Slashdot Mirror


Tiny Bubbles Key to Cooling Crazy Hot CPUs

Smaz writes "With future CPUs expected to generate as much as four times the heat of today's processors, wicking away that heat remains one of the biggest engineering hurdles in the biz. Researchers at Purdue have developed a pumpless liquid-cooling system that removes nearly six times more heat than existing systems. The trick, it seems, is in the tiny bubbles. From the Science Blog."

238 comments

  1. Pumpless circulation by stanmann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought that with a properly pressurized closed system that convection and boiling would keep things cool enough. I know this isn't the first silent system, I'm just curious what special benefit the "tiny bubbles" and microchannels provide... unless we are going to another proprietary IBM standard bus.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Pumpless circulation by PerlGuru · · Score: 5, Informative

      The benefit of "tiny bubbles" is the bubbles or transfering latent heat of vaporization into the channel (the energy required to boil the fluid), these bubbles also cause mixing of the fluid in the channel.

      Two terms to look up if your interested in this aspect of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow would be subnucleate boiling and the departure from it. There is a balance between the amount of boiling and the amount of heat transfer. Not enough and you don't get many benifits... too much and the large bubbles that form on the channel walls effectively create a steam void that has a much higher specific heat then the fluid used for cooling... basically it is acting as an insulator preventing heat transfer into the fluid in the channel... a very bad thing [tm]. That is where departure from nucleate boiling comes in (this being the good thing) departure being where it starts getting bad very quickly.

      Think pot of water for spaghetti before the water really starts boiling... Oh, and I apologize for my horendous spelling but you don't have to spell to run a nuclear reactor.

    2. Re:Pumpless circulation by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh, and I apologize for my horendous spelling but you don't have to spell to run a nuclear reactor.


      Note found at Chernobyl:
      seam to haveing seeris probum with retacter. dun't sart teests

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Pumpless circulation by Tim+Doran · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, and I apologize for my horendous spelling but you don't have to spell to run a nuclear reactor.

      Very true, Homer. Very true.

    4. Re:Pumpless circulation by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Can anyone explain why mercury isn't a good solution?

      It's highly conductive, liquid, and has a much larger heat capacity than water. Sure it's a poison, but this is a closed system. No leakage. So why not inject liquid mercury into these micro-channels instead of water?

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    5. Re:Pumpless circulation by nolife · · Score: 3, Informative

      In laymans terms...

      Cooling ability of water alone is good.
      Cooling ability of water with slight boiling is really good.
      Cooling ability of steam is really bad (3 Mile Island comes to mind among other things).

      Very fine line...
      The trick is controlling the amount of boiling so that the steam collapses when it is stripped away from pipe surface.

      If not.. I hope they have analyzed for the hot channel effect or even worse, flow reversal!!

      I too was in nuclear power, and can't spell either

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:Pumpless circulation by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I apologize for my horendous spelling but you don't have to spell to run a nuclear reactor.

      !!!

      Does anyone else find this alarming?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    7. Re:Pumpless circulation by PissedOffGuy · · Score: 1

      too much and the large bubbles that form on the channel walls effectively create a steam void that has a much higher specific heat then the fluid used for cooling... basically it is acting as an insulator preventing heat transfer into the fluid in the channel... a very bad thing [tm].

      this is also the same effect that is a good thing when doing various tricks (walking across hot coals with damp feet, dunking your wet hand into molten lead, etc.).

    8. Re:Pumpless circulation by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I got this right. They put a boiling stone at the bottom of a container of some non-conducting fluid (like CBr2F2) and call this a great invention?

      Oh boy! They discovered boiling chips!!!

      PS They use bubble wands in fish tanks for similar reasons.

    9. Re:Pumpless circulation by billanderson71 · · Score: 1

      It's harder to form bubbles with mercury. You need the bubbles in the heated micro-channels, to help create the density difference between the two legs that drives the flow. Mercury has a much higher thermal conductivity, so boiling tends to be suppressed (the heat conducts much better in a liquid metal than water)

      Even if mercury was the perfect fluid, it would be unacceptable from an environmental standpoint, as pointed out by the posters above. We're talking about millions of these systems being disposed of in a few years, and no one would want to have to deal with the attack lawyers. Consider that many thermometers used to contain mercury - I don't even know if you can buy a new mercury thermometer.

  2. yeah by bananaape · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is also why beer is good.

    1. Re:yeah by stanmann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Tiny bubbles,
      in my wine,
      makes me happy,
      makes me feel fine.

      Tiny bubbles,
      in my beer,
      makes me happy,
      all the year,

      Tiny bubbles,
      in my keg,
      makes me wonder why,
      I can't feel my legs,

      Tiny bubbles,
      in my whiskey,
      makes me drunker,
      makes me feel frisky,

      Tiny Bubbles,
      in my rum,
      makes me stumble,
      makes me feel dumb,

      Tiny bubbles,
      in my brandy,
      makes me smile,
      makes me feel dandy.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    2. Re:yeah by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Bong makers are aware of this fact as well. Putting a bit of cloth/gause over the pipe at the bottom will make the air flow into lots of smaller bubbles, rather than a few large ones. Most surface area, more cooling.

      I'd love to submit an "Ask Slashdot" article on the making of bongs. I'm sure we'd see quite a few novel ideas from the MacGyver Smokers out there...

    3. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coke!

      Mountain Dew!

      Coke!

      Bawls!

  3. Cavitation? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see if the shock waves from the cavitation (the sudden formation of the tiny bubbles) affects the operation of the chip or erodes the surface, limiting the life.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Cavitation? by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The sound waves from hard disks and power supply fans surely already make more vibration on the CPU than this would

    2. Re:Cavitation? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Isn't the shock strength from cavitation proportional to r^3 of the bubble, or something like that? I would think that with these tiny bubbles the shocks would be so weak that they would dissipate so quickly that no harm could be done...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:Cavitation? by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cavitation has nothing to do with vibration. The sudden changes in pressure in the liquid deform or destroy the material. I've seen better links, but try this article for more information about the complexities in measuring and predicting cavitation caused by bubbles.

    4. Re:Cavitation? by bittmann · · Score: 3, Funny

      It will be interesting to see if the shock waves from the cavitation (the sudden formation of the tiny bubbles) affects the operation of the chip or erodes the surface, limiting the life.

      No, no! It won't be the shock waves that reduces the life of the chip...rather, it will be the hard radiation from the resulting sonoluminescence and nuclear fusion that will undoubtedly occur.

    5. Re:Cavitation? by Guignol · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What your parent talks about is cavitation, the vibration you talk about is also a problem, but it has nothing to do with cavitation.
      What your parent reffered to was the formation of very tiny bubbles that quickly collapse and release microjets which are very damaging to surrounding surfaces.
      Those tiny bubles also have the (generaly) unwanted property of always orienting themselves so as to send the microjet against the surface of contact, thus making the problem more severe and less unlikely to happen that it might sound in a first thought.
      Those nasty microjets can do a lot of damage and are the reason why stainless steel helices of boats still get corroded.
      In the case of the proposed cooling system, the surface of the channels might be attacked by the released microjets until perforation, since it is so thin.

    6. Re:Cavitation? by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your explanation of microjets is good.

      The parent post makes the mistake of identifying bubble formation with the cavitation damage, where as you point out, it is the bubble collapse that is the dangerous part.

      Another important thing to note is that bubble collapse is more of a problem when there is a large disparity between the bubble pressure and the ambient liquid pressure. Lots of liquids, like beer, sustain CO_2 bubbles nicely for lengths of time, without the beer glasses sustaining lots of chipping damage from microjets. The pressure of the gases in beer bubbles can be higher than atmospheric pressure.

      Under the ocean, however, where props rotate at high speed, the bubbles that are created have little more than water vapor in them (that's what cavitation is all about - causing the water pressure to drop below its vapor pressure). Those bubbles are highly unstable and short-lived.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    7. Re:Cavitation? by PSL · · Score: 1

      The sound waves from hard disks and power supply fans surely already make more vibration on the CPU than this would Or the 100W subwoofer that I have sitting under my desk that rumbles as I frag you.

      --

      "Times may change, but standards must remain the same." - George Carlin.
    8. Re:Cavitation? by luzrek · · Score: 1, Informative
      Cavitation comes from turbulence and is dangerous because the bubbles are unstable. The bubbles form because of the very uneven distribution of energy in turbulent flow (like around a propeller and less so an impeller). They then colapse again (causing damage) when the energy is re-distributed.

      From looking at the article, I don't think that there is any cavitation in these pumps.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    9. Re:Cavitation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is an interesting point but I doubt that the bubbles would cause any erosion. Take inkjet printer technology, for example. Ink droplets are formed by using a heater to boil the ink and create a small bubble, which ejects a small volume of ink out the nozzle. This process can occur at 100KHz per nozzle.

    10. Re:Cavitation? by neitzsche · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The surface area they affect is also very tiny. Basically, you have a lot of tiny bubble doing serious dammage to a lot of very very small surfaces (that make one large surface.)

      Here's my horrible analogy: the starting surface is like a indi race trace - very smooth. After cavitation, the road looks like the Brooklyn Queens Expressway (where the surface area of the potholes is greater than the surface area of flat roadway.)

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    11. Re:Cavitation? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The parent post makes the mistake of identifying bubble formation with the cavitation damage, where as you point out, it is the bubble collapse that is the dangerous part.

      Bubbles forming on a hot spot in a liquid that is significantly below its boiling point collapse in place. The expansion gives them a large cooling surface an allows the vapor to suddenly cool below the boiling point and recondense. It isn't until the liquid is superheating near the bubble formation site that the bubble continues to expand and breaks off rather than collapsing.

      Watch a pot of water coming to a boil some time. It goes through a phase where the bubbles flicker in place, before warming to the point where the bubbles break off and float away.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    12. Re:Cavitation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mr. Coward:

      Your ideas intrigue us. Please tell me the country in which you reside, so that we can plan a "summit" to discuss our military power.

      Sincerely,
      Donald Rumsfeld

  4. Wow, who woulda thought... by the_consumer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that the music of Don Ho would ever yield any practical engineering application.

    --
    "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    1. Re:Wow, who woulda thought... by mmaddox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would argue that the school's mascot - the boilermakers - would probably have a lot more to do with the idea for the technology.

      Great stuff!

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    2. Re:Wow, who woulda thought... by tuffy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess Don Ho is cool after all...

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Wow, who woulda thought... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don Ho Trivia:
      He got his first name from his godfather and his last name from yo' mama.

  5. And the next great innovation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will be using the descending liquid flow to turn a generator to provide additional electricity.

    1. Re:And the next great innovation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..which would be a possible, considering the CPU heat is the 'external' energy input... whats your point?

  6. Yes but will they keep you from burning your unit by bubblegoose · · Score: 1, Funny

    From this article

    Laptop burns boffin's penis
    November 22 2002

    Doctors are warning that laptop computers may inflict a burn even through clothed skin, after the bizarre case of a Swedish scientist who scorched his penis and testicles while writing a report in his armchair.

    The unnamed 50-year-old father of two had balanced the computer on his lap while he wrote the report at home, taking about an hour to do it, according to a letter published in the next issue of the British medical weekly The Lancet.

    The following day, he started to develop painful blisters on his foreskin and scrotum, which became infected but eventually cleared up without the need for antibiotics.

    Laptop manuals usually advise users not to use the computer while its base is resting directly on exposed skin, as heat can build up if the device is left on for a long time.

    In this case, however, the patient had been wearing trousers and underpants.

    The tale "should be taken as a serious warning against use of a laptop computer, in a literal sense," said the letter's author, Claes-Goran Ostenson of the department of molecular medicine at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  7. note who funded the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Energy Department. In other words, your tax money at work doing something far more useful than blowing the shit out of Iraq. The big bad Federal Government.

    and yes, I am an coward, faceless even.

    1. Re:note who funded the research by Cereal+Box · · Score: 0

      I was already happy to have my tax dollars be used to bomb the shit out of Iraq and now that I learn about this... what a great deal!

    2. Re:note who funded the research by mike3411 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is my biggest problem with war/military/etc. I think FDR is a better orator than myself, so I'll just quote him:
      "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron."

      in other words, the resources and manpower can be going to far worthier causes.

      and make sure to log in next time, then I can add you to my friends list, check out your posts, and mod them up to advance my personal political views in a public forum. ;)

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:note who funded the research by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, we would have a much better society if we spent all our tax money on welfare instead of defense --- and then the next psychotic petty dictator to come along would come and kick our butt because we wouldn't have any military with which to deter him. :)

    4. Re:note who funded the research by mike3411 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well obviously we need a military capable of defending our nation - if they can't do that, there isn't really much of a point. But the amount of resources currently devoted to the military is repugnantly excessive, and is evidenced by our worldwide military influence and activities. Our current military is like a kid with a constant string of new toys - they have this new shiny thing so they want to go out and play with it.

      Your implication that wellfare is the only other area for spending money (or even the area that I'm advocating) is absurd - there are many, many places where money (and the many intelligent and dedicated people that comprise our military) could be spent. Take a look at the decision to build the national highway system - this act has been given a great deal of the credit for our current economic prowess, and has likely paid itself back many times over and in many ways. The government should focus more on things like this; I'm sure the legions of engineers, scientists, and others employed in finding new ways to kill people could come up with some very potent ways to improve the lives of people in this country.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:note who funded the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really think 5% of resources going to the military is unnecessarily excessive

    6. Re:note who funded the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whered u find that number its not right at all

    7. Re:note who funded the research by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      US Military Budget (2004) - $400 Billion
      US Education Budget (2004) - $52 Billion

      NATO (canada+germany+france+britain+,+,+ (excluding (obviously) the US) Military Budget (2004) -
      $160Billion
      2nd Largest independant Military Budget ON THE PLANET is Russia, at $60Billion in 2004.

      Just a note, this is not at all relevant in the context of terrorism.. terrorists are criminals who your military will do nothing against.. ever.

      Further, "--- and then the next psychotic petty dictator to come along would come and kick our butt because we wouldn't have any military with which to deter him. :)" just so you know, Iraq had NOTHING to do with WTC bombing. You are obviously amoungst the 40% of Americans who believe that he did... and who are absolutely ignorant, clueless victims of Propaganda.

    8. Re:note who funded the research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless ":)" meant you were being sarcastic...

    9. Re:note who funded the research by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      "Take a look at the decision to build the national highway system... The government should focus more on things like this"

      You seem to be unaware that the federal highway system was a MILITARY project designed to improve the movement of men and material during the cold war. Would you like to choose another example; perhaps one that helps your argument, rather than destroys it?

  8. Anybody else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    imagining a Lava Lamp mounted to your CPU?

    1. Re:Anybody else... by fobbman · · Score: 1

      Imagine? I've got one, baby!

      It's shagadelic!

    2. Re:Anybody else... by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      Almost, I pictured something like a tea kettle...if your CPU overheats, it warns you with a load whistling sound out of the case

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  9. Copy of the article (w/o karma whoring) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From the Purdue University:

    Tiny bubbles are key to liquid-cooled system for future computers

    WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Purdue University researchers have made a discovery that may lead to the development of an innovative liquid-cooling system for future computer chips, which are expected to generate four times more heat than today's chips.

    Researchers had thought that bubbles might block the circulation of liquid forced to flow through "microchannels" only three times the width of a human hair. Engineers also thought that small electric pumps might be needed to push liquid through the narrow channels, increasing the cost and complexity while decreasing the reliability of new cooling systems for computers.

    Purdue researchers, however, have solved both of these potential engineering hurdles, developing a "pumpless" liquid- cooling system that removes nearly six times more heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems, said Issam Mudawar, a professor of mechanical engineering.

    Liquid forced through microchannels forms smaller bubbles than expected, Mudawar said he was surprised to learn. Moreover, decreasing the diameter of the microchannels increased the cooling efficiency of the system by causing the liquid to form even smaller bubbles, which is contrary to the expected result.

    Because the bubbles are much smaller than the diameter of the microchannels, they flow easily through the channels. The Purdue-developed system does not require a pump because the liquid circulates in a self-sustaining flow in a closed loop that carries heat away from a computer chip.

    Findings about the new cooling system are detailed in a research paper appearing in the March issue of IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The paper was written by Mudawar and graduate student Swaraj Mukherjee.

    Innovative cooling systems will be needed in about three years for personal computers expected to contain microprocessor chips that will generate four times more heat than chips in current computers. Whereas current high- performance chips generate about 75 watts per square centimeter, chips in the near future will generate more than 300 watts per square centimeter, Mudawar said.

    "Any time you squeeze more circuitry into the same space, you are producing more heat per unit area and per unit volume," he said.

    Today's computers use fans and heat sinks containing fins to help cool circuitry. But this technology will not be efficient enough to remove the increasing heat generated by future chips, Mudawar said.

    His research team created a liquid-cooling system that uses a closed loop of two vertical, parallel tubes containing a dielectric liquid - or a liquid that does not conduct electricity. The liquid flows through microchannels in a metal plate that is touching the chip. As liquid flows through the channels, it is heated by the chip and begins to boil, producing bubbles of vapor. Because the buoyant vapor bubbles are lighter than the liquid, they rise to the top of the tube, where they are cooled by a fan and condensed back into a liquid. The cool liquid then flows into the parallel tube and descends, creating a self-sustaining flow that eventually re-enters the microchannel plate and starts all over again.

    "We were surprised to see that the dielectric liquid forms really miniature bubbles, so they slip through really fast," Mudawar said. "The bubbles don't block the flow, as you would expect."

    The researchers found that the system was 5.7 times better at removing heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid- cooling systems.

    "This is only a starting point, and much better performance might be possible," Mudawar said.

    Future research will focus on testing various designs to see which configurations work best.

    "Now that we have a system that we know will work, we are going to test different geometries that will be beneficial to indust

  10. Clarification by PseudoThink · · Score: 5, Informative

    The researchers found that the system was 5.7 times better at removing heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems.

    It's misleading to generalize "existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems" to "existing systems", as was done in the discussion header. At least, it made me think article was about a cooling solution six times better than *ALL* existing cooling systems. Of course, this leads one to question how good "existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems" are...

    1. Re:Clarification by gpinzone · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The exact quote was, "The researchers found that the system was 5.7 times better at removing heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems."

    2. Re:Clarification by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1

      I took it to mean heatpipes (though I might be totally off base on that), as used on This
      And those do work pretty well.

    3. Re:Clarification by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      No, they mean existing pumpless phase-change systems with stuff like fluorinert. It's not the type of thing you would get from a shop that sells biohazard case badges and windows for your case.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Clarification by klui · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed to read that their system has a fan at the top of the system that aids in taking the heat away. So much for a silent pumpless system.

    5. Re:Clarification by Jordy · · Score: 1

      I imagine sticking a radiator on top of the tubing would be possible. Having a fan cooling the top of the piping was probably done to reduce the variables in the experiment.

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  11. Hail Old Purdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hail Hail to old Purdue,
    All Hail to our old Gold and Black
    Hail Hail to old Purdue,
    Our friendship may she never lack
    Ever gratefull Ever True
    May we raise our song a new
    Of the days we spent with you
    All hail our old purdue

    I love when my school shows up on a slashdot post for research it has done!

    http://www.purdue.edu/Admissions/

    1. Re:Hail Old Purdue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem. I too attend the Purdue University. I'm also quite dismayed at your ignorance with respect to our school song (specifically, the one verse (the chorus) that you pasted). Below is the actual chorus:

      Hail, hail to old Purdue
      All hail to our old gold and black!
      Hail, hail to old Purdue!
      Our friendship may she never lack.
      Ever grateful, ever true,
      Thus we raise our song anew
      Of the days we've spent with you,
      All hail our own Purdue!

      As I'm sure you see by comparing the two, you seem to have confused a few of the words. I'd assume that you're a liberal arts hippie, but the fact that you're posting on Slashdot causes me to question that assumption. Perhaps you're one of those stupid technology fools. Ah well, hopefully next time you won't screw up our school song.

  12. so in the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you will hard boil an egg rather then fry it on your P12 256bit quad CPU.

    darn, all have to get a new recipe book.

  13. Cue the Don Ho Jokes... by Pirogoeth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tiny Bubbles
    Running WINE
    Make me happy
    Make my PC feel fine.

    Tiny Bubbles
    Make me warm no longer
    With a feeling that I'm going to cool you
    Till the end of time

    So here's to the Boilermakers
    And here's to Purdue
    But mostly here's to a cooler CPU

    Tiny Bubbles
    Running WINE
    Make me happy
    Make my PC feel fine.

    --
    Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    1. Re:Cue the Don Ho Jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the young'ns.

  14. Aero Bar by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bubbles? Bubbles of nothing?
    DJCC

  15. Original Purdue Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Minus the banners (for those that can see them ;) and the crappy blog aspect

    http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/030411.Mudawa r.cooling.html

  16. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    I actually submitted this to slashdot back in november:
    2002-11-22 15:19:35 Why Cooling is Important In Laptops! (articles,humor) (rejected)

    At least it gets the laugh it deserved several months later ;-)

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  17. Guinness as cooling agent ? by bushboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    They mention bubbles in this article - well, it's common knowledge that bubbles in Guinness defy gravity !

    So maybe these chips will be served with a Guinness cooling agent ?

    A 500 year old cooling method can't be wrong !

    I love my chips with Guinness !

    Hic, arrrr

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Guinness as cooling agent ? by BancBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common perhaps, but correct, no. Guiness bubbles do not defy gravity. To quote - "The reason for this optical illusion is the turbulence in the glass after pouring the drink. Dark liquid is flowing down the inside of the glass and rising in the centre giving us this circulation of fluid. It is this dark fluid rippling down the inside of the glass, superimposed on the white froth, that gives the impression that the bubbles are sinking. Look closely and you'll see what I mean. New Scientist have looked into this question and the fluid dynamics of a pint of Guinness are pretty complicated and it is still impossible to predict the movement of the bubbles by theory. If you want to read more about what is going on in your pint have a look at Pure Genius, pages 56-57 of the 1998 Christmas Special of New Scientist, dated 16/29 December 1998 - 2 January 1999" But yes, I was aware of the attempted humour in your post.

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    2. Re:Guinness as cooling agent ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the bubbles in guinness dont defy gravity, they defy the laws of mass and density. Any guinness drinker surely knows the difference between density and weight...

  18. Chips are expected to get hotter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I guess that comes from somebody focusing on Intel and co, ignoring Transmeta...

    1. Re:Chips are expected to get hotter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmeta and VIA chips will get hotter too, as the speed ramps up enough to make them useful.

      The 68000 in my genesis doesnt need active cooling either, but I wouldnt want it on my desktop.

      So, suck my salty balls, slashbot.

  19. IBM was right all along ... by binaryDigit · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... Microchannel was the way to go.

  20. Re:Hello, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I wonder if any email marketers have considered letting people know about a product like that?

    No...that wouldn't happen!

  21. This brings me to my favorite rant... by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where does the heat go?

    This seems like a nice technology to remove the heat from the CPU, but what I'm always wondering about is, where will the heat actually be dissipated into the environment? At some point, there has to be a heat exchanger where all this heat collected in the tiny bubbles is passed outside the unit. This is going to take a fair amount of space - one of these days we're going to see ads for heat exchangers that take up less space than the "standard" box available from Intel.

    I'm looking forward to a Beowolf cluster not only performing amazing calculations but also heating the building it's in.

    myke

    1. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by nebular · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The heat will be dissipated into the environment the same way it always has, fans will cool the liquid causing it to condense. Other fans will blow the resulting hot air out into the environment just like they always have and then it's up to your ventilation system and air conditioning to keep the place from turning into an oven.

      Sure you could link up your ventilation system to your PC, but that's just overkill.

    2. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      or even a way to use the heat to generate electricity, maybe the energy in the heat could be used to power the buildings air con and lights (or maybe find a way to feed that extra leccy into the national grid and get a rebate from the power company).

    3. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by Kefaa · · Score: 2

      I agree. I have this issue today with two windows and a linux box all run 1ghz+ processors. Add the monitors, broadband modem, hub, and printer. By 2pm, the my office is over 85 degrees if I keep the door closed.

      If I adjust the temp, my co-workers begin to hate me. Who wants to wear a jacket in the summer? What we need is a venting system to get heat away from the source. Imagine 200 PCs running in Arizona in the summer. Half the A/C is being used to offset the PCs.

      If only it could be shipped north, a few office buildings could make Canada tropical.

    4. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by 10seconds · · Score: 1

      Something like this?

    5. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the way things are going, maybe it won't be overkill.

      The PC cooling problem has become so ridiculous that some are resorting to using liquid cooling systems to alleviate some of the annoying fan noise modern PCs have. Others are underclocking their processors so they don't need as much fan cooling.

      Chip manufacturers have made great strides in reducing the feature size on chips (down to 130 nm now, with 90nm coming soon), and reducing the operating voltage. Both of these measures greatly increase the efficiency of a chip, reducing the amount of waste heat it generates. But instead of making chips that use these advantages to run cool and quiet, they crank up the clockspeed as much as they can without any regard for power consumption and heat generation. And for what? So you can get more fps in some game?

      The problem with chip manufacturers is that they haven't noticed yet that most people are happy with their old P2s and P3s, and a 3 GHz P4 isn't going to help them do word processing faster or make their 56k modem go faster. I have a hard time maxing out my little 1 GHz AMD Duron. And now when people do buy new computers, they're taking notice of the new noise their older computers didn't have.

      These high-performance processors the article is predicting, and these new cooling systems, are great however for servers and renderfarms. What chip manufacturers need to recognize is that most home and corporate users (except for those stupid "gamers" that care more about fps than gameplay, and constitute a tiny though vocal fraction of the market) have very different needs than datacenters, renderfarms, supercomputer clusters, etc. and tailor their product offerings accordingly.

    6. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if these CPUs are going to be producing 4 times the amount of heat why not recycle it? Throw all your processors next to the hot water heater and put in nice cool running fanless chips at like 1 Ghz in all your thin client systems and use high speed wireless nets everywhere.

      The future might be an interesting place. We have extra energy we don't know what to do with coming off our CPUs and with solar, wind and sea power we should be able to generate enough clean electricity to run the thing. Now if only we could figure out how to make environmentally friendly CPUs. Heh, but I think we'll give up before then.

    7. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by neurojab · · Score: 1

      this could bring a whole new meaning to the linux-coffee HOWTO!

    8. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by Metrol · · Score: 1

      ...most people are happy with their old P2s and P3s...

      Get all of Mozilla to compile from source code in under 5 minutes, then I'll be happy.

      Of course the downside to this is that by the time machines get that fast we'll all have cabling hooked into the back of our heads as we float about in orange goo.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    9. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by billanderson71 · · Score: 1

      As some one above said, the heat eventually gets dumped to the air. Think of this device as a heat flux transformer. It cools a very concentrated heat source, and spreads the heat to a much larger area, where it can be cooled with a fan. Air is a lousy heat transfer fluid, and it wouldn't be practical to cool the chip directly with air. This system lets you size the surface where the liquid is cooled so that the air can efficiently remove the heat.

    10. Re:This brings me to my favorite rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a question I read. 90% of the electricity used in a normal light bulb is turned into heat, and 30% of the power the US uses each year is just for lighting, how much actual excess heat is pumped out each year, just from lights? Also the rest of the world(non-us) uses up to 60% of their energy just for lighting. Are light bulbs the cause behind global warming? If I'm wrong please don't troll me saying LEARN PHYSICS or whatever, just explain why I'm wrong!!

  22. Interesting.. by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

    "The trick, it seems, is in the tiny bubbles"

    Amazing! That's also the trick behind Dr Pepper!!

    Just how do they make them so damn small?

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
  23. Re:Hello, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the same site: Neural biology explains ejaculation

    How does the body know it has had an ejaculation? And why does it care? Anatomically, it is more complex than it seems, says the University of Cincinnati scientist who last year identified the spinal cord cells that control ejaculation in rats and the neural pathway by which signals travel between the body's sexual organs to the brain.

  24. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes but will they keep you from burning your unit ?

    No, they'll help it happen faster... No slow heat up of the bottom of the laptop - This heat pump is up to 6 times as efficient as the heat pipe. It'll just get the heat away from the cpu faster, no help in keeping it away from your unit.

    To recap - No nude laptopping. It is not allowed.

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  25. Next Generation Cooling by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Now we know why Intel was so anxious to get their anti-overclocking technology working.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Next Generation Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, ok, I don't see the connection...

  26. Re:Answer me that question..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if you want heterosexual male fantasies, mayhaps you should seek out a Windows forum somewhere.

    This site is dedicated to "alternative" software and lifestyles.

    (You know, free-as-in-gaymo)

  27. i call that this is going to be.. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Funny

    VAPORware!

    yeah, had to say it and couldnt find it said with 1 sec search.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  28. Tiny Scrubbing Bubbles... by flogger · · Score: 1

    Tiny Scrubbing Bubbles...
    We keep cooling so you don't have to.....

    Throwback from some bubble advertisement in the 80's.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  29. Re:Imposible to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try this special secret Flash advertisement blocking technique:

    # rm /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so

    I have found it is capable of stopping all flash advertisements before they even load.

    Remeber, it is a secret. So please don't tell anyone.

  30. good analysis by ih8apple · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a good analysis on the current state of CPU heat, for those of us who need to be brought up-to-date on the subject to understand the benefits of the new technology...

  31. I've known this all along by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's quite a cheap and simple system, that I've been using for years. Here's how it works:
    1. Buy some cold beer
    2. Open a bottle
    3. Take a sip, then sit the bottle next to your cpu
    4. Repeat 3, until beer is empty
    5. Repeat 2-4, until beer is gone
    6. Repeat 1-5, until unconscious or broke
    --

    Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    1. Re:I've known this all along by nebular · · Score: 1

      After years of experimentation, this also works with:
      TVs
      VCRs
      Laptops
      Pools
      Chairs
      Carpeted Floors
      Tile floors
      etc..

    2. Re:I've known this all along by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      1. Buy some cold beer
      2. Open a bottle
      3. Take a sip, then sit the bottle next to your cpu
      4. Repeat 3, until beer is empty
      5. Repeat 2-4, until beer is gone
      6. Repeat 1-5, until unconscious or broke

      Now what if we made a Beowulf cluster of those!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:I've known this all along by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      1. Buy some cold beer
      2. Open a bottle
      3. Take a sip, then sit the bottle next to your cpu
      4. Repeat 3, until beer is empty
      5. Repeat 2-4, until beer is gone
      6. Repeat 1-5, until unconscious or broke

      And the now Ubiquitous:
      7. ????
      8. Profit!!!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  32. Laminar Flow layer by Skreamer · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's the same principle used in cooling nuclear reactors - deals with the Laminar Flow layer in fluids. Pretty simple actually. The surface area of the bubbles (must be small or they begin to restrict the flow) is much larger than the surface area of the overall fluid. Sounds weird, but it's true.

    1. Re:Laminar Flow layer by spells · · Score: 1

      Remember, you can never put too much water into a nuclear reactor.

    2. Re:Laminar Flow layer by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      ...unless it's cold water and the reactor has a negative temperature coefficient of reactivity....

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    3. Re:Laminar Flow layer by mike3411 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quite true, I saw an entire show on the history or learning channel or some such (so you know my expertise is unquestionable) on the properties of bubbles. This is also why suds are so important when cleaning things - bubbles = larger surface area, which means a solute (dirt) will be more inclined to dissolve. Makes sense that the same is true for heat.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:Laminar Flow layer by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      ...unless it's cold water and the reactor has a negative temperature coefficient of reactivity....

      thats when you apply a tetrionic field inducer and wait for the neutron radiation to build up. then you just use the coefficient of muons reactivuty to counter balance it all.

    5. Re:Laminar Flow layer by Coz · · Score: 1

      ... shortly after which, you will need MASSIVE amounts of water, hot, cold, it don't matter, just so long as it's liquid, and an extremely thick, high-melting-point foundation under your containment building... of course, the cloud of radioactive steam that results may present issues.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    6. Re:Laminar Flow layer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you displace the gravitic radiation present in such a fluid dynamical system? I think you might also run in to problems obtaining enough dilithium to power this reactor.

  33. misread first line by bryanthompson · · Score: 3, Funny

    I looked away as I glanced at the first line and read it as "With future CPUs expected to generate as much as four times the heat of the sun..."

    I was going to agree... my t-bird 1.3ghz gets daamn hot. :)

  34. Fish tanks have used these for years by uiil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There one of the cheapest filter methods out there. The bubbles drive the flow through an uptake tube of an already established siphon between the tank and the filter resivoir.
    The hardware layout would need to be orientation independant for a laptop though.

  35. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    No big deal, obviously the guy didn't use his penis much any more if he couldn't feel 3rd degree burns developing on his penis.

    "boffin" is the right word.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  36. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1
    Ditto: 2002-11-22 19:55:52 Laptop + Lap = Burning genitalia? (articles,humor) (rejected)

    I bet there were countless others that submitted it too, and given that I don't understand why it didn't make it? I'm not grousing, I'm just curious ...

    --

    -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

  37. Heat = power consumption = money by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The heat a CPU generates is roughly proportional to how much power it consumes. Power costs money. With the computer power consumption fast increasing, and electricity costs going much the same way, at least in Gray California, I suspect this has to start becoming a major buying decicion factor.

    Does anybody have any numbers on current and future power consumption, and what it would cost per year with current or future electricity prices to keep a computer turned on 24/7?

    1. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      ... along the same lines, what happens to the "4x more heat" itself? Looks like they just let it dissipate into the surrounding air. Fantastic, so I get to replace my 120mm CPU fan with a good old fashioned 18" fan just to be able to bear the heat in my workspace. Chipmakers really need to start paying attention to reducing power consumption and heat in the first place.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by stanmann · · Score: 1

      No, you will just upgrade your fan to a pair of Turbofans blowing at 50000 RPM, one in each direction so your case doesn't spontaneously take flight.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My electricity costs about 12 cents per kilowatt hour. A kilowatt CPU (1000 watts) would cost $86 a month.

      Note: This is an average, since there are fixed and variable costs for electricity (kilowatts, hookup fee, taxes, etc.) per month.

    4. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...if energy gets to expensive, you can just invade another Oil-Reserve-Rich nation. dont worry your prettylittlehead over it..

    5. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by sludg-o · · Score: 1

      electricity=~$.10 per kilowatt-hour (varies greatly per area, don't flame me)

      $.10/kwh=.0001 cents per watt per hour

      365 * 24 = 8760 hours per year

      8760 * 0.0001 = 87.6 cents per year per watt

    6. Re:Heat = power consumption = money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current cpu's are around 70watts (some more, others less). Which is imho an utter disgrace.
      The VIA C3 processor (at 1ghz) consumes 15w at most. Granted, it may be a bit less powerful than its intel or amd equivalents, but it's able to beat them in certain areas (in overal desktop performance and mpeg playback for one). I think it's about time the major cpu-builders headed via's way and paid lots of attention to power consumption.

  38. something wrong by kEnder242 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As liquid flows through the channels, it is heated by the chip and begins to boil, producing bubbles of vapor. Because the buoyant vapor bubbles are lighter than the liquid, they rise to the top of the tube, where they are cooled by a fan and condensed back into a liquid.
    I see two things that might be a problem

    -The chip needs to be at the boiling point of the liquid, maybe not a problem (freon anyone?).
    -What happens when the CPU isn't pointing up? (e.g. on a motherboard in a standard case) Will it overheat because the bubbles don't "rise"?
    --
    my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
    1. Re:something wrong by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Just because the CPU isn't pointing up, doesn't mean the cooling system can't point up. It does mean that there will have to be space "above" the CPU socket in the case/on the motherboard for the "cooling tower" in whatever orientation, though. The bigger problem would be people who don't have their computer oriented the way they were intended. I work on my tower on its side. I've seen desktops (as opposed to towers) stood on end to save space.

      Maybe this "tower" could be a cone shape, so that bubbles always move to the far end as they "rise", even if its on its side. These would work better when upright, but shouldn't stop completely working as long as you don't turn it too far.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  39. Of course it came from Purdue by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the heat from the CPU creates bubbles in the liquid... Certainly sounds like a Boilermaker to me!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  40. EMC by blueidoru · · Score: 1

    "Scientist Yahoo Serious was quoted as saying: "It's really not all that different from work I did with bubbles on that Einstein flick... in fact, early prototypes of this cooling system even involved some beer I had stashed in a jug during that shoot..."

  41. What happens when you tip the thing over? by flakk_jacket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since this relies on gas rising while a pool of dielectric fluid boils, I assume there's some air left in the system, right? So, what about when you have your laptop on an agle, and could this work with a traditional tower? It seems that for whatever application you use it in, the cooling unit would always need to be oriented "up".

    1. Re:What happens when you tip the thing over? by stanmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would assume that it would work in a range of angles. And that you could attach one to a heatsink on a tower case, provided that there was clearance "above" the processor.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    2. Re:What happens when you tip the thing over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, the fluid is introduced into a vaccuum ideally. the "air" is actually vaporized dielectric fluid.

    3. Re:What happens when you tip the thing over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      --
      Vegetarians eat Vegetables, BEWARE the man who claims to be a Humanitarian.


      What are Humanitables for fucks sake?

  42. Picture by m0i · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those who don't bother to read the article, here's a picture of the thing.

    --
    have you been defaced today?
    1. Re:Picture by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1
      For those who don't bother to read the article...[snip]

      Translation: 95% of /.

      As for the other 5%:

      2% skimmed it and didn't see the Crazy Hot Heat as promised and gave up on the picture. Here your work was definitely appreciated.

      another 2% understands the Crazy Hot Science Geek lingo and proceeds to write insightful and informative comments on the subject. Here your work goes unappreciated.

      .5% finds enlightenment amongst the Crazy Hotness and that guy's bald spot peeking through his hair.

      The rest troll out, as .5% of all comments to this story end up in the dangerous -1 Troll land.

      In other words, without your dilligent support, there would be readers who would have to actually Read The Article (a thing almost unheard of around here) and the unenlightened would remain unenlightenend, and the Trolls would still roam free, without the other half of the equation balancing out.

      So tell me, have you ever thought about politics?

    2. Re:Picture by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      How much space will it take in my case? Will I have to use that water bong to dissipate heat? How much is it going to cost? Can't I buy the equipment and setup my own bubble cooler? How much $$$$??

    3. Re:Picture by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "For those who don't bother to read the article, here's a picture [purdue.edu] of the thing."

      Man.. imagine how big of screen my laptop would have if the implemented one of those devices!

    4. Re:Picture by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      For those who don't bother to read the article...[snip]

      Translation: 95% of /.

      As for the other 5%:

      2% skimmed it and didn't see the Crazy Hot Heat as promised and gave up on the picture. Here your work was definitely appreciated.

      another 2% understands the Crazy Hot Science Geek lingo and proceeds to write insightful and informative comments on the subject. Here your work goes unappreciated. .5% finds enlightenment amongst the Crazy Hotness and that guy's bald spot peeking through his hair.

      The rest troll out, as .5% of all comments to this story end up in the dangerous -1 Troll land.

      In other words, without your dilligent support, there would be readers who would have to actually Read The Article (a thing almost unheard of around here) and the unenlightened would remain unenlightenend, and the Trolls would still roam free, without the other half of the equation balancing out.

      So tell me, have you ever thought about politics?


      Actually some of us fellow like the "Crazy Hot Science Geek" hairy bear types. So it wasn't entirely deceptive on that front even though the actual page title is "Tiny Bubbles Key to Cooling Crazy Hot CPUs". The "Crazy Hot Science Geek" seems fairly handsome, in shape, intelligent, has decently clean hair + skin, functional taste in clothes, etc... all good qualities in a potential sexual partner.

      As for the tech, it is basic "putting one concept together with another concept to test a theory" that is the foundation of basic experimentive science with the followup of getting the proper numbers to prove the results are valid. Simple science tends to always follow through with easily replicated results and fast mass-production of product lines. Given those qualities I suspect a fast cash flow to follow and thusly another increase in the "Crazy Hotness" of this "Science Geek". Not too hard to figure these things out I would say.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  43. Re:Imposible to read by jx100 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You forgot the addition of plugin.display_plugin_downloader_dialog and setting it to false under about:config

  44. Bah by thejackol · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Honey, come quick, the computer's bubbling. There are tiny bubbles all over the place"

  45. Hehe... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Go Boilers... literally. ;)

  46. So when can we stop wasting heat? by johny_qst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shouldn't there be some ideas to utilize a similar system coupled with a miniature sterling engine to get some of this energy back... regenerative braking is the only cool idea to come out of the automotive industry in the last couple decades of supposed innovation.

    --
    Fnord.sig
    1. Re:So when can we stop wasting heat? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      The other innovation in the BigThree American Automakers is to Buy Legislation.

      They werent doing *that* 100 years ago... (well, not as bad anyway)

  47. So... by baudbarf · · Score: 1

    ...if I replace the water in my cooler with root beer, will it cool better?

    --
    You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
  48. In related news... by hendridm · · Score: 1

    AMD stock climbed 37% closing at $9.98.

  49. er..less is more by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    Tiny Bubbles Key to Cooling Crazy Hot CPUs

    I would have thought Reduced Instruction Sets and less transistors would be the "key" to cooling crazy hot CPUs...

  50. Re:Imposible to read by donutz · · Score: 1

    If you might want to view Flash on web pages, but don't want them playing their flashy flying wizzing crap as soon as the page loads, check this out for Mozilla, it prevents flash animations from playing until you click on them. It works great, and I wouldn't want to browse without it!

  51. Future CPUs will use LESS power by bhny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought the whole emphasis on CPUs was changing from higher clock speed to lower power usage, even in servers. Google's number one requirement is low power usage in their servers.

    I'm sure the average PC in the future is going to be using LESS power than today.

    1. Re:Future CPUs will use LESS power by WavyGravy-R5 · · Score: 1

      That is a good point. I think the processors they are talking about are the latest ones for breakneck speed. Of course they're going to be hot. After they have been developed are they made more economical.

    2. Re:Future CPUs will use LESS power by scot_sd · · Score: 2, Informative

      The current emphasis on low power CPU's isn't an effort to reverse the power consumption trend, merely to slow it down. In most cases, power consumption offsets performance. Historically, designers have almost always favored performance, resulting in power consumption varying roughly with clock speed (P~af^2) squared for the same family of chip. Current efforts are to bring that closer to a linear relationship (P~af). However, even in this "ideal" relationship, faster chips will use more power (and while you're right about a general shift in priorities, don't kid yourself for a minute that the market will altogether stop demanding faster CPUs anytime soon). While it is technically feasible to make a faster chip use less power (provided the original chip is reasonably inefficient), it is extremely difficult and costly (TTM, R&D efforts, material cost, chip size, etc.).

      A second issue is miniturization, since the issue we are concerned about here is not necessarily power consumption, but temperature. Even if we assume that power consumption will stay the same, if we make the chip with half the surface area, then the power dissipation per unit area (roughly proportional to temperature) will double. Thus, even without increasing the power consumption, we run into issues that can only be addressed by advanced cooling systems such as this.

      scot

  52. Suck the heat out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How about lowering the pressure?

  53. Delicous by WavyGravy-R5 · · Score: 1

    I want one. Now. My damn processor stays a nice 130+ degrees. Yay.

  54. Different approach from HP by EinarH · · Score: 2, Informative
    Remember reading this article over at The Economist about efforts to cool down future HP CPU's (read: Itanium X) using inkjet heads from HP's printers and plotters to spray cooling fluid directly on the chip's surface, overcoming the bubble problem.
    The article is here but unfortunatly it's pay per wiew.

    The article also mentioned that future (within 2005) CPU's will generate five to ten times more heat.
    The feedback mechanism inside this inkjet head included a sensor so the squirt can be directed to the hottest areas. Really cool. No phun intended.

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    1. Re:Different approach from HP by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Economist about efforts to cool down future HP CPU's (read: Itanium X) using inkjet heads from HP's printers and plotters to spray cooling fluid directly on the chip's surface, overcoming the bubble problem.

      Let me guess: they'll sell these high-end servers for only $50. The catch is that they'll constantly consume cooling fluid from insanely priced single-use proprietary HP cartridges. What's worse, the server will come only with a half-filled cartridge.

    2. Re:Different approach from HP by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      The best cooling fluid will also cost 5x as much and inexplicably be comprised of separate blue, yellow and red fluids.

      And everytime the dispenser clogs and you have to do a deep purge your CPU drowns and your case fans spray paint your walls.

  55. But can they scrub? by Small+Kingdom · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm going to hold out until the inevitable integration with the advanced chemistry found in my Scrubbing Bubbles(r) Bathroom Cleaner.

    Then my PC will be heat AND dust free! Less work for Mom!

  56. Why must the manufacturers make even hotter CPUs ? by DaveWhite99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As if 80 watts isn't already enough !! For the vast majority of CPU consumers, 1GHz is more than enough. I wish the CPU manufacturers would focus more on power consumption (which generates heat) and less on raw speed. They are starting to do that, but I would like to see them focus even more on that. I am not looking forward to the day when my computer consumes half the elecricity in my house !

    --
    Biodiesel : domestic, renewable, clean, and in the fuel tank of my bone stock 2002 New Beetle TDI
  57. Isn't it time for lower power processors? by xluap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the moment the pentium 4 at 3.06 is the most power hungry pc processor at 82 watt. So future processors will consumate 320 watts? Imagine an office with 10 of those computers. I think it is time for processors with a better ratio of processing power / electric power. And more efficient optimized software that doesn't waste so much clock cycles.

    1. Re:Isn't it time for lower power processors? by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Take a looksee at the IBM 970. Hopefully this will be Apple's next CPU - fast, low power consumption, able to leap small buildings in a single bound...

  58. boiling and circulating by essaunders · · Score: 1

    These two points seem very valid.
    The first is just a matter of liquid choice. They just pick a proper liquid.
    The second point is very important. This system requires the bubbles (produced by boiling) to rise to sort-of pump the liquid. A non-vertical system would not work.

    I think this bit is key..
    " As liquid flows through the channels, it is heated by the chip and begins to boil, producing bubbles of vapor. Because the buoyant vapor bubbles are lighter than the liquid, they rise to the top of the tube, where they are cooled by a fan and condensed back into a liquid."

  59. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you drop a frog into a pan of boiling water then it will attempt to jump out and save its life. Hoever, if you place a frog into a pan of cool water and then heat to boiling the frog will sit until the end. The same occurs with humans - think about when you try to get into a hot bath - then think about how much hotter you can sustain if you run the hot tap whilst you are in...

  60. Stop using fish! by fritz1968 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today's computers use fans and heat sinks containing fins to help cool circuitry.

    That's the problem with today's technology. We keep using Fish in our hardware. No wonder the experts predicted that the smaller the channel, the less heat that would be dissipated (paraphrasing). The fish they were using would not be able to fit though the small channels, thus causing the channel to be blocked!

    --
    It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    1. Re:Stop using fish! by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      Today's computers use fans and heat sinks containing fins to help cool circuitry.
      Mikka Hakkinnen, Linus Torvalds, Kimi Räikkönen, Mika Salo and the others must be very proud.

      I wonder if Mexicans would be so successful in cooling silicon.
  61. efficiency question... by jaredcoleman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...developing a "pumpless" liquid-cooling system that removes nearly six times more heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems...

    Every comparison in the article was with current liquid systems. How much more efficient would this be than the heatsink/fan cooling my Athlon?
  62. Solid conductors by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't see why there is so much effort on dispersing heat... It seems that the only reason systems have a fan is that it's the cheapest cooling method.

    Want silent cooling??? Design a case where the healt-sink goes from the processor, to the outer-shell of the case... Presto, no more restricted airflow, and no fans at all.

    Convection works well when there is a large surface area (unlike current CPU heatsinks), and there is little impediment to airflow (unlike current systems).

    In fact, you could have some incredibly hot systems if you designed a case with a large, EXTERNAL, healtsink, mounted so the top is flush with the case. It could look like a grill on the top of your case instead of a flat piece of metal, but be connected to the CPU with copper/aluminum.

    I've always been wondering why nobody designs computers that conduct the CPU heat outside the case. Anybody have some ideas?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Solid conductors by satterth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually i know of one right now. Hush Technologies This case is designed for the Via ITX style motherboards, at least its a start. Myself i'm looking forward to getting one.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:Solid conductors by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, the VIA chips put out very little heat (because they have incredibly little power), so it's not much of an accomplishment.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Solid conductors by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Or, why not just start putting the processor on the bottom of the motherboard and use whole case as a heat sink.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Solid conductors by satterth · · Score: 1

      The case is meant for the new Via boards that require a fan hetsink combination. At least it gives you an idea of how a case might be invisioned. You asked, i gave. Sure a heatpipe solution isn't the best for a 3.0Ghz P4, but it might be just fine for a slower celeron.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    5. Re:Solid conductors by klui · · Score: 1

      NeXT's workstation slabs worked kinda along these lines. Although the CPU was not attached to the case, the case worked like a heat sink. It had fins running along the underside of the case from front to back with a fan mounted at the front, pushing air out the back along the vertical slits. Here's a site (lower right-hand corner) with a picture.

    6. Re:Solid conductors by joib · · Score: 1

      The hush technologies itx box was already mentioned. Another german thing which is very similar, but uses a P4, is the Signum Data FutureClient. Expensive as hell, though.

    7. Re:Solid conductors by billanderson71 · · Score: 1

      You can dump the heat this way with a heat pipe, which has a very high thermal conductivity. In fact, some laptops use the method - take the heat from the cpu and dump it to the case. This works well for lower power consumption cases. I sure wouldn't want an exposed sink trying to dump several hundred watts - it would be like have several lightbulbs in your lap.

      Solid conductors won't work. The temperature drop through the solid is too high, so you can't cool the chip to a low enough temperature.

    8. Re:Solid conductors by evilviper · · Score: 1
      According to their site, the CPU is WATER-COOLED.

      Inside aliquid-cooled CPU.
      http://www.signum-data.de/english/index_eng. htm
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Solid conductors by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I sure wouldn't want an exposed sink trying to dump several hundred watts - it would be like have several lightbulbs in your lap.

      I wasn't really considering laptops with that suggestion.

      With a desktop, you'd have plenty of surface area to disperse the heat (from the top of the case), so any point on it wouldn't be much warmer than room temperature. Also, the high-points of a heatsink, which happen to be the coolest point, would be the only parts anyone could directly touch.

      The temperature drop through the solid is too high

      That's a pretty one-sided assesment. Solid condutors certainly DO work, the only question for a designer would have to be 'how much material will be needed to conduct enough heat over ??inches to the outside of the case'.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Solid conductors by joib · · Score: 1

      Well, they say the CPU is liquid-cooled, not necessarily water-cooled. Looking at the pictures there's no pump, so I guess it's some kind of heat pipe which transports heat from the cpu to the case by convection only. Better pictures at http://www.signum-data.de/pdf/ct_signum_engl.pdf

    11. Re:Solid conductors by billanderson71 · · Score: 1

      The temperature drop through the solid is too high

      "That's a pretty one-sided assesment. Solid condutors certainly DO work, the only question for a designer would have to be 'how much material will be needed to conduct enough heat over ??inches to the outside of the case'"

      First, I'm talking about the high power chips discussed above, with 4 times the power of current chips, or about 300 Watts. While it theoretically may be possible to use a solid conductor to transport the heat, it not economically practical, especially since you are talking about using natural convection in the air.

      First, the heat flux off of the chip is around 300 W/cm^2. Assuming copper as your solid conductor, there is an 80 degree C drop through a 1/4 inch of copper at this heat flux. This means that your chip has to be well over 100 C (ignoring the temperature drop between the outer surface and the air). Copper is the best reasonably cheap conductor (there are other, very expensive composites) so the temperature drop is too high.

      In addition, since you are using natural conduction, you need a much larger area to dump the heat, on the order of 100 times more, so your solid conductor must spread out to a larger area. This means a great deal of metal - it's a lot cheaper to use a heat pipe or other two-phase device to spread the heat, and conduct it away, since a heat pipe can have an effective conductivity that 1000 times greater than copper.

    12. Re:Solid conductors by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Assuming copper as your solid conductor, there is an 80 degree C drop through a 1/4 inch of copper at this heat flux.

      You mush have done your math wrong... From experience, I can safely say that copper (or aluminum for that matter), approx the size of a CPU, can conduct far more than 20% of the heat over a distance much greater than 1/4".

      If there was that steep of a drop, current heat-sinks would not even work. (/me grabs a heatsink and a ruler). So current heatsinks have just under 1/4" of solid metal (mixture of who-knows-what, but definately not copper) next to the processor, before it even splits up into seperate surfaces.

      Either you aren't saying what I think you are saying, or your math is VERY VERY wrong.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  63. Tiny Bubbles... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    I'll bet Don HO is psyched.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  64. This explains exploding control panels by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Funny

    This explains why the Star Trek control panels are always exploding. It's not that they routed main power through a switch on the panel, it's that the fancy-assed graphical display needed a terahertz-class processor to render the warp field display in real-time. That last Romulan disruptor blast just dislodged the heatsink for a few milliseconds and {poof}.

    1. Re:This explains exploding control panels by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was the big banks of capacitors they used on the sets...

  65. Off topic, my ass by Midajo · · Score: 1

    Parent post is informative, mods!

  66. Pumpless circulation-D'OH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Think pot of water for spaghetti before the water really starts boiling... Oh, and I apologize for my horendous spelling but you don't have to spell to run a nuclear reactor."

    Homer Simpson, is that you?

  67. Cue the CPU fart jokes! by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, this is really a good idea. I almost said it was cool, but, I mean, duh, right?

    --

    You are not the customer.

  68. Heat sucks by Proc6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem with all these cooling solutions is that unless the final output for the heat is "outside", it's doing nothing but making MY ROOM hotter and hotter. Put an Athlon and a 21" CRT in a room and close the door. It seriously sucks. Having to sit in a sauna to send an email is really ignorant. I dont know what the answer is, but generating 4 times more heat isn't it. I think PC's need the equivalent of a dryer vent you can hook up to suck the hot air outside.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:Heat sucks by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I am trying to find a link to this article I read about (possibly was poset on /. as well) regarding these wall ports that looked like a house lac system. You plug plastic duct work on to your computers fan outputs and duct it into the interior walls of your house, which typically have no insulation and connect directly to the attic where most houses have decent venting.

      This is what you need to move the heat out of your room. In the summer this would be ideal, since the AC systems for houses return air from around the house back to the cooling uint where your newly generated hot air must be cooled. If the hot air was sent outside of the AC system's environment, then only the cooler air of the house has to be cooled.

      robi

  69. The key question by f97tosc · · Score: 1

    From the article: ...have solved both of these potential engineering hurdles, developing a "pumpless" liquid-cooling system that removes nearly six times more heat than existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems

    And, if I may ask, what is the performance of existing miniature pumpless liquid-cooling systems. I have not seen any in the store lately. Do they perform as well as pump-driven systems (probably not)? Do they perform on par even with fans (maybe not)?

    Tor

  70. Kid 'n Play woud have said by BluGuy · · Score: 1

    Tiny Bubbles Key to Cooling Mad Stupid Crazy Hot CPUs

  71. Heat your home by ralico · · Score: 1

    Well, If you use the heat dissipation system in those wifi boxes put out by martian.com, then you could stick em in your floors or walls to heat your house. (As suggested by Bob Cringely).
    Or you could build a water heater/home server.

    --

    SCO to Hell
  72. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by mskfisher · · Score: 1

    this is false:
    http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/frogboil.htm

    gradual acclimation to temperature changes is true, but there is a relatively well-defined pain threshold (around 120-125 for humans).

    --
    0x0D 0x0A
  73. Familiar Icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those icons on the front page of the Science Blog look familiar.

  74. Re:Hello, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, of course, this is possible with electrostimulation:
    Cut the power cord off of your toaster and strip the insulation off on the toaster end. Keep the plug on the other end.


    Wrap one end around your willy and shove the other up your bum, then plug the cord into the wall.


    If this does not work, go to an industrial site and ask them where you can plug into their medium-voltage system.

  75. This is bad new for case modders by scourfish · · Score: 0

    I mean, their whole goal in life is to add as many fans as possible to something; cpu fans, exhaust fans, backup fans, fans for the fans.

  76. Treehugger #1 by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do you want a zillion computers needing special disposal? Technowaste is a big-enough problem as it is today, lets not RE-introduce a hazardous material that needs to be handled at EOL.

    1. Re:Treehugger #1 by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Yes I thought of this while I was posting, but wanted to know of any particular technical reasons why it wouldn't be feasible.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Treehugger #1 by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      technical reasons why it wouldn't be feasible

      Because it conducts electricity? The cooling tubes are inside the CPU chip, so a leak would be somewhat problematic....

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:Treehugger #1 by stilwebm · · Score: 1

      If technical reasons include production, think of how much harder mercury is to handle than, say, water. It might not require much murcury per chip, but over thousands of chips, it will require many. Then the chips must be tested in their package, where the bad chips must be disassembled. So the mercury in the bad chips must be carefully separated. Again, every expensive. But no one is going to use a technology that allows mercury in to products that end up in landfills in the first place.

    4. Re:Treehugger #1 by Clan+Hanna · · Score: 1

      Actually... water does not conduct electricity.

      Pure water (H2O) is non-conductive. However, as it serves well as the "universal solvent," it usually doesn't stay pure for long. It is the impurities dissolved in all water that makes it conductive.

      This is why they can use high-pressured D.I. water hoses to clean power-line insulators without worrying about electrocution or surges.

      --
      ----------
      I'm sick and tired of being responsible for the preservation of the universe and its outlying suburbs.
    5. Re:Treehugger #1 by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Actually... water does not conduct electricity.

      Except that they are discussing mercury, which does conduct electricity.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  77. Why not advanced SMP? by rf0 · · Score: 1

    OK thi is just a thought off the top of my head so feel free to shut me up if I talking rubbish. Instead of making CPU's faster why not start looking at ways of creating an SMP system which can handel normal applications thorough something like branch prediction or read-ahead but on a large scale?

    I would think that a decent chipset which good inter CPU communication could at least rival say 350% of the same system in a single CPU config. Also wouldn't this just dispearse the heat more?

    Then again I could be talking rubbish

  78. Heat pipes by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's what they are. Pretty standard effect. I'm guessing (from a scan of the article) that they've managed some magic concerning the microchannel interface, but the meat of the "discovery" seems to have been lost in favor of the amazing new heat-pipe phenomenon, which has only been around for thirty years.

    Here's an example:
    http://www.swales.com/products/heatpipes .html

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Heat pipes by billanderson71 · · Score: 1

      No, they're not heat pipes. In a heat pipe, you are vaporizing liquid (cooling the chip with the latent heat of the fluid). Vapor travels to a condenser, where heat is removed. The liquid is then returned to the chip.

      In this case, you have a two-phase flow of vapor and liquid from the evaporator to the condenser. Some of the heat is removed by the vapor, the rest by raising the temperature of the liquid.

      From the article, you can't tell if this would be better or worse than a heat pipe. Going to micro-channels allows you to get much higher heat transfer coefficients than in a more normal sized channel, but I think that a heat pipe could be designed for this application.

  79. Cooling - Lava Lamp - Random numbers by emarkp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally! A dedicated random number generator coprocessor.

  80. New CPU architectures needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The trouble with CPU manufacturers is that they are continuously increasing clockspeed to increase performance. All modern processors use CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) technology. CMOS is great in that the only time it uses substantial power is when the transistors are switched. Unfortunately, the higher the clockspeed, the more often transistors are switched, and the more power is consumed.

    New architectures are needed that can do a ton of work per clock cycle. Then, clockspeeds can be reduced greatly, along with power consumption.

    I heard an example one time that the human brain works at like 10Hz, and is capable of like 10^15 operations per second, but uses only 80W of power.

    I think late great physicist Richard Feynman drew up some equation to describe this relation, but I'm too lazy to look it up.

    Cheers!

  81. Re:Yes but will they keep you from burning your un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There's been a mistake," said the irritated customer at the return counter. "I said I wanted a compact DISK burner!"
    ba dah - ching!

  82. Cost of electricity.. by destiney · · Score: 3, Interesting


    The articles states:

    Innovative cooling systems will be needed in about three years for personal computers expected to contain microprocessor chips that will generate four times more heat than chips in current computers. Whereas current high-performance chips generate about 75 watts per square centimeter, chips in the near future will generate more than 300 watts per square centimeter, Mudawar said.

    Who can afford the electric bill to run such machines in their homes? I already stress over the few rooms in my house where I use 100 watt light bulbs instead of 60 or 75 watt bulbs. Can you imagine hooking up your shiney new PC in 2006, then getting an $800 electric bill the next month? Man..

    I guess powering down your system when not in use will become more common.

  83. Call me when you generate electricity by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Instead of wasting all that energy as a pump, you should try and recapture it as electricity like they're doing on car's braking systems.

  84. This is exactly what I was thinking of... by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Thanx for the pointer,

    myke

  85. Hey look at our millitary!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding we could and should cut funding considerably and invest it in the future of our nation, education, the children, science, and engineering. Instead of designing wasy to kill people we should be designing systems to save lives. What do we need new nuclear weapons to beat a dictator. hell if they cut the budget by 70-100 billion, cut the tax rebates we could afford the worlds best public education system, and keep inportant reasearch on say alternative energy. Terrorism is a fight not against a target, the Soviets and now Russians found this out the hard way, they used their massive millitary and just killed tons of people they believed were terrorists or supporters in afganistan and chechnya. It just bred more terrorism. We could have prevented september 11, but we were too disorganized and mismanged to do so, none of the 19 hijackers were allowed to be here but it did not stop them, we knew where they were they were flagged by the FBI, flight school instructors, and were being followed by israeli agents. We were warned about these people and the big talk about september 2001 by Italy, Israel, Russia, Egypt, Afgani leader Mousoud, and others. We not only let them stay in the country but did not survellence them and then let them get on planes with weapons. That tells me we need to improve our alert system not OUR MILLITARY.

    Welfare is what we do anyway but for rich people it is called a tax cut, just as affirmative action is called legacy for the rich people.

  86. Got it wrong by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    You got it wrong, the bubbles have a very low heat capacity themselves, it is the formation of the bubbles that bleeds the heat out of the system, the heat of vaporization is enormous compared to the heat capacity of the vapor form for every fluid I have ever heard of... Then the bubbles, now buoyant, float off with lots of heat stored up, they then condense returning their heat to a more traditional, but much larger compared to the chip, heat sink, and the liquid returns to the cycle to vaporize once again...

    BTW the flow is laminar, you got that right, but a turbulent flow would actually be more effective, you just can't get a turbulent flow in such a small channel, remember the Reynolds number has the length scale in the numerator... micro-channels will never have turbulent flow with any fluid that does not have a viscosity approaching zero

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Got it wrong by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      You got it wrong, the bubbles have a very low heat capacity themselves, it is the formation of the bubbles that bleeds the heat out of the system, the heat of vaporization is enormous compared to the heat capacity of the vapor form for every fluid I have ever heard of... Then the bubbles, now buoyant, float off with lots of heat stored up, they then condense returning their heat to a more traditional, but much larger compared to the chip, heat sink, and the liquid returns to the cycle to vaporize once again...

      BTW the flow is laminar, you got that right, but a turbulent flow would actually be more effective, you just can't get a turbulent flow in such a small channel, remember the Reynolds number has the length scale in the numerator... micro-channels will never have turbulent flow with any fluid that does not have a viscosity approaching zero


      How about adding in a small fan in the liquid before it hits the microchannels?

      That way you'd have:
      [ fan and heat sink on exterior of chip ]
      [ top of liquid containment chamber ]
      [ bubble release chamber ]
      [ microchannel stalks ]
      [ liquid spot before microchannel ]
      [ turbulence zone + circulation fan ]
      [ liquid spot under fan for bubble formation ]
      [ bottom of liquid containment chamber ]
      [ the chip to be cooled ]

      The current design eliminates the fan addition you have suggested.

      Another choice should be instead of a circular rotating fan perhaps a waving fan design that resembles sunshade blinds waving to and fro for turbulence and to prevent a steam buildup zone.

      That way each cycle on the sunshade blind fan would sweep in a left - right - left - right motion.

      The only other obvious solution would be to create spikes on the bubble formation surface to disrupt a stream layer formation.
      1 1 1
      1 1 1
      1 1 1
      ^_^_^

      That way the steam would force the vapor up the stalks until they hit the bubble transfer microchannel stalks.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  87. where do you get 4x as much heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what in the world do you think anybody needs a CPU consuming 200 watts of power for? you're forgetting that CPUs as fast and faster than today's power hungry desktops can also be made in the future that draw *less* power and generate *less* heat. that's the direction things will go in the long term unless you listen to Intel marketdroids trying to tell you that you need to be able to compress six HDTV streams in real time from your desktop computer or you're a looser.

    1. Re:where do you get 4x as much heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why every single other CPU manufacturer is heading the same direction as Intel? They all listen to Intel market-droids?

      Go back to your altair 8080 and let the rest of us have our future. It's spelled L.U.D.I.T.E.

  88. Nuclear Cooling by sarcasticninja · · Score: 1

    I don't know if anyone's mentioned this yet... but couldn't this be applied to nuclear reactors, where large volumes of water are used to cool down the reactor? Just a thought. It would help to prevent thermal pollution in rivers/lakes/etc...

  89. Horizontal by Sayten241 · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the container of water (or whatever liquid) would have to be placed vertically over the CPU, which means that the CPU would have to be horzontal. Does this signal a change back to horizontal PC cases?

  90. Now to make this complete... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

    They need the computer playing the Mp3 song "Tiny Bubbles."

    *singing* Bubbles... Tiny Bubbles... make me happy...

    --
    ~ kjrose
  91. lower power & different architecture processor by uwbbjai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what my university course taught me, CPU power is composed of 2 factors: dynamic power and static power, where dynamic power is dependent on clock speed and the other is independent of the clock speed. But dynamic power itself is the sum of the switching power (to charge up the transistors) and short circuit power (that split fraction of a second when both transistors are on, causing power to leak through). Both of these factors are directly proportional to the activity factor of the signal (the probability of a signal chaning from 1-to-0 or 0-to-1) The one signal that changes 100% of the time is the system clock. To distribute this one signal to all the individual components of the chip, a lot of power is wasted on generating the clock tree. Maybe we should seriously consider reviving the asynchronous CPU design. This would at least minimize the amount of signal activity. Besides, the faster the processor gets, the more time it spends in the NO_OP state, waiting for data to process. I say we should stop focusing on pumping higher clock rates and focus on other components that ARE TRULY THE BOTTLENECK. eg. memory and storage??? Or even use a different transistor technology, e.g. a CMOS transistor that recycles its charge to power other transistors?

  92. Why not use them for heating.... by bace · · Score: 1
    your house, ok now before you turn on the flame throwers think about it for a minute. Computers are almost part of every home. In the future more houses should have computers. And with more and more pc's being left on all the time, why not put this wasted or unwanted heat to some good use. Why not use I to heat a room or 2 in your house, or uses it to heat your water for your house, kind of like killing 2 birds with one stone.

    I know a big redesign of pc hardware will have to happen for this, but hey what ever happened to prototypes and proof of concept models. Yes all my assumptions are just that, assumptions.

    --
    =If life was easy, i would be out of a job=
  93. I looked at this .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    a while back ... actually building large farms into unuseable spaces in large buildings in exchange for some winter heating .... it's a non-simple problem - you have to be able to handle what happens when a box toasts itself and pumps the toxic fumes into the air conditioning system - requires a lot more support equipment that you might thinl

  94. ERmmm by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    actually, simulations were done about 2 years ago, it was posted on slashdot I believe...
    the bubbles on the outside DO go down (how is that defying gravity, by the way?)

    All the rising bubbles towards the center end up creating a downward flow at the edge of the glass, where there is little resistance to the bubbles flowing downwards.. so they do. Look even closer.

  95. Tiny bubbles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tiny bubbles?! That's your answer to everything.

  96. All you have to do is sound informed... by edinho · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that TamMan2000 got a 2 for a simple and correct explanation of the phenomenon, and a couple of guys for a 4 and 5 for spewing some "I heard something dunno what really but it makes sense". Says a lot about the ability of the moderators to detect bullshit, huh? Strangely sad...

    Cheers,
    e.

  97. Anyone think of the wasted energy? by GamezCore.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Four times the heat of today's proc's??? Let's see 84 watts (P4 3.06GHz) X 4 == 336 watts?!? No friggin way, there is no way anyone is going to pay for the costs of running a machine like this... this doesn't even take into consideration the rest of the system!

    This is the kind of thing that just outrages me, I think what should be perfected are efforts like the VIA CPU's or the Crusoe (ugh). This brute force mentality in CPU's and Video cards is getting ridiculous. Things need to change in a big way, and I hope that they start soon because I'm not buying or running a 1500 watt powersupply 24/7. I don't care how many FPS it can push in Quake III, hell California alone would be under blackout conditions forever if we start seeing CPU's like this.

    --

    www.GamezCore.com For Hardcore PS2 Gamerz : By Hardcore PS2 Gamerz
  98. Where's a moderator when you need one? by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    OMG, now THAT was funny!!!

    Somebody toss that AC a mod point or two.

  99. Anyone Want to Sing? by statikuz · · Score: 1

    Nothing more fearsome than /.ers bursting into song!

    Tiny bubbles in the wine,
    Make me happy, make me feel fine,
    Tiny bubbles make me warm all over...

    ...or cold, I guess. =)
  100. Kit Please! by billcopc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, now sell me a DIY kit so I can tame this Athlon T-Bird block heater. 50 degrees idle with a 7000-rpm fan.. it's insane!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  101. Groan by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm only pissed because you posted it first...

    For all the non-Microsoft folks out there:

    Tiny Bubbles,
    Running Xine,
    Make PC happy,
    Make PC fine
    ...

    (Cue the large beast swallowing the poster in a Monty-Pythonesque cartoon sequence.)

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  102. does cavitation really apply? by lukme · · Score: 1

    I fail to see how cavitation applies. The phenomena here is akin to boiling, hence the pressure inside the bubble is sufficient to prevent the collapse of the bubble.

    With cavitation, the pressure inside of the bubble is almost a vacuume. The shock wave is due to the collapse bubble.

  103. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are
    3.155 x 10^7, you won't even try to remember it. On the other hand,
    who could forget that, to within half a percent, pi seconds is a
    nanocentury.
    -- Tom Duff, Bell Labs

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...