Slashdot Mirror
Gesture Control for Automotive Peripherals
j-rock nowhere writes "An article in Automotive Design and productions' Field Guide to Automotive Technology describes a possible future method of controlling things like your cell phone and stereo while keeping your eyes on the road."
Soon, drivers will be able to command vehicle functions with the wave of a hand.
Does this work on storm troopers too?
I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
-Xenocrates
Driver makes gestures
Car swerves down into a ditch
Hands not on the wheel
Cyde Weys Musings - Scrutinizing the inscrutable
looking where you're going is one thing, steering in that direction would be nice too :)
Sounds like a recipe for a new rash of Road Rage incidents.
"Hey, a$$hole - you gonna flip me off like that, I'll show you!" (swerves and cuts off guy who's just trying to check his voicemail)
Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
I'll give it a hand gesture all right...
Watch for the neon middle finger to pop up from my truck.
What does the car do when you give the finger to the a$$hole that just cut you off?
hands free ya know....
He tried to kill me with a forklift!
The car tries to go straight up!!
Middle of the road...
If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
Does that make me a bad person?
There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
Why cant you build a keyboard with something like this. It would be more intuitive and easier on your wrists.
I already make enough gestures while driving.
People look silly enough talking on hands free phones while in the car. If they are waving their arms about at the same time they are going to look positively psychotic.
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
What's next your current squeeze throwing a pencil through the area of effect, throwing off the station while you try to listen to the news of your theft of the new wonder car? Sheesh!
What if it is just turtles all the way down?
It might be a problem for those who use sign language to speak to their passengers, but then, maybe signing while driving isn't such a great idea.
Behold the riant ape! Beware, his crooked thumbs!
I'm used to using my hand.
Best Windows Freeware
I'm fairly confident that I have hand gesturing in the car well covered, usually accompanied by some symbols such as @ and $. @^#!%%$ off!
Can't wait for this to be implemented for PCs. Maybe one day I can merely give the finger to my Windows computer at work instead of giving it the three-fingered salute. Certainly help prevent RSI.
I already have this.
If I place my hand on the device in front of me,
and I move my hand to the left, the car goes to the left. If I move my hand to the right, my car goes to the right.
There's a set of gestures I can make with my other hand to select something called a "gear". And the motion recognition even watches my feet, too!
-JDF
...and your hands upon the wheel.
How about a few buttons on the steering wheel that correspond to standardized jacks used to interface things like your celluar phone and stereo? The stereo part is already done (in most Acura's for example), now just add celluar compatibility and provide one of those systems that turns you car into a speaker phone and your done.
Politicians and inventors seem to think that the cause of cell-phone related accidents has something to do with their hands being too occupied. I think it's quite obvious that the real problem is that people can't focus on two things at once. I don't think any of these new laws or hands-free technology will improve anything because little Susy driving around in her new BMW SUV that her daddy gave her isn't going to be saved when she's talking to Jennifer about how her boyfriend Chad just dumped her and she changes lanes into MY CAR!
a possible future method of controlling things like your cell phone and stereo while keeping your eyes on the road.
Or more importantly, the movie playing on your nice in-dash LCD DVC player.
Or for women, it allows them to more easily apply eye make up in the rear-view mirror.
I can kill an annoying tune on the radio by flipping it the bird.
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
Yeah... This is exactly what I need. I want to let go of the wheel and wave my arms around like a moron in order to change radio stations. More importantly, I want flipping people off to dial my ex-girlfriends. Better yet, I want signalling a left turn (right turn for ppl driving on the WRONG side of the road) to change the channel on my DVD player. They could combine this technology with the motion-activated PDAs to make caucophonious symphony of beeps and widgets powering up whenever I light a cigarette while driving. Seriously, who the fuck needs another distraction or reason to let go of the wheel while driving! I can't even imagine what would happen if I was getting some on my ride into work... Not that I could now, but...
Webmaster Wanted - Entropic Reactions
Going back to the days when in Driver's Education, they teach that while driving you should keep your hands on the wheel at the 10 and 2 o'clock positions. While you may move your hands about the vehicle to perform certain tasks as changing the radio station etc. using hand gestures to control things within the car gives us the same problem that we have now. This problem is that people are using the hands that they should be driving with to do various other things within their vehicles. A voice command system would be much more valuable within a car as it would preclude the need to remove your hands from the steering wheel. Their argument in the article about voice recognition has holes in it. They say that cars are too noisy. If you've taken a ride in one of the newer cars with the windows up, and the radio off, it's rather quiet inside the car. Perhaps I just don't understand, but I still think that this would just be asking for trouble.
If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
Hell, there have been car phones that respond to voice since 1986 at least. We used to have a GTE prototype. Gestures sound like a step backwards.
Just get a bee into their car and watch the hilarity!
Seriously, most people I see can't even handle driving when they aren't actually trying to do anything else, why are they being encouraged to do anything but drive?
like your cell phone and stereo while keeping your eyes on the road
How about shut off the cell phone, tune the stereo to one station and pay attention to the road.
Solution: $0
Chance to get into an accident/kill someone: less
-- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
The big problem seems to be that the concentration isn't on traffic even with hands-off versions of mobile phones. True enough, there is not that gross inattentiveness associated with reading or writing text-messages, or other non-telecomms activities like applying makeup or reading the newspaper. Still, the concentration isn't where it ought to be during phone calls, I have experienced this myself, being on "autopilot" whilst talking. Enough to keep the vehicle following the road; but at the end of the conversation I realized I could not remember anything of what I had passed, even obvious things like small towns and intersections.
On the other hand, this idea of being able to quickly get commands across to various in-car systems seems exciting. Being able to turn on a music selection with a flick of the wrist certainly is vastly better than an in-car entertainment system full of pushbuttons. I got one of these here, and I never am able to work it unless the car is stationary.
SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
Research has shown that the largest affect of a Cell Phone conversation on a driver is in fact the level of concentration required to listen, think and converse with the other party.
Not having a phone held awkwardly while driving is a big help but you still loose a lot of your concentration on the road.
It sounds like an innovative control method but it still won't keep concentration purely on the road.
...cover both eyes with your hands. Airbag will deploy shortly. No peeking!
Someone should devise a system that could apply makeup to womens faces while they were driving.
:p
Imagine the drop in road rage and accidents...
just imagine.
If driving was simply a function of keeping your eyes on the road, there would be no problem... the thing is you have to PAY ATTENTION when you are driving. I don't remember where I saw the numbers, but I remember recently reading an article that suggested hands free cell phone uses drive as bad and crash as often as those who do not use hands free kits.
Now with the desire to integrate a LCD screens, DVD player, Video Games and a whole host of distractions I loath to think what driving will be like in the future. People need to just drive their car and worry about amusing themselves when they are not hurling down the road at 60 MPH.
We should leap-frog gesture technology and go straight to this.
But Seriously. Yes, safety innovations are worthwhile. However, at the risk of sounding like a hystronic dumbass, your car is not a goddamn entertainment center! Work the CD player, yap on the phone, eat a taco, crank up the A/C, turn around and shriek at the kids... I even see advertisements for in-dash TV/VCR/DVD screens.
Maybe the answer is getting cars to drive themselves with GPS or something. That way we won't distract Joe Consumer with the tedious task of driving, leaving him free to settle back with a bucket of KFC and some pr0n on the way to the mall.
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
Why not stick with the physical interfaces for cellphone, stereo, etc, but DRIVE using guesture recognition? How cool would it be to just have to point in the direction you wanted to go? Okay, not that cool, but I still like the idea
evil math within Nature's Cubic Creation!
>> But they're taking things a step further, because the work on gesture interfaces at CMU doesn't include physical touch
The physical touch is important. It is important for the person to receive a physical feedback from the controls so that he can "feel" them moving.
It is not coincidence that many people still prefer the old-style clicking keyboards that give a nice tactile feedback.
btw. How are they going to distinguish between control and spontaneous gestures? Maybe the system will be forbidden in the southern countries where the people naturally move their hands a lot when they speak?
Can we rig it so that giving someone the finger deploys the airbag?
Please?
"Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
According to the article
"(1) cars are noisy, so that technology needs much more work and (2) many people simply don't like the idea: "I would feel strange if I had to talk to my car," he says."
Personally, I'd rather give my car voice commands instead of hand gestures so I don't know where it comes up with #2. As for #1, I thought most modern cars (excluding cheapo cars like my neon) were pretty good at eliminating road noise. I suppose that would still leave issues with noise in the car such as radios and screaming children.
Ever since my 8-bit Commodore 64 with 64k of RAM I've was promised Computer Speech Recognition. I was able to train the C-64 speech recognition software to recognize commands like "North, South, East, West, Go up etc... " to play Infocom games like Zork. Now we have cell phones with enough CPU power to process images, play Beethoven's 9th with a 16 string polyphonic orchestra to notify the user of an incoming call, but WE STILL DON'T HAVE BASIC SPEECH RECOGNITION. What's up with that?
So is this the end for speech recognition? Have we given up? I want to speak to my cell phone and have it obey, not gesture to it while I'm trying to drive. Clue to cell phone manufacturers, the cell phone has a microphone, maybe it could be used to something..... hmmmmmm.....
Ozzy trying to voice control the BMW radio... he resorted to gestures. Didn't work. Of course you have to be able to speak actual words and use more than one gesture to do any of this, so he and his two kids are out...
"Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
so does the airbag deploy when your mouth opens wide and you throw your hands in front of your face in horror?
method of controlling things like your cell phone and stereo while keeping your eyes on the road
First off- my stereo in my car displays the FM frequency info in the gauge cluster, at the top, and I know all the controls by feel; the button groups are shaped with surfaces to let you recognize which button group you're on. This feature was introduced in 1989 by Audi, and continues in every single model they make- so this is solving a problem that doesn't exist, frankly. If one manufacturer can do it, any can- it's just smart design and a little bit of extra electronics.
Regardless, The problem is NOT the "taking your eyes off the road" bit. The problem, time after time, is your mental focus.
Researchers found that when a driver is talking on the cell phone, it's almost like they enter a tunnel of sorts- they loose their situational awareness(ie, "where are the other cars around me?" "what is my speed?" etc.) and sort of blankly stare ahead. You can recognize anyone in this "mode"; they look like some kind of automaton.
Of course, the phone companies say "that's absurd, people in cars talk to the driver". That's right(even right to the extent that many states limit passengers for young drivers, who haven't enough experience)- but when you're talking to the driver (studies have shown that) you stop talking to them if the situation the driver is in gets complicated- ie, a merge, someone starts to cut them off, an exit is coming up, or they're looking for a turn to make- or even if the driver suddenly changes their body language- and even that act of stopping talking to them can give the driver a wakeup call. People on the other end of the phone can't do any of this, of course.
But, have you ever wondered why the cellphone industry is happily embracing the hands-free stuff? They get to sell extra accessories at an absurd profit margin compared to the phone unit itself- and it distracts everyone from the much more "dangerous"(to them) truth- that people can't talk to other people safely unless they're in the car, ie, cell phone calls by drivers should be illegal PERIOD.
Please help metamoderate.
I still think the best method for changing radio stations or answering phone calls or other non-critical tasks in the car is buttons on the back of the steering wheel. Some cars already have it. So you don't have to take your hands off the wheel, you just move a finger or two.
Hey, they use gestures to fly in Earth: Final Conflict but it looked a little to much like they were always being a bit inexact in their movements. Don't know that I want controls that have no feed back to them.
Im going back to my cellar now to make more tin-foil hats for my family... :)
Still it does make me wonder.
Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
Oh yea, the convenience of a wave of the hand. You itch your nose, you hang up on someone. You swat a bug, you auto-dial your mother in law. You start making out with your significant other, and your OTHER significant other plays you a tape of it off their answering machine. Oh yea, can't WAIT for this one to come out!
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
These days, society is a lot more integrated.
Keeping your brain focused and in gear is the real problem with cell phones and other gadgets.
"It's not just the physical distraction of holding the handset -- there's the intellectual distraction of holding the conversation."
"...cell phone conversations using "hands-free" devices are just as likely to cause dangerous distractions as those conducted on hand held phones."
"There is a very substantial decrease in the amount of brain activity, the amount of neural activity allocated to driving, while you are simultaneously listening,"
Hang up and drive.
HOLY FUCK!
*makes vulcan sign*
*crashes into tree*
Windows
A fatal exception 0E has occured at 0028:C004CDCF in VXD VNTFS(01) +
00000B987. The current application will be terminated.
* Press any key to terminate the current application.
* Press CTRL+ALT+DELETE again to restart you computer. You will lose any unsaved information in all applications.
* Pray that one of the above will work.
Press any key to continue_
I like big butts and I cannot lie.
By your logic, we should eliminate radios, remove all passenger seats from vehicles (making it so only one person can be in a privately-owned vehicle at a time), etc.
After all since drivers can't do two things at once, listening to the radio would be out, talking to passengers would be out, fiddling around with car seats, etc. would be out...
No, you're right. We should make so the driver has NO DISTRACTIONS. I'm starting my campaign to remove passenger seats and radios from cars today!
My journal has hot
Time to leave the planet.
Any moment now a space ship will crash and announce "Take us to your lizzard."
At least Vogon poetry will be better than most pop crap.
As I said before:
My question is, if the whole planet now sounds like Ford Prefect is somewhere in the area, where's my electric thumb and my copy of that book with the "Don't Panic" cover?
"Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
If I'm going to take my hands off the wheel, I want to do something quick and unambiguous, then out them right back where they were. Buttons and switches are simple, reliable, and give tactile feedback. When I flip a switch on my dash, I can feel it move, and heard it click. I know my will has been done and I can go back to driving the vehicle. With a gesture system, there will be a tendency to wait and see if the system has properly recognized your motions before returning your attention to the road This is bad.
Steering-wheel mounted controls are the way to go. Control the radio with you thumbs and maybe dial your phone with buttons in the middle of the wheel.
Controls need to be quick and simple. We don't have any laws saying you need a hands-free kit for your CB in any state that I know of because they aren't that distracting. A single button push or know twist will effect whatever changes you want, and no one hesitates to drop their mic if they need to, since they're desiged to handle it. Contrast this with a typical handheld cellphone: Tiny keys, poor tactile feedback, inefficient controls (volume buttons instead of a knob), tiny displays. Just think about how much time you take your eyes off the road to dial a seven digit number. Plenty of time to get you killed on the wrong day.
Voice dialing (for ANY number: "five-five-five-one-two-one-two"), volume control knobs, and a single button that takes the phone on and off-hook should be mandatory for all cellphones used while driving. NYS already has a law requiring the use of a "hands free" kit, but AFIAK just plugging and earbud into your phone satisfies that requrement.
Life is too short to proofread.
When you stick your middle finger up will the car automatically flash it's lights, blare it's horn and swerve violently?
Outdoor digital photography, mostly in New Engl
I bet getting road head would really confuse the shit out of it.
I hope it doesn't recognize gestures in the back seat....
I usually hate "mod parent up" posts, but mod parent up.
No, I still hate them. Mod me down.
In other words, "me too".
Will there be variations of gestures for the individuals? For example, Italians love to use their hands when talking and they already have an informal meaning for each gesture, so it would make sense that they could define their own gestures. Then there's deaf people who know sign language. Could it be adapted to their own variation of sign? Lastly, there's the amateur orchestra conductors I see now and then leading an imaginary symphony in their cars.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
I love old VWs, because there is nothing to mess with. It's about driving.
Now it's about eating, calling, tuning, drinking, shaving, beautifying, watching, reading, screwing, eating, listening, drinking, and eating.
Does anyone know if they've used this technology to create so-called "virtual" keyboards, in which an IR array tracks your fingers over a flat space and interprets your finger motions as keystrokes? It seems like a logical step for those who type faster than they speak, and it would be extensible to all sorts of applications.
goto www.jestertek.com
Loose wave with semi-outstretched 1st finger... "Make it so... Engage!"
As long as you can make the middle finger honk the horn and swirve, I'm happy!!
Reminds me of a conversation with my father years ago.
"What's this mean?" - arm out window, bent with arm pointing to the ground.
"That's stop."
"And this?" - arm straight out.
"That's a left turn."
"And now?" - arm bent up.
"That's a right hand turn."
(3 out of 3 - yay!)
"Right, what does this mean?" - he put his arm out the window, unbent, palm flat, and waved his hand up and down.
This was a new one. I had no idea.
"It's a woman who's just applied nail polish, and is trying to get it to dry faster. Stay well clear of her if you want to live."
You let your "subconscious" take over and drive for you, and you're worried about little Susy? It's people like you that I worry about...
~Berj
Yup. Thats what this study found.
It's really not a question of hands, phones, pushing buttons, where your looking or any of those accident reasons that people throw out to explain cell phones and bad driving. Really, what we have here is a matter of Aptitude. Some people, when driving and recieving or making a call, never look at their phone. These users reach out, work their phone, radio, various pieces of their automobile all by touch. The phone doesnt distract them or make them reckless cause their completely capable of doing several things at once. In fact, they probably always do several things at once. Then there's the rest of the cell phone users, about 90% of the population? Probably a high number but maybe not for some area's. heh. Anyway, these users need to look at their phone every time they do anything with it... they drive down the road staring intently at the radio just to change the station. You see them weaving abuot and following lines whenever they do anything but drive. So what it really comes down to, is ability. Some of us can use the cell phone, and all the better to us, nothing should take that away. Nothings gonna fix this cause no ones gonna wanna sit though an aptitude test to see if your smart enough to drive!.. never know how many people would fail! lol
*There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape em off Jim!*
Surveys are another good tool, although when the reader strips away the conclusions, it's possible for the mass media to have disseminated valuable partial truths, which any savvy mass media would generally avoid since it does not serve any powerful profit-center advertiser agendas such as those of distilleries, pharmaceuticals, and the agents/services for which such advertisers pay.
Crime reporting is another great tool for the media to lead the charge into totalitarian excess.
It really helps speed the pace to have an irrational set of punishments enshrined in law, too.
Let's randomly pick Sweden for an example. Let's say for the sake of argument that Sweden has irrationally strict penalties against the use of a certain naturally-occurring substance, and it is decided in Sweden to survey use of said naturally-occurring substance. Perhaps drawing on studies that show Schizophrenics to be more self-embarrassingly candid, or studies that show dogs beaten at random subsequently manifesting volatile reactions, these intrepid Swedish surveyors find that (lo and behold!) users of said naturally-occurring substance in Seden are more likly to manifest schizophrenia.
Of course, the problem with cellphones, consumption, tuning the radio and changing CDs is not that the hands aren't free it's that the brain is free - it isn't trained on the road, paying attention to where you are and what you are doing (respects to Yoda!)
The studies are in and show that hands free cellphones don't significantly reduce accidents caused by being distracted.
In fact, there shouldn't even be a law specifically regarding cellphones or anything else, there should just be one d.w.d. (driving while distracted) law.
Stupid sexy Flanders.
That is, the problem is not taking your eyes off the road, or your hands off the stearing wheel. Instead it is your attention off the road.
In fact, talking with someone in the passenger seat, that has their eyes closed and therefore does not pause when the traffic get's funky, should cause just as much problems as talking on the phone.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
If gestures were used as the controls in a formula 1 car, music conductors would become the new Michael Schumacher!
I hate all sigs, even this one.
... make fist, extend middle finger....
Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
A survey says cellphone users, even hands-free, more easily distracted during driving ... even when not using the cell-phone!
The conclusion assumes the survey is answered honestly. Suppose that the survey actually matches with some accident reports, then doesn't the survey merely indicate that some people are pretending to be distracted by something else besides the cellphone?
Personally, I've found that using the phone while I drive was very difficult at first, even though I was a very experienced driver when first I tried it. During the learning process, I nearly ignored a stop sign and a red light, simply because a conversation or call was extremely important to me. Even now, I would probably look for an opportunity to pull off the road if knew something like that would be happening. I believe I'm a good multi-tasker, but it doesn't make sense to me to multi-task driving with any other activity of vital importance. The most difficult conversations are the emotional ones, and I'm not talking about the kind of emotional show needed to bawl out a company rep. for conveniently (to the company) mishandling a regular payment.
Great now the deaf can use their cell phones and stereoes while driving!
Plus, factor in the danger of thousands of Americans trying to learn this new gesture technology in their new car (turned guided missle) while doing 65 down the freeway. Oh, learn it in your driveway? Yeah right, we are talking about Americans, here...
You know what?
University of Utah study published January 2003
A key finding: users of handheld and of hands-free cell phones were equally impaired.
I think the plain and simple answer is that we've been trained since age 4 to have good phone manners, to be polite to the person on the other line.
We all know how aggravating and rude it is when the person on the other line is "distracted" by TV or something, giving us "uh-huh" waaaayyyy too late to have been paying attention.
We want to avoid this in the car, to be polite, to follow our ingrained phone ediquite, and so we drive like apes on morphine.
hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
When will there be a (-1, Did Not RTFA) moderation?
I think it's because your mind has to adapt to the concept of the phone. It's not natural to talk to a hunk of plastic, so you kind of project yourself somewhere else where you can ignore everything but the voice. Talking to a real person is more natural- they are actually there, so you still pay attention to your surroundings.
Did anybody watch the Osbournes this week? Ozzie's new bimmer doesn't understand a word he says... especially where he swears at it. Think it will understand his gestures any better????? :)
--D
That said, I suppose the increasing size of the American ass is going to render the point moot, anyway. Video killed the radio star, but McDonalds killed mooning...
"ie, cell phone calls by drivers should be illegal PERIOD."
Come on, making something that is not a direct infringement on another person illegal is what should be illegal. I should be able to do whatever I want in my car while driving, even if it's really stupid. But, the instant that effects someone else (I hit someone/something) I should be punished accordingly (because I will have then actually infringed on someone).
Studies have shown that computer ownership and fast internet connections correlate to online file swapping. I think we'd be in agreement that computers, and the use of them to make/share MP3s when not violating copyrights, should be legal. It's only when you violate the copyright should you be punished...and you should be punished for violating that copyright, not owning/using a computer.
Same with cell phones. They, and the use of them, should be legal as long as that doesn't infringe on someone else. When you get in an accident cause you made that choice to talk, and accepted responsibility for that choice by making it, you should be punished for hitting someone...not for use/ownership of the phone.
I (unfortunately) see a world approaching where everything "good" will be mandated by law, and everything "bad" or "potentially bad" will be prohibited. You, my fellow man, are leading this march...and I wish you would stop.
...It really makes driving a bitch. :o)
Every time Phil Collins or Led Zeppelin comes on, and it'll automatically change the channel?
OK!
Jon Acheson
All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
If we outlaw gestures, only criminals can flip people off!
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Trying to navigate a graphical interface with voice (think windows or a HUD of some type) is murder.
I work at a place that invented gesture recognition technology years ago and it is quite tight now. The "Hurdles that are mentioned in the GM press release are not an issue with our product"
Check it out at www.jestertek.com
What about the movie, "The Minority Report"??? This sounds like what we are coming to. In the movie John Anderton uses a pair of gloves, which cover the three fingers (middle, index, and thumb) that each have a light emitter at the end. With the have of his hand(s) in multiple configurations he can control an entire system.
But, what if we skip the buttons, gestures, voice control, and whatnot, and head straight to oblivian and work on thought control. Thought Control (TC) is in its infancy , but once we get there, there is no end to what we can control, from the television (even if we can still call it that) to our cars as we drive (even if the cars even need us to direct them by then, which should be controlled by a central system that handles traffic and does away with traffic jams and congestion).
Another development is pupil control. Some sort of system monitors the pupil and takes action based on what the user is looking at. We already have that (military helicopters and the disabled) and will soon push the barrier for person computers.
I say we stand back and wait to see what the future holds, it's going to be a crazy ride.
I just hope they dont forget the "stick two fingers up to beep the horn" gesture!
Oh the possibilities...
Oh great, how am I supposed to car dance to my technolicious music on the way home from work. Half the fun is having uptight soccer moms stare while you jam to Slyver or some such nonsense. Fortunately my cars tend to be so old that it will be another 50 years before I drive anything with this level of innovation.
Now that is the gesture controlled device I want in MY car!
... but have you ever found yourself driving next to deaf folks signing while they're driving? Neither their hands or their eyes are engaged in the act of driving. But I guess it's legal. (I've encountered this a couple of times and just slow down and give myself enough space to slow down or swerve in case I need to avoid wreckage.)
Imagine the typical big city commuter trying to control their car phone, mobile fax machine, stereo, and all the other electronic toys they need while they're getting to work. This has got to be the best ever promotional tool for public transportation.
CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
Honda: She wants me. I can tell by the way she keeps flicking her sun roof.
So now when someone cuts you off and you give them the bird, your car can automatically honk the horn too. All too easy!
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
So, if I have a convertible and I put the top down, I wonder if trees/clouds, tall buildings, or any combination thereof could be seen as a gesture by the computer? Not too darn likely, I know, but what if...
The 'flying finger'.. and if you have to ask.. :)
---- Booth was a patriot ----
I always love these jesture articles. It's funny seeing what people say will happen when the finger is given. I wonder if having one of those operations where the brain is split, left from right, would help users be able to talk on the phone and drive at the same time. :)
TT
Cool - been looking for the gesture control on every car I've had - saves having to wind down the window........
Obviously, motorcycles are rather more likely to kill you when you do have an accident, but the accident rate for motorcyclists is around half that for car drivers per mile travelled. In the UK anyway.
Why? The motorcyclist's full attention is on the road, no radio, no mobile phones, no chatting to passengers, no screaming children, no lipstick, no coffee.
That and the fact that you *know* you're going to die if you hit something. It concentrates the mind.
Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
Yup. It's called a passenger. :)
I am expecting for voice control. For example, to keep the motor going, you make "vroom" noises. The louder you vroom, the faster the engine goes.
__
Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
GW Bu
While on the subject of Clancy:
I really like Clancy's stuff, but occasionally there are technical errors made. Once such ball drop was to define security by obscurity as knowing full well what services were running on a box, but being able to do nothing about it. I think this was in one of the Net Force books.
Yes, I know that Clancy didn't actually write the Net Force books, but he's made blunders in the Ryan series :-/
Need a Linux consultant in New Orleans?
Who is this interstellar gas cloud gesturing too, and what is it ordering?
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
While generally I would agree that cell phones are intrinsically unsafe in cars, there have been times when I felt that my using a cell phone made my driving more safe. On long-distance drives, or when I'm otherwise getting sleepy while driving, it's far better to be slightly distracted by the cell phone (but awake) than to be drifting off. So it's not all bad.
I thought everyone agreed that voice command was going to be best in these kinds of situations.
I mean I really dont see what the need is when buttons, sliders and knobs have done just fine. Once VoiceWare is perfected we should be just about set. I dont see any appeal here at all.
Next thing you know they will be wanting us to watch an animated hand that makes responce gestures to tell you the fucking check engine light is flashing at you. Just more Tech for the sake of Tech.
"Doctor, it's not the voices I hear in MY head, but the voices I hear in YOUR head that really frighten me."
I get the feeling that this system was invented by ravers just so they can continue to do their crazy dancing while they drive.
The plus side of it for them is that they can use to to flash their lights and stuff, thereby simulating the experience of being at a rave.
But then, what would I know? I'm just saying this because I watched a video of a rave yesterday and I was freaked out by some of the people. (I also loved the visualisers they had running behind the DJ's) I should go to one sometime.
When reading this, did anyone else think of that Volkswagen commercial with the guy 'dancing' in his car to the tune of 'Mr. Roboto'
Turns out he wasn't caught up in the music, he was just trying to change the damn radio station...
I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.