Slashdot Mirror


Trekkie Communicators Now a Reality

SolFire writes "Forbes is carrying an article about Vocera Communications and their little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG. The employees wear the system as a badge and touch it to start the connection. Then they speak the name of the person they want to talk to and the system connects them using VOIP for one-on-one communication." We mentioned these in 2002.

355 comments

  1. Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but does it make the classic "deet deet" sound?

    1. Re:Yeah, by pilgrim23 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It will also give your co-ordinates so that The security officer can beam you right to Guantanamo Bay...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no no, It's a rapid chirp sound. The "boo
      boop!" sound is when they use a wall or console
      mounted panel!

    3. Re:Yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hospital I work at just put 14 WAPs into their new Emergency Department specifically for these guys... They are LOADS of fun.

      And as for the sound... it is sort of a happy little jingle when you connect with someone... and a sad little jingle when you disconnect.

  2. Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    I bet they are not as fast as the ones on Star Trek. Ever notice that the computer on Star Trek semes to route the connection before the target name is given.

    Data: Data to Lt Worf.
    No real delay
    Worf (over comms): Go ahead Data.

    The delay is only enough for Worf to open his mouth and talk. It is not long enough to replay "Data to Lt Worf." I freely admit I'm crazy.

    1. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it just has an anti-time buffer. Maybe it's made by Anti-Real Networks.

    2. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's obvious - they're listening for Sub-vocal commands.

    3. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would there be delay in fast than light computers. What kind of geek are you that you have never read the Techincal manuls for Enterprise.

      The computers use a small warp field around the processors to increase calculation speed.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      The delay is only enough for Worf to open his mouth and talk. It is not long enough to replay "Data to Lt Worf." I freely admit I'm crazy.

      The real fantasy here is that Worf, or anyone in your workplace, will answer a communicator that fast. Has there *ever* been a busy signal?

      "Lt. Worf is on a nother line, please hold. ..dah-dah-dahhhh..dah-daddah-dah-dahhh..."

      Now when you face someone who appears to be talking to you, you won't see a headset and think they may be on a call. This should add to confusion. (Like that funny phone commercial where the woman comes onto tha man, she's unaware is on a call.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dood. It's just a TV show.

      p.s. In Plato's Stepchildren, Kirk and Spock figure out how to get telekinetic powers... but they never use them in any later episodes. Why???

      You'd think telekinesis would be pretty damn useful, even if you're only using it to get a beer.

    6. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      The delay is only enough for Worf to open his mouth and talk. It is not long enough to replay "Data to Lt Worf." I freely admit I'm crazy.

      These dudes travel faster than the speed of light. So in there universe, this would be possible.

    7. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by somethinghollow · · Score: 0

      That might cause cancer.

    8. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Funny
      Now when you face someone who appears to be talking to you, you won't see a headset and think they may be on a call.

      I recall Scott Adams predict that this would be used as an excuse to insult people with impunity (claim to be talking to somebody on the phone rather than the hulking brute in front of you).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    9. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All joking aside, this could easily be done by storing the audio in a small buffer (say, 5 seconds would be more than enough for "[any conceivable name] to [any conceivable name]"), doing the name detection and connection negotiation, then playing the contents of the buffer to the targeted party before opening two-way communication.

    10. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I just realized I didn't answer your objection at all, but I'm still correct for a real-world comm system :)

    11. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now when you face someone who appears to be talking to you, you won't see a headset and think they may be on a call. This should add to confusion.

      I've confused more than one sales droid, by talking to them, and talking to somebody on my c-phone at the same time. The sales droid never realized I was on my phone.

      I can see somebody wearing one to a concert, opening a connection to their computer, and taping the entire concert that way. OTOH, the sound quality wouldn't be that good.

    12. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Funny
      Not only that, their transporters are amazing. People on the planet below never seem to mind waiting until Picard got to the Transporter Room, and as soon as Picard walked in he gave the order to Energize. But people on the surface are always ready to greet the Away Team, no matter how much time they fiddle around arguing with the Doctor or configuring the Image Enhancers.

      If I were standing on a planet waiting to be beamed up, I'd be terrified about moving too far, sitting down (I'd be beamed up without the chair!), or even worse going to the bathroom. Could you imagine the kind of embarassing situations that would arise from being beamed out of the toilet?

    13. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by adamjaskie · · Score: 2

      Nope. Worf would have to answer immediately. NOBODY does this. When the phone rings, do you answer it 1/10 of a second into the first ring? No. I don't always even answer the phone on the first ring. It is usually on the second ring by the time I get it out of my pocket and answer it.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    14. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by da+cog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is actually a little warp field around the main computer that allows computations to perform at faster than the speed of light. Due to relativistic effects, this means that the computations must be traveling backwards in time, so the computer already knew what Data was going to say. Furthermore, it knew what he was going to say several seconds ago. By the time Data had finished asking the computer to connect him with Worf, not only had Worf's communicator already paged him, but it had done so several seconds ago. This is how Star Trek charecters get the time to sigh or stretch for several seconds before responding, and yet always sound to the other person as if they'd responded right away!

      --
      Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
    15. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this could easily be done by storing the audio in a small buffer....doing the name detection [recognition] and connection negotiation, then playing the contents of the buffer

      The original poster implied that there was not even enough pause allowed to play back the message "Data to Worf" to Worf before he answered. Thus, even instantanious name recognition AI would not be enough to match the turnaround in the show.

      I suppose the writers could claim that Worf was the default, but then Data would not have to say "Worf". And, if he said another name, then Worf would still hear part of the message, such as "Data to Cap....". Or perhaps there was a certain beep tone if it was from Data so that Worf did not have to hear the whole message "Data to Worf" message to know who it is from.

      What am I doing? You sucked me into nerd thinking again. It is a fricken TV show for God sakes. Shame on both of us.

    16. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      Dood. It's just a TV show.

      Apart from answering your own question, it's probably because the fanbase knew more about the overall continuity than the writers -
      For example, writer "A" only needs to write a story featuring Kirk, Spock, McCoy and a couple of expendable red-shirts. They weren't expected to check what addtional character traits writer "B" added to the main players.

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    17. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by drwiii · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real reason Q was pissed off at humanity, of course, is that there was no letter Q on traditional phones. Nobody could key his name into the company phone directory to find his extension. You try spending a few centuries getting only wrong number calls and see how you turn out.

    18. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      More interesting, has anyone ever had to wait for a turbolift?

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    19. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by bebing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ensign Jones: *hits communicator* 'Captain, I have received reports that there
      may be a bug in certain ship software, is Holodeck 1 running?'
      Captain Picard: 'Why yes, it is running.'
      Ensign Jones: 'You'd better go catch it!'

      Ensign Jones: *hits communicator* 'Guinin, do you have Klingon Prince Garduk in
      a can?'
      Guinin: 'Why, yes we do'
      Ensign Jones: 'You'd better let him out then!'

    20. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you know the advantages of a truely pre-emtive kernel.

      and you thought it was just marketing speak :)

    21. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by x0n · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Could you imagine the kind of embarassing situations that would arise from being beamed out of the toilet?

      ROTFLMAO!

      Imagine: Spock appearing semi-naked in the transporter room, mid-tugging session.

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    22. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kirk: "Operator! Get me Engineering"

      Operator: "I'm sorry sir, but that line is bizzy."

      Kirk: "How can that line be busy? I have a direct line!"

      (ringtone)

      "Lt. Limey here."

      (Ripped from "Star Drek", IIRC)

    23. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While your complaint is technically valid, we're supposed to pretend that there is indeed a delay long enough for the message to be repeated to the reciever. If they made it truly realistic every time the comm system was used, there would be too much time being wasted in each episode. In eposodic television, corners have to be cut everywhere to make sure there's time and money for more important parts of the show.

      Besides, the comm system is just another one of those little technical inconsistancies that have plagued trek for years. Like the Klingon forhead problem, the Trill spots problem, the numerous time travel paradoxes, and episodes like TOS:Miri or Voy:Threshold that make absolutely no sense whatsoever. It's TV. Cut it some slack. :)

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    24. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How quickly would you answer your phone if the ringtone was actually the CEO already talking, and you knew he knew you could hear him?

      I bet it'd be a bit quicker. Especially since you could simply tap the device and speak in order to signify you were listening.

    25. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Second ring? Damn people are lucky if I answer on the second CALL!

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    26. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by AJWM · · Score: 2, Informative

      More interesting, has anyone ever had to wait for a turbolift?

      As a matter of fact, yes. I recall Kirk & Spock in one episode waiting for one. Sorry, don't recall which ep, I'm not that much of a Trekkie.

      (In, I think, "Wrath of Khan", there's also a scene where the occupants of the lift pause it to talk -- when it finally arrives at destination McCoy is there waiting muttering something about "who's holding up the damn elevator?". Dang, maybe I am that much of a Trekkie....)

      --
      -- Alastair
    27. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by 1SmartOne · · Score: 0

      What really happens is the network is open to all until the designated person responds. Thus Warf responds and then they're the only people in comm. This would make the most sense, b/c the computer could then make the comm link so that this would seem almost instant.

    28. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by starm_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      "No real delay"

      That true, there is some weird shit happening to time in general in Star Trek. Did you notice how, all incidents seem to be resolved within an hour of time?

      Also they have events that for us in our universe would take much longer than in the Star Trek Universe. The one you mensioned about the communicator is one. But did you also notice poker games last only a few minutes? Same thing with meetings, meals, surgery, war battles, rarely these events last more then 10 minutes whereas here in our universe they would all last hours or days.

      And also everyone and everything in the "Star Trek Universe" seem to take a break every ten-fifteen minutes so that the television channels can show us a commercial. Its true! Try to notice next time you watch, after a commercial you never feel like you missed anything. Nothing happened during that time, its almost like time "froze" for that period. Also you'll notice they take more breaks towards the end of the hour maybe its because they get tired.

    29. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Captain: Lt. Worf
      (no response)
      Captain: Lt. Worf (impatiently)
      (again, no response)
      Captain: Computer, what is the location of Lt. Worf?
      Computer: Lt. Worf is in Counselor Troi's quarters.
      Captain: Lt. Worf, what are you doing in the Counselor's quarters.
      Lt. Worf: Sorry, Captain, I was just showing the Counselor my O-face....Oh! Oh! Oh!

    30. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by 1SmartOne · · Score: 0

      you funny man.

      play tricks on my mind! Oh the pain!

    31. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Lyran · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Off-Topic)
      Chekov has those powers...
      oh wait, wrong show...

      --
      Remember, for every CD you purchase, you give the RIAA that much more power. RIAA = SCO = IP terrorists. Any questio
    32. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Why the heck is he *WALKING* to the transporter room? Why is he not transported from where he is to his destination? Or worst case senario, transported to the transport room then down to the planet?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    33. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by PorscheDriver · · Score: 3, Funny
      You're worried about the subtelties of communication delays??!!

      Here's some news for ya...

      KLINGONS AREN'T REAL!!!

      Sheesh, some people... :-)

      --
      "This is your life, and it's ending one second at a time."
    34. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you aren't serious, but I used to be a Trekkie so I'll answer.

      Transporter room to transporter room is the safest form of transport; having a transporter room at only one side follows that. They CAN transport between two other locations, but it's safer to turbolift to the transporter room and just do it from there.

    35. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure, you laugh, but you just know there's fanfic out there somewhere depicting just that.

    36. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sluggy had a reallllly old strip that covered this.

      Worship the Comic.

      Even if Pete's on crack lately..

    37. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

      i also vagly rember for my old tech guide that site to site eats alot more power.

    38. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by FroMan · · Score: 1

      SO TRANSPORTERS ARE NOT SAFE!?!

      Why the heck is the captain using it then? I mean really, if the risk is so minimal for Kirk to get beamed down to every planet with Spock and Bones and a couple red shirts (granted I guess they only count as one full trip since neither of them are coming back), have the captain mess around with the skimply clad green chic, then beam back, why did we never see a single accident? Personally I think Kirk needs to be in detox after every episode incase he caught some alien disease during his escapades, but that obviously is a different issue.

      Why are transporters used to liberally if they are too dangerous to go from somewhere on the ship to the transporter room (so they have a pad at atleast one side), then transport down to the planet?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    39. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by jamshid42 · · Score: 1

      Of course, the big thing that you are all forgetting: the editors probably cut the waiting bit out. You don't see them taking every single step from the bridge to engineering do you?

      --
      /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
    40. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Clearly the right way to address a com badge is "Worf from Data" rather than "Data calling Worf." The computer can tell right away who's calling and fit in "Data calling," suitably speeded up (after all, it's a computer....) which it sends while Data is still saying "from Data."

      In fact, I think some of the old shows had things like "Bridge, this is the captain," which would work well.

    41. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by jamshid42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there are two examples of transporter malfunctions that I can think of.

      During season one of the original series, Kirk gets beamed up and his "good" and "evil" sides become separate entities.

      In Star Trek: The Motion Picture, the transporter's buffers lose their pattern and get shunted back to Star Fleet. When the Enterprise queries them to see if they were able to retrieve them, Star Fleet states "What arrived didn't live long. Fortunately."

      --
      /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
    42. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by grammaticaster · · Score: 1

      If that were true, there would be constant radio chatter on the ship, but we never hear that.

    43. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by adamjaskie · · Score: 2

      Still would be about the same amount of time, I think. The ability to just tap the device would speed it up a lot more than the ringtone being the CEO's voice. That, in itself, would not make any difference, because I would still have to register the phone ringing, and dig it out of my pocket. However, it still would not be instant. The computer needs to know where to route the call, so the CEO would still have to get through "CEO to Adam" or something like that before the computer would know where to route the call to. Even if it can hear that, and find the proper route instantly, it still needs to wait for him to finish saying where he wants the call to go. Maybe if it broadcast to all the devices, but only let me answer it?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    44. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by thorgil · · Score: 1


      Two more...

      from Voyager
      Borg tech (from seven) mixed with doctors (from the future) portable holo-emitter = borg on steroids

      from DS9
      Half the crew ends up as holo-characters in a James bond/dr Evil program.

      --
      Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
    45. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by bshroyer · · Score: 1

      And what do you suppose Lt. Worf's response would be to being put on hold?

      By an android.

      Some disassembly would ensue.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    46. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes they are! Mother, you should have seen how much toilet paper I had to use yesterday!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    47. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 more

      Voyager: When tuvok and nelix are combined into one entity.

      tng: When ro and laforge are turned invisible

    48. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      "Imagine: Spock appearing semi-naked in the transporter room, mid-tugging session." No thank you, sir.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    49. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by bicho · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of an episode of the "Freaks and Geeks" series where Bill calls over the phone to his sports teacher, and starts insulting him (faking a different voice), because he is angry the teacher wouldn't do anything about team-picking (he was always chosen last).
      The teacher immediately knows its a joke, and the next class gets all his students into his office and starts asking each one to repeat a series of insults he wrote on a sheet of paper for him to hear and recognize de voice...

      Neal, one of Bill's friends, takes advantage of that...

      --

      errera hunamum ets
    50. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by minister+of+funk · · Score: 1

      What you and the original poster seem to be ovelooking is that Worf is answering "Worf Here", not "Go ahead, Mr. Data", which may imply either extreme professionalism or the fact that Worfs comm basically said "Incoming Chat Request", and doesn't necessarily identify the initiator... For instance, how many times has a Star Trek officer said, "Who is this?" over the comm? I seem to recall a couple instances...

    51. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by phaggood · · Score: 0

      Ye gods, people! These folk spend x-number of years in basic training at the Academy; it's obvious that during all the survival and academic training they also learn how to hit their com badges on the first micro-second before the 4000V "Do I have your attention NOW!?!?" microburst comes thru.

      Damn Pavlovian of them, but effective I'd say.

    52. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by shokk · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Trek folks were using the subvocal tech from the previous story to figure out who Picard was mumbling to himself about calling next. Might not explain Data, though.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    53. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enterprise: Every time they use the thing.

      I'm starting to sense a theme here. I believe it's called an "overused plot device".

    54. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by 1SmartOne · · Score: 0

      This is a good point. Perhaps if there were noise filters though...

      Makes me start to believe this precognition crap. No, must not assimilate!

    55. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that they need to go to the transporter room while on the enterprise but nothing on the other end is ever needed

    56. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of something a Sergeant once told me about handling emails. If the email was really important to handle, you'll get a second email (or phone call). He was also within two years of retiring.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    57. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by thorgil · · Score: 1


      "overused plot device"

      Holodeck malfunction plot:
      - That character is not supposed to be here.
      - End program!
      (no response)
      - damn!
      - Safety precautions seems to be off.
      - damn!

      --
      Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
    58. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Of course, the big thing that you are all forgetting: the editors probably cut the waiting bit out. You don't see them taking every single step from the bridge to engineering do you?

      Yes, but that is between scene changes. The audiance is aware that scene changes often involve skipping forward in time.

    59. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And has it ever occured that in Star Trek baby's are still delivered as we expect them to be. Why aren't they beamed out of the womb. Any woman will want that!!

    60. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by kundor · · Score: 1

      Huh...that was also Linus's pre-bitkeeper manner of kernel management. If the patch was important, they'd send it again.

    61. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

      Nana, this is because they also use this NASA thougth-reading thing that was covered yesterday.

      While they hit the button, they think the name and the connection is established.

      They still speak loudly though, because marketing studies suggested that people dont like computer generated thougth-to-speach.

      8-}

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
    62. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by equiraptor · · Score: 1

      I agree... Notice, the communicator signals that someone wants to talk to them with a beep or a bell. The response is typically " here." If it is safe to assume it's the Enterprize calling when you're on a planet, they occationally answer to the ship, or who the most expect to be calling. "Worf here," is similar to "Hello?" or ", how may I help you?" when answering a telephone.

    63. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by $0+31337 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No way... Data would kick Warfs ass.. In fact, there are only two or so episodes that Warf actually defeats *anyone*. He always gets the crap kicked out of him... If he was still on the Klingon homeworld he'd be a nursemaid or something..

      Yeah, fine, I freely admit that I don't have a girlfriend :P

    64. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by AndyL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since the Enterprise(D)'s communication system appears to transmit intra-ship communications including the opening line (usualy), there's only one way it could work.

      Obviously the only answer is that the computer must know who you with to speak to before you state their name. Either the computer is far smarter than they give it credit for or it's reading their minds. (This could help explain the universal translator as well.)

      This is further supported by the instances in the show when the recipient of a call speaks a short aside to a person they are physicaly talking with before answering the communicator and the computer correctly relays only the speach directed at the person on the other end of the line. Even if they never touch their com-badge or a wall panel!

      The only problem the computer-reading-the-mind theory doesn't seem to account for why Picard sometimes takes over a minute to respond to a hail but Worf can tell in under three seconds if a Romulan is going to pick up the line.

      More research is indicated.

    65. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Funny

      God damn you and the parent poster both.

      I now have an unshakeable mental image of Leonard Nimoy sitting in a bathroom stall beating off whilst singing about Bilbo Baggins.

      I hate you.

      p

    66. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by omynous · · Score: 1
      Could you imagine the kind of embarassing situations that would arise from being beamed out of the toilet?

      There are no toilets in ST. They have transporter devices implanted in their intestines and bladder to eliminate the need.

      Sheesh!

      Shannon Mann

      --
      A comment overheard in a corn field `If you have better ideas, lets hear them. I am all ears.'
    67. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      If I were standing on a planet waiting to be beamed up, I'd be terrified about moving too far, sitting down (I'd be beamed up without the chair!)

      Sounds like a great gag reel idea for the next Trek movie: Picard says, "Three to beam up" and the newbie ensign in the transporter room gets Data, a tree and half of someone's house, leaving Picard and Geordi watching the remainder of the house collapsing in a cloud of brickdust...

    68. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek by SmurfBoy04 · · Score: 1

      I have been doing this for years, and not just to hulking brutes but pretty much everyone!

      --

      I didn't spend all that time playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
  3. Man oh man.. by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scotty at work is really going to hate me...

    1. Re:Man oh man.. by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Worse yet, your doctor get mad at you when you ask him to do things not in his job description.

    2. Re:Man oh man.. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I work with doctors. NOTHING is in their job description by the way they act.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Man oh man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scotty beamed me twice last night. It was wonderful.

  4. Uhh.. I've never understood.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why technology will ever become a fashionable accessory.

    1. Re:Uhh.. I've never understood.. by peragrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Look at the iPod, the only real reason why it is taking off is becase it is fashionable. If I had a cell phone, that had a bluetooth headset, and a pin that did the conecting I would be happy. I don't like carrying my phone around, but a simple decorative item(changable covers anyone????) with a bluetooth headset for a private converstion would be really cool.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  5. Next Logical Step... by adamgreenfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's also easy to integrate the system with desktop phones and mobile phones. The database software allows the device to forward its messages to phones and pagers and also can accept calls forwarded from phones.

    This would seem to be the next logical step for the Nextel style "walk-talkie" communications. In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones, but the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

    It that ends up the case, I'm sure we will all be sitting around telling people how we remember the good old days when you could actually hear yourself think in a public place.

    If they could make the whole thing fit into an ear piece, and just use the mini-boom mic that you see on a lot of cell phone head sets now, they would probably spread like wild fire, but all I have to say is I have a hard enough time not losing my cell phone as is.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
    1. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      This would seem to be the next logical step for the Nextel style "walk-talkie" communications.

      The next logical step after "walk-talkie" would be true two-way communication. Full duplex is so much better. The Nextel thing is only about looking cool. The other day I thought, "Why is that driver holding his cell phone in front of his face? Oh, Nextel. What a dork."

    2. Re:Next Logical Step... by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      just intigrate this technology of picking up words that havent been spoken yet

      Slashdot Thread on it

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    3. Re:Next Logical Step... by Muddie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone.

      Isn't that what those Nextel "walkie-talkie" phones are, basically? Carrying on a conversation over a speaker phone? I resent those beyond a reasonable passion. It was rude enough to carry on a conversation on a cell phone in public, now I have to hear it as well? And that annoying *chirp* to boot?

      Not too far away is your concern going to meet reality, I fear.

    4. Re:Next Logical Step... by 74nova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that is exactly what i was just thinking. it would seem to me that without an earpiece of some sort, this would get chaotic. it sounds like a great idea, ideed, but i dont want to hear both sides of every conversation. its bad enough when one person is talking extremly loudly and obnoxiously on a regular cell phone, but if theyve got their speaker turned up while using these things, the other person is loud and obnoxious as well.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    5. Re:Next Logical Step... by garcia · · Score: 1

      BlueTooth ear pieces?

    6. Re:Next Logical Step... by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones, but the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

      That's where directional audio comes in. If only "you" can hear what the other person is saying, there ya go!

    7. Re:Next Logical Step... by hrbrmstr · · Score: 5, Informative

      We evaluated Vocera last year. Really nice tech, but it wasn't - buzzword warning - enterprise ready. While it may work in one building, the server-side of it isn't scalable (or wasn't - I haven't looked at them since). It didn't help their case that it was Windows-based (get a virus/worm, lose communications *:^).

      The lanyard-attached phone was pretty nice (since I can easily lose my cell phone as well) and I believe you can get a headset if you need to keep the receiving end private. I can still see those annoying/loud conversations popping up much more with these units, tho.

      The routing capabilities worked well and it would be great for our help desk and emergency incident response teams. Being able to say "Where's Bill?" and get a response was also pretty cool. It's only as accurate as the nearest associated access point, but it's still better then not knowing which side of the building some is on.

      Once they get more enterprise features (integration, scalability, global functionality) we'll probably adopt it in key areas.

      --
      Mind the gap...
    8. Re:Next Logical Step... by 74nova · · Score: 2, Funny
      Isn't that what those Nextel "walkie-talkie" phones are, basically? Carrying on a conversation over a speaker phone?
      yeah, except they are only half-duplex. my phone, otoh, has this new FULL-duplex capability! imagine that! it can even do it without those little chirps you speak so fondly of
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    9. Re:Next Logical Step... by warpSpeed · · Score: 5, Funny
      BlueTooth ear pieces?

      BlueTooth neural implants

      3 am Tech support calls take on a whole new dimention. "Man, I was dreaming that the server kept going down last night."

    10. Re:Next Logical Step... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      but the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

      How about sub-dermal cochlear implants which receive audio wirelessly? Also throw in the research on sub-vocalization that Slashdot posted today and Voila! you have what would previously be considered mental telepathy. Now if they can just make people's heads explode by staring at them they'll have a marketable product.

    11. Re:Next Logical Step... by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Funny

      enterprise ready

      You missed a pun opportunity, too.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    12. Re:Next Logical Step... by musikit · · Score: 2, Funny

      "picking up words that havent been spoken yet"

      Like "Blathering Blatherskite.... i am GIZMO DUCK"

    13. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't see why that driver deserves to be called a dork. Nextel is perfect for someone who has short intermittent conversations with a single other source.

      With Nextel, the user pushes a button, talks and lets go. The other party needs to only listen to the message, they don't need to do anything. Simple and highly effective.

      With a cellphone, the user pushes a button, waits for the other party to pick up the phone, talks, pushes another button. The other party must pick up the phone, push a button, talk, listen, push another button. Complicated.

      In summary, my fellow coward, the only dork here is you.

      xP

    14. Re:Next Logical Step... by hrbrmstr · · Score: 1

      Doh! I'm just not with it today. Would have been a nice one, too...

      --
      Mind the gap...
    15. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean?! I want to hear both sides of the conversations. It's really annoying when the rich guy at the next table picks up his phone and says "hi... oh howudoin?... really?... sounds like a deal, buy me 1000 shares of that!... thanks for the hot tip mate, bye."

      Shares of what? Shares of what?! What's the point of eavesdropping when you can only hear one side of the conversation! I want in on this hot tip too, it's my constitutional right!

    16. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only real limiting factor I see here is I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today escentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation. .... .... ....

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

      What do you think a conversation is? It's like a speaker phone without the speakers or the phones! People walking around having two-way conversations? It's be just like life BEFORE cell-phones.

      Personally, I find it more annoying when I can only hear half the convesation. If you can hear both sides, it's not so out-of-context, adn easier to filter.

    17. Re:Next Logical Step... by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      You have a warped sense of humour...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    18. Re:Next Logical Step... by gleam_mn · · Score: 2, Funny

      In a few years we will all be taping our shirts to answer our phones

      I can see it now:

      Bob the IT Guy: *Gives female coworkers breast a good squeeze*
      Female Coworker: *Gives Bob the most savage beating of his life*
      Bob the IT Guy (barely conscious): "I was just trying to answer your phone for you, I swear!"

      This technology is evil... it's just going to get geeks hurt!

      --
      - The auditors said to secure the server... hand me that duct-tape -
    19. Re:Next Logical Step... by Cypherus · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can change it from speaker to talking just like a phone up to your ear. I even think you might be able to do that same thing with a headphone jack. So you don't always have to have it on speaker phone when answering you nextel.

      --
      Open Source. It's the difference between trust and antitrust.
    20. Re:Next Logical Step... by simcop2387 · · Score: 0

      Now if they can just make people's heads explode by staring at them they'll have a marketable product.

      i can see a great market for this! with so many phones (i believe) having bluetooth you could just call someone up and give them a shock! Plus if they are near a WIFI AP too you could do it over the internet! Voila i'm a freaking millionare because now you can give people something close to a punch (albeit not the exact samething) over the internet!

    21. Re:Next Logical Step... by jheiss · · Score: 1

      My first thought after seeing that the server was Windows based was "Can I buy the little communicator devices and write my own server software?" Seems like some replacement server software that runs on Linux, scales decently, integrates with LDAP, etc. would be a good SourceForge project.

    22. Re:Next Logical Step... by FCP · · Score: 1

      We're also piloting Vocera, using it all over a medium-sized urban hospital campus. It's working pretty well so far. It's mostly support folks who have it now. There's one guy in particular I'm always having to page, and it's very nice to be able to just phone the Vocera extension:
      *chime* "Vocera"
      "Call Mike Effing Scott right effing now!"
      "I didn't understand"
      "Call Mike Scott"
      "Calling Mike Scott ..." *ring*

      (Name changed to protect the geeky)

      As far as the Windows lockin goes, we're stuck with so much of that anyway that I don't think anyone blinked at it.

      --
      .plan: file not found
    23. Re:Next Logical Step... by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      Yes that would be a great idea, because no one ever thinks of things they don't intend to say to the person they're talking to.

    24. Re:Next Logical Step... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hearing words not spoken isn't so new. My girlfriend has been doing that for a while now.

    25. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      women, cant live with them. cant have heterosexual sex without them.

    26. Re:Next Logical Step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Man, I was dreaming that the server kept going down last night."

      Usually when I dream of something going down on me, it sure as hell isn't a server.

    27. Re:Next Logical Step... by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1
      With recent developments in brain-computer interfaces (such as the monkeys controlling a mouse cursor with only their mind), It wouldn't be a stretch to simply think about talking instead of hitting your shirt all the time.

      And in the farther future the next step is not even bothering to vocalize but merely think about saying those words. That would be moving from the enterprise, to the borg I guess.

      It simply amazes me how those ideas are no longer restricted to science fiction anymore.

    28. Re:Next Logical Step... by hummassa · · Score: 1

      It's words not *yet* spoken, as in "that will be spoken in a moment"; not "words not spoken", that women seems to hear all the time :-)

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    29. Re:Next Logical Step... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      It used to be that talking to one's self in public [or having that appearance anyway] was the sign of lunacy and homelessness. Now it is a status symbol for the rich, and "chained to their friends, work, or Significant Other".

      I think most sane people would balk at talking to air, without a phone in their hand, but only until they saw everyone else doing it anyway...

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    30. Re:Next Logical Step... by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      It didn't help their case that it was Windows-based (get a virus/worm, lose communications *:^).

      So that's why communications were always going down whenever there was trouble on the Enterprise!!! (...in the enterprise? :p)

      --

      NO CARRIER
  6. The editors at slashdot need these ... by Sheepdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... might help prevent all the double posts we get regarding VOIP articles.

  7. Scalability by gid13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do they do if there are two people with the same name?

    1. Re:Scalability by levork · · Score: 1

      Someone removes a promotion, so Lt. Commander Smith won't be confused with Ensign Smith. :)

    2. Re:Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fire one of them? :-P

    3. Re:Scalability by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      Narrow it down by adding information. At some point, the database containing the mapping needs to be created. If you've got two Rob Malda's then you can represent the title. For instance, "Rob Malda, accounting" and "Rob Malda, janitor" would obviously get you to two different people. Or you could have the floor that their office is on included in it as well. Basically, enough descriptors could be added to distinguish between identical names.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    4. Re:Scalability by Rostin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Use a full name (w/ middle initial), a number tacked on the end, a location ("Frank at LA"), or whatever. Hasn't been to hard to work out with email addresses.

    5. Re:Scalability by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      You have to use the first letter of their last name, like in third grade.


      "David R, this is Bob. David R., come in please"


      "Yo, this is Dave. What's up?"


      "Hey David R. - did you just reboot the server?"

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    6. Re:Scalability by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same, too. I'd guess everyone gets a number (like a phone number), and maybe you could specify that if a "Mr. Smith" is requested from your badge specifically, it means Mr. Smith with the number 32474-3424, not the other one. Or, you could specify with the number directly.

      Beats me, really, I just thought of that in a couple seconds as the seemingly simplest way.

      --
      http://wsulug.org
    7. Re:Scalability by sporty · · Score: 1

      It'll ask you which one :P then you can uniquily identify them

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:Scalability by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      One of them has to die.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    9. Re:Scalability by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Funny
      Use a full name (w/ middle initial)

      Like James T. Kirk?

    10. Re:Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess employees will have to be assigned a rank.

      "Lt. Smith, this is Col. Johnson. Report to my office immediately."

    11. Re:Scalability by supergiovane · · Score: 1

      That's what type II hand phasers are made for.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
    12. Re:Scalability by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      His name is James Tiberius Kirk, and was often refered to as James T Kirk. Check out A Fan Page.

    13. Re:Scalability by vinnieg · · Score: 0

      Like "Rostin 69471..3.. uh.. nevermind."

    14. Re:Scalability by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What do they do if there are two people with the same name?

      The database could contain a many-to-many list that has the "relationship strength" in it. For example, if Data is more likely to talk to Worf 1 (the Klingon we all know and love) than to Worf 2, then Worf 1 would have a higher value. Thus, if there is an ambiguous name, then it selects the one with the higher rank. One would have to give the full name if they want Worf 2. Sample schema layout:

      Table: relationWeights
      -----------------
      callerID
      contactRef ... (foreign key to Contact table)
      Weight

      Note that those not in the relationWeights table are assumed to have a default, but low, weight. Thus, we would have to do an outer join during actual lookup.

    15. Re:Scalability by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Funny
      What do they do if there are two people with the same name?

      One of them is awarded a red shirt.

    16. Re:Scalability by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [What if there are two people with the same name?] One of them has to die.

      The guy with the red shirt, no doubt.

    17. Re:Scalability by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Oops. I forgot to address the issue of two identical full names (for completeness sake). Generally the intercom could say something such as, "There are multipe matches. Press once for [insert full description, including rank, specialty, etc.], twice for [other full description]."

      If there are so many matches that it is beyond practical tap counting, then some other approach is needed. Perhaps you listen to each one, and at the end of each person's description you press to call, or don't press to hear the next one. To keep it simple, maybe use this approach for 2 matches also.

    18. Re:Scalability by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Too hard. Just use personal nicknames. "John the prick" and "John the backstabber" for example.

    19. Re:Scalability by Ruzty · · Score: 1

      Would "the Bobs" have to fire themselves?
      -Rusty

      --
      The Master (Angelo Rossitto) in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, "Not shit, energy!"
    20. Re:Scalability by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Give everyone a second, unique frat-house nickname, like Sharkbait, Hurl, or Nads. You get the picture: 'Computer, let me talk to Ensign Nads.' 'Nads here. Wazzup, Captain Kludge?'

      OK, so I'm not funny? How about we implement this and take care of the redundancy stuff via LDAP. Or X.500. There goes any weekends off THIS summer.

      On second thought, maybe I wasn't joking just a moment ago. Compared to making LDAP multimedia-friendly and integrating it into a voice-recognition server, getting to saddle certain coworkers with subtly insulting nicknames (SCOFan, Goatse, 1d10t, Lamer, arrem-dash-are, Ms Bob) starts to look pretty cool, huh?

    21. Re:Scalability by palironsat · · Score: 1

      I can see it now...

      "We're sorry, Mike Jones, our lead developer already has that name assigned to him in the phone system. So, we're calling you Mike W. Jones. We're sorry for the inconvenience, so here, take this red shirt, on the company.

      "Oh, and here's your first assignment. You're going to try to sell our new deployment solution to the Romulans. Be sure to wear the red shirt - they love those!"

      Then he goes there, in his red shirt, with the entire senior executive staff of the company - who do you think wins in this business deal?

    22. Re:Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howard SternTrek

  8. now if only by pvt_medic · · Score: 0

    we can develop warp drives and phasers. I give a little time on the photon torpedoes.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  9. Big badge by baywulf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That is one heck of a badge from the picture they show. I was thinking of the little triangle pin-on from Star Trek.

    1. Re:Big badge by Neophytus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Someone will have had it modded in no time.

    2. Re:Big badge by Lanfear1020 · · Score: 4, Informative

      their only about 3in long by 1in wide.... they use them in the hospitals, especially the ER, around here... alot quicker then having to find a phone or PA system

      --
      ~ If you must mount the gallows do so with a coin for the hangman, a jest for the crowd, and a smile upon your face. ~
    3. Re:Big badge by dubiousdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it won't take long before Linux is ported to them and we see roving Beowulf clusters chirping all over the place.

      --
      Thank you. Drive through.
    4. Re:Big badge by jayteedee · · Score: 1

      Another thing that is very UN-Star-Trek-like is the fact that this is short range. A "Real Communicator"(tm) would talk to a satellite in orbit at the very least. This announcement is akin to claiming an automatic air soft pistol is a WMD.

      --
      Religion and science are both 90% crap..but that doesn't negate the other 10%.
  10. And for company-wide broadcasts... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...everyone answers to "Nerd".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:And for company-wide broadcasts... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      How come they both look like clowns? Well, duh... :)

  11. The Verizon dweeb by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is just gonna look like a homeless wacko saying "can you hear me now?" just staring into the sky...

    1. Re:The Verizon dweeb by Grave_Rose · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...so he's not a homeless wacko already? Seriously, he just walks around the land talking to himself always repeating the same phrase over and over. If there's a definition for "homeless wacko", I'm sure this fits the bill. ^_^

      Gr@ve_Rose

      --
      !ekoj on si aixelsyD
    2. Re:The Verizon dweeb by prockcore · · Score: 1

      is just gonna look like a homeless wacko saying "can you hear me now?" just staring into the sky...

      Shouldn't he be saying "Can you still hear me?"

      "Can you hear me now" implies that the guy couldn't hear him previously.

      This is the beginning of the commercial that they cut out.

      "Dude, are you still there? Hello?"

      "Hello? Can you hear me?"

      "Dude? Hello?"

      "Hold on, I'm going to go walk over by this camera"

      "Hello?"

      "Can you hear me now?"

      "Yeah, that's much better"

      "Good!"

  12. Quantum computer by DarthVeda · · Score: 0

    It knows what you want before you do

    1. Re:Quantum computer by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Maybe ST uses the information from the NASA Develops Tech To Hear Words Not Yet Spoken article covered earlier to speed things up.

  13. Never made sense by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    One thing that never made sense about Trekkie communicators is how does the communicator know who the heck to contact? You always see the trek dude touch the communicator and say "Mr Foo. Are you there"? Does that get broadcast to everyone with a communicator? If so that would be annoying! Damn Star Trek.

    1. Re:Never made sense by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Note how they ALWAYS say the person's name first. Yeah, just like the ones in the article. You say their name, it connects to them.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:Never made sense by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if I remember, they always say the persons FIRST name only (usually). What if two people have the same first name?

    3. Re:Never made sense by crschmidt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congratulations, you have just asked the exact same question that someone else already asked earlier in the thread, in addition to ignoring even the short description of the article.

      --
      -- Christopher Schmidt YouTube Quality of Experience
    4. Re:Never made sense by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      I think some people are forgetting the precept of RTFM. Read othe posts...the actual article itself...you will find answers to your questions there.

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    5. Re:Never made sense by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if I remember, they always say the persons FIRST name only (usually). What if two people have the same first name?

      If Outlook can figure out who to send my email to from a first name (by checking personal address book first then corporate directory), I'm thinking an advanced communications network from centuries in the future can probably do the same. In Star Trek, I suspect the computer would resolve ambiguity based on who you work with and talk to a lot, with some way to override this if you needed to.

    6. Re:Never made sense by ronaldb64 · · Score: 1
      I think some people are forgetting the precept of RTFM. Read othe posts...the actual article itself...you will find answers to your questions there.
      You must be new here... (duck).
      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    7. Re:Never made sense by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations Christopher, you didn't read my post. I said the STAR TREK communicators didn't make any sense to me, not these. The Star Trek ones seem to magically connect you to the proper person, just by saying the persons first name. I guess UIUC isn't known for intelligent students though.

  14. god what nerds.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...can i buy one?

  15. Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by dealsites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should have used a wifi standard. They could have sold to a larger market. Many cities (ie, Verizon in Manhattan) are putting up wifi hot spots. Then you wouldn't be limited to the office. People could also use it around the house if it could patch into the POTS network.

    Someone could use it around the house while watching TV to alert the wife that a new cold beer is needed.

    --
    Real-time deal updates from major deal sites.

    1. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by Toxygen · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've never been married, have you?

    2. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never gotten a joke before, have you?

    3. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by bjmorel · · Score: 1

      The Vocera rep, told us it works over 802.11b. Since the place I work at is planning on rolling out wireless networking, we are going to get some demo's to try it out. The demo they gave us was pretty cool

      --
      That's About It!
    4. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      The article says "a wi-fi standard", but you're right that this is useless without knowing which one. 802.11, though, was designed for relatively high-powered devices like laptop computers; good luck getting a laptop battery into a 3x1" badge. Does Bluetooth have the bandwidth for two-way voice?

      An even better alternative would be a cellular technology, as that's more mature and vastly more widespread than 802.11.

    5. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by esswedl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bluetooth certainly has the bandwidth for two-way voice--that's why you can buy a Bluetooth wireless hands-free headset for your (Bluetooth) cell phone. For example, one from Jabra. However, the range of Bluetooth is much shorter than Wi-Fi. At a maxium of 30 feet (a lot less going through the walls in my apartment), Bluetooth would be less convenient than Wi-Fi. Also, Wi-Fi access points are already becoming prevalent, whereas Bluetooth access points are less widespread. Though you can buy a Bluetooth access point, Bluetooth is meant more as a device-to-device standard for peripherals, not a networking protocol. It would be easier to cover a large buiding with Wi-Fi, and the network would be multi-use, allowing laptops and PDAs and such to connect along with the badges. While it's possible for devices to use Bluetooth to use a computer's internet connectivity (see the Share2Blue2th AppleScript that my friend C.K. wrote for allowing a cellphone to browse the web over a computer's intenet connection (that's the reverse of the usual way where a notebook uses Bluetooth to browse the web over the cellphone's modem connection)), it's much more of a hassle than with Wi-Fi, which was designed expressly for that purpose.

    6. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by jbarr · · Score: 1

      And in crystal-clear, high-tech clarity, you immediatly hear, "Get it yourself, you lazy dumba**!!!"

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    7. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by bigfatlamer · · Score: 1

      Two quick clicks, first the one from within the original post and the second one on the products link at the top of the page will tell you that it's based on 802.11b. A little further digging tells us that it uses a 660 mAh Li Ion battery with 2 hours talk time and 30h standby (with an extended, 800mAh battery available).

      As to 802.11 vs. cellular, in my hospital, you can't get a cell signal anywhere but the top floor (and even if you could, the Security goons rip the phone out of your hand as there's a fear - real or imaginary I don't know - that cell phones interfere with some wireless patient monitoring equipment). The place is lousy w/ WiFi signals though.

      BFL

      --
      There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
      --Doug Copland
    8. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by jargoone · · Score: 1

      At a maxium of 30 feet (a lot less going through the walls in my apartment), Bluetooth would be less convenient than Wi-Fi.

      30 feet for class 2. Class 1 is 100 meters, or 300 feet.

    9. Re:Simliar to wifi, but not quite. by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      So, how about a bluetooth badge/pin, communicating with a device in your pocket or clipped to your belt?

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  16. William by jstrain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shatner uses these to dictate his albums to his secretary...

  17. I can see it now... by indros13 · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...Doctor enters restroom where other doctor has occupied the stall. All of a sudden, a nurse on the other end of the hospital pages the stall occupant. The message echoes throughout the bathroom:
    "Dr. Johnson, please finish your business and get back to Ward 3"

    Sometimes you need a little peace and quiet.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  18. This really sucks ... by El+Cubano · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Vocera Communications and their little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG.

    There is no way I will ever be able to talk my wife into letting me have one of these setups. Darn!

  19. Must be bad... by lofoforabr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine how cool when you forgot your hand over your badge and start saying things you shouldn't be saying :)

  20. Voice recognition by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Funny
    I hope they've become better than Sprint with the voice recognition dialer. At least with a cell, people understand why I have to shout the same name 5 times in a row with different inflections.

    It'd look a little odd to see someone walking down the road, repeatedly tapping their chest, saying "Robert! *smack* Ro-bert! *smack* Robbberrrtt! *smack* "

    1. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robert!

      *smack*

      Ro-bert!

      *smack*

      Robbberrrtt!

      *smack*

      What is it, Robert?

      *smack*

      Robert, stop smacking me!

    2. Re:Voice recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes?

      - Roger

    3. Re:Voice recognition by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      I've found my phone works better with longer names, so I assign native American style names to my coworkers.

      'Call chief pointy-hair golfs-too-much'
      'Call codes-in-Java-and-never-bathes'
      'Call wears-loud-shirts-and-combat boots'

      And so on.

    4. Re:Voice recognition by tmortn · · Score: 1

      damn my that was funny.. and my mod points just ran out... oh the humanity.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  21. Re:Not as fast as Star Trek (or IS it?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe it uses the NASA technology to know what your going to say b4 you say it SlashDot -Auger

  22. Can the mics be remotely activated? by e9th · · Score: 1

    New employee motto: Bugged with pride.

  23. Vocera calling Apple... by FTL · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The technology inside these communicators was the hard bit. While Vocera appear to have solved the technical problems, they screwed up the easy bit: Style. Which would you rather carry, this or this?

    What they've produced is an ugly little box which you keep in your pocket, purse or belt. What they could have had -- for minimal extra investment -- is something that people would be proud to show off. Vocera need to have a conversation with the folk at Apple.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Vocera calling Apple... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Which would you rather carry, this or this?

      With the minor caveat that the first must actually work in the real world, while the latter only has to be sewn onto a zipperless jumpsuit.

      Vocera need to have a conversation with the folk at Apple.

      Well, I'm mad at Apple for not producing an 80GB iPod the size of my wristwatch. For minimal extra investment they could've had something that isn't so big and bulky and would actually hold my entire music collection. They clearly should've talked to the people at Paramount.

      And where's my damn holodeck anyway?

    2. Re:Vocera calling Apple... by simcop2387 · · Score: 0

      With the minor caveat that the first must actually work in the real world, while the latter only has to be sewn onto a zipperless jumpsuit.

      if you've watched enough startrek you'll have seen that the communicators are actually pinned on, they have removed them before, i don't have exact episodes on my head, anyone else care to help out with that?

      And where's my damn holodeck anyway?

      i dont know but i definately do not want to be cleaning those things... esp after commander riker has been in there...

  24. Just hope they can be disabled.. by flashbang · · Score: 1

    Just disable them when people enter the bathroom - just think how many people would sit there and talk while they really shouldn't be..

    --
    My sig left me for a younger user id.
    1. Re:Just hope they can be disabled.. by freakmn · · Score: 1

      It depends on what they are doing in the bathroom, and what name they are screaming out... icky...

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    2. Re:Just hope they can be disabled.. by mrtroy · · Score: 0

      Some Austin Powers is necessary here

      Austin: Who does number two work for??

      Texan: You show that turd who is boss!

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    3. Re:Just hope they can be disabled.. by flashbang · · Score: 1

      Put's a whole new meaning to "crunching" the numbers.

      --
      My sig left me for a younger user id.
  25. PARENT IS A TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your weak attempt to karma whore has been logged.

    1. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      ok it's not exactly insightful, but a troll? :)

  26. Already here? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    I cannot really imagine everyone using a cell phone today essentially walking around talking on a speaker phone. It would be so overwhelming that you would hardly be able to carry on a conversation.

    I really think that essentially, this is what already happens, in a lot of corporate bull pens you see people walking around talking into space. And it defiantly happens in the car. The badge link is the next step, some sort of proximity mic that simply links with current cell phone services like phone / net / walky-talky / voice-IM.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  27. Combine by goatan · · Score: 1

    They should integrate it with this for a really cool bit of technology.

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  28. Fast Company was first with this story... by tbase · · Score: 2, Informative

    In this story from last month's issue, Fast Company talks about VOIP tech and specifically these communicators being used at a hospital.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  29. not realy geard towards cellphone by Standard+Colin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This looks like every nerds dream, but i dont see it being usefull in place of cellphones. There are too many problems that can't realy be avoided, the scalabilty problem mentioned before, and the complete lack of privacy. more likely, it will endup finding use in exactly the same situation it was designed for - a 2-way radio for co-workers. I use a 2-way radio on my job, and this would be the ideal technology for us. in any case, this is damn cool

  30. Privacy by bobthemuse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh great, I can just see this at the hospital

    *beep* Doctor Smith, this is the Lab, Mrs. Thompson's results came back positive for chlamydia.

    I'd be more impressed with a belt-pack which communicated with a small earbud via bluetooth or similar.

    Article also mentions paging for an anesthesiologist and getting the closest one. I wonder if they do that based on the AP, or if they have plans to add a GPS receiver. Considering the amount of interference in a hospital, I can't see GPS working.

    1. Re:Privacy by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

      I'd be more impressed with a belt-pack which communicated with a small earbud via bluetooth or similar.

      Hmm... I think I just described the nextel network with a voice-recognition feature available on many high-end phones.

    2. Re:Privacy by garcia · · Score: 1

      Considering the amount of interference in a hospital, I can't see GPS working.

      Interference in a hospital? How about interference ANYWHERE? It's not exactly like GPS works all that well indoors...

    3. Re:Privacy by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Considering the amount of interference in a hospital, I can't see GPS working.

      Interference in a hospital? How about interference ANYWHERE? It's not exactly like GPS works all that well indoors...

      Heh. It never ceases to amaze me how many people forget that one tiny fact about GPS when they propose it as a location tracking solution: if it can't see the sky, it don't work.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Privacy by AJWM · · Score: 1

      GPS would be silly. Just triangulate the signal source as received by several different APs. That'd be more accurate, too.

      --
      -- Alastair
    5. Re:Privacy by frankmu · · Score: 1

      true story, i had to retest a Mrs Clapp for chlamydia

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  31. Nurses cry? Trekkies maybe, but not nurses. by $-chavito-$ · · Score: 0

    Lang says. "At one point we had nothing more than a bunch of PowerPoint slides, that we showed to health care organizations, and we had nurses in tears saying 'Where has this been all of my life?' "

    If this is not an exaggeration, as in proverbial tears, I find it hard to believe. It takes a lot to make a nurse cry -- think about all the unbelievable things they see on a daily basis. No doubt it will make their jobs easier, but bring them to tears -- I highly doubt it.

  32. Yeah But does it by myownkidney · · Score: 4, Funny
    Run Linux?

    On a more serious note, the badge, if you stick on your breast pocket, will have one heck of a time picking up your voice, especially in a noisy enviroment. Otherwise you will have to bow your head and pull your shirt up. Looks quite odd.

    1. Re:Yeah But does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever had your ear up against someone's chest while they're speaking?

  33. Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone have any idea what these little gizmos cost? Vocera seems to be one of those mysteriously vague businesses who want their "partners" to push "solutions" rather than slapping on a price tag and raking in the bucks.

  34. What's the big deal? by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use my hands free kit now. I touch the button on the ear piece, speak the name of the person I wish to call and voila, I'm one of the teaming masses walking around looking like I'm talking to myself. So ok, this is located on the shirt ala ST and uses the PTT model, ho hum.

    What I want is a blue tooth hands free kit that's small and comfortable enough to keep in your ear (and doesn't make you look like a 'tard, figuratively and literally) that has a very easy way to dock it seamlessly into your phone.

    1. Re:What's the big deal? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What I want is a blue tooth hands free kit that's small and comfortable enough to keep in your ear (and doesn't make you look like a 'tard, figuratively and literally) that has a very easy way to dock it seamlessly into your phone"

      I would like to add that it HAS to look like Uhura's ear piece, otherwise I'm not buying it.

    2. Re:What's the big deal? by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      I would like to add that it HAS to look like Uhura's ear piece, otherwise I'm not buying it.
      Take your pick. Although none of these are truly as outsized and ugly as Uhura's comm gear, they're all garish, obvious and aggressively sci-fi looking.

      Fortunately, at least one headset isn't ugly, garish and obvious.

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    3. Re:What's the big deal? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. In less than a decade it will be cool to wear a clearly noticeable ear piece. And within 5 years of that happening nobody will even notice it anymore, and they'll consider you quaint and old-fashioned if your ears are naked.

    4. Re:What's the big deal? by Flannelbum · · Score: 0

      heh... you MUST be a *player* ... But, did you get the matching case?

  35. Nurse Chapel? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

    Now if die-hard Trekkie geeks can get something that simulates Nurse Chapel, life will finally be complete.

    "You, you must be almost 30... have you ever kissed a gir?!?" - William Shatner, SNL

  36. Trekker by Nyhm · · Score: 3, Funny

    The title should be updated. A Trekkie communicator brings to mind Captain Kirk flipping open a palm-held device. A Trekker communicator indicates a lappel-pinned badge. Please be more diligent when posts involve Star Trek sub-cultures.

    ... now, should I post this anonymously, or openly attach my geek-code

    1. Re:Trekker by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      +1: Pedantic

    2. Re:Trekker by Nyhm · · Score: 1

      ... and much of the /. croud must be pedantic, as well. I expected this to be modded only Funny, but some have taken it as actual insight, which I think is just great!

  37. Great! by dupper · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only we Trekkies had someone to talk to...

  38. Strange ... by ciupman · · Score: 1

    ... I dunno why this has triggered so many bathroom jokes .. And no .. there's no hidden camera pointed at you while you take a dump .. (or is it?).

    --
    I fuse with Mercer every single day...
  39. Off topic by cmburns69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "How come Homer and Krusty look like clones?"

    It was to show the irony that Bart did not respect Homer, while at the same time idolizing Krusty (essentially the same person).

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    1. Re:Off topic by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Which goes to show you - Try to beat respect into your child and they'll grow to despise you.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  40. Deja Vu by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    Seems like this was...

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=100545&cid=8 57 2821

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  41. Don't bother me by rigmort · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't even sit at my desk for two minutes straight without a user bothering me for something, even though they've been told time and again that the proper channel for non-emergencies is email (for me, at least). I think that phone calls and unannounced visits are the all-time biggest productivity-busters in existence. I think a communicator-style device would suck. I had a fleet of 70 Nextels for my users originally, but when you can't even escape the direct-connects when you're trying to concentrate, you soon realize how harmful they are to productivity.

    1. Re:Don't bother me by Ba3r · · Score: 1

      nah, /. is the all-time biggest productivity-buster in existence

    2. Re:Don't bother me by globalar · · Score: 1

      Where is the technology that allows me to focus vs. distract me? Sometimes our efforts seem, literally, counter-productive.

    3. Re:Don't bother me by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you still help them when they come to your desk? If so, when someone comes up to you desk you should not look at them, extend your arm towards them, palm out, fingers out, and say "talk to the email", and otherwise ignore them.

  42. Do you really want everyone listening in? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1, Funny
    I always wondered how the Enterprise crew would have a private conversation . . . It looks like this thing has the same limitation . . . if your going to get a dressing down over the com, everyone around you is going to be able to listen in.

    "Worf, how many times do I have to tell you "Hailing Frequencies Open" and "Fire Photon Torpedos" are NOT the same thing!"

    There is something to be said for a little piece of plastic held up to the ear . . .

  43. This makes good business sense by just+some+computer+j · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see this company doing a couple of things different with this device. One, use a different protocol for transmission of the signal. I work in a office where our sales reps are always out when you need them to be here to answer questions. If this device had a hard set IP address, that is routeable, at least if the sales rep was near a hot spot, you could get ahold of them. Also, it would be nice to see some better design with this device. It's isn't huge or anything, but it needs to be stylish, something that this model does lack. Also the ability to encrypt any communication just in case you don't want evesdroppers and script kiddies sniffing your network or hearing what's going on.

    Personally, I would like to see a earbud or something, just in case you wife calls you and wants to talk about what she want to do to you when you come home.

    --
    eh, this sucks, I am going back to bed....
    1. Re:This makes good business sense by edwdig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A hard set IP wouldn't work well for roaming.

      What you want is an IM-like system. Give each communicator a unique id, and let the central server map id's to IP's as necessary.

    2. Re:This makes good business sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like I care that my cubemates know that I've got to take out the trash and walk the dog.

  44. Ear Piece by john82 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't even need a boom mic. I've got a Jabra ear piece that doesn't need a boom. The nice trick would be a keyword that would facilitate activation of the comm link. Voice activation for all functions. The biggest problem with making it an entirely in-the-ear unit would be radiation from the antenna being that close to your melon.

    1. Re:Ear Piece by wing_comm · · Score: 1

      the simple solution would be to build the earpiece so that it resembles Uhura's from TOS

  45. wouldn't be too hard by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a few years to integrate GPS and be able to say "Computer, locate CmdrTaco". Or how about Google's former voice search?

    Google's CTO Craig Silverstein has already said his grand vision for google in the future would be something along the lines of When search grows up, it will look like Star Trek: you talk into the air ("Computer! What's the situation down on the planet?") and the computer processes your question, figures out its context, figures out what response you're looking for, searches a giant database in who-knows-how-many languages, translates/analyses/summarises all the results, and presents them back to you in a pleasant voice.

    With a few more technologies like this, it's only inevitable this WILL happen.

  46. Beep..What was That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    beep. was that my cellphone? or...my email?..or IM?..or my cellphone walkie-talkie? or my pager?.or my badge?

  47. Tag ... You're it by Chief+Technovelgist · · Score: 5, Funny
    New office game - walk up to someone, tap their communicator, say the name of the president of the company and walk away. You're it!

    At least this is an ST technology that works. Once on the set of the original Trek in 1967, an executive for a tech company saw the automatic doors. You just walk up to them and *whoosh* they open. No big sensor doormat, no nothing. He offered a million dollars for the technology.

    The "technology" turned out to be two stagehands who yanked them open JIT.

    1. Re:Tag ... You're it by jbarr · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the outtakes of the actors running into doors that didn't get opened on cue are truely funny!!!

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    2. Re:Tag ... You're it by halo8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Math Time

      $1,000,000
      / (1 Person X $7 hour X 40 hours X 52 weeks)
      = 1 guy pulling open the doors automatically for 68 years
      OR
      = 68 guys pulling on 68 doors for one year
      add nauseum in any combo

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  48. Duh! by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 1

    That's what IPv6 is for!

  49. Push to talk by tka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out push to talk.

  50. Next, Next Logical Step... by skinny.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that the communicator style won't (or shouldn't, imho) bode well for public communication.

    From the hardwired rotary of the past to the 24th century communicator, we're evolving from both sides into something ~almost, but not quite entirely~ like the phones we have today. You're suggesting a small phone with voice dialing almost perfectly.

    I remember an Apple Quadra commercial from 1990 or 91 where a little kid says, 'Computer, call Grandma.' The only different thing 14 years later is the form factor.

  51. Slashdot Redux by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

    We mentioned these in 2002.

    And you will again in 2005.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Slashdot Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, that's funny. Mod him up, Scotty.

    2. Re:Slashdot Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, they probably will again in 2004 for that matter...

  52. why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by subjectstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i've decided, after reading several other unrelated stories here on slashdot, that this sort of thing doesn't go far enough.

    want something really badass? combine these communicators with the "campus ghosts" concept. throw in a gps. tie it all back in to a huge server farm in the bowels of some university.

    now you can smack your communicator and address the computer (with it's awexome speech recognition capabilities and limited AI) directly, and ask it for directions; or maybe just what's on the menu at the cafe, or if there are any books left in a particular subject at the bookstore.

    you could smack it up and set it to "record mode" so that it picked up your professor's lecture, and then later you could grep through it verbally, or have the text or audio file uploaded to your desktop. set reminders on the thing, ask it for definitions of words or have it call off a formula to you, or send the text to your pda.

    hell, you could even ask it for a weather report or world news.

    of course, this is largely based on "Prime Intellect" from the online novel of the same name - uh . . . only, without all the reality warping and stuff.

    i'm just sayin . . . hurry up with the future. i need a little electronic elf to keep up with my crap and make sure i don't kill myself in some dumbass fashion.

    --
    ** Chigusaaa!!! You're the coolest girl in the WORLD!!! **
    1. Re:why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by BobSutan · · Score: 1

      I like the idea you're suggesting--a digital "elf" so to speak. Maybe that'd make for a nice open source project??? However, in order to do everything you're suggesting, today's form factor would be too unmanageble to maintain externally. You'd need to house it in a special carrying case or backback a la a laptop. At best I see it being in a small belt pouch like some of the larger PDAs come with.

      In a few years time I think it might be possible to do it externally. Maybe a Wireless USB device you wear on your shirt or as an earpiece where the body of it hangs off the belt?

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    2. Re:why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by LaForce · · Score: 1

      Why limit yourself to a campus? Create a giant database of information in different cities and pipe it over cellular.

      Now you can just tap your badge and hear "Hello, Onstar"

    3. Re:why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by autophile · · Score: 1
      now you can smack your communicator and... you could smack it up and...

      Why stop there? You could just up and smack your communicator! Bad communicator!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    4. Re:why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by MShield · · Score: 1

      hummm. bluetooth enabled mike and a regular ipac? tap the mike - record the lecture? My wife uses a program on her ipac to do dictation (she tried the bluetooth headset but really isn't into star trek and it looked a bit too borg). When she gets into the office the ipac automatically dloads the dictations, and the server puts 'em in the right place. An old fashioned human has to transcribe the notes however.

    5. Re:why not take it to the next LEVEL?!?! by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Why would the user form factor need to be any bigger ?

      Think of it as a keyboard with a speaker... so it is an input/output device. You unit is tied to your CPU back at home/dorm/laptop or to server space allocated to you. So you make a request for an audio playback which is simultaneously recorded on your base system, server space or device of choice to which you have access via the WAP ( could be limited to campus network or any net attached system to which you have access ). The brain system just becomes a very sophisticated router for requests. The voice recognition heavy lifting would be done by the main system while your pager/communicator whatever is just an i/o device.

      For a wider ranging system your personal user information would be able to be transmitted to the local access point and that might increase the size a bit but I see no reason something along the size of an ipod wouldn't do the trick... and allow signifigant local storage capacity to boot.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  53. I WANT ONE! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right could you imagine it.

    *Taps badge* "Scotty the shredder is full!"

    Though if you were running alerting sofware it would be easy to incorporate this into your system.

    Imagine if you could recieve a "comm" from your server telling you *Dave, my resources are getting low.*

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  54. They had those for 15+ years by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They used to have walkie-talkie-based Trek badges. The downside was that they were about 10 times heavier and about 5 larger (volumewise) than the TV series ones. They would sag your shirt. But, being first does not always mean being best.

  55. yeah but... by General+Newcomb · · Score: 1

    No built in camera or ogg support.

  56. It would be slick... by Wolface · · Score: 0

    If they mix this communicator with the thing NASA is inventing "To Hear Words Not Yet Spoken" so u'll have a very comfortable cellphone with cheap service that you can actually use with your mind. No more complaints about the "guy with the cellphone". Imagine the military and espionage uses for that kind of technology...

  57. hook this up with the NASA technolgy by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    and you have instal communication to people by just thinking about calling them.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  58. Star Trek wishlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    my start trek wishlist:

    1) Faster than light travel
    2) Shuttles that levitate
    3) Replicators
    4) Teleportation

    ..
    ...

    9,472,381,478,471,832,741,592,158) Communicators

    1. Re:Star Trek wishlist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh .. left out

      5) Lt.Deanna Troi

    2. Re:Star Trek wishlist by jakob_grimm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Every other geek's Star Trek wishlist:

      1) Seven-of-Nine

      2) Holodecks (see #1)

      3) Faster than light travel

      4) Shuttles that levitate

      5) Replicators

      6) Teleportation

      ..

      ...

      9,472,381,478,471,832,741,592,158) Communicators

      --

      "No prints can come from fingers / If machines become our hands." -- Jack Johnson

  59. Don't you remember your Trek? by chronoso · · Score: 1

    They never seemed to have a problem with ditching their badges whenever they needed to be sneaky. The other night, they had two episodes of TNG in a row where they did that (the one with alissa milano as wesley's girlfriend with that video game thing, and the one where the 'ghosts of the essex' take over troi and worf's bodies.) doing some subterfuge? just ditch your badge in the turbolift...

    1. Re:Don't you remember your Trek? by e9th · · Score: 1

      I forgot. Doctors attribute my memory lapses to frequent transporter use.

    2. Re:Don't you remember your Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the one with alissa milano as wesley's girlfriend with that video game thing

      Ashley Judd

  60. Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L.E. by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    I always wanted to say, "Open channel D," into my fountain pen.

  61. Precognition is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Anyone who has ever worked on a Federation Star Ship knows that the comm. system uses a "defocused temporal perception" to give the comm. system a limited sort of precognition. The inventor of the system claimed he got the technology for it from a parallel universe of sorts, that he stole it from an elevator system (the "Happy Vertical People Transporter") at a parallel universe corporation called the "Sirius Cybernetics Corporation". No one knows what he's talking about.

    What Star Trek doesn't show you, is the many hours each day that the Ship's Counselor has to spend working with the comm. system just to get it to want to work. Apparently the system suffers some of sort of depression. I don't understand it.


    Modern elevators are strange and complex entities. The ancient electric winch and "maximum-capacity-eight-persons" jobs bear as much relation to a Sirius Cybernetics Corporation Happy Vertical People Transporter as a packet of mixed nuts does to the entire west wing of the Sirian State Mental Hospital.

    This is because they operate on the curios principle of "defocused temporal perception". In other words they have the capacity to see dimly into the immediate future, which enables the elevator to be on the right floor to pick you up even before you knew you wanted it, thus eliminating all the tedious chatting, relaxing, and making friends that people were previously forced to do whist waiting for elevators.

    Not unnaturally, many elevators imbued with intelligence and precognition became terribly frustrated with the mindless business of going up and down, up and down, experimented briefly with the notion of going sideways, as a sort of existential protest, demanded participation in the decision-making process and finally took to squatting in basements sulking.

    An impoverished hitch-hiker visiting any planets in the Sirius star system these days can pick up easy money working as a counsellor for neurotic elevators.

    --Douglas Adams, "Restaurant at the End of the Universe"

    1. Re:Precognition is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "defocused temporal perception"

      I'll be sure to use that one to diffuse the situation the next time I am really late for some event at my in-laws.

  62. Re:has to be said..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comedy...it's not so easy, is it?

  63. System error by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    And when one of these badges freezes up, you can reset it by tapping the button twice and shouting "REBOOT!"

    1. Re:System error by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Except that then you change into the Thief. ("I'm not the Warrior? I'm ALWAYS the Warrior!")

      Chris Mattern

  64. Re:Apple Quadra Commercial by adamgreenfield · · Score: 1

    I remember that commerical, and I remember the first time I saw it I laughed so hard I fell out of my chair.

    I remember thinking how unrealistic that was... imagine all the things we think are unrealistic at this point becoming reality in the future.

    "Computer, Beam me to Grandmas"

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
  65. Plato's Stepchildren by Raistlin99 · · Score: 1

    Because the telekinesis was a side effect of some chemical in the foods the people ate. Since normal food on Enterprise didn't have the chemical it eventually worked its way through their bodies, leaving them non-telekinetic.

    --
    I/O, I/O, its off to disk I go, with a read and a write, and a bit and a byte, I/O, I/O, I/O, I/O
    1. Re:Plato's Stepchildren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the telekinesis was a side effect of some chemical in the foods the people ate. Since normal food on Enterprise didn't have the chemical it eventually worked its way through their bodies, leaving them non-telekinetic.

      That's not an explanation. Why didn't they analyze the food and start synthesizing the chemical?

    2. Re:Plato's Stepchildren by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Because it would have brought up ethical issues a bit too close to Floridation and McCarthy's witchhunt?

      I don't know the real reason, but that would be a good enough excuse for me.

    3. Re:Plato's Stepchildren by Raistlin99 · · Score: 1

      Because in the same episode the small person(read midget)explained this. He wanted to do stuff with his own 2 hands. To know that you have done something rather than use your powers to make everything easy. However, Starfleet command probably did analyse Spock's tricorder readings and put it to good use.

      --
      I/O, I/O, its off to disk I go, with a read and a write, and a bit and a byte, I/O, I/O, I/O, I/O
    4. Re:Plato's Stepchildren by bluesangria · · Score: 1

      What I got from that episode was the "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" spiel. The midget was immune to the telekinetic-inspiring properties of the chemical, but consequently, he was alot less corruptible and contemptible than the ones who had the power and abused it.

      blue

  66. combine this with NASAs tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now what would be really sweet is to combine this with NASA's sub vocalization technology.

    http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/03/18/013 22 22.shtml?tid=134&tid=160

    Welcome to the 21st century baby.

  67. Sounds like a quote from the dot com era by cmj · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Once we had a prototype, we started doing research into who might want to use a product like this,"
    So you thought up a "cool" idea, spent a bunch of dollars making it work and then went looking for someone that would find it useful? Good plan.

  68. Re:Apple Quadra Commercial by skinny.net · · Score: 1

    By unrealistic, I hope you mean 'unreal' or fantastic because it actually was possible. It took a little more than AppleScript, though, and Apple took a little flack for that.

  69. Their inital business plan.. by shiva600 · · Score: 1
    ..sound suspiciously like it's lifted off of some well known slashdot comments:

    "Once we had a prototype, we started doing research into who might want to use a product like this,"


    Translation:
    1. Invent Star Trek Communicator
    2. ???
    3. PROFIT!
  70. CEO to managers come in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [CEO] managers come in...

    [managers] here boss...

    [CEO] we're losing sales this quarter on the Pharcock Needletit account. Terminate all non essential peeons in braches 5-7.

    [managers] (to braches 5-7) You guys heard the boss now get going, haul ass pack your shit.

    [CEO] One last thing, hows my hair?

    [managers] (in a resounding chorus) great boss!

  71. And finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    BlueTooth teeth.

    And then we will be done.

    1. Re:And finally by rufo · · Score: 1

      BlueTeeth?

      Well, at least it's not blue balls...

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  72. How often... by Bluesman · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is this going to get left on accidentally. People will be getting fired left and right.

    Or will people learn real quickly not to say "stupid (*&*(&" as soon as they hang up the phone.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  73. Can you hear me now... good by modder · · Score: 1

    "It that ends up the case, I'm sure we will all be sitting around telling people how we remember the good old days when you could actually hear yourself think in a public place."

    Can you hear yourself think now? good

  74. Yes but by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    what is the range don't forget that they work from the surface of a planet to orbit. And even from inside said planet to orbit.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  75. Big Deal by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who cares about a stupid badge communicator? WHERE THE HELL ARE OUR PHASERS GODDAMMIT!!! Looks like the research community needs to focus on the important things.

  76. RTFM? on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Read othe posts...the actual article itself...
    Welcome to Slashdot, where reading the fine article, other posts, or proofreading one's own work before pressing Submit is neither required nor expected.

    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO

  77. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll driving traffic to his site with every post he makes with links that have nothing to ever do with the article. Check his post history.

    MOD TROLL DOWN.

  78. Re:Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L by Mateito · · Score: 4, Funny

    > I always wanted to say, "Open channel D,"
    > into my fountain pen.

    I'm sorry, but exactly what is stopping you?

  79. Health care is in trouble! by Nevo · · Score: 2, Funny

    "One study by the First Consulting Group, a healthcare consultancy based in Long Beach, Calif., found that when the 300-bed St. Agnes Healthcare facility in Baltimore deployed the Vocera system, its nurses saved more than 1,100 hours a year, while the entire organization saved some 3,400 hours."

    They only have three nurses?

    1. Re:Health care is in trouble! by javaguy · · Score: 1

      After reading it a couple of times, I think it means the nurses saved 1,100 hours collectively, not each. It's not a well written sentence.

  80. Cute by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha! When these come in, my call name's going to be "Supreme Commander of the Universe."

    "Butthead to Supreme Commander of the Universe, it's not funny anymore, change my name back."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  81. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's got 5 for that!
    Shows that all slashdot users are trolls

  82. Re:Next Logical Step... telephone tooth... by Paul32_829 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there is an other way...

    "The "telephone tooth" would place a small device in a person's back molar that includes a wireless, low-frequency receiver and a gadget that turns audio signals into mechanical vibrations, which would pass from the tooth directly to the inner ear as clear sounds. "

  83. What about by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    What about a locate feature? that can't be hard to add and would be really useful.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:What about by sam1am · · Score: 1
      What about a locate feature? that can't be hard to add and would be really useful.

      Yup. It's got it.
      Me: [press and release button]
      Vocera: Vocera
      Me: "Where is Joe"
      Vocera: Joe Hill is in Berry Library.
  84. Re:Translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it be a Universal Translator? Take the doctor jargon/nerd stuff and translate it to newbie talk.
    Hmmm. I wonder if there was a species of "newbies" in the Star Trek episodes... sound familiar. I think it was the Newbian race.

  85. The answer is obvious by aztektum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you were wasting time on /. as early as I was this morning you'd know they just have one of these on every starship too.

    I wonder if it was extra or just standard equipment by then.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:The answer is obvious by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I think Troi must have one of these. That's her dirtly little secret.

      "Mmm, Worf is thinking that he likes my ass. Riker's going to be jealous. Hee Hee."

      "Captain, I sense that the Romulan is experiencing feelings of humor. He's comparing your head to a cue ball."

      "So Wesley pulled it in the holoshower this morning. And he was thinking about...Guinan!"

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
  86. ST: TOS by Alioth · · Score: 1

    My cellphone can be used a bit like an ST:TOS communicator - flip the keyboard up so it's angled at 45 degrees, and hit 'Speaker' after dialling the number. It also has voice tags so you can voice dial for the full effect. Nokia 6820.

  87. Re:Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, but exactly what is stopping you?

    I didn't think that it actually necessary to add, "and have it do it."

  88. Bluetooth? by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 1
    Bluetooth would be good for this. Wear the mike on your lapel/headset/helmet/whatever, the wifi transceiver sits in your pocket/utility belt/backpack/whatever.

    I imagine this is only a hardware revision away.

    1. Re:Bluetooth? by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth's range is only a couple yards.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Bluetooth? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

      If your head is more than a couple yards away from your pocket, the only guy you get to talk to is the one that changes the water in your head-vat.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  89. How would this work around the world because... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the Communicator talks to YOU!

  90. Not as far either by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I doubt these things can be used from orbit... or 1/2 way across the solar system...:)

    But perhaps down to the corner donut shop...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  91. Re:Translator by 1SmartOne · · Score: 0

    that's the babel fish.

  92. Pricing?!?! by GoRK · · Score: 1

    I know that they price the entire solution for a company rather than sell out individual devices, but damn do I hate it when you can't even get a ballpark idea how much something costs. When a company does this, it just feels like it's going to cost "too much" even if it's not!

    1. Re:Pricing?!?! by GoRK · · Score: 1
      Oh ok I found it finally. I guess I was too hasty with the above:


      Vocera Communications System Pricing and Availability
      The Vocera Communications System will be available October 2002. It will be sold through select value-added resellers across the United States. The Vocera Communications System pricing is based on purchases of Vocera Server Software, Vocera Communications Badges, and software maintenance agreement. Server software licenses start at a list price of $20,000 for a 75-seat users' license and the Vocera Communications Badge, which can be shared by shift-based workers, is listed at $400.


      Ouch! Oh well, I guess that explains why they are targeting the medical industry :)
    2. Re:Pricing?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and people wonder why an asprin at a hospital costs $15.00....

  93. who can I talk to by jcgf · · Score: 1
    So if I wanted to talk to a random person would I say CQ CQ CQ DE VE5JCF running QRP? I'm assumming I was running low power cause I don't want any more than about 5 watts if the thing is just above my heart.

    Jared

  94. Re:Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L by AJWM · · Score: 1

    Now there's a show I'd like to see in a DVD boxed set.

    OTOH, after watching a few of them again this many years later, I might come to regret the purchase.

    --
    -- Alastair
  95. Hmmm by thrills33ker · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure this technology is ready for the enterprise.

    Oh, hang on...

  96. Electromagnetic radiation health implications ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how healthy it is to have one of these things on your chest, centimeters away from your heart and other major vessels.

    We need to know the long-term health implications of all these devices, not to mention computer monitors, cell phones, etc.

  97. Another way to send spam by JohnCC · · Score: 1

    I can just see it now...

    Hi John, this is Kitchens Direct, your postcode has just been selected to win a free....

    Argh!

  98. All the better to click you with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    My what a big link you have! :]

  99. Not good enough. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    There are 3 people with my name at my current organisation and I get much of their internal mail.

    People simply can't be bothered finding the correct person, so I know who's getting fired next month, the margin (spectacular) on a bunch of our products and when the new one hits the market.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  100. Reason for no delays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be the magic of the marketing machines. Editing OUT the delays, and power cycles, and everything else the creates adverse performance. Of course the 23rd century looks so wonderful, they never show the bad side of it... Just imagine watching the raw footage of Picard having to reboot his communicator... LOL - Auger

  101. Update to firmware: location by autophile · · Score: 2, Funny
    I heard the next release is going to include a tracking system, so you can also ask where someone is.

    "Computer, locate Dr. Vidal!"

    Dr. Vidal is taking a dump in the third floor men's lavatory.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Update to firmware: location by sam1am · · Score: 1

      They have tracking, at least based on the Access Point the user is associated with. In our installation (college campus), each access point is only tagged with the name of the building, so we don't have that close a monitoring, but we do have some. It's nice to be able to see if someone's at lunch or their desk or still out working in the field. That said, these things go through battery pretty fast when you spend large amounts of time out of range of an AP. But if you're within range, they're surprisingly long lasting and high quality.

  102. Re:Damn, they've skipped over The Man from U.N.C.L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or when the number of channels are high enough "Connect to DD."(double D) That would be my favorite channel.

  103. Naming conventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine trying to contact an employee named, oh... let's say Carl Fermat.

    * squiggly lines dissolve into dream sequence *

    EMPLOYEE: *touches communicator button, then speaks* "FermatC"

    COMM SYSTEM: ahh..%&^%()_*##@@NO CARRIER

  104. Spock? One to beam up.... by db10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...this planet sucks.

  105. Very funny, Scotty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...now beam up my clothes.

  106. So, how long 'til there's an implantable version? by kclittle · · Score: 1

    It's 4 A.M. and you're soundly asleep in bed. Then, POW!, all of a sudden you bolt straight up as your boss starts yelling gibberish at you from somewhere deep in the base of your skull. Ah, the future is just ducky, ain't it?

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  107. Why the trek intercom can't be instant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well first the person has to say "Data to Cmdr
    Worf". Now the processing of this command probaly
    takes a billionth of a ms, but it then has to
    play back the "Data to Cmdr Worf" message.
    *That's* where the delay comes in, and why this
    system can't be instant if it's set up in
    this manner.

  108. I want a cell phone that looks like the old by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    Star Trek style communicators. The whole touching the badge thing really does not do it for me.

    Mix in the little connecting sound with the rough ability to recognize voice input and I'm sure you would have something people would love to buy. I know I would buy one. (Not really a trekkie, but I have always liked the show.) Seems to me the real trekkies would be all over something like that.

    Paramount could benefit as well. Licensing the product likeness along with cool trek ring tones and such would be no brainer value adds. Just another way to continue to milk the Trek franchise that I would actually appreciate.

    C'mon, there is somebody that reads /. that works somewhere that could at least float this idea. --do it!

    Offtopic: (well, sort of)

    Does anybody know where good replicas can be purchased? As a kid, I had a model that was pretty cool that got lost somehow. Have always wanted another one for a cool desk toy.

  109. How do I... by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

    get a job here??? I don't even care what they make me do, or if they pay me.

  110. New Idea: Telepathic device by Escalus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just saw another story on Slashdot earlier that'd be relevant: NASA Develops Tech To Hear Words Not Yet Spoken. Just combine the two, and you get a telepathic device!

    1. Re:New Idea: Telepathic device by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      Uh, too late, someone beat you to it.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  111. Re:Why is this modded as "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose first.last doesn't have a memory, or the sense to understand the word traditional.

    Old phones just had "PRS" on the 7 key, and "WXY" on the 9. After a while, they added Q and Z to the number 1, and then seem to have changed their minds for cellphones.

  112. Actually used/seen the Vocera device in action by Palmzombie · · Score: 4, Informative

    The devices are very cool. You sign in with your voice (the system stores a voice print that authenticates you). It knows who else is logged in to the system and can locate them if you assign locations to the AP's (big brother calling). It also ties in to your pbx system so you can dial the phone,"call 222-222-1342". Has a series of voice commands-voice recognition. You can setup groups and do group calls. A hospital is using it for paging/communications system in house. Devices are small and can be clipped on or hung on your neck with a lanyard. Can be used by multiple people. If the battery runs low, you sign off, drop the old one back in the charger. Pick up a new one and sign in and off you go. You can set it to "not disturb" you. And it tells you who is calling first (screen those calls) before you answer. Much more intelligence built into the server, this device has great potential... Now to program them to order chinese food for me automatically....

  113. Ah. that's an easy one to explain by Lobsang · · Score: 1

    Slashdot comes with the questions. Slashdot comes with the answers. Just look a few articles down. They're using NASA's technology to hear unspoken words. You jus had to scroll a few articles down to get the answer.

  114. I've used these, they are neat by pantera · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had the chance to use these and evaluate rolling them out on a large scale. They are excelent little devices. Most of the innovation here is in the software, the keys are in the voice recognition and badge tracking. For the most part the system was very well thought out.

    I've read a couple of post saying (probably joking) that they want all sorts of features in the badges, bluetooth, linux, etc. No, No, they've got it all wrong and vocera got it right, the badges are as simple and cheap as can be, they only have 3 buttons, and a simple LCD display. So all the battery life can be spent on the WIFI.

    There is a regular headphone/mic jack on the badges.

    The units work very well, and the feature of auto-forwarding to cell phones is great.

    The management software is all written in Java, and changes quite often, as this is all coming from small company and bugs are fixed and features added all the time.

  115. Um... no... by Guppy06 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG."

    The communicators in Star Trek can reach across interplanetary distances and don't even have to worry about line-of-sight. These things probably won't work more than 500 yards off of the interstate.

  116. Would this really be more annoying ? by tmortn · · Score: 1

    A lot of people seem to be complaining about the idea of having a bunch of people walking around essentially on speaker phone.... but so what ? What is it when your walking around with your buddies ? Its not like we all walk around using sign language or anything.

    To me the annoying thing with a cell phone is a one sided conversation.. you know the guy standing in the middle of the isle at the grocery store talking to no one... but if your hearing a tiny little speaker voice it should be more natural than just hearing one side. After all we are very accustomed to hearing two+ sided conversations going on around us... one sided conversations stand out because they have a very different cadence due to the constant long breaks while the other person is talking.

    past that as far as the annoyance of having conversations in places where they should not be had ( MOVIES !!!! ) goes, it will not matter how many sides of the conversation you hear because they will always be annoying.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  117. Re:Why is this modded as "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe he's not from the US?

  118. Re:Why is this modded as "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not from the US, but I can still remember such phones.

  119. Mirror Mirror by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    TOS: During a space (ion?) storm Kirk, Uhura, Scotty (and Checkov?) are beamed to the ISS Enterprise in the Mirror Universe. Conversely, Mirror Kirk, Mirror Scotty and Mirror Uhura are brought to our reality. Much fun ensues.

    Oh yeah, in the Mirror Universe, you get to see Spock's Beard. ;)

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  120. Location by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'd be cool if the system was set up such that you can ask it where someone is, and have them located via GPS on the badge.

    Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?"

    Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the 10 Forward restroom, Stall 3."

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can. The system replies with the location of the AP the badge is asscociated with.

    2. Re:Location by Keith_Beef · · Score: 2, Funny
      Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?" Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the 10 Forward restroom, Stall 3."

      Picard: "Computer, connect me to Commander Laforge"

      Computer: "I'm sorry, I can't do that; Commander Laforge is in conference with Master Bates."

      .

    3. Re:Location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?"

      Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the 10 Forward restroom, Stall 3."



      Picard: "Computer, where is Commander Laforge?"

      Computer: "Commander Laforge is in the holodeck running the Britney Spears Interactive simulation".

    4. Re:Location by BrainStain · · Score: 1

      why do you think the red shirts are the first to get offed? easy to trek ... er track; next yellows then blues. I dunno, what are the real stats on t-shirt color vs. life expectancy? die engineers! most expendable filth, you denebian slime devils. oh, wups, reflecting the original series, gawd I HATE revisionists. nurse chappel, you are so hot, give me a shot of tranquilizer, then I want ohura all stardate long. all women shall wear their hair down from now on, beam up a dozen green women and a keg of romulan!

  121. Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I just paranoid, or is it a bad idea to have a wireless card transmiting that close to your heart?

  122. Technical inconsistencies rampant in TNG by giminy · · Score: 1

    their little internal communication system that they have working at their office that functions like the badge communicators from ST:TNG

    Those were the communicators that you sometimes had to tap to talk, and sometimes didn't, right?

    Boy oh boy this is going to get people into trouble...

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  123. Retro by Cloudface · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder whether anyone has modded a a cellphone with voice-recognition into a 1967-style ST communicator. Seems to me that it would be easy to do, especially the part where you flop open the mesh cover to the tune of that neat cicada sound...

  124. Why is it that nobody remembers .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 seconds would be more than enough for "[any conceivable name] to [any conceivable name]

    Why is it that nobody remembers the name of Johann Gambolputty... de von Ausfern-schplenden-schlitter-crasscrenbon-fried-di gger-dingle-dangle- dongle-dungle-burstein-von-knacker-thrasher-apple- banger-horowitz- ticolensic-grander-knotty-spelltinkle-grandlich-gr umblemeyer- spelterwasser-kurstlich-himbleeisen-bahnwagen-gute nabend-bitte-ein- nurnburger-bratwustle-gernspurten-mitz-weimache-lu ber-hundsfut- gumberaber-shonedanker-kalbsfleisch-mittler-aucher von Hautkopft of Ulm?

  125. Forget The Man from U.N.C.L.E., Get Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we're going to need the cone of silence with all these people whacking and yacking.

  126. Re:Why is this modded as "funny"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whups! So now you admit you're pretty low on the reading comprehension scale too.

    Here:
    You try spending a few centuries getting only wrong number calls

    Understand yet? Moron.