Slashdot Mirror


Swarthmore Students Keep Diebold Memos Online

An anonymous reader submits "Two student groups based out of Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania announced today that they are rejecting Diebold Elections Systems' cease-and-desist orders and are initiating an electronic civil disobedience campaign that will ensure permanent public access to the controversial leaked memos. You can read the memos, search the memos, or download the memos."

402 comments

  1. Uh, just stick em on freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or host them in another country, and you'll always have access to them.

    1. Re:Uh, just stick em on freenet by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could but then *no one* would be able to download them. :P

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:Uh, just stick em on freenet by phatlipmojo · · Score: 1

      Actually, why not post this on FreeRepublic? Once those psychos get ahold of this, it'll only be a matter of time before Limbaugh mobilizes his army to shut down the possible takeover of the government by liberal hackers...

      --

      Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
    3. Re:Uh, just stick em on freenet by Anonumous+Coward · · Score: 1

      OK then, here.

  2. Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet Diebold just posted it too slashdot too destroy it (servers dead with one post)...

    damn there creative

    1. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Servers were dead during the "subscriber special", too.

    2. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it should be called the Slashddos effect?

    3. Re:Slashdotted by KU_Fletch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot: The Open Source Alternative to Cease and Desist Orders

      --
      It's not stupid. It's advanced.
    4. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet Diebold knows the difference between too,to, there, and they're.

    5. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus eye hoap you're speling wuz a joak

    6. Re:Slashdotted by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      Well, whatever has happened, no gots on the documents.

      Quoth the server, 404

  3. Permanent public access? Not for long! by mfago · · Score: 2, Funny

    Permanent public access? Linking from slashdot may be less than beneficial in the short term...

    1. Re:Permanent public access? Not for long! by saden1 · · Score: 1

      Well the news is out there now so why has their so why did their stock go up? I'd imagine as soon as the general news media jumps on this they are screwed. I say their stock drops to 30 within two weeks.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    2. Re:Permanent public access? Not for long! by thogard · · Score: 0

      When a /. story happens, you can buy puts on a stock and then get calls a few hours latter. What happens is the price takes a tumble and then the auto systems decide the price is right to buy and the large mutual funds buy enough to push the price up. The reverse can happen on good news as well. Aren't you glad all your retirement funds are in systems that are so well thought out?

  4. Well you could anyway by coolmacdude · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You can read the memos, search the memos, or download the memos.

    That is, until they were posted to the Slashdot homepage.

    --

    -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  5. Mirrors needed by setzman · · Score: 1

    Wow 0.19 of 11 MB downloaded, average is 0.0k per second. This will take a while. Does anyone have a mirror up yet?

    --
    C:\>
    1. Re:Mirrors needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirrors here or here or here.

    2. Re:Mirrors needed by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Use the torrent files! This is the kind of thing torrent was made for. I'm currently pulling at 305kB/s.

      OK, now I'm not. It finished in the ammount of time it took me to write this.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    3. Re:Mirrors needed by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Like the other guy said, try a torrent download.

      Anyway, apparently Why War? is keeping some mirrors in their back pocket in case Diebold starts throwing lawyers at existing mirrors.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  6. How to Help Us - 3 Steps by mykawhite · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can have a real effect on what is going to happen. Please take a few minutes to help us out with this action.

    Here's how to help:

    1) The students engaging in this civil disobedience are meeting with the Dean of their college Wednesday, October 22nd at 4pm. We need you to email *nice* and *supportive* emails to rgross1 (at) swarthmore.edu and cc them to info (at) why-war.com *before* October 22nd at 4pm EST. Please help Dean Bob Gross understand the importance of this issue!

    2) Download the entire memo archive:
    http://why-war.com/memos/s/lists.tgz

    3) Join the disobedience by hosting the memos and posting the URL in this thread

    SCDC: http://scdc.emegaweb.net/
    Why War?: http://www.why-war.com/

    1. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

      If you would like to send me them through some other means since I can no longer download them, I will host them on 2 different mirrors. contact me at coolmacguyosx@cox.net

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
    2. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by metlin · · Score: 1

      You can have a real effect on what is going to happen. Please take a few minutes to help us out with this action.

      I think we just _did_ have some very real and very visible effect :)

    3. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by mykawhite · · Score: 5, Informative

      Email info (at) why-war.com if you are willing to mirror the files.

    4. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

      Damn, I think the whole swarthmore domain is hosed.
      Currently downloading from that alt link at 4.2k/sec.

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
    5. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by herrvinny · · Score: 2, Informative

      My email:

      Dear Mr. Gross,

      I am writing to you in support of the students at why-war.com, mirroring the memos of Diebold. They are doing a service to this country by keeping those memos in one place, so everyone can see how flawed Diebold machines are. If you read up on the issues of Diebold voting machines, you will see that they have numerous problems keeping track of votes, eg recording a NEGATIVE 16,000 votes for Gore in contested Florida. If you require more information, I am a very qualified computer programmer and would be glad to go over specifics with you. Please consider me at your service in this issue. Thank you.

      Signed,

      Vinny

      Short and sweet. They're going to receive at least thousands of emails, why not make it easier on their mail servers? After all, they do have to deal with spam as well...

    6. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      DAMN that's the fast, I'm getting ~2.02kB/s from my univ :(

      Though, once I get it, I'll mirror it of course.

    7. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      BITTORRENT

      BITTORRENT

      BITTORRENT

      BITTORRENT

      !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Is this stuff on Freenet yet? (Then no one will see it.... :-) )

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's the penalty for ignoring a cease-and-decist anyway? I bet it's not as heavy as a buldozer, but it's the same kinda deal.

      I don't think there is one per se. It's simply that they can't claim that you were unaware of any party being injured by posting the memos. Since they're probably going to argue that there is overwhelming public interest in these being posted, and this is greater than Diebold's need for copyright protection.

    9. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by goon+america · · Score: 1

      How big is a .torrent file?

    10. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

      Now it keeps timing out.

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
    11. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13% downloaded now, will mirror it tomorrow. Look for a link either here or in a JE.

    12. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by jonabbey · · Score: 4, Informative

      A torrent file is tiny.. only a few k, at most. The problem is that a torrent is useless unless you have someone ready to seed the file that matches the torrent. Clients start downloading the file from the initial seed, and quickly get enough bits of the file that they are capable of serving pieces to other downloaders. Rather quickly, there are enough chunks outside of the original server that the load should drop on the initial server.

      At least, so long as people are continuously downloading/uploading the file. If everyone who downloads the file shuts off their bittorrent client when the download is complete, the original seed system may wind up being the only one providing the file.. as soon as that happens, you're back to square one, effectively.

    13. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by knobmaker · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Hey, if hippie-wannabes piss you off more then rigged elections, may I suggest you move immediately to someplace more in accord with your philosophy? Red China, maybe? Hardly any hippie-wannabes and plenty of rigged elections.

      It's a win-win deal. You'll be happier, and the rest of us, who worry more about who's going to lead us than who has a politically incorrect haircut, will be happier without you.

    14. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by webtre · · Score: 1
      --
      litigious bastards
      suck it sco!
    15. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by omega_224 · · Score: 1

      There's an additional complication, if a fellow Swarthmore student may add a few words. We don't have P2P access as of earlier today due to continuous networking issues, so someone besides a why-war or SSDC member will have to seed it off campus and subject their server to a slashdotting. Good luck, guys. I guess it's time to find out if this college's grand civil disobedience tradition will carry over into the internet.

    16. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody there has a dialup connection? My university blocked P2P apps (actually, they're rate-limited to around 100 bytes/second), so I keep a dialup connection going 24/7 just for BitTorrent. We get free call forwarding, so I just send my calls to my roommate's phone.

      It has the nice bonus of tying up an external phone line, which costs the university money but doesn't break any rules - if more people did this, it might become clear to them that it's cheaper to give each student 56 kbit/s for P2P apps than to pay for extra phone lines.

    17. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by CComMack · · Score: 1

      The phone system at Swarthmore a PBX system; makes it a little harder to have a dial-up connection. (Not quite impossible, I know, but a definite hassle to students who wear T-shirts that bear the college logo and the slogan "Guilt Without Sex".)

      The easier solution is to get it mirrored off-campus.

    18. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirror in Canada:

      http://www3.telus.net/swix/list.tar.bz2

      -Ryan Daw

    19. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by wahmuk · · Score: 1
      Three more steps:

      1) I have the file in a Kazaa shared folder.

      2) I have the file in an eMule (eDonkey) shared folder.

      3) I'm seeding the torrent. The tracker is having issues.

      I'm on DSL, currently passing about 100KB/sec. My wife will complain that I'm sucking up all the bandwidth when she checks her mail in the morning, but she'll get over it.

      On a slightly different note - we're both working Nov 4 as tech support on these very machines. We go for "training and testing" on Oct 31. We plan on asking some rather embarrassing questions during this "training", but sadly, not enough to jeopardize the obscene amount of money they've threatened us with. Expect an update.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me!
    20. Re: How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirror:

      Die Bold Memos, bzip2

      This will be up for only a day or so. Be nice to the DSL line.

    21. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by DragoonAK · · Score: 1

      A BitTorrent of the lists exists at http://www.emptylogic.com/suprnova/torrents/451/li sts.tgz.torrent.
      Seeding's easy.

    22. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      a poor quality PDF of the book about Diebold fraud exists too. http://suprnova.sptorrents.org/torrents/453/BLACKB OXVOTING.torrent.


      also, copy of diebold voting software! http://suprnova.sptorrents.org/torrents/452/GEMSIS .torrent.


      if copyright protects fraud like this, fuck copyright!

    23. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      mirror: http://mica.nfshost.com/Diebold/lists.tar.bz2

    24. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      temporary mirror 100mbit

      http://64.186.152.69

    25. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penalty for ignoring a cease and desist? For someone who throws advice and criticism around so freely, so seem to know so little.

      I can get my lawyer to whip uo a "cease and desist" letter telling you to stop posting your moronic opinions on slashdot. What's the penalty for ignoring that? Just because a scumbag lawyer's name is on the letterhead doesn't mean it is has the backing of the law.

    26. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swarthmorians fuck Bryn Mawr girls. Go Fords!

    27. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should have read: Swarthmorons fuck nasty Bryn Mawr fatasses. Go jump off the belltower, Swattie!

    28. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing like a good old rigged election to take care of those long haired hoodlums, right? Because we all know it's more important to take care of the bleeding hearts than to have a fair, transparent election process.

      Maybe we should put armed thugs outside the polling stations so that we can take care of the riff raff who try to vote? Hell, then we could make sure the queers, women, negros, Irish, chinks, reds, hippies, et. al. won't go screwing up your precious rigged elections.

      Could you possibly have posted something stupider? Or, can your perceived IQ actually drop into the negative numbers?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    29. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it's set up by an idiot, and only if you're an idiot.

    30. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by wavelet · · Score: 1

      The torrent has 126 seeds now. I downloaded at 126K/s

    31. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it's not as heavy as a buldozer, but it's the same kinda deal.

      Oh, that's nice. Disrespecting the dead. Real classy, asshole.

    32. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not use kazaa and or emule? That is the stated purpose of these file sharing services... This is a perfect use of them.

      L8,
      AC

    33. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by connorbd · · Score: 1

      I'd mod this one Funny, actually...

      "My country: Fix it or leave it."

      I like it. 'Bout time someone came up with a counter to ignorant-conservative rhetoric like that.

    34. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Better yet, freenet. This is what freenet is for.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    35. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      I readily acknowledge that my post should have been much different linguistically to better convey the point I wanted to make, you hightlight a part of what I was trying to get at.

      If there is no reprecussions from ignoring a cease and decist (and I don't think there are in this case, 1st amendment and all) then how does it get labeled "civil disobedience"?

  7. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost made it.

    Better luck next time, kiddo!

  8. Indymedia by Augusto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Earlier this week, the Electronic Frontier Foundation announced that it will defend the right of Online Privacy Group, the Internet service provider for San Francisco Indymedia,

    Is this the same Indymedia which consists of "stories" posted by raving lunatics that try to pass their most rabid conspiracy theories as legitimate news items? If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Indymedia by rossz · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with you. The concept of indymedia seemed like a good idea, but in practice it ends up being the Weekly World News and the Aryan Brotherhood Newsletter (or whatever it's called) combined.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    2. Re:Indymedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's a thought, since you are fully aware of the biases of both, why not just read them both with the biases in mind, and form your own opinion?

    3. Re:Indymedia by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is this the same Indymedia which consists of "stories" posted by raving lunatics that try to pass their most rabid conspiracy theories as legitimate news items?

      Sounds kind of like Slashdot.

      If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

      1) The open newswire you blast is handled differently on different IMCs. Some sites have an iron-fisted editorial policy, while others are practically free-for-alls. Since the newswire clerks tend to be activists familiar with being ignored and shouted down, the topic of censorship and editorial control is always sensitive. I've argued for a looser editorial policy in some cases, and I've argued for a harder line on crap in others. Read the mailing lists sometime--a lot of people who spend time working on an IMC or two share similar concerns about the unsourced, unsubstantiated crap that some people post as news. Unfortunately, it's hard to argue that such stuff should be immediately hidden when corporate and state media sources post similarly unsourced or half-cocked news with a hardline editorial policy.

      2) One person's wacko conspiracy theory is another person's reality. Mind you, this does not excuse some of the greater excesses of the tinfoil hat crowd (the whole "plane didn't hit the Pentagon" crap is so blatantly factless I have to wonder if it's someone's idea of a joke, or a lame COINTELPRO plant, for one example). However, the term "conspiracy theory" seems to be aimed at practically any argument that challenges conventional wisdom, instead of being reserved for the truly raving shit. I actually feel better letting those we view as nutters present their case, so it can be judged on the merits (or lack thereof), instead of having someone else decide for me before the info/crap can even reach my eyes.

      3) Some reactionaries like to refer to Indymedia as "Nazimedia" because some of the morons from the neo-Nazi crowd think they've found a place where they can post freely and get away with it. Going back to my first point, many (ok, practically all) IMCs have editorial policies that explicitly ban racism, sexism, or other forms of hatred based upon intrinsic, immutable characteristics. We hate the Nazi fuckers just as much as you do--even more, perhaps. The Jewish-world-conspiracy morons get the same reaction from real progressive and radical activists that I imagine many of you would have upon reading the crap, and if it can't be hidden due to an extremely loose editorial policy, the imbeciles can at least get slapped down in comments.

      Finally...

      4) The open newswires found on most sites are a fluke of history. The original newswire, on the Seattle IMC, dates from the 1999 "Battle of Seattle". It was intended solely as an experiment in relatively unfiltered, frontline reporting from any observer who could get to a computer. It's rather amazing that many IMCs haven't cracked down and just rid themselves of the often-criticized and -abused open wires, but perhaps it speaks to the committment of most volunteers to ideals of freedom of information and debate.

      "You are your own journalist."--English tagline of Indymedia Israel.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    4. Re:Indymedia by Unordained · · Score: 1

      Alternet had a story about independent media centers just a few weeks ago. As the autor puts it, Indymedia journalists generally believe everyone is biased, hiding it, and that we might as well just be as opinionated in written form as we would be among friends. It goes into the history of the "democratic" (I think "open" is a much better word) system, their decentralized nature, and the tough decisions they've had to make.

      Indymedia: Between Passion and Pragmatism by Gal Beckerman, Columbia Journalism Review, September 17, 2003.

      I don't think it was in this article, but the comment is easily made that two biased viewpoints next to each other don't make up a fair, objective statement. If you assume, however, that everyone is out to convince you of something at least partially untrue, then this is as good as it gets (sadly.)

      I fail to understand, however, why sites like this are mostly liberal-oriented. Is it a culture thing, or a reputation thing? Would unlike-minded individuals just never be caught posting here? Is it a bit like pro-microsoft articles and slashdot?

      Independent media is a tool, not a solution. If everyone were to use the tool, it might actually be more useful. It would also have so much "information" flowing through it that we would be unlikely to pick out the good parts. Any selection or editorial process is likely to be biased ... it all comes down to the readers checking their facts, with any source.

      Your mileage will most likely vary quite thoroughly.

    5. Re:Indymedia by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Indymedia newswires have an open publishing policy. Anyone familiar with the internet knows what that means in terms of content -- there's a wide variety of content, some of it silly, some of it just copied from other sources. But some of it is also valuable. Typically the best Indymedia content is material posted by non-journalists, either direct participants or activists.

      If you don't like the newswires (and they can be pretty noisy) each local site has edited features, which should make note of the better articles in the newswire. Of course, it's all entirely volunteer, so results may vary.

      Latin American Indymedia sites have been very active, while mainstream media ignores events there almost entirely. Bolivia and Argentina have been very active covering recent events.

    6. Re:Indymedia by dankdirk77 · · Score: 1

      Its like every article on there uses the word "jingoistic", just to give the impression that "its not propaganda because THOSE PEOPLE are propaganda"... as if Geraldo is some kind of conspiritor in the enslavement of the world to capitalism.

      --


      SCO: 800-726-8649
      Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
      Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
    7. Re:Indymedia by An+Anonymous+Hero · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the Electronic Frontier Foundation announced that it will defend the right (...)

      If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

      Evidently you don't grok the difference between defending what Indymedia say, and defending their right to say it. Cf. Voltaire: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." (Letter to Helvetius, one of whose books had just been ordered to be burned.)

      Thankfully, the EFF is more enlightened than you are.

    8. Re:Indymedia by elefantstn · · Score: 1
      Indymedia newswires have an open publishing policy.


      Actually, they don't. They just censor news according to a different bias.

      Indymedia isn't independent, they just have different biases than some other sources. It's not better than major sources, just written from a different viewpoint.
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    9. Re:Indymedia by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1

      No news is deleted from Indymedia newswires, though posts are hidden. Different local Indymedia sites can make their own policy, within the general bounds of the Indymedia mission. All sites hide some articles, typically articles that are overtly racist, pornographic, or "spam" (junk, contentless press releases, duplicate posts, etc). Some are more agressive about this, but censorship based purely on political perspective is uncommon and frowned upon by the larger network.

    10. Re:Indymedia by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      Is this the same Indymedia which consists of "stories" posted by raving lunatics

      No, that would be you, and that would be "posts".

      that try to pass their most rabid conspiracy theories as legitimate news items?

      Everyone is giving rabies a bad name these days. You're foaming at the mouth and I didn't say anything about it. (Oops!)

      If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

      Aha! Now that you admit ownership of said media, it lends credence to your charges of bias and greed. I always knew it but it sure is sporting of you to admit it. Bring back Firefly please! If you do, I'll make you the next governor of Georgia.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    11. Re:Indymedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

      In other words, you'd rather hear "news" you agree with, than anything that might make you think about and/or question anything you've already come to believe.
      You must love Fox News...

    12. Re:Indymedia by Unordained · · Score: 1

      Voltaire? Might check. Quotes are easily mis-attributed. (Yes, my site probably has a few too. I'd love to know.)

    13. Re:Indymedia by An+Anonymous+Hero · · Score: 1
      Yeah, this falls under Arnold's law :-)

      (He has a bottomless bag of "Euler's theorem (due to Bernoulli)", "the inequality named after Schwarz (and therefore not due to Schwarz)..." with which to crack up audiences.)

    14. Re:Indymedia by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      But wait, there's more! You can get the same raving lunatics passing rabid conspiracy theories who are also biased greedy corporate lackies at Fox News! Yay Capitalism!

    15. Re:Indymedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The open newswires found on most sites are a fluke of history. The original newswire, on the Seattle IMC, dates from the 1999 "Battle of Seattle". It was intended solely as an experiment in relatively unfiltered, frontline reporting from any observer who could get to a computer. It's rather amazing that many IMCs haven't cracked down and just rid themselves of the often-criticized and -abused open wires, but perhaps it speaks to the committment of most volunteers to ideals of freedom of information and debate.

      I'm not sure that the Open Publishing newswire was an "experiment", the Indymedia software was specifically designed around it (see below). However, regardless of its origins, Open Publishing is the very crucial reason that Indymedia has become so popular, perhaps by some measures the largest media organization in the world.

      Indymedia is distinct from other alternative media precisely because it does not rely on a handful of elite commentators. It is popular because it is popular, everyone is invited to publish their media (within reasonable bounds). The momentum and growth of Indymedia is a direct result of its fundamental aim to facilitate people being able to publish their media as directly as possible.

      It's open nature is also evident in the organizing structure, folks can participate in multiple areas, to multiple degrees, and fade in and out of roles. There is a balance of autonomous publishing with collective organization.

      What would happen if IMC closed its Open Publishing? What would the site consist of? Posts by a few ambiguous editors? Who would produce the enormous amount of media content? If you mean to imply that all posts would be moderated, I don't see how long IMC would last before imploding. What incentive would people have to publish, apart from IMC's past popularity -- based on Open Publishing? Moderation would appear arbitrary. Who is going to donate their media content to a new organization for free, and perhaps not even published?

      If it seems hard to find 'good' content on Indymedia, then why has it grown to 120+ IMCs worldwide? The reason is that while there is signal to be found among the noise, it is all created by the people themselves. And that participation is the fundamental reason Indymedia has been embraced the world over.

      Some history: There was reportedly an open text-posting newswire at the 1996 Democractic Convention. Later there was the open publishing newswire at J18 in Sydney.

      From "Open publishing is the same as free software":
      A working definition of open publishing

      Open publishing means that the process of creating news is transparent to the readers. They can contribute a story and see it instantly appear in the pool of stories publicly available. Those stories are filtered as little as possible to help the readers find the stories they want. Readers can see editorial decisions being made by others. They can see how to get involved and help make editorial decisions. If they can think of a better way for the software to help shape editorial decisions, they can copy the software because it is free and change it and start their own site. If they want to redistribute the news, they can, preferably on an open publishing site.
  9. They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just another example of how America's colleges promote liberalism and anti-americanism, and promote the acceptance of lawbreaking. The aptly-named "liberal arts college" should be banned if you ask me.

    1. Re:They're anti-american by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just another example of how America's colleges promote liberalism

      Okay. That's a good thing.

      and anti-americanism

      How is it anti-American to expose flaws in voting machines which could threaten the very heart of our society; the fair democratic election of our leaders?

      and promote the acceptance of lawbreaking

      We should accept lawbreaking when the laws being broken. Did you ever learn about the Boston Tea Party? Ever hear of Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat on a bus? Civil disobedience has a long, proud history in America.

      If you like conservatism and patriotism, and you dislike civil disobedience, then move to Communist China. They are very conservative, very patriotic, and don't tolerate civil disobedience. Your kind of people...

      The aptly-named "liberal arts college" should be banned if you ask me.

      No one did, but you'd have really appreciated Mao's Cultural Revolution where intellectuals were rounded up and sent to brutal labor camps.

    2. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say it with me - If we expose flaws in voting machines which could threaten the very heart of our society; the fair democratic election of our leaders, then the terrorists win. See, it's easy.

    3. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an extremely well written refutation to a troll.

      Welcome to my friends list.

    4. Re:They're anti-american by Gil-galad55 · · Score: 1

      No one did, but you'd have really appreciated Mao's Cultural Revolution where intellectuals were rounded up and sent to brutal labor camps.
      Mao: Let's see if you can think naughty thoughts... WHILE YOU'RE FROZEN IN CARBONITE!!! Mwa ha ha ha hah asdflh *cough rasp choke

      --

      To follow knowledge like a sinking star, / Beyond the utmost bound of human thought. ("Ulysses", Tennyson)

    5. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism is extreme socialsim and hence extreme liberalism. It's not a conservative philosophy.

    6. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservative:

      # Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.

      dictionary.com.

      Whatever our politically twisted views of conservative may or may not be, China is extremely opposed to change - thus yes, they are a conservative state.

    7. Re:They're anti-american by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you like conservatism and patriotism, and you dislike civil disobedience, then move to Communist China. They are very conservative, very patriotic, and don't tolerate civil disobedience. Your kind of people...

      Kiss my patriotic ass. This stupid ultra-liberal backlash against patriotism is pissing me off. Patriotism != blindly following Dubya and his henchmen. Patriotism, as I see it, has always meant a love for the United States and the ideals set forth by the founding fathers, two of these ideals being the Constitutional rights to freedom of press and freedom of speech. By that view of patriotism, what these students are doing is clearly patriotic. No American in their right mind would argue that having our elections run by a bunch of incompetent buffoons who try to cover their massive flaws with lawsuits is a good thing.

    8. Re:They're anti-american by laird · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you two are in violent agreement.

    9. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unbelievbable. This guy completely misses the point of the post he's replying to, and gets MODDED UP.

      Only on slashdot....

    10. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Okay. That's a good thing.

      So you admit your bias. But you must realize that a majority of americans feel differently, and as a democracy public policy in America is not necessarily going to reflect your values, okay?

      How is it anti-American to expose flaws in voting machines which could threaten the very heart of our society; the fair democratic election of our leaders?

      Its not a matter of the particular instance of voting machines. Its a simple matter of copyright. Now if there were exceptions in copyright that said that "if you think its really important" breaking copyrights would be okay, there would be no more incentive to produce intellectual property. Diebold has as much of a right to the copyright on internally produced documents as anyone else, regardless of what they pertain to, and anyone who gains unauthorized access to said documents, and then distributes them without permission, is in violation of copyright law, every bit as much as pirating Windows XP is a violation of copyright law.

      We should accept lawbreaking when the laws being broken. Did you ever learn about the Boston Tea Party? Ever hear of Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat on a bus? Civil disobedience has a long, proud history in America.

      Well, there is a long, proud tradition of murder in the USA also, if the only prerequisite for a long proud tradition is that it has happened consistently throughout history. That doesn't make it morally acceptable. In fact the two cases you mention are completely different. In the case of the Boston Tea Party, it was a legitimate protest against a law that was instituted by an authority (the British) in which the colonists had no representation, and so said institution could be said to not have any binding authority over them. The second was a clear violation of the law, and probably set the cause of civil rights back more than anything, by associating black activists with willful violations of the law. They would have been much better served by working for reform within the legal process at the state level, where according to the constitution such laws should be made, rather than agitating for unconstitutional federal intervention and the undermining of the tenth ammendment and commiting crimes in order to short-circuit democracy.

      If you like conservatism and patriotism, and you dislike civil disobedience, then move to Communist China. They are very conservative, very patriotic, and don't tolerate civil disobedience. Your kind of people...

      It might entertain you to know that in most communist countries there were no copyright laws, so what these loony-leftists were doing would be perfectly legal. In fact, copyright is absolutely essential to a free society, and undermining copyright is a sure way to undermine freedom and free markets. In fact, unlike breaking laws, copyright is directly enshrined in the constitution. As for banning subversive activities, there is a well-established constitutional authority to override certain privileges when the national interest is at stake; considering the tradition of treason within the liberal movement, I don't think my suggestions are at all in conflict with this principle.

      In short, I am for the use of state power to protect freedom, and you are for the use of state power to suppress freedom. You are far closer to the views of Communist China.

    11. Re:They're anti-american by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot....

      Thank god.

    12. Re:They're anti-american by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      If we expose these flaws then no one can find these flaws "secretly" and exploit them. Finding and pointing out flaws is a good....oh, I see, you were joking. :)

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    13. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeeeez, folx, can't we all spot the obvious flame bait and just step over it??

    14. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > considering the tradition of treason within the liberal movement

      Bwahahaha. I love right-wingspeak Let's develop a lexicon from this post.

      "Bias" -- Having a viewpoint different from yours
      "Democracy" -- Doing things your way. If the
      other side wins an issue, it's
      "Unamerican" or a "subversion of
      Democracy"
      "Simple matter" -- Stop arguing, I'm right.
      "legitimate protest" -- A civil protest whose goal
      you agree with.
      "clear violation of the law" -- A civil protest
      whose goal you don't agree with.
      "Treason" -- Disagreeing with your viewpoints
      "Freedom" -- The ability for you personally to get your way while the rest of us can go hang
      "well-established constitutional authority" --
      A law that punishes lefties as opposed to.....
      "Tyranny" -- A law that punishes you

      Rush has done well on you, my friend. I don't know about you, but I can't wait for his reasons why his drug abuse is "completely different" than the drug abuse he rails against on his show!

    15. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truely terrifying thing is that you probably aren't trolling.

    16. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Rush would argue that since he paid for his drugs with legitimately earned money instead of with money stolen from other people, he was merely helping the economy, not breaking the law.

    17. Re:They're anti-american by krilli · · Score: 1

      What did you write this for?

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    18. Re:They're anti-american by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Excellent, looks like this little "democracy" is functioning just fine, cute little soilder ants

    19. Re:They're anti-american by Darby · · Score: 1

      This stupid ultra-liberal backlash against patriotism is pissing me off. Patriotism != blindly following Dubya and his henchmen.

      Liberal?!? Dubya and his cronies are the ones trying to redefine patriotism to mean just that. Anybody with a scrap of patriotism in them is backlashing against those lying traitors as hard as possible.

      Cripes how can people be so freaking confused about basic ideas and still able to find their way out of bed in the morning is beyond me.

    20. Re:They're anti-american by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      So you admit your bias.

      It's my viewpoint, not a "bias." Do you consider yourself biased or do you consider yourself conservative? Answer me!

      But you must realize that a majority of americans feel differently,

      Then why did Gore get about half a million more votes than Bush?

      Well, there is a long, proud tradition of murder in the USA also

      We, as a people, are "proud" of murder? I don't think so. We are, however, proud of those who stood up to unjust laws.

      The second was a clear violation of the law, and probably set the cause of civil rights back more than anything, by associating black activists with willful violations of the law.

      You need to go back to your history books (assuming that you ever opened one in the first place). Historians generally view her act of civil disobedience as pivotal in advancing the cause of civil rights for blacks.

      As for banning subversive activities, there is a well-established constitutional authority to override certain privileges when the national interest is at stake; considering the tradition of treason within the liberal movement, I don't think my suggestions are at all in conflict with this principle.

      That sounds just like the rationale for Tiananmen Square massacre in Beijing in June 1989. Yep, just another case of self-righteous conservatives looking out for what they viewed as the national interest.

      In short, I am for the use of state power to protect freedom,

      How does protecting the interests of a corrupt, unethical corporation qualify as protecting freedom? How does the state protect freedom when it uses laws to hide documents that expose corporate corruption?

      and you are for the use of state power to suppress freedom.

      How? Please, tell me what I asked the state to do in this matter. Or was that just another in a long series of lies?

    21. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they'd end up rewriting everything related to politics on a yearly basis. thank the republican party for me. got some talented linguists over there...

    22. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, unlike breaking laws, copyright is directly enshrined in the constitution.

      Go back and read the Constitution again. It's heavily draped with language that makes clear the intention that the good of the people should trump any law.

    23. Re:They're anti-american by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cripes how can people be so freaking confused about basic ideas and still able to find their way out of bed in the morning is beyond me."

      Well, well I was just going to say the very same thing about you.
      Interesting how things appear to look completely different to me ....
      So why don't you just shut the fuck up and stop acting like a fucking oracle cause sure like hell you aren't one.

  10. http://verifiedvoting.org - by horster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pleas join an existing, legitimate effort at http://verifiedvoting.org -

    This site, rather than continually despairing at the fact that there are problems with electronic voting, has concrete steps that average citizens can take to make change.

  11. darn by quadelirus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it already seems /.ed

    1. Re:darn by 00420 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, apparently all you can do is /. the articles.

  12. need to print them by seriv · · Score: 1

    need to put them in a magazine or some kind of printed material so that it can not be taken offline , but remain in the public eye.
    -seriv

  13. Anyone have the memos mirrored? by revmoo · · Score: 1

    I'd like to mirror the memos if someone has them up, the main server can't be reached by me.

    Lets get a fundraising campaign for these guys going if they do indeed go through with it, they'll need it!

    --
    I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
  14. You Can Read the Memos... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Troll

    Or not!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  15. this was posted... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    This was posted more than an hour ago in the previous discussion. see Here

  16. bittorent by joe_plastic · · Score: 1

    They should have set up a bittorent for this one.

    1. Re:bittorent by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      If you read the post

      Note: Due to high bandwidth, the location of the documents may change. You can download the archive (or here). BitTorrent users should get the archive here. You can now browse (or here) and search the memos.

      Thats not the hyper link but it is there on the page dude !!

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  17. Put them on P2P file sharing network by bigberk · · Score: 1

    Why not put the documents on a P2P file sharing network, to provide access even if the "source" gets shut down? Oh yeah, I forgot, because only criminals and kids with lack of morals use P2P file sharing.

    1. Re:Put them on P2P file sharing network by kid-noodle · · Score: 1

      ok, done.

      edonkey: ed2k://|file|list.tar.bz2.gz|7762005|c53855d1c5da1 fec2da1548905bc689f|/
      shareaza: magnet:?xt=urn:bitprint:ZHWRG5CJDWM24BVYBYQREXEEYC MDEK22.W3GYQCJPCOJXYFTVIA3E5FHGCLBFJS6B7W2NCHI&dn= list.tar.bz2.gz

      filename: list.tar.bz2.gz
      filesize: 7.4Mb
      Should be avaikale on ed2k, g1 & g2.

      --
      fortune -o
  18. Wouldn't it be better to post it outside the US? by baywulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would make it harder for Diebold to fight back...

  19. God by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

    None of the stuff is DMCA material why do ISPs keep caving? Have they no balls? I hope this school shows more composure when running up against the greedhead laywers for Diebold who know they are full of crap.

    --
    As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    1. Re:God by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some schools just don't want to deal with the hassle..... or instead of their lawyers spending time on the case (no matter how right or wrong Diebold may be), they might just make the students pull them down. They also may fear negative publicity. I don't know Swathmore's stance on this kind of issue, but that seemingly weak stance would seem commonplace today.


      I belive it was Wired magazine a few months ago compared Schools and Universities and how they view their student's online rights.


      For an example of a positive school, MIT supported the student(s) that started the bonsai kitty website after review from their legal department. Until they had explicity documentation that the webiste was somehow illegal or violated something or other, they allowed the site to remain up. I'm sure they were not happy to be painted as supporters of kitten abuse, but they were smart enough to see the real issue of free speech.

    2. Re:God by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No, the ISPs generally don't have any balls, but they do seem to be setting some bad precedents for themselves. I suspect this general nutlessness we keep seeing on the part of our providers is going to come back to haunt them.

      Unless they want to accept the role of regulated carriers. They seem to want the legal protections afforded to regulated telecom providers (i.e., your local Baby Bell) without the actual regulation.

      Schools have generally been showing more backbone, at least against the RIAA's shenanigans, but we'll see how these kids fare against Diebold. I suspect Diebold will just drop it once their attorneys realize they haven't a chance in Hell of putting a lid on this anymore. I hope so: I admire their stand on principle.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  20. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    They're kind of like polar opposites. Why can't we have both? Do we have to have only one or the other? Personally I think raving lunatics will go anywhere they think people will listen (*cough* Anne coulter's adoration for Joe McCarthy *cough*), but I think it's good to have at least two points of view. It gets boring otherwise.

    Also, it could possibly be discriminating if you shutdown stuff like indymedia and let people like Rush Limbaugh and that general who equated Islam with Satan spout their gibberish. Maybe if both sides are free to spout their gibberish, they will cancel each other out?

    1. Re:Well... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Maybe if both sides are free to spout their gibberish, they will cancel each other out?

      Finally someone as gotten the point. In uch the same way you'd be a fool to believe everything you hear on Fox News, so it is with Indymedia. Truly Objective reporting is immpossible. Hearing both sides of the story and deciding which one has less holes is the only choice left. So I say neither should be shut down.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:Well... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      It's a nice idea, but the more we take that path, the more it seems that it doesn't work. I'll use me for an example. I'm moderate left in my universe, which kinda translates into Damn Commie in the real world. I recognize that, which is why I try to look at conservative news sources too if I want to be really sure something's accurate. The problem is that, while I would often really like to watch a little Fox News, it's usually offensive enough that I end up triggering my fight or flight response and become incapable of paying attention. Seriously. About 5 minutes into an average O'Reilly show I've got enough adrenaline in my system to bash my head through a brick wall without feeling it. I imagine the same thing would happen to a Bushophille on Indymedia. Everybody's going to drift towards their own side just to keep from having an embolism.

      The way to fix that is to just write the story without injecting the "Hilary's a whore!" or "Bush is a Nazi!" every 6 words. You still have a bias, but you're at least offering the possibility that somebody that doesn't share all of your opinions might be able to read it without developing an intense, personal hatred of you. My being able to intelligently handle bias is worthless if my brain regularly confuses your reporting with a kick in the nuts.

  21. Print 'em up! by NeuroManson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, print up pamphlets and distribute them, citing the e-mails and memos, with a "dumbed down" non technical explaination of just what the problems are with Diebold machines. You don't need to spend hundreds of dollars on copies, just print out 10-50 pamphlets.

    Then hand them out to anyone and everyone you see on the street. If you can manage to do it outside of polling locations, all the better.

    There's only about 5 million people online, and talking about it amongst ourselves is not going to make any difference, especially since the mainstream news has been ignoring the issue. We are, in essense, the minority. The majority are those who need to be informed. The guys without computers, the guys without internet service.

    And maybe, just MAYBE, the more people in the general public that are made aware, then perhaps enough people will start asking questions that NOBODY can ignore the issue any further.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Print 'em up! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      ...There's only about 5 million people online...

      Surely you left of a few zeros from that number? There's probably more than 5 million people on-line in California alone, never mind the rest of the country and world. I MIGHT buy 500 million, but even that seems low.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Print 'em up! by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To go further, I'll bet that printed flyers distributed by hand are immune to any sort of cease and desist order. It's clearly political speech, and it doesn't have that stigma of being "on the internet."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Print 'em up! by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Good point, my numbers are a bit out of date. However, there's still a huge imbalance between people who actually look up this kind of information, as opposed to those who use the net for e-mail and similar mundane activities, *and* those who are "unplugged", as it were.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Print 'em up! by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, print up pamphlets and distribute them, citing the e-mails and memos, with a "dumbed down" non technical explaination of just what the problems are with Diebold machines. You don't need to spend hundreds of dollars on copies, just print out 10-50 pamphlets.

      Great. Put together such a pamphlet. Make sure it self references "http://www.effortlessis.com/evoting.pdf" so that more copies can be printed. Make sure it's informative, and eye-catching.

      I'll host it.

      Now, the sad part of today's society is that I'll never get taken up on this. I have at my disposal a powerful information dissemination too, and will I see any takers? I doubt it.

      I'm not a pamphlet-maker, I'm a database guru - a fact that probably makes me part of the problem. Oh well. Come up with something reasonable, and I'll host it.

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Print 'em up! by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      More to the point, print out the emails and memos and attach them to letters to your Senator and Congressman. Try to make them understand that the next election could be bought by pretty much anybody with enough cash on hand to influence the makers of the machines. Point out that that doesn't just mean Bill Gates or Warren Buffett could buy the next Presidency for their own stooge, it also means that the next President could be picked by Saudi Arabia...

      For that matter, the next President could be picked by Osama Bin Laden, because it's not just money that influences people. People have been known to cave in to sufficiently credible threats against their families.

    6. Re:Print 'em up! by njdj · · Score: 1

      We are, in essense, the minority. The majority are those who need to be informed. The guys without computers, the guys without internet service.

      You're several years behind the times. A substantial majority of US residents have internet access, see
      statistics here.

    7. Re:Print 'em up! by ENOENT · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is the obvious answer to any attempt to quash free speech on the Internet--make it available in pamphlet form.

      Then, if you continue to provide the info on the net, you can point to the freely available pamphlet that contains the same information.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    8. Re:Print 'em up! by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      I don't think those numbers are an accurate measurement. For one thing, it lists US *and* Canadian internet users. Secondly, according to the details page, 59% of Americans are online. This does not, however, define how many net connections are business related (cybercafes, libraries, colleges, offices, etc).

      And as the population is around 292,000,000+, I somehow doubt that there are *really* that many people, all browsing the web and reading the same things, at the same time. If the numbers *are* right, then 1/3 of the internet users are preverbal and still in strollers.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  22. INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so slow) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Friday, 12 September 2003 (PDT)
    By Bev Harris - blackboxvoting.org

    http://www.blackboxvoting.com

    If certification isn't being done properly, the whole house of cards falls. Below are actual copies of internal Diebold memos which show that uncertified software is being used in elections, and that Diebold programmers intentionally end-run the system.

    Quick backgrounder first, scroll down to see the memos.

    BACKGROUND

    Our voting system, which is part of the public commons has recently been privatized. When this happened, the counting of the votes, which must be a public process, subjected to the scrutiny of many eyes of plain old citizens, became a secret.

    The computerized systems that register voters, will soon sign voters into the polling place using a digital smart card, record the vote we cast, and tally it are now so secret they are not allowed to be examined by any citizens group, or even by academics like the computer scientists at major universities.

    The corporate justification for this secrecy is that these systems adhere to a list of "standards" put out by the Federal Election Commission, and that an "ITA" (Independent Testing Authority) carefully examines the voting system, which is then provided to states for their own certification.

    As it turns out, the states typically do not examine the computer code at all, relying instead on a "Logic and Accuracy" test which will not catch fraud and has frequently missed software programming errors that cause the machines to miscount.

    A Diebold message board has been used since 1999 to help technicians in the field interact with programmers to solve problems. The contents of this message board were quietly sent to reporters and activists around the world, most likely by a Diebold employee. In a letter to WiredNews, Diebold has acknowledged that these memos are from its own staff message boards.

    Without further commentary, judge for yourself whether Diebold has been following certification requirements:

    From Nel Finberg, Technical Writer, Diebold Election Systems

    (Note: Metamor/Ciber is the ITA assigned to certify the software)

    alteration of Audit Log in Access

    To: "support"
    Subject: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    From: "Nel Finberg"
    Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:31:30 -0700
    Importance: Normal

    Jennifer Price at Metamor (about to be Ciber) has indicated that she can access the GEMS Access database and alter the Audit log without entering a password. What is the position of our development staff on this issue? Can we justify this? Or should this be anathema?
    Nel

    Reply from Ken Clark, principal engineer for Diebold Election Systems

    RE: alteration of Audit Log in Access

    To:
    Subject: RE: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    From: "Ken Clark"
    Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:55:02 -0700
    Importance: Normal
    In-reply-to:

    Its a tough question, and it has a lot to do with perception. Of course everyone knows perception is reality.

    Right now you can open GEMS' .mdb file with MS-Access, and alter its contents. That includes the audit log. This isn't anything new. In VTS, you can open the database with progress and do the same. The same would go for anyone else's system using whatever database they are using. Hard drives are read-write entities. You can change their contents.

    Now, where the perception comes in is that its right now very *easy* to change the contents. Double click the .mdb file. Even technical wizards at Metamor (or Ciber, or whatever) can figure that one out.

    It is possible to put a secret password on the .mdb file to prevent Metamor from opening it with Access. I've threatened to put a password on the .mdb before when dealers/customers/support have done stupid things with the GEMS database structure using Access. Being able to end-run the database has admittedly got people out of a bind though. Jane (I thin

  23. Don't just sign the petition by pjcreath · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Don't just sign the petition by horster · · Score: 1

      thanks for the additional info - I don't know why slashdot editors don't post this stuff on the front page

  24. It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just link them to Microsoft, SCO, and Jessica Simpson, and they will win the backing of all of us geeks.

  25. it ain't civil disobedience by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    electronic civil disobedience campaign that will

    As far as I can tell, it's only sleezy Diebold who is telling people not to post the memos. Unless these kids are standing up against a court order to take down the information, they are hardly participating in civil disobedience just because they are pointing out serious flaws in Diebold's buggy system and not listening to Diebold when they say to stop, flaws that Diebold would apparently like to hide.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:it ain't civil disobedience by Danse · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What they are doing is not backing down in the face of barratry, which is noble, but not the same as civil disobedience.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:it ain't civil disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the link, they say that they although they're calling it civil disobedience, they don't believe it actually is, because they don't believe they're breaking the law. It's probably smart of them to call it that anyway, because it gets everybody psychologically prepared to keep going even if a court does rule it illegal.

    3. Re:it ain't civil disobedience by jafuser · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      they are hardly participating in civil disobedience

      Judging by the information you expressed in your message, you may not be aware of the gradual transition of power from elected representatives of the people to appointed representatives of the corporate sector...

      Just to bring you up to date on how things are today:

      - Corporations now have primary consideration before indivudal people for all high-impact legislative decisions. (tax relief, wars, special contracts, etc)

      - Citizens who threaten to harm the profit margin of a corporation will be rounded up and silenced. (DMCA, reverse engineering, publishing security audits)

      - Law enforcment of intellectual property is being turned over to corporations. (suponea power of the RIAA)

      - Existing monoplies are extended indefinitely to ensure any potential future profit is secured, despite the suffering of the public domain (copyright extensions)

      - New monopolies are granted with minimal review for corporations who have contributed sufficient funding to ensure their approval. (FCC, patent system)

      Perhaps it wouldn't be considered "civil disobedience" ten years ago, but nowadays, any act which threatens the bottom line of a large corporation will most likely be interpreted by our legal system as an act of civil disobedience or be considered a violation of some other nonsensical law in order to put a stop to it.

      Forward my mail to the MiniLuv...

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  26. How to Help Us - 3 Steps-Regrets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Here's how to help:"

    Step one: Apply fire extinguisher to burning server.

    Step two: Clean up resulting mess.

    Step three: Put together a new server, and never publish it's IP address to Slashdot again.

  27. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by bfree · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else see a new hall of fame story in the making, "Diebold orders /. to remove posts"? Sure is fun to watch however (even when slashdot caves in to the $cientoligi$t$).

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  28. shut up. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Linking from slashdot may be less than beneficial in the short term

    Ho, ho, ha ha, "Slashdot effect". This joke is more worn out than hot grits. Say something useful, says something funny but quit posting "Slashdot effect" trolls.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice sig there, master of the 'played out'.

    2. Re:shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      And should we model this new insightful commentary after your elegant post?

    3. Re:shut up. by webtre · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      litigious bastards
      suck it sco!
    4. Re:shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This joke is more worn out than hot grits

      It's not a joke. A link gets put in a Slashdot story, tens/hundreds of thousands of people suddenly go there, site is overloaded and reacts slowly. This is the Slashdot effect.

      How is this a) a joke or b) a troll, fuckwit?

  29. Keeping the memos available by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Informative
    an electronic civil disobedience campaign that will ensure permanent public access to the controversial leaked memos.

    Freenet.

    Exactly why it exists.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Keeping the memos available by kajoob · · Score: 1

      yes, but they want people to see them ;)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    2. Re:Keeping the memos available by westlake · · Score: 1
      permanent...access

      don't documents disappear from Freenet as interest in them decays?

    3. Re:Keeping the memos available by OverlordQ · · Score: 0

      This is hardly informative . . . if you've checked Freenet lately:

      a) it's a 'reasearch project' not an actual program
      b) it's near impossible to insert or retrieve anything from the network

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Keeping the memos available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, ideally, not have to wade through too much kiddy porn to get to them.

    5. Re:Keeping the memos available by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Exactly why it exists.

      Then why is it full of porn?

    6. Re:Keeping the memos available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever moderated this Overrated I hope you get M2'd out the ass, because evidently you haven't tried freenet, this post was 100% informative, because it is the ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

  30. USENET would be appropriate by bigberk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the kind of information that can be easily postedon USENET. This would provide worldwide public access distribution for the content, except at ISPs that choose to censor the data of course.

    1. Re:USENET would be appropriate by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      Great! Soon as I get the things downloaded, I'll pick an appropriate group and post them.

      Let's see Die-mold try to silence that one! ;-)

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  31. ATTENTION MODS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    WARNING-Goatse man link!!

  32. Re:Mirrors needed? mirror provided! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    That is fuckin' awesome.

  33. Reminds me of the good old days... by chosen_my_foot · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo! 3hrs 4mins remaining at 33 bytes/sec.

    Reminds me of downloading warez from crappy sites on my 28.8 modem. Those were the days.

  34. Re:While you are waiting for the memos, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that would be all, thanks!!!

    yumm!!

    -zrgyva

  35. No problem. by twitter · · Score: 4, Funny
    If that's independent news media, give me my biased greedy coporate controlled news anyday.

    Comming right up sir! You are just our kind of consumer. Double plus good for you, don't listen to anyone but solid dependable whores we pay. It's not like you need an impartial third party telling you what they think happed. Let the good folks of GE, MSNBC, Disney, and MacDonalds feed you just what does them the best good.

    Whatever you do, don't read the internal memos from DiBold's techs. Those people are no longer associated with DiBold for their lack of proper corporate protocal. They should have used Microsoft's famous disapearing ink email, instead of bathering all over the internet. Go back to sleep while they chose your next mayor, govenor, president, forgein policy and conservation laws designed to maximize my^H^H your wealth. Good night, sweet prince!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  36. Bittorrent by 110100 · · Score: 1

    The problem with bittorrent is that Diebold can read the torrent file and send cease and desist orders to every host at once. With the current scheme, Diebold can only issue one cease and desist order at a time because only one host is visible at a time. This forces Diebold to do a lot more work and greatly increases the longevity of the effort.

    --

    I have never regretted my speech,
    but I have frequently regretted my failure to speak.
    1. Re:Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with bittorrent is that Diebold can read the torrent file and send cease and desist orders to every host at once.

      The .torrent file contains a link to a tracker, not the address of every host. The tracker manages the host information, and is a single point of failure for a given .torrent (BT was not designed for anonymity or to be difficult to shut down).

      So Diebold would just have to send a C&D to the tracker operator, and the existing .torrent files would no longer work.

    2. Re:Bittorrent by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      They can very well take it further to retrieve the IP list from the tracker, and then go on to sue each of the IPs like RIAA.

  37. Re:Put them on P2P file sharing network WHICH? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    put the documents on a P2P file sharing network

    This is often suggested, but which one?
    Which network(s) do Slashdotters favor?
    What file names?

    It's not enough to just drop them out in P2P land. Give people a place to look.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  38. Remember, they were posted to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find them here... I didn't post the post i link to, by the way.
    here

  39. Re:Christ jesus, kids!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jah! Zem liberal bastards, it is zee American way to never question zee President, afterall that is what a zeemocrazy is all about. And what is 1/2 million fewer votes between friends?

    I am with you my friend! Sieg Hail! Sieg Hail!

  40. Oddly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wrote a report for a class on Diebold. I'll have to email these links to my Professor and maybe raise my grade :) Thanks /.!

  41. Re:"Re:it ain't civil disobedience" But it IS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    awesome fucking link, my friend

  42. MOD DOWN (goatse idiot) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Into oblivion. Some people...

  43. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike Republicans, some people believe that wrong is wrong no matter who's doing it.

  44. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A thief believes everyone else is a thief.

    Why do you Republicans keep on assuming that every one else would have acted in the same sleazy manner just because you do behave like that? Maybe, just maybe there are people who atually have *gasp* morals and democratic values. I know that does not ring the bell, but please stop assuming people would do the same or not do the same if there would be a Democrat in the presidency.

    Afterall you are the same merry bunch that wanted to impeach the previous guy just because he got a blowjob. Yet it would be interesting to see what the Repug reaction would have been if Gore had been indeed the actual president through 1/10 of the scandals your boy George has gone through.

    Jeez!

  45. digital cohones by meeotch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This link (right side of why-war page) is pretty intense. Pick away at the guy's amateur lawyering if you want, but it shows more sack than signing an e-petition, anyway.

    mitch

  46. It's a bad sign for our country when by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    being a patriot is equated to being a nazi.

    I've voted green in the last election, and will in the next, but I love my country and I'm sure the grand parent poster does too. Does that make us 'nazis' in your eyes, junior?

    1. Re:It's a bad sign for our country when by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I've voted green in the last election, and will in the next,.."
      it's nice to know you don't think about the person running....

      "Hey iys a green party. I guess I won't have to think about who is running, I'll just vote my party line.

      good not thinking. Just like every democrat and republican that just votes the party line.

      Me, I'll weigh the history and views of each canidate, then decide.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:It's a bad sign for our country when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thread Godwinated with the first post

    3. Re:It's a bad sign for our country when by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      You're assuming I'm voting for a *canidate*, I'm voting third party for the sake of "getting the foot in the door"--meaning to open the process up to more than just the democrats and republicans. Of course, since the democrats and republicans control the process and the system itself, that is impossible so any vote -in my opinion- is either a wasted vote, or a protest vote.

      So, with that, I'll vote green, for the sake of protesting the two-party lock-in, and because, frankly, their party has the best platform (again, in my opinion).

    4. Re:It's a bad sign for our country when by pmz · · Score: 1

      I've voted green in the last election, and will in the next...

      I know the greens and the libertarians have platforms that are one-to-one up to a point and then diverge sharply at issues of social justice. I wonder if the debate over social justice could be delayed long enough for these two major third parties to run a unified canidate. It wouldn't be easy (and possibly very hard to stomach for die-hard libertarians and greens), but it could give this canidate a much larger voter base to pull from. Certainly enough to get noticed in 2004. One or two presidencies are much too short for social justice policies to make any difference, anyway, leaving a possibility for these issues to be revisited in earnest in 2012 or 2016.

  47. Limited amount of time. by Augusto · · Score: 1

    I have a limited amount of time, and I do read a lot of news. There are just some sites where the BS is too high to waste my time with.

    Newsmax used to be such site, but many of the Indymedia servers have won the prize of just not worth paying attention to.

    If you have all day to read everything, feel free.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Limited amount of time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, you are exactly the consumer they're looking for: no concern whatsoever of what a author's bias might be, willing to accept and not question anything put in print.

    2. Re:Limited amount of time. by Augusto · · Score: 1

      I question everything, but I have a filter that saves me time from wasting going over nutjob sites.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  48. Wish you'd straighten out your rhetoric by dcollins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the link...

    War? believes that what we are doing is legal; though we see it as an issue of electronic civil disobedience we believe it is Diebold which is abusing copyright law in an attempt to shut down free speech and the democratic process.

    Okay, now it's either legal OR it's civil disobedience (i.e., intentionally breaking a law, and accepting an unjust punishment, to draw attention to an issue). As someone who supports this effort -- someone who's done a little political action and gets steaming mad at scatterbrained hippies who drag down liberal progressive movements -- I'd prefer that they straighten out the claims of their action.

    I think it would be preferable to claim that Diebold's cease-and-desist order is illegal and unenforceable. Then, keeping the memos online is even better than civil disobedience (noble in its own right), it's actually civil obedience for a just cause.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Wish you'd straighten out your rhetoric by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      You can legally disobey a company. I'd say that's a civil version of disobedience. No?

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    2. Re:Wish you'd straighten out your rhetoric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >intentionally breaking a law, and accepting an unjust punishment, to draw attention to an issue

      People do tend to forget that part. Smoking weed in your closet is "disobedience."
      Smoking weed in the courthouse is "criminal"
      30,000 people all insisiting that they be arrested on the same day for smoking weed in various courthouses... That's civil disobedience.

    3. Re:Wish you'd straighten out your rhetoric by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I think it would be preferable to claim that Diebold's cease-and-desist order is illegal and unenforceable.

      Unenforceable, yes, but illegal?

      (ObIANAL: I am not a lawyer)

      C&D letters are not instruments of law enforcement. A corporate (or personal, for that matter) attorney can send a C&D request to whomever with whatever justification they wish.

      The recipient is under no legal obligation to obey the request to cease & desist, but if the behavior continues they can and should expect a civil suit to be filed against them.

  49. MOD PARENT UP +1 INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. Do what you need to do by craw · · Score: 1

    I am older than the average /. reader/poster. In my very youthful years I protested against the war in Vietnam. I participated in a march to my state's captital to protest cuts in funding for my university. I've sent a few letters to the editors of the Washington Post; one abridged version got published. Hey, the World Series is taking place; I've sent a letter to the NL baseball commissioner about something that Marge Schott did. I've been on the National Board of a civil rights organization.

    I have never done civil disobidience. I can't read the details of what they are doing because of their servers are going poof. Additionally, I have not been active in these types of activity with regard to computer/technical related issues. Many of you do a much better job than I could ever do.

    I'm rambling on right now so what is my point? Get involved in social issues (and protests when needed), in a manner that you are comfortable with.

    While I'm more liberal and libertarian than the norm, my advice also applies to those that are more conservative than me.

    1. Re:Do what you need to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am older than the average /. reader/poster.

      That explains the low UID. They were giving out four-digit numbers when, the 70's?

  51. Relax, it's not so bad... by mclove · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not like this is going to favor Republicans just because the guy running Diebold is a Republican - with security this bad it's open season for everyone. I think the more worrying thing would be if these machines weren't hackable but were iron-clad, then the only backdoors would belong to the guys who wrote the code; instead, the backdoors are wide open to any idiot who wishes to wander in.

    If these machines really are hackable then they'll be hacked, and going by the intelligence of your average script kiddie they'll be hacked to such a ridiculous degree that the results will clearly be fake and the judiciary will declare all of these elections invalid. I mean, really, when Kevin Mitnick is mysteriously elected governor of Minnesota in a write-in vote and NORML supporters sweep the legislative elections in nine states, somebody's going to start asking questions...

    1. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did you somehow sleep through the 2000 election and then forget to read the news?

    2. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I guess you forgot that those butterfly ballets were designed by a Democrat. So I guess that means that Democrats are for Bush after all.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    3. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by msingle1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps he was refering to the -16,000 votes Diebold voting machines netted Gore in Florida.

    4. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be kidding, or working for the GOP... easy to hack = excuse when you get caught + the ability to shift blame to the high school hacker, instead of the organized efforts. SMART planning crooks (political advisors) will only cheat enough percentage to not draw attention. The more they cheat, the bigger the chance of getting caught.

    5. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by mclove · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but my point is, when these ridiculous election results start popping up the entire system will be shown to be faulty. If Kevin Mitnick is indeed elected write-in governor of Minnesota then the 5% inflated Bush numbers will be discarded along with everything else. Windows security vulnerabilities didn't suddenly become a big media thing because a terrorist secretly installed an undetectable backdoor program on a top-secret government computer, they became a big media thing because of idiot pre-teen hackers launching big, stupid, obvious attacks.

    6. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by rabel · · Score: 0

      That would be funny, but the main point is that the machine operates with code that is closed source. So really we have the worst of all worlds. Easily hackable by any elementary school script kiddie, while also ripe for having back doors written into the code by the developers for the purpose of swinging elections.

    7. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it'd be interesting to see the Communist Party take 98% of the ballot! :/

    8. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by autophile · · Score: 1
      It's not like this is going to favor Republicans just because the guy running Diebold is a Republican - with security this bad it's open season for everyone.

      So... it's just like voting, except that only the hackerz get to vote!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    9. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      I mean, really, when Kevin Mitnick is mysteriously elected governor of Minnesota in a write-in vote and NORML supporters sweep the legislative elections in nine states, somebody's going to start asking questions...

      I know what question I'd ask... "hey, when are you going to implement those machines here in Texas? Willie Nelson for Governor!"

      Seriously, though, I've been an opponent of electronic voting systems since my first experience with them during early voting. The interface was total crap -- a pain for me, and I'm a programmer. The idea that there would be no paper trail just makes me shake my head.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    10. Re:Relax, it's not so bad... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It's not like this is going to favor Republicans just because the guy running Diebold is a Republican

      Are you sure about that? Have you audited the code to make sure there isn't a function that changes every 100th vote to the Republican candidate regardless of who the voter selected?

      If these machines really are hackable then they'll be hacked, and going by the intelligence of your average script kiddie they'll be hacked to such a ridiculous degree that the results will clearly be fake and the judiciary will declare all of these elections invalid.

      You have to be pretty optimistic, one to think that the people hacking the system will be "script kiddies" and not professional black-hat crackers, and two to think that the judiciary would invalidate the results of an election that showed clear evidence of tampering.

  52. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

    IIRC the $cientology stuff was just modded down and not deleted... therefore it can be found by those looking... same should be done with the diebold memos... just make it easy to fin the posts but keep them modded low to have an added benefit of saving bandwith for the server and visitors not intending to get said documents

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  53. Re:Put them on P2P file sharing network WHICH? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 3, Interesting
    but which one?

    all of them. its the only way to be sure.

    I'm not joking by the way.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  54. Re:"Re:it ain't civil disobedience" But it IS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    goatse troll. I know I was warned but I clicked anyway.

  55. Swathmore Tradition by toxic666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before we condemn these students about a civil disobedience stance against electronic voting, keep in mind these folks are at a Quaker-based college and are acting in those traditions. A few of the posts modded up have been somewhat critical of the motives and methods.

    The Society of Friends -- Quakers -- have a long history of questioning that which is conventionally accepted. Thus, they were among the first to question slavery:

    http://www.gospelcom.net/chi/DAILYF/2002/02/dail y- 02-18-2002.shtml

    Quaker-based organizations -- The American Friends Service Committee and British Friends Service Council -- won the 1947 Nobel Peace Prize for their material aid efforts in postwar Europe, particularly in Germany which was then an international paraih:

    http://www.afsc.org/about/nobel.htm

    And they were in Cambodia when nobody else would go.

    Pick a topic -- civil rights, underground railroad, women's rights, GLBT, tolerance of different religions among them -- and Quakers have been quietly (and sometimes not so quietly) questioning convention and willing to stand by their decisions, even when confronted with prison and punishment.

    Check http://www.quaker.org if you want to read about how these people have stood in the face of convention and often ended up ahead of their times. Hint: William Penn Hat Trial.

    And no, they DO NOT dress like the 17th century guy on the oats box. That's more of an Amish style.

    1. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what on earth would we condemn their acts?

    2. Re:Swathmore Tradition by omega_224 · · Score: 1

      >And no, they DO NOT dress like the 17th century >guy on the oats box. That's more of an Amish >style. Well... As a member of said liberal-arts college (once denounced by no less of an authority than S. Agnew as the "Kremlin on the Crum"), I would have to say that we do have a fair number of students whose fashion sense does extend to the big hat and cloak traditions that the oat box glorifies. No, they are neither Amish nor SCA members. They're just SWIL. Google at your own peril.

    3. Re:Swathmore Tradition by orpheus2k · · Score: 1
      And no, they DO NOT dress like the 17th century guy on the oats box. That's more of an Amish style.

      There are still Quakers who adopt the "plain" style of dress (and speech, for that matter: thee, thou, etc.). It's more of a regional distinction: those Quakers can mostly be found on the West Coast. Nixon was a Quaker, BTW, and his mother was very much one of those West Coast-style Quakers.

      But, you're right: the vast majority of modern day Quakers look like regular ol' folk. In fact, you might know a few Quakers right now!

    4. Re:Swathmore Tradition by donnz · · Score: 1

      Damn straight, and did you know, the first Quaker president was good ol Tricky Dicky Nixon himself. Go you Quakers :-)

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    5. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Ragica · · Score: 1
      I've been getting to know the Quakers around here a bit better lately. Very interesting people with an extremely compelling perspective.

      It strikes me as utterly bizarre though the number of people I mention the Quakers to respond: "Nixon was a Quaker." Nixon, the man who while Quakers in general are fairly extreme passifists (though you don't have to be a passifist to be a Quaker) presided over half of the most cynical (until GW came along) and brutal wars America was involved with. Quakers, when you research them, one finds just are astonishing in their depths of historical social activism... as already mentioned... yet whenever you mention Quaker's someone says "Nixon was a Quaker".

      Honestly I don't know that much about Nixon, except that in the public general consciousness he is associated with cynical and power abusing government, illegal wire-tapping (invasion of privacy), the bloodiest part of the Viet Nam war, and so on. Everything that Quakers would oppose.

      The only thing I can figure it that Quakers must simply be too nice to turf anyone out most of hte time. Though some of them I have noticed seem to insist on adding that Nixon may have been a Quaker, but he was "non-practicing". Ah well.

    6. Re:Swathmore Tradition by norkakn · · Score: 2, Informative

      okay, I know this is half a joke, and I am drunk right now so I should probably jsut not answer, but.. I grew up a quaker and have done some research into it

      there are many different types of quakerism.. 3 main branches, i grew up in the most liberal ( www.fgcquaker.org ) i think nixon was in EFI, which is basically like baptist.. i don't even know why they call themselves quaker (they don't reallly beleive anything that it was based on.

      the other group is FUM.. they seem nice but i haven't really dealt with them
      they are mor conservative than fgc but still openminded.. they have a more close minded doctrine but the individuals seem cool

      afsc is mostly fgc i think

    7. Re:Swathmore Tradition by donnz · · Score: 1

      I think Nixon even "converted" to Baptism to get elected. No doubt some Baptists can correct me on that one...

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    8. Re:Swathmore Tradition by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      The kid who left boxcutters in airplane restrooms also went to a Quaker college and was acting (or at least believed to be acting) in those traditions. And Pol Pot was a Buddhist. I'm not putting down what these guys are doing -- I support it wholeheartedly -- but I don't think we should be too deterministic about the relationship between religion and their brand of activism. Especially since (1) what they're doing is not technically civil disobedience, since they are probably not breaking the law, and (2) their activities are likely to be far more influenced by the culture of slashdot than the culture of Society of Friends.

    9. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Ath · · Score: 1

      Who was going to condemn them? I think they are fucking heroes.

    10. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      This is not a tradition unique to Swathmore. All universities should encourage open exchanges of information. As it says on a plaque at the University of Wisconsin since 1910 :
      "Whatever may be the limitations which trammel inquiry elsewhere, we believe that the great State University of Wisconsin should ever encourage that continual and fearless sifting and winnowing by which alone the truth can be found." (Board of Regents 1894)
      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    11. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US involvement(in Vietnam) was because of the Dimmocrat Truman giving Vietnam back to France (who did and still do support extermination of all jews), and later because of the Dimmocrats Kennedy and Johnson. Nixon just inherited the Dimmocrats' fuckups.

    12. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time someone says "Nixon was a Quaker" to you in response you should say "and Torquemada was a Catholic. So what?"

    13. Re:Swathmore Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, please check out Herbert Hoover?

  56. Memos now on Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here are the memos (saved them from the last time Slashdot mentioned them). Now go Slashdot yourself, Slashdot.

    From Nel Finberg, Technical Writer, Diebold Election Systems

    (Note: Metamor/Ciber is the ITA assigned to certify the software)

    alteration of Audit Log in Access

    To: support
    Subject: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    From: Nel Finberg
    Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:31:30 -0700
    Importance: Normal

    Jennifer Price at Metamor (about to be Ciber) has indicated that she can access the GEMS Access database and alter the Audit log without entering a password. What is the position of our development staff on this issue? Can we justify this? Or should this be anathema?

    Nel

    Reply from Ken Clark, principal engineer for Diebold Election Systems

    RE: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    To:
    Subject: RE: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    From: Ken Clark
    Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:55:02 -0700
    Importance: Normal
    In-reply-to:

    Its a tough question, and it has a lot to do with perception. Of course everyone knows perception is reality.
    Right now you can open GEMS' .mdb file with MS-Access, and alter its contents. That includes the audit log. This isn't anything new. In VTS, you can open the database with progress and do the same. The same would go for anyone else's system using whatever database they are using. Hard drives are read-write entities. You can change their contents.

    Now, where the perception comes in is that its right now very *easy* to change the contents. Double click the .mdb file. Even technical wizards at Metamor (or Ciber, or whatever) can figure that one out.

    It is possible to put a secret password on the .mdb file to prevent Metamor from opening it with Access. I've threatened to put a password on the .mdb before when dealers/customers/support have done stupid things with the GEMS database structure using Access. Being able to end-run the database has admittedly got people out of a bind though. Jane (I think it was Jane) did some fancy footwork on the .mdb file in Gaston recently. I know our dealers do it. King County is famous for it. That's why we've never put a password on the file before.
    Note however that even if we put a password on the file, it doesn't really prove much. Someone has to know the password, else how would GEMS open it. So this technically brings us back to square one: the audit log is modifiable by that person at least (read, me). Back to perception though, if you don't bring this up you might skate through Metamor.

    There might be some clever crypto techniques to make it even harder to change the log (for me, they guy with the password that is). We're talking big changes here though, and at the moment largely theoretical ones. I'd doubt that any of our competitors are that clever.

    By the way, all of this is why Texas gets its sh*t in a knot over the log printer. Log printers are not read-write, so you don't have the problem. Of course if I were Texas I would be more worried about modifications to our electronic ballots than to our electron logs, but that is another story I guess.

    Bottom line on Metamor is to find out what it is going to take to make them happy. You can try the old standard of the NT password gains access to the operating system, and that after that point all bets are off. You have to trust the person with the NT password at least. This is all about Florida, and we have had VTS certified in Florida under the status quo for nearly ten years.

    I sense a loosing battle here though. The changes to put a password on the .mdb file are not trivial and probably not even backward compatible, but we'll do it if that is what it is going to take.

    Ken

    Reply by Nel Finberg

    RE: alteration of Audit Log in Access
    To:

    1. Re:Memos now on Slashdot! by pmz · · Score: 1


      Or should this be anathema?

      This is the most chilling statement I've read in a while. Out of dozens of paragraphs, the first one with a specific choice of word--anathema--describes exactly why electronic systems developed by pork-barrel government contracts are absolutely the least appropriate for running elections.

  57. 2000... by 110100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Did you somehow miss the 2000 election fiasco?

    --

    I have never regretted my speech,
    but I have frequently regretted my failure to speak.
  58. Let's just not vote on it. by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

    Next time you vote and found out you need to vote on Diebold machine, just tell them you don't trust the machine and refuse vote. Or if possible, request a paper ballot.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  59. Why on earth is this on a web site? by laird · · Score: 1

    This ought to be posted into FreeNet, where it cannot be killed. And putting up a BitTorrent of the files isn't a bad idea, either.

  60. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got a blowjob? Oh please how about lied about it under sworn testimony stemming from a sexual harrasment suit from one of the many women he sexually assualted over the years. Shit you think he would have come clean if Monica didn't have the dress? He would have buried her just like any other woman who tried to come forward.

  61. A noble effort, however by dankdirk77 · · Score: 1

    why do they make it sound like a republican plot? if you are a democrat out there, how many of you have assurances from your representatives that they will oppose diebold and any non-open source government initiative?

    --


    SCO: 800-726-8649
    Verisign: 800-361-8319, 888-642-9675
    Diebold: 800-433-VOTE (8683)
    1. Re:A noble effort, however by adarn · · Score: 1
      This seems like it is a republican plot. Diebold's corporate history has some connections to ultra right wing organizations.

      Quoting an article which can be found in its entirety at http://www.infernalpress.com/Columns/election.html
      Brothers Bob and Todd Urosevich founded American Information Systems. Bob is currently president of Diebold and Todd Urosevich is Vice President, Aftermarket Sales of ES&S. (In 1999, American Information Systems, purchased Business Records Corp to become ES&S.)

      American Information Systems (AIS) was primarily funded with money from Ahmanson brothers, William and Robert, of the Howard F. Ahmanson Co. The majority stake in ES&S is still owned by Howard F. Ahmanson and the Ahmanson Foundation

      Howard Ahmanson belongs to Council for National Policy, a hard right wing organization and also helps finance The Chalcedon Institute. As the institute's own site reports, Chalcedon is a "Christian educational organization devoted to research, publishing, and promoting Christian reconstruction in all areas of life... Our emphasis on the Cultural or Dominion Mandate (Genesis 1:28) and the necessity of a return to Biblical Law has been a crucial factor in the challenge to Humanism by Christians in this country and elsewhere..." Chalcedon promotes Christian Reconstructionism, which mandates Christ's dominion over the entire world. The organization's purpose is to establish Old Testament Biblical law as the standard for society.

      The article also explains how Bush II used leverage with a database company to win the florida election. (90,000 alleged felons who got the "update registered_voters set elligability = 0 where name = 'John Smith' and race = 'Black'" treatment.)

      I think it seems pretty obvious that the company who designed and has copyrights to the software has more access to alter the results than any outsiders. And Diebold seems to have a pretty far right Christian slant. RTFA.
  62. Communist != conservative by ccmay · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    If you like conservatism and patriotism, and you dislike civil disobedience, then move to Communist China.

    I've heard it all now. Communist China conservative? What about the Cultural Revolution? What happened to 'no enemies on the left'?

    Communism is the most extreme manifestation of loony leftism. They are your ideological cousins, and it is you leftist twits who should be ashamed of your history of making excuses for their wickedness.

    The blood of millions of people is on the heads of the "progressive" nitwits in the West who supported Mao and Stalin and the dozens of minor tyrants who followed them.

    You should stop trying to redefine conservatism as anything that pampered Western liberal intellectuals don't like, and vice versa. It's dishonest and despicable.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Communist != conservative by Womble333 · · Score: 1
      The blood of millions of people is on the heads of the "progressive" nitwits in the West who supported Mao and Stalin and the dozens of minor tyrants who followed them.
      You mean like Richard Nixon?
    2. Re:Communist != conservative by cranos · · Score: 2

      Umm I think you will find that China is extremely conservative. Just because they adhere to a psuedo communist doctorine does not make them free-loving hippies.

      I am a leftie, I believe in the community and a social design that does not leave those less fortunate behind. However I do not at any stage condone any acts of bastardry, whether committed by the far left or the far right.

      Extremism in any flavour is a blight.

    3. Re:Communist != conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Kissinger deserves some recognition there as well. Please explain to me how someone could get the Nobel Peace Prize for extending a war that was still being fought.

    4. Re:Communist != conservative by Womble333 · · Score: 1

      Indeed! I can add that to the list that the dishonest conservatives ignore when trying to falsely associate all liberals and progressives with dictators mass murderers.

    5. Re:Communist != conservative by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      communist is as liberal as Nazi's are conservative.

    6. Re:Communist != conservative by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this belong on kuro5hin? In case you didn't know, we hate all politicians here.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    7. Re:Communist != conservative by TKinias · · Score: 2, Informative

      Communist China conservative? What about the Cultural Revolution?

      Would that be the same cultural revolution where they shut down the universities and shot all the hippy-pinko professors?

      What happened to 'no enemies on the left'?

      This was the rallying cry of the united fronts of the 1930s trying desperately to stop the spread of Nazism and fascism in Europe. When the most immediate threat to your freedom comes from brownshirts, an alliance with the extreme left is quite prudent.

      The sad fact is that Stalin's lamentable ``Social Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of Fascism'' divided the anti-fascists so much that there was nobody to stop Hitler until it was too late.

      In Berlin in 1933, from any standpoint not alien to modern American norms of morality, there were no enemies to the left.

      Communism is the most extreme manifestation of loony leftism. They are your ideological cousins, and it is you leftist twits who should be ashamed of your history of making excuses for their wickedness.

      To suggest that somehow the post-Maoist state capitalism practiced in PRC now is somehow the same thing as Bolshevism, much less the same as Marxism or Catalan-style anarcho-syndicalism, is simply hallucinatory. One might assert with equal validity that Social Catholicism, white separatism, extreme laissez-faire capitalism (a.k.a. pure `liberalism' in the true sense of the word), English Conservatism, and Falangism are all the same thing. And only Stalin would say that.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    8. Re:Communist != conservative by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should stop trying to redefine conservatism as anything that pampered Western liberal intellectuals don't like, and vice versa. It's dishonest and despicable.

      What's despicable and dishonest is your attempts to portray a society which subjugates women, resists change at all costs, and highly values conformity as anything other than conservative.

    9. Re:Communist != conservative by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      China's not communist you dummy. It's a REPUBLIC. See, it's in its name: Republic of China. Must be true.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    10. Re:Communist != conservative by Darby · · Score: 1

      I've heard it all now. Communist China conservative? What about the Cultural Revolution? What happened to 'no enemies on the left'?

      Communism is the most extreme manifestation of loony leftism. They are your ideological cousins, and it is you leftist twits who should be ashamed of your history of making excuses for their wickedness.


      Actually, it's more like a circle. The extreme right and the extreme left are essentially indistinguishable. So Chinese communism and Neocon conservatism are very much alike.

      Just look at the US right now.

      Freedom of information act: Gone.
      Right to vote for the candidate of your choice: Going fast

      The only real difference is that in China, the government owns the businesses ( although they are moving away from that somewhat), so government tells business what to do.
      In the US businesses own the government and tell it what to do at the expense of the rights of the citizenry.

      The differences are real, but the visible affects of these differences are becoming vanishingly small.

      You should stop trying to redefine conservatism as anything that pampered Western liberal intellectuals don't like, and vice versa. It's dishonest and despicable.

      I define it based on the actions of those leading the movement. They spew hatred, fear, and lies. Much like
      China.
      That is completely honest and morally good.

      Defending traitors based on a lack of understanding of the political spectrum and your surrender to the filth these traitors spew is hardly an honest or righteous action for you to take.

      Don't you dare have the audacity to call yourself a decent American if you can't even be bothered to face reality.

    11. Re:Communist != conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first intelligent comment in subthread. karma awarded equal to number of posts preceding. congratulations, you are now buddha.

  63. All of you guys above are offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That link is to a GNAA post.

  64. you ain't a lawyer by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

    Me neither. But it sounds like the students freely admit to breaking the law -- which they are or not, I don't know -- and are doing it in order to keep this information public, because they believe that risking legal action in this situation is worth the public good. Seems to me that qualifies as civil disobedience, whether or not they ever end up in a courtroom.

  65. Torrent link... by ahaning · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    1. Re:Torrent link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a poor quality PDF of the book about Diebold fraud exists too. http://suprnova.sptorrents.org/torrents/453/BLACKB OXVOTING.torrent.

      also, copy of diebold voting software! http://suprnova.sptorrents.org/torrents/452/GEMSIS .torrent.

      if copyright protects fraud like this, fuck copyright!

  66. Archive link by mykawhite · · Score: 1

    here is a direct link to the archive, please download and mirror
    http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/org/scdc/me mos/list s.tgz

    micah

  67. Re:China == conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conservative:

    # Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.

    dictionary.com.

    Whatever YOUR politically twisted views of conservative may or may not be, China is extremely opposed to change - thus yes, they are a conservative state.

  68. Re:As usual by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    Bill Clinton was not impeached because he received a blowjob. Bill Clinton was impeached because he lied under oath and obstructed a federal investigation.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  69. READ THIS by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Informative
    What really scares me is Diebold's political activities which are biased.

    Read my rant here.

  70. Mirrors Available by coolmacdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    These are my two best servers. Though I must admit, they have never had a severe bandwidth test. I guess its about time.
    Please provide other mirrors if you can.
    Here you go:

    mirror1.coolmacguy.com/lists.gtar
    mirror2.coolmacguy.com/lists.gtar

    --

    -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
    1. Re:Mirrors Available by NineNine · · Score: 1

      It'd be nice if they were in a format that's actually usable. WTF is "gtar"??

    2. Re:Mirrors Available by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

      GNU Tar. That was the format he sent it to me in. I suppose I could change it.

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  71. Re:Put them on P2P file sharing network WHICH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to seed them on usenet as well.

  72. Re:Christ jesus, kids!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Flamebait." Right.

    What part of that was not true? Is it counter to democracy to actually get behind your fairly elected leader?

    It's not the right wing's fault that the whiners make the liberals look childish.

  73. how can you ignore a cease and desist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    when its the universities servers/bandwidth that they are hosted on ? sure rebel on your own server/ip range but this surely will get the college in trouble not the students as they are merely "borrowing" the facilities

  74. Please support BlackBoxVoting.com by DrunkClam · · Score: 3, Informative

    they've been doing most of the grunt work on this issue. Bev Harris deserves alot of credit. They have a really easy way to donate on their front page. 2 paypal buttons, 1 is a one time payment, the other is a $1.99 supscription. 2 bucks a month is cheap if you consider what these people are trying to do. So please help them out.

  75. Re:China == conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please focus your eyes further down in the definition.

  76. I used to worry by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to worry about all the lame-brained, right-wing-liberal, hippie-conservative, crazy assed shit that I've said over the years, and whether having my various posts where I've been all over the political spectrum, all over the spectrum of sanity and insanity, and everywhere from reasonable and educational to bloodthirsty pirate and troll.... I've worried that this legacy would take some explaining, maybe someday, if I were being recruited by the NSA or something, or any other job interview.

    But I WOULD NOT trade for anyone named on any of these Diebold memos.

    If these discussions are really true, if they are really from developers and QA people, they had better count their lucky stars if the interviewer at their next job isn't political.

    You could probably get away with a batch file that prints "system test passed" for all I know.
    --Ken Clark

    I may have said some crazy-assed crap in my time, but that's because I tend to be a clown. But I don't think I'd want to go on record with something like this. I actually might be more inclined to blow the whistle on this operation. Which is obviously what someone did do.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:I used to worry by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      If I were Ken Clark (and maybe I was) I would have had my name changed by now.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    2. Re:I used to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's naieve. These are EXACTLY the types of people most managers are looking for.

  77. TEMPORARY MIRROR by Adam9 · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is TEMPORARY.

    I put it in bzip2 format, which reduced it to 7.4mb from 11mb+ in gzip.

    Here it is

    It's on limited bandwidth, so please post a mirror with more resources.

    1. Re:TEMPORARY MIRROR by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Why is your mirror 7580kb and the original 11280kb?

    2. Re:TEMPORARY MIRROR by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Erm.. from the original post:

      I put it in bzip2 format, which reduced it to 7.4mb from 11mb+ in gzip.

    3. Re:TEMPORARY MIRROR by Rooktoven · · Score: 1

      Thanks friend.

      --

      Acquiescence leads to obliteration
  78. Freenet.... by Placid+Lake · · Score: 1

    I await the day when freenet becomes popular enough to work at a speed considered 'useable' to the average internet Joe. Insertions of information such as the diebold memo's can be completely anonymous, makeing sure there's no one to target with a law suit. The more people who use freenet 24/7 the better it gets. I'm sure theres plenty of slashdot'ers with unlimited and fast connections (unlike those stuck here in australia, where freenet eats into my quota like a fat man eat pancakes). Do the world a favour. Run freenet.

  79. Edonkey Link Mirror available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    available on the big servers (with the most users)

    ed2k://|file|Diebold.Electronic.Voting.Memos.Lis ts .Archive-FFM.tgz|11550838|4281C028A5257463347BE6AD A3C53D44|/

  80. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

    Makes more sense to fold to the CO$.
    Diebold may sue, but the CO$ kill.

    I agree that the "we sued slashdot" hall of fame would be an interesting concept.

    YAW.

    --
    Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  81. Remember to remove the spaces that /. adds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    shitty paranoid lame filters that make this site a chore to use not an good experience

    see subject

    1. Re:Remember to remove the spaces that /. adds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shitty paranoid lame filters that make this site a chore to use not an good experience

      The filters are better than shitty lame trollers that make this site a chore to use not an good experience.

      It's generally not all that difficult to make a link rather than posting an entire URL in plaintext.

  82. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While completely off topic, this is technically true.

    However, he was never supposed to be asked the questions he was asked.
    Why? Because they were irrelevant to the case.

    Someone said it was to show a pattern of behavior, but when the case is about alleged sexual harassment, questions about the defendant's consentual sexual endeavours are totally irrelevant. It's like asking an accused wife beater if he's ever touched another woman WITH her consent.

    If you want to go into legal wrangling, I still maintain he did not lie under oath, although his testimony was less than truthful. What's the distinction, you ask?
    The distinction is, according to the definition of sex, which was based on penetration; oral gratification was not part of the definition, AGREED TO BY BOTH SIDES, he did not have sex with Ms. Lewinsky (assuming no penetration), and thus when asked if he had sex with her, his denial did not technically qualify as a lie.

    However, if you read the investigation reports, they seem to be all about his affair with Ms. Lewinsky and not about the alleged sexual harassment. Can you say "witch hunt"?

    Anyway... your post was completely off topic, and therefore, so is this one.
    But I felt this needed a response.

  83. Real BitTorrent Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Available here. Someone please mirror this torrent, uploadit.org probably can't host it for too long.

    Torrent is built with backup trackers, so if you're using TheSHAD0W's experimental client it will fall-back to the next tracker in line if one is down.

  84. Fighting the Power by br4v3_s1r_r0b1n · · Score: 1
    What I want to know is whether I have the choice of NOT using an electronic machine. I'd think it's reasonable to say 'I want to vote old-school, with a pen and paper.' Then, it'd be a matter of enough people requesting this that the machines would just go away. Perhaps there is some accessibility issue that can be invoked, or maybe just use absentee ballots.

    I agree: current versions of these machines are prone to error or corruption, and shouldn't be foisted on us without considerable *SUCCESSFUL* testing by highly critical, technical people.

  85. 404 by WookieinHeat · · Score: 1

    I am already getting a 404 error...

  86. NY Times wimps out by canineK9 · · Score: 1

    NY Times had more than a page in Sunday Edition about replacing aging voting machines with computerized electronic voting. In spite of an entire column on the intense lobbying the several companies are doing to gain government contracts, only one part of one sentence mentioned security as a concern at all. The old media has either been co-opted or is totally clueless... probably both.

  87. Mirror mirror on the wall by achurch · · Score: 1

    http://achurch.org/lists.tar.bz2 (until I get slashdotted)

  88. Australian mirror by Dylancable · · Score: 1

    http://eddie.ratm.net/johnkimble/lists/lists.tgz grab it here 100mbit.

  89. Ding ding! We have a winner for most confused! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      • If you like conservatism and patriotism, and you dislike civil disobedience, then move to Communist China. They are very conservative, very patriotic, and don't tolerate civil disobedience. Your kind of people...
    • Kiss my patriotic ass. This stupid ultra-liberal backlash against patriotism is pissing me off. Patriotism != blindly following Dubya and his henchmen. Patriotism, as I see it, has always meant a love for the United States and the ideals set forth by the founding fathers, two of these ideals being the Constitutional rights to freedom of press and freedom of speech. By that view of patriotism, what these students are doing is clearly patriotic. No American in their right mind would argue that having our elections run by a bunch of incompetent buffoons who try to cover their massive flaws with lawsuits is a good thing.
    Wow! Where to begin?

    Go back and read a little bit. The original poster accused people conducting civil disobedience of being unpatriotic.

    The poster you replied to said that the OP was being unpatriotic, and perhaps the OP should move to China, where they dislike public discourse and prefer prison for anyone who disagrees with the official government propoganda (e.g., tiananmen square).

    Now you come along. I practically need to stretch the english language to convey how completely you misinterpreted the entire conversation, so I won't try. I'm nervous that you might interpret this reply as an endorsement of dwarf tossing or something. So this is for everyone else.

    He was confused, is all. Go ahead and gawk at him for a while and then continue along with your daily activities, like you would if you saw one of those little green lizards in your yard.

    Darl, is that you?

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  90. I can think of a great use of P2P tech.... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    Everyone says p2p is evil, but in a case like this it can really shine. Download it, put it on your favorite P2P app properly named, and bandwidth will come. There's no stopping half a million netizens who are hosting it off of their boxen.

  91. Bittorrent link by nstrom · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try this bittorrent mirror link; this torrent uses multiple trackers so even if the tracker is taken down it will still work, as long as there are seeds connected (or even once complete copy of the file across all the downloaders).

  92. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet, starting an unprovoked war and destroying the economy are A.O.K.

    Bush is a bastard president. Thankfully, "like father like son" he'll be gone after 1 term. That's what you get for believing in trickle-down economics.

  93. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps - Australian mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  94. Oh. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    "A nondeterministic set of sentients devoted to order and chaos"

    So the like to use big words so they can feel 'better' about themselves?

    1. Re:Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more that we use big words because it's goofy and fun. Same reason some of us wear amusing hats and swoopy cloaks. *shrug* Immanentize the eschaton, boys.

      ----jere7my tho?rpe, SWIL co-president 1992-1993.

    2. Re:Oh. by CComMack · · Score: 1

      And I get my Moderator points after posting on this story already... grr... Mod parent up, and hi, j7y

      ---Michael Noda, Proud cloak-wearing SWIL Nonmember

    3. Re:Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) You've described all of Swarthmore, not SWIL in particular.

  95. Re: bzip2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A different compresion algorithm is used.

    The orig. is gzip,
    the mirror is bzip2

  96. MOD PARENT UP by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  97. Want the Memos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  98. OK OK OK by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I'm an idiot. I am going to bed before I do anything else stupid.

    Sorry about that.

  99. ...when Godwin's Law is invoked this quickly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't quite USEnet, but what the heck.

    Godwin's Law is hereby invoked. Sooner than I thought it would be, too. Come on, /.! We're better than this! Why, when there's an interesting conversation regarding the insecurity of a widely used voting system, do we have to bring up the nazis?

    (Move along, move along. Nothing left to see here. The Nazis have been kind enough to produce flamebait for everyone.)

    For example, someone could mention something about how this is another example of the ignorance of the masses being taken advantage of, once again, by the technical elite. People trust those in charge of systems like this to have integrity. I don't care what party you belong to. Doesn't the thought of a hacked together MS Access database without any non-trivial security protocols being responsible for your election results send a chill through your soul? It sure as heck does mine.

    I think that a situation such as this is absolutely key to enlightening the public of the dangers of ignorance and blind acceptance with regards to technology. I really believe that, in the US, the people are the ultimate power. Would the DMCA have ever passed through the legislature if the average Joe on the street knew it existed and had even the slightest inkling of its ramifications? No, of course not. If the average Joe were aware of some implications, the people who do tend to write letters to their representatives would have run their local post offices out of stamps. (Pure conjecture, of course)

    What we need to do, as the responsible answer to these technical elitists who are trying to hide their incompetence behind the shimmering curtains of copyright law and technical wizardry, is explain to our less-technical friends what this means and what sort of implications it has. Set up your own little database in Access if you want (read: If you can stomach using Access for that long) and demo just how easy it would be to change the vote results in such an insecure system. 3 clicks changing the outcome of the race oughta' be enough to convince any skeptic just how scary this can be.

    Alright, then, I've said my piece. Resume your discussion of Nazis, Hitler, conservatives, liberals, and all other flamebait.

  100. Everyone needs to hack these machines by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    The answer to getting rid of these machines is to hack them in a massive way, putting in completely bogus candidates and making them win by a landslide. Mickey Mouse wins a state. Natalie Portman becomes a real life senator.

    Do this on election day using Wireless hacks, from laptops or whatever else is needed. Make the election so completely screwed that the government is forced to drop electronic voting completely.

    Why Americans can't follow the Australian way by simply marking a paper sheet with the numbers 1 thru 7 or putting a X in the candidate square you like, is beyond me. It's simple, easy to tally, and can be recounted ad nauseum if required with no allegations of vote tampering destroying the trust process of the election.

    If you aren't intelligent enough to do that you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

    Quizo69

    1. Re:Everyone needs to hack these machines by mikewolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      paper ballots are just as easily altered as electronic... who would know if a box of ballots disappeared? or if a box of ballots just showed up... in Chicago people used to vote more than once in the same election, hence the phrase "vote early and often"...

      I'm not saying i agree with diebold, reading these memos makes me sick to my stomach... i am a software developer (g, surprise) and i can't believe what i just read. I think that they should be sued out of business for the little bit that i just read that was reposted on slashdot, and i think they should face criminal charges... i am writing my congressmen and senator immediately to try and make sure that they understand the gravity of what these memos reveal.

    2. Re:Everyone needs to hack these machines by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1
      paper ballots are just as easily altered as electronic...

      That may be true, but the main issue is that paper ballots have been around for a long time -- long enough for us to work most of the kinks out and to find out where the weak spots are.

      Remember that security issues are not an absolute; we rarely look for perfect security or perfect auditing. But any system that purports to be secure (i.e., keep a secret) has to be provably secure enough, and well-understood enough to determine the best implementation.

      Put another way, the Diebold machines have a lot of known issues with security and auditing. What we should be as concerned about is the unknown security and auditing issues.

      When discussed in this light, paper ballots are insecure as any physical tally can be. They are subject to accidental miscount and deliberate abuse. However, we've had hundreds, maybe thousands, of years to devise systems that utilize paper ballots to minimize or isolate these problems. We know where most of the systemic bugs are, and we can concentrate on ensuring that rogue polling stations don't break existing law.

      Jeepers, when we vote federally in Canada, the polling officer actually initials each ballot (on the back, naturally) and checks for the initial before the folded ballot goes into the box. This is one of the oldest checksums known to humanity (and no checksum is perfect).

      Paper ballots are not perfect, but they are perfect enough.

      My question (and it may be naive) is why do we need fancy polling machines (mechanical or otherwise) anyway? What problem do they solve that is not solved by paper ballots? Is it simply a matter of scale? Is the electorate really served any better by mechanical or electronic voting methods by solving a critical problem with paper ballots?

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    3. Re:Everyone needs to hack these machines by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      paper ballots are just as easily altered as electronic

      Yeah right, try forging 100,000 ballots by hand in one day.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Everyone needs to hack these machines by mikewolf · · Score: 1

      why would i do that when i could just 'lose' 100,000 votes from the heavily county?

    5. Re:Everyone needs to hack these machines by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      why would i do that when i could just 'lose' 100,000 votes from the heavily county?

      Because then you have to steal a couple tons of ballots.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  101. WARNING PARENT CONTAINS GOATSE.CX LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  102. Hot Mirror Action! by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    http://www.guanotronic.com/~snook/lists.tar.bz2

    http://www.guanotronic.com/~snook/lists.tgz

    For those who are considering mirroring, my lawyer warns that angering large, litigious corporations is not generally a bright move, even if they don't have a leg to stand on in court.

    1. Re:Hot Mirror Action! by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Large litigious corporations do not get to hold democracy hostage. If they want to sue, they can sue fucking everybody and we should all stand up.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:Hot Mirror Action! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

  103. It's a 1st amendment right by harriet+nyborg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Okay, now it's either legal OR it's civil disobedience (i.e., intentionally breaking a law, and accepting an unjust punishment, to draw attention to an issue).

    I believe there is an argument that it is neither. It should be seen as protected speech under the protections of the first amendment of the US Constitution.

    In the US supreme court's landmark Sullivan decision, it was firmly established that speech criticizing public officials was more or less immune to ordinary charges of libel.

    The court adopted Madison's view that the people are the ultimate owners of the country.

    As Justice Brennan wrote in the majority opinion, Thus we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, casutic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials... and as an expression of grievance and protest on one of the major public issues of our time, would seem clearly to qualify for constitutional protection."

    While Dieblod is "not" a government official, its involvement in the election of public officials should be close enough to invoke the free speech protections which the US Supreme Court has provided.

    The ability to critize our public officials AND THEY WAY THEY ARE ELECTED is a fundamental American right.

    Use it before the traitors who stole the last US election take it away.

    1. Re:It's a 1st amendment right by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      You are correct, but what we're talking about here is not SPEECH criticizing anyone. What we're talking about is the THEFT of confidential and proprietary internal company memos and then the illegal disemination of those memos to the public at large.

      Law provides each and every person and corporation with reasable protections of privacy to prevent undue harm by those who would seek to inflict it.

      This is no different than me breaking into your house, stealing your computer, and posting all of your bank records, medical records, your kiddie porn collection, and everything else for all the world to see.

      Sure, what Diebold is doing is despicable and I'm really glad this made it into the open, but you can't by any stretch of the imagination call this "protected speech."

      What's really nice is that stolen company documents are admissible in a court of law if the attorneys involved played no part in the theft, so when DieBold gets indicted over this, the memos will be admissible :)

      It should also be noted that these security problems could help democrats just as much as they could help republicans. This is not a political issue and the hyaenas that are slobbering over this as the next "vast right-wing conspiracy" need to just calm down and see this as the TECHNICAL problem that it is.

      I read through some of the memos and it's pretty clear that these problems are caused by poor management, rushed schedules, and lack of attention to detail in the design - not political motives. Granted, the Chief over there is obviously right-biased, but I have a hard time believing that he could pry ANY entire group of developers into purposefully inserting code that would give any one class of candidate an unfair advantage. If he ever attempted, I'm sure someone would blow the whistle... oh wait a minute... nevermind...

  104. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by SixDimensionalArray · · Score: 1

    Violation of rule #1 of SECURITY when it comes to electronic voting systems (this is a "restricted protocol": "Our voting system, which is part of the public commons has recently been privatized. When this happened, the counting of the votes, which must be a public process, subjected to the scrutiny of many eyes of plain old citizens, became a secret." If any of you are security experts out there, you know that they simply should not rely on a secret process. The process should be PUBLIC, it should be PEER-REVIEWED and AVAILABLE for people to pick apart and strengthen. There are plenty of REAL, PUBLIC voting protocols out there Diebold. Why'd you choose to privatize? I mean, they obviously realize that is a departure from the proper methodology, and yet they STILL did it?

  105. I have an obvious question. by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck havent any of the major media outlets started talking about this? Why arent the democrats up in arms?

    If this is even half true, then its HUGE. This would completely knock Watergate out of the history books. Can you imagine the outrage if this became widely known? This would deal an enormous deathblow to the christian right, the republican party and the bush family, amongst others. How many election results would have to be recalled? How many Bush family members would be thrown in jail? Would there be an impeachment?

    1. Re:I have an obvious question. by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative

      "This would completely knock Watergate out of the history books."

      Would it?

      Watergate was an incident of a political party's attempt to manipulate an election. The perpetrators were caught, and even a conservative view of the facts indicates that members of the highest level of government conspired to coverup the incident. The effort was a failure, and led ultimately to the only resignation of a sitting US president in history.

      The Diebold situation seems to consist of a correspondence record of some engineers and managers who botched the quality control phase of a project. The closest thing to a crime indicated here, would be on the hands of whoever allowed an uncertified product to be used in a public venue where certification was required.

      I'm afraid Watergate still holds its place on the scale of national scandals. There's really no evidence that Diebold's incompetence is because they have been instructed by a political party. There is some evidence for negligence though. I wouldn't want to be ANY of the people whose names are on these memos, at least not while looking for my next job.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:I have an obvious question. by RevSmiley · · Score: 1

      People who profit form such kinds of stuff have no interest in pursuing this perhaps? That could be one answer. Perhaps they are aware of this and have used it to their own benifit before?

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
  106. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Maserati · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear God. What these people consider a 'release" version should count as criminal negligence on an ordinary project. This is about an election, nothing - with the possible exception of the judicial system that may have to step in over this - is more important in our system of government.

    I mean... My God ! They don't know what they're sending to the client ! "Is this a "testing" release or not? (Ashamed to ask). I think the hallucinations ought to be resurfacing with Steve already. Ken"

    Where are the US Marshall's ? Ashamed to ask ? How's he gonna feel under interrogation ? Or on the witness stand. Draft 'em and send 'em to Leavenworth.

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  107. Great idea by Eese · · Score: 1

    What's really brilliant about this, is even if they (the people behind this civil disobedience movement) totally lose, get sued/shutdown/jailed/whatever, they still win, because now, this is like the original decss source, everyone has it, it's spreading across the Internet in a multitude of countries, and the message that they are trying to spread will be spread even further and louder. So congratulations to all the martyrs involved.

  108. GOATSE by chosen_my_foot · · Score: 1

    Whoever modded that informative obviously did not click the link. The link is NOT a mirror of the file, but a link to goatse. If you don't know who/what goatse is, then you are lucky. Don't click the link.

  109. another mirror by Zak_Arcatia · · Score: 1

    Here's another mirror of the Diebold memos.

  110. Re:Eloquent != moviestar (+10 sarcastic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To suggest that somehow the post-Maoist state capitalism practiced in PRC now is somehow the same thing as Bolshevism, much less the same as Marxism or Catalan-style anarcho-syndicalism, is simply hallucinatory. One might assert with equal validity that Social Catholicism, white separatism, extreme laissez-faire capitalism (a.k.a. pure `liberalism' in the true sense of the word), English Conservatism, and Falangism are all the same thing. And only Stalin would say that.

    Who the fuck are you, Will Hunting?

  111. Mr. President... by Rutje · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've asked it before, but how can such a dumb guy become leader of a country... democratically??
    I don't believe the majority of the people voted for him.

    --

    I want my karma, and I want it now!
    1. Re:Mr. President... by RevSmiley · · Score: 1
      "I don't believe the majority of the people voted for him."



      They didn't. That is not what is requried to win. Almost no president has been elected by a majority ever. If you don't understand how the presidential electorial system works you have a sub standard education.



      This whole Diebold thing is getting interesting. I wish the accuracy of these memos could be verified.

      --
      As you can see I don't care about my karma.
    2. Re:Mr. President... by Rutje · · Score: 1

      You have a point there.
      I misformulated... but my point was clear.

      And about my level of education: why should someone from Holland know how the presidential electorial system works? Do you know how it works in Holland?

      --

      I want my karma, and I want it now!
    3. Re:Mr. President... by cicho · · Score: 1

      Isn't Diebold's reaction sufficient to verify the memos? Diebold is not saying the memos are false. They're saying "this is our property".

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    4. Re:Mr. President... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      how can such a dumb guy become leader of a country?

      Because there are always more, dumber people out there to vote for him.

      --
      That is all.
  112. It's in Freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I just put it there. And it's in my frost uploads table to ensure that it stays there permanently.

    CHK@uNJEck3x2pPCIZnqHPFDqKXlYN8NAwI,chtwdxwIyVoD Wj CKevv4pg/lists.tgz

    Unfortunately freenet routing is permanently fucked and the project is in a tailspin so you will have to retry a number of times before you get the file. I'm hoping one of the few people on the planet who knows java will take an interest and help out because the current project leaders are in way over their heads.

  113. My response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Text of my email to R Gross.

    As an English IT consultant (and a member of the Society of Friends) with many relatives and business contacts in the USA, I have been growing more and more concerned by the vast budgets available to American politicians for elections and the consequent possibilities for electoral fraud based on unverifiable electronic systems.

    The attempt by Diebold to conceal the extent to which these concerns may be justified seems to me to be profoundly anti-democratic. It is deeply worrying that a private company should effectively have control of the outcome of the electoral process without proper oversight. Central to allaying concerns over the fairness of elections is that the process should be fully transparent. If part of that process is proprietary and cannot be independently audited, transparency is lost and the opportunity is open for fraud. As any experienced analyst knows, the use of test routines cannot be a guarantee of any kind of completeness, and only full access to the source code by qualified programmers and analysts can rule out the possibility of backdoor access, data modification or data loss.

    I am delighted to see that Swarthmore students are following in the great Quaker tradition of speaking truth to power. If in some ways they may have been less than well ordered, I hope that Swarthmore will be able to help them into a right understanding. But if they have genuinely uncovered an abuse I hope it will be able to stand firmly behind them.

    Yours in friendship,

  114. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do things the way they do because they are lazy, greedy, and most likely pretty stupid. They keep it secret because they are republicans and need to make sure they win at any cost in a time when their kind is going extinct.

  115. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Natalie Portman becomes a real life senator.

    Does she actually have to take the job if it happens? Now that would be sweet. I mean, Arnold is entertaining and all, but it would be great to see a celebrity forced to be a politician.

  116. And best of all by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    They pretty much invented modern chocolate - Cadbury, Rowentree, etc. (and the welfare state but that's less important :-)

  117. Mandatory Access Control by escowles · · Score: 1

    The issues of audit trail tampering really brings home the point that they should really be using military-grade systems to do this kind of stuff. We already have commercially-available systems that provide a high level of auditing and capability-separation. I worked with B2 DG/UX in the past (for medical records), though I guess that since DG was purchased for their storage products, that's probalby not an option these days. Sun Trusted Solaris, a version of Solaris that is B1 equivalent, and includes x86 support. I'm sure there are a few other products out there that could be used.

    Designing an audit system that isn't modifiable, even by someone who has superuser-level privelieges, isn't rocket science. Even if you don't have robust security features in your OS, you could do remote logging to a separate machine. It seems like a decent audit trail is the least we should ask for.

    -Esme

  118. Wow! 16,022 votes by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

    Apparently, there seems to have been a mysterious netting of -16,022 votes for Gore on a Diebold machine in the 2000 Florida election. IIRC, Bush won by a very small margin (hundreds) in Florida.

    I have never been that interested about pregnant chads or various conspiracy theories relating to absentee votes, voters written off from the lists etc... Basically, those claims usually lacked consistence and these kind of dirty tricks were probably played by both sides.

    Now, this kind of direct tampering with the results can be proved (or disproved) and that makes a big difference IMHO.

    Maybe Gore actually won the 2000 election after all.

    --

    It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  119. i'm just going to download them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and save them on a floppy disk and put them in the ceiling tiles. that way i'll be a "hacker".

  120. FREENET Misconceptions by Famatra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is with these misconceptions about freenet.

    First of all, Freenet is making rapid progress despite the fact they have very *very* limited funding. I'm currently able to insert and receive gigabytes of stuff off freenet. Perhaps if you did as suggested and left your node on for a few days so it could intergrate into the network you'd see some speed.

    Second, this child pornography thing is false. The main sites have little if any of it, see for yourself. As well, this porgraphy content could easily be displaced by projects like this Memo thing if people would just insert other content.

    Third, content doesn't drop off fast. It usually takes months of non requests before it slides off. As well GNUnet, another p2p anonymous GPL project, has the ability to host specific files on your hard drive, perhaps this feature will be added to Freenet.

    The coding is simple, and if you dont like Java, there is a close cousin of freenet in C,C++ type language called Entropy, as well as there is GNUnet. Why not look at the code and experiment, its all GPL.

    1. Re:FREENET Misconceptions by hankaholic · · Score: 1

      Aye, there are many misconceptions about Freenet.

      However, as of a few months back, integration wasn't working properly, and after a week of running the client continuously, all I got for my efforts was a large amount of bandwidth consumed, and very slow page access.

      I'm all about Freenet, but integration didn't work for me. I'll give it another shot in a few months, but for now I don't have the time to play.

      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
  121. Mirrors by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Mirror linked here too. Ironic - and revolting - thing is that Diebold is also the company responsible for protecting the original Constitution, Declaration, and Bill of Rights.

  122. Mirrored in Freenet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's being inserted into the Freenet "production" network as I type this. The production network is an older stable build running a smaller network, and performs remarkably well. It'll definitely be retrievable. Set up a production node and try it for yourself:

    http://www.frontier.eclipse.com/freenet

    When it's all in, I'll switch to the "development" network and insert it again. Depending on whether the routing algorithms are happy today, it may or may not be retrievable there. Keep trying and you'll probably get it. (Development is the regular freenet network.)

    No matter where you look for it, the key is

    CHK@fsatUAqLqJP91UTrCoReT3qciVYNAwI,whenOQbgnMLS o8 4zg1~~aA/lists.tar.bz2

    1. Re:Mirrored in Freenet by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      This is just what Freenet seems to be made for.

      I only wish I didn't encounter ridiculous speed problems with it...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  123. Re:Freenet.... Leeching Problem / Slowness by Famatra · · Score: 1

    There is a problem with freenet, a large one actually: people can run non contributing 'transient nodes'. i.e. serial leecher nodes.

    Leeching, esp. on an anonymous network, where there is little if any drawback to doing so, is a big problem. If few people contribute then the network becomes slow (although the speed is faster now on Freenet I find).

    One solution to serial leeching was created by another p2p project, which is GPLed, called GNUnet. They use an economic model in which people who contribute get credits they can use to request files, so leechers are out in the dark.

    Even if you don't know programing, but know network topology, or even economics in GNUnet's case, then why not contribute your ideas to these projects? Freedom of speech seems like a worthy cause to donate some time to.

  124. p2p edonkey emule link here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is the link

    ed2k://|file|Diebold.Electronic.Voting.Memos.Lists .Archive-FFM.tgz|11550838|4281C028A5257463347BE6AD A3C53D44|/


    ed2k://|file|Diebold.Electronic.Voting.Memos.Lis ts .Archive-FFM.tgz|11550838|4281C028A5257463347BE6AD A3C53D44|/

    to be downloaded from the donkey/emule/overnet network.

    truth for the world. dont become their slave.

  125. Re:p2p edonkey emule link here (mod p. up!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up.

    good link, file works, best and secure way to distribute stuff.

    thanks

  126. Re:p2p edonkey emule link here (mod parent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modders please do mod the parent up.

    p2p networks are the best way to ensure stable and secure links to stuff that the feds want to get rid of.

    fuck the feds, fuck this evil and corporate world.

    information wants to be free.

  127. Re:p2p edonkey emule link here (modder up) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modder up da parent.

    emule links are the best.

    cool, this link is much faster in download than those crap slashdotted websites.

    jeezuz, dont them slashdot editors ever use their brains?

    what good does it do, to slashdot em?
    put up links to p2p systems of downloads, before u guys post a story.

    thank you

  128. Still repeating the same myths? by axiom9 · · Score: 1
    If you read up on the issues of Diebold voting machines, you will see that they have numerous problems keeping track of votes, eg recording a NEGATIVE 16,000 votes for Gore in contested Florida.
    Go after Diebold citing factual information please. To do so otherwise is to discredit legitimate claims questioning the effectiveness of the Diebold systems. Thanks, drive thru.
    --
    "As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy." - Abraham Lincoln
  129. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by bfree · · Score: 1

    It's not a concept to have a "we sued slashdot" hall of fame, if you look at the hall of fame and the most visited stories you will note that numbers 1 and 8 are the Microsoft and the scientoligists requests to remove content (with 377844 and 265178 views respectively)! Just goes to show that sueing to remove content is not the best way to have the content go away!

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  130. Bittorrent: the anti-slashdot-effect by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

    torrents buck the /. effect and actually improve the overall transfer of the files to you. (Assuming you can get the torrent downloaded.

  131. Whats new? by I+can't+find+a+name! · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys, nothing new here. People with access to the voting equipment--no matter what technology is used--have always had the ability to cheat the system. I've worked in election offices, and guess what, I could easily grab a couple bags of cards, ballots, whatever and throw them in the pile. Thousands of them. You have to actually *trust* the people working your polls! It is that simple folks. Next time you vote (you do vote right?) look around at the current technology and see how many ways it can be beat! A lot of it is easier than hotwiring a electronic machine!

  132. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the kind of reply that should be posted to /dev/null. As cool as it once was, fewer and fewer people are using usenet.

  133. clever hack by colmore · · Score: 1

    If these things do get used in an election, and somone DOES hack them to demonstrate weakness, please do so in an unambiguous way.

    Give a nonexistant candidate more votes than the state has citizens.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  134. #include "stdcomplaints.h" by autophile · · Score: 1
    "I have become increasingly concerned about the apparent lack of concern over the practice of writing contracts to provide products and services which do not exist and then attempting to build these items on an unreasonable timetable with no written plan, little to no time for testing, and minimal resources. It also seems to be an accepted practice to exaggerate our progress and functionality to our customers and ourselves then make excuses at delivery time when these products and services do not meet expectations."

    "I feel that over the next year, if the current management team stays in place, the Global [Election Management System] working environment will continue to be a chaotic mess. Global management has and will be doing the best to keep their jobs at the expense of employees. Unrealistic goals will be placed on current employees, they will fail to achieve them. If Diebold wants to keep things the same for the time being, this will only compound an already dysfunctional company. Due to the lack of leadership, vision, and self-preserving nature of the current management, the future growth of this company will continue to stagnate until change comes."

    Except that these are sentiments expressed at every company.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  135. this won't affect me because by Savatte · · Score: 1

    I don't vote!

  136. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you go, another insecure product which relies on Microsoft software/databases.

    I guess they didn't even bother to password protect the Access Database.. and geeze.. Access sucks for performance, but I guess they're not concerned with that.

  137. The moderators win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mods seem to be able to get even more confused since they view that MalleusEBHC's comment you referred to as "insightful".

    I'm more convinced that very few adults post to Slashdot.

  138. Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a pamphlet-maker, I'm a database guru

    Ah ha! I have the solution to your problem! Simply engineer your databases to return a reminder that Diebold is evil and attach the memos onto any query to your databases! You have a captive audience, the best kind!

  139. My e-mail to Dean Gross: by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Here's my letter:
    • I'm dropping a quick note in support of Open and Auditable voting rights, and in the rights to discuss the implementation of such systems.
    • Currently, a leading manufacturer of electronic voting systems named Diebold Systems is attempting to squelch critics and critical discussion of their products and business methods. Some of these critics are your students, as you are probably well aware. Such Cease and Desist orders are the first step in a campaign to control those who would dissent, and to intimidate those who would research.

      I believe this discussion rightly should include the publication of confidential business memoranda that have been acquired from Diebold Systems. These memoranda may show certain antipathy to the proper methodology and design for a secure voting infrastructure. It is only through such exposition that a frank discussion of security and responsibility can be pursued.

      Lastly, I am very concerned at corporate influence in government function. I have long held the position that "a corporation has no vested interest in the rights of the individual." I am not anti- business or anti-profit, but companies which perform vital government functions such as producing voting equipment must be adherent to the principles of a free and informed electorate, both in products and in deeds.

      I recommend you support your students, and support their cause to inform the public where possible on these issues.

      Please show your students that Democracy and Research are more important than corporate greed, and that transparency is critical when building a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  140. eDonkey & Overnet link by wossName · · Score: 1

    Here's an eDonkey and Overnet link for the .bz2 file (remove the space !):

    ed2k://|file|list.tar.bz2|7762005|c53855d1c5da1f ec 2da1548905bc689f|/

    --
    Someone is wrong on the Internet!
  141. BitTorrent link HERE by casio282 · · Score: 1
    --

    :wq
    1. Re:BitTorrent link HERE by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      That's one of the things I like about Bit Torrent, is finding torrent files around the Net. It's like a scavenger hunt. Although Bit Torrent has its problems, it works sometimes and I'm sure it will improve as algorithms are refined and new ideas are implemented. Exciting technology right now.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  142. Re:Eloquent != moviestar (+10 sarcastic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Funny, bitches. Come on.

  143. MAINSTREAM MEDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not forget to make a call to the mainstream media outlets, abc, nbc, cbs, etc., and tell them they should cover it. Having many people call might make it a news item.

  144. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    What scares me most is the apparently lack of cryptographical expertise. Now I'm not a crypto expert but I have perused Bruce Schneier's secure elections chapter in Applied Cryptography, and I work orthogonoly with security systems (e.g. Kerberos) - But even considering an embedded password, or operating system security, as any form of reliable security, is just absolutely bewildering. Have these people not heard of PKI? Signatures? Blinding? This is not "theoretical" stuff at all. It is a sad day when the security of democracy is relegated to that of the "next stupidest" competitor.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  145. Freenet Diebold Archive Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freenet was created so government, courts, or corporations could not silence speech. Here is a link to the Diebold Memos via Freenet:

    CHK@sgOjWAy4g-0bf0m5biyqnEzWloENAwI,OXw8OfHPfsmLd0 68BtICKg/liststorrent.tgz

  146. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

    Oh, OK, I misunderstood.
    I still think a Hall of Infamy would be a good idea though.

    YAW.

    --
    Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  147. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    I disagree with you one one (and only one) point.

    "This is about an election, nothing - with the possible exception of the judicial system that may have to step in over this - is more important in our system of government."

    The last US federal election made it clear that elections don't matter much. You can lose the election and still take control of the government.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  148. I just mailed off the following to the addresses i by jefu · · Score: 2, Informative
    I am a professor of computer science with a long time interest incomputer security and related matters (though I do not publish or research primarily in that field).

    I find that the legal climate concerning publications about computer security is becoming such that research in this area is increasingly being put in jeopardy. In large part this comes about as a result ofthe DMCA, but the problems that the DMCA cause are being exacerbated by companies issuing gag orders on publications that they find embarrassing or annoying. Should this be allowed to continue, fundamental research in the area ofcomputer security may well become an underground activity - with prior restraint on publication, gag orders on publications that do make it out and severe penalties on those who support or condone such publications or even such research even at second hand.

    I urge Swarthmore to contest this legal threat and to continue to support academic freedom on all levels.

  149. Me too!!! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
  150. MOD PARENT UP! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

  151. But O'Rielly's not a conservative! by JCMay · · Score: 1

    Bill O'Rielly is a populist, not a "true" conservative. Instead of wanting small, weak Federal Government that the Founding Fathers designed, he wants a "good" Federal nanny instead of a "bad" Federal nanny.

  152. Mirror and Search Engine at GlobalFreePress.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://new.globalfreepress.com/search.cgi?form=ext ended

    psst... pass the word ;->

    peace

  153. Dear Diebold by Letter · · Score: 0
    Dear Diebold,

    It is so nice of you to put up a mirror on your own server.

    Cheeeeeers,
    Tab Cola

  154. Ken Clark by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    Reading through that exchange, Ken Clark had also better hope the interviewer at his next job doesn't place a particularly high value on English skills and the ability to construct a sentence. Mind you, I could just be miffed because he violated one of my pet peeves -- loosing when he meant to use losing.

  155. Way to go, moron by kiwimate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have aptly demonstrated you are too stupid to be reading Slashdot. Here's a hint -- you agree with the parent! You just insulted someone by affirming what that individual said.

    And you got modded up for it! Looks like you're not the only person around today who's too stupid to be reading Slashdot.

    1. Re:Way to go, moron by asscroft · · Score: 1

      Thank you, for a second I thought I was crazy. Then I realized this poster either quoted the wrong post, or is a complete idiot.

      --
      because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  156. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    Incredible, isn't it? I found myself wondering just how many rows are going to be stored in their Access system on a typical machine. Never mind about performance issues (as others have pointed out) -- what about the robust (or otherwise) nature of Access when it comes to handling large quantities of data, and the recoverability of such data in a problem scenario?

    I've seen people try to write little Access databases in the past and expect them to cope with millions of rows of data (usually they're the people who think referential integrity means how accurate the encyclopaedia is). I always heartily suggest they consider keeping the Access front end, if they must, for the forms and reports and so forth, but link the tables to a real database engine. You know, one which has transaction logging and can run DBCC, for example.

  157. COWBOYNEAL FOR PRESIDENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  158. Download available here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downloadable memo file (it's a .tar.bz till I can get time and clue to .zip it) here , and check with /die if problems.

    1. Re:Download available here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my links just above -- the first one does not work, but the second one does, which will get you to the file.

      -- Chalice.Us owner

  159. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by TheMidget · · Score: 1
    Nope, the $cientology stuff (Fishman affidavit) was indeed deleted. However, soon afterwards it was reposted to random unrelated stories by lazarus. Many of those lazarus reposts have been deleted as well, as soon as they were spotted by the editors, but some went unnoticed.

    However, to Slashdot's credit, this has been the only time that Slashdot has caved it. They once got some pretty stern cease & desist letters from Micro$oft about some dodgy republishing about some NDA'ed MS-Kerberos documents, and they resisted. Does this mean that David Miscarriage is more powerful than Bill Gates?

  160. working toward civil acountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To paraphrase the Nobel laureate Richard P. Feynman, anyone can throw stones but but if you can point out what went wrong something good can come out it.

    There are a BUNCH of good software engineers mathimaticians, and programmers reading these lists. Why don't we join ranks over at sourceforge and either develop voting software or vet the vote tabulation project (hosted by sourceforge).

    As a first pass, the following need to be added:

    1) full transaction logging with intrusion detection.
    2) add a full regression and unit test suite for validation and testing.
    3) GPL required so that any changes to he codebase MUST be pubulished so we do not have backdoors, etc. slipped in.
    4) consutation with legal staff concerning copyrights and pattends. Electronic polls and voting have been going around since the earlydays of ARPANET, DECNET, etc. What is the basis of Diabolds patent?

    With these, a Linux voting machine can be made wich uses secure links, auditable, and legal.

    1. Re:working toward civil acountability by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "There are a BUNCH of good software engineers mathimaticians, and programmers reading these lists."

      Good engineers and scientists do not succeed in business or politics, apparently. On the other hand, the people who DO succeed in business and politics are the same people who got picked first for the dodgeball team starting in kindergarten.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  161. Ballot stuffing? Welcome to the 3rd world, USA! by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Looks like you guys need independent international observers to watch your elections and make sure they are really conducted fairly...

    Just like the rest of us eh?

    http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&i e= ISO-8859-1&safe=off&edition=us&q=%22election+obser vers%22

    BTW great coverage on this vital issue (the foundation of your "democratic republic") by your "free", "uncensored", "independent" mainstream media. Which reports that 70% of you guys still think Saddam/Iraq has something to do with 9/11. And that the war is for a regime change (and not the WMD someone was yelling about some time back).

    You guys are making it way too easy for them. WAY too easy. Can't you at least make them sweat a little? I mean you're letting them get so obvious it's not funny. It's kinda disgusting actually.

    --
  162. FreeNet - Frost Posted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are on FreeNet via FROST and I have them archived other places, they will not be going anywhere.

    Freedom of Information

    lists.tgz * CHK@ZZJG866h69cb74CnSUMt70gIxBENAwI,0X~1ErYtvlNRqx dW4u-Kvw
    lists.tgz.torrent * CHK@1IibNz3FMjS3RukK077j9J8puTILAwI,~1h6fhjjTLnCka 3lu5SUiA

    GEMSIS.torrent * CHK@8ETV5-rRVk~6PCEH2a3Ang8W9pUNAwI,qdpPPab76VPtit T6-71J9w
    GEMSIS-1-18-17.zip * CHK@sOw805Zw3qUyc-nKqLmYnIOjiRcOAwI,9pdmHaTS15lxP5 dLJqw74Q
    GEMSIS-1-17-23.zip * CHK@OjkXGismOdW0JPXzRb5ZXdArFn4OAwI,GG0AkE-9Vbw2B- QlOsu43g
    GEMSIS-1-17-17.zip * CHK@jLmw5zknWAdHvTlxd~GXigzOJtkOAwI,Lvju7-OP73hu3q 4bKU4VWQ

  163. The Access engine is same as SQL Server by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

    The only difference is that M$ deliberately limited the number of simultaneous queries to five. Otherwise Access does have a robust DB engine.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    1. Re:The Access engine is same as SQL Server by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Not unless you installed the MSDE engine as an option when you installed Access 2000 or better. By default it's always been the Jet engine (which was also used, eg, for WINS). Granted, it's not explicitly stated, but as they're talking about MDB files and Access I suspect it's a Jet engine; otherwise they'd be talking about MSDE files. (By the way, one of the differences between the two engines is that MSDE provides a transaction log file.)

  164. Mirror Here as well by Sedennial · · Score: 1
  165. Re:Wouldn't it be better to post it outside the US by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    Not sure.

    Universal copyright is one of those things that many countries have all agreed to and ratified, in principle. Copyright enforcement might be one of those things where international borders don't quite have the same meaning.

    --
    -- clvrmnky
  166. Re:How to Help Us - 3 Steps (my letter) by uucp · · Score: 1

    I've just recently been informed about the work of the Swarthmore Coalition for the Digital Commons, and I have to say if the attitudes and actions of these students represent your school, then I want my children attending Swarthmore College. The dedication that these students have in finding and supporting the truth should serve as an example of how honest, studious Americans can aid their country. Your support of the SCDC shows me that you are a man of integrity and honor, and I highly respect both you and Swarthmore College for shining a light in the darkness. Thank you for remaining strong in these chaotic times.

    -Brian

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  167. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Darby · · Score: 1

    and I work orthogonoly with security systems

    That word you're using?
    I do not think it means what you think it means.

    You work at right angles to security systems?

  168. Re:Wow! 16,022 votes by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1
    Maybe Gore actually won the 2000 election after all.

    It really never was about "the chads", except in the U.S. media. What really happened is far worse.

    Check this and this and this out. And this. And why not this, as well.

    --
    -- clvrmnky
  169. How about yours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Civil disobedience does not mean "accepting an unjust punishment." The best civil disobedience is that which does not accept the punishment to the very bitter end. That is how revolution is fought and won; it is the very stuff from which freedom is made.

  170. FUCK YOU, YOU POOH-POOHER WITH YOUR GODWIN'S LAW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up. Your lame attempt at pedantic whateverthefuck is meaningless and trite.

  171. Take off your tinfoil hat, it's nice out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A C&D is NOT a legal order, it is a threat to sue.

    1. Re:Take off your tinfoil hat, it's nice out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a threat to sue a private individual made by a massively overprivileged and wealthy corporation is tantamount to a legal order. yes, they should resist - and yes, they should start shopping for a lawyer.

  172. Re:Freenet.... Leeching Problem / Slowness by Placid+Lake · · Score: 1

    Freenet does have one immediate advantage (though i'm sure you hardcore geeks won't appreciate it), Windows support.

  173. No, it's a bad sign for our country when... by Corgha · · Score: 1

    What is so patrotic about the statement "stop your whining and get behind the president already", especially in the context of voting fraud?

    It's a bad sign for our country when people think that patriotism means slient obedience to the President.

    Patriotism is about love, support, and defense of one's country, not of one's head of state. It does not require the love of authority figures simply because of their authority. (Love of authority for authority's sake is, however, a characteristic of fascism, which was, I imagine, the point of the earlier AC's post.)

    There's a reason we pledge allegiance to the Republic, and not to the President. People used to be compelled to swear an oath of allegiance to King George, but we don't do that anymore.

    We need dissent, and we need people questioning the President. When people are afraid to tell the President what he doesn't want to hear, or otherwise disagree with him, the government stops working effectively. No one is right all the time, but when people are free to disagree with and criticize our leaders, we can avoid letting the mistakes of one man become the mistakes of our entire nation. That's what democracy is all about. It may be a pain in the President's neck sometimes, but it works better than anything else out there. After all, silent obedience to their insane King George didn't serve the British very well, did it?

    Should the founding fathers have been told to quit their whining and rally behind King George like good British patriots? No doubt they were told as much by the Tories. Were they unpatriotic for not obeying? No, it was their very patriotism that led them to risk and sometimes to sacrifice their lives by defying the King.

    More to the point, did they risk and sacrifice so much to give us freedom and the right to vote only to let us piss it away with unauditable and easily-manipulated elections? Should we stand by and let our vote be taken from us because, as some people think, patriots don't complain?

    No! Dissent is the duty of the patriot. Open and free elections form the very foundation of this country. Those who would silence this healthy dissent regarding the safety of our elections with a call to patriotism may love something, but it's not America, at least not the America for which our forefathers fought and died.

  174. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
    I always heartily suggest they consider keeping the Access front end, if they must, for the forms and reports and so forth, but link the tables to a real database engine. You know, one which has transaction logging and can run DBCC, for example.

    Bad idea!

    Despite absolute horrid SQL generated by Access as a front end I've seen nasty effects on industry strength databases. For example ghost locks on pages, which would only go away upon a server reboot.

    Generally speaking I think that all "4GL" front ends are bad news in terms of performance, but what I've seen under Access is a desaster.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  175. Re:INCRIMINATING MEMOS!!!!(since the site is so sl by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    it means that enemies of microsoft are not found mysteriously dead or framed for murder.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  176. Another mirror by Belgand · · Score: 1


    http://www.plastic-idolatry.com/diebold [user: diebold, password: die]

  177. Mirror and Writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's my Mirror

    And some of my other writing about the issue, including my letter to Dean Gross