Slashdot Mirror


Lycoris Announces Desktop/LX Tablet Edition

penguinrenegade writes "Lycoris has announced the release of a new Tablet Edition of their popular Desktop/LX Operating System. There are several screenshots in the tour, and it looks like a really polished system, including some of the things that you'd really need in a Tablet, like the virtual keyboard, actually working. It appears according to one page that there are already Tablets in production by some manufacturer, too. So much for Bill Gates and his vision of only Microsoft on a Tablet, eh?"

190 comments

  1. Why? by UTaimSRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because Microsoft created the TabletPC does not mean that it needs Linux as the competition. The TabletPC will fail without Linux's help because there is a very small niche for the product.

    1. Re:Why? by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      Because, to many, it is not important that your product was a sucess. It is enough that it was less of a failure than M$.

      And I suspect that arguement will actually work, in an edited way, on bankers.

      Only one letter different....

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's wrong with the concept of the TabletPC?

    3. Re:Why? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "because there is a very small niche for the product."

      Small niches can be very successful. Apple is doing just fine thank you very much.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can think of plenty of uses for tablets that beat a regular computer/laptop any day.

      And for your just sitting back surfing the web I'd take a tablet any day if I could just afford one.

    5. Re:Why? by acousticiris · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I agree. I mean, I type very fast and my hand-writing is nearly illegible (even to me). I'm not an artist with a pen, I'm an artist with a keyboard and a mouse. (OK, maybe not an artist)

      ...My two canadian pennies worth.

      --
      "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
      "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
    6. Re:Why? by peterprior · · Score: 1

      Why must it have to just be about competition? Linux wasn't developed in the first place as "competition" to another product.

      If I was buying a tablet PC (and I _do_ like the form factor), I sure as hell wouldn't want it running Windows XP, so its just nice to have the choice.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Small niches can be very successful."

      If and only if they do not compete in any meaningful way with the market dominator... Just like apple, thank you very much ;)

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would kill for a tablet in my airplane. Approach plates, en route charts, flight logs, you name it. All in a little box with an LCD display. Add a GPS and the possibilities are limitless, and for a tenth of the cost of a panel-mount multifunction display. Sure beats a flight bag.

    9. Re:Why? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Gosh, you better go avail yourself to all the focus groups... "the one man focus group" you could call yourself.

      That's a bit harsh above, but there are people who'd manage quite nicely with a tablet PC.

    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say

      Big, huge, Palm Pilot?

      Really - I am not sold on the TabletPC, I mean, for one, I can type faster then I can write, and two, I can really type faster then I can tap on a fake keyboard.

    11. Re:Why? by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with the concept.
      The only problem is that there are no applications that make use of pen input in a good way Not on windows, and not on Linux.

      Besides all existing tablet-PCs are fare too heavy.

      If you work with them on the run as you are supposed to, it will almost certainly result work related injuries to neck and sholders. The weight must get down to below at least 500g.

      And if you work with them on a table like an ordinarey laptop. There is little need for pen input.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    12. Re:Why? by cEnTiBeE · · Score: 1

      My tablet has a 60g HD, 768RAM, 988cpu.. weighs 3.2lbs, has both handwriting and voice recognition ... negatives are lack of good video card and XPtablet edition. Will I partition the HD and duel boot linix??? Ubetcha I remember when everyone thought that the market for PDAs was to small to be sucessful. Flow with the change....tablet for you? not yet...but someday.

      --
      cEnTiBeE ... Computers come in two varieties: the prototype and the obsolete. -- Anonymous
  2. Additional Information by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've managed to uncover the manufacturer - their web site is here

    Rumor has it that there are stylus limitations, however.

    1. Re:Additional Information by bad_fx · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Sigh* I've got one, and your rumors of limitations are 100% true - pr0n looks terrible on it! .....everything ends up freakin' square!

    2. Re:Additional Information by Snoopy77 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rumor has it that there are stylus limitations, however.

      Yeah, but the reboot times are out of this world.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    3. Re:Additional Information by bsharitt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, it reboots as quick as you can shake it a couple times.

    4. Re:Additional Information by SubjunctiveSam · · Score: 0

      That was the joke. Now you've ruined it.

    5. Re:Additional Information by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Dude... it just depends on the OS. You should have gone with Linux, then you could use GQview Windows makes everything look like squares. I mean cripes, Their logo is all squares! Highly stylized, but still squares. As are Gates and Ballmer. :)

    6. Re:Additional Information by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      Dammit ... you try to be funny but someone thinks it's interesting.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    7. Re:Additional Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lie back and think of the Karma

      p.s. Boo yah sucks for Funny not counting towards Karma. :-P

    8. Re:Additional Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'course it's interesting. Can you imagine rebooting your laptop THAT fast?

    9. Re:Additional Information by svallarian · · Score: 1

      dood,
      that's why they call it a "box"!

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
  3. About time by jnguy · · Score: 1

    The Tablet PC market has been out there for a while now, it just hasn't really gotten a lot of consumers yet. I was thinking about getting one, but that would probably bind me to using windows. Another option is always nice.

  4. virtual keyboard by yelohbird · · Score: 1, Funny

    like the virtual keyboard, actually working

    or you could just flip the screen around and use the real keyboard, actually working

    --
    h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-slash-dot-dot-org
    1. Re:virtual keyboard by diatonic · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are many tablet PCs without real keyboards built in.

    2. Re:virtual keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this would be a great opportunity to use Dasher, a very interesting alternative input method. Like any input device, it takes a little while to get used to. But it learns over time, and can be quite fast and even a bit entertaining! it is available for Linux, MacOSX, Windows, and WinCE. Palm support is supposed to be coming.

      visit earth2willi.com !

    3. Re:virtual keyboard by EddWo · · Score: 1

      The HP TC1000 does have a keyboard built in. The keyboard is detachable. You can use it with the keyboard as a notebook, with the keyboard folded underneath as a tablet, and with the keyboard detached as a slate. Its a great form factor.

      http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/tabletpc/imag es /mobility.gif

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  5. Well? Where can we get one? by mrklin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you know /. ers require immediate gratification!?!

  6. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you spelled too right, nice

  7. Not bad for a complete ripoff by FusionGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... of Windows XP Tablet Edition.

    1. Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... of Windows XP Tablet Edition.

      In your opinion does that make the product good or bad?

    2. Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff by LionMage · · Score: 1
      ... of Windows XP Tablet Edition.


      As if Windows XP isn't already a ripoff of other modern OSes?

      I mean, seriously, Microsoft rips off every other company that has an original idea (Apple, Xerox, Palm), and usually gets their ripoff wrong in the first few iterations, but through attrition they manage to be the last guy standing...

      That there's a Linux variant that is designed for Tablet PC use is wonderful. There are vertical markets where Tablets make sense, and the cost benefits of Linux on Tablets means they can be sold cheaper. Maybe Tablets will percolate into common use? Most companies would rather not have to pay the Microsoft tax on every unit sold, and most consumers don't like having that tax passed on to them.
    3. Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

      Not a complete ripoff, virtual keyboard != scribbling

    4. Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a complete ripoff, virtual keyboard != scribbling

      Windows XP Tablet Edition supports both virtual keyboard and handwriting input (presumably what you meant by 'scribbling'). Hopefully any Linux-based tablet devices would also support both.

    5. Re:Not bad for a complete ripoff by gfburn · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has become so sucessful because 90% of computers look the same; most people just don't want to learn a completely different system. If there is to be any competition on the tablet market all tablets have be easy to use, and operate as close to each other as possible, or it just won't work.

  8. Comdex Best of Show - BeOS Webpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone remember that? 2000, I think.

    A few months later, the company that won Best of Show for their BeOS-based webpad switched to Windows CE...

    BeDoper

    1. Re:Comdex Best of Show - BeOS Webpad by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      After searching the net for more info on the BeOS Webpad I found this comment:

      Everyman's friend Bill Gates was the moderator. A certain Jean-Louis Gassee was a competitor. The question from Gates was (and I am paraphrasing) "What is the name of the yearly contest on Usenet in which the object is to produce the most convoluted C code that still produces a working program?"

      According to many, JLG's brilliant answer was: "What is Windows?" As you might have imagined, Mr. Gates was not amused.
      read it here
      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
    2. Re:Comdex Best of Show - BeOS Webpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was so wrecked when I wrote that." - Douglas Ginsberg

  9. blatant rip-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks exactly like Windows XP

    1. Re:blatant rip-off by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      Take a careful look at the corporation name. This is "Redmond Linux Corp.". What does THAT name suggest that they may be emulating? Eh?

  10. Tsk, tsk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Microsoft puts its hopes of recovering in products which are either unlikely to succeed (XBox) or bring nothing new to the table (tablet).

    And when I say "nothing new", I really mean totally unimpressive. Its ok, but do we need a party for this supersized pda?

    Too bad Micro$oft is a follower: now is really the time to become innovative.

  11. Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

  12. Windows XP Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the screenshots. They are a total ripoff of Windows XP. Not original at all. I happen to hate M$, but if they sent them a Cease and Desist letter, I wouldn't blame them. They should keep their UI original, and not just steal from other companies. BeOS was original enough, and that was fine. They can use basic concepts that Mac OS and Windows use, but they copied many of the finer details from XP.

    1. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Look at the screenshots. They are a total ripoff of Windows XP. Not original at all.

      No kidding. For those who care to compare:
      Can you see a difference? :)
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by webguru4god · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is that a bad thing? Lycoris primarily caters to customers who have no Linux experience whatsoever, and are looking to learn or use Linux as their primary operating system. If Lycoris' Tablet OS looks and acts like Windows XP, it reduces the learning curve for new users, and helps them get better acquainted with Linux. Besides, it's still KDE and the end user can customize their desktop however they wish, Lycoris is just giving new users a friendlier environment.

      I think a lot of people complain about the way in which many distributions copy Windows XP for their default UI's, but I think it is a great step towards helping the user become accustomed to using Linux.

      Besides, there isn't a law that dictates you have to use Lycoris...If you really want a Linux tablet PC I'm sure there are other projects out there, or that it would be pretty easy to customize a distribution to run on a Tablet PC.

    3. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Is that a bad thing?

      No, it's good to make it as familiar to people as possible. Many people are familiar with Windows XP (or other Win variations) and this will allow them to get up to speed quickly. What's interesting is if Microsoft copied some innovating UI from Linux (take your pick). All hell would break loose and people would decry Microsoft's blatant ripoffs. But because it's copying from Microsoft, it seems to be okay. After all, it's just a matter of making it comfortable for users, right?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody seemed to cry when Microsoft and Apple implemented fast user switching, which we discussed yesterday.

      So shut the fuck up.

    5. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbass, this isn't about *features*, it's about the L&F of the user interface. Get with the program!

    6. Re:Windows XP Ripoff by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes I can. The Lycoris one actually works. :P

      Seriously, the only reason that Lycoris exists is to give "Joe User" an alternative to Windows. What good is an alternative if the look and feel isn't very similar? The two screenshots you linked aren't identical. They have a sameness, but no more so than the trash can on the Windows 9x desktop had to the Mac OS Trash icon. Nothing to see here folks... move along.

  13. Yes, well by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    So much for Bill Gates and his vision of only Microsoft on a Tablet, eh?

    Perhaps they should stop copying Windows XP, eh?

    1. Re:Yes, well by BabyDave · · Score: 1
      So much for Bill Gates and his vision of only Microsoft on a Tablet, eh?

      I always did find that idea a little hard to swallow ...

    2. Re:Yes, well by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      And how is Lycoris copying ms windows XP? Lycoris uses KDE as the deskotp. It is a completely differnt desktop then the Fisher Price (TM) desktop of ms windows XP. KDE and Gnome both have very good support to make the desktop Look how you want. MS is the one that actaully copies from others and try to pass it off as their own.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    3. Re:Yes, well by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Uh, d00d, it looks *exactly* like Windows XP. What was XP copied from, pray tell? That link is nothing but hysterical blabber, as it was when I first saw it a few years ago.

      It's OK to cry, really.

    4. Re:Yes, well by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Well to me XP looks like it was copied from Fisher Price(TM). It is very childish looking. I use Gnome and the XP GUI just doesn't compare to the power in Gnome or KDE. If some people want KDE to look like XP, then more power to them. If some want it to look like Mac, then more power to them as well. To each is own.
      It's OK to cry, really.
      What? You make no sense at all. Why would I cry over ms windows XP? Now march along sonny and go back to your legos and Fisher Price(TM) GUI.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Yes, well by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Well to me XP looks like it was copied from Fisher Price(TM).

      Hahaha!! OMG, that is so insightful and funny. "sonny"? Hahahaha!! You're killing me!

  14. Linux on a tablet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Now, even HARDER to use!

    Thank you, thank you, I will be here all week.

  15. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Create an account
    2) Apply +6 modifier to Troll, Flamebait, etc
    3) Apply -6 modifier to the rest
    4) ???
    5) PROFIT!!!

  17. Resistive touch screen? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hard to tell but it sounds like they are supporting only a resistive technology for the touch screen. RF (such as in Wacom tablets) is much better for an interface. You get hover, pressure sensitivity and MUCH higher resolution.
    Plus a side switch and eraser.
    There was an article a while back about linux on an Acer Tablet PC so I know it can be done.

  18. Windows XP Tablet PC edition still required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a company to sell a tablet PC with Windows XP TabletPC Edition, they must sell one copy of the OS per tablet PC -- no more, no less.

    That makes it even harder for a mainstream tabletPC ODM/OEM to sell a tabletPC with no OS or Linux preinstalled.

  19. Linux GUI Design by straterpatrick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand why the 'evolution' of Linux means that it become more and more like Windows. If Windows is the bad (not that I'm saying it is) why do all Linux apps try to emulate it. From OpenOffice.org to Licoris, why are we stuck using Windows Graphic Design and Interfaces. I mean if you really want to copy a GUI why not look to Mac OS X?
    Strater
    strater.ca

    1. Re:Linux GUI Design by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean if you really want to copy a GUI why not look to Mac OS X?

      Because the only people that like having one toolbar shared between all apps already own macs.

    2. Re:Linux GUI Design by mrklin · · Score: 1

      Because Apple will sue but Microsoft will actually be glad that you are copying them!

    3. Re:Linux GUI Design by jkeyes · · Score: 1

      I mean if you really want to copy a GUI why not look to Mac OS X?

      Because MS doesn't sue when you copy XP and Apple does.

    4. Re:Linux GUI Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather then bitch why not do something about it....

    5. Re:Linux GUI Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > If Windows is the bad (not that I'm saying it is) why do all Linux apps try to emulate it.

      Windows is 'the bad' in lower case. Microsoft is THE BAD, and they're the reason why Windows is 'the bad'.

      Windows done by a company that cared about its customers, and not its own no-dividends-for-15-years stock price, would be a much better product.

      XP's pretty reasonable (except for the default Fischer-Price theme), it's the company behind it that has folks mad/hateful as hell.

    6. Re:Linux GUI Design by dash2 · · Score: 1

      Because Linux wants to take market share from windows, and to do that, you have to make it easy for windows users to switch.

      Once we have 60% market share, we can start making the running ourselves.

    7. Re:Linux GUI Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monopoly + price gouging + bugs + arrogance + crushing competitors = bad

      is it ridiculous to accept that MS might have some worthwhile things to copy in a non-monopolistic, non price gouging less buggy less arrogant and competition-friendly sphere?

      what a retarded comment.

    8. Re:Linux GUI Design by David+Hartigan · · Score: 1

      It's pretty simple actually.

      Windows DOES have a very large userbase, and a lot of people are used to the layout and design of it.

      With that in mind, people who are going to want to switch to Linux will want something to be familiar, because let's face it - the GUI isn't the hardest and most challenging part of learning how to use Linux.

      I think that once Linux has a higher number of users than Microsoft products do, then a GUI change can happen, much like Windows 3.11 -> Windows 95 was for the end user.

      Cheers,
      David

    9. Re:Linux GUI Design by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why the 'evolution' of Linux means that it become more and more like Windows.

      I agree. It is so annoying that all automobiles have very similar controls. All just cheap knockoff copies of each other.

      I personally believe that every car should have radically different controls and good online help. Approaching the intersection too fast? Just pull up the online help! It's right there for your convenience.

      I'm very interested in hearing more about your ideas for interface design. No doubt you've got the next great UI concept that KDE and GNOME have been waiting for.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    10. Re:Linux GUI Design by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      From OpenOffice.org to Licoris, why are we stuck using Windows Graphic Design and Interfaces. I mean if you really want to copy a GUI why not look to Mac OS X?

      KDE seems to copy elements from OS X. It seems like we have transparent menus. OS X alike desktop wallpaper. Very similar styled GUI widgets. Numerous things that are obviously and overtly influenced by OS X. So it's not like everything is being copied from Windows.

      It seems to me that desktop themes that look "too much" like OS X get projects into trouble with Apple. So maybe you should direct some anger that direction.

      Now let's untangle the two concepts you mentioned, and discuss graphic design and "interface" seperately.

      You can have a different interface, and still copy elements of graphic design. I think I already covered that.

      But the UI is really something else. Even on OS X the widgets aren't all that different. Just decorated differently. And those widget appearances, or very similar are present in KDE. Yet nobody would argue that KDE's interface is just like OS X. So just the appearance, or graphic design, of the widgets doesn't do it. And having the same collection of widgets (buttons, option buttons, checkboxes, combo boxes, close boxes, minimize, maximize, scroll bars, etc., etc., etc.) doesn't an interface make. (Although it is part of the definition of one.)

      The interface concepts in OS X are largely present throughout most modern desktops. Scroll bars are used mostly in accordance with Apple UI guidelines, for example. Radio buttons in every modern UI (Windows, KDE, GNOME, etc.) work as described in the original old old Mac UI guidelines.

      So what are we getting at?

      Perhaps the Finder? But this is just an application. Not a UI for the whole system. It forms a big part of how you perceive the system. But a more Finder like UI could be done for, say, KDE. An OS X like doc bar at the bottom could be done. These are just applications. But still, is the OS X doc bar at the bottom really in any fundamental way, other than in graphic design different than the Windows / GNOME / KDE taskbar at the bottom? After all, you minimize applications, and they are represented there. There are some cool eye candy effects.

      You brought up OpenOffice. So let's talk about that. Just how would you propose making OOo different? Are you just talking about Aqua-like widget design? Or some fundamentally different way of approaching the problem of, say, word processing? A fundamentally new approach to working with spreadsheets? If not, then why shouldn't the controls have the same interface? (Although possibly better graphic design.)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    11. Re:Linux GUI Design by cshark · · Score: 1

      Linux is an interesting animal. The funny thing about it is that because of it's very nature, there will never be an accurate record of just how many linux machines are actually out there. Well, not unless you tracked and compiled accurate download statistics from all linux iso download sites. But even then, how do you know how many instalations there were? I've used my copy of mandrake to install linux on 300 workstations locally. So it's reletive I guess. Anyway, my point was, How do you know that there aren't more linux pc's out there already? hmmm?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    12. Re:Linux GUI Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OS X 'doc bar', known as the 'Dock', is actually a lot more than a repository for minimised/open documents/windows. It's an application launcher, quick-access tool for documents/folders, and it does some other nifty things too. And, yes, it looks pretty. But is quite different from the 'traditional' taskbar.

  20. Listen UP - low cost is more important than speed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell can't someone product laptops, notebooks, tablets,,,,etc....for $400 or under

  21. WinXP:Not bad for a complete ripoff by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 0, Troll

    of Mac osX.

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
  22. Recovering from what? by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1

    Being so darn profitable? Having so many of it's products being used? Phooey on Microsoft!

    1. Re:Recovering from what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Being so darn profitable? Having so many of it's products being used? Phooey on Microsoft!

      Thats the point of being a follower, dude. You get success faster.

      Why reinvent the wheel, when you can copy it or buy the idea? Why lose all that time tinkering with a new gizmo, when a sucker (thats the developer) likes having all the trouble?

      It started when they bought the first OS, and life has been a party since then.

      But, alas, nothing last forever... as I said above, now is the time to be really innovative... will they make it on time?

      Sincerely, I dont know.

  23. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    a) because they cost more than that to make
    b) because companies exist to make profit, not practically give stuff away
    c) because people will pay more than $400

  24. Tablet XGalaga??? by maxmg · · Score: 5, Funny

    To display the abilities of applications written specifically for Desktop/LX Tablet Edition, Lycoris has created Tablet XGalaga, a customized version of the arcade-inspired open source program. Now you can experience the power at your fingertips!

    In related news, Microsoft commented on the perceived threat to their tablet PC platform:
    "Even though this is a pretty slick move on their part, our developers are working right now on a new and improved version of TabletMinesweeper. Not only will it feature much bigger buttons, we will also include improved 16-color graphics and at least two different sound effects. That oughtta show them who's boss."

    But seriously, if you want to show off the power of your high-tech bleeding edge computing platform, don't use GALAGA, for god's sake!

    --
    I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.
    1. Re:Tablet XGalaga??? by Plug · · Score: 1

      You may think this is a joke, but so far the best use for the Tablet PC I've found, and the one that keeps my Linux loving friends taking the laptop, putting it into tablet mode, and using it, is Microsoft's InkBall.

      Super simple game - really addictive. How games should be made.

      Don't knock a game as a killer feature for a platform.

    2. Re:Tablet XGalaga??? by Mr.Ned · · Score: 1

      I think I'd break my spiffy new tabled after about 5 minutes of XGalaga.

      taptaptaptaptaptaptapCRUNCH

    3. Re:Tablet XGalaga??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Maybe they should try Quake 2 as well, just to compare?

    4. Re:Tablet XGalaga??? by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      How would you right-click in a tablet?

      I always have to put the flags down to keep myself from screwing up and getting the sad face.

      --

      -Bucky
    5. Re:Tablet XGalaga??? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      I LOVE GALAGA!!!

      Galaga running on a tablet PC is reason enough to buy one right now!

      couldn't resist...

      I really do love Galaga though.

  25. Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why are you so sure the tablet PC is doomed? It's just a slight evolution of the laptop concept -- and laptops are pretty popular. Sure tablets are overhyped and most of the "features" are useless, but that's true of a lot of products. Doesn't mean the basic idea isn't sound.

    I, for one, am looking forward to the day when I can recline on my couch and surf the web or read an ebook with the same ease I now read a paperback. Yeah, you can do that with a laptop, but it's awkward. You don't always need a keyboard.

    1. Re:Why is why? by UTaimSRC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The TabletPC is a stripped down version of an entry level laptop that also costs several hundreds more. There is nothing wrong with the concept of TabletPCs but untill they are priced accordingly they will not sell. I for one, is in the market for a laptop so I could bring it to my classes. I was highly considering the TabletPC but for an entry level (800mghz, 256 MB RAM, 8MB Video Card, WiFi) I could get a top of the line Sager Notebook (3 GHZ, etc...).

    2. Re:Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Uh, you didn't say TabletPCs were overpriced, you said that that will fail. Overpriced tech does sometimes succeed -- consider Rolls Royce, Bulova, and Think Geek.

      Besides which, new tech is always more expensive than comparable old tech. I mean, if price is the only issue, I'll sell you a Thinkpad 770 for fifty bucks!

    3. Re:Why is why? by koreth · · Score: 1
      Yeah, okay, so you won't buy one... but other people are making other choices. I know two people who've bought them (one is a student planning to take it to grad school, the other is a roving sysadmin at a government agency who needs to be able to jot down notes on the go.) The company I work for is considering outfitting a couple hundred field-service technicians with tablets to replace the clipboards and printouts they use now.

      I borrowed one for a few days and it sure was convenient to have access to a computer in meetings without blocking my view of the person across from me, and take notes without being the annoying guy in the corner clacking away on a laptop keyboard. If I buy a portable at some point I'll strongly consider a Tablet PC even with the price premium.

      Yes, they may flop... but I think it's far from a done deal. You pay more money and you get capabilities you don't have in other portables, even if some other portables do things the tablets don't. Raw CPU power isn't the #1 item on everyone's priority list.

    4. Re:Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      The company I work for is considering outfitting a couple hundred field-service technicians with tablets to replace the clipboards and printouts they use now.
      Which is exactly how new products get cheaper. It's not a law of nature. At first the product costs "too much" for most people, but if it's got any good points, some people buy a bunch of them because they have a process that justifies the cost. When this happens enough times, you get economies of scale and the price starts going down.

      Of course if nobody buys it, the initial production run gets remaindered and you can buy the product real cheap. But that's not really a good sign!

    5. Re:Why is why? by gessel · · Score: 1

      The history of tablet computing is littered with failure, and MS is joining the parade 10 years late (though, as a history lesson, MS crushed Go by promising pen-windows 3.1 and forcing vendors to dump Go to get seeded with pen windows, then after Go tanked, they pulled the plug).

      If you could get a touch/pen interface for trivial incremental cost and no resolution/weight/durability penalty, people would probably go for it. Maybe someday, but not yet.

      Until then, as for Apple taking the niche: I worked on Scribe, the ATG's predecessor to the PenMac, a project so lost to history you can only find references to references on the web.

      And the PenMac had, back in 95/96, many of the features of the new windows versions, including pressure sensitivity, a very accurate neural net based natural handwriting engine, etc. It even seemed quite a bit more responsive on that old 68020. It sold briefly in Japan for Kanji entry...

      One problem with tablets... who writes anymore? Have you tried to write a letter recently? If you're less than 20, you probably never did. It's a compelling paradigm, but ultimately retro. Honestly, I can't anymore; my hand gets tired after a few paragraphs. Sure I could if I did it every day but I still wouldn't write this much with a pen. (Would the quality of writing improve if we took away all the keyboards?)

      To be sure, there are niche markets. It's a solid interface extension to existing touchscreen applications like POS and machine control, and it's a nice for sketching.

      But niche markets won't make for profitable software or affordable hardware. The problem is, in a nutshell, if you do it really well - get the tactile interaction just right, eliminate the display parallax, get the contrast up, get the pen as light and durable as a regular pen, even make the display flexible, make the whole thing weigh only a few hundred grams, and make it "instant-on," uncrashable, and with failsafe archival data retention and you've got....

      ...paper.

    6. Re:Why is why? by zobier · · Score: 1

      This seems as good a place as any to post about the subject, although this thread is getting quite old now.

      I keep reading peoples posts bitching and moaning about tablet computers. I'm writing this post on the screen of my TC1000 while reclining on my couch and playing Scrabble with my wife. By the way, my handwriting sux and this thing's very good at working out what I'm writing.

      l like my tablet computer and wouldn't trade it for your wiz-bang P4-m laptop. It's got a 1GHz Crusoe & 256MB RAM. The battery lasts for a long time.

      At work when I'm writing code I use the detachable fold-out keyboard that it came with and a USB mouse. It has VGA out aswell, So i can use it with an external monitor or projector in dual screen mode.

      It's great for reading and taking notes while standing on the train. Surfing the net while curled up on the sofa like you would with a good book, like I am now, is the best.

      I know that early adopters like myself pay a premium, the things already come down in price by nearly a third since i bought it, but that's OK because get good use out of it and it's a tax concession.

      The only problem I have had so far is trying to get Debian installed on it. It has no external drives but can boot from a USB CD drive though. I want to keep XP tablet edition (Huge improvement from '98) but the Compaq Quick Restore formats c:\. I need a way to non-destructively resize my (XP) NTFS.

      Regards,

      Mike :)

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    7. Re:Why is why? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Why are you so sure the tablet PC is doomed? It's just a slight evolution of the laptop concept

      I don't think so.

      The way you use a laptop and tablet are very different. The hardware might not be all that different, which is what you are probably thinking. But the two products are very different.

      The biggest thing is the stylus, a user interface designed for it, and including handwriting recognition.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:Why is why? by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

      "I'll sell you a Thinkpad 770 for fifty bucks!"

      Does that include shipping? If so, if he doesn't want it, I'll take it ;)

      --

      Physics is good

    9. Re:Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Of course it doesn't include shipping. "Shipping and handling" is where the profit margin is!

    10. Re:Why is why? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      In a couple years when we can get some nice ruggedized ones, we'll use them in place of the handhelds we're deploying to the field now. The clipboard-sized form factor is alot better for field work, and the increased screen size is a real boon to the inspectors, who have trouble writing notes into tiny text boxes and picking items from tiny list controls.

    11. Re:Why is why? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Very true. People used to complain that the Newton was too big to fit in your pocket. I would have liked it better if it had been just a little bigger.

  26. Damnit! by fastdecade · · Score: 1

    Linux on a tablet --- there goes the only reason I decided not to get a tablet PC.

  27. Touchscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Touchscreens suck for Tablets. I've been using a Toshiba Tablet PC since March and love that the screen is not sensitive to TOUCH, but only activated by the special PEN. That means when I rest my hand on the "page" to write in the journal the screen doesn't erroneously respond to that pressure as it does on those (cheaper) models which are touch sensitive. Also, when I flip my pen around it is recognized as an eraser. That, with the real-time feedback, makes it feel so much like writing on paper that I brush the "eraser shards" after erasing. When I use those other Tablets that are touch sensitive, I'd hate it.

    Please tell me Lycoris' Tablet supports WACOM pads...

    1. Re:Touchscreen? by thadk-- · · Score: 1

      I kind of liked the wrap-around-finger pen idea that one of the original linux tablets had as an accessory. You then get the advantage of convenience of using direct input and the flexibility of an RF tablet.

      I wonder if there is one available. If not someone should make one.

    2. Re: Touchscreen? by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      Touchscreens can be active OR passive. The ones that you appear to dislike are passive, as in PDA's. The active ones, found Wacom tablets and Official MS Tablet PC's (TM)(R)(PG-13) are much more common in Tablet PC's. So unless they specifically state passive digitizer, you can assume any Tablet PC should come with active digitizer. Well, any one made recently at least.

      Information not guaranteed to be more than 0% correct.

    3. Re: Touchscreen? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I happen to have it on very good authority that Wacom does not like to refer to their tablets as 'Touchscreens'.
      I agree with you though that an active (RF in the case of Wacom) is much better for this type of device than passive (resistive).

    4. Re:Touchscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a fujitsu P166 tablet computer (about 5-6 years old, i think) and i can easily rest my hand on it without it caring. It works great for writing (yes, erasing is *slightly* more inconvenient, as i usually have to press a button and then erase, but i can live with it). I also have pretty much instant feedback and some great note-takng software, all on windows 98! woohoo!

  28. Im interested... by rosewood · · Score: 1

    I have been wanting a Tablet PC and I really really dont have a desire to give any money to Microsoft for similar reasons on why I don't buy CDs. But thats for a whole different issue.

    Im more interested in this distro. Is there a demo version out there somewhere. I will probably spend more time looking deeply into this but is this the distro with the built in winex stuff that runs win32 apps easily?

    1. Re:Im interested... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a WineX add-on for games.

      You can download a copy at LinuxISO.org.

      I'd have to say that I've tried Lycoris and I'm rather impressed with it. It seems to be somewhat picky about what hardware it works with, but otherwise it is a fast, no-nonsense desktop. There is one well-chosen app for each task you could need, and the menu layout is simple and straightforward. I think they were even using Mozilla as the default browser before RedHat was. Everything is designed to look and work like, say, Windows 98; so it is an easy transition for almost anyone. The install is also very quick and easy; this is the one that lets you play solitare while it's copying files. There aren't really any installation options; you get the default install, but it will all fit on a 1gb disk.

      The only thing I can't really gauge is whether it would be as easy to upgrade/modify as a distro like Lindows that is based on Debian. Lycoris originally didn't offer development tools for download, but I think their new version has them. I would be somewhat worried, though, about the long-term financial viability of some of these smaller desktop distributions.

      I also used to think their productivity pack was something like AbiWord and Gnumeric because of the goofy pictures on their site, but I read somewhere that it is a modified version of OpenOffice.org.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  29. Do we even like Lycoris? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    This isn't a troll, I'm asking an honest question here...

    As near as I can tell, Lycoris is the artist formerly known as Lindows. They took freely available open source software, slapped a Windows-lookalike skin on the desktop, then started charging for the priviledge of using their specialized click-and-run installer.

    Something about them just rubs me the wrong way... Did they really do a lot of work to make open source an easier pill to swallow for the masses, or are they just prettying up the same stuff you can download yourself and slapped a price tag on it?

    From their blatent copying of Microsoft's GUI (and no I am not defending Microsoft, just stating the obvious), to taking free open source software and selling it as if it was their own, they seem like a company bent on profiting from the hard work of others. I don't think that's in the true spirit of free software.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Do we even like Lycoris? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Lycoris is the artist formerly known as Redmond Linux - just a small correction :). They do seem to be doing pretty much the same as LindowsOS though.

    2. Re:Do we even like Lycoris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lycoris was out before Lindows. As for the desktop.. the default KDE2.2 theme looked more like MS windows.

      As for the prettying up and price tag, you know where to get the source code, you do it yourself.

    3. Re:Do we even like Lycoris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, no, no. Lycoris is *not* Lindows.com. Lycoris is a completely different company and you can download their distro for free. They have a very dedicated and loyal user community at lycoris.org

      Their distro is based on old Caldera Openlinux code (hah! - will Sco sue them next?!?)

      Their goal, as near as I can tell, is to make a Linux distro your grandmother can use. And they do give back to the community.

      Lindows is a "pay-as-you-go" distro, based on Xandros (used-to-be Corel Linux), based on Debian. You can't download it for free, and their goal is to tackle Microsoft head-on. They used to advertise as "runs windows programs" but they have cut way back on that angle.

      Lycoris is not for everyone, but it might be right for everyone's grandmother.

    4. Re:Do we even like Lycoris? by PaulBeelee · · Score: 1

      I am a Lycoris user. I love their product. I had used Red Hat quite a bit, but settled on Lycoris. (They compete with Lindows btw, they are not the same company). I find Lycoris to be more stable, and certainly something I would recommend for a Linux newbie over something like Red Hat. You don't have as many pre-rolled apps with Lycoris (RPM's and such) as you do fo rsome of the bigger distro's, but what is there works a lot easier than on some other distros. Frankly, I, as a consumer, am willing to pay a company like Lycoris for doing all the hard work of configuring the software to make it easy for me to use. It saves me a lot of time and headaches.

  30. Handwriting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it do Handwriting recognition? Last time I checked I didn't see any Linux options for that. If it can't do that it seems pretty useless to me.

    1. Re:Handwriting by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1

      There seems to be no mention of it on there website, so I'm pretty sure it wont. Agreed, pretty useless without this feature. (Well maybe not useless, but seriously flawed anyway)

  31. Disposable computers - via C3 small FF like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A via eden system for $150 + external hard drive or flash card would fit perfectly.

    Upgrade every other year for whatever system is about $150.

  32. Tablet PC's & Rock & Roll = Fad-tastic by felonious · · Score: 1

    A tablet pc is to computing what Nsync is to Rock & Roll.

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:Tablet PC's & Rock & Roll = Fad-tastic by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ehh... may not quite THAT bad, but you're close.

      I think a properly done tablet PC would take hold in special markets (such as package delivery), where the devices used now are much more limited than a full-blown PC.

      (Look at the wireless slabs carried around by UPS drivers, for example. Sure, they get the job done pretty well - but I bet much more information could be presented to a driver if it was an actual tablet PC. Perhaps, an instant display of package tracking results for the current customer the driver is doing a daily pick-up for?)

      Generally though, I agree. Tablet computing is a solution in search of a problem -- and it's got just enough "cool" factor to convince retailers it's worth trying to sell, time and time again.

  33. Sleep? by SailorFrag · · Score: 1

    That's interesting

    I wonder what kernel they're using. Linux 2.4.x does not support ACPI S3 sleep, and it seems surprising that they would ship a 2.5.x kernel. I can't wait to take a look at the sources they release.

    1. Re:Sleep? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not like they're actually capable of adding said functionality to 2.4.x themselves.

      (I'm in a sarcastic mood today.)

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:Sleep? by SailorFrag · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it would prove rather difficult.

      In fact, the Linux ACPI development project has declared it impossible.

      I couldn't find the direct quote, but this sums up the situation.

      Basically, the framework for notifying each device driver that the system is sleeping/waking up is not possible with 2.4. There were major changes in 2.5 to add support for this.

    3. Re:Sleep? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      I sit informed.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  34. But how does it work with the GIMP? by The_Great_Satan · · Score: 1

    ???

    Will pressure sensitivity work right out of the box? Or not at all?

    Can it output to a seperate monitor? The viewscreen's a bit small for art purposes - sure you can zoom in for details but an artist also needs to see how the full image is going to look at its print dimensions.

    I'd love to be free from wacom/adobe/microsoft, I don't know if the Lycoris tablet will do the trick but it's an exciting step in the right direction.

  35. Handwriting? by rlobrecht · · Score: 1

    No mention of handwriting recognition. The on screen keyboard is nice and all, but to make a table really useful, it going to have to recognize handwriting.

  36. WHAT!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, hell... No wonder sleep never worked on my desktop.

  37. Whiny Little Condensending Trolls. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We went through all this crap back when Lycoris released build 43 and finally got attention as a viable contender for the Linux desktop market. Half the damn posts where "3ww, 100k$ 1|k3 Wind0z3! T3h sUx0r!" Get a grip, its just KDE2 with a similar picture as the default background. The most it comes to copying windows is by arranging its "control panel" to look similar to Windows XPs.

    What? Do you pricks think everyone should only have a term? Maybe run a tablet with 1 key so you can input commands in oh so 133t binary? If you want to bang your head against the wall and jerk off to your command prompt, use the approprate distro and let the people that like to actually use a GUI have one that works for them.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    1. Re:Whiny Little Condensending Trolls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I wish I could mod you up. That was fucking great.

  38. HAHA by JewFish · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your saying that a commericial version of Linux is popular. I laugh just hearing the words Linux and popular in the same context, but throw in the commericial fact and it should make you want to fall out of your chair.

    ya right like I am going to pay $30 to get a "popular" Linux

  39. Hand-writing recognition? by sameyeam · · Score: 1

    From what I can see, it doesn't do handwritten input...so what's the point? Without decent handwriting recognition or some accessible form of easy on the move input these sort of devices are going to fall flat on their faces.

    What's the point of lugging around something so big, then having to resort to typing using the on-screen keyboard with one finger (tiny on-screen keyboard+the hand your holding it in)? You may as well have some form of PDA or even...just a good old pad and paper. At least Microsoft is making an *effort* with the handwriting thing. *evil grin*

    IMO, there's no market for these as a general web-browsing consumer type device where the touch-screen idea would work. I like the idea in principle but see it more as something I'd drag around with me the office with me taking notes in meetings etc. For that an on screen keyboard/touchscreen isn't gonna cut it.

  40. Re:crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me goes to espn.com

    what is all this sports crap

    does anyone really care this much about sports

    man, i read all these articles and they're all about sports

    what a bunch of crap

    fuck sports and fuck you too

  41. Why copy anyone? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Why should they copy anyone? Why not come up with something workable and original?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Why copy anyone? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Any suggestions?

      I've thought a lot about this, but as sub-standard as the current way of doing things is, I can't really think of another that would work to any degree.

      Especially now that everyone is used to the Windows/KDE/Gnome/Mac OS/Everything else way of doing things... there's a lot to be said for familiarity, that's why all the interfaces you see are so similar.

  42. Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like the OS can be downloaded from http://www.lycoris.org. Has anyone here tried it? They've pretty much taken KDE, reskinned it, added a network browser and packaged it "For the whole family".

    1. Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      I have, it's fairly nifty (although I tried it under VMWare, there was enough support within the community to allow it to run quickly enough to enjoy it).

      In the simplest terms, it's as hard to work with in the CLI as any mainstream GUI addicted user will find, but as easy to get to the CLI as Windows is (usually run>cmd in the windows environ). However, since it's well designed enough for newbie needing net usage, it takes little to no time for a beginner to track down the documentation needed to operate it.

      It does the "Windows cannot find the nessesary program to open this file, please choose it" routine when you double click on an unfamiliar file, and others take a little work to get around.

      However, as far as "idiot friendly" Linux distros go, it IS the best. It's friendly, a very familiar environment. It's only true flaw, IMO, is the horrible text inherant in KDE desktops everywhere.

      If not for needing an OS that allowed me to run everything (applications, mainstream released games, etc), I would move to Lycoris in a heartbeat.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I think the text problem is because they are using an older version of KDE and XFree86-3.x. The newest versions of XFree86-4.3, KDE and GNOME have excellent AA as can be seen in Red Hat 9. I don't know why Lycoris is using such old stuff. The video driver support is also better in the latest version of XFree86-4.3.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    3. Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      I have not only tried it. I use this on my man personal computer. It is the first distro I ran across that wasn't hell to get on the internet and be able to do something useful in the GUI.

      My Complaints:
      #1. It uses /usr instead of /usr/local as its prefix which makes compiling and installing stuff a pain in the ass.
      #2. Video modes for the desktop cannot be switched without restarting the xserver.
      #3. Thier version of Mozilla keeps turning on popups for some dumbass reason.
      #4. It really should come with mplayer.
      #5. You absolutely _have_ to get the devtools iso as well in order to install any extra software.

      Tip: go ahead and download the beta build (should be around 84 or 85 now.) It is much more advanced than clunky old build 46 (stable). :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    4. Re:Has anyone tried Lycoris OS? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      There's a simple and reasonable reason. They're using what is considered as proven and stable code, just like everyone else does when it comes to incorporating "new" concepts into their OS.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  43. Re:We who? by getling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not meant as a flame, but take it as you will.

    Why do /.ers feel the need to have the herd mentality about products and politics especially? Are that many people coming here to have their opinions spoon-fed to them that they have to have a stamp of approval on products WE think are good (or reject those that WE feel are bad)?

    Whatever happened to reading sources and forming a coherent opinion all your own?

    Or am I expecting too much?

    --
    "Life is tough but we're tougher. You only get what you give, so give all that you've got." --Tony LaRussa
  44. The free software myth. by mindstrm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free software is not about what you think it is about. It's about freedom for the software itself.

    Free software is not about giving away software for free. If you can take free software, and bundle it in such a way that you have an edge, and can make money off it... that's great. Go for it.

    Yes, Lindows did do a lot of work to make linux get out there into people's homes. They have a deal with a MAJOR outlet to sell lindows preloaded on pcs. That sounds good to me.

    It's not the job of everyone who works with open source to "promote open source". Not everyone is a holy crusader.

    Lindows has caused a lot of people to use linux who otherwise wouldn't, becuase of how their products are sold. They abide by the licenses of the software they are given, and found a way to profit from it. That's not something to complain about.. and frankly, all the complaining every time someone makes money off open source while still complying with licenses is what gives open source a bad name.

    Do I think lindows is technically a great feat? Hell no, but I don't see anything wrong with what they are doing. If you release something under GPL, you should not be upset when someone takes it, packages it, and sells it. Your license, after all, permitted it.

    If the authors did not want people to sell or use their products in this manner, the licenses would refect that fact.

    1. Re:The free software myth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lindows has caused a lot of people to use linux who otherwise wouldn't..."

      Yeah? Name one.

      Seriously, the hardcore Linux geeks put their parents (or whoever) on Mandrake or Red Hat, and everyone else who buys a cheap-o PC just runs Windows (pirated copy or not). Seriously, I doubt that there are even 1000 PCs running Lindows out there. Most of them have long since been reformatted to something else.

    2. Re:The free software myth. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Really? Where did you get that statistic from? Or are you just guessing?

  45. TabletPCs by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been working with the Compaq TC1000 TabletPC for a while. We got in several for the office and I got one for me to look at. At first it just seems to be a small notebook...but once you use it for its intended purpose you'll see it has advantages. The longer battery life is nice. The Compaq screen can detach from the keyboard to make it smaller and lighter. I normally carry it like a legal pad. The handwriting recognition is EXCELLENT and I can't write worth a damn. It's much better than any PDA I've used, and this is without even using any special type of writing. It's also comfy to sit back on the couch and read your favorite sites with a small device.

    Give me a good 16 hours of battery life and I'll be real happy. The only real downside I've found is the screen. Since it is a touch screen it is not as clear as a normal LCD monitor. But, at least on the Compaq, it never gets fingerprints on it like most PDAs.

  46. Now I can finally switch my tablet to Linux! by rayd75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because all I've been waiting for is a crappy on-screen keyboard that takes up 60% of my 10 inches of screen real-estate. Long gone will be the days of handwriting recognition that is unthinkably accurate (after a week of training).... Now I can switch to Linux and peck at 2mm buttons with a stylus that is accurate to half of that at best. Way to go!

    Seriously, I'm afraid that this falls into the category of products that make "Joe User" think that Linux (+GNU) is a cheap knock-off of Windows. I mean, the functionality is truely useful but it really doesn't warrant the creation of a separate product. To do so only puts its shortcomings in the spotlight.

  47. Re:We who? by cranos · · Score: 1

    Herd Mentality on /.?? Surely not. Sure I expect a Hurd Mentality but I think you'll find that there are enough "discussions" on here that could quite possibly be classified as holy wars to disprove the "Herd Mentality" idea.

  48. Re:NAACP officially calls republicans nazis by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    "Confederate swastika"? Is that like when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  49. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1
    a) because they cost more than that to make

    b) because companies exist to make profit, not practically give stuff away

    c) because people will pay more than $400

    My response:

    a) Bullshit. The average laptop is only worth about $250 in parts bought in bulk. Tablets are only slightly more expensive due to the touchscreen. But the form factor reduces the cost.

    b) Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.

    c) Because people have no choice but to pay more than $400. If a company got wise and decided to make a laptop for $300, they'd make a killing because everybody and his brother would buy one. Even if the quality wasn't as high. Smart people are more concerned with cost than anything else. The sheep who pay too much for a status symbol are just idiots. Sounds like you just might be an idiot.

  50. Too Expensive by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

    The reason why the tablet PC will never take off is that it's as expensive if not more so than the average laptop. What's the point in that? The tablet, as far as the end-user goes, appears to be an oversized PDA. But there is an order of magnitude in pricepoints between even a high end PDA and a low end tablet PC. As long as Microsoft thinks they are only going to sell these to the corporate market, that's fine, but what we really need is a new niche market for low-priced wireless computing devices that are more powerful than PDAs but not necessarily as state of the art as the most recent laptops, but have all the modern peripherals and wireless features (unlike a used laptop).

    1. Re:Too Expensive by rlobrecht · · Score: 1

      You can get a FIC Slatevision for about $1300 these days. Its not the nicest tablet on the block, but it is pretty cheap if you're buying based on price. That's about twice what a high end HP Pocket PC is.

  51. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>a) Bullshit. The average laptop is only worth about $250 in parts bought in bulk. Tablets are only slightly more expensive due to the touchscreen. But the form factor reduces the cost.

    You can barely even get an LCD monitor for $250 retail (lowest LCD price on pricewatch is $196 for a 14"), let alone the motherboard, processor, hard drive, battery, CD/DVD drive, keyboard, trackpad, case, power adaptor, and RAM. I know things are a lot cheaper in bulk, but I don't see them becoming cheap enough to justify your $250.

    >>b) Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.

    Then move into a commune.

    >>c) Because people have no choice but to pay more than $400. If a company got wise and decided to make a laptop for $300, they'd make a killing because everybody and his brother would buy one. Even if the quality wasn't as high. Smart people are more concerned with cost than anything else. The sheep who pay too much for a status symbol are just idiots. Sounds like you just might be an idiot.

    IF such a company would make a killing, I'm sure that you could start it. We'll see how you do. You sell $250 worth of stuff at $300 and we'll see if you sell enough to make it worth your time and the risk.

  52. Handwriting Recognition? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think they seriously forgot something... I didn't see any mention of handwriting recognition.

    Without that, it defeats the whole point of a tablet PC. That silly onscreen keyboard makes it slower to enter data at the expense of wearing out the touchscreen and taking up screen realestate.

    This is a silly flop. I cannot believe a company would release something like this without even offering something so basic that has been on tablet machines since the Qbe. Aren't there any open source handwriting recognition libraries they could have used?

    It's really quite useless like this.

    1. Re:Handwriting Recognition? by Georules · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I completly agree, and don't know why you were only given a score of 1, this is one of the few relavent replies I see.

  53. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    b) Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.

    um, you're in college, right? maybe you want to get a job and work for a company that doesn't make a profit? companies that serv e the customer best (except in cases of monopolies) are the most profitable. but hey, we're all idealists here at /.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  54. Handwriting Recognition by Poeir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I checked the site, and I couldn't find any mention of handwriting recognition. Does anyone have any idea what the quality of the Lycoris' (or another Linux distro for tablet PCs) handwriting recognition quality is?

    Also, where could I buy this, and what would it cost?

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  55. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1
    um, you're in college, right?
    Um, wrong. I'm a 33 year old guy who works in IT doing a LOT of really cool stuff.
    maybe you want to get a job and work for a company that doesn't make a profit?

    You're right on that count. I work for a non-profit organization because I believe it's the right thing to do. The organization I work for provides a lot of really cool stuff to people who need it, at no cost. And I still manage to live well. Even through the dot-bomb bubble that the neocons brought on themselves.


    companies that serve the customer best (except in cases of monopolies) are the most profitable. but hey, we're all idealists here at /.

    That's the way it should be. Companies should serve the customer first, the company second and the shareholders last.

    Profit motive is just a poor excuse for greed.

  56. You should take a look at the MSFT Tablet... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ability to play with the UI using just a pen does not equal a Tablet PC.

  57. hibernate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Among the power features of the tablet was a hibernation mode. Does anyone have any info on this? Last I checked, linux hibernation was somewhat lacking, at best.

  58. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you're doing good stuff but you're really annoying.

  59. When did Lycoris NOT look like WinXP? by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    Lycoris Destop, like the tablet version, is like WinXP, and that's really just a style that they chose for some reason (though I personally hate the Windows default interface... it reminds me of preschool toys). Dosn't mean that the entire OS is ripped off of XP. The inner workings are substantially different.

    Since it uses KDE, you should be able to configure just about everything about the interface if you have an internet conneciton. A great site to get new styles for the interface is here

  60. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    i strongly recommend you read milton friedman. the greatest thing a company can do is maximize profit. if they do otherwise, then one, they misallocate resources, which hurts not only their workers who cannot receive the fullest compensation, they also hurt the economy because they waste scarce resources that could be used elsewhere. also, if they do not maximizr profit, they must make it up accordingly with higher prices, which does not "serve" the customer.

    now, you choose, in a free market to work for a non-profit. but would youy like to live in a country that says you can only make X, and no more. for all the idealism that runs wild here at /., let's face it, the best economic system is capitalism. that's undeniable.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  61. But have you used one? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    After using mine for a short time I noticed that I prefer the tablet for screen navigation far and above the track pad or nub. I think once the prices come down and more people discover this, they will show up even in larger, more traditional laptop type Tablet PCs.

  62. Re:NAACP officially calls republicans nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wish the NAACP didn't officially think of Republicans as nazi swastica flying racists.

    Yeah... I bet nazis everywhere are cringing at that.

  63. Does this use the pen drivers from linuxslate? by mateo650 · · Score: 1

    I configure my fujitsu using drivers from http://www.linuxslate.org/

    This site has some great resouces for slate users.

  64. ProGear by levanjm · · Score: 1

    I have one of SonicBlue ProGear Tablets. It is the 1050 HX version (Linux). These have been out a few years, and the prices have gone from $2500 to $400-$500 on EBay. There has been some work done towards porting a full version of Linux to the ProGear. Check out the following group for more info: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/progear/

  65. No, call it Linux with training wheels. by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Informative
    Lycoris is based in Redmond, Washington. Joseph Cheek, the person who is project leader, is an ex-Microserf. He's also put together a damn fine distro. That takes some doing, considering he had the misfortune to choose Caldera as the distro he forked to create it.

    They are not pulling a Robertson and keeping their tools closed-source. Aside from Iris, their easy-install software gallery, they have released source on everything that makes Lycoris Lycoris. I would rather give an absolute beginner Lycoris than, say, Mandrake. You can get lost in Mandrake if you are a newbie.

    I worry about the future of Lycoris because of this hideous, screwed-up SCO mess. I worry because what Joseph and his buddies have put together is really, really good, and they had the "it just works" thing down even before Mandrake got the hang of it. Yeah, Lycoris is designed to be Windows-refugee friendly. It doesn't mean what they are doing doesn't have value.

    If you want to see the real face of Lycoris, stop in at http://www.lycoris.org/ and check out the community behind it. There's some good people there. And nobody will tell you to "man man" there.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  66. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember this?

    Those were to be made by StepUp Computing and to be sold at $799. The same company that now sells Windows Tablet PCs for over one grand.

  67. Hell yeah by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

    You thought M$ and Fisher-Price had a joint venture? Hope you can change that theme.

  68. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by some+damn+guy · · Score: 1

    Companies exisiting for profit is the worst approach. They should exist for the customer. We should be their masters, not the other way around.

    The customer IS the master, the problem is, they aren't the ONLY master of a business. A company needs money, and lots of it, to get started and keep going. This means investors and creditors, and unfortunately they expect something in return for the hassle of giving their money to someone else. You would too. Have a 401k? If they are going to give their hard-earned money to someone to piss away without profit, it usually goes to finding a cure for AIDS or something more useful than providing cheap laptops to middle-class schmucks.

  69. The drawback to to an RF stylus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They constantly get misplaced at the worst possible times and are expensive to replace.

  70. Needs SW with better pen support by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    MS has a very nice feature in Office XP that allows you to directly draw diagrams into e-mails and Word documents using the pen. This feature was developed specifically for use with the Tablet PC (though I think it would be useful for any PC with a pen and tablet). I would like to see this feature incorperated into non-MS software (such as Thunderbird for instance). Maybe with more features like this the Linux Tabler PC would be more attractive.

  71. Microsoft is screwed by baker_tony · · Score: 1

    Wow, now I know where Windows XP copied it's interface from, blah, blah, bash, bash, more law suits. If most of you geeks say that everything Microsoft does is rubbish, doesn't it make this interfeace shiit by default?

  72. Have a Tablet PC, how do I get this software? by ewanrg · · Score: 1

    Saw the story announcement and followed the link. Demo certainly looks interesting. Went to the Lycoris store, and no listing showing the product available. Started scanning through the site, and no evidence that it could be DL'd anywhere.

    Shouldn't a product actually be available before being promoted so heavily?

  73. List of Supported Tablets? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    I checked the site, and I couldn't find any mention of handwriting recognition.

    There are handwriting recognition programs available for Linux, including several under the GPL, but you are correct that the Lycoris website, which does have a "keyboard free" section, only seems to mention a software keyboard (xvkdb perhaps?) and not handwriting recognition as such. I too would be interested in a clarification of this, although I suspect the virtual software keyboard is the only form on 'keyboard free' input available at the moment (it is what we use on our GNU/Linux tablets as well).

    A more important question for me, as an administrator who works for a firm that deploys several dozen GNU/Linux tablets (Fujitsu Stylistic 3400s and LPT-600s at present) is, do they have a list of supported tablets and are the latest Fujitsus on that list? Such a list would be invaluable when it comes to evaluating new hardware, and if their distro is as good and seemless as they make it sound, we would certainly buy a copy for consideration.

    Alas, their website seems to be very lacking in that information as well. Hopefully someone from Lycoris is reading this thread and can comment and/or update the information on their web page.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  74. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1
    If they are going to give their hard-earned money to someone to piss away without profit, it usually goes to finding a cure for AIDS or something more useful than providing cheap laptops to middle-class schmucks.

    While this is a really nice sentiment this doesn't happen much if at all unless:
    -They are going to get a tax break
    -It's going to increase their opportunities for more revenue (Think Microsoft "giving" PCs to public schools and libraries)
    -There is basically something that they stand to gain from their "charity"

    Giving something to a good cause should have not strings attached to it. Again... we get back to the basic problem of control. These companies want more influence over our lives than they rightfully should have.

  75. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe you're doing good stuff but you're really annoying.

    To cop a phrase from someone else... If I'm not annoying "them" then I'm not working hard enoughat it. Someone has to be responsible for getting people to think about things a bit.

  76. Lycoris is based on Caldera (SCO). Remember them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.lycoris.org/faq.php?myfaq=yes&id_cat=6& categories=General

    Q: What distro is Desktop/LX based on?
    A: It's based on Caldera's Workstation 3.1.

  77. Re:Listen UP - low cost is more important than spe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. misses the whole point of a $300-$400 tablet, laptop or small form factor complete PC.

    Those machines could be used by just about everyone, including people in countries where $300 is many months pay.

    Secondly, those machines could be used as disposable computers where you trade them in for the newest model, just like a used car.

    The open brick, and other mini-itx systems where you never open the case will work and will solve many of the current problems users have with computers.

    Here's the system:
    1. mini-itx system with built in memory, cpu, flash memory, video out, network
    2. external USB hard disk or even store data off of a network disk
    3. bootable OS media either off flash card, off the network disk, or off a CD-ROM. Knoppix is a start.

    This is simple to adminster and upgrade.

    Since there are no local read/write disks for a user in a business setting, there is no software to configure for each user. --> only a hardware or network failure can cause a support call.

    Upgrades end up being a swap of the entire cpu unit instead of opening the case.

  78. Parititions and Crusoes by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Isn't XP pretty good at resizing partitions? If not, there's always Partition Magic. Though if you don't mind the extra expense, running Linux and Windows side by side is a lot handier than dual booting.

    I saw a TC1000 in a store, and totally fell in love with the physical design: it's a tablet and a laptop with an oversized swivel screen. But I was put off by the Crusoe processor. I had a Sony sub-laptop that used it, and there was a nasty delay starting new apps. Didn't seem very economical of power either, though maybe you can blame that on Sony featuritis.

  79. Modbombing by Pervertus · · Score: 2

    It was me who modbombed you, because you disabled comments in your journal entry! No go back and enable them before I rape your comments further!
    (and befriend me, too. I have no friends and it depresses me so much)