Slashdot Mirror


Emulate Nintendo on Your MessagePad

Green and Geeky writes "That Marvel of a PDA, the Newton MessagePad, has always been a good product. It does a lot of things: plays MP3s, connects to the Internet wirelessly, can be used to bludgeon someone, fits in your pocket (if you're a giant), etc. Now, it plays Nintendo games. Strange, yes, but still pretty cool. I can't play Legend Zelda, Final Fantasy, or Dragon Warrior on my Palm V." And I don't need to waste money on a Game Boy Advance!

217 comments

  1. Bandwidth Fun by TPIRman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Newtendo has hit the big times! However, earthlink just let me know that if I get much more traffic this month, I'm gonna be shut down until next month.

    Well, it was nice knowing you.

    1. Re:Bandwidth Fun by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nintendo does not profit from emulation of their games.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    2. Re:Bandwidth Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually, if he gets shut down today, he'll be back in 2 days, right?

    3. Re:Bandwidth Fun by sYn+pHrEAk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nintendo does not profit from people buying their 15 year old games from a thrift store, either.

    4. Re:Bandwidth Fun by byolinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another example of the inconsiderate slashdotting factor.

      Would it really be such a pain for pudge/whoever to setup a little mirror before slashdotting the fuck out of the poor guy?

      That said, it seems like a good project... maybe I'll buy my friend Dr Mark a Newton now -- he never had a NES.

      "Eat up Martha"

    5. Re:Bandwidth Fun by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Nintendo does not profit from emulation of their games.

      They don't profit from it, and they don't have to pay for the advertising.

      Seems like quite the synergy to me!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:Bandwidth Fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You've just hit a FAQ!

    7. Re:Bandwidth Fun by Keybounce · · Score: 0

      No problem, that was posted Feb 28th. So, even if they shut you down til next month, well, it's March as I post this.

      'Sides, I wouldn't even have loaded your site if your post hadn't let me know that there was a link back in the article :-).

      Michael

  2. Anyone figured out how to... by podperson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...install Newton OS on an iPaq?

    The iPaq's with ARM chips are basically a Newton with a color screen and more memory. Then we really wouldn't need a GBA.

    1. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by BlueGecko · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Newton uses a huge number of custom proprietary chips relating to things such as its operating system and Newton data soups that have thus far made emulation entirely impossible. The mere fact that the iPaq uses an ARM chip won't allay those problems.

    2. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by podperson · · Score: 4, Informative

      The operating system is ROM. The data soups are implemented in software.

    3. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by WileyWiggins · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh, and it doesn't run anything even remotely similar to the Newton OS.

      What I want is a little handheld computer that runs Mac OS 6. It wouldn't be that hard to do and you have a literal ocean of abandonware out there you could use with such a device.

    4. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by FortissimoWily · · Score: 3, Funny

      " ...install Newton OS on an iPaq?

      The iPaq's with ARM chips are basically a Newton with a color screen and more memory. Then we really wouldn't need a GBA."

      Well, you wouldn't need a GBA or anything related to it in this instance anyway - the article is about a NES emulator. ;)

    5. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The iPaq's with ARM chips are basically a Newton with a color screen and more memory. Then we really wouldn't need a GBA. "

      A small handful of people who are willing to go with inadequate controls rejoice!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Basilisk runs macos classic on linux systems with X11. All you'd need is to install linux with an X environment on your pda, then port basilisk to it, which should be in the realm of the doable. As for actual speed, who knows, but it would be a cool hack indeed.

    7. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... with hooks to proprietary data command sets instructing custom chips onboard to do things ... that you can't ... do ... on other PDA's ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your PDA? You mean Vulcan Flipstart, don't you? There's no PDA that can run X well enough for this, but the Flipstart, being a PC, could do the job. IIRC, Basilisk doesn't need much, though - the Win32 version ran OK on my old P75 with 16MB RAM, except the hard drive was filled to the brim and then some.

    9. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by X86Daddy · · Score: 3, Informative

      What I want is a little handheld computer that runs Mac OS 6. It wouldn't be that hard to do and you have a literal ocean of abandonware out there you could use with such a device.

      Merry Christmas

    10. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by kabdib · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, the Newton has one truly custom chip (which does memory interfacing, DMA, interrupts, timers, A/D for the tablet and so forth).

      The kernel makes extensive use of the ARM 610's MMU (especially its domain and sub-page-granularity protection features), so porting the OS to another platform would be quite exciting, but the application (Newtonscript) world is pretty isolated from the wacky stuff going on the OS. You could probably fake-out a fair amount of the OS and the apps would run.

      Here's a reference to a paper on the Newton OS that we presented at CompCon in 1994.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
    11. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by Cramit · · Score: 1

      I think they were reffering to the fact that you can emulate NES on a GBA, here are the sites: gameboy-advace.net

    12. Re:Anyone figured out how to... by pantherace · · Score: 1
      Excepting floating point a StrongArm (206 MHz) will badly beat that p75 in almost anything.

      Not to mention a PDA *already* runs Basilisk 2 http://www.killefiz.de/zaurus/showdetail.php?app=6 15

  3. Here it comes by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I smell a cease and desist letter on it's way, $5 bucks says the term DMCA will be used ATLEAST once!

    1. Re:Here it comes by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Informative

      Given the number of NES emulators out there, I doubt this one is very special.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Here it comes by mriker · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Nintendo has much better things to do rather than chase after a black-and-white emulator which emulates a console that was made almost 20 years ago, and is no longer in production (along with its games). There are approximately 2.47 billion NES emulators already available on various platforms.

    3. Re:Here it comes by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I smell a cease and desist letter on it's way, $5 bucks says the term DMCA will be used ATLEAST once! "

      I doubt it. Emulators are not illegal. ROMs are not illegal. Illegal is when you use an emulator to play a ROM you're not licensed to have. I don't even think the DMCA would be involved here unless somebody bypassed a protection scheme to get the ROM uploaded. That, however, is up to the original infringer, not the guy who makes it available for download.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Here it comes by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      in fact, the silhouette SNES emulator for mac os began as a nintendo project. that's why the developers are anonymous.

    5. Re:Here it comes by oobar · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. Copying the ROM image is what's illegal. Copyright does not govern the *use* of the item. (In fact it provides everyone with the specific right to copy a program from e.g. the hard disk to RAM for the purpose of running it.) Presuming that you had legally obtained the ROM image there is no law that would prevent you from using it with an emu.

  4. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most Slashdotters are too young to remember the NES

    1. Re:Amazing by TheBoostedBrain · · Score: 1

      What about SNES. I remember it. Is there an emulator for any PDA?

      --
      -- When did Ignorance Become a Point of View?
    2. Re:Amazing by stonebeat.org · · Score: 5, Funny

      the old Slashdotters never left the slashdot.org. They were just modded down.
      Surf safely. Don't Slashdot and Surf

    3. Re:Amazing by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Funny

      Aye, but some of us don't need to emulate as we still have them :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Amazing by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      there is an SNES emulator for the tapwave zodiac, And there are also SNES emulators available for PocketPCs The zodiac though has the best layout for SNES IMO. The snes emulator for the zodiac is currently being beta tested, and runs very well.

    5. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In my day, we didn't have fancy consoles with DVDs, pretty colors and 64bit 3D graphics. We had 8 colors, all em' shades of green! and a controller with 1 button that would only go right but that didn't matter cause everything on screen was just a undecipherable blob ... and thats the way it was and we liked it!

    6. Re:Amazing by HorrorIsland · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You have just inspired my new sig. Thanks!

    7. Re:Amazing by jefdiesel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most slashdotters are too young to remember The Newton

      --

      I hate spyware and spies
    8. Re:Amazing by WorkEmail · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree, most of us were raised on that damned thing. Let me say a few things that will trigger some huge memories for a lot of people. Karnov, Ikari Warriors, Captain Skyhawk, Spy Hunter, R.C.Pro AM, and many many more. Anyone between 21-30 right now most likely spent a reasonable amount of time playing this system. I was born in 1979, so I did get to play on the Atari beifly, but this was really my original, the first system I was hard-core on. In my opinion the best consoles ever, in no order are, The NES, the Genesis, the Dreamcast, and the Xbox. Yes I know you hate MS, but the Xbox rules, and it did a lot for online gaming.

    9. Re:Amazing by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not dead yet! I feel happy! I feel happy! [thwack!]

    10. Re:Amazing by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Some, no doubt, but for those too young to, I suggest you read my sig (or if you have sigs off, just go to consoleclassix.com :P and you can play all the NES games you want for free online, if there's a cart available).

    11. Re:Amazing by WorkEmail · · Score: 1

      Nice! I will do that for sure. Thanks for the info! :) I read an awesome article on www.gamespot.com once about the history of the NES and it's japanese version that came out a little earlier called the SuperFamicon. I think that the NES was Nintendos best system to date. I have all of their consoles. I also love the Gameboy Advance SP. In my opinion, for a handheld to be worh while to purchase, it needs to be backlit, I swear, I could not see anything on the first gameboys and on the Gameboy color, or the advance, you had to almost have on of those miners helmets with the light on them to play the thing. lmao.

    12. Re:Amazing by WorkEmail · · Score: 1

      No, we all know that PC games are better, especially better for online play. For many mant reasons which I will not go into and are also obvious to anyone who has played Xbox Live. There were several articles written by Wired Magazine about MS's real motivation for making the Xbox. And it was to get a new breed of online gamers hooked, and also to incorporate themselves into the living room by adding a DVD player to it. MS knows that the xbox live games and service is not as good as PC online games. But it does have fairly good graphics, full voice chat with headset, and friends list and many chat and game features that in my opinion are well worth 50 dollars a year to play all of their LIVE titles online as much as I want. It is also nice to sit on my couch sometimes and hold a controller, I am an old school gamer, so I dig it. But the games are not as nice and Gaming Clan friendly as PC games are, and MS knows it. They are trying to get people to but more computers, and that is what the Xbox has done. They aim it at the 15-17 year old kid who lives at home and cannot use mommy and daddy's computer for games, but can plug his xbox into their router or the cable modem when they are not using it, and can go to a retailer and pay 50 bucks and play some online games. These are the same gamers who will withyin a year or two will end up migrating over to PC games after a taste of the online environment. :)

    13. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you said Karnov and I thought I was one of the few who loved that game. And RC Pro Am, I loved that game too.. Not to mention Mike Tyson Punchout. You brang back so many good memories.

    14. Re:Amazing by pez · · Score: 1

      Chips and dips anyone?

      [If you don't recognize the reference, it was slashdot before slashdot]

    15. Re:Amazing by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Funny? I was just playing Duck Hunt the other day. Broke 500,000 points. Best gun game ever.

      I've been playing lots of nes recently. It's too much of a PITA to reach behind the tv to toggle the manual RF switcher for my atari or intellivision.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:Amazing by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Yea I didn't really intend the comment to be "funny" but I think people liked it and didn't know where to put it :) Kudos on the duck hunt score :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    17. Re:Amazing by WorkEmail · · Score: 1

      I think Karnov was one of the most underrated games on the NES. I logged countless hours on it. It was a true classic, and didn't get the recognition it deserved. As well as R.C.Pro Am. I loved the graphics for the time, and the control scheme was weird too remember it, the car didn't steer in relation to itself, it steered kind of like a tomb raider game, where up was always up, etc.

    18. Re:Amazing by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

      I have Snes9X running on my Zaurus 860 now... FFIII, Zelda, Chrono Trigger, Super Mario World, all the great games run just like they do on the console. You can get it for your Zaurus here. Also available are NES, GameBoy/GBA, Genesis, MAME, Atari 400/800/XE and even a Scumm emu for Monkey Island, The Dig, etc. After all, it does run linux and a lot of apps can be ported to run on it. Check out the Zaurus Software Index for more cool stuff.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    19. Re:Amazing by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      I was born the year NES came out in the US (1986), and with a brother 4 years older than me and grandparents that liked to spoil, I was literally raised on the NES system. Metroid, Super Mario Bros... wow. Before I could even speak I was playing them.

    20. Re:Amazing by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I need to emulate one because mine kept dying. :P But to capture that lovin' NES feeling, I bought a Dreamcast and put all my ROMs on one CD. mmmm.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    21. Re:Amazing by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      I think Karnov was one of the most underrated games on the NES

      I was always fond of MC Kids -- probably the best platform game by anyone other than Nintendo themselves. Too bad it's chock-full of advertising for McDonalds. Oh, well -- if you can choke down your irritation at collecting Golden Arches rather than coins or rings, it's a fun game.

      --saint

    22. Re:Amazing by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      There were several articles written by Wired Magazine [wired.com] about MS's real motivation for making the Xbox.

      There were several articles in Wired about how push technology was going to make the web browser obsolete, too.

      Anything Wired gets right is plain luck, it seems to me. It's like letting a retard run a wildcat oil drilling operation.

      --saint

    23. Re:Amazing by F1reF0x · · Score: 0

      There is of course also NesEm which works wonderfully on my tapwave. I have every NES game I played as a kid ... in the palm of my hand. Not to mention the fact the games look better smaller :)

      --

      Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit bucket.
    24. Re:Amazing by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Technically, I think the SP is side-lit, not backlit, but I agree :)

      I'm really gutted now, the NES went the way of my Star Wars toys, marbles, Lego, Amiga 500, Atari ST...parents sold them at boot sales and such when I "outgrew" them...

    25. Re:Amazing by fshalor · · Score: 1

      So, a sub 999 user consipracy? :)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  5. Nintendo games? bah.. by TheBoostedBrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's not the same without the original gamepad

    --
    -- When did Ignorance Become a Point of View?
    1. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hmm, I had forgotten how crappy NES games really were. Take away the color and the suckage forms a black hole. Just get a GBA if you want to play games. Sheesh.

    2. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      ...and get a flash card for the GBA, upload an NES emulator plus tons of games, if you still want to play them.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're telling me. I mean, where's the fun without the arthritis?

    4. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by WorkEmail · · Score: 1

      I somewhat agree. It would be nice to play them on the original gamepad. I don't see how it would be played on some of the handheld PDA's. I love the Gameboy Advance SP, if you have a serious interest in playing Nintendo games on the go, get that. Awesome screen, you cna play it fine in the dark, amazing battery life, comes with the rechargable batteries, it is amazing.

    5. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by sYn+pHrEAk · · Score: 1

      Can't use this for a PDA but as for your PC emulating pleasure, try this.

    6. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      There's a gamepad attachment for the Sony Clie. It comes pretty close to the NES gamepad. It's perfect for the Palm GB emu.

    7. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by CrezzyMan · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      ->www.chuma.org, ranting and Newtons, what more could you want?
    8. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      ...and get a flash card for the GBA, upload an NES emulator plus tons of games, if you still want to play them.

      Why would you need a NES emulator? Just play Gameboy Advance games. They're 100 times better than the NES games, AND it'd be in color.

    9. Re:Nintendo games? bah.. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Huh? NES games are color too, you may be mixing up with old GB games. In any case, there's lots of good games for the NES, and they're pretty small, so you can fit a lot on, say, a 256mb flash cartridge.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  6. Still another example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...of Apple products having a longer life.

    1. Re:Still another example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      versus what?

    2. Re:Still another example... by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "...of Apple products having a longer life. "

      That's more a testament to the fans than to the engineering of the product. No doubt Apple is an innovative company, but when you choose the underdog, you fight harder for it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Still another example... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "That's more a testament to the fans than to the engineering of the product. No doubt Apple is an innovative company, but when you choose the underdog, you fight harder for it. "

      Why is this flamebait? I just complimented the users here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Still another example... by Lussarn · · Score: 0, Troll

      The newton is a "never has been", no life now, yesterday or in the future.

  7. Portability is a bit of a pain... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I actually quite like the Newton, though I think it was a bit ahead of its time and tried to do too much. It's a cool hack to get it playing Nintendo games, but would you really walk around with a bag to hold the 'pad, to play games on ?

    It's useful when allied with a briefcase. I can't see it really as a games platform (on the other hand, my phone plays Doom quite well, (Nokia 9000 :-) so whatever floats your boat - the phone's easier to carry though :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Portability is a bit of a pain... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Posted with no karma bonus...

      Well, this is massively off-topic. I'd reply in email, but you're being cowardly...

      The reason it's "forgetting" you is probably due to you having a dynamically-assigned IP address, and it changing from time-to-time. If you come in with the same IP address, I guarantee it will remember you - if you keep returning with different IP addresses, I don't see how it can "remember" you...

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Portability is a bit of a pain... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, thanks to my work, Johnstown, OH now seems to be assigned to a bunch of DHCP IP addresses, and it RARELY forgets me.

    3. Re:Portability is a bit of a pain... by mjoecups · · Score: 1

      Why not use your Bluetooth cable phone as a gamepad. This old Monster still has a couple of serious tricks left up it's sleeves...

      --
      If your hear it, fear it. If you see it, flee it.
  8. MIRROR by chrisopherpace · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://hnsg.net/~cpace/ninendo/ I'm only on a 512 line, but this should hold for a while, lets keep earthlink off his back!

    1. Re:MIRROR by chrisopherpace · · Score: 4, Informative

      shit, forgot the clickable one. HERE. preview, preview, preview, i know.

    2. Re:MIRROR by chrisopherpace · · Score: 3, Funny

      actually, if you substitiute 127.0.0.1 for hnsg.net, it doesn't have to resolve, and you can attack hnsg.net faster, without putting a load on your DNS server. ;)

  9. Google Cache Version by CeleronXL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why doesn't Slashdot link to Google cached versions of pages instead of slamming webmasters using little Earthlink accounts with ~10 MB of bandwidth? Oh well. There's the google version.

    1. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you mirror the home page, he's still gonna get slammed once people click on the links to other pages. esp. the ones with the screenshots.

      slashdotted in 3...2...1

    2. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could read the FAQs

    3. Re:Google Cache Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All an irate webmaster would have to do is say that Slashdot essentially copied his page (cache or no) and benefitted from it for their own subscribers. Smells like a lawsuit. Now you know why Slashdot doesn't cache.

    4. Re:Google Cache Version by powerg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All an irate webmaster would have to do is say that Slashdot essentially copied his page (cache or no) and benefitted from it for their own subscribers. Smells like a lawsuit. Now you know why Slashdot doesn't cache.

      I understand the reasoning for "playing it safe", but the slashdot effect is nothing to be taken lightly. It's really an "unintended" DDoS. Someday Slashdot is going to get sued because of it, and I'll be glad, because only then will we actually get some sort of mirror or cache links. The editors wield the power of the slashdot effect irresponsibly and recklessly.

      What Slashdot ought to do is train (gasp!) their editors to evaluate each story they post and decide if there ought to be a mirror or cache provided. They could even contact the author or webmaster of the site before they post it!

      Go ahead, mod me down.

      --
      Wild Eeep!
    5. Re:Google Cache Version by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      I think a system should be set in place for slashdottings. Here's a rudimentary I'm making up as I type. For each slashdot article NOT from a major news source (news.yahoo.com, msn.com, and the rest, as oppsed to say, the one we're commenting on) should require some type of agreement. On the website linked, the editor could go to /slashdot.html (per email instructions from the submitter to the webmaster) and see an agreement to slashdot, or an agreement to slashdot with cache.

      Obviously my plan has a bunch of holes in it but it was something I came up with on the fly. I think a plan like that would benefit everyone.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  10. Newton's still the best. by Dan+Crash · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you've never actually seen the latest version of Newton handwring recognition in action, take a look here under Newton Usability. "Eat up Martha", my ass. Makes Graffiti look like the kludgy hack it is.

    And did you know you can sync your Newton with iTunes wirelessly? Even the latest iPod can't do that.

    Apple got everything right with the Newton except the size. What a foolish mistake they made cancelling it as a product instead of redesigning it in a slightly smaller form factor.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    1. Re:Newton's still the best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The size is what makes the last Newtown's stand out. The large screen is what made the handwriting so effective - you had real estate to write the words out on. The small screens from the palms really required the use of Grafitti for input.

      Plus, my Newton can't get lost in my coat pocket. I always know where it is.

    2. Re:Newton's still the best. by Blic · · Score: 1

      Ah, I fondly remember my MP2000, but it was way ahead of it's time - it tried to do too much and was too large. Palm got it right - started with just core functionality in a small size and grew from there. The other thing that killed the Newton is Apple's other big problem - it was damn expensive. =)

    3. Re:Newton's still the best. by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right. I really like the fact that my Zaurus runs Linux (I've actually had a use for zethereal!), but it sucks that I pretty much have to use the keyboard for input. I can't read my own printing most of the time, and my Newton can. I'm just flabbergasted.

    4. Re:Newton's still the best. by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      If you've never actually seen the latest version of Newton handwring recognition in action, take a look here under Newton Usability.
      I thought the latest version of Newton's handwriting recognition is built into OS X. It's called inkwell.

    5. Re:Newton's still the best. by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      I would love to see an updated Newton that has the screen (true 640x480) and form factor of the Sharp Zaurus SL-C860, the features (802.11, Bluetooth, Voice recorder, you can skip the camera)& battery life of the Sony Clie TH-55 and the handwriting recognition of the Newton.

      Ahh, one can dream....

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    6. Re:Newton's still the best. by primordial+ooze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple got everything right with the Newton except the size. What a foolish mistake they made cancelling it as a product instead of redesigning it in a slightly smaller form factor.

      True story - I was a Newton developer back in the day, and while on a business trip to the west coast, I damaged my Newt (cracked the screen by dropping it against the corner of a marble table) just before a client presentation. I called the folks in Cupertino and they very graciously agreed to take a look at it. I drove down right away, and was met by someone from developer relations who swore me to secrecy because there was a huge "NEWTON INC." banner hanging in the lobby - yes, this happened just a day before Apple announced the rollout of Newton into its own subsidiary.

      Anyway, she took me down to the repair lab, where a couple of very interesting fellows proceeded to open my machine and replace the screen while I waited. As they worked, I looked casually around and in addition to the regular zoo of MPs and eMates, I spied several devices that made me drool - at least two different tablet devices (one roughly letter-sized and one even larger) and a large wristwatch sized device with a screen and a Newton logo.

      I was very excited because as a developer, I knew that the NewtonOS was designed in such a way that it could support displays of almost arbitrarily large or small sizes (I think that when figured at ~80dpi the largest display can be almost a couple hundred meters on a side). The layout of screen elements in a Newton app is done using relative coordinates, so the same sw will run full-screen on an MP130 or a 2x00 even though one has a display half again as large. A well-written app can even make decisions about which elements to display, if there is too little screen real estate to show all the controls at once. God, I loved NewtonScript!

      Anyway, none of the Newton folks would answer any questions - they were in serious info-lockdown mode, and I didn't press, figuring that I'd hear about it soon. Alas, it was not to be, for Jobs had just returned to power and shut down the Newton Inc. experiment before it ever got off the ground.

      Wouldn't it have been great if they had been allowed to try? Contrary to popular belief, the Newton division was starting to generate substantial positive revenue and Sandy Bennet, head of the Newton Group, gave a presentation to the board showing that all R&D costs would be paid off in less than 5 years - pretty good in the consumer electronics industry for a completely new platform. Alas, Jobs had just returned to power and saw Newton as part of his now-enemy Scully's legacy. Like the new alpha lion of a pride, he felt he had to kill all his predecessors offspring.

    7. Re:Newton's still the best. by Dan+Crash · · Score: 1

      At the end of Defying Gravity, I'd read that the Newton group was already talking about designing a smaller Newton immediately after the original MessagePad launched, but you're left wondering how far they ever got with that idea.

      It sounds like they might have continued work on the Newton Cadillac concept, as well as extending Newton Intelligence into other devices.

      Wouldn't it have been great if they had been allowed to try?

      Insanely great. :)

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  11. waste money a Game Boy Advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The're fun. And you can play a lot more than just 3 games on it. I don't know if advance wars works on the the Newton MessagePad, but considering that this is special, it probably doesn't.

  12. Windows CE by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pocket PC and Windows CE devices have been emulating PS1, GBA / GB, NES, Genesis, MAME, and many other consoles for a number of years now. Even PS1 runs incredibly fast due to the coding talent and dedication put in by various developers.

    While this may be news for this specific platform and OS, emulating NES is very old hat when it comes to the world of PDAs in general.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Windows CE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but the Newton predates these systems and that's what's extra cool about this story.

    2. Re:Windows CE by brandorf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are there really PocketPC devices out there with enough memory to waste with a CD image for a Playstation Emulator? I fould what seems to be the site for the main PSX emulator, but there's no mention of the process required to rip a gaime. I assume you have to manually remove all sound and video, but it still sounds like these games would be huge in comparison to say, SNES.

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
    3. Re:Windows CE by letdownjournals · · Score: 1
      Pocket PC and Windows CE devices have been emulating PS1, GBA / GB, NES, Genesis, MAME, and many other consoles for a number of years now. Even PS1 runs incredibly fast due to the coding talent and dedication put in by various developers.

      While this may be news for this specific platform and OS, emulating NES is very old hat when it comes to the world of PDAs in general.

      Right, but you can't have a story about an Apple product's features without the obligatory line, "Let's see (Windows, Microsoft, etc.) do this!"

    4. Re:Windows CE by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Some games were small, maybe 10MB. And yes, some games were full CD sized at ~650MB. However, there are certain models of PocketPC devices that interfaces with the 1GB+ storage memory modules. Control has got to be pretty bad on them tho. I read that a lot of them have trouble with simultaneous button presses.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    5. Re:Windows CE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that hasn't been true in about 4 years. Now, devices with button problems are in the minority (anything but Toshiba)

    6. Re:Windows CE by saintlupus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dan East

      Speaking of old NES games, you wouldn't happen to be related to Data East, would you? What a Bad Dude. A Radical Ninja, in fact.

      [/dork]

      --saint

    7. Re:Windows CE by madbeaner · · Score: 1

      the newton predates all these pda's. we're talking a device from that's at least 6 years old. if i started talking about the marvels of a current desktop computer, wouldn't it be obvious that it is more powerful, and therefore likely to run more advanced software than one years older? i don't see why this is so hard to see, to me it seems like uninformed Apple bashing.

  13. I miss my Newt. by Bug-Y2K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used a MP2000 as my primary computer for almost two years. I was "commuting" between the US & UK and used it - along with a Ricochet (R.I.P.) in the US and Nokia cell PCMCIA card in the UK - for browsing, email, telnet (with PT100, killer app!), etc. So I was wireless when mobile, and on Ethernet when at a desk... All pre-802.11. This was circa 1997 BTW.

    It was nice to carry virtually all my computing needs in a "daytimer" sized case. People bitch about the Newt's size, but compared to a circa-97 brick of a 7lb laptop? Is was VERY small.

    To date the NewtOS was pobably the most elegant OS ever created... and I've run them all. The only thing it didn't do well, at least until now, was gaming. I played a lot of NewTRIS, and I seem to recall a snood, or snood-like game too but Newtgaming was limited to puzzles or very simple action games (like a sub depth-charging thing that I can't recall the name of)

    I might have to charge it back up now and play some old NES game. =) Nice to see the Newt still breathing.

    1. Re:I miss my Newt. by UnassumingLocalGuy · · Score: 1

      I HAVE one of those "circa-97 brick[s] of a 7lb laptop", you insensitive clod!

      --
      "Hu, ho, ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Hu, ho ho-ah-oh-oh-oh. Mario Paint! Whoaaa!"
  14. "Best"? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Eat up Martha", my ass. Makes Graffiti look like the kludgy hack it is.

    Sorry, I have a MP2100 and the famous Simpson's reference was not far from the truth at all. You had to be exceptionally careful with your handwriting, and still often had to correct it. It would misinterpret taps, and it was impossible to correct letters out of order(say, you forgot to cross your t- out of order scribbling got me 90% of the time).

    Graffiti is not a "kludgy hack", its a system that is designed to quickly and accurately enter data, which is what a PDA needs; my Handspring was much better for most of the typical PDA usage- entering phone numbers or appointment times. Sure the Newton's natural system is faster for writing large amounts of text(assuming you have perfect handwriting) but people just didn't(and still don't) use PDAs for that sort of thing. They use- gasp- notebooks(and I don't mean the electronic kind)

    1. Re:"Best"? by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Its funny that the RS Zoomer { pre PDA } had a better reconizer.

    2. Re:"Best"? by Xyde · · Score: 3, Informative
      You must have only used it for 10 minutes. To correct an arbitrary word:

      1. Tap and hold next to the word until the pointer turn into a large dot. Then drag over the word to select it.

      2a. Rewrite the word. or,

      2b. Double in the selected word and select the correct word out of the list, or click the keyboard button to enter it with the on-screen keyboard, or click the underlined a and just rewrite the incorrect letter.

      Let's see, that's 3 ways to do it. You claim there are none. Do yourself a favour and give your Newton to someone who cares enough to spend 30 minutes discovering how to use it, instead of talking out of their ass.

    3. Re:"Best"? by primordial+ooze · · Score: 1

      Sorry SuperBanana, I too have a 2100 (have had several actually, and at least one of every other commercially released version of Newton hw - I was a Newt developer for several years), and the later versions of hwr (hand writing recognition) work great for me - I can easily correct letters "out of order". (The first version of newton hwr deserved the jibes but it was quickly updated to truly useful versions - public opinion damage was already done unfortunately).

      Have you tried tweaking prefs>handwriting recognition>options>fine tuning? Sliding the "Recognize my handwriting" towards "slower, more accurately" will help with recognition (you do have the Newt tuned to learn your hw, yes? That option is off by default). And also in fine tuning, if you slide "Transform my handwriting" towards "after a delay" you will have more time to make mid-course corrections. Taking the time to adjust these two settings (and those in p>hr>o>letter shapes) can make all the difference in usability.

      It's really unfortunate that Apple/Newton never took the time to create a good user tutorial on how to train the Newt hwr. Many people who came to our Boston user groups meetings back in the day would have a complete turnaround wrt their Newtons after we spent just a few minutes showing them how to effectively train the hwr engine.

  15. Nothing New by Kaboom13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I used to play Gameboy games on my visor deluxe, the lack of a color screen is probably all that kept a NES emulator from being developed. My PocketPC emulates NES, SNES, Genesis, MAME supported arcade machines, and probably a few others. I have a rom cart for my GBA that lets me play NES games on their as well. I applaud the author for writing an emulator for such an old platform, but it's nothing to get excited about.

  16. Gameboy for Palm OS by stuckpixel · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't play Legend Zelda, Final Fantasy, or Dragon Warrior on my Palm V.

    Um, actually you can. Gambit Studios has had a gameboy emulator out for the palm os for quite some time. Some of the older palms are a little sluggish, but it works.

    1. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And while you can't do NES games on the Palm V, Kalemsoft has an NES emulator for PalmOS 5 based devices. They also have a Game Gear/Sega Master System emulator as well. And with Tungsten E's being available for under $150 some places, that's a good reason to upgrade from the V. Color, tons more speed, more memory, and you can play MP3s on it as well.

    2. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Legend [of] Zelda, some Final Fantasy titles, and Dragon Warrior are all NES games. Zelda DX (Zelda for GBC) is a really weak and twitch-style version of a link to the past implemented with the graphics of The Legend of Zelda (orig. NES) and I think it sucks, but my girlfriend seems to like it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but that doesn't help. Legend of Zelda, Final Fantasy, and Dragon Warrior were all NES games. A Game Boy emulator does nothing to help you play those.

    4. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Zelda DX(Otherwise known as The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening DX) is a colorized version of the Gameboy game Link's Awakening from 1994, with a bit of extra stuff added.

      Maybe you should watch a little closer the next time she plays it.

    5. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've watched closely enough to know how uninspired it is. I have most Zelda games, including the GC titles, and I think I still have actual carts for all the old ones except N64 (I have the GC ports of them though) and some of them grabbed me (like the first one, and link on snes, and of course 64 and wind waker.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Gameboy for Palm OS by Jesselovesscripts · · Score: 1

      i have that emulator, and i have a newton, your post is retarted. on an m515 games run about 50% slower than normal. funny the 7 year old newton runs them quite well. what about the fact that the handwriting technology made it's way as far up as os x? AND XP?

  17. Re:Emulate Nintendo on Your MessagePad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You must be new.

    Welcome to Slashdot.

    Around here, people do things just to SEE if they're possible.

  18. Eulogy for the Newton by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Progress isn't guaranteed. Innovation, once it hits the marketplace, is not destined to take root. The Newton was the first PDA platform, and going on six years after its demise, it's still the best. It had, essentially, one deficiency, and that was in its size. This was easily rectifiable, especially with the technology of the day. It's death was the result of ego rather than sound business, and perhaps the largest mistake Jobs made in turning Apple around.

    Now, even though we have machines who's hardware is more than equal to the old newton, none have its ease of use, utility or ease of development enjoyed by the Newton. It's utility as an everyday computer in the modern age is a testament to Apple's software engineers, who Got It Right the first time out, and a condemnation of Palm, Microsoft, Symbian and Sharp, who still can't approach it so many years after its demise.

    SoupIsGood Food

    1. Re:Eulogy for the Newton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people still use newtons?

    2. Re:Eulogy for the Newton by steveha · · Score: 1

      Not just one deficiency. In addition to size, there was the wonky handwriting recognition, and the price.

      You can roll it up into one meta-deficiency: the Newton didn't make a good PDA. From comments I'm reading here, it makes a heck of a compact mini-laptop. But that's not how it was sold.

      The reason the Palm took off big-time is that the Palm made a great PDA. The size was perfect, the handwriting recognition was solid, and the price was reasonable ($300 at introduction). The Palm doesn't work as well as the Newton as a mini-laptop, though, so if that's what you want, don't get a Palm.

      I've always been annoyed that Steve Jobs killed the Newton outright, when there was a loyal core user base that wanted Newton to not die. A group of Newton developers got together and made a serious bid to license the Newton from Apple, and Jobs refused. I don't know if he expected to introduce an Apple PDA, and wanted Newton dead so it couldn't compete; or if he just didn't like the Newton since it wasn't ever his baby.

      The good news is that in the near future, you should be able to put together a Newton-like package: take one of the new small computers with a touch-screen (like the Oqo, which may actually ship someday) and run a GNOME system on a Linux kernel. Now run GNOME Storage. (I haven't used a Newton, so I don't really know how the "data soup" system works; if I'm wrong and GNOME Storage isn't Newton-like, perhaps there is some other free software project that will be Newton-like.)

      Once there is free software that is Newton-like, you can have your Newton happiness and no one can take it away from you.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:Eulogy for the Newton by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 2, Informative

      By the later generations of the Newton, the handwriting issue had ironed itself out, and the solution that Palm used had first seen the light of day as an add-on to the Newton.

      The price issue wasn't a killer, either, because the eBook was in the $800 range, and shrinking the package down to Palm (or even Psion) size would have halved the price (no keyboard or large touch screen.) The guts weren't too far different from the Psion, which was in a nice price point.

      The Palm was not a step forward, and the fact that even today that it relies on glyphic shorthand alphabets rather than true handwriting recognition, even though it has access to more horsepower than even the Newton 2100, is telling.

      SoupIsGood Food

    4. Re:Eulogy for the Newton by steveha · · Score: 1

      The price issue wasn't a killer, either, because the eBook was in the $800 range, and shrinking the package down to Palm (or even Psion) size would have halved the price

      But an $800 price point was (and still is, I'd say) too high for a PDA. And that was the eBook, not even the Newton proper. The Palm, at introduction, was $300; at that price it sold like hotcakes.

      If Apple had shrunk the Newton down and cut the price a lot it indeed might have made a better PDA, but that never happened.

      The Palm was not a step forward, and the fact that even today that it relies on glyphic shorthand alphabets rather than true handwriting recognition, even though it has access to more horsepower than even the Newton 2100, is telling.

      I must respectfully disagree. The Palm was a huge hit with customers, because it provided exactly what people wanted in a PDA. The Newton didn't. I would say the Palm was a step forward, because it was the first time anyone made a PDA that was exactly what people wanted. Even today, Palm's biggest competitor is their own installed base. People are basically happy with their Palm PDAs and see little reason to pay money for a newer one.

      The shorthand alphabet made the Palm viable on an 8 MHz 68000-family CPU. It isn't hard to learn, and if you do it correctly the recognition accuracy is close to 100%. Modern Palms continue to use it under the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" theory, as well as the "customers don't like it when you change an established product too much" theory. Note that you can buy different recognition systems for Palm, if you like.

      From what I have heard, the Newton's handwriting recognition did improve a whole lot, but the damage had already been done to its reputation. In any event, I only listed that as one of the factors that made it fail as a PDA.

      Note that I am not dissing the Newton; I am merely observing that it wasn't what most people wanted in a PDA. And I certainly am not dissing the Newton community.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  19. A Compact Mac in the Palm of your hand... by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Informative
    What I want is a little handheld computer that runs Mac OS 6. It wouldn't be that hard to do and you have a literal ocean of abandonware out there you could use with such a device.

    Here you go. PalmOS up to version 5.x is basically the equivalent of MacOS 6 before the Multi-Finder. It's no accident...the people who wrote the PalmOS were former MacOS developers. A Palm, to me, feels like a Compact Mac shrunk down to a handheld size and weight.

    Now if only I could make my m125 chime when I turn it on and make the generic Mac system beep when it encounters an error...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:A Compact Mac in the Palm of your hand... by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, the chip on my visor (Motorola Dragonball) uses the same/similar 68000 machine language (upto mac plus had the 68000). So you can port your assemblt skills for cracking^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H programming.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:A Compact Mac in the Palm of your hand... by rufo · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a somewhat-related note, the beep sound on my Treo 600 sounds *very* similar to the old Mac OS Beep sound.

      Just in case you wanted to know. ;)

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    3. Re:A Compact Mac in the Palm of your hand... by mjoecups · · Score: 1

      Right down to the screen that's F'n TOO SMALL...

      Marty

      --
      If your hear it, fear it. If you see it, flee it.
  20. 1997 Technology? by XavierItzmann · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Apple Newton was discontinued in 1998.

    The Newton browses the internet wirelessly via Airport (a.k.a. Wi-Fi or 802.11);
    http://www.ff.iij4u.or.jp/~ngc/eng/newtwave.htm

    syncs with nSync (OS X)
    http://www.everchanging.com/newton/

    syncs your MP3 collection with iTunes
    http://www.pixell.net/newton/

    runs a Java Virtual Machine (waba)
    http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/projects/newton/waba/

    there's been a VNC client since... ever
    http://mywebpages.comcast.net/saweyer/newton/vnc.h tm

    A processor accelerator is available
    http://shop.pixsolution.com/catalog/product_info.p hp?products_id=29

    Apple was one of the original investors in the ARM technology, from way back before Intel ever dreamt of buying it. The Newton runs a RISC StrongARM at 162 Mhz (compare to a 2003/Tungsten T2 running OMAP/ARM at 140 Mhz !!!)

    If anything, the major weakness of the system is its limited memory heap, but we are talking about a 1997 design here.

    Can you say... Apple ahead of its time?

    --
    The next pasture is always greener
    1. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Erm I have a 1989 ARM 2 Acorn A3000 Amiga-box-style computer downstairs. And a 1994 ARM610 desktop, the Acorn RiscPC 600. Mind you, ARM _was_ Acorn RISC Machines before others decided to invest in it.

      So Apple was a bit ahead of its time investing in Acorn's ARM, like it was a bit ahead of Microsoft's time investing in Xerox's GUI... good, but not pioneering ;-).

    2. Re:1997 Technology? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being ahead of your time is a good thing if you're a scientist but a bad thing if you're a publically traded commercial concern.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! Speaking of which, is there a more elegant CPU to write for (i.e. in assembler) than the ARM? So few special cases to mess with, but the joy of conditional prefixes, the barrel shifter, all since the mid-to-late-80s...

    4. Re:1997 Technology? by CrezzyMan · · Score: 1
      --
      ->www.chuma.org, ranting and Newtons, what more could you want?
    5. Re:1997 Technology? by DancesWithBulls · · Score: 0
      I am very sick of these one liners which mention a random word or two, in the desperate hope that those will be read as facts or some educated insight into the subject matter.

      The relation of Lisa and Mac development to Xerox boils down to two (count them 2) trips that Apple engineers made to Xerox PARC in 1979 for Smalltalk technology demonstration (a common practice) by Xerox after Apple signed an agreement with them that allowed Xerox to buy $1 million worth of Apple stock at throw-away pre-IPO price (their investment was up almost 1800% just a year later on IPO). The two visits by Apple including nothing more than a technology demonstration. There was no code provided or stolen. Yes Apple was inspired by Xerox's Alto, you will never find any Apple employee who does not give Xerox due credit for their technology and vision. However having said that both Lisa and the Mac were far cry the technology demo that Smalltalk was. Xerox's Smalltalk did not have a file finder, drag and drop file manipulation, file types, imaging and windowing model, clipboard, pull-down menus, self redrawing windows, control panels, and a zillion other things that made the commerically viable operating System that embodied the Lisa and the Mac.

      The Xerox PARC director at the time had this to say, "Just like the Russians and the A-bomb, they developed it very quickly once they knew it was doable." Apple independently developed the first GUI operating system and also invented most (some by Xerox) of the underlying concept and technologies. Yes they were inspired by the Xerox's Smalltalk but an inspiration does take away from all the hard-work and brilliance of the Apple Engineers who poured their hearts and souls into Lisa and the Mac. If you have doubts about that just ask the father of modern physics.

      Now in contrast Microsoft being a future developer for the Lisa/Mac had the actual source code from Apple which they blatantly STOLE. You should read up on a subject before posting sweet nothings. These might help:

      Apple and Xerox

      Apple history Books

      Microsoft's founding principle, "Steal first, ask questions later". There are probably thousands of examples of this principle at work, but here is a sampler or two:

      The real origins of ClearType

      Virtual Desktop manager "invented" at Microsoft

      Apple is like a guy who, saw someone else who built a wooden raft for the first time but never actually tried it on water, and said, hey this is a good idea let me build my own version. Only they built a proper boat with a sail that could and for the first time did carry many people on water. Microsoft is like another guy who saw Apple's Sail boat and said hey this is a good idea, let me steal one. They stole it repainted it and sold it as their own.

      BIG DIFFERENCE!

    6. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original MessagePad actually ran an ARM610, although the MP2000 series did run StrongARM.

      And, the comparison between the clock speeds of the StrongARM and OMAP 1510 (with an ARM9 core) is pretty worthless, as the ARM9 has a much more advanced architecture...

    7. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've managed to give more detail on precisely the fact stated by the parent, while simultaneously stating that the parent post is false. Your points of contention are (1) Apple paid for it (so what? the point of the parent was that Apple invests in good tech rather than creating it); and (2) Apple improved upon it (where was that being disputed? so did Amiga and a dozen other commercialisers of Xerox's GUI).

      Really, there's no need to get so worked up about just another toolmaker. Chill out a bit. I've seen posts like this before on the Apple forum followed by accusations of zealotry, which I'm sure is a bit OTT, but I can see where the view comes from! Good speaking with you anyway.

    8. Re:1997 Technology? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1
      The Newton runs a RISC StrongARM at 162 Mhz (compare to a 2003/Tungsten T2 running OMAP/ARM at 140 Mhz !!!)

      Yes, but I'd be willing to bet that a OMAP at 140MHz is still faster than a StrongARM at 162MHz, due to architectural differences. Don't believe the megahurtz madness!

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    9. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being ahead of your time is a good thing if you're a scientist
      I think Galileo would disagree with you.
    10. Re:1997 Technology? by hooded1 · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly the StrongARM was developed by Digital. They had a working prototype of what eventually became the iPaq long before they sold the tech to Intel.

      --
      A rabbit in the hand is worth 4 in the cage
    11. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not. The Newton 2000 and 2100 were VERY FAST MACHINES underneath.

      Newtons, and the chip they were running, were way *way* ahead of their time.

    12. Re:1997 Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is. The 68000. 100% orthogonal, down to allowing the program counter be any register you like. As clean a CISC design as has ever been done.

      ARM stands for [Acorn|Advanced] *RISC* Machines, no? A great CPU. But RISC is not known for easy assembly language programming.

  21. Pocket Nester by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For me personally the best Pocket PC emulator is Pocket Nester. It runs nintendo games at full speed with perfect sound on my toshiba e350. Nintendo games are optimal because they are easy to find on kazaa (and I don't feel bad downloading them because back in the day I used to own almost everyone that came out) and they don't take up much space. Nothing like playing Dragon Warrior 4 in class.

  22. Now if only.. by jefdiesel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Now if only these brilliant hackers can get the handwriting recognition to work! Then I'll be impressed!

    --

    I hate spyware and spies
  23. Why do this? by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to emulate nintendo games, there are native emulators for the iPaq and other PocketPC platforms. Just check out pocketNES for example. It runs at full speed, no frame skip, and even COLOR, something that the newton does not have.

  24. This begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why'd they discontinue it?

    1. Re:This begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      So why'd they discontinue it?

      Maybe they were ahead of their time there too?

    2. Re:This begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> So why'd they discontinue it?

      > Maybe they were ahead of their time there too?

      This got modded as funny, but it might turn out to be true. The market for stand alone PDAs may get absorbed by ever more powerful cell-phones in the near future.

    3. Re:This begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Insightful

  25. Gatta hand it to 'em... by Valiss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I swear this thing has the most loyal cult following ever. For a product that didn't sell well (or as well as it should have), I'm still amazed that people are still modding these things up. Great works folks!

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Gatta hand it to 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just sold my 2100 on eBay (for a decent sum, too) because I haven't used it in years, literally, and as I was packing it into its box, I felt a lil' sad, because, well, it was just so damn cool, ya know? I'm not even in the Cult of Newton, and I still love the little bastard.

    2. Re:Gatta hand it to 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...I swear this thing has the most loyal cult following ever.

      Never met an Amiga owner?

    3. Re:Gatta hand it to 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most loyal cult, is to put it mildly. My first tatto is of the Newton logo (the hand drawn lightbulb).
      People ask me what it is i tell them its a symbol for good ideas that no one know what to do with.

  26. Works fine for me by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    I've been there several times myself over the past few months. The first time, it had the right region of the right country. I told it where I was, and every time after that it was perfect. I was using different computers on a dhcp network. I just tried it from an entiery different network, and it got the country right. I can try it out to prove it to you, but believe me: If I set the city name now, it'll be correct from now on, not just for me, but for everyone else on my local sever, if not better. It's a good site.

  27. Me thinks not by Gilesx · · Score: 0, Troll

    And I don't need to waste money on a Game Boy Advance!



    Well you kinda sorta do - those Gameboy Advance cartridges tend only to fit into Gameboy Advances.
    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
  28. Re:Emulate Nintendo on Your MessagePad by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Actually, doing things just to see if they're possible is kind of a geek thing to do in a general sense. And of course, this is the place that advertizes itself as "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters." So it kind of makes sense, doesn't it?

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  29. On the contrary... by Yosho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you buy a GBA with the intention of playing NES games on it, you are wasting money (and probably need to be smacked in the head). I'd say it's still a good deal if you want to play GBA games, though. ;-)

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    1. Re:On the contrary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're wrong, the gba has a very good nes emulator with save states etc, it alone justifies the gba price

    2. Re:On the contrary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its also very illegal, unless you're of course, backing up from your personal carts.

      There is, however, versions of NES games released for the GBA in Japan, and should be showing up here soon.

  30. What's that? by ProudClod · · Score: 1

    No NES on Palm?

    BOO! - NES, SMS, GG and Turbografx16 - sure it's for PalmOS 5.x so it won't actually work on a Palm V... And it's not OSS.


    But there was an OSS GB emulator for PalmOS 4 if i remember right.

    --
    Gamers Europe - Gaming News. Reviews.
  31. Hmph by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    I bought a GBA with the intention of playing NES games on it. Of course, I also intended to play GBA games on it.

  32. Xbox by ward.deb · · Score: 1

    I want to play Xbox games @ my Palm m100. Would it be possible? =)

    1. Re:Xbox by zackeller · · Score: 1

      No.

  33. Sorta off topic, but which PDA is OSX/XP friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi:

    I'm thinking of getting a PDA but have been spooked by the Palm decision to drop OSX syncing.

    I already bring a Secure Digital stick with files to and from work every day (XP at the office and OSX at home) and so reading stored e-mails on the bus would be great, as would listening to AAC audio.

    I can afford to wait a few months, but any suggestions would be appreciated.

  34. Yay for wasted money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And I don't need to waste money on a Game Boy Advance!

    So instead I'll waste money on a PDA to play copied games.. oh wait.

  35. Re: waste money a Game Boy Advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And also there's a shitload of emulators for the GBA. Want to play a gameboy game without buying it?? Buy a flash cart and load it up with 50 gameboy roms and the emulator Goomba. Or you can play PC Engine games (aka TG16) using PCEAdvance.

    There's Sega, Nintendo, and somebody has already showcased how they managed to get the Gameboy to play SNES games by creating an alpha version of a SNES Emulator for the GBA ( http://pocketsnes.pocketheaven.com ). Also a Colecovision emulator is on the horizon of being released. So, definetly, the GBA scene is hot.

  36. My Newton by OPTiX_iNC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You wouldn't beleive the looks I get when I pull it out in public (my newton) but I still love it, and the NES emulator makes it so I can waste even more time in class.

    I have been following the NES emulator and have been using it since version 0.12. Right now several people are working on getting a NES controler working on the newton so we can play with a contoler.

    I wonder how many people are going to be storming the J&K Sales store to buy a newton now...

  37. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I can't play Legend Zelda, Final Fantasy, or Dragon Warrior on my Palm V."

    A quick google-search for palm nintendo emulator turns up this as the first result...

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That still won't run on a Palm V. (OS 5.0 only).

      However, Liberty (commercial)--remember, this was the one with the supposed 'crack' released by the author that was a trojan instead-- will do it just fine, as well as palmboy if you prefer oss.

  38. Newton Revival by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What apple needs to do is bring the newton back. It was way ahead of its time ( well, and expensive ) but now the public has caught up.. The time is right for the return of the only true PDA ever.. ( bastardized versions of windows or the clunky 'palm-OS' don't really count.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  39. Size was part of the functionality by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While some may want a mini-newt.. Most of us that have used netwtons, miss the size in the smaller 'modern' pda's.

    Such tiny modern screens make it pain in the butt to use. Sure it fits in a shirt pocket ( though the newt fits in a SUIT pocket.. its inital target market ) but still...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Size was part of the functionality by Dan+Crash · · Score: 1

      Well, that's why I said "slightly smaller". I like that the Newton has a lot of screen real estate. But I recognize that a lot of people didn't, and found the Newton awkward to carry around.

      To be honest, I think that if Apple had responded to the market by making a smaller Newton, they would've seen a huge rebound in market share, and the Newton would still be around today. Even if they'd had to make the mini-Newt less functional, it would've kept the Newton brand alive until electronics became small enough to give the same functionality in a smaller package.

      As it is, Apple just gave up on the most innovative product they ever produced. Apple borrowed much of the Macintosh's GUI from Xerox PARC, but the Newton was entirely their own creation. It literally defined the entire category of PDAs! (PDA was Apple CEO John Sculley's description of the Newton; before Newton, there were only "personal organizers".)

      Instead of responding to the market, however, Apple hung its head in shame and declared the Newton a failed brand, abandoning it. They walked away from what ought to have been a real success story for them. What a truly colossal waste of corporate capital.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  40. Wasted moolah by thehomeland · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I don't need to waste money on a Game Boy Advance!

    Or on a Palm V! I have a spiral notepad and a pencil stuck through the wire. The nub on the end of the wooden stylus acts as a special deleting function, and text is automatically saved into the new-age graphite-wood memory system. Guaranteed never to crash.

    1. Re:Wasted moolah by Laconian · · Score: 1

      But the optical bus between the memory and the eye is only line-of-sight!

    2. Re:Wasted moolah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you're doing something else when an appointment comes up, does the new-age graphite-wood memory system sound a loud alarm to remind you of the meeting you're about to miss?

      Or is it capable of re-sorting a giant to-do list by due date, priority, time required, etc.?

      Can you program the graphite-wood memory system to automatically schedule appointments for you for every three days for the next six weeks, and once a week after that (say, for physical therapy) without having to find each date manually?

      What about automatically remembering holidays, birthdays and anniversaries of friends & "significant others", every year? (Don't tell me you like having to re-copy 365 days worth of those each January 1!)

      People always make good, funny jokes about how much wiser it is to save your money and go for the spiral notebook with pencil method, but there are so many disadvantages. A Palm Zire costs less than $100. I lost that much money worth in paper and school supplies one semester in college. But I never lost my Palm, and it was a much better investment than all that paper-based stuff.

    3. Re:Wasted moolah by thehomeland · · Score: 1

      But if you're doing something else when an appointment comes up, does the new-age graphite-wood memory system sound a loud alarm to remind you of the meeting you're about to miss?

      This obselete function is replaced by something much better. It's called Just-Remember-You-Doofus(R), and is a new strategy in Mead technology. The concept is based on the threat of consequences of being late to a meeting, rather than have some cheap piece of electronics being smarter than you. Your pride as a higher life form will override the necessity of a lower form of electronics thus causing you to remember like you should and not depend on something with batteries to be your brain.

      Or is it capable of re-sorting a giant to-do list by due date, priority, time required.

      This too is a prehistorically obselete function. For the price of one Palm V (eBay for $50), you can get up to 200x replacement minipads for rearrangement of information (price of minipad at WalMart: $0.25).

      Can you program the graphite-wood memory system to automatically schedule appointments for you for every three days for the next six weeks, and once a week after that (say, for physical therapy) without having to find each date manually?

      Here on Earth, that's called a "slave" (in some areas known as "secretary") that does all those kinds of things anyway and having an electronic device for that would be redundant. For those few without a secretary (such as myself) you might check into a handy dandy device called neuropathways, which actually outclass the minipad by millenia and comes free with every life, using futuristic technology so advanced you can access the information even as you wake up without putting on your glasses or even moving yet. For the terribly forgetful, you might upgrade your minipad to the "dry erase board" which employs a similar technology to the minipad but doesn't require movement to access the information.

      What about automatically remembering holidays, birthdays and anniversaries of friends & "significant others", every year? (Don't tell me you like having to re-copy 365 days worth of those each January 1!)

      Chances are those who hold it to you for remembering their birthday really aren't your friends, but are actually con artists (or colloquially termed, "whiners") who want to scam you out of presents and unnecessary and/or undue attention. Real friends like you regardless whether you can recall the anniversary of the first spaghetti dinner you ate on a Wednesday together. If you get fired or divorced because you couldn't remember a birthday, a terrible burden has just been lifted from your shoulders! Rejoice my friend, because you had a minipad! If you couldn't remember it off the top of your head anyway, it really wasn't that important to you.

      It's the all-in-2 combined social restructuralizing device for the modern age. Lose worthless connections you thought were your friends! Be liberated from undue and tedious quests for more batteries (which are overpriced anyway)! Those few hours copying 365 days worth of notes are good memory refreshers, especially when you lose the device you never really needed anyway!

      People always make good, funny jokes about how much wiser it is to save your money and go for the spiral notebook with pencil method, but there are so many disadvantages. A Palm Zire costs less than $100. I lost that much money worth in paper and school supplies one semester in college. But I never lost my Palm, and it was a much better investment than all that paper-based stuff.

      You might fall into the 2% of people that require something to keep track of that much information, but the 98% of the people who don't, which I would estimate comes out to at least 90% of PDA owners, possibly including you, are really clogging up their own lives with a seemingly stress-reducing device. It's a trojan horse, my friend. You're funnelling all your life, it seems, into a Etch-A-Sketch Advance, and whe

    4. Re:Wasted moolah by thehomeland · · Score: 1

      But the optical bus between the memory and the eye is only line-of-sight!

      Well, for the cognitive group out there, you can use the optional Hold-A-Page-Up-Backward-And-Read-The-Text-Through- The-Backside-Even-Though-It's-Backwards(R) technology, such a feat no known PDA can perform. For ease of transfer of data straight to PC, use the thankfully-unpatented PinkFinger (none of this silly BlueTooth nonsense) interface with any common keyboard!

  41. Re:Amazing that this hasn't been modded down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone thinks this is not off-topic?

  42. Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to waste your money on a GameBoy because you already wasted it on the Palm V.

  43. other better gamepads by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    Be careful what you wish for. I give Nintendo full props for inventing or popularizing the gamepad, but better designs now exist. The original NES gamepads were so square they hurt your hands after no more than a few hours of gameplay.

    The Genesis pads were quite nice. I never did get the hang of the Playstation pads with their plethora of equally sized buttons, although they are pretty comfortable and they did come up with the dual analog stick paradigm. The N64 pads would have been nice if they didn't have two different left hand positions, and the DreamCast controllers were innovative but uncomfortable. The XBox controllers are OK, but the best gamepad is the one that comes with the GameCube. It has two analog sticks and a d-pad, differently sized buttons, and it just feels right in your hand.

    There are some PC gamepads that don't suck as well. I am pretty happy with my WingMan RumblePad. Dual analog sticks + 6 right-thumb buttons = Robotron + Street Fighter with the same pad!

  44. Best! by Dan+Crash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've heard this before, and it just doesn't ring true for me. Graffiti requires you to be much more "exceptionally careful" with your handwriting. If you can make Graffiti work for you, you can certainly make the Newt's much more flexible handwriting recognition engine work with much less effort.

    I think it's a conceptual problem, really. The Newton attempted to recognize all handwriting, and thus many users blamed the Newton when it couldn't decipher their illegible script. It was Apple's fault, not theirs.

    But the Palms didn't even pretend that they'd recognize your handwriting. They simply forced users to learn a new way to write. If Graffiti failed to recognize what you wrote, well, then you must not be doing it right. So people blamed themselves instead of the device.

    my Handspring was much better for most of the typical PDA usage- entering phone numbers or appointment times

    I think entering phone numbers and appointment times became "typical PDA usage" because that's all you could conveniently do with Graffiti. That's my experience anyway, YMMV.

    Sure the Newton's natural system is faster for writing large amounts of text(assuming you have perfect handwriting) but people just didn't(and still don't) use PDAs for that sort of thing.

    I'd say that there's an amount of text between the size of a phone number and a "large amount of text" which is what the Newton was really designed for. Short notes, quick e-mails, reminders, that sort of thing. And lots of people have been very successful using it for just that.

    Again, whatever works for you, works for you. But I personally really liked what the Newton did, and would've loved to see what a 2004 Newton OS and handheld would be like.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  45. I have one of those... by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1

    Can't find the 'on' button though.

    1. Re:I have one of those... by thehomeland · · Score: 1

      Can't find the 'on' button though.

      Its cutting-edge, always-on, ready-to-use, "retro-input" features eliminate the need for power buttons or obselete devices such as batteries, drastically reducing the weight of the unit.

      Might I also recommend the most comprehensive HTML encoding program, Windows Notepad?

  46. apple is making a pda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats why palm cobalt (aka palm os 6) is not mac friendly.

  47. Pocket PC runs it at full speed by marcybots · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you want gaming on the go buy a Pocket PC, it emulates games at full speed with sound, even super nintendo games work...if you want to play strategy games or rpg. However, one word of warning, the controls on a pocket pc are terrible, definitely not designed for gaming at all and playing any action game is like playing it on hard. I thought I could be content gaming on the go with a pocket PC, I was wrong...GBA SP is by far the coolest game gadget, nothing else compares. Play Advance Wars, that game is aboslutely brilliant when traveling.

  48. actually u can play Zelda, FF & DW on Palm... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    "I can't play Legend Zelda, Final Fantasy, or Dragon Warrior on my Palm V."

    "Legend of Zelda, Final Fantasy, and Dragon Warrior were all NES games. A Game Boy emulator does nothing to help you play those."

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Nintendo made Final Fantasy Adventure, Final Fantasy Legend, Final Fantasy Legend 2, Final Fantasy Legend 3, Legend of Zelda, Dragon Warrior I & II, and Dragon Warrior III all for the Gameboy & Gameboy Color.

    So yes, actually you can play Legend of Zelda, 4 Final Fantasy games and 3 Dragon Warrior games on your Palm. However, having played Final Fantasy III on a m515 clocked at 45mhz I can tell you it's still no were near as fast as a real Gameboy and the sound sucks, so I recommend a PocketPC @ 200mhz or better running Morphgear for real GB framerates with good sound.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  49. What's wrong with GBA? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

    "And I don't need to waste money on a Game Boy Advance!"

    *sigh* Yeah, it's such a waste of money what with two original Metroid Games, Golden Sun, FFT Advance and all... Not to mention all the ports of SNES games. I'd just as soon play NES games in black & white on my Newton. Seriously... It's not like a GBA is *that* expensive. Especially when you consider that most of its games retail at $30 or below.
    Now, don't get me wrong, I think being able to play NES games on a Newton is cool, but comparing it to a GBA seems rather ridiculous.

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    1. Re:What's wrong with GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just check out the games that pudge is playing on the front page of games.slashdot.org. Pudge is hardly a console-style gamer, so his opinion doesn't really count.

      I could state my opinion of FPS games, but it would easily be discounted because I do not typically play games on PCs. Likewise with pudge and his limited appreciation of console-style games. Of course, he's just being stupid by voicing this opinion in the first place, when it is neither required nor relevant.

  50. Re:Emulate Nintendo on Your MessagePad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Round here people are exceptionally up themselves.

  51. GBA = teh awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, waste money on a GBA? The GBA is worth every penny you spend on it. It's practically a portable SNES, one of the best systems ever created.

  52. Re:actually u can play Zelda, FF & DW on Palm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well aren't you mister clever.

  53. Re:Eulogy for the Newton - Two deficiencies by barthrh2 · · Score: 1

    There were two deficiencies: Size and synchronization.

    Part of what made the Palm succeed was size, but just as much the one-button-sync to your desktop applications.

    As usual, Apple ignored the Windows user, believed that the Newton was a computing platform all of its own and provided an exceptionally weak sync solution. If I remember right, there was no straighforward way to link your calendar on Win. Outlink and one other solution came along later, but it was too little, too late. That stuff needed to be in the box.

    Size was an issue with day-to-day carrying, but from a business standpoint where you have a briefcase anyhow, it wasn't. The larger screen is what made the Newton versatile. I cannot enter lots of text into a PocketPC with transcriber or Calligrapher because you just run out of space. It's like tyring to write on a playing card.

    To date, no PDA has risen to the usability level of the Newton. We all talk about "intuitive" and Apple really created an intuitive device. Show me a PDA where I can drag-n-drop text for copy/paste, or scrub text to erase it ( and see a Poof! animation to boot) and then we'll talk.

  54. Idiotic by SPYvSPY · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but the parent post is just silly dumb. All you need to know is that Newton will allow you to write complete cursive sentences while translating them to typed text on the fly. The fact that this joker can't tweak his handwriting to make the interpreter more effective is entirely PEBKAC.

  55. Re:actually u can play Zelda, FF & DW on Palm. by RickHunter · · Score: 1

    As you appear to be incapable of reading, let me point something out to you.

    Final Fantasy Adventure != Final Fantasy

    Final Fantasy Legend (I, II, III) != Final Fantasy

    Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening != Legend of Zelda. (Though it is, IMHO, a much better game)

    The Dragon Warrior remakes I'd forgotten about, but claiming that the above games are the classic NES games instead of later Game Boy games makes me wonder if you've ever played any of the above.

    (Its also worth noting that Final Fantasy Adventure is actually a Seiken Densetsu, or Secret of Mana, game. And the Final Fantasy Legend games are, in fact, SAGA Frontier games. The only thing they have in common with the console line of Final Fantasy games is the title.)