Slashdot Mirror


Investigating Online Movie Piracy?

kewsh writes "There's an excellent piece from the LA Times via Yahoo! News which explains the interworkings of the movie, music, and software piracy scene, including quotes from former and current scene members: 'Common to most groups is a disdain for selling pirated goods in favor of giving free access to anything and everything'." The article also notes: "Not everyone in the scene is so pure. Some players... are suspected of selling pirated movies and music to commercial bootleggers."

232 comments

  1. Bootleggers are paying? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would they have to pay if the pirates are into giving the milk away for free?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's the difference between the bootleggers downloading the movie themselves, or being handed/mailed a DVD master copy. It's all about the time involved. It may takes hours or days, depending on connection speed to get the entire movie, but you can overnight ship a master disk to someone easily.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Informative

      The bootleggers (ie, the people who make and selling lots of unauthorised copies of movies) are paying "the players" (ie, people in the movie industry who can get their hands on screeners and other preview copies) for preview copies of movies.

      In other words, some of the people who are opening the door to the bootleggers (or pirates) are charging them for the priviledge.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by MikeDX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is one of the things that really annoys and gets my goat every time I see it.

      People selling pirated movies and music at car boot sales, markets, roadsides, ebay, etc. This is totally wrong and I think is what the RIAA/MPAA should target and not joe bloggs downloading britney spears from kazaa.

      The people selling this stuff are not only tax dodgers, but are often taking the customers for a ride, some people often mistake these copies for the real thing and are buying in good faith, only to find out they have been ripped off by a shoddy inkjet printed jewelcase inner and an un-stickered cd-r costing next to nothing.

      What irritates me further, is that some people are also under the impression that those who do download for their own PERSONAL use are looked upon in the same league as those who download, copy, and sell to people for huge profits.

    4. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      What irritates me further, is that some people are also under the impression that those who do download for their own PERSONAL use are looked upon in the same league as those who download, copy, and sell to people for huge profits.

      Well, maybe not same league, but definately the same game. If they are just using it for their personal use, the MPAA or RIAA sues for an exorbitant amount of money. Once I've been sued for $100,000 the couple of years in jail I would have had had I sold the products wouldn't look like _that_ big a deterrent.

    5. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harr, We be the pirates of the seven subnets! Where thar's a will thar's a way, and by the end'o thday we be watching wut we like with NONE of those FBI or MPAA warnings, for that is the true nature of Pirateing Movies! That, and's we can't find half of what we likes here either! (Note: Sholin Soccer is not available in it origional form in northamerica, that and Disney ruined it completely).
      Be it sofware, media or otherwise as a great man once said "Information wants to be free" and since this is the information age...

    6. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by kaiwainz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The people selling this stuff are not only tax dodgers, but are often taking the customers for a ride, some people often mistake these copies for the real thing and are buying in good faith, only to find out they have been ripped off by a shoddy inkjet printed jewelcase inner and an un-stickered cd-r costing next to nothing.

      I completely agree. I've seen some real fine work done in Ukraine. Some even go all the way and make a box. The problem is that the average user doesn't know what they're doing is actually illegal.

      Talk to your average user, I doubt they even know that the Office they're running which they borrowed off the neighbour is actually breaching the EULA. Again, the average user doesn't understand because they see it as a victimless crime.

      As I have said to people, there is VERY little money made by the software company off end users. 85% of the money made are off enterprise and public service sales. The end user *may* once it a blue moon purchase a cheap $50 card making kit, however, in terms of the Microsofts and Adobes, they make little money off these customers.

      Here we are in 2004, and now these companies, and rightfully so, are now demanding that customers actually pay for the software. Activation is the first step and I am sure there will be more full proof protection mecanisms on their way. The fact is, unlike the end user, large commercial customers are kept in line via random BSA audits, with end users, there is no such safe guard.

      As for the movie business, the problem is that again, the end customer see it as a victimless crime. They don't see the negative spin offs hence they have no way of knowing what they're doing.

      If it were just Hollywood, then I think I wouldn't worry too much, however, small independent film units are the worst hit. These organisations are on razor thin margins. They live day to day on the sales of their movies. Sure, many of these independent films are sponsered by grants from governments, however, if the government see that the money is being put into a bottomless pit then they may pull the plug.

      If the plug is pulled then diversity will cease to exist and as a result, we're all worse off.

    7. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People selling pirated movies and music at car boot sales, markets, roadsides, ebay, etc. This is totally wrong and I think is what the RIAA/MPAA should target and not joe bloggs downloading britney spears from kazaa.
      But where do you think they get the pirated material? Some of them get it from kazaa! It's possible that they even downloaded it from YOU!

      Doesn't seem so innocent now, does it?

    8. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by MinusOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Talk to your average user, I doubt they even know that the Office they're running which they borrowed off the neighbour is actually breaching the EULA. Again, the average user doesn't understand because they see it as a victimless crime.

      I don't agree with this statement. I think that most people know that this is a violation of something (a law or license, or both.) The know that they should be paying for the software. They also know that they should be paying Microsoft for Office or Windows or whatever, and think that "Bill Gates has enough money already" It is easy for most people to justify not giving any more money to a company that is already one of the richest in the world. If it was only a few bucks to share an existing license with a second machine I think that most people would pay and MS would have even more money.

    9. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      If it was only a few bucks to share an existing license with a second machine I think that most people would pay and MS would have even more money.

      I think that statement right there says pretty much what most people think.... If the software was priced reasonably, people would be much more willing to pay for it. I know, set the price to what the market will bear, right? Well, if the market was bearing the price so well... then why is there this "rampant" piracy?

      --

      Place sig here.
    10. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      People selling pirated movies and music at car boot sales, markets, roadsides, ebay, etc. This is totally wrong and I think is what the RIAA/MPAA should target and not joe bloggs downloading britney spears from kazaa.

      Since you are a fan of hers, be sure to open the "Britney Spears naked" email being forwarded to your email address.

    11. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by danila · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I've seen some real fine work done in Ukraine. Some even go all the way and make a box. The problem is that the average user doesn't know what they're doing is actually illegal.

      In Ukraine, Russia, China and other poor, but free countries pirated copies are often pressed on the same plant where the licensed copies are (but not always). Sometimes the publisher would clearly say to the developers that they can expect to sell so many licensed and so many pirated copies. That's just the same thing as region encoding - you offer differently priced goods to different customer segments. And of course, pirated DVDs are packaged in completely the same way. The box art might differ, but the quality of packaging is the same. And both pirated and legit CDs (cheaper editions) are sold in the same "jewel" boxes (legit are sold in boxes as well).

      And the average user knows what he gets pretty well. I don't know about USA, but most people here appear pretty capable of figuring this out.

      As I have said to people, there is VERY little money made by the software company off end users.
      While we are talking about money made, let me tell you that there is also not really much money made by the pirates. Yes, they get a fair profit margin and a decent risk compensation, but in the end this is a competitive market and despite what one may think, it is not controlled by a cartel a la MPAA.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    12. Re:Bootleggers are paying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in 1995 there was probably less people in queue to fight over the maxed out cable modem bandwidth of those who actually share their often broken/incomplete/fake/shaky-camera-in-the-cinema movies... :P

      "Many hours" is an understatement. Me having a 10Mbps line doesn't help when the sources are slow and all their d/l slots are busy.

  2. ISP customer bandwidth... by johnfreez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is increasing (slowly but surely). what...10 mbits common place by 2007? say hello to zooming movie downloads :)

    --
    Disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about.
    1. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by include($dysmas) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      bah, by then whatever is in vogue to download will still require you to leave your computer on overnight. im setting up a wireless broadband connection in my village & others atm, got a 16mb sattellite (sp!?) connection. Can get films pretty quick atm

    2. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bandwith "can never get high enough".
      Already I have seen DVD rips of an entire set of DVDs, making it more than 10 GB. Even with 10mbps it will take some time to download.

      My lecturer in Distributed Communications said that "increasin bandwith will just result in software makers letting their software use more bandwith", which off course brings us back to where we started.

    3. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      10 mbits common place by 2007? say hello to zooming movie downloads :)

      Linux ISO's are so common at 2-5 disc sets, Why would 700 meg DIVX CD's be any different for downloading, now? You only rent a couple movies, you could just download a couple movies at night and burn them to CD.

      What we need is an iTunes for Divx movies. :)

    4. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My lecturer in Distributed Communications said that "increasin bandwith will just result in software makers letting their software use more bandwith", which off course brings us back to where we started.

      Perhaps... however, you can't deny that it's pretty mandatory for DVD movies to use a lot more space than most pieces software, which is the reason for the enormous size of the rip.

      The race between 'software makers' and media capacity/data transfer speed is one that the latter will ultimately win, unless software manufacturers literally start including files with gigabytes of random noise in just to fill up the space :-)

    5. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      Maybe I wasn't clear enoug, but I did mean to include DVD-rips etc as "software" (You use software to rip the dvd).
      Instead of ripping to DIVX which is 1/10 the size of a dvd-rip or something like that, they now rip the dvd with all the extra material and data making it 10 gb instead of the 700 mb divx rip.

      Perhaps... however, you can't deny that it's pretty mandatory for DVD movies to use a lot more space than most pieces software, which is the reason for the enormous size of the rip.
      No, I don't deny that, you are right if you talk only about software, but as I said, DVD ripping, online multimedia etc is all part of the definition of software in my previous post.

    6. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is an iTunes for Divx movies. :)

      when did apple add Divx support to mac's?

    7. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DivX at typical online distribution quality is not suitable..

      Firstly for the codec trouble experienced when playing files, secondly for the generally poor display quality

      Mp3 (and encrypted AAC or WMA) work because the compression is lossy in ranges not easily detectible to the human ear.

      Video compression leads to far more obvious loss of quality, especially when viewed on a high-res PC screen.

      I believe a Video iTunes is possible but it will be a bandwidth hog as the technology to deliver good-quality video at small file-sizes just doesn't exist yet... The only solution I can think of would be to distribute the Mpeg video file from a DVD, but using some form of copy-protection (Preferably a form which allows burning to DVD or VideoCD for backup)

    8. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Instead of ripping to DIVX which is 1/10 the size of a dvd-rip or something like that, they now rip the dvd with all the extra material and data making it 10 gb instead of the 700 mb divx rip.

      The distribution of DVD images is still very rare. I have only seen it on a couple of occations. What the guy said was that people are now starting to distribute entire sets, like season boxes. A good DivX of a 42 minute episode is going to be 250-300 megs, so a 22 episode season adds up. I know a guy who has the entire run of The Simpsons, which is 59 gigs IIRC.

      The same thing is happening with music. While file sizes have gone up a little, it isn't like people are moving to FLAC or WAV files. Instead, while people used to download individual mp3s back in the Napster days, that became albums, and today in places like eMule, Overnet, etc, you generally download entire discographies in RAR files. I've dled files with 34 albums from Queen, 40 from Rolling Stones, 25 from Aerosmith - and I don't even like these bands enough to download a single mp3 when I was stuck behind a modem.

    9. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DivX at typical online distribution quality is not suitable..

      Firstly for the codec trouble experienced when playing files, secondly for the generally poor display quality


      You don't know what you are talking about. A properly done DVD-rip using for example Xvid is indistiguishable from the original. In fact, the audio loss tends to be much worse than the video (since they generally encoded without surround).

      As for codec issues, that is simply a problem with lousy software. I don't know what the situation is with Windows, but in Linux there are no codec issues - just install mplayer or xine and run...

    10. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by shachart · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm.... no. Why do you care when the entire DVD collection *FINISHES* downloading?

      Even if the DVD set is 40GB, if you download as fast as you watch (which is up to, say, 1200 kilobit/second), then it's okay it's just that fast. And broadband today is often just as fast as needed.

      Now, if we only have proper QoS...

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    11. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by really? · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. I got this today from my provider:

      "Price: FLET'S ADSL 40M
      Monthly 1,230 yen
      Yearly 12,300 yen"
      (Today's exchange, 106 yen to the US$.)

      Just as I was beginning to think that 1TB would be enough for a few months. :-)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    12. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a great amount of quality variance between rips, it really depends on the quality of source and the skill of the ripper. Lately, I've been seeing 2-cd sets for movies that are very high quality. Other than the loss of surround sound, these movies are difficult to distinguish from DVD.

      The codec game is the end-user's problem. There's a learning curve with any technology. You can't expect people in the scene to rip using a poor codec just so that lazy people can watch the movie more easily. If you really want to be a viewer, put the time into learning how to use the tools. If that's too difficult, go and rent or buy instead.

    13. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      alt.binaries.dvd
      alt.binaries.dvdr
      alt.binaries.dvd-r

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Tarpan · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who has the entire run of The Simpsons, which is 59 gigs IIRC.
      59!? must be bad rips, mine is 72.

      $ du -hs /it/tv/Simpsons
      72G /it/tv/Simpsons


      and another 16 gig of Futurama...
      and yes, I own all the 3 seasons of Simpsons released on dvd so far (and all four of Futurama). I can't wait for the rest of the simpsons to be released also...

    15. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I disagree. That's rather like saying that computers will never get fast enough. They're "fast enough" now. Upgrading a 486 from 25MHz to 33MHz was a big deal. Going from 1GHz to 2GHz isn't a big deal at all. It makes a difference if you're playing games but not much at all if you're running Quicken. Bandwidth available and bandwidth required are both growing, but availability is growing faster than requirement. It'll eventually catch it, just as computer speed available caught computer speed required.

    16. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Uh... sure maybe where you are... But I struggle daily to find someone (anyone) willing to offer me broadband of any form only a few miles away from the third largest city in Pennsylvania (PA having two huge cities: Pittsburgh and Philly that overwhlem anything else in the state). Verizon abondoned us after milking the state for billions, Adelphia only services a limited area of the city itself, Cablevision (aka Time Warner cable) covers my area but doesn't seem interested in providing broadband... The same can be said for the local government, who can't find anyone to provide them with a T1+ conenction and that killed my suggestion for providing municiple broadband service...

      That's why I'm still stuck on dial-up... I doubt I'll have basic broadband by 2007, let alone 10mbit broadband... I'm not alone either last I heard broadband services covered only around 40% of people in the US... So maybe some of you can see easy movie downloading, but a large chunk of the population can't...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    17. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont even get 1 mbs yet.

    18. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      look for the dvd-r section on suprnova. loads there.

    19. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by BitchAss · · Score: 1

      That's true and all, but what about mp3s? It used to be the case that it was a pain in the ass to share and download mp3s. Now music files zip all over the place. I've lost an mp3 on my hard drive and rather than spending the time to search for it, I'll just download it. The bandwidth will get to a point where there's enough room for people to swap movies in the same way.

      You can argue that uncompressed sound files are harder to swap because they're so big, and that's true, but mp3s are 'good enough' for most people to want to swap them. I think the same can be said about divx movies.

      --
      Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
    20. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Jerf · · Score: 1

      My lecturer in Distributed Communications said that "increasin bandwith will just result in software makers letting their software use more bandwith", which off course brings us back to where we started.

      I do not find this argument anywhere near as compelling as the (more-or-less proven true) argument that as processors increase, programmers will use more processor time.

      Programmers use more processor time because we can trade off processor time for human development time. If you're doing "normal programming" and using C when you could instead be using Perl or Python, you're a fool and it's costing you lots of money. For most programs, the users will never know the difference, but you're taking more of your preciou$ time to develop a worse product.

      What's the equivalent with bandwidth? We generally already send down the entire dataset for a given app; when you view a web page, the browser greedily loads it, even if it's 20 pages long and there's an image at the bottom you won't look at for another ten minutes. Speculative downloading of the next page only costs 2x or 3x more of the bandwidth.

      Decentralized P2P programs aren't "wasting" the bandwidth, though they could (and should) get a little more efficient, they're using it. Bigger pipes might actually increase their efficiency, though they might be encouraged to be more wasteful then. Still, this is only one app that might conceivably grow the bandwidth usage to match bandwidth, a trend that does not make.

      Sure, we'll ship around DVDs, but those are new apps; nobody bitches that SETI@Home consumes all of my brand new processor, the app needs all the power it can get. New apps that weren't feasible previously don't really that much more power.

      I just don't see what software is suddenly going to waste 10x-100x-1000x more bandwidth just because it can, the way our programs are easily 100x slower then they used to be (but they are written many, many, many times faster then they used to be; certain types of programs are easily 1000x easier to write then they were in the days things were running 100x "faster"). What do the programmers get for this? Handling more data is generally harder, and it's not like the data we're throwing around the net is already especially compressed, or that we're going to stop compressing it anytime soon. (As long as processors remain umpteen times faster then bandwidth, it's worth it to compress.)

      I can see why your Distibuted Processing professor would claim this, but most of us aren't using it, aren't about to use it, and have no interest in it. Bandwidth used in a lab, full of distributed processing computers, isn't an interesting metric. Even then, it takes a lot of distributed processing value to use much bandwidth; distributed processing is only useful if you can offload a problem and get an answer more quickly then you can compute it yourself, and that typically only applies in certain heavy-duty computation cases that aren't normal. Mere message-passing is going to look much the same as the bandwidth we already use; I'm subscribed to about 40 RSS files, and we could pass messages instead of my software polling them, but the bandwidth use will be about the same either way (almost nil vs. almost nil).

    21. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1

      I've found that the images lock up after I spend days DLing. This happens with DVD-RW and using a virtual drive, so it must be the image itself. Last 3 were bad, haven't tried since...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    22. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      Bandwith "can never get high enough".

      maybe...

      Already I have seen DVD rips of an entire set of DVDs, making it more than 10 GB. Even with 10mbps it will take some time to download.

      How does this justify your first statement? It seems that say, a bandwidth of 10 GB/s would be feasible...

      I don't think it's fair to say that movies will keep increasing in size as bandwidth and storage increases. The current quality of DVD is so good, it's almost limited as much by the TV (even if it's HD) than the DVD. And how much more image quality can they get from the cameras anyway?

    23. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "is increasing (slowly but surely). what...10 mbits common place by 2007? say hello to zooming movie downloads :) "

      Hopefully the success of music services will be closely looked at, thus preventing that from happening illegitimately.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    24. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by klang · · Score: 1

      ..there is a test of a 100Mbit consumer network in Denmark right now .. I seem to remember that the Korean consumers have 1Gbit direct backbone access .. so the danish test case is not unique ..

      Bandwidths are going up fast, and people that really don't use the net that much, still pays between 6 and 12 euros a month to share a quite good bandwith with the rest of the people in the building. A private, 2Mbit ADSL line will run 100 euros.

      2007? .. I would expect more than 10Mbit .. I would also expect DivX file sizes to be quite a bit bigger than they are today.

    25. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Other than the loss of surround sound, these movies are difficult to distinguish from DVD. "

      This is the 2nd or 3rd post I've seen alluding to this. Why aren't people copying the surround sound?? I don't have a DVD burner yet (on the short list of things to get), so, I'm just now looking into ripping and burning DVD's for backup...is this a lack on part of the ripping tool?

      I guess I'm also a little surprised at the low common denominator people go for copies. Missing surround, lossy compression...etc. I don't want a copy bad enough that I'll take one inferior to what can be purchased. I mean, they don't cost THAT much. Is it that people just don't care about the quality, or that so many these days just don't have quality equipment to play audio/video over to where they can tell the difference?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Interesting...I pretty much thought unless you were living in a rural area, you had access to at minimum one form of broadband. I just had figured that many people were just too cheap to buy it.

      I'm actually shocked at how many people are still on dial up...hell, I switched about 5 years ago the second they first started offering DSL in my area...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I haven't done this for quite some time, so maybe my experience is dated, but...

      Even if you have broadband, and the person you're downloading from has broadband, you're going to be lucky to sustain over 100 kb/s. From my experience, I'd be happy to be able to average over 50 kb/sec for even a fraction of the duration it takes to load one of these monsters.

      Like I said though, I haven't tried this in a while and maybe I just never had the right "connections".

    28. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked into Satalite or satalite relay station to wireless? We are thinking of switching over to that. The verizon adsl in this area leaves much to be desired. Those are the only 2 options left open to us after Verizon. You might want too look into it. I know satalite is available pretty much anywhare.

    29. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the quality of dvd is okay for viewing on the majority of today's tv sets.

      but recently seeing a hdtv program right after a dvd movie on a plasma tv, i must say that there is a lot of improvment that can made over dvd.

      and hdtv is only 1080 lines interlaced. we have censors today that provide digital (still) cameras with 6-11 megapixels. Imagine if the resolution those things can provide are every adapted for video use?

    30. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this would be a great idea, i think. especially since the movies downloaded off of such as site would be pretty much gauranteed to be error free, as opposed to many of the glitches you get downloading them off of p2p apps.

      i would only be willing to pay so much for them, though. the quality of a divx rip (even the best of them) are a far cry from dvd, and don't have the special features, and rarely include the ac3 track but just a downmixed mp3. sometimes i don't mind this, for movies i would like to see, but not really too crazy about paying $15-25 for the dvd. I think a reasonably price for such movies would be $7-10. (or if they put some kind of drm system in it, $1.99 for a one time viewing)

    31. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it's anything like me, there are some movies that i just want to watch a couple of times, and don't really care about it being that high quality. and then there are the ones that are fully worth buying (lotr!)

      for me, i usually buy four or five movies a year which i consider worth owning where the better quality is justifiable.

    32. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mp3, and aac sound great on lower end systems, just as divx rips are suitable for tv's under 32" and computer monitors.

      but whenever you play these on a high end system, their flaws come out.

      from my experience, the loss of quality from aac, mp3, etc. played on my home theater is much worse than the loss off quality I experience on my projector playing a divx rip.

    33. Re:ISP customer bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about. The latest edition of Gordian Knot is only 7500kb ;)

  3. Hmmmm..... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...an article that tells me that the Internet is used for distributing pirated warez and movies...

    The phrase "No shit, Sherlock" springs rapidly to mind.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Hmmmm..... by danila · · Score: 1

      If you had RTFA, you would know that this is a pretty detailed explanation of several levels of Internet movie piracy, obviously written by someone who knows his shit, or at least bothered to do the research.

      I have been following piracy-related articles and other materials for a few years and I can tell you that this is one of the best introductions to the topic that you can find on the Net today. Please have some respect for the author and save your sarcasm for a more appropriate occasion.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  4. The next step by gringer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose next we'll see some report from a country like Australia showing how sales of ripped media are not hurting the industry.

    Or has that already happened?... I get a little confused as to which counter-argument is the most recent.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:The next step by Mascot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The aussies aren't the only ones. Where I live (Norway) record sales revenue has been on an upward trend for years. Ironically, it apparently started to accellerate shortly after Napster became a household name. Surely a coincidence.

      Personally I wish it would've started going down once the record companies started making their "CDs" incompatible with many devices. Of course, they would've attributed that to piracy as opposed to people getting fed up having to rip the CDs to burn on a CD-R and get the compatabilty back (I've yet to meet a "protected" CD that failed to rip as opposed to just ripping slower).

  5. ROFL by graveyardduckx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The scene is closed to much of the world; would-be participants have to gain the trust of insiders and prove their worth before gaining entry. And the lifespan of groups tends to be short, at least on the Net, where players come and go."

    It's only closed to those who don't know about P2P apps, IRC, FTP, WWW, E-mail, CDR/DVDR, and any other method of transferring data... and the easiest way to gain entry is to type something like "/join #warez950". As far as the players, they don't come and go, they just change their names and keep doing what they're doing. I'm sorry, but how silly is this article?

    1. Re:ROFL by Inda · · Score: 1

      If only it was as easy as typing "/join #warez950"... If only getting access to FTP dumps was that easy...

      The acticle was silly though. It didn't decribe the scene as I know it - it only contains part-truths.

      Centropy make money out of it? Yeah, yeah they all do. You are a bit green if you believe they take all that risk for no financial reward.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:ROFL by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      It's even more basic than that though...

      I can see why people might want to download "warez" to get an *identical* copy of a piece of software free of charge...

      I can see why people download good quality MP3s that are a *near* identical copy of a piece of music freed of charge...

      But downloading a movie that's been taken by a shaky handed teenager with a hand camera in a cinema purely to avoid paying a few dollars/Euros/pounds for a cinema ticket or to avoid waiting a couple of weeks until it's released at a local cinema??? Sorry, a few people need to go get themselves a proper hobby...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:ROFL by gringer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try reading the *whole* article before commenting on parts of it:

      "According to Nguyen, it takes minutes for a newly released item to reach all of the topsites, but it may take hours or days to reach the lower echelon of private sites. After that, the digital booty leaks out intermittently to online areas more accessible to the public, such as chat channels and news groups.

      To get the movies, you just need to wait. But to get the movies as early as possible, you need to know the right people.

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    4. Re:ROFL by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Informative
      But downloading a movie that's been taken by a shaky handed teenager with a hand camera in a cinema...

      In China you can buy DVDs of just about any movie within days of release in the US, or sometimes before. They all have very nice packages, probably pasted up from promo sites on the web. (However, the English text is often nonsensical, or relating to an entirely different movie. And sometimes they include real reviews from, eg, AICN, like "[Matrix 3] is a steaming pile of crap".) The quality of the movie though is a crapshoot. Sometimes it's a perfect dupe of a DVD release (especially Oscar screeners with the anti piracy notice floating across the bottom every 10 minutes), sometimes a slightly blurry image with good sound, not bad but a bit worse than VCR quality, sometimes it's obviously a video camera in a cinema complete with audience coughs and shadows on the screen. But as they're less than $1 you can just shrug and throw those away, or go back to the shop and exchange it -- it's actually a lot easier to exchange pirated goods than legit; less paperwork I suppose.

    5. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The public distribution you deal with when you use any of those methods is a few orders of magnitude worse than what the insiders get.

      Terabyte sites on gigabit uplinks are not uncommon. You get your own dedicated login. If you're on a FastE school or work connection, you can grab things at a few MB/sec. It's rather similar to having all the latest stuff pushed to your hard drive.

      Of course, you generally have to be involved with some group to get on these sites. Thus, you need to be providing resources of your own (be it source material, a big box on a fat pipe, etc.). It's a pain in the ass if you're doing it yourself.

      I hate finding stuff the old fashioned way, but it's much easier than dealing with the "scene" overall.

    6. Re:ROFL by DZign · · Score: 1

      - well maybe some people (kids ?) just have to much time and cheap bandwith (after all I pay for 10gig a month, so I'm going to d/l enough ;-)

      - maybe people just download it because it's available to them

      - but just maybe, people don't really want to go a lot to the movies, or at least not to see every movie, and prefer to see new movies now already in the comfort of their home..

      - and maybe there are too many crappy movies being made, there are some impressive movies which you just have to see on the big screen.. but 80% of all movies are just as good/bad on a small screen.. so at least you've seen them without having to go out to the theatre

    7. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but just maybe, people don't really want to go a lot to the movies, or at least not to see every movie, and prefer to see new movies now already in the comfort of their home

      That pretty much hits the nail on the head for me. Going to the cinema is nice sometimes if a film is really something special, but when you have to sit in a cramped and dirty place with popcorn all over the floor, listening to the conversation of the people in the row behind you who have somehow managed not to switch off their mobile phones - especially in the UK, going to the cinema isn't always a pleasant experience.

      Why buy overpriced and badly made drinks and popcorn when you can just make your own at home, and sit in the comfort of your own chair, enjoying the movie in reasonable enough quality on your widescreen TV or 21" monitor? The quality of DivX rips is certainly better than VHS video tape, and is often not far from DVD quality.

      Why wait two months after it's US release for a film to come out in your country, when you can download it a month before it's even been released anywhere?

      Don't get me wrong - I actually do like to go to the cinema for films of the magnitude of The Matrix and Lord Of The Rings, but basically, for a normal run of the mill film that isn't available on DVD yet, there's not much chance of me going to the cinema to see it. If it's really good, I buy the DVD when it comes out.

      To be honest, I think worldwide release dates should be the same for all films, and that new films should come out on DVD at the same time as they are released in cinemas. Except that would put cinemas out of business, because almost nobody sensible would ever bother going to them any more.

      Just get your own home cinema and buy the DVD!

    8. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise you can e-mail mystic.
      He included an e-mail in the release notes.

    9. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Dear lord. P2P is not the scene, #warez950 is not the scene. ROFL indeed but hardly for the reason you think.

    10. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never had anything to do with the piracy scene at any level.

      However, as with experience, I can say the article is 100% correct. The lifespan of groups is short, often times too short. People come, and people go. Sure, some people just change their names and keep doing what they're doing, but not as many as you'd think.

      oh, yeah, and "/join #warez950" might give you access to a couple of dcc servers with cable connections and 10 gigs of space. Get to the top, and you're taking 8-10TB at speeds as fast as your connection can handle. There's a world of difference, and it takes something to get there too. Like the article said, you need something to offer for people to hook you up. Shell boxes, fast lines, money for hardware, pre releases, etc, will get you access eventually. Showing up in a channel on IRC and asking for stuff without contributing will get you laughed at.

    11. Re:ROFL by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Actually, for some really popular films, I can find it on my dorm's gnutella net on the day it's released.. yes indeed cam-rip, not something I'd want to download. But maybe somebody who lives here is a "high-level geek" (when they say there are "mid-level geeks", I assume there are high-level and low-level geeks as well then)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    12. Re:ROFL by netsharc · · Score: 0

      Oops I forgot to check "Post Anonymously" *G*

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    13. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food is a big issue for me. I can't enjoy myself when I am hungry, and everything available at movie theaters is disgusting. I don't like junk food. If they didn't treat me like I was smuggling cocaine just because I brought some healthy snacks with me, I wouldn't mind the place as much. I refuse to try to hide food in my jacket and risk a mess. Watching movies at home is not only free, it is more enjoyable!

    14. Re:ROFL by anethema · · Score: 1

      Actually it usually gets posted to news right away, within about an hour of getting released. I love news.

      Ohshit, I've said too much...

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    15. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scene itself is relatively closed to the mainstream, as most rip groups believe very strongly in the philosophy of keeping their releases off kazaa and the likes. It is the distro channels (like '#warez950') that spread the releases to the masses and eventually P2P. In fact, most rip groups that are associated with distro channels are penalized in various ways, such as not being allowed on topsites (citing security concerns) or not being given access to release databases. To be truly 'in the scene' (in some rip group) it does require a bit of trust.

      This article, instead of being silly, does a fairly accurate job of explaining in layman's terms how the scene works. As someone who has spent years involved with both rip groups and distro channels, it is well-publicized articles like this that make me glad I am no longer directly involved.

    16. Re:ROFL by billybob · · Score: 1

      It's only closed to those who don't know about P2P apps, IRC, FTP, WWW, E-mail, CDR/DVDR, and any other method of transferring data... and the easiest way to gain entry is to type something like "/join #warez950". As far as the players, they don't come and go, they just change their names and keep doing what they're doing. I'm sorry, but how silly is this article?

      I'm sorry, but how silly are you? "The scene" is not referring to downloading movies from kazaa or edonkey, it's about the people who allow this to happen, eg pirate the goods and distribute them. The article was slightly on the "dumbed down for joe public" side, but had more insight than I thought it would.

      --
      Joseph?
    17. Re:ROFL by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think the article makes some serious presumptions about the technology awareness of its readers. As a result we see all the silliness about FTP being primarily a piracy protocol (God forbid anybody should use it to backup personal files, or transmit documents or whatever!). And likewise the article makes the Internet appear to be an enigmatic and fearsome place, with much a life of its own. The internet's just like the mafia where nobody knows what's going on and people are brought in and killed on a whim! Be afraid! I think the article is just pandering to the sensibilities of its constituent (the ordinary Kazaa user, a Hollywood somebody-or-another, whatever).

      Kind of reminds me of a recent Wired cover proclaiming "Amazon's secret plan to turn books into bits". Secret plan? You can hardly navigate Amazon without being assaulted by the "Look inside" (a different feature, yes, because those pages are scanned and not searchable), but my point is that I don't think it's such a big secret on account Bezos wants to advertise this to draw customers. Wired was just trying to make technology seem more mysterious and greater than perhaps it is. Looks like it's the same with the LA Times.

    18. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a bit stupid if you believe CTP or anyone else of the groups make money out of this.

      Most vcd suppliers get movies to release by buying them from bootleg shops.

      These movies are released on the net AFTER they've been pirated in SE Asia or whereever.

  6. Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've got Star Wars Ep. 4-6 as theatrical release ripped from Laserdisc in the best possible DiVX quality.

    It's not my fault that I had to get a pirated version.
    George Lucas with that "CG" labeled crackpipe in his hand is to blame.

    Another point of disgust is MiramAXE with their sabotage of asian cinema. Has "Hero" (Jet Li) been released in the US already? I don't think so. MiramAXE likes to shelf things for a long time. After that they like to AXE movies into little ugly pieces, too.

    Piracy is competition and the only chance to stop this re-release and censorship nightmare.

    People who hate cinema may mod this down.

    1. Re:Piracy is competition! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wrong. Piracy happens because:

      a) People want something for nothing.
      b) People want something before it's officially made available.
      c) People want to impress other people with something they have but the other's don't.

      It's nothing to do with competition - just the opposite. Every audio CD, piece of software or DVD that is released these days is done so at a price that *takes into account* the fact that "x" number of copies of it will probably be pirated - that means we all pay more as a result.

      Competition results from not being a pathetic consumer, nothing more.

      If you don't like CD protection, then don't buy protected CDs...
      If you think a retailer charges too much for a product, don't buy from them...
      If a movie isn't released on DVD quick enough, email the studio and don't buy any of their other films...
      If enough people do the above, the vendor or producer has to relent.

      I'm neither condoning or criticising piracy - I just wish people that do it would admit they do it for one of the reasons above, rather than trying to justify it as though they are acting as modern day "Robin Hoods".

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Piracy is competition! by iainl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, it is your fault. If you had a laserdisc player (or even just bought the VHS releases when they came out), you could play the perfectly legal versions that the divxes were ripped from, like the rest of us.

      Laserdisc is great, and complaining that you need one in order to be able to watch Star Wars properly is only a little more relevant than the fact that I needed to buy an XBox as well as my Gamecube when I wanted to play Halo.

      As for Miramax's frankly useless attempts at Asian cinema, get yourself a multi-region DVD player and import the good versions like the rest of us.

      There are a hell of a lot of things that people get pirated, that they could have legitimate (and better quality) versions of if they only did a bit of extra work.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Piracy is competition! by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      I've got Star Wars Ep. 4-6 as theatrical release ripped from Laserdisc in the best possible DiVX quality.

      Where's the .torrent? ;-)

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    4. Re:Piracy is competition! by Mmm_Coco · · Score: 1

      If only the people in charge saw it that way. Instead of making thier product better, the way they do for other types of competiton, they are trying to sue it out of existance. I bough "Mallrats" on DVD a while ago, and soon found that I couldn't upload the movie to my computer. Not needing to carry around a hardcopy was the only reason I switched to DVD, the quality of VHSs is good enough for me. Those stupid people! Now all the new DVDs are like that, and I have all this empty harddrive space!

    5. Re:Piracy is competition! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Another point of disgust is MiramAXE with their sabotage of asian cinema.

      Just order them direct from HK or Singapore. No delay, no dubbing (silly subtitles though).

    6. Re:Piracy is competition! by animaal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Every audio CD, piece of software or DVD that is released these days is done so at a price that *takes into account* the fact that "x" number of copies of it will probably be pirated"

      No, every such such product is priced according to the maximum that the market will bear. Hence region lockouts on DVDs, with vastly different prices in different regions. Consider; if, in Bangkok, 90% of copies of a particular CD are pirated, that does not lead the local CD distributor there to increase the price of CDs. In anything, it may lead to lower prices, because the market will not bear an inflated price.

      Piracy has mixed effects. On the one hand, it helps to keep the movie/music/software industries on their toes, making sure that the consumer gets value for money, and that the product purchased is worth more to the consumer than a copy. (e.g. the recent trends to add more "extras" to movies/cds).

      However, on the other hand, it has a negative effect on the marketplace for the industries. This can (probably does) lead to some problems. e.g. some smaller production companies closing due to lack of sales. For example, imagine a small software house producing an innovative new software package, but then closing due to lack of sales. The package is now not going to be developed any more, even though there maybe many users (some using illegal copies). So piracy can cause the consumer to lose as well.

      I think the current system is probably self-sustaining, with a degree of piracy keeping industry from degrading value-for-money too much, and the laws keeping piracy from wiping out the industries. Piracy and the industry keep eachother in check. I suppose it's a bit like walking a tightrope...

    7. Re:Piracy is competition! by sinikal · · Score: 0

      I don't see how not buying a CD or DVD from a vendor is any different than pirating it, except that you are missing out on it.

      If I pirate a movie that is not released yet, I will buy the movie at release for a better quality product and to support the industry. (if the movie is worth it) But they are not missing a single cent from me pirating it because they have not even released it yet.

      And if I download one song from a band that puts out a CD full of crap with one good song, I would not have bought the CD anyway, I would have done without it. Again, they are not losing money, just coming out equal.

    8. Re:Piracy is competition! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>No, every such such product is priced according to the maximum that the market will bear.

      But most music is owned by about 5 big music publishers and movies by a few major film studios. Go into any music/movie store and every new release CD/DVD is priced about the same. That's as a result of monopolistic price fixing by the manufacturers and the retailer. The market "bears" those fixed prices because most people are too stupid and mindless to NOT pay those prices.

      >>On the one hand, (piracy) helps to keep the movie/music/software industries on their toes, making sure that the consumer gets value for >>money, and that the product purchased is worth more to the consumer than a copy.

      Piracy pisses off the industry to the point where the industry is prepared to spend some money to wipe it out and reap more profits as a result.

      It does not reduce prices because, as I stated above, average Joe Bloke is too stupid to use an Internet connection to download stuff free anyway and instead pays over-inflated prices at the local store.

      Even if there are 100,000 illegal copies of a movie (probably an inflated figure anyway), what percentage of movie goers and DVD buyers is that globally?

      The fact is, the publishers *believe* they can make more money as a result of stamping out piracy than they spend on trying to kill it.

      That means that normal users have to put up with being treated like criminals, do not get fair use of a product due to CD protection and DVD regioning, all because of piracy.

      >>This can (probably does) lead to some problems. e.g. some smaller production companies closing due to lack of sales.

      No, because the model I have stated above states that people will flock to buy a product if it does what they want it to at a fair price. It's nothing to do with size of a company, it's just about quality and reasonable pricing.

      If you don't believe me, look at the number of small games companies charging a *REASONABLE* price for downloadable games on the Internet - there seem to be an increasing number of these (Small Rockets, BigFish Games, etc.) implying that this is a burgeoning industry based on the Shareware model that worked so well for companies like ID, Apogee, etc.

      Films are out of the league of small companies due to the costs of making them but there is also a *growing* industry of musicians that publish their own music.

      All this happens *DESPITE* piracy, not because of it...

      >>Piracy and the industry keep eachother in check.

      No, they do not, they are mutually exclusive. Film companies originally added extras to DVDs to encourage the consumer to ditch their VHS video collection and replace it with DVD. Extrass, now, have become the norm because everyone expects extras on DVDs they buy.

      Again, as I said in an earlier post, I'm not going to moralise on piracy - what pirates do is up to them - but please don't try to tell me that pirates are doing ME a big favour by doing what they do - they do it because purely for reasons of saving a few bucks/pounds/Euros and for notoriety, nothing more.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    9. Re:Piracy is competition! by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Films are out of the league of small companies due to the costs of making them"

      Only if by "films" you mean $200,000,000 Hollywood movies. The problem for small film companies is not raising money to make movies for a couple of million dollars, it's getting them distributed when the big movie studios own or control the vast majority of the distribution channels.

      Most cinemas would rather take a crap Hollywood movie than a good independent movie because they know that Hollywood will spend another $100,000,000 advertising their crap and bringing in customers to buy the popcorn and soft drinks that make the profits, and that the studios will punish them in the future if they show non-Hollywood movies.

    10. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Laserdisc is great, and complaining that you need
      > one in order to be able to watch Star Wars
      > properly is only a little more relevant than the
      > fact that I needed to buy an XBox as well as my
      > Gamecube when I wanted to play Halo.

      Tell me, where can I:
      1. buy a laserdisk player (in the Netherlands, Europe)
      2. buy the theatrical release of episodes 4-6 on laserdisk?

      I can get the VHS versions, and actually have them (official, legal versions)
      If Lucasarts would release them on DVD I'd buy them, however, they didn't and my VHS tapes are slowly turnign into crap, so I got myself a backup on divx to watch, and incidentely in a quality thats much beyond the crap that Lucasarts wants me to buy, well, too bad for them.

      Am I justifying piracy as being their fault? no, but I am quite sayign that the policies of companies like Lucasarts (and Disney for that matter) encourage piracy, esp. with peopel who in fact already bought from them.

    11. Re:Piracy is competition! by awol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a) People want something for nothing.

      Er, no. People want something for a fair price. What is a fair price is a good question, but regardless of the answer there is one reality and that is that over time the price of content approaches zero. For different bits of content, the times at which this marginal change takes place vary, but the reality is that once content is no longer timely then the price tends towards zero. Want proof? See how much you have to pay for stock prices delayed by 20 minutes. Then see how much a real time price feed is. The difference? Timeliness.

      Music, movies, everything - no different. The metric of when this zero pricing starts, changes but not the reality. For movies it probably starts about a year after it is "released". Go and ask a distributor to show the ROI over time for their product. Even with their bullshit anti-competitive behaviour it is still true.

      b) People want something before it's officially made available.

      Officially, Ofsmishilly, they made the fscking DVD available in HK 2 years ago, they just don't think there is enough of a market in the US to justify and official release, but can you just buy the HK version and use in the US? No, because of the freakin' regional encoding (replace countries and times with parameters of your choosing and the statement will still be true). The whole parallel importing thing is just reaching offensive levels at the moment. The industry is trying so hard to screw over consumers, the line will soon be crossed. Watch cdWow for the battlefield.

      c) People want to impress other people with something they have but the other's don't.

      Some people just have small dicks, they have to have something to compensate. Better this than have them driving Porsches, makes the world a safer place IYAM.

      Piracy (and it really is such a bad word) exists because the price at which the product is offered does not reflect its actual value and bad law is in place to force the price. On top of that most people are enourmously price sensitive to these products, they will take a shitty copy of a movie camcordered from a screening for nothing, but if you offer them a legit copy, for 2$ they still won't pay because it is the zero cost that makes the product purchasable. This is not the same as what you said "People want something for nothing", but rather it is true that, for some things, people will take a thing if it costs nothing, but that same thing at any price over zero has no utility. Given that they are already paying for their broadband connections the marginal cost of this movie or that song, is zero. Mind you, there are a number of purchasers that are not so price sensitive to the acquisition of this content and so they will pay something for a legit version, but the vast majority of those people are being frozen out of the market because the content creators are still above their utility level in the vast majority of cases. But even then, some not, because DVD and CD are still being sold. The issue is that the model the industry uses to determine price is so contrary to the realities of their product that they will continue to suffer until they work it out. And, no, $0.99 a song is not the right price, just better than $10.00 for 15 songs, 12 of which you don't want.

      As for your list of things to do. I follow 'em all. Plus, I don't buy DVD at all (anymore) since I will not play their stupid game of funding their crusade against my rights of fair use. I am unable to resist going to the cinema, but at least the cinema owner gets (some microscopic at times) part of my money and I never go in the first few weeks to try and make sure they get the most possible, but I am close on boycotting it totally. Plus I don't download priated material. Sure, I have less amenity in my life than I would have if the industry sorted itself out, but I simply will not fund their erosion of my rights to use my purchases as I wish.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    12. Re:Piracy is competition! by NaCl · · Score: 1

      Buy a multi-region DVD; pressure the studios. Don't steal

      Actually, if you call copyright infrigiment "stealing", buying a multi-region DVD player would be considered "stealing" as well.

      --
      I shot the sheriff
    13. Re:Piracy is competition! by dontod · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, every such such product is priced according to the maximum that the market will bear. Hence region lockouts on DVDs, with vastly different prices in different regions

      Absolutely Right!
      It was reported that car manufacturers considered the UK to be the 'Golden Isles' because the British public 'would bear' to pay way more than other european countries.

      After a rip-off britain campaign started a few years ago people began to wake and see they were getting stiffed. Example: HMV sells older (not in the charts) CDs at around 17GBP (30.50USD) .There aren't many places in the world you can pay that much.

      We're still getting stiffed in the UK but maybe not quite as bad as we were.

      Don.

      ---------------
      Bart: Hey mouse...say cheese. With a dry, cool wit like that, I could be an action hero.
      Homer: Die, bad robots, die! With a dry, cool wit like that, I could be an action hero.

      --
      Slashdot - The Home of the Tortured Analogy
    14. Re:Piracy is competition! by B5_geek · · Score: 1


      If you just stop buying the "protected" items then the companies will only know that slaes have slumped. If they see that a particular song has been downloaded by a million people, but they have only sold 2 copies, it might provide some insight as to why that happens.

      People will always try to get something for nothing. But consider how many CD's are still selling despite all the piracy.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    15. Re:Piracy is competition! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, you're entirely correct and I don't know how things in the movie & music industry will change until the consumers themselves become more discerning in their tastes. With the software industry & the Open Source movement, the whole "Linux or Windows" thing is happening because there is a "change in taste". The people driving the Open Source movement are more than likely those that have been in the industry for years and are just not satisfied with the commercial, mass-market offerings. (That's a statement of fact, not an attempt to start a Linux v Windows argument in this thread). The movie & music industry is targetted at the "eighteen to twenty somethings" who desire nothing more than to be "part of the pack" and are generally therefore happy to accept the same old recycled plastic pop & bland movie sequels simply because "everyone else is doing it". It's an ideal situation for the media companies, a group of customers that will happily buy anything that's churned out if it's cool enough. Unless they change their tastes, I don't see smaller music artists or low budget films ever getting the popularity they deserve. As someone in his early 40s, I actually don't mind this too much in many respects. As a big fan of classic rock music from the 70's and 80s, because the stuff I like is a minority taste, I get to see bands now in 1000 seater venues that, 10 to 20 years ago, were "ants" on a distant stage in an 80,000 capacity stadium - and because I'm too old now to care about fads and fashion, this suits me perfectly.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    16. Re:Piracy is competition! by arctan1701 · · Score: 1
      As for Miramax's frankly useless attempts at Asian cinema, get yourself a multi-region DVD player and import the good versions like the rest of us.
      That doesn't make you legal in the USA. In the eyes of the law you are also a pirate.
    17. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should do a little more research about the music business before you post an opinion. First of all, there is a big difference between who publishes music and who releases it. There are literally tens of thousands of music publishers, and they control the underlying compositions (the songs). Most songwriters own a percentage (many 100%) of their compositions. It seems what you are trying to say is that the big 5 control most of the releases (recordings). In that statement, you are partially accurate. I say partially, because they are now, in fact, the big 4. Also, they do control most of the releases, if you define "most" as somewhere between 50-65%. The rest of the recorded music released globally is truly independent.

    18. Re:Piracy is competition! by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Too bad Miramax thinks their distribution rights on these Asian flicks for the U.S. gives them the rights to c&d people linking to imports. Kind of hard to buy a movie like "Hero" when the distributor tries to use the laws to keep you from purchasing your legal copy. And since we're here, here's an honest question: is it actually legal to buy multi-region DVD players in the U.S.? Does anyone sell them, or do you have to order them from the web? Is using one to view your legitimate version of an import DVD considered a DMCA violation, for circumventing the movie industry's price fixing mechanisms?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    19. Re:Piracy is competition! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Rather than stripping out bits, I'll take your (well-reasoned) argument as a whole.

      "Timeliness"? That doesn't follow as an argument. There are timeless movies and timeless pieces of music that always have some value to somebody. I do agree that a 30-year old album by Led Zeppelin, say, should not cost as much as a 2003 CD by, say, Limp Bizkit because with the 30-year old album, the recording costs, (most of the) band royalties have been paid, etc., etc. The "fair" price for a 30-year old album might therefore be half the price of the modern one - but that will *STILL* not stop people copying the Led Zeppelin album if they can get it for nothing.

      "DVD regions"? A totally pointless practice that stems from about 50 years of outdated film distribution practice. There's no reason why a film or DVD cannot be released simultaneously over the globe, now that we have electronic distribution means. However, to kill the practice of DVD regions, you buy a region 1 player and import region 1 DVDs - if everybody does that, the film industry has to change as a result.

      "Small dicks"? They're in charge of record and film companies and they also copy and distribute warez. Both types do what they do for entirely selfish reasons (to make money or to avoid spending money), nothing more.

      "Piracy"? A morality issue, not a legal one. Like I already stated, you don't like the price of something then you don't buy it. If enough people don't buy it, the seller will feel it in his wallet and start to question the price he/she's charging. I'm not excluding myself from that either, but if I've copied a piece of software or music, it's because I couldn't be bothered to pay for the real thing, not because I'm trying to fight some moral cause on the behalf of the repressed masses.

      If you recognise that you're being screwed by these big companies a lot of the time, then I applaud you for being more aware than Mr Average Joe in the street. However, piracy won't stop you being screwed in the future, it'll just give those companies more justification and a legal argument to take more of your rights away from you by putting more regioning and CD protection on than there was previously.

      I'm sorry, if you believe there is a moral crusade through piracy then you are your own worst enemy - your rights will be eroded even more in the future.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    20. Re:Piracy is competition! by fermion · · Score: 1
      People want to own things with the minimum opportunity cost. Manufacturers create a demand, and people reasonably have come to expect the ability to fulfill that demand. Part the demand that the manufacturers create is the 'first on your block' mentality, and people who are particularly susceptible to such manipulations will tend to do whatever is necessary to fill that need.

      For some physical products, products that are physical and have good branding, it makes good business sense to create a demand, then minimize the availability of the product. This will tend to maximize price and profits. However, such a strategy runs the risk of the potential customer switching to another similar product that is marketed less aggressively.

      For products that are not fundamentally physical, and are licensed, such a strategy is death, especially is such a product is commodity. The adolescent that needs the content for peer group recognition, the adult that is used to having the desire for content fulfilled, will realize that the opportunity cost for licensed acquisition of the content is orders of magnitude higher than the those of unlicensed acquisition. It quickly becomes apparent that there is no need to live by the rules of the enforced and artificial scarcity. The consumer downloads the content.

      The content owner can either raise the opportunity cost for unlicensed acquisition, or lower then for licensed acquisition, or both. The former, as we have seen, has the risk of destroying the brand image, as have seen not only with RIAA, but previously with MS. The later requires a fundamental shift in business outlook that is impossible for most corporations. It is really stupid for copyright owners to be yelling 'they are stealing our stuff.' All that is happening is that consumers are changing the rules. Business owners do this everyday. Recorded music and movies spelled the death of the previous content delivery system. The current system, which depends on an artificial scarcity, will also die. Such is life.

      I do believe in personal responsibilty and trying to only have those things that you can afford. However, at least in the US, we live in a highly competative psuedo-market economy, which depends on consumers have great needs and meeting those needs quickly. This is an expectation, and if people cannot do this legaly, then they will just bend the rules.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    21. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will probably be pirated - that means we all pay more as a result.

      Yeah, right. And if piracy is gone everything will be available for half the price or lower.

    22. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a clue: You don't have a God-given right to watch *any* movie you want, when you want -- let alone some specific version.

      By your logic, we should all have the right to view (and copy) the dailies for films that are still in production.

    23. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I won't! So there!

    24. Re:Piracy is competition! by gjash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, keep believing that the music industry will pass the savings along to their slimy customers if no sharing existed!! It's been claimed that the recent lawsuits decreased file sharing. Let's see if sales go up!! They are full of shit!!

    25. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) People want something for nothing.

      Piracy comes at a cost to everyone involved. May it be through buying a computer to play the movies, purchasing the bandwidth to download them or the CD-R/DVD-R's to store them. People arn't looking for 'something for nothing' any more than they wish the grocery store wouldn't charge and end up going to the store that charges less. If the Entertainment industries chose to reduce the cost of purchasing their Movies/Music/Software to a price that could compete (even through internet distribution) with Pirates, Piracy wouldn't be a 100th as strong as it is now.

    26. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a test audiance for Hero in Manhattan about a year ago or more. Seemed like a lame Crouching Tiger ripoff and had some scenes that were long and boring. I gave it bad reviews as did my girlfriend, independently. Perhaps others felt the same and that is why it hasn't been released here yet.

    27. Re:Piracy is competition! by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      However, to kill the practice of DVD regions, you buy a region 1 player and import region 1 DVDs - if everybody does that, the film industry has to change as a result.

      The parent was referring to American movie studios buying up movies from Hong Kong and other asian movies and then either cutting them to shreads or not releasing them. So buying a DVD player that only plays American (Region 1) discs isn't the answer. Buying a multiregion player is the answer, but very few places in America sell them due to pressure from the media companies. In the UK almost all DVD players are multiregion so the only problem we have is that now the media companies are bringing legal action against companies who parallel import DVDs, companies like play.com and CdWow.

    28. Re:Piracy is competition! by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking as one of those "18 to Twenty-somethings" that you refer to here, I think you're overlooking an important point: people my age don't go to the cinema for the product, they go for the social experience. Music is different, yes. But, let's see, I went to maybe seven movies in 2003. In all but one of those cases (LOTR) it was because of the social environment -- it's an activity that you can do with people. I don't really care about what crap they produce -- maybe two or three good films a year, which I still don't care enough about to pay NY theatre prices for (again, excepting LOTR) -- but the opportunity to get out of the house and go to a social gathering place with a group of friends is what I wind up buying.

      So we may not even be endorsing the films we watch. They're just there as background noise, to provide an alternative to the bar scene.

      Meanwhile, the grandparent mentioned that Hollywood will pump ad money into its movies. This is true. But if my experience is typical (which it may not be) this money doesn't effectively advertise individual movies. Rather, it advertises going to the movies as a viable option for a social outing. Hollywood advertises for the cinema industry, which (given the predominantly social character of going to a movie theatre) is much more important for the theatres than what our tastes are.

      Also, don't forget that sometimes people see movies expressly because they're awful... :) But to the point, there's more forces at work than just "those ignorant tasteless kids" buying up whatever schlock you splat at a screen for them. If anything, art films might be worse than Hollywood crap for the purposes that people use it for (an insightful movie might be a distraction somehow). Though I'll be happy to rent it eventually.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    29. Re:Piracy is competition! by danila · · Score: 1

      For example, imagine a small software house producing an innovative new software package, but then closing due to lack of sales. The package is now not going to be developed any more, even though there maybe many users (some using illegal copies). So piracy can cause the consumer to lose as well.

      And the reason? Simple. The reason is that market economy has irrepairable flaws. So regardless of whether you have piracy or not, consumers lose compared with perfect allocation of resources. The best way to do that perfect allocation is planned economy where signals about how valuable a product is (demand) do not interfere with how much it costs to produce (supply), and where vote of more qualified people count more. Of course, we haven't seen a well-functioning planned economy, so this remains a hypothetical plan, but it is the only thing that might work better than the market.

      Regardless of their other problems, countries that support local cinema sometimes tend to produce better movies overall than entirely market-driven Hollywood.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    30. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will say this I am about to borrow a copy of win xp. I Bought win 2000and was locked out of my own computer , And why becouse It would not keep my admin password I do not have the money to trow around on products i can't use yes i tryed to return it saying my problem... they looked at me and said "seals broken"...now i and going to test drive anymore windows. I am not going to waste money again. If i do plan on not deleteing the program from my computer i WILL BUY a copy of it or even 2 for the amout of computers i run i am only testing it on one thou. Does this make me bad. no it makes me cautious i already know ppl who have bought win xp and couldn't install it till the first service pack came out. will i trade in one set of problems for another maybe i will maybe i won't but this time i want a tase of my problems to come not to be blind-sided

    31. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a number of pirated discs at home, and quite a few VCDs of TV shows not currently scheduled for screening in Australia.

      As the DVDs become commerically available - we buy them. Buffy, Angel & West Wing for example.

      We also have copies of the Star Wars Ep 4-6 DVDs - the ones Lucas says will never be made available. We also have the same theatrical releases on legitimately purchased VHS tapes which are wearing out.

      One of my friends is slowly converting a number of video tapes we have across to DVD becuase they are not currently available on DVD and some of them are highly unlikely to be made available (e.g. "Red, Hot and Blue" Aids fundraiser from 1990).

      These would probably be considered piracy by the studios, but it they were available to purchase - we would.

      The new seasons of Buffy and Angel were announced earlier this week and we have an order in for them - they won't be available until March/April, we've had them on VCD since they screened in the US.

      Sara
      from a land downunder

    32. Re:Piracy is competition! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      >>people my age don't go to the cinema for the product, they go for the social experience.

      It's no different to what I was doing 20 years ago and what I still do now. If I just went to see films I *wanted* to see, I would go maybe once or twice a year - I probably go once a month with friends and have a meal before the movie and a few beers afterwards. I may be old but I can still socialise :-)

      >>But if my experience is typical (which it may not be) this money doesn't effectively advertise individual movies.

      Of course it does. "Hollywood" doesn't give a damn about whether or not you treat a movie as a social occasion - it just cares about selling as many cinema seats as possible on release and as many DVDs and other merchandising bits as possible afterwards. That's why "Hollywood" is totally stale - less so twenty years ago but now it's really stuck in a rut of sequels and poor quality remakes.

      >>there's more forces at work than just "those ignorant tasteless kids" buying up whatever schlock you splat at a screen for them.

      If you're contributing on here, you're probably not an "ignorant tasteless kid", not that I used the words anyway in the first place. However, the popular music scene is stale, the charts are filled with boy bands and pop idols that look good on video (in their eyes, not in mine I might add!) but have the musical talent of a slug, and there is absolutely no sign of any change from that on the horizon.

      Personally, it doesn't bother me because I've never really followed the mainstream music scene anyway but I feel sorry for the others in your generation that view fashion and "fitting in the crowd" as more important than exploring their personal tastes and expression properly. If you yourself don't fall into that category, then I applaud you.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    33. Re:Piracy is competition! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's nothing to do with competition - just the opposite. Every audio CD, piece of software or DVD that is released these days is done so at a price that *takes into account* the fact that "x" number of copies of it will probably be pirated - that means we all pay more as a result.

      That is not correct. They price them as high as the market will bear. The even illegally price-fix in order to set the prices high. Though they now have their lawyers properly edit all statements so that the price fixing is legal.

      Just for argument's sake, let's say that young males are more likely to illegally copy/distribute software (like a movie from DVD). Now, with your assertion, I should expect to find higher prices on, say, X2 and XXX, as these were popular with those who would pirate. I should find lower prices on, say, Bend it Like Beckham.

      As it appears to me on a quick walk through the store, the prices are *lower* on the ones that are more likely to be illegally distributed (or at best, not substantially different), I would say that either your assertion is completely incorrect or mine is.

      So why do most "pirates" do it? Because it is easier. Perhaps the software is not otherwise available. Perhaps they think it easier to download an illegal MP3 of a song they already own than rip it themselves. Most are not looking to get it for free just to save money on something they would otherwise have bought. Most sharers will admit to having bought something first obtained illegally. It isn't to cheat anyone. It is more like a try-before-you-buy program. Since it is pretty much impossible to get a refund once the product is purchased and used for most things pirated (try asking for your money back after viewing a movie in a cinema, from DVD or VHS, or try returning an opened CD for a cash refund), people may want to try it on their terms. It is quite easy to buy clothes and return them. Much of the food I purchase has an 800 number on it with a pledge to replace or refund if you aren't 100% satisfied. The software (DVDs and CDs being nothing but software) industry pretty much laughs and tells you that if you broke the seal on the box and don't like it, you as screwed. Of course, that makes more than one person unhappy.

      Your "if you don't like their practices, but like their product, don't buy their product" stance is not one that many people would buy into. Why should I be the only person harmed (by denial of something I want). It makes much more sense to "steal" without actually causing loss. I get what I want, and they get the same money as if I did what you advocate. Sure, it is illegal and immoral, but then so are many of the practices by corporations. It is like consumer karma.

    34. Re:Piracy is competition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that you ended up missing the points of the origional response, I'll summarize it for you.

      Awol was right, You are wrong. Think beyond yourself. Things are true that you don't currently believe.

    35. Re:Piracy is competition! by Baggio · · Score: 1

      I just lost hours of work I was putting into a reply, so I'll paraphrase.

      The studios are still making a ton of money. Don't let the ads fool you. A bad film like "The Core", still made some $6.7 million in world-wide sales, and that doesn't include DVD sales/rental or distribution to some movie channel like HBO or Showtime. If the key grip is starving, it is because the studio executives are hording the profit and keeping it themselves.

      The movie industry is unique as an investment that there is limited risk with most studio productions. While investment in some industries have gone belly up with complete loss of revenue (care to buy some Worldcom stock?), the studios are complaining that they aren't making as great a profit on some cheesy cookie-cutter film. One of the few films recently, that did put a strain on the studio was the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. "The Fellowship of the Ring" alone cost $93 million, but grossed $500 million in world-wide DVD rental alone. I'll bet that $300 million investment in the trilogy seems like small change to them now. Unfortunately, most studios like to play it safe, and won't commit to a project unless they KNOW it will attract mindless droves. A movie that doesn't make a profit is practically unheard of after all the distribution channels are exhauted; "From Justin to Kelly" and "Gigli" excepted.

      The studios, both movie and recording, are living in a fantasy world. When they are reporting a "losing" year, they mean their profit margin didn't have the same growth as seen from the previous year. This does NOT translate into losing money.

      I hope that something happens that will drive most of the studios under. Just as the blacksmith is no longer profitable in the 21st century, the studios are quickly becoming an archic dinosaur. Rather than embracing electronic distribution of media, the studios have chosen to fight it so they can maintain their monopoly. What would happen if all of their "talent" found they could skip the middle man and widely distribute their art and although it might have a smaller unit cost, the artist can keep a greater percent of that returned investment? Well, for starters, we might actually get talented people making movies and writing songs.

      There are some great films out there, "Bubba Ho-tep" for instance, but when you only show a movie on at most 22 screens, you can't expect it to have the same ROI as a super mega-blockbuster that the studio has advertised as the best film since "Gigli". These brilliant films don't have the same return, but they aren't given the same chance to suceed.

      I'm glad that living where I do in Seattle, I'm close enought that I can go see some of these smaller films. I just spent 8 years in the middle of Texas where that wasn't an option. Given the choice, I'd go see 10 of these films to every "Boat Trip". But where else can you see Oscar award winners doing low brow jokes with homosexual context? Aside from Oscar award winning actor Kevin Kline, for his work in ("In & Out". But that movie also has Oscar award winning actor Matt Dillon, and twice nominated Joan Cusack included -- I degress.

      I generally find films like "Le Peuple Migrateur" a.k.a. "Winged Migration" more satisfying. Perhaps if these larger studios keep getting too greedy, more films like the "Russian Ark" will get a chance to be shown, but I figure they'll just get Congress to pass some law that will secure their place in the digital world and then enforce that by suing some of their biggest supporters.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow;
      Fruit flies like a bananna
  7. Re:Pirates of a Carribean on Kazaa Already? by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn, I want to be able to mod comments as Unfunny.

  8. The more things change... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the more they stay the same. I find it kind of funny that you can replace the word "Movie" with "Software" and voila! You have an article about the warez scene in the 80s.

    Granted, we didn't have FTP sites or Broadband. You young punks don't know how lucky you have it! Why, back in my day we had to courier stuff at 24oo baud! (Ranting fades...)

    Still, I miss those days. I'm glad I gave it up though. I'd hate to be caught now, in my 30s, and have my life ruined.

    1. Re:The more things change... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Erm, I'm in my (early) 40s and can recall staying at work late at night to dial into US BBSes at *300 BAUD* to download the latest Amiga warez :-)

      It's nice being this age and being grown up enough to not give a sh*t about competing with my peers and not giving much of a damn about *HAVING* to have a particular CD, piece of software or movie *AT ALL COSTS*!!!!

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:The more things change... by clifyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      300 Baud? I remember on my Commodore 64, half the time, it wasn't even 300 Baud, it was like 150 because the connection strings got crappy on the long distance connection (who remember how long its been sing you've actually heard static on a land line). And you could TELL what speed it was connecting at because of the hum from the modem.

      But yeah, it is nice not to have to compete with peers...I'm only early 30s and I see kiddies that work for me and how they are using my fast internet to aquire illegitimate software they they have no need for, but might just need it to trade. Smart...you don't need it, but willing to screw over a company just so that if someone REALLLLY needs it, it can be leverage in their trading schemes and the end user won't have to pay for it. I remember the scene myself...I can't say I was above it when I was that young...I'm jus saying it was stupid and wrong and now that I've had years undernethe me and actually put out a professional product for a few of these years (it was a piece of very genre specific medical software I had written for a friend, and his doctor wanted to collaborate with me, and it expanded from there)...and then I see a few dozen copies sell, but I get calls and inquiries from 10x that with questions on why the software wasn't working right (because they changed the name...that was my big security 18 years ago and allowed 'customization' but didn't tell anyone that changing the name meant that the program was going to randomly 'crash'). And these were folks that could afford it.

      The problem with these kiddie pirates aren't that THEY are collecting the software, its that they are putting it in the hands of folks that would have otherwise paid for it...these kids don't know who they hurt, and today, these same kids cry out "if you can't handle it, pick a new profession" everytime you say anything about it critically. What ever happened to corporeal punishment :-) Yeah, it isn't about all that to them, its competing with their friends and trying to be the coolest at any and all expense...

    3. Re:The more things change... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Well I was the same in the heady days of the Amiga - the downloading "because it's there" mentality...

      I think the problem with software, specifically in a commercial environment, is that it genuinely does cost a lot of initial outlay to develop an application which always looks to the potential user as *just* a CD and manual that could cost anything up to a few hundred dollars/pounds/Euros, etc.

      And with the "need for rebellion" nature of kids anyway, they think they're fighting "the big bad software industry" by piracy when all they are really doing is harming the end users (probably themselves in later years) who'll just get charged a premium as a result.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:The more things change... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember on my Commodore 64, half the time, it wasn't even 300 Baud, it was like 150

      Looxury...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:The more things change... by warpath · · Score: 1

      Ahh, who'd have thought remembering "Upload/Download" ratios would be a fond memory so many years later... they were so annoying at the time. What?! I'm not a leach! I'm not, I'm not!

    6. Re:The more things change... by danila · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if I can support a copy protection scheme that introduces random crashes in a medical software. While this might be safe in your particular case, the idea still makes me writhe with disgust.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:The more things change... by clifyt · · Score: 1

      It clearly stated that if you want to reregister it under another users name, you needed to contact my company. CLEARLY stated.

      It was just a charting program for a very specific use, no data was ever corrupted, it just would crash randomly when trying to print (never actually crashing, it just exited)...unfortunately, if you didn't change the name, another doctors name was then listed on the chart.

      I did have it set up where a site license would allow for any office / hospital / whatever that needed it could use the name of the organzation as the key file instead of the name of the individual.

      Yeah, this disgusted me as well...considering it was used in a medical office, it cost me a LOT to design...it had to go before a lawyer that was trained in medical technology malpratice...I explained the name protection and what happened, he was more concerned that the data could be corrupted (we had to write instruction on how to read the almost human readable text files, incase they wanted to migrate away from this software to something else).

      The fact that these guys were using it and saying screw the $500 license, I didn't spend $100k on my degree to waste it on software pissed me off...

      I wanted to give it away at the end of all of this (back before I knew what the GPL was...we all just threw things into the public domain), but I was informed that if someone used the source and screwed it up, *I* would be personally liable for whatever damages could be caused...this is one field I will never deal with again.

    8. Re:The more things change... by danila · · Score: 1

      The more I look at it, the more it seems to me that all this mess is not someone's personal fault (i.e. not yours), it's the fault of the whole system. Clearly, software is a public good, or at least many sorts of software SHOULD BE public good. If only there was a GPL-like license. If only a public organisation would pay for software development so that it can be used for free by medical professionals, who would no longer need to worry about wasting 500$ on software (and let's admit it, it's always "wasting" when WE have to pay).

      And of course, the whole "liability" stuff is totally wrong. Why on Earth should a person giving the software away be responsible for screw-ups, when companies selling it so often are not?...

      Totally appalling. I think I will go infringe on some copyright to feel better. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:The more things change... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      Shame of it is, people not on 1rst world coutries can't afford the same prices. So, yeah, piracy is rampant. People don't even talk of buying games. Well, except the generation that is now getting jobs...

  9. Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone notice its all SVCD or VCD dvdrips? I know the ease of playing on the DVD player is attractive, but for the same size you can have a nice Divx release with AC3 sound. Or even a nice dual Divx CD set.

    How many people here went and downloaded GordianKnot and tried to rip some DVDs? Takes dayd, hard as hell.

    I'd rather download a rip off the net for a DVD I own that try to rip a DVD with the current set of utilities. SVCD is a different story, being mpeg2. (Sounds like fair use to me)

    1. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can rip a 2 hour dvd to a 650MB divx file with acceptable quality in about an hour. What's the problem?

    2. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by iainl · · Score: 1

      "I'd rather download a rip off the net for a DVD I own that try to rip a DVD with the current set of utilities"

      I wouldn't disagree with you, having taken weeks to get a decent transfer from my own laserdiscs of The Trilogy, but why would you bother to rip your own DVDs? I find that my DVDs work perfectly fine on my DVD player; rather better than some SVCD copy that took 12 hours to download.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there is some excuse to ripping your own DVDs (not that I can be bothered to do it myself) - you get portability and the ability to play the movie on a PDA or other small device, just like you can with MP3.

      Perfectly reasonable fair use of something you've purchased...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by fruey · · Score: 4, Informative
      Gordian Knot does not take days. In fact, it's just a well put together collection of tools.

      The ripping of a DVD itself doesn't take very long. The compression might, but that really depends on how you set it up, how you resize, and how you then compress it. If you know a little bit about what you're doing, you can get those times down, sacrificing quality sometimes. VCD and SVCD is unsurprising as these will play in set tops, and you can encode to VCD more quickly than to higher quality DivX formats.

      Common mistakes :

      • not cropping the black bars from a 16:9 widescreen version actually encoded on the DVD at 4:3 regular TV aspect ratio.
      • Using default compression parameters that are too high quality and make multiple passes.
      • Not resizing the image down to a smaller width, leaving it at full resolution. Note that resizing and then encoding at the same bitrate as a bigger size version can result in better looking films, though they're 'softer' to the eye.

      There are many other things as well, like the hardware you have, what you're doing at the same time on the PC, etc. But on a reasonable system you can rip and compress to DivX or XviD in less than three hours. Make sure you have a 2GHz+ processor and plenty of RAM.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Gordian Knot's a pig of a thing to use. However, if you've got a Linux system (maybe it works on BSD or what have you as well, I don't know) then there's a program called DVD::Rip which does the same job and is an absolute joy to use. I'd thoroughly recommend it.

    6. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a lot that can be said about encoding/compressing video, and the picture you give is overly simplified.

      The 2 main factors for perceived quality are the actual resolution and motion quality.

      The details differ for various compression standards, but the basic idea stays the same.

      Given a certain bitrate r and a framerate f, you have r bytes to represent f frames. Now, if for example 30 frames are grouped together and you have a 30fps video source, and you use 1200kbit/sec, you will get an average of 1200/30 is 40kbit/frame.

      More bandwidth is consumed by so called I frames, and those primarely enhance the 'sharpness' of the movie. The more bandwidth is used for those, the less bandwidth is left for the remaining frames.

      The frames bewteen 2 i frames are mostly determining for how well motion looks, and the more bandwidth you have for that, the better fast moving scenes will look.

      This is however always a compromise, and finding the best compromise for each group of pictures is one thing that a good encoder will do, optionally with multipass.

      Another one is the so called search radius, this value is used during compression to determine how far to look in a frame for parts of a previous frame that may be identical in pixel information, but has been moved.

      A high search radius is expensive during compression, but it will allow a much lower bitrate for the same quality, and as such is often a very good investment in time (for svcd resolution and higher, a search radius of 24 is really the minimum, for vcd resolution, 16 will do)

      When looking through what is posted online, it is very clear that few people understand how to make decent quality encodings, and even fewer actually spend the efford to do a high quality encoding.

      The simple result is that svcd compressions I make for my own use (and directly from DVD) are often of similar or better quality then a divx encoding with a similar size as can be found on the sharing networks.

      Of course, applying the same level of attention and knowledge to a divx encoding would mean that I can get a lot more quality still out of the same size in bytes, but portability comes into play there.

      checkout http://www.bartsplace.net/publications/videocd.txt for some more info on making high quality svcds using linux or similar.

    7. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by fruey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hi, thanks for the detailed response. I was trying to pin down some simple mistakes that I have seen on encodings that I have received; it's only a quick kneejerk reaction. I might add to your comments that I frames are full frames, whereas P and B frames contain only differences from the previous or next frame, or both. I would generally go with 25fps because I'm a PAL person (in Europe, and the standard is better too...). One thing we haven't mentioned so far is sound. A lot of people just encode that without any preproduction tweaks like downsampling to 44.1KHz, normalizing, and possible compression on some films in 5.1 with very high dynamic range that don't sound so hot in MP3/Ogg stereo without a touch of compression. If you have space, then you can go MP3 AC3 or similar to keep all 6 channels but then you're into 3 discs per movie territory. I'd rather sacrifice sound for image quality, although my rips have reasonable stereo sound, some people live for 5.1...

      I generally use multipass XviD these days and do reduce resolution because subjectively for me I prefer the results. Objectively, it means the bits per pixel goes up and of course encoding time is reduced. A good bicubic resampling routine tends to soften images but they tend to encode quite nicely compared with full resolution sharp images.

      An interesting response. Don't get too many of those these days. The article you linked to is particularly good, thanks a lot for that too, it might encourage me to finally find the time to go back to dual boot Linux (I lost a hard drive with my linux install and I just haven't had the heart to get it all back so far).

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    8. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      8 minutes to rip the DVD to disk. 3 minutes to make the project file. ~10 minutes to do a test encode to test compressibility. 4-5 hours (typical 90-120 minute movie) for 2-pass encoding at a very good quality. All in all, less then 5 hours usually with GordianKnot. Once you understand what you are doing, it goes quite quickly.

    9. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, People mastering DVD releases put a lot of efforts in the conversion process. Some scenes request different encoding parameters than others, depending on kind of action, contrast, colors, camera movement, etc.
      Why shouldn't it be the same for Divx encoding ? If you only need to put 3 hours in the encoding process, that's great, but are you sure your encoding is really the best you could pull out of it ?

    10. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by trezor · · Score: 1

      You forgot Inverse Telecine. I can't stand it when i download movies (*hrm*backups*cough*) from the net, and they're still semi-interlaced, ghost infected, unsharp 29.90 fps clips.

      A proper inverse telecine gives a sharper (and possibly the correct) image, and saves 20% video bitrate. In my eyes, that's worth a little hassle and encoding time.

      Did anyone here know that "The simpsons" are telecined? Says so in the credits at least. Still I haven't seen one 23.96 fps rip up to date...

      Lot's a lot's a unproffesional kids out there. That's for sure.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    11. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by palutke · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should call Customer Service and demand a refund . . .

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    12. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Normally movies get released first as SVCD as the quality loss isn't an issue when your source is a telesync or screener. Then when the DVD is available they are rereleased as xvid with much better video and sound quality.

      Although xvid is better quality and much better compression than SVCDs being able to play it on a stand alone DVD player is a big deal for people who don't want to sit in front of their computer to watch movies.

      Other posts already address your ignorance of how long it takes to rip a DVD so I won't say anymore about that.

    13. Re:Anyone notice its VCD not Divx or DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I might add to your comments that I frames are
      > full frames, whereas P and B frames contain only
      > differences from the previous or next frame, or
      > both.

      I tried to keep it somewhat simple, but true of course.

      > I would generally go with 25fps because I'm a
      > PAL person (in Europe, and the standard is
      > better too...).

      Yep, its a much better compromise between framerate and resolution, not to mention getting easy to de-interlace movie source material on pal (2-2 pulldown reversal is a lot simpler then 3-2 pulldown reversal)

  10. These criminals have a weak spot! by Christian+Engstrom · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:
    Sometimes group members will send files to other sites themselves, using a technique called File Transfer Protocol instead of e-mail.
    Aha! Since this FTP thing is obviously a tool for criminal acts, all we have to do is to use the DMCA or the Patriot Act to declare it illegal. Once this is take care of by the responsible authorities, the Internet will once again be free of criminals, and a safe place where innovation can flourish.

    Bring out the stromtroopers!

    --
    Christian Engström, Former Member of the European Parliament 2009-2014 for The Pirate Party, Sweden
    1. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      plus

      what kind of loser would even consider sending a 1Gb file via email!

      oh I remember, an Outlook user

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of uses for FTP that are very viable. It is not a technology that can be made illegal! I am not into piracy and use ftp on a daily basis for other stuff!

    3. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by lewp · · Score: 0

      Psst... check your mail.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    4. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh - I've seen an Outlook user do this with WinRAR and a hundred or so emails... ...what was worse, it was Vin Diesel's "xXx" that person was sending! I'd have gladly *GIVEN* that person my DVD of it if asked...

      (Note to self: Never buy subsequent movies by an actor you quite liked in "Pitch Black".)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    5. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Sklivvz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are joking but here at work FTP use is restricted for exactly this reason. Bit Torrent is totally blocked because it's a "pirate tool" and so is P2P.

      Totally ludicrous, expecially since our netadmins would be perfectly capable of monitoring who's using the bandwidth and how.

    6. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yeah right. Save it for the judge you fucking criminal.

    7. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Hanno · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is a sad actual quote from a German lawsuit where one judge used the following sentence in the official verdict:

      http://daufaq.de/index.php4?aktuellerubrik=Techn ik

      F: Was ist ein FTP-Server?

      A: Es antwortet LG Braunschweig, Urteil vom 21.7.2003 - 6 KLs 1/03, rechtskraeftig, CR 2003, 801: FTP-Server sind Systeme, in denen gecrackte, also nach Ueberwindung des Vervielfaeltigungsschutzes kopierte, Software geladen ist.

      Translation:

      Q: What is an FTP server

      A: As answered by the court of Braunschweig, in its decision from July 2003: FTP servers are systems used to store cracked software - software that has been copied after removing its copy protection.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    8. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by cyb97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's probably because your netadmins want the bandwidth to themselves.
      Nothing is more annoying than some luser consuming all the bandwidth when you really want the last rar-archive of the latest release

    9. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      Strange that most universities and large corporations operate their own "FTP-servers". I guess this piracy reach further than people think ;-)

      Most of this entities even allow *anonymous* access.

    10. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      And most linux distrobutions (henceforth in this post known as "Evil Hacker Computer Virus Generator" come with FTP-servers BY DEFAULT. If you try and use the "Evil Hacker Computer Virus Generator" even for legitimate purposes you may be infected with one of the FTP-servers.

      The "Evil Hacker Computer Virus Generator" also comes with software called "Apache" which is named after a brutal tribe of red skinned people/animals that would cut the SCALPS off their innocent white female victims. God alone knows that this "Apache" software will do to your sensitive private data.

      "Evil Hacker Computer Virus Generator" also encourages ignorance among the use, teaching them to randomly insert silent letters, especially 'G's, at the beginning of words! Please keep in mind that 'G's is the slang term for gang affiliated colored people to refer to money gotten by illicit means! This is encouraging youth to STEAL money or SELL DRUGS instead of working hard, honest jobs for upstanding companies such as Microsoft, SCO, or the RIAA!

      We must stop it now!

    11. Re:These criminals have a weak spot! by Alzheimers · · Score: 1
  11. Incredible by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1, Funny

    People went to all that effort just to see Elf ffs?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Incredible by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Last I saw on Usenet, there was a someone who was making a big deal about not revealing the full titles of films in headers, because the MPAA or the guys with black helicopters or sombody might notice. This same sombody had just posted Eight Legged Freaks, and insisted on abbreviating it "ELF". Makes you wonder.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  12. What they are saying is that.. by vpscolo · · Score: 0

    People who are stealing the movie and then selling it on to other illegal parties. And this is meant to surprise us how? Rus

  13. Plz Email Me LOTR ROTK by SpinningAround · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sometimes group members will send files to other sites themselves, using a technique called File Transfer Protocol instead of e-mail.

    Ah yes.. those sneaky hi-tech pirates thinking of a clever and novel way to avoid clogging up their inbox with 700 meg email attachments.

  14. Re:Plz Email Me LOTR ROTK by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ah, *THAT'S* what "FTP" stands for!!! I always thought it meant "Films To Pirate"...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  15. goodness gracious by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Posting to slashdot, explaining the internet piracy schene?

    Next thing you know, the preacher will be sermonizing the choir.

    Oh wait. Did I miss something?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  16. wtf...oh dammit by atari2600 · · Score: 1, Funny

    For a second, i was like "Is today a Sunday?" Then i saw my crystal ball and it had a date 8th Jan on the lower right corner. Shame you for misleading me with this kind of news. Thursdays aren't slow days are they?

  17. Suggested "new customer" handout for ISPs by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello! Thank you for chosing [online service/ISP]. We are proud to have you as our customer!

    As a new citizen of the Internet, it is important that you are made aware of the many important and dangerous aspects of the Internet.

    First off, there are search engines. Search engines are your gateway to all of the content that is available on the World Wide Web and beyond.

    While there is a vast array of information of interest online, we do not give a damn about any of it. The main kinds of material you will find online are actually just porn, smut, erotica, MP3s, pirated software, movies, and various other good things that every family can enjoy.

    The dander lies in how you get this data from your Internet connection. There are a couple simple guidelines to keep you and your family safe.

    1) DO NOT use shitty P2P clients with "fuck my upload cap, yo" enabled. That's just asking for the same treatment in return. Instead, set up a password-protected FTP server and share it with all your friends!
    2) DO NOT listen to flacid music, look at flacid porn, or watch flacid movies! These things only provoke the evil empires. Instead, have a sense of taste!
    3) DO NOT assume you know what you're doing! Instead, go read the fucking documentation, you bastard!

    By following these simple steps, you can help us provide better service for you, while also improving your own online experience. Thank you for chosing [online server/ISP]!

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Suggested "new customer" handout for ISPs by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1, Funny

      A few points you forgot to mention:

      4)DO NOT use Internet Chat Rooms - all chat rooms are filled with paedophiles, even those that claim to be discussing "The Merits Of The Make Command" in #linux_kernel_compilation.
      5)REMEMBER that the letters "A, O & L" also appear in the word "asshole".
      6)DO NOT email us telling us you have the "Worms Blast" virus - that is a computer game.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Suggested "new customer" handout for ISPs by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      Oh let's not stop there, I can imagine this going one step further...

      News Bulletin: This just in:

      Due to the enormous amount of online piracy on the Internet today, Senate has passed a bill forcing ISP's to charge an additonal Internet tax for all customers to help recover the RIAA and MPAA's lost sales. You only have yourselves to blame for this. Be well.

      I wouldn't be surprized...

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
  18. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "MysticVCD is one of dozens of "ripping" or "release" groups that obtain, prepare, package and feed movies, songs and games into a secretive and complex distribution scheme that functions a bit like the illegal drug trade -- minus the bloodletting."

    jesus christ next thing you know hill tell me about "computers" and "high speed internet thingies"... who wrote this shit? it sounds like the starting of a romance novel you read in a supermarket checkout lane.

  19. damn! by crabpeople · · Score: 3, Funny

    wholly god

    "The scene is closed to much of the world; would-be participants have to gain the trust of insiders and prove their worth before gaining entry. And the lifespan of groups tends to be short, at least on the Net, where players come and go."

    and here we see a "nerd" or "computer insider" as they perfer to be called. see how it looks at us with quiet distain.

    do the people at this paper pick technical editors based on who can send a midi file in an email?
    on the plus side, im a player in an international world of intrigue and mystery

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  20. Re:Pirates of a Carribean on Kazaa Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a quarter for every time...

  21. They forgot to mention FXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course we are going to use FTP to get stuff onto servers initially, but dont forget once its on the FTP server we use FXP to move the file from server to server (courier'ing)

    1. Re:They forgot to mention FXP by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0

      Oooh! Quick everyone! We have a *REAL* L33T HAX0R here! ..and he's not just a spotty teenager with a PC, he's a *COURIER*, jetting around the world in Business Class with a briefcase full of CDRs... ...he even knows how to use a little known TCP/IP utility called FXP...

      WE'RE NOT WORTHY!!!

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  22. These people have NO clue. by syberanarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This shit is way off base - Kazaa? That virus-laden piece of trash? "Topsites"? Aren't those the fake sites that promise me LORD OF THE RINGS NEW GREAT QUALITY - JUST VOTE FOR US IN ORDER 1 2 3! Please. Bit Torrent, Win MX, and DC++ are the future. The fact that these people still quote Kazaa as the file sharing service of choice when there is far more material on DC++ alone is very indicative of how little of a clue these so-called "experts" and "tech editors" really have.

    1. Re:These people have NO clue. by MtlDty · · Score: 1

      You have completely misunderstood the term 'topsite' in the context it was intended.

      A topsite is literally the 'top' site, where pirate releases are released first. And by first I mean literally first. Every copy you see on Kazaa/IRC/Newsgroups and yes indeed Bit Torrent and the other services you mention, has originated from one of the 'topsites'

      Its a fair misunderstanding. Lots of people still think the word 'topsite' has something to do with Web Warez/

      To summarise then; the article is actually very well written. Without the services of core group members going to the trouble of obtaining telesyncs/ripping dvd's, the majority of filesharing services would be empty. Or at best filled with amateurish self made copies.

    2. Re:These people have NO clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note carefully the drug references littered throughout the article. This is a skillfully written piece of progaganda authored by a shill to dirty the act of copying bits.

      No wonder, it does come from the LA Times, published in the home of hollywood and the MPAA.

    3. Re:These people have NO clue. by Bagels · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WinMX is still widely in use (particularly in Asian countries like Japan), but IIRC it's been out of development for a looong time... I'd put my money more on clients like Shareaza that are adless, like WinMX, and combine multiple protocols (BT, EDonkey, Gnutella, and Gnutella2).

      --
      --- Bwah?
    4. Re:These people have NO clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Topsites"? Aren't those the fake sites that promise me LORD OF THE RINGS NEW GREAT QUALITY - JUST VOTE FOR US IN ORDER 1 2 3! Please.

      Seems that you don't have a clue about topsites, definitely nothing to do with `webwarez'.

    5. Re:These people have NO clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hrmm..

      this article is not about www/p2p warez/software.

      topsites refer to rip group affiled ftp sites..

      where _every_ piece of warez hits the net before it filters out to p2p/www and junk like that..

    6. Re:These people have NO clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitTorrent? Sucks. Won't resume downloads
      Direct Connect? Sucks. Too much hunting and having to share out 100GB of data to get anywhere.
      WinMX? Cool.
      Kazaa #Klchat? Program is good, but transfer rates suck. Fine alternative if you can't find it anywhere else.
      Overnet? Very cool.
      eDonkey? Not as cool as overnet.
      Gnutella? Hasn't this thing died yet?

    7. Re:These people have NO clue. by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

      Huh? BT resumes downloads just fine, have done so multiple times myself

    8. Re:These people have NO clue. by delinx32 · · Score: 1

      People still quote kazaa as the service of choice because we don't want the **IA relizing (sp?)that its actually winMX, or DC++(which would be great if you could do multiple sources at once). So in other words, tell people you use kazaa so those dumbarse users will keep getting sued, and don't mention winMX or DC++ again) BTW, I use kazaa, its great.

      --
      Ah screw it, you're not paying attention anyway.
    9. Re:These people have NO clue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, YOU have no clue. The article is fairly accurate, with the exception of "MysticVCD" being a major scene group.

      This shit is way off base - Kazaa? That virus-laden piece of trash?

      Okay, so they didn't pick the p2p flavor of the day... P2P isn't a part of the active "scene" anyways.

      "Topsites"? Aren't those the fake sites that promise me LORD OF THE RINGS NEW GREAT QUALITY - JUST VOTE FOR US IN ORDER 1 2 3! Please.

      No. They are private FTP sites in the 100mbit+ range. Groups release their warez and movies to these sites first and they are spread down to lower-rank sites and from there to IRC channels, FXP groups and P2P. These rankings are structured very informally. there are no "official rankings" (though there are groups that rank sites)

      Bit Torrent, Win MX, and DC++ are the future. The fact that these people still quote Kazaa as the file sharing service of choice when there is far more material on DC++ alone is very indicative of how little of a clue these so-called "experts" and "tech editors" really have.

      Once again, the P2P flavor-of-the-day is irrelevent. They barely touch upon it in the article at all.

  23. This reminds me of ... by HawkPilot · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... the BBS scene.

    This is certaintly not news. But the article does remind us that the BBS scene is still alive and well. The file sizes have gotten bigger (vs. 340K Apple //e floppies.) But the transmission speeds have also increased. The only difference I see know is that, thanks to P2P, the end-user/downloader gets the goods directly. In the old days, the final user was never granted access to the releaser's or the courier's site. It arrived via the "sneaker net" from a friend of a friend.

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points! Use 'em or lose 'em! They will expire before any good stories are posted.
  24. Re:Pirates of a Carribean on Kazaa Already? by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1, Funny

    You would have 7 quarters.

  25. wouldn't even make a good movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fraudulent larcens & thugs. nothing new/interesting about that.

  26. Re:Piracy is competition! - MOD PARENT DOWN. by Oakey · · Score: 1

    Except that Miramax consider importing a copy of Hero a violation of their distribution rights and a violation of copyright and you're *stealing* yadda yadda yadda. Read the Wired article from the guy who was recently sent a Cease & Desist letter by them for linking to a Hong Kong site that sold legit copies of the DVD>

    --
    "Dre don't get as high as me.... I'm Cheech and Chong" - Snoop Dogg
  27. Gmencoder by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is actually usable as a dvd ripper in linux.

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
  28. Re:Piracy is competition! - MOD PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Buy a multi-region DVD

    Which may be a 'piracy tool' and as such illegal in the USA under the DMCA.
    If it were upto the movie industry, you would not have a multi region player to begin with (read up on the DVD licencing)

  29. Re:Piracy is competition! - MOD PARENT DOWN. by mirko · · Score: 1

    I actually bought a perfectly legitimate DVD copy of Hero (for the imdb people, look for "Ying Xiong") in Chinatown (San Francisco) in September.

    I do not see how it is forbidden ???

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  30. Re:Piracy is competition! - MOD PARENT DOWN. by twoshortplanks · · Score: 0

    Dude, you don't ask people to mod people down because you disagree with them. The right and the wrongs or the arguments aside, the grandparent is a reasonable comment that is 'Interesting'; If you disagree with someone, argue your case, not ask for people to abuse the mod system.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  31. Re:Plz Email Me LOTR ROTK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they're not going to use e-mail, with the Internet Protocol Address Verifier around.

  32. History repeats itself, again by heironymouscoward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I watched in wonder a few weeks ago as an aquaintance logged into an FTP site he owns with some friends, populated with something like a thousand ripped movies, and downloaded a movie, burnt it to CD, and handed it to me, saying 'try this'. (I did not like the movie).

    We're only a year or two away from seeing *massive* movie trading on p2p networks.

    Anyone who claims this is about fair use is obviously trolling. It's about cheating, getting something for nothing.

    But that does not mean it's necessarily going to be bad for the movie business. There is still a world of difference between watching a movie on the big screen and watching a movie at home. The video/DVD rental industry, however, is definitely going to die, I think.

    The key to "anti-piracy" is to understand that the warez kids never pay anyhow. Whatever they're ripping/cracking/hoarding, it's always stolen and it's always for kicks, not because they want a quiet evening at home with the wife.

    The only significant market for media sales (music, movies, and probably software too) is the bulk of non-technical people who look for the easy solution, for decent quality, and are willing to pay for it.

    The music industry lost this market when it dropped the Napster ball. The movie industry still has a chance...

    The film industry has perhaps 2 years to make a paid service for downloading / burning movies to protected DVD, if they miss this window of opportunity, they will find that their main market is already getting their stuff for free.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:History repeats itself, again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are wrong there, the rental business will continue to thrive, DVDs have more value to them with all of the special features, right now anyways you dont see many rips that include the special features so there is still an attraction there. Even buyin DVDs I dont see changing, if anything it will get better for the same reason. I could watch a DVD-rip (in divX) of Freddy VS Jason over a month ago. I chose not to, I prefer the movie along with all of the special features, plus its always nice to actually have a nice "legal" copy. Actually, I'm going to buy that one, perhaps someday I might need to explain what "buy" is if your predictions come to fruition.

    2. Re:History repeats itself, again by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      The only significant market for media sales (music, movies, and probably software too) is the bulk of non-technical people who look for the easy solution, for decent quality, and are willing to pay for it.

      There's always going to be people who won't pay for it. Often at a certain age and will grow out of it.

      I worked in a record shop, and we used to see the same old faces coming in with 'scratched' records, and requesting a refunds, probably after they'd taped it. Of course, 99+% of our customers weren't like that.

      You could say the same about ringtones. a few people probably hack the ringtones out of their phones (I guess) but most people are willing to spend a small amount of money to get it.

      The problem is that Napster wasn't just about getting something for nothing, it later became about convenience. Get the music you want and get it right now.

      I've just had a look at the movies on Divx and MovieFlix.com, and there's nothing major. Stuff I'd expect stuck rotting between shelves in a video rental store.

    3. Re:History repeats itself, again by j3110 · · Score: 1

      That arguement drives me mad. The "they want something for nothing" arguement is bull****.

      1) Prove that they actually get anything to begin with. I assume that by getting something, you mean entertainment. Were you entertained by the video that you saw? No. Would you have bought it? No.

      2) Prove that is for nothing. 1st, they take risks to do what they do. 2nd, a lot of the people I've known to download movies have actually bought them. If that movie that you were given was really good, would you have bought the actually DVD? Maybe. Would you have seen the sequal in the theatre? Probably.

      It's not something for nothing. It's more of your own personal screening of a video than anything else. If the DVD is worth what they ask for it in the stores, you'll buy it... maybe even the collectors edition that costs 10x more than it should.

      Is it illegal? Yes. I should be able to buy a movie, watch it, and return it in 30 days if I don't like it as well, but I can't. Any industry with those kinds of rules is asking for piracy. If piracy hurts any industry, it's the rental industry. If you want to be fair (not legal) then you could go rent the movie if you think it was worth the rental price to see it once. If nothing else, I'm sure you'll recommend someone to see the movie that may not have. Isn't fairness what we are trying to achieve?

      You find a way to enforce fairness. I'm just showing that the overpriced hollywood mine-field is no more fair than average piracy. Everyone wants to blame piracy for their flops, when really the only people they have to blame is themselves for not offering the entertainment value they promise.

      That aside, you will always have the theives as well. You won't stop them with any manner of DRM, because they always find a way of getting the content for free, even if it means shoplifting. The MPAA's anti-competitive practices are the major cause for movie piracy, not the .01% of theives.

      --
      Karma Clown
    4. Re:History repeats itself, again by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      >>Were you entertained by the video that you saw? No. Would you have bought it? No.

      Fine. Take it back from where you bought it as "not fit for purpose" just like I have done with *every* protected CD I have ever bought. And if the store doesn't take it back, write to the music / film company. Kick up a stink...

      >>It's more of your own personal screening of a video than anything else.

      What is it with file-sharers always *justifying* what they do? It's about greed and kudos, nothing more...

      >>Is it illegal? Yes. I should be able to buy a movie, watch it, and return it in 30 days if I don't like it as well, but I can't.

      And have you tried it? Have you stood in a store and raised your voice at the salesperson, insisting to speak to a manager? Have you emailed the record company or film distributor?

      >>I'm just showing that the overpriced hollywood mine-field is no more fair than average piracy.

      You're right, it isn't. The music, film and software industry is plagued by unscrupulous companies that want to rip you off. So when they *do* rip you off, you complain, you tell your friends, you email them, post criticisms on bulletin boards, etc., etc.

      >>You won't stop them with any manner of DRM.

      Piracy creates an excuse for DRM to get used - this is my entire argument... Pirates give record companies, films distributors and software publishers the reasons to take away *everyone's* right to fair use of a product. Pirates are helping the very thing they claim to fight against...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    5. Re:History repeats itself, again by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      >We're only a year or two away from seeing *massive* movie trading on p2p networks.

      I hope you wrote this two years ago :)

      Just get any one of the neat P2P tools available
      now, and you can get everything. Anime, latest
      cinema releases, obscure animation and independent
      movies..at 330MB per hour, my movie collection
      grows. And I don't even need to be a "known player"
      to the ones who share.

    6. Re:History repeats itself, again by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Just get any one of the neat P2P tools available...

      I was not talking about the software but about the people who use it. It's easy, yes, but still restricted to a niche of power users (those with unrestricted broadband, enough capacity, skill to burn DVDs or VCDs, etc.)

      Two years and then everyone and their grandmother is doing this, that's my prediction.

      "Massive" is when it's a more popular way of getting movies than going to the video/DVD rental shop.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    7. Re:History repeats itself, again by j3110 · · Score: 1

      >>What is it with file-sharers always *justifying* what they do? It's about greed and kudos, nothing more...

      I gave a plausible legitimate reason for piracy that I don't think harms the actual artists or industry except under the circumstance that the product did not deliver to it's promise of entertainment value.

      Why is it always the pirates fault by default? I thought this was a country of presumed innocence. If you presume "pirates" as being morally innocent, then the burden of proof is still to show how they harmed another. If the best you can come up with is that we should expect to get screwed then complain, then you should consider that in the US, we have every bit as much right to protect our property as they do. They have no more right to deny us a refund, which they do, and I've seen it a happen several times no matter how obnoxious or loud you get, deny you that right. I think it's fair ethical use to screen have a personal screening of a video until my right as a consumer to return a "defective" product back WITHOUT HASSLE on the grounds that it didn't fulfill it's promise of entertainment.

      If there was competition in the field such that I could easily pick an alternative vendor to get those forms of entertainment under a fair agreement, then your point would be closer to accurate. The fact remains that I have no other alternative to choose from that don't fund the MPAA or RIAA. The next common arguement that I run into with the likes of you is "Entertainment is not a prerequisite to life". Of course not, but does that mean that those who don't like to get screwed by the media industry should be underprivileged because of their monopolistic practices? Then you'll argue that if there is value, then you should pay the price, and that I have a choice. That arguement only stands in a fair market, ie. competitive market. When monopolistic price fixing incentives and hidden taxes on media are being funneled into an organization, I don't think it's a fair market. I don't have a choice of funding the MPAA or not, because I burn CD's and DVD's of data. It's also hard to not buy from any MPAA backing companies as well (in the tech industry).

      Argue as long as much as you like, but theives accusing anyone of being a theif will never make a rational arguement about ethic. Suggesting to me that I should just bend over and take it is not going to work. They made the rules of the game when they started taxing the media I use and artificially inflated prices well beyond what they would be in a competitive market. They'll have to live with the resistance they have created by not allowing us to vote with our wallets. Am I supposed to build a computer out of sticks and stones to use in todays technological world? I certainly couldn't buy most name brand hardware considering that a lot of them are members of the MPAA or RIAA. I would have to choose a whole different career to make a point, and probably never touch another peice of electronics. I can't think of many career opportunities I would have considering even McDonalds has POS machines that probably have chips manufactured by a company that is a member of the MPAA or RIAA. In the very least, in every dollar you spend anywhere, there is going to be some small amount that trickles to the MPAA/RIAA through their use of CD/DVD media or drives.

      --
      Karma Clown
  33. Oh...computer games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Although most piracy groups still concentrate on software and computer games

    Thank goodness they said computer games else I would have to question the authenticity of the Scrabble and Twister sets I bought last week from some guy in a big rig behind Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:Oh...computer games by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0

      "Scrabble and Twister"???

      So how do you keep hold of the little piece of wood holding the letters then?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  34. An iTunes for DiVX movies... by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

    without the itunes.

    --
    if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
  35. 2400 baud? Asymmetric 1200 Baud! by swb · · Score: 1

    When I was a warez kiddie in the 80s, the "state of the art" for Apple ][ computers was an Apple-Cat modem, which in addition to 45.5 Baudot encoding (the TDD standard), also would do asynchronous 1200 baud, and "normal" 1200 baud if you bought an upgrade daughter card.

    Nobody I knew had the upgrade card, and virtually no BBS in the early 80s supported 1200 baud anyway (I think a Hayes or Racal 1200 baud modem was like $600 at the time).

    The Bell 202 asynchronous 1200 baud mode seemed largely moot until someone figured out how to use it to send entire Apple ][ disks (a whopping 120k)! A program called "DiskFer" or something similar would send an entire floppy disk (sector-copied, useful for full-disk games) over the phone.

    Anyway, you kids and your 2400 baud modems sure had it good. Before diskfer or whatever it was called, the only other thing was to go to peoples houses and bring your floppy drive for faster copying action, which seems kind of queer now.

  36. the best way to stop software piracy = open source by whitekolovrat · · Score: 0

    n/t =)

  37. the best way to stop piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is to let it go...

    I used to crack/distribute Apple ][ games when I was a kid. I stopped playing them because the primary goal was the crack. The games got boring. Having hundreds of them that I'd never played eventually seemed pointless. Years later, I got into the movie distribution scene. Burning movies to VCD/SVCD soon seemed pointless since I eventually stopped watching them. Now I pirate satellite in addition to paying for the part of the service that I find value in. I pirate out of curiosity but when free PPV's are all yours, you find yourself unable to devote the time to watch them. I haven't watched a free PPV for months.

    I do go to movies because it's a social event; certainly not because I want to sit in an uncomfortable chair, with my feet on a sticky floor, some couple talking loudly in front of me and a coughing/hacking fat guy behind me. If watching the movie was my goal, I'd do it at home, in comfort.

    So give the stuff away for free and people will discover how amazingly boring the movies/games/software really are and probably end up spending more time with their kids.

    Remember, when you get a movie for free, you don't feel obligated to sit through the whole thing after the first 10 minutes prove that it sucks.

    (yes, one of these days I'll get a real /. account. All these free journalism sites are boring).

    1. Re:the best way to stop piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "how amazingly boring the movies/games/software really are"

      The most insightful comment I've seen on /. in weeks. Wish I had some mod points to give you.

  38. Lame comment by gruntled · · Score: 1

    First time I've seen anyone in the mainstream media describe the process of movie piracy, who plays, what motivates them, and how the end product trickles out into the "mainstream" to wind up offered via services like Kazaa.

    Disclaimer: I know the story's author, Jon Healey, and I happen to think he's one of few people left at the LA Times who's even interested in writing about technology or intellectual property issues on anything other than a "here's how *you* can money with this stock" level.

  39. Language by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    I think it's interesting that the term "pirates" are being appied to intellectual property robinhoods (BTW - governments and rich people hate robinhoods)

    The term "pirates" does not fit - pirates steal, rape and pillage. They commit more than one crime when "pirating". That term may apply to those that hijack media and resell it for profit, but it doesn't fit where someone buys, then shares or gives away a product for free.

    --
    -- $G
    1. Re:Language by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      I think it's interesting that the semantics of the word pirates is being argued by someone who has arbitrarily coined 'robinhood' as a noun.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to wake up and start speaking English. The term "piracy" has been used to describe unauthorized copying (originally of books) for at least two centuries. Check your dictionary.

    3. Re:Language by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Sorry... I'm in marketing :)

      --
      -- $G
    4. Re:Language by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Heh. S'ok, it just struck me as particularly ironic, and amusing.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  40. Remember this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Not everyone in the scene is so pure. Some players... are suspected of selling pirated movies and music to commercial bootleggers.
    File sharers, remember this the next time you're inclined to believe that your actions are harmless. Even if your personal use is not for profit, you don't know who you're sharing with. You could be an unwitting accomplice to a major crime.
  41. ok read but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a bad read, kinda common knowledge, doesnt really break new ground...Found myself skimming the article a lot...a bit too long

    But interesting non the less

  42. the only funnier thing is... by rbird76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...buying a cracked DVD in China and getting the MPAA anti-piracy notice on the screen. Yep, that worked REALLY well.

  43. history - don't alienate your customer base by rbird76 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are always people who want something for nothing. There are also those who want to copy things for the thrill, or as a way to get friends, or for other reasons. These people won't go away - as long as the technical means exist (and in a free society, the means will always exist) people will copy works. I think that these people make up a small segment of the market - that doesn't mean copyright holders shouldn't protect their works, but this set of people is unlikely to destroy the business of selling recorded works.

    DVD copying will run rampant if the MPAA decides to screw their customers. The music industry (the larger labels, anyway) raised the prices of CDs, homogenized much of the product, made CDs hard to use, and tried to extract money from customers for fair use rights that weren't theirs to sell. Record companies (RIAA labels) have a product that people want, but they decided that they could get more money from their customers than their customers wanted to pay. Once P2P apps came around, the large set of people the record companies angered had an alternative - copy the music and pay nothing. There would have always been copying at a low level, but the frustration of people with the record labels meant that as soon as a means to get records some other way came around, people would take it. Had there not been significant frustration with record companies in the first place, most of the people who get their music from file trading would not have gone through the trouble to do so.

    The means to copy digital media is not going to go away. What will determine whether copying becomes rampant or not is the level of frustration of the customer base (and the cost of the product - e.g. high-end software). If it becomes very easy to obtain copied movies, more people will do it as well - but they probably won't try as hard if they aren't frustrated in the first place. At least, IMHO.

  44. Which laws can govern what countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar to the poster who said his friend said "Here, try this" from a library of tons of movies, I was just exposed to the world of Anime Fansubs. Having just turned into an Anime junkie, I'm curious where this kind of stuff lies. Is it just a gray area because these are not licensed in America yet? They weren't the best in the world but it was kind of cool to see something that will probably never be on the Anime Network or on Best Buys shelves.

  45. Re:Pirates of a Carribean on Kazaa Already? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now eight.

  46. ARRRRRRRR! by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    You make a good point. The again, for years the SPA, the RIAA and the MPAA have been publicly pushing the idea that anyone who gets a copy of something without paying for it is a Thieving Pirate, and anyone who assists them in obtaining the data (warez, mp3z, moviez) is Aiding Piracy. The recently re-written intellectual property laws specifically make no differentiation between people who SELL unauthorized material and those who give it away for free. For years (decades?) there's been a thriving community of Bootleg Music Collectors. Most of them traded material they had for other material. Most specifically did not sell the material they had - almost as a matter of principle. From what I've read, The Well, one of the first popular online communties grew in large part because of the activities of people trading Graeful Dead tapes. This spirit is probably the same that motivates most of the release groups.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  47. The mainstream press finally got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to say that the article is quite accurate. Something that is too rare in the mainstream press. Kudos to Jon Healey for doing proper research.

  48. freedom of choice pays by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If some bootleggers are selling a copy, while others are giving the same copy for free, those getting charged are paying an "ignorance tax". With Internet searches and messaging for finding alternatives, that becomes more of a "stupidity tax". Geeks should be grateful to those paying it for the subsidy.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  49. Plus Ca Change by meehawl · · Score: 1
    I wrote this back in 1997. Not much has changed except fatter pipes.
    Although the act of breaking computer codes may seem a barren process, there is intense competition. Crackers form themselves into exotic groups14 and use individual names15 as rich as in any youth subculture argot. Attached to 'gifts', they leave dated message files that carry taunts and boasts about their prowess and storied accounts of their progression and advancement.

    This program is the hardest in my life,
    it have a propietary variable code serial dongle.
    The program send to key a variable stream
    and the key answer
    with some data depending from data received.
    I have captured the data exchange
    from program to key
    and viceversa
    and I have rewrited the DLL to emulate this flow.
    But unlucky is not sufficent
    because every time you start a program
    another flow is needed.
    Then I have modified a executable
    to make a flow ever the same
    and my dongle emulator now work 100%.
    This crack has required 2 week of hard work,
    and the original dongle.
    Thanx to Paul Leadle for dongle,
    thanx Jabbar for help about rewriting.

    (BLASTSOFT [RBS] 1997)

    Frequently, they contain social exchanges or denigrations of others, defined by their arbitrary group monikers or genre conventions:

    When so many groups bring you crap fakes non-working,
    X-FORCE always gets you
    the Best of the Best.
    ACCEPT NO IMITATION!
    X-Force 1997!

    Group News & Greetings
    A warm welcome to Tragic Kingdom
    as a new XFORCE HQ
    OUR DiAMONDS-4-EVER GREETiNGS
    MUST GO TO :
    Stingray ,
    Mach One ,
    Ones Wally ,
    Slain ,
    Wildchild ,
    Roamer.

    (Accreditation in X-FORCE .NFO file)
    --

    Da Blog
  50. It come down to price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the price of the official movies were way cheaper, (say half the price they are now) then there would be no piracy, and Holywood would sell vastly more copies than they do now, and probably make more money in the process.

    Why would you buy some cheap crappy reproduction when the official movie was a "reasonable price" right??

    1. Re:It come down to price by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Define "reasonable price"...

      In the case of CDs, most of the music I listen to is 1970s - 1980s rock music that I can easily find for under $10 / 6.00 in local record stores and Internet sellers. Yet I still see those same CDs copied as MP3s on the Internet. How cheap do they need to be before people stop copying them?

      If you copy movies and CDs, that's your decision but please admit that you do so because you don't want to spend *any* money on them or for personal kudos.

      The only way these items will become cheaper is by *direct positive action* - don't pay the prices that are being asked for them...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  51. Hmm, let's see... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    Start->Run
    cmd

    C:\>ftp
    ftp>

    Oh My God! I've been rooted and had illegal file sharing software installed! Darn Microsoft and their so-called security.

    Rich

  52. Mac: The BEST Divx player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On A PC I NEVER get the right color, brightness, etc. I change these things all day in XINE, Avifile and MPlayer and NEVER get the right result.

    On a Mac (I have a 12 inch PB) the colors, etc are RIGHT, I dont have to change anything. Both Videolan and Mplayer do a great job. In NEVER use Quick Time, because the interface is ugly.

  53. Magic by 0spf · · Score: 1

    FTA- "Unlike the private sites, most of the chat channels and news groups are open to anyone who can master their relatively arcane protocols."

    Dam, I want to get on Usenet but I can't find my crystal ball.

    : )
  54. Hollywood is not the one losing money by imcclell · · Score: 1

    I know a lot of people who grab these movies, and I don't see why the industry is complaining. Everyone I've ever met who does it still goes to the theater, and still buy movies.

    If anyone has a right to complain about this, it's the rental places. Most people download to save on the price of a rental.

    Hollywood and all the people making movies are probably not losing millions (despite the claim), but I'm willing to bet that Blockbusters profit margin is down.