Slashdot Mirror


The Wireless Backpack Repeater

Andy Laurence writes "So, you've decided to do a webcast around the streets of Bristol, but your puny wireless NIC isn't up to it? You need the ultimate wireless repeater! Built from an old backpack, a lead acid battery, a Linksys wireless device, and a rather scary antenna, this wireless repeater will get you webcasting from over a mile away." You'd definitely burn extra calories hiking with that thing.

241 comments

  1. Wondering... by infofreako · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was wondering how we could do remotes with our new 80s radio station!

    Thanks.

    -nfo

    1. Re:Wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm no offense but this IS not offtopic!

      the poster is referring to so remote webcam/internet radio broadcasts for their online 80's radio station..

      and no i am not the original poster.

  2. Which Bristol? by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From surfing around the site, it seems to indicate that we're talking about Bristol, WA which is near Seattle... there's enough communities going by the name of "Bristol" in the USA this could get confusing.

    1. Re:Which Bristol? by haluness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually I think its about Bristol in England

    2. Re:Which Bristol? by Patik · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought of Bristol, Connecticut, the home of ESPN. Had to look it up, and apparently it's in England.

    3. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, it clearly talks about Bristol, England.

    4. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are Americans so stupid that they DON"T REALISE that virtually all of their towns are named after places in Europe? Hasn't it ever occurred to you idiots that they might be talking about THE Bristol?

    5. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean people outside of America use computers too, just like us?

    6. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, not just like you. Some of them DON'T just surf for anal porn!!

    7. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. I bet you think there's an OLD York, an OLD Hampshire, and even an OLD England. As if.

      Oh, and it's spelled "realize."

    8. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and it's spelled "realize."

      Not in British English you moron.

    9. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The one from which vicious chickens come, judging by the size of that chick repeller.

    10. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't it occur to you that this particular Bristol, the original Bristol, isn't in the USA.

      As a Bristolian I can produly reveal to you that it's Bristol, England, the center of the universe, where such great phrases as "gurt lush" (very good) have originated (and gone nowhere).

      Of course if you look on their website under "contact" you'll see they've thoughtfully provided a link to a map which really does give the game away!

    11. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, of course, English.

      The Welsh have Welsh, the Irish have Gaelic, the Scots have both Scots and Gallic, the English speak English. That's why it's called English.

    12. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't blueyonder.co.uk give you a clue as to where it is?

    13. Re:Which Bristol? by eetiiyupy · · Score: 1
      We (in the West of England) have been trying to keep our Bristol quiet. Now I expect a cease and desist order from the real Bristol in the USA demanding that we cease (and for that matter desist) using their name.

      The fact that we have a dossier of information establishing prior use will be no defence.

    14. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bling, bling moi babbers.

    15. Re:Which Bristol? by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      Bristol (UK) is home to the second largest HP Labs in the world. They have also been involved in some fun wireless projects around the city. By fun, I mean "open networks connected to JANET". (here's one)

    16. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We gave you a language, now please use it."

    17. Re:Which Bristol? by scorp888 · · Score: 1

      Confusing for people that assume everything centres around their own country you mean?

    18. Re:Which Bristol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is England? My USA map doesn't show this place.

  3. As a bonus... by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... you won't have to worry about being mugged for it. The police will be watching far too closely.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:As a bonus... by NeoThermic · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>you won't have to worry about being mugged for it.

      And even if you did get mugged for it, a laptop and some wireless network scanning software of your choice, and you could track them down for it back!

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    2. Re:As a bonus... by cybermage · · Score: 3, Funny

      The police will be watching far too closely.

      Yeah, I'd stay away from government buildings with it unless you like guns pointed at you.

      "Giant backpack with antenna ... hmmm ... I think I'll shoot him before he gets too close"

    3. Re:As a bonus... by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      Well, in England, most police aren't even allowed to carry handguns...

    4. Re:As a bonus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they have giant helmet to look stoopid.

  4. Solar? by DrewBeavis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if here in Florida we could rig up a solar panel that makes enough power for this rig. That would make it lighter... but it might not work in places with less sun. Maybe a smaller battery and the solar panel?

    1. Re:Solar? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a smaller battery and the solar panel?

      The battery is pretty small, probably a scooter battery. For the price, weight, and energy output, I don't think you can do much better than that.

      Yeah, it's England, solar power probably never crossed their mind...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:Solar? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      IANwhoeverthehellwouldknowthisstuff but I'm guessing that the solar panel would probably have to be at least the size of an umbrella. Pretty awkward.

    3. Re:Solar? by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      Put panels on an umbrella, then it gives you shade and power.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    4. Re:Solar? by MightyPez · · Score: 1

      Put panels on an umbrella, then it gives you shade and power. Not only that, but build the antenna into the umbrella shaft.

    5. Re:Solar? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      My AP's AC->DC power supply is rated to 1A output at 12V . That is 12W. Given that sunlight is about 2kW/m^2 on a bright sunny day, and assuming a 10% conversion efficiency out of a panel (I think some are 15%), you might only need a panel that is about 25cm by 25cm. It is not all that large.

      Say you buy a 30cm x 30cm panel that generates current at 12V and buy small battery pack to store charge in the bright spots and to supplement power when a cloud passes, I think it could easily be done.

      I've been thinking of doing a "portable" repeater setup, but using a parabolic dish to bring a wireless connection a kilometer from the base station. I've done a basic proof of reception, I just need to build something like that.

    6. Re:Solar? by TofuDog · · Score: 1

      Solar charging would be viable in sunny climes. Don't count on theoretical output based on solar insolation values -real world performance differs from theoretical maxima. If you want your solar/battery system to work, double the power requirement estimates. Your panel won't always be perpendicular to sunlight and free of cloud/particulate interference. It's neat stuff. I've lived off-grid for 2 yrs. and currently run a network of remote weather stations that use PV panels.

    7. Re:Solar? by matty619 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You could at least cut down on battery size, although you would still need a battery. We have a solar powered repeater running right now on a rooftop in downtown San Diego. Details including pictures are here

      We used 2 6 volt 220 Ah trojan deep cycle batteries wired in series for 12 volts and a 65 watt solar panel.

      This was all to power a soekris board which only draws about .3 of an amp. So even without the sun, it would run for something like 6 weeks.

      But we plan on many more of these, specifically on mountain tops where there isn't power. This one was mainly as a test, but it's been up rock solid for about 2 or 3 months now.

      -M@

    8. Re:Solar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, and you could mount it on your head so you wouldn't have to hold it! It'd be neat!

      god I feel like such a nerd.

    9. Re:Solar? by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      I know that Mikrotik do that all the time with their routerboards, especially in countries like Mongolia and Iraq. Works pretty good because of minimal power consuption (like 5 wats :o).
      P.S. No, I don't work for them. I just use their gear.

  5. Hey, what's that smell? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny
    You'd definitely burn extra calories hiking with that thing.

    ...especially if the lead-acid battery leaks.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 1

      A sealed battery would definitely be a better option.

    2. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by Tmack · · Score: 1
      Which, judging by the pic, it is. Looks like a common sealed lead-acid Gel cell battery. They are common in both 6 and 12 volts and are found in exit signs, children's electric riding toys (aka powerwheels and the like), portable hand held spot lights, UPS's and many other things. I use them as a backup to power my headlamp on long caving trips (as an alternate to the NiMH pack that lasts 1/4 as long but weighs alot less). They dont leak, unless you manage to break the casing and squeeze the gel out of it (which I know one person unfortunate enough to have that happen after a bad fall while caving).

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    3. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't burn much extra calories because that assembly is probably only 6 to 10 pounds, at most. Try humping an 80 pound rucksack over rough terrain, for a real burn...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by deathazre · · Score: 1

      watch it be a size 8D. (yeah, I really want to carry a 50kg battery on my back.)

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    5. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Hmm, mine usually hovers between 50 and 60 pounds, or 23 to 27 kilos. However, a Marine Corps rucksack hovers around 85 pounds (38.5 kilos). This thing is nowhere close to either of those numbers.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    6. Re:Hey, what's that smell? by TofuDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you want a deep-cycle battery, not a starting battery made for peak current at near full charge. The "marine" or "RV" batteries with thicker plates and other elfin' magic will work better.

  6. More details on power? by Quixote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some more details about the power connection (12v DC to the Linksys) would be nice. Anyone have any ideas? I'm not an EE, so please don't flame me crisp for asking...

    1. Re:More details on power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like much computer equipment, it has 12V DC connections. You just splice the battery intto an adapter cord.

    2. Re:More details on power? by tim_mathews · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, according to the manual for the router it takes 12VDC and the connector is + Tip, that is the positive wire goes to the inside part of the plug. So no special electronics, just wire from the battery to the router. The manual also says that the router draws 1.0amp, so I'd put a 1.5 - 2 amp fuse in line as well. The router probably has an internal fuse, but for an extra $0.50 why not?

    3. Re:More details on power? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Just a guess (since I don't have the Linksys device in question) but most of these are powered by a 9/12/whatever volt wallwart.
      It should be a simple matter to convert the 12V from the battery to whatever voltage is needed by the router with either a 3 terminal voltage regulator or even a zener diode.
      Or a DC-DC converter if you need more efficiency or higher than 12 volts.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:More details on power? by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, I'd love to try this when I'm riding round the world on a tiny (250cc) motorcycle. Can't power anything with the bike's magneto though. It'd be great to have a webcast run through a satellite phone. That way /.'ers could watch me die of thirst in the Outback while bitching about my connection and what version of linux I should've been using.

    5. Re:More details on power? by bhima · · Score: 1
      Linux hasn't been ported to "a tiny (250cc) motorcycle"... But NetBSD has!

      Come to think of it 250cc is not tiny; it must be less than 50cc to be tiny.

      Have fun!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:More details on power? by DamnYankee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually V1.0 WRT54G's use a 5V 2A power supply. V1.1, 2.0 and WRT54GS models use 12V 1A.

      Unfortunately they use the same power connector so some unfortunate folks have watched a V1.0 go up in smoke when they mixed up the power supplies.

      --

      Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
      William Shakespeare

  7. And then! by NeoThermic · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>You need [...] a Linksys wireless device

    so now users can hack your rotuer as well with this article!
    Joy!

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    1. Re:And then! by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      Good point, except the firmware is non-standard to allow repeating via WDS.

      Cheers,
      Andy

  8. Re:Dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh, no. This seems to be a completely different story about a similar idea. RTFA?

  9. Go ahead and troll me.... by HuckleCom · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but it's like every little thing somone does with wifi these days... gets so much attention...
    What's next? The Debut of the "WIFI Helmet"? Gimme a break, I'm sure I'm not alone on this... but whatever. Troll me to kingdom come.

    1. Re:Go ahead and troll me.... by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      Uh, don't you mean 'mod me into oblivion?'

    2. Re:Go ahead and troll me.... by Ankle · · Score: 1
      what's next? The Debut of the "WIFI Helmet"? Gimme a break, I'm sure I'm not alone on this... but whatever.
      What do you mean debute? I've already got my trusty tinfoil hat wired as the antenna on my portable network!
    3. Re:Go ahead and troll me.... by HuckleCom · · Score: 0

      Funny it's not on slashdot! ;)

    4. Re:Go ahead and troll me.... by Ankle · · Score: 1
      Funny it's not on slashdot! ;)
      Would you want something attached to your body /.ed when it could be providing you with pr0n on the go?
    5. Re:Go ahead and troll me.... by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      They're fun, whacky, sometimes surprising uses for what everyone hopes will be the last mile from the telcos to the customers.

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  10. Nope... by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    After going to Bristol Wireless' webpage I highly doubt this is a USA address.

    8 Bannerman Buildings,
    Bannerman Road,
    Easton
    Bristol
    BS5 0RR

    Telephone
    0117 9025247

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. For all the geographically impaired /.ers:
      Bristol is a large city in the UK, as can be seen here.

    2. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the only Bristol isn't Bristol Tenn the home of the greatest NASCAR race ever?

    3. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's NASCAR?

    4. Re:Nope... by Cally · · Score: 1
      It's the real Bristol. Proud home of HTV West and 'Points West'. (ROTFLMFAO)

      Sorry, in-joke for the Voresters out there.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    5. Re:Nope... by Cally · · Score: 1
      As in Brizzle...mye luvurr.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    6. Re:Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love that short track, especially the night race.

    7. Re:Nope... by 68K · · Score: 1

      You forgot slavery a couple of hundred years ago as well.

      (Yeah, I'm from Bristol, UK as well. Reprazent.)

    8. Re:Nope... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny
      After going to Bristol Wireless' webpage I highly doubt this is a USA address.
      And more conclusively, the story contained the word "whilst."

      Come on Brits, that ain't a word.

    9. Re:Nope... by joshsnow · · Score: 1

      alwight me old cocker? I've got a gert load uv cider in my garridge...

    10. Re:Nope... by rp8774 · · Score: 1

      I live in Bristol too ;) (and this is my first ever Slashdot post!)

    11. Re:Nope... by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

      Whilst I appreciate that you colonials have a colourful approach to the English language, I can assure you that the word whilst is quite pukka.

    12. Re:Nope... by Boccaccio · · Score: 1

      Cheers drive ;o)

  11. Not to mention by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    You'd definitely burn extra calories hiking with that thing.

    what else would burn, when someone DoS's you, the router overloads the battery, and the acid leaks all over your back.

    1. Re:Not to mention by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 2, Funny
      ahhh man, you beat me to the punch on that joke. I was going to say:

      Famous last words before entering the ER room for 3rd degree chemical burns....
      "Hey, why does my @$$ feel like it's on fire?"

      Ever get cold? Invite a hacker to hit you with a few "Pings of Death" and bask in the warmth of your router tx/rx all the requests.

    2. Re:Not to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's CASUALTY in Bristol, ER is in Chicago.

      Don't you watch ANYTHING other than Star Trek?

  12. burning by musikit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You'd definitely burn extra calories hiking with that thing."

    you'd definately be urning something. cancer/lightning stick on your back? i hope you were you lead hat as opposed to your tin foil to add more shielding

    1. Re:burning by brotherscrim · · Score: 0, Troll

      Give me a break. Look out! Cancer Rays! Don't believe everything your militia/new-age healing circle intercepts from lemurian broadcasts to the Illuminati.

    2. Re:burning by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought it was funny...

    3. Re:burning by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, but I keep my mobile phone in my pocket, not on my back. We're talking 65mW IIRC (no doubt someone will correct me). Add the 8dB antenna, and the fact it's a few feet above your head, and the radiation to your head is minimal. Baking sheet should suffice!

      Cheers,
      Andy

  13. What about cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People were concerned about holding cell phones close to their brains due to the risk of tumors. Isn't this thing going to fry your brain?

    1. Re:What about cancer? by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Isn't this thing going to fry your brain?

      People need to look up the definition of non-ionizing radiation. For comparison also look up ionizing radiation. Exposure to non-ionizing radiaton does not have a cumulative effect over your lifetime. This (or your cell phone) is no more harmful to you than the local rock station broadcasting their signal.

      The worst thing that can happen from this kind of radiation is everyday, non-mutating burning (like your microwave), but the low power from the repeater won't do that.

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    2. Re:What about cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's interesting that the link on non-ionizing radiation mentions that UV falls into that spectrum. UV can damage DNA and cause skin cancer, right? I'm confused then why non-ionizing radiation would be considered risk free? I'm sure you're probably right, I'm just interested in a more detailed explanation.

    3. Re:What about cancer? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Of course, there is transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    4. Re:What about cancer? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The worst thing that can happen from this kind of radiation is everyday, non-mutating burning (like your microwave)
      Speak for yourself! I haven't accidentally microwaved myself for almost a whole month now.
    5. Re:What about cancer? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      UV is ionizing. Ionizing means that you can remove electrons from atoms, and that happens already with frequencies in the optical range (Planck's E=hv is the formula you're interested in).

      Of course, radiation in the optical range, i.e. 'light' shouldn't be too dangerous for you :)

      It gets dangerous 'beyond blue'.

  14. Its Bristol in the United Kingdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wikipedia article. I should know because I live near there.
    And here are the other Bristols

  15. Police Interest by Cheeko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about them, but I'd be worried about the interest of the authorities if I was walking around wearing this. You might get mistaken for a terrorist or some such. Its definately a cool idea, but it would be even cooler if it could be done in an inconspicuous manner, though that might be tough with the antenna.

    1. Re:Police Interest by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      I don't know about them, but I'd be worried about the interest of the authorities

      I don't know about you, but I'd be mored worried about being marked as a potential mugging victim.

      You see an antenna, I see a flag say "Look a geek!! Easy victim"

      ;-)

    2. Re:Police Interest by praedor · · Score: 1

      I don't know...at Purdue you will see students walking around now and again with funky backpacks with a funkier antenna sticking up out of the back. I haven't asked but I think it contains GPS equipment - don't know the class that is using them. That thing doesn't strike me as being that much different except that the guts are showing (the router).

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    3. Re:Police Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just put the antenna in one of those gun bags you can buy. Noone should be interested in a person walking around wiht a big gun on his shoulders...

    4. Re:Police Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the stupidest crap! Since when is it illegal to walk around with a wifi router and antenna strapped to your back?!?! Why are you afraid of being conspicuous? If a policeman hassles you, you tell him you are well within your rights to be doing what you are doing.

      Geez, they've got you Americans on a really tripped out on paranoia, it's a real shame.

    5. Re:Police Interest by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      The whole point was to be conspicuous. We're trying to demo technology to the public at an event that will be covered by the media. That's also the reason all the gear is on show, rather than covered up in case it rains. Also, its main function is to repeat webcasting data, so the bloke holding the video camera plugged into a laptop a few feet from you is also gonna look pretty abnormal!

      Cheers,
      Andy

    6. Re:Police Interest by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      Sounds like APRS

  16. never put a car battery on your back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just a tip, in case you were thinking of trying.
    I built something I called "loud backpack" once. It consisted of a 1/4" mic jack, 2 12" speakers, an amp, and a car battery.
    On a particularly warm day, my back started to itch, and it took a while before I realized that it was battery acid leaking through the padding, my shirt, and onto my back.
    Ran to the shower, falling once to scrape my knees, and immediately doused myself with water. Well, don't forget what they said about adding water to acid in high school chemistry class like I did... it burns!
    Anyways, amusing anecdote.. do not try at home!

    1. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 3, Funny

      You just ruined a terribly funny follow up story by telling people this. Shame on you.

    2. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by at_kernel_99 · · Score: 1

      Like my 7th & 8th grade algebra teacher used to say: "A little knowledge is dangerous."

      Both the author in Bristol & the poster above need to do a very minor amount of research & find a solution using a sealed battery (see my post above). Sure its easier to swipe one off the spare motorbike (which the pictured battery looks like - not a car battery), but do you really want an unsealed box of acid strapped to your body?

    3. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

      While your warning is certainly appreciated, wouldn't it be more helpful to just encourage folks to line their backpack with plastic? :)

      You can get rolls of plastic for cheap these days, and it wouldn't be all that hard to even double- or triple-line your battery compartment with it. It's my understanding that the garden variety clear plastic you can get at any home improvement store is impervious to sulfuric acid (and many others). I'm one of those folks who believes home experimenting and proper safety procedures don't *have* to be mutually exclusive.. ;)

    4. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably would have been a good idea... at the time I wasn't aware car batteries leakead so readily, what with driving up and down hills all the time.
      although, slugging around a pool of acid in a backpack can't be too safe either.. especially when it comes time to remove the battery and return it to your car :)
      I'm using sealed batteries in my projects now, so at least learned from my mistake :)

    5. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by baudilus · · Score: 1

      Except acid eats through plastic. Try glass. Good luck.

    6. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lead acid batteries have caused me difficulties as well. I once sat on a car battery (as there was nowhere else to sit.)

      A little later, I felt an intense itching on my rear cheeks, and found myself scratching bare burning flesh.

      I had also been walking about town for some considerable time - I was a little embarassed when I realised that I was in a state of "undress."

    7. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like the guy in the article is using a sealed lead-acid cell. These are no more likely to leak than a standard NiMH cell, and NiMH usually uses a potassium hydroxide electrolyte which is somewhat more dangerous to get on your skin.

    8. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      acid is used for glass etching, enough of it and i'msure it can eat through glass too

    9. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except acid eats through plastic.

      Yea, that's why they make car batteries out of glass.

    10. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Except acid eats through plastic.

      Not necessarily. Depends on the acid and the plastic. For sul(f/ph)uric (battery) acid, there's a number of suitable polymers. I believe polypropylene is usually used in lead-acid battery manufacture. (Car batteries made of glass don't travel well.) High-density polyethylene also resists acid quite well. PTFE (Teflon) doesn't blink on exposure to most acids.

      Heavy-duty rolls of plastic from the garden center, while not impervious to acid indefinitely, will definitely provide some protection.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That would be hydrofluoric acid.

      You can put 100% pure H2SO4 in glass forever and not bother it one bit.

      On the other hand, a 10% solution of sodium hydroxide will eventually eat its way through glass. It will take a long time, but you'll notice the solution turns cloudy after probably only a day.

      Use polypropylene for most acids or bases - that stuff is fairly impervious to anything aqueous. It even withstands acetone or chloroform for a while. Not all plastics are created equally...

    12. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're either really old or really stupid. These days we have things called Sealed Lead Acid batteries. See that word sealed?


      Next you'll be telling me you once ate a bunch of Ni-Cads and were surprised when you got Cadmium poisoning...

    13. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      "You can put 100% pure H2SO4 in glass forever and not bother it one bit."

      I may be stating the obvious here, but 100% pure H2SO4 isn't acid at all in the sense that it corrodes stuff, it needs water to react with in order to form the H3O+ ions (the actual acid that corrodes stuff).

      As for sodium hydroxide, again I might be stating the obvious to you, but it isn't an acid, but a base - it forms HO- in water.

    14. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by kabocox · · Score: 1

      but do you really want an unsealed box of acid strapped to your body?
      Come on this is /. you should know better than to even ask. I think you need to start a poll.

    15. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That NaOH is a base isn't much of a surprise (MS in Chemistry). My organic is a bit rusty, but I believe H2SO4 can have an acid/base reaction with a lot more than just water. I'm not sure if it will corrode metal in the absence of water, but I believe there are many reactions which utilize H2SO4 in the absence of water. I believe one of the reasons H2SO4 is so useful is because it can be made anhydrously - which means you can use it as an acid in organic reactions where water would cause problems.

    16. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      To put your mind at rest, it is sealed! It wasn't swiped from a car or bike, but bought from Maplin.

      Cheers,
      Andy

    17. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by n17ikh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to break it to you, but the reason they tell you to never add water to acid is because it can cause an explosive reaction if there isn't enough water to damp the reaction, not because it burns. The burning sensation was just from you "waking up" (for lack of a better term) your deadened nerves when you splashed water on them. The burning sensation was already there, you just couldn't feel it ;)

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
    18. Re:never put a car battery on your back! by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1

      Ah, in that case, sorry to explain that basic stuff to you :)

  17. Addendum by omarius · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...and cancer! Don't forget about the cancer!

  18. uh oh, Linksys Router by reidhoch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "A Linksys WRT54G wireless router is attached in the middle"

    Isnt that the same router that was reported earlier today to pretty much be wide open?

    1. Re:uh oh, Linksys Router by riptide_dot · · Score: 1

      Ack! My back pack has been hacked!

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
  19. I'm much more interested... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...in the possibilities of a dynamic WiFi network built out of electronic devices in close proximity. It would present a great number of engineering difficulties, but the payoff would be complete internet coverage anywhere in the world. ... Well, at least anywhere there's other people present to relay the packets.

    Hmm... I think there'd need to be a way of identifying open Internet points. Phones, laptops, etc. near these points would then need to broadcast their access. When a device receives a packet, it should know enough to accept or reject the route based on its current network uplinks. Bandwidth could present a problem, especially since a ton of small packet messages would be necessary to identify the current status of a given device.

    Anyone know of research that's currently being done in this area?

    1. Re:I'm much more interested... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of research that has been done and is still being done in this area (called ad-hoc networks a similar research area is also sensor networks). Apart from security which has always been a major issue with ad-hoc networks, quite a lot has been done in terms of energy-efficient routing techniques, network-formation protocols and so on. Some of them have been implemented in certain military situations as well.

    2. Re:I'm much more interested... by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Anyone know of research that's currently being done in this area?

      No, but I've thought about designing a "Wireless Internet" as a research project, though I'm just a lowly undergrad. I'm sure it could be done; the biggest problem is signal strength/range.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:I'm much more interested... by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Isn't that exactly what Bluetooth was supposed to bring us?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    4. Re:I'm much more interested... by sploxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, and I was interested since I had my first grasp of TCP/IP, packet switching and all that.

      I imagined every house with free space optical (FSO) devices on top of it+a router, long distance would be the last task for phone companies/ISPs. But sadly, it didn't happen.

      Maybe the telcos are trying to prevent that? Maybe people are too lazy and too stupid to grasp the whole idea? Remember, you'd have to convince many people to 'relay' packets before such a network gets usable. I don't really know, but IMHO it is both technically and socially superior. (Promotes local exchange etc.)

      Anyway, appropiate routing protocols and also research exists nowadays:
      Manet routing protocols, IETF
      Fleetnet, mobile adhoc for cars (very interesting!)

      Maybe I'm pessimistic, but I think you'd pay
      a fee in such a network, even if you only exchange
      data between you and your neighbour (the telcos want to live, right?).

    5. Re:I'm much more interested... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the biggest problem is signal strength/range.

      Oddly enough, I see that as only a minor problem. In a typical city, people are close enough that Bluetooth connections would be sufficient. Here are a few of the problems I see:

      1. The various networking theories still apply. Thus the network will introduce more and more latency as it grows, and the bandwidth used to keep the network up to date will eventually cause problems. This is a very similar problem to the one of GNUTella, which eventually experienced a network collapse.

      2. Routing is a difficult issue to handle. Do you spam every packet to every nearby device until it makes it through? The overhead in this approach would be extraordinary. Thus a more intelligent algo must be used. Perhaps the nearest Internet connection point could provide some form of network organization from its vantage point?

      3. Power, the antagonist of every electronic device. Phones currently spend a minor amount of power maintaining an established connection. What would happen to a device's power supply if it were suddenly required to handle all sorts of packet communications and network updates?

      Those are a few on my thoughts, anyway.

      BTW, it seems I'm an enemy of yours. What did I ever do to deserve that?

    6. Re:I'm much more interested... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Bluetooth merely allows for devices to find one another. It does nothing to promote exchange between devices that are not directly connected via bluetooth.

      i.e. Getting my cell phone to communicate with my PDA will work, but sending an SMS message to someone two miles away won't.

      That's not to say that Bluetooth isn't a good option for creating such a network.

    7. Re:I'm much more interested... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Your talking about mesh networking. TCP/IP does not work well in large meshs. Addressing is an issue. Routing is an issue. If you can design or find a routing protocal that can deal with billions of routes in a secure manner it might work. Right now TCP/IP has big limits if you want to have stable packet ingress and egress you have to run BGP there is a limit of 65k BGP networks world wide.

      Having said that you can design small meshes that run fairly efficiently. The mesh has to have border points and inside points. IPv6 works well for inside addressing just use a private range and the mac address to remove any need for centralized authority. All Border points need to make tunneles via the normal internet to each other and NAT IPv6 to IPv4 for any other point. The point should keep the status of any NAT translations and pick there border point. Border points submit packets including there avalible bandwith, when retransmitted there should be a list of points traversed along with bandwith and latency data. Points pick the best border point based on avalible bandwith, hop count and latency. The Border point if it accepts the session sends back a NAT packet giving the details of it's outside IP and how things got nated.

      Now thats a whole pile of extensions to a layer 3 protocal to get things done without rewriting the internet as it exists now. It would be somewhat problematic to get into a handheld device as it's pretty much making a statefull router out of every device that requires memory and lots of packets.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    8. Re:I'm much more interested... by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      During the big Cedar fires last year, I had the crazy thought of some sort of portable/wireless device that would give you up to the minute news/road closures/accidents/ whatever about your local area.. possibly just text, but maybe graphics too. If the device could be made cheap enough, and enough people had them, they could establish a psuedo network, which doesn't rely on main lines (such as power/cable/phone) that could be destroyed or damaged in a disaster/attack.

      Maybe I'm just too much of a dreamer, eh? Probably 100+ years from now we'll have something like this.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    9. Re:I'm much more interested... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge, gnutella has had "100% uptime" since its inception. File reliability may have been iffy for a while there, and still is not up to emule standards, but the gnutella net has never ceased, nor can it to my knowledge, as long as there are at least two peers interested in trading files.

    10. Re:I'm much more interested... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      but the gnutella net has never ceased, nor can it to my knowledge, as long as there are at least two peers interested in trading files.

      I didn't say that it ceased. I said that it collapsed. And it did. Into tens of miniature networks, all with varying degrees of connectivity. What happened was that the network became too "top heavy" from the amount of traffic it generated, and nodes were no longer able to keep in communication. Connections started dropping, and nodes splintered into smaller nets with no relation to one another.

  20. Script Children Rejoice! by turminalillness · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sure hope he has ports 80 & 443 forwarded.

    1. Re:Script Children Rejoice! by moorg · · Score: 1

      I know you are going for funny, but since he's using the Sveasoft firmware that's not a problem.

  21. That'll attract the women... by ardent · · Score: 4, Funny

    nuff said

  22. Heating issues? by c0bw3b · · Score: 2, Funny

    I found that my Linksys WAP11 had major problems when I had a router stacked on top of it, I wonder if these guys have had any problems with heating?

    --
    ||:|::
    1. Re:Heating issues? by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      We've gone with air/water cooling. Contrary to popular belief, we're in the UK where it's not often hot, and often raining. Heat will not be an issue!

      Cheers,
      Andy

  23. heh by abscondment · · Score: 1

    sounds like this should be modified for some wardriving.. er... walking.

  24. Spooky! by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    and a rather scary antenna

    Anybody else think the antenna looked similar to the spooky wavy antenna that shows up in the Star Trek TOS episode: Shore Leave just before somebody's "wish" is about to be fulfilled?

    Maybe it's just me....sorry. I'd post a screenshot if I had my StarTrek TOS CDs with my right now. Maybe I'll post it in reply to this message later if anybody's interested. Sorry if it's just me.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  25. Probably not much involved. by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Linksys box probably gets 12VDC from its AC power adapter... So I doubt there's a whole lot in the way of electronics involved except for something to limit the current flow and thus not fry the thing.. And all you need for that is the right resistor.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Probably not much involved. by karnal · · Score: 1

      Also, keep in mind that current won't necessarily fry a device.

      If you attempt to supply too high an amperage to a device, it will only take what it needs (at least that is what I've found with most consumer electronics... other than LEDs)

      However, too much voltage will always rip things apart if you've not the right fuse or protection. I'd add a fuse to this setup for the battery's sake; you would probably rather have a blown linksys than acid on your back.

      I was sitting here wondering why they didn't use 10xnimh 9ah "d" cell batteries, and then realized the cost for that kind of setup would be way more than finding a lead acid (or even sealed) battery. I would have to think that the weights would be about the same, though.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Probably not much involved. by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      You really don't understand current. A device will draw a given current for a given supply voltage. You cannot give it more current than it wants without increasing the supply voltage. They are linked, one cannot change without the other. A resistor will only serve to drop voltage from 12V, and this voltage drop is dependant on the amount of current the device is drawing - so it just ends up as a useless heater.

    3. Re:Probably not much involved. by Otto · · Score: 1

      No, I do understand it. I just had a brain fart and didn't type it out properly. Not enough coffee yesterday. :P

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Probably not much involved. by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      Current is how much food is available

      Voltage is how fast it's shoved down your throat

      Which would make Wattage crap as it is the product of the two

  26. gbuster by toolshed7 · · Score: 1

    maybe they will make one of those proton pack or eco-plasm guns next for Dr. Peter Venkman....i hope they rememeber to not cross the streams...or it could be the end of us all.

    --


    Deserving got nothing to do with it.....shuffle
  27. Ghostbusters by sklib · · Score: 4, Funny

    The first thing that popped into my mind when i saw that backpack:

    DON'T CROSS THE STREAMS

    --
    -S
    1. Re:Ghostbusters by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Why...what happens if we cross the streams?

    2. Re:Ghostbusters by toolshed7 · · Score: 1

      Worlds collide...and to mention all the possible realities wil converge ino one and BOOM, no more anything. No Powder Puff Marshmellow guy(but to have that you would have to think about it...it would just have to pop in your head and that is another story) or anything. In other words it would just sux if they cross the streams. DO NOT CROSS THE STREAMS

      --


      Deserving got nothing to do with it.....shuffle
    3. Re:Ghostbusters by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      From IMDB:

      Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: What?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean "bad"?
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
      Dr. Raymond Stantz: Total protonic reversal.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: That's bad. Okay. Alright, important safety tip, thanks Egon.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    4. Re:Ghostbusters by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Yeah...something like that. :)

      All I remember is when someone asks you if you're a god, you say yes!

      Guess I need to rewatch it, which'll drive my wife nuts.

  28. Cancer Risk? by vasqzr · · Score: 1

    And we're scared of getting cancer from this?

    1. Re:Cancer Risk? by jridley · · Score: 1

      If by "we" you mean people who don't know the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, and/or will believe any scare that the media dreams up during slow news weeks, then maybe "we" are scared.

  29. Gargoyles by thesupermikey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another step in building my gargoyle suit!!

    --
    Mikey
    I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
  30. that's not the ultimate wireless hotspot by psychokid · · Score: 1

    ...this is http://www.jacobsschool.ucsd.edu/news_events/news_ 2002/20020401_CyberShuttle.shtml Apperantly, they have made setups where you have an 802.11b network LAN with a EV-DO WAN, and have it all fit in a backpack for "mobile hot spots"

  31. Scary antenna?? That's no scary antenna.. by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should see my car with the 3 ham radio antennas on it. Looks like an old Soviet "fishing" trawler. That's scary. Or a stack of single-band multi-element yagi beams for all the HF bands.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Scary antenna?? That's no scary antenna.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask.. Why do you have 3 HAM radio attenas strapped to your car? A fellow storm chaser by chance?

    2. Re:Scary antenna?? That's no scary antenna.. by slackerboy · · Score: 1

      More like a porcupine. (I try to point them out to my wife whenever I see them in the hope she'll stop complaining about my single ATAS...)

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
  32. Hrmm by ANY5546 · · Score: 0

    Burning calories is fine, but is it low in carbs too?!

    What are we going to do this time?
    Nothing Rabbit.
    How about the repeater?
    Nothing Rabbit.

    License and registration please sir. ... License and registration please sir.

    Wow, I've got nothing.

    --
    http://www.freepokerchipset.info
  33. Why not use pringles cans? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Can't I just use a cooler full of pringles cans hooked up in parallel / serial (damnit Jim, I'm an artist, not an EE) to get some kinda sick signal range? Kinda like in the Simpsons, where Bart connects all the megaphones together?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Why not use pringles cans? by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

      Pringles cans are a adaptation of a directional antenna. The way a typical radio is built, it can only handle one RF input, thus, stringing together multiple antennas would not be possible without building in multiple RF ports, (and extra processing power) into the radio. Why not just splice the wires? Well, you could, but the signal would get so overrun with collisions and FCS errors, that it would defeat the purpose. Best to use a high gain omni. He's using an 8db, which isn't bad, but, for as much bulk as it would add, I would have got with a 9 or a 12, as long as you don't mind pissing off anyone else who is sharing that same RF channel.

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    2. Re:Why not use pringles cans? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, pissing off the right person can land you with a very large fine. In the US, the FCC has rules on this stuff, because WiFi devices fall under Part 15.

      Omnidirectional antennae (if built to the letter of the law) can only have a limited amount of gain (dependant upon the power output of the radio itself, as it's measured using dBi), where directionals can have more gain because of the limited directional scope.

      At any rate, doing the math when building an antenna is essential, because the government doesn't find ignorance of the law to be a sufficient excuse. Want more info? Here's a link.

      No, you can't build a 50' collinear array legally.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Why not use pringles cans? by karnal · · Score: 1

      "No, you can't build a 50' collinear array legally."

      Actually, building it isn't against the law. Plugging an amp into the coax would be.

      --
      Karnal
  34. You still need to be close to a hot spot. by marika · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I prefer my Wifi Clie... Maybe I don't repeat but it just seems more useful for me.

    --
    This is totally insecure, but very convenient.
  35. Re:Dupe... by tvh2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's times like these that I wish we had a "-1 Dumbass" moderation choice.

  36. YES! Link HERE by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:YES! Link HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not only is your post offtopic (as is mine) but we also already covered this story earlier this morning.

      -1, Retarded

  37. cool....but by MoFoQ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    if he wasn't using a hacked firmware on it, it would be vulnerable to various exploits (as just /.'ed).

    One mod to that backpack might be solar panels so it can be self-sustaining.

  38. what really amuses me is that someone somewhere by xutopia · · Score: 1

    said "Whoaa cool!"

  39. Zzzt! by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

    Official (zzzt) backpack of the (zzzt) Stormchaser's Photography Union (zzzt).

    --
    Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
  40. Front page news? by scosol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some guy hooks an antenna to an access point, and uses a battery instead of an AC adapter?

    Come on guys...

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
  41. Well, times are changing by digitalgimpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Way back when, it used to be a sign that said "kick me".

    Now even that went digital.

  42. First impression by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1
    The phrase "Necessity is the mother of invention" comes to mind in looking at that "backpack".

    Complex problem, simple solution. I tip my hat to them. Shit, I might even have a spot of tea, too.

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

  43. Lead acid? by flying_monkies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not go Sealed Lead Acid or, if you want to save some weight nicads/nimh?

    --
    I disagree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to say it to the death - Voltaire
    1. Re:Lead acid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cause the one he used came out of his buddy's motorbike. for free.

  44. Whew by Linux+Thought+Leader · · Score: 0, Troll

    Good to know you've stopped trying to build a woman suit. Hookers are relieved all over the country.

    1. Re:Whew by thesupermikey · · Score: 1

      Hey!
      I will never give up my woman suit....HEY!

      --
      Mikey
      I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
  45. Alternative Batteries by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What kind of alternative 12VDC batteries could be used instead of that potentially unsafe lead acid one?

    I think a laptop battery might do the trick, but where do you find the connectors?

    1. Re:Alternative Batteries by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not unsafe, it's a gel cell. They can run upside down or any other position for years and will not leak. The only potential problem is that if you short it out it'll get damn hot, but any decent battery will do that.
      Try it with Lithium Ion (from a safe distance) - they will explode when shorted. By comparison, lead-acid gel cells are tame.

    2. Re:Alternative Batteries by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      I dont like gel cells because they get damaged if you let them completely drain too long, OR if you overcharge them.

    3. Re:Alternative Batteries by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, but LiIon's will EXPLODE VIOLENTLY if overcharged or discharged too quickly.

  46. Inconspicuous might be worse by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 1

    Hiding the thing might make it much easier to explain. I'd probably print up a little propaganda folder on the machine. Advertise on the back and expect questions.

    If you're just a repeater you dont actually have to do anything but stand there anyway. You probably dont even have to be quiet.

    LS

  47. why worry? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    If you carry that contraption with you, rather than just getting a cable for your damn cell phone, your brain is already fried.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  48. Microwave fresh! by Cumstien · · Score: 1, Troll

    The battery is the least of your worries. The resonant frequency of water is somewhere around 2450 Megahertz, which I believe is the approximate frequency that a microwave oven uses. 802.11 wireless uses 2.4 GHz (2400 MHz). Essentially this backpack will slowly cook you.

    Sign 'em up for the Darwin Awards.

    1. Re:Microwave fresh! by DustMagnet · · Score: 4, Informative
      The resonant frequency of water is somewhere around 2450 Megahertz.

      This is a myth. From the The Straight Dope:

      Contrary to what many think, the frequency at which microwave ovens operate, 2.45 GHz, is not tuned to the maximum absorption frequency of water. That frequency is actually closer to 10 GHz, and if ovens operated there, food would be heated even less inside, since the bulk of the radiation would be absorbed at or near the surface due to the short wavelength.
      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    2. Re:Microwave fresh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how much radiation this thing puts out, but I'd bet it's far less than your average cell phone. Most point to point 802.11 wireless links are ~a thenth of cellphone output.

      Besides, you only cook once your water starts turning to steam (which is not affected by the resonant frequency, water will gain kinetic energy from any frequency you throw at it, just like anything else). It's not ionizing radiation, so you don't really have to worry about it dislodging your DNA, either. Bonus.

      You're constantly bombarded by radiation from other things (radio, TV, THE FUCKING SUN)... This little backpack is like background noise when everything else is considered. So, get a grip.

    3. Re:Microwave fresh! by rcw-home · · Score: 2, Funny
      Essentially this backpack will slowly cook you.

      Yes, it will pump maybe a tenth of its power (perhaps 100mW, tops, so 10mW) into you, which will be converted to heat, cooking you.

      Some other things that you should avoid would be flashlights, which can pump upwards of a watt of very concentrated RF into you, or even worse, the sun, which is capable of directing over 500 watts your way, burning you and contributing to your cancer risk!

      To prevent this, you should stay away from all electronic devices, especially communication devices, as even an LED or computer monitor may exceed 10mW of radiated power. After all, we want you to live as long as possible. Without hearing from you ever again.

  49. Wimp by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good God, what a wimpy battery. It looks like something from a motorcycle, and a small one at that.

    When I was in high school during the height of the CB craze, a kid I knew wired up a full-size truck battery to a CB, mounted it all on a gigantic aluminum backpack frame, and topped it off with a 12-foot whip antenna. The whole contraption probably weighed fifty pounds and brought him all the attention he presumably wanted as he wandered around baseball games wearing the thing, talking on the radio.

    The funniest thing? That skinny little kid was about 5 foot nothin' and weighed maybe 90 pounds. The whole rig looked like it was wearing him.

    1. Re:Wimp by elem · · Score: 3, Funny
      The funniest thing? That skinny little kid was about 5 foot nothin' and weighed maybe 90 pounds. The whole rig looked like it was wearing him.

      *sigh*

      In Soviet Russia....

  50. Fun with backpack batteries by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny
    I know a kid who had a side gig making a few bucks parading downtown in a huge inflatable sandwich handing out coupons for a big sandwich chain. There was a little fan and motor (to keep the 6 foot tall sandwich inflated) and a battery.

    One day, the battery started leaking and getting extremely hot. He stripped off the outfit just in time to avoid any heat or chemical burns, but about half the suit was reduced to a molten pile of plastic.

    If you ever need a laugh, check out a toasted 6 foot sub outfit (and no, this wasn't Quizno's *baddum-ching*)

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  51. Thanks for the vote of confidence! by SamSim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, that's our ultimate intention.

  52. eh by techefnet · · Score: 1

    Who the hell wants to walk around with something like that on them? I imagine it would look kinda stupid..

  53. Why the battery? by esoterus · · Score: 1

    You could just double that crazy antenna as a lightning rod... Here's 1.21 Gigawatts in your eye!

    --
    Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
  54. Why don't they just plug it into a car? by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 1

    If the outdoors is a problem for a temporary site why dont they just find a plug somewhere or put it on the roof of a running car. Are british cars not 12 volt in the cig lighter?

    If they could make it more weather resistant a Car could even be outfitted permanently.

    I still like the idea but think that if the range is a mile getting a car nearby is likely possible.

    ls

  55. Bristol UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telephone
    0117 9025247


    Absolute confirmation that it's none other than Bristol UK: (note the 0117 prefix)

    http://www.numberingplans.com/kropla/index.php?got o=areacodes&s=GB&action=show

  56. Give parent MOD points by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info! :-)

    You probably would have to pay fees, but not because of the exchange from device to device. Rather, you'd probably have to pay for access to the Internet endpoints. Your packet would probably contain a device identifier that a provider would be able to use in tracking your usage and provide security for their endpoints. It would probably be difficult to stop someone from faking an ID, however...

    1. Re:Give parent MOD points by sploxx · · Score: 1

      > Thanks for the info! :-)
      No problem, It took me quite some time to figure them out even with google, because as another poster said, everything today is "mobile" and "p2p" and whatever. The right word here is "adhoc", I think... :)

      Hey, there is another idea and something I'd really like to implement if it is feasible, because it would be ONLY SOFTWARE that has to be implemented:

      - Provider-free Message-passing for PDAs and cellular phones -

      AFAIK, today's cellulars are equipped with much processing power, a standarized software platform (java), bluetooth and IRDA.
      Wouldn't it be nice to send (encrypted) SMS (or something similar to SMS) 'for-free' in an adhoc mobile phone network?
      A store-and-forward scheme for messages, with a bit of redundancy (if messages get lost somewhere), but possibly big time-delays between forwarding?
      Let's say A writes a message to D, meets B, B forwards to C and C meets D later in the day...
      great for university campuses and the like :)

      But I see several principial problems here:
      - Is it possible to access bluetooth and irda networking in Phone-Java? (I don't own one, only an old Palm Pilot)
      - If yes, can one automatically, without user interaction, pass objects/messages to other/foreign phones (pressing "yes, ok, I want to relay traffic from this stranger I don't know" repeatedly can't be a solution :)
      - Getting the routing right (scaling) is probably hard.

  57. The fuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is integrated into the sensitive electrical components on the pc board.

  58. Chicks Dig It Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now chicks will run from you *before* actually talking to you.

  59. 3 ham antennas, plus the regular car radio one.. by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    I usually have a medium sized HF antenna, a 2 meter (144 MHz) 5/8 wave whip and a slightly smaller 70cm (440 MHz) antenna.

    The HF antenna has a loading coil that gets changed to change bands. I usually operate on 20 or 30 meters with 4 watts of CW from one of those little single-band MFJ rigs. The keying paddle gets strapped to the console and I use an amplified speaker to boost the sound to get past road noise.

    I've contacted all continents including Australia and New Zealand (Middle Earth). It's not for everybody, but I have fun with it when I'm on long road trips on uncrowded Interstates.

    --... ...--

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  60. A Mile? by ftzdomino · · Score: 1

    Who the hell goes hiking or exploring and only walks a mile? A mile is about 22 minutes of slow walking. I don't get the point of it unless you get enough people to form a grid.

  61. Hackable backpack, by Evoluder · · Score: 1

    So is this the first case of a backpack having security problems?

  62. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did the same thing once but I couldn't find a suitable backpack so I ended up mounting it on a jockstrap. ...I found I didn't need the antenna either.

  63. Re:3 ham antennas, plus the regular car radio one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CW while driving... And folks think Cel phones are bad behind the wheel.

    On the other hand, if you hack the cruise-control buttons on the steering wheel to be your CD key....
    Hmmm ....

  64. Holy subdomains Batman! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    www.mjleonard.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

    Does this make this a sixth level domain?

    1. Re:Holy subdomains Batman! by paul_cairney · · Score: 1

      its his free isp webspace (pwp being 'personal web pages' id presume) to avoid melting the bristolwireless server which is hosted in (you guessed it), bristol on a 2meg connection.

  65. Anyone remember Al Franken... by smithmc · · Score: 1


    ...and his "one-man mobile satellite linkup"?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  66. Replying to myself.. by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

    Here's more

    1. Re:Replying to myself.. by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      link



      why does this keep stopping me post this?

  67. Arm ache? by lancomandr · · Score: 1
    We hit a snag when we realised that the signal dipped out at street level because of the wireless card's antenna. The solution to this was to hold a more powerful antenna up at around 10 feet. Seeing as none of us wanted arm-ache, Matt Leonard built this fantastic backpack!"

    They built a repeater backback to avoid an arm ache? Why didn't they use a more high powered card? Or perhaps a directional antenna? Clearly they know where their target AP is. Sometimes I have to rest my laptop in weird positions on my lap to keep a good signal but this seems a little excessive.

    --

    "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"

    1. Re:Arm ache? by andylaurence · · Score: 1

      Not really - can you go round corners with a directional antenna? Imagine a road with a good signal because there's line of site to the node. There are roads coming off it at 90 degrees. These roads have no signal (except at roof level), so someone stands at the junction acting as a repeater whilst the webcasting crew walk up the road.

      Specific problem, specific solution.

      Cheers,
      Andy

    2. Re:Arm ache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Seeing as none of us wanted arm-ache

      Well it's not like anyone on /. is getting any action any *other* way...

  68. Careful! by Cragen · · Score: 1

    Watch carefully as we all slowely turn into ---- HAMS!!! The line between Geek and Ham is fading fast! Can't somebody do SOMETHING to help us?!!! Otherwise, the Gam or the Heek (certainly not a GEM) is about to become a reality. We have GOT to start leaving stuff at home! (Or at work, at least.) geez... (Say, I do have outlets in the back of my SUV...)

  69. never trust the weather. by lexluther · · Score: 1


    I think he could have used some more rain protection.

  70. backpack repeater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi all,

    Firstly id like to say its a sealed lead acid battery so fingers crossed it wont leak on me on saturday (being sealed) - and yes it is very similar to a motorbike battery. Also there was no waterproofing as the whole aim of it was to show people the kit and how it works to get people interested in our open wireless network. The kit/setup is nothing new - its all off the shelf kit, nor is running it off batterys a new thing. As I said earlier the aim is to demonstrait what is possible to the less technicly minded amung us.

    Cheers
    Matt

    1. Re:backpack repeater by psychosquirrel94560 · · Score: 1

      This is a neat idea. I mean who wouldnt want to use something similar to this idea. I mean the battery "seems" far enough away from the back side of the pack that if it indeed were to leak that It would possibly not get on you. But thats what it seems in the picture, I may be wrong. Besides the only real way a battery would leak on you is if it over heated and expanded therefore causing the seams to burst or if it was accidentially dropped. There is also an idea I keep hearing about that is similar to this one. but inclued the Armed forces. The idea is to get real-time battlefield data direct from the battlefield by equipping soldiers with WLAN technology that includes cameras GPS locators and something like palm pilots. But the Palm pilot type thing coupled with the GPS technologies allow the soldiers to know where each other are therefore minimizing frendly fire incidents. the WLAN technology transmits this data back to the "office" where commanders can take the best course of action by knowing where and what the battle grounds look like. I dont know if they are testing it in theatre but I would think its had some kind of test or it wouldnt be on the 5pm news.

      --
      Jeremiah Meyers Technical Administrator for RelaxedIRC http://www.relaxedirc.net IRC: irc.relaxedirc.net
    2. Re:backpack repeater by paul_cairney · · Score: 1

      lo matt, typical slashdot modding the author of the artical in question down to 0. Can we expect to see this teamed witht he wireless rickshaw at summer events?

  71. NLOS 500ft range? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know a way to create a 500 ft link with 3 townhouses in between? There is NLOS.

    Any suggestions?

  72. Nah, The antenna is too high for that! by 6800 · · Score: 1

    Did you look at the radiation pattern for this antenna via the link? The pole looks high enough to me to place the base of the antenna well above your head. The pattern places nearly all the power in, more or less, the horizontal plane. So you onle fry the person in front of you if you are both climbing a hill. If course, don't operate the thing from ground level and stand nearby :-).

  73. For 12V just clip transformer, turn-on, drop-out.. by TofuDog · · Score: 1

    I'm not an EE either, but can vouch from empirical evidence that clipping off the wall dealy on a 12V appliance (e.g., LCD display, "computer" speakers) is all you need to do to connect up a 12V battery. (Do check polarity before you play this game)

  74. Re:A New Career Opportunity: +1, Super-patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod down! Parent has a link to some sort of weird cult material.

  75. Alternative battery source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this site

    http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.c gi ?category=160&item=GC-125&type=store

    you can get a battery that is more than adequate, for less than the cost of a lead-acid battery. It is COMPLETELY sealed, and does not have any liquid in it. It works in any position and is also rechargable.

  76. Mod the beer cooler by canineK9 · · Score: 1

    People at music festivals are always pulling beer coolers on wheels and then sitting on them blocking the view from my blanket. This is a perfect op to mod the cooler thereby increasing safety by moving the battery and router to an enclosed container, decreasing visibility by modifying the long handle into an antenna, and by layering in a separate insulated box you get cold brew, too. Bluetooth your mini-DV and you can narrowcast anywhere. For urban situations, mod a homeless person's shopping cart to do the same.

  77. Not so bad by jhylkema · · Score: 1

    Quoth the poster:

    You'd definitely burn extra calories hiking with that thing.

    No worse than the old Army AN/PRC-77 (also known as a "Prick-77.")

  78. DoD by prestidigital · · Score: 1

    is gonna be all over that.

  79. Like a pocket router, but much bigger by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

    This is neat, like a grown up version of Chris Davies' Pocket Router, slightly more cumbersome though...

  80. campervan by fool_in_spirit · · Score: 1

    I live in a campervan and the thing seems just perfect. Can't wait to try it out.

  81. Consume Project by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

    Consume is a collaborative strategy for the self provision of a broadband telecommunications infrastructure.

    Like the Internet?
    Its certainly a similar structure with mail, web and multimedia content, but a supplement free from commercial limitations and guarded interests. The Internet is a communications infrastructure built up in layers of provision and service. Your access to it is generally governed by commercial interests. Internet Service Providers and giant Telecoms Companies have grown wealthy on the growth in our Internet use. Building fresh structures presents us with the oppertunity to supersede the greed, lets take IT.

    Why do this?
    If, as many are, you feel disenchanted by corporate telecoms and seek an alternative or are unable to connect to or meet the costs of always on connectivity, then you will be excited, as many of us are at the prospect of an open and autonomous approach to networking. We can realise some of the promise of modern communications on a local level at a fraction of the commercial cost by building our own supplements to the Internet. There is no single set of reasons why we should want to do this: one of Consume's strengths is that it is many different things to many different people.

    How are you doing it?
    By working together to build clusters of interconnecting 'nodes' using widely available networking products and optimising existing local services where possible to re-distribute network access and free the exchange of information further. Traditional wired and wireless techniques are being used to make links and a fresh and open attitude has been adopted toward sharing of information and resources.

    URL: http://www.consume.net

  82. Make use of that battery! by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    Why spend all that energy carrying a big battery around? Get one of those Weeble-People segway thingies (they wobble, but they don't fall down!) and let it carry the battery and you around. (use the built-in battery)

  83. an 8dB omnidirectional antenna by dougmc · · Score: 1
    an 8dB omnidirectional antenna
    This is a much larger accomplishment than a simple backpack repeater. In order to get gain out of an antenna, you make it directional. To make an antenna with positive gain and yet it be omnidirectional, you need ... magic, since you're violating the laws of physics.