Slashdot Mirror


The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed

SimuAndy writes "David Dvorkin, a programmer and writer of some repute, has published an essay on The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed. Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day."

155 of 1,053 comments (clear)

  1. Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Becoming a Slashdot Addict

    I have time to become intimately familiar with all of the Slashdot memes like FP!, GNAA, In Soviet Russia, and CowboyNeal. I know all of the rules for them and when they're just being faked by copy-cats. Sure, sure, I can stop any time.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was more of a slashdot addict when I was employed. Now I have more time on my hands to do other things then sit here all day.

    2. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 5, Funny

      the other day I caught myself telling a coworker "you are trolling the meeting you should be mod'ed down" ofcourse I got a blank empty void look on his face.

    3. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ameoba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes... now you have all the time in the world to be a FPer. Congrats, yo, you've achieved the Amernian dream.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Funny

      You probably work for that goatse guy trying to imagine a beowolf cluster of business plans but foiled by micro$oft.


      I did my homework and Im a proud member of Slashdot Nation.

    5. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess being in a cocktail party automatically excludes you from being a Slashdotter.

    6. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ebay+troll · · Score: 3, Funny

      Excellent insults. Very pleased with seller's wit. Also informed buyer of availability of "0$" to refer to Open Source. Looking forward to doing business again.

    7. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by andyt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh.. for the sake of those of us who haven't quite learned every new acronym, what is FP? :[

      I am living the dream. Finally I can, without fear of being offtopic, do what I have always dreamed of but have never dared...

      FIRST POST!!!!!!!!111!!111!1!!!!!!

      I can now die happy.
      Thank you :-)

    8. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmm... you know you've been stuck at home too long when not only do you swear at inanimate objects, you also apologise to them afterwards.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  2. Benefits of being unemployed by Mastab286 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep, according to my dad, one of the best books hes ever read... well worth the read

  3. The guy has no job and you say... by JusTyler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day

    He has no job, way to rub it in, you inconsiderate clod! ;)

  4. Odd Todd by corz · · Score: 4, Funny
    The greatest of all unemployed people will always be Odd Todd.

    This man is my idol, and anyone who has ever been unemployed should appreciate "staring at the wall for an hour after waking 'early' up at 10:17, drinking a pot of coffay." I donated a few bucks to help his cause, and you should too, after all, he is unemployed :)

  5. I am now back at school by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes I moved back in with my parents. :-(

    But now I have less stress, met a girlfriend online and I am going back to school.

    I feel I am working towards myself and not a greedy souless corporation.

    People work to hard today. I think the divorce rate might have something to do with people doing the work of 2-3 in order for bigcorp to boast its stock price for productivity increases.

    I love programming and want to do it. However I do not want to work more then 55 hours a week. I also want to learn and better myself. Its hard with such high demands. Also young college kids are willing to work 80 hrs a week so if you don't then they steal your job!??

    In other words its now the new norm to be underpaid and overworked where 40 hr work weeks are considered "not meeting expectations".

  6. Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Laid off in April. The usual. Have to say, pretty much everything on this list rings really true. Although in my case, the biggest benefit was:

    Time to read up on any obscure or interesting subject that sprang to mind.

    I think I advanced my self-education more in the last few months than I had in years previously. I know a whole lot more about our legal and political systems, can tell you all sorts of fun things about Wicca and Buddhism, know more about more obscure European bands than I care to name, and I'm even getting closer to really understanding why the Middle East is the way it is.

    But things are looking up. Getting out of the cube farms seem to have freed my mind. I've been taking on odd freelance jobs. I've just gotten hired by a tutoring company which'll let me more or less make my own hours. Been doing some freelance writing. I'm not out of the woods yet, but if things keep going the way they are, I may be able to build up enough contacts and experience to make a good enough living without ever stepping foot in an office, and 3/4 of it from home.

    I feel oddly like the Campbellian hero having passed through the Cave. (Week of May 15th: Read "Hero of a Thousand Faces")

    So, just to chime in with the message of this article, if you're unemployed, take heart. Look at it as an opportunity. If you've got the money to ride on for a bit, DON'T spend all your time looking for yet another cube. Use the time to boost your knowledge or skills.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But ultimately, it IS all about food. We're plotting to get food, one way or another. (and shelter, and sex)

      The problem, ultimately, is that as we moved away from the insular village\tribal life, the idea of people's contributions to society became more and more abstract. At its heart, the most romantic definition of money is that it's a symbol of how much you have put into society. (I know, I know) Without trying to slip into some idealized Marxist fantasy of a world-tribal culture where everyone does exactly what work they want, and is rewarded with a decent lifestyle in return, money is pretty much the closest you can get.

      Those people who have the ability to make money entirely on their own are, ultimately, in the minority. Not bragging here - I have a real problem with self-motivation that's a hinderance. Many people simply don't have the resources to work for themselves. But more than that, as our world gets more streamlined, more efficient, there simply are not enough "fun" jobs to go around. Once we were a huge nation of millions of farmers, now we have corporate owned farms with thousands of workers.

      But you can't get rid of it without getting rid of all the infrastructure we take for granted - power, the Internet, running water, etc etc. Every modern convenience creates a new category of menial drudge work that SOMEONE has to do.

      It's pretty much an unsolvable problem. If you have the resources to get out from under the corporate thumb, then more power to you. But for our world to function as it does, large numbers of people have to stay put.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    2. Re:Been there, am doing that by SunPin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it's a resource problem. I think it's fear. People are afraid to step into the unknown or, as in Plato's Cave, step out to the unknown. Sure, it's scary at first because we've never seen our minds unbound. Our minds start fsckin with us for awhile while unemployed but then things settle and it's like being out in the warm light rather than a dark, stuffy cave.

      Note to moderators: I'm minding my own business and chatting with other /. denizens. Go mod somebody else down and leave me the fuck alone. You'll get yours in Meta-moderation.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:Been there, am doing that by Lurgen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I went through this last year, and it changed the way I look at work completely. I'm back in a relatively "normal" IT consulting job, but I did some time contracting and enjoyed it.

      The downside of course, and the underlying message in this guys website is that it's not easy being unemployed. He hints at the downsides, like not eating the things you used to, not having the option of going out or buying new things. Of course, he wrote that page simply to cheer himself (and maybe others) up. Pity 'bout the political statement he felt obligated to make.

      When I was out of work, I started a blog. It made a good place to gather my thoughts, and I've written up quite a few entries on the subject of job-hunting. Not that I'm a master at it, I spent 5 weeks out of work when my last contract ended and got to enjoy 5 weeks of hell.

    4. Re:Been there, am doing that by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely agree. I've recently graduated (BS in Comp Sci/BA in Philosophy), and have been unemployed since then. I've been learning how to play guitar better (something I've always wanted to do) and reading. Speaking of which, I'm currently reading Campell's The Power of Myth and I really enjoy it. I'd be very interested in any good material you've read on Buddhism. I've read a couple books as coursework and found them fascinating (though the neatest single thing I've found is the Jainist theory of reality (i.e. their metaphysics)).

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    5. Re:Been there, am doing that by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I learned to speak Sanskrit and I can divide by zero.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. Yeah right. by sakusha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I try to convince myself I've gotten out of the rat race of Upward Mobility, and it's morally superior to have Downward Nobility. But I just want a fucken job. I helped build this industry in the early 1970s, now I'm supposed to be in the peak earning years of my career, but I'm locked out due to the bad economy. It sucks. There is nothing good about being unemployed.

    1. Re:Yeah right. by ashot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't sound like you spent 20 years with computers, it sounds like you spent 20 years maintaining them. "working with computers" is a really broad field, and its actually one of the smartest things you could have done, and could be doing right now.

      --
      -ashot
    2. Re:Yeah right. by sakusha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm only 46, just on the edge of greylisting (I started really young). I actually went back to school and got 2 degrees in different fields, and then of course the money got sucked out of those too. America is turning into a ghost town, by the time GWB is done selling this country to Halliburton, there won't be a single job left except in the Army (and I'm too old for that).

    3. Re:Yeah right. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Christ tell me about it ... There's also a LEGION of college students out there who are terminally screwed as well.

      Almost all of the people I graduated college with in 2001 are unemployed or severly underemployed (the lucky ones). The *lucky* folks are selling motorcylces, the less lucky are delivering pizzas etc... but most are just unemployable. Ever try to get a minimum wage job when you have a BS degree? I have a BS in CSIf you lie you have to explain why you haven't been working for the last 4 years, or in my case why my previous job was as a Systems Administrator and now I want to answer telephones at a reservation center?

      If you don't lie they are very nice to you and you get a letter in the mail a few days later saying you don't match their needs. What community college flunky manager for Hilton reservation center is going to hire an engineer to answer their phones? They probably have no doubt that you could do a good job but still they know Im gone as SOON as I find a new job and their training costs are wasted.

      I've had similiar situations with jobs where I would be underemployed, I interviewed for a job as a Computer Tech II for 20,000k a year. I had more experience/education then the MIS director who interviewed me ... was he gonna give me a job? no fucking way :) They hired some guy who could barely find the power switch on a computer -- no threat to him.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Yeah right. by Triv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever try to get a minimum wage job when you have a BS degree?

      Have you tried working at a bookstore? They crave people like that because they're smart and desperate. Sounds like a joke; it's not - I used to work with a guy at Shakespeare and Company who had a masters in english lit and was making 6.25 an hour like the rest of us. :)

      Triv

    5. Re:Yeah right. by squaretorus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The market may be totally different in the US, but here in the UK my advice to the IT grads in unemployment hell is to apply for a fasttrack management position with a retailer.

      These guys are desperate for talent which can feed through to more senior management, and even for 'talent' that won't forget to order the bread and wine for the weekend rush. They'll start you on a decent salary and put you in a position of relative power, pensions and healthcare should all be in there too if its a big company.

      When the market in IT picks up you can hop over and answer the 'Last position' question with something a hell of a lot better than 'Pizza delivery boy for 3 years'. 'I took a fasttrack management position in retail to get some people management under my belt - within 18 months I was running my own store with responsibility for 3 satellite stores - as the IT sector is picking up I've refused a more senior management position in retail to come back to where I think I can truly kick some ass - I want a board position within 5 years'.

      Try it kids - it might just work!!

    6. Re:Yeah right. by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I try to convince myself I've gotten out of the rat race of Upward Mobility, and it's morally superior to have Downward Nobility. But I just want a fucken job. I helped build this industry in the early 1970s, now I'm supposed to be in the peak earning years of my career, but I'm locked out due to the bad economy. It sucks. There is nothing good about being unemployed.

      As a 45 yr old Principal SW Eng., writing this from my cube, I'd suggest to you that peak earning years in the 40s are due more to age discrimination than to economical issues. Otherwise, you'd see the peak at retirement age. This economy is NOTHING compared to the unemployment we saw in '81. It's easy (I won't debate the merit in this thread) for companies to dump us higher paid folks and hire a couple of recent grads or H1B Visa types for less. Your best bet is to find a niche, do work that others aren't willing or able to do, keep current on tech issues, and make sure your boss is aware of the value you're adding to his bottom line (from his viewpoint, if you're not adding then your dispensible). Anyway, good luck to you...from my vantage point, it looks like things have started picking up over the last six months.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:Yeah right. by hanssprudel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe the fact that you are limiting yourself to that town is the problem?

      Anyone who isn't willing to take any job they can get, anywhere in the world, is unemployed by choice.

  8. The reality of popcorn for the jobless by JusTyler · · Score: 4, Informative
    Speaking of things you don't need, what about that tub of buttered popcorn


    Popcorn is actually an ideal foodstuff if you're on a very tight budget. It's SO cheap!

    I bought myself a popcorn making machine for $20. Basically it's a big "hot air generating machine". You throw your popcorn kernels in, they get heated up and blown around for five minutes, then they all pop and out tumbles the popcorn.

    You can buy a bag with two lbs of kernels for about a dollar. Lasts me about 15 gigantic bowls of popcorn. Keeps your regular too. High in fibre.

    So you pay about 7 cents a bowl, which is a good stomach filler in the evening, and a cent or two for the electricity needed. Popcorn is a bargain, particularly if you like it plain, or with some salt thrown over it (as I do). Just make it YOURSELF.
    1. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by nfotxn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need a machine that'll get me heated up and blown for about five minutes. It's all I need really.

      --

      _nfotxn

  9. Irony deficient by watchful.babbler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely I'm not the only one who finds a dark amusement in seeing both "The benefits of being unemployed" and "Where do I find an honest headhunter?" showing up simultaneously on the Slashdot front page.

    --
    "Freedom is kind of a hobby with me, and I have disposable income that I'll spend to find out how to get people more."
  10. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, it's harder to get a job when your unemployed then it is when you are employeed. Because, when your unemployeed, any future employer will want to know why and how long you have been without work. But, if you already have a job, then you have a much better reputation for current skill status and thus a better chance of swiching over to a new company.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  11. Kind of unimaginative.... by puppetman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about,

    - working on that interesting open-source software project. Good for the resume as well

    - do some volunteering (hey - just go to the park and pick up garbage for an hour or two, till the unionized city employees chase you off)

    - get in shape (running is cheap, and so are push-ups)

    - eat better; too broke to eat out, so buy lots of veggies; kick the coffee and beer habit (too expensive)

    - go to the library and get out all the "classics" (whatever your definition of a classic might be) and read them. No essay at the end required, unless you really want to.

    Time like that should be used in a positive way. The silver lining around the dark cloud. And when you go for interviews, let them know what you've been doing - makes you look like a well rounded person who knows how to organize his/her time.

    1. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What about, ...

      Hey -- are you the one spying on me from the adjacent building? :).

      I lost my job (with a company often associated with the properties "blue" and "big", not necessarily in that order) nearly two years ago, back in January 2002. Since then, I've Open Sourced my PalmOS data synchronization project (v3.0 final is due out in the next two weeks, so go download it!!!), run about 20km per week, and do about 60 push-ups, 80 sit-ups, and 12 chin-ups a day. I completely kicked the caffiene habbit (switched from regular Coca Cola to caffiene free Coca Cola... :) ), and am eating quite a bit better (and a whole lot cheaper!).

      The only things in your list I haven't done is any volunteering (unless you consider administrating and leading development on a large Open Source project every day to be volunteer work ;) ), or going to the library (I already have three bookshelves of books here, so I've been re-reading them all).

      Oh, and I haven't kicked the beer habit -- having never picked it up in the first place, I haven't really seen the point of starting, just so I can quit.

      Yup -- unemployment is the best thing that ever happened to me. More time to work on important projects, read, eat right, and get more excercise. If only I had an un-exhaustible source of money, things would be perfect (or, barring that, a decent job would do...).

      Yaz.

    2. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by gnunick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm not even sure you deserve a response, what with the 'hippie programmer' troll...

      But whenever I'm involved the hiring process, those candidates who have been involved in volunteer work of _any_ kind will always get extra points from me.

      I'd rather have someone working for me who isn't soley interested in their _own_ bottom line and that Escalade they've been lusting after. Someone who's a pure mercenary seems less likely to put their heart into the project they're working on, and more likely to rip off my company any chance they get. Funny, when I worked at a certain large corporation, that could have described my boss. Nope, I wouldn't have hired him either.

      So you don't like people who are willing to contribute to society while further developing their job-related skills?

      Let me guess. You wouldn't hire some slacker like Linus Torvalds in a million years, would you?

      Damned hippie programmers. Look what the 'great unwashed' have done with that kernel he gave them!

      I'm looking to hire someone who will put in the effort to grow our business and boost our stock price.

      Right, that'll also help those super-valuable (some day...) stock options you're offering them? Oh wait, that trick doesn't work any more does it?

      Oh, I get it, you're looking for slaves. Me, I'd rather have human beings working with/for me. I pity your little hirelings.

      ta GN>

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Open+Council · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most annoying thing about being unemployed is that I still can't visit all those places that I wanted to visit but didn't have the time because now that I've got the time I haven't got the money.

      On the positive side I've done the other things that people have suggested ...

      I've got involved : restructured the local borough's service delivery and IT structures..

      I'm setting up a (hopefully) useful website www.opencouncil.org to promote open source in local government and, in particular, assist in the process of persuading the decision makers, not the techies, of the merits of open source.

      I'm creating an open source product ... one for creating "Rich Internet Applications" and front-ending web-services.

      I keep trying to write that book ... over 20 years of journalism only helping a little...

      And I'm keeping myself up-to-date with new technologies.

      read lots of books ... and not just computer manuals ... discovered James Lee Burke, rediscovered Jerome K Jerome

      Actually I was able to do more when I was employed and busy. Having so much time makes it so difficult to concentrate on individual projects.

      Staying up all night does let me discover old programs on cable (2hrs of Dr Who most nights) and catch up on the episodes that I missed decades ago..

      The availability of instant messaging and email to keep in contact with old friends would take up all my time if I let it.. not having to get up early lets me match my UK time with my friends US time as well.

      The bad bits : I am annoyed that my 35 years IT experience is considered a problem - "we have a young team". That being able to understand business systems and problem solving doesn't count if you experience only covers up to version 3.475 of some software that has just released version 3.476.

      Seeing job ads that want people in "mid-career" and define that as 2 to 3 years experience. Being unable to apply for lesser jobs because they'll think I'll leave.

      And then recently watching a TV ad campaign conning people into spending their money on computer training that will guarantee them high earnings "even if you have no experience".. You have to laugh don't you ??

      --
      Paul
      www.opencouncil.org
      Open
    4. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by pballsim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quote:
      - working on that interesting open-source software project. Good for the resume as well

      Apparently you didn't read his resume =). He has the a very impresive resume! Worked at NASA back in the day and has been busy with lots of wonderful jobs and experience.

      I think he too over-qualified.

      Quote:
      - get in shape (running is cheap, and so are push-ups)

      - eat better; too broke to eat out, so buy lots of veggies; kick the coffee and beer habit (too expensive)

      Apparently you didn't read his page. He said he has been doing this.

      Sorry, just bitter =)
      pball

      "My kid reads your honor kids e-mail"

    5. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, probably not. Anyway, last I checked he didn't turn Transmeta into a big success story.


      Transmetas success or failure is not up to Linus. He's but a one software-engineer at the company. You wouldn't hire anyone who has worked at a company that for some reason or another was not a huge success? Isn't that kinda stupid?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  12. A thinly veiled political rant, actually by randyest · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    The article runs the gamut, from the mildly amusing:

    Some of those benefits are obvious, and I could have anticipated them even before a supervisor tapped me on the shoulder and said he needed to talk to me about something. ("Do you have a minute?" he asked. What would have happened if I'd said no, that I was too busy?)

    To the not at all funny but trying really hard (Snuffy Smith! Egads):

    There was a character in the Snuffy Smith cartoon strip of many years ago who retired but would still get up at the crack of dawn and go down to the mill every morning just so he could thumb his nose at the place as the get-to-work whistle blew.

    It does include a few good, creative ideas useful even for the gainfully emplyed:

    Back in the glorious paycheck days, I used to think about telling [telemarketers and salespersons] I'd just lost my job. Actually, sometimes I really did tell them that, because I'm a cowardly kinda guy and it's easier to fib than to be firm. Now I don't have to fib. When I tell them I'm unemployed, they hang up or back away quickly, terrified of infection by the job-loss virus.

    As well as a few really stupid comment that make me wonder about this guy's sense of self:

    My Beard It's still growing! Well, of course it is, you say. Let me explain that, on an emotional, irrational level, I still feel relieved every morning when I realize that I still need to shave. It's still growing! Despite the way I frequently feel, I haven't really been unmanned.

    But, it also has quite a bit of offtopic, annoying, and really rather insulting partisan political nonsense:

    These [fake-job advertising scammers] are rotten enough to be members of George W. Bush's cabinet. Encountering them has taught me something about the depths of human nature.

    But perhaps the greatest benefit of being unemployed is this. I now feel absolutely free to despise George W. Bush. Oh, of course I despised him before I lost my job. But now I know I'm not alone.

    And it closes with a really stupid anti-Bush link. Sigh. Bring a salt shaker if you're going to read it all.

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cscx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To add to that, anyone could find a job if they really wanted to. It's just that too many Americans are too goddamn lazy to work jobs they don't like. If you're unemployed, I don't think you have a choice, now do you? McDonalds is always hiring. Sell magazines. Mow lawns. Clean toilets. Oh, but you don't like flipping burgers? Well too damn bad, quit whining about it on your blog and complaining about how GW Bush and "da man" is keepin' you down.

    2. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by inertia187 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I blame the French.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by be-fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here is where you are wrong. I'd rather that a guy like this spends his time improving himself and his skills, so he can be even more productive when the economy does improve, than that he waste his time flipping burgers at Macdonalds.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by driftingwalrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up! Of course you would run off, but it means that you don't get the job. They just look at the resume and say, "What is wrong with this guy that he's applying here?!".

      So, I find myself in a situation where there is no work in my field(computers, and it's really, really dead), I don't have enough experience to work at a different trade(machinist or welder, for example), AND I know too much to get a job flipping burgers. Of course, the idea of an apprenticeship is completely out of the question, those are almost impossible to get these days. Employers *will* *not* train people. Period.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    5. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cscx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasting time, sure. But at least it's income. He's blaming other people for his problems, but there are many people in this world who would love to have a job at McDonalds, here in the land of opportunity. You can be short-sighted like this guy, or take what you have and make the best of it.

      In short, life isn't fair. Blaming it on other people just isn't going to help.

    6. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've been working shit jobs for two whole years now. Temping, laboring, substitute teaching. If you have any kind of education and experience at all, I assure you that you still feel unemployed when you are that badly underemployed.

      Were it not for my sporadic tech consulting jobs, I would probably be forced to throw the last 15 years of my life out the window, and start pursuing a new career.

      Thankfully, the job market is gradually improving. I've had more interviews for programming jobs in the last 2 months than I did in the previous 22, and I'm expecting an offer sheet in the mail from at least one of them this week. I suspect that, a year from now, people will be talking about the "Bush recovery," and whoever emerges from the Democratic primary is going to be scrambling for issues to run on.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless of McDonalds "Long Term Carrer" hype they tend to expect you to run to the first better job you find. I really don't think that they are going to look at your resume and see you as over qualified. (who gives a resume to a fast food joint anyway) I think that they would tend to look for people that are over qualified to work there. I mean really how good of a worker could a worker be if a worker was only qualified to work at mcdonalds?

      I would hope that even the majority of youth are over qualified to flip psuedo meat.

      -blb

      AC 'cause I don't need no stinkin slashdot account

    8. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by schtum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are deeply misguided. There are many people in this world who would TAKE a job at McDonalds. But love it? Not a single one. Judging from your attitude, you've never had to make that decision, have you?

    9. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So we have a reduction in income taxes, a removal of dividend taxes, all sorts of extensions to unemploymet insurance, and a crackdown on Wall Street corruption. What the hell else do you want?

      Now if I let all the immigrannts in this country that are dying for McDonalds jobs, that brings down the standard of living for everyone. From the libeterian point of view this is a good thing, becasue the standard of living for the immigrants goes up. However, your not arguing the libeterian view.

      As to working at McDonalds or not working at McDonalds, obvisiously this guy has savings, or credit, or a shit job at McDonalds. The wonderful thing about shit jobs at McDonalds is you get to go home at the end of shift. No staying late to be a team player. He is surviving at the moment, and looking for a "real job." As long as its not off my tax dollars I'm ok with that. And if it is off my tax dollars than obvisiously Bush is doing something about it.

      Its not governemts job to fix the economy. If they can help its nice, but the market as a whole always eventually corrects itself. Goverment is one of the forces of the market, not the only force.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    10. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is always the military, nowadays that IS job security....They train too.

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    11. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But at least it's income.

      It doen't pay nearly as well as unemployment.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    12. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thankfully, the job market is gradually improving.

      Remember, when you see the unemployment rate go down, it's not because people are finding jobs, it's because they've abandoned hope and are no longer trying to get a job, so they no longer get counted as "unemployed" - they're removed from the equation.

      However, for those who are still looking, yeah, maybe it is starting to get better. I've got an interview tomorrow.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few points:

      We're hemorrhaging 400k jobs a month,
      No, not exactly. The most recent month statistics shows a net loss of 93,000 jobs. Check it out yourself here.

      consumer confidence is going down
      In the link above, you'll notice that one month of stastics shows a decline. The trend was upwards all summer long. Essentially things trended upwards over the summer, and are starting to trend downward. One month or two months or even three months is a very small trend. It is *NOT* considered a big economic indicator to have a month of declined consumer confidence.

      we're spending more on social services in Iraq then in the U.S
      That's patently absurd. The entire budget for the war, social services, rebuilding and operational expenses for the next 12 months does not exceed the cost of one month of social services in the US. Second, are you somehow suggesting that the social welfare of minorities like the Iraqis and muslims is somewhat less valuable than an unemployed person in the US? Which is worth more? Is one okay to be unemployed and the other not? Why? One the surface your statement belies a latent racism/nationalism that is offensive at best and abhorrent at worse.

      top administration officials are leaking the names of covert CIA agents
      One agent is in question. It is two "senior officals" in question. The persons status has not been necessarily declared to be covert. Not every analyst in the Operations Directorate is a spy. It is likely the husband of the outed agent tipped Novak off himself. Wilson told Novak that he went to Niger at the suggestion of his wife. Novak called around to confirm the story. Additionally, before Novak broke the story it was common knowledge that Plame worked for the CIA. Read Novak's defense of the situation and you'll probably change your mind on the situation.

      we have a humongous deficit and an administration that doesn't give a rats ass
      Deficts are a long-term problem, not a short-term problem. What you seem to forget is that the world economy and the US economy specifically are cyclical. Boom-bust-boom-bust etc. Look at over time and you'll see essentially its a 9-10 year cycle. I do not agree with the spending patterns of Bush or even of the last administration (or any in the last 40 years really), however, to suggest that the current administration cares not for deficits is false. To solve current deficits would require drastic short term action that is not justified by the severity of the problem. A deficit of 5% of the budget is not a serious long-term concern.

      Next November you're going to be enjoying a democratic president back in the white house
      Of course, that is possible. Anything is at this point time. But it is speculation, just FYI.

      I know, the freepers and little green footballers and NRO and all you guys will attempt to smear the shit out of anyone who shows up but I don't think it will matter
      Thats an odd statement, but I dont quite follow. NRO (I assume you mean the NRA?) is as far as organizations go blisteringly forthright about how it selects to endorse candidates. They rate candidates based on issues determined by the executive board and membership at large. They assign points on a 100-point scale and then give out a grade-letter. Are you suggesting that somehow the NRA doesn't have the right to lobby citizens to vote for candidates they support? Are the 1 Million + memberso the NRA not allowed to express their collective political opinions?

      Kiss president fucktard good bye.
      Bush may well be voted out of office in favor of a democrat. But the bigger issue here is why yourself and the author of the article puts so much weight on the office of President of the US.

      The United States is not a central

    14. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry if it sounds stupid, but it's true. They're called discouraged workers, those who have given up trying to find a job. Maybe the next time you find yourself in the situation of either believing some random person on /. or blindly trusting your government to act reasonably, you'll think twice.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    15. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by craigtay · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you can call a 500 billion dollar defeceit "recovery" then I guess we are ahead of schedule.

    16. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I can've believe I'm responding to an AC.. but, just to clarify my point:

      It is also apparent that you love this country and are quite pissed for the current situation the nation is in. How can your stance be what it is yet you disagree with the war in Iraq & Afghanistan?

      Afghanistan I had no problem with. There was acknowledged direct involvement in the events of 9-11 and with the perpetrators thereof. Iraq, on the other hand, was a trumped-up load of bullshit which has cost us all of our international political capital and goodwill, not to mention almost 400 US military lives (I'm not even counting Iraqi civilians). Saddam, while a despicable human, had nothing to do with 9-11 or terrorism in general, obviously in hindsight had no WMDs (either to use or give to terrorists) and was effectively bottled up in his little locale doing nothing but making laughable press releases which the rest of the Muslim world largely ignored.

      I'm glad that the Afghanis and Iraqis are free from oppressive governments. It should have stopped at Afghanistan. Where is Osama these days? Is he bunked up with Saddam in some Baghdad suburb?

      How is it not worth the money to know the US freed them from a life of horror

      How about spending 1/4 of that money here at home making sure US citizens have jobs? I'm sorry, but when I'm constantly facing the loss of MY home and MY standard of living, I have to think about MY family first. A McJob wouldn't even begin to allow me to provide for them without uprooting everything we have built in the last decade (a decision, as a family, we have made not to do).

      So I take my job as a Patriot seriously enough to speak up against the transgressions of my current government, and seek to change the persons currently in power and responsible for those transgressions.

      Btw: Read some American history. Start with Nixon, and then go back to King George (18th Century).

    17. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, "soak the rich" may make an appealing sound bite to people like you, but in practice it just doesn't happen. Anyone making a million bucks a year who actually pays anything close to the nominal income tax rate has an incompetent accountant. Rich people have much more influence over government than you do, and if you think that goverment is ever going to help you satisfy your envy, think again.

      Consider for a moment the possible consequences of eliminating the tax on dividend income. *anyone* could start on developing a tax-free, property income for increments of a single share price. To get into making money from property today, you pretty much have to come up with the price of a house or condo that you can rent out.

      Eliminating dividend taxes would certainly help Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, but it would help *me* a great deal more, by lowering the barriers to property income.

      Without dividend taxes, I could go and buy a stock that pays a reasonable dividend yield (RJR pays 9 percent), and reinvest the dividend annually for as long as I'm working. By the time I retired, I'd have a pretty nice, tax-free income to live on.

      The way things are today, my best bet is to buy real estate, and hope I don't get screwed over by too many deadbeat tenants.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by gdarklighter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe for an encore, a bit more money could solve the drug problem, and improve student performance in our public schools!

      Actually, a spending increase would definitely improve student performance. Spending more on education leads to more qualified teachers, better facilities, and smaller classes, all of which contribute to a better learning environment.

    19. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up!

      First of all who submits a resume to McDonalds? They have a little application you fill out and that's it. I have a ton of technical skills yet I still managed to get a job at Taco Bell. I was working their and fixing computers on the side. Fast food places are always hiring, and if you have technical skills they don't say "Hey this person is over qualified we can't hire them" they say "Hey this person is pretty smart lets hire them because they'll be a great employee."

      The only time you'll ever give a fast food place a resume is for a management position, and the only way to get one of those is with past experience as a manager (or get hired as a regular employee and work your way up to manager.) If you really find yourself not able to get a fast food job you're too lazy to try, just show up and 99% of the time they will hire you and if they don't they'll send you to one of their stores that will (the taco bell I worked at was in desperate need of people, if anyone applied at one of the other 3 locations on staten island owned by our franchise they would be sent to where I worked.)

    20. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Rich people have much more influence over government than you do, and if you think that goverment is ever going to help you satisfy your envy, think again.

      Believe you me, I was under no illusions there.. And I'm not saying "soak the rich". I'm saying "don't soak the rest of us to benefit the rich".

      To get into making money from property today, you pretty much have to come up with the price of a house or condo that you can rent out.

      Not really.. it just depends on how leveraged you want to be in the early going. It's actually much easier to break into the property market than most people think, and you have to start with shit-boxes with short-term neg-am mortgages hoping the value holds or increases. I shifted all of my invested money into property shortly before the bubble burst and my properties have so far held value (even slightly increased while others have dropped) but this was soley due to location. So far that is the only thing between me and a trailer park.

      Dividends don't really help me here, only a capital gains reduction would (if I flip short-term, which I'm not doing).

      Anyway, this isn't available to the majority of the populace. The middle and lower income folks just never see the benefit of a reduction of dividend taxes. This was intended to put more money in the pockets of business with the hope that business would spend that money creating jobs. In this economic environment, all it does is make business keep its cash reserves high for a little longer, hoping to ride out decreased revenue.

    21. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      rather insulting partisan political nonsense

      I don't get it. Are you saying that you don't think self-proclaimed President Bush and his "cabinet" are a bunch of crooks and liars?!! I mean, we are talking about people like Rumsfeld here, a man that happily sold Saddam WMD while he was know to be using them on the Iranians? Or Dick "Dick" Chaney, who's being paid by Halliburton 1 million dollars a year to be VP! Let alone the rest of the half-crazed ultra-rightwing nut cases from the Project for the New American Century.

      Or have I mis-understood?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    22. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by constantnormal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You apparently failed to read the guy's resume.

      It is evident that he HAS spent a substantial amount of time over the years improving his skills, to the end that he has better (certainly broader, likely deeper) IT skills than 99% of Slashdot readers.

      And his reward for this? He's too expensive. The "improve your skills" meme is not successful when facing offshore competition at 10% of the wage rate.

      The skills he has to improve in order to stay employed are those that cannot be shipped offshore, like becoming a plumber or an electrician. Of course, this means he is required to throw away a career he has invested over 30 years in, along with all that vaunted training and experience.

      I would like to think there is a case for a domestic IT industry, but until the dismal sciences recognize the benefits of a diverse local economy over a specialized global economy, all the arguments are going to be slanted towards cutting business expense by gutting the middle classes.

      One of the major reasons Linux is so successful outside the US is that foreign governments recognize that it would be nice to have an IT industry of their own, one that does not send all the profits overseas. They're not switching to Linux to be better positioned to export IT jobs to India or China.

    23. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. Blame Canada!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    24. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Azghoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reread your history. FDR's policies extended the great depression, didn't mitigate or end it quickly. A number of new historical economic analyses demonstrate it pretty clearly.

      Good try though.

    25. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, a spending increase would definitely improve student performance. Spending more on education leads to more qualified teachers, better facilities, and smaller classes, all of which contribute to a better learning environment.

      The evidence indicates otherwise. Across the board, the school districts that spend the most per student are inner-city, failing systems like Atlanta, Washington, DC, Richmond, VA, Detroit, etc. -- usually several thousand more per student than the neighboring suburban districts. The extra money tends to go toward (1) gigantic, corrupt administrative bureaucracies and (2) security.

      The single most important factor for a good learning environment is the presence of interested parents. Money doesn't help that.

    26. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's no big deal, then why is the CIA going after the administration?
      Because information was leaked. And that deserves an investigation. The original quote was referring to "agents". This is one case. Not multiple. The CIA is also covering its ass, because Novak contacted them - confirmed the person in question was an employee - and didn't ask him not to print the name. They are just as much at fault. Novak stumbled upon information that he had no idea was even illicit. On top of that, as I pointed out, Wilson himself to Novak outed his own wife by confirming she worked for the CIA. The quote you provide from the CIA analyst from PBS Newshour says he couldnt dilvulge to anyone except his wife that he even worked for the CIA. Yet Wilson divulged to Novak that he was sent to Niger at the suggestion of his wife who worked at the CIA.

      The timeline is like this:

      1. Novak looks into "yellow-cake" incident.
      2. Novak wonders why a Clinton-appointee was sent on a highly sensitive mission.
      3. Novak contacts Wilson and asks him why he was chosen.
      4. Wilson says he was sent because of the influence of his wife - who is a WMD expert analyst for the CIA.
      5. Novak - now knowing that the wife is an employee of the CIA contacts administration officals to verify Wilsons story.
      6. Administration officals believing that Novak already knew that the wife was a CIA Agent (he did) and that she was "covered" as part of another government agency (he didn't know that yet) confirmed Wilson's story that he was sent to Niger due to the influence of his wife - a long time CIA employee.
      7. Novak prints a story with information he believes is open-sourced and which is clearly cross checked and verified.

      The claims coming from some are clear: Bush admin people - namely Karl Rove - purposely outed the wife to punish Wilson. The information that Novak and others provide does not support this possibility. Novak contacted Wilson, Wilson told Novak about his wife being an employee of the CIA. Novak contacted the White House for confirmation of Wilsons story, which is when the administration people gave out information that is proscribed. Clearly the law was broken by the White House people giving out information that is protected. However, there is not yet a single shred of evidence - investigation pending - that this was deliberately leaked. All signs indicate that it was Novak investigating Wilson's story that lead to the information being let out. Additionally, under the law as written the crime is mitigated if the information is no longer secret - meaning that this conversation we are having isn't a violation of the law. If anyone can prove that this information was pubic knowledge before the Novak article the crime is completely mitigated.

      Regardless of any of that though - it is very clear that the claims of deliberate retilation by the White House are unfounded at this time. There isn't anything to suggest it other than it would be conveinent for the White House and that it was physically possible. The quote from the PBS person does nothing to further the case except to confirm that the wife was in fact a CIA employee (which is now confirmed through the CIA) and that a leak did happen (which Novak said in his follow-up article).

      Bottom line? Two admin officals probably broke the law, and will likely get slapped on the wrist. In terms of who is actually responsible it is Wilson himself.

      Back to the President and jobs. There is a big difference between 4.8 million jobs and 400,000 jobs as originally claimed. A freaking huge difference. In terms of raw unemployment there is not a huge nationwide problem. Uemployment is higher than it has been in the past 15 years, but not certainly record breaking. Additionally, it has been trending downwards. On top of that economic recovery experts will gladly tell you how jobs are the last thing to recover from a recession or downturn.
      I am not suggesting that we give the President a

    27. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but when I'm constantly facing the loss of MY home and MY standard of living, I have to think about MY family first.

      If you have to worry about it I have three suggestions for you:
      1. Life insurance, accidental death.
      2. New line of work.
      3. Stop worrying.


      I'm sick of people complaining about how they are constantly facing all these great losses because they're too fucking retarded to learn that they just shouldn't be in the IT Business. If you are constantly facing the challenges of losing your shit, get out.

      Make room for the people who deserve, love, and are good at IT jobs. I don't care if you love computers, if you are a retard, get out. If you can't hold down a job, get out. If you have been unemployed for more than a year, go to realty school and become a realtor.

      There are two types of people that I hate in this world, those who aren't stupid but act stupid because it's easier and those who believe they're entitled to shit they don't earn.

      You sound exactly like the latter, and I hope you are not.
      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    28. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by dustman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up!

      Last year, I got a job stocking shelves at the Home Depot. When I applied, I was up front about the facts: I am a computer person, looking for a computer job. When I find one, you'll get two weeks notice. I am also a hard worker.

      You just have to find the right places. And the job wasn't that bad, either... It was nice to do something physical.

    29. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Where is it written that we, as Americans, are responsible for the rest of world.

      Nowhere. Your government uses the "save the world" rant to get you onside whatever war you are in at that point; it's easier to get civilian support if they believe they are the good guys.

      The world doesn't want us there, why are we interfereing all over the world.

      The same reason that any other country interferes in another: personal gain. This can be in pure profit or political/strategic gain.

      I agree wth you on Afganistan. It involved American lives. We had a right to retaliate.

      It wasn't a retaliation. The Afgan war was in planning prior to 9/11. I believe it was around June/July when the Indian ambassidor was told by the US to expect a war in Afganistan "before the snow starts falling". 9/11 was used as propaganda to get the public onside.

      The gain? Well, Harliburton, the company directly linked to the current US regime, has been attempting to build a cross-Afgan pipe line, to ship the oil resources of the former USSR states to the north to the Persian gulf. When the Taliban awarded the contract to an Argentine company instead, the adminstration fell out with them. Prior to that, they were best-of-buddies, always in negotiations etc for the lucrative contract. The pipeline was under construction by US interests before the war was over, guarded by US troops.

      But Iraq? There was nothing going oon there at the time.

      Ah, you miss the point there. Question: where did the majority of 9/11 hijackers come from? Saudi Arabia. Where does the US rely mostly for foreign oil? Saudi Arabia.

      Back in the initial gulf war, the US convinced the Saudi's that positioning US troops in Saudi was neccessary in case Saddam advanced further than Kuwait. It is rumoured that the satelite inteligence shown to them of troops near their border was faked by the US. Previously, the US only supported the Saudi dictatorship with weapons and financing, in return, the US was able to access the oil. The US actually helped this dictatorship to power, after the previous democracy (yes, democracy) was toppled (again with US assistance) because it wasn't forthcoming to US interests.

      When the troops arrived, that's when the anti-US terrorism there really kicked off, away from the purely religious fanatics that hate all non-Islam, and into a more mainstream position. Al Qaeda's stated goal is to remove the US from Saudi, allowing them to control their own government. The "hate freedom & democracy" thing is a US propaganda lie, to prevent you from knowing why they hate you so much. If anything, that's exactly what they want, although their idea of Freedom is a bit more strict than ours.

      Anyway, back to Iraq. After Saudi, the second largest oil reserves are in Iraq. Under Saddam's regime and UN sanctions, this oil was essentially out of play for the west, increasing dependance on Saudi, a state with huge ties to terrorism and anti-US feeling.

      With Saddam gone, and a democratic government in Iraq, this oil is now available. The Saudi troops have already mostly moved to Iraq, which will become the new US reserve of power in the middle east. There will be a large US army stationed there for many years to come, even if the guerilla war ends before then.

      So, in essence, the west has actually conceeded to the terrorists goal. Of course, it's not going to work out. I estimate that the story of Saudi Arabia is going to be replayed in Iraq. There have been some good documentaries on recently on the BBC, and while there is some support for the war, the majority of the population were against it, and have lost family. Note we've never heard Iraqi soldier casualty figures on our news, they are very high. If the US is not careful, the hate for them could grow to the point that Iraqi becomes the source of a large amount of terrorism.

      American history shows that it is neccessary to disagree with you government if it dooing wrong

      And n

    30. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by tres · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit.

      I'm sick of simple, bullheaded idiots telling me that it's my fault that the tech industry has turned into a gobbling bunch of MBA cannibals more worried about preserving their own 6 figure salary than jobs.

      You keep on the platitudes, speaking about "deserving" and "earning," but the fact of the matter is, there is no hard and fast way of defining what exactly affords one the deservedness, or defines them as "good at IT jobs;" it's all arbitrary, and getting a job is based upon many other things than deserving or aptitude.

      I don't know where you are, but out here in the real world, rarely is it what you know, but rather WHO you know that gets you in the door. So you can be a kickass coder or a great sysadmin, but it still won't get you a thing if you don't have an edge over the 500 other guys who are kickass coders or great sysadmins and also have their resume in the same pile.

      You tell me; is David Dvorkin one of the retards who should be getting out?

      I tell you what, there's two types of people that I hate: idiots who know better and greedy self-serving retards who can't see the world except through the shaft of their own ego.

      You sir, sound exactly like the latter, and I hope you are not.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
  13. and in two years... by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 2, Funny

    the other day I caught myself telling a fellow slacker "you are trolling the unemployment line you should be mod'ed down" of course I got a blank empty void look on his face. also, I really ought to move out of my mom's house soon.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  14. CATO by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, the CATO institute would probably have a paper on the moral duty of the unemployed to increase downward pressure on wages and how the recently homeless have merely chosen to realize capital gains by selling their houses to pay for food. The Heritage Foundation would no doubt follow up with a paper on how eliminating the capital gains tax would then be in the best interest of the future homeless population. It's the compassionately conservative thing to do.

  15. unemployment by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The boss told me that if I'm late for work again tomorrow, I shouldn't bother turning up on Monday.

    Woohoo! Four day weekend!!

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
  16. For perks of being unemployed without the guilt... by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 5, Funny

    For all the perks of being unemployed without the guilt, frustration and lack of income that it brings with it...Do a PhD! ......back to the grind, another day of back-breaking research ahead...ooops...dont feel like working, i think ill go home and sleep instead....better tell the boss...wait...there is no boss...hehehe....my paper is not due till next month, ill just do it the night before.

  17. Who said the Slashdot editors weren't smart ? by tmark · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, they're smart enough to realize that articles about being unemployed are likely to be of great interest to a large proportion of those people spending the most time reading Slashdot.

    Way to go after your core readership guys !

  18. "simple living" by penguin7of9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is actually an entire movement of people that have discovered this. Look for "simple living" on Google. "The Simple Living Guide" by Luhrs is pretty nice reading, too.

    Even if you don't want to adopt frugality and simple living right now, just knowing that you could can make you worry a lot less about the future.

  19. A real benefit by tmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of his "benefits" seem to have been writing with a smirk. One friend of mine who has been unemployed for about 9 months has been catching all hell from his wife. However, even she has to admit that his being unemployed and his consequent stays at home with their 2-y old son has made them much closer. For instance, before the son never ran to his father for comfort (only ever his mother), now he does. I think my friend has become a much better father largely because he is unemployed. (Of course, that doesn't stop him from wanting to leave the kid alone while he's sleeping so he can go checking out the satellite dish store down the street, because he thinks the baby monitor will reach halfway to the store, but don't tell his wife).

  20. Bitter much? by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sheesh... a few of flashes of insight in there, but it's mostly bitter, sarcastic, angst-ridden despair... quite depressing read, actually.

    Notice how he blames it on everyone else, as if some puppetmaster controls his destiny? (evil corporations, GW Bush, supervisors and managers). Sheesh, guy... I hate to sound like your dad, but that's life. Lots of people have been screwed out of jobs before, and lots of peolpe have had jobs that frankly sucked, but there's always work out there if you are willing to swallow some pride, and make some sacrifices. Go back to school for god's sake.

    I wish I hadn't read that depressing little piece... I'd say it was a lot higher on the despair scale than the humor scale.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Bitter much? by mvh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wow, now i have to say that comment was about as depressing as I can handle. The original guy seems to take life quite well.

    2. Re:Bitter much? by helix400 · · Score: 2

      Sheesh... a few of flashes of insight in there, but it's mostly bitter, sarcastic, angst-ridden despair... quite depressing read, actually. Notice how he blames it on everyone else, as if some puppetmaster controls his destiny? (evil corporations, GW Bush, supervisors and managers).

      I agree, and I can see why he's unemployed. Why would any company want a to hire high maintenance anti-capitalist whiner like that guy? His views kind of clash with want businesses need. He blames capitalism from idealogical viewpoints, and yet wants no-nosense business to glady hire him with a healthy salary.

      I know unemployment must suck like hell, but if he really wanted a job, the first step is to become a potentially useful employee. If he becomes qualified, and still can't get a job, then he has grounds to blame society.

    3. Re:Bitter much? by qaggaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but if he really wanted a job, the first step is to become a potentially useful employee

      Been there, done that...

      This comment obviously comes from someone who has never actually experienced the joys of unemployment. I actually agree that it is important to become a useful employee. I was unemployed for nine months last year and took the time to go back and actually read through RFCs, play with network equipment, do some volunteer work, take a few classes, and so on. And I did eventually get a job.

      On the other hand, it is as though someone else was controling my destiny. Afterall, was it my fault that the upper management of my former employer decided to divert corporate revenue away from the business (and stock holders) and into their own bonuses and golden-parachutes? Is it my fault that the stock holders often see lay offs as "trimming the fat" and reward these same executives for their "bold moves to improve the bottom line" with even larger bonuses?

      Capitalism itself may not be to blame, but surely the corrupt cabal that runs most American corporations as well as our political system should be held accountable.

      Perhaps if unemployment benefits were paid directly out of executive compensation, the unemployment rate would drop.

    4. Re:Bitter much? by ojQj · · Score: 2, Informative
      Neither of us knows his entire story, but I had a different take on his capitalism rant. Basically he was complaining about an asymetric relationship. He gave a lot to his company, and thought that he could depend on them in return. But some companies don't realize the value of employee loyalty and don't choose to foster it, instead making brutal, but (hopefully at least) economically correct decisions which don't see any practical value in intangibles such as loyalty.

      My answer to that not would be to pretend its not true. It is. Instead, it's time to realize that companies are this way and to plan around it. A few possibilities are:

      1. Get together with others so that you can have the same kind of collective bargaining power as the monopsonists (ie create a labor monopoly, ie unionize).
      2. Make sure that the company really can't live without you by performing a critical service no one else can.
      3. Keep your skills and contacts up-to-date so that you can find another job, even while you perform consciencious work at the job you have. Don't let unpayed over-time at your current job suck away the time you need to do this.
      4. In addition to retirement savings, save to bridge potential dead periods. Negotiate your salary with the need to do this in mind.
      5. In short calculate all the costs and risks of employment into your decision making processes at all levels. Don't let optimism and the desire to like your employer corrupt your judgement.
      Just because someone has recognized that capitalism can be brutal doesn't make him a bad employee. I'd say it could make him a better employee because he enters the contract with open eyes, and a clear understanding of his position.

      The author of this article was simply saying that he didn't realize this before, and that now he does.

  21. What I really want to know... by wessto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is at what point he gives up his monthly internet bill.

    I've been looking at my monthly budget for ways to save a few bucks and dsl is costing a lot, but I feel I can't let go of it.

  22. Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by 1337_h4x0r · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    damn, this guy is OBSSESSED! Check out the link at the bottom of the article page. I can totally agree with people wondering about the policies of the president, and even not liking him as a person, but insulting someone's daughters and his family is going a wee bit far... hard to agree with his "I'm a nice guy" comment after reading his list...

  23. lived through the no heat thing 2 winters ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't have the money to fix a 25-year-old furnace shaking itself apart with a horrible delayed ignition problem (Kaboom!). Did later sell the condo at a nice profit.

    The condo had large single-pane windows that always drew comments, but did nothing for insulation. The lowest temperatures at the first floor thermostat hit low 50's (Thankfully there was a heated space below that did some good). It actually became bearable although I wouldn't want to do it again. Wore a hat, couple of long john tops, couple of t-shirts, sweat top. 2 long-john bottoms and sweat bottoms. Would sit in a chair or at my computer with a blanket (was still paying for DSL till the end!!). The worse part was my hands and face. With my nose being the worse. Should have got one of those face mask things. Sleeping was fine. Showering was avoided at all costs. Going to the bathroom also involved the shock of cold as you had to get all those layers positioned or off.

    I had very few pipes and they all ran through a heated space to me. Your pipes may break before you do. If you do the no heat thing make sure you insulate pipes. Take a small room and make it your heat space. Crank up the TV and computer and confine you activities to that area. Your own body heat can raise the ambient. You need all the help you can get.

  24. Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like what he says about his expectations about being loyal to the company you work for. Most of us, at least deep down, expect that those days we come in sick or work a 20 hour day will show loyality to our employer that will be repaid with loyality right back. Then wouldn't fire you.. you're as good as best buds afterall. You're in it together.

    Ha ha ha! What shock when you're fired or laid off. Does it matter how much you sacrificed for your employer? Nope, not a damn bit. All those pep talks about being in it together.. they're complete bullshit. You may as well have gone home on time every day instead of missing out on quality time. Of course now there is no way I'm going to believe any employer when then make promises and ask for loyality and a little extra effort. Two words.. blow me. I'm not going to be gungho to finish projects ahead of schedule anymore.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeySquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, that's what i'm talkin' about! Damn skippy.

    2. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Several years ago, someone posted an interesting observation on this site:

      Your employer owns your job. You own your career.

      Don't confuse the two. The days of corporate loyalty are long gone. Even very popular and successful business leaders of large and successful companies can not guarentee a job.

      I view my employment as a mercenary contract. My loyalty is linked to my compensation. Don't get me wrong... I am loyal to my employer. But I don't do things for free.
    3. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by expro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget that working hard helps the company and helping the company ensures it still has money to pay you.

      And let's not forget to pay the boss his millions (or hundreds of millions) of dollars in bonus. The company could get much further in loyalty paying that money to help employees, if it hadn't written them off.
  25. Everything this man says is true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently had quit a job at a large fortune 500 company developing systems software for a shaky startup. I figured, I'm young, so why not give a less structured job a try where the fruits of my labor would come back and benefit me. Well, long story short, this particular startup had some issues; there wasn't a decent chemistry, and the management was somewhat capricious, fickle, inexperienced, and unaware of just what was involved in having a legitimate, organized business. (In fact, I think unemployment caused me to realize the importance of great management.) So, with legal dilemmas and financial dilemmas at hand, I decided maybe I made a mistake joining this particular venture. So, I ended up unemployed. I stopped going out because of a lack of health insurance, and COBRA didn't really cut it, because the insurance premiums were ridiculously high.

    I ended up finding another job, but I went through everything the man who wrote the featured article went through. I was dating a girl at one point; when she knew before that I had been making money, things were fine. However, as soon as she found out that I was in trouble and that I needed employment, suddenly I became a lot less attractive and we went our separate ways. (She's now dating another guy with a nicer car and presumably more money in the bank.) Everyone kept insisting that my failures were somehow my fault. Perhaps they were, but I like to think that in the grand scheme of things, this little experience of unemployment was to teach me a lesson about the value of a job.

    In college, you'll hear a lot of talk about how engineering is worthless because it only pays some petty 5 figure salary. People like to talk about how you should start a business, and how real losers become engineers. Increasingly, there's a trend for good American engineers to try and get their MBA or JD. All in all, I find the situation really disappointing and hard to cope with. I got into engineering thinking that I would be able to build cool things and be creative. Instead, I found insane market deadlines, invasive work spaces, no offices, ridiculous cubicles, no room for creativity. But, one thing is for sure, ... unemployment taught me to have more respect for having *a* job. I just am wondering how long it will be before the pendulum swings from "job is good" to "fuck it, maybe I need the fear of unemployment or business failure to drive me into a state of action again."

    Anyway, I wish the best of luck to anyone else out there in the same situation.

    1. Re:Everything this man says is true. by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In college, you'll hear a lot of talk about how engineering is worthless because it only pays some petty 5 figure salary. People like to talk about how you should start a business, and how real losers become engineers. Increasingly, there's a trend for good American engineers to try and get their MBA or JD. All in all, I find the situation really disappointing and hard to cope with. I got into engineering thinking that I would be able to build cool things and be creative.

      People that run successful businesses must be good social engineers.

      And Social Engineering, being the most difficult kind of engineering pays the most.

  26. whee... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't been this depressed since I read "Nickel and Dimed." Excellent book, btw, but don't read it expecting to be cheered up. Anyone who's out of a job, I wish you well. (Been unemployed a bit before; now I've got two.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  27. Puss by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have worked steadily every single day of my life since I was four years old. That coal mine taught me to be a man, and it put hair on my chest.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  28. Yes but could you actually quit? by roninbix · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've gotten to the point where I wonder if I couldn't make something really cool happen on my own. Except of course I'm on salary so I end up working around 2 times what I should for the job. Add to that significant travel expectations and I just have no time to advance any ideas or any side ventures on my own.

    Given my skill sets I'm sitting down and telling myself I need to leave the corporate world and go my own way. I even have a large cushion of cash to fall back on. Plus my significant hours have resulted in a minimalist livestyle anyway. I estimate I could live for 5 years on my current savings at my current lifestyle, less the costs of other activities I take up (especially significant if you try to start a business). I just don't have time to piece it together while working. And I'm pissing away valuable years if I try.

    Only one thing holding me back. My attachment to having a stable respectable job that pays decently. All the skills are there, I could easily acquire support from skilled friends in any profession I could want. I could probably scrape together 50-100K for starting money if I begged a bit without approaching professional lenders. But it's pretty hard to actually quit to do nothing and take a huge "risk" on possibilities coming through. I'm much more the type of person to try to set it all up before I quit, but I just can't seem to get the time together for that unless I quit first.

    Anybody else? Could YOU quit?

    1. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by cbdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I had 5 years cash I'd be gone in an instant.
      Ive worked in computers since 1969 and have only
      a heart attack to show for it. I can never retire and will probably die at my desk.

      Dont do this to yourself. Take off for a long time, learn photography, go to culinary college, volunteer as a computer mentor at a local school, etc.

      I'd give anything to have trained as a plumber growing up. But no, I had to be the geek and go into computer shit.

    2. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by tetra103 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A 5yr cash reserve is just good planning. Congrats! I don't think anyone can tell you what you should or should not do. Everyone's situation is different. I would suggest that you just concider what's important. Think of what memories you'll have later in life. You also have to play "what if". You may be a top dog now in your profession, but will it always be that way? You know the saying, "Get while the getting is good." That money pot may not be there tomorrow. Think of your health (this is a big one for me). If you're in your prime of life now, no money in the future will buy that health back. Above anything else, take your health very serious. If you have childern, no money will buy back time spent with them when they're young. And if you don't have childern, do you really want to wait until your 40 to have them? You sound like you have a good plan now and I wish you the best of luck. Just remember, money isn't everything.

      My own personal story. My prime of life was a few years back. I made a decent salary and I worked for a Wall Street firm. I was recently married and my wife and I were just turning 30. We wanted kids, but with both of us working long hours, we just couldn't see it happening. The money was so nice, that it was hard to leave. We finally made the decision that having a family sooner was better than waiting. We left the big city and moved to a smaller place near our folks (to be grandparents). We decided family was better than money. Looking back, it was the right decision to make. My former job was on the 103rd floor of the World Trade Center. I worked for Cantor and I left in 2000. I know that's not a good example and tragety can happen at any time anywhere. Still, my wife and I can't help but call it fate.

      Today we have a beutiful baby girl and I stand a very good chance of loosing my job. Honestly, it doesn't bother us to the least. Where there's a will there's a way. I may never be rich, but I'm alive and happy. You just need to prioritize what's important in your life. Use your head and follow your heart...or said differently...think things over and do what You feel is right for you. Best of luck!

  29. the benefits of being unemployed? by bigmaddog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, I don't think this article is irrelevant, unlike a lot of the people that posted replies so far (uh, what's this... I'm a (-1, troll) already? dammit...). Some guy's musings about his lack of a job are probably not front-page material, and posting it to Slashdot seems like shameless self-promotion, but the sad truth is that there are more and more people out there who are either unemployed or, almost if not equally as bad, underemployed (McJob, anyone?). People who went to school at the height of the late-90s high-tech boom (like me) are entering the workforce to find it flooded by people who worked through that boom, are more experienced, at least equally skilled, and are also looking for jobs. Even seemingly trivial jobs have substantial requirements of experience and obscure skills because employers know they can easily get overqualified people. At the same time, older people find themselves being edged out by the young'uns, who are willing to work longer and compromise more for less money.

    This leads to depression, sarcasm and cynicism, all of which seem come across in that writeup; most of the things he lists there are not really benefits of being unemployed but benefits of having lots of free time, which is a byproduct of unemployment but not the only way to get it. Philosophical insights and beard growth aside, you can get this stuff and still work. The trick is to have a good job, and by that I mean one that affords you lost of free time and enough money to get by. Working for the gov't is good, at least in Canada - pay's ok, hours are fixed, and the boss isn't particuarly evil. Getting into a union, though those are increasingly rare, is even better. My father always complains how lazy those union guys are - I envy their laziness, and weep every time unions lose out to big corporations.

    Personally, I've been without a job since April and haven't had much success finding for one. All I'm really going on right now is sarcasm and cynicism - the money's all gone (I guess, then, I'm also going on the good nature of my parents). I'm even starting to become cynical about my own cynicism. I go nutty periodically and produce "great" works of prose (beware of popups, and I promise that my resume is nowhere to be found), but how long can I go on? The end is not in sight...

    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

  30. Re:This is News for Nerds? by gfordham · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a good Poll Idea.

    How many Slashdi are:

    Employed In Tech
    Employed In Retail
    Employed In Fast Food
    Contractor
    Unemployed
    Cowboy Neals My Surgar Daddy

    --
    When work feels overwhelming, remember that you're going to die.
  31. Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by protogoogoo69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What good is 15 years of Netware experience today?
    How about someone who knows that the original PC had odd size ISA slots, so that 286 and later cards wouldn't fit?
    Who cares that you spent a million hours with DOS and QEMM getting an extra 60K of base memory so somone's blasted Autocad machine would work correctly?
    It's turning out that spending 20 years working with computers has been a really poor investment.


    Sad. I always thought of learning as something that makes you human (as opposed to insects? viruses?), not rich or job-secure. A lot of people specialize in some industry and when that culture/economy/technology/employer changes and they lose a job (or are about to), they whine as if they've wasted their life or they go cry to the government to try save that dying industry so that they may (selfishly) preserve their outdated niche in society.

    Its called evolution. Its a way of life. Only the fittest will survive! And you know who survives? The beings who change. Honestly, if you feel your life was wasted because you specialized in something and the only thing that made you important was that job-field, then maybe you aren't really special. Sorry, but being an intelligent human means being able to use your knowledge for something beyond a stupid job. If all you are is someone who picks up knowledge with no intent to use it beyond the scope of its context, then you are not intelligent, IMHO. But I do not believe any human in this world is NOT intelligent, just someone who has a tainted definition of life.

    So here is my suggestion to all you unemployed or job-security conscious people out there: Make yourself special, use your intelligence, and learn things with the intent of using them beyond the scope of their context. Not only will your expertise grow (hence becoming more of an asset), but you may end up creating something innovative.

    --
    ...small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri...
  32. The most important benefit by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

    He left out the mst important benefit of all: the grapes are sour, anyway.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  33. Check out this guy's story... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... He knows how to live despite having been laid off!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  34. Warning! by CiXeL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you feel like opening a vein don't read this article. I am officially depressed.

  35. Corporate Loyalty by The+Kow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you contribute to your company's success and help it to advance its interests and financial health, often making sacrifices of your own time to do so, then your company will reciprocate by making sacrifices in bad times to take care of you by not depriving you of your paycheck and benefits. That's the way I thought it worked.

    Funny that, we got a nice speech today from our CTO or some guy who can walk around happily because he won't get outsourced. The speech focused on how we need to keep our performance levels "above the bar", or we'd be managed up or out. [Tangent: GOD I love that term, 'managed out' - HOW FREAKING AWESOME is that?! That's even better than right-sized!] then he goes on to tell us that no job is sacred, and that as a company who has to strive to cut a profit, if outsourcing is a more fiscal option, then they'll take it.

    I'm pretty new so I didn't even think to point out the catch-22 he had presented us with. Work hard or get fired, but even if you do work hard, you may get outsourced.

    Of course this is the truth, there's no two ways about it. Nevermind the questionable nature of a US company (enjoying US corporate laws, tariffs, quotas, et. al.) that has a majority of its workforce offshores, it's a simple fact that until something changes, be it now or thirty years from now, this is how it is. The flipside is that I have the right to work wherever the hell I want (provided they want me of course), and can leave them at any time.

    Fresh out of college, yes, but I think I'll catch on to this twisted game soon enough. The question, however, is how do you maintain a sense of optimism in spite of all this?

    --
    Moo
  36. What I "Learned" from being out of work by SupahVee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1 - That while average Joe Worker makes 66% more salaray than he did in 1980, Joe CEO is making 1996% more than _he_ did in 1980.

    2 - that having to sell your house after 8 months of being unemployed, SUCKS, worse than anything you can imagine.

    3 - That moving a thousand miles away from a place you consider home for a job fixing Windows boxen is about as fun as it sounds.

    4 - That companies do job postings with no intention of filling them.

    5 - That of all the oddball things that helped while having a mortgage, a newborn and no job, Wife's Unionized insurance plan is at the top of the list.

    6 - that I can now be lazy at work, and get fired, or bust my ass at work, and get fired.

    7 - that startng over is as shitty as you think it is.

    --
    "See, we plan ahead! That way, we never have to do anything now."
    1. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by mandolin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      6 - that I can now be lazy at work, and get fired, or bust my ass at work, and get fired.

      Very true -- but. External commitments and priorities aside, if you're learning a lot at your current job, and get fired, it's still better than learning nothing, and getting fired.

      If you're lazy, you don't learn as much.

  37. Tired of Anti-capitalism by boatboy · · Score: 2, Troll

    To risk sounding like Seinfeld: What is the deal with anti-capitalists? Seriously. There's so much of it rampant on slashdot and elsewhere: those evil businesses, those greedy businessmen. When confronted with the alternative, though, people rarely have the gumption to be consistent in their beliefs: Don't like 'big business'? Think everybody should have equal paying jobs? Read up on Marxism and it's success this past century. If you still think 'free enterprise sucks' then at least be logical and apply that belief to your life- move to Cuba.

    Sure, I feel for anybody who doesn't have a job, but consider for a second all the people who not only have no job, but no roof over their head, no water or food- or heaven forbid- no internet access to publish essays on. Where are they? In the dictatorial, socialist, and communist countries for the most part. Clearly, if you really want to do this guy and others a favor, the right thing to do is support free enterprise.

  38. Yeah it sucks... by Grimster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok unemployment sucks, but this article is.. not that good but I digress.

    I was unemployed 2 years ago on Oct 16th I knew it was coming, around March I realized (when quarterly earnings showed 1.9 million burned 4 million in the bank, can you say dot BOMB?). So I moved back to the small town I came from figuring it'd be easier to pay a $350 a month rent payment on unemployment than it would a $1300 a month payment in the Bay Area. I moved in July and telecommuted until the end.

    I immediately started planning on starting my own business I was hoping to last until about Christmas 2001 but I got axed on Oct 16th instead. Oh well. Started my company, did some consulting here and there, made ends meet, got some customers, a few more, no more consulting was scraping by on the business, more customers, and more, and then tax time comes and I realize I owe uncle sam $13,000 in taxes (YIKES!).

    Long story shorter, I get up when I want, go to bed when I want, leave when I want and stay at home with my 3 year old son (well he'll be 3 next week). I run my business from home.

    I've always been a unix geek/linux nut/internet addict so why not make a business out of it, web hosting is the perfect job :) Now I have a decent sized income bills are paid, and I get to play around with over 50 linux boxen hosting over 11,000 web sites.

    My wife also just lost her job of over 10 years, company sold out and that's that (they were dying anyway so sell out or bankruptcy they chose sell out). So she stays home draws unemployment and plays with the kid too, a kid with two stay at home parents how lucky can he be? She also is doing some volunteer work.

    When the unemployment runs out she might start her own business, she likes decorating cakes, or maybe open a daycare. Or get into real estate she likes going out and looking at nice houses, so why not sell 'em for a living. I told her don't look for another "job" do something you LIKE instead, the money isn't important the satisfaction is.

    The economy truly sucks right now and I really would hate to be trying to find a job, but sometimes you might have better luck making your own job instead of looking for one.

    --
    --- www.f-theocean.com
  39. 14 steps. by Martigan80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like nothing but a 14 step program. 14 ways to look at a glum problem. Well you can look at it this way there are always jobs out there-it just depends on how much pride you have.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  40. Look a few articles below this one. by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Open Courses at MIT.

    Not a bad idea for those with an abundance of time (I have a 2.5-year-old to take care of and entertain, so I wouldn't be able to take advantage of this).

  41. Depressing read. by zapp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is one of the most depressing things I've read in atleast a month. This guy lives in Denver, an hour away from me.
    His resume is filled with the same buzzword bullshit as mine, only more of it and with more experience.

    I feel right now like I just lost everything in the stock market. 4 years ago when I started college (investing in a skillset), those skills were climbing in value at a good rate. I remember being told that I'd be making an easy 50-60k right out of college - as in the day I graduate.

    Now the prices on my skills have collapsed. What once went for $60/share now goes for $2.50. Everyone knows Java. Or Perl, or SQL, or blah blah blah.

    I want a real career. Without computers. Without the corporation.

    Fuck this.

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Depressing read. by colinleroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want a real career. Without computers. Without the corporation.
      Not focusing on your income may help. Where's the need to earn 60k if you can live correctly with 30?
      Let your job be only a little part of your life and you may be happier - there's so much more to do (you know, the "Real Life" people here often make fun of ;-)) than work for a company you don't care about .
      Of course this is not very valid for unemployed people. (I've been unemployed for a few monthes, just long enough to be able to consider this as nice vacations, but i wouldn't have wanted this unemployment to last too long).

      --
      blah
  42. Company != family by seichert · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The real benefit of this recession is that more and more people are starting to realize the difference between company and family. Your family members love you and will remain loyal to you in good times and bad. They have a vested interest in your success and happiness. They want to see you succeed at work and enjoy the fruits of your labor. The company you work for does not love you and is not loyal to you. That does not mean that individuals at your company are not compassionate and loving. However, they are not your family members.

    I suggest that you look at your company in a different manner. The company can provide you and your family with opportunity. The opportunity to earn a paycheck and possibly learn something. When the company has no need for the job that you do or can find someone to do it better or cheaper you will not have a job with that company. On the flip side when the company is no longer offering you a good paycheck or opportunity you will quit. The relationship is really no more than that. The company is not a family, clan, or tribe, just an opportunity.

    --

    Stuart Eichert

    1. Re:Company != family by Grimster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, absolutely, I've been trying to drill this into my wife's head for years, where you work is not your family, sure you like(d) working there, sure it's a good place to work, but when the chips are down they'd eat your young if it helped the bottom line.

      She found it out in July, they sold out, no warning, not even a WEEK before they closed up shop they were spouting off on how they had some good contracts coming up, etc etc etc. Less than a week later she's being "laid off" to make matters even more lovely the bastards quit paying their share of the Cobra health insurance so on Sep 1 that went away too! (luckily for us Alabama has a state run group health plan for people losing cobra or other group coverage, and our premiums are only $790 per month, yes sarcasm is implied).

      Now she's telling me how she's not getting emails every day from her friends (surprise remember how you said these people are like your family and they love you? well who's emailed you at all this week?). Not pretty to see a 29 year old woman have to learn such a hard lesson. Hey I learned it 4 years ago myself when I was 26 so I wasn't much better off.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  43. People know corruption when they see it. by composer777 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is America even "free enterprise"? Are you fucking kidding me? A country where a corrupt government regularly bails out it's richest? And gives billions of dollars to corporations, which immediately pay off corrupt CEO's. A country that doesn't give a shit about educatingg it's youth, because it's too busy gutting social programs and giving that money to Enron, Haliburton, et al. That's "freedom". Freedom means picking on the little guy. Apparently I'm supposed to understand that supporting a corrupt system is "freedom" to you. Call it what you want, I won't support it, and neither will a growing number of Americans. Let's not talk about fantasy land, I'm too busy trying to deal with the real world, I don't know what country you're talking about, but the country I'm living in is corrupt, and has problems that need fixing, and "freedeom" is the last thing that our business leaders are after. If you're too stupid to realize that, then I'm sorry for you.

  44. Al Franken said it best by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider all of the years that Bush I and II were in the White House. For each and every one of those years, you know how many net new jobs were created? None! After each year of them being president, fewer people were employed at the end of the year. Bush recovery my ass.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Al Franken said it best by Mikey-San · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a matter of fact, when the Clinton Administration moved into the White House, their audit team discovered that things were far worse than they knew:

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cl in ton/chapters/2.html

      The excerpt:

      Reich: Well, we knew the deficit was large. In fact, years before [Reagan budget chief] David Stockman had referred to '$200 billion-a-year deficits as far as the eye could see." And during the campaign, the president did talk about the importance of reducing the deficit, but it had been of second order priority to investing in education, in job skills, in health care, and a lot of other things that the country needed to do. But, obviously, when the president is on the cusp of actually governing the country, he's got to know how bad that deficit projection really is, how much damage has been done, what he's inherited in terms of an economic mess.

      And so I headed over to the Treasury Department to talk to officials over there, officials in the Bush administration, and try to get the best estimate I possibly could as to how bad the numbers really looked, how bad that deficit was going to be the next year and likely to be in years to come.

      Frontline: And you found out it was going to be worse than you had been told, and on December 7th I think it was, you go to tell the president the news. What's his reaction?

      Reich: The president was not happy when he heard that the projected deficit was much larger than we had assumed, larger than we had been told, larger than the Bush administration had told the public. He knew that it meant that we couldn't do everything that he wanted to do, everything that he had promised the public. Now, he was both upset, but he was also -- I remember this very vividly, and I was surprised at the time because he was also kind of excited. He said, "Gee, that's a great challenge. We're going to really, really have to work on that." And I remember sitting there thinking, "Now, wait a minute. This is going to set a lot of our plans back. Certainly this is going to put a major crimp in all of this public investment.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    2. Re:Al Franken said it best by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I remember sitting there thinking, "Now, wait a minute. This is going to set a lot of our plans back. Certainly this is going to put a major crimp in all of this public investment."

      Oh man, that's wonderful. "Public investment." So maybe that's where it started. Have you noticed that these days, all spending is an "investment?" We're not pouring money into failing schools! We're investing in our children! No, no, they're not farm subsidies, we're investing in middle America!

      Well, that said, I'm going to go invest in a Coke, and maybe on the way home tonight I'll stop by the video store and invest in some porn.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  45. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Being unemployed and/or underemployeed is really kind of cool. You really ought to try it for 6 months or so. I don't live in a ghetto, I'm not next to prostitutes or crackhouses. My needs are really pretty modest I've found. If I was trying to raise a family, and if someone with those kinds of responsibilities has lost a job, you have my sympathy. I live with roommates. I drive a 12 year old car. I cook most of my meals. I steal music. Oops. I mean, I infringe copyrights. =) I do occassional low stress jobs to pay the bills. My standard of living has plummeted, but I really don't care. I'm much happier. Let the Indians or the Chinese work their asses off for a change. They need the money more than i do.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  46. Keep dream'in by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 3, Informative

    I suspect that, a year from now, people will be talking about the "Bush recovery," and whoever emerges from the Democratic primary is going to be scrambling for issues to run on.

    For the last two years I've been telling myself that things would be better by this time next year. Now I really doubt it. With the Gartner Group saying that over the next 18 months 10% of the remaining IT jobs are heading overseas I really don't think it'll be any better next year at this time. With consumer confidence back down where it was just before the war started because so many people are afraid they'll lose their job, I really doubt things'll be much better next year. With us spending hundreds of Billions of dollars to rebuild Iraq, I really doubt it. But maybe I'll be wrong again this year?

    Nah, I doubt it. Bye, bye Bushie, looks like it'll be a democrat next time.

  47. A good read on the subject of saving money by DownTheLongRoad · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Read "Suriviving without a salary" by Charles Long. Make sure to check it out from the library instead of buying it(as mentioned in the book itself). Charles Long is the true penny pinching non-salaried person. Some of his ideas can be far out such as when he comments on how he started to shower in the rain(that is until he almost got hit by lightning).

    It's a good guide for learning how to end the daily consumer culture grind.

  48. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by uptownguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because, when your unemployeed, any future employer will want to know why and how long you have been without work.

    (First off, I'll avoid making any comments about the difference between "your" and "you're")

    I think you are thinking pre-2001. Seriously. I've hired over 15 people for a medium-term project in the last month or two. Lots of qualified people. Some were amazingly over-qualified. But you know what? We all know that the job market sucks right now and really could care less if you have a three or six or nine month employment gap on your resume. Seriously. Listening to people spend five minutes trying to explain "why" they are currently "between jobs" gets old.

    Interview tip: Hold your head high and don't worry too much about your current employment status. Make your cover story short and to the point and then move on.

    Personal Aside: The project I have been interviewing people for is so atrociously foul that of the people we have hired, the best have already quit or are in the process of doing so. People's fears that you will jump ship because you are overqualified are justified by real world experiences.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  49. but it has helped. by pyrrho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It got the weekend, the forty hour week. (Unless your exempt). It got rid of Monarchy (unless you're british etc.) It got national health care (well, if you are british). Blaming stuff on other people has helped in a lot of cases.

    He said that dedication to a company deserves reciprocal dedication from a company. Is there a problem with that in particular?

    --

    -pyrrho

  50. You do understand.. by composer777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That people are unemployed because there AREN'T ANY FUCKING JOBS TO BE FILLED, DON'T YOU? If there is a 7% unemployment, which is an understatment, it's really above 10%, then that means, that no matter how hard those people try, they are SOL. There just aren't jobs for that 10%, period. They can throw there shoulders back all they want, they can quack like a fucking duck for that matter, it's not going to make a bunch of jobs appear, stupid. According to your logic, all America has to do is throw it's shoulders back, and corporations are going to pull out of India, move back ashore, the government is going to clean up it's corruption, start investing in education, and everyone will be happy again.

    I'm supposed to believe that your way of "not taking it for granted", is to promote an ideology that trivializes the plight of that 10+% that doesn't have a job? In other words, those poor people whose plight you are using, ironically, to trivialize their plight. You have to be the stupidest, most superstitious fool that I've met in a long time. Just because you worked in a children's hosptial and a job magically appeared doesn't mean that the same magic trick is going to work for everyone else. I know people that have been out of work for YEARS. I bet if you hopped on one leg and got a job the next day, you would be telling people to do that too.

  51. The contract route can work by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After I got laid off 2.5 years ago, I decided to go the contract route, and it has been pretty good. The key is to have existing clients, and unique skill sets. I was the lead consultant for my former company, but a lot of the potential customers for that kind of service had competing products. So once I was on my own, a lot of my initial clients made products that competed with my former employer's stuff. My billable hours actually went UP.

    Glad I never signed that non-compete!

    Anyway, it's important to note that the business didn't really take off until I decided it really was a business, not just what I was doing until I found another job. Once I decided this is what I wanted to be doing for the next ten years, I was motivated to go out, take out some loans, spend the capital to get some marketing, and that kind of thing. The average service business like this isn't really profitable for the first two years. If you accept that and plan accordingly, that's not a big problem.

    The mistake I've seen others make is to blow their whole nest egg early in the process, not leaving enough to live on as things start to get rolling. What a business is evolves a lot depending on what clients you actually land, so you need to keep enough money in reserve to be able to keep adjust the plan mid-stream.

  52. Well duh! by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The _only_ disadvantage to being unemployed is that you don't have any money. (At least if you're like most of us and aren't independently wealthy)

    If you're unemployed you don't have any money, if you're employed you don't have any time.

    If you're retired, you have (some) money and time, but you're old. If you're young and independently wealthy, you suck and i hate you :)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  53. Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much it really cost to keep a light on while you have a shower?

    The obsession people have with not leaving lights on even for a few minutes has always bothered me, because it's really the last thing you should be concerned about. I'll have to look at my electricity bill when I get home and work it out ... I did do this exercise once to defeat an annoying co-habitant, but I can't remember the exact result. It really was not worth talking about, even for (at the time) starving students :) 20 cents to run a light for 24 hours, or something like that. I remember giving her one dollar, and requesting that she therefore never bug me about lights again, as those few minutes I leave lights on are now covered for at least a year.

    And then there are flourescent lights. In that case, they are cheaper to run, *but* it takes a lot of electricity to start them up. The equivalent of about 30 minutes worth of running time IIRC. This means that if you walk into and out of a room switching the damned flourescent light on and off, you are actually costing much more money then just leaving it on! And yes, the ex-roommate kept switching the flourescent kitchen light off, and then back on again, every ten minutes.

  54. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Capitalism sucks as bad as communism. It just takes a little longer to realise...but you realise it well when you are fired and you can't find a job.

    Making a comparatively huge wage for years, then spending a while unemployed before making another (comparatively) huge wage is much better than being forced to work in a tedious, menial, or back-breaking job for your whole life with no hope of ever escaping abject poverty. If that isn't clear to you, maybe you could use a stint in a poor country to help you see the real world. If you've never lived outside of the U.S., you've never seen what a hard life really is.

    3. Companies sell their products with up to 90% profit, especially those that outsource production. And the profit fills the pockets of their owners

    If you think that many companies make 90% profits, you obviously don't understand the costs of doing business. Any market where a company can repeatedly make a profit anywhere near that level is a market that will soon be flooded with competition. For a company to make actual profits even in the very low double-digits is very, very good.

    7. If you ever realized how good rich people live, a revolution would be started in a minute.

    If you've ever lived in a truly poor nation, you'd realize that you, by virtue of the fact that you're even posting on Slashdot, are likely within the wealthiest 5% of the entire world. The lifestyle accorded to an American working for minimum wage is literally an impossible dream to hundreds of millions of people.

    9. If you ever realized that the rich people got rich by stealing,

    Yes, we all know that poor people never obtain their means through criminal means.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  55. Worse than you thought maybe. by roninbix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    4 years ago my company lost 95% of it's revenue generating contracts (programming consulting at the time) in a 3 month period, 35-40% went to India. As an added insult we had to train them while laying off our staff, and keep 1 person around on an el cheapo retainer just in case they screwed up badly down there and needed help. We helped ensure there was no risk to them while they screwed us. Course, since then we rebuilt and have recovered significantly by creating different products. But man did that period of time suck. Remember that 10% isn't evenly spread out.

  56. Unemployed for 5 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was a March layoff. Funny thing, I never thought I'd be let go since I was young, relatively speaking.

    The usual thing you hear is, "better you than me, you'll have no problem finding a job." This from co-workers and other middle-aged employeed people.

    I didn't see it. For the last few months I pushed real hard to get a job, particularly in a prospering market area. It was a no go. The only responses I've got were from staffing firms. So, I gave it another ultimate go, handing out revised resumes to friends and all the jobs I took an interest in.

    My friend told me he was jobless for 8 months, so he suggested, just get used to the empty ride. I figured employees wouldn't be knocking down my door, so I picked up a few things.

    I learned how to do wood flooring, installed wood floors in all my rooms. I taught myself how to do home improvement skills, painting, texturing, adding trim around walls and such. I taught myself how to do tiling. I burned a bit of cash to do something I always wanted to do, but never had the time. I also made a website, re-learn web making skills. I also got back to exercising and eating right, lost a lot of weight.

    I got a lot of things done, but I only see it as keeping myself from going crazy.

  57. Not just a rant it's true... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting
    <rant>
    This is true, my brother in law decided to get a new job and got the idea to move into locomotive maintenance (he's a truck mechanic). He called up a number of train operators in the UK and was told at every turn that they don't train people any more, he should go to Virgin trains (apparently the only ones in the UK who still train/educate personnel), complete their training course and then when his contract with Virgin expires they would be happy to hire him. So in summary the training program of every train operator in the UK consists of poaching the people trained/educated by the few haples idiots in the corporate community (in this case Virgin trains) who still still live up to their obligation to provide their field of industry with a new crop of trained professionals. This attitude is pretty typical for much of Europe, of course I dont know how things are in the United States but I can't imagine they are much different. Companies are screaming for:

    - Experienced personnel

    They are not:

    - Providing training programmes
    - Entry level jobs

    Apparently the overhead involved in training new personnel or hiring somebody with less than a minimum of 5 years experience is too great for this to be a viable option for modern European companies. Just getting an engineering degree is insufficient. They only ray of sunshie here is that they are prepared to hire you, even if you are not especially experienced, if you have a set of cetificates the length of your arm. Unfortunately most certificates are obscenely expensive to get, they are slightly less obscenely expensive to maintain and in Germany at least, where I used to work, many companies seem to expect you to pay for your vast portfolio of obscenely expensive certificates out of your own pocket and to do the studying on your own time. And with all of this plus the ever present danger of being dropped like hot potato (ie getting your ass fired) every time one of the CO's feel in a mood to draw the magic cost cutting sword from its stone and go on a crusade, they expect you to be loyal to the company. It kind of makes me glad that after 6 months of being unemployed I finally found a job with one of those haples idiot companies that will still hire people with limited experience.
    </rant>
    Have karma will burn it!
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  58. Another George W. Bush... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    bashing article in the guise of post-employment enlightenment.

    Don't people have better things to do then live for every opportunity to bash someone...geesh...

    Go hound the IRS or something...or join Al-Queda...

    =8-)

  59. Yes, I expected some creativity from a programmer by Morgaine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pretty odd really, his entire set of "benefits" were almost entirely negative, or at least presented negatively: for example, not needing to wake up to the alarm clock, yet waking up anyway at the crack of dawn owing to a sense of dread. That seems to stem from a less than positive outlook on life, and it isn't really all that consistent with the title of the essay.

    As a freelancer, I go through long periods between contracts as part of normal operation, and yes, one does turn down the spending knob to its lowest setting, but it's entirely a positive experience. One simply doesn't need to keep up with the Jones's every time they go out to the restaurant, buy a new DVD, or upgrade their car. Life in the affluent west is great ... as long as you don't fall for the hype, and you keep the telly firmly switched off, and you do your own thing.

    And as a programmer, assuming that it's in your blood and not just a job, then "your own thing" really means being creative with computers.

    So, I'd have expected a long list of new technologies that he'd always meant to catch up on and now has the time, and a long list of personal projects that he always wanted to develop and at last has the opportunity, etc etc.

    Being positive is in the mind, and has almost nothing to do with external circumstances, and definitely has nothing to do with financial circumstances.

    Just keep that telly firmly switched off, as it's the primary instrument of evil hype and distorted goals, and it will not help you to feel happy in yourself unless you have the cash that the advertisers implicitly require viewers to have. The messaging is largely subliminal or implicit too in "entertainment" features, so it's not enoough to simply avoid the adverts. Stick to online games ... same square format, no evil hype. :-)

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  60. Americans who have work work too much by Nice2Cats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (I realize that my subject line might sound cynical to those out of work; sorry for that.)

    There is actually an entire movement of people that have discovered this.

    There is at least an entire continent that has discovered this: Europe. Industrialized nations all of them, the top nations on all quality of life rankings, little violence, though a bit crowded. Now check the hours they work. Now realize that, by law, they have weeks and weeks of vacation time -- if I remember correctly, it is 20 days by federal law for Germany. You have 35 hour work weeks in a lot of places. You have paid maternity leave and sick leave. You can't be fired at the drop of a hat.

    Why does this work? You don't buy every piece of crap that some ad throws in your face. Consumer spending is two-thirds of the U.S. economy. In Germany (to stick with the example), it is about one third. You don't pay your CEOs so much money that a company's pay chart has to have a logarithmic scale: Read up on what the Daimler managers at DaimlerChrysler get and what the Chrysler managers get. Try to explain -- with a straight face -- why some Chrysler manager who couldn't keep his company from being de facto swallowed gets more money than they guy who is now his boss.

    It used to be that the U.S. economists pointed to all of this and said, yeah, sure, you have universal medical care while we have children who can't get antibiotics, you are home with your families while we are putting in more hours than the Japanese, and you are getting tan on Spain's beaches five weeks out of every year while we don't dare take those pitiful few days of vacation we have. But your unemployment is high and not coming down.

    Well, guess what: This is basically going to be a jobless recovery. Maybe some of Europe's prices can't compete with the U.S., but nobody can compete with India, and even India can't compete with China, or government-sponsored slave labor in Burma. Your job is ending up in Asia just like everybody else's. And do you really think that it is going to come back in our lifetime? Fool.

    Tell me again why you are spending all that time at work while those Europeans are at home after 35 hours and playing with their children. What is the justification? More to the point, what is wrong with you? Why are you supporting, maybe even defending this system instead of trying to change it?

    Remember when Tyler Durden told you that you are not your job?

    Advertising has these people chasing cars and clothes they don't need. Generations have been working in jobs they hate, just so they can buy what they really don't need.
    Fight Club, book (which this quote is from) and film, are so hated by the establishment not because of the violence, but because the CEOs and such ilk are deathly afraid that the American middle class will figure out that it isn't worth it -- that the Europeans (though politically they might be loathsome cowards), might have the right idea here. That you don't need to by the latest gadget, follow the newest fad, buy the newest gizmo. They might decide that quality of life is more important than blowing their paycheck on crap just to keep the GDP up by one more decimal point. They might decide they don't want to be bombarded with ads morning, noon, and night.

    They might not want to make their carreers the center of their lives anymore. They might not want to define themselves by the job they have. They might not be content anymore to start living only after they have stopped working.

    It's you choice, really. The U.S. is just about the only real democracy on the planet (ironically, all of those Europeans are living in republics). You can change the system, and get this country's priorities straight -- once you have gotten yours straight.

  61. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by mankey+wanker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, we won't be alone for long:

    http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/invest/extra /P 62115.asp?Printer

    Management, legal, sales, and even regular office staffers will be joining our ranks soon!

    What I think is funny is how Management people in particular have seen themselves as invulnerable as they happily gobbled up bonus after bonus for doing the layoff dirty work of the even higher-up than themselves. The thing is, when there's nobody left to manage they too are out the door. Surely, they saw this coming?

    I had lunch with my girlfriend's dad the other week where he was in full silverback glory:

    "I don't know anything about computers," he said, looking squarely down his nose at me, "I just run the IT department for the whole corporation."

    Maybe not for much longer, y'old fart!

  62. Re:Depressing read (I feel your pain) by BadElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've made the same realization. Good tech jobs requiring what used to be not-so-popular skills and paid 50-60k were everywhere. Now it seems everyone and their dog can write code and the employers know that -- no more 50-60k jobs.

    I got the boot from a good job only to find out they hired someone new at half the rate just a couple of weeks later. And now, having been actively looking for work for the past 9 months, I see that the few companies that *are* hiring are paying even less than that.

    I'm no longer looking for the good tech jobs anymore. Instead, I've enrolled at the local university to earn a B.A. in English -- or maybe psychology -- or anything else that doesn't smell like IT or technology.

    I figure I'll always have the tech experience to fall back on if that market recovers, but in the meantime I'll have earned a degree in something completely different with completely different opportunities.

  63. Kinda sad by Headius · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was out of work for a while when everything went under. Actually, I was out of work twice, once right at the end of 2000 and once in late 2001. The first time was because a major corporation decided to trim the fat and clear out an assload of consultants. I don't blame them for that, and I wasn't really sorry to go. The second time, I was working for an HMO provider, and they went belly-up because of shady accounting practices. Neither time was really related to the bubble.

    However, the first time I was only out of work for a month, and the second time for about three months. During the inbetween times I kept studying software development, cleaning up my resume, and tossing it off. In the end, I got those new jobs because I actually had the skills necessary for "senior"-level positions.

    This guy's resume is exactly the kind I walk away from. He's floated from language to language, technology to technology, and doesn't have a mastery of any of them. I won't go into specifics, but this looks exactly like a guy that doesn't learn anything he doesn't pick up from his current job. One job leads to another only by virtue of what odd jobs his former employer required him to do. A single one-off project in language X produces a marketable skill? I've been doing server-side Java development for 7 years and the market is still a tough nut to crack.

    Learn how to do something (software development or tech writing, for example) and learn how to do it really well..the jobs will follow.

  64. I saw a dark side of unemployment first hand by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine, still living at home at the age of 29, got laid off from a major entertainment firm over two years ago. Got a six-month severance package, with benefits, AND unemployment insurance. Decided to wait a couple of months to really look for a job. Then the Sept 11, 2001 attacks really finished off the job market. Look, everyone's free to live their life as they see fit, but someone who collects that much money and doesn't seem to care about working is crapping on everyone that got a measly package and WANTS to work. He's even turned his nose up at fairly decent paying temp work ($15-$20) an hour, because it "wasn't what he wanted to do." So he's hurting his own chances of getting another job with a HUGE gap in his employment history. And setting himself up to not have the resources to start a family and retire well. He doesn't realize that these are peak earning years for us. In effect, he's retired at the age of 29 with not much in the way of assets. I'm sure he'll be working well into his 70's...

  65. Leave the government out of it... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, you want a simple life, go get it. You want a short week, go for it. You want a 35 hour job and can't get one, start your own business and see if you can provide one.

    It's not enough that 46 cents of every dollar my company produces goes into a government coffer before hitting one of the employees bank acounts?

    How many chains do you want to put on us.

    Without excessive government interference, we'd be twice the size we are now (read that as "creating more jobs" for those of you that believe in our Marxist/Fascist economy).

    The middle class is getting squeezed by your policies. The government bails out/subsizes the biggest businesses to keep the stop market rising, which shifts tax money to the richest Americans (because they own stocks). Then the tax code hits people generating income.

    So: produce wealth, get it taxed away. Simply own wealth, and much of that money comes back to you.

    The government taxes productive businesses to give it to unproductive ones to "keep existing jobs."

    Sure, the Steel Tariffs saved jobs in the steel industry. For every job saved, how many jobs were lost/not created in the automotive industry because of higher steel prices. How many jobs were not created in corporate America because the company car-fleet costs more than it should? How many jobs were lost in the computer industry because consumers had less discretionary spending because their car lease costs an extra $10-$20/month.

    All this meddling destroys economic growth, and is killing those of us willing to work 60-100 hours/week greating the economic engine that the rest of you live off of.

    Alex

    1. Re:Leave the government out of it... by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hear, hear. Alex, if I had mod points, you'd get them.

      I couldn't stand the corporate rat race, so I got out and started my own small business, and I love it. I work more for about the same amount of money, but I'm my own boss and I make my own hours.

      However, I never realized quite how much the government squeezes little guys like me until I got out on my own. The stupid taxes I have to pay for no good reason just boggle my mind. The worst ones are the "fees." See, I know, they're "fees" because it says in big bold letters on the form, "THIS IS NOT A TAX."

      For instance, the Florida Department of Corporations informed me that, after already paying my city and county for an occupational license, and paying the federal government to register my corporation, I need to pay them another $200 to register my corporation with them. Now, if I don't pay the "fee", they disolve my corporation. So, it's $200, that I pay to the government, for no obvious service, and if I don't do it, they disolve my company. Well, it sure is great to know it's NOT A TAX, though! Rat bastards every one of 'em...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Leave the government out of it... by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm in favor of small government and all, but when you say things like...
      Without excessive government interference, we'd be twice the size we are now


      I feel I must point out that some amount of government interference is a good thing. Good things (as well as bad) have come out of government interference (things like civil rights etc).

      and when you say your bit about Tarifs
      Sure, the Steel Tariffs saved jobs in the steel industry....


      I say that's a bad example. I submit that there is such a thing as a strategic industry - an industry that a nation needs if only for it's own ability to defend itself. A strong nation must be able to provide from within, the tools that it needs to make war. Saving the American steel industry is a necessary evil. Now if you had mentioned that crap that we went through with that tarrif on wine and grape seeds I'd have agreed with you 100%.
  66. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by pebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    he said he had roommates. In some cities, rent is cheap even in the nice areas. If you have 2 or 3 roommates, you can find a 3 or 4 bedroom house or apartment that is quite afordable. Owning a house also helps, which would eliminate the need to pay rent (though other expenses would probably make up for this difference).

    --
    #!/
  67. losing weight and saving by malice95 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boy can I relate to this one.. When I was unemployed I lost 30 lbs. I think from just sheer worrying about getting another job, increased activity around the house, and stress. Now that I am back to work I quickly put the weight back on, but being unemployed has taught me quite a few lessons,

    1. SAVE!! (and I dont mean 50$ here and there) Hundreds of dollars or more a month if possible. You will need it if you are ever out of work for a long period of time. I just payed off my car so I am going to take every penny of that payment and put it in savings every month.

    2. Unemployment doesnt pay shit

    3. Its very easy to get used to living and eating well. Buy generic all the time if you can. Its just as good in most cases and every penny counts.

    4. In this economy its not a matter of If a rainy day is going to come, its WHEN a rainy day comes.

  68. Older than I Thought by ReadParse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While reading this article, which is really good, by the way, I clicked on the "resume" link and glanced at it. I figured he was a dot-com generation guy who had gotten out of school and started working for six-figured salaries until his various employers started showing up on f**kedcompany.com. You know, the same old story of the IT workers who didn't how much they had until they lost it. But Holy Astronauts, Batman! This guy worked on the friggin' APOLLO program. He worked at NASA from 1967-1971 (the year I was born).

  69. A rant that doesn't even make sense by siskbc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And it closes with a really stupid anti-Bush link. Sigh. Bring a salt shaker if you're going to read it all.

    I agree, and I'll even say I don't understand how anyone of even lukewarm intelligence can blame the dot-bomb collapse on Bush. Don't get me wrong - I don't *like* Bush, and there's *plenty* that he directly answers for - but this isn't it.

    The economy was already heading south by the end of 2000, and the crash was, by that time, completely inevitable. Christ himself (I mean Greenspan) couldn't prevent it.

    So if you actually feel like blaming a President for the collapse, Clinton's your man.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Digizen64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, presidents don't control the economy but can influence the bone-crushing depths of a recession through sound fiscal, policy and social initiatives. Bush is a one trick pony i.e tax cuts. Clinton didn't create the boom nor did they create the bomb, they did do what they thought would create a favorable climate for an emerging Internet-enabled economy.

  70. sleep... by kidlinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a student one of the most important things I've learned is getting up early. That is, not sleeping in. Getting up by 8am every day makes me more productive than I would have ever guessed. Any later than that, and my day is toast. It's strange.

    An even better combination is getting up bloody early and going to the gym. My gym opens at 6:30am, and I'm there when the doors open. A jog and some good stretching is a great way to get fired up for the day. Some weights too, if I have time. I did this in the summer before work too. Makes my day much better.

    I even did it when I was home from school and before I started work. You'd be surprised at how nice mornings can be.

    Whatever you do, don't sleep in! (well, maybe on the weekends once in a while ;) Seriously, getting up early makes a big difference. Even when I'm fartin around on my computer. I though hackin code was all about stayin up late - it's all about gettin up early! It's just a matter of self-control. You're workin on somethin and you just wanna keep goin - but it's that much better with a fresh mind in the early morning. Some problems I've spent hours on the night before I'll wake up the next day and solve in 5 minutes. It's crazy.

    Try it!

    --
    -kidlinux.
  71. How To Be Disloyal by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article is mostly dead-on, but misses the mark in two respects on the loyalty question.

    In the first place, it's wrong to say that companies are loyal to their Boards of Directors, or shareholders. The fact is that companies are loyal to nothing whatsoever, except possibly to the neurotic personal needs of their executives and managers. If companies were loyal to their boards or shareholders we wouldn't see the gross mis-management and poor corporate governance that is all too common.

    In the second place, employees should not just not be loyal, they should be actively disloyal, in the sense that every employee should be in the job market all the time. Seriously.

    That means keeping your resume up-to-date, and reading the job ads in your field (print and on-line) regularly. If you see something that looks particularly interesting, don't be shy about applying for it, and if you get an interview go for it. It'll keep your interview skills in shape, and you never know--it might be your dream job. Don't worry about wasting anyone's time: as mentioned by other posters, companies advertise jobs they have no intention of filling, so turn-about is fair play.

    Furthermore, you should be fairly up-front with your current employer about this attitude after you've been with them for a year or so. You don't have to make a big deal of it--just mention casually now and then that you've seen that Company X is hiring (it helps if Company X is a well-known competitor, as your boss won't know if you're keen and keeping an eye on the market or thinking of jumping ship.)

    No matter who you work for, you are your own boss. You are the only boss who will ever care about your career, your goals, your well-being or the well-being of your family.

    After moving into the tech world from academia seven years ago, I've had five jobs. I jumped ship twice, companies folded twice, and I'm currently running my own business after a period of unemployment resulting from the last company folding, so I know whereof I speak. Both as a developer and a manager I pursued the policy I've outlined above.

    As a manager, I encouraged members of my team to do the same--I wanted them to be able to walk in the door in the morning and ask, "What has the company done for me lately?" and be able to find an answer that would motivate them to work hard and well, which they did. Of course, part of the answer to that question is always, "Paid my salary", which is important to keep in mind.

    Senior management, of course, did not like my attitude--amongst other things, they were unhappy that I insisted that every member of the development team actually take all the accrued vacation owing to them! But so long as my team kept mysteriously producing outstanding results they had to put up with it.

    And equally unsurprisingly, those outstanding results did not stop half my team from being laid off (over my objections) a few months prior to the company folding up.

    --Tom

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  72. If you like this article... by hamhocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you liked this article, then definitely must read Juliet B. Schor's "The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don't Need." She makes a great argument that Americans, by default, are caught in a see-want-borrow-buy-repay cycle.

    The problem is marketers who traditionally appealled to the top 5% of income earners (e.g. Tommy Hillfiger) now direct their marketing efforts to all 100% of households. Whereas 95% of households never knew who Hillfiger was 20 years ago, everybody does does. And now that we see, we want, and borrow (because we're not among the top 5% of income earners) to buy, and repay. The repay part is a kicker. This means working longer hours in a job you may not even like because you have to pay back you $15,000 in credit card debt.

    Ms. Schor makes a very well-researched article that explores the different influences that contribute to the desire to purchase. She also includes a discussion of how some people have bucked the trend to more by going less. She calls these folks, like the author above, "downshifters."

    As a freshly minted "downshifter," I highly recommend the read.

  73. europe style govt/living may be unattainable by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    America is too big now to be able to control our own govt. Look at what they are doing--cramming in every possible immigrant so as to continue to lower wages and increase real estate values, etc. With so fragmented a populace, how can we possibly fight back against our own govt?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  74. He must be a Democrat, too. by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From his GWB rant: "Both men know that the Clinton presidency was the country's longest and most profound sustained era of growing optimism, wealth, opportunity, and hope!"

    What a trivial and superficial inference to make about a 4-year presidency which lies in the midst of much longer business cycles. The success of the USA really has little to do with Democrats or Republicans. Instead, it has to do with the US Constitution providing the essential freedom for people to seek prosperity. All the last several decades of government has succeeded in doing is slowing that progress through obsessive regulation that often trumps our original freedoms in favor of political ends.

    Here's a hint: even the Democrats can't save us from GWB and his cronies, because their only differences are the causes they use to front their agendas.

  75. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my last job as a basic computer application instructor at a community college, I saw MANY people who were going back to school at age 50+ to 'learn how to use computers' so they could get a job. That nice nest-egg they thought they could live on disappeared with the stockmarket crash.

    It is truely pathetic to see these people who worked most of thier life, saved, invested, did everything right, looking for some menial position to pay the mortgage.

    Funny, many of these same people will support GWBush & Co. to the end.

    --
    There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
  76. Demographics will change the employment situation by Doofus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In a recent article in Business2.0 ( September 2003), The Coming Job Boom, the authors demonstrate quite handily that over the next 20 years or so ( beginning sooner, rather than later, for the impatient or unemployed out there ), the baby boomers are going to be retiring. IN DROVES. HUGE FLOCKS, running from the workplace to drive their RVs around the country ( Side Note: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway holding company just invested some ungodly amount in an RV insurance company. Don't think he's doing that just for a few extra bucks.)

    The article describes, sometimes in painstaking detail (and with a number of information-dense graphs), that this demographic issue is inexorable, and that the most serious problems will be in the skilled job market. Those retiring booomers are going to leave gaps in the job market the size of Meteor Crater, and those of us in Generations X and Y will have some sense of job security again.

    The authors provide a list of the jobs that will be highest in demand - and their comments in the text indicate that the shortage of tech workers in the late 1990s was nothing compared to what's coming.

    Here's some of the list:

    Systems Analyst - approx 60% growth

    DBA - approx 65% growth

    Network/System Admin - approx 80% growth

    Software engineers - between 85-100%

    So hang in there.

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  77. Blame Yourself, Not the Government by KnarfO · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dvorkin, like so many on both ends of the pollitical spectrum, places the blame for his predicament not on his own shoulders, but at the feet of the opposing pollitical party. Get real! 90% of all polliticians give nothing more than token lip service to the plight of the un- or under-employed.

    He'll find solutions to his problems much faster if he wakes up and takes responsibility for his career, instead of waiting for some populus pandering pollitico to come rescue him.

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  78. Follow up story: by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Surprising Benefits of Not Having a Girlfriend"

    * No one complains about your lack of showers! (well, nobody important that is.)

    * More money available for important things!

    * No risks for pregancy!

    * Plenty of room in bed!

    * No need for showing your feelings!

  79. Re:Not really by Digizen64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, manufacturing jobs have been hit harder than programmers. Imagine if Clinton had tried to mute the boom. The howls from the pundits would have been deafening. In hindsight, accounting standards should have been better enforced. It's a no-brainer what Bush should have done. It's a demand-side problem, a demand-side problem deserves a demand-side solution. Tax-cuts geared towards consumers would have made far more sense than capital gains guts and dividend taxes reduced. Creating demand should have been the goal. Bush should have cuts taxes significantly towards middle and lower income earners. We haven't been facing a problem with productivity and companies have a glut of infrastructure. Companies didn't need more money to invest in growth, they needed to get people and companies to buy more of their products and services.

  80. Re:Ramen Noodle! by JusTyler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But could you work up a solid shit while on your Ramen diet?

  81. Re:Simple truths by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making a comparatively huge wage for years, then spending a while unemployed before making another (comparatively) huge wage

    So you are in the 5% that makes a huge wage ? what about the rest ?

    is much better than being forced to work in a tedious, menial, or back-breaking job for your whole life with no hope of ever escaping abject poverty.

    But I did not say Communism is better. I said that in the long run, Capitalism is as bad as Communism. Since you don't seem to understand anything, let me explain it to you:

    • money goes where money is; eventually, only a few will have all the money; we are not far off from this situation.
    • Capitalism, as aggressive as in US, promotes the primal instincts of each person, instead of promoting humanetarian values. A person living in the US (and other capitalistic areas) is a wild animal, always scared, on a loan and a mortgage...in the work place, most people look to eat you alive in order to promote themselves over you...the scary thing is that you accept this animal behaviour as normal!!!

    If that isn't clear to you, maybe you could use a stint in a poor country to help you see the real world. If you've never lived outside of the U.S., you've never seen what a hard life really is

    I am living outside the US. But I have lived in the UK for a year. I am in a position to judge clearer than you the benefits of a mixed system, where Capitalism is not so aggressive. I can go to work and be really open to people, much more than when in US. In the 8 hours that I work, I can steal a couple of hours once in a while and do nothing (because I am tired!!!), and I know that my colleague will not say it to the boss, because he is not an antagonist to me!!! The company can't fire me so easily without paying me some amount of money!!! and if I am fired, I don't have to go through the agony of not having health care!!!

    Is it just coincidence that the poor people in the US are millions ? is it just a coincidence that you are a trigger-happy society ? which country has the most gun-related incidents ? which country has the highest rates in criminality ? is it a coincidence that more than 1 million people have been added to the class of poor people in the last year ? is it a coincidence that after the .net fiasco, there were huge scandals like Enron ? what did these managers do ? they stole money!!!

    If you think that many companies make 90% profits, you obviously don't understand the costs of doing business. Any market where a company can repeatedly make a profit anywhere near that level is a market that will soon be flooded with competition. For a company to make actual profits even in the very low double-digits is very, very good

    But you don't understand that it's the production cost that allows this situation to rise, not the actual profit!!! For example, the pair of Air Jordans that one wears and cost you 100 bucks cost 5 bucks for Nike to make in a sweat shop!!! And that's true for other companies as well, like Reebok, Spalding etc... with asians working 16 hours in a day, with wages like 1 dollar, at shitty places, without proper air conditioning....yeah, this type of Capitalism is really good!!! wake up, buddy...

    If you've ever lived in a truly poor nation, you'd realize that you, by virtue of the fact that you're even posting on Slashdot, are likely within the wealthiest 5% of the entire world. The lifestyle accorded to an American working for minimum wage is literally an impossible dream to hundreds of millions of people.

    This is because of the following reasons:

    • US and EU do not allow the cheap agricultural products of Africa and other areas to enter their markets!!! they actually impose restrictions, in order to promote their own products!!! how is that for a 'free' market ?
    • US imposes restrictions in many products. A recent example is steel: last year US introduc