Slashdot Mirror


glabels: Ready For Prime Time

Joe Barr writes "NewsForge is running a review of glabels. It's still in beta status, but it's ready for prime time now. It knows hundreds of predefined label formats and allows you to design your own templates for custom work. Barcodes, images, just about anything but MP3 tracks can be printed on them. glabels is destined to become one of the most popular native apps for Linux." If you need harder-core barcode support, the excellent kbarcode would probably make a good complement. (NewsForge and Slashdot are both part of OSDN.)

187 comments

  1. Wimps... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    ..back in The Day we'd just "cat > /dev/lpt" and do it right the first time. If the client was lucky we'd remove the tractor feed strips off the "cards". Fancy pants, downtown GUIs and pointing and clicking and carousing and hooliganism...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Wimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "offtopic"? Goddamn punks with their 21st century mod points and mice and mice with 4 buttons and a wheel and color and sound...

    2. Re:Wimps... by name773 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not me, i'm browsing with links on a 10 year old retired desktop (got it for free :)) that doesn't even have x installed

      it's still functional!

    3. Re:Wimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia links is spelled lynx.

    4. Re:Wimps... by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quit your whining ;-) We didn't have some fancy /dev/lpt or even an lpt0:. All we had was the printing terminal. Hell, we didn't even need a computer to make address labels, just a loop of punched tape and either a teletype or flexowriter.

    5. Re:Wimps... by name773 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      links is a bit different from lynx
      i, for one, was quite glad to find out about the former, it's a good browser

    6. Re:Wimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you young whippersnappers, back in MY day we didn't have any of these fancy matrix matrix printers, or tractor papers.

      Ever tried carving those damned labels to a stone blocks each weighting at least a ton?

    7. Re:Wimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is cool! I get my IT3800 (Image Team 3800) in the mail in a few days! Now I can play with it! :-)

    8. Re:Wimps... by torpor · · Score: 3, Interesting


      you haven't lived (as a computer geek) until you've worked on a coding project, 20 hours a day for 5 weeks, sitting in a chilly halon-smelling computer room, with a 128-char daisy-wheel printer chattering away in your ear, printing label print jobs you spooled with 'lp sometextfile' 4 months ago ... having to cat/cut/grep/uniq that same 'sometextfile' whenever the tractor-feed edge tape gets jammed and you only notice because the temperature in your immediate vicinity has risen because the daisy wheel hasn't noticed and is stuck, typing the names and addresses of 150,000 people, over and over, on the same position on the rubber roll, and the whole thing has started to smoke.

      until you've been there, its hard to understand why its not so easy to get excited about a program called 'gLabels', which just seems so ... redundant ... even in its 'advanced'-ness ...

      you need a GUI to print labels? Bwwaaaahahahaaaahahaahaa! here's a dime kid, go by yourself a chance to type 'man awk' at some command line ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:Wimps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those condescending UNIX users, aren't you.

    10. Re:Wimps... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      you haven't lived (as a computer geek) until you've worked on a coding project, 20 hours a day for 5 weeks, sitting in a chilly halon-smelling computer room, with a 128-char daisy-wheel printer chattering away in your ear, printing label print jobs you spooled with 'lp sometextfile' 4 months ago ... having to cat/cut/grep/uniq that same 'sometextfile' whenever the tractor-feed edge tape gets jammed and you only notice because the temperature in your immediate vicinity has risen because the daisy wheel hasn't noticed and is stuck, typing the names and addresses of 150,000 people, over and over, on the same position on the rubber roll, and the whole thing has started to smoke.

      Uphill both ways in the snow.
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  2. most popular native apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    glabels is destined to become one of the most popular native apps for Linux
    Oh yes, because I can't make it through the day without printing labels.

    Either this is a statement about the status of Linux apps, or a comment on the poster's anal retentivness.

    1. Re:most popular native apps by Deusy · · Score: 0

      Oh yes [gLabels is destined for popularity], because I can't make it through the day without printing labels.

      Either this is a statement about the status of Linux apps, or a comment on the poster's anal retentivness.


      Or a statement of your ignorance. gLabels does more than printing labels.

      UTFA (Use The ... Application) before commenting on it's inadequacies. Otherwise your sarcasm simply backfires.

      Not only can gLabels do labels, it does business cards, CD covers (and labels), posters, fliers, and is as good at single page DTP as any of the competition (such as Scribus).

      Now who's the one suffering from anal retentivity?

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    2. Re:most popular native apps by JPriest · · Score: 1

      "It's still in beta status, but it's ready for prime time now" - glabels is a Linux distro?
      [/sarcasm]

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:most popular native apps by gasp · · Score: 1

      I hope you are not entirely serious. gLabels is a good single page DTP app? When it can't print properly from KDE? When it can't overlay text on images? When it can't do much beyond place blocks next to each other and fill them with content produced by a more capable app?

      I agree it does labels and business cards very nicely without requiring many workarounds. I only wish I could print directly to a CUPS printer under KDE in non-draft quality so I don't need to print to a PDF and use another app to do the printing.

    4. Re:most popular native apps by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Last time I tried (admittedly some time ago) it also was lacking good data import beyond CSV. For automatic label creation I'd prefer a non-gui app anyday, anyways. Don't want to repeat all that clickery all the time...

  3. A label maker? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is newsworthy?

    That's what Bart's aunt Selma got him for his birthday. It caused nothing but trouble.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:A label maker? by underpar · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it caused the o so important plot twist for the episode. What would have happened if Bart hadn't put the label on there? He wouldn't have ended up in the well and we wouldn't have gotten to see Sting's badly drawn shirtless chest.

    2. Re:A label maker? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Awwwwww! There's only one beer left... and it's Barts.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:A label maker? by radiophonic · · Score: 1

      You took the words right out of my mouth. If you don't give them back I may have to charge you interest.

      Must be a slow day when all of the news sites are covering a beta application. Leave the application announcements on freshmeat IMO.

      --
      Whenever you read this sig someone's refrigerator light turns on.
  4. Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    wouldnt it make more sense to package a label printing facility as part of Open Office as apposed to a standalone application ?

    great idea that *nix has this now but these sorts of things have been standard in MSWord for a long time, do i really need to open a specific application (and all the hassle of saving/re-opening) just to print a label or envelope ?

    1. Re:Standard in Open Office by prockcore · · Score: 4, Informative

      great idea that *nix has this now but these sorts of things have been standard in MSWord for a long time

      Not really. You need Avery to do anything more than wipe your ass with a sheet of labels under Word.

      OOo has label support, it even has more templates than Word... but neither are as complete as Avery.

      This is supposed to compete with Avery.

    2. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the debate about traditional UNIX philosophy of many small, effective applications which play nice with each other VS large apps that do it all.

    3. Re:Standard in Open Office by femto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In that case, shouldn't a label printer be implemented as a print queue filter? That way any application can print to a label, without being aware that it is doing so.

    4. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you tried to use the label printing option in Open Office? I have. My wife asked me to print off 5 pages of labels. Sounds simple right? She needed to print off a bunch of name tags for kids and parents at her soccer club. The names were in a spreadsheet. Still sounds straightforward, right?

      Not.

      I think I spent 1-2 hours banging my head against open office trying to get this to work. It is possibly the clunkiest, craziest, non-intuitive procedure I've yet to come across.

      Compared to that, the description of glabels sounds like a dream..

    5. Re:Standard in Open Office by ethix · · Score: 2, Informative

      I find glabels very easy to use, and I really like the fact I don't have to fire up a full blown office suite to print some labels, or work on a business card. It's a terrific tool...cheers to the programmers.

    6. Re:Standard in Open Office by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the *nix philosophy on the role of programs:

      "Do one thing and do it well"

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right on man. Why does everyone coming from Windows want these huge bundled do everything apps? Linux is Unix. Keep it small and simple and we'll all be productive.

    8. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to write a button display program. It will display a button very well. I hope I can recruit some volunteers to make this the best button displaying application out there!! Maybe you can click on the button, but that might be stretching my program too thin. It should only display buttons, but do this very well.

    9. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is Unix.

      Shhhh! SCO will hear you!

    10. Re:Standard in Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Parent post is just plain WRONG!

      Since at least Office 97, Microsoft Word has had more templates than you can shake a stick at, and the ability to easily create custom ones in a snap. Not to mention a quick google for the ID of the label you are using will get you a template in no time flat.

      Yea, Word isn't free software, but you are serving the entire open source community a grave injustice by flat-out lying about Microsoft products.

    11. Re:Standard in Open Office by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      I can shake a stick at a lot of templates.

    12. Re:Standard in Open Office by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Why does everyone coming from Windows want these huge bundled do everything apps?

      So that they don't have to switch between a thousand programs to do ONE THING.

  5. Underpromise, Overdeliver by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 5, Interesting
    glabels is destined to become one of the most popular native apps for Linux.

    This seems like a nice little application, but I don't think you do it any favours by hyping it up so much. Great label-making program, check; most popular native application for Linux? That might be a bit of a stretch

    1. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This just in:

      Label making fever sweeps the nation

    2. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That made me wonder about the maturity of linux as a desktop platform, even more than before.

      I'd just assume there would be a way to print envelopes/labels from linux. Even if it was an OO.o template, or some such. It's a fairly simple task.

      Sad. Wake me when they come up with the calculator or cardfile clones.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by tuffy · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'd just assume there would be a way to print envelopes/labels from linux. Even if it was an OO.o template, or some such. It's a fairly simple task.

      gLabels has been around for three years. It might look nicer now and support more labels than it did then, but it isn't as if Linux has gone without a method of making them until now.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, the author really thought that the label making industry is going to take over the world. Must I spell it out? H.U.M.O.R. Sheesh, do you want it more explicit? Next time we'll underline the humorous parts for you. Isn't there a "pun-intended" tag somewhere.

      Ok, I'll stop before half of slashdot is my enemy :)

    5. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by shigelojoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tagline seen on the cover of next month's "Linux Today":

      Labelling: It's the new 'blog'!

    6. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Who the hell uses label making software? Nobody that I know, that's for sure.

      Not to say it's a bad program; I just don't see myself ever using it for anything, ever.

    7. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      This just in:

      Label making fever sweeps the nation

      Don't I know it.

      At MyCorp, not only does every piece of property have a small bar code sticky label on it, but they've put bar codes on our office doors, too!

      I'm just waiting for the policy announcement about the new employee forehead tattoo...

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    8. Re:Underpromise, Overdeliver by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but I see label "graffiti" all the time-- usually using "found" labels, like the ones you get at the Post Office or FedEx office. After taking a few labels from the supply, the artist (and I recognize that to some I'm using the term loosely) draws his mini-piece of graffiti on the label, which is then applied to a surface in the same manner as other graffiti and tags. These sorts of labels and stickers are usually a lot more interesting than regular tagging, and more compact than large wall pieces of graffiti-- so they can be put in places where larger graffiti wouldn't fit. It wouldn't surprise me to see some enterprising young artist adapt glabel to this use, perhaps even taking advantage of the barcoding function to encode subversive messages. :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
  6. In other news... by ResidntGeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here's what Clinton economics could mean to your cat...

    --
    ResidntGeek
  7. This software sounds great... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    as I never get mod points.

    Now I can just print out my own!

    +1, Insightful!
    -2, Cut and Paste Troll
    +3, Agrees with My Post
    -10, Thinks Bush is doing Great Things
    +1.3, Made an original Joke about Soviet Russia
    -4, Rants about the RIAA but still buys CDs
    +42, Post by me, explaining the Meaning of Life.

    1. Re:This software sounds great... by RTMFD · · Score: 1

      +(inifinity) thinks I'm an insufferable wanker.

      I think that would be the one I'd use most.

  8. Sorry, I'm still working on those labels by underpar · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a geek girl and former clerk I can say that it's really awesome to have software that gives me time to do things other than work. Labels are the most obnoxious thing to make, too. To quote Homer (guess which one): I hate them SO MUCH!

    1. Re:Sorry, I'm still working on those labels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a geek girl, you theoretically don't exist.

    2. Re:Sorry, I'm still working on those labels by glwtta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, a geek what?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Sorry, I'm still working on those labels by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your homepage hits probably jumped up by a factor of 1000 of everybody clicking it hoping for pictures of you...

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
  9. Sounds useful by uberfruk · · Score: 0

    However, I can't really see anybody using it on a daily basis. You can just print out large volumes of generic lables and be set for a long time.

  10. Wrong link by lovemayo · · Score: 5, Informative

    its not kbarcode.org, but kbarcode.net

  11. barcodes == MP3 by ChipMonk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since a barcode is merely a specialized format for binary data (similar to a hard drive's RLL, in fact), I'm sure it's a matter of time until someone figures out how to transfer audio data to a print medium, for later retrieval via barcode scanner.

    I know a hobbyist magazine back in the '80s used to print entire programs in barcode format. I think it was for the old Radio Shack Model 100 laptop.

    1. Re:barcodes == MP3 by jjeffries · · Score: 1

      How about the Cauzin Softstrip? Never had one myself but always though they were cool... for a (not very long) while, the 'puter magazines of the time were printing their BASIC programs encoded for the Softstrip, saving hours of typing...

    2. Re:barcodes == MP3 by calica · · Score: 1

      I know a hobbyist magazine back in the '80s used to print entire programs in barcode format. I think it was for the old Radio Shack Model 100 laptop.

      It was Home Computing. And it was for Apple IIs and IBM PCs. Very similar to that card reader for Gameboy today. Also the programs were few hundred line basic programs. The also printed them at text so you could type them in.

    3. Re:barcodes == MP3 by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Erm, a standard bardcode doesn't hold much, considering the MaxiCode (AKA UPSCode) barcode can only hold up to 100 ASCII characters, so you'd need a hellaciously large barcode reader/writer/media to store an entire mp3.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:barcodes == MP3 by chill · · Score: 1

      When will you GNU/Linux hippies learn! This would be STEALING the music.

      And to top it off, your hippie free software barcode font is probably PIRATED as well!

      http://www.idautomation.com/piracy/illegalfonts. ht ml

      Congratulations! You have found a way to violate at least 2 different copyrights with one crappy inkjet printer!

      [On a more serious note: PDF417 is a 2D barcode format that can encode about 1K. While this isn't enough for a full song, it would be enough for a lo-fi sound bite or brief voice advertisement.]

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:barcodes == MP3 by sploxx · · Score: 1

      There is paperdisk to do exactly such things. Includes redundancy so that you can stain your data prints without losing data (hopefully).

      However, this is an old patented windows crippleware application, therefore not suited for the /. crowd :)

    6. Re:barcodes == MP3 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      What makes you automatically think glabels or kbarcode even use a font to generate the barcodes?

      and any site that makes claims about "unique and proprietary symbol placements" is 100% certified bullshit - there's nothing illegal about putting a space symbol at '=' and a start/stop symbol at '!'

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    7. Re:barcodes == MP3 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      "If a font is distributed as freeware without promotion of another product or service it is most likely a counterfeit of another font."

      well, i suppose it is reasonable to call Arial a counterfeit of Helvetica (and a poor-quality one, at that), but i don't see what bitstream vera serif is a ripoff of.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    8. Re:barcodes == MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 80s, we had a synthesizer that did this. It came with a book of preprinted bar label songs, and you scanned them in with a wand. It was a casio (CZ-101, i think...) and it was pretty nifty. The wand was a pain in the butt to work though...

    9. Re:barcodes == MP3 by chill · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was tired and trying to be funny.

      As far as the "unique and proprietary symbol placement", that isn't 100% bullshit. Map makers do it -- putting intentional small errors or custom features -- to make certain no one copied their maps.

      It would really be a clue to the font company, who would then have to look to see if the hinting and code are the same or stolen from theirs. More details are certainly needed, but duplicating a non-standard layout is a clue that it might be a ripoff.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    10. Re:barcodes == MP3 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      As far as the "unique and proprietary symbol placement", that isn't 100% bullshit. Map makers do it -- putting intentional small errors or custom features -- to make certain no one copied their maps.

      So did phone book compilers - nothing proprietary about them, or about the phone numbers themselves, as was eventually ruled.

      The claim that the symbol placements are themselves proprietary is the bullshit in the claim.

      And see the rest of the page - they also claim that freeware is in itself evil - i.e. anyone giving away a font for free must be a counterfeiter.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    11. Re:barcodes == MP3 by chill · · Score: 1

      So did phone book compilers - nothing proprietary about them, or about the phone numbers themselves, as was eventually ruled.

      Except that lists, recipes, scents and a few other items were always considered non-copyrightable.

      I know they're spouting bullshit. It is on par with the MPAA and RIAA.

      "It's free! It *MUST* be stolen!" Sad...

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:barcodes == MP3 by Random832 · · Score: 1

      Except that lists, recipes, scents and a few other items were always considered non-copyrightable.

      the "ruling" i refer to is the one that took place "always ago" that caused it to be considered uncopyrightable ;P

      incidentally, since you mentioned them... scents are, this very moment, being trademarked (and quite possibly patented), right under your nose!

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  12. Another Win App bites the dust by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's great. I've been using an inexpensive program that's called Labels Unlimited 2 that did a great job handeling graphics, bar codes, database, and serial number functions. That's one less reason to keep a Win box. Now if only they can get National Geographic Back Roads Explorer and the state series TOPO maps ported...

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:Another Win App bites the dust by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      I've been using an inexpensive program that's called Labels Unlimited 2

      Get it here for US$13.95.

      MyLabels for US$19.95 is also popular.

      This site lists 100 label-making products for Windows.

    2. Re:Another Win App bites the dust by Technician · · Score: 1

      Get it here for US$13.95

      I have to laugh at the name of the website. Software-blowouts dot com. They are charging more for the blow out priced software than I paid for mine new. (PC Heidens, Hillsboro, OR July 21 1997) bought my copy of Lables Unlimited localy for $12.00 without any S&H cost. Maybe you have to order online now after checking my purchase date, it might be no longer on your local retailer's shelf.

      This is probably off topic, but the topic is doing labels on a Non-Windows platform, so I don't need to know where to buy another copy. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  13. Destined to be the most popular native app? by curiosity · · Score: 3, Funny

    If that's true, I think I see the problem with Linux on the Desktop.

    It's a friggin label maker. Jesus. Why is this on NewsForge, much less the front page of Slashdot. Wasn't there a dupe you could have posted instead?

    1. Re:Destined to be the most popular native app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAT MURDERER!

    2. Re:Destined to be the most popular native app? by underpar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've never had a mindlessly boring desk job have you? It may not be cool, but it may be very popular with those assigned the most tedious tasks in the office. That's normally a girl, by the way. Anyway, it is a dull story. It still makes me happy, though.

    3. Re:Destined to be the most popular native app? by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Are YOU one of those girls?
      Not to sound condescending, but you sure sound like one. =) Hey, I'm all for this, I do it all the time (barcoding, labeling etc).

      pretty soon there will be a way to encode MP3's into barcode format, afterall, barcodes are just binary input, so... use your imagination from there!

    4. Re:Destined to be the most popular native app? by uberfruk · · Score: 0

      I have a label maker. It cost $2.95 and fits in the palm of my hand. It isn't open source, but the screws come off of the case pretty easily

  14. Re:WHAT THE HELL IS IT???? by lovemayo · · Score: 1

    it says anything but mp3s ;)

  15. Linux_Rulzorz.lbl by Psymunn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, i can proclaim my OS suppiriority by... printing up a label.
    And, what's more, the label can mention just how unfeasable it would have been to have it's self created had it's creator not been using everyones favorite GTK based desktop
    Or... you know... maybe the whole linux labeling community is a dead idea before it starts...

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    1. Re:Linux_Rulzorz.lbl by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I gotta know - what exactly is "interesting" about the parent? I can't even tell where the sarcasm stops and the bad grammar begins.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Linux_Rulzorz.lbl by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1


      Because it's little things like this that make Gnome a viable desktop.

      Printing lables IS one of the things people do with their computers. And in windows most people do it using Word. And while Word is good at a great many things (none of which OO can't do better), it's a truely $h!ty label printer. Why? Because it does things the Windows way. Masive, feature bloated, and overly complicated programs.

      gLables is a simple. It has one function. A function people need. And it does it very well. That's Unix and that's why this is a signifigant thing to the Unix desktop.

      More people should learn from the example. We may need to replicate the functionality of Windows, but for G_d's sake we don't have to imitate how they deliver it! This is an excelent model of how the Unix CLI mantra can be translated to the GUI Desktop.

  16. No mp3s on labels? by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Funny
    Damn, that sucks.


    I was so looking forward to dusting off the old CueCat and listening to some tracks with it.

    1. Re:No mp3s on labels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a device prototype made from a cuecat and a printed long narrow strip of UPC-encoded mp3. I wrap this printout on the outside of a cylinder and rotate it in front of the cuecat. In this manner I am able to play streaming mp3s off this device. I call it an "LP" for "long printout".

  17. "beta" or "ready"? by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's still in beta status, but it's ready for prime time

    Sorry, you can't have it both ways. Nope.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:"beta" or "ready"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's still in beta status, but it's ready for prime time

      Sorry, you can't have it both ways. Nope.


      Think 'Windows'.

    2. Re:"beta" or "ready"? by blmatthews · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't see how that applies, Windows is neither in beta status nor ready for prime time. ;-)

    3. Re:"beta" or "ready"? by CliffH · · Score: 1

      Sure you can

      --
      sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
    4. Re:"beta" or "ready"? by svallarian · · Score: 1

      Think firefox....

      Steven V>

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    5. Re:"beta" or "ready"? by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      Apparently you can. So when people flock to use this or other "prime-time-ready" 0.x products and complain that something does not work or that it fucked up their system or whatever people will say "Duh, it's a beta, what dif you expect ?" (as observed on the various recent Firefox/Thunderbird threads).

      It would really be great if people made up their mind if their software is the great super-stable-prime-time-ready-be-all-end-all for everyone and his dog or if it is still-buggy beta software. But doing all this 0.0.Beta.RC.Idontknowifitreallyworksbutitisgreat stuff is just trying to avoid any responsibility for the real-life worth of your creation.

  18. barcodes == MP3-Readers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How well is Linux support for Barcode Readers? I've been thinking of getting one.

    1. Re:barcodes == MP3-Readers. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      How well is Linux support for Barcode Readers? I've been thinking of getting one.

      Most barcode readers actually have ps/2 (pass-through) keyboard connectors. So they're compatible with whatever OS uses keyboards.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  19. Uh Oh by gooman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I sense great hostility in the crowd...
    Quick! Someone post some SCO news.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  20. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now just add support for text-file databases and it will be as powerful as the throw-away software that came with my dymo label printer!

  21. Mac OS X? by jjh37997 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So where's the native Mac OS X version? Or will it run natively within the Mac OS X compile of GNOME?

  22. Sorry, I'm still working on those labels-Shippers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think it does those 3D labels that shippers use though.

  23. Re:WHAT THE HELL IS IT???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah alright you caught me. so i tell you what; when teh revolution comes and they get up against the wall, i'll join them. I'll step into the strike zone and take one for the home team.

  24. I like gLabels by steveha · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently used it to mass-print a bunch of name badges on name badge stock in my laser printer.

    I have also used it for labels; you can print just a few labels from a sheet, by specifying which label to start printing upon. So, if you have a sheet of labels, and you have used up the first 11, you can tell gLabels to start printing labels on the 12th label on the sheet. It's slick.

    Finally, this is just the thing for address labels on a dedicated mini-label printer. I don't have that set up yet, but I intend to soon.

    Someone asked why you can't just use OpenOffice for your labels; I want to have OpenOffice print by default to my laser printer, and gLabels by default print to the mini labels-only printer. I wouldn't object to OpenOffice knowing how to pass labels off to the mini-label printer too, of course.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:I like gLabels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also used it for labels; you can print just a few labels from a sheet, by specifying which label to start printing upon. So, if you have a sheet of labels, and you have used up the first 11, you can tell gLabels to start printing labels on the 12th label on the sheet. It's slick.

      That's slick? Back around 1997, I needed to print mailing labels for some shareware I was selling. I wrote a quick labelmaker that would let me say choose which labels on the page to use, by X'ing the spots on a picture of a page of labels.

      It only handled one format of labels, which was fine: because unlike Linux, Windows in those days had good GUI development tools that made it trivially easy to rewrite the app if the next box of labels I bought was a different size. (I used Delphi, I imagine it would have been just as easy in VB.)

      The fact that *anyone* is excited about an app like this is pretty damning for Linux.

    2. Re:I like gLabels by steveha · · Score: 1

      That's slick?

      Yes, it is. And it has a nice graphical thingy that lets you see visually which label you have selected. And it handles all formats of labels that gLabels can deal with.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  25. gLabels for Gentoo... just like with those gnomes by Theovon · · Score: 1

    1) emerge glabels
    2) ...
    3) Wooo! Cool!

  26. Barcodes? MP3's? time for some self promotion! by Flat+Feet+Pete · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I made this to play my mp3's. Description from the site:

    There's two main parts.

    • A set of business-card-sized cards that represent the music album collection.
    • A webcam in a harness that the card can be slotted into.

    Each card is printed sideways with album cover art, artist, title and track listing. A barcode on both sides of the card uniquely identifies it. When inserted the PC analyzes the image to pick out the barcode. The barcode is linked to a playlist, which is played when the card is inserted.

    1. Re:Barcodes? MP3's? time for some self promotion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually kinda interesting.

      You should have submitted that as a story, not a post.

    2. Re:Barcodes? MP3's? time for some self promotion! by bitMonster · · Score: 1

      That's really clever! It's a great hybrid of the digital and the physical world.

    3. Re:Barcodes? MP3's? time for some self promotion! by Scud · · Score: 0

      Very cool! Like the AC said, this should be a article not a link :)

      So when do we get an automatic card changer for it?

      And a Zaurus (C860) port of the curling game would be nice too :)

      John

      --
      I dream in binary.
    4. Re:Barcodes? MP3's? time for some self promotion! by filenabber · · Score: 1

      That's just freakin' cool. Nice job!

      --
      Are you a Candy Addict?
  27. um that's great an all BUT..... by isbhod · · Score: 0

    i have a hard enough time getting my Open Office.org documents to print, how the hell am i going to get these awe inspiring, life saveing, cancer curing, all dinging, all dacing lables to print?

  28. Um... by Aeiri · · Score: 5, Funny

    just about anything but MP3 tracks can be printed on them

    So it prints OGG & AVI files then?

    1. Re:Um... by WeblionX · · Score: 2, Funny

      The AVI can only be printed if it's one frame long, though. They hope once the resolution of printers go up, they can add support for larger videos.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    2. Re:Um... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      AVI files then?

      Of course. Simply print out 10,000,000 frames, each on a label, and voila -- instant flip-book.

  29. Label Making Itch by Eberlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must admit, I never had the itch to make labels in linux. Not that big of a fan, really, but I do see the need for it. (labels, that is)

    People will dismiss this project as a pointless waste of time, but I do believe it has its merits. If nothing else, think of it as something shiny to attract new users...or at least give them more of a cushion when they switch OS. (you don't usually switch because of apps as much as you DON'T switch because of a lack of apps)

    We've seen lots of craptastic freeware/shareware stuff for Windows. Heck, back when I watched TechTV more, they had free files featured to do anything you didn't want to do to begin with. All I'm saying here is that it's a Good Thing(TM) to have apps created for linux.

    Give us a GUI that does a batch mogrify on a folder of images. Give us more cute little penguins dancing on the screen. Give us something that does random "at" jobs to play random soundbytes to annoy others. Give us Elf Bowling. Give us whatever you fancy to write.

    In the end, hack away to your heart's content. Write code, give code, learn from code. I can't look any of you coders in the eyes and say "you're wasting your time." Instead I say keep up the good work and keep churning good code.

    1. Re:Label Making Itch by u38cg · · Score: 1

      It may be pointless to some, but when it's capable of taking over from the proprietary software at my work, that'll be 20,000 of savings to you, buddy. And maybe I might finally get a pay rise (woohoo). And it'll crash less often than Windows 95, and I won't be standing there waiting for computers to reboot all day.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  30. promising work early on, but... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's a matter of time until someone figures out how to transfer audio data to a print medium, for later retrieval via barcode scanner.

    There was some promising work early on, but the labels kept catching fire, unfortunately.

    [ducks, runs for cover]

    1. Re:promising work early on, but... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      rip, mix, _burn_

      for those who missed it.

    2. Re:promising work early on, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creak, creak, creak...
      (sound of crickets)

  31. Standard in Open Office-Horn o' plenty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "OOo has label support, it even has more templates than Word... "

    Were? StarOffice is the one with the templates, and the clip art, and the fonts, and the drivers...

    1. Re:Standard in Open Office-Horn o' plenty. by lubricated · · Score: 1

      just used it in OO the other day

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  32. Why not MP3s? by thephotoman · · Score: 0

    This should be good news for retail stores that currently are forced to run Winblows for their check-out systems. I've worked on such a computer before, and it wasn't fun by any stretch of the imagination.

    On the other hand, why don't they allow for MP3 files to be labled this way? It'd be quite useful for people who keep archives on CDs or DVDs. That's what I'd use it for, myself.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  33. Very useful to the right people by strider3700 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see lots of jokes about barcodes software and how ground breaking it is being made here. It's obvious that the people making those jokes don't work in retail software.
    I write Point of sale and inventory management software and good easy handling of barcodes is a huge thing with customers, even if it is relatively boring software wise. Programs like this may seem like nothing but they will go a long way towards linux acceptance in key non server locations.

    RFID may be the new hotness but barcodes still rule the retail world.

    1. Re:Very useful to the right people by CAL_ND · · Score: 1

      I worked in a distribution center (read: warehouse) one summer during college and I can assure you that a great many companies would be more than willing to stop wasting money on Windows boxes that they only use to look at inventories and print invoices and labels. While distribution systems and the supply chain are often overlooked by consumers, I can assure you most business people are well aware of the costs associated with them and Just-In-Time has only caused the number of bar code labels used to grow exponentially. So while most of you may think this is boring (which it is to be honest), you shouldn't mock a utility that will allow more enterprises to go away from Windows and proprietary software even if its only a few machines at a time.

  34. What I need is a *reader* by no_such_user · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Printing labels is the easy part. Reading them is another story. In a perfect world, I'd be able to use a run-of-the-mill webcam to read barcodes put in front of it in any direction. While there are a few commercial apps which do this, they're expensive and (after playing with a couple demos) not all that accurate.

    If anyone has any leads on a good OSS (or even just cheap -- this is for personal use) solution, please post!

    1. Re:What I need is a *reader* by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      Cuecat!

      You can get one on ebay cheap. There are lots of free programs to drive them.

      I used one to read book UPC codes to input to Amazon.

    2. Re:What I need is a *reader* by amunter · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to read a barcode? Most barcode readers I have ever seen come with a keyboard wedge. They also are able to figure out what encoding was used just by scanning the code.

      You just plug it in between your keyboard and your computer, and when you scan a barcode it dumps whatever was encoded to the keyboard interface.

      By scanning codes printed in the manual you can program even the cheapest of them (sub $50) to append a linefeed (for instance) to the end of what you read, so write a perl script that just sits and listens for individual "keyboard" commands and do something with them and voila, you got yourself a barcode reader.

    3. Re:What I need is a *reader* by no_such_user · · Score: 1

      Though the CutCat is handy for simple UPC codes,
      I'm looking for something that's more flexible, can decode more sophisticated codes, and something which can be mounted so that the user can just wave the bar code by to have it read (think supermarket scanner at the end of the conveyor, but vertical). It's for an embedded device, and the end user shouldn't have to do anything other than make sure the item is in the field of view of the camera. I'm hoping that an inexpensive webcam running at 640x480@10fps would be sufficient.

    4. Re:What I need is a *reader* by baywulf · · Score: 1

      The CueCat can decode quite a few barcodes. I got the Oreilly's "hacking hardware" a few weeks ago and de-clawed a CueCat and tried it on many barcodes from products and from glabels. Did you know that by cutting off one pin on an IC in the CueCat, it outputs unencoded numbers and text so no special program is needed to read barcodes?

  35. Wow, labels AND cards! by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 3, Funny
    This will definitely edge out ***MOZILLA*** as the Linux's most popular app because hardly anyone wants to view webpages.

    Do I use glabels? Yes. Do I like glabels? Do I mention glabels as a Premier Application when I talk about Linux? No.

    1. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by Deusy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This will definitely edge out ***MOZILLA*** as the Linux's most popular app because hardly anyone wants to view webpages.

      What is it with people being assholes today? I know it's /. but really, today just seems worse than normal.

      Nobody said it would become the most popular native Linux app, or that it would usurp things like Mozilla. The comment was it would be "one of the most popular native Linux apps" and has to be taken in context; that gLabels will become the de facto standard for things like label, card, CD-art, and flier design, and maybe even DTP too if it gets extended a little.

      Nobody called it a web browser. Nobody said it would be more popular or more used than Mozilla. But if it comes with installed with every distro and is pointed to as the leading application for it's niche (which isn't as tiny as you think; I know people who spend ages making their CDs pretty or creating fliers for events they organise) then surely it has become "one of the most popular" applications out of the hundreds of thousands of applications out there, most of which people have to search out rather than have put in front of them.

      Do I use glabels? Yes. Do I like glabels? Do I mention glabels as a Premier Application when I talk about Linux? No.

      If somebody talked about needing to do something gLabels excels at, would you suggest anything else?

      'Nuff said.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    2. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Can we get an asshole meter as a sidebar? That way we can know at a glance wether or not to read the article comments.

      fucking wait two damn minutes before I post, my ass!

    3. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The comment was it would be "one of the most popular native Linux apps" and has to be taken in context; that gLabels will become the de facto standard for things like label, card, CD-art, and flier design, and maybe even DTP too if it gets extended a little.
      That's not taking it in context; that's attributing a completely different meaning to it than what was said.

      And if saying that makes me an asshole, so be it, but I think that you're flipping out over a rather innocuous comment.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by big+tex · · Score: 1

      If somebody talked about needing to do something gLabels excels at, would you suggest anything else?

      Yeah, KBarcode.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    5. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Ulch - that meat was tainted! You feel deathly sick.
      #pray

      Perhaps not as popular as Gecko-based web-browsers, but become a killer app on its niche, yes, glabels can do that. Or can you name out of the top of your head another free (speech) app for doing labels/cards/cd covers/fliers/the like?

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    6. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Ulch - that meat was tainted! You feel deathly sick.
      #pray
      The voice of Ishtar thunders: "Thou durst call upon me? Then die, mortal!"

      but become a killer app on its niche, yes, glabels can do that.
      Heck, I don't dispute that. (I can't confirm it, as I've never used it, but I won't dispute it.) But being the killer label app hardly the same as being "one of the most popular native Linux apps," don't you think? :)
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2

      What is it with people being assholes today?

      Did you even read your initial post? You point the finger at your parent poster's supposed ignorance, then complain when a little sarcasm is thrown your way?

      Are you that much of a sissy? Get real, man. If you can't take it, don't click submit in the first place.

      And yeah, I freely admit I'm an asshole. Every day.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    8. Re:Wow, labels AND cards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Jesus.

      Get your head out your ass and get a life.

  36. Sigh... still no predefined meritline templates by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    I made my own template for oodraw for Meritline Matte CD/DVD Labels. They work.

    Sigh. I guess I'm going to have to sit down and make my own templates for these as well. Does glabels support vertical retangular stickers as well as round CD stickers on the same sheet?

  37. Very useful to the right people-Printers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem is that Linux support of those specialized barcode printers is poor. It's not much better for the readers either.

    1. Re:Very useful to the right people-Printers. by strider3700 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We don't use windows or linux and would kill for the hardware support of either OS.

      The majority of readers we use operate off of a keyboard wedge. Nothing special there it just fakes keystrokes.

      As for the printers it's usually just a case of pumping through the correct control codes to get what you want out. We use barcode blasters and the code required to get one barcode with say an item description, and price is maybe 20 lines. It's easy and the codes are always included with the printer or on the website documentation. Perhaps I should take the time to adding support for the printers I have access to.

      Now the more advanced stuff, USB scanners and printers may require more work but I doubt it can be that hard.

  38. FYI by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1

    Yes, I do like glabels.

  39. Oh maaaaan! (swiper the fox) by ikoflexer · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    We're over-using letter "g"! I thought it had something to do with gmail---got all happy and fuzzy and sweaty...

    What a disapointment.... :( Printing labels was useful years ago, like 6-7. Now everything is disposable... can't find it?--get a new one. Not labeled?--trash can! Works for me good.

    1. Re:Oh maaaaan! (swiper the fox) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice nora the explorer reference...backpack, backpack...backpack, backpack...

  40. Generic labels?!?! by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    Why not just leave them blank?

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  41. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to install Linux right now so I can print some labels. Oh wait... You can already do this on Window's... Never mind...

  42. I hope that it improved by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Informative
    When I last tried glabels a few months ago it has some pretty serious image quality problems. The templates were plentiful and well defined. The editing was intuitive and easy. However I could never get the images to come out printed well.

    The problem seemed to be two-fold:

    1. Image scaling seemed to be done using linear interpolation. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it for anything that should have presentation. All the lines come out with jaggies. Use bi-cubic please.
    2. Printing was done at 72dpi. Hello, my printer is 1200 dpi, can you please take advantage of it?
    In my experience, it did a great job of easily producing poor quality labels. Anybody know if these issues have been resolved in the current version?
    1. Re:I hope that it improved by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

      Printing was done at 72dpi. Hello, my printer is 1200 dpi, can you please take advantage of it?

      You're getting dpi and dpi confused.

      Your 1200dpi printer can only print black (or CMY) dots on a (usually) white background. You see, it needs to use all those 1200 dots per inch to render halftones, so that if you stand back far enough an area will look kind of like the approximated colour and not just a collection of dots.

      These labels are formatted at 72 dpi. That's 72 full-colour 24-bit fully-toned dots per inch, not a collection of dots that differ only in size.

      There is a formula somewhere that converts perceived dpi to perceived dpi, but I can't recall it...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:I hope that it improved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Confusing dpi and dpi? Is that like confusing morons with morons? DPI = dots per inch = DPI. Not too tough to figure out. If the labels are displayed on screen as 72 dpi, no big deal. But that's not what he said, he said that the printing was done at 72 dpi, which is piss-poor since even shitty old printers can do 300 dpi printing.

      Before saying someone else is confused, pull your own head out of your ass. And yes, I do know what the fuck I'm talking about and have been dealing with printing issues for decades...

      There's a formula... but I can't recall it...

      No, really?? Fancy that!

      I just love how fucking dumb moderators see a bunch of babbling and mod it up. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit, eh?

    3. Re:I hope that it improved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      DPI = dots per inch = DPI. Not too tough to figure out.

      You, sir, did not understand what the parent meant. Although his post was a bit confusing, he was right to some extent. Let's try to rephrase that:

      monochrome dots per inch != perceived full-color dots per inch

      Basically, your printer is using lots of small monochrome dots in each of the 3, 4, 6 or whatever number of colors that it supports. These small dots are not seen individually by the eye, but are perceived as bigger dots with mixed colors. In that case, a 24-bit picture at 72 DPI may require a 1200 DPI printer if you do not want to lose quality.

      That being said, I think that defaulting to 72 DPI is a poor choice. This may be suitable for printing photos on medium-quality labels, but is not appropriate if you want to include high-resolution graphics to be printed in high-quality lablels. Especially if your graphics are mostly monochrome and do not have color gradients, etc. You will lose a lot on the edges.

  43. excellent by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    An easy way to print out those "Powered by Linux" Stickers!

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  44. Labels by AnomalyConcept · · Score: 1

    I think the most recent time I used labels (or mass-produced) them was close to yearbook/annual signing time for my last two years in high school. I created a label that had my name on it, my website URL, and a logo that I made for myself. I don't remember if it had a barcode or not. Anyway, I ended up using Microsoft Word to make it (through mail merge), and I copied/pasted the label in all of the little cells. Tedious work, but it worked. Maybe this will make my life easier. I will most definitely give it a try. Maybe I'll also start labeling CDs now, instead of remembering what they look like and where they are in relation to everything else. Or maybe I'll waste my time crafting and printing labels instead of pulling out the extra-fine Sharpie. =)

  45. Just as well... by curne · · Score: 3, Funny

    just about anything but MP3 tracks can be printed on them

    Just as well. I wouldn't use it if it supported MP3 and not Ogg Vorbis... :-)

    --
    All interpreted languages are abstractions over Lisp
  46. Actually... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    It's probably quite possible to put mp3 tracks on them. If not them, then definately midi tracks.

  47. crashes when I tried it. by mAineAc · · Score: 1

    I guess if they are looking for MS standards it is ready for primetime :)
    No but really, I did try it to do a business card. It works pretty good. It is a nice simple interface with not to much garbage. Everytime I would unselect grid under the view menu it would crash though. Did it everytime.

  48. Business uses by RogL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you ever dealt with (non-IT) businesspeople? I've been in offices where every person in sales/accounting/billing had a dedicated label printer on their desk, for shipping labels / packaging / general mail / whatever. Think about what "most popular" means: not "earthshaking", not "technically brilliant"; try reading it as "most commonly used" or "widespread". Yes, some people print labels every 5-10 minutes as part of their job. It's a handy niche to fill.

    1. Re:Business uses by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      It seems there it is the hardware aspect (the dedicated label printer) that is valuable, not the software application.

      I still can't see a software application that makes labels one of the "most commonly used" Linux applications out there, even if it fills a niche which is part of someone's job.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  49. Works like a charm by Starky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are many /.ers that are wondering what the big deal is. The big deal is that this is one of those simple applications you don't realize you need until you need it. Then you realize that you really need it.


    After I recently finished my Ph.D., I put together over 70 job market packets. For both appearances and efficiency, I needed to generate labels by the dozen.


    Much to my surprise, there was an ebuild of gLabels for Gentoo. Even more to my surprise, even though it's in beta, it worked flawlessly. The interface was so well done that I never even needed to look for help files.


    Kudos to the gLabels team!

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
  50. It would be useful if it did online postage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To my knowledge there are no Linux apps that print postage (like Stamps.com or Indicia).

    Printing the labels seems like the easy part...

  51. good loss leader by zogger · · Score: 1

    for a store. You give out the cards various places with various tracks you want to promote, to get folks to check out your store. The store has a kiosk setup with the reader. The customer puts in the card, it's playing the song back to them and simultaneously burning the track to disk as the freebie give away, or if they like the one song they can buy the whole album custom burned right then on the spot.

    maybe, I dunno. Bound to be some other spiffy things you could do with it.

    1. Re:good loss leader by Flat+Feet+Pete · · Score: 1

      I was surprised that they wern't already doing it.

      The Virgin Superstore here in SF has listening posts that are controlled by scanning the CD's UPC barcode. I was thinking that they could mail people the barcodes and they'd have to come in to hear it. Band postcards could have codes printed on them too.

    2. Re:good loss leader by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You need to get yourself some marketing.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  52. Re:gLabels for Gentoo... just like with those gnom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listen, nobody cares about gentoo.

  53. mp3 by oboeaaron · · Score: 1

    Barcodes, images, just about anything but MP3 tracks can be printed on them.

    Tonight, a thousand pizzas will be delivered, a thousand neighbor's TV sets will be reduced to a single tricolor dot, and a thousand RIAA lawyers will be mobilized as, in all corners of the globe, a thousand geeks simultaneously rise to this supreme challenge.

    --
    Journey onward.
    1. Re:mp3 by filenabber · · Score: 1

      If anyone does want/need to pirnt MP3 CD labels, my freeware app, MACCC, (link in sig) can do it. It's a work in progress, but works as-is. It's a Java swing app and I have tested it on (Knoppix) linux, Windows, and I have had users tell me it works on a Mac too.

      --
      Are you a Candy Addict?
    2. Re:mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody wanna bet a sheet of paper printed using the same codes that the Nintendo eReader uses would be enough to hold an mp3?

  54. It's a nice little package by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Good timing as I needed to lay out some new business cards, so I gave it a download and a try.

    The package itself seems pretty much flawless, with no crashes or instability detected (prebuilt RPM on SuSE 8.1 with Ximian enhancements.) The only glitch I encountered is that trying to print to a .pdf fails. Print to a postscript file or to a printer and it works fine.

    Much easier to work with than a word processor and label templates. It's not a daily use utility for 99% of the population, but it does it's one job rather well. The epitomy of a "utility program."

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  55. Re:gLabels for Gentoo... just like with those gnom by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Listen, you didn't get the joke.

  56. ahh! by Linwood · · Score: 0, Funny

    I use linux on a 486 i dug out of the dumpster at food lion! I can't afford a printer you insensitve clod!

  57. professor frink by stev_mccrev · · Score: 1

    For some reasons the title makes me think of the good professor.

    "Linux and the printing of the barcodes and the GLABELS!"

  58. You don't get it. by iantri · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For those who are saying "Bah! What good is this? Just use OpenOffice," you don't get it.

    OpenOffice (nor Corel Wordperfect or MS Word) are acceptable substitues for a real label making program -- have many Slashdotters ever bothered to try and print out CD labels or covers/trays to pre-scored stock (like the Avery media available)? Futzing around with templates in Word Processors sucks -- they are designed for linear text. Publishing apps are a little better, but there is nothing like the right tool for the job.

    A program like Avery DesignPro or Surething CD Labeller for Windows makes producing such things very quick and painless.. it is good that this sort of thing is now available under Linux.

    The reason (well, one of them at least), that Linux lacks as a desktop is BECAUSE of the lack of useful tools like this; answers like "You don't really need a (label-making program, greeting card maker, etc.), just use OOo" or "You don't need a WYSIWYG HTML editor, just use vi" completely miss the point.

    BTW, I, for one, could really use a good greeting card program, like Sierra Print Artist. Does any such thing exist?

    1. Re:You don't get it. by iantri · · Score: 1
      OpenOffice (nor Corel Wordperfect or MS Word) are acceptable substitues for a real label making program --
      Gah.. are not acceptable
  59. Just when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drats.. Just when i printed my labels in openoffice. ;)

  60. Absolutely NOT! by Morgaine · · Score: 1

    wouldnt it make more sense to package a label printing facility as part of Open Office as apposed to a standalone application ?

    Absolutely NOT!!! The last thing we want to do is install a massive bloatware suite when all we need is one specific and well-defined function.

    Open Office has its good points, for those with needs that mirror the many things that it offers. For everyone else, it's a throwback to the integrated packages of the past, and a major pain.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  61. I've been using glabels for ages... by ncw · · Score: 1

    ... It rocks! I've used it for the christmas card list for the last two years and address stickers (from me and to someone else) etc.

    Its small and neat and does just enough - perfectly in tune with the Unix philosophy IMHO. I hope the developers resist the urge to bloat it up into openoffice ;-)

    The developers have added all the features I wanted without me even asking too! (Images, sideways text etc).

    The only hiccup I've had with it during an upgrade (forgotten the version numbers) when all the fonts changed in my saved labels. That was slightly annoying but easy to fix.

    It sure beats doing this the manual way (with very carefully lined up pages in a WP/DTP)!

    Top program - 5 stars ;-)

    --
    Every man for himself, all in favour say "I"
  62. non-hacker speaks! Was:Underpromise, Overdeliver by thomasj · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That made me wonder about the maturity of linux as a desktop platform, even more than before.

    I'd just assume there would be a way to print envelopes/labels from linux. Even if it was an OO.o template, or some such. It's a fairly simple task.

    Sad. Wake me when they come up with the calculator or cardfile clones.

    I always wonder what this kind of people wants with Linux. Linux is what we, the hackers, makes it; what is in Linux is what comes from programming nice things.

    So, what you say is: "Please make Linux nice as I like it! I will go to sleep and you do the hacking. Once in a while I will wake up, whine and curse, and then go back to sleep!"

    Linux is not free as in "comes out of a tap". Some people make these things. You don't pay them money, but you should pay some homage and respect; or please go away!

    (As a child I was a cap scout. When we went on field camps we made all sorts of cool things out of wood and stones and some rope. We were all thrilled by the things we could do ourselves. But there was this guy who basically missed his TV and his comfort zone. He didn't help and he critized everything. I guess he didn't get why all the jokes were on him. He should never have been a scout anyway...)

    --
    :-) = I am happy
    :^) = I am happy with my big nose
    C:\> = I am happy with my OS
  63. That'll be helpful for those of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  64. Prime time by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    ... and I thought this would have something to do with Mersenne primes (Hmm, primes...). Speaking of disappointment.

  65. haven't we learned yet... by jpellino · · Score: 1
    ...not to use the term "destiny" in the same contsruct as "invention"?

    "...glabels is destined to become one of the most popular native apps for Linux..."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  66. did I miss something? by acid_zebra · · Score: 1

    "glabels is destined to become one of the most popular native apps for Linux" What? no, wait, what?

    --
    -- No Sig is a Good Sig
  67. ditto: Keep It Simple by leinhos · · Score: 1

    I'd really have to agree with the parent (an all the others saying this). A simple application that does one thing well, makes my life easier, and can (eventually) interface to my other simple applications. Isn't that the Unix Way?

    I've been trying to orgainize my personal files at home (it boggles the mind how much paper we tend to collect), and gLabels makes this *very* easy to do.

    $0.02

  68. I'm puzzled.... by WeekendKruzr · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember a website that offered the ability to type in a price for a given item at a specific store and the website would then generate a barcode for that item. The idea was that you could then take the fraudilent barcode, stick it on top of the true label and when you take it to the checkout lane you pay a fraction of the real cost.

    What's stopping people from using this program for such purposes? Is this yet another dual use program that will come under fire?

  69. Re:WHAT THE HELL IS IT???? by ward · · Score: 1
    First line of the article:

    gLabels, a GNOME program that makes and prints all sorts of labels and business cards

    From that, I think you can assume that it is an application, written for GNOME, that is somehow able to make and print labels and business cards. You know, labels, those sticky things you put on boxes and envelopes. LABELS.

  70. Yes by DrCode · · Score: 1

    And they'll look like those moving paintings in the Harry Potter movies.

  71. Re:Sorry, I'm still working on those labels-Shippe by hesiod · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > I don't think it does those 3D labels that shippers use though.

    3D labels??? Utter craziness! I think you mean 2D, as while they technically ARE 3D, the 3rd dimension is only about 1/3 of one millimeter and not measured by the reader (ie, the paper thickness).

  72. Re:Sorry, I'm still working on those labels-Shippe by hesiod · · Score: 1

    I hope no one actually thought this was flamebait, I said "utter craziness" to be silly, not to call anyone stupid.