Slashdot Mirror


Europa's Acid Ice Fields

tr0llb4rt0 writes "The New Scientist reports on recent observations that suggest the ice on Jupiter's moon Europa may be highly acid with a pH of near zero, and have a surface layer of hydrogen peroxide. Two theories have been put forward. One says that the acid has been formed at the surface layer from oceanic salts reacting with the intense radiation from Jupiter, the other that sulphuric acid is coming directly from the ocean, with the water reacting with sulphur produced from undersea volcanos. Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa, it is not ruling it out completely, as there are terrestrial extremophile bacteria which thrive in highly acid environments."

311 comments

  1. A nice place to visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I wouldn't want to live there. You try building a house in an acid field.

    1. Re:A nice place to visit by SFBwian · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first one might not stay up, but build another one. If it doesn't, build another. By the fourth iteration or so, you'll probably be able to claim large tracts of Europa for your own.

      --
      I'm looking to get rich. I've got steps #2 (????) and #3 (PROFIT!) planned out, but am having trouble coming up with #1.
    2. Re:A nice place to visit by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Okay, so go for a hike.

      If that doesn't work, try it again. ;)

    3. Re:A nice place to visit by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

      But I wouldn't want to live there. You try building a house in an acid field.

      I'm afraid you can't even visit.

      Please follow the directions inscribed on the handy black monolith:

      "ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS--EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE."

    4. Re:A nice place to visit by SlipJig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah! All that means is that you can't land. That doesn't stop my plans for a floating Bespin-style cloud city 5 km above the surface ;)

      --
      Read my keyboard review.
    5. Re:A nice place to visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I did it.

      It's a pretty colorful house, but unfortunately, I can't walk through it without tripping.

    6. Re:A nice place to visit by escher · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop my plans for a floating Bespin-style cloud city 5 km above the surface.

      But the lack of atmosphere does.

    7. Re:A nice place to visit by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm pretty sure that city would be a great place to live, with the lack of crime and all. What's that? Why's there no crime? There's a diving board outside of the courthouse. And no one wants to risk a guilty verdict.

    8. Re:A nice place to visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Only one kind of alien that can live in that level of acidity...

      Just hope Ripley is on stand by...

    9. Re:A nice place to visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Please follow the directions inscribed on the handy black monolith:

      > "ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS--EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE."

      Pardon my nit-picking, but you left out the "nice" part of the message - "USE THEM TOGETHER, USE THEM IN PEACE."

      And all you need is love, and I'd like to buy the world(s) a Coke, and... ;-)

    10. Re:A nice place to visit by Aadomm · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Europa, acid eats you.

      --
      Mention the Lord of the Rings one more time and I'll more than likely kill you.
  2. Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,... by xC0000005 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, are those black obelisks going to be pissed. Of course, they are several years behind schedule already, which probably didn't do much for their attitude to begin with.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  3. With all that hydrogen peroxide by patricksevenlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can bet that if there is life on Europa, they'll most certainly be blondes :D

    1. Re:With all that hydrogen peroxide by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, but what good is that if all they are is microbial extremophiles?

      I'd at least want a normal-sized extremophile blonde Europan ...

      heh heh ... 'extremophile' ... heh heh ... yeah ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:With all that hydrogen peroxide by craw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Acid? blondes? Hey, you might be right!

      I guess the others were natural brunettes.

    3. Re:With all that hydrogen peroxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with all that acid & peroxide, I won't be too surprise they love rock & roll or metal. ;)

  4. pH balance by joshua404 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should send a probe loaded with Red Devil lye to help even things out.

  5. hydrogen peroxide by kemapa · · Score: 2, Funny

    hydrogen peroxide...? My ears will never be full of wax again!

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    1. Re:hydrogen peroxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I can't hear you.

  6. Mental Note... by Smitty825 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mental Note...don't make Europa Landing probe out of metal...

    --

    Doh!
    1. Re:Mental Note... by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh, gold or platinum would work... it's zinc and the others that you have to watch out for.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:Mental Note... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Easy solution? Glass or Pyrex. Or if you want to be a bit more sophisticated, some sort of polymer.

      Or you could still use metal, but take an ablative approach...Essentially standing on thick stilts. Make sure they stand vertical (as opposed to at an angle) else they'll only provide a short-term delay rather than a long-term one.

    3. Re:Mental Note... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Easy solution? Glass or Pyrex."

      But how well do they stand up to solar and jovian radiation?

    4. Re:Mental Note... by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but imagine how big the engines on this spaceship will need to be to launch a ship made of something as dense as gold or platinum. Not to mention the cost of the raw materials to build the thing. And, well, the fact that gold, at least, isn't exactly known for its strength.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:Mental Note... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      It could be gold-plated...

      That would be one pimpin' spaceship.

      Actually, I think some spacecraft/probes/satellites do in fact have gold plating, or something to that effect.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    6. Re:Mental Note... by Muhammar · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Stainless steel is probably good enuf, especialy at freezing temperatures at Europa
      2. It actualy rains sulfuric acid on Venus and the surface temperature is 350C there (and 90 atm pressure). Russians managed in sixties, although their probes did not last much over 1 hour before malfunction.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  7. error? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    highly ACIDIC environments

  8. *cringes* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    it's acidic

  9. Life could be tough on acid Europa by Richard+Allen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Strange title considering life on Earth is thought to have been borne out of the toughest conditions.

    I understand they are just saying "tough", but if life likely arose from similar (harsh) conditions, I don't think it would be that unlikely.

    1. Re:Life could be tough on acid Europa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to the eropans life on earth would be living under harsh conditions

  10. Alternative life forms by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa, it is not ruling it out completely, as there are terrestrial extremophile bacteria which thrive in highly acid environments.

    Key word being terrestrial. What about life forms based on silicon and sulphur (as opposed to carbon and oxygen). The theories are there, and I think we have merely begun to scratch the surface of what different kinds of 'life' may be out there.

    --

    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    1. Re:Alternative life forms by Surazal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Examples must first be found before we can meaningfully talk about these forms of life from a biological standpoint.

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    2. Re:Alternative life forms by ktanmay · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about life forms based on silicon and sulphur (as opposed to carbon and oxygen).
      I'm not sure that we might even be able to recognize it as life despite observing it. We are living in a universal time period where there have been enough supernovae explosions to create an abundant supply of carbon and oxygen, plenty more will be required before there will be enough to chemically kickstart silicon based life.
      There's no way of knowing if that kind of life will work on an evolutionary platform, maybe it will maybe it won't, for us it's DNA, what will it be for them?

    3. Re:Alternative life forms by elohim · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about ammonia-based, instead of water-based, lifeforms!

    4. Re:Alternative life forms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Key word being terrestrial

      I think the keyword here is "extremophile" - A pointless word which need not have been invented. When is it ever required?

    5. Re:Alternative life forms by beeplet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Two notes:

      1. The large amount of oxygen on Earth is a result of the the presence of life, not a prerequisite for it.

      2. Even if a particular element has a low universal abundance, there can still be a local concentration of it high enough to "kickstart life" (as might be the case with silicon and sulpher on Europa).

    6. Re:Alternative life forms by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Organic chemistry is basically the chemistry of carbon. No other element can easily form the kind of complex chemical structures and reactions that carbon is capable of. In spite of what your favorite sci-fi shows might tell you, it's highly unlikely that we will ever see any lifeform based on silicon or anything else.
      Wake me up when we have an entire field of science dedicated to the study of silicon compounds, and I might be more inclined to believe in the existence of non-carbon-based lifeforms.

    7. Re:Alternative life forms by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a load of bull. Are you on crack? You're sitting in a HUGE BALL OF SILICON COMPOUNDS.
      Every rock on earth is based on silicon, for crying out loud, there is absolutely no shortage of it.

    8. Re:Alternative life forms by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking of which, I love how whenever you see silicon based organisms in literature, they're always talking rocks. Just imagine if some silicon based intelligence was thinking about the possibility of carbon-based life forms! "We think they'll turn out to be black or clear, and either extremely hard like diamond, or flammable, like coal!"

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Alternative life forms by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I can imagine a race who is remarkably good at cleaning windows!

      Don't get too close to 'em though, they reek!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Alternative life forms by GerritHoll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You need much, much, much more than your odd supernova explosion to get life. Given the complexity of life, and the complexity of the beginning of life, it is, even with the universe being so huge, very well possible that life did emerge at only one place in the universe. To get life forms from the elements may be a chance of only 1 to 10^100. The size difference between the smallest life forms and the largest molecules is many orders of magnitude (I believe 6-10, so it differs a million to 10 billion times in size). This is not easily overcome. History has proven that it can be overcome, but given the unlikelyness, it may have happened only once.

    11. Re:Alternative life forms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the key word is "whilst," which, when used in a sentence, is proof that the writer's penis has never seen the inside of another human being's body. Non-human's cannot, however, be ruled out.

    12. Re:Alternative life forms by xtal · · Score: 3, Funny

      maybe it will maybe it won't, for us it's DNA, what will it be for them?

      Some might disagree with me, but I'd be putting my money on some variant of struct {}.

      --
      ..don't panic
    13. Re:Alternative life forms by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      non-human's what? seems like you're missing a word in there, somewhere.

      oh, did you mean non-humans? plurals don't have apostrophes. did you 'loose' your grammar textbook?

    14. Re:Alternative life forms by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Informative
      The presence of molecular oxygen, O2, is a result of the presence of life. The presence of atomic oxygen, in whatever form, is a prerequisite for life, at least of the kind found on Earth.

      The oxygen was here long before life, it was just locked up in other chemical compounds besides O2.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    15. Re:Alternative life forms by corbettw · · Score: 1

      "We think they'll turn out to be black or clear, and either extremely hard like diamond, or flammable, like coal!"

      I know you were trying to be funny, but you do realize that you are, in fact, flammable, right? If you don't believe me, go into your kitchen, turn on one of the burners on your range (assuming you have a gas stove), and hold you hand in the flame. That burning smell is coming from your skin as it chars off the bone.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    16. Re:Alternative life forms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Slashdotter needs much, much, much more than your odd supernova explosion to get a life.

    17. Re:Alternative life forms by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Didn't life on Earth require a reducing atmosphere to get the chemicals to bond properly?

    18. Re:Alternative life forms by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      1. The large amount of oxygen on Earth is a result of the the presence of life, not a prerequisite for it.

      I believe the original poster was refering to the presence of the element, not its gaseous diatomic form. His point is that carbon and oxygen are abundant elements and have *very* favorable properties that lead to the natural creation of extremely complex, self-repeating molecules. The presence or absence of life does not, to our knowlege, transmute elements.



      2. Even if a particular element has a low universal abundance, there can still be a local concentration of it high enough to "kickstart life" (as might be the case with silicon and sulpher on Europa)

      What you are saying is strictly true, however it severely reduces the probability that such life is anywhere in our "local vicinity".

      Most of the guys I work with at NASA aren't that hopeful that we'll find life on Europa... however we'll never know unless we try.

      And if that doesn't work out, we might get some interesting results from the Terrestrial Planet Finder.

      Cheers,
      Justin

    19. Re:Alternative life forms by beeplet · · Score: 1

      Quite true... Mea culpa.

    20. Re:Alternative life forms by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure that we might even be able to recognize it as life

      I don't think it would be a problem. Life has a few basic requirements, one of which is procreation. We should be able to recognize that behavior fairly easily. Others, such as respiration, may be harder to recognize at first (they would probably exist in some form though, as a means of recieving energy to sustain the life). Locomotive capabilities of any object/substance discovered would definitely be a clue to investigate other signs of life.

      The main thing is that life evolved from self-reproducing molecules. Ones better at reproducing out-evolved the others. Life structures exist to reproduce themselves. Natural structures exists due to the physical process that form them. River beds, stalagmites and stalagtites, caves, mountains, desert wind sculptures, etc., exist due to obvious physical processes. However, even a cactus does something unobvious by growing against the force of gravity. Vines that grow on the ground don't form due to the deposition of "vine molecules", and they have internal structure that easily verifies this. I don't think that recognizing a life form based on a different chemistry than our own should be too difficult (assuming that the other life form is based on the rules of physics as we know them). Even microscopic "life forms", such as virii, should be recognizable due to their behavior.

  11. I knew it! by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jupiter is an enemy planet

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an awful website. Can anyone actually read that? -- let me guess, you linux fatties use Lynx

    2. Re:I knew it! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Actually I agree. But see I knew of the joke before I knew the site so I just googled for 2 seconds to make a joke.

      You could just highlight the first line to read it.

      You think that page is bad? Goto their "home" page. It's a travesty of HTML and other junk. They have mouse text thingies, a status message that overwrites any links you highlight, etc... Pure crap. MBA ==> Major Boring Asshat

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  12. New Scientist, you say? by rasafras · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Disregarding the validity of this claim (which I find somewhat questionable), if it is true, it may put some things in doubt. However, life has been seen to survive in extreme circumstances, such as undersea vents, where it is able to use the chemicals released by the vents as sources of energy. So, not all hope is lost.
    Just think twice before going for a swim...

    1. Re:New Scientist, you say? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      The question is not can it manage to survive there but can it form there. It doesn't matter if life can evolve to survive in even the most extreme conditions if the conditions are not right to allow life to form there in the first place. Life may be able to suvive in an ocean of acid but I highly doubt it formed there (unless you mean an ocean of amino acid.)

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  13. Dictionaries rule (www.m-w.com) by jeblucas · · Score: 5, Informative
    No.

    Main Entry: 1acid
    Pronunciation: 'a-s&d
    Function: adjective
    Etymology: French or Latin; French acide, from Latin acidus, from acEre to be sour -- more at ACET-
    2 a : of, relating to, or being an acid; also : having the reactions or characteristics of an acid (acid soil) (an acid solution) b of salts and esters : derived by partial exchange of replaceable hydrogen (acid sodium carbonate NaHCO3) c : containing or involving the use of an acid (as in manufacture) d : marked by or resulting from an abnormally high concentration of acid (acid indigestion)

    --
    blarg.
    1. Re:Dictionaries rule (www.m-w.com) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both are correct.

  14. With apologies to Monty Python... by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Listen, lad. I built this kingdom up from nothing. When I started here, all there was was acid...other kings said I was daft to build a castle on an acid field, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the acid. So, I built a second one. That sank into the acid. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the acid, but the fourth one... stayed up! And that's what you're gonna get, lad: the strongest castle on this planet!

    1. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who are you, who are so wise in the ways of science?

    2. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Eagle7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are some who call me ... Tim?

      --
      _sig_ is away
    3. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Nerull · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop with your incessent Monty Python quotings, you silly english kaniggets.

    4. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by FroMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      the strongest castle on this planet!

      Ahem, moon, I believe.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    5. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      Go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

    6. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      With apologies to Monty Python...

      Let's be pedantic here and say, "With apologies to Terry Gilliam and Michael Palin", since Jabberwocky wasn't a Python film.

      Hmmm? Or, perhaps, the Beatles sung 'Imagine' and Genesis are responsible for that 'modern prog-rock classic' - "Groovy Kind Of Love".

      Just to be pedantic, of course. I'm sure you knew it wasn't a Pyphon film, really :)

      .02

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    7. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Let's be pedantic here and say, "With apologies to Terry Gilliam and Michael Palin", since Jabberwocky wasn't a Python film.

      Or, let's be extra pedantic here and realize that the (modified) quote was, in fact, out of Monty Python and the Holy Grail instead.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    8. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      Lol, Oh crap. /me goes back to contemplating cigarettes again and makes a mental note not to comment on /. until the coffee kicks in...


      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    9. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      And that's what you're gonna get, lad...

      What? The curtains?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 0, Troll

      Or as we say on Slashdot.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    11. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acidic Oceans with curtins? We used dream of living in acidic oceans with curtins, you posh git!

    12. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's only a model.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    13. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by raga · · Score: 1

      Stop with your incessent Monty Python quotings, you silly english kaniggets.

      Or what? You'll wave your private parts at my aunties?

    14. Re:With apologies to Monty Python... by CyberdogOSX · · Score: 1
      ALL...calle me Tim.

      it's my name you see.

  15. Life on Europa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even if there is life on Europa, they'll all be eurotrash, anyway.

    1. Re:Life on Europa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eurotrash that love acid & peroxide...

    2. Re:Life on Europa? by Lane.exe · · Score: 1
      So basically, young Germans?

      Lachen, meine Freunden! Lachen!

      --
      IAALS.
  16. The perfect environment? by Frohan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If anything I would say that a highly acidic environment supports the idea that life could form on Europa. If you compare Europa to the Earth model then it seems that the acidic environment was similar to the old Earth where most of the organisms were extremophiles that did not use oxygen but sulfur and other substances. Earth didn't gain much oxygen until photosynthesis took a foothold and when that happened it killed off most of the organimsms because oxygen destroys chemical reactions that aren't suitable. Also, most of the organisms that exist today are the real extremophiles since they are adapted to deal with non-acidic/cold/hot environment since the original Earth was very hostile (I doubt my wording made any sense). So I would say that the acidity supports the thought that life could exist (especially the presence of sulfur).

    1. Re:The perfect environment? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      The presence of hydrogen peroxide makes the theories that life exits there doubtful. There is a reason that hydrogen is used as an antispetic: it kills almost any type of baterial infection imaginable.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:The perfect environment? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen Peroxide I mean.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    3. Re:The perfect environment? by ajs · · Score: 1

      One point to back you up here is the most acidic environments on earth are CREATED by bacteria. Recent cave research has found that many (most?) caves were formed by intense mineral-consuming bacteria that produce powerful acids as a waste product.

      The acid oceans of Euorpa could easily be the result of such activity, though there's nothing to sugges that that's more likely than the other theories.

      One this is for sure: with the gravity and radiation from Jupiter and the possibility of a molten core, Europa is going to be a complex environment and complexity is the first (arguably most important) ingredient for life.

    4. Re:The perfect environment? by ajs · · Score: 1

      Ooops, it's the acids that are intense, not the bacteria... heh, I sounded like a surfer dude for a minute there... ;-)

    5. Re:The perfect environment? by AddressException · · Score: 1

      Did you also mean antiseptic?

  17. If only they could find silicone... by Buschman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you'd have the three pillars of West Coast civilization.

    1. Re:If only they could find silicone... by pheesh · · Score: 1

      This was modded Insightful? come on mods, funny yes, absolutely hilarious, but Insightful?

      --
      They have a tremendous selection of fresh juices
    2. Re:If only they could find silicone... by lambent · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Oftentimes, humour is borne out of the introspection into one's own world.

      That's insight.

    3. Re:If only they could find silicone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny" mods don't give karma. His post deserved karma.

  18. Sounds like a recent Nova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Spelunkers in caves observing extremophile bacteria that were literally eating away the cave with the sulfuric acid end products of their metabolism. Their experiments were finding levels of acid were largely driven by biological processes.

  19. Re:Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,.. by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd still like to shoot Roy Schieder into space, if it's all the same to you.

  20. baffling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't understand why someone who is marginally literate would be visiting a text-based website.

    1. Re:baffling by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

      Actually, it makes perfect sense because if they couldn't read, they would goto picture-based websites, so if they could read, they would goto a site with text, no?

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
  21. H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by DR+SoB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is vast quantities of H2O2 (Hydrogen peroxide), wouldn't that indicate the presense of life is more likely? It would indicate high levels of oxygen, since, H2O2 is obviously oxygen risk. Many farmers on earth use H2O2 to increase the concentration of oxygen in the water supply, so wouldn't that work on Jupiter as well?? Any chemists out there know the answer?

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Erm...just because an element is available doesn't mean it's usable.

      I mean, O3 may be available, but that doesn't mean you can breathe it. :\

      It would seem that life as we know it would be indicated more by the presence of CO2, oxygen in of itself.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    2. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong. H2O2 is USABLE for providing Oxygen to plants. This is a proven fact. o3 may not be breathable to us, but it's presence means that we could extract the Oxygen from it (EASILY because o3 is unstable). That's why water on mars is so important, if it's there, we can EXTRACT the oxygen and breath it. If it's there, it's usable!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    3. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by Walkiry · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's called Catalase. It's an enzyme that is present in many living organisms and catalyzes the reaction 2H2O2 -> 2H2O + O2 . Plants have it too. In Europa, though, the reaction might be very slow unless there is a catalyst to help it.

      So it really depends on how you define "usable", that is, what you really want to do with that oxygen peroxide ;)

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    4. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by forkboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's assuming the catalase (the enzyme responsible for converting the peroxide into O2 and water) can survive the acidic environment. Most protiens can't thrive in a pH that low....it screws up the hydrogen bonding resposible for the folding that gives it the characteristic shape of its function.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    5. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      Luckily for us, the extremophiles that live at pH of near zero on earth are eukariotes and archaea, so they do have catalase we could use if we wanted to. I think the real problem is the lower than freezing temperature ;)

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    6. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by locofungus · · Score: 1

      MnO4 will catalyse 2H2O2 -> 2H2O + O2. Doesn't necessarily require a protein. Most terrestrial organisms use iron for transporting Oxygen, why shouldn't an extraterrestrial organism use something else?

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    7. Re:H2O2 indicates lots of OXYGEN! by locofungus · · Score: 1

      That should be MnO2 - Manganese IV oxide. Duh!

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  22. No Biggie by Sparky77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just have the probe take along bottle of Tums.

    --
    One bad monkey spoils the whole barrel.
  23. so by CubeHard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess Europa's is nothing more than my girlfiend in planet form...

    --
    \\"You go hole now"
    1. Re:so by Feyr · · Score: 1

      big, fat, blonde and a fondness to throw vitriolic comments?

      you can keep it

  24. Rocket Fuel? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't hydrogen peroxide a rocket fuel?

    *hm....*

    1. Re:Rocket Fuel? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      i though H2O2 was the oxygen source for rocket fuel...

  25. Attempt no landings here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Perhaps Sir Arthur was correct.

    1. Re:Attempt no landings here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fucks sake people, how many times will you mod up the same joke in the same article comments?

  26. Why by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do we decide the probability of life on Europa based on life's characteristics on Earth? It's a completely different environment that has never had any contact with Earth and almost certainly has never had conditions similar to conditions at any time in the history of life on Earth. Our knowledge of biology may not even apply to anything we discover out there.

    1. Re: Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It's a completely different environment that has never had any contact with Earth"

      You my friend, have little knowledge of chemistry. But that's not the real point I'm trying to make here. Fact is that everything in this entire solar system has had some contact with everything else.

      The origin of life on Earth came at the end of the late heavy bombardment, a time when there was a near constant series of assults on all the worlds which blasted great chunks of each into the surrounding maelstrom. Rocks from Earth have been cast onto the other major bodies just as rocks from Mars have been sent here.

      There is much research showing that life could very likely survive the ordeal of being blasted off of one planet, traveling through space for a few million years, and then the impact on another world. I'm not gonna provide you with links since it's so easy to google for them. I'm not saying that life from Earth has survived there or anywhere else, just that it's known that life can survive the stresses that this series of events entail, and that life could very well have made it to europa.

      Regardless of wether there is or is not terrestrial life there, both Earth and Europa have had contact over the entire eriod of their histories.

    2. Re: Why by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      You my friend, have little knowledge of chemistry.

      Are you saying that organic chemistry is essentially a solved problem? That we have proven that Earth life is the only feasible biochemical basis for life and that chemicals capable of sustaining life can only form in Earthlike conditions?

    3. Re:Why by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably because (as Asimov pointed out in a great collection of essays titled "The Tragedy of the Moon") what we know about chemistry suggests that life favors a sweet-spot of conditions. These conditions include an abundant diversity of chemicals, a reasonable temperature range, and a reasonable range of temperatures. At this sweet-spot the creation of complex molecules is probable. Outside of this sweet-spot increasingly improbable.

    4. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Most people seem to think God created them. So they think they know all there is to know about things like biology, astronomy, reality and the universe. Until they are proven wrong by a pack of rabid scientists and beaten over the head with very large books for centuries until every God fearing man, woman and child in their "civilization" finally "gets it".

    5. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but what we know about life is it is in essense the struggle to organize against the natural order of the universe to decay into chaos.

      So life could exist anywhere in any imaginable form. One day we might be able to create "living" machines by our definition of life. Life is simply organized matter. And we haven't even explored all forms of matter in our little corner of our solar system let alone this universe.

      Let me put it this way. We created the laws of physics, Neutonian physics anyway, to describe what we saw in nature. But we discovered that these "laws" were not accurate. That our limited perspective of our universe prevented us from drawing the real equations just to describe motion in this 4 dimensional universe. And now our brightens minds are still extremely confused about something all of us take for granted everyday, they don't even know if our universe is limited to 4 dimensions anymore. We don't know anything about anything, we just have a few logical guesses and a lot of pigheaded assumptions.

    6. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're an ignorant twit when you can't even spell newton right.

    7. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. So why bother to reply to ignant fools like me? I can't even spell ignant right. :)

    8. Re: Why by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you saying that organic chemistry is essentially a solved problem? That we have proven that Earth life is the only feasible biochemical basis for life and that chemicals capable of sustaining life can only form in Earthlike conditions?

      exactly! and i would think that at the time life formed on earth, the conditions on earth weren't very earthlike...at least not in the way it is now. it could very well have been more marslike or possibly even europalike at the time and place that life first appeared on earth. it probably wasn't until oxygen releasing algae formed that the earth became earthlike, which at the time probably killed off all the then non-earthlike life that couldn't adapt to the poisonous oxygen.

      oxygen is a really harsh chemical! it has a tendancy to combine with almost anything. i would say that we live in very harsh conditions, and that by comparison europa is mild!

      i bet some methane breathing aliens are looking at us now through their powerful telescopes and saying "look at all the oxygen on that pitiful blue planet, what a harsh environment nothing could survive there...but that beautiful icey acidic moon on the other hand..."

    9. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We created the laws of physics, Neutonian physics anyway, to describe what we saw in nature.
      *crosses legs* And I thought we created it as an extreme form of birth control...
    10. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much more importantly I think now, is that we know that asteroid impacts have transported in part biological materials (including encapsulated bacterial spores) all over the solar system. Once you realise that little detail, it suddenly becomes much more likely that if you could support earth like life on that planet, that your damn well are going to find earth like life there.

      It's something to think about really, but without finding other proper habitats testing it's correctness may be difficult. We'll just have to wait and see I suppose.

      Quickshot

    11. Re:Why by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what we know about life is it is in essense the struggle to organize against the natural order of the universe to decay into chaos.

      I suppose if one wants to advance a mystical theory, that would make life possible everwhere. However, that is not a scientific theory.

      So life could exist anywhere in any imaginable form. One day we might be able to create "living" machines by our definition of life. Life is simply organized matter. And we haven't even explored all forms of matter in our little corner of our solar system let alone this universe.

      I would argue that we have explored pretty much all the forms of matter that are abundant in the solar system. We know the properties of HCNPOS to a high degree of certainty, and we know that the properties of electron shells are tightly constrained by what apparently is fundamental laws and forces of the univese.

      Thus it is quite possible to lay odds on how likely it is for life to develop in any location.

    12. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what we know about life is it is in essense the struggle to organize against the natural order of the universe to decay into chaos.

      I suppose if one wants to advance a mystical theory, that would make life possible everwhere. However, that is not a scientific theory.


      Is a virus alive?

      Its funny, based on various people's opinions about the definition of life a virus is both a lifeform and not.

      This scientific theory you mentioned, tell me, does it have anything to do with this definition of life I keep hearing about?

    13. Re:Why by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Is a virus alive?

      No.

      This scientific theory you mentioned, tell me, does it have anything to do with this definition of life I keep hearing about?

      No. He was responding to your statement about the "essense" [sic] of the struggle against entropy. To wit, your statement is not a scientific theory. He was not advancing any particular theory of his own.

      You stated, "So life could exist anywhere in any imaginable form," and that sort of unqualified blanket statement is probably true simply due to the unbounded nature of what you're saying. However, the real question -- the interesting question -- is the probability of life appearing at any specific location under specific conditions. And that was the point of the original parent post.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    14. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      But why is a virus not alive?

    15. Re:Why by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    16. Re:Why by Cyno · · Score: 1

      But that goes right back to the definition of life. Since a virus is not self-replicating we say it is not alive. However, if you change that definition very slightly a virus becomes a lifeform. How can we say this definition of life is the only definition of life? Who are we to define life?

      So if we find a pack of wild viruses running around on Mars we'll still consider the planet lifeless?

      What if we find a virus that replicates by leveraging other viruses in a sort of symbiotic relationship?

      Or a nanite that self-replicates?

      I think I disagree with our definition of life.

    17. Re:Why by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      If we slightly redefine "car", my car becomes an airplane. You can't really have a conversation if you insist on redefining everything. "Life" means something fairly specific. Again, the dictionary definition is pretty good, and rather clearly excludes viruses by implication:

      The property or quality that distinguishes living organisms from dead organisms and inanimate matter, manifested in functions such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli or adaptation to the environment originating from within the organism.

      You aren't going to find "a pack of wild viruses running around on Mars" because viruses don't do any of those things (form packs, run around). They just lay there, inert: lifeless. You also won't find a virus that replicates by leveraging other viruses, because by definition other viruses don't have the ability to replicate.

      Definitions are useful things. Words have meaning. You may disagree with the definition, but that doesn't make you right. I can appreciate an attempt to be clever or thoughtful, but these are basic questions, and maintaining a contrarian position is akin to beating your head against a wall.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  27. Mhmm...Acid Ice! by Lispy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Reminds me of long, hot, trippy summernights back in my teens!

    Lispy

  28. Acid ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like one hell of a trippy Margarita. I bet we can get a blender up there for less than 5 billion USD. Who's with me!

  29. You know, I'd never throught of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But given I've never heard of PH14, I guess you must be right!

    1. Re:You know, I'd never throught of that by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ph 14 would be the opposite of Ph 0. It is considered the most extreme side of the BASIC scale (opposite of the ACID side). It does exist, but the original poster was wrong in what he thought was the scale..

      The scale goes:

      Ph0 - Most acidic Ph7 - Neutral Ph14 - Most Basic

      Ph0 Ph7 Ph14

      Acid Neutral Basic

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  30. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by DR+SoB · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Your completely wrong, it's a sliding scale.

    7 = Neutral

    7 = Base.

    A Ph of 0 would burn directly through your cars engine block (solid steel!), no problem.

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  31. Attempt no landing here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because your probe will melt from the highly concentrated acid bath

  32. Volcanoes on Io responsible by TasosF · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sulfuric acid found on Europa was reported as far back as 1999 when this article was published on Science@NASA based on this NASA Press release. According to the article, sulfur from volcanoes on Io, another one of Jupiter's satellites, may be responsible for the environment on Europa.

  33. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by sbennett · · Score: 4, Informative

    pH 7 is neutral. 14 is 'completely' alkaline, and 0 is completely acid. pH 1 or 2 is a fairly strong acid (concentrated hydrochloric acid, for example).

  34. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by dtl · · Score: 0

    Nope. pH 7 is neutral pH 14 is highly basic pH 0 is Strong Acid

  35. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by xtermpie · · Score: 0

    You are indeed right :
    br> 0 Acid
    3.5 Neutral
    7 Base

  36. pH of near zero? by niom · · Score: 0, Informative

    pH is a logarithmic measure. Saying "A pH of near zero" is like saying "a near infinite number of people" i.e. nonsense.

    --
    -- Repeat with me: "There is no right to profits".
    1. Re:pH of near zero? by pclminion · · Score: 4, Informative
      pH is a logarithmic measure. Saying "A pH of near zero" is like saying "a near infinite number of people" i.e. nonsense.

      How so? pH = -log10([H+]) -- negative base ten log of hydrogen ion concentration. A pH of 0 would imply:

      pH = 0 = -log10([H+]) ==> [H+] = 1 mol/liter.

      H+ solutions which are more concentrated than 1 mol/liter will have pH values below zero.

      A "logarithmic scale" means that linear changes in the scale indicate exponential changes in some underlying quantity. For every change of 1 in pH number, the concentration of the solution changes by a factor of ten. Just because the graph of log(x) goes to minus infinity as x goes to zero doesn't mean a logarithmic scale has some kind of asymptote.

      Learn before you post.

    2. Re:pH of near zero? by Xandu · · Score: 1

      pH is a logarithmic measure. Saying "A pH of near zero" is like saying "a near infinite number of people" i.e. nonsense.

      Not quite. PH is logarithmic, meaning that something with a pH of 4 is 10 times more acidic than pH 5. However, the scale is shifted (unlike the standard logarithm, like the log button on your calculator). Google pH, and you'll find many websites which explain the pH scale, like this website.

      --


      --Xandu
    3. Re:pH of near zero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hogwash!

      pH = -log(c) where c is the concentration of H+ in mol/l. So pH near zero is about 1 mol/l H+. A negative pH is possible.

    4. Re:pH of near zero? by pclminion · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Hogwash!

      What is the pH of hogwash? Are hogs acidic or basic?

      Anybody know?

    5. Re:pH of near zero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen, we've identified a humorless ass.

  37. pH meaning by Walkiry · · Score: 4, Informative

    The pH is the negative of the base 10 logarithm of the H3O+ ion concentration in water. At any given point, the pH + pOH = 14, and both the pH and pOH of neutral water are 7.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  38. ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE by vaxer · · Score: 4, Funny
    Looks like we got good advice:

    ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS EXCEPT EUROPA
    ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE
    USE THEM TOGETHER
    USE THEM IN PEACE

    But do you think sending a metric shitload of baking soda and red food dye counts as attempting a landing? Because I, for one, would LOVE to use Europa as a gigantic science-fair volcano.
  39. so, so confoused... by nphinit · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not sure what to make of this. I visited Europe several times in the past few years with my Uncle Tim. I'll admit the water in Scottland tasted abit funny but the place didn't strike me as acidic. I didn't smell much sulfer either, i think the author is mistaken about that one! as for intelligent life in england there is some but not so much in france. maybe this article on acidic europe is what the hackers call a "troll"?

    1. Re:so, so confoused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The water in Scotland tasted a bit odd??? London, yeah - it tastes like shit there, but give or take the odd bit of plutonium (which isn't our fault) the tap water even in major cities in Scotland could be bottled and sold as Mineral Water in most other European countres...

    2. Re:so, so confoused... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what to make of this. I visited Europe several times in the past few years with my Uncle Tim. I'll admit the water in Scottland tasted abit funny but the place didn't strike me as acidic

      Rosanne? Rosanne Rosanna-Danna?

      Oh ... Nevermind.

      (Slashdot readers born after 1975, please Google on "Gilda Radner".)

  40. What is this basic of which you speak???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you mean Alkaline?

    1. Re:What is this basic of which you speak???? by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same thing, different text book. It is called Alkaline, or "basic"..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  41. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by AJWM · · Score: 5, Informative

    What scientific illiterate modded this "insightful"?

    The pH scale runs from 0 to 14, with a pH of 7 being neutral. The number is actually an inverse exponent and has to do with the concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) in solution. (You could also use pOH, relating to the concentration of hydronium ions (OH-), the relationship is pOH = 14 - pH).

    --
    -- Alastair
  42. Nope by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A pH of 0 indicates a concentration of hydronium atoms in water of 1 (in moles/litre).

    I think you're confused:

    pH = -log10([H3O+]).

    pH can be = 0 if [H3O] = 1. Of course, getting to pH 0 is mighty hard, but getting near it is very possible.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard at all. Concentrated HCl is 12mol/l giving a pH -1.

    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah sure is, I mean, our human chemists make acids that put the pH scale in shame. But things like acid lakes and stuff formed more "naturally" usually have a hard time going that low.

  43. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by LouisZepher · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, I think there's two scales for pH. One states that 1-4.9 is "base", 5 is neutral 6-10 is "acid". The other is 0-5 "acid", 6-10 "alkaline".

    Confused the hell out of me in Bio class when the chart in the textbook was different from the charts the teacher was using on the OH lecture. Then again, it's been a few years, so I may be wrong.

  44. Acid.. by iLEZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Acid? What? Ok! Im Listening, go on.

    --
    You cant fight in here, its a war room!
  45. Let's go there instead of Mars by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Plenty of nice swimming, and all that rocket fuel present for the return trip.

  46. Gasoline oceans on Titan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheesh...

    no wonder Bush wants to go to Titan!

    don't strike a match... we might have a second sun!

    1. Re:Gasoline oceans on Titan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ding!

      I can light matches and throw them into buckes of gasoline all day long and simply watch them go out.

      Gasoline is NOT FLAMMABLE or EXPLOSIVE.

      it's fumes or gasoline in it's gasious state is.

      Please learn chemistry...

    2. Re:Gasoline oceans on Titan... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      You go do that, OK?

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    3. Re:Gasoline oceans on Titan... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > it's fumes or gasoline in it's gasious state is.

      If you are on a planet covered in gasoline, chances are pretty good that a good bit of it has evaporated. Especially if you are able to survive long enough (ie, close enough to 1atm pressure) to strike a match, the gasoline will evaporate. You are right, in a way, but it was a joke close enough to the facts.

  47. Shooting into space by xC0000005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not just land him on Europa? "All these planets are yours. Except Europa. Attempt no landings there. But then again, since it's covered in acidic ice, poisonous gas and is so radioactive it glows in the dark, do you really want to land there?" - 2001, (new living translation).

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  48. And a monopropellant to boot by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 5, Informative
    I was thinking the same thing. H2O2 is not a particularly powerful (high-impulse) fuel, but if you could refine it you could use it as a source of energy to make something more potent (LH2 and LOX). It would also be a great way of running a self-powered rover/hopper; if it came to a crevasse or other impassable feature, it could use rocket power to jump over it.

    This assumes that the concentration is high enough to be recovered and purified using the available local energy. That may not be the case.

    1. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well the solution seems simple to me. H2O2, AFAIK, does not require another oxidant to burn. So it may serve as a useful fuel, especially in a vacuum environment.

      Also, since 2 H2O2 can become 2H2O + O2, you can get oxygen and water, both useful. Finally, with the expenditure of energy (freely available if you burn H2O2 as a lone energy source), you can use electrolysis to get H2 and more O2 from the water.

      Sounds to me like a sweet deal.

    2. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      ...unless you start a chain reaction in the 'atmosphere' and incinerate the whole planet. Wasn't there a certain amount of uncertainty about the potentially global atmospheric effects of detonating a nuclear device when the time came to do that for the first time? :D

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    3. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's something I hadn't thought of. Europa going up in flames.

      I don't think it's possible. Or, rather, I don't think it'd have that much impact. After all, asteroids must be pounding into Europa fairly frequently, as geological timescales go. And the H2O2 is still there.

      I don't think your nuclear analogy is very apt. We didn't understand nuclear science very well at that time, but we have thorough understanding of the behavior of chemistry at the polyatomic scale.

      Probably the biggest problem they'll face is that they just don't know much about the physical conditions. Is the surface covered with ice dust, or is it solid? Are there reactants in the atmosphere? is there a complex airflow pattern over the planet? (i.e. wind, weather.) What about fluid flow below the surface? What the hell does happen when a couple million tons of magma causes a warm convection flow below the icy surface?

    4. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On second thought, if you apply electrolysis directly to the H2O2, you may get your H2 and your O2 without the waste heat of 2H2O2 becoming 2H2O + O2

      But if you're talking about a manned facility, you'll want that H2O. You can get it from the original reaction, or from fuel cells.

    5. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Funny

      The grandparent was making a Scientologist joke, before anyone else spends too much time thinking about this. I know no one saw Battlefield Earth, but at the end Ayn Rand uses the Stargate to lauch the nuclear bomb back up the Klingon homeworld, and the sexual energies cause a tachyon reaction in the dilithium crystals and all the the Klingons' air explodes.

      Then probably some jock kid who made fun of her at the begining claps and then everybody starts clapping and they all learn the true meaning of Christmas or something. I don't really know, I scratched the end of the DVD up pretty badly with a steak knife trying to voodoo-stab L. Ron in Hell.

    6. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Such a use of H2O2 will be inefficient because you will loose energy while electrolysis. The overall efficinecy will be very low. it would be better to use some catalytic process.

    7. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      *lmao* mod this shit up :D

    8. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should read the book, Old john real fucked it up. The book rocks and is one of the best sci-fi books written. The book and the movie share one thing in common, their proper nouns.

    9. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1
      Hahaha, poor you

      Or you will be soon if you're a Scientologist!

      There is no end to the bridge. There is no crossing. It just keeps going until you're out of funds. Or if you're SeaOrg, until you're old or frail, then they'll kick you out onto the street. If you haven't seen that happen yet, you will soon...

    10. Re:And a monopropellant to boot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > you could use it as a source of energy to make something more potent (LH2 and LOX)

      LOX?? Holy Cow, just tell the Jews & the bagel shops and we'll be there in a few months!

      *JEEEEWWWS IIIN SPAAAAAAAAAAACE*

      (apologies to "History of the World, Part 1" fans and Jewish people)

  49. Acid...not just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such educational films as "Acid: Not just for Hippies Anymore" or "Hydrochloric Acid Dissolves all Evidence."

    1. Re:Acid...not just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn gotta love this new troll

    2. Re:Acid...not just... by dfay · · Score: 1

      Atomic Man: "My eyes ... The goggles--they do nothing!"

  50. Can't have two theories by paiute · · Score: 3, Informative

    Two theories have been put forward.

    You cannot have two contradictory possible explanations and have them both be theories. What you have are two hypotheses.

    The hypothesis that fits with the evidence might become a theory.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Can't have two theories by devilspgd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless I'm mistaken, you can have two hypotheses which both fit the evidence. In the absence of further evidence, you have two valid theories (although ultimately at least one must be incorrect, or at a minimum incomplete)

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:Can't have two theories by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, at least that's the theory.

      KFG

    3. Re:Can't have two theories by zx75 · · Score: 1

      And if both hypothesis fit the evidence as far as our understanding allows us in this time frame, we have two competing theories.

      One theory may be more or less plausible than the other, but if both fit the evidence equally well, and are equally valid at explaining what we have observed, then we do indeed have two theories.

      Do not mistake theory for cause, a theory is an unproven statement, although mathematicians like to confuse the issue by calling proven theories 'Theorems'.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    4. Re:Can't have two theories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theories are contradictory? Wait . . .

    5. Re:Can't have two theories by paiute · · Score: 1

      ...a theory is an unproven statement...

      Sigh.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    6. Re:Can't have two theories by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right, I was in a hurry. What I was trying to get across was the 'unproven' bit, that because two theories are conflicting (and possibly mutually exclusive) that does not negate the use of the term 'theory'.

      Theory : An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    7. Re:Can't have two theories by mikeg22 · · Score: 1

      You cannot have two contradictory possible explanations and have them both be theories.

      Yes you can. For example, there are many theories of evolution (no I'm not talking about ID or creationism...those certainly are not theories).

      As you said, a theory is just a hypothesis that has stood up to testing. It is possible to have two hypothesis that are contradictory that have stood up to available testing. Only theory will stand the test of time, but there is plenty of room for more than one theory in most of science, especially the theoretical branches like quantum mechanics.

    8. Re:Can't have two theories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a scientific context, a "theory" is an explanatory framework of underlying principles which ties observations together and allows you to make predictions about the behavior of the subject under study.

      The term does not connote, much less denote, the state of being unproven. Notice how your meaning is buried way down in Websters' meaning 6b?

      Main Entry: theory
      Pronunciation: 'thE-&-rE, 'thi(-&)r-E
      Function: noun
      Inflected Form(s): plural -ries
      Etymology: Late Latin theoria, from Greek theOria, from theOrein
      1 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
      2 : abstract thought : SPECULATION
      3 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art
      4 a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action b : an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances -- often used in the phrase in theory
      5 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
      6 a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b : an unproved assumption : CONJECTURE c : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject

    9. Re:Can't have two theories by mentaldrano · · Score: 1
      ultimately at least one must be incorrect, or at a minimum incomplete

      Strictly, that is not true either. It is possible to have two theories which accurately describe reality in different ways, and have them both be correct. The important thing is that the predictions of each theory must be the same in all cases. Sometimes it is possible to prove that the theories are equivalent, as with the wave and matrix formulations of quantum mechanics, which makes the theories homologues.

  51. Blond aliens. by xC0000005 · · Score: 1, Funny

    So there really is *no* chance of intelligent life on Europa.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
    1. Re:Blond aliens. by madpierre · · Score: 1

      Sounds just like Essex then.

      --
      siggy played guitar
  52. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by forkboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not quite. pH is a scale for dilute acids and bases. 1M HCl would have a pH of 0. I've gotten 1M on my hands before...it's not that bad. Concentrated HCl is in the negatives as far as the pH scale goes. (pH=-log[H+]) The H+ concentration would be the same as the acid concentration, in this case 13M. -log(13)=-1.11

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  53. Acid fields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda misread that as "Europe's acid ice fields" and I was like, acid, ice and fields are all good together in the same sentence, and in my own backyard too.

  54. Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa? by jgardn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it is possible for organisms to survive this kind of acid here on earth, are there organisms that can survive zero pressure, low temperatures, and high background radiation?

    What if some bacteria escaped earth's atmosphere -- maybe a meteor kicked it up, or it was randomly carried by wind up and out of the reach of earth -- and settled on Europa, Mars, Venus, or some other planets?

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  55. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by NSash · · Score: 1

    IIRC, I think there's two scales for pH. One states that 1-4.9 is "base", 5 is neutral 6-10 is "acid". The other is 0-5 "acid", 6-10 "alkaline".

    The "other scale for pH" you're thinking of is pOH. Just subtract a pH level from 14 and you have the equivalent pOH level.

  56. Ok, mod me down by niom · · Score: 1

    I was wrong. Thanks to all who posted informative responses without being too much of a jerk.

    --
    -- Repeat with me: "There is no right to profits".
  57. Isn't it rather sad ... by phoxix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that we've become more obsessed about life on other planets, than life on our own planet ?

    Sooner or later we'll just be what we've created in the movies: A group of living things going from planet to planet stripping it of its resources.

    Sunny Dubey

    1. Re:Isn't it rather sad ... by drfishy · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that?

    2. Re:Isn't it rather sad ... by peragrin · · Score: 1
      As a southern bumper sticker I once read said. Earth First! we can strip mine the other planets later.

      I let Setiathome run on my computers because I have given up hope of finding intelligent life here on Earth.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Isn't it rather sad ... by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't it rather sad ... that we've become more obsessed about life on other planets, than life on our own planet ?
      Sooner or later we'll just be what we've created in the movies: A group of living things going from planet to planet stripping it of its resources.


      Tell you what: when we do, you can take Ark B, m'kay?

      For those who don't get the HHGttG joke: http://www.sadgeezer.com/hhg/golgaf.htm)

      --
      -Styopa
    4. Re:Isn't it rather sad ... by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      so you'd stay behind to be eaten by the approaching space goat?

      or would you rather die of a rather virulent plague passed by unsanitized telephone handsets?

    5. Re:Isn't it rather sad ... by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      that we've become more obsessed about life on other planets, than life on our own planet ?

      Yeah, it's practically impossible to get news about Earth these days.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  58. ohhhh by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...there are terrestrial extremophile bacteria which thrive in highly acid environments."

    Let's leave the Haight out of this, shall we? :)

  59. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

    Ahh, that makes sense. Thanks for clearing it up.

  60. Post joke analysis... by nphinit · · Score: 1

    Let's gather 'round and examine why this joke failed.

    1.) I didn't use the term "ice fields" at all in the post. A line like "i saw no ice fields in dublin!!" might've been nice.

    2.) A reader thought I was actually dissing prestine Scotland water.

    3.) Another reader made a pre-1975 SNL reference. I thought that show started in the early nineties, the brainchild of Adam Sandler.

  61. Way to go, /. editors - Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Two theories have been put forward. One says that the acid has been formed at the surface layer from oceanic salts reacting with the intense radiation from Jupiter, the other that sulphuric acid is coming directly from the ocean, with the water reacting with sulphur produced from undersea volcanos

    Actually, if YRTFA, it mentions three theories. The third is that the sulfur came from Io.

  62. Surviving in high concentrations of acid by Syberghost · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa, it is not ruling it out completely, as there are terrestrial extremophile bacteria which thrive in highly acid environments."

    Such as UC Berkeley.

    1. Re:Surviving in high concentrations of acid by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      My roommate used to say that only two good things ever came from Berkeley: BSD and LSD

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  63. and Titan looks like Sweden! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting

    or Canada... same thing, really.

    http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2533735

    Saturn Moon 'Could Look Like Sweden'

    By John von Radowitz, Science Correspondent, PA News, in Seattle

    A probe due to land on Saturn's moon, Titan, could discover a world that looks "a little bit like Sweden or Northern Canada", one of the mission's scientists said.

    The Cassini spacecraft is due to reach Saturn in July after an epic journey lasting seven years.

    On January 14 next year, the American orbiter will send a European lander parachuting down to the surface of Saturn's largest moon, Titan - one of the most mysterious bodies in the Solar System.

    No-one knows for certain what the probe, called Huygens, will find as it drops through Titan's smoggy methane and nitrogen atmosphere which is four times thicker than the Earth's.

    But scientists have found new clues using the Earth's biggest radio telescope as a giant radar to bounce signals off the moon's surface.

    Images from the 300-metre wide Arecibo dish in Puerto Rico indicate the presence of seas and lakes - but not of water. These would be seas of ethane and methane liquified by Titan's frigid surface temperature of minus 179 degrees Celsius.

    If Huygens lands in such a lake of liquid lighter fuel it will float on the surface, taking photos and collecting data. Scientists hope the probe would also survive an impact on soft ground or snow, but landing on a hard or rocky surface would destroy it.

    Dr Ralph Lorenz, a mission scientist based at the University of Arizona in Tucson, USA, yesterday described what he expected Huygens to encounter.

    Despite Titan being such an alien world, its physical appearance was likely to be similar to parts of the Earth, he said.

    He told the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual meeting in Seattle: "I think what we'll see is a rugged, but muted landscape.

    You don't have the sort of freeze and thaw shattering process that gives you lots of sharp mountains.

    "I think we'll see a lot of impact craters. Impact cratering occurs everywhere in the Solar System and on Titan, being a fairly sluggish environment, erosion is fairly slow.

    "A lot of these will be filled with liquid to form circular lakes, rim-shaped lakes, bullseye lakes; horseshoe lakes. So I think we'll see something maybe a bit like Sweden or Northern Canada."

    He said the probe would hit the surface at five metres per second. "If we landed on a solid lump of ice or a rock then its got to be all over," said Dr Lorenz. "If we landed on snow or something like sand then we should survive and continue to transmit data."

    Nearly half the size of Earth, Titan is the only moon in the Solar System with a thick atmosphere. Scientists believe there may be a deep layer of water ice beneath the hydrocarbon surface.

    An intriguing possibility is that asteroids or comets hitting the surface might have melted the water ice and cause it to mix with the methane and ethane. This could theoretically give rise to organic chemicals - including amino acids, the precursors of life.

    Dr Lorenz said 20 gaseous organic chemicals had been detected on Titan, and many more may exist in solid form on the surface.

    However he thought although the first steps towards biology may be seen on Titan the world was too cold for the development of life itself.

    "If you were to introduce microbes down there they might survive, but the question of how life evolves is a different story," he said.

    1. Re:and Titan looks like Sweden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Like Sweden, of course except the trees, the blue clean air, the occassional bears and elks, and all the Viktoria Silvstedt lookalikes.

  64. Dumb conclusion by amightywind · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...One says that the acid has been formed at the surface layer from oceanic salts reacting with the intense radiation from Jupiter, the other that sulphuric acid is coming directly from the ocean, with the water reacting with sulphur produced from undersea volcanos. Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa, it is not ruling it out completely, as there are terrestrial extremophile bacteria which thrive in highly acid environments

    The chemical composition of the Europan surface as revealed by earth-based spectrascopy may bear little resemblance to the bulk chemical makeup of the surface ice or ocean beneath. Photochemistry due to Jupiter's radiation environment only operates very close to the surface. How anyone can come to the conclusion that the result is "bad for Europan life" when such life may lie many kilometers beneath the surface is beyond me.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  65. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes! I want to have your babies. You have any idea how MUCH it annoys me when people can't tell the difference between a theory and an hypotesis in science?

    Sorry, got a bit carried away, that's one hell of a pet pevee of mine.

  66. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by MoP030 · · Score: 2, Informative

    close....
    pH = -log([H+]), where [H+] is a usual way to denote the Proton/Hydrogen cation concentration. So for pH 7 we have the natural concentration of 10e-7 mol/l of H+. The pH may however be larger than 14 for very strong bases and smaller than 0 for strong acids. For the latter case, it simply means that [H+]>1 mol/l. Concentrated hydrochloric acid has a negative pH e.g.
    Also, Hydronium ions are hydratized H+, H30+, while OH- are called hydroxide ions.

    --
    the most sexp i get is my paren-mode.
  67. Just checking by doru · · Score: 1

    Anyone else parsed the title as : "Places in Northern Europe where they have giant acid parties" ?

  68. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Okay, it's been a while ('98) since I dabbled in chemistry, but don't you hit a kind of asymptote at some point?

    As far as I remember, pH is only valid in a water sollution (although there might not be much actual water), and at some point you simply cannot make it more acidic/basic, as the H+ or OH- ions have absolutely nothing to bond with.

    Or am I just talking out of my ass here?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  69. Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We named our new email server Europa. I guess I know how it will die now, don't I?

  70. Re:Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,.. by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roy Schieder, maybe; but I'd rather shoot Rob Schneider into space...

  71. Interresting take. by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

    At first I read the headline as "Europe's Acid Ice Fields" - And I thought we had some real news!

  72. No wonder by Washizu · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Jupiter's moon Europa may be highly acid with a pH of near zero"

    Now we know why we shouldn't set up a base there.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:No wonder by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      ahh.. we tried.... all our base are belong to neutralization.

  73. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by MoP030 · · Score: 1

    doh..., i forgot
    so suppose you have 10mol/l hydrochloric acid, HCl. It will be almost comletely dissociated, hence you have a H+ concentration of 10mol/l => -log(10) = -1. so the acid has a pH of -1.

    --
    the most sexp i get is my paren-mode.
  74. Only brunettes and redhead need apply by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    and have a surface layer of hydrogen peroxide.

    And yet, oddly, there are no blondes.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Only brunettes and redhead need apply by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      we dont know yet. only after we've successfully sent a probe will we know if the drapes match the rug.

  75. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, you're stupid.

  76. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 0

    I really doubt anything could have escaped earth's gravitational field.

    Remember that rockets etc use continuous trust to get out. If something gets "kicked up" by a meterite it will not have continuous trust but only an initial velocity which will keep decreasing from the earth's gravitational force and the drag from the atmosphere. Also the air drag forces are proportional to velocity, so the fastest the initial velocity is, the faster it will get decreased by air drag.

    Now the problem is not only excaping from the atmosphere, one must escape from earth's gravity as well. That is a piece of debree that escapes from the atmosphere, will likely end up in some kind orbit around earth. In order not to get caugh in such an orbit, the piece of debris must be going even faster!

    If you assume that these processes of debris getting "kicked up" are more or less random, it follows that if a highly unlikely thing such as a piece of debris escaping earths gravity has happened, than the less unlikely thing, that is a piece of debris escaping the atmosphere and getting caught in earths orbit would happen much more often. But, as far as i know, nobody has found earth debris in orbit around earth (excluding of course man made stuff). So it is pretty safe bet to say that no piece of earth has naturally escaped the earth atmosphere.

  77. Re:Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,.. by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I fail you boy for being a geek. it was 2001 that the obelisk was found on the moon, but we haven't gone to the moon in 30 years so we don't know if it is there or not. Second it was 2010 when the second start was formed out of jupiter. WE got time left.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  78. Re:With apologies to (Monty) Python... by GerritHoll · · Score: 1
    Stop with your incessent Monty Python quotings, you silly english kaniggets.

    "I'm a Perlist, don't you recognize my outraguous code, you silly king" ;-)

  79. Instant Atmosphere! by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am no chemist, but with all the hydrogen peroxide on the surface, we just need to send an initial landing party of astronauts with lots of cuts and scabs.

    As soon as the H2O2 hits the infected areas, instant oxygen and water!

    A few hundred battle-scarred individuals and we'll have an inhabitable atmoshpere.

    1. Re:Instant Atmosphere! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      ow, just ow

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  80. Life forms that thrive on acid by Apostata · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay, so either we're talking about Syd Barrett or H.R. Giger .

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  81. This could be home for Aliens. :-) by crovira · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean they have acid for blood, right?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:This could be home for Aliens. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't kiss a Europaen...

    2. Re:This could be home for Aliens. :-) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Which means that they'd be cake for shotguns loaded with magnesium pellets. You'd think someone would have tried a box of Arm & Hammer on them...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  82. If only people wanted to go...? by mynameis+(mother+... · · Score: 2
    IAMDNAC [most def... chemist] but-

    Wouldn't this combination of abundant peroxide and sulfuric acid, make for easy 'fuel' production?

    IIRC, you can use a catalyst to crack peroxide into steam and O2. And I know SA is like the 'Mister Log' of chemicals; but I am pretty sure it can be made to exothermically react with water. ['NEVER pour water into concentrated SA' warnings, et al.]

    I think I just invented the 'far-toxide' rocket. [typed while digging around to find IP attyn's bcard]

    To sum up:

    1. H2O2 + catalyst = Steam + O2
    1. H2SO4 + Steam = Heat + ionsofstuff

    Anyone chemically-enabled out there do the math and figure out how much output you get from it? That involves invoking knowledge which makes me think of a green compliment to tortilla chips, and not much else.

    Another thought- environmentally powered 'melt' for a probe?

    1. Re:If only people wanted to go...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I think I just invented the 'far-toxide' rocket.

      That's a funny coincidence, because I had chili for dinner last night, and invented the 'fart-oxide' rocket.

    2. Re:If only people wanted to go...? by Aerion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IIRC, you can use a catalyst to crack peroxide into steam and O2. And I know SA is like the 'Mister Log' of chemicals; but I am pretty sure it can be made to exothermically react with water. ['NEVER pour water into concentrated SA' warnings, et al.]
      . . .
      Anyone chemically-enabled out there do the math and figure out how much output you get from it?


      Hydrogen peroxide will be decomposed by ... well, just about anything. Fine metal powder, maybe activated charcoal, organic solvents, etc. The most obvious catalyst for H2O2 decomposition is light, which is why commercially-distributed bottles of the stuff are brown. Heating it above 80 C or so will also do the trick. So that part ought to be easy.

      The decomposition happens to be exothermic, giving off about 98 kJ per mole of H2O2 decomposed. (Standard heat of formation of O2 (g) = 0 kJ/mol, of H2O (l) = -286 kJ/mol, and of H2O2 (l) = -188 kJ/mol.)

      The heat of solution of sulfuric acid is -95 kJ/mol, so you'll get 95 kJ per mole of sulfuric acid you can put in solution. (1 mol H2SO4 is about 98 g.) Of course, that heat of solution is assuming that you have pure liquid H2SO4. If it's already in solution, the heat production is dramatically reduced.

      Whether or not that kind of energy is enough for your purposes... depends on what you want to do with it. There's certainly a more efficient method.

    3. Re:If only people wanted to go...? by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 0

      early chemical rockes used a silver screen to catalyze the combustion of h2o2

  83. snot-tites by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    Look it up on google. They live in house of the lighted cave in mexico. They're a symbiotic relationship between a fungi and an archaebacteria. fascinating stuff. they hang like giant loogies from the ceiling waving back and forth in the gentle breeze eating sulfur off the roof of the cave.

    http://www.geo.utexas.edu/chemhydro/Annette/pisa ro wicz6.jpg

    http://www.geo.utexas.edu/chemhydro/Annette/micr oh abitats.htm

  84. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    it's proven as fact that Earth got meteorites originating on Mars.

    the only way to prove it worked the other way would be to find meteorites on Mars that originated on Earth... but we dont have the resources to do that yet.

    heck, we might have meteorites on Earth that originated on other solar system bodies, but we dont have enough data to make sure yet.

    so i wouldnt discount the remote possibility that one of the big meteors that hit Earth during prehistoric times could have kicked up enough debris out into space, and that some of it might have found its way to Europa, and other solar system bodies.

  85. No, it isn't. by dexter+riley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that we've become more obsessed about life on other planets, than life on our own planet ?

    To really understand something, it helps to know where it came from. Finding a second instance of life in the solar system could help us better understand how life on Earth originated. We have theories about how nucleic acids led to simple replicating 'organisms', but to find one on a world like Europa or Titan would be invaluable in determining whether these theories are right or wrong.

    Sooner or later we'll just be what we've created in the movies: A group of living things going from planet to planet stripping it of its resources.

    Which resources? All the sunlight that gets radiated to empty space? Or the water and minerals on the lifeless worlds that might compose 99% of the planets in the galaxy? Besides, if (as the tone of your post suggests) you believe that life is the most valuable resource that Earth contains, shouldn't we be exporting it to those places that don't have any?

    1. Re:No, it isn't. by radja · · Score: 1

      >you believe that life is the most valuable resource that Earth contains, shouldn't we be exporting it to those places that don't have any?

      wot? and break the monopoly?

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  86. Rusty Dust on Mars indicates lots of OXYGEN! by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe someday we will extract the oxygen from Mars and Europa for our own purposes.

  87. Oxygen's not even all that good for us by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you ever get a severe burn that removes the top layer of skin, first aid will include an airtight dressing. Oxygen on unprotected tissue hurts.

    By the time you get past the lungs, oxygen is locked into special carrier molecules and shuttled to mitochondria. Most parts of your body aren't exposed to it, and even so there's cumulative cell damage from oxidation that's been theorized to be a cause of aging.

    We've adapted to it, even "learned" how to get energy from it, but we did that with wrapper layers.

    Oxygen-releasing algae were the ultimate environmental catastrophe.

    1. Re:Oxygen's not even all that good for us by rev_reverse · · Score: 1
      We've adapted to it, even "learned" how to get energy from it, but we did that with wrapper layers.

      we don't even get energy from it. all it does is just bind well with the hydrogen ions and electrons that the Krebs cycle is done using.

    2. Re:Oxygen's not even all that good for us by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      We've adapted to it, even "learned" how to get energy from it, but we did that with wrapper layers.

      Oxygen-releasing algae were the ultimate environmental catastrophe.

      So maybe if we don't clean up our act and end up polluting almost everything on earth into extinction a few creatures will learn to adapt and start a whole new kind of life going.

      Something that figures out how to live off of all of the acid rain we're producing...

      Hey! Maybe Europa is the end result of a civilization like ours! Perhaps that's where the monolith makers came from? The warning might just be because they don't want us fucking around with their stuff while they're away from home cruising the galaxy.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  88. Why does it matter? by fredmosby · · Score: 1

    It's not like anyone else is using those resources.

  89. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by AJWM · · Score: 1

    Also, Hydronium ions are hydratized H+, H30+, while OH- are called hydroxide ions.

    Of course, you're right.

    (Note to self: finish morning coffee before posting to /.)

    --
    -- Alastair
  90. Well I for one... by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our acid drinking overlords !

    (Well somebody had to say it...)

    1. Re:Well I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I for one welcome our acid drinking overlords !

      If you drink this stuff, hellacious overlords welcome you!

  91. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by Corvus+V+Corax · · Score: 1

    This is plain wrong. Quite the opposite is true.

    To leave earths atmaosphere AND its gravitational force you just have to be accelerated above escape-speed (look in any physics school-book about that one) and the impact of a meteorite is likely to speed some rocks up enough.
    On the other side to enter an orbit you need less than escape speed, thats correct, but you have to look what the characteristics of an orbit are. its an elypsical path around another object in space (or better the combined center of gravity)
    where the object passes through the same point in space (relative to each other) every circulation.

    So if a rock is accelerated on impact with less than escape-speed, one of this points is the origin, which happens to be on te planet surface, which means on circulation later (or more likely much sooner since it will approach from the other side) it will hit it again -- boom -- end of orbit -- recombination !

    To enter a real orbit you have to get distance between you and your planet, and then gather up speed sideways, to not hit it again - for example by rocket thrust or another collision (very unlikely)

    The only case where this doesnt happen (and the only case of past-impact-matter being in a stable orbit i know) is when the "rock" getting thrown out is so huge, that its mass inflics the whole planets movement itself, splitting one planet into 2 literally.
    They say earths moon was created that way by impact of a 3rd planet several thousend kilometers in diameter.

  92. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by pz · · Score: 0

    What if some bacteria escaped earth's atmosphere -- maybe a meteor kicked it up, or it was randomly carried by wind up and out of the reach of earth -- and settled on Europa, Mars, Venus, or some other planets?

    Basic celestial mechanics would suggest that if anything were ejected from Earth, it would be very unlikely to have enough energy to escape much beyond Earth's orbit, and would, more likely, decay toward the Sun instead. That's the hypothesized mechanism for the few (terrestrial) meteorites which have been identified as having Martian origin. Therefore, based only on the sequence of planets from the Sun, we'd expect Earth ejecta on Venus and Mercury, but probably not Mars, and probably not on any of the outer planets' moons. Additionally shrinking the probability of hitting an outer planet's moons is the large gravitational well from the outer planet itself. Add then, to that, the difficulty of getting through the asteroid belt without being deflected, and it becomes not impossible, but overwhelmingly improbable that anything from (geologically modern, life-bearing) Earth has made it to Europa.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  93. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

    There's no asymptote; the pH/pOH scales are logarithmic, so the ion concentrations change exponentially with pH and pOH. Asymptotes occur for functions like 1/x^n, not 10^x.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  94. Oops, scratch that lol by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    /me goes back to sleep...

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  95. Someone had to say it, I guess. by x136 · · Score: 1

    I guess all our base don't belong to Europa!

    *dodges thrown tomatoes*

    --
    SIGFEH
  96. For god sakes no! by twoslice · · Score: 2, Funny
    We should send a probe loaded with Red Devil lye to help even things out.

    What we have here is the worlds largest battery! what we need to send is lead. Instant power source for the entire planet.

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  97. Limit, yes by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a limit to pH, but it is not so hard and fast. Since pH refers to concentration in water, it is possible to displace more and more of the water with acid solute. There should be either a limit of solubility for the solute or a notion of all solute, no water that limits the extreme of pH for a given solute.

  98. Idiotically wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should make sure that third base isn't your own ass before offering answers. pH is not a scale with hard limits at 0 and 14.

    Here is a guide to posting.
    1. Collect clues
    2. Double check
    3. Post
    4. Profit

  99. Alien life on Europa by TheLastUser · · Score: 2, Funny

    With concentrated acid for blood... Don't look into the egg! Don't look into the egg!!!

  100. Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acid and all that. but what about the mountain made of diamond?

  101. I'm a bit suspicious about this... by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article presents three hypotheses for how sulfuric acid might get into Europa's oceans. The first is that Io ejects it, and it ends up falling onto Europa. Another is that precursor salts are present in Europa's ocean and intense radiation converts them into acid. The third is the one that leaves me a bit suspicious. From the article:
    Jeff Kargel of the US Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Arizona, believes the sulphuric acid is coming directly from the ocean. He thinks that Europa's heart is rocky, with undersea volcanoes releasing sulphur-containing compounds and oxygen that react with the ocean water to form sulphuric acid.

    "Europa has an Io hiding underneath the ocean," he says. If the surface sulphates have come from the water deep below, Europa's ocean might be an "acidic sulphate brine".
    The bit I put in boldface is suspicious. Io is volcanic because of the effects of it moving through Jupiter's inhomogeneous gravitational field, which causes stresses that are sufficient to heat up and melt Io's interior, creating the conditions for volcanoes. This effect was predicted by Professor Stanton Peale of the University of California, Santa Barbara just before Voyager arrived and took pictures of Io. But Professor Peale ran the same calculation for all the moons in the solar system, and the only one that came up as possibly volcanic was Io.

    Interesting aside: Professor Peale narrowly made the window before Voyager took the now-famous pictures. He had done some work earlier on Earth's moon, then applied the same calculation to every moon in the solar system. But for historical reasons, orbital data about the Galilean moons are recorded differently from those of every other moon in the book where Professor Peale looked up the numbers to check each moon. He only noticed this months later, and when the calculation showed the possibility of a volcanic Io, he had to rush to try to get his prediction published-- ANYONE can write a paper explaining why a given moon is volcanic, but Professor Peale had actually predicted that Io was volcanic before anyone knew if it really was.

    Anyway, the idea that Europa has a rocky center (with a molten interior) doesn't seem very likely to me. I've sent an e-mail to Professor Peale asking what he thinks, but I just did that, and he has not replied yet.

    --Mark
    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    1. Re:I'm a bit suspicious about this... by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

      D'oh...

      I just got an e-mail back from Professor Peale. He's going on a trip and will respond to my questions about this Europa story when he gets back on Thursday. Oh well...

      --Mark

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  102. The forgotten addendum by pokeyburro · · Score: 4, Funny

    "ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS--EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE."

    "SERIOUSLY. THE WHOLE PLACE IS COVERED IN ACID. WE LOST FIVE CRAFT BEFORE WE FOUND OUT."

    "WE'RE JUST SAYING."

    (ps - pretend this text isn't here. It's just lowercase stuff meant to get around the lameness filter so's I can tell this (admittedly lame) joke. Damn you, /.! Damn you to helllllll!)

    --
    Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
  103. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flawed idea there, if I just get a big enough rock, we'll be getting rocks having escape speed for this solar system, let alone escaping this puny planets orbit, so getting rocks further out isn't a problem. And in fact NASA had a calculation showing that so many kilogram or tons of earth material were dropped on mars each year. Forgot the exact number, sorry.

    Quickshot

  104. Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May not be good for life forms terribly similar to those here on Earth. But then again how likely is it that life's the same everywhere? Why not nitrogen, silicon, or for that matter argon based forms?
    ~M
    (artiloop.blogspot.com)

    1. Re:Life? by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because a key requirement for a molecule to be the base of life is it's ability to polymerize - ie form long-chain molecules. Carbon is very good at this at earthlike temperatures, which is why it became the basis of life on Earth. Silicon, I hear, can be convinced to do so at high temperatures, which means it could concievably give rise to some sort of life.

  105. Re:Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,.. by Pope · · Score: 1

    Does this mean Dr. Chandra = JAFO?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  106. Finally! 2001 Explained. by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, all that acid on Europa certainly explains David Bowman's trip during Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.

    1. Re:Finally! 2001 Explained. by wishus · · Score: 1

      Well, all that acid on Europa certainly explains David Bowman's trip during Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.

      This is the funniest thing I've read in 2004. The pun on the word "trip" just pushes it over the top.

      Thanks!

  107. Hydrogen peroxide? by cavac · · Score: 1

    Isn't that used to make blondes? I'm sure, the cosmetic industry would like to have a word with Mr. Bush about NASA's future plans...

    --
    Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  108. Life in harsh environment by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    It's known that bacteria can survive in a harsh evironment, for instance in the Rio Tinto, or in undersea vents, but that bacteria more than likely originated from somewhere else and then adapted itself to the harsh surroundings - in other words it already had a head start. It may be more difficult for a new life form to evolve from scratch in a harsh evironment.

    1. Re:Life in harsh environment by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > It may be more difficult for a new life form to evolve from scratch in a harsh evironment.

      Wasn't Earth a "harsh environment" when life supposedly originated? Also, wouldn't a harsh environment cause more/different chemical reactions to occur? Maybe that is what causes life?

  109. Highly acid? by oniony · · Score: 1

    Highly acidic, surely.

    --

    Powered by onion juice.

    1. Re:Highly acid? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      high on aciiiiid

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  110. Acid everywhere? by popo · · Score: 1

    ... well if there is life on Europa its trippin' its balls off.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  111. Sounds Familiar by anakin513 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, creatures able to withstand powerful acids, maybe using it for, say blood.... I can't place my finger on it... sounds familiar.

  112. Not Bacteria, Archaea by Anthony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A completely seperate _Domain_ of life, only recently delineated from bacteria an eukaryotes. Analysis of acid mine drainage sites have found these microbes living in pH -3.5, and actually actively drive down the pH themselves. See http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/archaea/archaea.html. Jill Banfield, a Macarthur Grant recipient, has done quite a bit of work on this.

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  113. Hmm... by Cyno01 · · Score: 0

    Thats probably what happened to Io, some punk alien kids came and dumped an asteroid sized chunk of baking soda onto it.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  114. Re:Acid ? pH zero ? by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

    C'mon Mods, I'm flattered that at the time of this post someone modded my post +1 Informative, it was a waste of a Mod Point. Half a dozen of others said more-or-less the same thing I did, on top of that, what I said was only half-accurate.

    Anyone with points left, feel free to mod my parent post back down, hell, mod it as redundant.

  115. Let us gather around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and work out why your trolls aren't even trolly enough to get modded as such... What's worse than getting a negative moderation??? Being totally fucking ignored, perchance...

  116. Not quite USSR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On surface of Europa; the ice melts you!

  117. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 0

    why some hypothetical 3rd planet? why couldnt it have just been mars colliding with the earth?

  118. Re:Wilst reducing the chances of life on Europa,.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I fail you! In 2001 there were monoliths, not obelisks, not quite the same thing!

  119. Negative pH by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    To an analytical chemist, a pH of 0 is nonsense--it's too imprecise to be of much use. However, a pH of 0.0 is indeed possible.
    I'm not sure whether abandoned mine waters count as natural, but solutions with a pH of -3.6 are known to exist outside the laboratory.

  120. Would 2001 even work? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    Given the monster Van Allen belts and the radiation environment, could humans even contemplate getting near Europa without getting fried?

  121. Coca Cola by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    I remember testing Coca Cola with pH paper in grade school science test -- don't know if it was near 0, but it shocked us how acid it is.

    I had asked for a "second opinion" on some filling replacements and this dentist matter-of-factly states "don't know if it is that urgent as you don't drink soft drinks." I wondered how he knew that, but it seems that Cokes and such and do a number on your teeth, and it isn't just the sugar.

    1. Re:Coca Cola by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Most colas has phosphoric acid added to them. Additionally, carbon dioxide dissolved in water becomes carbonic acid. You have two potential sources of acidic hydrogen.

      While the urban legend about dissolving a tooth in a glass of Coke overnight is false (check out snopes), it cetainly is acidic enough that long term drinking WILL cause excessing tooth decay.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  122. Misc. guesses about H202's utility by chadjg · · Score: 1

    Yep, it could be a great way of powering anything, including a hopper.

    Maybe a James Bond style hopper. It looks like it might be possible to build something that is not thermodynamically efficient, but has an insane thrust to weight ratio. If fuel is easy to come by, who cares about efficiency?

    While I lack any real idea of how to build a spacecraft, maybe a small rig couldn't afford the overhead of a system that could refine H202 into something more potent. Would catalytic decomposition be enough? Would it be possible using the stuff on Europa?

    According to our wiki friends, H202 can be some nasty stuff, which makes it fit right in on Europa!

    In my opinion going to Europa would be a waste of resources. If we have X available to do space exploration, we can do a lot better than going to some hell hole in a bad neighborhood.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    1. Re:Misc. guesses about H202's utility by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If fuel is easy to come by, who cares about efficiency?

      The interstellar environmentalists.

  123. Little Johnny by MrByte420 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Little Johnny was a boy,
    He isn't anymore,
    For what he thought was H20
    Was H2SO4.

    --
    If religous zealots don't believe in Evolution, then why are they so worried about bird flu?
    1. Re:Little Johnny by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > For what he thought was H20

      H 20? I didn't know hydrogen could DO that.

  124. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by pz · · Score: 1

    Note I'm not saying it is *impossible*, just improbable. With a big enough impact, ejecta could have enough energy to escape the solar system, but an impact with that amount of energy is very, very improbable. Given that it takes a fair amount of energy for ejecta to escape Earth, one would expect to see more terrestrial material on Venus than on Mars, but it does not make the ratio 1:0. There's a big difference between improbably and impossible, and, regrettably, many people don't understand that.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  125. Sulfuric acid = Aluminum Spacecraft by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article mentions that they think the acid is H2SO4. I know from putting aluminum flashing into H2SO4, that it doesn't dissolve. It just sits there even if you add water or heat the acid. That's why I was annoyed when the aluminum rowboat dissolved in the acid lake in the movie Dante's peak. It would have been fine on that lake for days and days if not longer. I don't know if it is because the aluminum coats itself with aluminum oxide and oxygen and sulfate both have a -2 charge, or what. I know HCl eats aluminum lickety split though as does HNO3. I think they should just make the lander out of aluminimuminiminimuninimimum

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  126. No shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that we CAN'T define laws on things we havn't observed. We can't make up new laws on how life forms based on what we MIGHT see IF it happened. Observations are called that for a reason: They're observed, not made up.

    Until we go down there and something tries to eat us or something, all we can do is pontificate on our existing knowledge.

    1. Re:No shit? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess that's the difference between some religions and science.

      But if we haven't observed most of the universe then how can we define universal laws, such as the conditions necessary for life?

  127. Out of date information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not likely due just to the sheer amount of acid that's been found now. NASA then thought it was little more than trace acidity, which could easily be explained by fallout from Io. But newer observations show that the acidity on Europa is far and above even the most generous estimates, and the distribution of the acid suggests strongly that it's comming UP out of Europa's interior, and not being deposited there by an exchange of material with Io (although that could certainly be a contributing factor, it's not a significant one).

  128. Mars to Earth is easier than Earth to Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth has three times Mar's gravity, meaning it takes a much bigger (and rarer) impact to throw material from Earth out into space.

    Material blasted off from Mars gets to ride the sun's gravity down to Earth orbit for a pot shot at us. A meteorite blasted off from Earth has the sun working against it, and it has two ways to get there (bearing in mind that it gets all its energy during the impact, and that it only gets an invisible fraction of the impact force):
    1. Get accellerated to a fast enough speed that it will spiral outwards from the sun at least as far as Mar's orbit.
    2. Get blasted all the way out past Mars, and spiral inwards to hit Mars.

    Provided it gets out there, Mars is a smaller target, but that may be balanced by the fact that it lacks a large moon that could block or deflect impacts. Phobos and Deimos are there, but that's like two bullets colliding on the battle field. Sure, it can happen, but don't expect it to save the general.

    But we're talking about Europa, which is another ballgame alltogether. Our little rock (With its very fragile cargo of life, which will be VERY lucky not to be reduced to a nondiscripb blob of carbon before even leaving Earth) has to get all the way out to JUPITER's orbit.

    Once there, it has to survive a plunge through the Jovian system itself. Jupiter's gravity sucks up most of what goes through, and barring that, there are still three other major moons and a host of smaller objects to dodge. It's almost like firing blind into the air and having the bullet come down on one specific fly buzzing around an Elephant a mile downrange.

    Can it happen? Sure.

    Is it likely? A bit more likely than me walking out the door of this room and defracting ten degrees off normal.

  129. melting the ice by cazzazullu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    embed your lander in a large quantity of something that has pH 14. The heat generated in this reaction could get some serious melting done. Or use this as a source of energy.

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
  130. Re:Organisms escaping earth and settling on Europa by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > why couldnt it have just been mars colliding with the earth?

    Because Mars would then not exist.