stand in the same place day and night (they don't have jobs, don't go to the pub, etc., like in U7),

      Yeah, admittedly that's bad. Right now, I'm waiting for the memetic AI to develop something practical and non-beta - finally a CRPG AI that's cooler than U7's usecode =) For highly personal reasons, the recent demo of wolf packs was pretty damn cool.

      and the scenery is very repetitive.

      I've said this before, but I think tilesets are crutch for a weak imagination. The tilesets as they stand cover most stuff with reasonable detail and can be used to make distinct areas, which is good enough for most purposes.

    5. Re:Her jiggly bits... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

      > NWN is not so much a game as it is a game engine

      My point exactly. When I buy a RPG, I expect a good SP campaign, not just the possibility that someone, some day, might use the same engine to make one (in which case I'd prefer to pay the person that makes it, not the people who made the engine - and the very poor original campaign).

      Regarding the tools: yes, now there are some tools available (as long as you happen to have 3dsmax, which luckily I do, because I work in post-production). When the game was released, there were no tools to create 3rd party content (just the basic map editor), and there wasn't even any information from Bioware about file formats, etc.. It's still not exactly easy for an average person to create, say, a statue or a sundial and add it to the game (even if he or she is a competent 3D modeller).

      RMN
      ~~~

  65. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been running the beta pretty much since it came out. Apart from a few fairly minor complaints every thing has worked well for me (although I do have a Windows partition to copy from and a NVidia card). It definitly great to have it out, even if it is more than a little late.

  66. Re:First jihad post by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 1

    "We killed a lot of people.... We dropped a few civilians," Sergeant Schrumpf said, "but what do you do?" [In one incident], he recalled watching one of the women standing near the Iraqi soldier go down. "I'm sorry," the sergeant said. "But the chick was in the way."

    I thought this was a troll too, but it's real. Check it out:

    NY Times link

  67. Why pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want to pay for the game? The official install instructions say to copy the install from some strangers windows machine anyway (friends don't let friends run windows), and as windows users usually don't run ftp, that would probably mean spending a lot of time searching kazaa for an installed NWN. So the only difference between copying and paying+copying is the paying part, and needing to find a keygen.

  68. I don't get it. by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    How did this make it to the main page? Seriously, the article just says to download the installer and run it. This is news how? Anyway, everyone knows that real linux geeks only play nethack anyway. Beware the ASCII!!!

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  69. Will this work on yellow dog linux? by geddes · · Score: 1
    I am a Mac user, and for the time being am stuck without NWN. I have never had a linux system as my home system so my understanding of linux and its various distros is limited. Here is my theory:

    Would it be possible for me to install yellow dog linux or linux PPC onto a partition on my G4, and boot to that partition, buy NWN for windows, and then install the linux client on my powerPC? Or would the client only work for linux running on x86 systems? If it would work, it is a very tempting reason to install linux, since I have drooled over this game since it came out for windows. I apologize if my question is stupid and this is clearly technically impossible, as I have a feeling it might be, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask.

    1. Re:Will this work on yellow dog linux? by Jiles · · Score: 1

      No, unfortunately Bio only did a binary for x86.

  70. "NWN is the mother of all timesinks" by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

    This guy obviously has never played EverQuest before.

    --
    http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  71. Who cares about Neverwinter Nights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you've got games like FFX-2,Zone of the Enders:The 2nd Runner,GTA:Vice City and others out for the PS2?

  72. Thre requisite link - NWN for Linux by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    You can get the beta right here. Looks real enough.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  73. Nerd Of The Year by Charm · · Score: 1
    Should half your Linux boot up time.

    Umm dude you get the award for "Nerd of the year". The guy was talking about something else going up and you replied as if he had a technical problem. Not only that but someone else modded you insightful; it's times like these that I fear for the future breeding of the human race :)

    --
    -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
  74. HA. HA. HA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're funny. Can I have your autograph?

  75. Fansite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a fansite for the linux version if you need help or just want to learn more about it. http://nwnlinux.project404.org/

  76. Misguided Article by Glabrezu · · Score: 1

    I didn't have a single problem installing NWN. Yes, the 'official' way to install it is using a separate windows installation. But the day after NWN for linux was released, a linux installer was posted for the latest NWN version that didn't need the windows installation.

    Im a proud user of NWN, and I truly find that posting an article such as this is way to spread FUD, which clearly Bioware doesn't need nor deserve.

    Kudos to Bioware, and thanks for taking the linux gaming community seriously!!!

    --
    Santiago
    1. Re:Misguided Article by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Spread FUD because of the installer? Did you actually read the article? Barr used Ravage's installer, not Bioware's method.

  77. NWN isn't always that difficult by motorsabbath · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the Linux client beta (all 3 of them so far) and they just installed and worked. No problem.

    Granted, there's no installer (yet - actually - there is a port of the Loki installer available - look in the fora) but if you're comfortable with your Linux PC and know how to create, copy and change permissions on directories, it's pretty painless. Runs like a top. Better framerate too :)

    JB

    --
    The heat from below can burn your eyes out
  78. Timesinks by Vandil+X · · Score: 1
    Neverwinter Nights is the mother of all timesinks. Do not follow my path unless you have nothing important you want to get done for the next week or so
    A week or so? EverCrack's timesinks are measured in years.

    Nevertheless, it's great to see a native Linux version of NWN in the works. From what I've seen, running the Windows version in Linux under Wine is not exactly the best gaming experience.

    Hopefully BioWare can work some magic and allow people of either platform (Windows or Linux) to play multiplayer together.
    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Timesinks by motorsabbath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Multiplayer between the Windows, Linux and (vaporware) Mac versions should work fine. Several have already gotten it working in the fora. I was able to connect to a friend's win32 NWN server but didn't have time to hang out and beat on it.

      --
      The heat from below can burn your eyes out
  79. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. RuneQuest for instance. Published 1978, one year after D&D, and still better.

  80. You're right, but the 90%/10% rule applies. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    I use 10% of the applications 90% of the time. One of these 10% just happens to work a lot better with optimizations - that being Mozilla/Galeon/Pheonix (all about the same improvement).

    Prelinking has also done wonders for me when using the massive applications. This is a binary feature, but it's one that is implemented quite well in Gentoo thanks to the fact that the developers are optimization nuts.

    Optimization makes a big difference on really big, really slow applications, though not much on smaller ones. Not surprisingly, these are the apps that are talked about the most frequently in Gentoo chat channels and the forums with regard to optimization.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  81. Hardware requirements by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Could someone please reply with *actual* hardware requirements? I have a somewhat aging AMD Duron 800 machine with 384MiB of RAM and a Matrox G450 video card in my Linux box.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    1. Re:Hardware requirements by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      As tacky as replying to yourself is, I should point out that I get 30+ fps in online gaming on that machine playing Quake III Arena and 15+ fps in the Urban Terror TC.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Hardware requirements by motorsabbath · · Score: 1

      Hmm. NWN is very very resource intensive. It might *work* on your box, I dunno. You'll probably have to back down quite a bit on the graphics detail and maybe play at 800x600.

      On a 1.2 GHz Athlon with a Geforce and a gig of RAM I can play NWN at 1024x768 with all the graphics detail maxed or at 1280x1024 with some of the detail backed off (and at this res it sometimes stutters in external scenes).

      HTH - JB

      --
      The heat from below can burn your eyes out
    3. Re:Hardware requirements by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      It ran on my old machine, which was a Intel p3 500, with 384MB RAM (pc100) and an Nvidia GeForce 2 MX card. However, it wasn't very smooth, even with most of the eye candy turned off. However, I'm kind-of picky when it comes to performance, so I built a new gaming rig for this (and other droolworthy games, of course).

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    4. Re:Hardware requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello

      The limitation is your videocard. The Matrox videocards are not competitive 3d graphics acceleration in performance; the Matrox G450 has superior 2D graphics framebuffer acceleration architecture and it's 3D acceleration architecture is simply slow and beautifuly rendered.

      If graphics vendors got their heads back in the late 80's and early 90's again, ie out-of-their-ass unlike today, then we would be able to install a Matrox G** in our systems and have a GeForceFX or Radeon or some other kind of super 3D graphics accelerator co-operativly working next to a *similar* competing product. Now-days, companies don't let you disable the VGA BIOS: it is either one way or the doorway. I prefer the hybrid way, but 3Dfx was the last company to offer a 3D graphics acceleration architecture without a VGA BIOS (voodoo2), and the last company to be kind and install a VGA-OFF switch was Elsa and their Permedia2-based GLoria Synergy, or 3DLabs and their clever VX1 that *can* have a VGA_BIOS-OFF switch or JUMPER installed on it for nice multi-head 3D action.

      *sigh* I still use the Elsa GLoria Synergy with XI Graphics' AcceleratedX in *BSD and Linux, and somtimes switch back to Microsoft Windows NT 4 to do *other* 3D Graphics work. Elsa GLoria Synergy is still quite high-priced on eBay, I hope to get a third one...

      Good luck to you!

    5. Re:Hardware requirements by lateralus · · Score: 1

      Works @ about 13fps 800x600 and high detail (32bit textures, dynamic lights etc...) with:

      Hardware
      • Athlon 1.7
      • Nvidia TNT2 M64
      • 294MB RAM
      Software
      • RedHat 8.0
      • SDL 1.2.5-1
      • The new NVIDIA unified Linux drivers (released March 31)
      • NWN Linux version 1.29 BETA 3

      I'm waiting for a NWN Emacs mode.

      --
      If you outlaw the law, only criminals will have laws
  82. And another thing by mormop · · Score: 1

    The day I have to change the tyres, frame and engine on my Honda in order to use a different brand of spark plug I'll start complaining. Until then my bike and car are very satisfactory thanks.

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  83. And finally by mormop · · Score: 1

    I don't tend to keep up with the latest windows driver releases because 99% of the time I'm running Linux

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  84. Plus Persistent Worlds by Rotworm · · Score: 1

    I picked up 'The Atlas of Dragonlance' and, although it has taken months and will take many more months, Neverwinter Nights allows me to build a persistent world that is very close to the Dragonlance world.

  85. come on by johny_qst · · Score: 1

    Any rpg/adventure game that limits you to 20 lvls of growth seriously cramps the fun of working through all that insanely overdramatic combat. Avoid this...

    --
    Fnord.sig
    1. Re:come on by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Didn't Bioware remove that limitation in the latest patch?

  86. RPGs are suffering from the same as other genres by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    The first quest in the game with any choice in it was the altar in Helm's Keep. It was the first time in NwN where I didn't feel like a monster exterminator or someone else's errand runner.

    NwN's base story is ridiculous: there's a disease so they're training warriors and archers and wizards and thieves to find a cure. Shouldn't they be training doctors and alchemists instead? And if I'm such a great hero, why do I spend the entire game doing what other people tell me to do? Never in NwN are you required to actually put 2 and 2 together; from start to finish it's "go here, do this, come back for more instructions". I know they're going for a "wide audience", but there's a point where too much dumbing down is just, well, dumb. NwN may be like a "real" (PnP) RPG inthe sense that it follows the same rules, but if so, then it's a "real" RPG with a very bad DM (BTW, I'm not a big fan of PnP RPGs, and I think a good computer RPG should use much more complex rules - PnP rules are "practical", a computer CPU can handle a lot more variables, giving a game more depth).

    Regarding the potential... well, Half-Life also has the potential to be used for RPGs. It's a good thing people can use the NwN engine to make their own games, but it would have been an even "gooder" thing if NwN was a better game to begin with.

    Most people who go on and on about how NwN and BG (and, in some cases, Diablo) are such great RPGs are people that never played the "golden age" of Ultimas (U6, U7, UU, U7p2 and UU2). The main difference is the fact that the world in Ultima games (especially U7 and U7p2) is much more dynamic, much more "alive". NPCs have daily routines and interact with each other, your actions have logical consequences, objects are in logical places, there are hundreds of "irrelevant" side-quests and easter eggs, there are thousands of lines of dialogue (all good), etc. You can pretty much ignore the main quest (which, itself, changes a lot as you play) and just "live" there (a bit like in MMORPGs). In U7 for example you can become a baker, a farmer, a drug dealer, a professional gambler, a fisherman, etc. NwN has very linear progression and is more about stats and items than about role-playing.

    The only recent RPG that I really liked was System Shock 2 (brilliant sound, great atmosphere, shame there was no dialogue, shame the ending was so predictable). I never got to play Deus Ex, but since it was made by some of the people involved in UU and UU2, I'm planning to check it out one of these days.

    The current trend seems to be releasing poor games and hoping the community uses the tools (or, in some cases, develops the tools) to make a good game based on their engine. This would be perfectly OK if a) you could buy just the engine and the tools, without the original campaign and b) if most of these games' EULA didn't include a clause stating that any mod you make belongs to the game's publisher, and that you cannot profit from it. Also the original tools that shipped with NwN were very, very poor. They've been improved, but they're still not quite as flexible as they could be.

    RMN
    ~~~

  87. I am Superman, and I can do anything by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    You've just reminded me of another issue: during the whole game I never came even close to dying. I could take on 4 or 5 enemies at the same time and I consistently wiped them out with a couple of slashes. What is this, a Charles Bronson RPG...?

    I bet someone, somewhere, is working on a remake of U7 using the NwN engine. But I suspect that, despite all the amazing shadows and reflexes and shiny water (BTW, why can't anyone seem to make decent refractive water, like in Tomb Raider?), they are still finding that a lot of what U7 did (back in, what was it, 1956?) can't be done in NwN.

    RMN
    ~~~

  88. News Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No cracks or key generators exist for WinXP, so you have to use Professional to get around the registration. Well, according to the previous coward, anyway. Those of us who download "registration required" software all the time know that you can't throw a virtual stick without hitting a keygen.

  89. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by master0ne · · Score: 0

    well the only problem i have with MS is the fact that there trying to advertise a "stable" operating system, or a sever operating system. in my expirence i havent found a stable microsoft operating system yet, and instability + servers = bad things. now when i get the stability of linux, unix, or beos out of windows, ill be happy with there product, and might even shell out $500+ for a copy. untill then im sticking with what works best for me.

    --
    Noone writes jokes in base 13!
  90. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by master0ne · · Score: 0

    oh and also MS's licencing scheme's suck, being locked into a certin product for years, when your in a feild that needs the ability to change on the fly, and upgrade imedently, this kind of licencing doesnt cooperate too well.....

    --
    Noone writes jokes in base 13!
  91. I still don't get it, why Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is harder to use, has less available quality apps to run on it, is fussy with just about everything, has a more difficult GUI than even the old Mac OS, and in general is poorly supported by code hackers and basement box monkeys who create a mishmash of barely opperable code on to of other shoddy work from the community filled with people just like them? Why go to all this hassle to run the game on lesser hardware, with lesser overal visual and audio quality, and with such difficulties in even installing it?

  92. Timesink? Hardly.... by mirkurius · · Score: 1

    I used to think that these solo player RPGs and multiplayer adventure games could be timesinks. Then I played the persistent MMORPGs....

    There is no comparison. The other day I ran into someone in Everquest whose name was an odd Gold color. It turns out that is the reward for 500 days played... That's 500 realtime days, or 12,000 RL hours playing one character.

  93. Good and all, but I'm keeping my eye on Magicosm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the time these Linux installers still endure problems, especially when there are updates. The Unreal Linux install just didn't seem as stable as it should be. However, the MMORPG called Magicosm, which is written in pure Java, looks like it will be the game for Linux users to look forward to. I've seen Java3D in action, and it is extremely powerful. Looks like this game could be released for Windows, Mac and Linux at the same time and be just as reliable no matter what OS.

  94. Re:Good and all, but I'm keeping my eye on Magicos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the info! I'm going to check this game out.

  95. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by reanjr · · Score: 1

    I do the NT administration (2k) for an ISP/Web hosting company, and I can attest that our Web Server has not had unplanned downtime. Ever.

    There are serious flaws in some of the software out there for Windows, but the OS itself is extraordinarily stable. And an admin that simply takes some time to understand how it works can make it secure as well.

    I've seen no objective data indicating that Windows (at least 2k) is less stable than Linux, Unix, BeOS, or anything else. I really think all this hooplah is due to inexperienced admins.

    Example:
    I never had to do any kind of Linux administration before working for my current employer. In fact, I had never even used it except to try it out as a curiosity. And I can attest that I am NOT an experienced Linux admin. I can also attest that my Linux server crashes, locks up, etc. significantly more often than our Windows servers. Why do you suppose that is? That's why I don't buy all this FUD about Windows being unstable (or even to a certain extent insecure as we were unaffected by every NT worm I can think of other than that SQL worm (which isn't really an NT worm, now is it?)).

    Maybe admins should stop believing everything they read and actually try to learn how to run a Windows server.

    My 1

  96. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by mink · · Score: 1

    It's wasy easy IMO to stand up now and boast about how stable Win2k is.
    I wont disagree with you there.
    But up till 2K What were you guys running on?
    I have had some serious issues with base NT4 over the years, most versions of Windows were not designed to handle multi users, and the multi user ones seem to not be great at handling hundreds of users. The stability of Windows depends greatly it seems on what you do with it. If no one ever uses it and it just sits there from 98SE on was rock solid.
    Yes I agree that NOW Win2k has made those problems less/go away, but as Windows releases goes so far 2K has been the exception not the rule.
    Win2k introduced some nice storage featres, but they are years behind other systems in that area.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  97. Re:You know, there are other reasons to run Linux. by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1

    Whoops...sorry about that. I put my reply under the wrong post. Please accept my apologies.

  98. Installation Easy by michaelsimms · · Score: 1

    For anyone wanting to install easilly, when the final version is released, Tux Games will be selling a fully functional Linux version that includes the boxed product plus an installer CD that does all the work for you.
    Here is the product details link.

    --

    Tux Games. Your complete source for native Linux games.
  99. Re:RPGs are suffering from the same as other genre by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
    Regarding the potential... well, Half-Life also has the potential to be used for RPGs.
    Yeah, and I have here a recent copies of XEmacs and GCC that also have potential to create great CRPGs. But obviously it's far easier to create interesting RPG scenarios with NWN toolkit - the toolkit is suitable for the purpose, so let's use the suitable tools =)
    It's a good thing people can use the NwN engine to make their own games, but it would have been an even "gooder" thing if NwN was a better game to begin with.
    Mmyeah, the official campaign obviously wasn't Bioware's focus, but rather the toolkit and the multiplayer. Shame, but hardly something that destroys it.
    The main difference is the fact that the world in Ultima games (especially U7 and U7p2) is much more dynamic, much more "alive".

    Ultimas are made for single-player game only, and in their design, the story was of lesser priority. Thus, the game needed a good world where things seem alive.

    In NWN, the story is more important, the players need to interact with the world far less because they can interact with the other players. People don't come to the module to live virtual life for months in game time, they're coming to adventure for hours at time.

    Yet, NWN has tools to produce modules with a "living world", and even tools to produce MMORPG-like persistent worlds (even when it's clumsy at the time). People are making story-focused games simply because making story-focused games is far easier. Besides, that was the focus of the game from early on: Make a game where DMs can create their own game modules to tell stories and improvise. In PnP games, people sat down and went adventuring, led by their DM. In NWN, people sit down in front of their PCs and log on to server where DM leads them to the adventure.

    Certainly, creating a world where everything is scheduled and every NPC has daily routines is hard now. But as said, I'm really waiting for something like the Memetic AI to make lifelike routines easier. =)

    Most people at the moment seem just think "we don't need a living world - let's build a world in MMORPG style where players can be their own 'living' NPCs."

    If we were to download a module called "The Defeat of the Guardian" and play that with a group of 5 people, would it make sense if the adventurers just sat down and baked bread for weeks? Sure, it would be a nice touch, but hey, nobody expects that in a module of such epic proportions. Who wants to bake bread when they are adventurers by occupation and there's a world to save?

    This would be perfectly OK if a) you could buy just the engine and the tools, without the original campaign

    I don't follow the logic here. If the point of the game is the toolkit, who cares of the official work? If it's good, fine, if it's bad, bleah? Or are you saying people shouldn't pay extra for the official campaign if it sucks?

  100. Re:RPGs are suffering from the same as other genre by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    Mmyeah, the official campaign obviously wasn't Bioware's focus

    That's the optimistic view. The pessimistic view (supported by Baldur's Gate) is that they really think (and perhaps they're right) that people like "RPGs" where they're not required to think, but simply follow instructions and kill monsters for 40 hours of gameplay.

    are you saying people shouldn't pay extra for the official campaign if it sucks?

    Exactly. Same problem I have with MSIE being included in Windows. I don't want it, therefore I shouldn't have to pay for it (they can say it's "free", but obviously it's included in the price of Windows).

    Half-Life has great user-made mods, and great (free) Valve mods, but the original (SP) game is also excellent. Still, they did release a "stand-alone" version of CS, for people who are only interested in the MP side of things (note: I don't know if the stand-alone CS also lets you run TFC, NS, etc., but I assume it does).

    The story in U7 is light-years ahead of NwN's. To start with, it makes a lot more sense. The NwN "plot" sounds like something written by James Cameron (or worse, by a committee of James Camerons, each writing a separate "quest", without checking if it rhymes with the other ones).

    One thing that really annoys me (in games, books, and movies) is lack of consistency; things that don't make sense (they don't have to be realistic, but they have to be consistent). And that's why I hate most James Cameron movies, and that's why I don't like NwN's original campaign. MP does have potential, but most modules still play a lot more like Diablo ("let's get together and kill all the monsters in this dungeon") than like a RPG.

    The engine isn't bad (looks nice) but it's not exactly brilliant, either. No 1st person view, no sky, no swimming, no jumping, no climbing, no horses / carts / ships / etc., no pushing / moving objects, not really 3D (you can't walk over a bridge and under it, for example), etc..

    The whole "chapter" thing is another aspect I don't like (and that BG shares). It makes me feel like I'm playing a pre-determined story (i.e., an "adventure" game) instead of creating my own (i.e., a RPG). Of course, the story is always pre-determined (possibly with some variations), but again using U7 as an example, you had access to the whole "world" since the beginning of the game, and could in fact "solve" a lot of "quests" before anyone asked you to do so (or before reading about them in a book, or hearing about them in a song, etc.).

    Oh well, I suppose it's still better than this... (c:

    RMN
    ~~~

  101. Re:RPGs are suffering from the same as other genre by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    I agree with the story points for most parts. U7 is a really good game. (I just hope Exult folks implement journal so that I can remember what the hell I was doing after I've taken a break of a month. I guess I need to start all over again and get a notebook like everybody else! =)

    I see the problem with buying the sucky campaign. I have some hopes about Shadows of Undrentide campaign, but I'll be definitely buying it for the tiles and creatures =)

    The engine has been pushed pretty far - not quite as cool as official support, but good enough. 1st person view was possible (until .28, camera change broke it) for people who have tunnel-vision and insist on torturing themselves with it. (Really, what's wrong with over-the-shoulder??? Bloody immersive...) There has been sky hacks, but regrettably it needs a quite dynamiteful vidcard. There was some "go jump in lake" script which I haven't seen. And no, there's no Z axis =( Yet, climbing walls or cliffs is cheatable with exit triggers. No transportation is stupid, yeah, but static ship transports aren't that bad (the galley in last NWNWednesday rules - small file and feels almost like the real thing! =)

  102. Re:RPGs are suffering from the same as other genre by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    One of the things I liked about Ultima was precisely that sense that there weren't any "quests". There was information, action and consequences. Sometimes I'd completely forget about what a certain NPC had asked me to do, and then I'd remember it while reading a book that had some information about it, or while talking to another character. In other words, a bit more like Real Life (TM) than an automatic journal that tells you exectly where to go and what to do next.

    1st person view was possible for people who have tunnel-vision and insist on torturing themselves with it. (Really, what's wrong with over-the-shoulder??? Bloody immersive...)

    The same that's wrong with the "cutscenes" in many FPS games (ex., AvP2): they take you out of your character. In RPGs with a party, a 3rd person view is a necessity (because you are expected to control all members of the party). In games where you are supposed to be a specific character, and control only that character, it doesn't make much sense to see that character from a ghostly floating viewpoint. Unless you eat some funny mushrooms, anyway.

    Yes, it makes the game visually more attractive, and helps to sell (especially in a game that's so much about collecting items, weapons and armor), but it's definitely not "immersive".

    RMN
    ~~~