Slashdot Mirror


DefCon WiFi Shootout Winner Announced

devn2k writes "At the first annual WiFi Shootout at DefCon in Las Vegas, Adversarial Science Lab won the contest to shoot a wireless signal across the Nevada desert, with a distance of 35.2196 miles. The antenna was built from metal poles, window screen mesh, cardboard, duct tape, and aluminum foil! According to the official contest page, the antenna was designed the night before the contest, its component parts were purchased for $98 at Home Depot, and the next day it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain."

196 comments

  1. Pretty Damn Impressive... by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... If you ask me. 98 Dollars of crap you find at a Home Improvement store makes an antenna that blasts across as small desert.

    Ingenuity++;


    I take my hat off to these guys.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more impressive is that they built it on July 31st, the day before the convention. And they almost got thrown out of Home Depot for staying close to closing time fretting over which parts to get.

    2. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by GreggBert · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, but they don't tell you about the guy having to hold onto it with one hand while twirling a metal hool-a-hoop with the other hand and hoping up and down on one foot while wearing an aluminum foil beanie.

      Still pretty impressive though. I wonder what they could do about my crappy cable TV service if I have them a $150 home depot gift card ?

      --


      If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
    3. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by sporty · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure their success is attributed more to knowing what you are doing in a McGyver'ish way than simply hacking.

      That special knowledge that is the difference between the guy who buys dirt for a garden versus one who knows what to plant and mix in to make soil healthier.

      Yeah, anyone can make a bomb with the proper chemicals, but can YOU do it with bubble gum, a piece of thread and a muffin? :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    4. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      "but can YOU do it with bubble gum, a piece of thread and a muffin?"

      I'd need a small apple and a paperclip, otherwise the detonator wouldn't work properly.

    5. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by femto · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Yeah, anyone can make a bomb with the proper chemicals, but can YOU do it with bubble gum, a piece of thread and a muffin? :)

      Easy!

      You eat the muffin, stick the bubble gum over your rear end and fart until you have a nice big bubble full of explosive gas. You then poke the bit of thread into the bubble to act as a fuse. Done and ready to light.

    6. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by O_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Wow.. Exactly, even if you know what you are doing, to design this the nigth before and win the contest with duct tape is just awesome!!

      Like PP said, hats off!

      --
      Into MMORPG's? Check it out!
    7. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by hashinclude · · Score: 2, Informative

      While it *is* impressive that these people are doing this over 36 miles (56 kms) from non-commercial equipment, IIT Kanpur has already done this over 40 kms (25 miles) using ordinarily available parabolic antennae (no Pringles available ;)

      And, IIRC, there was a project a while back to do the same over 72 miles (which also succeeded)

      --
      US is now divided as the "Red" and "blue" states. Red States = communist countries. Coincidence? I think not
    8. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by Skord · · Score: 1

      No, they got the parts and did the design on the day before, built it mostly with duct tape after trekking up a mountain on a rainy desert day. The rain was COLD and these guys were dedicated. All the winning teams at DEFCON this year seemed to have overcome crazy odds to come out on top. It was my first con, but it won't be my last.

    9. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1, Funny

      +1 informative

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    10. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      Damn that was one sorry post...but it has me laughing my ass off.

    11. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by iworm · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's +1 Flamebait if ever I saw it ;-)

    12. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by pyser · · Score: 3, Informative

      Impressive yes, but typical of what ham radio operators do all the time. (Many of the ASL team members are hams, as was mentioned in the story.) We're always building equipment out of such mundane stuff as tuna fish cans and coat hangers, and making contacts around the world.

    13. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by sporty · · Score: 1

      Is that like the Daffy Duck magnificent feat? You can only do it once ;) Lessse you do it twice w/o getting personal w/ someone else :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    14. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by orasio · · Score: 1

      -1 Gross

    15. Re:Pretty Damn Impressive... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      A small Apple? How's an Apple IIc+?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  2. U S A, U S A, U S A... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Funny

    the antenna was designed the night before the contest, its component parts were purchased for $98 at Home Depot, and the next day it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain.

    This, and watching the US team whip the Brits on Junkyard Wars, is the reason that I'm proud to be an American.

    I think I'm about to cry...

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:U S A, U S A, U S A... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just stop, the more you post the more you seem like a "dropped baby"

    2. Re:U S A, U S A, U S A... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taboo, I haven't seen so many (-1 Flamebait)s since I fucked the Queen.....

  3. Desert? Rain? by SUPAMODEL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn, I guess for US$98 you *can* change the weather :).

    1. Re:Desert? Rain? by bo0push3r · · Score: 1

      well, for all the ad dollars they get, you'd think the weather channel would be able to get on top of their shit then.

  4. What no pringles can? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2, Funny

    The antenna was built from metal poles, window screen mesh, cardboard, duct tape, and aluminum foil!
    I think I just felt Procter and Gambles stock dropping (I mean those things aren't good for eating; that's for sure.).

    1. Re:What no pringles can? by Timesprout · · Score: 1, Funny

      But they picked up agian when it was revealed that the receiver for this antenna signal was an array of 25,000 pringle cans

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  5. ... and by Quixote · · Score: 4, Funny
    the antenna was designed the night before the contest, its component parts were purchased for $98 at Home Depot, and the next day it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain...

    You forgot to add "...while walking uphill, in a blinding snowstorm..." followed by the obligatory "... and we liked it!".

    1. Re:... and by soliaus · · Score: 1

      Hey now, the nevada desert isnt that hot...its only death valle (well, close too...(kind of)). I saw some of the parabolic dishes hauled out to the desert in the chill out room at the con this year, some of those things were fugn huge.

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
    2. Re:... and by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      Well, it was uphill, and it was cold and rainy on the mountainside. And they did win :)

  6. and by objwiz · · Score: 1

    it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain while walking up hill with no shoes.

  7. hah.. listen to this... by jkrise · · Score: 1, Funny

    I couldn't move a single bit of data between two WinXP Home systems sitting RIGHT NEXT to each other! The damn thing doesn't support netwroking...

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:hah.. listen to this... by Surak · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't move a single bit of data between two WinXP Home systems sitting RIGHT NEXT to each other! The damn thing doesn't support netwroking...

      Errrmmm...yes, actually it DOES support networking.

    2. Re:hah.. listen to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But it doesn't support netwroking. I'm not sure what that is exactly, but I have a feeling it involves truly understanding your bowl-shaped frying pan remotely.

    3. Re:hah.. listen to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a pointy haired boss. You see... early civilizations had no concept of zero... and...

    4. Re:hah.. listen to this... by brakk · · Score: 1

      Networking? I thought these things were just used for sniffing out others.

  8. Big desert by sosume · · Score: 2, Funny

    with a distance of 35.2196 miles

    That's one whopping distance! Isn't the radius of Earth about 40.000 km? Or did they point the antenna in the wrong direction?

    1. Re:Big desert by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Isn't the radius of Earth about 40.000 km

      Oooh, that's why I can never see my neighbors' feet under the horizon ...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Big desert by briaman · · Score: 1

      Earth is only 80km across? Boy, no wonder property is so expensive!

      --

      ==========
      Error in module creativity.dll : Unable to create witty comment.
      Abort / Retry / Ignore ?

    3. Re:Big desert by soliaus · · Score: 1
      I cant help myself...

      Thats a "Decimal Point"
      Not a "Period".

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
    4. Re:Big desert by fbjon · · Score: 1

      That depends on where in the world you live.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Big desert by sosume · · Score: 0

      Hehe, I couldn't figure the correct translation. (and still can't --maybe the sun)

      I meant: if you go hiking in one direction and keep walking indefinitely, you'll travel about 40.000 km before you're home again;)

      And yes, I've seen that there are four figures behind the decimal point.

    6. Re:Big desert by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 1

      poster said "diameter" not radius. diameter = pi * 2r.

      6,370 * 2 = 12,740
      12,740 * 3.14159 = 40,023.8566

      Add to that the fact that Europeans use . to separate thousands from hundreds, and , as a decimal point, and the original poster was fairly correct. Just misguided.

      --
      Karma: Ran over your dogma.
    7. Re:Big desert by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, that's circumference you just calculated there.

      --
      ...
    8. Re:Big desert by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      No, that was a "period" (full stop for those of us who have female companionship).

      This is a decimal point: 314159

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    9. Re:Big desert by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      Fucking brilliant, I make a stupid joke and shitty slashcode fucks the fucker up. Fuck.

      Try again:

      This is a decimal point: 3·14159

      Slashdot won't let me put a decimal point. Why am I not suprised.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    10. Re:Big desert by operagost · · Score: 1

      This is a comedy of errors. Each poster tries to correct the last one and screws it up.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Big desert by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Except for my post, right?

      --
      ...
    12. Re:Big desert by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, we use the comma "," to seperate sections of our numbers (1,000) and "." to designate the decimal stuff (1.00).

      Your way is clearly retarded.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    13. Re:Big desert by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 1

      Er, right. I think I was thinking what the original poster was thinking, but still not applying the right name. If only I'd had enough coffee yesterday...

      --
      Karma: Ran over your dogma.
  9. yeah by freedommatters · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    keep frying your brain cells guys

    1. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WiFI, another air polution solution.

      I feel the headage already...

  10. Pfff, been done before by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain.

    Why buy $98 worth of equipment at Home Depot and take the trouble of making tinfoil emitters when you can just dance to get rain in the desert?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Pfff, been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the hell did that get modded "informative" ? :-) /me thinks there should be a tougher selection than /dev/random to select Slashdot moderators ...

  11. Obligatory Python Joke by PakProtector · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody expects the Adversarial Science Lab! Our main construction material is Metal Poles!

    Metal poles and Window Screen Mesh!

    Two construction materials! Our Two Weapons are Metal Poles, Window Screen Mesh, and Cardboard!

    Our Three Main Construction Materials are Metal Poles, Window Screen Mesh, Cardboard! And Duct Tape!

    Among our CHIEF building materials are such diverse materials as Metal Poles, Window Screen Mesh, Cardboard, Duct Tape, and Aluminum Foil!


    Oh, bother. I'll come again.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Obligatory Python Joke by B.C.+of+the+VRWC · · Score: 2, Funny

      And. . . an almost fanatical devotion to the PPPoE.

    2. Re:Obligatory Python Joke by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Oh, I give up! You do it! There, go outside.

      ...

      I wasn't expecting the Adversarial Science Lab!

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  12. Ummm what rain? by el-spectre · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was at defcon, and it was 9 million friggin' degrees all weekend (I have the sunburn to prove it).

    Unless of course they did it before I awoke at noon each day...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Ummm what rain? by soliaus · · Score: 1

      It rained slightly on friday. On thursday though, there was more rain than I have seen in months (I live in vegas).

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
    2. Re:Ummm what rain? by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      it was 9 million friggin' degrees all weekend

      Farrenheight or centigrade?

    3. Re:Ummm what rain? by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1
      I thought we weren't allowed to go out while the sun was up? [runs hissing to the basement... and the 110 blocks. >:D]

    4. Re:Ummm what rain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      friggin

  13. shape of the antenna by ih8apple · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Notice that the shape of the winning antenna is a pyramid? There are a lot of theories regarding electromagnetism and the pyramid shape, including a bunch on how the ancient egyptians figured out how to utilize these electromagnetic properties, which is (supposedly) why the pyramids were built that way.

    If you want to get kooky, it can also point to the extra terrestrial origins of ancient egyptian civilization.

    1. Re:shape of the antenna by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Funny

      From this it should be pretty obvious that the pyramids were just early prototypes for pringle cans where someone got their scale units mixed up.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:shape of the antenna by throwaway18 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > There are a lot of theories regarding electromagnetism and the pyramid shape
      True, however only the theorys that involve Maxwell's equations and a lot of advance mathematics can actually be used to predict the behaviour of electromagnetic waves in antennas. A theory involving aliens building pyramids will not tell you what angle the sides of your horn antenna should flare out at.

    3. Re:shape of the antenna by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 0

      1. make antenna to contact the aliens that built the pyramids
      2. ask them what oyur antenna horn flare should be
      3. ????
      4. Profit!

      Note: step 1 may require recursion...

    4. Re:shape of the antenna by fritter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Notice that the shape of the winning antenna is a pyramid? There are a lot of theories regarding electromagnetism and the pyramid shape, including a bunch on how the ancient egyptians figured out how to utilize these electromagnetic properties, which is (supposedly) why the pyramids were built that way.

      If you want to get kooky, it can also point to the extra terrestrial origins of ancient egyptian civilization.


      That makes perfect sense! The aliens, feeling like outsiders in this new place, built gigantic 802.11 antennas to download porn and MP3s from their home planet.

      If it wasn't for the unacceptably long ping times, they would still be with us today.

    5. Re:shape of the antenna by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So that's what those "ancient astronauts" were doing: Cruising the galaxy, warp-driving for pr0n!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:shape of the antenna by rootnl · · Score: 1

      It also explains the shape of a wigwam, how els do the Indians send smoke signals when it rains?

      --

      We are the people our parents warned us about.
    7. Re:shape of the antenna by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the pyramids wern't built that way because it was stable and allowed you to use the finished sides of the building as a ramp. No, it has to be some weird theory involving technologies they wouldn't have the slightest idea about.

      Here I was figuring the winning team went for a pyramid because the shape is good for conducting electromagnetic waves _and_ is easy to build with a simple metal screen and tubes.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:shape of the antenna by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Yes, but horn antennas must have a fairly long taper to maintain phase coherence. The Pyramids of Egypt would not be effective antennas.

    9. Re:shape of the antenna by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      "That makes perfect sense! The aliens, feeling like outsiders in this new place, built gigantic 802.11 antennas to download porn and MP3s from their home planet. If it wasn't for the unacceptably long ping times, they would still be with us today."

      Naw, their version of the RIAA took care of that a LOOONG time ago. You think all the people being abducted here are random? Nope, they are interstellar music thieves in disguise.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    10. Re:shape of the antenna by cybercuzco · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except the Pyramids were made of nonconducting sandstone and limestone, and were about as good antennas as say, a small mountain. I.e. they block electromagnetic waves rather than concentrating them. Now if the pyramids were made out of aluminum and duct tape, you may have had something.

      --

    11. Re:shape of the antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. the pyramids have a layer/sheet of mica in the middle of the walls which allows all that non conducting material to become a perfectly good conductor.

    12. Re:shape of the antenna by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Or, if you really want to be a little more reasonable along those lines, the aliens come down to visit, tell us how to make said antennaes, so that when they leave, we can still contact them.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  14. i can see it now... by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

    ... big f'in antenna on the roof of my house... community wide network... KING OF BAYSIDE QUEENS! ALL HAIL THE WIFI GOD! really though, these "do it at home" projects just get my blood pumpin'...

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
  15. Alvarion Swedish? by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just a quick correction to the article: The Guinness World Book of Records distance for a wi-fi link is 310 kilometers, and was set by the Swedish company Alvarion.

    Alvarion is not Swedish (in fact, it's basically BreezeCom in new clothing), but the record was set with the help of SSC, the Swedish Space Corporation. Slashdot story link here.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  16. Conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "According to the official contest page, the antenna was designed the night before the contest, its component parts were purchased for $98 at Home Depot, and the next day it was built completely from scratch in the desert, on the side of the mountain, in the rain."

    In the privacy of your own home, between the hours of 11:55 and 12:00 PM, on the 4th of July, in any year, during a hail storm.
  17. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with a distance of 35.2196 miles.

    It was only 35.2194 miles.
    They exagerate their claims by nearly 13 inches!!!

    1. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used a few of those pills to increase that certain distance.

    2. Re:bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...I might exagerage, sure, but even I couldn't convince my wife I had an extra 13 inches.

  18. Bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    in the desert...in the rain.

    Now that's bad luck.

    1. Re:Bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it's in the desert...in the lightning...in the rain.

    2. Re:Bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brain is melting........

    3. Re:Bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least it wasn't "in the desert in the snow"

  19. photo of the antenna by Numeric · · Score: 4, Informative

    Photo of anntena and team. Its look pretty cool.

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
    1. Re:photo of the antenna by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course it looks cool, there's a chick in the picture.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:photo of the antenna by Quarters · · Score: 1
      If you think a large truncated pyramid built out of window screen is cool, then yeah, I guess it looks pretty cool.

      Personally, I think it just looks like a large truncated pyramid built out of window screen...

    3. Re:photo of the antenna by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      And of course she's posed in the antenna horn with her arms raised. No wonder they caught the signal over that distance!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:photo of the antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tee Hee

      They all have boobies

    5. Re:photo of the antenna by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck are these guys anyway? Real geeks (tm) would have had the antenna info/specifications before the picture.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:photo of the antenna by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1
      Of course it looks cool, there's a chick in the picture.


      Not much of one.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    7. Re:photo of the antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they trying to trap the only female at defcon into their "antenna"?

      "sure hun, just step inside this cage^H^H^H^H antenna here and you can eat all that chocolate inside!"

  20. 35.2196 miles = 56.7 km by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    ... for the metric users

    1. Re:35.2196 miles = 56.7 km by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      Still trying to figure out how to get 'net access to my cottage. How much would it cost to get a wireless signal to travel about 200km?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    2. Re:35.2196 miles = 56.7 km by schussat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Still trying to figure out how to get 'net access to my cottage. How much would it cost to get a wireless signal to travel about 200km?

      Well, if you do it like these guys, it costs $98, plus 170 miles of wiring.

      -schussat

      --
      The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
    3. Re:35.2196 miles = 56.7 km by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could build 4 of them for $392.

  21. yes but... by Cumstien · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Was it up hill both ways too?

  22. homemade vs commercial by aXis100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whilst the homemade winner was pretty good, im a bit suprised by some of the commercial entries.

    eg: "Using a Stock Hyperlink 15dBi Omni at the base camp, and a stock Hyperlink 24dBi parabolic grid at the field site, with a confirmed distance of 10.1625 miles"

    the WAFreenet (Perth, Western Australia) has several links of 18 to 22km (11.25 to 13.75 miles) - 30mW Clients with home modded 24dBi dishes (galaxy mods), connenecting to a 30mW AP with 14dB Waveguide. These links are about 8 - 10 SNR IIRC.

    Our best is a link to the same AP from Rottnest island - 46 km! One connection was using an ipaq + cantenna with 2SNR, and another was with a modded satellite dish (overpowered at about 40dB EIRP), not sure of it's signal performance.

    Several groups in the eastern states of Australia have achieved similar resulst.

    If I only got 16km with a commercial 24dBi panel, i'd ask for my money back!

    1. Re:homemade vs commercial by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      You'll note they had seperate classes for unmodded commercial gear and modded commercial gear such as you describe.

      Look again, you'll find the categories for power-boosted stock equipment.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    2. Re:homemade vs commercial by mcdade · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a problem with heat inversion and all sorts of weird stuff like that while shooting a signal over desert like settings? Sure it's flat and no trees to kill your frezel zone but i think it's just like water which can apparently be a pain in the ass to get a good signal across a notablely short span.

      Then again they aren't bouncing it off the atmoshpere or anything (which i'm sure they would have had to do on a 310 mile link..)

    3. Re:homemade vs commercial by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      That is correct, and I was aware of the classes. Regardless, Im still suprised that some of the commercial gear was so ordinary.

    4. Re:homemade vs commercial by div_2n · · Score: 1

      If you do some research on the 310km link you will find it was a weather balloon WAY up in the air so no sort of reflection would be needed.

      Besides, 2.4ghz will NOT bounce off of any layer in the upper atmosphere in any sort of predictable way. It will more likely bend on temperature and moisture inversions like light hitting water.

    5. Re:homemade vs commercial by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's because the commercial gear has to conform exactly to gov't regulations? (or rather, the strictest regulations in every country it's sold in)

      I think the 24dB power is a government-imposed limit somewhere, for example, since most gear seems to be set with that as max stock power.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  23. Rain, Las Vegas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe everything except the rain part.

  24. Yeah, but the pyramids would be upside down... by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    The shape of the pyramids is fine - IF you're trying to pick up a signal from the center of the earth... the entire angled shape of the horn is designed to focus the inbound radiation smoothly towards the center (peak) of the pyramid shape, where a little tiny antenna actually receives the radiation. Somehow I doubt you can pick up much RF thru 3000 miles of rock. And it's awful hard to beam-steer with a multi-trillion-pound pile of stacked rocks.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  25. Woohoo, more WAPs! by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    Hooking this antenna up to my WiFi card will open about a 1000 new WAPs in Boston. Free internet here I come!

  26. /.'ed & pringles by madaxe42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hm, the adversarial science lab site seems to be /.'ed.. On another note, pringles tubes make very good single-axis antennas for wi-fi applications, I've managed to get about a 3 mile range using them!

    1. Re:/.'ed & pringles by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      How is this informative? So far the most powerful can antenna made without making a custom "can" is made from something like a dinty moore chunky stew can, and it just blows the pringles can away. For those who need more gusto, a used primestar dish and some other kind of can (I think it was a juice can) makes an antenna which, in pairs, can reach ten miles with near-11Mbps-throughput. (Using the cheap stuff.) Those persons just now noticing pringles cans are over a year behind.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA scientists make fun of Slashdot users for unit conversion errors...

  28. clearing it all up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You meant to say "circumference" instead of "radius". The confusion really stems from the fact that some countries use "." where Americans use "," and vice versa, which inevitably leads to bizarre slashdot arguments and satellites running into things.

    You are correct in that it is roughly forty thousand km all the way around the ball. The article was trying to indicate a distance of roughly 35 miles, but I can imagine how comical it would look to a US reader if they saw a headline reading "wifi link extended 35,200 miles with duct tape and chicken wire!"

  29. Meanwhile, in the real world... by djeaux · · Score: 1
    I'd like to see a similar competition in an urban area or campus (buildings) or eastern woodland (trees). And what about wi-fi competition over water?

    35 miles in the desert might equate to the other side of a decent-sized college campus. That still might be pretty impressive...

    We are living in the future,
    Tell you how I know,
    I read it in the paper
    Fifteen years ago.
    We're all riding rocket ships
    And talking with our minds,
    And wearing turquoise jewelry,
    Standing in soup lines.
    (John Prine)
    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:Meanwhile, in the real world... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      I recently did a test across the Potomac River in Washington, DC, using the same cardboard and aluminum foil horn antenna design. We tried to avoid pointing it at the Pentagon though...

  30. Can't be true. by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duct tape and rain don't mix.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  31. 35.2196 miles? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    How much is that measured in sane units? Like the royal dutch kilometer?

    And are you saying thirty five thousand miles or thirty five point.. miles?

    If it's thirty five miles, then isn't .2196 a bit excessive?

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:35.2196 miles? by pclminion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      0.0001 mile is 6.3 inches (16 cm) -- I can believe they measured the distance to within that accuracy, probably using a laser.

    2. Re:35.2196 miles? by Theocracy · · Score: 1

      More like GPS coordinates.

      (From contest site)
      Base Camp GPS Coordinates: N36 39.646, W114 55.394
      Field Site GPS Coordinates: N37 09.910, W115 00.618

      I don't think GPS coordinates would work with a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Any idea on how to do it?

    3. Re:35.2196 miles? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I don't think GPS coordinates would work with a^2 + b^2 = c^2. Any idea on how to do it?

      Orthodromic distance (distance measured on the surface of a sphere):

      Let dlat = lat1 - lat2,
      Let dlon = lon1 - lon2,
      Let a = sin(dlat/2)^2 + cos(lat1)*cos(lat2)*sin(dlon/2)^2.

      Distance between the points is 2*R*arctan(sqrt(a)/sqrt(1-a)), where R is radius of Earth.

      However, Pythagorean theorem would be a good approximation since the Earth approximates a plane very closely on scales of 31 miles. Calculate the tangent plane to Earth at either point, convert from spherical to cartesian coordinates, project onto the tangent plane, and use Pythagorean theorem. I don't feel like doing all that though :-)

    4. Re:35.2196 miles? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Umm, GPS. Would you REALLY want someone pointing a laser at you powerful enough to span 30+ miles and attempting to hit a little target for the measuring device? the slightest movement and it would be way off target hitting who knows what. GPS works much better for this.

      Oh, and it POURED rain earlier in the week during Black Hat. The lunch tent was flooding and all the little cutie towel girls at Ceasers were running people back and forth with umbrellas - did they really think we'd melt?! The locals seemed to be pretty amazed, seems it seldom rains. People in the hotel reported that the storm was comnig with multiple lightning strikes visible from the thundercloud as it rolled in. Pretty wild to watch!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  32. Materials are cheap, brain is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    > The antenna was built from metal poles, window screen mesh, cardboard, duct tape, and aluminum foil!

    And the deep knowledge on how to put these materials together, how to calculate the parameters and how to trim the antenna to achieve the maximum adaptation to the transmitter/receiver.

    Analog electronics is the art of adding 1 to 1 to get always a result near to 2 but never an exact 2, and microwaves follow this principle literally: one tenth of a millimeter error can make the difference from the best antenna and the worst one. These guys did a darn good job.

  33. And when they came down off the mountain... by IcebergSlim · · Score: 1



    ...it was uphill all the way down.

  34. Pretty neat. Another el-cheapo long ranger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The once ubiquitous C-band satellite dishes make killer 2.4GHz antennas. Coffee can feed with hairpin and a skyline view of the city = zippy /. participation. These things can be had, usually free for the asking from suburban yards and in exchange for a case or two of beer if the house is on wheels. With a 200mw output power from your card, if my math is right, the effective radiate power will be at least 200Watts for an 8' dish.

    1. Re:Pretty neat. Another el-cheapo long ranger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      and highly illegal, to boot. 200W EIRP is, oh, 196W too much for a PTMP link, although you can play tricks if you're doing a PTP link.

  35. Even more impressive... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    ...is that http://www.adversarialsciencelab.net/ has not only withstood a slashdotting, but opened an unrequested window under Mozilla!

    Mozilla team: you've found your nemesis.

    1. Re:Even more impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flash animation triggered the window.

      So, we have a new feature to request:
      Suppress unrequested popups from plugins. Should be simple enough... deny the new window if the plugin hasn't received any mouse clicks.

    2. Re:Even more impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugzilla entry is here: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150340
      (you'll have to copy/paste this into your address bar, as bugzilla disallows links from /.)

      Add your comments to this bug!

    3. Re:Even more impressive... by aim4min · · Score: 1

      But the google toolbar add blocker succesfully blocked it!!! I love google!

  36. Verbal encryption during wi-fi shootout? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    From the article: Those distances were verified on the spot by contest staff using GPS coordinates and a verbal encryption scheme at both the base camp location and at the field location.

    Just a guess: Eam-tay ot-way eporting-ray, urrently-cay irty-thay iles-may est-way, oger-ray.

  37. I wonder.... by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they could calculate the gain of the ant. I'd love to see that.

    double the output for every 3db... Sounds like a lot of sterile geeks in the desert now.

    --
    Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
    Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    1. Re:I wonder.... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Sounds like a lot of sterile geeks in the desert now."

      As if they were getting any to begin with.....

      Sorry..it had to be said...;)

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  38. IN MY DAY by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    We used a mouth full of partially chewed gum, a can of chips and some half bent paper clips.

    1. Re:IN MY DAY by Brian_rts · · Score: 1

      mcguyer is thats you?

  39. Bogus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the rain!? Everybody knows duct tape won't stick on a wet surface!

  40. I love the Informative mod on parent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it almost cancels out the smugness...

  41. What about the FCC regs? by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    While this exercise was done for fun and games did anyone look at the FCC regulations concerning 802.11? 802.11 falls under part 15 of the rules and I'm sure using such a hi gain antenna put the ERP (effective radiated power) over the limits for that unlicenced service. Not that I'm trying to ruin someones fun but the FCC could issue a NAL (notice of aparent liability) over this.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:What about the FCC regs? by djeaux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not that I'm trying to ruin someones fun but the FCC could issue a NAL (notice of aparent liability) over this.

      This would be possible, I suppose, if the FCC had any proof other than the DEFCON account of what happened. Of course, the FCC could have staked out the competition & made busts on the site. But that didn't happen.

      My local police can't write me up because I tell someone that I drove 85 mph to the party. They have to catch me.

      IANAL (thank God) but I wonder if, in the current "legal" climate, the FCC might bring charges against DEFCON for "conspiracy to commit terrorist acts" or something simply for holding the contest...

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:What about the FCC regs? by pclminion · · Score: 4, Funny
      The attitude at DefCon this year was pretty much "Fuck the FCC." There were so many WiFi networks (over 1000, when we were scanning), that the hopes of any FCC official having the slightest chance of locating the one guy who was using an illegally high power were pretty much zero.

      People (ahem) were flashing the firmware on their Senao cards to enable them to go up to 249 milliwatt. The entire area was bathed in 801.11 frequencies. Shit, I felt my hair stand up.

      It was funny to see a thousand black-clad geeks waving their WiFi antennas in the air, trying to get a signal. If you didn't know better you would have thought it was some kind of dildo festival.

    3. Re:What about the FCC regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the hopes of any FCC official having the slightest chance of locating the one guy who was using an illegally high power were pretty much zero."

      Ya, They would never find the guys alone in the desert with the 6 foot antenna.

    4. Re:What about the FCC regs? by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      More detail on these cards and the firmware please! :-) I was there but unfrotunatly didn;t know about this - all the vendors had were pretty crappy 802.11 cards from what I could see :-( A few years ago I had a shot at a VERY nice card but was too stupid at the time to pick it up.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  42. .....and one baby zebra by up2ng · · Score: 0

    .....and one baby zebra

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  43. Guys, beware the radiations by cpc · · Score: 1

    With such a high gain antenna (they talked about +30dB), you'd better keep your balls away from the radiations.
    I also wonder how many birds were fried that way... :)

    1. Re:Guys, beware the radiations by ASLRulz · · Score: 1

      We were using the antenna to keep the competition away. Anytime a team looked like they were doing well we threatened to point our antenna at them.

  44. Friday by ehintz · · Score: 1

    I was driving in from CA on Friday, arrived Vegas around 2pm. There were several squalls, some resulting in significant precipitation. And every bloody idiot on the road slowing down to 50mph. For the record, tempratures were mild this year. You thought this was hot, you shoulda been there in previous years. That damned tent they used to have on the roof was misery incarnate. The AC units could never get it much lower than a few degrees below ambient, and when ambient is pushing 100F, well... I've heard through a reliable source this was the last year on the contract at the Alexis, so hopefully they'll move the con to a more agreeable location. Prefereably not Vegas, but a better hotel in Vegas would be a start. Why anybody wants to hold a con in Vegas in July-August is beyond me. Hold cons in Vegas in winter, in the summer put them in Monterey or someplace nice.

    --
    ehintz
    1. Re:Friday by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I missed the rain, luckily.

      Yeah, the last couple of years in the tents have been pretty nasty. They need a bigger hotel anyway, the con is too big when you have to wait in line in that heay for a seat at a talk...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  45. Precision by KC7YRN · · Score: 1

    Not only did they need to know what to do, they had to do it to close tolerances.

    You can ruin the pattern of an antenna by putting in irregularities a fraction of a wavelength high. One wavelength at WiFi frequencies is about 12 centimeters. The usual rule of thumb is to be smooth within 1/10 of a wavelength.

    Pretty good for aluminum foil.

  46. Could've been legal by KC7YRN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some of the WiFi channels are within the amateur radio allocation, governed by Part 97. They could have run a powerful tight beam legally by complying with the rules for the amateur radio service.

    If both ends were run by someone with a ham radio license, and if they used channel 1, and if they didn't attempt communication with the general public, and if they didn't use obscene or indecent language, and if they turned off encryption, and if they didn't forward data for third parties from other countries that don't have third-party traffic agreements with the US, and if they identified transmissions with their callsigns every 10 minutes and at the end of each transmission, and if they didn't transact any business or communicate on behalf of an employer, then it could have been legal.

    Simple, really :-)

  47. Homemade TV antennas? by melted · · Score: 1

    There's got to be something on the web dedicated to TV antennas. I've disconnected my satellite dish (feel stupid paying $40 a month to watch commercials every 15 minutes) but my Terk aerial antenna leaves much to be desired. Are there any designs to make a decent (and compact, and possibly even amplified) TV antenna at home?

    1. Re:Homemade TV antennas? by morgue-ann · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's part of an interesting discussion by ham radio people on VHF and UHF antennas in an area (Santa Cruz mountains) where reception is terrible.

      The conclusions I draw are:

      1. crappy antennas with amplifiers can work esp. if the amp is right next to the antenna (but it does have to get power- the Fubas on VWs are too short, but amplified, but they switched from separate power to "phantom" power over the RF lead that's unreliable)

      2. putting the antenna outside on a tall mast is better than indoors, but in an attic might be an OK compromise

      3. directional beats omni, but you'll need a rotator, a "farm" of antennas (feasible when there are only 3 or 4 xmitter sites as in SCruz) or you need to live somewhere (the end of a long peninsula?) where all the transmitter antennas are in the same direction

      4. some commercial antennas are poorly designed, but good ones (Winegard) aren't that expensive- $90 - $220.

      5. there are good VHF antenna designs for the ham bands near the TV bands and software that'll calculate element lengths & performance if you put in the different frequency

      6. the emphasis in antenna design seems to be in UHF these days because HDTV uses that band & the set owners are the people that need the reception & have the $$ for the antenna & installation.

      ---

      If I didn't have satellite, I'd build a farm of stacked dipoles on the roof for VHF and buy a couple bowtie + screen antennas for UHF. Rotators are pain in the ass because the wind can blow the antenna out of alignment so all of your channel/angle settings need to be re-jiggered. They're also expensive.

  48. DisneyDefcon by ehintz · · Score: 1

    Agreed. DisneyDefcon was not so fun. I got shut out of 2 talks on Friday, it did not make me a happy man. If they do continue to use the AP, the value of Blackhat will go up; I've never been shut out of a talk at Blackhat.

    --
    ehintz
  49. Homemade Antennas by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure their success is attributed more to knowing what you are doing in a McGyver'ish way than simply hacking.

    Yeah, antennas don't respond well to guesswork.

    Most people don't know that an antenna rings electrically the way a tuning fork rings mechanically. There's only a very limited frequency range that an antenna will handle well.

    On top of that, as the frequency increases, radio waves behave more and more like light. And problems like stray capacitance and stray inductance - tiny values in farads and henries - become very important design considerations as the frequency increases.

    But a well-designed amateur antenna can be very capable. The radio waves don't care if you make the elements out of silver encrusted canine feces, if they're the right lengths.

    UHF TV band, around 450MHz. Design is extremely critical here. But by doing a little math first, I designed and built a 12-element Yagi (looks like an ordinary rooftop TV antenna but with more elements) which is tuned to channel 29. It's very directional, meaning I have to be pointed within a few degrees of the transmitter. But I can also watch WUTV Fox 29 from Buffalo, in Ottawa Canada, without shelling out for cable. Cost? Scrap of wood, old coat hanger wire trimmed to within 1/16" of the design dimensions, plastic tubing and clips to hold the elements to the board, old 75-300 ohm matching transformer gutted for its balun and soldered directly to the driven elements and feeding coax. Essentially free. Not waterproof, so it lives in my attic.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Homemade Antennas by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but fox29 buffalo is crap, even when you don't need a huge antenna to get it.

      Sorry. Cool implementation, though. Pictures?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    2. Re:Homemade Antennas by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but fox29 buffalo is crap, even when you don't need a huge antenna to get it.

      Well, this is true. But I like the Sunday night line-up.

      Up here in Canada, there's a CRTC (Canadian equivalent to FCC) rule that if an American channel and a Canadian channel are carrying the same show, the cable company has to switch and carry the Canadian station over the American one. Presumably to benefit Canadian broadcasters and advertisers.

      Problem is that the Canadian stations are showing the same three episodes over and over, or without stereo sound, etc. They frequently forget to make the switch until about 10 minutes in, so you get to watch the opening of a new episode then miss out to a very tired re-run. The Simpsons became intolerable after the Apu-has-babies episode was run three times in three months while new episodes were on.

      Just more protectionist bullcrap making me yearn for a Green Card.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    3. Re:Homemade Antennas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that, as the frequency increases, radio waves behave more and more like light

      Ummm, no. Radio waves behave like light all the time, because they are light.

    4. Re:Homemade Antennas by H8X55 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, antennas don't respond well to guesswork.

      I don't know if I agree with that or not. I do happen to remember my father adding aluminum foil, coat hangers, and various other sundries to our standard set top pair or rabbit ears to increase the reception.

      it wasn't rocket science. it wasn't science it all. it was trial and error.

    5. Re:Homemade Antennas by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I agree with that or not. I do happen to remember my father adding aluminum foil, coat hangers, and various other sundries to our standard set top pair or rabbit ears to increase the reception. it wasn't rocket science. it wasn't science it all. it was trial and error.

      Use a quality antenna... VHF TV channels 2-6 and 7-13 are in different parts of the spectrum; you cannot handle them efficiently with the same antenna... to say nothing of UHF. If it's a rod antenna (my favorites are 1/2 wave), make sure it's isolated from, but on, a good ground plane. Old BBQ grills work well for this at high frequencies, but remember that you want each side of your ground plane to be twice the length of the antenna - ie, one wavelength. Place the antenna up high. Make sure you polarize it the same way as the transmitter - AM/FM radio is usually vertically polarized, TV and SW radio are horizontal. Move the antenna away from all conductive objects (including drywall screws embedded in the walls). Replace 300 ohm twin-lead with 75 ohm coax by using a matching transformer right at the driven elements on the antenna. Beware of reflected radio waves coming off everything from wet trees to building walls. Orient the antenna to receive the strongest signal, whether it's the main signal or a reflection off a permanent object. Any other technique (ie. aluminum foil to unbalance the dipole) is a poor I-don't-care-if-I-lose-12dB-of-good-signal response to the problem. It may work in local areas with strong signals, but it's neither reliable nor efficient.

      Among cheap antennas... UHF loops are great, if you use a UHF-capable matching tranformer to drive coax, and mount the loop far away from all conductive objects. Rabbit ears are junk and are really only good for strong reception areas, unless you place the ears horizontally at 180 degrees to each other, place it on a NON-conductive surface, and retract the telescopic elements to the right length for the frequency of the station you're trying to receive.

      In short, if you know what you're doing, you'll avoid the aluminum foil and random chunks of coathanger. Math is your friend, and it will blow trial-and-error out of the water every time.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  50. Ham becomes geek becomes ham by Trajan's+Horse · · Score: 1

    It's amazing to me how much "WiFi" stuff resembles ancient and modern DX Rituals in the Ham community. Good job guys. THat's a heck of an antenna, but it's not that old of a design. I know a ham who uses a similar design on 10GhZ and 5 watts or so.

  51. Not to mention... by Jason_says · · Score: 1
    ..they were also blind folded, hung upside down from trees, had use of only one arm, and had phones attached to their heads so they could answer internet tech questionsb from stupid people.

    What an achievement?

    Splchker anyone?

  52. what? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    ???? Huh? Mica is about the worst thing you could possibly use for an antenna. Mica is commonly used as a dielectric in capacitors, it is an extremely good insulator as seen with some mica tape stats here

    --

  53. 5G Wireless FGWC took the commercial category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like 5G Wireless took the commercial category at the wifi shootout---14.8 mile coverage using their commercially available antenna. I'm not how widely known this is but Mcdonalds has a pilot in upstate NY according to this --feb 03 http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.asp?layout=artic le&articleid=CA274448 trades for a few pennies on the OTC bulletin board under FGWC were any of these other wifi shootout companies public? "CATEGORY 5 - Enhanced power, (omni or directional) commercially made antenna Base Camp GPS Coordinates: N36 39.698, W114 55.431 Field Site GPS Coordinates: N36 52.523, W114 57.389 At the base camp: Apple G4 800 MHz Notebook, with 10.2.6 ftpserver, 5G single panel AP, 3-foot tripod, 15-foot mast, angle ~150. At the field site: 4ms 4.26 Mbps, Toshiba Satellite 1135-s1552, P4M 2.0 GHz 512 meg ram, Windows XP Pro ftp command prompt only, 5G CPE 800 mW, 16 dbi circular polarity antenna, RSSI -67 dbm, Noise floor -125 dbm, 10-foot mast, 3-foot tripod, AGL ~2 feet. With a confirmed distance of 14.8951 miles the winner is: 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. http://home.earthlink.net/~wifi-shootout/

    1. Re: 5G Wireless FGWC took the commercial category by tunescribe · · Score: 1

      CATEGORY 5 - Enhanced power, (omni or directional) commercially made antenna With a confirmed distance of 14.8951 miles the winner is: 5G Wireless Communications, Inc.(FGWC) http://home.earthlink.net/~wifi-shootout/

    2. Re: 5G Wireless FGWC took the commercial category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Check these guys out!

      www.5gwireless.com

    3. Re: 5G Wireless FGWC took the commercial category by tunescribe · · Score: 1

      http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.asp?layout=artic le&articleid=CA274448 Shaking It Up With Burgers, Broadband By Sue Marek February 1, 2003 c 2003, Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. McDonald's-home of the fast burger, fast service and fast Internet connection? That's the case in Sidney, N.Y., where the local McDonald's restaurant hired 5G Wireless Communications to outfit the fast-food haven with a high-speed wireless connection. Using traditional 802.11b technology in conjunction with direct sequence spread spectrum, 5G Wireless set up a Wi-Fi network in nearby Bainbridge, N.Y., and then provided surrounding business customers with broadband Internet connection speeds. "We operate within the standard of Wi-Fi but we have pushed it to some strong limits," says 5G Wireless President and CEO Jerry Dix. "Using our own technology, we are able to broadcast up to eight miles, if necessary." 5G's service initially appealed to Richard Dombrowski, owner of the Sidney McDonald's restaurant, because it allowed the restaurant to transmit and receive e-mail messages from McDonald's corporate headquarters much more quickly than traditional dial-up service. However, there may be an opportunity to offer the service to McDonald's customers, similar to how Starbucks has used Wi-Fi to seek more revenue from its coffee-slurping patrons. "Now that we have high-speed Internet service, our plan is to offer it to our patrons as they dine with us," Dombrowski says.

  54. 5G Wireless FGWC took the commercial category by tunescribe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It looks like 5G Wireless took the commercial category at the wifi shootout---14.8 mile coverage using their commercially available antenna. I'm not sure how widely known this is but Mcdonalds has a pilot in upstate NY according to this --feb 03 http://www.wirelessweek.com/index.asp?layout=artic le&articleid=CA274448 trades for a few pennies on the OTC bulletin board under FGWC were any of these other wifi shootout companies public? "CATEGORY 5 - Enhanced power, (omni or directional) commercially made antenna Base Camp GPS Coordinates: N36 39.698, W114 55.431 Field Site GPS Coordinates: N36 52.523, W114 57.389 At the base camp: Apple G4 800 MHz Notebook, with 10.2.6 ftpserver, 5G single panel AP, 3-foot tripod, 15-foot mast, angle ~150. At the field site: 4ms 4.26 Mbps, Toshiba Satellite 1135-s1552, P4M 2.0 GHz 512 meg ram, Windows XP Pro ftp command prompt only, 5G CPE 800 mW, 16 dbi circular polarity antenna, RSSI -67 dbm, Noise f

  55. Bad Timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raining? In the Desert? on the side of a mountain? HMMMM.Must have been the windward side of the mountain I guess.

    I had to walk 2 miles to school with my sister on my shoulders through the woods in the middle of winter too. And no shoes.

  56. Not impressed! by AlexTog · · Score: 1

    If I had actually showed up to defcon (ride bailed) I would have been able to get a far greater distance. Congrats to the winners, but there 35 miles is nothing to what I'm capable of doing.

    1. Re:Not impressed! by ASLRulz · · Score: 1

      We were contrained by the terrain and our vehicle. We ran out of road and tried to get farther out with our rental. Who woulda known, a Chevy Cavalier is a horrible off-road vehicle.

    2. Re:Not impressed! by AlexTog · · Score: 1

      Can you explain what you had to do?

      Is there a full story of this somewhere?

      I know the rules changed a bit at the last min.


      thanx!!

    3. Re:Not impressed! by ASLRulz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Check out http://www.adversarialsciencelab.net/sumdoo.html Sumdoo has some info on what happened to us... Did I mention that one of the other teams also was trying to jam us... sore losers!

    4. Re:Not impressed! by quinkin · · Score: 1
      Looks like they are jamming your server too...

      Oh wait - that was /.

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
  57. It rains a LOT in the desert when it rains. by morven2 · · Score: 1

    Not that much of the year, obviously, and the total annual rainfall is low (that's why it's called a desert, of course!) but when it does, it really rains. You didn't think the all the drainage ditches and culverts and things under the 15 freeway were there for fun, did you? Think flash floods. Think your car being carried off in a torrent. It happens.

  58. For those who can't get to our site by ASLRulz · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting that we could have gone a lot further than the 35 miles we did achieve. We had some terrain problems. We ran out of road and it turns out a Chevy Cavalier makes a horrible offroad vehicle. Plus it didn't help any that one of the teams was trying to jam us when we were trying to get our final readings.

  59. Yet more proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that the US patent and law system are fucked up!

  60. Good thing they are civilians by Frailty · · Score: 1

    I can only applaud the innovation and tenacity of these guys. It's a good thing they aren't government contractors, we'd all have to worry, as it is (from many years of personal experience), the US government is lucky when it can bounce a basketball near a hoop, much less a Wi-Fi Signal 35+ miles, and in bad terrain and adverse weather. That is some s**t hot hack boys. Good on ya.

    --
    " My next house will have no kitchen - just vending machines and a large trash can. "
  61. And dates? by quinkin · · Score: 1
    You also decide it is a good idea to list the months before they days (as in dd/mm/yyyy).

    Now that is retarded.

    If someone writes 2.000,00 - I have a damn good idea of what they mean.

    If you write 11/7/2003 - I have no idea what you meant.

    It is the USA that is backward.

    PS. I am australian so I agree with you on the numbers notation - you can keep your attitude though.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:And dates? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      You also decide it is a good idea to list the months before they days (as in dd/mm/yyyy).

      Now that is retarded.


      I used to agree, but after much thought I no longer do. You see, if you ever have filenames with the date as a part of them, say file.mmddyyyy, they will alphabetize in quite a nice fashion. However, if they are named file.ddmmyyyy, you will end up with the first day of each month at the top of your list, followed by the second day of each month, etc. So it makes it much more difficult to select say, all files from June. And besides.... who actually says "I'm going on a vacation on 25 June 2397?" Wouldn't you rather say, "I'm going on a vacation on June 25th, 2397?"

    2. Re:And dates? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Dates? What dates? This is Slashdot!! :-P

      Your example doesn't match the sentence. You meant to write mm/dd/yyyy.

      Numeric dates can be annoying. But you could always just say "The 7th day of the Month of November, The year of our Lord 2003". BTW, the "retarded" part was not entirely serious. Many things that are different from the way we like them, we regard as stupid, even though they may not be.

      Since this is OT already, is it me, or are there a lot of australians around here? (I'm trying not to say "crikey!". Oops.)

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    3. Re:And dates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And besides.... who actually says "I'm going on a vacation on 25 June 2397?

      The U.S. Military.

    4. Re:And dates? by BdosError · · Score: 1

      That argument (sorting by dates) leads one to the ISO date format -- YYYY-MM-DD -- which sorts files even better. None of this Jan 1, 2001 comes before Jan 2, 2002 stuff like your system.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    5. Re:And dates? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Ummm... sorry. 2001 will always come before 2002 when sorted alphabetically. It matters not if the Jan 1 is before or after the 200x.

  62. Four wrongs squared, minus... by quinkin · · Score: 1

    "Yes, yes, I know that, Sidney ... everybody knows that! ... But look: Four wrongs squared, minus two wrongs to the fourth power, divided by this formula, do make a right."

    -- Gary Larson

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  63. Radio over water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about wi-fi competition over water?

    Doesn't broadcasting a radio signal over water actually boost the distance you can get? I vaguely remember reading something about radio communications and ships... Can any radio comminucations experts shed some light on this? (Excuse the terrible pun.)

  64. All the theories date from a April's fools prank by arivanov · · Score: 1

    All these theories origin from a prank by R. Wood bless him in an old issue of the Science magazine. They are unfounded and have nothing to do with reality. Quoting Wood from a later interview (by memory so quote may be garbled a bit): "If I knew how manu idiots will take this April's fool joke for granted and repeat it by now I would have chosen another subject".

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/