Slashdot Mirror


Not-So-Clean Hard Drives For Sale

Saeed al-Sahaf writes "The Register is running a story about a security consulting company that as part of a study bought hard drives and laptops on eBay, and then was able to recover highly sensitive data including customer databases, financial information, payroll records, personnel details, login codes, and admin passwords for their secure Intranet site. This is a bit scary considering all of these drives were supposedly formatted and sold for surplus by major companies (although few of us actually use the multiple formatting standards of the DoD). Looks like it's hardly necessary for crooks to get at your private information, although I sure industrial espionage spooks have probably done this for awhile." Shades of the recent post about recovering sensitive contents from swap partitions.

122 of 436 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no... by Snad · · Score: 5, Funny

    To whoever bought my old hard drive on eBay, those pictures were all for research purposes only.

    Sincerely
    Peter Townshend

    1. Re:Oh no... by erucsbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Next time you might get more for it by advertising it as a hard drive with hidden flash.
      BTW, try doing a data recovery on some of the little flash drives that get given out as promos. A few I've seen look like they've been used by the sales staff, before being given out to clients :-)

    2. Re:Oh no... by Ateryx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear on my life, every hard drive I've gotten from a garage sale has had some sort of horse porn on it.
      After the 4th out of 5 harddrive I was scanning had horse porn I just figured it'd be better to not look anymore.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    3. Re:Oh no... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps you should move away from Wisconsin, then!

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    4. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I swear on my life, every hard drive I've gotten from a garage sale has had some sort of horse porn on it.
      After the 4th out of 5 harddrive I was scanning had horse porn I just figured it'd be better to not look anymore.


      I remember my first laptop, a 386sx with vga b&w screen. It was so spiffy I wanted some pictures to show it off, any pictures would do. This was the late 1980s and the only gifs you could find on local BBSs were porn. So I got some porn. In dennies I was asked if my computer could display pictures. I said "Sure here's an image of a woman having sex with a horse". The waitress was so impressed, the quality, the detail, yet was somewhat disusted. So not to apear sexist, I showed here another one "here's a picture of a man having sex with a horse". She asked me if I had some pictures without horses, I had to say "No, the only pictures you can get for computers are of people and horses having sex".

    5. Re:Oh no... by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scary stuff indeed. I had to take our pet our local vet. Very friendly girl, but she had all kinds of animal porn all over the walls of the waiting room; horses, cats, dogs, gerbils, even budgies!!! Even the screensaver of her PC was showing animal porn. The mind boggles...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  2. Hard dives. by Raven42rac · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, there are signs on pools for this very reason.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  3. Active KillDisk by holy_smoke · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.killdisk.com/eraser.htm

    Its worth its weight in gold.

    --
    Is the juice worth the sqeeze?
    1. Re:Active KillDisk by kayen_telva · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second Eraser, or SDELETE for scripting.

    2. Re:Active KillDisk by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no such thing as a secure deletion. To be sure that data is irretrievable you need to physically destroy the disk, which includes at least chopping up the platters and preferably melting them down. Here's a quote from the definitive paper on data recovery by Peter Gutmann:

      For this reason it is effectively impossible to sanitise storage locations by simple overwriting them, no matter how many overwrite passes are made or what data patterns are written.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Active KillDisk by whereiswaldo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read the entire paragraph quoted from the article:

      Data overwritten once or twice may be recovered by subtracting what is expected to be read from a storage location from what is actually read. Data which is overwritten an arbitrarily large number of times can still be recovered provided that the new data isn't written to the same location as the original data (for magnetic media), or that the recovery attempt is carried out fairly soon after the new data was written (for RAM). For this reason it is effectively impossible to sanitise storage locations by simple overwriting them, no matter how many overwrite passes are made or what data patterns are written. However by using the relatively simple methods presented in this paper the task of an attacker can be made significantly more difficult, if not prohibitively expensive.

      So it sounds like if you are overwriting your data in the exact same physical location which it currently exists, it should be possible to make the original copy unrecoverable given enough overwrites.

    4. Re:Active KillDisk by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah, but with modern disk drives it's basically impossible to be sure that you are writing to the same physical location. The magnetic domains are so small with GMR that temperature fluctuations of just a few degrees can throw off the alignment enough to ensure that complete erasure is not possible.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Active KillDisk by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm. Well, I format, change partition type, overwrite the entire disk contents several times, then format again. If I'm really feeling paranoid I install windows, and hook it up to the internet without a firewall or any patches. If there is any data left on it after a day, i'd be quite surprised.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    6. Re:Active KillDisk by ostiguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent poster had it right:

      basically, the theory is that if the heads are slightly off, the drive may still work fine, but the data is written slightly off as well, such that traces of the data exist due to slight magnetic remnants. this theory thus is that drives must be destroyed to be secure.

      most high security orgs feel the same way - IIRC, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police put out a doc for .ca govt usage, and they came up with allowing any non classified PC to be recycled. But they also laid out destruction requirements (how small the remaining debris must be) for classified and higher pcs.

      ostiguy

    7. Re:Active KillDisk by Twinky · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually you don't really have to physically destroy your harddisk, the following command deletes all the data reliably
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=65536


      Interested German speaking people should check out c't Magazin 5/2003. They took harddisks with four deleted files and sent them to professional data recovery labs. The first file was overwritten with zeros, the second with a random bitpattern, the third three times with zeros and the fourth three times with complementary bitpatterns.


      None of the labs was able to retrieve a single file. If you however try to burn, drown or hammer your drive, chances are good that the data stays intactand can be restored.

  4. Re:Low level it. by crackshoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dumpster diving ( just doing to my local dump and pulling shit from the stack of electronics) i've gotten social security numbers, credit card data, grading data from various area High Schools...

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  5. Learn something!! not scaremongering!! by kiwioddBall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps more useful than yet another pointless scaremongering exercise would be for the company that now owns the drives to go back to the companies that they bought them off to find out how they were erased so we could find out how not to do it, and where they were not successful in recovering info to go back to those companies to find out how they did wipe that info properly.
    The point is to learn something from it.

    1. Re:Learn something!! not scaremongering!! by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Perhaps more useful than yet another pointless scaremongering exercise would be for the company that now owns the drives to go back to the companies that they bought them off to find out how they were erased

      From the wording of the story, it's not clear that the drives were erased at all -- it says 'all of had "supposedly" been "wiped-clean" or "re-formatted"', which makes it seem likely to me that this is not some high tech recovery from wiped space, but simply taking advantage of negligence. Other stories have highlighted this as a consequence of outsourcing of disposal to companies which are supposed to do this before selling them, but neglect to. A company shouldn't let a disk off the premises without wiping it themselves -- it's a trivial process, as many other posts are detailing their favorite methids I won't bother. The sad consequence is that many potentially useful machines will now be destroyed out of paranoia and cosntribute to computer waste

    2. Re:Learn something!! not scaremongering!! by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Informative

      find out how they were erased so we could find out how not to do it, and where they were not successful in recovering info to go back to those companies to find out how they did wipe that info properly.

      Most likely it's very simple. The disks they recovered info from were not overwritten and the disks they couldn't recover information from were overwritten. A format that operates mostly in read-mode will leave most of the information intact on the disk. I have even FDISK'd, messed around with varying partitioning schemes, reformatting, and to my surprise eventually winding up with the original contents of a partition still readable.

      Something as simple as
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/def/hda
      and let it run until it's finished would be adequate to put the disks into their "couldn't recover information from" category. Still for the few bucks a used drive is worth it seems kinda stupid not to just pull them and pile them up somewhere. This from someone who has a pretty cavalier attitude toward security.

  6. If you're really paranoid about your data... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're really paranoid about your data then don't sell your hard drives, even if you have used US DoD-levels of formatting. Duh.

    Rather than make a few tens of dollars selling an old drive, take it apart, and burn the platters until they're nothing more than dust. Problem solved.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:If you're really paranoid about your data... by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rather than make a few tens of dollars selling an old drive, take it apart, and burn the platters until they're nothing more than dust. Problem solved.
      ...then mix the dust with concrete and water, let it harden into several small chunks, charter a ship around the world, and drop each chunk in a different spot in the ocean.

    2. Re:If you're really paranoid about your data... by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Rather than make a few tens of dollars selling an old drive, take it apart, and burn the platters until they're nothing more than dust.
      "Burn the platters?" What, do you live in a hyperbaric oxygen chamber? They're aluminum, aren't they?

      I was looking for a link for oxygen chambers and happened across this link on underwater blast injuries. I figured it was interesting and it kind of goes with the typo in the title.... At least, it seems more interesting than a second article that says "there's data on used hard drives."

    3. Re:If you're really paranoid about your data... by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

      then mix the dust with concrete and water, let it harden into several small chunks, charter a ship around the world, and drop each chunk in a different spot in the ocean.

      Damn. You're the guy responsible for every Adventure game ever.

      Now I gotta go collect this guy's harddrive and reassemble it so I can get the Master Sword.

    4. Re:If you're really paranoid about your data... by Obfiscator · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aluminum is very pyrophoric. If you grind it up into a fine enough powder, it ignites in the air (see this MSDS, for example...sorry, no cool pictures).

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
  7. This is why... by DaHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally speaking, I've never given away or sold a HD in my life... not that I'm paranoid about what might be on it, I find it a good practice to use em until they die, even if it's only a few extra gigs.

    1. Re:This is why... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll second this, even when I get a new hard I usually keep the old one to back stuff up to when I'm putting a new o.s. in. Or when I feel like trying out a new distro (or new version). Plus if a drive dies on me I have spare I can use.
      Though is this case I think we're dealing with corporate upgrade cycle here. Usually the corporation sells off a bunch of drive in bulk to cut the cost of the upgrade or company hired to do the upgrade takes the old drives and re-sells them to garner a few extra $$.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    2. Re:This is why... by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it a good practice to use em until they die

      Heck, I've got every harddrive I've ever owned here, even the ones that died. Someday I'll get around to making clocks from them or maybe speakers like I saw here a long while back. Recently I had a computer start acting strange on IDE (but with an adapter, the drive worked fine on SATA in that machine) so I went through ALL the old IDE drives until I found one that actually still worked... 650MB IDE drive from Conner, if I recall correctly. That drive exhibited the same issues as well, so I chalked it up to the IDE controller dying, and stuck to SATA.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  8. Slashdot Spellchecker.... by Papatoast · · Score: 4, Funny

    has taken a "hard dive".

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
    1. Re:Slashdot Spellchecker.... by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nobody is this bad of a speller. The purpose is beyond my comprehension, but it can only be deliberate. I'm going to go through past stories and try to crack the code. There's got to be a secret buried in the mispellings...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Slashdot Spellchecker.... by mdielmann · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here's the code. Take every letter that is missed, and add it to your message. If an extra letter is added to a word, take a letter off your message. Repeat. If you follow it long enough, you will get the following message: "You are a loser with too much time on your hands." Don't ask how I know this.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  9. not a joke by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Funny
    Step1: buy used hard drives
    Step2: ???
    Step3: profit

    let's discuss Step2

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  10. Similar to MIT students in Jan 2003 by Amgine007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This reminds me a lot of this story.

    Simplified summary of both: buy some hard drives on eBay and you could end up with some cool data!

    1. Re:Similar to MIT students in Jan 2003 by Snad · · Score: 5, Funny

      buy some hard drives on eBay and you could end up with some cool data!

      Of course you are more likely to buy some hard drives on eBay and end up with the entire history of some guy's girlfriend's medical problems in old e-mails, a small collection of old cached Slashdot pages, and some rather naff Flash animations.

  11. What kind of bullshit story is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At least post some backup or I've gotta call bs on that one.

  12. old computer by keadie · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bought a old computer once that had a database of about 200 names, address, phone numbers, DOBs and SSNs. They didn't delete anything on the hard drive. It had NT on it, I just used linux to check what was on it for grits and shingles. That company is lucky that I'm not evil...any opening bids?

  13. I'm going to rip a line from Schnier(sp?) by foidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and say that if your company's secrets are that valuable, the safest way to get rid of hard drives is just to scrap them. Laptops are a slightly different story, but how much can one actually expect to get off an auction of an old hard drive off of ebay? By the time you figure in all the auction fees, labor to ship them etc, I would bet that the companies probably don't make that much. It might just be safer to eat the cost than to try to sell them. It all really depends on the value of your secrets.

  14. DUPE! by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stop, timothy... we've heard this joke before. In fact, you seem to post this same story every nine months or so.

    Circa September 2003... nine months ago.
    Circa January 2003... eighteen months ago.

    Then again, we've been talking about this problem for a year and a half, yet there still are people stupid enough to be selling HDs with readable data that should be kept secret on them without doing DOD-level formatting.

  15. In other news... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, SCO recently purchased a used PC from eBay containing its IP and e-mails sent by Linus Torvalds proving that he stole SCO's IP for the linux kernel, and that he didn't actually write the linux kernel.

    What? Troll, am I? Well, it's slashdot. Someone had to poke fun at SCO. Sue me.

  16. Re:pr0n by martinX · · Score: 2, Funny

    My homemade pr0n is very unsafe. Don't try this one at home unless you're a trained professional!

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  17. I know I'm OK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stories like this really scare me, but I know I'm ok - I format my hard drive with my licenced Microsoft Windows XP CD, so I know there's no sensitive data left to be found! That's one of the many benefits of running secure and professionally developed software like windows.

  18. Is it worth the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    to sell old hard drives on eBay? I would think the cost of handling the entire transaction would cost more than the selling price of some old drive.

    My organization disassembles the drives and incinerates the platters. I'd like to see anyone get data from them.

  19. Deconstructing a HD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    - Get a Torx screwdriver set from your local hardware store.

    - Open the hd. Save the cool looking screws.

    - Turn the platters into coasters.

    - Just make sure you don't hurt yourself when playing with the magnets.

    1. Re:Deconstructing a HD... by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just make sure you don't hurt yourself when playing with the magnets.

      Ha, yeah right. I'd like to see someone who's played with hard drive magnets and not *at least* pinched themselves really good.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  20. Why SlashDot keeps posting dupes! by kidMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe someone bought the old hard drives from a /. server, grabbed the admin passwords for the site, and keeps posting the old articles they recover! It makes perfect sense. Surely the admins can't keep making these mistakes over and over... err, nebbermind. kM

    --
    -- You can't drink all day. (Unless you start in the morning...)
  21. May or may not help... by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps advice for anyone planning to let go of a hard drive:

    Use the shred utility, with a good number of iterations (25 sounds good). Go to the root directory and issue
    shred -n 25 -u -v *

    Then when you're done with that, low level format the drive using a disk utility such as the ones that come with Maxtors and Western Digital drives.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:May or may not help... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      You would probably be better off running shred on the device file: "shred -v /dev/hdb", or whatever. Your method has trouble on journaled filesystems, and will leave information like filenames and directory structure around.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:May or may not help... by mebon · · Score: 2, Informative
      One caveat...

      If you are going to use a file shredder make sure you aren't using a journalling filesystem. From the shred manpage:

      CAUTION: Note that shred relies on a very important assumption: that the filesystem overwrites data in place. This is the traditional way to do things, but many modern filesystem designs do not satisfy this assumption. The following are examples of filesystems on which shred is not effective:

      * log-structured or journaled filesystems, such as those supplied with AIX and Solaris (and JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Ext3, etc.)

      * filesystems that write redundant data and carry on even if some writes fail, such as RAID-based filesystems

      * filesystems that make snapshots, such as Network Appliance's NFS server

      * filesystems that cache in temporary locations, such as NFS version 3 clients

      * compressed filesystems
    3. Re:May or may not help... by hool5400 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do all that, and then smash it with a hammer into bit size pieces. And then throw those pieces to the bottom of various oceans.

      Then you are safe...maybe.

      --

      Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
  22. Hard drive erasing HOWTO by infolib · · Score: 4, Informative

    What they should have used: Secure Harddisk Eraser

    The Secure harddisk eraser is a Linux boot floppy that overwrites your drive with random bits. Comes in a 3-pass and a 35-pass version. Insert, boot, wait for beep. Free as in GPL.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  23. Eraser (GPL) by KrisHolland · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is only gratis software, so you really don't know how well it works, if at all.

    A better choice is Eraser, it is GPLed.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/eraser/

    You can also make a nuke boot disk with this program that automatically starts erasing everything upon start up. Don't forget to clearly label it ;).

    1. Re:Eraser (GPL) by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Label it? You mean, something like "Windows Installation" or "Intrarnet Access" and leave it laying around school?

      --
      Banaaaana!
    2. Re:Eraser (GPL) by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is only gratis software, so you really don't know how well it works, if at all.

      A better choice is Eraser, it is GPLed.
      Being GPL isn't much of a help here either. Whether you can truly erase a drive depends on so many low level (read: inside the drive 'black box') factors, that it's impossible to be 100% certain the disk is clean.

      Physical destruction of the disk is the best and only certain way of ensuring that critical data isn't still readable. Degaussing takes second place.

    3. Re:Eraser (GPL) by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What The HELL does a program's license have to do with its quality? Geez, talk about GPL zealotry!


      Its not about the licesne you dolt, its about source code visibility. If you can't see the source code, then you can't easily sure what the program is really doing.

  24. shred floppy by wirzcat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://staff.washington.edu/jdlarios/autoclave/

    Works like a charm. And it has various levels of paranoia to choose from.

  25. A Large Multinational Bank had this problem by sabinm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Happened to me once. My brother in law worked for a Large Multinational Bank and he new that I liked old computer junk. So he gave me a bunch of old 2/3/486 computers that were surplused from his job. They gave them to him because they didn't know how to get rid of them. Here was the catch . . . they didn't even format the things

    So I had their FedEx programs, account numbers, their in-house banking programs and a sweet little windows 3.1 interface. Needless to say I disposed of the information properly. But I told my brother in law. He said "Oh, really" and just forgot about it. Go figure.

    It is far too easy for those who would take advantage of sensitive information to exploit it for their own gain. They are quite fortunate someone like me got their hard drives and not someone bent on robbing them blind.

    --
    http://cincyboys.blogspot.com/ Everything Cincinnati. Including the word 'Finnih'
    1. Re:A Large Multinational Bank had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Texas A&M University, late 90s... Poor college student digs about a dozen old computers out of the dumpster figuring he could salvage one or two computers worth of parts. EVERY SINGLE ONE booted up with no work (windows 95). They were chock full of email, employee info, student grades/personal information and god only knows what else.

    2. Re:A Large Multinational Bank had this problem by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh, The computer I'm currently posting on was rescued from dumpster duty. It had all the companies data from the last quarter it was used on it. I was nice enough to reformat it for them before I upgraded the OS. BTW, my brother worked at the company (He was the one that pointed out the computer to me), He still doesn't know how I found out what his first year's pay was!) };->

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
    3. Re:A Large Multinational Bank had this problem by irokitt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, found a computer in my school parking lot-someone didn't want to pay the nifty $50 fee San Diego residents are required to fork out to recycle old computers. Hey Kyle, if you're reading this, your data is safe with me;)

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  26. Re:Just Destroy The fucking Things! by neuro.slug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why destroy something that is perfectly reusable? We waste enough resources as it is. If anything, give them away to low-budget institutions in need. I'm sure the cost of low-level formatting a bunch of drives really isn't all that high.

    Waste = bad.

    -- n

  27. Re:Low level it. by kistral · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, because these days you're not supposed to do the low-level formatting yourself. That's done by the manufacturer.

  28. The Real Canadian Method by dan.hunt · · Score: 5
    Real method of the Canadian Armed Forces:
    1. remove drive from machine,
    2. remove screws from drive,
    3. split HD case open,
    4. smash to bits.
    No data leaks. Really! Kind of brings a tear to the eye of the guy with the screwdriver and hammer though.
  29. Re:Who resells HDs anyhow? by john_anderson_ii · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess that depends on the context. I mean, if you are a large company reselling entire PCs that were scrapped due to a recent departmental upgrade, then you might recover some value. Those PCs that were sold still contain information on their HDDs. Here in AZ, there are many auctions every weekend where one can purchase used PCs that were scrapped by some company by the pallet load. I'm sure if one wanted to spend the time, then one coudl obtain a wealth of information from the drives contained therein.

    --
    Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
  30. Re:Low level it. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well that depends on what you mean by 'low level format'.
    Re-formatting ata hard drives at a truly low level can mess the disk organisation in ways that seriously degrade performance.
    If your referring to a 'full' format with does more than the 'quick' format that mearly marks the drive as empty, well it's easy, and of very little use in this case.
    Simply writing zeros to every location on the hard drive that stores data doesn't completely erase the data. That is the magnetic field of the bits are not set at exactly '0'. Slight variations in the magnetic material, write head field strength, and positioning all contribute to increase the odds of data being recoverable.
    One way to improve your odds is to repeatedly write a series of 1's and 0's to a location to help average out these variables as well as use the hysteresis(sp?) effect to 'degause' the location, this is what 'shredder' programs do (the ones that aren't crap).
    Some programs even go so far as to not simply write 11111111 then 00000000 over and over to the same byte, but to use other patterns so that the fields of niegboring bits add to the deguas effect in destroying the data.
    At one time (and probably to this day) the US DOD specs used to require a certain number of passes of 0 and 1 bits followed by the writing of a specific bit pattern before a hard drive was considered to have been properly erased.
    And yes each pass does put a little wear and tear on the drive, not enough to worry about unless your 'shredding' the drive quite a few times, but still worth noting.
    The number of passes used and what if any special patterns are used determine the amount of effort it would take to recover the data, kind of like key length in cryptography. Adjust paranoi settings apropriately. (note: the anology is imperfect as hell, 1024 might be a mediocre key length, but thats enough shred passes to noticeably shorten drive lifespan.)

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  31. Alot of people are not aware of this by MrRuslan · · Score: 2, Informative

    They think once it is formated evrything is gone but not so...I think HD manufacturers should put warning labels on there hds, They already provide Free utils to write zeros to the hd for that purpose.

  32. Re:Low level it. by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    so instead of fixing a drive thats realy screwed up by doing a llf i should send it back for an RMA? doesnt sound like the best solution to me

  33. Re:Just Destroy The fucking Things! by weeboo0104 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are companies really so desperate for money that they need the revenue from used hard drives?

    You mean the same type of company that would lay off an employee and hire the employee back as a contractor at 1.5x's the employees original salary to avoid paying health insurance premiums and so they don't have to pay as much to the employees pension???

    *choke* Bwahahahahahahaha

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  34. We break them! by MightyJB · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for a large manufacturing company in the US. The facility I'm in has an interesting approach. First they format... Then they drop a 20 pound weight on it. Usually a few times. I'm sure if someone really wanted the data they could get it, but it's raises the bar a little.

  35. PowerPoint presentations? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
    15 Microsoft PowerPoint presentations containing highly sensitive company information.

    Well, that's BS. Nothing even remotely important gets put into a PowerPoint presentation.

    I know, I've been to meetings. God, have I been to meetings...

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  36. Re:Low level it. by mwilliamson · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a good program called DBAN available from dban.sourceforge.net which is linux-based boot disk that does a good job overwriting to at least one of the DoD specs.

  37. Re:Low level it. by mackman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Properly shredding data on disk requires writing known values that also set the ECC bits to all possible values. That requires knowledge of the ECC being used on the disk. Many disk scrubbers actually write so many known vlues because they are attempting to catch all of the common ECCs.

  38. Little bits of metal == the only way to go by Gunfighter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was lucky enough to never have to worry about this sort of problem when I worked for Uncle Sam. We had to take the actual platters out of our discarded hard disks and grind them down with a belt sander. No recyling either. Once we had a pile of dust, we had to dump the remains in a drum of some sort of acidic crap (usually used to destroy reams of sensitive print material). I always found it funny to see a few nice, shiny disks in the bottom of the safe with a classification label on them awaiting their demise.

    Perhaps there's money to be made in performing this sort of destructive service for banks and other entities handling sensitive customer information.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    1. Re:Little bits of metal == the only way to go by real_smiff · · Score: 5, Funny
      phew, good thing you dissolved that platter dust! otherwise, obviously, we'd have terrorists glueing the bits* back together and getting the data back. i mean, if you'd stopped after grinding them down with the belt sander, i dread to think where we'd be..

      *excuse the pun, but it's kind of fitting. but please note the sarcasm.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  39. Darik's Boot 'n' nuke by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Darik's floppy disk sized mini-Linux-onepurpose-distro is what I use to surgically clean hard disks.
    Click here

    The floppy disk I created is red and I went so far as to draw a skull and crossbones on it, knowing full well what booting this thing does to a PC. A disk like this is an essential little tool to any geek's arsenal.... alongside Knoppix and tomsrtbt.

    The only thing is it takes HOURS to DoD wipe a hard disk. It took 15 hours for me to fully DoD a 40GB drive.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Darik's Boot 'n' nuke by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always thought it was funny to see the phrase "industrial-strength steel" -- as though there was steel on the market that *wasn't* produced by heavy industry... "Oh yeah, sure, I have a little smelter in my basement, but I only use that for light applications, you wanna do this job right you gotta use industrial strength steel!"

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  40. Re:Low level it. by Prendeghast · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gotta watch out for those pesky journalled filesystems though! I don't think a typical shred program does anything useful on an ext3 filesystem, for example. IIRC you can't be sure that you are really overwriting the physical location of the the orignal data (especially if the file has grown over time) and the journalling will (presumably for files below a certain size) just optimise away the intermediate disk writes and just write the final bunch of 0's ...

    I guess you really need to repartition the drive using non-journalled filesystems only and shred all the free space.

    Disclaimer: I don't claim to be a fs expert - I just remember looking for a shred application a few months back and being dissapointed that none of them worked with ext3.

  41. In a police environement by Chip7 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I work in a police force environement. They have a strict policy on hard drives: No hard drives ever leaves the HQ, unless it is sealed it it's original bag or to be used by a employee. If a PC or laptop has to be shipped to be repaired, we remove the drives. When we give our PCs to charity, they're HDless. Even faulty drives aren't thrown away. They're kept until someone decides to head to the incinerator and throw'em in themselves. Even if they're under warranty (and needs to be returned to be honored) we don't. We buy a new drive and that's it!

    It'd figure other industries would do the same. Heck it's your business, your data, your life (well, only of part of it hopefully!) you have on these disk. Why bother with selling them? To get 20$ 50$? The way i see it, selling hard drives is equal to selling random filing cabinet without making sure they're empty.

    slightly off-topic side note:
    Some officers here are so tight about security: One of out tech went out to replace a fried power supply. When walking out with the roasted one, one guy asked: "Hey couldn't there be data on there?" the tech answered a polite "no" with a smile. The guy handed him a pair of cutter and said:"Well why don't you cut-off those wires just to make sure" !! :-D
    /slightly off-topic side note

    --
    -- If you actually say LOL instead of laughing, maybe it's time to go outside! --
  42. Re:Low level it. by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At one time (and probably to this day) the US DOD specs used to require a certain number of passes of 0 and 1 bits followed by the writing of a specific bit pattern before a hard drive was considered to have been properly erased.

    I find it hard to believe the US DoD is this lax on security. I used to work for the Canadian government, and we had to hammer a nail through the drive a certain number of times "according to the specs" to consider it properly erased.

  43. Government by oneshot47 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My dad did computer forensics for 10 years in the air force and i know for a fact that it takes a lot of work to completely format a drive. Even measures that people take to destroy a drive (i.e. drilling a hole thru the platters) arent entirely effective. With the right tools you can recover data from all but the most carefully destroyed or formated drives.

  44. Re:Darik's Boot and Nuke (GPL) by aligas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Eraser actually uses Darik's Boot and Nuke when you use it to wipe an entire drive. See the features page.

  45. Re:Low level it. by TexasDex · · Score: 5, Informative
    Information recovery tools work by subtracting the current pattern of bits from the magnetic reading that the drive outputs. The previous bit pattern generally masks any small variation in the signal, but when that is subtracted from the signal you get a clear pattern of what the old data was. Then you can repeat the trick for a total up to 6 times. Beyond that, the basic noise in the system and the uncertainty of the signal strength makes it impossible to determine the bit pattern.


    For this reason, I believe the DOD reccomends writing random data to the disk 7 times, to guarentee that it is destroyed.


    Remember, however, that any overwriting makes it impossible to recover data except by special means far beyond that of a normal file recovery program. Tools that recover data after it has been overwritten are not easy to make, and I'm not even sure that they would run on computer hardware. It's possible that such recovery would require special ATA firmware, or even replacing the hard disk firmware.


    I'm not an expert, but that is what I've been able to grok from casual reading on the subjectt.

    --
    The Cheese Stands Alone.
  46. Something like this usually works by Trogre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Put in knoppix CD

    for(( i=1; $i20; $((i++)) )); do
    # Do something to seed random number generator, probably involving the clock
    echo Erasing cycle $i;
    dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda;
    done

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  47. Um... by Dwonis · · Score: 5, Funny
    Naked horses != horse porn...

    Horses don't normally wear clothes, you know.

    1. Re:Um... by jpetts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Naked horses != horse porn...

      Horses don't normally wear clothes, you know.


      You are so wrong!

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  48. The chinese army... by Trogre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... had this problem with military laptops. What to do if they get invaded and need to dump their data before getting captured lest their tactical data fall into enemy hands?

    They tried hotkey combinations, which would trigger a script to delete the hard drive, but they were either too complex to remember, or too easy to accidentally hit.

    In the end, they painted a big red 'X' on the underside of the laptop right where the hard drive sits, and instructed the operator "point gun here".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  49. Skeet shooting. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Take out the platters and load up the shotgun.

    Geek hint: Do this in that mythical place called "outide", unless you have a very understanding landlord/mother.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  50. Re:Low level it. by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Informative

    A few years ago, DoD spec for erasing info classifed "Confidential" was a minimum of seven passes with varying strings of 1's and 0's. DoD "erasure" for a drive that has held "Secret" data involved opening the case and applying a power sander to each surface until ALL the magnetic media has been sanded off, or in a combat situation where the destroying authority was prepared to sign that time was absolutely critical, thermite or white phosporous grenades. I don't remember offhand what the spec was for Top-Secret, as I never had to know that one.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  51. Re:Low level it. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well I imagine random data would probably be 'good enough'.
    The use of specific patterns, especially alternating 1's and 0's, is to take advantage of known effects such as degausing. There is also the matter of modern hard-drives and ecc data that a poster below kindly pointed out. My last dealings with such data-erasure techniques was a few (8-10?) years ago. My appologies for not pointing out that my info might be a tad dated.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  52. Re:Low level it. by OrangeGoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    DoD 5220.22-M, 1995. This is probably outdated by now, but the standard at that time was to overwrite all addressable locations with a single character to clear the disk, or overwrite each address with a character, its compliment, and a random character to "sanitize" the disk.

    Note that these procedures only apply(ed) to every-day harddrives, not anything containing sensitive information. For the drives with classified information, 5220.22-M gives you a list of things you can do: "Disintegrate, incinerate, pulverize, shred, or smelt." There is no acceptable method of sanitizing a disk with classified information on it.

    And for the poster below who said that overwriting the data seven times would guarantee that the data was gone... not true, though the data is almost certainly out of reach for the average Joe. NSA is by no means the average Joe, of course, but they have successfully recovered data from a drive that has been overwritten at least a hundred times.

    2-cents

  53. hypothesisesees by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    maybe horse porn lovers like garage sales? or, much more worrying, a much larger % of the pop than we thought. is into horse porn. thanks for the comic goldmine of a post btw.

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  54. Re:Low level it. by Cramer · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the drive needs a low-level format, it SHOULD be sent back. A modern hard drive should never need a field reformat within it's design lifetime.

    (If you disable thermal recalibration on the drive, you'll get what you asked for. I don't know if you can even do that anymore -- "AV" drives used to have that as an "option" for bursts of increased speed.)

  55. Another easy alternative -- KNOPPIX by Atario · · Score: 2, Informative

    Boot into Knoppix, run shred.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  56. Re:Low level it. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, back about 20 years ago I got so much stuff doing the same thing. My friend and I had a large moving box full of floppies we recoverd, stacks of drives, old backup tapes, credit card numbers, SSNs, vendor statements and account numbers, complete and functional PCs, etc.

    For others who plan on trying this out: Don't worry, dumpsters for your average company is clean with no gross shit in it. Oh, and regarding the police.. Wear nasty looking clothes.. I mean, really look like a dirt bag. If you go looking like geekboy from a middle income family, you'll get a trespassing charge against you. If you look like a rat, they will leave you alone. We only had a couple of run-ins with the cops and tenants. They all went pretty well, as we said we were looking for things to sell at the pawn shop.

    The key, I have found, when performing a social hack is to always pretend like you recognize authority. Cops will quit caring about pointing out your trespass, real fast, when they manage to get a self-esteem boost by picking on a poor person. The little guilty voice in the back of their head will say "Leave the poor slob alone.. AlooOoone!"

    Warning: This will not work if you park your new Volvo next to the dumpster. Park around other cars, if there are any, and be prepared to abandon your vehicle a few hours if you are told to leave by the cops. Oh, and get some strong fabric laundry bags to carry your loot.

  57. A use for all those pictures full of pink bits. by B.D.Mills · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or you can do the following:
    (1) wipe the drive with ones
    (2) wipe the drive with zeroes
    (3) fill the drive with p0rn
    (4) wipe the drive with ones
    (5) wipe the drive with zeroes

    When they get to the p0rn layer, the chances are good that they will stop looking further. Once they find all those goodies you planted at step 3, they won't look for all those financial records.

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  58. ` man shred ` for more info by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    For the purposes of most people who aren't expecting the NSA to go recovering quantum residues off of your disk:
    • for N in 1 2 3 4 5 6 ; do
      • echo pass $N .. `date`

      • dd if=/dev/urand of=/dev/hdc
      done
    ( /dev/hdc presumes that the soon-to-be disposed of drive is the primary drive on the secondary IDE controller. Adjust as appropriate -- eg: /dev/hda to sanitize the dos C: drive).

    For those of you who don't have Linux, a copy of Knoppix will do fine, as will using the first install disk of most distributions, and going 'Linux Rescue"
    (i've tried this on RedHat.. I'll presume that others have something similar).
    Many distributions now also have the 'shred' command which does a (much) more organized version of the same thing.

    Oh, and did I mention "Backup any data you want to keep before trying this"?

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  59. Can someone explain why 35 times? by Sark666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never understood why once isn't sufficent. And if once isn't, can 35 guarantee it or is it the more the pass the less like they can retrieve data, but I guess I don't understand to what end.

    1. Re:Can someone explain why 35 times? by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Informative
      Once is sufficient if all you care about is someone connecting the hard disc up to a machine and attempting to recover confidential information via the standard IDE/SCSI protocol and bus.

      But if you're concerned about someone ripping the drive open and using electron microscopy to work out the alignment of the molecules (and from that, the data they store), then theory (and experiments?) shows that the multiple-pattern-wipe technique is sufficient to guarantee data is destroyed.

      For most data, therefore, one all-zeros wipe is probably sufficient and will take the least time. But for some users and some data, more wipes will be appropriate.

      Peter Gutmann's paper is a good place to start for more detail.

      --

  60. Re:Low level it. by danielrose · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe the problem is that the journal still exists, after shredding the file content. Ie the file contents are shredded, but journalled entries for file creation still exist, thus unless you create the file while the fs is mounted as ext2, you still have the problem..

    --
    i hate pansy republicans
  61. Re:Low level it. by danielrose · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is still possible to recover data from a physically damaged disk which will no longer work in a machine.
    Data can be obtained from the undamaged (or less damaged) portions of platter, which is usually still a lot of the disc, of course this requires MUCH more low level tools than overwriting with data. Best effort is 25 overwrites, combined with a large nail.

    --
    i hate pansy republicans
  62. Re:Low level it. by Crizp · · Score: 2, Informative

    One could always use this

    zap!

  63. ATA/SATA drives can Secure Erase by themselves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This guy who does research on hard drive technology gives away a freeware Secure Erase HDDerase utility that just calls the HARDWARE-BASED Secure Erase capability that is ALREADY BUILT INTO all recent ATA-type hard drives!

    We just need to figure out how to get Linux/*BSD/*NIX/Apple/Microsoft to make this an option at the OS or fdisk/format/Disk Utility/Volume Manager utility level so we can all use it easily.

  64. What's all this rubbish about opening up a HD... by syousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...taking out screws, carefully making coasters.....blah blah bleh!

    I had a 40GB hard disk that I'd paid a bit more for at the time because it was from a large reliable company (which I won't name) and had decent performance. It had a short life - maybe 2 years before it started playing up. Within 3 or 4 it was unusable even as a backup disk.

    I took a great deal of pleasure in "opening it up" with a hammer. The screws were star shaped (torque screws??). The platter actually shatterred into dust and some larger shards. Don't know how safe it was doing this in my backyard, but it was a lot of fun. (Remember the scene from Office Space where they smashed the printer into tiny bits). Good therapy.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  65. Re:Low level it. by slimsam1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Diabetes, either type, cannot be spread to another person by blood contact.

    --
    ...
  66. Hard drives aren't the only media like this... by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...I buy used DLT-IV tapes off ebay and found a lot of uhm, "interesting" stuff on some of them.

    About 1 out of 10 tapes I buy has stuff like source code for commercial closed source applications, confidential customer data, etc.

    It's scary how lax people are with this shit.

  67. Ghost 2003 - GDisk by Nikkodemus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Symantec's Ghost 2003 has a command line utility for erasing your HD, allowing the user to select HD, select the amount of passes and various other options, includes a one word switch.

    /dodwipe

  68. The final solution...or paranoia by polemistes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least some companies don't take any kind of risks. A friend of mine, who works in a security complany, told me he often get assigned to take a big load of computers, often fairly new ones, to the dump, and there, using a sledge hammer, destroy all components in the computers, including the hard drives.

    Hearing about such things makes me angry, since all those computers could have been put to good use. If sensitive information really has to be stored in a computer, then they should take the precautions first, and use good encrypted file systems.

  69. Re:Low level it. by crackshoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    most diabetics i know use sharps containers or gallon jugs to hold their used needles before they're properly disposed of. i also make a point of gloves, heavy shirt or hoody, work pants, and boots when diving.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  70. what we do by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and we're not military, we're just a large corporation, is we use the simplest solution that definitely works. you can mess around with disk wipers, but if there's the tiniest chance it won't work then it's easier, quicker and cheaper to take it down to engineering and get them to put it under a pillar drill. *no-one's* getting data off a platter that's had a 12mm drillbit go through it.

    1. Re:what we do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just running one drill hole into a disk will not render it totally unreadable, it just means it won't work in a standard PC. You can still retrieve the information off off it if you have the know how. Just depends on how valuable this info is.
      For disks sued for defence at level secret and above we used to scrub it, place it on a runway and run over it with a tank!! Then dispose of it in a secure landfill site.

    2. Re:what we do by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...note i said "we're not military". still, it completely Shatters the Platters (StP) which is what counts. good luck to the NSA if they want to get that data back again.
      for the more paranoid, simply increase the number of holes.
      a power drill's a lot cheaper than a degauser, and *every* techie can find a use for a powerful cordless drill hanging on the wall, even if it's only for threatening lusers.

  71. "DoD-levels of formatting" is themite by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3, Informative

    The British Army decommision hard drives using an angle grinder. The US use thermite.

    That said, for most purposes programs like Eraser will make data recovery so expensive and ineffective that for the data most of us have, nobody will bother. In fact, that's probably true even of less effective measures such as "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb".

  72. Recover data? by zeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've read some posts here which states that if you overwrite data on a drive, it's possible to recover it. Well, it's NOT. Not according to Ibas, a large data recovery company here in Europe anyway.

    The problem with all these so called reasers and such is that they often try to write a continous stream of zeroes for example. The hardware in that case will compress the information, leaving only a small footprint on the storage media itself. That makes it very hard to securily erase a harddrive.

    Some people claim that one can read out already overwritten bits from magnetic media. Well, no, you can't. Sure, maybe one can read back a bit or two if you analyze the physical structure of the disk itself. But getting some real data back from overwritten bits is quite impossible, with todays technology.

    If you want to securily erase a drive, use a big magnet. I mean big as in the ones used for lifting cars on the junkyard! There are some special tools out in the market for that purpose.
    One other way is probably just to remove the platters and crush them into dust.

  73. Even the East German STASI ... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... fell on its face on this count. After the German reunification the Bundesnachrichtendienst, (German Intelligence sercvice, BND for short) combed East Germany for hard drives because the STASI used to pass used ones on to state businesses and institutions. Apparently they were able to recover a fair amount of documentation this way. But the real score was that they found a set of tapes (the famous SIRA tapes) with backups of among other things an index linking agents to the STASI's library of coded agent activity reports which somebody had forgotten to flag for deletion. The problem was of course that the CIA had stolen the directory containing the codename key ie. directory of codename=agents-real-name (aka. "Rosenholz" files) before the BND got to it. So now the CIA knew who all the agents were but no more and the Germans knew how to find out what they were upto. Of course the CIA insisted that the BND hand over the database but refused to trade it for the codename key. Last I knew that request was flatly denied they have now settled on some sort of tit for tat exchange.

    So the lesson is, after you whipe your disk, DON'T FORGET THE BACKUP MEDIA!

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  74. interesting question by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It takes just two overwrites with really random data to remove data forever. Magnetism is a hysteresis loop phenomenon {think of a spring toggle; it will only move if you push it hard enough, then the same spring you were fighting against snaps it into its new position}. There is a slight difference between a "1 that used to be a 0" and a "1 that was always a 1", and there's a corresponding slight difference between a "0 that always was a 0" and a "0 that used to be a 1" -- but that, by design, isn't apparent to the disk read head. (Think: the same few hundred MB of disk get repeatedly overwritten when it's used as a swapfile. Data surviving overwrites would lead to all manner of reliability problems.)

    You can usually get some fairly random data from /dev/dsp - if all the inputs are turned up full whack with nothing plugged into them, then you will get a nice mix of static and power hum that ought not to contain any discernible pattern.

    A "1 that used to be a 0, and before that a 1" and a "1 that used to be a 0, and before that a 0" are almost certainly indistinguible. One write ago you might be able to recover, but two writes ago you haven't got much chance. Perhaps if you extracted the platters, you might be able to find some remnants of data on them ..... but you'd have to do a lot of work to reconstruct it. Unless you struck gold straight away, you'd have to wade through a hell of a lot of crap reconstructing the drive's own low level structure and the OS's file format before you work out what order the recovered zeros and ones should even go in.

    Once the data is as close to unrecoverable as won't make much difference, any extra effort you make is wasted. Sure, there are going to be one or two gems out there; but most people's data isn't that valuable, or can be had elsewhere for less effort. Think about it: Names and addresses are published in phone books and electoral registers. Identity numbers / SSNs are not secret. Nor are bank account numbers -- they're on every cheque you write. Credit card numbers are only valid for two years. Medical records of strangers are an interesting read, but not terrifically useful for anything interesting. If you're utterly paranoid, it might be worth doing partial random writes before storing any data on a new drive -- so if someone really can determine the first thing ever written to the drive, it would be nonsense. "Underwrite" each sector a random number of times, of course. Of course, if you have an encrypted file system, only the encryption key need be erased securely.

    So, having applied the laws of physics and seen that getting rid of data isn't that hard (and could be implemented almost trivially at the OS level; but not being able to recover data might conceivably be worse than being able to recover it, what with everyone getting used to the idea of a magical 'undo' button), let's turn the question around and look at it from the other side:

    Who gets fat on persuading people that they need to physically destroy used hard disk drives? And why? Let's see .....
    • Hard drive manufacturers - they will obviously sell more new drives if people can't buy second-hand ones.
    • Data recovery companies - they make money persuading people they can recover data from anything.
    • Secure data disposal consultants - they can charge big money under the colour of authority.
    • The Government - misinforming the populace is a centuries-old tradition. Documenting a data disposal procedure that is actually overkill might suggest to the Enemy that you have the technology to recover from anything less.

    Anyway, if recovering overwritten data really worked -- or even only half-worked -- someone would, by now, have tried to use it for a "drive space expander" utility. The kind of thing that would probably be advertised by SPAM.
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  75. Re:be careful who you hire by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
    (Of course re-partitioning stands a good chance of bringing everything back

    A Windows crash screwed up my partition table, eventually I found Testdisk, a marvellous free utility that analysed the disk for an hour then rewrote the tables, and brought it back to life with my data (unbacked) all there.

  76. Re:Low level it. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last think I want is HIV or some nasty cuts from broken glass or metal shit.

    Phone handsets or doorknobs are generally *far* worse from a sanitary perspective than just about anything else. All the communicable respiratory diseases have been nicely cultured on the doorknobs by people sneezing on their hands and then operating the knob.

    Heck, your ancestors survived tromping around in the mud, barefoot, getting stabbed, clawed, bitten, stung, and so forth. You have an immune system and regenerative abilities that are awfully tough to muck with. Now, *cars*...*cars* are scary. Not many people die each year from scorpion bites, but tens of thousands of people die each year from auto accidents in the United States. And you probably have a road out right in front of your house!

    As Neal Stephenson put it -- you're a stupendeous badass. You come from a long line of stupendous badasses. Anything that wasn't a stupendous badass is now dead.

  77. Total Destruction by neccoant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a hospital, so we have to satisfy HIPAA regulations when disposing of hard drives. When a PC is junked, we ship it to the warehouse, where it is stripped of RAM, if it is still useful, and the hard drive. The hard drives are then fdisked, formatted, and put in a cardboard box. Once we get over twenty hard drives, out come the hammers, and there go the drives. It is overwhelmingly satisfying to hit a "fragile!" sticker with a hammer. Once the platters are cracked through or shattered, the drives are reboxed, the box is taped, and it goes out with the rest of the computer trash (perhaps to recycling.) Though this isn't perfect, anyone who gets the data off of those platters is likely to get it no matter what we do.

  78. DoD Standards = destroy hard drives by mgargett · · Score: 2, Informative

    The new DoD standard is that no wipe software is good enough, you've got to destroy the hard drives if they contain anything sensitive and above. Basically, that's everything the DoD or DHS does. So, when machines are turned in now, hard drives are degaussed and then put in a shredder. And I've got to tell you, the hard drive shredder is one cool thing. It makes hard drive confetti.

  79. Misconception by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is a bit scary considering all of these drives were supposedly formatted and sold for surplus by major companies (although few of us actually use the multiple formatting standards of the DoD)
    This one sentence explains it all. You can format it a thousand times, but the data will still be intact. Formatting (as the term applies to modern OSes) just clears out the areas of the disk that contain entries pointing to the actual blocks of data, unless it's low-level formatting, (which I don't recommend you do).

    That's sad. Professional techs don't know the difference. I understood this the difference when I was a child, so I guess it's true that "professional" only means "I get paid". The correct procedure is to overwrite every bit of data on the disk, multiple times. Nine times, twelve times if you're really paranoid. No special software needed if you've got Unix/BSD/Linux around.

    cat /dev/zero > /dev/whatever
    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  80. Re:Low level it. by binary+paladin · · Score: 2, Funny

    My friends and I take our old drives out for target practice. Some .357 and .308 usually do the trick. If someone can get my chat logs off of that then more power to them.

    That's what I call a format.

  81. Re:Low level it. by teknokracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just had an idea: If the data is so incredibly vital, if the data would cost a company millions if released, if the passwords would let anyone gain access to the system... why not just lock up the hard drives in a vault, or perhaps physically DESTROY them. After all, the cost of not selling those drives compared to the prevention of secrets/passwords being released is minimal! Then again, if someone wants your data, they'll get it by any means possible, so you are screwed either way.

  82. Re:Low level it. by Lancer · · Score: 2, Funny
    Phone handsets or doorknobs are generally *far* worse from a sanitary perspective than just about anything else.

    No kidding! I once read about the population of an entire planet that was killed off due to a particularly nasty virus contracted from a filthy telephone, embarassingly after they had sent off all of their telephone sanitizers to colonize a new world.

    You can't make stuff like that up...

    --
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  83. DOD 5220.22-M, the RCMP guidelines, and friends by valdis · · Score: 2, Informative
    The current DOD standard for contractors says thusly:

    Pages 14 and 15 note methods "a, b, d, and m" sanitizing fixed drives, and continues:

    "d. Overwrite all addressable locations with a character, its complement, then a random character and verify. THIS METHOD IS NOT APPROVED FOR SANITIZING MEDIA THAT CONTAINS TOP SECRET INFORMATION."

    Note this applies to DOD contractors, and other rules probably apply to DOD, military, and the CIA/NSA/NRO/etc intelligence community.

    The obvious implication is that the 3 verified passes are sufficient to render the information not worth recovering for Confidential and Secret, but that Top Secret info is still potentially recoverable within cost/benefit constraints for the opponent. Remember - for many things (except possibly some weapons systems info) you don't need to guarantee the opponent can't recover the information, you merely have to make the cost of recovery greater than the benefit they gain from the secret.

    Oh, and the Canadian RCMP TSSIT OPS-II says: "Must first be checked for correct functioning and then have all storage areas overwritten once with the binary digit ONE, once with the binary digit ZERO and once with a single numeric, alphabetic or special character, " and again, not for Top Secret - for that, they recommend contacting somebody for special instructions/handling.