Slashdot Mirror


Software Error Causes Crisis in Mississippi

marklyon writes "Mississippi's Alcohol Beverage Control division shutdown its distribution center for an indefinite amount of time to fix computer problems today at noon. A software update applied to the inventory and ordering software last week is malfunctioning, causing orders and inventory to be lost or misrouted. 'It's a software problem, and it's an operational problem. We've gotten a lot of product in and we've got it going to the wrong location ... and the location numbers were wiped out,' said tax commissioner Ed Buelow. Buelow said the distribution center will fulfill all orders placed before noon today. He said he hopes the system will be fixed in a few days, but it's possible it could take weeks. Until that time, Mississippi bars, restaurants, and liquor stores will not be able to purchase additional stock. Many retailers are already complaining that they were unable to order sufficient quantities to supply them if the bug takes more than a few days to fix."

380 comments

  1. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mississippi finally got a computer?

    1. Re:Wow by GreatOgre · · Score: 1

      If you check the top 500 supercomputers, you'll see that Mississippi has a few on there. Dumbass!

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to understand the principle of a "joke," you humorless ass.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only see one in the list, but I didn't look too hard.

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May have changed since I last looked. But there should be one in Vicksburg (may not be declassified, though), one at Mississippi State, and one at Stennis Space Center.

    5. Re:Wow by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      No wonder america is so screwed up, we got the govt controlling booze in 18 states. How bass-ackwards are you people to let the govt control something it has no business doing. Do all cigarrette packs go through govt warehouses to get taxed and resold? Do all cars? Why is alcohol so special?

      it gets even worse. the president of the store manager union in PA went on record as being opposed to a plan to open up (oh my god!) state stores in grocery stores. basically, they would operate as their own entities, and you'd pay for the alcohol separately.

      the moron started clamoring about underage drinking and even said the state wanted to sell "more of the drug alcohol".

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they used to have one, but somebody figured out it was just a color TV.

    7. Re:Wow by doormat · · Score: 1

      Hah! Of course, I live in Vegas so buying alcohol anywhere at any time (no last call) is normal for me. It astounds me how people can be so backwards -- at least by my standards =^)

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  2. I bet they run Linix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TP!

    1. Re:I bet they run Linix by croddy · · Score: 1

      The site www.mstc.state.ms.us is running NetWare-Enterprise-Web-Server/5.1 on NetWare.

    2. Re:I bet they run Linix by Harrakis · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the actual ordering server runs Apachie 1 on a 8.2 mandrake distro

  3. This is no laughing matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if all those rednecks sober up?!!!

    1. Re:This is no laughing matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Another Republican landslide.

    2. Re:This is no laughing matter! by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1

      Withdrawal, shotguns, mayhem?

    3. Re:This is no laughing matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you I am a redneck from North Carolina and so is the guy that works for me. Funny picture of us at work, check it out Here

    4. Re:This is no laughing matter! by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1

      So, what kind of work is that? Inquiring minds wish to know...

    5. Re:This is no laughing matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was an honest legit link!? Damn you guys. I am scarred for life now. I see people posting about and others say to do a google search for it. Bahhhhhhh. Last week I get brave enough to search it and the friggin google toolbar took me to i'm feelin lucky. I figured I would share it with those who will be as foolish as I. Come on, hit im feelin lucky.

    6. Re:This is no laughing matter! by vanillacoke · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the internet Another goatse.cx deflowering strikes again!

      --
      The secret to getting modded up is to allways say i've got karma to burn in your sig..
  4. Just In Time inventory by Asgard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the downside of Just In Time inventory -- the system has little resiliancy to burps in the supply chain. Every step should have enough buffer to handle problems (ie bad weather, computer problems, disasters, etc).

    1. Re:Just In Time inventory by Smidge204 · · Score: 0

      I think the real problem here is that a temporary restriction in the supply of alcohol is labeled as a 'crisis'

      Maybe the submitter skipped out on his AA meeting to report this story?

      "I have an alcohol problem - I can't seem to find anyplace to sell me any!"
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Just In Time inventory by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      The real problem here is lack of adequate testing prior to an upgrade.

    3. Re:Just In Time inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell an H1B here

    4. Re:Just In Time inventory by rf0 · · Score: 1

      How much of a buffer would be needed for stag parties :)

      Rus

    5. Re:Just In Time inventory by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

      The crisis is not the lack of alcohol but the lack of "product" for the distributor (bars, etc.)! It doesn't matter if it was widgets...the point is businesses may have to close and lose money on account of a screw up at the supplier.

      I bet you wouldn't take it so lightly if it was all the gasoline in your area instead of alcohol. :p

    6. Re:Just In Time inventory by stand · · Score: 1
      Every step should have enough buffer to handle problems

      If you have to build a buffer of "a couple of weeks" into your inventory system, you can't really call it Just In Time anymore, can you?

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    7. Re:Just In Time inventory by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      But the fact that it IS beverage alcohol is what enables me to make light of this! If it was something that really threatened the stability of the whole state, then I wouldn't make light of it so easily.

      Unless the state's economy relies heavily on the distribution and sale of alcohol - which is, of course, the core of the joke :P
      =Smidge=

    8. Re:Just In Time inventory by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I think the real problem here is that a temporary restriction in the supply of alcohol is labeled as a 'crisis'

      You know, for a minute there I thought I was reading Fark. Then I realized on Fark it would've been a complete disaster with a Newsflash tag and an infinite number of comments already.

    9. Re:Just In Time inventory by EverDense · · Score: 1

      I think the real problem here is that a temporary restriction in the supply of alcohol is labeled as a 'crisis'

      It happened in Mississippi.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    10. Re:Just In Time inventory by AVee · · Score: 1

      The crisis is not the lack of alcohol but the lack of "product" for the distributor (bars, etc.)! It doesn't matter if it was widgets...the point is businesses may have to close and lose money on account of a screw up at the supplier.

      Worse yet, there is not even a change to drop the supplier and pick another one.

    11. Re:Just In Time inventory by op00to · · Score: 1

      This is a Bad Thing. Think about the bars and restaurants that rely on alcohol sales to make their money. A majority of these places are small businesses. Most bartenders would be out of a job, and it would be awfully hard for clubs to pull a crowd without booze. This could easily kill a city's downtown area if it was anchored by bars and restaurants. Bad for tourism too.

    12. Re:Just In Time inventory by shepd · · Score: 1

      >But the fact that it IS beverage alcohol is what enables me to make light of this! If it was something that really threatened the stability of the whole state, then I wouldn't make light of it so easily.

      Heh... don't forget about what prohibition did to the crime rate!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:Just In Time inventory by enigmals1 · · Score: 1

      Geez, Smidge... you really are ignorant. How old are you?! I doubt you would think it's funny if you were one of the thousands of proprietors that are going to lose $100-1000's per night they aren't selling the nector of the gods. I'm not even a drinker and I understand what this really means. Do you really think it made headlines because it's "funny"?!

      How bout you just go back to doing your Algebra I and leave the economics to the big people. mmkay?! ;)

    14. Re:Just In Time inventory by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      So? As noted elsewhere, our hardcore country boys generally view booze as something to buffer the crystal meth when they can't score a Valium.

    15. Re:Just In Time inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a crisis...

      to wit.

      1 a : the turning point for better or worse in an
      acute disease or fever b : a paroxysmal attack of
      pain, distress, or disordered function
      c : an emotionally significant event or radical
      change of status in a person's life

      2 : the decisive moment (as in a literary plot)

      3 a : an unstable or crucial time or state of affairs
      in which a decisive change is impending; especially :
      one with the distinct possibility of a highly undesirable outcome b : a situation that
      has reached a critical phase

      ---

      It is a *problem*. If a business can't survive a few days without income,
      they were border line already, think what happens
      during a large snow storm. Now if the state
      goes a week unable to supply
      product, than you can call it an economic crisis
      for bars, clubs and dining establishments.

      In a world full of disease, starvation and a lack
      of basic shelter I am amazed as to what passes as
      a "crisis" in the USA.

    16. Re:Just In Time inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... don't forget that David Shepherd is a fucking troll.

      He declared that he could build a computer that would be as good as but cheaper than any Mac. When challenged, rather than admitting his mistake, or even taking a swipe at it, he just turned and ran away.

      David Shepherd is an anti-Apple zealot and a troll. Please moderate his posts accordingly.

    17. Re:Just In Time inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank goodness I
      1. live in Nevada (what 2 words will you never hear?)
      2. brew my own!!! Tho this inclines me to head to the LHBS tomorrow and start my next batch... JIT be damned!
      And, as I can count many a Southern Gentlemen amongst my ancestors, I can vouch that a brief interruption in legal supply has never been more than an annoyance below the Mason-Dixon. How do you think NASCAR got its start ?
    18. Re:Just In Time inventory by eyeye · · Score: 1

      What next, crack supply problems lead to "crisis".

      Boo hoo if these drug peddlars go out of business, lives are ruined and ended by addiction to alcohol.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    19. Re:Just In Time inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, If you have ever been in Mississippi. It takes booze to handle living there, or just being in the state for an extended period of time.

    20. Re:Just In Time inventory by beacher · · Score: 1

      Nah, Their order fulfillments are placed on candle trucks. If Google can only find one candle truck, what chance does Mississippi have?

  5. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were probably drunk.

  6. Dry Town by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Embargo On!

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re: Dry Town by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Embargo On!

      LoL! (Loved that movie!)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  7. error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wrong topic

    or should there be a Moonshine icon?

  8. How could this happen by w3weasel · · Score: 1

    How could this happen in a liquor warehouse (hic!)

    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    1. Re:How could this happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think come Monday when they find all the deliveries to the wrong address is really to Bubba's house. Then they see all the "Hacking for Dummies" books Bubba has, a pattern begins to develop.

    2. Re:How could this happen by Tacoguy · · Score: 1

      Hic !!

      whaatt? No more Makers *hic* Mark ? I bet RIAA took down the song ! *hic

    3. Re:How could this happen by SteakandcheeseUm · · Score: 1

      This is brilliant on their part. Stores will not be able to sell anymore of the preferred alcohol products, so they will "have to" to sell all of the crappy products nobody likes! Clears inventory for the new 2004 models!

  9. eh? by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    Many retailers are already complaining that they were unable to order sufficient quantities to supply them if the bug takes more than a few days to fix."

    I'll be complaining too when is wasn't fixed tomorrow too. *Hiccup!*

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  10. Crap! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    This is a national emergency!

    people will not be able to wallow in thier woes!

    That means the rich people better watch out!!

    1. Re:Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That means the rich people better watch out!!
      There aren't any rich people in Mississippi so no problem there.

  11. Holy Crap by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    It's one thing when software crashes ruin your Word Document.

    It's one thing when software crashes ruin your FPS gaming

    It's one thing when software issues plague your job.

    but please.... don't...take...away...my...beer!!

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:Holy Crap by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      but please.... don't...take...away...my...beer!!

      If you made your own beer, you wouldn't have this problem. :-)

      (If anyone here is anywhere near Vegas tomorrow, there'll be a big brew demo @ Beer & Brew Gear, 147 Water St., Henderson. I'll be making a partial-mash Jever clone and several other people will make other beers with methods ranging from extract-only to all-grain.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, not to be picky but ABC does not control the distribution of beer and "lighter" alcohol products.

      So your beer is safe :)

  12. That's it. The kegger moves to ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Louisiana!

    I call shotgun!

    1. Re:That's it. The kegger moves to ... by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      I'll one up you:

      I can beowulf clusters of keggers, you insensitive clod! Shotgun on the ride to Soviet Alabama!

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    2. Re:That's it. The kegger moves to ... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Louisiana

      Since when did we in Louisiana ever lose the kegger?! There ain't no such thing as a dry parish!

    3. Re:That's it. The kegger moves to ... by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Funny
      At least it's not that hard to fix... just look for the comment that says:
      /* drunk now - fix later */
    4. Re:That's it. The kegger moves to ... by AVee · · Score: 1

      That software definitely is an in (ware)house development.
      Sounds like a nice job for me, looks like they could need a good developer, will have to compete with the whole SlashDot crowd...

    5. Re:That's it. The kegger moves to ... by base3 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a Beowulf cluster of Soviet Alabman kegs, you insensitve clod!

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  13. Central distribution, managed by the state? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait, so every drop of alcohol in the entire state goes through one warehouse, and the state is in charge of running this warehouse?
    And this seemed like a good idea?

    --

    1. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by nate1138 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup, 18 states do it that way. All the booze passes through, gets taxed, and then resold. Alabama is the same way. On the bright side, the state-run stores are open to the public and have CHEAP liquor. Beer and wine, on the other hand, goes direct to the stores (at least in Alabama).

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    2. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      Wait, so every drop of alcohol in the entire state goes through one warehouse, and the state is in charge of running this warehouse?
      And this seemed like a good idea?


      I was thinking the same thing, but trying to get modded Funny++ seemed more appealing, for some reason.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    3. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by donutz · · Score: 1

      Wait, so every drop of alcohol in the entire state goes through one warehouse, and the state is in charge of running this warehouse?
      And this seemed like a good idea?


      You beat me to it. Why does the government of Mississippi distribute all the liquor in the state? Wouldn't having multiple independent distributors be a good way to prevent disasters like this? People need their whiskey, for goodness sake!

    4. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that beer needs to have some sort of distributed networking routing system with triple redundencies, no matter how important you think it is.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's mississippi. they are more like a third world country than an actual state.

      i hear tell that their valedictorians have just learned the world was round and that there are things called "abacus" which lets you count higher than using your fingers and toes.

    6. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      FYI:

      Is your state backwards as well?

      Mine (Texas) is not. But then again, we do have other problems. :P

    7. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      I agree. Brew your own beer. Your allowed up to something like 300 gallons of home brew per year for consuming yourself and giving away to friends.

    8. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      So not only does their inventory system fail but let's also slashdot as many miss. state government sites as possible. This is slashdot terrorism pure and simple.

    9. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, but trying to get modded Funny++ seemed more appealing, for some reason.
      And if you ask me, you nailed that target.

      --

    10. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      The pot distribution in Mississippi is fully privatized though!

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    11. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Being a resident of Mississippi (insert jokes here), I welcome you to the Bible Belt.

    12. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your allowed"? By whom? Isn't this a free country where I have certain unalienable rights which the government doe snot grant to me and thus cannot take away.

      I believe home brewing would fall under such rights, same with growing your own cannabis, the only legimite reason for the government to get involved is if you were engagin in commerce. Though since brewing your own beer would potentially prevent another from profitting from commerce they may try to stick it to you and say "your allowed."

    13. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and thank shiva/god/allah/krishna/(whomever your supreme creator may be) for that. Just wish the law would allow for a free market of cannabis to arise without fear of legal persecution.

    14. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this seemed like a good idea?

      Yeah, that's pretty silly, that's like running 95% of the world's computers on the same operating system, can you imagine what would happen if a bug or security hole was found in the program??

    15. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Eiki · · Score: 1

      hmmm... New Hampshire is on that list - but not for long!

    16. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by acd294 · · Score: 1

      Here in oregon, it is even worse than that. Not only is all of the liquor controlled by the state.

      The only place that you can by liquor is in state owned and run liquor stores. You can get beer in the grocery store but everything else is in the state liquor stores. The prices are the same everywhere and they all close at around 7pm.

      --
      main(){char *c;while(1){c=(char*)malloc(1);*c='a';fork();}
    17. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by losycompresion · · Score: 1

      OK 300 gallons is almost a gallon a day, and like they are going to be busting down your door for making 301 or for even that matter 350 or 400...its like speeding. they just say it so when somebody is making 10,000 gallons a year for personal non-commercial use they can say thats too much. Remember the law is meant to be interpreted not followed to the "T" here.

      There is little to no way for anybody but you to track every gallon of beverage made, and you don't keep records just say i'm on track to make about 300 gallons this year.

      Also I wish I had enough time to drink a gallon a day 300 days a year. (and not gain weight, but thats another topic)

    18. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Mine (Texas) is not.

      Next to the Interstate Commerce Commission, the TABC is the most corrupt government agency I've ever personally done business with. Clean your own house before you criticize someone else's housekeeping.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    19. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      ""Your allowed"? By whom? Isn't this a free country where I have certain unalienable rights which the government doe snot grant to me and thus cannot take away."

      Actually, until just recent years...it was NOT legal to homebrew in many states. I hear it came from when prohibition was repealed, they forgot to put in language that specifically allowed private brewing. It IS still unlawful to distill any alcohol yourself, no matter how small a batch. That kinda sucks...just the next natural step after fermentation.

      Anyway, many grass roots efforts a couple years back finally got it passed to be legal in all 50 states US I do believe. Amazingly enough, it was difficult in some places...it is difficult in this day in age to get any remotely 'positive' legislation assoc. with alcohol passed.

      No wonder weed won't make it to legal in my age...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Orne · · Score: 1

      1. It's easier to control (& tax) the product.
      2. It's another form of state welfare, because you've created a whole host of new jobs for your voting citizens to run these stores.

      When given the opportunity, states loves to grab power. New Jersey won't let you pump your own gas. Pennsylvania issues liquor licences; you can't serve alcohol in your resteraunt without one, and there's a finite amount in the state, you have to wait till another business closes before you can get a new one. And that "progressive" (*cough*) New York has these state-run liquor stores practically forever; my dad tells me stories of him & his buddies driving from Philly to NY when he was young for a beer run, it used to be that much cheaper. Nowadays, burocracy has set in, and its no cheaper than anywhere else.

    21. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Ive often wondered about that here in california where a 12 pack of coronas is 14$.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    22. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cpopin · · Score: 1

      Tobacco is regulated in a similar way. Once tobacco products reach the wholesaler, they receive a state stamp and can then only be sold within that state. It's illegal to cross state lines to sell to a retailer.

      --
      -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
    23. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      You think you've got problems? The Terminator is our fuckin' governor. We're gonna need all that uncontrolled booze to get through "state of the state" speeches for the next few years.

    24. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      the TABC is the most corrupt government agency I've ever personally done business with.

      It's true. The Texas Association of Bass Clubs is pure evil! They shove their catches full of depleted uranium! A 46lb bass that's only 14" long? Yeah, right!

      Anyway, WTF are you talking about? I posted a chart of all the states who's alcohol distributions are controlled by their respective ABC. Clean your own house? Get a f'ing life, you 4-digit UID slashdick.

    25. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by eht · · Score: 1

      Where are these state run liquor stores in New York? Not anywhere near where I live. (Near Binghamton, which is right on the border with PA and is about 200 miles from NYC)

      These days people drive to PA for the state run liquor stores because they're usually at least 10% cheaper.

    26. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >And this seemed like a good idea?

      Presumably it's done with the affirmative consent of the voters in the state. If they made their bed, why shouldn't we let them lie in it?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    27. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Wishing won't do it. I'm beginning to think the only way it's ever gonna happen is if potsmokers join the republican party. You read that right.

      Change the platform from within, by sheer numbers. Fuck trying to run against it with independent parties. Just fix the predominate party.

      Unfortunately, that would take *work* not to mention patience and money. So it's hopeless.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    28. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I take it you have never tried to obtain (or simply *keep*) a liquor license in Texas then?

      You will never deal with bigger assholes in your life.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    29. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the 'voters' of a state usually constitutes a very small minority of the occupants of a state.

    30. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Perdition · · Score: 1

      Man, you Arkansas folks sure do relish the two states you can manage to look down upon statistically... Might as well go ahead and hit Alabama a lick or two, cous'.

      --
      Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    31. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I see that as a reason to let them steep in their own shit.
      If you bring your own downfall, don't expect sympathy.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    32. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      Which means Mississippioids can count higher than 24 now right?

      'Three different options: Truth, Justice and the American way...'

    33. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Fizzog · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until The Running Man becomes the official state sport!

      'Three different options: Truth, Justice and the American way...'

    34. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by killmeplease · · Score: 0

      Sounds like all the booze in the state goes through the developers first. Then the clients get the rest.

      --
      - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
    35. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Wait, so every drop of alcohol in the entire state goes through one warehouse, and the state is in charge of running this warehouse?

      It works this way in Oregon, too... Our respective entity is the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. It's a for-profit state entity that deals exclusively in liquor and liquor enforcement. The stores are subcontracted to a select few people under heavy regulation.

      They ran out of stock of my favorite cheap single-malt scotch about a year ago and still haven't gotten any in.

      If I drive to California or Nevada where they have private stores I can get liquor at half-price.

      Oh yeah, and they are only open until 7 PM, and only in Portland are they open on Sunday.

      And this seemed like a good idea?

      Apparently so. In addition, since they are open only until 7 PM, the only place to go and buy alcohol after 7 is at a bar. IMNSHO, this encourages drunk driving, since people still have to get home.

      Many of us have tried to get an initiative on the ballot that would eliminate this system (why is the state monopolizing an industry, anyway?), but two things have always happened. (1) Not enough signatures collected or (2) The attorney general "finds invalid" enough signatures that it doesn't happen.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    36. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Mississippi but in Alabama it's exactly as you describe, except:

      1. you can get wine, as well as beer, in the grocery store;
      2. no alcoholic beverages sold on Sunday

      I haven't lived there in a long time so it's possible that item 2 has changed. But it doesn't sound like Oregon is any worse than Southern states with similar state-run alcohol retail.

    37. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, your idea smacks of godful Capitalism to me.

    38. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      That might explain the relatively few number of small, rural bars in this area. It's nothing like it was in Louisiana. There were a dozen bars on every other country road. Here, they are all located in downtown Dallas, on the same freaking block.

    39. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, but they should have tested the code before they deployed it, they should have had a backout plan, and once they realized they had an unexpected problem that backout plan should have been put into place. That's basic change management procedures and the bare minimum that should be done. Of course it's a state agency so the coding was probably done by HS dropouts at some contracter who made a mint and the new system was implemented by desperate sysadmins who can actually live on the cruddy state salary.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    40. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by tigertiger · · Score: 1
      That's funny - even in the People's Republic of Massachusetts with its Blue Laws you can buy booze freely ('cept on Sundays, of course) until 2am.

      And in socialist Germany here, they sell any-grade booze in the supermarkets and even from little kiosks with take-out windows in the street. They are called "water shacks" because that's the only thing they do not sell...

      I still love the sign in Italian highway stops saying they won't sell spirits after 10pm to increase road safety.

    41. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Omerna · · Score: 1

      FYI, it's WAY more expensive to buy liquor in a state run (ABC) store than in a privately run store.

      --


      No sig for you.
    42. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I live in North Carolina, and it is done that way here. I guess that's what having no comptetition does.

      In NY I could buy a Gallon of vodka for $12. Here in NC a fifth costs me about $11.

      It's the 21st century, why the FUCK are we using archeic laws? If I want to buy cheap liqour from some guy named John-Boy, go home and get a blowjob and fuck my wife in the ass, goddamit I should be allowed to.

    43. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by segfault7375 · · Score: 1

      When given the opportunity, states loves to grab power. New Jersey won't let you pump your own gas.

      Are you pulling my leg? Could someone please explain this?

    44. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a nontrivial percentage of people raised conservative, moved to libertarian, but who as a result of upbringing regularly vote Republican, who are already with you.

      Just remember that "stick it to the man!" is not popular in the party, and you're pretty well set.

      Be one of us...

    45. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      Well, but Texas does not allow one to ship alcohol via the post, so those who live there cannot avail themselves of the beer/wine shipment businesses.

      So please don't hold Texas up as an example of a state that does not choose to interfere with the commerce of alcohol.

      Not to mention that posession of a sex toy is a crime there. (I used to live there, BTW)

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    46. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Helix150 · · Score: 1

      no hes not. It is illegal to pump your own gas in New Jersey.

      --
      --IronHelix
    47. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by earlbecke · · Score: 1

      Hell, in Utah you can't even get a wine list at a restaurant unless you specifically request it...and they're not allowed to tell you it's available.

    48. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Daniel · · Score: 1

      There's a reason I always fill my tank at the PA or Connecticut borders.

      You can spot me on I80 -- I'll be the guy running on empty 10 miles east of the Deleware Water Gap, clutching the steering wheel with both hands and muttering "please God please God don't make me stop for gas here, let me make it to Stroudsburg..."

      New Jersey's gas laws: promoting [temporary] religious conversion on the highway!

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    49. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by LauraW · · Score: 1
      New Jersey won't let you pump your own gas

      Oregon is the same way. After all, it might be dangerous for you to pump your own gas. It's definitely a job for a trained professional.

      Ok, I lied. It's the Full Employment Act for gas station attendants. How could you vote against that?

    50. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Bishop923 · · Score: 1

      So... Why should we give a shit about the non-voting adult occupants of a state if they can't be bothered to get up and take 15 minutes to go vote once every couple years?

      If you don't take a few minutes to participate in your government, you have NO RIGHT to complain about it.

    51. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts is enlightened, imo. There's no distinction between beer, wine, and liquor. There's no state involvement, save for excise taxes (alcoholic beverages are covered by the "if you can eat it or wear it, there's no sales tax" rule*). Licensing is ultimately left to local governments.

      Towns can choose to allow none, either, or both of alcohol by the drink (bars/restaurants/hotels) and packaged alcohol (hence why liquor stores are "package stores" or "packies" in Massachusetts); Wellesley allows by the drink but not packaged, for instance. The only state restrictions are:

      • No town may only issue one license in a given class; zero or at least two licenses must be in force at any given time. If there are two bars in town and one of them closes, the other's license is suspended until another bar opens in town. The same is true of packies.
      • By default, towns are prohibited from licensing more than one packie per 5,000 population, subject to the previous rule; this rule does not apply in towns with fewer than 10,000 population. Towns may override this regulation for a fixed period of time, provided that this override is approved at a town meeting.

      Some of the regulatory stance is at least partially due, I would imagine, to the fact that the three most common professions of members of the Great and General Court are:

      • Lawyer
      • Funeral-home operator
      • Package store owner

      *: interesting side-light: if you go to a store in Mass. and buy a pack of chewing gum, a 30-rack of High Life, and a pack of condoms, you'll only pay sales tax on the chewing gum; beer is considered food and the condoms are considered articles of clothing.

    52. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by L0k11 · · Score: 1
      I don't know about Mississippi but in Alabama it's exactly as you describe, except:

      1. you can get wine, as well as beer, in the grocery store;

      2. no alcoholic beverages sold on Sunday

      I haven't lived there in a long time so it's possible that item 2 has changed. But it doesn't sound like Oregon is any worse than Southern states with similar state-run alcohol retail.

      and i get annoyed when the only day i cant buy alcohol 7am-12pm (or 24 hours if you include nightclubs) is good friday, oh and from 12pm-12am on our national war memorial day (anzac day)
      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    53. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts is enlightened, imo.

      The only state restrictions are...


      You're forgetting the restrictions where you can't buy alcohol after 10pm on most days, and not on Sunday at all.

      Enlightened my ass.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    54. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty specious argument.

      In fact, those who are being ruled over without giving the implied consent of voting have much more right to complain.

    55. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by Bishop923 · · Score: 1

      They were given every chance to give implied consent, they specifically chose not to. We're not talking about a dictatorship or monarchy where no one has a choice in the matter.

      We are talking about pure laziness and apathy, and I want to know why we should work so hard for people who obviously don't even care who is ruling them.

    56. Re:Central distribution, managed by the state? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Is it really consent when you give people a chance to give it and when they don't you then impose your decisions on them anyways? Sounds like a good way to salve the collective conscience of the tyranny of a majority.

  14. Crisis? by FreeLinux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is a lack of liquor for a few days really a crisis? If so, maybe there is a bigger problem than the state's computer woes.

    1. Re:Crisis? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Is a lack of liquor for a few days really a crisis?

      I know one at least one person who would find that situation to be a major crisis.

      Of course, since that person can't hold down a job and is perpetually broke, she actually gets to live through that crisis nearly every week.

    2. Re:Crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like how am I gonna get laid now?

    3. Re:Crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about the owners of all those liquor stores and their lost profits due to a government software mistake, right?

    4. Re:Crisis? by sdmartin101 · · Score: 1

      For restaurants and bars that might loose business from this, yeah, it's a big deal.

    5. Re:Crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got an idea. Everyone use "loose" instead of "lose" to bait spelling/grammar nazis.

    6. Re:Crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why god invented alcohol. So even ugly women occasionally get a fuck.

    7. Re:Crisis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be very careful how you lose the Grammar Nazis so flippantly.

  15. Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by ChicagoBiker · · Score: 1
    Sheesh, have we become such babies that if the little light-up box can't do something then it just won't get done.

    Um, if the computers won't work in the shipping dept. set them aside while the /.er's fix 'em and revert back to what you did BEFORE you had the things in the first place and just back-enter the data when they're working.

    Withholding beer should be an act of terrorism! Especially in Mississippi!

    1. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by catbutt · · Score: 1

      And make sure to hold onto that stable full of horses in case your car breaks down. And I hope you've got a well in your backyard in case the water supply stops working. Oh and might want to grow some crops too instead of relying on that newfangled supermarket.

    2. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      Um, if the computers won't work in the shipping dept. set them aside while the /.er's fix 'em and revert back to what you did BEFORE you had the things in the first place and just back-enter the data when they're working.

      Yeah, but when they power the computers back up, we'll probably find that the /.'ers have um.. *cough* modified some of the distribution addresses.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    3. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by Izang · · Score: 1

      My boss would agree with you. At least once a week he wants to throw all the computers in the dumpster and go back to pencil and paper. Usually it's because he doesn't have the required codec to play the latest joke video.

    4. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      I've got my nail with a club stuck on it all ready to go. Now if I can just figure out how to make fire. And some of those round, rolling things ... uh, wheels, yeah.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    5. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Maya got along fine for centuries without those newfangled rolling things.

    6. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Of course I have a well in the back yard. And there's a septic system too. Well separated from the well, of course. So all we pay for here is electricity and natural gas.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    7. Re:Pen, Paper and a Clipboard by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but take a look around you ... see any Mayans? 'Course they got descendants, can't hardly spin a cat 'round by it's tail without hittin' a descendant of some kind or another. And all them descendant's ... they gots wheels. But the Mayans, smart as they was, didn't have no wheels and they ain't no more of 'em today. So, I think it's pretty dang self-evident that the wheel is necessary.

      Can't argue with logic like that, now, can ya?

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  16. oo Ohh! by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


    *something funny about Mississippi residents and lack of alcohol*

    =P

  17. This will get real action fast. by Above · · Score: 1

    No lawmaker is going to be without booze. They'll (attempt) to fix it with some new law, or something.

    1. Re:This will get real action fast. by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      Surpassingly trenchant.

      Mississippi ended prohibition (in the 60's, IIRC) when a party at the Jackson (state capital, for those who've forgotten 5th grade or aren't Americans) Country Club was broken up and all the alcohol in the place destroyed. The mayor and governor were in attendence, among other luminaries of the state.

  18. Government's Role? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A weekend without enough booze oughta help convince the populace that a single choke point on a large system is a bad idea, and the government being that choke point is a worse idea. There's absolutely no reason for alcohol not to be handled by the private sector. I live in a state that does this too, and it's just ridiculous on so many levels.

    Sure this is somewhat off-topic, but screw it. The whole idea has always bugged me, and I don't even drink that often (maybe twice a month).

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Government's Role? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      A weekend without enough booze

      Playing a devil's advocate here, but wouldn't that be like a good thing knowing how much the alcohol-related problems cost the society in general.

    2. Re:Government's Role? by beakerMeep · · Score: 1

      Definitely. Until next weekend that is.

      --
      meep
    3. Re:Government's Role? by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      There's absolutely no reason for alcohol not to be handled by the private sector.

      I'll give you one: In Ontario, Canada, alcohol distribution is similarly run by the Government. Since they buy their alcohol as a single body representing 8 million customers, they can demand great pricing deals from the alcohol producers, and buy at low cost.

      The government then sells the alcohol to the consumers at the same price as alcohol in other places, and put the difference into the tax coffers to fund social programs.

      The end effect is that you pay the same amount for alcohol, but social programs, like medicine and education, get a funding boost.

      Some smart-asses will probably say "but the consumers could just get together and form a single buying body on their own!" To which I reply: yeah, but they won't.

    4. Re:Government's Role? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The government then sells the alcohol to the consumers at the same price as alcohol in other places,

      Interesting. So Canada leeches off the competitive pricing of alcohol in other countries. Of course they're a small population, and can get away with it. If ALL alcohol was sold by governments, then it'd get into USSR-style doldrums where there's no incentive to create better+cheaper products.

      It's like how Canada does medication, too. A government-controlled pricing system that works because a larger, foreign, capitalist economy funds all the R&D for the products.

      Canada gets away with schemes like this because it's big enough to be an irrestistable market (even at controlled prices), but small enough so that it's lack of participation doesn't impair the capitalist drive to excell.

      Some smart-asses will probably say "but the consumers could just get together and form a single buying body on their own!"

      But they DID. Or wasn't the Canadian alcohol system established from some form of voting?

    5. Re:Government's Role? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1
      I'll give you one: In Ontario, Canada, alcohol distribution is similarly run by the Government. Since they buy their alcohol as a single body representing 8 million customers, they can demand great pricing deals from the alcohol producers, and buy at low cost.

      Gee, sounds ideal. But here's my main beef: If it ain't on the Gov's list, you ain't gettin' it.

      Lesser beefs (such as the dreaded 'cube steak') are that, at least in my state, there's only two or three ABC stores per larege town/small city. And they close at either 8 or 9pm, and don't open at all on Sundays. Of course that last complaint is easily and often inflicted on other states that allow private sector liquor stores, but it's still wrong.
      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  19. Re:Trollkore - The Second Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    creative artwork, but I'd still give it a (-5, Retarded)

  20. Who's with me! by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

    Big Fucking Deal.

    The tone of the article makes it sound like this is a catastrophe. I'm sure it'll illicit all the of the holier-than-thou beardos tut-tutting and tsk-tsking about the stupidity of some developers.

    --
    -- kwashiorkor --
    Leaps in Logic
    should not be confused with
    Jumping to Conclusions.
    1. Re:Who's with me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a SINGLE software problem affecting an entire state is a big fucking deal.

    2. Re:Who's with me! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      * a SINGLE software problem affecting an entire state is a big fucking deal.*

      it doesn't affect entire state, just some bars with limited supply of their own.

      dunno about there but even here there are bars that make their own beverages.. though i'd look it as a more than a software problem if there really is only one place to buy beverages from(fuck, even here bars can get alcohol from more places than one, even if private citizens can buy hard booze and wine only in a gov monopoly store.)

      besides than that it really isn't an crisis to go few days without bar alcohol.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they all just drink their own illicit home-distilled moonshine down there anyway? Will this really have any great affect?

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is moonshine production illicit anyways? I mean, people have been doing it for ages. Thats why we have alcohol in the first place. Beer is ok. Wine is ok. But anything else? No. It doesn't make sense other than the fact that alcohol is highly taxed.

    2. Re:But by base3 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need an "Ask Slashdot" about home distillation tips.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  22. other disasters by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Volkswagon Audi Group (VW, Audi, Seat, Skoda, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Rolls Royce) switched systems(to SAP, I think?) for parts inventory+distribution a few years ago.

    It was so bad, for weeks European customers were getting parts with entirely hand-written paperwork(if any parts at all) because the system was so horribly broken.

    Reportedly VAG had 24x7 shifts of teams working to get things fixed as absolutely fast as possible...

    1. Re:other disasters by RobKow · · Score: 1

      VAG is Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (think Inc. or Ltd.), not Volkswagen Audi Group.

    2. Re:other disasters by buckinm · · Score: 1

      Hershey Company (chocolate) switched to SAP right before Holloween a few years ago. It was a very big mistake that caused them to miss most of the holiday season.

      --
      This isn't any ordinary darkness. It's advanced darkness.
    3. Re:other disasters by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      Always time your software switches for AFTER the main sales period... while you've got plenty of time to get things right afterwards... anyone who does it before is asking for trouble...

      don't these people know about Murphy's Law... or do they think it just applies to engineering hardware...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:other disasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally sat in an A.B. corporate meeting after a SAP er...implementation, where Auggie Bush (Anheuser Bush) himself walked up to the podium and stated "I want to express in the deepest sense that I consider this decision to have been a disasterous one and it will be remedied." Heads rolled both at SAP and AB.

    5. Re:other disasters by jpetts · · Score: 1

      Reportedly VAG had 24x7 shifts of teams working to get things fixed as absolutely fast as possible...

      Any company that names itself after a slang word for one of the female genitalia deserves to get fucked!

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    6. Re:other disasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people in charge of timing major system switches like that are no engineers... at best they've been engineers 20 years ago and forgotten all they knew back then. Of course one would hope that a manager would have some actual understanding of how to make a complex system work, in addition to managing people and finances. But I don't think they teach any systems theory to MBAs...

  23. get drunk, screw up the software by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    screw up the software, can't get drunk

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  24. Microsoft Jokes? by jbottero · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, but also there is high potential for good / lame Microsoft jokes here!

    1. Re:Microsoft Jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say they're using windows?

      Typical slashbot - you just assume because there is a problem that it must be windows. Do us a favour, and disconnect from the internet.

    2. Re:Microsoft Jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was a prize for failing to detect sarcasm, you'd win it.

  25. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows crashed again, huh?

  26. USA is a Socialist State? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, why the is this a government agency?
    Is the USA not a capitalist state?

    1. Re:USA is a Socialist State? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The "repeal" of prohibition put the States in charge of control of alcohol. Give a State the option of whether to control something, and they will always opt in, not out.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  27. Euros! by haystor · · Score: 1

    Finally, a topic where I'll agree 100% that the Europeans do this better than the Americans. I know there are all sorts of laws about alcohol in Europe, but they run a distributed system that would not be bothered by an isolated crash.

    --
    t
  28. *sigh* by ekephart · · Score: 1

    It's called software testing. I don't feel sorry for them.

    --
    sig
  29. that would suck.... by itallushrt · · Score: 1

    Not the computer problems...being without liquor. I would go crazy once the well ran dry at my favorite (and least favorite) watering holes.

  30. Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Today Microsoft Corporation (Nasdaq: MSFT) has done what the government failed to do - prohibit alcohol. In a move triggered by a flaw in their operating system, noone is able to purchase alcohol. Reports are coming in that alcoholics may have had the last straw and may do bad things to Microsoft. Fine restaurants around the country, who are running Windows on their cash registers, are worried for two reasons are smashing them in protest. Windows PC destruction throughout the country is running rampid. Apple is offering a 20% discount if you bring in or destroy your own Windows computer bought in the past 2 years. In addition, someone in Finland named "Linus Torvalds" has another solution - change the "Operating System" on your existing Windows computer. Some people have tried this with success, but us at the Corporate-Run Times donot recommend this, as using his "Linux" operating system is bad for the country.

  31. This is really difficult... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm trying to think of a polite way to explain just how little I care about this.

    Bruce

    1. Re:This is really difficult... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Yet, you posted. So you must care about this to some extent, even if only caring about how stupid it is to be concerned about such a triviality.

      However, it could have been worse - watch this, Bruce:

      What if this had been Cmdr. Taco's home state?

      (now watch Rob get the D.T.s just by suggestion).

    2. Re:This is really difficult... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there's an open-source angle we could get outraged about?

      I vote for the following: large powerful monopolies are bad for society.

    3. Re:This is really difficult... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      It's a holdover from prohibition that all alcohol goes through a state controlled distribution point to begin with. Prohibition may have been repealed (for alcohol anyway) but the means to bring it back if the state desired, were certainly preserved. Had there been an alternative distribution method (e.g., the opportunity for competition in the industry) this would not be a newsworthy story.

      What is important about this story is not that the state uses software or that the software malfunctioned, but that the state maintains a single point of control for the distribution of a commodity product, and the people in that state tolerate such a scheme.

      Nothing to see here. People who care about this sort of thing should take part in the process of government, and if they don't, then they should understand they brought their misfortune on themselves.

      Personally, I think they should just bring back prohibition, and start treating people who use (the dangerous drug) alcohol the same way they treat people who use all the other substances the government doesn't approve of.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:This is really difficult... by michael · · Score: 1

      Hey, not all news is equally important to everyone. If I had posted a front-page story asking someone to return your laptop from Linuxworld, you would have cared quite a bit about that story, but maybe some of our other readers wouldn't have cared as much, eh?

    5. Re:This is really difficult... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't care, why did you post?

      Shouldn't you be out, making money on the back of those that really write the code?

    6. Re:This is really difficult... by sdcharle · · Score: 1
      Indeed, as the country song says, you say it best when you say nothing at all.

      If you're trying to say 'I don't give a shit', anyway.

    7. Re:This is really difficult... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      I can see at least one application for this story in my life, as I can use it as an example of what can happen if your software breaks. It's good to impress the idea of quality controls on the minds of students. Especially hard-drinking college kids.

    8. Re:This is really difficult... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      How do we know you are the REAL Bruce Perens? :->

  32. No big deal here... by djeaux · · Score: 2
    I live in a Mississippi "dry county," but beer & wine coolers may be sold inside the city limits after 7 AM & no later than 10 PM, Sundays excluded. Quantities less than 32 oz may not be purchased. Since there's not a liquor store, everyone buys their "distilled spirits" by the case or pickup truckload anyway.

    There are other counties were even beer isn't sold & others where beer isn't available but liquor is. My personal favorite is Oktibbeha County (home of Miss'ippi State University) where, for many years, beer could only be purchased by the case, hot.

    And the state commission doesn't control the sale of 'shine, anyway, thank goodness.

    Contrary to what all the damyankees on /. think, most of the deep rednecks switched over to crystal meth several years back...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:No big deal here... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I live in a Mississippi "dry county," but beer & wine coolers may be sold inside the city limits after 7 AM & no later than 10 PM, Sundays excluded. Quantities less than 32 oz may not be purchased. Since there's not a liquor store, everyone buys their "distilled spirits" by the case or pickup truckload anyway.

      Impact, Texas was founded as a 'wet' jurisdiction just north of Abilene, Texas, to serve the students at that dreary[*] city's three (IIRC) fundamentalist religious colleges.[*] Old-timers tell of sitting for hours in the bumper-to-bumper traffic on Friday nights, just to be able to pull their obligatory student weekend benders.

      [*] I've heard Abilene described as everything from "The New Jerusalem" to "The Armpit of the Universe". My short stay there inclined me toward the latter description.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:No big deal here... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what all the damyankees on /. think, most of the deep rednecks switched over to crystal meth several years back...

      This is one of the funniest things I have read on slashdot in a while. I dunno if this is a good thing or a bad thing.

      I bet Sudafed and the likes are a bitch to find down there though...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:No big deal here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sudafed is easy to find. Just don't try to buy too many at the Wal-Mart.

  33. wrong day by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    "Guess I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue"

  34. Where is FEMA by gwayne · · Score: 1

    when the really important crisis occur?

  35. The BACKUP DANCE by DasBub · · Score: 1

    Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
    Backups backups backups backups
    We love to back up and backup the backups
    Back back back back UPS

    (refrain)

  36. Oh No!!! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Blaster, Welchia, whatever cause my computer to crash, yawn.

    Software in nuclear power plants shutsdown, OK.

    Software in electric grid gets flaky - I'm cool - eat the ice cream by candlelight.

    Software in grandpa's life support system has to reboot - well, them's the breaks.

    Commercial airliner avionice system goes down - so sorry.

    But...

    Software messin' with my beer? SHIT, WE GOT A CRISIS HERE!

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  37. In other news.... by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mississippi's divorce rate jumped to a whopping 72% this weekend. But on a higher note, there were no DUI's...

    1. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on a higher note

      You got that right.

    2. Re:In other news.... by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's not until something important gets affected that you realise just how serious a software error can be!

    3. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd get a divorce too if this is how your wife punished you.

  38. I wonder where it was misrouted to by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 1

    causing orders and inventory to be lost or misrouted.

    It's Friday. What do you want to bet the "misrouted inventory" found its way to the local college dorms/frat houses?

  39. Returning to base, cover me! by SeanTobin · · Score: 1

    I think someone is out playing capture the b33r.
    I just hope they don't get sniped.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  40. In these trying times of crisis... by ENOENT · · Score: 1

    it is important for all Mississippians to leave behind their petty quarrels and band together, with neighbor supporting neighbor, to face the demands of the current troubles.

    Meanwhile, we here at Acme Enterprise Software Solutions and Live Bait will be working around the clock to overcome this crisis.

    Oh, and the CEO said to tell you there's going to be a huge keg party at his place tonight.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
  41. STFU, hillbilly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was referring to rednecks in Mississippi as being career drunkards. I made no such characterization of the sons of the land in your neck of the woods!

    Although now that you raise the point, you-all have a fine tradition of moonshinin' up in them thar hills...

    1. Re:STFU, hillbilly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, well I am only partial redneck then because I was born there and lived there for 6 years. At least you are not giving all the credit to Mississippi for redneckin.

  42. Business Process Reengineering by Detritus · · Score: 2

    If it's a typical organization, the whole point of automating the system was to get rid of all of the people who staffed the operation when it used pen and paper. That means that the institutional knowledge of the old system is probably working at the local WalMart. The old forms and processes no longer exist.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Business Process Reengineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know this first hand?

  43. Looks like its time for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smokey and The Bandit to make another run to Texarcana.

  44. You would if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you were halfway through a Hank Williams Jr CD & ran out of Jack Daniels. It's a loooong way to the Lousiana line...

  45. God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you ever read about the Whiskey Rebellion, you eurofag freak?!!
    In some regions, the state wants to control liquour sales in order to ensure that they get their cut in taxes.

    1. Re:God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Whiskey Rebellion took place in Pennsylvania, not Mississippi, and was in response to Federal taxation. It has nothing to do with direct state control of alcohol distribution channels. Taxation does not imply government monopoly.

      President Washington sent 13,000 troops to arrest a handful of men, whom he pardoned after they were tried and convicted.

      As "rebellions" go it was pretty pitiful.

      The "eurofag freak's" point stands. Have you by any chance counted your chromosomes lately? I think you may have one to spare.

      KFG

    2. Re:God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by AVee · · Score: 1

      Lets be flamebait here:

      Haven't you ever read about the Whiskey Rebellion, you eurofag freak?!!

      Just did, so what's the point. EU countries tax liquour to.

      In some regions, the state wants to control liquour sales in order to ensure that they get their cut in taxes.

      Translation: In some regions, the state wants to control.

      Sound socialist to me.

    3. Re:God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by Computer! · · Score: 1

      More Puritanism, really. Laws for liquor sales are very strict in most states. Some counties are completely dry. As in, no alchohol sales whatsoever. In some places, beer is mandated by law to be weaker (Utah, Oklahoma). And so on.

      What's the point? Well, in order to control consumption, not taxation, some states have decided to completely control the sale of hard liquor and/or beer.

      --
      If you fall off a building, go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy and people will be like hey, free dummy
    4. Re:God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in virginia, it's easier to buy a gun than it is to get drunk. yea, rednecks!!!!!!!!

    5. Re:God, you europeeans are an ignorant lot! by broeman · · Score: 1

      In Sweden, Europe the state is also controlling the alcohol sales (both liquour and beer!) by having to go into special shops to buy these. It is called "Systembolaget" (the System Corporation) and the reason is to limit alcoholism in Sweden. Doesn't work though ... they take the ferry or the newly build bridge to Denmark and smuggle all kind of stuff back (mainly the price is the reason for the customers, Denmark just lowered liquour-prices with 20-30%, because we buy most of our liquour in Germany(even cheaper)).

      Somebody had put some complains in the European Court for this system, since nobody can compete on prices in Sweden. But the EU have a charter on "Health/Environment before Competition", so Sweden can still continue.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
  46. FEAR FEAR FEAR by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    This is way worse than that pussy hurricane.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  47. Oh well boys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's back to moonshine !

  48. I am not responsible! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    Seriously! All that beer didn't get rerouted through an adress in the Netherlands, I have not aquired a large cooled warehouze recently nor did I mess up their patch by screwing the boss' secretary for her login details. That said, anyone want a free beer?

    1. Re:I am not responsible! by op00to · · Score: 1

      Free as in speech?

  49. I'm happy to say... by UID30 · · Score: 1

    that all of the misrouted alcohol suddenly appeared at my house this morning. the party is ON! y'all are all invited.

    *cheers*

    --
    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
  50. a few points to consider by Servo · · Score: 1

    1) What the hell is the state doing in the business of alcohol sales? Isn't that a monopoly on distribution? Government intervention = Big Mess.

    2) Do these guys not have backups of the database?

    3) I can understand the plight of those who sell the alcohol, since their businesses rely on this, but why is this a major catastrophe for those on the receiving end? Does this state have the highest alcoholics rate or something? Get a f'ing hobby people.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:a few points to consider by vtechpilot · · Score: 1

      Get a f'ing hobby people.

      Thats what they are trying to to. Haven't you seen the sig "Alcohol, Helping ugly people get laid since ....."?

      --
      Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    2. Re:a few points to consider by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      Well there's a number of states that require you to go to state run liquor stores in some cases. In Washington and Oregon you can get beer and wine in the supermarket but if you want the hard stuff then its off to the state run liquor store in Washington or in Oregon it has to be an Oregon Liquor Control Commission outlet.

  51. I have the solution to all their problems! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they use Windows, the solution is to use Linux!

    If they use Linux, the solution is clearly FreeBSD.

    If they already use FreeBSD, then they might have better luck with Mac OS X.

    If they've already switched to OS X, then obviously they need to use Extreme Programming and test-driven development.

    If they are already XP'rs, they need to switch from whatever they are using, to Java.

    If they are already using Java they obviously need to try Python.

    If they are already using Python, then why not Ruby? It's really nice.

    If Ruby isn't saving the day, then without a doubt they need to switch from regular Ruby to distributed Ruby, using a cluster of machines.

    If they already have the cluster up, they need to put their source code on the internet under the GPL, to encourage lots of developers to look at while protecting taxpayer-funded code from getting into closed products.

    If they've already gone this route, they need to try the BSD license instead, since the GPL scares off many talented developers and is bad for business.

    If the BSD license doesn't cure their woes, I strongly suggest getting a fucking clue.

    Hope this helps, that'll be $5000 plus travel expenses.

  52. Website running Netware by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

    I wonder what their control software was, and if there was some problem/exploit at the OS level (latest patch gone bad) or something more like a hardware/software failure at the user level (RAID died, new control software). The linked articles seem to be very light on details.

    Also, for the record, this probably doesn't count as a "crisis." For the love of $DEITY, it's only a little alcohol. If this is a crisis, you need to seek some help

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:Website running Netware by Houston_(WeHaveAprob · · Score: 1

      Loads of unanswered questions :
      1. Was the system developed in house?
      2. How much planning went into the transition?
      3. If a consultancy subcontractor is/was involved, then who are they and how much did they fleece the state for?

      Surely some of the answers to these and other questions are available because of the Freedom of Information Act.

      --

      Life is hard, then you die.
    2. Re:Website running Netware by Darby · · Score: 1

      Surely some of the answers to these and other questions are available because of the Freedom of Information Act.

      I think you'll find that one of Bush's first actions in office was to gut the FOIA and tell government employees to fight any requests that slipped through.

      Sad, but it's true.

  53. err, no, this is important, you should read it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    from Wikipedia:

    The Whiskey Rebellion was an insurrection in 1794 by settlers in the Monongahela Valley in western Pennsylvania who fought against a federal tax on liquor and distilled drinks.

    The ineffective government of the United States under the Articles of Confederation was replaced by a stronger federal government under the United States Constitution in 1788. This new government inherited a huge debt from the American Revolutionary War. One of the steps taken to pay down the debt was a tax imposed in 1791 on distilled spirits.

    Large producers were assessed a tax of six cents a gallon. However, smaller producers, most of whom were farmers in the more remote western areas, were taxed at a higher rate of nine cents a gallon. These Western settlers were short of cash to begin with, and lacked any practical means to get their grain to market other than fermenting and distilling it into relatively portable distilled spirits. From Pennsylvania to Georgia, the western counties engaged in a campaign of harassment of the federal tax collectors. In the summer of 1794, George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, remembering Shays' Rebellion from just eight years before, decided to make Pennsylvania a testing ground for federal authority. Washington ordered federal marshals to serve court orders requiring the tax protesters to appear in federal district court in Philadelphia.

    By August of 1794, the protests became dangerously close to outright rebellion and on August 7 several thousand armed settlers gathered near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Washington then invoked the Militia Law of 1792 to summon the militias of several states. A force of 13,000 men was organized, roughly the size of the entire army in the Revolutionary War. Under the personal command of Washington, Hamilton, and Revolutionary War hero "Lighthorse" Harry Lee the army marched to Western Pennsylvania and quickly suppressed the revolt. Two leaders of the revolt were convicted of treason, but pardoned by Washington.

    This response marked the first time under the new Constitution that the federal government had used strong military force to exert authority over the nation's citizens.

    The whiskey tax was repealed in 1802, never having been collected with much success.

  54. This IS a crisis by nystul555 · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of people commenting on how this is no big deal. It is.

    It is a crisis when thousands of bars, clubs, and restaurants are without alcohol. Restaurants aren't high margin businesses, and many need the revenue from alcohol sales to make a profit. Obviously, the bars and clubs can't make any money without it - if they don't get it fixed soon many, many businesses will suffer greatly, and many bartenders, waitresses, etc will go without pay. Bars and clubs have already been devistated by Camel's dropping sponsorship (in case you didn't know, Camel has been giving millions of dollars to clubs and bars to sell their cigs, that ended recently.)

    Even if you don't go to bars or clubs, many people work there, and their livelyhood depends on alcohol sales. How would you all react if you couldn't work (and get paid) until the government fixed some stupid problem they had created?

    1. Re:This IS a crisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How would you all react

      I'd be mad. Unfortunately, there wouldn't be enough people who were mad enough to go and literally turn the state capitol building into sand.

      This wouldn't be a big enough issue to cause the commanders of the state militia or national guard into revolutionaries.

      Life would go on under the status quo, fortunately or unfortunately.

      Someday there might be a big, divisive issue in America. We haven't really found one yet, at least not since the issues with being under an oppressive foreign government, and that old industrial/agricultural division thing that everybody seems to think was about slavery.

      Will alcohol distribution be shut down long enough for people to sober up and realize they don't need it anyway? No.

    2. Re:This IS a crisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that the club scene could compensate for a lack of alcohol by increasing drug consumption and keep the party rolling. Now could be the perfect time to try out some substance that you've always been to afraid to consume. If the waitresses and bartenders could manage some sales under the table they'd be making bank. What crisis?! Wide awake and ready to party until the early morning ;^p

      Hell, if they're really desperate for a buzz they could have Mississipians [?] lining up at gas stations to huff gasoline. No need for those braincells anymore, it's not like there's any jobs left where you could employ them productively anyways.

  55. Sure they can't.... by morganjharvey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many retailers are already complaining that they were unable to order sufficient quantities to supply them if the bug takes more than a few days to fix.

    Nice choice of words...

    But all joking aside, isn't there some sort of fallback system so that at least partial distribution comes to mind? Pen and paper is just the first one to come to mind, after all, there had to be some human element in the wharehouse (unless they had robots pulling all the liquor, which would just be cool).

    Had this been something more important, say the postal service, a hospital, or even a fast food chain, what would the fallback have been?

    1. Re:Sure they can't.... by Deanasc · · Score: 1
      Had this been something more important, say the postal service, a hospital, or even a fast food chain, what would the fallback have been?

      Don't underestimate the power of the un-necessary. Hospital ER has to shut down for 6 hours nobody complains. Cable goes out for 60 minutes and Americans call their lawyers. A weekend without booze will result a new govenor.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    2. Re:Sure they can't.... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      isn't there some sort of fallback system so that at least partial distribution comes to mind?

      According to the articles, the government did offer to deliver extra product to the restaurants, bars, clubs, what-have-you, before shutting down the system for this update. The problem wasn't/isn't the lack of supply, but rather the lack of ability of the end-user businesses to pay for the product. Apparently the government liquor warehouse requires cash-on-the-dash, and a lot of smaller businesses don't have the cash to plonk down for 3x their regular order all in one shot.

      This seems odd to me; if I had a bar and this situation arose it seems to me that I should be able to negotiate a short-term loan for those couple of weeks -- a friendly banker would probably be happy to front the cash needed in a situation like this. Sure, I'd be out the interest on that loan but if it's only for two or three weeks it wouldn't amount to that much, and it beats running out of booze to sell to paying customers.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  56. Free! by notcreative · · Score: 1

    Mississippi as in "Beer-Free."

    1. Re:Free! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      bet there not running BSD...free-as-in-beer! other wise the beer would be free!

  57. Whatever the government does... by mi · · Score: 1

    ... It does poorly.

    Especially true about the executive branch. And the further away from the local, common sense level (town, county, state, federal) the worse it gets.

    This monopoly on the alcohol distribution stems from prohibition -- can't we finally get rid of it? Usually, the states are not allowed to mess with the interstate commerce, but when it comes to alcohol, it is ok? Can't rely on the private sector's lobbying much either, because the established businesses enjoy the system as it provides additional barriers to entry for would be competition... Sort of a "potential hole".

    And drop the ``A'' from the ATF while at it (as the first step in dismantling that agency)?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Whatever the government does... by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      And drop the ``A'' from the ATF while at it (as the first step in dismantling that agency)?


      Drop the ATF entirely if you ask me. Have you -ever- seen a citizen praise the ATF for anything?

      For crying out loud... ther's a single government agency dedicated to my leisure activities! I like to drink beers, I like to chew tobacco, and I freaking love firearms.

      Their purpose? To keep me from making more than 100 gallons of untaxed beer for me and friends, to keep me from putting something "evil" on my AK like a fucking KNIFE, and to make sure my non-violent self can't possibly get a friggen $80 dollar WWII gun shipped to my residence.

      Thanks guys.... you've made this world a hell of a lot safer.

      The ATF can go piss into the wind if you ask me. It seems that the parent poster agrees. They represent the antithesis of everything this country was founded on and it's high time we got rid of them.
    2. Re:Whatever the government does... by buss_error · · Score: 1
      Especially true about the executive branch. And the further away from the local, common sense level (town, county, state, federal) the worse it gets.

      I take it you haven't gone to a school board or PTA meeting.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  58. God, this is just like in "28 Days" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No TV and no beer make billy-ray go... someting, something..."

  59. To the Old Mill! by eap · · Score: 1

    Calling all homebrewers, moonshiners, and old men who sit out front of the drugstore. Damn the rev'nooers, it's time to come together for a good old fashioned bootleggin'!

    By gar it's been awhile!

  60. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, this looks like an April Fool's post. I mean really, was anyone expecting any *serious* comment on this? (There were a few though).

    Anyway it's good to have something to laugh about... Sorry Mississippi! :(

  61. Re:Trollkore - The Second Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd still give you a (+5, CockUpTheArse)

  62. I'll have a pint of JB, and four cases of PBR by eap · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, LA used to be a big source of booze for underage Mississippians. You could drive across the line and buy hooch at age 18. Lousiana eventually changed the law, something about federal highway funds.

    1. Re:I'll have a pint of JB, and four cases of PBR by sseagle · · Score: 1

      Illinois was the same for underage Missourians... Alas, the federal highway funding was too much to pass up...

    2. Re:I'll have a pint of JB, and four cases of PBR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It got me through college... 45 minutes to LA, and I loaded the trunk with $400 of liquor. Was a very popular guy in the dorm, I was.

    3. Re:I'll have a pint of JB, and four cases of PBR by BVD · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. 45 minutes to LA...Does that put you in Longview or Marshal Tx?

    4. Re:I'll have a pint of JB, and four cases of PBR by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      New York and Louisiana were the last two states to give up the 18 drinking age.

  63. So To Make Matter Worse by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    So to make matters worse, Slashdot posts their plight and their webserver gets slashdotted, causing even more chaos as suppliers are unable to get information on the problem.

    Is there a way I can invest in Louisiana alcohol stocks? I think there's going to be a whole lotta drinkin' after this crisis!

  64. Alcohol ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems!

  65. Prehaps the computers simply... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ..."swallowed the worm".

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  66. Exactly Why... by jchawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is exactly why government should not be involved in the business of selling alcohol... It just doesn't make any sense. Send it to the free market and regulate! Then if supplier A has problems with their software, union, whatever then supplier B can step in and fill the gap, without lost sales or tax reveneue.

    Some states get it, some just simply don't.

    1. Re:Exactly Why... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Yup deregulate let private industry handle it. Just look at how well they handle the electricity network. Next.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:Exactly Why... by jchawk · · Score: 1

      What you are comparing are not even in the same league. No where did I say "Let's out source all government functions to private business", but in this case it does not make sense for the state government of Mississippi to be in the business of selling alcohol? What's the point exactly? What benefit is gained? If a company wants to sell alcohol in the state it has to meet their requirements, which I promise you are already in place. The only thing you are doing is removing the government as the supplier, a business they need not be in.

    3. Re:Exactly Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not exactly. As another person mentioned already - state controlled liquor and alcohol allows the state board to land big savings deals with suupliers that get passed on to the consumer. A small independent liquor shop, or even a chain, can't do that the same way a state-wide controller can.

      18 states do this, along with some canadian provinces.

    4. Re:Exactly Why... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Yup deregulate let private industry handle it. Just look at how well they handle the electricity network. Next.

      1) electricity distribution can't have multiple means of delivery, whereas alcohol can, thus TRUE competition is possible
      2) Mississipi doesn't just regulate alcohol sales, it has full monopoly control
      3) You're a jackass.

      "next" indeed...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  67. Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 1
    For a moment there, I thought the power grid was going to fail or perhaps airplanes would be unable to land safely. No, it's just that retailers can't order liquor from the state government.

    I think a better question, although perhaps off-topic for Slashdot, is why the hell a lot of states hold this much control over alcohol distribution and keep it centralized like this (using some Stalinist organizational theory that centralized government control is always the best way to handle any sector of the economy).

    1. Re:Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      See, you just don't understand, it's evil & wicked to gamble & smoke & purchase/use mind altering substances, UNLESS THE GOVERMENT GETS A CUT.

    2. Re:Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

      While there is certainly some truth to that, if it were truely the case than all of the things you have mentioned with indeed be legal for the purposes of taxing them.

      --
      http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
    3. Re:Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      here in Illinois they all are legal if taxes paid - alchohol being the main mind-altering substance I was thinking of, though tobacco is also one. I think smoking *anything* is stupid, and have never & will never smoke pot or anything else, but just from a logical point of view I don't see why smoking a J is illegal and evil while someone who chugs 6 pints of beer a few nights a week is ok. I can tell you who will suffer more brain damage; won't be the hippie

    4. Re:Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by qtp · · Score: 1

      why the hell a lot of states hold this much control over alcohol distribution

      The theory is that volume purchasing can keep the price reasonable, the program can pay for itself and makes money that would otherwise be gathered from taxes, and that it is much easier to enforce drinking age laws when the sales people are state employees rather than private business people who might see drinking age laws as interference in thier pursuit of a livelyhood.

      It's not really a Stalinist policy. I doubt that anyone in these regions believe that the same system could be effectively applied to anything but addictive wares that will be in demand no matter who the seller might be.

      Personally, I'd rather be giving the profits from my liquor purchases to the state than having them take that amount from my paycheck (they take enough already).

      --
      Read, L
    5. Re:Get the hell out of Mississippi while you can by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

      So heroin is legal in Illinios? Interesting.

      --
      http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  68. This is a job for... by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds like a job for these guys

    1. Re:This is a job for... by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      Not that far from being possible considering that Cooter is a former Georgia congressman.

  69. Wasn't me by verloren · · Score: 1

    I brought up slashdot while waiting for a batch file to run to help me test the stock and distribution control system we're trying to release a patch for today.

    Quickly checks client list.

    Goes back to testing, unaffected but slightly rattled..

  70. +1 NOT flamebait on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    Is a lack of liquor for a few days really a crisis? If so, maybe there is a bigger problem than the state's computer woes.

    This is hardly flamebait. Who is it going to tempt into flaming? All the alcoholics who don't care about computers yet still for some inexplicable reason read /.?

    -- MaruksQ

  71. Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by cookie_cutter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We have a similar thing in Ontario, Canada. It has some interesting characteristics:

    Because the province buys all it's alcohol as a single buyer, it can demand, and gets, really awesome pricing deals; I believe about the lowest anywhere.

    However, the consumer doesn't see much of this benefit directly, because the price is jacked up so that it isn't really cheaper than any other place. Of course, the difference goes to the tax coffers, paying for social programs like medicine and education. I think it's a good deal.

    Also, I've never heard of any disaster like this one happening here. The cause isn't state control, it's having a single point of failure.

    1. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Does it go directly to the "Medicene and Education" coffers?

      I'd suspect just a small percentage of that does, and they pretty it up by saying "It's for medicine and education! You're not against medicine and education are you?"

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Of course, the difference goes to the tax coffers, paying for social programs like medicine and education

      Probably most of it goes to the union wage that is paid to the retail workers, all of whom are government employees. And the government taxes the snot out of alcohol anyway, so I'm not seeing the big benefit.

      Ontario: Better society through alcoholism!

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    3. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, the difference goes to the tax coffers, paying for social programs like medicine and education. I think it's a good deal.

      You make it sound like the Government can't tax privatised liquor distribution. I don't know about you but I think there are better things for my tax dollars to do than operate Provincially run liquor distribution centres & stores.

      Liquor was privatised in Alberta a while ago and quickly become a booming industry. The owners & employees of the privatised liquor store aren't living out of the pocket of the taxpayer and the tax the GoA collects goes to Provincial programs.
    4. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its the fact that americans are illiterate and can't write the orders down on paper in the mean time.

    5. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      The cause isn't state control, it's having a single point of failure.
      State control is the cause of there being a single point of failure. Without government-forced monopoly, there would be competition.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Few comments:

      - Worth mentioning that it's only the LCBO (Liquor Control Board of Ontario) that's similar: "The Beer Store" is owned by the four large breweries.

      - Also worth mentioning that the LCBO is the single largest purchases of alcoholic beverages on the planet.

      - The LCBO will try and source ANY alcoholic beverage for you! Not only this, but their product specialists at head office really are alcoholic drink afficinados....I had reason to ask them about absinthe once and they wrote me back an entire history of absinthe and told me what products they had available and how they were different to 'real' absinthe.

      So, the LCBO is pretty neat....I moved here from the UK and was stunned when I found out the province sold all the liquor ;-)

      -psy

    7. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      You make it sound like the Government can't tax privatised liquor distribution.

      If you simply tax liquor, that only serves to drive the cost up. With the system I outlined, the price stays the same, because the government buys in volume at low cost, sells to the consumer at the regular price, and then puts the difference towards the coffers. Both the consumer/citizen and the government win.

      The owners & employees of the privatised liquor store aren't living out of the pocket of the taxpayer

      No, because the liquor stores are profitable, they don't need any tax subsidization, but rather they generate money to supplement tax revenue. Hell, you can LOWER taxes, because the liquor stores generate supplemental revenue for the goverment.

    8. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Does it go directly to the "Medicene and Education" coffers?

      "We actually own less than half of the $8 billion Ontario beverage alcohol market "
      ...
      "When all taxes are added, LCBO last year generated $1.7 billion for government social programs, services and capital projects."

      from : LCBO web site
      So a bit less than 50% is not that small.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    9. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      State control is the cause of there being a single point of failure.

      True, in this case, but that doesn't mean you can't have a robust state controlled system without single points of failure.

    10. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by beyonddeath · · Score: 1

      but 19 years old... im going to calgary at xmas, guess what im stocking up on ... you guessed it... yup yup... only one more year till i can uh legally ... nevermind that im gonna shut my mouth now

    11. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Also worth mentioning that the LCBO is the single largest purchases of alcoholic beverages on the planet.

      Really? I always thought it was Diana Ross.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    12. Re:Ontario has the same thing, it's pro/con by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      LOL! That's some funny shit ;-)

      -psy

  72. don't be so quick on patches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope most understand this is one great reason why not to be so damn quick to install patches before testing them. That's why every system isnt always patched 100% on security stuff... it needs to be tested..

  73. States want their cut! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    After Prohibition was repealed, the amendment to repeal it left states with all sorts of extra power over sale of alchol. Many states [I live in Michigan] created state agencies to control liquor licenses, handle supply, set the prices, and collect taxes...making the state a monopoly on all alchol sales in it's boarders. Several years ago, Michigan disband their warehouses and went to an entirely paperwork based system...with several perfered wholesalers and no state "monopoly". Missisippi's system is fairly common.

    That said, it's just plain slopply business...like what you get with a state-run scheme. No sane business would hold up shipments of product because the computers didn't work! You wouldn't be in business very long using MS products! This is typical state-agency lording it's power over "citizens" rather than doing what it takes to fix the problem...be cause they just don't care...

  74. State mismanagement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an unfortunate fortunate occurrance for a state agency created to not promote drinking by taxing people for the hooch that they're so eager to sell.

  75. I live in Pennsylvania by whig · · Score: 1

    We have one of the more annoying Liquor Control Boards in the country, liquor can only be purchased at State Stores, etc.

    I sympathize with the people of Mississippi, but perhaps this will bring pressure against the state control of liquor distribution.

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
  76. Its a development project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just don't know they've been bought out by Microsoft. Their new net-perimeter scanning technology will sense which users have been infected, and booze will be shipped as part of the new "Painless Patching" program.
    A ploy to make worms more popular than iTunes?
    If you're extra lucky, your booze will have another worm in the bottle. Let's see Pepsi match that!

  77. It IS a crisis by Hamstaus · · Score: 1

    There are a ton of posts with uppity, sarcastic tones about how this can possibly be a crisis. I would like to point out that these posts are short-sighted and the posters are obviously not thinking before posting.

    If you own a pub, club, restaurant or booze store in the state, you have the potential to suffer serious business losses. Imagine the pub that has no beer. The rent and administration costs for pubs and clubs are astronomical... without anything to sell they will have serious problems.

    Imagine if you were in a retail business, and suddenly all of your suppliers stopped supplying. You are boned. If it's a large retail industry, a lot of people are boned. This is that exact situation. Hopefully it can be fixed in a short time before any serious losses are taken. If it stretches into weeks, then there are going to be lawsuits, I can almost guarantee it.

    --
    I moderate "-1, Fool"
    1. Re:It IS a crisis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you the "state" has made sure they have no lability by some law they passed. Only businessin the socalled "free world" have libality problems.

  78. Nightmare in Oxford with 'Bama in town. by Sans_A_Cause · · Score: 2

    This weekend is the Ole Miss-Alabama football game in Oxford. If we run out of beer, you are likely to read about riots on the front page of national newspapers. This might actually bring attention to our archaic, prohibition-era alcohol laws. Like, for example, only warm beer can be bought at stores and no alcohol sales on Sunday at all, unless you drive 15 miles across the county line, where you can buy all the cold beer you want on Sunday, but not wine or liquor.

    I will keep you posted from the front lines.

    1. Re:Nightmare in Oxford with 'Bama in town. by igorxa · · Score: 1

      fortunately, there was no beer shortage this weekend, as the abc filled all orders from last week. but if this isn't fixed soon, we could have shortages for the next three home games. and if we have no beer when lsu fans start to roll in, there may actually be a war. oh wait, maybe their won't be. maybe the lack of alcohol will actually make the lsu fans bearable....nahhhh

  79. But wait... by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

    I thought the admins were idiots if they didn't apply patches the instant they became available.

    --
    who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
  80. Only on slashdot.. by malverian · · Score: 0

    would the word "crisis" be used to define a shortage of alcohol.

    --
    You're just mad because the voices in your head talk to me.
  81. Typical Government by eberry · · Score: 1

    It's ok for the establishments and employees to lose money just so the state doesn't miss a drop of tax dollars.

    BTW, I did not RTFA!

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
  82. no beer... by jr87 · · Score: 1

    "No beer and no tv make homer go crazy." -Homer

  83. The Pub with No Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Australia, there is a good song about "The Pub with No Beer" - and in XXXX-land that's a major disaster!

  84. slashdotters demonstrate their ignorance by lotus87 · · Score: 1


    Of course the state controls the distribution of liquor. If they let it move in and out freely, how could they apply a sin tax to it? They'd have no way of knowing if the alcohol taxes being paid were correct.

    (Same applies for almost all sin taxes, cigarettes--tax sticker, gasoline-pump monitors, luxury cars-car dealers, etc.)

    What do you think this is a free country??

    1. Re:slashdotters demonstrate their ignorance by GoldenBB · · Score: 1

      Well, the people on Fox News seem to sing the praises of how free we are...but I usually feel like I'm living inside an America with many similarities to the low budget film "They Live." I can't seem to get it through many people's heads just how un-free and over-regulated America is. I wish it was as easy as issuing sunglasses...

  85. Well the state has the guns.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what do you expect?

  86. Drunk on the Job by killmeplease · · Score: 0

    They fired me. I got drunk on the job and put one to many pointer dereferences in my code. I gotta start working in a safer environment away from the booze.

    --
    - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
  87. The Horror by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    The Horror

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  88. The big question by abe_is_fun · · Score: 1

    Is this a Microsoft bug?
    OR an opensource bug?

    Sorry... the real question is where do I buy my beers?

    --
    I don't want to be here.
    1. Re:The big question by marklyon · · Score: 1

      I'm working that out now. I've got a call into the geeks at the ABC in order to find out what sort of technical environment this was operating in. So far, this is the closest thing to a technical rundown as I've found. But there are pictures of the new line (it was just installed and setup last month) here.

      --
      -- Mark Lyon http://www.marklyon.org
    2. Re:The big question by fuali · · Score: 1

      You know if it was, it would be plastered all over this story. So it's safe to say it was not.

  89. The fix is astonishingly trivial, if nontechnical by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Imagine if you were in a retail business, and suddenly all of your suppliers stopped supplying. You are boned. If it's a large retail industry, a lot of people are boned. This is that exact situation. Hopefully it can be fixed in a short time before any serious losses are taken. If it stretches into weeks, then there are going to be lawsuits, I can almost guarantee it.

    This problem can be fixed tonight or tommorow, via a very nontechnological route.

    The governor can call a special emergency session of the state legislature, who can repeal the idiotic law giving the state a monopoly control of a legal, commodity product and return the marketplace to where it belongs: the private sector.

    Of course, this would require a governor with character and a backbone, and a legislature that would put its state's economic needs ahead of its own porkbarrel projects, neither of which is likely.

    I say this as someone who is not a libertarian, and most definitely believes the government does have a responsibity to address those areas that capitalism is either incapable, or abysmally subpar, in addressing. Police services, military defense, public roads, public communications infrastructure, and healthcare come to mind immediately. Alcohol, on the other hand, clearly belongs in the private sector, along with legos, computers, automobiles, etc. Regulate it if you like (we do car safety, after all), but don't nationalize ("stateize"?) it for crying out loud.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  90. Dry state? by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    Damn, looks like prohibition all over again...

    This time due to software error rather than poor judgement by leaders trying to control a society that just wasn't enlightened enough... :-P

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  91. Why the state should not be involved by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

    This is a perfect example of why the state should not be involved in something like product distribution and why monopolies are bad. They have no incentive to do things right, do proper testing, etc. Instead its all the small business owners that get hurt.

    Ike

  92. Lost booze by BigT · · Score: 1

    They just installed a patch, and now a bunch of booze is getting "lost"?

    How much of that is getting delivered to the programmer's garage, do you suppose?

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  93. This is serious by harley_frog · · Score: 1

    Damn! And I live in Mississippi. I'd better run down and stock up on all the Jack Daniel's I can get. Knowing how things run in this state, it could be years before they get the problem fixed. But then again, I smell a potential market here . . . ;)

    --
    It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
  94. You know what makes me weep with joy? by Perdition · · Score: 1

    The simple fact that Mississippi got a mention on SlashDot for something other than teenage pregnancy, poverty, or crooked politics. I also want to take this opportunity to promote the Nissan Titan, a wonderful addition to anyone's full-size pickup comparison list. It's being built in Canton, MS, so go out and buy two, y'hear?

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    1. Re:You know what makes me weep with joy? by marklyon · · Score: 1

      Well thanks, but I don't really think becoming a primo example of why just-in-time distribution is dangerous is the image we want to get across.

      But I did learn we're #1 is something last night. Apparently, California has the 2nd highest taxes on businesses. Mississippi has a lock on 1st place.

      --
      -- Mark Lyon http://www.marklyon.org
    2. Re:You know what makes me weep with joy? by Perdition · · Score: 1

      I want to ask a serious question of you, if I may:
      Do you think that Mississippi's shortcomings (real and/or percieved) can be overcome (i.e. with progressive politics, revamped education, etc.) or is it merely a case of someone having to be last in line at the cafeteria? I mean, I find Mississippi pleasant enough of an environment, and most people I meet seem to be fairly happy with their lot in life here, so is there truly enough tangible improvements practically available to vault us as a state out of the basement, or are we merely the barrel-bottom indicator of American statehood?

      --
      Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    3. Re:You know what makes me weep with joy? by marklyon · · Score: 1

      No, I do think Mississippi can be improved, but in order to do so we're going to have to give up a lot of the things we don't carefully examine today.

      We need to reduce, at least by half, the number of counties in the state. Such a large number of redundant services stretches our budget too thin. We then need to centralize many of the services we currently provide. We also need to cut back on services. By finding alternatives to some of our programs, privatizing others, and dropping the ones that have outlived their need, we can reduce the burden on the citizens and allow the state to be a welcoming place to business and industrial growth.

      --
      -- Mark Lyon http://www.marklyon.org
    4. Re:You know what makes me weep with joy? by Perdition · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you've given me a lot to think about. It's very true to state that Mississippi is a bit underpopulated to have so many counties and other heirarchies stepping on each other's toes to provide basic services, but how the hairy heck will you get the state to reduce (combine?) counties? Will they be combined in function, but not in name? For instance, I live in Lee county. Should we, in a sense, join with Webster or Itawamba in services, while retaining our geographical (map) names?

      --
      Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  95. Just read the related links text by caluml · · Score: 1

    The related links almost read like a complete story by itself.
    Saves on having to read all the actual articles.

    Mississippi's
    Alcohol Beverage Control division
    shutdown
    indefinite
    will fulfill
    stock
    unable to order

    There. Any questions?

  96. Mississippi uses linux by poptones · · Score: 1
    Wrong, trollboy. While it's certain there are MS boxes involved, Mississippi has been one of the LEADING states in migrating to open source software - including linux.

    So, maybe we should throw some lame linux jokes in here? After all, if the software has problems you can bet this case will make it into the next round of windows propoganda.

  97. Texas by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

    Thank god I live in Texas ;)

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  98. Re:The fix is astonishingly trivial, if nontechnic by Hamstaus · · Score: 1

    I agree with your post completely, except for the part about it being trivial to do. An emergency meeting of the state legislature would not be trivial, nor would the amount of effort needed to convince the legislature that this is the appropriate course of action. It would be difficult to make this come around, but maybe a situation like this will be a catalyst.

    --
    I moderate "-1, Fool"
  99. The Sysadmins are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Damn Yankees!

  100. three words by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1

    Too. Much. Regulation.

  101. Here's some more information. by LoRider · · Score: 1

    Here is an article titled "Firm's attempt to down hyperlinks an attack on free speech, says EFF" which discusses how Diebold is using the DMCA to force ISP's to remove links to internal memos that were leaked regarding Diebold's crappy software and business practices. You can read the internal memos, for now, here.

    --
    LoRider
    1. Re:Here's some more information. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >You can read the internal memos

      Where?

      That page leads to 404 links. Maybe information wants to be free, but this information seems to want to be 404.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  102. Best US history book picture ever by op00to · · Score: 1

    Oh, this cursed OGRABME!

  103. what is a state doing selling it anyway? Stupid by chfriley · · Score: 1

    What is a state doing selling it anyway? Sheesh. Stupid.

  104. Damn Revenuers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always screwin things up. Good thin' me an my cousins gots da still in da barn.

  105. Coding around the stash? by coene · · Score: 1

    See, this is what happens when you let bored, lonely coders work around a stash of hard liquor... Maybe Mississippi will learn a lesson?

    Or better yet, maybe Microsoft will take a note from this before such a disaster happens over there... Wait, that already happened, and it was called Windows ME.

  106. Re:The fix is astonishingly trivial, if nontechnic by rco3 · · Score: 1

    Err.... no.

    The cause of the problem *can* be fixed, although it won't be. However, the symptoms cannot be. Sure, you could make it legal for alternative suppliers who are no longer under state control to supply the booze - but there aren't any. Not in Mississippi, that is. Not any with booze in stock.

    So even if the state of Mississippi told me I could start supplying all the booze in the world to all the bars I care to, I don't have the booze to give 'em. Nor does anyone else... except the state beverage control board. And we're back to square one.

    It's a great argument for decentralization of beverage sales, but this is Mississippi. Freedom of MS's citizens to drink what or when they want isn't high on the state govt's list of priorities, unfortunately. I was really annoyed, once, trying to find a drink after midnight in Meridien. Had to drive to Alabama.

    Hey, dj'a hear the one about the Alabamian who moved to Mississippi? Raised the IQ of both states.

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  107. prepare for the mass exodus from Mississippi... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...as people finally sober up and realize they live in a shithole of a state.

    Yes, this is a Troll, but when it comes to the state of Mississippi, I just can't help myself! Jed, move away from there!

  108. Re:The fix is astonishingly trivial, if nontechnic by rco3 · · Score: 1

    Note, of course, that I meant it can't be *quickly* fixed. Not overnight. Might take a few days or so.

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  109. The Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like this system couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery...

  110. Actually, $1.7 billion towards the coffers by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
    Probably most of it goes to the union wage that is paid to the retail workers

    Last year it generated $1.7 billion dollars towards government programs, and note that's after costs.

    1. Re:Actually, $1.7 billion towards the coffers by s20451 · · Score: 1

      You know ... Canada is probably the only western democracy I've ever seen where you can only buy liquor at government-approved stores (Alberta and Quebec excepted, of course). In Europe and the US, you can get wine at the grocery store. In Japan, there are beer-vending machines on every corner.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:Actually, $1.7 billion towards the coffers by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      Canada is probably the only western democracy I've ever seen where you can only buy liquor at government-approved stores

      I believe Sweden has a similar system.

  111. Might actually be a good thing by slapout · · Score: 1

    Oh no. Those poor people will have to go around sober for a few days.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  112. Serious issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a programmer, I'm shocked that any developers would allow such a bug to get into the alcohol distribution channels. I could understand errors in flight navigation or life support systems; but in alcohol distribution systems! Oh, the humanity...

  113. One for the rest of the British readers out there: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about not being able to organise a piss up in a brewery ...

  114. What happened to? by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    their Disaster Recovery process?

    This is one of the most fundimental plans that must be tested every 12 months. Fitted with scenerios such as this one.

    An organisation with so much clout as the Alcohol Beverage Control division, they should have enough money to keep at least *one* person looking at it. Shame on them!

    Crashing systems by applying updates to software, where it be OS or App is nothing new and certainly can happen on any artitechture.

    It also doesn't help that slashdot has created another problem, slashdotting their webserver! :)

    Ahhh, thank goodness I keep a stock pile in my cellar, now, where was I......

  115. A still? by jmorse · · Score: 1

    Maybe Missippi will devolve into an antiquated culture where people make their own whisky by setting up stills in their backyards.

    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
  116. Be prepared! by El · · Score: 1

    Always keep at least a 2 year supply of alcohol in case of emegencies! (This is easier for some people than others. For me, a two-year supply is about a six-pack.)

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  117. Wow by doormat · · Score: 1

    No wonder america is so screwed up, we got the govt controlling booze in 18 states. How bass-ackwards are you people to let the govt control something it has no business doing. Do all cigarrette packs go through govt warehouses to get taxed and resold? Do all cars? Why is alcohol so special?

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  118. Doesn't this mean their IT department are idiots? by El · · Score: 1

    Don't cluefull people generally do a phased introduction of new software, i.e. run in the lab for a couple weeks, then install it on a few servers to see how it works before putting the entire state on the new system?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  119. Taking my manager's advice by El · · Score: 1

    At least we've established that the Mississippi ABC is "eating their own dog food"!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  120. Those Mississippi Niggers are going to get mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No liquor makes a mean nigger. I expect an explosion of burr head crackheads however.

    Mississippi is a nice state, only problem is too many niggers. They should buy them all one-way bus tickets to New York and San Francisco.

  121. Don't fret.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Mississippians...Snowman and the Bandit will have a shipment of cold vertical refreshment heading your way...unless the infamous Buford T. Justice gets his way...

  122. Re:Trollkore - The Second Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she grunts like an ape.

    That's because that was a real ape, you dimwit!

  123. why you might care. by twitter · · Score: 1
    • Highlights the stupidity of central control and many laws. Would it not be great to be able to order a case of good wine from a French vinyard instead?
    • If it's M$, yawn, we all know better. Still, it's fun to say that M$ has finally defeated free beer in one US state.
    • If it's propriatory Unix, there's another lesson in it.
    • If it's free software, a speedy fix will be a great relief to all concerned.
    • If you are stuck in Mississippi, you may care. Then again, some people don't drink, they sniff glue instead.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:why you might care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this post highligths your stupidity, to boot.

  124. Antitrust law? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Maybe the citizens should sue the government under the Sherman Anti Trust Act?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  125. new? by twitter · · Score: 1
    No lawmaker is going to be without booze. They'll (attempt) to fix it with some new law, or something.

    Who needs a new law while the old still is working? Silly boy, where did you get name like the Above?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  126. Mississippi and home brewing? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I might have the state wrong, this is a vague memory. I remember that many states have home brewing somewhat regulated and taxed, where if you bottle your own beer for example you must purchace offical state taxed caps for the beverage in question.

    This is about as high tech as a piece of paper, but never the less doesn't require much in the way of software to maintain. In the event of major failure in the system, you can resort to lower tech means do to your accounting until such time you can get your accounting software back online and working.

    While this would wouldn't nessicarly help those who import from other states, a simple tag across the cap that is broken upon opening it would do the trick as well. Can you bypass this, sure! But it's a hell of alot better then the "let's just not allow new booze to be sold till we get our software fixed".

    Very low tech... requires only printing of specific ammounts, printers are more then happy to handle this aspect.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  127. Misconceptions about ABC. by animeit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought I'd correct some facts about this topic. The majority of systems in Mississippi use MS office and server products, not Linux (unfortunately). In my opinion the MIS directors and Systems administors are not the best informed (or experienced for that matter), causing the problems we're seeing now. MS government is NOT migrating to open source, quite the contrary. Mississippi is a dry State. Only counties which have elected to be 'wet' sell liquor. It's a real pain if you live in a wet county and there are plenty of them here. Of course, beer isn't affected by this debacle as there are private distributors for anything with an alcohol content 6% or less. Alcohol purchase in Alabama is a hell of a lot more expensive than in Mississippi. That's why they come over here to get their bottles. It's not true that our liquor stores get great prices on liquor. Every liquor store in MS pays 7% State tax and an additional 7% excise tax on every case AND it's paid in advance. You also have to pay the city content tax to boot. And most of that tax money is spent by the MS Division of Medicaid. Certainly the most liberal and program rich of nearly every State in the US. It is true. The majority of liquor business are mom and pop operations. You don't like hearing from a State official that you 'need to purchase at least three weeks of liquor because we're going to be down for a MINIMUM of three weeks and maybe six.' If you've been to some of the liquor stores around here, you know they don't have that kind of cash to outlay. Just for a couple weeks worth of stock we're talking up to $10,000 or more for a small store. Yes folks, I'm one of those pissed off people.

  128. OWNAGE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA!! Dude... you got OWNED!!!!!

  129. debugging the Mississippi Code of 1972 by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

    Here's a fix:

    # "67-1-41. (1) The State Tax Commission is hereby created a wholesale distributor and
    # seller of alcoholic beverages, not including malt liquors, within the State of Mississippi.
    # It is granted the sole right to import and sell such intoxicating liquors at wholesale within
    # the state, and no person who is granted the right to sell, distribute or receive such
    # liquors at retail shall purchase any such intoxicating liquors from any source other than
    # the commission except as authorized in subsections (4) and (9), provided that retailers
    # and consumers may purchase native wines directly from the producer."

  130. In the south, loss of booze is not a crisis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bedding down my sister, now that's a crisis.

  131. I was on the team that developed the website by Harrakis · · Score: 1

    I was on the team that developed the website for online ordering. MS is running an AS400 backbone to the system, with a linux box as the web server. I am no longer involved with the company that supports them, and neither are the two other programers. If you want to complain to the company that supports them send an email to lim@sparco.com or sparco@sparco.com.

    1. Re:I was on the team that developed the website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this is bold. But yeah everybody send an email to lim@sparco.com and sparco@sparco.com .

      Maybe if enough people complain they'll actaully develop decent software, for once.

      Oh and they're really not even suppose to have written the software to begin with.

  132. cram it, Bruce by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Mr. Perens, I honestly generally have a ton of respect for you, but on this, I have to say, "Cram it some place dark!"

    Sorry for being crude.

    Seriously, I drink. I drink often. I drink responsibly. I don't drink and drive, etc. If I can't drink because my government screwed up, that pisses me off, just like when I can't do $foo when my government screws up.

    But the real problem here is not the people who possibly can't drink for a couple days, not a big deal, and if it is maybe it's time for AA, the real problem here is the loss of business due to ridiculous government regulation and incompetence.

    BTW, if you don't care, don't post... The fact that you did makes me think you have something against alcohol, and perhaps people who drink. Well, Bruce, I have always respected you, but I drink.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  133. Oh, no! by $ASANY · · Score: 1
    "Geeks are preventing me from getting my six pack!"

    I'd hate to be there. Closet Luddites don't need anywhere near that degree of provocation. Really.

  134. The Bible belt, huh? by saihung · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a good thing that Jesus turned the water into iced tea.

  135. socialism AND capitalism have their place by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
    Canada gets away with schemes like this because it's big enough to be an irrestistable market (even at controlled prices), but small enough so that it's lack of participation doesn't impair the capitalist drive to excell

    But Canada does have a very healthy liquor industry.

    A government-controlled pricing system that works because a larger, foreign, capitalist economy funds all the R&D for the products.

    Many people try to take the capitalism vs. socialism as an all or nothing choice; they think that either capitalism makes sense in all cases, or socialism does. In reality, they both have there place.

    Capitalism makes sense when an industry or product has not matured, and the competition to find the best product/business model results in important new developments which the consumers can then select for. However, once a product or service has been optimized, competition doesn't really bear any fruit, and it's just fighting for fighting's sake, which wastes alot of time, energy and money because no new developments are coming from it; in this case, it makes sense for all involved parties to get together and establish an orderly system which benefits the most people; basically, a social union.

    While minor innovations continue to be made in liquor, just as in any other industry, I think that it's fair to say that the product has matured, and the new innovations are just window-dressing. Therefore, it makes sense to not get involved in the competition, and accept a system which let's the optimized product(s) do the most good.

    If you disagree, you must explain why it makes sense for companies to compete, wasting a lot of time and resources, when the product is already optimized, and no new developments will be made.

    1. Re:socialism AND capitalism have their place by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      But Canada does have a very healthy liquor industry.

      Part of the continental and global markets, both as customers, and as competitors. Their business practices are constrained by US industrial behavior. Potential rivals in Illinois keep them honest.

      If you disagree, you must explain why it makes sense for companies to compete, wasting a lot of time and resources, when the product is already optimized, and no new developments will be made.

      Because if one company has no competitors, new developments will be made... to its profit margins. Prices will rise or quality will fall. Maybe both.

      Look at the US soft-drink industry. The products it makes were arguably perfected anytime between 60 and 30 years ago. Yet there's still 2 major companies, and 50 small ones. Each acts as quality-control and price-control on the others.

      (Sadly, a distressingly amount of the largest firms' reinvestment dollars go to marketing & promotion, areas that harm customers. But it is the publics' own fault for succeptibility to advertising)

      And of course, there's always the other rejoinder that "no more developments to be made" is something that'll happen to no industry until it's obselete and dead.

  136. Another announcement from MS-ABC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their web site is having trouble dealing with distraught thirsty /. geeks.

  137. Bad Software and Bad Jokes by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a software problem, not an alcohol problem! And some ignoramus has no idea what AA is! This could happen in any industry, and for those of you who have never worked with JIT, it means placing an order far enough ahead so that the product arrives just before you run out of inventory; sometimes weeks in advance.

    The real question here is "How do you test software to simulate a real world system without putting it on the system and then finding problems?"

  138. Newsflash... by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

    Ugly Mississippi women can't get laid. Early morning Trailer park auto accident rates down.

  139. New York has these state-run liquor stores? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell are you talking about? I've lived in various parts of New York for several years now, I've never seen a state-owned liquor store around these parts.

  140. Oh -really-? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    VAG is Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (think Inc. or Ltd.), not Volkswagen Audi Group.

    Oh -really-? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q =%22Volkswagen+Audi+Group%22&btnG=Google+Searc h

    Sorry bud, I've been an Audi enthusiast for 10+ years and I've never heard anyone call the parent company anything but "Volkswagen Audi Group". I suppose it's possible after the recent buying spree they changed it, but most people still call it the 'old' name.

    1. Re:Oh -really-? by RobKow · · Score: 1

      Yes, really. A common mistake, but still a mistake.

      VW GmbH became VW AG in '60, 5 years before the first "Audi" model was ever produced.

  141. Arnold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  142. Medical care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why the government should be in control of the medical industry also.....

  143. Free Beer by rfg · · Score: 1

    If this works out right, maybe we can all get
    Free Beer!

  144. Crisis? by menscher · · Score: 1
    So.. what's the crisis?

    I knew people act stupid when they drink, but acting stupid because you can't drink?

  145. Hot tub reboot by LauraW · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine once had to reboot his hot tub. He noticed that the air jets in the tub were running constantly, then realized that the tub was way too hot beause the heater wasn't shutting off. Apparently its computer was smart enough to turn on the jets because that cools down the water, but it had gotten stuck in a state where it couldn't just turn off the heater. None of the controls worked. He had to pull the plug, let it rest for a while, and then plug it back in. Problem solved!

  146. would never happen in a free market by GoldenBB · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine such a thing happening if alcoholic beverage distribution was not centrally controlled? How many times does the world have to re-learn the same lesson about the state and its inability to provide goods and services? I hope this incident spurns a call for market reforms.

  147. Fewer Drunk Driving and Spousal Abuse Cases? by Bishop923 · · Score: 1

    Would be interesting to find if the lack of new alcohol sales over a period of days will affect the number of Drunk Driving and Spousal Abuse cases.

    Maybe a few lives will be saved this weekend.

  148. Time to think about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This piece of software seems to be the key to all the booze biz in town. This is a 24/7 operation on which the whole state depends. I do not know what these people were thinking.

    I suggest they take these few days(or weeks?!) of sobriety to really think about how to make sure this never happens again and alcohol is distributed promptly to the good people who really need it.

  149. WTF is the state by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    doing running the alcohol industry ?!?! Too much inbreeding going on down there....

    *listens for banjo music*

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  150. You are a nigger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe you're Bruce Perens?

    1. Re:You are a nigger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Michael - no, I'm actually none of the above. But thanks for asking.

  151. So does that translate to.. by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

    ..Haley Barbour or the other guy? I live in Memphis and we've been bombarded with the (rather dirty, I think) ad campaigns for the MS gubernatorial race. Happy to see MS get a mention on Slashdot, but sort of curious about the politics down there.

    Y'all have one thing going for you, at least - the casinos! We've just finally gotten around to approving a state lottery, and it's supposed to be up and running in Q1 04. Maybe a bit more of TN money will stay in TN, but I hope not to the detriment of MS.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  152. Re:Doesn't this mean their IT department are idiot by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
    Don't cluefull people generally do a phased introduction of new software, i.e. run in the lab for a couple weeks, then install it on a few servers to see how it works before putting the entire state on the new system?
    Not when the break room is stocked with free Grey Goose in the freezer instead of free Mountain Dew in the fridge...
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  153. Re:The fix is astonishingly trivial, if nontechnic by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    Note, of course, that I meant it can't be *quickly* fixed. Not overnight. Might take a few days or so.

    No, overnight will do. The state warehouse apparently said they would supply extra product before shutting down. The end-user businesses say they can't afford to pay for the extra product to carry them for a couple of weeks; I say that any reasonably profitable small business (or even large business) should be able to arrange a short-term loan from their friendly neighbourhood bank to cover the cost of the extra product.

    I don't know why no-one else has picked up on this.

    Any reasonable business should be able to arrange a loan for a few thousand dollars for a few weeks. If your business isn't sufficiently credit-worthy for this, then you have greater problems than a shut-down of the state liquor warehouse.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  154. waitjustaminutenow by timothy · · Score: 1

    "The cause isn't state control, it's having a single point of failure."

    I think I can identify a single point of failure here :)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  155. Hmmm.... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    A software update applied to the inventory and ordering software last week is malfunctioning, causing orders and inventory to be lost or misrouted

    Ok, so where is the party?

  156. Montgomery County Maryland has this by mekkab · · Score: 1

    You can buy beer and wine anywhere else, but for the Haad Licka' (trans: Hard Liquor) You GOTTA buy from the DLC. And they are closed on Sundays. Given the way I currently live, I have a liquor cabinet. When I'm running low, I'll make a note to go out and buy. So this is a decent set up for how I live now.

    But how I lived in college, that would have been COMPTELEY unacceptable! Thank god you could get haad licka up to 2 am on Greenmount in Bal'mer.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  157. Have you ever heard of MIT?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever heard of MIT?!?
    Mississippi Institute of Technology!!!

  158. Problem = Monopoly, not JIT or software by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The problem is that the state is running alcohol distribution as a monopoly, and it's not competent at it, and it doesn't have competitors who can either do a better job or at least do a worse job but fail at different times. You'll also find that in most US states with state-run liquor monopolies that there's a limited selection of products available compared to the "regulated and corrupt but more flexible" oligopolies in states like Florida and the actual free markets like (well, not quite any of them, but many are close.) One of the fundamental reasons that the Soviet Union fell is that without a real market mechanism, they weren't able to make good economic decisions, because central planners never have adequate data or adequate competence.

    This is somewhat of a California-centric perspective - we may have state-dominated incompetent quasi-monopolies for minor little things like electricity, but on important stuff like wine you've got a really wide choice. Now, that's also because we have the climate to do good winemaking, while most of Mississippi's is better for making liquor and various kinds of hooch (:-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  159. Honestly, by fasura · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that in Mississippi there is only one organisation responsible for shipping alcohol. I know yanks have a backwards attitude to alcohol but that seems positively stupid.

    --
    -- Be careful what you say. Someone might remind you about it another day.
  160. Homebrew anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess its the only way to beat this crazy system.

    Get brewing!

    http://brewery.org

    Cinnamon

  161. absinthe by arete · · Score: 1

    you couldn't perhaps forward me that, could you? It sounds neat.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  162. Sadly, the Open Source alternative is... by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    ...no longer being developed. The GNU.FREE author mentions another incident in his explanation of why he stopped development:

    "The final straw was a book by Greg Palast, "The best democracy money can buy", which in one chapter explained how the Republicans had stolen tens of thousands of votes in Florida. The details are arduous, but in essence a sub-contractor used to clean the electoral roll was the cover for the illegitimate removal of a large number of Democrat voters. This was shocking enough, but the fact the Palast had to come all the way to the UK to get the story published in the independently funded BBC and Guardian newspaper truly drove me crazy."

    = 9J =