Slashdot Mirror


ISP Recovers in 72 Hours After Leveling by Tornado

aldheorte writes "Amazing story of how an ISP in Jackson, TN, whose main facility was completely leveled by a tornado, recovered in 72 hours. The story is a great recounting of how they executed their disaster recovery plan, what they found they had left out of that plan, data recovery from destroyed hard drives, and perhaps the best argument ever for offsite backups. (Not affiliated with the ISP in question)"

258 comments

  1. Heh by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully no one was hurt when the trailer park got levelled.

    1. Re:Heh by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Yea, that really blows.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny? Come on mods... this is a troll post. Why encourage stereotyping?

    3. Re:Heh by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I thought the image of an ISP located in a trailer park would be funny.

      I mean, maybe it'll come up next week on Trailer Park Boys.

    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is modded funny? Wow, I don't even know where to begin.

    5. Re:Heh by valkraider · · Score: 1
      Even if it was a troll, it was "funny". So the "funny" mod points are appropriate even if the post is not. It could also deserve other mod points, but it *Was* funny.

      But to address your "stereotyping" comment. It is *not* a stereotype.

      In 2002, a total of 55 people died in tornadoes, 37 of whom were in mobile homes, 12 in permanent homes, four in cars and two outside. In 2001, 40 fatalities were recorded, 11 of those in mobile homes, 18 in permanent homes, six in vehicles, three outside and two in buildings. In 2000, 29 of the 40 tornado deaths, or nearly 78 percent, were in mobile homes, four were in permanent homes, four in vehicles, one was outside and two were in buildings.
      - NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory report

      It goes on to say that Mobile homes are *dangerous*. And if you take the numbers above and put them into context as to how many people live in regular homes/buildings vs. how many live in mobile homes, the numbers would be all that much more damning.
    6. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Proud to be a mere Wiccan."

      I used to be proud that I believed in Santa.

    7. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But to address your "stereotyping" comment. It is *not* a stereotype.

      It *is* a stereotype to assume that just because the ISP is located in Tennessee that it *must* a trailer park.

    8. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I thought it was saying that they must have been in trailers because they were hit by a tornado. The Tennessee part only *adds* to that... If they were hit by a tornado, odds are 80 they were in a tornado park, and if they were hit by a tornado AND in TN odds are 95% they were in a tornado (err, trailer) park...

    9. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a play on phonics. "Proud to be a-mer-i-can" and "Proud to be a-mere-wiccan". But what does the Wiccan religion have to do with your belief in Santa? Are you implying Wiccans or the Wiccan religion (belief system probably a better term for it) doesn't exist?

    10. Re:Heh by Wog · · Score: 1

      Not funny.

      I *live* in Jackson, TN at Union University. The school ran busses for three days so that students could go downtown and help with cleanup. I helped a gentleman move pieces of a tree off of what was left of his already run-down house. He pointed to a half-broken coffee table and told me that he and his pregnant wife managed to get under the table when the walls and ceiling came down around them.

      We lost nine people in Jackson, and downtown is still a wasteland. Every single car on the north side of town (including mine) was hit by baseball-sized hail.

      Not to mention that Union was directly hit by an F-1 last November. Two tornadoes in two semesters. I think the insurance company should consider pulling our "acts of God" coverage...

      Yes, we have a lot of people who even we refer to as "hicks"... That doesn't have to define our town though. Jackson is a good place to live with three thriving colleges and not a few slashdot readers.

      Joke about our cars that look like golf balls. Joke about out gutters which are still wrapped around light poles. Joke about how dark it is downtown at night. But don't make light of people who died in their homes, just because that was the best that they could afford.

    11. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Making fun of poor people is really fun. I swear this is the kind of shit you deal with whenever a southern state is mentioned. I have lived all over, people are people everywhere and basically the same. Yet the stereotypes persist among way too many people, and it goes all ways. If this parent is not modded down, I will lose what little faith in the mod process I still have. I suspect it will stay as "funny", but I certainly hope not.

    12. Re:Heh by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Perpetutating the myth or not, I happen to live in a double-wide mobile home, so I'm well justified in making fun of it.

      I just thought it would be a funny mental image for an ISP-style business to be located in a mobile home. :)

    13. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Are you implying Wiccans or the Wiccan religion (belief system probably a better term for it) doesn't exist?"

      I hope you're smarter than that, and just practice really hard to look that stupid.

  2. It will be a damn shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    when Munchkins overrun the web now that this ISP got relocated by the twister.

    1. Re:It will be a damn shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [MUNCHKINS] ~We-rep-re-sent, the lolly-pop-clan! The lolly-pop-clan! The lolly-pop--~

      [DOROTHY STRUTHERS, AENEAS INTERNET TECH SUPPORT] "Lollypop Clan"? What, you mean in Quake 3? Or is that some kind of Furry thing?

    2. Re:It will be a damn shame... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Toto, sumthin' tells me we ain't in Kansas no mo'...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  3. That's fricking awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So, ah, your ISP here.. what's your uptime for the last year?"

    "99.18% for our service, and 96.2% for our building."

  4. That's pretty good for getting levelled by a tornado.

    My server company (who's name I will not mention) sometimes just shuts down because a gentle breeze. Then when I call them, I hear "whoops, I guess it is down!"

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Wow by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 1
      So why are they your server company and not your former server company?

      --
      Proud patriot and republican voter.
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares?

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not our fault! It's just been a really crummy (and windy) summer!

      SBC ineptitude, bad neighborhood wiring, a DDoS, and a major load of spam are just a few of our worries.

      It's amazing, though, that our DOS authentication box running Worldgroup has better uptime than SBC alone.

  5. Poor tech support by dswensen · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I'm sure every minute of those 72 hours was characterized by irate phone calls to tech support.

    "Are you guys down again? You're down more than you're up! I'm going to find another service... etc..."

    "Ma'am our facilities have been entirely leveled by a tornado, we'll be back up in 72 hours."

    "72 HOURS?! I have photos of my grandchildren I have to mail! Worst ISP ever! Let me speak to your supervisor!"

    "Ma'am our supervisor was also leveled by the tornado."

    *click*

    Not that I work tech support for an ISP and am bitter...

    1. Re:Poor tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine having a day trader yapping at your heels. Been there.

    2. Re:Poor tech support by koa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually.. I ran a technical support department for a small ISP for a couple years.

      It amazing how accurate you are in reguards to customer viewpoint on downtime.

      After having done it myself, I actually have MUCH more respect for technicul support engineers/supervisors becuase within reason most "downtime" is fixed even before the customer knows about it (i.e. small blips in service).

      And the majority of people who purchase an ISP's services have absolutely no idea what it takes to respond to an outtage.

      --
      ....move along....nothing to see here....
    3. Re:Poor tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...work tech support for an ISP and am bitter...

      Amen, brother.

    4. Re:Poor tech support by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Here's what I usually get:

      "Hey, I can't connect. Did that tornado hit you guys or something? Just wondering."

      "There's nothing wrong with our service you ingrate whiner."

      "Well I haven't been able to connect in 72 hours, so I was just wondering."

      "Of course we're up! We're UltraMegaColossalISP! If you're unable to connect, it's obviously your problem."

      "No, no, you don't understand. I just want to know if there's been an outage in my area."

      "Hey Dumbass! If you just go to our site we have a page listing all the outages! Stop wasting my time."

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:Poor tech support by dswensen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry to hear you've run into such rude tech support. Around here, we're polite enough up until the customer starts copping a serious attitude.

      That said, we get dozens of calls a day accusing us (not asking politely, as characterized by your post) of having downtime when, in fact, the problem is on the client's side. I have outright been called a liar when I say our ISP is not "down." When there actually is an outage (which is rare, but happens), it's much worse.

      Then, we are "always" down, and have had "dozens" of outages in the past week, and etc. etc. (usually this is a customer running Win 95 with an antiquated HSP modem who lives in the sticks and has a 400-foot phone cord going from his computer to the phone jack in the barn, but... nevermind. We're "always down.")

      So yes, when you have hundreds of callers a day telling you you are ruining their business and costing them thousands of dollars and raping their grandchildren, patience sometimes runs a little thin. Because so many customers open with "are you guys down AGAIN?" rather than describing their problem, sometimes techs can get a little terse.

      Nonetheless, if any of the techs here spoke to a customer the way you're characterizing it, he would pretty much be fired on the spot.

    6. Re:Poor tech support by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      "Of course we're up! We're UltraMegaColossalISP! If you're unable to connect, it's obviously your problem."

      You could always try using someone other than AOL. . . . .

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    7. Re:Poor tech support by rjch · · Score: 1
      So yes, when you have hundreds of callers a day telling you you are ruining their business and costing them thousands of dollars and raping their grandchildren, patience sometimes runs a little thin. Because so many customers open with "are you guys down AGAIN?" rather than describing their problem, sometimes techs can get a little terse.
      Try working on a helpdesk for a petro-chemical company. Around every two weeks the bank that processes all of this company's debit & credit cards has a scheduled outage for maintenance during the very early hours of Monday morning. Despite the on-hold message clearly stating that the bank is offline due to maintenance, people still hold on to ask "does the bank outage affect me?"

      It gets better though... occasionally when the scheduled outage doesn't happen, we get a heap of phone calls asking why the bank isn't offline - and even worse, those who complain that the bank isn't doing their maintenance properly!

      Go figure.

  6. Users need their porn! by Trigun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that that's out of the way, it never ceases to amaze me how many companies have little to no severe disaster recovery plans, and how a little bit of ingenuity(sp?) can go a long way in a company.
    Times of crisis and how one deals with them are the mark of successful businesses/employees/people. I don't think that we could recover so quickly should a disaster of that size hit my job, but it'd be fun to try.

    1. Re:Users need their porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also work for a good sized ISP (about like the one in the story), and I know for a fact that we'd just be liquidated if that happened. We're simply not prepared.

      Funny thing is, a tornado did hit our administration building recently, but it was basically used for accounting - our servers and backbone connections are in a different city.

  7. Nice work! by Tebriel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what happens when people make intelligent plans and the modify them as they see other plans work or fail. I'm glad to see that this was a work in progress rather than some arcane plan in a binder somewhere that no one ever looked at.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:Nice work! by blackp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the problems with a plan in a binder somewhere, is that the tornado would have probably taken out the binder as well.

    2. Re:Nice work! by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Do you work for Utopia Corp?

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:Nice work! by Mooncaller · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Right on! I have been involved with the design of at least 5 disaster recovery plans. The first one was while I was in the Air Force. I guess I was pretty luck, learning at the age of 19, that preparing for successfull disaster recovery is a continous process. The main output of a disaster recovery development process, are those binders. I guess thats why so many people confuse disaster recovery with the binders. But they are only the result of a process; just like a piece of software is created as part of a process. And like software, the binders need to be tested and reviewed regularly.

      Some people learn by reading.

      Some people learn by observing.

      And some people have to piss on the electric fence for themselves.

    4. Re:Nice work! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Yeah, sort of, but did you read this part?
      he larger and more formidable of the two setbacks involved the company's tape and hard-drive backups. It was clear from the beginning that most of the company's paper-based customer records had fallen victim to Mother Nature, but four days after the tornado, Hart and Warren discovered that the electronic tape and hard-drive backups had failed as well. Hart finally uncovered the tape and hard drives May 8. When he pulled the tape from the rubble, it was so badly damaged that he hardly recognized it. Hart passed the hard drives on to a number of local data recovery specialists to see if they could retrieve anything. One by one, each came up empty.

      Finally, as a last resort, Hart plucked the hard drives from four different nonfunctioning computers and turned them over to Kroll OnTrack, a data recovery company in Minneapolis. Miraculously, the vendor discovered a recent copy of the customer records database on all four computers and was able to recover all of the customer data and return it to Aeneas, delaying printing of its May bills only minimally.

      In other words, they almost lost the business by violating the first rule of disaster recovery. This is a priceless piece of advertising for Kroll OnTrack.
  8. Wow by JCMay · · Score: 2

    That is some very well thought out planning. Big props to those guys!

  9. Elephant Insurance by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    When your business gets pelted with the equivalent force of 100,000 elephants, you better have a friggin contingency plan.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  10. Another thing to add to the plan... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    "Move somewhere where the wind don't blow quite that much" =)

    However, it amazing how soon after a 'total disaster' a system can be up and running again. I distinctly recalls seeing a lot about just that in the paper (the one made from dead wood) after 9/11. Kudos, I say!.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  11. one comment and it's gone . . mirror by GlassUser · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Twisters, hurricanes, floods (oh my)

    SEPTEMBER 03, 2003 ( CIO ) - The evening of Sunday, May 4, 2003, at Aeneas Internet and Telephone began as any previous Sunday evening had. The Jackson, Tenn.-based company that serves about 10,000 Internet and 2,500 telephone customers was closed for the weekend, awaiting the return of its 17 employees the next morning. Just before midnight, however, all hell broke loose. An F-4 category twister touched down just outside of town, then tore through Jackson's downtown area, leveling houses, historical sites and municipal buildings alike. The tornado ripped straight through Aeneas's one-story building, leaving only a pile of rubble.
    Meanwhile, Aeneas CIO and Operations Manager Josh Hart, who'd heard about multiple tornadoes in the area that day, was home, 52 miles away in Martin, Tenn., huddling in his bathroom with his family. As soon as he was able, he flipped on the TV for news footage of the devastation. What he saw looked like "a war zone," bricks and concrete everywhere and piles upon piles of rubble.

    At 2 a.m., with those images in the background, Hart's cell phone rang--it was Aeneas Network Administrator Jason Warren calling from what he likened to Ground Zero to report that everything in Jackson was lost. Another call came in from CEO Jonathan Harlan.

    "I'm listening to [Warren] tell me what it's like, and he says, 'It doesn't even look like there was an office here,'" remembers Hart, 25. "The tornado destroyed our computers, our desks, everything. I couldn't believe what he was telling me."

    Aeneas lost nearly $1 million in hardware and software that night, and an estimated 72 hours of downtime. But just as Aeneas in Virgil's Aeneid endured the worst the gods had to offer, so too did this Aeneas. This one, however, was wise enough to have created a contingency plan--one that minimized the damage and kept the company afloat during its darkest hour.

    The company is not alone. After a nationwide scramble to prepare for high-impact, low-probability events similar to the attacks of Sept. 11, CIOs have since realized that their organizations are far more likely to succumb to another type of event--one that has a high probability of occurring and, curiously enough, is probably simpler to predict: the weather. For example, in June, while the Atlantic seaboard was bracing for the start of hurricane season, Arizona was busy battling forest fires. And in Harris County, Texas, in 2001, a tropical storm and resulting flood taught one IT executive the importance of flexibility.

    Both Aeneas's Hart and Steven W. Jennings, Harris County's executive director of central technology, share their experiences here in an effort to provide best practices and battle-tested secrets about which preparations work best. According to Carol Kelly, vice president of government strategies for Meta Group, these are lessons from which everyone can learn. "When disaster strikes, you want to be ready with a plan of action and an approach of how to deal," she says. "You might be ready for the next terrorist attack, but if you're not ready for the next nor'easter, your plans won't amount to much."

    Big plans for a small company

    Aeneas launched its contingency plan when it was founded in 1996; since then, CIO Hart has enhanced the strategy gradually almost every year. In early 2002, as the ISP neared 10,000 Internet customers, he and his network administrator, Warren, thought up the company's most comprehensive approach yet. While they determined that the likelihood of a terrorist attack on the western Tennessee town of Jackson, population 59,600, was slim to none, they concluded that because of the municipality's location in the central U.S.'s infamous Tornado Alley, the plan should respond to the next most likely cause of disaster--twisters. What ensued was a three-pronged plan that hinged upon colocation, distribution and backups.

    First, by employing Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) programming on a high-class circuit shared with an ISP 90 miles

    1. Re:one comment and it's gone . . mirror by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      If you don't want the karma, post AC.

      But there have been too many trolls lately that repost the article with certain, er, modifications. Like the one about a rocket launch that slipped in several references to other... "rocket-shaped personal entertainment devices".

      Besides, there's not much point in Karma Whoring anymore. Who *doesn't* have Excellent karma these days?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  12. Fire... by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is a good enough argument for off site backups. If you don't have them, your backup plan is not enough.

    1. Re:Fire... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      Very true, but like everything else you don't realize how important it is, until after the fact.

    2. Re:Fire... by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

      yeah... what idiots... i've been keeping off sight backups for years in my closet. i can barely even see them when the door is open!

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    3. Re:Fire... by Stargoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone should have off-site backups. It's not very expensive (>100 dollars for tapes). It's not very hard (drive tapes to site). It's not difficult to get the backups if you need them (drive to site with tapes). It just makes sense.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    4. Re:Fire... by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone should have off-site backups. It's not very expensive (>100 dollars for tapes)

      Er, for how much data? For your personal computer, maybe (but the tape drive will cost you considerably more than that $100), but I don't think you're going to back up a few hundred gigs of business data on ~$100 of tapes. And I suspect you meant 100... although if the latter then you're almost certainly correct!

      It's not very hard (drive tapes to site). It's not difficult to get the backups if you need them (drive to site with tapes)

      If your offsite backup is within convienent driving distance then odds are it's not far enough offsite. A flood, tornado, hurricane, earthquake, or other large scale natural disaster could conceivably destroy both your onsite and offsite backups if they're within a few miles. The flipside is that the further the distance the more the inconvienence on an ongoing basis and the more likely you are to stop doing backups.

      There's far more to be considered here, but I'm not the DR expert (my wife is... seriously). It does make sense to have offsite backups, but you have to have some sense about those too.

    5. Re:Fire... by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that once you have those tapes in hand; they're not likely to be much good to you unless you have a contract with a business continuity services group which will allow you to load your data back onto the systems they have on hold.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    6. Re:Fire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 for tapes becomes very expensive very quickly. Consider that tapes are highly unreliable, so you have to have at least 2 of each mirrored. Then consider that they have pretty much 100GB per tape. For us, that'd mean we'd need to buy 120 tapes (6TB). Now, most people say you can only use tapes once and then you're done. So that's 120 tapes per week, or over $12000 per week. But wait, there's more. It's pointless to have tapes if you don't have another tape system ($$thousands) offsite as well.

      Tapes are insanely expensive.

    7. Re:Fire... by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

      If your offsite backup is within convienent driving distance then odds are it's not far enough offsite.

      Safety deposit boxes are good places to store off site backups. They can be just down the street from where you work. If a vault is destroyed in the same disaster, then there are probably more important things to worry about.

      There are also services. Our data is backed up in our ISP by a company that only does backup services. They connect to one of our servers through a dedicated line and backup to tape. They then transfer a copy the data to another location in another city. It costs money, but if your data is important, you do what it takes.

    8. Re:Fire... by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If a vault is destroyed in the same disaster, then there are probably more important things to worry about.

      If the vault is destroyed, then you're probably right. But it doesn't take that to render the data unusable -- if the bank gets hit, the vault may survive but the keys may be destroyed (yeah, I'm sure they can get more made or have a locksmith come in, but that will take time). Or the vault is inaccessible for some amount of time due to damage. Even if the data is good, having it unavailable does you no good at all.

      The data backup services are good, as is just going a bit further afield for a safe deposit box or other repository. As you say, if the data is important you do what it takes.

    9. Re:Fire... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can use a fireproof safe for near-line backups and then move them offsite in batches, thus seriously minimizing the amount of trouble, while still more or less ensuring that they will be safe. Extra points for putting them in ziplock baggies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Fire... by grnbrg · · Score: 1
      Everyone should have off-site backups.

      ... of their resume. :)


      -- grnbrg

    11. Re:Fire... by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Tapes are so expensive that it usually makes a lot more sense to have a synchronized backup server in another city as Aeneas did. Of course, this doesn't protect you from accidental deletions, etc., but customers that need that level of protection also pay higher rates to cover the extra backup expenses....

      Sounds like the biggest problem they had was that they didn't have similar backup capabilities for their administrative data or enough server horsepower at the backup site to carry the load. Compared to what would happen to most small ISPs in such a situation, that's nothing short of miraculous. :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    12. Re:Fire... by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're going to back up a few hundred gigs of business data on ~$100 of tapes.

      $100 will buy you a 400GB Ultrium cartridge, more or less. So, yes, you will only be spending a few hundred dollars making spare tapes for offsite backup (assuming you already have a drive), unless you are talking about terabytes of data.

      As you say though, operational considerations are more important. If you store tapes offsite, that is two places where your confidential data can be stolen from.

  13. And then gets slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hah, they can recover from a tornado. That's no biggie. How 'bout a SLASHDOTTING, then!

    1. Re:And then gets slashdotted by cindik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's actually interesting - how many sites have contingency plans for the /. effect? How many businesses? It's not just /., but just about any media can refer people to a real business site. For small companies, this could bring them down for some time. Imagine the "Bruce Almighty" effect, only with some business with a small-to-medium capacity connection, bombarded just because someone used http://www.slashdotme.com/ or spam@.me.into.oblivion.org in their movie. The fact that so many sites are taken down by the /. effect causes me to believe that few sites and those who run them are truly prepared.

    2. Re:And then gets slashdotted by Fishstick · · Score: 4, Informative

      that's computerworld receiving the /.ing

      the isp is here

      picture of the aftermath here

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:And then gets slashdotted by ceije · · Score: 3, Informative


      I think a lot of sites already have contingency plans for sudden traffic increases, and if not, they begin to think about them very seriously once they get a large spike in traffic that causes disruption of service. Even with traffic spike contingency plans, the level you establish as the maximum amount of traffic that you need to be able to sustain, and what amount of latency or down time is acceptable to business, can be and often is debated ad nauseum. It costs a lot of money to maintain readiness for, say, double or triple normal site traffic for a large site, and you have to make a business case for balancing that cost with the cost of an outage due to increased traffic.

      There are several things you can do to quickly add the capability to handle additional load, and most of them rely on forethought when establishing contracts with your colocation facilities and software/hardware vendors. For instance, most large colo facilities allow you to reserve additional bandwidth capability. You may pay more for that priviledge, but that's part of the cost of preparedness. Also, you may purchase or lease additional hardware, have it set up and ready to install in a short amount of time, but not use it on a regular basis because of high licensing costs.

      Licensing costs for database software can be enormous, but in the event of a large spike in traffic, turning on an additional 20 or 30 cpus on a large database server could save the company a lot of money in lost revenues. Especially if you database software vendor specifically allows this in your contract. If the contract doesn't allow this, you may end up paying a lot more in licensing fees than you would have made in revenue during the outage.

      My main point here is that planning for extra traffic is a big cost-benefit balancing act, and it requires a lot of forethought. Most large software, hardware and service providers allow for emergency clauses in contractual agreements, but it's often up to the customer to specifically call those out.

      But then again, it's like insurance. You hope you don't need it, but you're glad you have it when you do. And you have to pay for it even if you don't need it.

      Also, when you plan for traffic spike, you need to consider the source of the traffic. Denial of service attacks are often easy to mitigate with common network practices, and it's just a matter of preparing for those. But real, human-driven traffic is much different, less predictable, and actually capable of generating revenue.

      Understanding your company's site infrastructure, software architecture and day-to-day traffic patterns is very important when it comes to handling real traffic spikes. When a real spike happens, network operators, developers and database admins (among others), will probably need to jump into action, looking for and attempting to mitigate bottlenecks as they appear. This can be a difficult task, and there's nothing worse than knowing what the problem is and not being able to do anything effective to combat it in a reasonable amount of time.

      Real traffic doesn't just come from other sites, it can also be driven by other forms of communication, such as television, print and other media... even word of mouth (although I haven't seen an example of this). A large, syndicated national television news program that runs during primetime can generate a lot more traffic than most web sites, and those spikes seem to grow on orders of magnitude as the duration and repetition of air time increases. A fifteen minute segment that is marginally compelling might be enough to swamp all but the largest and most prepared sites. The silver lining of the television spike is that it declines very quickly after the segment ends.

      A spike from multiple media sources, for instance print, web, and television, could be very difficult to handle, both in magnitude and duration. Although, duration isn't often a problem, because even the most prepared sites will succumb under a huge spike and

    4. Re:And then gets slashdotted by goldfndr · · Score: 1

      Wow, I really love their background image!

      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    5. Re:And then gets slashdotted by shess · · Score: 1

      The "slashdot effect" is when a site which normally gets dozens of hits a day suddenly gets thousands of hits and hour. For a service with a million hits a day, you literally cannot tell if you've been slashdotted (been there, done that - President's Day has more impact than /.).

      IOW, you don't need a contingency plan, you just need to design your site to be able to deliver 100x your "normal" front page volume. Make your front page static without a bunch of flash or huge full-color graphics or database queries, and everything reasonably cacheable, and you're pretty much set. But none of this is slashdot-effect specific.

      [_Nobody_ bothers to get caching right.]

    6. Re:And then gets slashdotted by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Heh, gotta love those wacky html coders!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  14. Because of a tornado... by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Tornado huh?

    Well that's what you casemodders get for installing twenty overpowered cooling fans in every one of your 1000 servers!

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  15. Crippled by Slashdot Effect in 72 seconds.... by Papatoast · · Score: 0

    Mirrors anyone???

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
  16. Tornad'oh! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let the OZ jokes flow:

    "Bring me the router of the wicked switch of the Qwest!"

    Although, I am starting to wonder. Has anyone checked to see if this ISP has a record of resisting RIAA subpeonas? Perhaps the RIAA levelled it after acquiring cloudbuster equipment.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Tornad'oh! by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Pay no attention to the web site behind the proxy server!

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    2. Re:Tornad'oh! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Cue the "Ignore that man behind the curtain" references for SCO.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Tornad'oh! by PD · · Score: 1

      I'll get you, my pretty, and your little laptop too!

      Ballmer, I have a feeling we're not in Redmond anymore.

      Close your eyes and click your mouse button three times.

      There's no place like $HOME

      Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful Linus. I said come back tomorrow.

      You are talking to a man who has laughed in the face of the RIAA, sneered at Microsoft and chuckled at SCO.

      How would you like it if someone came along and bluescreened your server?

      Read what my medal says: "SCO SUCKS". Ain't it the truth? Ain't it the truth?

    4. Re:Tornad'oh! by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      now, that's a screen of a different color!

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  17. Tomato? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear I read the headline as "ISP Leveled by Tomato"

  18. Compare and contrast... by ptomblin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of friends of mine were badly burned because the web hosting company they were using lost all their data (customer and their own) in one humungous crash, and didn't have any backups. They didn't even have a spare copy of their customer database, so they couldn't even contact their customers to tell them what was going on. Nor could they tell what customers they had and how much service they'd paid for, etc.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Compare and contrast... by FattMattP · · Score: 2, Insightful
      A couple of friends of mine were badly burned because the web hosting company they were using lost all their data
      It sounds like your friends got badly burned because they didn't back up their data, not because of their ISP. Always back up your data. That goes doubly so if your data is stored on someone else's computer.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    2. Re:Compare and contrast... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't their web site content, it was the fact that the ISP lost their customer records. It's hard to get your web site back up and running when the ISP doesn't even know if you're a customer or not.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    3. Re:Compare and contrast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save your receipts and/or credit card statements. Never order anything, hardware, software, or services, without keeping a copy of WHAT you ordered, WHEN, from WHOM, for HOW MUCH, etc. as well as a record of everything you pay.

    4. Re:Compare and contrast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but with backups, your friends could go elsewhere, move the DNS over and you'd be up and running within a day.

    5. Re:Compare and contrast... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      A couple of friends of mine were badly burned because the web hosting company they were using lost all their data (customer and their own) in one humungous crash, and didn't have any backups. They didn't even have a spare copy of their customer database, so they couldn't even contact their customers to tell them what was going on. Nor could they tell what customers they had and how much service they'd paid for, etc.

      Are these incompetent morons still in buisness? If so, can you let me know who they are so I can avoid them?

    6. Re:Compare and contrast... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      A couple of friends of mine were badly burned because the web hosting company they were using lost all their data (customer and their own) in one humungous crash, and didn't have any backups.

      Err, burned or they got what they paid for?

      If your friends really cared about thier data, they would still have it. Period.

      Who are thier customers going to blame? Not the ISP. ISPs are a commodity item that can be hosted just about anywhere, and I'm sure that some of them provide backups/offsite backups as part of thier contracts.

    7. Re:Compare and contrast... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
      I think ptomblin's ambiguous use of pronouns is confusing people -- it was the ISP's data, including ISP customer records, that got lost. The friends didn't lose any data, just connectivity when their ISP couldn't find its own ass with both hands.

      Right?

    8. Re:Compare and contrast... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      Yes, right. Sorry about that. The friends had their data backed up (or at least, the smart one did), but the web hosting company couldn't tell whether they had an account or not.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    9. Re:Compare and contrast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. sevaa.com They got my site (minus some features) back up in about a week or so (I had a backup). No idea if they will ever bill me again. After their TOTAL data loss, I am sure all they have on record is my email address and domain name. Sure, they could track me by my domain registration but nothing yet.

    10. Re:Compare and contrast... by clare-ents · · Score: 1

      Er, yeah.

      The ISP of my current employer charged us a nice fee for backup on our colocated machine. On my first couple of days as the first person with sysadmin skills I had to look at it.

      First thing I did was phone the ISP and ask for the most recent backup. Four hours later they told me they couldn't find any backups of our data because the guy who set it up two years ago was now in China teaching English.

      I got a full refund for all the backup fees charged by the company.

      My work priorities changed from 'find out how our stuff works with a view to developing further' to 'make an operation backup system in 48 hours'.

      If you do have offsite backup as part of the contract, challenge the ISP to produce a recent backup at random every few months or so.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
  19. here's the link by cnb · · Score: 1

    long article with no link.

    Aeneas Internet .. now lets see if they can recover from a slashdotting. :)

    - cnb

  20. The world's a'changin' by HungWeiLo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow...Jackson, TN has electricity. Now it has computers and the Internet. What's next? Evolution in schools?

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:The world's a'changin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mixie, TN has a t1 thanks to these guys. There's fiber and wireless out in these woods. And coyotes and dragons, too; come visit. you'll never be found

  21. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst. Troll. Ever.

  22. 72 Hours to recover from tornado obliteration . . by palutke · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . how long will it take the article's host to recover from the slashdot effect?

    --
    'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
  23. Well... by Senecca · · Score: 0

    All told, colocation was down for about a day and a half. Allthough it is exciting that they recovered from such an accident quite fast - it also means that their customers where 36 hours out of business. This could kill a small company. Maybe they should overhaul their strategys..

    1. Re:Well... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those businesses should realize they need a backup/disaster plan as well, if they absolutely could not withstand a day of downtime.

      Perhaps having the sites mirrored on two colos in two locations, and routing to the other one when the first goes offline.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  24. My ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They really were mostly back in that time frame. it was amazing. All Hail the guys who went without sleep to make it happen.

    Jason Warren has 3 level 60 EverCrack characters...

  25. Before someone else says it... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, in Russia Tornado does not own you. Neither does ISP. It is not, step 1) tornado step 2) ??? step 3) ISP recovers. There is not a beowulf cluster of these, and the tornado doesn't run Linux.

    1. Re:Before someone else says it... by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      the tornado doesn't run Linux.

      No, it runs .NET. There's a lot of huffing and puffing, nobody knows too much about it, and in the end your business is in shambles and half your IT staff is no longer.

      -3 Stupid.

    2. Re:Before someone else says it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha.... that's some funny shit right there

      =]

    3. Re:Before someone else says it... by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention if someone saved the grits, whether the porn archive of Natalie Portman was recovered, and if SCO was suing the webhost for using linux.

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    4. Re:Before someone else says it... by drivers · · Score: 1
      the tornado doesn't run Linux.


      No, it runs .NET.


      Hailstorm?

    5. Re:Before someone else says it... by jakupovic · · Score: 1

      .NET is great yet it's BIG so big that it's like a puzzle. You get in a hope to find a pathway and then repeat

      --
      You always point your finger at the bad guy, but what if the bad guy points his finger at you?
  26. Screw remote backup.... by mschoolbus · · Score: 1, Funny

    Build a better building!

    1. Re:Screw remote backup.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never had the opportunity to see what an F4 tornado can destroy.

    2. Re:Screw remote backup.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As an Architect, even building a below-ground bunker might not protect you from the full force of Nature with a capitol 'N'.

      I'm in California, and as such, we design buildings to take a certain scale of earthquake or less; not because clients are cheap, but because above a certain point all bets are off, no matter what kind of building you've built! At some point the force of Nature you're dealing with is so staggering that no amount of preparation or work can give you a guaranteed resistance.

      I doubt many buildings could take a direct hit from a tornado; and even if they could that's not saying that everything that's not the building (i.e. all that fancy computer equipment and nice people inside) wouldn't be sucked out and sent to OZ in a minute...

  27. /. Effect by phathead296 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Unfortunately, computerworld.com may take longer to recover from the ./ effect.

  28. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This story is great. It deals with important subjects to Network Administrators and PHBs alike. Disaster recovery is one of the most important issues most Network Admins face. An article like this one makes for a good story. If you can't figure that out, then maybe you should consider shutting the hell up.

    As for cable monkeys, I would like to point out that a programmer is a programmer is a progammer. A programmer is just another dumbass like yourself, who may or may not know his code from a hole in the ground. Progammers can be replaced with folks in India and the Baltic States without anything thinking twice, or caring. But a good Network Admin who knows his stuff and how best to implement it in a business environment is a gem.

  29. Re:Welcome ! by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new twister overlords.

    +1 Informative?!?

    Does that mean that some moderator actually believes that we have, indeed, been conquered by twisters?

  30. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Network admins are just IT jack monkeys running around plugging stuff into switches and getting in everyones way who has actual work to do.

  31. I'd settle for... by siskbc · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Wow...Jackson, TN has electricity. Now it has computers and the Internet. What's next? Evolution in schools?

    ...evolution of their knuckle-dragging residents.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  32. so... by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    let me get this straight, all the houses around the isp have no power, no phone... but they still need to get online?

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re: so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what the backup generators are for!

      the Internet is like crack

    2. Re: so... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      This ISP was also a dialtone provider...

    3. Re: so... by GT_Alias · · Score: 1

      What's your point....are you saying the ISP should have sat on their arses until everyone had power again?

    4. Re: so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, a tornado affects a small area, doesn't it?

      The thing ripped through downtown levelling structures in it's path. It didn't nuke a 10 mile square area, though.

      Plus, the biggie was recovering the customer database so they could send out bills and keep their income flowing. Getting service back online was a plus.

      Oh, but you didn't read the article then, didja?

    5. Re: so... by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, ofcourse you are right. We all know that ISPs only have customers immediately next to the company building. Damn those CAT5 cable length limitations...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    6. Re: so... by afidel · · Score: 1

      During the great blackout I was able to browse the web in the dark from my laptop for several hours until the UPS at the ISP's datacenter finally gave up. They were recently purchased by a larger ISP and next time the servers and networking equipment will all be in a generator backed datacenter so I will need a fuelcell laptop instead of a battery powered one.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  33. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I though I told you to shut the hell up.

  34. Cool, but could be better by MicroBerto · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While that's awesome, I still think that small businesses and big ones should both have offsite tape backups. Even if this means the owner brings back and forth a case of tapes to his home once a week or so. That alone would have saved much of this trouble.

    Then I've seen the other end of the spectrum - a 6 Billion dollar corporation's world HQ IT center... wow. They have disaster recovery sessions and planning like I never would have imagined. Very cool facility, but it has to be like that. Some day if they get burned, it's all over.

    --
    Berto
    1. Re:Cool, but could be better by NoCleverName · · Score: 1

      "Better" is planning for disaster as part of the system's initial design. In the early days, I hated D/R planning because of all the lousy details and the fact that sometimes you could never really get things back exactly the way they were. Later, enlightenment struck and I realized you could design a system that was hard to backup or one that was easy to backup.

      Therefore, don't build something that you'd hate to have to replicate. You should design for recovery from the get-go. Another benefit: recoverable designs end up being simpler and easy to manage.

  35. Now they just need... by Saberwind · · Score: 1

    ...a Slashdot recovery plan

  36. impressive..... by lylum · · Score: 1

    now I just hope somebody comes up with a way soon to recover that fast after a slashdotting!!!

  37. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by HardCase · · Score: 5, Funny
    I realize that slashdot is mostly populated by high-school educated "IT people", who give a shit about logs and backups and think plugging a PC and monitor into a powerbar is "computer science". To these people, the prospect of plugging in a bunch of computers and restoring backup tapes is exhillirating and exciting. The highlight of their lives.

    But, as a programmer, I just dont care.



    When I was a sophomore, working on my electrical engineering degree, I worked for a small, network-centric company that employed what seemed to be an abnormal number of snooty programmers and technical writers. Maybe it wasn't so abnormal.



    Me: "Hi, IT support."
    Stratjakt: "Hey, I know you're just a high-school educated 'IT person', but you need to get one of your cable monkeys up here and find out why I can't see the network!"
    Me:: "OK, but let's check a couple of things quickly before I dispatch a technician. It may save some time."
    Stratjakt: "Hey, I'm a programmer! I just don't care!"
    Me: "I understand...I realize that my mundane existance doesn't have the exhilaration and exitedness of the thrilling, edge-of-your-seat world of a computer programmer, but there are just a few simple things that we could do to resolve this problem that will be faster than you waiting for a technician."
    Stratjakt: "I just don't care."
    Me: "No problem, I'll dispatch a technican."


    An hour later...


    Technician: "Stratjakt is all fixed up. I plugged his network cable back into the jack."

  38. Truly stunning by dbarclay10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What amazes me isn't that these people were able to restore service to their customers in 72 hours. They used standard systems administration techniques. BGP was specifically mentioned.

    No, what amazes me is that this is news. The IT industry is so full of idiots and morons and MCSEs that taking basic precautions earns you a six-figure salary and news coverage. These folks didn't even have off-site backups, it was luck that they were able to resume business operations (ie: billing) so soon.

    Moral of the story? When automobile manufacturers start getting press coverage for doing a great job because unlike their competition, they install brakes in their vehicles, you know that the top-tier IT managers and executives have switched industries.

    --

    Barclay family motto:
    Aut agere aut mori.
    (Either action or death.)
    1. Re:Truly stunning by HardCase · · Score: 5, Interesting
      No, what amazes me is that this is news. The IT industry is so full of idiots and morons and MCSEs that taking basic precautions earns you a six-figure salary and news coverage. These folks didn't even have off-site backups, it was luck that they were able to resume business operations (ie: billing) so soon.


      I agree, although maybe not so vehemently. For the IT managers who need a clue, the article is evidence that a sound disaster recovery plan works. Obviously, in the case of the ISP, the plan wasn't completely sound, but the other, possibly more important, point of the article is that the ISP's management recognized that their recovery plan was incomplete. Based on the lessons they learned, they made changes.


      I work for a large (~20,000 employees) company, with about 10,000 employees at one site. The IT department (actually the entire company as well) has a disaster recovery plan in place. But beyond having a plan, we also have drills. As an example, we are in the flight path of the local airport (possibly not the best place in the world for a manufacturing site). What happens if a plane crashes smack in the middle of the plant? Hopefully we'll never know for sure, but the drills that we've run showed strong and weak points of the disaster plan. The strong points were emphasized, the weak points were revised and the disaster plan continues as a work in progress.


      Specifics aside, and maybe this is just stating the obvious, but considering a disaster recovery plan to be a continuously evolving procedure could be one of its strongest points.


      -h-

    2. Re:Truly stunning by Ruzty · · Score: 1

      Do you work at Motorola in Schaumburg, IL? Airplanes overhead all the friggin time...

      -Rusty

      --
      The Master (Angelo Rossitto) in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, "Not shit, energy!"
    3. Re:Truly stunning by HardCase · · Score: 1
      Do you work at Motorola in Schaumburg, IL? Airplanes overhead all the friggin time...


      No, I work Micron Technology in Boise, Idaho. I suppose that there's a direct correlation to the number of factories near airports and the number of airports built in the desert on the edge of town...land is cheap out there! ;-)

    4. Re:Truly stunning by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      No, what amazes me is that this is news.

      It's the neglected side of security. And probably the more important side.

      Companies have been destroyed by lost data. I'm not aware of any that have suffered catastrophic loss due to unauthorized read access to data. For a real cheap shot at offsite backup, occasionally put backups onto owners, managers, sysadmins, etc. laptops. If they can't be trusted, you've got bigger problems than the data they're carrying. Any backup is better than no backup, Several poor backups generally beat one almost excellent backup, and it's much easier.

      There's a statement "There is the "right way" to do things and the "real world" way to do things." elsewhere in this thread. That bothers me somehow. The "right way" means essentially ten times the storage for one-tenth the cost. Something's gotta give. When you need the backups, almost by definition, something isn't right, and there is no way to know beforehand what that something will be. I've always felt more comfortable with multiple backups, done different ways at different times, with much more attention paid to the physically smaller and more important things, but none of them done with a lot of effort.

      Question: Do you have backups?
      Answer: Yes, if anybody has ever done anything remotely resemblin a backup ;-(

  39. 72 hours thats pretty bad by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK I just may be jaded I work in a secor that thinks 5 minutes is earth shattering ammounts of downtime. 72 hours would ahve me everybody that works for me and some C level guys fired at the companies I work for. First things first what did they do wrong backups stored on site this is page 2 of a disaster recovery howto backup need to be stored onsite and remote, they also need to be verified as functional (yes I am that manager that insists that servers be restored and checked for functionality on the backup hardware during a work window) From the story it wasent even client data as much as it was there billing DB and other office information. When will people learn that information makes a lot of businesses and needs to be protected a nominal cost to do proper backups and house them remotly even if it's in a bank vault a few towns over perferably the other coast. Satalite uplinks can provide decent ammounts of bandwith in a pinch though the latency is horid.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

      Did you read anything since this was not a computer crashing they were distroyed along with the building so 72 hours is a fast recovery

    2. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Satalite uplinks can provide decent ammounts of bandwith in a pinch though the latency is horid.

      Considering latency doesn't matter, you might as well ship physical backup tapes to a vault several miles away. You have the usual truck full of storage tapes bandwidth argument again.

    3. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup... definetly a manager concerned about the minutes, rather than the details.

      Details like it not being one box or even one rack that went down, but ALL RACKS, ALL WIRES, ALL ELECTRICITY, ALL WALLS, FLOORS, AND CELINGS.

      Also too busy to bother with details like punctuation or a proper paragraph from the look of it...

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think I speak for everybody when I say, "Uh, what?"

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    5. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA before typing in a stupid rant with no whitespace.

      The whole building was demolished. This was a small operation, not some fortune 500.

    6. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by BenV666 · · Score: 3, Funny
      yes I am that manager
      So that's why your post is such a lovely formatted and readable text ;)
    7. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Yes I dead the article 72 hours for a lost building is pretty bad. It's not that hard to implement plans that have the equipment back up in minutes to hours.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    8. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by mph · · Score: 1
      Yes I dead the article 72 hours for a lost building is pretty bad. It's not that hard to implement plans that have the equipment back up in minutes to hours.
      What equipment? Ever been to a tornado site? It's not a question of bringing servers "back up." It's more like finding the servers embedded in a cow that's stuck in a tree.

      I helped the Red Cross with disaster recovery after a tornado once. It was a pretty small tornado, I guess, but the town was just a mess. There was a substantial Mennonite community there, and the men worked tirelessly to fix up structures (whether owned by Mennonites or not) while the women fed the whole town. I'm not sure whether they would have been much help in an "old-fashioned ISP-raising," though.

    9. Re:72 hours thats pretty bad by afidel · · Score: 1

      I've dealt with enough telco's to know that just getting backup circuits provisioned this fast was amazing. Hell during normal operations they typically want 30-45 days notice, after a disaster they are so busy I'm suprised he even got a response from his sales rep.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  40. Don't think so.... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    >But just as Aeneas in Virgil's Aeneid endured the worst the gods had to offer

    A single tornato is NOT the worse thing that could happen. It is pretty bad, but never underestimate how messed up God can make you.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Don't think so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. The Aeneid sucked. God damn Romans, always whining and pitching a fit about how mean and tricky Ulysses was. Get over it, you simple minded City-State xenophobic assholes. If I hear one more time about how cruel the Achaeans and Danaans were during the rape of Troy, I'm going to sack Rome myself. Pathetic cry-baby race of people.

    2. Re:Don't think so.... by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      A single tornato

      Anyone else read that as "a single tomato" and envision that famous Italian festival?

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
  41. Good Thing They 're Not a TV Network by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...cuz they'd be the laughing stock of their industry.

    The TV Ope Geeks always get such a big kick out of their l'il Internet brothers. It was fascinating to watch the melding of these two geek cultures in some shops circa late 90's. The I-Net guys were still getting all the dough and new toys, but thought that "Five Nines" was the name of a new Goth Band. Meanwhile, the TV dudes ("Yo, I got yer "streamin' video" right *here*!) were besides themselves as they watched the Young Gods attempt to re-invent rich-content distribution.

    This not meant as a knock to either "side" of course; the story just inspired a brief traipse down Memory Lane...

  42. New BOFH Excuse... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our ISP was leveled in a Tornado.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:New BOFH Excuse... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      We have implemented extremely distributed load leveling, with a shared experience overlay, and our remaining engineers assure a remodeming experience in only 2.592E+05 seconds.

  43. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wrong on SOOOOOO many levels.
    Let me start with this line:
    "I realize that slashdot is mostly populated by high-school educated "IT people", who give a shit about logs and backups"
    You claim to be a programmer, I have been a programmer and am now a Sys Admin, as both the BEST way to troubleshoot was from the logs. Unless you are the supreme programmer whose code never needs debugging and whose users never mispunch something causing an error a log file will let you see and know what has happened.

    Now for this line:
    "and restoring backup tapes is exhillirating and exciting."
    I have restored from tape backup. We had a "programmer" BS from Virginia Tec, Masters from UMass who was certain he knew exactly what he was doing when he blew away an entire production database. (Actually he was a really good guy who just made a simple mistake) Fortunately we had tapes to restore from. But if ANYONE thinks that a restore is "exhillirating" (yes I left your type/mistake in there) then they are just strange. That was one of the most tedious and boring things I have had to do. But we had been tedious in backing EVERYTHING up so production was not severely impacted.

    Now for where you directly insult everyone:
    "I fully expect the PHBs and army of cable monkeys to get the network up and running in our new location."
    So as a systems admin do I become a cable monkey? or am I a PHB? Either way I would be VERY needed if a disaster strikes just as I am needed every day. As for the elitist attitude and your lack of knowledge and concern for the backend of systems I am glad you do not work anywhere near me as I hate IT personal that have to call me to run windows update on their system when the latest worm comes around or to show them how to NOT clik ignore when Norton tells them they have a virus.
    In short, Please show some respect for your coworkers and realize that these guys were prepared and did what their plan stated they could do.
    If not don't be alarmed if somehow your account gets disabled and everything blown away and surprisingly they won't have backups, cause you "just don't care" for them.

    --
    I am 31337 or something.
  44. Of course it is wireless! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "There's fiber and wireless out in these woods"

    Come to think of it, the Bronze Age could be called "wireless" as well. Makes them sure look advanced?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  45. Re:However... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Tornado-beating ISP overlords.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  46. Re:Welcome ! by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

    don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...

  47. Re:However... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    ugh I knew I forgot one. :(

  48. More on Disaster Recovery by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

    Any ISPs looking to learn their lesson through these guys should check out this company. They make wireless disaster recovery systems for ISPs. Pretty nifty stuff. AES encryption and Mesh protocol. Cool beans!
    http://www.wavewireless.com

    --
    Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
  49. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yep, thats the way it works. I dont crawl around on the floor plugging shit in and getting dirty.

    But you forgot the rest of the story. ...5 minutes later

    Me "Yeah, it took IT a fucking hour to plug my computer back into the switch."

    CTO "An hour? What the hell."

    Me "Yeah some high school kid argued with me on the phone for 15 minutes about jibber and jabber and didnt want to come up here. Then some kid shows up and sits around just randomly clicking shit on my desktop, and types 'ping 127.0.0.1' into the command prompt like he knows what hes doing. I told the kid 50 times that theres something physically wrong with the network. But you know, he's taken a weekend course on computers and needs to act like he's got some sort of skill. It was a friggin joke. I swear to god, it took an hour for him to plug in an ethernet cable"

    CTO "Who was it? They're fired."

    Seriously, you talking about taking an hour to plug in a cable like it was someone elses fault just justifies everything I feel about dipshit administrators.

    They're just added beurocracy for the computer world, and I work to replace them each and every day with more sophisticated self-administrating softwares.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  50. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by blinder · · Score: 1

    First, this is a joke... we have a saying around here... goes something like: a good programmer is one who can replace all sys admins with a shell script.

    Its a funny joke.

    But anyway, I would becareful with your generalizations. I, as a programmer, have an enormous amount of respect for the admins because well, they know their shit and are pretty cool to boot... and you can't just say a programmer can be replaced by folks in India or Russia... as someone who has as much experience as I do, and not just hacking code, but doing analysis, design, consulting and all of the other things one gains by years of experience is not so easily replaced and is also considered a gem. Yeah sure college kids fresh from classes looking at jobs to do web development or whatever have a steeper hill to climb, but hey, that's the way its supposed to be... paying the dues and all that jazz.

  51. But... by macshune · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can they recover from the slashdot effect???

    The slashdot effect differs from a tornado in a few subtle ways:

    1) You can't see it coming (unless you pay money to be a subscriber)

    2) It doesn't hurt anything, except for webservers, the occasional OC line lit up like New Year's Eve, spammers, and the odd *IAA executive.

    3) A tornado doesn't typically smell like armpits, cheetos, empty 64oz soda cups, burning plastic, your parent's basement and/or too much cologne for that first date.

    4) It travels at the speed of light, a lot quicker than a tornado.

    5) Does not require specific atmospheric conditions to be present...just a link on the front page.

    Anything else?

    1. Re:But... by BMonger · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmmm... what if a website admin did become a subscriber. Could they theoretically take the RSS feed to know when a new post was made, pull the article text, scan it for their domain and if their domain was linked to just have a script auto-block referers from slashdot for like 24 hours or so? Somebody less lazy than me might look into that. Then you could sell it for like $100! It'd be like paying the mob not to beat you up! But only if somebody affiliated with slashdot wrote it I guess.

    2. Re:But... by BMonger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ohhh! Or even better yet! Have your site auto-post the articles text in a slashdot comment plus block the slashdot referer header for 24 hours! (patent pending)

    3. Re:But... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I'd think that the easiest method would be to have a program running that every couple of seconds pulls the last 100 or 1000 lines from the web log files and counts the # of times the referrer matches *.slashdot.org/*

      If the # exceeded some threshold, you could present an alternate, 'lite' version of the page, or set off some alert (an air-raid siren would be nice) to warn the support crew.

      RSS might work well, but /. asks that you don't pull it more than once every 30 minutes, and that's a looooong time to not know you're being hammered.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just block referers from slashdot in the first place

    5. Re:But... by ibpooks · · Score: 1

      Who cares what the fuck slashdot asks you to do with their bandwidth? They've never bothered to respect anyone else's bandwidth or webservers before running them into the ground.

    6. Re:But... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      1) I like the service these people provide (yes, there are people behind slashdot, and they work hard), for free no less, and try to respect their wishes when reasonable. The RSS request is reasonable. Just because we are geeks doesn't mean we _have_ to be elitist jerks.

      2) The folks who foot the bill for slashdot don't hammer other websites, we (the readers) do. So, getting mad at 'them' is kinda silly.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:But... by afidel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I think This would be an apropriate signal to use as a slashdot alarm for your datacenter.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey! Does that thing have a HEMI?"
      "Yeah"
      *switches on siren, the servers are instantly pulverized*
      "Oh, you mean the Charger! That has a HEMI too."

  52. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by pmz · · Score: 1

    Technician: "Stratjakt is all fixed up. I plugged his network cable back into the jack."

    Also, a programmer that cannot diagnose problems at multiple levels is a bad programmer. This is why I think tools like GUI IDEs can cause more harm than good, because they trick programmers into thinking everything is dandy and cool. However, when those tools fail, I've seen programmers waste days on what should be trivial to fix (it turns out that nifty tool is quite inflexible, indeed).

  53. Why, oh why do they respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT, sucka.

    HAND

  54. My ISP's disaster recovery plan by masouds · · Score: 0

    Well, my ISP (in Ottawa) was down for more than 24 hours, and after than one more day with using a slow link to Internet, with a caching proxy.
    What was the disaster? a nuke attack? plane crash? no! it was the famous blackout in mid august. Out of power (and ups), with no generator or fuel.
    I wonder whether they plan to serve Ottawa.

    --
    This .sig was intentionaly left blank.
    1. Re:My ISP's disaster recovery plan by trybywrench · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend works for what was UUNET in Richardson TX. His datacenter is on two seperate power feeds and has two or three massive generators with 30 days of fuel. When I asked him why 30 days he said that if the datacenter doesn't have power for >30 days then society is crumbling and Internet access/web sites are pretty low on the overall priority list.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    2. Re:My ISP's disaster recovery plan by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      30 days may be a bit much but as I found out one day 48 hours comes close to being too little in some situations. We had a massive generator capable of running most of our 4 story suburban office building for a couple days including the datacenter, AC for the datacenter, lights, and desktops. It would not run AC for the rest of the building or the elevator. At the ~35% load we placed on it and its 500 gallon tank the engineer from Catapilar said it should run for around 48 hours. Well we called our fuel supplier to get some offroad diesel delivered the next morning, no can do, they no longer stock it!?!? WHAT! Then we tried every other listed company in the area, none of them could get to us the next day with fuel. We ended up getting a fuel company out to deliver 300 gallons from Detroit to our offices in Akron, Ohio paying a $500 delivery charge and 70 cents a mile. After that we made sure to get a contract with a fuel company that guarenteed 24 hour delivery of offroad diesel =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  55. Off topic, I know..... by BlabberMouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but isn't the new moderation system leading to the first few good posts on any topic all getting modded up to 5 while the rest get ignored?

    1. Re:Off topic, I know..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but isn't the new moderation system leading to the first few good posts on any topic all getting modded up to 5 while the rest get ignored?"

      you must be new here..

  56. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Effexor · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're a VB programmer, aren't you?

    --

    As the air to a bird or the sea to a fish, so is contempt to the contemptible -W.B.

  57. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by venom600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow! This is exactly the reason that systems administrators generally dislike most members of their development group. Your attitude does not do very much to endeer us 'cable monkeys' and 'PHB's to you.

    "IT people", who give a shit about logs and backups and think plugging a PC and monitor into a powerbar is "computer science"

    If you think this is all that is involved in running a remotely large and reliable network, you are sadly mistaken my friend. A lot of thought, planning and testing goes into most corporate network infrastructures.....kinda like software development.

    "Computer Science" is a very broad term that encompasses much more than just 'programming'.

  58. make sure off-site is far enough away by DiveX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many companies in the World Trade Center thought that off-site backup meant the other building.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
    1. Re:make sure off-site is far enough away by hawkbug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly, that statement is very true - I had a buddy who worked for a company there in tower 2. He worked offsite in Iowa, and one day couldn't vpn in to continue his programming. Turned on the news, and you know the rest. The problem was, he had all his java source on their servers. Sure, they backed it up daily and had an offsite backup in the other tower... The bad news was he lost all his work, and a lot of coworkers. The good news is that the company survived, and simply contracted him on for another 2 years to complete the project. He had to start from scratch, but gets paid more as a result. I'm sure insurance covered the companies losses.

  59. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, companies used to need to employ a bank of telephone operators. They'd answer the phone, ask "how may I direct your call? Hold please." and plug the cable into the appropriate jack.

    They were some of the most critically important employees in any company in the 50s and 60s.

    Then they were replaced by a box in the back of the closet.

    Network administrators are todays telephone operators. Obsolete in a few decades. Just a part of a system that hasn't been implemented in silicon yet.

  60. Don't forget the grits! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    Since the event occurred in Tennessee, how could you forget to include something about Hot Grits?

    Unfortunately (?), I wasn't an active Slashdotter when Natalie Portman and Grits were associated in the minds of the troll community, so I can't come up with anything myself. Maybe that's a Good Thing.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  61. Amazing... by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    I find it amazing that this ISP can be up and running within 72 hours of losing its main building.

    I'm lucky if I can get change control OK for a very minor change on a single UNIX server within a week.

    Maybe all the managers that do nothing but make everything slower and more expensive all died in the tornado.

    1. Re:Amazing... by redwoodtree · · Score: 1

      That's what P1s are for, so you can get all your work done!!

    2. Re:Amazing... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      You must work for EDS.

    3. Re:Amazing... by 1s44c · · Score: 1


      No, DHL global IT.

      I've heard EDS is far worse.

  62. Ahhh... disaster recovery by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show... disaster recovery can make the difference between coming back online in a few days or not at all... http://www.nccomp.com/sysadmin/whatif-5.html

  63. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is a funny joke.

    My generalization was out there, but it sounds like you do more then programming. At some point, you have to acknowledge the fact that you are no longer just a programmer, but rather you are a software designer.

    I'm sure you would admit that there are a good many pompous programmers, but most folks who have been around are pretty humble. They know how much they don't know, and network admins who get to deal with 100 users and 30 different programs a day learn to be humble a lot faster.

    There are a lot more asshole programmers than there are Mordacs.

  64. It's a handle by 31415926535897 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I know this guy, and he's a pretty nasty h4XX0r. I didn't know he could take out whole buildings.

    Oh, wait, you mean, this was an *actual* tornado. Crap, that must've hurt.

  65. Slow down!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to post, at least take 5 seconds and think about what you're trying to say. Sheesh, what a ramble...

  66. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by HardCase · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, the hour delay was because of lazy people who kick their network cables out of the wall, then insist that a technician hold their hand to plug it in. It doesn't take an hour to find the problem...in fact, if you listened to the nice help desk man, he would have asked you to look for the end of the plug lying on the carpet. Instead, you wasted 15 minutes of his time explaining to him that you're a programmer who just doesn't care.


    What takes an hour is that the technician has to take care of the other 20 people who can't be bothered to plug a cable back into the wall on their own.


    Oh, and, of course, the tech also has to take care of real work - like fixing the programmer's machine after he installs the latest Webshots and Gator software.


    Me: "It took our technican an hour to get all of the malware off of Stratjakt's computer that he downloaded from the Internet."


    CTO: "Didn't he read the email that I sent out every month for the last six months telling the employees not to install non-work-related software?"


    Me: "Well, I asked him about that...he said that he was a programmer and just doesn't care."


    CTO: "He's fired."


    Oh, and, incidentally, when your self-administering software becomes proficient enough to keep your big foot from wrapping around the network cable and yanking it out of the wall, then I'd say you really had something worthwhile. At this point, though, I have my doubts.

  67. thankfully, its an generic "isp" mentioned... by zippity8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    otherwise -- were the ISP linked from the story, we'd have to see if they can also recover from a Slashdotting within 72 hrs! ;)

    Could it actually be that a /. article has an effect close to a tornado?

  68. 5 minutes is bad if your servers still exist. by caveat · · Score: 1

    That's like saying it's unacceptable for a 747 to fly without wings - they're a midsized ISP, certainly large enough that offsite backups would be wise, but be reasonable for a second; the entire physical facility was completely obliterated, electronics, electrics, offices, building...72 hours isn't THAT bad. 24 would be impressive ehough to get a headline though, IMHO.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  69. Re:Nice work indeed! by Tebriel · · Score: 1

    At least I had something constructive to say rather than a "ha ha ISP down means no pr0n" post like I'm seeing.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  70. Before we dole out all the praise... by s88 · · Score: 1

    "Though the tape and hard drives were stored onsite at the Jackson location, Hart and Warren figured onsite backup was better than none."

    They had to recover the drives from the rubble and after numerous failed attempts, finally found a data extraction company that could retrieve the data.

    While their recovery, and foresight is impressive, I don't think we should raise them up as the example, when they ommited something as simple as carrying a backup home every once and a while. They got lucky, with regards to company data, plain and simple.

    1. Re:Before we dole out all the praise... by krray · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. Hell, my insurance carrier questions me, every year, if we maintain offsite backups. YES (!)

      This isn't a debate on this backup method or that one -- just the fact that you NEED ONE. I personally gave up on tape and went to live hard drives for pure ease and speed, while at the same time cutting costs drastically. All servers, RAID-5, dump their data/configurations to a local RAID-1 IDE based system (encrypted of course).

      Daily it's running 35-40G currently. Dump that data to a portable drive and walk with it -- I take it home and offload it to a mirrored dumping system (RAID-1). Replace all backup drives every 2-3 years as needed. Having live backups of data onsite, in the car, and offsite is, well, comforting.

      I don't target workstations or operating systems anymore for backups. I can install a Linux base system in no time flat -- heck, even the Netware servers are somewhat trivial to get fired off. There's ways to just backup NDS (the configuration -- and a copy of SYS: is always nice too). Windows is just a base snapshot ready to roll for those unfortunate users (of course after I patch patch patch it to current :).

      My downtime in a decade? -0- Fortunately we're not a 24/7 operation, but a 9-5 Mon-Fri type. So yes, I've tested my backups, used the data, and have rebuild/upgraded every sub-system over the years. The one day that I had a major problem -- and sat there with one (1) tape in my hand holding ALL my data was the day I nearly shit a brick. Fortunately everything worked, but it was changed quickly.

    2. Re:Before we dole out all the praise... by s88 · · Score: 1

      Kudos!

      That level of preparation virtually guarantees that you will never have the need to use it. :)

      Scott

    3. Re:Before we dole out all the praise... by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      Good point. The last small business I worked for had off-site backups of all "critical" customer and corporate information.

      It was hardly sophisticated, as it just backed up changed files to a server across town every couple of hours, but it's good neough that if the offices burn they can still work.

  71. I live in Jackson.... by Daniel+Wood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am also a former Aeneas customer.
    Unless Aeneas has made some major changes they are quite certainly the worst ISP I have ever worked with. Aeneas has contracts with the Jackson-Madison County School System to provide internet service district wide. The quality of such service is, bar none, the worst I have experienced.
    I did some volunteer work at a local Elementary school helping teachers work out any lingering computing problems they had(Virii, printer drivers, misconfigured ip settings, file transfer to a new computer, etc). The internet service I experienced while I was there lead me to believe I was on a 128k ISDN line. Not until I went to the server room did I realize that I was, infact, on a T1. Now this is during the middle of summer, mabye four other persons were in the building, three of which were in the same room as myself. The service was also intermittent, having several dead periods while I was working. Needless to say, I remained unimpressed by said experience.

    When I was an Aeneas dialup customer, in 1998, the service provided by Aeneas was also subpar. The dialup speeds were averaging 21.6kbps, where as when I switched to U.S. Internet(now owned by Earthlink) my dialup speeds were always above 26.4kbps(Except on Mother's Day). There were frequent disconnections, and they had a limit of 150hrs/month.

    I'm not supprised how easy it is to restore subpar service. All they had to do was tie together the strings that are their backbone.

    1. Re:I live in Jackson.... by dinog · · Score: 1
      The internet service I experienced while I was there lead me to believe I was on a 128k ISDN line. Not until I went to the server room did I realize that I was, infact, on a T1. Now this is during the middle of summer, mabye four other persons were in the building, three of which were in the same room as myself.

      This doesn't surprise me. Certainly you don't expect the school to be paying for full T1 service when not in session. That would be ignorant and expensive. I probalby would have contracted for very limited service in the summer, perhaps exactly the 128k it felt like. Depending on the schools usage while in session, I might also only contract for fractional T1.

      Schools have limited budgets. Wasting money on needless bandwidth would be a breach of fudiciary duty.

      Dean G.

    2. Re:I live in Jackson.... by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
      When I was an Aeneas dialup customer, in 1998, the service provided by Aeneas was also subpar. The dialup speeds were averaging 21.6kbps, where as when I switched to U.S. Internet(now owned by Earthlink) my dialup speeds were always above 26.4kbps(Except on Mother's Day). There were frequent disconnections, and they had a limit of 150hrs/month.


      Have you never learned what line quality means? Not just from you to your local POP, but beyond the local loop, on the trunks that go across town (or further) to the ISP's POP?

      21.6 is an interim speed that, when seen in conjunction with v.34, v.90, or the other modern standards that go beyond 28K, all technicians know means "well, it's trying, but the lines are crap." Connections that lousy are also prone to disconnects. Nobody deliberately locks their modems down to that speed to be jerks or to save bandwidth - if they were that cheap, they'd put you on old-style 28K modems, which are practically free. The U.S. Internet POP was probably in a different part of town from the Aeneas POP, so you went over different trunks to get there. (since Earthlink took over, they probably dumped their local lines also, and it's probably Sprint's dialup network that is serving you locally)

      Anyone getting weird speeds like that should be bitching to the local telco, not just to the local ISP, though they should have worked with you to isolate the problem to bad trunks. The fact that you're not getting 33 or better connection right now means the local part of the loop is still crappy.

      Oh, I do agree with your complaint about being limited by 150 hours a month. Still, that's not a lousy service issue, that was a contractual agreement you signed up for, right?

      As far as the school's T1 being slow goes, did you attempt any troubleshooting, or just blame it on the ISP? What did the router logs say? Were all channels 1-24 up? Were you getting frequent bounces? What were the CRC errors like? Did you arrange for a circuit test? What were the BERT results? More importantly... did you try throughput while directly connected to the router, since a lot of schools have really pathetic wiring systems because they're installed by volunteers who don't design and install networks for a living?

      - No, I never worked for Aeneas, but I've done everything from dialup to customer network engineering for a global Tier-1 provider, and I have learned from hard, hard experience to be cynical about complaints without supporting evidence.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  72. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by sloth+jr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    IT is about handling the shit storm that happens when the software that YOU write fucks up in the colossal way that it does.

    Keep up the good work.

    sloth jr

  73. An ISP in tornado country by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Really ought to have all their hardware in a basement, with a diesel generator to run both it and the pumps (gotta keep the water out of the subbasement somehow.) Of course all the phone poles in the area would be down so unless all their communications wiring was buried (ha ha ha) then there's not much point to being up.

    Point is, if I had more than just a few thousand dollars worth of equipment, especially if I had a million's worth, I'd want to keep it safe. This is earthquake country (California) so here that means single story building, ground floor, no basement, but in tornado country, that means... putting it in the basement.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:An ISP in tornado country by sexylicious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some places in tornado country can't have basements. This is due to the soil having extra clay, the water table being a couple feet below the surface, or annual flooding.

  74. Re:Nice work indeed! by interiot · · Score: 1

    It may be common sense, but so is quality assurance, developing products for quality rather than by schedule only, etc... but none of these things ever happen in real companies it seems.

  75. I think I'd be pretty worn out... by Tickenest · · Score: 1

    if I were doing a bunch of levelling by a tornado. I mean, I usually do my levelling in locations such as the Royal Crypt south of Endor (Dragon Warrior IV), the Northern Crater (Final Fantasy VII), or Zeon's Lair (Shining Force II), but certainly not by a tornado.

    --
    This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
    1. Re:I think I'd be pretty worn out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a life.

  76. What about practicing your disaster recovery? by sllim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The company I work for practices disaster recovery once a year on all our major systems.

    In the article the writer was talking about how much work it was to migrate the T1 connections, and how they hadn't forseen that. That is exactly the sort of thing that a practice disaster recovery uncovers.

    If you want the model from the place I work it is simple enough:

    1. Run the disaster recovery during a 24 hour period
    2. Pat yourself on the back for what worked.
    3. Ignore what doesn't work.
    4. Repeat next year.

    Of course next year gets a new step:
    3.5 Act surprised that stuff didn't work.

  77. 3 words for them by essiescreet · · Score: 1

    Underpin it, boys! The lameness filter is lame...

  78. Re:However... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what? It's not the end of the world.

  79. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by wuice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep, thats the way it works. I dont crawl around on the floor plugging shit in and getting dirty.

    ...

    They're just added beurocracy for the computer world, and I work to replace them each and every day with more sophisticated self-administrating softwares.

    If you don't know how to crawl around on the floor plugging shit in and getting dirty, you do not have the perspective necessary to write software to replace the people who do. The best programmers are not arrogantly disconnected from the people in the trenches, especially if they're working on software directed towards their field. A good programmer needs at least to know what people commonly need support about in order to address it in future software. If your CTO is as out of touch and disconnected as you, I pity your fellow employees.

    You're also a poor team player, which is a liability to you and your career unless you work solo. You're also incredibly stuck up and elitist, which unfortunately probably actually helps your career. You're also way off base: you obviously consider yourself "above" the type of people who enjoyed this article, and your comments have been way more of an advertisment of yourself than anything to do with the issue. Why don't you drop out of this conversation and let the high school kids who spend all day plugging shit in enjoy it. Believe it or not, there are a lot more nerds in high schools than in high-paying programming positions. That being the case, this site should have more stories about them than you.

  80. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by swillden · · Score: 1

    Oh, and, of course, the tech also has to take care of real work - like fixing the programmer's machine after he installs the latest Webshots and Gator software.

    Now you're reaching. I don't know a serious programmer who will let *anybody* else "fix" his/her machine. I *might* let you babysit an OS install, as long as you promise not to touch anything.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  81. 72 Hours is a little long.... by fuqqer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    72 hours seems way too long to be out of business. That's 3 days of money that the ISP is not pulling in dough. Unless the whole internet is crippled, I'd ditch an ISP that was out for three days. One of the main selling points for ISP is connectivity rain, snow, shine, OR rabid squirrels...

    The company (ISP/consulting/services hosting) I used to work for had a DR plan to be executed in 24 hours with 75% functionality. Offsite servers and backups of course...

    More impressive to me is the World Trade Center folks like American Express and other companies that had DR plans situated across the river. A lot of datacenters and information services were functional again within 18-24 hours. That's PPP PPP (prior planning prevents piss-poor performance).

    I write good sigs on my bathroom wall...but this is not a real sig.

    1. Re:72 Hours is a little long.... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Well, remember a good number of their customers might be in the same boat, most ISP have local customers.
      After all, could you replace your home machine in 3 days? how about a small bussiness?

      But you are right, the only way to do it is to have half your capacity somewhere else if you are truely that important.

      I remember a white paper detailing how half of the bussinesses that went under after the first WTC bombing went under because of data loss.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:72 Hours is a little long.... by JungleBoy · · Score: 1
      >OR rabid squirrels...
      Hey, don't laugh. We had a squrrel take out power in half our town (Missoula, Montana, USA) because he decided to jump into a transformer at a power substation. There was another time in early 1995 when a beaver bit through the only fiber going out of town and cut the entire town off from the Internet.

      Yeah that was funny.
      --
      "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
      -Calvin
    3. Re:72 Hours is a little long.... by payslee · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My Dad worked in the IT department at one of those banks, across the street from the WTC. I found it interesting that according to him, the year-2000 bug scare turned out to big a big help when the real disaster struck. Of course, their systems were orders of magnitude more complex than this ISP's, but then they, had that much more redundancy built in to everything.

      Prior to 2000, they built an entirely new system and ran it in parallel with the current one, for six months. Every transaction went through both systems with the results compared to ensure compliance. They had run so many data recovery scenarios that even having to abandon their headquarters did not mean that service was interrupted for more than minute amount of time.

      So the article has a good point when it says you may not know what disaster will hit, but a good plan has flexibility built in. Total system failure can happen in oh so many ways, these days.

      --
      Doing my part to piss off the religious right.
  82. The Slashdot Effect by brlancer · · Score: 1
    It travels at the speed of light, a lot quicker than a tornado.

    While optical fibre may allow travel at the speed of light, copper lines do not.

    --
    Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    1. Re:The Slashdot Effect by macshune · · Score: 1

      Hey there brlancer-

      Yeah, I was rounding:) I think the speed of electrons in copper wire is something like 0.95c. I take it you'll let me know if I'm wrong.

      Thanks!
      macshune

    2. Re:The Slashdot Effect by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      Ummmm.... think back to Maxwell. Electric signal over copper wire by definition travels at the speed of light through the medium (true, the speed of light through copper is slower than through fiber, air, or vacuum and is not absolutely observed from all frames of reference as is the speed of light in a vacuum).

      So it travels at "a" speed of light, if not The Speed of Light in vacuo (tm, trumpet fanfare). And much faster than a tornado, at any rate.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
  83. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by HardCase · · Score: 1
    Now you're reaching. I don't know a serious programmer who will let *anybody* else "fix" his/her machine. I *might* let you babysit an OS install, as long as you promise not to touch anything.


    My point exactly. No serious programmer would allow that. Of course, no serious programmer would install that malware on their system to begin with, would they?


    -h-

  84. Planning and Funding by Detritus · · Score: 1

    In defense of the "idiots", many IT people and system administrators are hobbled by the lack of time, money, and equipment. There is the "right way" to do things and the "real world" way to do things. If management isn't willing to spend the money, and doesn't care, what can you do? At my last job, I had to bring a spare CD-RW drive and blank CDs in to work from my home to back up the critical files on my work PC.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  85. How about by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) Implement good disaster-recovery plan
    2) ??? (aka mad-scramble to initiate plan)
    3) Profit (or at least don't go under)


    This must have been a pretty in depth recovery plan though. I mean, even with backups and a redundant connection elsewhere... I think that for myself processing the fact that my office had just been bowled over by wind-on-steroids would faze me for a little while (office...tornado...holy...shit...must...recover.. .data)

    Now they're up and running, but what of their old office? It must be very interesting to have to deal with the stage of "step over rubble, salvage what we can" and the general amazement at nature's fury.

    I'm in the process of configuring several of my servers to offload to a remote master. If the town gets levelled we're toast, but if an individual location bites it, then at least critical data (accounting records, home dirs, etc) is saved. This will still be a big bite out of the business.

    Does insurance cover natural disasters such as tornado, would be a big question? A lot of insurance companies don't cover "act of god", etc

  86. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Valence_99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh what a sad day it was when I (being a cable monkey) was asked by the supreme programmer to get his computer back up. When I told him the his HD was dead, he looked at me with shock, as he explained that the last months worth of his so valuable work was on his disk. I asked him if he backed it up anywhere. He said no. He then asked me if we backed it up. I said no, we don't do that for local drives. We sent the drive off to see if anyhing could be recovered. Nope, big waste of time. Almost like his own little tornado in his PC. Hope it doesn't happen to you.

    --
    I'm only human!
  87. offsite backups by option8 · · Score: 1

    this is exactly why i have my backup tapes stored offsite. they're actually on a two week rotation. the current week is onsite - too frequently i have to get something off yesterday's tape because someone hosed a project file or changed their mind after emptying the trash - and the previous/next week's tapes are stored in my secure, climate-controlled offsite facility.

    okay, it's my house, but it counts.

    if my house burns down, it's unlikely the office will suffer the same fate, and vice versa - it's a 20 minute commute. of course, there is the possibility of a large nuclear blast that could hit both sites at once, but i doubt i'd survive, or for that matter care about recovering data, considering i'd be too busy killing off the other survivors and eating their brains..

    brains... brains!

    but on a more serious note, if i ever switched from tape backups (or had too much data to reasonably be able to do them on tapes) to a RAID system, how would i back *that* up and store it offsite? it's not like i can pull the whole shebang out of the rack, throw it in my car and head home each day...

  88. Better yet, underground mine / cavern... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't remember if it's Springfield or Joplin Missouri, but one of those cities in southwestern Missouri has a municipal ISP service and the data center is located underground in an old mine's caverns.

  89. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    And the serious programmer then ends up fixing all his own problems, when his attitude makes the support staff decide that he's not worth their time anymore.

    Get over yourself, please.

  90. tape backups? by Musashi+Miyamoto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article, it looks as if the only thing they had to restore from tape/disk was their customer database, so that they could send out the next month's bills. So, the 72 hours was basically putting in new hardware and turning it on. They probably lost all their user's web sites and other "expendible" data.

    How about talking about disaster recovery for a REAL company with tens to hundreds of terabytes of data sitting on disk? The kind of data that you cannot lose and must have back on-line asap?

    This article is like congratulating them for putting up detour signs when a road is destroyed, or rerouting power when a power line goes down.

    Just about everything that was destroyed was not-unique, manufactured items that could be recreated and repurchased. The only exception was the user data, which was pulled off of a nearly destroyed drive by a data recovery company. (Lucky for them!)

    I would like to hear more about companies that lose tons of difficult to replace, unique items, such as TBs of user data, prototype designs, business records, etc.

    I would bet that if a company were to permenantly lose these types of things, they would nearly go out of business.

    1. Re:tape backups? by KFury · · Score: 1

      I agree. The whole story is misleading. True, the ISP was only down for 72 hours, but their clients who relied on their ISP for data-backup as well as uptime, are probably still down, many with no hope of recovery.

      I'm glad they were so relieved that they got thier billing software running a few days later, but it's not really a gold star that they lost all their customer's data.

      Data's the easiest preparation to make. Creating a 'disaster plan' specifically for tornados, and not having so much as a weekly offsite backup isn't much of a plan at all.

    2. Re:tape backups? by weileong · · Score: 1

      I agree. The whole story is misleading. True, the ISP was only down for 72 hours, but their clients who relied on their ISP for data-backup as well as uptime, are probably still down, many with no hope of recovery.


      Sounds almost like the story was a pre-emptive PR exercise intended to counter the eventual angry-customer "what do you mean you had no offiste backups?!" complaints being published?

  91. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by swillden · · Score: 1

    My point exactly. No serious programmer would allow that. Of course, no serious programmer would install that malware on their system to begin with, would they?

    No serious programmer would be running an OS on which the malware will run ;-)

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  92. Been there, done that, Northridge Quake by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was playing minute-person at a "disaster recovery" meeting (the first one) where high-level suits were figuring out what to do in case of a disaster at their multi-state bank. Their core assumptions were initially as follows:
    • They would all survive whatever it was. (I was looking out the window, and seeing jetliners coming in for a landing ... a few feet too low and the meeting would have been over).
    • All critical equipment would survive in repairable condition.
    • Public services would not be affected over a wide area or for a long time.
    • Critical personnel would be available as needed, as would the transportation to get them there.
    • The disaster plan only needed to be distributed to managers, who would instruct people what to do to recover.

    That was on a Monday. The next Monday was the Northridge quake.

    • One critical person woke up with his armoir on top of him, and a 40-foot chasm between him and the freeway.
    • One of their buildings was so badly damaged that they were banned from entering ... and there was mission-critical info on those desktop PCs. Had it not been a holiday, the casualty toll would have been horrendous.
    • The building with their backups was on the same power grid as the one with no power and the generators could only power the computers, not the AC they also needed.
    • None of the buildings had food or water for the staff who had to sleep over, nor did they have working toilets or even cots to nap on.
    • One of the local competitors was back in business Tuesday morning, because their disaster plan worked. They rolled up the trailers, swapped some cables and were going again.

    They came into the next meeting a couple of weeks after the quake with a whole new perspective on disaster planning and training:

    • Anyone who survives knows what the disaster plan is and copies of it are all over the place.
    • Critical equipment is redundant and "offsite" backups are out of the quake zone.
    • They have generators and fuel enough to last a couple of weeks for the critical equipment and it's support, survival supplies for the critical staff. This is rotated regularly to keep it form going stale.
    • They cross-trained like mad.
    • They started testing the plan regularly.
    1. Re:Been there, done that, Northridge Quake by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well a solid disaster plan would (if you are big enough to afford it) have a second location far away. If you had a location in California and a second say in Boston you would be ok. Ofcourse that costs a lot of money and many small to mid sized firms could not afford it in the first place.

      But one thing with disaster recovery is you need to figure out what is and is not a disaster you should worry about. I live in Jerusalem, terorism is something very real here but mostly hits soft targets. On the other hand major blizards are a non issue. In Boston we worried about Nor'easters and occationaly a huracane. If you live in Utica NY you probalby don't have to worry to much about terrorism. Fire can happen anywhere.

      I don't know how you figure out what is or is not a probable event in your location. I suppose you talk to the insurance folks they have spent a lot of time figuring this out.

      The other question is how much recovory can you afford? If your disaster recovory plans puts your company into chapter 11 it was not a very good plan.

      I like saying "Utica"

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:Been there, done that, Northridge Quake by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      No, you shouldn't select both locations to be next to oceans.

    3. Re:Been there, done that, Northridge Quake by molo · · Score: 1

      About out-of-the-way places like Utica.. they don't seem like the most likely targets, I agree.. But all it takes is one crazy white boy to do something like the Oklahoma City bombing.

      Granted, the likelyhood of this is much lower than other places.. but it shouldn't be ruled out.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    4. Re:Been there, done that, Northridge Quake by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      True, terrorism can happen anywhere. My point was not to say that it can't but things must be put in proper context. In a midsized american city your should spend more of your time thinking about fire, weather or power issues than terrorism.

      OK if your building burns down it probably won't be national news, but its very relivant to *YOU* and your customers etc.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  93. Arial Photo by el_nino-2000 · · Score: 1

    Can't get much worse than what it was, take a look at an arial photo of the leveled building: http://www.aeneas.net/news/tornado_aerial/index.ht ml

  94. A compelling story.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Critics are calling it "A triumph of the American spirit."

    One ISP, a horrific tornado, and the fight for high availability.

    "The part where the sysadmin held the hard drive platter in his hand was so gripping. I gave my computer a hug when I finished the movie..."

  95. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Sternyz · · Score: 2, Funny


    5 minutes later -

    HR: "Hi, Stratjakt? This is Mindy in Human Resources, We've outsourced the programming department to a company in Bangalore. Your replacement, Raj, will be calling you today to discuss transferring over all your existing projects. Thanks for all your hard work-"

  96. NOC at University of Twente by Vexler · · Score: 1

    We had a similar story from a while ago:

    http://slashdot.org/articles/02/11/20/132259.sht ml ?tid=99

    There was a subsequent story that describes how that NOC went back up fairly quickly as well, thanks in large part to selfless sys/netadmins who put the good of the larger community ahead of their own need to sleep or, for that matter, do much of anything else.

  97. Redneck tornado jokes... by johnwyles · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kind of offtopic but maybe funny if you haven't heard them 495,954 times...

    You might be a redneck if:

    You've been on TV more than 5 times describing the sound of a tornado

    A tornado hits your neighborhood and does a $100,000 worth of improvement.

    --
    [[ the only 15 letter word that is spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable: it may soon be, however. ]]
  98. I wonder by austad · · Score: 2

    I wonder how long it would have taken them if they already had a redundant datacenter that everything was replicated to. In the financial industry, 72 hours passes and the feds come in and shut you down. 72 hours may be acceptable for an ISP, but not for a bank or services like Western Union.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  99. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    Umm.. You never hung around many software programmers have you? When I went to college, it was ongoing joke the teachers would make about MIS majors that were forced to take CS150 Basic C(well until they protested enough saying it was too and got the dean to remove it and replaced it with MCSE classes). Those were the days, taking $50 from future IS managers to do their CS homework.

    Respect is earned and not given. And I respect the engineer the who built and designed the building, and not the janitor who cleans it up.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  100. Re:can't top print comics yet... by petie123 · · Score: 1
    I'm going to find another service... etc...

    I used to live near Jackson, TN. If someone thought they could get another ISP there that doesn't have "OL", "arthlink" or somesuch in the title, they've been on the tractor too long.

  101. but... by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

    A beowulf cluster of these could have kept them down for a month or two...

    --
    Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  102. Why were they down at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Given they had BGP running and obvisouly another set of machines to fail-over the entire operation onto, why were they down at all? Admittedly the admin side of things (i.e new user signup, billings, user queries) would take time to recover while new workstation are commisioned. But the operational side should not have been down more than an an hour. 72 hours is a very long time in any business, may be the lesson they have learnt is how to bring it back up within 72 seconds.

  103. Hmmm... by EverDense · · Score: 2, Funny

    You should have posted a link to the ISP's website.
    Then we could've kicked a dog while it was down.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  104. Not good enough by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Insightful


    When you go to a DRP seminar, they make the claim that the majority of business that are knocked out for longer than 48 hours go out of business within 1 year.

  105. But...Self-medicating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not have the server detect overload from Slashdot, and direct the excess to Goate.sx.

    That will kill the effect right then and there.

  106. Forget your families men! by dapcook · · Score: 1

    Customers need to be able to access their porn!

  107. Re:can't top print comics yet... by mkldev · · Score: 1
    Sounds like you've been away too long. I lived only an hour from there in Martin (the home town of the CIO of Aeneas). It's not that bad. The other ISPs I know about are:
    • local schools and universities (faculty only)
    • ISWT
    • AT&T
    • Charter Cable
    • DSL (in some areas, not sure what provider)
    It's not that backwoods, and Martin's a town of 8,000 or so. Jackson is a good sized city (about 250,000 people in the Jackson metro area, 87k or so in the city proper) with a decent infrastructure. It's no Silicon Valley, mind you, but it's not anywhere near as bad as that....

    --
    120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  108. From the article... by n7ytd · · Score: 3, Funny
    Miraculously, the vendor discovered a recent copy of the customer records database on all four computers and was able to recover all of the customer data and return it to Aeneas, delaying printing of its May bills only minimally.

    This was from a mazazine for managers, after all. Now there's some good news that pointy-haired bosses can understand!

  109. In Retrospect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In retrospect I suggest that they should have been doing remote file synchronization with rsync. There would have been no need then to try to recover data from lost hard drives.

  110. What we do as a small company by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    I wrote such a plan for a small/medium sized business not to long ago. Part of the plan included leasing 3 off-sitededicated servers for nothing but back up. Their databases would be dumped once a day at like 2AM and then the data uploaded to the three off site servers. Their database is about 120MB, not that large, and those dedicated servers have dual Hard Drives between 80 and 120 GB SCSI harddrives in a raid configureation and those are also backed up on-site daily. While not fool proof, this should save their ass in case of an emergancy.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  111. Nice name for data recovery company... by jtheory · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read "Kroll OnTrack" as "Troll OnKrack"?

    Wait, did anyone else even read the article?
    Oh, never mind.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  112. Young! by holzp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did anybody else notice these lines:

    Meanwhile, Aeneas CIO and Operations Manager Josh Hart..

    'It doesn't even look like there was an office here,'" remembers Hart, 25.

    Aeneas launched its contingency plan when it was founded in 1996; since then, CIO Hart has enhanced the strategy gradually almost every year.

    Seems to have gone unnoticed that this guy founded the company at 18...before the dot com boom!

  113. If you use Linux you'd better get Storix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company decided to migrate from $olaris to Linux to save money. They also bought the cheepest intel boxes they could find to run it on. Not soon after we started having hard drive failures. Geee there isn't much for System Recovery on Linux. We finally found a company called Storix, but not after many hours of writing scripts around tar. It is bad enough to restore from a tar backup, let alone a dd=if /dev/sda of=/dev/st0.

  114. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by Artifex · · Score: 2, Insightful
    When I told him the his HD was dead, he looked at me with shock, as he explained that the last months worth of his so valuable work was on his disk. I asked him if he backed it up anywhere. He said no. He then asked me if we backed it up. I said no, we don't do that for local drives.


    This is really sad, and the company could have fired him for being incompetent. He basically destroyed their intellectual property through negligence, wasting all the money they invested in his project, which was almost certainly more than just his salary for that time period.

    If a truck driver gets a load and forgets to check his own tie-downs, and as a result loses the load before reaching his destination, whose fault is it?

    Besides, as supreme programmer, he should be motivated to work sometimes from home in the middle of the night, and have backups there :)
    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  115. Well by revividus · · Score: 1
    If they can rebound from being hit by several hundred thousand elephants, I'm sure they can overcome the /. effect.

  116. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by wuice · · Score: 1

    I took two years worth of C classes in college. However, I don't program in C now. I script in PHP and have worked professionally on many large business sites, but I'm sure that's beneath your respect (which I really don't care about). I have a friend who writes microcode for IBM and he's basically of the same philosophy as myself. And I've "hung out" with many programmers. Not all programmers are pricks.

    As for your analogy, it's cute but I don't see how it pertains to the conversation you tacked it onto. I can only imagine you consider the people who keep the programmers' computers, and the services they depend on to do their job, running to be akin to a janitor. Network admins usually get paid a little bit more than janitors, so businesses disagree. Secondly, I respect the janitor who does a good job keeping things clean, and there's no reason you shouldn't except for snobbery. You certainly shouldn't act like you know more about cleaning up than a janitor does, because if you're like most programmers I've met (myself included), you sure as hell don't.

  117. 12 Things heard after a tornado. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Things you don't want to hear after a tornado.

    1. "You don't expect me to clean that up, do you?"

      "So this is were 'Gone with the Wind.' was filmed?"

      "I'm sorry. I should have covered my mouth, before sneezing."

      "Damn! That was some serious burritos."

      "When I said I wanted a skylight. THIS ISN'T WHAT I MENT!!"

      [Sign in front]
      "Moving to a new location, with statewide coverage."

      "Hey dude. That was some party."

      "Can someone help me? I lost a contact lens."

      [Another sign]
      "Excuse our mess. We're remodeling."

      [Sign #3]
      "The dynamite factory is that way--->"

      "I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blow your building down."

      Stan:
      "But Ollie, it's not my fault."
  118. Re:Amazing is an innapropriate adjective by swillden · · Score: 1

    And the serious programmer then ends up fixing all his own problems, when his attitude makes the support staff decide that he's not worth their time anymore.

    You must not have read my post. I said I don't know any serious programmers who would allow the support staff to touch their machines. By simple logic, this means that all of the serious programmers I know do fix all their own problems.

    Get over yourself, please.

    This has nothing to do with any sense of personal superiority, it's just about control. I like my machine my way, and I don't want anyone mucking with it.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  119. Two live sites: the best offsite backup by 200_success · · Score: 1

    One of the larger clients of my company has this setup: they have a West Coast and an East Coast information center, presumably with identical hardware and software. At any time, one site is live, and the other is dormant. Data are constantly replicated from the live site to be backed up at the other site. Each Friday evening, they switch roles -- the backup site goes live, and the live site becomes the backup. That way, they know for sure that the backup copy is just as good as the live copy. They rehearse the switchover every week, so it should be no big deal should an emergency happen. With some fancy IP routing, I'll bet that the transition can appear to be transparent, too.

    They would still need backups to guard against data corruption. And yes, their hardware and software would cost approximately twice as much. But I have to say, I'm impressed by their idea.

  120. Re:However... by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

    Me too !!!!

    I, for one, welcome our new Tornado-beating ISP overlords.

    Yes, Yes, Yes! Read this line and chant it people!!11!