Slashdot Mirror


Is There An OS On My Hard Drive?

stm2 writes "Thanks to an agreement between Lindows and Seagate, from October you will be able to choose a hard drive with or without Lindows. Michael Robertson, in his usual marketing speak, compares this to adding "Fluoride in the water", because now you get for free something you used to need to go after (people used to go to dentist to get their Fluoride). According to the PR, the OS can autodetect and configure itself on the host machine."

356 of 553 comments (clear)

  1. What? by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Funny

    because now you get for free somethis you needed to go after

    What?

    1. Re:What? by claygate · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somebody set us up the Operating System

    2. Re:What? by saden1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The question isn't what but when. When will Microsoft money come into play. Sooner or later Microsoft will be knocking on Seagate's door with a fruit basked full of goodies.

      This a good start but I'm afraid money talks and we all know Microsoft money talks the loudest of them all.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    3. Re:What? by randyest · · Score: 5, Funny
      First, that set us up comment is truly funny for the first time in years. Second, please let me say that this is as cool as it is unexpected. And, to save you all the not-so-funny funny stuff, I will preemptively steal all the predictable bad jokes right now:

      • Imagine a beowulf cluster of these . . .
      • In Soviet Russia, OS comes with hard-drive built-in!
      • I, for one, welcome our new OS-bearing hard drive overlords . . .
      • I wonder what the SCO licensing fees are for one of these?
      • My TiVO is better, much better. Wholly unrelated, but better.
      • It's a dupe! A dupe I say!
      • Everyone knows Lindows is dead.
      • We haven't seen this sooner because Microsoft has been keeping it down. Damn monopolists.
      • I'm withg the GLAA (Gay Lindows Association of America) and let me tell you . . .
      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Somebody set us up the Operating System
      What happen?
      LCD Screen turn on
      Michael Robertson: "How are you gentlemen"
      Michael Robertson: "All your hard drive are belong to us"
      Michael Robertson: "You have no chance to install WinXP"
      Michael Robertson: "Billy G make your time"

      Ha ha ha ha
    5. Re:What? by Scumbag+Tracker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but, does it run Linux?

      --
      I track known Slashdot scumbags on my foes list!
    6. Re:What? by raffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      and....

      bsd is dying

    7. Re:What? by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

      What I want to know is why everyone is so surprised that Florida is in the water? It was built on a swamp, for gods sake. Didn't anyone watch Gentle Ben when they were young?

    8. Re:What? by zelurxunil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seagate probably has Microsoft knocking on the door for the last few years with more money than they've ever seen. Unfortunetly for Microsoft they are gaining a little bit of a track record of well lets say not neccessarly treating business partners as well as some think they should. Accepting any Microsoft deal is almost a death wish for companies. They suddenly become locked into a Windows only market, and when Microsoft becomes unhappy with them, they'll just buy them, or copy their ideas and remove them from supported Windows devices. If I where running Seagate, I would not want to have anything to do with Microsoft.

      --

      What's another word for Thesaurus?
      -Steve Wright
    9. Re:What? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Not for while. That might have worked with Windows 98, but NT-derivatives are notoriously non-drive-portable. They could do it, but it would take some work.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey there, it's "Somebody set up us the Operating System." Yes, "set up us," not "set us up." Your grammar is reflexively too good.

    11. Re:What? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Wow!

      I'm looking forward to TDK shipping CD-R Media with KNOPPIX pre-burned. ;-)

      I keep giving 'em away faster than I can write 'em anyway.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:What? by Illbay · · Score: 1
      How about:

      "Move 10,000 units of these per month...

      For great justice!"

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    13. Re:What? by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      Well at least they spelt 'fluoride' correctly.. And as for "with or without an Lindows" ... Oh God no! Not without an Lindows!

    14. Re:What? by Illbay · · Score: 4, Funny
      What not many people know is, they built SIX Floridas before the current one...

      And they all sank into the swamp!

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    15. Re:What? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Hey, I live in the USA, but I'm on a well, you insensitive clod!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    16. Re:What? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      And how, exactly, is Microsoft going to compensate Seagate for forgoing an interesting opportunity to sell a ton of hard drives? Paying them for their potential losses each quarter? Not going to happen.

      Also, Microsoft and Seagate are big tech companies. Like any of the major tech companies, they already talk, have plenty of discussions, blah, blah, blah. Seagate execs are not going to say "gee golly, I completely didn't consider the fact that Microsoft might object" *after* making a product announcement.

    17. Re:What? by netringer · · Score: 1
      The question isn't what but when. When will Microsoft money come into play. Sooner or later Microsoft will be knocking on Seagate's door with a fruit basked full of goodies.
      ...and do what? GIVE AWAY their most profitable product (Windows OSs)? Not likely.

      Sure they make OEM deals that force PC makers to install Windows, but those makers have to PAY for the copy of Windows. What they may not be a lot of money, but it is in no way free.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    18. Re:What? by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      knocking on Seagate's door with a fruit basked full of goodies Don't you mean high explosives on a 30-second fuse? That's how the Mafia takes care of its competitors, anyways...

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    19. Re:What? by inri · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these . . .

      Shouldn't this read:

      Imagine a RAID array of these

    20. Re:What? by trp0 · · Score: 1

      One last one:

      I just got my new pre-installed harddrive and it is working gre&*^*&#$NO CARRIER

    21. Re:What? by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      ..."I will preemptively steal all the predictable bad jokes right now:"...

      Which ones were the jokes?

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    22. Re:What? by candelap · · Score: 1

      All your hard drive are belong to OS.

  2. Formatting by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it will be easier to explain to people why new hard drives need to be formatted. To get rid of Lindows.

    1. Re:Formatting by Goonie · · Score: 1

      Well, as we all know, free software is communism and we can't have any of that...

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    2. Re:Formatting by apoch2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...gives Linux a bad name. Seagate could have sought out a better partner... perhaps SuSE or RedHat. Lindows is still too much a hacker dev to be useable by any normal people i.e. my gf.

    3. Re:Formatting by Citizen+Gold · · Score: 1

      I have to do this with most of my friends boxen when they come preinstalled with MS crap...

    4. Re:Formatting by Channard · · Score: 1

      And many x-boxen going by the popularity of mod chips.

    5. Re:Formatting by SashaM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Admit you were posting this just to brag that you have a girlfriend :-)

    6. Re:Formatting by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      but, it comes preloaded on the drive when you buy the drive only. perhaps you misunderstood. anyway, i have to do the same thing with the ms crap...

      --
      I write code.
    7. Re:Formatting by Illbay · · Score: 1, Funny
      Oh, girlfriend.

      I thought he meant "grandfather."

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    8. Re:Formatting by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup. Even as a _strong_ Open Source and Linux proponent, I think this is a bad idea.
      I wouldn't want my "blank" TDK cassettes with Plastic Bertrand pre-recorded on them.

      Linux, and all the other options, chould be _chosen_.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    9. Re:Formatting by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Poor Mac users.. It's just like the old floppy disk days when disks came pre-formatted for IBM.

      Maybe Apple should pay someone to pre-format with OSX 10.x and try to sell hardware that way.

    10. Re:Formatting by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Admit you were posting this just to brag that you have a girlfriend

      Naaahh. That was hypothetical. If I had a girlfriend, then Lindows would be too tough for her to use. ;P


      Knoppix, on the other hand......

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    11. Re:Formatting by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Right right right...

      At least it's not the most "FORMATTED and REINSTALLED" of all time...

    12. Re:Formatting by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The reason to dump Lindows is that everything runs as root.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    13. Re:Formatting by McAddress · · Score: 1

      Not anymore, since version 3.0, you can have separate users. Remember, Lindows is still a young distro, and it will continue to get better. Plus Lindows is easier to switch to than most distos, except possibly Redhat (Slackware, Mandrake)

    14. Re:Formatting by ksheff · · Score: 1

      So does every other linux distribution unless you install other users.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:Formatting by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

      Well, the hard-drive is being marketed as "LindowsHD" not "blank" If you buy a HD marked as "LindowsHD" expecting it to be blank you should not be using computers anyway, especially if they are connected to the internet :P

      Basically, the HD with Lindows preloaded is an option, you can still buy truly blank HDs. Also, from the article it sounds like they're pushing the HD towards manufacturers (not consumers) so they can use it to make PCs that run right out of the box, without having to mess around with software.

    16. Re:Formatting by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

      >>Yup. Even as a _strong_ Open Source and Linux
      >>proponent, I think this is a bad idea.
      >>I wouldn't want my "blank" TDK cassettes with
      >>Plastic Bertrand pre-recorded on them

      MS makes $$ by *selling* windows. Lindows makes money by their subscription service, like Redhat. IANA(Marketer) but this seems like an excellent business move to me.

      >>Linux, and all the other options, chould be _chosen_.

      You don't have to buy seagate HDs, you know.

      --
      "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
    17. Re:Formatting by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      I agree. BTW why hasn't anyone here complained about the obvious security concerns ? These hard drives sit on the shelf for a month or something, during which an *ahem* exploit is discovered. Someone buys it, installs it, boots their computer with a broadband connection, and BLAMO! I admit that its not very likely, but it certainly could happen, and then we'd all be bitching about how it was a stupid idea in the first place.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    18. Re:Formatting by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Which is why they shouldnt of gone with Lindows.
      Had this been a debian install, you could of forced an apt-get upgrade on first boot (and then maybe weekly).

      Of course, this might be possible with whatever Lindows' package manager is, but I really dont know.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    19. Re:Formatting by mrogers · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want my "blank" TDK cassettes with Plastic Bertrand pre-recorded on them.

      Non? Ca planerait pour moi.

    20. Re:Formatting by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yes, but RedHat makes creating a non-root user part of the install process, as do most other sensible distributions.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    21. Re:Formatting by Donut2099 · · Score: 1

      Lindows can auto update itself I believe, so any security patches should be applied as soon as they connect to the internet. I could be crazy though.

    22. Re:Formatting by http · · Score: 1

      omg its too late. i read that (twice) as "...explain that people with new hard drives need to be formatted."
      sleep should arrive any moment now...

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    23. Re:Formatting by apoch2001 · · Score: 1

      . You guys are so cruel. . You're right. I don't have a gf nor have I tried Lindows. I was just... umm.. living in my own little word. So sad that i spend days playing w/ Linux and not women. That was sarcasm, BTW. Or is it.... ;) . But naturally, the question for SashaM would be, does she/she/it have a bf/gf/thing? :D The debate rages. Perhaps a poll?

    24. Re:Formatting by nick+rawlings · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he was referring to the bloke who wrote "The Count of Monte Cristo"?

      --
      No sig for YOU!
  3. PBF by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Michael Robertson, in his usual marketing speak, compares this to adding "Fluoride in the water"

    Great, so not only do they make a crappy OS, their also after my precious bodily fluids.

    1. Re:PBF by danrees · · Score: 1

      > > Michael Robertson, in his usual marketing speak, compares this to adding "Fluoride in the water"

      > Great, so not only do they make a crappy OS, their also after my precious bodily fluids.
      This just goes to show that Linux is for Communists!!!

    2. Re:PBF by Edgy+Loner · · Score: 1

      I can no loner allow Linux subversion, Linux propaganda and the Linux international conspiracy to sap and impurify, our precious, bodily fluids.
      "Tell me Mandrake have you ever seen a penguin drink a glass of water? No? and not without good reason."

    3. Re:PBF by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1, Funny

      nope it is POE for Purity Of Essence... or was it Peace On Earth? They never could make up their minds in that movie... :)

      --

      You either believe in rational thought or you don't
    4. Re:PBF by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Michael Robertson, in his usual marketing speak, compares this to adding "Fluoride in the water"

      While Lindows puts fluoride, M$ puts concrete, and charges for it.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    5. Re:PBF by The+Troll+Catcher · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just really liked ravens?

      (Ravens - POE - get it?)

    6. Re:PBF by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he was, but the Purity of Essence dude (General Ripper) was Sterling Hayden.

    7. Re:PBF by 11223 · · Score: 1

      The recall code was OPE :-)

    8. Re:PBF by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Somebody take the pure grain alcohol away from this guy...

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    9. Re:PBF by gughunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do not avoid Linux. But I do deny it my essence.

  4. for free by mgebbers · · Score: 5, Funny

    now you get for free somethis you needed to go after

    that's how i tried explaining it to my girlfriend, but just like these hard drives, she didn't buy it either :-/

  5. Fluoride... by Sago · · Score: 3, Funny

    is a poison.... What are you trying to tell us?

    1. Re:Fluoride... by ScottKin · · Score: 5, Informative

      David Icke? You must be joking.

      Mr. Icke is a psychotic, raving lunatic who preys on people's naivete`, and makes money on it with his particular brand of "bovine fecal excrement" stuffed into books.

      Sources say that Mr. Icke's major source of information for his books can be found in the alt.conspiracy newsgroups.

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    2. Re:Fluoride... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is somewhat nonsensical.

      Flouride as a preventative measure against cavities was first discovered by the dentists. Of course, the industry/government might be exploiting the situation, but I think the author of the linked article perhaps is paranoid to the irrational.

      But pre-installed Lindows on hard drives sold seperately is an excellent idea :) I wonder if Mandrake or Red Hat will cut a similar deal with Quantum or whoever?

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    3. Re:Fluoride... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anything in quantity is a poison. Hell you can die from drinking too much water.

      Yes flouride is a poison, but it is also good for you in small doses, the kind of dose that they put in drinking water.

    4. Re:Fluoride... by deadgoon42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While the element Fluorine is highly toxic, I seriously doubt that Fluoride is is toxic or millions of people would be dying of fluoride poisoning. This is like saying table salt is poisonous because it contains Chlorine. While Chlorine on its own is a deadly gas, sodium chloride (table salt) is not poisonous and is in fact necessary for human survival.

      --

      Smeghead every day of the week.
    5. Re:Fluoride... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      You're not listening, are you? People were convinced that fluoride was good for them BEFORE the industry moved in. In fact, IIRC, the effect of fluoride on dental care was discovered when someone (anthropologists?) realized that people in some regions had excellent teeth in spite of poor general dental hygiene. They tipped someone off, and the effect of fluoride on teeth was discovered.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    6. Re:Fluoride... by AftanGustur · · Score: 4, Informative


      Flouride as a preventative measure against cavities was first discovered by the dentists.

      True, but it's highly toxic.. Have you seen the space-suits the fluor-handling employees of the toothpaste companies have to wear ?

      You're not supposed to eat toothpaste, and there are good reasons for that. One is that fluor builds up in your bones and can cause deformations in high levels.

      There realy are reasonable doubts about putting fluor in drinking water.

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    7. Re:Fluoride... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      As I said in an earlier post, there are laws underway to stop it being added to water supplies in Europe and the UK.

    8. Re:Fluoride... by CyberDave · · Score: 1

      Bzzztt! Quantum got bought (actually mostly bought out, IIRC) out by Maxtor a few years ago.

      Reminds me of when i bought a 20 GB hard drive on sale for about $100 at CompUSA.

      It was a CompUSA-branded drive. As many of you probably know, it's just a Maxtor drive with "CompUSA" instead of "Maxtor" on the box (do they still do that??). I took it home and inside I found a little note and a nice shiny new Quantum LCT 20 GB drive.

      CyberDave

    9. Re:Fluoride... by shepd · · Score: 1, Funny

      A "medical" site that advertises "Alien Identities" and "The plot against civilisation / World Revolution" does NOT inspire confidence in the information presented.

      Look, Jehovah's Witnesses bug me because they waste my time, but this is a wee bit over the top:

      "Subliminal Mind Control & Manipulation Archive Features -- Jehovah Witnesses' Subliminal Covert Mind Control

      And, just do let David Icke know, for future bullshit sessions, there is no CIA in Canada. We have CSIS instead. Therefore this little rant is a little pointless (and funny!) to us in Canada.

      I do have to read more there, I haven't seen such a good wacko site in a LONG time.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Fluoride... by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you know water is also toxic? Heck, even your blood could be toxic!

      Convincing people it's good for them is a clever trick.

      Or is it?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Fluoride... by Arker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Flouride rinses and toothpastes that are not meant to be swallowed are preventative measures.

      Flouride in the water supply, where people do swallow it, is an entirely different matter.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    12. Re:Fluoride... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that article *is* talking about the American CIA. It says something about "South Central British Columbia"; you don't see me jumping up and down and pointing because we have no British Columbia in L.A.

      That said, this Icke guy is a fucking loon.

    13. Re:Fluoride... by elodan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Take anything David Icke writes with a pinch of salt. He's a loony ex-footballer who believes that the world is controlled by a cartel of alien lizards . Google for "David Icke" and see what you get.

    14. Re:Fluoride... by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Flouride as a preventative measure against cavities was first discovered by the dentists.

      and later...

      In fact, IIRC, the effect of fluoride on dental care was discovered when someone (anthropologists?) realized that people in some regions had excellent teeth in spite of poor general dental hygiene.

      You lost me there, maybe you don't "RC" after all. Okay, people were convinced that fluoride was good for [their teeth], does not mean it is. Fluoride in the water is a different kettle of fish. Okay maybe they've found prehistoric remains with great teeth, now show me someone living in a state with fluoridated water with excellent teeth despite no dental care.

    15. Re:Fluoride... by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      While Chlorine on its own is a deadly gas, sodium chloride (table salt) is not poisonous and is in fact necessary for human survival.

      Well, that all depends on the quantities involved.

      --

    16. Re:Fluoride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A highly-connected guy in england once told me this (shortly before firing me, as it turned out, but that was unrelated and due to the .com crash).

      I didn't believe him at the time, thought he was winding me up (as usual). But then, as a result of a trip to eastern europe, I switched to drinking bottled water. After 3 weeks or so, my mind was very much clearer. Yes, I became more agressive and generally nastier, but definitely quicker on the uptake and less prone to unthinking action.

      I don't think it's an accident that MBAs and other business-management types seem to always drink bottled water - flouridation makes people docile and controllable. The controllers, on the other hand, try to avoid it...

    17. Re:Fluoride... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      good lord are you nuts?

      Flouride has helped the dential health of the People massively.. simply look at the dential data from a city with flouride and an area without it in their water. a Significant increase in dential work needed for those without flouride.

      Next you'll like to tell me that Chlorene in the water is also bad for you???

      Ok, here's a test for nuts like you that believe this crap...

      I'll drink treated water from a municipal water plant treated with alum,Sodium Hypochlorite,Hydroflorosisiliac acid (flouride) and a couple of polymers for the hell of it.. you drink from a stream or lake...

      let's see who lives longer.... better yet. let's see who doesnt die of Amobiec Dysentary.

      Water treatment has saved more lives than any medical discovery,process,whatever.

      only complete idiots think otherwise.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:Fluoride... by krygny · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm with Brig. Gen. Jack D. Ripper on this:

      "Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    19. Re:Fluoride... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why do Americans think people in the UK have bad teeth? In Scotland at least, people have very good teeth. Can't tell you about England, though.

      I thought all Americans had bad teeth? They seem to spend a lot of time and money getting them worked on.

    20. Re:Fluoride... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Lot's of things essential to life are toxic. Ingest too much salt, water, oxygen, iron, copper, selenium etc. and you'll soon find yourself fitted with a wooden overcoat.


      That something is toxic in sufficient doses is rather irrelevant to determining if a small amounts are essential or extremely beneficial to your health.

    21. Re:Fluoride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fluoride was first 'discovered' as a preventative measure by an industrial scientist working for ALCOA. Fluoride-based waste - which was illegal to dump in the ocean - is a major byproduct of aluminum production. At the time (1940's) the aluminum industry was plagued by lawsuits from farmers who had fluoride-based pollutants kill their livestock and plants.

      Fluoride was also key to the Manhattan Project - uranium hexafluoride was used to separate uranium isotopes. Consequently, the idea that fluoride was good for you became a very paletable idea for the government and industry.

      And how did they sell this crock of shit to the public? Edward Bernays was ALCOA's head of PR - read up on him, he wrote a book called Propaganda about selling bad ideas to an unsuspecting public.

      Fluoride in water is not a good idea. Anyone who thinks it is has been suckered by industry and the government, who think it's a neat idea to put something that's mildly less toxic than arsenic, and slightly more toxic than lead into our water supplies.

      Do your research next time, do not take what you think is true forgranted. This isn't scaremongering by loony crackpots who aren't scientists - most of this is historical and found in recently declassified military documents. If you want to read up on it, visit Google and look for Deepwater and fluoride, or Newburgh and fluoride. You'll find a wealth of information on it.

    22. Re:Fluoride... by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Why do Americansh think people in the UK have bad teesh? In Schcotland at leasht, people have very good teesh. Can't tell you about England, though.

    23. Re:Fluoride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes bottled water is the answer. Unfortunately many people do not realize there are less restrictions on purity of bottled water than on tap water. Many bottled waters are nothing more than distilled tap water and many contain fluoride.

    24. Re:Fluoride... by localghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Chlorine isn't neccessary, it's the sodium that you need. Chlorine is the simplest means of delivering it. In water, the sodium and chlorine dissociate, and the sodium enters the blood stream as an electrolyte. The chlorine simply joins the rest of the chlorine in the stomach acid (H+(aq) + Cl-(aq)) and is disposed of whenever the excess acid is disposed of.

      Flouride is similar. In water, you will find F-(aq), which is not flourine (which is a gas) but flouride (which is an ion). Flouride, because of its high electronegativity, binds to posivite ions the first chance it gets. The flouride, and any ion it carries with it, then passes through the digestive system and is disposed of, since it serves no useful purpose elsewhere.

      Now then, what was this article about? Oh right, hard drives and Lindows. Right.

    25. Re:Fluoride... by armb · · Score: 1

      > author of the linked article perhaps is paranoid to the irrational.

      David Icke paranoid? You're just saying that because you're part of the Giant Lizard Conspiracy, aren't you?

      --
      rant
    26. Re:Fluoride... by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since everyone else is off-topic, I'll say that it is interesting to look at stomach/intestine cancer rates in cities that Fluorinate their water.

      I also find it interesting that there might be a correlation to high-iron diets and cancer (ie. iron is an anti-anti-oxidant, meaning it makes free-radicals).. Western diet is high in red meat and iron-fortified foods.. Eastern diet is high in soy & tea (both very high in iron-absorbtion supressing chemicals, like tannins which are only available in green teas).. In the 70s they were so afraid newer soy milks / soy foods would be a real problem for kids which need Iron so they overdosed all our breakfast cereals to ensure kids would get enough.

      Men should avoid iron supplements and cereal. Actually, 1 in 200 people have over-iron-absorption gene mutation and most never find out about it.

    27. Re:Fluoride... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Fluroide is one of the most highly produced toxic waste products.

      Fluroide? Is that like a sick android, or something?

      Seriously, though...fluoride is a naturally occuring element. Atomically, it's called fluorine. A single atom of it is unstable, and tends to combine into F2, when it's called fluoride. Similarly to oxygen, which is unstable atomically.

      Sure, it may not be very good for us, but I'd hardly call it a highly produced toxic waste product.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    28. Re:Fluoride... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Eastern diet is high in soy & tea (both very high in iron-absorbtion supressing chemicals, like tannins which are only available in green teas)..

      Actually, tannins are are also available in red wines. (not white) So everyone go buy a fresh box of red wine because its good for you :D

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    29. Re:Fluoride... by alienw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fluoride in the water supply is more effective b/c it actually gets incorporated into teeth. Fluoride in toothpaste is a much less effective topical treatment.

    30. Re:Fluoride... by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe we are. There's an awful lot of unexplained cancer deaths this past 50 years. It's the funniest thing. Before that people didn't really get cancer.

      One aspect of what you say is true: People get more cancer now than 50 years ago. Maybe this is because people live MUCH LONGER now than 50 years ago, so they died of other causes before they were old enough to get cancer.

      200 years ago no one got Alzheimer's either, but then again, most people died before they were 60....

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    31. Re:Fluoride... by Natty+P · · Score: 1

      Was anyone else reminded of the famous 'Dihydrogen Monoxide' manifesto by this post?

    32. Re:Fluoride... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why I must swallow my food. Isn't just chewing it then spitting it out good enough?

    33. Re:Fluoride... by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      don't understand why i must drink what's in my toothpaste.

      I don't understand the fundamental basis for gravity but I'm glad I don't float off into space while I try and work it out :-)

      Cheers,

      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    34. Re:Fluoride... by mckayc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you're quite uninformed. Fluoride is allegedly only good for you if taken outside the body (i.e. just on your teeth.) There is no evidence that swallowing fluoride is good for you in any dose. In fact, it can cause fluorosis which causes teeth to become discolored and eroded.

      One of the biggest misconceptions the public has is that fluoride is "good" for you when in fact it's just one way for Alcoa and other companies that produce large quantities of fluoride as byproduct of their processes to dump in somewhere and make money of it. Before fluoride became "good" for you, it was classified as toxic waste and had to be treated as such.

      Furthermore, shouldn't people have the choice as to whether or not they want the "enhancement" of fluoride in their water supply?

    35. Re:Fluoride... by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Flouride rinses and toothpastes that are not meant to be swallowed are preventative measures.

      Flouride in the water supply, where people do swallow it, is an entirely different matter.


      Chlorine in pools are to disinfect and are not meant to be swallowed.

      Chorine in the water supply, where people do swallow it, is an entirely different matter.

      See what I'm getting at here? We have chlorine in our water supply. Chlorine is very, very, very toxic. Yet in safe quantities, we use it to keep our water from being contaminated. It is safe and is used the world over.

      Flouride is the same way. It is a toxic chemical that is used at non-toxic levels to prevent tooth decay. It has been used the world over safely for over 30 years. In fact, it is naturally in many water supplies already, just due to the mineral content of the crust in some areas. In fact, that's how they discovered flouridation. In England, they noticed children in an area with extremely high flouridation (not safe levels) got mottled teeth but did not get tooth decay. They then found a safe flouridation level that prevented tooth decay without mottled teeth.

      If flouridation was dangerous to our precious bodily fluids, we'd know about it. It's one of the most widely used, widely tested public health programs in existence.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    36. Re:Fluoride... by spike+hay · · Score: 1


      I didn't believe him at the time, thought he was winding me up (as usual). But then, as a result of a trip to eastern europe, I switched to drinking bottled water. After 3 weeks or so, my mind was very much clearer. Yes, I became more agressive and generally nastier, but definitely quicker on the uptake and less prone to unthinking action.


      That's why I only drink rainwater and pure grain alcohol.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    37. Re:Fluoride... by mikesmind · · Score: 1

      If you are against flouridation in water, here is a petition to the WHO.

      Stop Flouridation Now!

      --
      www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
    38. Re:Fluoride... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Breathin CO2 will kill you. My God, there is CO2 in the air! we're all going to die!
      Oh wait, It depends on how much CO2 is mixed with the air we breath.. whew.

      I wonder if that also applies to floride in the water?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:Fluoride... by Arcanix · · Score: 1

      Just grow up and accept the fact that the government and large corporations know what's best for you.

    40. Re:Fluoride... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Shhh. These are the same type of nuts that want to get rid of chlorination, too. At least until people start dying of cholera - though then they'd probably call it "chlorine withdrawal" or something.

    41. Re:Fluoride... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Who modded this infomative? While low chlorine is rarely a problem (at least compared to metals like potassium, etc.), Cl is still vital, and hypochloremia and the resulting metabolic alkalosis isn't a good thing. Since Cl is the major anion (-vely charged ion), it and bicarbonate are kinda necessary to balance those positive charges. It is also absorbed with the sodium and mostly excreted through the kidneys (sometimes with sodium, sometimes not, depending on the transporter).

    42. Re:Fluoride... by mckayc · · Score: 1

      Ah, ignorance is bliss isn't it? The government always knows best, right Toby?

    43. Re:Fluoride... by RedBear · · Score: 1
      This is like saying table salt is poisonous because it contains Chlorine.

      I can't imagine how this whole comment got +5. As a previous comment has stated quite clearly, any substance in the universe is toxic if ingested in (im)proper quantities. Including Fluoride and yes, even Sodium Cloride (table salt). It's necessary for human survival but an overdose will kill you just as easily as anything else. If you're lost at sea and try to drink saltwater to stay alive, you won't last long. Pure water will also kill you if can manage to drink about 16 gallons during a 24-hour period. That's right, H20 is a toxic substance, in the right quantities. You need X amount to survive, but Y amount will kill you.

      Just because something isn't deadly in minute, uningested quantities, like the fluoride in your toothpaste, doesn't mean it's perfectly safe to be drinking it every day of your life. It's worse with chemicals like fluoride because they have a cumulative effect as they build up in the body, like lots of heavy metals and dioxins. So anyone who says we shouldn't necessarily have fluoride in the drinking water definitely has a point.

      The comment I'm replying to is not only ignorant but dangerously ignorant. Please mod it down.
    44. Re:Fluoride... by Arker · · Score: 1

      This is a common misconception. Do a little research. Fluoride as a topical treatment is effective, because when it comes in contact with the outer calcium material of the tooth it hardens it.

      However, when swallowed, it is toxic to many of the bodies systems, in fact including the teeth.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    45. Re:Fluoride... by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      Timothy Leary did the same thing - look where it got him.

      Treat your mind as the most valuable Server resource at work, and use the most powerfull firewall in existence - CONSCIENCE!!!

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  6. Wow... by MoThugz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somethis just never cease to amaze me...

  7. The Usual Suspects by dobedobedew · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll save everyone some trouble, and get the obligatory usual comments over with now...

    I, for one, welcome our new pre-installed overlords!

    1. Have your OS pre-installed on HD's
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Actually, click-n-run is probably their step 2. I wonder if it will work for them?

    And yes, I know you can just add the debian sources and do an apt-get install packagename.

    1. Re:The Usual Suspects by XeXeN · · Score: 1

      Actually, it has the debian apt sources.. Well atleast all 4.0.x releases does, and I'm pretty sure 5.0 will also. I use Lindows, I also use just about every other Linux out there. Linux is like ice cream, the more flavors the better.

    2. Re:The Usual Suspects by XeXeN · · Score: 1

      In later news, Crest sues Lindows.com for including its Fluoride source IP in its version of the Linux kernel.

    3. Re:The Usual Suspects by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1
      And yes, I know you can just add the debian sources and do an apt-get install packagename.

      Better make that apt-get update && apt-get upgrade first.

      Lindows? Never touch the stuff, Wal-Mart pees in it.

      Apologies to the memory of W.C. Fields...

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
  8. Yea, um - what? by phrogeeb · · Score: 1, Funny

    I completely concur with my forebearers, and echo their sentiments, in asking:

    What the fuck is this post trying to say?

    --

    ------

    "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

    1. Re:Yea, um - what? by gilleyj · · Score: 1

      it's a free post as in beer. Lots of beer. Too much beer. Maybe some scotch too. And rum. And vodka. To top off the evening a glass of zinfindel.

      --
      feh
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Lindows and other KDE based distributions by Professor+Chaos · · Score: 5, Informative

    while i applaud lindows and seagate for this, I personally use Ark Linux arklinux.com which does the auto-login thing that lindows does but in a safer way. Plus the fact that arklinux is community based is a big plus as well. the way lindows runs as root is just wrong, arklinux created a program called kapabilities that makes it simple to give a user access to certain configuration things. plus its one of the few linux distros thats apt-rpm based. its really hard for me to weigh in on lindows. sometimes they seem like a smart and helpful company and sometimes they seem SCO/Caldera like. still, anything that gets more people using linux on the desktop is great to see.

  11. Ha ha by dmiller · · Score: 4, Funny

    Michael Robertson, in his usual marketing speak, compares this to adding "Fluoride in the water"

    This is very funny. There is a long history of wackos equating floridation of drinking water with government mind control. Here is an example, which is very tame by the standards of the alternate-science crowd.

    Gotta go, my alien gray masters are calling me by mind control satellite to their sub-antarctic base again!

    1. Re:Ha ha by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
      "Now all the scientific testing in the universe could not prove what a lifetime exposure to trace amounts of RAT POISON would do..."

      I guess that means she'll always have something to talk about at parties.

  12. Might have hit the right market... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a big chunk of people out there who aren't afraid to open up their own machines, but use Windows because they don't have enough Round Tuits to try Linux.

    If Lindows is easy enough to give a go it might last for a few days before being scrubbed (doesn't play game X)... but then the idea that Linux systems can do things pretty well will stick in the back of the mind for the next time they have to assemble a 'second machine' for general use in the house.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Might have hit the right market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but it's a shame that they will have Lindows in their mind, as opposed to Linux.

      Michael Robertson sucks, and so does his sucky Lindows. As for Seagate, I'd rather they paid more attention to the declining warrantees and declining quality control on their IDE hard drives than on turning a little extra profit by using their drives as billboards.

    2. Re:Might have hit the right market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Buy Samsung harddisks: They still come with 3 years of warranty, are no more expensive per GB and run quietly.

    3. Re:Might have hit the right market... by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      This is for small "white box builders". Those brave souls and small businesses who are still trying to make a living building cheap computers for resale.

    4. Re:Might have hit the right market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      but use Windows because they don't have enough Round Tuits to try Linux.

      You misspelled round tits.

    5. Re:Might have hit the right market... by darien · · Score: 1

      And it's a great defence against any attempt by MS (or similar) to claim that these guys are encouraging the use of pirate copies of Windows.

    6. Re:Might have hit the right market... by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      If it's a really slow morning, /. , then just dont post anything.

      Now that's just being dense. Of course this is big news, especially for systems builders too small to be able to swing a good deal with MS. Moreover, it's the first time anything like this has happened with Linux, and if it results in even the tiniest bit more exposure of open source OS to hoi polloi, then so much the better.

    7. Re:Might have hit the right market... by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Every Samsung hard drive I've owned has grown steadily louder over time. It's really aggravating. All of my newer Seagate Barracuda drives still run quiet with those spiffy fluid bearings. The Seagate drives are 7200RPM, and the Samsung drives are 5400RPM.

      Now if only someone would come along with a decent capacity 15000RPM drive that I could afford...

  13. Lindows and Flouride by Urantian · · Score: 1, Informative

    Michael Robertson compared Lindows to Flouride in the water??? He should have used a better comparison, if he was looking for positive impact. Flouride in the water is viewed as a severe health risk. He should do his homework before using analogies to make his point.

    --
    Urantian -- and proud of it!
    1. Re:Lindows and Flouride by DarkZero · · Score: 2, Funny

      If some Vegan on a glacially slow Crosswinds account that can't even proofread his site inbetween making childish MS Paint illustrations say it's true, then it quite simply must be! +5 Informative!

      In fact, this site is a wellspring of health information. According to the Vegan Children site, meat is nothing but child poison and milk is not only child poison, but also contains "bovine leukima viruses"! After reading this, I've also come upon the shocking truth that I died at least seventeen years ago and that you are actually reading the typed words of a long decayed child zombie! I would now begin moaning "Braaaaaaains!!! BRAAAAAAAAINS!!!" at you while stumbling menacingly in your direction, but brains are poisonous and evil meat, so instead of I must politely ask for whatever leftover celery or tomatoes you have sitting in your fridge. Preferably evil celery and tomatoes, Tomatoes Of The Dead you might say, but I'll take what I can get.

    2. Re:Lindows and Flouride by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 2, Informative
      If some Vegan on a glacially slow Crosswinds account that can't even proofread his site inbetween making childish MS Paint illustrations say it's true, then it quite simply must be! +5 Informative!

      Well, even a blind hen... But you needn't take the word of some vegan on the supposed problems of water fluoridation if you don't want to, take the word of Nobel laureate Arvid Carlsson instead.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    3. Re:Lindows and Flouride by pkp_gl211 · · Score: 1

      Yeah never mind the fast majority of people have no ill affects when drink water and using toothpaste containing flouride. Also ignore that fact that people who drink water without flouride on a regular basis have far more dental problems. Everything is harmful to someone... I love offtopics ;)

    4. Re:Lindows and Flouride by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Also ignore that fact that people who drink water without flouride on a regular basis have far more dental problems.

      No, that's not true. We in western Europe have about the same rate of incidende as you in the US (a bit lower actually). And we don't flourinate. Never really have.

      Everything is harmful to someone...

      Exactly the point. And as no one is seeing any benefits, there doesn't seem to be much point in continuing doing it. But my all means, be my guest, it's not like my water is flourinated.

      I love offtopics ;)

      Oh I don't know, Michael Robertson brought it up. :-)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    5. Re:Lindows and Flouride by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      but brains are poisonous and evil meat, so instead of I must politely ask for whatever leftover celery or tomatoes you have sitting in your fridge. Preferably evil celery and tomatoes, Tomatoes Of The Dead you might say, but I'll take what I can get.

      Wow, you sound like Bunnicula!

    6. Re:Lindows and Flouride by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      No, that's not true. We in western Europe have about the same rate of incidende as you in the US (a bit lower actually). And we don't flourinate. Never really have.

      This evidence, as well as the entire discussion itself, would be more relevant if I had ever met an American or Canadian that drank tap water. I have never met any such person in my life. Because of fears of water impurities (especially near me) or just the fact that tap water tastes like someone has urinated in your mouth, most people do not drink tap water. They drink bottled water or they just drink juice or soda.

    7. Re:Lindows and Flouride by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      This evidence, as well as the entire discussion itself, would be more relevant if I had ever met an American or Canadian that drank tap water. [...] They drink bottled water or they just drink juice or soda.

      And where do you suppose the water in the juice or soda comes from? You guessed it, the municipal water supply. Same with most beer. And much of the bottled water as well. (I'm guessing here, I don't know the percentages of the various types of bottled water; 'mineral', 'distilled' or 'municipal' sold in the US). Just because it was put in a bottle doesn't mean it magically appeared in the botteling plant. Most of it came there in a pipe from the water works. And the flouride wasn't removed, though the clorine may have.

      That's really the beauty of putting stuff in the municipal water supply. Unless you as the consumer don't distill it, it's going to get to you sooner or later.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    8. Re:Lindows and Flouride by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Sure, and should I take the word of Linus Pauling on vitamin C, too? OTOH, the guy does have some points about dosages and whatnot...as long as I don't have to pay the dental bills of the idiots that vote out fluoride.

      (What was the topic again? Oh, right - just format it and install Mandrake.)

    9. Re:Lindows and Flouride by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      as long as I don't have to pay the dental bills of the idiots that vote out fluoride.

      No, as I've said ealier, it's us in western europe that don't flouridate, so you don't have to pay our dental bills. And that's notwithstanding the fact that our teeth are about the same as yours.

      Anyway, I'll reply in kind with: "As long as I don't have to pay the medical bills of the idiots that flouridate." Which of course I don't have to.

      P.S. And Linus Pauling while being a gifted chemist isn't really in his own field when he's talking about vitamin C. (He got his nobel prizes in Chemistry and Peace). Arvid Carlsson OTOH is a pharmacologist, and recived his prize in medicin. So if you wish to argue by (reference to) authority, I think mine beats yours, hands down. (Quite a common phenomenon that, world renowned experts talking out of their arses when they open their mouths on a subject they really don't know anything about.)

      P.P.S. And getting back to the topic; as far as we're concerned Michael Robertson can keep both his Lindows and his flouride. ;-)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    10. Re:Lindows and Flouride by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      If you look just below the bit on Carlsson, the next passage is about Kamloops, British Columbia. The same province of Canada that I'm in. So, yeah.

      As far as paying "the medical bills of idiots that flouridate(sic)", I'm interested in any references to peer-reviewed clinical studies showing any harm from using it to prevent tooth decay, including epidemiological ones.

    11. Re:Lindows and Flouride by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      As far as paying "the medical bills of idiots that flouridate(sic)", I'm interested in any references to peer-reviewed clinical studies showing any harm from using it to prevent tooth decay, including epidemiological ones.

      Well, I don't actually have any references, as I said we don't fluoridate so we couldn't really make any such studies, when we're discussing the levels of fluor intake in wester Europe. It was more of a counterpoint to the statement "if I don't have to pay the dental bills of those that do not fluoridate" (paraphrased). There are no proper studies that actually show that fluor would do any good either. As opposed to improved dental hygiene, and a proper intake of calcium. If you have any references to recent studies that suggest that, I'm interested.

      That fluor in larger quantities (above 1.5 ppm, which is the WHO limit) is harmful is well known however, check the references that speak of 'skeletal flurosis'. That page also contains a lot of other references that I'm not that familiar with, but you might want to check them out as well.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  14. And this is aimed at who? by achurch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    with or without an Lindows

    Silent L? Hmm...

    At any rate, I have trouble seeing what Lindows is trying to accomplish with this move, outside of PR. Joe Sixpack will never buy his own drive, or at least his own system drive, and DIY people will, well, do it themselves. I'm sure it would be easier, and less failure-prone at that, to let OEMs install and configure for their hardware and then image their drives rather than hope that a preloaded OS on the HDD will work.

    So, what's the point of this?

    1. Re:And this is aimed at who? by RoLi · · Score: 1
      So, what's the point of this?

      The point is that in the future many whitebox-systems will preload Lindows that would otherwise ship clean.

  15. Windows by cdagobah · · Score: 2, Informative

    How long do you think it'll take Microsoft to entrap hard drive manufacturers to bundle Windows preinstalled and then force end users to pay for a $200 license. (damnit I knew 80 cents a gig was too good to be true!)

  16. This is weird by BooRadley · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most of the people who are buying hard drives do it for one of three reasons: either to replace a failing hard drive, to add space to an existing installation, or to build a new home-grown PC.

    I can't think of a good reason that any of these situations would merit booting a default OS from a hard disk, rather than formatting it, and installing what you want.

    The only people who might leave the Lindows OS on the hard disk are shops that build beige boxes, and don't want to burn a windows license to deliver a working computer. Maybe the mom and pop PC market is what they're after.

    --

    -- lk t lv ll th vwls t f wrds. T svs lts f tm t wrt bt ts pn n th ss t rd nd mks m lk lk cmplt dpsht.

    1. Re:This is weird by NightSpots · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What they gain is the attention of another press release, and a few dozen new users who happen to have the boot order of their BIOSes wrong, and will boot from the new drive instead of CD and see Lindows for the first time completely by accident.

      There will also be a ton of literature in the box, more inexpensive advertising. A lot of people have heard of Linux, but think it can be hard to install. If it's sitting there waiting for them, and they've heard of it but are afraid to try to install it, there's a chance a few might let it go ahead and boot... what is there to lose, right?

      Most people won't care. Lindows isn't going for "most people." Their target audience is the group of people who aren't afraid of Linux, but are technically curious. It's a small market, and this might actually let them make a little headroom.

    2. Re:This is weird by slagish666 · · Score: 1
      I can't think of a good reason that any of these situations would merit booting a default OS from a hard disk, rather than formatting it, and installing what you want.

      Actually, if I were building a new PC, it would be quite helpful to have an OS preinstalled on the hard drive in order to make sure the components like the sound and video card work properly before even installing a fresh OS. It would be pretty sweet to have that kind of immediate satisfaction.

      And, I would definitely want Lindows if I were to give a new computer to my parents. I am truly getting tired of telling everyone that it's time to use Windoze Update or get a firewall or update your A/V, only to have them click on a stupid fake Microsoft email message that completely messes up XP and Win2K.

      --
      "Consider the lillies of the goddamn field."
    3. Re:This is weird by JRoberson · · Score: 1

      Boo, I just wanted to say.. you have one kick ass Sig, Bravo.

      Jason

  17. Smart move for Lindows by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    I think this one the smartest moves Lindows could make. They are pretty much giving away the software for free and as a result become the default operating system on any system built with this class of hard drive.

    Not a bad idea at all.

    This is going to put Linux on a lot of desktops.

  18. Not a bad thing... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First off, it's not MS Windows so it's not *that* bad. second, you can opt to just get a blank drive. Third, it's kinda convenient.

    so quitcher bitchin :P nobody has a gun to your head saying you need to buy Lindows pre-installed on a seagate drive. I'm certainly not, although if i was buying a seagate i'd consider it.

    Plus for consumers this'll be "wow, no configuration, just plug the new drive in and the OS is there?" it's going to be great. Might even cause another mini-migration from windows for people who decide to get these drives. :)

    But i could be wrong.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
    1. Re:Not a bad thing... by piscoBandito · · Score: 1

      I just don't see the "wow" factor for consumers in this. In fact, I see more people picking this drive up in the store, not even being aware that Lindows is installed onto it than not, then formatting over it.

      Granted, someone who was looking into using Linux and buying a HD at the same time might be interested in this deal, but I just don't see that happening very often. I figure the hobbyist who's able to install his own HDD will be aware of and opt for RedHat (or another distro of choice) over Lindows if they want Linux.

      Maybe some kid building Mom and Dad a cheep PC would be interested in this?

  19. That is so amazingly useless by mphase · · Score: 1

    So whose is actually going to chose to buy a drive with Lindows preinstalled over a clean drive? Jerkoff end users who want to think they are using Linux but can't do it themselves.

    It's Lindows for god sakes. I think somebody got into the wacky tabacky again, what is up with that fluoride reference.

    1. Re:That is so amazingly useless by randyest · · Score: 1

      It's really not as amazingly useless as, say, your post is amazingly pompous, elitist, or annoying.

      Unsettling Fluoride references aside, ease off on the potential new users. They won't hurt you, or jeapordize your 3l337 }00l status.

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:That is so amazingly useless by darien · · Score: 1

      It's Lindows for god sakes.

      Well, did you expect Lindows Inc. to say "well, we could try to sell our product, but Debian's better and free, so let's try to get people to use that instead"?

  20. Prediction by BJH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first ten comments consisted of:

    - 1 first post
    - 5 complaints about the submitter's lack of English skills and/or the editors' failure to correct same
    - 2 comments on how fluoride is not good for you
    - 1 comment making a double entendre about "getting stuff for free"
    - 1 Gentoo fanboy comment
    - Exactly zero comments about the article itself

    I predict that these proportions will be true for this article no matter how many comments it collects.

    1. Re:Prediction by datan · · Score: 1

      what about 'first 'post'? lim n-> oo = ??

    2. Re:Prediction by anubi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      BJH, you are so right about the first posts in a thread. Most of the time, they are not well thought out, and reflect emotional responses.

      And rarely does any of the first 50 or so comments seem to come from anybody who has RTFA.

      I found setting up my Slashdot preferences to show newest posts first best for me.

      Its also why I have yet to mod a post "redundant", as I often do not make it to the very beginning of a thread.

      Note to others.. never be discouraged from entering a late post thinking it will never be read. I get the idea the Slashdot gurus would not have provided that reverse-listing option unless it was pretty well used. The last posts entered into the forum are the first ones we see.

      Generally, I find the very last posts of most of the Slashdot topics to be the most insightful of them all.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    3. Re:Prediction by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

      Check out the parent to my post here.. There's got to be a place for this in the FAQ.

      --

      Smeghead every day of the week.
    4. Re:Prediction by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, I just thought about the parent some more.. Where exactly does BJH's post fit in? Maybe he should add another catagory about offtopic posts, or /. rants.

      --

      Smeghead every day of the week.
  21. To clarify by achurch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:

    Fifty-five percent of the computers sold today are "white boxes" meaning they don't carry a brand name. They are typically assembled by small to medium size companies.

    s/OEMs/small to medium size companies/ in my previous post, and it still holds; unless these are really small companies, that only put out a few boxes a month or something, it'll still take not significantly more time and be more reliable to configure and image instead of using preloaded installers. Unless the companies in question have absolutely no computer expertise, and would Lindows really want to trust its reputation to such companies?

    1. Re:To clarify by ShadowDrake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >it'll still take not significantly more time and >be more reliable to configure and image instead >of using preloaded installers.

      Unless there's a lot of product diversity.

      Say you offer five different mainboards (K7/SiS, K7/nVidia, K7/VIA, P4/SiS, P4/Intel), three video cards (S3/Trident/SiS/whatever is $9.99 today, Radeon series, Geforce series)and 5 boolean options (CD burner, TV tuner, DVD burner, upgraded sound, RAID card).

      5*3*2*2*2*2*2=480 different systems are possible, not counting insignificant-to-configuration differences such as RAM and CPU levels or software packages.

      If you want imaging....

      Hope you make images for the configurations that become popular if you don't want to make all 480.

      or

      Hope you can make a single image that supports more than 1 system (I believe this to be possible... I recall a noname P200 that had several sets of mainboard chimpset drivers under Win95, though it sure threw a hissy when I replaced an i430TX board with a VIA)

      and always

      Pray that the next set of parts you use won't break your images.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    2. Re:To clarify by achurch · · Score: 1

      Good point; I hadn't considered that case. Still, how are you going to be certain the OS starts up and the hardware works correctly without testing it--and once you've tested it, why not keep the image around? With 200-300G HDDs available for cheap, even storing 480 images would be feasible using sparse files.

  22. Reality Distortion Field growing... by writertype · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Robertson's at 6.7 deciJobs, and climbing.

    1. Re:Reality Distortion Field growing... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I think Robertson's at 6.7 deciJobs, and climbing.

      Remind me to credit you every time I use the unit "decijob" from now on.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    2. Re:Reality Distortion Field growing... by randyest · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, my lawyers will keep you in check. DeciJob/DJ(TM) is already trademarked and patented as a concept (how you ask? I just coded it into some software, and you know the rest . . . ).

      Funny as hell, really. BTW, how many BagdadBobs are in a DeciJob? I think we now must inform them all that they are too far from reality. Or set them up the bomb. Or something :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Reality Distortion Field growing... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Damn, I'm glad I finished my drink before I read your post. DeciJobs. That's brilliant.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Reality Distortion Field growing... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      6.7 deciJobs = 67 Jobs!

      Assuming 1 Jobs = one Steve Jobs reality distortion field, how is this even possible?

      Shouldn't the Jobs be a fundamental quantity, like the speed of light? It can be come very close to, but never exceeded?

      For instance:
      Darl Mcbride would be around 997 milliJobs. (Very close, but not quite there.)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    5. Re:Reality Distortion Field growing... by lrucker · · Score: 2, Informative
      6.7 deciJobs is .67 Jobs. You're thinking deka. Still too large, though.

      As to whether a Jobs can be exceeded - it's a field, so what's being measured is the extent of that field. Jobs' RDF is large, but you can get out of it. I know someone with a smaller one that extends only a few yards - when you're within it, you believe Smalltalk is still viable and ParcPlace still exists (Hi Eliot!).

  23. And to make matters worse... by Calren · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...their "fluoride" causes a fatal exception in h2o.dll, and causes lungs.exe to be closed.

    --
    I've finally got a fan! Now what do I feed him?
  24. Why rip on them? by bdaehlie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who cares if most people will wipe their drives? Some might not, and either way some people will find out about the existence of Lindows. I don't think Lindows is betting their company on this move, so there is no need to rip on them for being dumb. If a drive is going to ship, it might as well have something on it by default. And if its going to have something on it, why not Lindows? Seems like they got a deal, even though its not going to make a huge difference. I think this is a smart move, and props to Lindows being smart enough to do it. People are so anxious to call Lindows (the company) stupid that they are overreacting to a small move made by the company.

    1. Re:Why rip on them? by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      Who cares if most people will wipe their drives? Some might not, and either way some people will find out about the existence of Lindows. I don't think Lindows is betting their company on this move, so there is no need to rip on them for being dumb. If a drive is going to ship, it might as well have something on it by default. And if its going to have something on it, why not Lindows?

      Why not Lindows? Perhaps because I don't want my hard drive to contain advertisements in the manual and boot sector for something that I don't want. If I want Lindows, I can get it myself. I don't need it pre-installed just so I can delete it, just like I don't need commercials to fast-forward through on my Buffy the Vampire Slayer or The Simpsons DVDs.

      This is nothing but a marketing ploy and it goes against the conventional wisdom that if a consumer is paying for something, he or she should not have to endure commercials on top of it. Granted, it's only on a portion of Seagate's drives, but I'll reserve judgement on that until the next time I go to CompUSA or some such store and see just how much variety there is on their shelves.

    2. Re:Why rip on them? by darien · · Score: 1
      This is nothing but a marketing ploy and it goes against the conventional wisdom that if a consumer is paying for something, he or she should not have to endure commercials on top of it.

      Um.
      • I pay for cable TV and it has adverts on it.
      • I pay for newspapers, and they have adverts in them.
      • I pay to travel on the tube, and there are adverts down there.
      • I pay to go to the cinema, and there are adverts on the walls, and before the film.
      • If I were to buy some breakfast ceral it would most likely carry advertising for a current film.
      • If I were to buy a new synth it'd probably have its manufacturer's name on the back, advertising its manufacturer to everyone who could see me playing it.
      ... and so forth.

      I don't think you can really say that what you cite is conventional wisdom. It sounds rather more like a personal value judgment. Which is fair enough, but in America it seems the only value judgment that matters is whether the consumer judges a product to be worth, on balance, the asking price.
    3. Re:Re:Why rip on them? by bdaehlie · · Score: 1

      Would you take a brand new drive and start using it without reformatting it? Absolutely not. You're probably not going to try to boot off it either because if there wasn't an OS on it, why the hell would you do that? So since you're going to erase the drive anyway, you might as well erase Lindows because it won't take any longer than erasing nothing. You're not being forced to endure anything. I agree that capitalism is bombarding us with too much crap but think it through before you react.

  25. I've just got one question... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    When does Kazaa partner with Western Digital to bring us hard drives preloaded with assorted music, movies and games?

    They could do like NetZero does and advertise it as Internet SuperDuperDownload Accelerator. Download music and movies instantly! It's just a form of caching right? Right?

    -JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  26. Smart move. Good for PR at least. by WoTG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like this idea. Those guys at Lindows sure know how to get publicity. Proof in point, they're on the front page of Slashdot for what, the 50th time? I'm going to guess that they'll be on Wired.com, News.com, a few newspapers, and elsewhere in the morning.

    Sure, most people will format the software upon arrival. Sure, few people are going to convert to Linux because of a preloaded OS on the HD. BUT, it costs nothing. Nothing to Lindows, nothing to Seagate (they have to test the drives anyway, it's trivial to load some software), and nothing to the end-consumer.

    At the very least, we shouldn't be dismissing this effort. It's another small step to bringing consciousness of Linux to the average PC user. Isn't that something we all want to bring some balance to the OS market?

  27. New hard drive installation procedure: by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Funny

    (1) Shut down computer.
    (2) Install hard drive, connect power and IDE cables.
    (3) Turn computer back on and make sure it autodetects the drive.
    (4) Tear your hair out as the computer proceeds to boot Lindows instead of (FreeBSD/Windows/Linux/Plan9).
    (5) Uninstall the hard drive, and sigh in relief as your old set-up proceeds to boot normally.
    (6) Return the hard drive to the store, yelling and screaming until they agree not to charge you a restocking fee.

    1. Re:New hard drive installation procedure: by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Yeah, fuck lindows and seagate. Here I rip out my exisiting drive and replace it with a spanking new one and all of a sudden my old OS is gone!!!! Vanished into tin air. I bet that linux nut erased it or something.

      Nice joke but this is a geek forum. We are the types to spot a split second shot of a command line. We know modern computers do not print one character at the time and we know how you should install a new drive.

      Of course I say nice joke. A friend who works in support tried to make me believe something like this actually happened. Apparently the customer believed the OS was in the memory or something. Either that or that the OS would be magically transported through the air or something. (he replaced the disks. Not added.) Didn't believe him.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:New hard drive installation procedure: by haut · · Score: 1

      4) Should just have Windows in it, users of the other OSs should know about boot order. :)

    3. Re:New hard drive installation procedure: by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      No, more like:
      (1) Shut down computer.
      (2) Install hard drive, connect power and IDE cables.
      (3) Turn computer back on and make sure it autodetects the drive.
      (4) Pop in KNOPPIX live-CD, format, and install distro of choice.

      BTW, If you put an empty drive in as primary master, it's just gonna bitch about not having an OS. So you'll need that KNOPPIX CD anyway.

      --
      #include "sig.h"
    4. Re:New hard drive installation procedure: by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      I just dropped an IDE drive into a system with a SATA main drive; and the IDE drive turned out to have a prior boot order. If it'd had an OS on it, I might have had a lot of trouble getting things straightened out again.

    5. Re:New hard drive installation procedure: by haut · · Score: 1

      Wouldnt you still just be able to change the boot order back in the BIOS, OS or not? I still don't see how having an OS on the drive would hinder the advanced user.

  28. What about boot loading?? by F'Nok · · Score: 1

    I don't know the specifics about lindows but... Considering that they are pushing this on a new drive, do they provide a *decent* bootloader to go with?? The majority of people like to install their own OS after, and the only way this would get much use would be if it bootloaded. That way, after someone throws on another OS, after a few reboots they might just decide to give it a look.

  29. Oh my god! by kosmonaut+pirx · · Score: 1

    Lindows.com was taken over by the
    Fiendish Flouridators!

    We have to preserve the purity of essence of
    our computer's body fluids...

    Kosmo

  30. Re:Unanswered question... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Lindows might be paying Seagate for the privilege. Really. Then they'll hope to get subscribers. Kindof like razors/razor blades, but more like free lamps/standard oil.

    If Lindows pays $5/drive with Lindows, it still seems kindof smart.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  31. Re:Unanswered question... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this same model isn't used in "the other camp"?

    I mean, what do I buy for having "Designed for Windows XP" stickers on my system that of course runs Linux?
    It must cost money to do the necessary validations and to attach the stickers during manufacture.

    At the end of the day, the customer is paying for that, even when he does not want to run Windows.
    (worse, he may be even paying for a Windows license he is not going to use)

  32. RTFA by powera · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA. It says they offer two versions, both the same price. Lindows is giving it away to increase their market share.

  33. Hmmm... by JoeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never thought this would be a way to undercut MickeySoft's OEM practices....

    Now, instead of asking, "Why should I over-right Windows? I have an OS that comes with my Dell!" People will say, "Why should I pay an additional $200 for Windows? I have an OS that comes with my hard drive!"

  34. Re:Unanswered question... RTFA by mihai · · Score: 1

    Costs the exact same price as a typical blank hard disc

  35. Re:i really dont get the point of this by deke_kun · · Score: 1

    My parents have an Odyssey, its the family wagon so to speak. Between the six of them (mum, dad, four small kids) they amazingly manage to use pretty much every cup holder in the car when they go on road-trips. If the few spare dont have cups in them, theyre usually filled with something else, like chips, nuts, or other snack for the ferocious carnivores that are my siblings.

    That said, I agree with you on the pgup/pgdown keys. Theyre not exactly highly used. Which makes me constantly beg the question, why did the G4 mini-keyboard opt to keep those keys, and not the much more used Del/End/Home keys.

    Ah logic.

  36. Re:Unanswered question... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why should it cost more? You don't think Seagate writes a crapload of bits to the drive during testing? You don't think they could see to it that the last pass leaves a certain combination of bits (Lindows) instead of some other combination of bits (1010101010.. or SEAGATE OWNERZ YOU!!!)

    Anyway, even if there is a cost, it seems clear that Lindows is paying it. Lindows isn't going to sell more hard drives, if anything it will sell less since people don't need the uber-GB that an XP install requires. So if Seagate isn't getting anything out of it, there's no reason for them to increase the cost to customers and hurt themselves in the market.

    Rather, it makes sense they are selling this otherwise empty space to whoever wants to use it. Lindows gets a change to make a convert. If nothing else, its free advertising. Hell, if I buy a drive that comes pre-loaded I'd probably check it out for curiousity sake.

    It's a smart idea. I predict that other hard drive makes make similar deals. What if someone decided to load the drive full of DRM music that people could just click-n-buy? Think about it...

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  37. Re:Fluoride kills by slash.dt · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Guess what, Oxygen kills too. Just because it is deadly in pure form does not mean that it doesn't have a benefit.

  38. Is that an OS on your hard drive? by Anonymous+Chicken · · Score: 1

    ...or are you just happy to see me?

    --
    This signature is intentionally left blank.
  39. It all makes sense now... by futant138 · · Score: 1

    All your bases are belong to us

    "now you get for free somethis you needed to go after"

    Yup....it's all in the wording...

  40. Caveat Emptor by deke_kun · · Score: 1

    My guess would be that, this move is aimed at cornering that section of the PC-building market that try to trick consumers by offering amazing deals for PCs by omitting to mention they come with no OS, since most Joe Sixpacks assume that a computer always has an OS.

    Now these shifty folks can safely claim that it does have an OS on it, with no increase in cost to them. Just think of the numbers of lindows boxes that are going to get handed out to ignorant buyers now!

  41. Lindows allows non-root users by steveha · · Score: 5, Informative

    the way lindows runs as root is just wrong

    It is possible to set up user accounts in Lindows. KUser, the KDE user manager tool, is available (renamed to "User Manager") and you can create users.

    It doesn't work perfectly out of the box: you will need to manually add each user to the "dialout" and "dip" groups if you want Kppp to work, and the "Click-N-Run Installer" will ask for the root password each time a user logs in. (The solution to the latter problem is to disable the C-N-R Installer from auto-running).

    Once you have created a non-root user, the KDE login manager will run and prompt for user name and password.

    The above applies to Lindows 4.0 at least; I haven't really looked at other versions. (I wrote a review of Lindows 4 for Linux Journal.)

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Lindows allows non-root users by Arker · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's all very nice, but Lindows is explicitly aimed at the folk that couldn't do that if you walked them through it. People that would figure all this out (or know that they needed to make a proper account in the first place, for that matter) aren't going to be using Lindows and are not the target audience for Lindows. They should ship it so that it runs with a user account and works properly that way out of the box.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Lindows allows non-root users by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      My wife is one of those people who thinks of computers as appliances. She couldn't stand logging into her linux machine. She would pester me about access to verious things on her system: "why can't I access the 'services' gui?" - and I would tell her she didn't need to mess with it etc. After fighting with her for awhile, I gave up and got her a Windoze XP machine - she has no password on it and blisfully goes about her business unaware of all the details underneath the hood. I just filter the hell out of access to that machine via my firewall, and I back up her data to a secure linux server often.

      So, I can see why Lindows chose to go the route they did vis-a-vis root access.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Lindows allows non-root users by steveha · · Score: 1

      They should ship it so that it runs with a user account and works properly that way out of the box.

      I agree completely.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  42. I bet it costs more WITHOUT Lindows. by sakusha · · Score: 1

    How much do you want to bet a blank drive costs more than the Lindows drive? It has to be, Seagate isn't doing this for free, they get a kickback from Lindows for each unit shipped, I bet.

  43. look in the firmware by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

    The answer to the story, even if the hard drive is blank, is most likely "yes", especially if its SCSI - just look at the firmware for the drive. I know for a fact Seagate disks run a real-time operating system (BOS or somesuch). As ATA gains ever more SCSI-like features (tagged commands and queueing), even modern ATA disks probably too run an embedded OS.

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  44. Actually, it's genius! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    After all, geeks will grab the drive and instantly wipe it anyway...After all, most Linux installs boot from CD so we'd never see it anyway! But...It's an added feature Segate can put on the box, Electronic stores can advertize it as a feature. Mostly, it signals the END of seperate OS software sales

    It will now be possible to go to a store, buy pieces and have a working computer when you get home with no other work necessary. That's a good thing!! Segate sells a lot of retail drives. If it works out even a little bit for them maybe others will follow suit. I've heard ATI has MMC for Linux in-house somewhere...but that's a big step to sell linux in the retail box. Most mice & keyboards work in linux. Most networking equipment works with linux [heck most home routers RUN linux!] This is a perfect path to getting Linux market share

    It's too bad BeOS didn't think of this first! After all, Robertson is making an end-run around the infamous MS bootloader license. Shops can sell pre-tested barebones systems...then conveniantly slip you a pre-formated Linux drive. They are just selling "upgrade" pieces. And they aren't selling Linux at all...the Manufacture just adds that as a "test" feature. Very, very clever.

  45. Re:Unanswered question... by marcushnk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lindows the OS is free.. If you want to take advantage of Lindows, you need to PAY for the SERVICES that open Lindows up to a useable product..

    If you get a drive with or without lindows.. its still the same price..

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  46. Free Advertising by mo^ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    whatever we may think Lindows has set out to achieve, there is no denying that i have just spent 15 minutes of my life reading what to all intents and purposes is an advertisement for the software on my favourite tech site.

    maybe that was the idea... instead of shouting "BUY LINDOWS" at us via TV, they have instead bred an (mostly)informed discussion on the product. Not bad for a bit of free advertising

    --
    bah!*@%!
  47. Brilliant! Really! by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK.

    So the biggest problem Linux faces on the Desktop is the Microsoft-sponsored stranglehold on the industry.

    Not only are OEMs strongly discouraged from installing Linux, they are usually contractually obligated not to install anything else!

    So, Mr. Cowpland, making the best of a *bad* situation, goes one back in the supply chain - to the hard disk manufacturers!

    Wow. Good thinking! No OEM contracts! Product delivered, ready for use!

    I know, 90% of these preinstalls are going to be nuked. So what. If Lindows gets 1%, given the cost of duplication on the drives, this is a smashing success.

    And, what else is he going to do? Knock Lindows as the orphan child of Linux, but, like Red Hat, this is clearly a positive commercial influence.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Brilliant! Really! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      I dont think 90% will be nuked. Here is why, new computer users will keep it for sure, most new computer owners dont know how to reformat. Also alot of people will think its an "upgrade" to windows when they buy a new harddrive and Lindows is on it.

      I think Lindows needs to corner this market quick before Microsoft gets involved.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    2. Re:Brilliant! Really! by kalinh · · Score: 1

      > So, Mr. Cowpland, making the best of a *bad* situation, goes one back in the supply

      It is interesting that Robertson and his product are on such a similar trajectory as Cowpland was with Corel Linux, another Debian based system for the masses, that people can get the two confused years after Cowpland has left Corel.

      I recall that one of Cowpland's coupes was bundling Corel Linux with motherboards. Hopefully Robertson fares better.

      --

      Metamuscle.com - News in the Iro

    3. Re:Brilliant! Really! by meffie · · Score: 1

      I agree. I just can't figure out what took so long to think of this tactic.

  48. IANAD by KarmaPolice · · Score: 1

    Well, IANAD (I am not a dentist) so what does flouride do for your teeth?

  49. Side note by Laconian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many conspiracy theorists agree that fluoride was added to water to control the minds of the populace. http://www.sonic.net/kryptox/mcp.htm

    1. Re:Side note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Many conspiracy theorists agree...

      Isn't it odd how it's always the conspiracy theorists who seem to be doing
      the conspiring?

  50. Debian inside by steveha · · Score: 4, Informative

    The good news is that Lindows is built on Debian. And even better news is that the Lindows.com guys didn't rip out the APT tools. Lindows doesn't use them (they use their "Click-N-Run" stuff) but the tools are there.

    It is actually possible to upgrade (or "side-grade" if you prefer the term) Lindows to just plain Debian.

    Basically, you just edit sources.list to point to a Debian mirror near you. (Lindows has it pointing to the main Debian server; be a good net citizen and change that.) Then "apt-get update". Then blow away all packages that have "lindows" or "xandros" in the name, if you want that pure free-software feeling... or don't bother, if you don't mind a few Lindows packages floating around. "apt-get dist-upgrade", handle any conflicts APT can't suss on its own, and install anything you are missing. If you blow away the lindows* packages and xandros* packages, you will lose LILO and the kernel, so you will need to replace those.

    Lindows by default sets up three partitions: a small /boot, a 256 MB swap partition, and the whole rest of the drive as a big ReiserFS partition, mounted as the root partition. I have not yet been able to build a kernel that can deal with the root ReiserFS; I keep getting the error "Unable to open initial console." I believe the problem is that it's trying to mount DevFS while the root partition is still mounted read-only, and I think the solution is to use an initrd (initial ramdisk). The 2.4.20 kernel that comes with Lindows 4 uses an initrd, and it of course works. I need to try building an initrd kernel soon.

    There will be an article about this on the Linux Journal website sometime soon... I'm not sure exactly when. I took a Lindows MobilePC and upgraded it to full Debian unstable; it now boots with GRUB and has a GNOME desktop, because that's what I prefer.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Debian inside by zsau · · Score: 1

      I believe the problem is that it's trying to mount DevFS while the root partition is still mounted read-only, and I think the solution is to use an initrd (initial ramdisk). The 2.4.20 kernel that comes with Lindows 4 uses an initrd, and it of course works. I need to try building an initrd kernel soon.

      When I accidentally crossgraded from Gentoo Linux to Debian GNU/Linux (because of a now-patched bug in Morphix 0.4), I had this problem. The solution was simply to have DevFS mounted automatically at boot (there's a kernel option for it).

      --
      Look out!
    2. Re:Debian inside by Blain · · Score: 1

      A couple months ago I tried working with a Lindows machine for my mother (who is over retirement age and not terribly geeky). She needed something she could do email with and write letters, basically. So I got her a Lindows machine through a listed provider. And I had trouble with it. I personally liked the Debian side of the system better than the Lindows side of things, and leaned on that side of things while trying to learn how to get good use out of it.

      Now, much of the problem came in that the machine came with an older version of Lindows than it was supposed to, so I was running into dependency incompatibilities that were screwing things up pretty badly.

      In figuring out what was going on, I stumbled into a Debian irc channel and mentioned the word Lindows -- I got the response you would get from telling the audience at a Rob Zombie concert that Barry Manilow would be opening for Rob. Once I got loose from the stake and stomped the fire out, one of them suggested looking into Knoppix.

      I found myself in a situation where I was going to have to download and install a full new system. Having very limited access to high-speed connections at the time, I decided to try Knoppix. In researching it, I found that installing Knoppix to the hd wasn't supposed to be all that tough.

      So I downloaded the iso, burned the cd, and tried it. It took some tweaking to get the graphics mode to work properly (but the reception my question got in the #knoppix channel was much nicer than before). The hd install took some tweaking (learning the partitioning game took several tries), and I had some fun getting the language things set to US-English rather than German, but I've been pleased with the experience.

      I wouldn't be comfortable having Lindows out-of-the-box running on the shared T-1 connection she has -- running as root with an always-on connection just bothers me. Although, honestly, Knoppix has the same problem. I set up fiaif as firewall, and it seems to be catching a whole boat-load of UDP requests (about one every 7 seconds) without a problem (other than growing logs). The machine's been running just fine since I left it several weeks ago (she lives a couple hours away), and she and her roommates are using it regularly -- no reboots needed, no system crashes, no problems.

      I've learned quite a lot in this process. In the next few weeks, I'll probably be putting together a new system for a friend that will just start with the new Knoppix without using the Lindows first-step. I'm much closer to ready to jump out of the MS world myself -- just a few more apps to duplicate or see if I can run under Wine, and then I'll be ready to go.

      I would recommend anybody interested in Lindows try Knoppix first, frankly. You can test it with no commitment, and putting it on a hd partition is pretty easy.

  51. Lindows in Japan by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I saw Lindows here in Japan at a broadband trade show.

    They had a nice selection of scantily clad ladies in Lindows outfits, who were giving out snackfood. On the snackfood package was a picture of an octopus punching Bill Gates in the nads with 8 arms. No I am not kidding. It tasted quite good. I picked up my Lindows show-bag as well.

    In the booth they had Lindows on everything with "Lindows approved" stickers pasted over the "Made for Windows XP" ones.

    Everyone was trying to rm -rf / the PCs, but were failing quite miserably.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Lindows in Japan by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      I think it has now become abundantly clear that we Linux users as a community need to begin a new Octopus-training initiative.

      --
      Build boards not bombs
  52. I think this is cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the negative comments here are obvious, but I think Lindows should be applauded for this move. A version of Linux (even if it's one for newbies) has managed to find a new and unique distribution channel that Windows doesn't have and is unable to compete in.

    I expect drives to have a brief burn-in / testing period at the manufacturer anyway, so it makes no difference to me what comes on it by default - all zeros or an OS. As long as I'm still able to low-level format / repartition / high-level format it.

    Admit it: if you ever got such a drive (especially if the pre-installed Lindows option didn't add to the cost), you'd boot into Lindows at least once to check it out, wouldn't you? If you were building a machine for a friend or relative, you might even want to see how they got along with it for a few days before you nuked it and installed Windows. Am I right?

  53. Is this creatively getting around the OEM? by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this a sneaky way to get a machine with Linux preinstalled? Can I now get a Dell box with a Seagate harddrive in it that has Lindows preinstalled? If so, this is pure genius.. it really makes you wish that Be had figured out this strategy instead of banging their head up against the OEM brick wall.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Is this creatively getting around the OEM? by sker · · Score: 1

      Yes .. it's so sneaky in fact that Robertson explicitly stated this as the point of the exercise in his communication. Hence the stats on "white-box" PCs. Most people seemed to miss this aspect of the article.

      MR sez: "Computer manufacturers will save billions by purchasing Seagate drives with LindowsOS, because it removes the need to purchase a $100 license for every computer they sell. 55% of the computers sold today are "white boxes," meaning they don't carry a brand name. The white boxes are typically assembled by small to medium-sized companies. These companies can now use LindowsHD and avoid entering into expensive licensing agreements with software companies. All the money they save as a result, they can pass along to their customers in the form of cheaper desktop computers."

      --
      nonsig. unsig. desig.
  54. Re:i really dont get the point of this by Tongo · · Score: 1

    I use the pgup/pgdwn keys constantly all day long. It's a helluva lot easier to scroll through code with them than pull my hands of the keyboard and use the scroll bar.

  55. HUH? by Sevn · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think I need somethis it explaineded it more some then. For this to go after an Lindows. Gazorninplat!!!!

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:HUH? by Sevn · · Score: 2, Informative

      gazorninplat - Something unknown, a thingy, a whatchamacall it of sorts.

      e.g., I cant finish this model, I lost the gazorninplat that came with it.

      That is from Pseudodictionary.com

      But I picked it up from an old ass episode of Garfield and Friends.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    2. Re:HUH? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      OK, this seems a good place to drop this story, Its been told to me by a friend who owns a small clone shop.

      some years ago, he gets a call. The person has a very thick accent and says "I need dose for my neck". My friend, puzzled asks him to repeat. "I need dose for my neck" comes again. Now, not understanding what the person is saying, he passes the phone off to one of his employees, "I need dose for my neck". Unable to discern what our mystery caller was saying, they ask "come to us at 123123 somestreet".

      About 30 minutes later, a person arrives, drops a computer on the counter "I need dose for my neck" he says.

      My friend hooks up the NEC computer and up pops "please insert DOS diskette" (or some such)... see he needed "DOS for his NEC."

      Maybe not funny here on /., but I tell you -- it sure is funny everytime a luser hangs up and someone in this shop says "oh, he needed DOSE for his NECK" -- funny as heck.

    3. Re:HUH? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Strange, I've always spelled it qzordnplat. I had no idea anyone else used the word...

  56. Re:Unanswered question... by RandomCoil · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you want to take advantage of Lindows, you need to PAY for the SERVICES that open Lindows up to a useable product..

    Oh, so it's *that* kind of OS... Now I understand why taking it to dinner and a movie didn't get me anywhere.
  57. Can't hurt... by gothicpoet · · Score: 1
    I don't think this is going to hurt anything, and anything that gets Lindows attention in the press is good for them. It might get a few people to try it out. Some few of them might even catch an interest in Linux... maybe...

    I guess the real question is, "how much do we care?"

    Is Lindows important?

    --
    Quoth he ::
    "It's all academic anyway..."
  58. Lindows is great by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Lindows is great but what I'd really like to see is a choice: Knoppix, Dyne:bolic or Biatchux. These are all GNU/Linux live bootable CD-ROM based operating systems with automatic hard ware detection, which makes them particularly well suited for such a purpose. Knoppix is a general-purpose system, Dyne:bolic is for multimedia production and broadcasting and Biatchux is a data recov./forensics anal. and incident response tool, which is great if one buys a new hard drive because one's old one contains important data but the system/security failure has made it inoperative. I do really hope more hard ware vendors will employ my idea, which I have been promoting for quite some time now as someone who is sort of into operating systems in my institute. Lindows should prepare the new ground for professional operating systems. This is great news indeed. All we have to worry about is making sure there will be no hard drives with Microsoft operating systems preinstalled, but Microsoft is a convicted illegal monopolist, so they wouldn't be able to do it anyway, thanks to DoJ verdict. Great news and a very interesting article.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  59. I for one... by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... am looking forward to 'Lindows Refund Day'

  60. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    > If you think Lunix is "usable", you need to stop using it for a few weeks and try Microsoft Windows XP Professional.

    I did that, and it sucked.....

    The command line was crap...I had to install cygwin to make that useable, and even then, the console app is brain dead - no ability to dynamically resize the windows.

    The lack of focus follows mouse bugged me and there's no virtual desktops.
    The ACL system completely screws me over when switching between the account I use for work stuff and the account I use for home stuff but using the same files....and fixing it requires clicking all over the place with a mouse (or braving cacl, the existance of which explains why Windows users think that a command line interface is difficult to use).
    Having my MP3s skip bugged me too....

    Note that there is a world of difference between Easy to Learn, and Easy to _Use_

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  61. Re:Its absolute genius. Wait for the next MSblaste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm having trouble deciding which sucks harder -- Lindows or HanzoSan. They're both so far beyond any conventional, comprehendible level of suck.

  62. The cost factor...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Suppose a copy of Lindows costs $50.

    Suppose the version packaged on Seagate drives is subsidised to $25 because there's no media, etc with it.

    Suppose as many as one in ten users keep Lindows on their drive.

    That means that the extra cost is only $2.50 per disk. Is that going to affect people's choice of drive so much? Most people use one brand and stick to it.

  63. Yes, bad analogy by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Europe and the UK, there is a lot of discussion over adding fluoride to water. In Scotland, they've pretty much stopped adding it in most places. It's poisonous, and too much fluoride (like if you have fluoride in the water and use a toothpaste with fluoride, ie. nearly all of them) it will cause horrible damage to your teeth.

    Also, some people are highly sensitive to fluoride. You can get non-fluoride toothpaste, but can you imagine the hassle it must be, having to use bottled water for things like brushing your teeth, making tea or coffee, and in fact damn near anything else where you might ingest some of the water?

    1. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The UK government is planning to force everyone to have it added to their water, which pretty much means I'll have to start buying gallons of non-flouridated water at inflated prices (my wife has a stomach condition and things like that are almost guaranteed to put her in hospital).

      Not to mention the major health risk - if you boil water with it it leaves a residue that is apparently more toxic than cyanide, so you have to scrub the kettle clean after each cup... no thanks. I can't risk dying because someone forgot to scrub the kettle out.

    2. Re:Yes, bad analogy by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Not to mention the major health risk - if you boil water with it it leaves a residue that is apparently more toxic than cyanide, so you have to scrub the kettle clean after each cup... no thanks. I can't risk dying because someone forgot to scrub the kettle out.

      While I'm not saying that there is no truth to this statement, I have a hard time believing it's as bad as it sounds. We've been living in the United States for years and have almost always had fluoride in our water. My wife frequently boils water for tea and only cleans the pot about once a week. We've never had any trouble with it, so although it may be more toxic than cyanide, it must be at a really low concentration.

      Nevertheless, for those who are sensitive to fluorine and any molecules it participates in, the UK government should be held responsible. If they are going to force everybody to have fluoride in their water, they should pay for bottled water for those who have medically proven problems with the fluoride.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Scotland, they've pretty much stopped adding it in most places.

      My understanding is that it was declared illegal in Scotland after Strathclyde Regional Council were taken to court and defeated in the early 1980s. This doesn't apply to the rest of the UK (separate legal systems).

      Personally, I think Michael Robertson needs his head looked at, and fast, because regardless of what you think of fluoridation (I think it sucks), it's a controversial issue and a good way to (pointlessly) alienate a large proportion of your audience.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's very important for non-UKians (and indeed, a fair proportion of our friends in the south) that Scotland is, in fact, a separate country from England, with a very different legal system.

    5. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Heh, yup... Sparcstation 2, Sun ELC, and a couple of SS1s in bits under my bed.

      Mine are running NetBSD, but I've got SunOS 2.4.odd on a hard disk somewhere.

    6. Re:Yes, bad analogy by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      apples naturally contain small amounts of cyanide... are you going to stop eating apples? the world is full of toxic things, and we eat them all the time. the fabric of your synthetic fiber shirt will abrade and give off trace amounts of known carcinogens. the plastic bottles your non-fluoridated water comes in will off-gass trace amounts of toxic chemicals. the pipes that you are currently getting your water from, i'm sure, contain trace amounts of all sorts of stuff that eventually makes it's way into your water.

      i think the one thing that's really bringing you down is only ingesting trace amounts of science.

    7. Re:Yes, bad analogy by freeweed · · Score: 1

      And people on /. complain when Americans don't get out of their country, or learn anything about other countries. *sigh*

      if you boil water with it it leaves a residue that is apparently more toxic than cyanide

      Hmm, that's interesting, most of North America has had fluoridated water for decades (I've only been around 30 years, so I can't swear on how far back this goes). I don't recall any large scale "more toxic than cyanide" poisonings happening within my lifetime. Oddly enough, we to will occasionally boil fluoridated water. Like daily. I've never seen someone "scrub the kettle out" after doing so - in fact, with most electric kettles, you can't even get into them in the first place.

      Considering cyanide is a pretty much guaranteed way to die, we should be a continent of maybe 2 million people by now.

      I guess this early in the morning, the moderators are all from the UK?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Considering the state of British people's teeth. This should be a top priority.

    9. Re:Yes, bad analogy by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UK government is planning to force everyone to have it added to their water, which pretty much means I'll have to start buying gallons of non-flouridated water at inflated prices (my wife has a stomach condition and things like that are almost guaranteed to put her in hospital).

      Uh, I really can't believe that. Flouride is perfectly fine in resonable quantities and prevents tooth decay. Larger quantities and you get problems like mottled teeth. Flouride is a common, common thing in the crust and is naturally found in many water supplies. Heck, the tap water I drink happens to be naturally flouridated, as it is in many areas. And obviously the animals aren't dropping over dead.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    10. Re:Yes, bad analogy by p4k · · Score: 2, Informative
      if you boil water with it it leaves a residue that is apparently more toxic than cyanide, so you have to scrub the kettle clean after each cup

      ROFLMAO, if you get a residue left in your kettle it's limescale, which is completely harmless. Whoever told you that must have been killing themselves laughing at the thought of you obsessively scrubbing your kettle out!

    11. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Doesnt ss1 have ie0 ? Memory is failing...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:Yes, bad analogy by ameoba · · Score: 1

      It could be worse; at least they think they're adding something good for you. Here, they can't even get the water clean enough to drink without a filter.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    13. Re:Yes, bad analogy by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Indeed, this was how its effect was noticed in the first place:

      "Fluoride's protective effect was uncovered accidentally in the early 1900s by a Colorado dentist who noticed some of his patients had mottled teeth and were less susceptible to cavities."

    14. Re:Yes, bad analogy by phthisic · · Score: 1

      i think the one thing that's really bringing you down is only ingesting trace amounts of science

      Very witty and very true. I think most people fall into that category.

  64. I think the reason could be to boost sales figures by stray · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading (and agreeing to) all the comments pointing out that this pre-installation totally misses any targeted audience, I think at the end of the day this might be just a strategy to inflate the number of "sold units" of lindows.

    You know, much in the same way as it is argued that the real installed user base for Windows machines is actually lower, since OEM sales of boxen that are later re-formatted and Redhatized are also counted as Windows installations in industry statistics. So, every drive sold marks one unit of Lindows out there, whether it's DOA or not.

  65. Lindows - the Stealth Version by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is what it should do. Sit on an idle and protected partition on the hard drive. Allow Windows to be installed as usual. Then, after six months, or every time there is a BSOD, virus attack, new piece of hardware that needs the now unfindable installation CDROM, popup a little window saying:

    Hi. I see that you're having some trouble
    using your Windows operating system. Would
    you like me to install Lindows so that all
    your problems will disappear?

    [OK] [Not yet] [Tell me more]

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  66. Re:Fluoride kills by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 1

    Could you explain how "Oxygen kills" or provide a link please?

  67. Good news. Good news..... by rew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are the tactics that we accused Microsoft of when they were trying to push other browsers like Netscape and other OSes like Linux out of the market. I'm pretty convinced they work.

    Give people for free the stuff that you want them to at least try once. They they have to DO THINGS to get rid of it or change it. People are lazy, so at least some won't.

    As to where will this end up? Well the small white-box assembly shops might be tempted to use the Lindows install on the drive to burn-in the computer. And leave it on if the customer didn't order a MicroSoft install. So the end users might end up seeing it. Great.

    Some people buy a new HD, and will install it as the first drive, move the old one over. Bingo!

    I installed two machines last week. They came with Seagate drives. Had a Debian based installation already been present, I'd just have upgraded that. :-) I'm a lazy guy!

    1. Re:Good news. Good news..... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      These are the tactics that we accused Microsoft of when they were trying to push other browsers like Netscape and other OSes like Linux out of the market. I'm pretty convinced they work.

      I believe Microsoft was only getting in trouble because they did not allow users to uninstall IE (not just because they included it).

      They they have to DO THINGS to get rid of it or change it. People are lazy, so at least some won't.

      If someone orders a blank hard drive, they are expecting to have to stick-in the Windows CD and go through the install process anyhow, so I don't think you can really say that they have to "DO THINGS" to get rid of it... It will automatically be taken care-of by any OS they chose to install.

      Had a Debian based installation already been present, I'd just have upgraded that. :-)

      I'm not too sure about that. Linux distros aren't nearly as flexible as they need to be. When you take a Linux harddrive from one system to another, you almost always need to manually work-out one problem or another. Not to mention those people with newer or unsuported hardware that, if they try to use Lindows, will be very unhappy about it, and probably complain to seagate, despite the fact that they got it for free. So I'm not sure this is such a great move for seagate, for that reason alone.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Good news. Good news..... by rew · · Score: 1

      Yes, Microsoft got into trouble because they didn't make uninstallment easy. And because they have a HUGE marketshare, and therefore it can be considered a bullying of the market.

      If someone expects it to be a blank harddrive: Fine. Those people simply won't notice. There is however a percentage of the people who will "run into" the OS and try it. Great.

      Another class of people who might "give it a try" is those that bought an extra drive, and get the card with it that says: "Lindows preinstalled, give it a try". If you're vaguely insterested in Linux/Lindows, you might just unplug the old drive, plug in the new one, and test-drive it.

      If you move a harddrive from one system to the next, the OS has been told it's configured, and the unconfigure/reconfigure of that "on average one" subsystem is unexpected. If however, the install on that drive KNOWS that it's going to be running on an "unknown" computer, it should be configured to run all configuration stuff at first boot. Should be doable....

    3. Re:Good news. Good news..... by ptr2void · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure about that. Linux distros aren't nearly as flexible as they need to be. When you take a Linux harddrive from one system to another, you almost always need to manually work-out one problem or another.

      Erm... maybe. But Windows wouldn't even boot when you take the HDD to a different computer. Ever tried to change chipset (motherboard) drivers on a Windows installation? Forget it.

      And let us not forget that WinXP has arrived. That makes a call to M$ because all of the hardware has changed. Stupid activation mechanisms...

      Debian just works(TM).

    4. Re:Good news. Good news..... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If however, the install on that drive KNOWS that it's going to be running on an "unknown" computer, it should be configured to run all configuration stuff at first boot. Should be doable....

      I certainly wish them luck, but I'm not too optomistic. I have yet to install a Linux distro on any system, and have it "just work". Always, a bit of work is required, and when any work is required, Linux knowledge is needed, which may be a show-stopper for many.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Good news. Good news..... by Pooquey · · Score: 1

      I have moved the same installation of Mandrake between three different pc's with completely different hardware set ups multiple times over the last three years (frying athlon procs is entirely too easy...) and never had to do anything other than boot the machine. I've only moved RedHat 7.3 and BSD 5 once with approximately the same result. Yeah I may have had to manually edit my XConfig file with the last two, but other wise smooth sailing. Try that with Windoze and I guarantee you, there will be a fresh install, or os repair in your future.

      --
      The english language is in beta. It's evolving but has not yet reached a level of usability.
    6. Re:Good news. Good news..... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I have moved the same installation of Mandrake between three different pc's with completely different hardware set ups multiple times over the last three years

      Congratulations, you've been lucky.

      (frying athlon procs is entirely too easy...)

      I will dispute that in the strongest terms. I live in the second-hottest desert in the world, with temperatures _regularly_ passing 120F degrees. I use poorly designed cases, keep my systems running constantly, have my XP2000+ overclocked, and I have yet to fry a single AMD processor. If you are having bad experiences, you need to look at other factors, because the processor certainly isn't the problem. (Most likely a crappy motherboard or power supply.)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Good news. Good news..... by Solarian · · Score: 1

      >I'm not too sure about that. Linux distros aren't nearly as flexible as they need to be. When you take a Linux harddrive from one system to another, you almost always need to manually work-out one problem or another.

      Heh, I've been using Lindows for a while and believe it or not, you can take the hard drive out of one box and drop it into another one, and it'll boot, redetect everything, and go on it's merry way. I've tried the same hard drive in three different machines. All running different hardware (ati and nvidia vid cards, and a different NIC in each)
      I applaud Lindows for this move. If white-box makers would sell a system with no OS, and now there's an OS, better for the end-user, better for the white-box maker (they can list it as ready to go instead of bare,) and better for Lindows. Not so good for Microsoft. Ah well.

    8. Re:Good news. Good news..... by Oscillatory · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure about that. Linux distros aren't nearly as flexible as they need to be. When you take a Linux harddrive from one system to another, you almost always need to manually work-out one problem or another.

      Heh. Ever try that with Windows, esp when the machines have different chipsets? I've never had much trouble swapping machines under Linux.
  68. Billions or Millions by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 1

    On this one -

    Computer manufacturers will save millions by purchasing Seagate[...]

    But Mike seems to think it will be a bit more -

    Computer manufacturers will save billions by purchasing Seagate[...]

  69. Re:Fluoride up yours, not in my water... by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 1
    If you can rebut all of his points, then tell me this:

    Why doesn't Portland fluoridate their water? Not good enough for them?

  70. Re:My city doesn't fluoridate, you insensitive clo by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Oh, man...

    Hrm... Can't comment on the 'stupidity' part, as I don't know your definition of stupid. (Obviously, the Republican party figures Portland is pretty stupid. Whereas the Green party thinks we're pretty darned smart. And the Democrats just plain hate us because we're TOO Green.) Don't have any comparative facts on cancer or senility. Docility? Well, Portland's about as non-docile as you can get, so you're wrong there... And malleability? Well, again, I'm not sure what you mean by malleable... If you mean that Portlanders (I believe the proper term is 'Portlandians', but I hate that term,) are more flexible than most, I'd have to agree with you. No 'lower rate' of that.

    So Fluoride is supposed to lower rates of docility and malleability? Apparently then, it turns you into a Southern Baptist fire-bleching, anti-Disney preacher. (i.e. makes you less flexible, and more aggressive at the same time.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  71. Re:Don't want this by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah, and if I catch any of you fluoride offtopic modders in M2, I'm gonna slap you with an "unfair".

    It was mentioned in the blurb, admittedly in a confusing manner. The editor was a dork for letting it go through like that, but in any case, people are going to talk about what they read in the blurb. Throw a stupid analogy in there, and you'll get a lot of discussion about it. Since when, even on /., is the heading offtopic!?

  72. Got to love that disclaimer! by oolon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Right at the bottom there is a lovely disclaimer....

    Lindows.com is not endorsed by or affiliated with Microsoft Corporation in any way - in fact, we don't even really like them because they are suing us.

    James

  73. Partitions ... by Flossymike · · Score: 1

    Firstly let me make make myself clear, I'd like the world and thier dog to use linux of some breed but ...

    When people have been experimenting in using linux they have found that they couldn't delete the partitions using the standard fdisk which comes on a win9x boot disk. Yep, I know, use cfdisk or fdisk off a linux boot disk, or use The Ultimate Boot Disk, www.startdisk.com, if you want to get rid of the partitions (I don't know if the recvoery console in winxp will delete the partions or not)

    Just trying to raise a valid concern

    1. Re:Partitions ... by KoolyM · · Score: 1

      Deleting "non DOS partitions" works just fine.

    2. Re:Partitions ... by Flossymike · · Score: 1

      Positivily had a fail on me before now, and I know of many more who say they can not get it to delete. Anyway, it's linux all the way now adays so it's been a while since I've experimented

  74. PARENT +1, Informative! by Dahan · · Score: 1
  75. Sure by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1

    My pleasure.

  76. Re:Fluoride kills by stray · · Score: 2, Informative

    yo...

    this is quite a good explanation:
    Is it harmful to breathe 100-percent oxygen?

  77. Re:duh by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Well,

    a) PlanetTimmy is experiencing technical difficulties

    and

    b) Normal service will resume shortly.

  78. Why? by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    I took a Lindows MobilePC and upgraded it to full Debian unstable; it now boots with GRUB and has a GNOME desktop, because that's what I prefer.

    I haven't used Linux a whole lot in the past couple years (these days its FreeBSD and Mac OS X only), so please bear with me if this is a stupid question, buuuut... What is the point/benefit of doing this, as opposed to just installing Debian? Seriously. It seems like quite a task to "side-grade" Lindows to Debian, so why not just stick with Debian to start?

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Why? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      The default debian installation routine installs a 2.2 kernel

      So type "bf24" at the Lilo prompt for crying out loud. Debian is NOT a n00b distribution. We like it convoluted enough to keep the rabble over in the Mandrake or Red Hat camp. :-)

  79. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
    The lack of focus follows mouse bugged me and there's no virtual desktops.

    You know what really bugs me about this? About 10 years ago, I used to use Unix + X-Windows all the time, and I really liked the focus following the mouse. Everytime I had to use Windows, the lack of it bugged me. Now I'm forced to use Windows by the place I currently work at, and since I have to do without this feature most of the time, I actually have trouble adjusting to it when I manage to sit down in front of X-Windows again. I usually end up turning it off because I just can't get used to it in the little amount of time I'll have. Sad, eh?

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  80. Re:Fluoride up yours, not in my water... by iainl · · Score: 1

    Jesus H. Christ man, you've just tried to back up your argument by using David 'I am the Second Coming, and will defect the 7ft Lizards who have taken over the world' Icke as a source. Are you completely insane?

    I'm against flouride in the water too, as some people are clearly allergic to it, but bringing the mentally unstable Icke into it is a very bad idea.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  81. Re:Fluoride kills by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 1
    Thanks, I've heard in the past that breathing 100% oxygen was hazardous, and wondered if that was what you meant, aside from the fact that it's very dangerous to be around.

    Now that I've read the HSW article I understand why, thanks again.

  82. OEM XP may not allow reinstall by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
    ...new piece of hardware that needs the now unfindable installation CDROM...
    If they're running the OEM version of Windows XP, they may be shit out of luck anyway as a major hardware upgrade [motherboard, hard drive, CPU] effectively makes it a "new" PC in Microsoft's eyes. This requires a new activation code which Microsoft will not give out more than once for OEM versions.

    IMHO, this is a self-inflicted time bomb for Microsoft. Wait and see how it pans out.
  83. Its not Seagate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't really understand why Seagate is mentioned. Lindows is delivering their OS on a HDD. It happens they chose Seagate but it's not like Seagate have added Lindows to their products...

  84. How about something more useful? by Agent+R · · Score: 1

    ..like an OS on a chip. So that we won't have to worry about viruses or other errant screware trying to destroy the functionality of PCs.

    If you want a new or different OS, plug in a new chip.

    --
    !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
  85. Re:Unanswered question... by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

    What if someone decided to load the drive full of DRM music that people could just click-n-buy?

    Didn't someone do this already? Gateway maybe? Anyone remember?

  86. Deaf Smith County by DoctorFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    now show me someone living in a state with fluoridated water with excellent teeth despite no dental care.

    That's exactly how they figured that fluoride was good for your teeth. Poor folk in rural Deaf Smith County, Texas had excellent teeth despite not having access to dental care, and they figured it was because the water was naturally fluoridated.

    Of course, it apparently also made a passel o' Smiths lose their hearing, but they could still smile right nice...

    1. Re:Deaf Smith County by nattt · · Score: 1

      It may be good for your teeth, and maybe it's a lie. Good teeth is related to pretty much one things - the amount of sugar you consume. Eat lots of sugar - have bad teeth. If you want good teeth, don't eat sugar. flouride doesn't come into it.

      Putting the industrial waste product and poison (fluoride) in the form of fluorosilic acid is not clever and not funny.

      Conspiracy theorists thing that fluoride makes you dim, which is why it's added to water. I juat think adding a poison to water int he vain attempt to mass medicate an entire population is one of the greatest criminal acts of our time.

      But I'm on well water (no fluoride added), so should I care?

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    2. Re:Deaf Smith County by alienw · · Score: 1

      If you want good teeth, don't eat sugar. flouride doesn't come into it.

      The amount of sugar you eat affects your teeth very little. I eat tons, and I haven't had a cavity in a while. Now, before I moved to the US and started drinking flouridated water, I used to get them all the freaking time. So I do think flouride makes a difference.

      Oh yeah, and here's another bit of news for you. Water companies actually add chlorine and sometimes ammonia in significantly greater concentrations than fluoride. Chlorine is from the same chemical group as flouride and is about as poisonous. Yet I haven't seen a single complaint about chlorination.

    3. Re:Deaf Smith County by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1
      The amount of sugar you eat affects your teeth very little. I eat tons, and I haven't had a cavity in a while. Now, before I moved to the US and started drinking flouridated water, I used to get them all the freaking time. So I do think flouride makes a difference.

      I asked my dentist about this once and his response was that this has a lot to do with chemistry (PH I think?) of each person's mouth.

      You're anecdotal evidence is nice all, but studies have shown there's not really a correlation between tooth decay throughout a population and whether or not fluoride is in its water (at least today).

      For what personal anecdotes are worth, both I and my parents grew up in Anaheim, CA, which at the time did NOT have fluoridation. Both my parents had lots of childhood cavities (I think around 10 each). I had none until I was 17 (3 very small ones) and had been living in a city WITH water fluoridation for 5 years. The more frightening part of all of this was that I remember when I was a child my parents talking about how the reason I must have less cavities is because the water was now fluoridated (which in fact, it was not). One account doesn't prove anything, but I think it's interesting to point out that the real reason was probably improvements in dental care. My mother did go to a dentist until she was in her teens, while I went every year since early childhood.

      It's also important to point out that not all municipal water systems in the US are fluoridated. I think I read a CDC statistic that said currently about 2/3 is though. In California even, its more like 1/3. Los Angeles only recently started fluoridating its water, mostly because of some changes in state law.

      Oh yeah, and here's another bit of news for you. Water companies actually add chlorine and sometimes ammonia in significantly greater concentrations than fluoride. Chlorine is from the same chemical group as flouride and is about as poisonous. Yet I haven't seen a single complaint about chlorination.

      Ya, but the motivations for adding chlorine (I don't know anything about ammonia) are completely different. Chlorine is added to water to reduce bacteria. The damage on your body from chlorine is counterbalanced by the risk you'd face from nasty diseases like cholera and typhoid. These diseases can KILL people (especially infants and maybe the elderly too). The only effect leaving fluoride out of the water these days would be (debateably) more dental work. The fact is, we're not living in the middle ages anymore, where dental problems were one of the leading cause of death. Modern dental medicine is quite capable of fixing these problems without a major risk to life.

    4. Re:Deaf Smith County by alienw · · Score: 1

      I know that aquarium enthusiasts hate chlorine. My point was that there isn't an organized lobby around it like there is around flouride. There's a reason the flouride present in water doesn't kill fish but chlorine does. The flouride is present in fairly small amounts. 1ppm is not a whole lot. In my city, chlorine is present in about twice that concentration, and the maximum permissible level is higher. This stuff is about equally poisonous as fluoride -- it's basically the same chemical as chlorine bleach.

      My opinion: there is something more behind the fluoride lobby than meets the eye. Don't know what that would be, unfortunately.

    5. Re:Deaf Smith County by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Chlorine content in my area averages between 4 and 8 ppm.

      At a previous job, I used to help regulate the water in a closed-farming facility, and we had to jack it up to 12 - 20 ppm for normal water and something well above that for certain washing tasks. (Imagine a tap that smells like a pool all the time.)

      We didnt drink the washing water, but the animals and staff consumed the 12 -20 ppm water... the animals did their entire lives. We raised some very healthy animals, including rats with near - record breaking longevity.

      My point is, some animals and possibly people can tolerate a lot of chlorine, more than is usually put in water mains to control bacteria.

    6. Re:Deaf Smith County by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      If you're drinking unpurified well water, you probably have a lot more than just fluorine in there...

  87. How about no... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    Thanks, but I'll take the hard drive WITHOUT Lindows installed on it. Linux or no Linux, I don't want an OS preinstalled on my hard drive. If I wanted that, I would buy a systen from a computer manufacturer.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  88. Re:Unanswered question... by stewwy · · Score: 1

    Simple maths --- $20 dollars for 1G of Music ~ $1 for 1G storage ~, essentially the drive would be free, but with music a 100G drive would cost about $2000 you got it the wrong way around, the RIAA should be giving away Hard Disks :)

  89. Re:Fluoride kills by nattt · · Score: 1

    Easiest way to protect your teeth is to stop eating sugar - but that would eat into the profits of the pre-packaged food industry, wouldn't it. And the profits of dentists, and the profits of the people who want to get rid of their industrial waste - fluorosilic acid.

    And as you say, it's a piss poor delivery method...

    --
    -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
  90. Thank God by mikeswi · · Score: 1

    Someone with worse typos than my own. :D

    1. Re:Thank God by stm2 · · Score: 1

      It was about 1 AM in my local time (Argentina) when I submited this news (and my wife, my kid and my dog where in the bed all waiting for me) and English is not my native language :)

      Bioinformatics news: Bioinformatica.info

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    2. Re:Thank God by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      English is not my native language

      Neither is mine according to my poor, abused partner who has to proofread everything. :/

      Sorry dude, didn't realize.

  91. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by kasperd · · Score: 1

    The lack of focus follows mouse bugged me and there's no virtual desktops.

    Yes, I feel the same whenever I have had to work on Windows for just a few minutes. How can they call it userfriendly when it lacks such important features. (Yes I have heard virtual desktops exists as addons, but most Linux WMs have it by default). And how about the cut'n'paste on Windows which requires to use the keyboard or pull down menus. On X11 it is just mark the text and click. The Windows GUI is really not that great.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  92. Re:Smart move. Good for PR at least. by vidarh · · Score: 1
    Now all they need to do is sue IBM and threaten all Linux users with license fees, and announce merger talks with SCO and they'll be on Slashdots front page continuously.

    (No offence meant to the Lindows guys - I'm in no way comparing them to SCO - just pointing out another way of getting free publicity on Slashdot :-) )

  93. Re:i really dont get the point of this by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

    >...if you're NOT a vi user, you are a moron who should just step in front of a speeding bus and remove yourself from the gene pool forthwith.

    Wouldn't that be hard for the non-vi-using bus drivers?

    --
    Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
  94. Re:Will we be getting a discount? by angle_mark · · Score: 1

    Hard drives are thoroughly tested before they are sold. How do you think they test hard drives before they are sold? Think about it? Yes thats right, at some stage in that testing they must write data to them. Therefore it is trivial to install Lindows on the hard drives during testing.

  95. Violence to end violence is the biggest failure. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    From the sig of the parent comment: "I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing."

    The war on violence is by far the biggest failure. Kill Iraqis to make them more peaceful?

  96. Re:Fluoride up yours, not in my water... by iainl · · Score: 1

    Ta - much better. I'd have posted the first link myself if I hadn't lost it. All the evidence suggests that for the majority of people this is useful, as they aren't very good at brushing their teeth, and the majority of people get along fine with it.

    However, the minority is a large enough one, and the side-effects bad enough, that the decision on this tradeoff should definitely not be taken out of our hands - if you are one of those badly effected, all you can do is move to an area that hasn't adopted it, or never drink tapwater.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  97. IBM by eurostar · · Score: 1

    what about IBM drives, isn't IBM the Linux company ?

    and why not other media ? a Knoppix CD with every plextor cd drive ?

    there are loads of ideas on the same line...

  98. ... out of business by ptr2void · · Score: 1

    IBM doesn't make harddrives any more. They sold their storage devices dept. to Hitachi.

    BTW IBM is not the Linux company... there is no such thing. Linux is not owned by a single company, that's what Open Source is about.

    1. Re:... out of business by eurostar · · Score: 1

      BTW IBM is not the Linux company...

      yeah, ok, I was being ironic, and I have an IBM drive in my shuttle.
      The point I'm making is that there are other possible directions.

    2. Re:... out of business by ptr2void · · Score: 1

      IBM is a b*tch -- after all they recommend Windows XP for their laptops :-)

      (I really wonder how much BillG had to pay to get that slogan on every laptop manufacturer's homepage.)

    3. Re:... out of business by op00to · · Score: 1

      Do you really think BillG ever pays for advertisement like that? Nope, the company does it for him because if they don't, all of a sudden their super-secret discount goes up in smoke. Get real.

    4. Re:... out of business by ptr2void · · Score: 1

      ... or they suddenly don't receive any more preview versions of the next Windows release... Yes, we all know and appreciate Microsoft's business methods.

      MS Employee: IBM says they won't display our XP advertising on their homepage!

      BillG: No trouble. I'll make them an offer they can't refuse...

  99. You're a cat, though. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Cats have rather different dental problems.

  100. It's not so much that flouride... by front · · Score: 1

    It's not so much that flouride is considered dangerous by a bunch of whackos as it is the fact that putting fluoride in drinking water is seen by some to be massmedication without consent.

    These people agree that fluoride is good for their teeth but they disagree with having to take fluoride internally in their drinking water. They'd prefer to apply it topically, as in a toothpaste.

    The Irish Dentists Opposing Fluoridation movement is concerned with the levels of fluoride being added to the water in Ireland... especially after the ban by Belgium on fluoridated products.

    http://homepage.eircom.net/~fluoridefree/belgium fl uorideban.htm

    cheers

    niall

  101. Re:Violence to end violence is the biggest failure by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    You'll be better off, or you'll be dead. And if you're dead, you won't care that you're not better off!

  102. Oh it does by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1

    OEM WinXP and Office XP require activation; the difference is that the OEM resellers are required to do it for you, thus shielding the buyer from this "activation" business and wondering about its implications.

    I bet fewer OEM copies would be sold if every prospective buyer were made fully aware of this. One fellow at work nearly bought OEM Office XP but decided not to once I told him of the once-off activation thing. He's been a happy OpenOffice user ever since :-)

  103. Re:Fluoride, Refrigerators and the Simpsons by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    Water treatment has saved more lives than any medical discovery,process,whatever.

    Don't mean to argue, but you are almost right. Maybe water treatment is the SECOND live saver, but the invention that has increased life expectancy more than any other is actually REFRIGERATION. 100 years ago, food poisoning was way more common, and often the cause of death. Ask an insurance expert, who has access to life expectancy tables for the last 100 or so years.

    Even the Simpsons know if you don't have a refrigerator, you should at least put your milk in a cool, wet sack...

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  104. For the 11th... by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I predict someone will once again make posts about how poor the posting quality is (even providing a list to prove it!), and how no one reads the articles, with the occasional "signal to noise" comment (which will then entail a Usenet flamewar).

    However, every 11th poster will faithfully sit, read Slashdot, and post comments, and never get it.

    Man, you'd think this site was required to get your daily Oxygen supply, the way people bitch about how bad it is. Every single day, and usually multiple times.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  105. Great by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    Now if I only bought seagate hard drives.

    --
    I do security
  106. The market is not people building themselves by hey! · · Score: 1

    These things are being sold through distributors; they may not even be available retail.

    The target is screwdriver shops. If you go into small businesses or local government, a locally assembled white box is about as common as a name brand PC. Also, their "computer guy" often also provides desktop and network support as well.

    This is a freakin' brilliant strategy. The shop owner (1) saves a cost of the windows license ( he does NOT get at the discount of the big guys he competes with) and (2) just pops the drive in the box and hands it to the customer instead of doing the install (he probably doesn't have the facilities to automate this). Which means for the same $$$, he gets to keep more and spends less time earning it.

    That said, most strategies, brilliant or otherwise, fail, and there's lots of ways this one could. For one thing I would provide, if I were Lindows, special training materials and possibly even a certification program for the screwdriver guys, focused on the problems of running Lindows in a Windows world. The advantages to the shop owner are going to mean nothing if he's dealing with irate customers.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  107. OT but I can't help replying by b0bby · · Score: 1

    Having lived in the UK for a number of years, I'd be more worried about all the lead pipes and lead lined storage tanks still in use than the addition of flouride, which as others have pointed out has been used for years in the US with no apparent ill effects. I could go into my rant about British plumbing, but suffice it to say I knew MANY people who had no idea that the only safe drinking water in a British home is from the cold water tap in the kitchen. One friend only discovered this when, as a child, the water in the bathroom sink (which she used to brush her teeth with) was blocked by their escaped pet hamster who had drowned in the water tank. See also the Fawlty Towers episode where the hotel inspectors are coming so Basil instructs Manuel to get the pigeon out of the water tank...

    1. Re:OT but I can't help replying by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      This is absolutely true. I almost had a fit when, while living in the U.K., I caught me American wife filling the kettle from the hot tap.

      In the U.K., the hot water system is (generally) fed by gravity by a tank either in the roof or on top of the hot water heater. My understanding is that this is to prevent back-siphoning in the event of low pressure. The tanks are typically left open to the elements or at best not particularly well sealed meaning that the water is generally not fit for ingestion.

      For those outside the U.S., here in the U.S. the cold supply is fed directly into the hot water heater and from there directly into the hot water supply. There may or may not be an anti-back-siphoning device on the heaters (I don't know).

      As an aside, the measly tens-of-feet hot water pressure provided by U.K. systems makes it pertty useless for showers. Hence showers are frequently provided by small electric heaters mounted to the wall just before the shower outlet. This may actually lead to improved efficiency as the main water heater can be turned on in advance only when water is going to be needed.

      As another aside, there are still a few places in the U.K. where water is delivered through hollowed out tree logs.

      Err, anyway, point is, if you're going to the U.K., get your drinking water from the cold tap.

      Rich

  108. Bottled water has no floride by hey · · Score: 1

    I heard that kids who drink mostly bottled water
    (a fairly recent phenomenon) has more cavities.
    Still I'm not crazy about the metaphor.

  109. I'm not an avid linux user but I gotta say... by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea, in conceptual terms if nothing else. I like the concept of buying discs with OSs already installed; conceptually, it makes them part of the "fabric" of the disc.

    Usually when I buy a HDD I think of it as an empty container to put things in. I'd much prefer to think of it as a toolbox with free tools already inside.

  110. The important question by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Yes, but will fluoride cause damage to my tinfoil hat?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  111. I guess you don't shop at Fry's by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Almost all of their hard drives come with an OS preinstalled. Sometimes even Windows XP Pro! But it's the luck of the draw. You get whatever the previous owner was using.

  112. It's a plot ! by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    The floridation of water is a communist plot to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids! oh, well it has not hurt me all these years.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  113. And this one... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...will burn down, fall over, and then sink into the swamp?

    The six-previous-floridas comment isn't as silly as it sounds, some of the swamps have several generations of ruins under them.

    However... I do wonder if LindowsOS will make the hard drive go brittle and blotchy.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  114. Re:i really dont get the point of this by Tongo · · Score: 1

    Nothing worse than an ANONYMOUS zealot.

  115. You can fix that! by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    It's called Knoppix. (-:

    I personally prefer Mandrake, but nothing beats the karma bonus of shoving a CD into the drive, having a working machine 30 seconds later, then typing a one-liner to make it permanent.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:You can fix that! by phthisic · · Score: 1

      How do you make it permanent? I read the readme and on that subject it says putting knoppix on your hard drive is possible and then it lists several steps.

  116. Reminds me of Ankh-Morpork slumpie by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    "Sits on the tongue like finest meringue
    and on the stomach like a concrete bowling ball"

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  117. Dr.Strangelove by whizzter · · Score: 1

    Now there'll be some crazy guy at a US Airbase launching an all out nuclear attack on the commies from Finland in retaliation to their communistic infiltration and poisoning of his harddrives.

  118. Obligatory link on why fluoride is bad by ulbador · · Score: 1
  119. Don't stop on a busy freeway, repair your car now. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    No, we should have taken action long, long before Hitler became powerful. Billions for violence, little for diplomacy doesn't make sense, in my opinion.

  120. Actually I copmare it to cavities. by inteller · · Score: 1

    Put an OS on your hard drive that is unsecure from the get-go.

  121. In a word... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    ...Knoppix.

    I'd add a boot-once automatic testing routine, to be sure.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  122. The original tagline was... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ..."May you live in interesting times and attract the attention of important men."

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  123. Robertson as Gen Ripper by Arbogast_II · · Score: 1

    Better start WW3, Lindows is a Linux/Communist plot to take over the world. Soon, all our computers will be impotent. We'll meet again, lalala, lalala... Steve Ballmer = Dr Strangelove ???

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
  124. Umm... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

    my cousin died of cancer when she was only 17. Likewise you can get Alzheimer's before 60. I think there is a lot more to more people getting all sorts of diseases besides dying before they have a chance. For starters I would look at how much more chemicals are in our air, and some of the things we use; cleaning products, spray deodorant, etc.

    --
    Trust Your Technolust
    1. Re:Umm... by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      my cousin died of cancer when she was only 17. Likewise you can get Alzheimer's before 60.

      That doesn't prove much though. People still got cancer in the early 1900's and 1800's. It was just more rare because they didn't live as long. Senility was not unknown either.

      For starters I would look at how much more chemicals are in our air, and some of the things we use; cleaning products, spray deodorant, etc.

      The levels of smog and air pollutants during the Industrial Revolution were far higher than today, with loads of heavy industry and no pollution controls. Far higher. As in, thousands of people died in London directly from it's effects. So how exactly does the lower air pollution rates of today cause such high cancer rates?

      In the 1800s, if you got to age 60 you were doing pretty good. Very few people get cancer or senility before age 60. Very few. Now most people live well into their 70s or 80s, hence the higher rates of diseases that strike at these ages, such as cancer and Alzheimer's.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    2. Re:Umm... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply that getting older doesn't have anything to do with. The more lightning storms you live through the more chances you had to get struck by lightning too. As far as pollutants I wasn't talking rates, lots of places have very low pollution. I'm thinkin more along the lines of the types of pollutants. Also things like fast food, SCO, RIAA, and other things that aren't good for you. I'm also not talkin specifically about cancer. Finally, once again I'm not sayin that age has nothing to do with it, though people live longer in part due to better medicines, but rather that there are likely other things contributing.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    3. Re:Umm... by orim · · Score: 1

      "For starters I would look at how much more chemicals are in our air, and some of the things we use; cleaning products, spray deodorant, etc..."

      Let me guess... you're from France?

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
  125. Insensitive clod by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    I still have to go to my dentist to get flouride. The area where I live refuses to put it in the water. I think it's a conspiracy by the dentists. Either that, or there may be a significant element in the local population that fears pollution of their precious boodily liquids.

    GF.

  126. Have you heard anything else about Nojima and by Idou · · Score: 1

    Lindows?

    I read this article at /.jp:

    http://slashdot.jp/article.pl?sid=03/09/06/1336247 &topic=46&mode=thread

    I was really excited, because for ~$300 I could buy a Lindows preinstalled computer AND get 1 year of broadband. I was going to set up my mother-in-law with a firewall and broadband access (and toyed with the idea of using gnomeeting to avoid long distance calls, though I use vonage). However, I can't find any more information at either Lindows or Nojima's site (the articles just disappeared).

    Have you seen or heard anything related to Nojima and Lindows?


    Thanks.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  127. Tools of the devil... by stienman · · Score: 1

    It's the same tactics Microsoft employs, only more so. They are probably making very little, if anything, on the seagate deal directly (they, in fact, may be paying to have it installed.

    What they are expecting to make money on is the click 'n run subscriptions - there may be a trial period included, but it probably isn't longer than 30 or maybe even 90 days.

    At that point, format, reinstall windows, and use all the old software that you've gotten for the last 10 years.

    -Adam

  128. Re:Don't stop on a busy freeway, repair your car n by protonman · · Score: 1

    And when was that you think?

    The invasion of Sudetenland?

    The Anschluss?

    The re-occupation of the Rheinland?

    Pre 1936?

    Pre 1933?

    Just after WOI?

    Without knowing what Hitler would do later on? Starting another war with Germany? Do you think the people of GB/France/Belgium would have agreed to that?

    --
    The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
  129. Like Knoppix by dheltzel · · Score: 1

    only on a hard disk. I think it will be very popular for white box dealers to use in their products. Now MS can't say that those PC's should be sold with Windows to be legal.

  130. Re:This is NOT wierd, this makes sense by vitalitychernobyl · · Score: 1

    What your missing is that the white box industry is a lot larger than you think. The white box industry (world wide) is ripe for this kind of innovation for several reasons:

    1) There is no need to pay $100 to M$. This is especially poignant in the world economy where most people cannot possible afford to purchase an OS for $100.
    2) No need to hire a Linux expert to install and configure your machines for you. Where the margins are razor thin for whitebox builders already, this cost woudl have precluded the possibility of going with an alternative OS.
    3) The savings that the whitebox builders realize will get passed on to the consumer in the form of even cheaper PCs. This means schools, governments, business can afford to upgrade hardware without additional costs for software, or IT specialists.

    --
    Automatics are for old men
  131. Fluorine, not fluoride. by caveat · · Score: 1

    Fluorine gas is nasty, nasty, nasty stuff - it reacts with pretty much everything except stainless steel, teflon, and platinum. Fluoride salts are pretty nasty in high doses, but nowhere near as toxic or reactive as fluorine; I haven't found any research that shows 1ppm long-term exposure causes any problems, though.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  132. I've had flouride all my life by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    The city I grew up in was one of the first to have flouride. In other words, every day for the last 43 years, I've drank water with floride in it. I also brush my teeth, using toothpaste with flouride in it. But I've had a total of 3 cavities over the years.

    My wife grew up in a city without flouride, and she has at least 13 cavities.

    Which is worse, mercury in your mouth (the stuff they use for filling cavities) or flouride in your water.

    I've had friends who took flouride drops when they were younger, and that was too much (Their teeth turned white, otherwise no ill effects). But generally speaking (they were extreme cases) flouride in the water is safe.

    So stop your worrying.

    1. Re:I've had flouride all my life by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      He can't. He's one of those hypochondriacs who are big on pseudoscience. If it wasn't this, it'd be high-voltage power lines, or aspartame, or vaccines...

  133. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately not everybody gets it right in X11. There are some X-like implementations, some Windows-like implementations, some in-between implementations that make no sense at all, and some apps don't even support copy/paste. Personally, I want to have two clipboard buffers, the selection buffer and a copy buffer (though the names might be different). The selection buffer would be used for mark+middle click quick copy/paste, while the copy buffer can be used to keep something until I tell it to go away with a ctrl-C or something. It should be pasted with maybe a shift+middle click or a ctrl-V.

  134. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know this is a troll and all, but I'm going to say this before someone else agrees with you...

    I've been using Linux as my primary (unfortunately not only) OS for the last few years. I've reached level 10 of the stages of Linux user evolution (i.e. I write my own device drivers). My laptop that I bought a year ago came preinstalled with WindowsXP. Sure, it's nice and pretty, and I thought "cool" when I plugged in my DV camera and a dialog came up asking if I wanted to capture video. But, when I actually wanted to do something useful, it became an extreme pain. There is nothing beyond that extremely simple "ooh, pretty" interface. Yeah, you can select a bunch of files in a directory and click "burn to cd," but what happens when you want to burn a .iso, or create a multisession or data+audio CD? The functionality simply doesn't exist without purchasing some third party software. Nearly every single Linux distribution comes with the tools necessary to do anything, from burn CD's to write your own software.

    Linux is for getting stuff done. Windows is just for home users who don't want to take the time to learn how to click launch->programs->video->kino or whatever, and depend on having an automagical dialog displayed for them. They're the kind of people who download a song from p2p all over again when they want to listen to it a second time.

  135. I got an OS on a hard drive I bought once... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, bought it off e-bay and not only did it have a copy of Windows 2000 on it but it had lots of credit card numbers I could buy cool new gear with! Thanks Seagate...

    That's what we're talking about right? ;)

  136. Yeah, but it's a bitch. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    If your system boots the new drive instead of your old one, then you have the choice of wiping the new drive from within Lindows, an OS you may not be familiar with and which may complain about being erased while you're running it, or of booting off the Windows install CD and zapping the partition from there. I'd consider this a rather annoying inconvenience I'd prefer to avoid.

  137. OS on my Hard Drive??? by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
    Is There An OS On My Hard Drive?

    ...or am I just happy to see you?

  138. Re:Usually the computer has Windows on it, by kasperd · · Score: 1

    some apps don't even support copy/paste.
    In my experience they are rare, but there does exist some combinations, where it doesn't work.

    Personally, I want to have two clipboard buffers
    Maybe you would like Klipper from KDE. It is not exactly what you request, but in some cases it works nicely.

    while the copy buffer can be used to keep something until I tell it to go away with a ctrl-C or something.
    Except from the ctrl-C part I agree it would be a nice additional feature. Perhaps ctrl+ins and shift+ins would be good choices, if they are not already used.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  139. hp by slutdot · · Score: 1

    hppc

  140. my choice... by nuintari · · Score: 1

    Despite the fact that in all odds, a new hard drive will take its place inside a linux or OpenBSD box, if I were to buy one, I would have to choose without Lindows. This direct marketing stuff is getting out of hand, telephone calls during dinner that we are expected to just accept with good humor, bags of tree killing paper ads attached to my door, little nuggets of crap in my inbox wasting my isp's bandwidth and my time, and now this? Inferior OS's attached to a supposed blank hard drive.

    I don't give business to companies that do this sort of thing. I live in an apartment complex where many college students exist. Therefore I get pizza ads on my front door all the f'ing time. Each one eliminates me as a customer, I won't eat there if I see an ad on my door from them. The same goes for Seagate, they wanna submit to the mass marketing god in a sick and unexciting new way? So be it, YOU JUST LOST YOURSELF A CUSTOMER!

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  141. This guy just loves calling out Microsoft! by Lester67 · · Score: 1

    First the X-Box/Linux challenge, now a free OS pre-installed on your hard drive.

  142. Ass by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

    Thats just plain rude. You really outta watch who you go callin French you could get beat down for that. I'm American through and through, I'm even in the military tryin to protect this country. Besides we all know the French don't use cleaning products and deodorant.

    --
    Trust Your Technolust
  143. Parent is not a troll. by qtp · · Score: 1

    The poster supplies two good links with valid research and information, does not take a judgemental stand on the issue and leaves the opinion up to the reader. A simple and informative post that in no way seems intended to incite or mislead.

    Moderators, get a clue. Just because a post doesn't line up with your worldview doesn't mean it's a troll.

    OT thread, maybe. But not a troll.

    --
    Read, L
  144. Re:Don't confuse stupid with unfamiIiar by dsfox · · Score: 1

    It is exactly like Seagate have added Lindows to their products. Those drives will ship directly from Seagate factories with the operating system installed.

  145. Er, you follow those steps? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    That's all I've ever had to do. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Er, you follow those steps? by phthisic · · Score: 1

      Oh, crap. I knew I was forgetting something!

      Yes, I tried those and I've gotten it to work. I should have been clearer, however. What I wanted to know was more detail on the parent's statement "then typing a one-liner to make it permanent."

      What's the one-liner? That would be news to me.

  146. sudo knoppix-installer by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    (an update from knx_hdinstall)

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  147. How about in Canada? by Jetson · · Score: 1
    now show me someone living in a state with fluoridated water with excellent teeth despite no dental care

    I grew up in a Canadian province that had flouride in the water (Nova Scotia). To say my dental habits were "lacking" throughout my teen years would be an understatement. When I recently moved to British Columbia (non-flouride province) the dentist took one look in my mouth and commented that he knew I was from out of province because my teeth were in remarkably good condition for my age. I'm a believer.

  148. OEMs not End Users by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Preinstalled free os on hard disk drives is not about end users but to do with OEMs building white boxes. The cost saving in producing a white box is reduced as once you have assembled the machine all you need to do is boot it to allow the software to adjust the configuration for the hardware installed. This sort of thing is a real threat to MS as it shifting the computer closer to being a consumer appliance - a non MS comsumer appliance. When it comes to consumer appliance's any bets that the PS3 will come with linux pre-installed with the security built into the GPU, ie open when it comes to browsing the net etc. closed when it comes to using the full power of the GPU for playing games or watching dvds.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen