Slashdot Mirror


Sun Produces Strongest Flare Ever Recorded

idontneedanickname writes "The BBC is reporting about the newest flare unleashed by the sun. According to NASA's SOHO website, "Today word came from the SEC that their best estimate was X28. We have a new number 1 X-ray flare for the record books." As usual there are magnificent images to be admired." This one's not headed straight for us...

422 comments

  1. Anyone else think... by Tenareth · · Score: 5, Funny


    That Sun Microsystems was coming out with a new line of servers when they read the headline?

    First the SunFire line, now the SunFlare line, the STRONGEST EVER!

    --
    This sig is the express property of someone.
    1. Re:Anyone else think... by someme2 · · Score: 1, Funny

      And it has X.28... that's even better than X.25.

      --
      You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
      Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    2. Re:Anyone else think... by Budgreen · · Score: 2, Funny

      does that include the dual X17 class or the X20+ class processor line?

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    3. Re:Anyone else think... by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      >And it has X.28... that's even better than X.25.

      *Shudder*

      That's what I call damning with faint praise.

    4. Re:Anyone else think... by KDan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yup. I was about to post something like this but then you did...

      Would be a good idea for Sun to follow actually. Great naming scheme, especially given how many flares there have been recently. Easy marketting line: "Sun Flare X35 - the only Sun Flare on Earth!"

      Will get them a bit of bad will if a really strong sun flare does end up wasting half the electronics in the world though...

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    5. Re:Anyone else think... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should say "The Sun", not "Sun". Anywho..

      "Sun Produces Strongest Flare Ever Recorded"

      Is their hardware really getting that flaky?

      Hehe...

    6. Re:Anyone else think... by Motor · · Score: 1

      I thought it meant one of the processor fans in a Sun had packed up -- but then I realised it'd have to be an AMD chip to *really* overheat and produce the strongest flare.

      --
      We all know that crap is king
      Give us dirty laundry!
    7. Re:Anyone else think... by meta_gorn · · Score: 1

      Sun Microsystems is more akin to a black hole these days.

      --
      --- When I grow up, I want to be a legislator of scientific laws.
    8. Re:Anyone else think... by bpowell423 · · Score: 1

      Back in college, we had a bunch of Sun systems and they were named flare1, flare2, flare3, etc. flare12 had the most memory (40 MB!) and disk space, but flare13 was our fastest... it was a Sparc II! Those were the days...

    9. Re:Anyone else think... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      That could backfire. A competitor could point out what solar flares can do to electronics, and try to draw a parallel.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    10. Re:Anyone else think... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought Sun Mocrosystems, but I figured they were making employees wear 15 pieces of flare.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    11. Re:Anyone else think... by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      ... or maybe the engineers of the Photon driven Quantum Cryptography System got a little too experimental?

    12. Re:Anyone else think... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      It's just a really heavy button to wear on your suspenders.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Anyone else think... by Ashtead · · Score: 1

      "The Sun" and talk about them and "Stronger Flares", sounds like there'd be a topless model on Page 3 wearing fashionable-looking Kevlar flared trousers and nothing else....

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    14. Re:Anyone else think... by VegeBrain · · Score: 1
      Easy marketting line: "Sun Flare X35 - the only Sun Flare on Earth!"

      This will only work until someone points out that a solar flare is a big bunch of hot gas coming from a hole.

    15. Re:Anyone else think... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Certainly not X86 - I hope.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    16. Re:Anyone else think... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      And get in trouble with Rupert Murdoch?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    17. Re:Anyone else think... by RickL · · Score: 1

      Why did they go with X.25/X.28 when it was aimed at SOHO? I would think that most small offices/home offices would use ethernet.

    18. Re:Anyone else think... by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

      And it's based on a 486 too!

    19. Re:Anyone else think... by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I thought. Awesome.

    20. Re:Anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeebus! I submited a story about this flare ON TUESDAY! but no...the damn editors didn't wanna see it. sheesh.

  2. That was close! by jamie · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:That was close! by jx100 · · Score: 1

      yeah.. but they get back through transwarp seven years later...

  3. Okay... by superdan2k · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...who's trying to hack the Sun?


    (Pun so totally intended.)

    --
    blog |
  4. What's with all these flares? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 5, Funny

    My guess would be... TERRORISM.

    --
    evil adrian
    1. Re:What's with all these flares? by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I wish somebody would shed a little light on the subject.

    2. Re:What's with all these flares? by powerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, brilliant. They probably want to leave us in the dark.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:What's with all these flares? by deanj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like flamebait to me...

    4. Re:What's with all these flares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop that.

    5. Re:What's with all these flares? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Not evil corporations or SUVs?

    6. Re:What's with all these flares? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      surely it's God's wrath concerning the end of the internet tax moratorium

    7. Re:What's with all these flares? by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      " My guess would be... TERRORISM."

      My guess is that this is the latest tactic by SCO to pump their stock. You see, Darl McBride plans on a press conference later announcing that the recent solar activity is a result of that viral GPL, and should be enough proof for anyone that GNU/Linux contains SCO's IP and is therefore a derivitave work. Furthermore, it is proof that the GPL is invalid, and all works under it are therefore in the public domain. When it's pointed out that if the GPL is invalid then GPL'ed code reverts back to standard copyright, he'll point to his newly found addenum to the original GPL that was stuck to the bottom of a filing cabinet somewhere which states "... except during abnormal periods of solar activity" and said addenum will be found to contain the signatures of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Darl McBride, Linus Tolvards, Richard Stallman, and, of course, Satan himself. So, you see, we should just all give up and let SCO have their way with GNU/Linux because the solar activity is just the proof they need!

    8. Re:What's with all these flares? by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      So if the sun is shooting out "billions of tonnes" of gas into space, how does this effect how long the sun is going to remain alive? I'm guessing since it just lost one-billionth-billionth of its mass. That 1 billionth-billionth of its life span is now gone.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    9. Re:What's with all these flares? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, wait. Let's hear this out. I for one would like to be enlightened.

    10. Re:What's with all these flares? by SirLantos · · Score: 2

      After all these puns, I think I need to go light one up.

      --
      The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    11. Re:What's with all these flares? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      All you pun makers can BURN IN HELL!

      no, wait. . .that's wrong. . .

    12. Re:What's with all these flares? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Darn those Tourists! Good thing we got Dub-ya's brother in charge, deep down in Florida. He'll find a way to stop all that tourism that's afflicting Flor-i-da.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:What's with all these flares? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see, if the sun is expected to last 5 billion years, and it ejected one-billionth-billionth of its mass, then that would be one-billionth-billionth of 5 billion years.

      Two billions cancel leaving us one-billionth of 5 years or 200 millionths of a year which is about 1/6 of second.

      When the sub is a red giant and is passing the orbit of Mercury in radius, and the oceans start boiling, we're gonna be begging and pleading for that sixth of a second I bet.

      Next question: Who can we sue?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    14. Re:What's with all these flares? by Judge_Fire · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's always a bright side to things like this.

      J

    15. Re:What's with all these flares? by snake_dad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lighten up, will you?

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    16. Re:What's with all these flares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, a fuse? TERRORIST!

    17. Re:What's with all these flares? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      What goes up must come down!!!!!

      A lot of the matter will fall back to the sun.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    18. Re:What's with all these flares? by powerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm I hope he doesn't get all steamed about this.

      Perhaps we should chill it for now.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    19. Re:What's with all these flares? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      (MontyPython) Always look on the bright side, of life... (whistles)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    20. Re:What's with all these flares? by oobar · · Score: 1

      Reading this thread is pure punishment.

  5. is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    it's not like there doesn't need to be some additional light shed on us.

  6. Other source by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Space.com covered. it yesterday, with an update today. The bottom of the article has two cool animated gif's that showed the X-ray sensor blinded after the flare, and the subsequent coronal mass that was ejected.

    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    1. Re:Other source by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 5, Funny

      My favorite line in that article: "A period of relative calm is now expected on the solar surface. But another round is possible."

      Reads as: We have no fucking idea what's going on.

      --
      evil adrian
    2. Re:Other source by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      I know whats going on. The sun is a node for an intergalactic internet we do not yet know how to harness. Voyager leaving our solar system set off an alien alarm that we have developed deep space capability and the sun is sending the message to our soon-to-be galactic overlords. I for one welcome...ah, whatever. But thats just my guess.

      I could be wrong, they could be Vulcans.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Other source by dunstan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like the famous weather forecast in the Western Mail one morning:

      "Warm and dry, but cooler with some rain".

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    4. Re:Other source by barakn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saturated the SXI imager as well. For those of you who don't know, SXI is a sun-pointed x-ray imaging device on a weather satellite.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    5. Re:Other source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, this becomes more and more similar to social sciences !!!! :-(

    6. Re:Other source by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      I bet some scientists are a bit pissed right now. I mean, strongest flare ever and they don't have a good picture of it because it overloaded the sensors.

      Space.com's other cams have some really interesting pictures. The animated one is especially cool because you can see all the activity that has been going on lately. It is over 11MB to load though, so if you aren't on dial up you'd better just forget about it.

    7. Re:Other source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorant post didn't get modded up.

      I guess you don't have friends? :'-(

    8. Re:Other source by Winged+Youth · · Score: 1

      That article has images which fortell a much more terrifying fate for our sun: GIANT FRIGGIN' SPACE SPIDERS

      --
      "p2p stabbing is such a vast, untapped market"
    9. Re:Other source by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      My favorite line in that article: "A period of relative calm is now expected on the solar surface. But another round is possible."

      Reads as: We have no fucking idea what's going on.

      Very droll, but you've misunderstood what they are saying. Sunspot AR10486, the source of the flares we've experienced over the last two weeks has now rotated around to the other side of the sun and we can no longer see it. Thus "a period of relative calm is now expected" (it's possible some other sunspot will start flaring in a similar way, but unlikely). However in two weeks time AR10486 will be back on our side of the sun and may still be very active, so "another round is possible".
  7. Re:OMG by hcetSJ · · Score: 0

    May I point out, you're asking the entirely wrong crowd.

    --

    This side up.
  8. Impressive, by Trigun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Impressive until we realize that we haven't been measuring solar flares for very long.

    Were these parsnips CORRECTLY MARINATED in TACO SAUCE? -- WTF is that?

    1. Re:Impressive, by October_30th · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I think we can measure sun's activity over thousands of years based on the barium levels in arctic/antarctic ice.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Impressive, by mungtor · · Score: 1

      Which is about 10 seconds compared to the overall age of both the earth and the sun....

    3. Re:Impressive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it still doesn't fit with our current model of how the sun works. The sun's little temper tantrum could really change our understanding of stars in general.

    4. Re:Impressive, by Trigun · · Score: 1

      And history as well. If the sun is acting up frequently and cyclically, then some of the old religious and cultural stories may be explained and verified.

    5. Re:Impressive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, that's great all the way up until science "discovers" some reason why barium levels in arctic/antarctic ice isn't a good way to measure this sort of thing.

    6. Re:Impressive, by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      It may not be the best but it is a tool we have right now. Science theory is only as good as the tools to observe with. Science changes constantly because the tools evolve, theories adapt with the added precision to the observations we have. So I don't understand the inverted commas which seem to be showing overt sarcasm. Maybe your sarcasm hints at the arogance in the scientific field that exists, this sense of knowing how things work and being sure about. I think the best scientist though have always been the ones who understand the potential and the limitations of the observations that give them the data they have. Science will always be a quest for more precise measurement, and more accurate data. So yes it is a good measure until a better one is found if a better one can be found. :p

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    7. Re:Impressive, by barakn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Beryllium, not barium.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    8. Re:Impressive, by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Not nearly as precise as what we're getting here. For instance, the Perfect Solar Storm of 1849 (or whatever they call it) was probably stronger, but we have no objective measure.

    9. Re:Impressive, by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but they do have photographic plates showing it.

  9. Fucking SUVs by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not one to come out and harp on SUV owners, but with this abnormal solar behavior I think it's clear to see how much impact humans are having on not only our world but even beyond.

    Emissions are way up and pollution is at an all time high in many areas. Add to that that the polar ice shelves are rapidly breaking up and falling into the ocean, and you've got yourself a recipe for disaster.

    1. Re:Fucking SUVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Better hope a big volcano doesn't erupt, then. The last few large ones put out more CO2 and other 'pollutants' in one bang than humans have ever put out in the course of their history.

      You're snivelling up the wrong tree there.

    2. Re:Fucking SUVs by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Uh, lemme get this straight...

      Car Exhaust is causing solar flares?

      MOD PARENT FUNNY!

      Meanwhile, maybe you should read a little more about Green House Gases...

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    3. Re:Fucking SUVs by Overzeetop · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm isn't a moderation option, so we have to settle for the 50/40/10 mix which counts as appropriate moderation.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Fucking SUVs by Marovingian · · Score: 1, Troll

      "I'm not one to come out and harp on SUV owners..."

      I AM!

      The SUV [I prefer ASS-U-V] craze that has hit America and that's now being exported around the world is an unsustainable manifestaion of our arrogant and selfish 'bigger is better/fuck everybody else on the planet 'cause I wanna big honkin' vehicle so I can cart all of my earthly posessions with me to the beach on the weekend and get a whompin' 8 MPG-

      /rant

      Nevermind- I have work to do instead of ranting on slashdot...

      --
      Cursing in the French language is like wiping your ass with silk.
    5. Re:Fucking SUVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, the grandparent could use a mix of +1 Paranoid, too.

    6. Re:Fucking SUVs by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      when I read your title the first thing that came to mind was this

      is that what you had in mind?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Fucking SUVs by fluffy666 · · Score: 1

      Show me the stastics or shut up, moron.

  10. The high activity may repeat in two weeks by poszi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The sunspots that produced these powerful flares during last days moved across the solar limb. They are now on the far side of the Sun. However, such huge suspots can last quite long and it is likely they will still be active after two weeks when the appear again on the side of the Sun facing Earth.

    --

    Save the bandwidth. Don't use sigs!

    1. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the term "limb" on a round object? I saw the same on space.com.

    2. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here ya go.

      Limb: Astronomy. The circumferential edge of the apparent disk of a celestial body.

      Ever been to google.com??

    3. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by escher · · Score: 2, Funny

      All spheres spontaniously grow temporary arms. Didn't you know that?

      This... this is what's wrong with education today! They don't teach young'uns anything anymore!

    4. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have they warned those on the anti-Earth that it's coming round to point straight at them???

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      The limb of the sun is what we preceive to be its edge. Because the sun is rotating (every 2 weeks? 11 days? Too lazy to get my ASTR text atm...) the sun-spots at the base of these flares move across the limb of the sun onto the far side, and will re-appear fairly soon.

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    6. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by jerde · · Score: 1

      The word "limb" in this sense comes from latin limbus, "border." Its meanings in English all have to do with the edge of a round object.

      Oddly enough, the more common meaning of limb is actually a different word, spelled "lim" in Old English. This etymology page says that the "b" appeared in the 16th century for no apparent reason, though American Heritage says that it was probably picked up from the other "limb."

      So unlike other separate words pronounced alike, such as everyone's favorite their/there pair, limb and lim wound up being spelled the same by someone's mistake.

      It's wierd that people so vehemently defend correct spellings, given that so many of them originated as mistakes some time in the past.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    7. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      > Limb: Astronomy. The circumferential edge of the apparent disk of a celestial body.
      Thanks

      > Ever been to google.com??
      About 1,000 - 30,000 viewers will view this thread. You've just saved many of them a visit.

    8. Re:The high activity may repeat in two weeks by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      that old English lim turned in to lem in Swedish of today. Are limbus and limit related as well or is that just a conicidence?
      It seems online at least they're and their are confused more than their and there.

      Yeah, we're offtopic leave us alone.

  11. Are we sure... by TiMac · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that Steve Ballmer hasn't just been eating a heck of a lot of Mexican food this week?

    --

    1. Re:Are we sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if he's doing the monkey dance, that can't be good for bowel retention...

    2. Re:Are we sure... by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      He's with Microsoft, not Sun...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  12. Sheesh by grocer · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't know what you people expect from a giant ball of super heated gas undergoing fusion...perhaps large explusions of luke-warm gas and flaccid solar energy?

  13. That darn 486 by Chas · · Score: 5, Funny
    The major flares have come from sunspot region 486, now officially the most active solar region in recorded solar observational history.

    Next we'll see cloned sunspots from AMD and Cyrix, followed by a massive rebranding campaign by Intel...

    Wait. What were we talking about again?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:That darn 486 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who said overclocking with out sufficeint cooling has no ill effects?

  14. Solar Chili - Take 2 by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hydrogen Hydrogen, the nuclear fruit
    The more you burn, gravity can let it toot
    The more you toot, the better your feel
    So burn Hydrogen in every nuclear meal!

    In Space...nobody can smell your vapors

    -1 Troll (I wish I could think of something to post)
    -1 Overrated (I wish my ADD would let me read and absorb all of this...functional illiteracy doesn't help either)

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  15. Could this be from a colission? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Could all this activity be caused by a colission of some object into the sun? I'm just wondering if the sun got pounded by some asteroids a few weeks ago and they screwed up the balance of the surface, causing geyser-like effects.

    Is the sun moving into some more active part of the galaxy recently, are we in the tail of some massive previous event? Are other stars in the neighborhood showing signs of duress?

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Wonderkid · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Someone posted a similar theory about asteroid collision on the BBC News website. If we are in fact doomed (assuming the Sun becomes a threat over next few weeks/months etc), it may explain why George Bush, Tony Blair and others are showing zero interest in the environment and the gradual collapse of their societies (in particular Britain which is in an infrastructure and moral mess). IE, nothing matters any more. For governments to achnowledge there is a pending catastophe would create so much chaos they may have chosen to act 'normal'. Even response to events in Iraq seems very 'low key'.

      --

      O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    2. Re:Could this be from a colission? by mikerich · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Could all this activity be caused by a colission of some object into the sun? I'm just wondering if the sun got pounded by some asteroids a few weeks ago and they screwed up the balance of the surface, causing geyser-like effects.

      Highly unlikely. The heat from the Sun would vaporise anything long before impact.

      Flares (including this one) tend to be linked with sunspots which are relatively cool (emphasis on the relatively there) areas of the Sun. The Sun is made of plasma - super-hot electrically-charged particles. The plasma convects, transferring energy to the surface of the Sun. As the plasma moves it creates enormous magnetic fields. Normally these are confined within the body of the Sun, but occasionally, the magnetic flux extends beyond the surface of the Sun as an enormous loop. At each point where the line emerges and re-enters the Sun are a group of sunspots.

      Hot plasma streams along the line of flux, it usually confined to the magnetic flux, but occasionally it will break away as a so-called prominence.

      Flares are relatively common, but their cause is not yet understood (if any solar activity experts are hanging around - please feel free to step in right about now :)). From memory, the most well-regarded theory is that ever-increasing amounts of energy is stored in the magnetic fields of the sun spot. As the field becomes twisted and tangled, the energy continues to build until a point when the magnetic field snaps back into a less-tangled state. At that point an enormous amount of energy and plasma are blasted into space in a very short period of time.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anything to actually reach impact, it would have to be huge. Comets get in that close all the time, and they just evaporate. Probably Jupiter-mass and moving very fast could do it - also solid, since an unfortunate gas giant planet near the sun would probably be stripped of its atmosphere fairly quickly, leaving a little rocky nub not much bigger than earth.

      If something that big managed to get anywhere near the sun without our notice, we have MUCH worse things to worry about than overactive sunspots.

    4. Re:Could this be from a colission? by ItWorkedLastTime · · Score: 1

      Well, if we're doomed to be toasted by 100+MeV protons, it'd be quite a cool and spectacular way to go. I stood on my balcony in the middle of Copenhagen watching the Northern Lights last week for about 3 hours. Oh, pretty pink and green lights in the Sky - take me now!!! .../**brightflash**/ ...

    5. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Wonderkid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not the protons, it is the waring down of the Earth's magnetic field, which is apparently happening. Am not sure of the consequences. Love your posting though! :-)

      --

      O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    6. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more plausable that there was a disruption of the gravitional waves that caused it. maybe the folding of space time in that gravety well caused a puncture?

      I'll get my quantum physics book out and explain it later...

    7. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A collision with a small black hole less than a hundred
      miles in diameter would be undetectable to us and totally
      screw up the sun.

    8. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A black hole 100 miles in diameter is ONE FUCKING BIG black hole. A "large" stelar black hole would have an event horizon about 5 miles accross, and would destroy the sun (not to mention the rest of the solar system) if it were to wander too close.

    9. Re:Could this be from a colission? by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      Yeah the gravity of a few hundre mile diameter black hole would do nothing detectable to us.

      First off most theories have black holes much smaller than a hundred miles in diameter. Secondly the gravity it would create would bend light very noticably as it moved towards the sun (or more likely the sun moved towards it.) Thirdly the gravity of a black hole in our solar system would destroy the stability of the system. We would have long since stopped orbiting the sun if we were meeting paths with a black hole.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    10. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Is the sun moveing into some more active part of the galaxy? There really aren't any such regions, at least unless you're talking about exotic physics that just might be found near the immense core black holes. It's easy to imagine the sun could change as it moves into areas where there is a higher concentration of gas or dust or something, but it doesn't apply here. Why? 1. the sun is currently in a region comparatively empty of gas and dust. We have an exceptionally low density for at least 100 LY in all directions, with arms or lanes or whatever of exceptionally empty space that extend much further. This situation is something that changes over tens of thousands of years, not just a few. 2. The sun's outflow pushes stuff away. More gas or dust around us won't fall into the sun as fuel, although it might adjust where the heliopause is, perhaps shifting it inwards towards pluto's orbit a bit.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    11. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's been shown that the earths magnetic poles flip from time to time. we're now long overdue for the next flip.

      it's quite likely that the magnetic field is simply getting weaker to the point where it will be able to flip and then will start to get stronger again.

      during the period when the magnetic field is weakest you will indeed be able to see the northern lights everywhere on the planet

      don't expect to be around to see it though... it's something that'll take a few hundred years

    12. Re:Could this be from a colission? by BryanL · · Score: 1

      Very informative post. Also the parent poster needs to keep in mind that some of these sunspots are bigger than Jupiter. That would be one very large meteor to make a spot that big, even if it could survive to hit the surface.

    13. Re:Could this be from a colission? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      What was that Niven story? I can't remember the title, but it's about a solar flare that hits during the day in Asia, and the story focuses on two people living in California. The moon (Inconstant Moon! That's it!) gets very bright, like daytime bright, and people slowly start to figure it out. Made for a pretty cool story.

      It got made into a Outer Limits show once, I think. The new Outer Limits, not the old one.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    14. Re:Could this be from a colission? by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Why??? It would make sense for someone in power to really try to achieve his own goals, no matter what. Re-election would suddenly seize to be a matter to take into account.

  16. how long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I keep seeing that this is the most activity
    since we've been monitoring the sun. How long
    have we been monitoring the sun?

    1. Re:how long? by NickFitz · · Score: 1
      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    2. Re:how long? by falzer · · Score: 1

      For about 6000 years.
      ;-)

  17. What it means to me by 4of12 · · Score: 1, Funny

    TiVo recordings of shows received from satellite TV might be interrupted.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:What it means to me by adamruck · · Score: 1

      yes, becuase when this is done there might not be alot of satellites left, if I recall correctly the x18 knocked down a couple.. just imagine what this will do.. considering that is esitmated to be between x28 and x40

      then again Im not a astro physicist(cant even spell the thing)

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    2. Re:What it means to me by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought last week when some of my recordings had "spots" in them but then I realized that some tree-like crap grew tall enough to block my dish, cut it down and everything was back to normal.

  18. Too bad it isn't heading this way by empaler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I *still* havent seen any of the promised Aurora Borealis [space.com] from previous flares.
    It's been a decade since last I saw any.

    1. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Might I suggest this?

    2. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by flappinbooger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard some people in the Bosten area saw some quite nice northern lights, but as I'm in SW Florida, I don't anticipate any.

      Well, actually if I did it would be a really bad thing so I hope I don't...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    3. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, I pity you. Some of us have never seen it. Consider yourself lucky.

    4. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You gotta be looking up at the right time!

      I live in southern Germany, and last Thursday night at about 10:00 pm CET was absolutely the most spectacular auroral display - the whole northern section of the sky was bright red/orange with streaks of bright light fading in and out that looked like searchlights.

      The whole thing was over in 45 minutes to an hour, but definitely unforgettable...

    5. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      visit Canada. I saw the aurora fall of '98. worth it. and Canadians are keen folk. :)

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    6. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nightly occurrence, even out of "flare season".

    7. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      hence the jealousy of those of us living living beneath the 58th

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    8. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      I saw them in upstate New York (Troy) back in November of '86. At first, we didn't even know what the hell we were looking at. There we were, 50 yards or so from that HUGE water tank on the RPI campus, and as a backdrop this blue/gold shimmering. Eeerie, but way cool.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    9. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I saw the same type of thing, in Southwest Virginia a few days ago.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I guess I am lucky. I am going to Yellowknife tomorrow for work and it will be interesting. According to one of the people there, you don't even bother noticing them anymore since it happens all the time.

    11. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Saw it here in SE Virginia one night as a subtle red glow on the northern horizon.

    12. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      Thats how my Canadian host reacted to me and the first time I saw it.

      I'm just standing there struck dumb staring at the sky, the lights. She goes, 'what?' Like it was rain or something.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    13. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      spaceweather.com has some images of auroras over Orlando from late october. They did get as far south as Florida. Too bad it was cloudy where I was every night they were out here in NY. :(

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    14. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by confused+one · · Score: 1
      Actually, just because you could see it in Florida, wouldn't mean it was all that bad...

      Now, if you could read the newspaper by the light of the aurora, in Florida; then, I might get worried...

    15. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from 10pm to 3 am local time is when you will see them... and you have to be away from a city full of light pollution.

      so get out in the north country in the middle of the night!

    16. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      visit Canada. I saw the aurora fall of '98.

      I live in Ottawa and haven't seen anything. Unfortunately the sky doesn't ever get dark around here - it's orange at night due to the light pollution.

    17. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. I too live in a light blob. When I was in Canada I was up in Thompson, Manitoba. Pretty damn dark up there. :)

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    18. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aurora come and go on fairly short timescales. Depending on the intensity of the storms, they can shift further south, but most of the time (in the northern hemisphere) they are up in northern Canada and Alaska, away from the main population centres. The last week was good for more southern places, but the days when the results of the last round of flares were reaching the Earth, it was cloudy where I am :-( It takes some luck to have the best aurora + darkness + few clouds.

      If you want to know when to expect to see auroras, and whether they extend far enough for you to see them in your neighborhood, check out the maps at this site:

      aurora predition maps

    19. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      I am in SE VA as well, during the storm the recent X17 caused, I went out into the country and mostly saw a vague greenish light in the northern sky with fuzzy areas of crimson a little higher in the sky that would move around and change shape and intensity. I did spot a very nice one about 45 minutes after it got dark that started out as a crimson pinacle that reached up to about 65 degrees, then decreased to about 45 and a white column formed in the center that quickly faded lasting about 60 seconds. The crimson area faded gradually for a few more minutes, shifted to the west and was faded from view. After that, it basically just sucked and I went back home.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    20. Re:Too bad it isn't heading this way by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You missed out. I saw the northern lights last week in downtown Ithaca NY. It was a gorgeous pulsating red glow with white spokes converging near zenith. Didn't last long, but wow...

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  19. Solar Flares by AyeFly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its strange how all of a sudden there are many reports of strong flares... Just as the Space Weather forecasting program comes up for budget renewal.

    --
    Sig- http://www.dreamhost.com/rewards.cgi?ayefly
    1. Re:Solar Flares by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      +5, Insightful? +5, Cynic more like ;-)

      (Hey, I'm not saying it's not necessarily the case...)

    2. Re:Solar Flares by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, I bet they slipped the sun a few back-handers so it'd put on the biggest show in history.

      I mean it's OBVIOUSLY a conspiracy between a few trillion tons* of hydrogen and some scientists to cheat the taxpayers out of money! The nerve of these stars sometimes....


      * I have no idea how heavy the sun actually is (and I don't particularly care)

    3. Re:Solar Flares by InThane · · Score: 4, Funny
      * I have no idea how heavy the sun actually is (and I don't particularly care)


      Tough noogies.

      Useless informational post:

      The sun's weight is one solar mass. Have a nice day.
      --
      InThane
    4. Re:Solar Flares by confused+one · · Score: 1
      That's right. They're in a conspiracy with the Sun Gods, to produce these awsome displays of power to prove that we must worship them.

      The Space Weather forcasting center is their modern temple.

    5. Re:Solar Flares by pmz · · Score: 1

      * I have no idea how heavy the sun actually is (and I don't particularly care)

      The sun has no weight...unless, of course, you know of a way to put it on a scale in the context of local gravity.

    6. Re:Solar Flares by Kombat · · Score: 1


      What's that in Beetles? Aren't Volkswagen Beetles the standard layman's measuring unit for celestial objects?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    7. Re:Solar Flares by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1

      Er. If I don't care about what the value of the mass of the sun is, I think you can safely assume that I care even less about weight/mass pedantry! ;-) Anyway, I think heavy and massive are close enough....

  20. Buy SUNW now! by csoto · · Score: 1

    With powerful products like that, they'll dominate the Enterprise!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  21. Re:FP!!!! by NorthDude · · Score: 1

    If God exists, why did he create something so terrible as me?

    Maybe to serve as an exemple to others?


    Taken from despair.com ...

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  22. even bigger then 20 by adamruck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Craig DeForest, a solar physicist at the Southwest Research Institute, said others in his field are discussing the possibility that Tuesday's flare was an X40.

    "I'd take a stand and say it appears to be about X40 based on extrapolation of the X-ray flux into the saturated period," DeForest told SPACE.com.

    That estimate may even be conservative, he said


    x40.. holy crap.. and that number might be low

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    1. Re:even bigger then 20 by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      x40.. holy crap.. and that number might be low

      Piffle, I ditched my old 40x ages ago *flaunts my ASUS 52x*.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:even bigger then 20 by aliens · · Score: 1

      Heh I like what the have it listed as on SOHO's website.

      X Whatever!

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    3. Re:even bigger then 20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's "even bigger then 20," are you saying that it is currently greater than 20, but will eventually drop to 20?

    4. Re:even bigger then 20 by confused+one · · Score: 1

      And, in the final analysis they decided it's an X28 -- still the biggest on record (in our records).

  23. since the 1970's by Major_Small · · Score: 1

    we've been monitoring since the 1970's... I would like to think the measurements in the 70s were accurate, but you never know... here's an interesting page with pictures and a graph of the solar cycle...

    1. Re:since the 1970's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The measurements in the 70's were accurate enough to know that these flares, which are two orders of magnitude bigger than anything we measuered, are a LOT bigger.

      We also have inferred records going back about 1200 years with good reliability (about the same as our measurements of climate and atmospheric content going back as far, which evidence suggests is quite accurate), and the amount of flare activity in the last month exceeds anything in any block of several years during that time.

      That's still a very small period of time, but it makes this no less impressive, as a sudden period of intense flare activity doesn't fit well with our current model of the sun. Hopefully they'll collect enough data off the flares to correct the model, but god knows how long it'll be before this happens again so we can test it.

  24. Is anyone worried about this? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    My guess would be "no", since there's absolutely nothing we can do about it if the sun blows up or something.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Skater · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? People worry about a lot of things they can't change. It's illogical, but it happens all the time.

      --RJ

    2. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by zootread · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. If the sun is really going to blow up and destroy the earth, I'd like to know in advance so I can get a group of hot women together and have unprotected sex with them.

      --
      Zoot!
    3. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. The sun is still in the main sequence, so it isn't going to blow up, "or something." Furthermore, the Earth's magnetic field and our atmosphere protect us very well from just about all the negative effects (hard radiation) from this kind of solar activity.

    4. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And just how do you know that? Astronomers agree that the recent behaviour has been unexplainable and completely unpredicted.

      How do you know that main sequence stars don't just self-destruct sometimes?

      I for one am getting really, really worried about our Sun exploding one day.

    5. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe that scientists know exactly how every type of star will behave at each stage through its life cycle?
      There are gazillions (technical term) of stars and I'd bet no two are equal.
      We can't even predict tomorrow's weather here on earth with very good accuracy and though I predict that there are more meteorologists than solar phycisists you're confident the sun is just having one of those weeks.

    6. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >> Don't worry.

      ...That is, unless, you happen to be outside the atmosphere, circling the Earth in a metal tube.

    7. Re:Is anyone worried about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give a man (thinking about the sun) a match
      and you can keep him warm for a day..
      Set him on fire, and he'll be warm for
      the rest of his life ....

      (see it -was- about the sun)

  25. Is it just me, or... by Froze · · Score: 1

    does looking at images of eructations that are larger than a planet make anyone else nervous?

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Is it just me, or... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      You know I keep seeing this stuff in other topics about when the sun dies, it will expand out beyond the earth and all. And this process will take billions of years or whatever.

      My question is how the hell do they know this for sure. In the short history of humans observing the universe they have never seen a star just unexpectadly explode. There has also been neither the technolgy or the time to observe a star going from "regular" star to supernova.

      I don't see how anyone can say for sure that the sun will not explode and kill us all in the next year. Just because noone has ever seen it happen doesn't mean that it cannot or willnot.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    2. Re:Is it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will find out for sure... or not.

  26. sun cam by Major_Small · · Score: 3, Informative

    there's actually a webcam pointed at the sun... i'ts updated every 4 hours and can be found here.

    According to Space.com: The image is generated by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft, which sits partway between Earth and the Sun.

    1. Re:sun cam by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      There's actually several. All the SOHO images are posted to the SOHO web site shortly after they are received. Strictly speaking, that makes SOHO a webcam.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  27. So big it exceeds capacity by Jesrad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The solar flare produced proton wind in speed exceeding what the SOHO probe can measure. It also saturated the X-Ray detectors on NOAA's GOES satellites. X28 is an understatement, the actual value cannot be precisely determined, but is thought of being somewhere around X40 to X50. This is a logarithmic scale, NOAA says the peak X-Ray emission reached approximately 2 * 10e-3 W/ squared meter.

    M-class solar flares' order of magnitude is 10e-5W/squared meter, X-class' is 10e-4W/ squared meter, and anything beyond 10e-3W/squared meter :
    - was unheard of until a few days ago.
    - is a Y-class MEGA FLARE! Tin-foil hat time.

    On unrelated news, X-Plane now supports borealis auroras...

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:So big it exceeds capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X50? We don't need any of that.

  28. Oh Geez... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    Well, what do you expect when you mix the words Gas, taco sauce and sun on to one page?

    Come get your new Solar Flame Servers by Sun today!!! Only Sun can provide the speed and power to melt the competition like heat of taco sauce gas (extra large Pepsi not included in BTU calculations)!!! New and improved, our RF emissions are going to make you glow at night, giving that special someone a warm fuzzy about YOUR choice in performance (absorbing charcoal not included)!!!

    MCR UAF MOD user /PASS=IMALOSERFORFORGETTINGMYPASSWORD /NOPWEXP /PWDMIN=40 /PWDLIFETIME=1 /FLAG=GENPWD

  29. You mean YAWN Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw it yesterday, felt the earthquakes, surfed the tsunamis and dodged the volcanoes.
    No doubt the delay in this news was a public-spirited attempt to avoid the mass panic of people rushing to hide in their basements.

    1. Re:You mean YAWN Old News by Trigun · · Score: 1, Funny

      No doubt the delay in this news was a public-spirited attempt to avoid the mass panic of people rushing to hide in their basements.

      This is Slashdot, we ARE in the basements

  30. Waitaminute by Ryvar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If those sunspots were pointing at us just now, and this flare had a southward magnetic alignment - that would basically be IT, right?

    I mean, Fight Club-style apocalypse, the temporary collapse of civilization for at least a month or so until order could be restored, that kind of thing, yes? Anything not in a Faraday cage blown to Hell and gone, etc.?

    Does that about describe the situation we just missed? If so, can we please, please find some way to artificially induce exactly that situation?

    --Ryv

    1. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm with you too.

      I've been ready since Y2K with guns, ammo, food and water stored in my basement. They laughed at me then, but who's laughing now...

    2. Re:Waitaminute by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1
      I'm not great at this sort of thing, but its you isn't it? Ooh, do I win a prize?

      I've been ready since Y2K with guns, ammo, food and water stored in my basement. They laughed at me then, but who's laughing now...

    3. Re:Waitaminute by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      No, the earth's atmosphere would protect us, high latitudes would experience disruptions in the radio frequncies (radio, VHF Nav Aids), maybe some blown out power lines and bad cell connections. The most populated areas of the earth would be safe. We might lose DISH network though, and of course that would be a shame ;)

    4. RE: Waitaminute by Compunexus · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the people in the ISS are going to do? Does the magnetosphere give them enough protection or do they climb into a lead lined compartment?

    5. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, Fight Club-style apocalypse, the temporary collapse of civilization for at least a month or so until order could be restored, that kind of thing, yes? Anything not in a Faraday cage blown to Hell and gone, etc.?

      Does that about describe the situation we just missed?


      No.

      you would need a MASSIVELY larger one to do that, and more than likely we would be baked as well.

      it might take out a couple of aging sattelites launched in the late 80's (funny part is the sattelites from the 70's would tolerate it just fine.) most of the newer birds are designed for such events.

      basically it would annoy quite a few people for a couple of days, and probably take out most of canada's electrical grid and some of the other states with long wire spans that reach to hundreds of miles.

      if it's gonna be big enough to kick out collective arses, you wont know that it happened.

    6. Re:Waitaminute by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      And most, to all of our satellites.
      But we don't use those for anything important.

      Oh well it didn't happen that way so here we are.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    7. Re:Waitaminute by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      I will disagree. can I please just disagree. What are we talking about. if it was X50 I think we pretty much would have some serious saturation going on.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    8. Re:Waitaminute by rev063 · · Score: 1
      high latitudes would experience disruptions in the radio frequncies

      I think it might be worse than that. This flare was only a glancing blow, but even so all short-wave communications through the sunlit hemisphere of the Earth experienced complete blackout conditions.

    9. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from what I hear they think one this powerful at us would basically fuck over our ozone layer.

    10. Re: Waitaminute by headonfire · · Score: 1

      you know, OSHA (i think it was, maybe Nuclear Regulatory Commission instead) has mandated that the yearly occupational exposure limit for astronauts is five times the normal 5000 mrems/yearly, to clock in at 25,000 mrem/yr. if the gubbernment says they're safe, they're safe, right? RIGHT?

      by comparison, the data i've found says that at 400,000 mrems of exposure you have about a 50% chance of survival, and at 600,000+ you're dead meat. hell, i guess an irradiated iodine treatment for the thyroid dumps 20k mrems at your body... and TWO MILLION AT YOUR THYROID, and people make it out of that ok... Medicine is weird like that, isn't it?

      on the up side, during the storm the astronauts can just leave their frozen pizza on the counter for a couple minutes, instead of messing with the oven...

  31. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I've been a "hard core" atheist all my life"

    Sounds like you've also been an idiot and/or a troll.

  32. I am convinced by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    that the sun is blowing up. we will all be dead in a few months...well, existence was fun. maybe if the ancient greeks had put some of those technical ideas together, we could have had the industrial revolution 2000 years ago and been surfing the stars by now...oh well.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:I am convinced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Greeks would never have gotten that far. They believed you could determine everything about nature by asking yes-no questions about any object from nature.

      This glorious insight led to such discoveries as Spontaneous Genesis, and Phlogisten Theory.

      Only thing I can say they did was come up with a basic atomic theory and something that sort of looks like Darwinian theory. But they threw both theories out because Plato couldn't write good poems about them.

    2. Re:I am convinced by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the main stream greek thought was like that, but they had the technology in the fringe to be able to start the Industrial revolution.

      but those people who had these ideas about certain things were scoffed at.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:I am convinced by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      Well slavery made such that you didn't need to improve technology manual labour was cheap and at hand.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    4. Re:I am convinced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting this. Now I can go tell everyone that the world is ending because I read it online.

  33. Is this the world ending by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Read a theory once that the sun would swell and engulf the closest few planets...

    Perhaps this is a precursor? ;-)

    The sky is falling!

    1. Re:Is this the world ending by cyberlotnet · · Score: 1

      It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine (it's time I had some time alone)

      I feel fine

      Any girl want to have sex before the end cums!!

    2. Re:Is this the world ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I remember reading, the sun will start getting slowly hotter. The leading theory would have the sun so hot that Earth would be uninhabitable in about 1-1.5 billion years, but the sun would actually be slightly SMALLER at that time. It would be another 2-4 billion years before the sun starts to swell up to swallow us.

    3. Re:Is this the world ending by confused+one · · Score: 1

      You're a few Billion years early... Should be modded funny

  34. anomalous! by trb · · Score: 4, Funny
    Last week's astrophysicist quote:

    "I have not seen anything like it in my entire career as a solar physicist. The probability of this happening is so low that it is a statistical anomaly."
    This week's quote:

    The probability of this happening is a double secret statistical anomaly.

    1. Re:anomalous! by aengblom · · Score: 2
      Last week's astrophysicist quote:
      "I have not seen anything like it in my entire career as a solar physicist. The probability of this happening is so low that it is a statistical anomaly."
      This week's quote:
      "The probability of this happening is a double secret statistical anomaly."
      No, you've got it wrong. This week's quote:
      "Somebody's fucking with us"
      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    2. Re:anomalous! by Griim · · Score: 1

      "You keep using that word....I do not think it means, what you think it means."

  35. Here's a good Q&A by GFW · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, sunspots are systems far larger than and completely unaffected by any normal infalling material. Here's a good Q&A at space.com covering the flares in general.

    1. Re:Here's a good Q&A by holzp · · Score: 1

      of course bare in mind that we know absolutely nothing about this stuff as i.e. last month two of these in a row were considered a statistical anomaly.

    2. Re:Here's a good Q&A by ninthwave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if he was talking about the flares or the fact that they aimed directly at earth for the first two because in context he says it is like a staring down the barrel of a great big gun pointed at the earth.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  36. Cool word! by Hell+O'World · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hadn't heard that one before. And yes, it is disturbing.

    eructation ( P ) (-rk-tshn, rk-)
    n.
    The act or an instance of belching.

    Source: The American Heritage(R) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
    Copyright (C) 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

  37. Re:FP!!!! by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

    probably god demostrate his vastly mightly solar flare that exceed 28x that serve as warning if earthing don't shut up like wars, terrorism and on.

    Hey, it only a theory... I, for one, don't belive in most of religious because i don't know which one is the true religion anyway.

    On the sidenote.. I, for one, welcoming overlord wrath!

  38. BOFH Episode #6 by freeslacker · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think of the BOFH excuse of the day?

    1. Re:BOFH Episode #6 by goljerp · · Score: 1

      Yes, last week. (I didn't include a link in that comment, though.)

  39. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing about Revalation is that the events described in it actually started in Genesis 2. By Christian theology, the apocalypse started days after the beginning of the world, but won't get up to speed until the seven headed dragon rains diadems from the heavens.

  40. Re:OMG THE SUN IS DYING!!!! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    OK... this whole thing is silly people. But I'll contribute to this thread since I find it entertaining. Farmlands could be pointless at such a time. Instead we will need to do away with agriculture and build on synthetic nutrients. If we can make artificial nutrients and nanomachines that get integrated into our bodies, it's likely there will be lots of improvements in human physiology. Imagine only needing to eat once a week and never sleep. Our civilization would progress at a much faster pace. As it is, we are barely evolved primitives compared to what we could be if we augmneted ourselves. Eating and sleeping are useless apendages that should be shed. We need to expand on our mental abilities and begin to eschew the physical. This will prepare us for the eventuality of becoming nebulous, sentient entities with no physical form whatsoever. Or not.

  41. GOES Graph Showing Saturation by mikewren420 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't know if anyone else saved the GOES XRay Flux image:

    http://cyberial.com/images/cme.gif

    Pretty impressive saturation!

  42. Hmm... by Ironix · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone else find it disturbing that the sun is halfway from its 11 year peak and it's now spewing out billions of tons of matter at an unprecedented rate?

    Perhaps, now just perhaps, the sun is gearing up to go nova and shed its entire outer layer. In that case, I think I'd want to be at the Sudbury neutrino observatory. =)

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't anyone else find it disturbing that the sun is halfway from its 11 year peak and it's now spewing out billions of tons of matter at an unprecedented rate?

      no.

      we have been monitoring it for a very VERY short time. we know absolutely nothing about the SUN.

      so no it's not bothering anyone. call me when you have 10,000 years of data and show a dramatic change. until then you are making wild-ass guesses.

  43. I'M a Power Supply Designer by lcsjk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am a power supply design engineer among other things. (no guessing!) Please don't use words like "Flare", Burn-In, or "Let's fire it up!" when you are talking to me. At 220 volts and 10 amps, those are very unwelcome words.

    1. Re:I'M a Power Supply Designer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      (no guessing!)

      You are a electronically-enchanced porn star? When the critics say "Electrifying!", they aren't kidding!

  44. Astronomy picture of the day by rodney+dill · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... and as usual the Astronomy Picture of the Day, already has a good picture posted

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:Astronomy picture of the day by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      Nice picture... not my favorite though =)

      http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030630.html

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    2. Re:Astronomy picture of the day by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030630.html for the linkagely handicapped. Awesome picure. Makes you think that God really doesn't care.

    3. Re:Astronomy picture of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF don't they make these images wallpaper size and brand them? Sheesh, talk about lack of creative marketing and the waste of opportunity. IMHO, way too many people are way too overpaid.

    4. Re:Astronomy picture of the day by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      click on it... even more awesome... :)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  45. It's Liserle by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Her name is Liserle and she is there to observe the photino birds which are destroying our universe. (Stephen Baxter's The Ring)

    1. Re:It's Liserle by BetaJim · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha!! "The Ring" has to be one of the best hard SF books I have read. I'm glad to see it mentioned.

      --

      "Drug related crime" is a misnomer, "prohibition related crime" is the more accurate and correct phrase.

  46. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I too.

  47. Re:I for one... by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome my new lead underpants.

    (gotta protect the boys)

  48. Morlocks unite! by BallPeenHammer · · Score: 1, Funny
    I say we get underground for the next million years or so until this blows over. My personal plans include:

    * evolving night vision

    * digging an extensive system of tunnels underneath all Wendy's locations

    * building a large metal Sphinx-like thing that wails periodically

    * keeping an eye out for Weena

    Who's in?

    1. Re:Morlocks unite! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I've got a secret stash of improvised maces,
      should you wish to arm yourself.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Morlocks unite! by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      I say we get underground for the next million years or so until this blows over.
      NORAD is more than just "Deter, Detect and Defend." It will be the hidey-hole for those in the know when things really get cooking.

  49. Sun's last stand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Sun lost marketshare and IBM and others gained I think the SunFlare will be the last flailing of Sun. Sun is a company predicted to be swallowed up by someone.

    What was Sun's latest line of products? Oh Linux on top of AMD processors. Why would I want to do this with Sun rather then someone else? I wouldn't... They have under 8 years left.

  50. Yeah, Because... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    We obviously understand everything there is to know about Solar Physics.

    My bet is God is Angry about SCO. I expect that there's going to be a lot of smiting going on Real Soon Now. Keep an eye out for old guys building arks.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  51. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but you can't get faith unless God gives it to you first. So, in the final analysis it's God who (at least from our point of view) pre-determines who goes to Heaven and who goes to Hell.

  52. wow by Shadestalker · · Score: 0

    Who knew "The Dot" could really take such punishment?

  53. What is the X-Ray Dose at 30,000 feet???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you're on a 4 hour flight at 30.000 feet,
    what is the dose rate??

  54. End Of The World Is Nigh! DOOM! DOOM! DOOM! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Funny

    <sarcasm>

    The sun is angry; we are doomed. These flares are just the beginning, they will increase in magnitude until they are so big, they penetrate the Earth's magnetic field, destroy the entire ozone layer and sanitize the surface of the Earth with UV rays - just like an autoclave. Not even bacteria will survive except underground and deep in the Ocean.

    The signs are showing, this is the END OF THE WORLD! The sun has been showing more activity since 1940 than it has for the last 1000 years put together. Doom is imminent!

    Scientists don't act worried, they think they understand the sun and how it works, but science it just guesses. Maybe the sun is made of iron instead of hydrogen where would all the theories that say we are safe be then, if such a basic 'fact' about the sun turned out to be wrong?

    As the flares grow in size and number you will all see that my theory is correct! "What is my theory?" you ask. It is that since the END OF THE WORLD makes a good movie plot point, that it must be happening NOW! These are going to be interesting times... We should all start storing canned food and porno mags in bomb shelters now before it's too late and we get cooked by the MASSIVE RADIATION STORM!

    And what if the sun should stop flaring, and I should get proven wrong. WE ARE STILL DOOMED! In the same way that load from a light socket makes the generators in a power plant harder to turn, so geomagnetic storms transfer the kinetic energy of megatons of speeding charged particles directly to the magmatic dynamo at our planet's core. Small purturbations can affect this chaotic fluid flow in unpredictable ways but the most worrying is that the shock from the kinetic energy of all those particles will cause avalanches at the core/mantle boundary this will cause massive vulcanism that will cover the earth with lava!

    If that doesn't get us, terrorists wielding viruses will.

    Get out your sandwich board and whisky! Walk the streets and warn! THE END OF THE WORLD IS NIGH!!!!

    <sarcasm>

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

    1. Re:End Of The World Is Nigh! DOOM! DOOM! DOOM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last post???

  55. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by kilfarsnar · · Score: 0

    Well damn! If its all predetermined, I'm going out to get a hooker!

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  56. Alright... time to fess up. by HuggybearVT · · Score: 0

    Who gave the Sun an extra Chalupa?

  57. primitive measurement devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the pateNTdead eyecon0meter is reporting these incidents as positive events.

    this stuff provides unlimited newclear power. it's also unbreakable. don't be afraid. it's a gift.

    it's more of what everything is really made of.

    it's not surprising that the universe is reacting in what appears to be an adverse manner.

    it gets a little fuzzy as to what else can happen, deepending on yOUR intentions/behaviours.

  58. No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The area of sunspots responsible for this latest spat of solar activity are FIFTEEN TIMES THE SIZE OF THE EARTH. Just to make this perfectly clear, THE SUN IS FUCKING HUGE! The whole fsking EARTH could smash into it and the sun wouldn't even blink. So no, it's highly unlikely that some heavenly body about 100 times the size of Jupiter smashed into the sun and we didn't see it coming or notice it happening. Solar weather just goes through weird phases, just like earth weather. That's all.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe it happened at night?

      HAHAHAhahaha OK... enough of that.

    2. Re:No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      So - how is this impacting HF ham radio?

    3. Re:No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

      Back when that comet ran into Jupiter (July 16 1994), the comet wasn't all that big, but it did have quite an effect on Jupiter. Jupiter's only a few orders of magnitude smaller than the sun. A colliding object wouldn't have to be all that big to have a big effect on the sun.

      That said, these flares are coming from sunspots, and the activity has been building up for awhile (not appearing all of a sudden) so it all looks like internal sun dynamics.

    4. Re:No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by KanshuShintai · · Score: 1

      Solar weather just goes through weird phases, just like earth weather. That's all.

      And all of the little alien guys on the sun are looking at earth asking "What's with all of 'dem white things on that blue one?"

      A hurricane....just earth weather...that's all.

    5. Re:No. Here's a little size comparison for ya... by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      It didn't cause the Jovan equivilent of Coronal Mass Ejections, it just left a pock mark in the clouds.

      Think about what you just said. Now thing about the mass of the sun. Now think about how FSKING HOT THE SUN IS! An object would have to be FSKING HUGE just to NOT BURN UP a million miles away from the sun! Jupiter would evaporate and get blown away by the solar wind before it ever got close.

      And again, there's the whole "We probably would have seen it coming" thing. Any object THAT LARGE would be visible for quite some time (like years) before it hit the sun, giving us ample warning about it. Plus it's gravitational pull would probably fuck up the Earth's orbit.

      Nothing's impossible, but you're probably better off buying a Megabucks ticket then waiting for an object large than Jupiter to smash into the sun un-noticed.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
  59. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0

    I guess from the point that God has given us free will you could look at it as pre-destination. But if you truly want salvation God will not deny it to anyone who believes.

    There is room in Heavan for everyone...

    John 14:2
    In my Father's house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you.

    Sounds like God wants as many people in Heaven as possible.

    It's God who judges us but it is up to us to WANT to get into Heaven.

    --
    Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
  60. Entire sun flashes by back_pages · · Score: 1
    If you download the mpeg for EIT-195, the frame corresponding to 2003/11/05 15:24 shows a significant flash across the entire surface of the sun? Does anyone know/think that is a good representation of what really happens? I looked at the other mpegs and none of them seem to have the same type of event, but most of them have no data within hours of the frame I mentioned above.

    Maybe it's just the satellite reacting to interference? I have no idea but it fuels my irrational paranoia that all of humanity is going to look really stupid next week when we're all cracking jokes about solar flares and stuff and then the sun collapses and our existence is forever unknown to the entire universe. Yeah, the egg will really be on our faces then.

    But seriously, can anyone explain that frame? It's pretty interesting looking.

    1. Re:Entire sun flashes by CXI · · Score: 1

      I admit I didn't go and find this frame, but I could think of a lot of other reasons for it besides some type of faster than light flash across the sun (Remember, the sun is big, very big. Any effect would take a noticeable amount of time to cross it, on the order of several seconds, and would not be an instantaneous flash.)

      I would guess a wave of particles came hurtling past the spacecraft at that second, briefly saturating the camera.

    2. Re:Entire sun flashes by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the reply. Two things though:

      1. Yeah, it could be some interference that saturated the camera (or radar, or radio, or whatever that thing is.) It is interesting that the bright parts of the sun got REALLY bright, but nothing else in the image seems to have changed. But it could be just interference.

      2. If it isn't interference, it doesn't necessarily mean some wave or effect traveled across the sun faster than light - there is a significant time lapse between frames in the mpeg. I am curious, though, if these solar flares DO have some repercussion that could be visible (in some spectrum) across the entire surface. Seriously, just for my own curiosity, and non-seriously, so I can tell everyone, "I told you so," when the sun turns into a black hole next week and kills us all.

    3. Re:Entire sun flashes by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      I would lean more owards camera saturation myself as well

      If it isn't saturation, it doesn't have to be faster than light. The event could have come from deep in the sun and reached the entire surface at the same time. Well preserving relativity, I would really hate to know what that could mean though, nothing racing through my head looks pretty.

      It's camera/sensor saturation. It could also be in the recording or in the transfer of the images to us.

  61. Re: X scale by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    There's the C scale for itty bitty lil' things, and the M scale for medium sized flares, and the X scale for big ol' solar flares.

    The numbers after the letters range from 0 to 20 so there are C5, M17, X8 etc.

    My question is this: What do the numbers mean? Is it like the richter scale ( powers of 10 ) or what?

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  62. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Think about it. God sees the whole timeline of the world at once. Once he put the initial values into the equation of creation, he got out the solution. He already knows the final score.

    We, on the other hand, are still traveling along that curve like a numerical algorithm integrating a differential equation. We only know about the past and present but not about the future. We think we have free will, but in reality we're only following the grand solution and coming up with explanations to justify our actions later on.

    So, sure you can go out and get a hooker. If you do it, it was so scripted in the beginning.

  63. Does anyone else think by blah1019 · · Score: 0

    There are astrologists all over the world smoking a cigarette right now after these last few weeks of solar activity? I would guess that this is akin to locking a sex addict in a porn shop overnight. BTW, if the sun blows up I'm gonna be pissed. My fantasy football team is kicking ass this year.

  64. Question: by jrwillis · · Score: 1

    How would this have effected things on our little sphere of dirt if it had been directed towards us?

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
    1. Re:Question: by tntguy · · Score: 1

      NO CARRIER

  65. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :) by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0

    It doesn't work like that. If you ask for Faith God will give it to you but you have to want it.

    --
    Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
  66. Anyone have an idea what this does to our climate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember theories about solar activity changing our climate patterns. Anyone here know more about that?

  67. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The quote says that he's going to prepare places for people who are going to be saved. It doesn't agree or disagree with what I am saying, which is that God determines beforehand who is going to be saved and who's not.

    up to us to WANT to get into Heaven.

    But wanting is an act and in the Bible it clearly says that salvation comes only through faith in Christ. If you want faith and want to be saved, isn't that an act of man? Just like hoping to earn salvation by going to church every Sunday or obeying a complex set of rules like the theocratic elite did in Jesus' days.

    The human free will is a problematic concept if one agrees that salvation should come only through faith in Christ and not because you were a good man or went to church every Sunday.

  68. This is unexpected. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The human experiential cycle is reflected by the goings on in the natural world. Things are heating up!

    Floods, Earthquakes, Heatwaves, Plagues, Mad Cows, Wildfires and Hurricanes in odd locations, anyone? Sure, this stuff happens, but all within such a short period of time?

    Mind you, I doubt very much that the Earth is in any danger from the recent Solar activity. A few power problems, perhaps. (Not like those are anything new these days, either.)

    It's the asteroid impacts, I expect, which could cause the, um, deepest impression.

    No need to be afraid. It's happened before, it'll happen again. Kick back and enjoy the show. It's why you're here.

    Oh, and the deadline for getting the heck out of the U.S. is rolling ever nearer. The government has been quietly re-staffing draft boards. But then nobody listens to the tin-foil hatter. It's easier to laugh than to actually do something.

    Knowledge protects. Ignorance endangers.


    -FL

    1. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a simpler explanation - today this stuff gets reported more than it used to. In the 1920's, if there was a solar flare, it certainly wouldn't appear in the newspaper. It's just like the myth that we are a more violent society than before. Nope - we just get to hear about violent news from farther afield than before, so what previously we would have remanined ignorant of we now get on the nightly news even if it's from halfway around the world.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    2. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the draft links. Interesting shit that I'll be sure to pass along.

    3. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think you're quite right. We've been using radio and telegraphs since the late 1800s. Although we weren't directly observing the sun, telegraph and radio operators were thorough in recording when they couldn't get through, and for how long. Back then, telegraphy was big business.

      The largest recorded flare was back then, in the early days of electronic communication. It definitely DID make the newspapers. It's 120 years later when we get a flare far larger, and surrounded by a set of flares that would have been measurable at that time as well. When the scientific historians say this is unprecedented in the time we've been aware of solar flares, they're not being unreasonable.

    4. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to worry about the draft. I havn't been exposed to direct sunlight in the best part of a decade, I have a heart condition exacerbated by twelve years of raving caffine addiction, and I can't bench press my PDA. The draft board will probably send me a plane ticket to Canada instead of a report-for-duty order.

    5. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by pmz · · Score: 1

      The government has been quietly re-staffing draft boards.

      The income tax, then socialized healthcare, and, now, the draft? Well, I guess whenever politicians say they are fighting for freedom, they are really just very good at telling jokes with a straight face.

    6. Re:This is unexpected. . ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      How did you learn of the flare? Newspaper? Television? Or a specialized website on the internet that caters to collecting news stories nerds might be interested in? That's the big difference. In the late 1800's we gained the ability to send messages quickly around the world. In the late 1990's we gained the ability to do so in large volume so that the news is there for anyone who cares about it, and not there for those who don't.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  69. Re:Bruce Dickinson: Prophet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Didn't he also something like:

    "I got a fever and the only prescription for it is more cowbell!"

  70. Re: X scale by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I think the numbers are logarithmic, like decibels. An X20 would be 10x as powerful as an X10. Corrections welcomed.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  71. Re:OMG THE SUN IS DYING!!!! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    It would take longer than eight minutes. Probably more on the order of a few hours. But I think if the governments of the world let the cat out of the bag on the alien forces they are hiding in various locations on the planet, we can probably work something out in that time. The ships orbiting the earth would probably be able to direct some heat our way. Or not. ;P (I take off my foil hat)

  72. Huge Mass Shoots Largest Hot Load Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expected to splatter over Earth's face soon
    May choke communications temporarily

  73. solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The power of these flares spewing into space must be truly ginormous. Sure, they're unusual, and unpredictable. But if we could harness even a tiny fraction of even a single one, we could supply all the Earth's energy needs for the forseeable future.

    How about we send a bunch of satellites into LSO (low solar orbit), within the orbit of Mercury, with solar photocollectors powering their wait. When a flare does come by one or more of them, a large, diaphanous electromagnetic antennae are charged by the approaching particle storm, converting the power into electricity, which charges a laser array. The lasers fire from the "lucky" satellite into a power grid among all the satellites. The satellites nearest the Earth fire the power at a receiver on the Moon, which charges a gigantic battery bored beneath the surface. Over months or years, lower powered lasers send the power to collector platforms floating on the seas, which send electricity over cables to the electric grid on land.

    Sure, we'd have to wait years before a flare was captured. And it likely would destroy at least one of the satellites capturing it. But there would be several seconds during which the satellite could capture more joules of power than consumed since we invented fire. So after a patient wait, playing the odds, we'd win the solar lottery. If we started now, repurposing all that expensive, dead-end Star Wars spacewar technology, we might be ready by 2020. Then we could power not just our homey little Earth, but all our exploration/communication needs within the planetary systems.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:solar wind power? by dougnaka · · Score: 1
      It could be the start of our very own dyson sphere!

      --
      My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    2. Re:solar wind power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like the idea of harnessing the petrochemicals on Saturn's moon Titan. Sure, we could power the earth for 40 million years, since the moon has a petrochemical atmoshere, oceans, and weather system - but it would take two additional moons with simmilar energy content to get all that material back to earth.

      There's enough oil shale in the US to power the world for thirty years - bit it would take twice as much energy to harvest and refine it than they would get out of it.

      The satellite network would have serious energy leaks - each transmission and collection point would have less than 100% efficiency, there would be loss due to interference by magnetic fields and matter with the beams, and we would have to replace any satellites destroyed by each flare. I can't figure the numbers without more information, but it sounds like it'll produce a net energy loss, which we hardly need.

    3. Re:solar wind power? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      So, basically, what you want to do, is put a big collector in close orbit of the sun; and, beam extra energy directly to the Earth.

      Good plan... Where's my suntan lotion???

    4. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      No, you're confused:
      [from parent]:
      The satellites nearest the Earth fire the power at a receiver on the Moon, which charges a gigantic battery bored beneath the surface.

      This is a failsafe, if something goes wrong with the laser, or the storage, it happens to the Moon. When the project is actually underway, the engineering tolerances of the time can determine whether to use the Moon, an asteroid opposite the Earth from the Sun, a satellite at an angle to the ecliptic, or something else as a waystation.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:solar wind power? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      Yes I am; but, that's not the point...

      You're taking additional energy from the Sun and (eventually after it's beamed from the Moon down to the Earth) adding it to Earth's energy budget. Over time, there would be an increasing net gain.

      This sort of rates with the idea of putting mirrors in orbit to light cities at night. You'd be increasing the solar energy absorbed by the Earth by some percentage.

      over a short term there'd be no change. Over centuries, wouldn't you think, the Earth would get warmer.

    6. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Earth has been trapping energy from the Sun for millennia (megennia? gigennia? :), in organic systems and their legacy: petrochemicals. We've been releasing it, mostly by burning (trees, oil, coal, etc), for a tiny fraction of that time. Some of that energy is transferred the way we want it, like moving cars through streets, moving electrons through wires, moving photons to our eyes and antennae, pushing concrete into forms. Most is transferred into heat, the disorganized bouncing of atoms, the inefficiency of our energy processing. But the Earth also radiates that heat out into space, boosting the infrared band of our albedo. Our warming problem, at our scale of energy processing, comes from pollution increasing the infrared insulation of our atmosphere, preventing its disposal as albedo. Replacing burning with solar wind power would cut that pollution right down, so the Earth could better maintain its heat balance. Orbital mirrors are extremely wasteful, and kinda stupid for night sleepers (nonhumans among them). An orbital laser, interlocked with a floating ocean platform, has been studied for decades; I first saw a presentation in 1990 by Arthur P. Little.

      Solar wind power would move us into a much larger scale of heat transferrence. The Earth might not be able to balance such an increase, even with clearer skies. Larry Niven described how aliens, the Puppeteers, coped with the heat pollution of their planet in his novel Ringworld. Switching to solar wind power would probably buy us time to harness more entropic power sources, like accumulated waste heat in the oceans/atmosphere.

      I don't pretend to know how to escape the thermodynamics of inevitably increasing entropy. But solar wind power could be a great investment in practically using energy that currently is merely wasted, instead of how we currently misuse energy that is practically wasting *us*.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:solar wind power? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      wait for solar flare????? you wouldn't *need* to wait for solar flares, there's HUGE amounts of energy pouring from the sun at all times, and much more per square foot within the orbit of mercury. Actually, more than this poor little planet could ever cope with, as a matter of fact. Better to make use of solar energy that would hit the earth anyway as other posters have pointed out.

    8. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      We don't have to choose between these methods of harnessing solar power. We can keep harnessing the insolation of the Earth, as we're doing. The LSO satellites I'm proposing could immediately send lower power back to the Moon, harnessing the solar wind with current technology. If we build them to harness a flare, we'd hit the jackpot. Developing and deploying them in stages would supply the energy "revenue" stream to keep us interested as we waited for the big payday.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:solar wind power? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I was just pointing out there is constant flow of ions with fearsome energies to drive your collection antennae all the time,24x7, if you could design something that could survive say 10 million miles from the sun, no need to wait for flare. Even with ordinary solar conversion of just light into energy, there's like 5x the radiant energy at Mercury's orbit (36m miles) than here at earth. But the PROBLEM is that collected energy sent to earth, regardless of where stored or how transmitted, would in the end become waste heat on earth; it's the worst kind of global warming, to add to the heat budget of the planet.

    10. Re:solar wind power? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      There's really no need to go anywhere near the orbit of mercury (yet, maybe in a n+1 years), small spots of Moon covered with solar panels and microwave beams to here would cover all our energy needs for a loooong time.

    11. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I address the "warming" aspect above, in #7411483. Think BIG: harnessing a solar flare could provide the energy to cheaply and quickly colonize the solar system, and power planetary vehicles/industry for the approaching 10 billion humans, without much atmospheric pollution.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:solar wind power? by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Let's start with something relatively easy and tiny. Let's harness the power of a hurricane. There's a lot of power there, should be easy to turn into useful energy, right?

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    13. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't know that diverting a significant fraction of a hurricane's energy will be so easy to cope with later, as the effects ripple chaotically through the atmosphere.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:solar wind power? by barakn · · Score: 1
      This is one of the most ill-conceived ideas i've ever heard. The most efficient use of an energy source occurs when it can be used in its raw form. Efficiency degrades with each conversion. Your scheme involves the following chain of energy conversions: "plasma" -> electric -> EM -> electric -> chemical -> electric -> EM -> electric (I assumed electricity is the desired final form on earth and that the satellites relay the energy without storing it). A solar panel on earth: EM -> electric.

      Also, your power arrives at the battery in one pulse. Batteries don't just instantaneously absorb energy, they take time. A battery theoretically capable of storing as much energy as you're suggesting would explode if it actually absorbed that all at once. So you'd have to make your already gargantuan battery even more oversized.

      Not to mention the fact that you'd have civilization dependent on an energy source (flares) that we can't even predict with any accuracy. Or the energy it would take to create this fantastic energy net in the first place. If your idea is so great, prove it with numbers.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    15. Re:solar wind power? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's your responsibility to *disprove* it with numbers: that's science. Meanwhile, your quibbles are easily dispelled:

      Flares are BIG (I used the approximation "ginormous"). Even if the efficiency of the flare capture is .000000001% (probably lots more 0s than that), the payoff is bigger than all the chemical energy in the Earth's crust. Even 1990s microwave laser transducer tech is >90% efficient in e- -> uw -> e-, so once we've grabbed a tiny chunk at the scales we can process, we can hold on to it. Who says the power arrives in one pulse? The battery could be many sub-batteries, each accepting its maximum pulse, and pooled for discharge. Or maybe it's just a magnetic bubble in acute-ecliptic orbit, containing asteroidal nickel-iron, or several of them. The metal is lasered to plasma by the incoming pulses, which is condensed later to power lasers for discharge. The total storage of the battery is likely the bottleneck, so lots of the R&D would focus on that - great spinoff tech once the flare has passed, and we ride its wave until the next one.

      With planning, civilization would become dependent on the *battery*, not the flares. Each flare is unpredicted, but the probability of a flare in a decade is predictable enough. And the energy to build, launch and maintain a dozen or so "Brilliant Pebble" satellites is already being expended now, for Star Wars tech more opposed to human development than supporting it. We can redirect that effort, investing it in a payoff that could overwhelm our scarcity-oriented security concerns with plenty. We don't worry that radioactive decay is unpredictable when we harness nuclear fission reactions in power plants, or that it's really energy-expensive to refine the fuel, because whenever the particles are inevitably emitted, the payoff is so huge. Solar wind power would use the mind-bendingly huge solar fusion power products in a flare to win the biggest lottery in history.

      While we wait for a flare, the satellites would beam back the much smaller take from the ambient solar radiation, which itself would dwarf our terrestrial energy production. That's certainly worthwhile in itself for the power obtainable in a satellite's lifespan, with over 50KW/m^2 of light in at Mercury's orbit, not counting the kinetic power in the solar wind particles. The satellites pay big dividends immediately they are deployed, and the real payday comes when a flare ends their lifecycle in a blaze of glory. Once future generations deplete the battery, redeploy and catch another.

      The perfect is the enemy of the merely good. We can hold out for "maximum efficiency", and miss everything, or do what we can with what we've got to get there, and actually get there.

      "Just get away from the shady turf
      And baby go catch some rays on the sunny surf
      And when you catch a wave you'll be sittin on top of the world"

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  74. strongest. sunflare. ever. by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

    strongest. sunflare. ever.

  75. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1
    It sounds like you are saying that we are just automatons running along a predetermined track. Are you really saying that? Do you really think there is only one way things can go?

    I also hold, as a personal belief, that God knows all that can and will happen from the beginning until the end of time. But this does not mean that our lives must be predetermined. Time is not linear, though it looks that way to us. We are presented with choices and divergent paths all the time. Do you think our decisions are already made? Do you feel that way?

    If all is predetermined, how can we be responsible for our actions? Not just in a law enforcement kind of way, but a personal growth kind of way. If we don't have free will, what's the point?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  76. No, no, no. It's because of Kyoto... by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 1

    ...or NAFTA. Or maybe it's SUVs.

    At any rate, this WOULD NOT be happening if Gore was in the Oval Office.

    </sarcasm>

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  77. Sun flames by gallir · · Score: 1

    Yes yes, we already suspected that Sun was financing SCO campaign. And now it's flaming also.

    --
    sgis ddo ekil t'nod i
  78. What the Sun thinks by stilwebm · · Score: 1

    "I DO wanna express myself and i don't need an X37 flare to do it! There! Hows that! This is me expressing myself!"

  79. Helioeccentric by Zerfus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sol? Would you come here for a moment, please?

    Sol: I'm sorry. I was late. I was having lunch.

    I need to talk about your flare.

    Sol: Really? I have 15 spots on. I, uh, (shows him)

    Well, ok, 15 is minimum, ok?

    Sol: Ok.

    Now, it's up to you whether or not you want to just do the bare minimum. Well, like Sirius, for example, has 37 pieces of flare. And a terrific smile.

    Sol: Ok. Ok, you want me to flare more?

    Look. Sol.

    Sol: Yeah.

    People can get a sunburn anywhere, ok? They come to Earth for the atmosphere and the attitude. That's what the flare's about. It's about fun.

    Sol: Ok. So, more then?

    Look, we want you to express yourself, ok? If you think the bare minimum is enough, then ok. But some suns choose to flare more and we encourage that, ok? You do want to express yourself, don't you?

    Sol: Yeah. Yeah.

    Great. Great. That's all I ask.

    Sol: Ok.

    1. Re:Helioeccentric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was a good movie

    2. Re:Helioeccentric by kahrhoff · · Score: 1

      apparently, Sol missed the memo. I'll make sure to get him a copy.

    3. Re:Helioeccentric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone please hit me with a cluestick, and let me know what the reference is? Thanks.

    4. Re:Helioeccentric by Helish · · Score: 1

      It's taken from Office Space

    5. Re:Helioeccentric by Zerfus · · Score: 1

      (This is my favorite response yet. Thanks!)

  80. Sun Produces Flare?? by Roofus · · Score: 0, Troll

    I knew Scott McNealy was gay!!!

  81. draft boards by ShaggyZet · · Score: 1

    Maybe there's a new push, but they never stopped looking for people

  82. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :) by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0

    "But wanting is an act and in the Bible it clearly says that salvation comes only through faith in Christ. If you want faith and want to be saved, isn't that an act of man? Just like hoping to earn salvation by going to church every Sunday or obeying a complex set of rules like the theocratic elite did in Jesus' days."

    I don't belive so. I can sit here at my desk and want some thing. I'm not really performing an action other than just firing off a few neurons to generate the thought. The acts the Bible are talking about are things like giving money, showing up to church, not hurting anybody, etc.

    It's like the parable of the two people giving money at the temple. The rich man gave a lot of money that he had lying around and the poor widow gave her two last coins. Both perfomed an act, but it was the widow that had faith that God would provide for her.

    --
    Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
  83. The obvious response by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    "Look out, Radioactive Man! The sun is exploding again!"

  84. Region 486 by Anonym1ty · · Score: 4, Funny
    The major flares have come from sunspot region 486

    Thank goodness it wasn't from the Pentium IV region, or even the extremely Hot Athlon XP region, we'd be burnt to a crisp. Damn solar over-clockers, If they burn out this sun, where are we gunna get another one? The bidders have been grabbing them up on ebay like hotcakes.

  85. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If we don't have free will, what's the point?"

    You think there is a point to all this?

  86. Can't believe nobody metioned Nostradamus yet! by Bastiaan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely these flares are signs of world's impending doom.

    1. Re:Can't believe nobody metioned Nostradamus yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people now realize that Nostradamus put dates to his predictions, and that the last of them is now 103 years overdue.

    2. Re:Can't believe nobody metioned Nostradamus yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An X5000000 flare is coming to irradiate each square meter of the earth with 500 watts of sunfire! - Nostrildamus.

  87. x10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    causes pop unders, at x40, it blows up on the sun...

  88. Re:MOD DOWN ! (-1 overrated) by ninthwave · · Score: 1

    In a way yes.
    Though the humour could be killed if the poster actually calculated the time for the flare to reach the heliopause and the p/cm3 at that distance.

    --
    I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
  89. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WHy do you believe in this silly fairytale nonsense? Do you believe in leprechauns , elves and santa claus too? Do try and drag yourself into
    the 21st century instead of speaking like some half witting medieval preacher who thinks lightning is goods anger and disease is caused by blasphemy.

    Why don't you religious types just grow up or go see a shrink?

  90. Leave Ron Jeremy out of this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text here, nothing to see, move on.

  91. in the Book of Revelations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Book of Revelations says the world will end with a war in the Middle East (three going on now) and when the Great Deceiver conquers Babylon (Bush now is the titluar head of Iraq). There something in there about the Sun's fury too.

    1. Re:in the Book of Revelations by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      1. The book is Revelation, singular. 2. Christian witnessing as an AC is unlikely to count for much.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  92. Re:Error by bodland · · Score: 1

    You need to close your tag with Sheesh....nothing worse than sarcastic syntax errors

  93. Cheesy Star Trek Plot by giminy · · Score: 1

    Think about. Voyager just leaves solar system. The Federation takes notice. My god, another intelligent species. My GOD, and their sun is about to explode...we have to relocate them to another system!

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  94. Could the Suns orbit/path have been altered? by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    I'm no genius, but close to it, but could this ejection cause the suns orbital path along the galaxy to be nudged a new microns? This blast looks powerful enough to alter the suns trajectory somehow.

    1. Re:Could the Suns orbit/path have been altered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only could it change the path of the sun but it definately has. However, the ejected mass is so much smaller than the entire mass of the sun that the alteration would be negligible. Besides, the sun could take a u-turn and we humans would be largely unaffected (altough astronomers would be out a couple hundred years of work). I conclude that while the orbit of the sun has changed, it doesn't matter at all.

    2. Re:Could the Suns orbit/path have been altered? by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      I conclude that while the orbit of the sun has changed, it doesn't matter at all.

      I think it would matter is a few billion years if the sun ever gets closer to the center of the galaxy, where the stellar density would be higher, which in turn increases the possibility of an Earth killer intersecting the Earth's oribtal path.

  95. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noooo. Lightning is caused by charged particles in our atmosphere and disease is caused by germs, bacteria, and unclean conditions.

    Where exactly do YOU think lightning and disease come from?

    Scottcha+4 (thanks for modding me down)

  96. X28 Popups by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Funny


    Maybe the Sun wasn't getting enough response from its X-10 popups?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  97. Sun Flares? by ubeans · · Score: 1

    Is this yet another scheme from Scott McNealy?

  98. The sun is exploding? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    That's great, it starts with an earthquake, birds and snakes, an aeroplane -
    Lenny Bruce is not afraid. Eye of a hurricane, listen to yourself churn -
    world serves its own needs, don't misserve your own needs. Feed it up a knock,
    speed, grunt no, strength no. Ladder structure clatter with fear of height,
    down height. Wire in a fire, represent the seven games in a government for
    hire and a combat site. Left her, wasn't coming in a hurry with the furies
    breathing down your neck. Team by team reporters baffled, trump, tethered
    crop. Look at that low plane! Fine then. Uh oh, overflow, population,
    common group, but it'll do. Save yourself, serve yourself. World serves its
    own needs, listen to your heart bleed. Tell me with the rapture and the
    reverent in the right - right. You vitriolic, patriotic, slam, fight, bright
    light, feeling pretty psyched.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

    Six o'clock - TV hour. Don't get caught in foreign tower. Slash and burn,
    return, listen to yourself churn. Lock him in uniform and book burning,
    blood letting. Every motive escalate. Automotive incinerate. Light a candle,
    light a motive. Step down, step down. Watch a heel crush, crush. Uh oh,
    this means no fear - cavalier. Renegade and steer clear! A tournament,
    a tournament, a tournament of lies. Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives
    and I decline.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

    The other night I tripped a nice continental drift divide. Mountains sit in a line.
    Leonard Bernstein. Leonid Breshnev, Lenny Bruce and Lester Bangs.
    Birthday party, cheesecake, jelly bean, boom! You symbiotic, patriotic,
    slam, but neck, right? Right.

    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it.
    It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine...fine...

    --

  99. beginning of the end by Major_Small · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they'll collect enough data off the flares to correct the model,

    hopefully this is part of a correct model, and not the beginning of the end of the sun's life. I'm not saying it will happen in weeks or years or even millenia, but the sun will start to die out soon (actually, it's constantly dying from when it's born), and hopefully this doesn't signal a change in it's rate of death...

  100. We all saw Smallville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a comet collided with the sun to produce these flares. The real question is, how will this affect Clark Kent's ability to control his super powers while Perry White is snooping around?

  101. Re: X scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    My question is this: What do the numbers mean? Is it like the richter scale ( powers of 10 ) or what?

    X-Ray flux is measured in Watts per square meter (averaged out over a period of time, usually over a minute).

    10^-8 is the lower threshhold of an A-Class
    10^-7 is the lower threshhold of a B-Class
    10^-6 is the lower threshhold of a C-Class
    10^-5 is the lower threshhold of a M-Class
    10^-4 is the lower threshhold of a X-Class
    10^-3 is the lower threshhold of a X10-Class
    10^-2 would be the lower threshhold of an X100-Class

    So, the X-28 flare saturated the detectors of the GOES satellites with 0.0028 W/m^2 energy.

  102. Democrats blame Bush's environmental policies for by blogx · · Score: 0, Troll

    Daschle on the house floor today said obviously this past week's events of four of the strongest solar flares ever recorded are a direct result of the Bush administration's environmental policies and if a Democrat was in the White house this would have never occurred. Daschle went onto to say looking at the long term data clearly shows most of these tragic solar events occur during a Republican administration and that it's damn time that the American people don't allow for a repeat of these events to reoccur under the Bush administration and not be distract by Iraq. When asked for comment, the white house spokesman said, "What's the problem, the president and the first lady are out in the back lawn enjoying the auroras as we speak and that if Daschle wants to use this as an election time issue, I'll have the RNC raise the issue on why there are 5 times as many earthquakes under the Democrat watch".... reports blogx.org

  103. International Space Station by caseih · · Score: 1

    How have these solar flares impacted the ISS? Have they been exposed to increased amounts of radiation?

  104. oooooo, nooooooo! by hellmarch · · Score: 1

    the sun is on fire!!! run away!!!

  105. Lucky it missed us by rev063 · · Score: 1
    But since the flare originated at the Sun's limb, the ejection was directed about 90 degrees away from us in the plane of the ecliptic. Most of the impact missed us here on earth.

    But it makes you worry: what would have happened if that X40 flare was directed right at us?

    1. Re:Lucky it missed us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I read something about the Maya. They thought that the world will end in 2014, because of solar flare. Remeber that the solar flares activity has a cycle that lasts 11 years (2003+11=2014).

  106. Actually... by siskbc · · Score: 1

    ...it's gotta be global warming.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  107. Soace Station denizens by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The astronauts have about an 8 minute warning before the radiation for the flare gets to them. The actual plasma comes much later. NASA informs them, and they retreat to one of the Russian modules (Zveda I think) which has a small section that is densly shielded. Even there, I believe they receive about a 2 week dose of radiation (what we experience walking around on the planet on a daily basis for two weeks). Of course, that level is based on an X10 I think. I have no idea how much they receive from an X20, but obviously it's more. I don't think this will be a problem unless we get 4-5 more X20s in their stay. I am sure at some point, NASA would have to consider bringing them back early if the doses keep getting higher.

    One thing to note, the Soyuze capsules are really bad at shielding cosmic radiation, so they aren't a very good refuge for that. So, if a big sucka (say an X30+) came off the Sun, the Astronauts would not be able to ditch till after the radiation pulse. They would have to endure it on the station, then leave for treatment back home. De-orbit with radiation sickness would probably suck.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:Soace Station denizens by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative
      astronauts have about an 8 minute warning before the radiation for the flare gets to them

      No they don't. It takes about 8 1/2 minutes for light to get from the Sun to the Earth. By the time someone on Earth knows about it, that 8 1/2 minutes have already passed -- we find out about it when the light reaches us; which, is the same time the x-rays and gamma reach us...

      Even if Soho is way out ahead of us, it still takes the same amount of time for the signal to travel from Soho to Earth as it does for the radiation to travel from Soho to Earth.

      Now, they do have warning (hours) before the plasma (mostly protons and electrons with some neutrons & alpha thrown in for good measure) reaches them...

  108. Curse you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curse you Sol, and your little dog too!!!

  109. The Sun's Western Limb? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    Because 486 is close to the Sun's western limb, the blast was not directed straight towards the Earth.

    I object! I think it was on the east. Proposal to NASA: send somebody to the sun with a compass to find out which way is west. While he's there he can ask the sun how a spherical entity can be considered to have limbs.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    1. Re:The Sun's Western Limb? by Planx_Constant · · Score: 1

      Did you do know that a lot (most) of astronomy pictures are shown upside-down? It has been a convention pretty much since they started taking pictures through telescopes.

      Interestingly enough, this would cause west to appear on the right in a photograph.

      Limb. Look for the definition that says "Astronomy" in front of it.

      --
      Heisenberg might have been here.
  110. airline 50x background radiation dose by peter303 · · Score: 1

    During last week's solar event I read somewhere that airplane passengers were receiving fifty times the normal background radiation. For a couple hour flight, this would be like four extra days a year background. You get a 100 days extra over sea level if you live in Colorado.

    Airpline employees however are getting like hundreds of days of extra radiation if they've worked regularly the past couple weeks.

    1. Re:airline 50x background radiation dose by confused+one · · Score: 1
      It still doesn't add up to enough to hurt anyone.

      airline passengers get more radiation anyway, since they're flying above 5 miles worth of the atmosphere. Everytime you fly across the Pacific, you get like the equivalent of a chest x-ray.

  111. Re:FP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gooder English learning go.

  112. well that's a... by mantera · · Score: 1


    The Sun has unleashed its largest recorded solar flare, capping 10 days of unprecedented activity for the star.

    Solar Orgasm

  113. What X?? class would cook Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how high can the earth take before we are cooked/extinct?

    1. Re:What X?? class would cook Earth by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Informative
      Using the above scale, where X50 = 0.005 W/m^2 and the earth having total surface area of 509600000000000 m^2 ( half of which faces the sun ) I get the impact on the side of the earth facing the sun to be 1.25 * 10^12 = 1,250,000,000,000 Watts. 1,250 gigawatts. I read that a hurricane puts out up to 2*10^14 watts = 200,000,000,000,000 watts = 200,000 gigawatts. So it is much less powerful than a hurricane. Though the magnetosphere is much bigger than the surface area of the earth. I don't know how big.

      The earth is 6,378,100 meters radius 2 * pi * r^2 = surface area of magnetosphere facing the sun ( 6.3781 * 10^7 )^2 = 36 * 10^14 * pi * 2 = 4.52 * 10^16 watts = 45,200,000,000,000,000 = 45,200,000 gigawatts Much bigger than a hurricane, but spread out more.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    2. Re:What X?? class would cook Earth by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Mod my last post down as stoned.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    3. Re:What X?? class would cook Earth by barakn · · Score: 1

      Since you're talking about x-rays, the magnetosphere numbers are meaningless. X-rays pass through the magnetosphere without noticing it. The atmosphere is remarkably efficient at absorbing them, though.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    4. Re:What X?? class would cook Earth by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Ok, this is boiled down and processed information fed to the unwashed masses via TV, but on a show I watched, they basically said the Sun would have to dish out a solar flare 100 times more powerful than what had been observed (which at the time, the most were the previous 2 X20's) pointed directly at us. This wouldn't cook the planet itself. What would happen as the shock from the CME reaches us, the northern lights would race southward until it was a global event. The entire planet (nightside) from poles to equator would see the aurora. Again, this isn't the problem. The problem at this point is that since the aurora is visable globally, that means the radiation is strong all the way past the ionisphere and is strong enough at the right altitude to do damage to the ozone layer and pretty much eliminate it. After that, don't go outside when the sun rises, you'll litterally cook within minutes in the direct sunlight.

      As for the planet being literally cooked by a solar flare, I wouldn't worry about that for another few billion years until the sun swells up into a red giant and gets ready to engulf this little rock in the process.

      Thought: if the strength scale for flares is logarithmic, wouldn't a X40 be the required strength to meet the 100x more powerful requirement?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  114. Believe it when i see it by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I thought Glen Oaks produced flares in the 1970's? Sun have a long way to go if they are going to break into the clothing industry.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  115. How does one read solar activity reports? by ThreeToe · · Score: 1
    I've been looking for a web site that states simply: "Aurora will be good tonight in the high-mid latitudes. Go outside at midnight PDT." Alas, most of the "space weather" reports I've seen are difficult to grok.

    Could someone please explain how to parse reports such as the NOAA solar forecast? Thanks!

  116. We all know why this is happening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you all probably read, the Sun "upgraded" to .NET a few weeks ago when all the flares started to appear. It appears to be a memory leak that Microsoft is working on, which are occurring as solar flares. Microsoft is going to release a patch soon. Looks like the Suns few billion years of uptime will sonn be gone, as the Sun will at least have to reboot once after it applies the patch and probably stay down longer so Microsoft audit it's license.

  117. Effects of an "X40" flare on earth?? by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

    So what would happen on earth if an X40 solar flare directly impacted? I haven't seen anybody mention the effects of something so large.

    Additionally, at what level should we throw our hands up in despair and declare the end is here?

    1. Re:Effects of an "X40" flare on earth?? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      when you throw up in despair from radiation posioning, we're ended

  118. The Sun will explode in less than 48 hours.. by Jor-Ella · · Score: 1

    ..and I've booked little Kal-El on the secret Mars probe being launched tomorrow.

  119. We need a -1, Cynic. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    A cynic...how freaking original!

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  120. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    What does the Securities and Exchange Commission have to do w/ the sun?

    --
    [o]_O
  121. Hmm by Tisephone · · Score: 1

    If the Securities and Exchange Commission is busying themselves by estimating the size of solar flares, I guess that explains why the job market is in the pits.

    --
    "Neque enim lex est aequior ulla, quam necis artifices arte perire sua."
  122. Sunny spots by rctay · · Score: 1

    In another 6 or 7 billion years this place will not be fit to live in.

  123. Can someone put this in context for me? by Kombat · · Score: 1


    How long does it take for a "solar flare" to ... well, "flare?" I mean, the little animated gif I saw on one of the news sites, what's the timespan of those images? I mean, are we talking hours, or minutes, or seconds? Is watching a solar flare erupt like watching a cloud change shape? Faster? Slower?

    Also, same question, but with respect to the Northern Lights. I've seen video animations of the lights vividly rippling in the night sky, like waves lapping at the shore of a pond, but do they actually move that fast? If I were to see them (and I never have), and I watched them for 5 or 10 seconds, would I see them move at all? Or are they, again, like clouds, and very slow moving?

    Just wondering.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:Can someone put this in context for me? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      minutes to hours for a solar flare, see here

      The only time I saw auroras near Canada (in the U.P of Michigan), there was a very faint blue flickering , not at all like the rich colors I see in photographs. Maybe someone further north could tell us how it appears to naked eye?

  124. Wouldn't it be cool if ..... by cjjjer · · Score: 1

    These flares were a precursor to the sun actually burning it's self out? I mean really. How do we know when and how the fiery ball at the center of our solar system will die out for real? It's not like we have ever seen something like this happen before up close and personal. Maybe the science of today is totally wrong when it comes to stuff like this. We just don't know...

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be cool if ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, we'll find out when it happens.. well 9 minutes or so after it happens anyway =P

  125. NWN said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The end times are nigh! Ours is deserved damnation!"

  126. Yeah, except. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I was in Toronto for the SARS thing. I was in Toronto for the huge black-out. Then I was on the East Coast for the weird hurricane which hit Halifax. I know people who have been financially screwed because of the Mad Cow thing, and this solar activity is happening right now. This is all within the last six months.

    When I was a kid, it was a rare and noteworthy thing when even one of these sorts of events would occur.

    Also within the last six months was the killer heat wave in France, and the drying up of numerous old rivers throughout Europe, and the crazy brush fires in California. --All of which, (with maybe the exception of the Danuabe drying up), are the sorts of things which would have been reported by the world press when I was a kid.

    Now when it comes to earthquakes, perhaps you are right, but then who knows? There have certainly been dozens lately. And Old Faithful in Yellowstone has been spouting eratically for the last couple of years now, which has all the geologists wringing their hands.

    As well, there have been a lot of big metorites in the last year, many actually striking the earth. --Another two events just since the beginning of November alone. Again, I don't recall any rocks falling out of the sky being reported when I was young, and that was during the seventies when the news industry was well established and quite robust. --And when all things related to space exploration were exciting and cool.

    But think as you will.


    -FL

  127. Ask google! by douglips · · Score: 1
  128. Weight vs. Mass by Sunlighter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, no, no! The sun's mass is one solar mass, or 2*10^30 kg, according to this page.

    But its weight is a different matter entirely. Weight is a force, which means it should be measured in Newtons. Weight also requires the influence of a gravitational field. Since the Sun is in orbit around the center of the galaxy, and in free fall, it is weightless.

    (Well, actually, the Earth ''does'' pull on the sun some, so we can calculate its "weight" in the Earth's gravitational field independently of its "weight" in other gravitational fields... this is from memory, so it may not be completely accurate...

    Gambit Version 3.0

    > (define big-g (* 6.67 (expt 10 -11)))
    > big-g
    6.67e-11
    > (define grav (lambda (m1 m2 r) (/ (* big-g m1 m2) r r)))
    > (grav 2e30 (/ 2e30 330000) (* 93000000 5280 12 2.54 .01 .001))
    3.6091773054556857e28
    >

    All right, the sun weighs 3.6e28 Newtons. So there.

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
    1. Re:Weight vs. Mass by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      > (define big-g (* 6.67 (expt 10 -11)))
      > big-g
      6.67e-11
      > (define grav (lambda (m1 m2 r) (/ (* big-g m1 m2) r r)))
      > (grav 2e30 (/ 2e30 330000) (* 93000000 5280 12 2.54 .01 .001))
      3.6091773054556857e28
      >

      Translation: An assload

  129. "Safe" solar power my ass... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 2, Funny

    Guess this will put the kibosh on all those tree-huggers advocating solar as safe and benign.

    Let's face it, it's time to shut down the sun before it kills us and step up use of safe energy sources like coal and oil. The sun has had its chance, and it blew it.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  130. net power by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The satellites only have to work *once* to have a net power benefit. The power in a single flare is vast compared to the total power consumption of producing, launching and monitoring a network of even hundreds of satellites. If the Earth were as close to the Sun as I propose the satellite orbit, it would be fried by a flare; the energy released making the satellites here on the Earth hardly makes a ripple in the ecosystem.

    The satellite lifetime is like the Star Wars "Brilliant Pebbles" tech: while the satellite is destroyed by the wave of energy passing through it, it lasts long enough to convert some power to a laser. The laser transfers power to a receiver a distance/direction away that is unaffected by the large power passing through the satellite, but even the fraction received is large. In Star Wars, the destroying energy comes from a nuclear blast, and the receiver is a military target on Earth. With the solar wind web, the destroying energy comes from a solar flare, and the receiver is a prepared target on the Moon.

    Some of the captured energy is used to make and launch replacements for satellites destroyed by the flare. Or not - even a significant fraction of a flare's energy would put us in an energy budget environment that makes today's tech look like rubbing sticks together.

    Solar wind power is better than Titanic petrochemicals for many reasons, mainly the superior efficiency of sending energy across the solar system in an "inertialess" laser, instead of bound up in matter. Then there's the reduced pollution of capturing and processing the laser energy, as opposed to burning chemicals to go out, retrieve, ship back, and process Titanic chemicals. And the pollution issue is relevant not just on the Earth side, but possibly on the Titanic side: maybe there's some kind of life brewing in that ocean. Probably not, but why ruin it for the possibility of human farming sometime in the future? The kind of life that might be affected by depriving it of a small fraction of the power of a sporadic solar flare is too different from us to consider, when compared to finding a cleaner way out of our approaching energy bottlenecks. Plus, we could siphon all these Star Wars scientists away from war development, into the more secure and profitable plentiful-energy business.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  131. related? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could these two events be related?

  132. the sun is obviously pissed off by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    With all of these flares right in our direction, makes me wonder if the sun is pissed at us.

  133. Ham radio and solar weather by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    So - how is this impacting HF ham radio?

    The hams seem to have a pretty good handle on solar weather. Its also the first site I found that explains what this M3.5 X17 X28 etc scale is. Seems to be logarithmic scale of X-ray flux averaged over 5 minute periods.

  134. I'll get modded down, but it's worth it by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you SUV fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in an SUV (Vortec 4800 V8 engine with 285 horsepower) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to create a level 17 solar flare. 20 minutes. At home, on my Volkswagen Bug running diesel, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this SUV, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various SUVs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a SUV that has run faster than its Rice-grinder counterpart, despite the SUVs' faster chip architecture. My six-disc in-dash CD changer and Bose speaker system runs faster than this 285 horsepower machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the SUV is a superior machine.

    SUV addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a SUV over other faster, cheaper, more stable vehicles.

    1. Re:I'll get modded down, but it's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUV addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a SUV over other faster, cheaper, more stable vehicles.

      It's compensation. The smaller the ..., the bigger the vehicle a guy chooses. Seems like a good enough reason for me.

  135. Re:OMG THE SUN IS DYING!!!! by anaphora · · Score: 1

    Hey man, fuck you, I LIKE sleeping, okay? That once-a-week crap just wont cut it.

  136. Re:OMG THE SUN IS DYING!!!! by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    But you woudln't even feel the difference once you were assim^H^H^H part of the new civilization. Besides, sleeping is overrated. You can't be productive if you are asleep. As it is, I get 4-6 hours a night myself. ;)

  137. FYI. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I think American news avoided this info to prevent panic. Here (Poland) they put a blunt fact in the news:

    Was the flare directed straight at Earth, oceans would evaporate

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:FYI. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or possibly because polish people are idiots.

      an X28 flare would not fucking evaporate the oceans.

      In the 1800's we had a flare that scientists estimate was an X54 or something larger.. oceans did not disappear.. sure an X28 would probably fuck up a ton of electronics.. the X17 we just had and the smaller ones kept knocking out my car radio and shutting off street lights, but no oceans evaporated, hell no puddles evaporated

    2. Re:FYI. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      In the 1800's we had a flare that scientists estimate was an X54 or something larger..

      Directed at...?
      And if this one was X40 (as some estimated)...?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:FYI. by Medisilvanus · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, there's a report of 'impossible' temperatures in Moere og Romsdal (Norway) shortly after the solar eruption. Certainly hot in November for a place near the arctic circle. That record came after a night whose low was 16.4 C.

  138. Space station radiation levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone aware of what protection the current group of space station astronauts have against the flare radiation?

  139. Re:Bruce Dickinson: Prophet? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    > Bruce Dickinson said it best when he sang, "The sun that gave us life yesterday is now the sun that takes our lives away" on his Accident of Birth album.

    Um, yeah. Let's hope omega zero day isn't just round the corner. ;-)
    [Parent post quoted in full because I like the album, and consider that any post that quotes it doesn't deserve -1 moderation :-)]

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  140. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    I believe in free will. If it doesn't exist then nothing matters anyway and I'm just following my predestined path in believing in it. If it does exist, well what d'you know, I'm right!

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  141. Re:Very disturbing turn of events :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you religious types just grow up or go see a shrink?

    Because they are afraid.

    They don't want to realize that after they die, that's it. No heaven, only slowly rotting pile of wormfood.

  142. Intellegent reasons for suv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -Northern areas snow fall
    -rural areas bad roads, need to get places without roads
    -need to tow, boat, camper, other
    -Need cargo room to transport stuff
    -need truck like vehicle for work, suv nicer for normal use than pick up

    i'd rather have a sports car or luxury sedan but one cannot argue the usefulness of an SUV

  143. Mod UP +1 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think your post should be modded up for humor. It better have been humour, otherwise you need an enema.

  144. Not really but... by Xconnect · · Score: 0

    I was picturing McNealy lambasting about Microsoft... :-)

    --
    --- root@127.0.0.1
  145. christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new photon overlords.

  146. Jeezes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeezes, was it that hard to put the simple word "The" in front of "Sun"?