Slashdot Mirror


The New York Times On Earth's Magnetic Flip-Flop

TolkiEinstein writes "The New York Times reports that, relatively speaking, compasses may soon point South. It's long been known that Earth flips magnetically every half-million years or so, and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent [less than] its strength of 150 years ago, many geologists feel a flip is coming up. Computer simulations also suggest that the current state of the magnetic field is indicative of an upcoming flip. Though it would take hundreds of years to complete, the impact on life may be significant but not catastrophic, including phenomena such as power-outages, satellite malfunctions and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles. The EU plans to launch a trio of satellites in 2009 to assume polar orbits & monitor the field." (Cross your fingers for some nice solar wind.) Update: 07/13 17:02 GMT by T : Note: the summary here originally misstated the Times' article; the field 's strength has decreased 10-15 percent, rather than to 10-15 percent.

106 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure this is Bush's fault, somehow, according to the left. I'm waiting for Peter Jennings to blame this one on Bush.

    1. Re:Bush's fault by malchus842 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Modded funny, but you just watch - people WILL blame the government when it happens. No matter how much you try to explain, no matter how clear the explainations are, a significant number of people are going to blame the government.

      It's also the case that whoever is in office is going to get burned by the problems - blamed for "lack of preparedness" or "failure to respond to the situation" etc, etc. And there will be calls for huge governmennt expenditures to "fix" or "solve" the problem.

    2. Re:Bush's fault by ScottGant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This will again turn into another non-event like Y2K and everything else these the-sky-is-falling people love drumming up to keep people afraid.

      The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself...oh, and also Carnies. Circus folk. They're nomads you know. Smell like cabbage...very small hands....

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:Bush's fault by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why hasn't the government tried to get internation agreement for a Kyoto Accord on magnetism? We have to start cutting down on world-wide use of magets immediately! :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Bush's fault by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      While everyone knows that this is actually the work of Arctic-based terrorists!

    5. Re:Bush's fault by jimicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (please mod funny)

      If you need to ask, you don't deserve the mod.

  2. Worldwide Aurora by TyrranzzX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And, since the magnetic field will be weakened, there'll be a supposed worldwide 24/7 aurora. Now that's kewl.

    1. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Informative

      "since the magnetic field will be weakened"
      You better pray not. The magnetic field is what keeps some of the nasty radiation in space out of our safe(ish) little bubble. If the magnetic field does weaken signifigantly, may I suggest investing in some Factor 3000 sunblock...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    2. Re:Worldwide Aurora by PhxBlue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Someone watched "The Core" one time too many. Earth's magnetic field does nothing to deflect UV radiation. I would recommend lead-lined clothing, not more sunblock. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    3. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was actually talking about high energy particles - the "solar wind" - more than EM radiation.
      UV is filtered mostly by ozone, the magnetic field (I think it's the Van Allen belt) catches the particles.
      Their penetration isn't that great on solids/liquids so a decent thick layer of sunblock should help a lot.
      Of course the main danger is atmospheric ablation - the current theory is that the reason Mars can't hold an atmosphere is cos' it has no magnetic field. It (probably) wouldn't be enough to totally strip the atmosphere - at least it hasn't before - but with the increasing toxicity of our atmosphere any change could be catastrophic.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    4. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope - just the DNA in the outer few millimeters of your body.
      The penetration isn't good because they expend all their energy quickly.
      Think of it like birdshot from a shotgun - the penetration isn't exactly great but you'd rather be hit on an armoured bit any day
      Hell, who needs skin anyway? It's so...millenial.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    5. Re:Worldwide Aurora by D-Cypell · · Score: 2, Funny

      IANACG (Comedic Genius) but I dont think he was being very serious with the sunblock remark anway.

      However, just incase (and to prevent poor Taco from lawsuits when the apocolypse comes!)...

      Ladies and Gentlemen, in the event of any kind of massive breakdown of the earth's radiation defenses, sublock with not be sufficient. This will be made abundandly clear by the sudden vaporizing effect you will feel on your body.

      There you go... that should prevent the panic buying!

    6. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Besides, the astrounauts survived on the moon, people survive at the poles (where many particles are redirected to). I believe our 80(?) km thick atmosphere is better protection against the particles from the sun than the spacesuit worn by the astronauts on the moon (the moon has no magnetic field). Like so much other things media reports, I believe the dangers to be very little - at most more people will maybe get cancer, more power outages and other electronic problems.

      Do also keep in mind that if this has happend every 150'000 years or so, this has happen more than 4'000 times during the past 2 billion years, and all those times life survived.

      (this raises an intresting question - the increased particles from the sun might have resulted in more mutations and sparked those evolutionary giant leaps? - so this may be a good thing in the long run).

    7. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Van Allen belts. Radiation != UV. You're a troll or a junior schooler.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Worldwide Aurora by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nova did a story on this that was quite fascinating. They covered the bases very well too and you're right. The Earth would be battered with more solar particles because the magnetic field currently protects us from it. We will likely see more instances of skin cancer too. On the "bright" side, you will likely see more Northern Lights in odd places like maybe Florida and Central America. (Okay, YOU won't, but your great-grandkids might.) Unfortunately, someone on the extreme left will miss the point completely and see this as a chance to gain power and headlines by blaming rich, white Americans (see "Global Warming").

    9. Re:Worldwide Aurora by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (this raises an intresting question - the increased particles from the sun might have resulted in more mutations and sparked those evolutionary giant leaps? - so this may be a good thing in the long run).

      as long as it doesn't result in those damn Morlocks, we don't have enough caves for them!

    10. Re:Worldwide Aurora by cjameshuff · · Score: 3, Informative

      This seems to be a common misconception. The solar wind is not a blowtorch that blasts any unprotected atmosphere into space. It will very slightly increase the rate of atmosphere escape, but it will still happen so slowly that it will probably not make a difference until after the sun ages enough to render Earth uninhabitable anyway. We have one big counterexample to that theory...Venus has slightly less gravity than Earth, and virtually no internally generated magnetic field, only a barely detectable one induced by the sun. It also receives over 1.9 times as much solar radiation as Earth, and over 4.4 times as much as Mars, yet its atmospheric pressure is 90 times as high as that of Earth...that's about 12000 times as much as Mars. Mars has little atmosphere because of its formation...it likely lost some gases that would have formed its atmosphere to Jupiter, and got more blasted off its surface by bombardment from the forming asteroid belt. Then it cooled, and a big chunk of its atmosphere froze...Martian atmospheric pressure actually varies highly depending on season, due to sublimating and freezing CO2.

      In addition, the Earth's atmosphere makes an excellent shield against charged particles...there will likely be a slight increase in secondary radiation, but not enough to cause measureable effects on Earthly life.

  3. I for one.. by caston · · Score: 5, Funny
    I for one welcome myself as part of the new Australian overlords...

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    1. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yay! We won't be at the "arse end of the world" any more (to quote former PM, Paul Keating)

  4. Hope we don't get irradiated... by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As the Earth's magnetic field is the only thing that protects us from the solar wind...

    1. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a geologist and can tell you there has never been an extinction event associated with or correlated to a magnetic reversal. These are common events that have taken place quite a few times since life arose on this planet.

      For whatever reason everything will turn out ok. That being said, they didn't have computers and power grids back then.

    2. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Sepper · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a whole lot of floppies and backup tapes erased...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
  5. Turtles by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
    "and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles. "

    Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

    And won't someone please think of the turtles?!?!?!?!?!

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Turtles by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

      You're just more interested in the effect this will have on the CPIP. If there were a LTIP you'd think of the turtles a bit more yourself.

      KFG

    2. Re:Turtles by sould · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

      For some reason this made me curious about turtles & magnetism- a little research turned up this guy's page about turtle migration at UNC.

      It includes this gem:

      To determine how turtles respond to magnetic fields that exist in different parts of the ocean or to magnetic field elements (such as inclination and intensity) that they encounter while migrating, each hatchling was placed into a nylon-Lycra harness as shown below. [empaphis mine]

      Image is here

    3. Re:Turtles by Like2Byte · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, it was bugging the crap out of me so here are what CPIP and LTIP mean.

      CPIP: Carrier Pigeon Internet Protocol
      LTIP: Loggerhead Turtle Internet Protocol (I'm guessing)

      {ala Snapple}(There are many other definitions for the acronym LTIP. Choose one that fits you.)

    4. Re:Turtles by Math+Avenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's not that random; Loggerhead turtles -- indeed, all sea turtles -- use the Earth's magentic field as an aid to navigation. Most animals know for their ability to return to certain locations use the variations of the magnetic field as a means to orient themselves geographically. So, a disruption or flip-flop of the magnetic field would send these species into a loggerhead with their own insticts.

  6. In Other News by deutschemonte · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dr. Evil has launched several satellites to orbit the polls to harness the energy of the magnetic flop and create a death ray capable of destroying mankind.

    All to extort the wealthiest nations on the planet for...one MILLION dollars.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
  7. Hollywood Blockbuster? by BigDork1001 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Am I the only one who sees this becoming the next Hollywood blockbuster disaster movie? They've done asteroids, tidal waves, volcanos, global warming/cooling, alien invasion, and so they have to be digging for ideas. And of course in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

    --
    "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
    1. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 5, Funny
      And of course in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

      Rephrase this: "...for the sake of more special effects."

    2. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by mork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Am I the only one who sees this becoming the
      > next Hollywood blockbuster disaster movie?

      They have, see "The Core"

      > And of course in true Hollywood fashion
      > they'll toss science out of the window for the
      > sake of a better film

      They did ...

    3. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did ...

      That should have been linked to the "insultingly stupid movie physics" review.

    4. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

      Yeah, when they head to the north magnetic pole to fix it and meet Santa Claus, they'll totally ignore that Santa Claus is at the north physical pole! Luckly they'll stop the reversal with two seconds left on the clock.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it wouldn't have been any worse without the dinosaurs !

    6. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by MissMarvel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or better yet, try Phil Plait's review... on his Bad Astronomy website

  8. magnetic disks by psyklopz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had my homework al done, but the magnetic poles flipped and wiped my harddrive...

    1. Re:magnetic disks by altek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While the above comment is amusing, is there some truth to it as well? Would things such as magnetic media be affected?

      I know, it's naive to think that we'd still be using the same types of data storage technology in a few hundred years, but for deep archive it's certainly possible.. I mean look at historical archives and libraries - they're filled with books, and that is simply the storage media of days past, so maybe it's not absurd to think about.

      I don't even know if this would affect these things, but that's why I'm asking. Anyone?

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    2. Re:magnetic disks by Arngautr · · Score: 3, Funny

      try turning your hard drive around...what happens?

    3. Re:magnetic disks by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well take your computer and move it 180 Degrees or Pi Radian does your all your data eraise because the magnicic poles are facing in an other direction. No it doesn't The Earths Magnetic Pull is large but it is relitivly weak compared to the magnets that are already in your harddrive.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:magnetic disks by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > try turning your hard drive around...what happens?

      It makes this kind of "screeee" sound. Is that bad?

  9. Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if we all donated spare refrigerator magnets, magnets from old hard disks, etc. and carefully arranged them at the north and south poles. These giant piles would hold the poles in place. Perhaps a lucky chain letter spam from Bill Gates would help get people to donate magnets to the cause.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Scarblac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just be careful to cut them in half first, sending the north half to the north pole and vice versa, because otherwise it wouldn't work of course.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by wwwrun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop! Don't! You can't just go around creating monopoles like that. The physicists will be baying for blood!

  10. What about the auroras? by Zawash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The aurora borealis, or northern lights, occur due to charged particles entering the Earth's magnetic field, being guided to the magnetic poles.

    If the magnetic field flips, what about the auroras? Will we have (weaker) auroras all over the place while the field changes?

    --
    File not found. Fake it(Y/N)? _
  11. Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will be hilarous if the poles flip about the time
    the Mayan calendar ends, hopefully it will go as gracefully
    as scientists have predicted .

    As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer,
    I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???

    I also wonder if the polar shift will effect magma flows ...

    I wonder if the magnetic field has any effect on plate tectonics too .

    Hopefully not, It is suppose to be a weak force .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The seasons are such because of the earth's tilt, rather than any magnetic effects.

      If you have kde run kworldwatch in speeded up mode to watch the sunlight distribution.

    2. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Informative

      It will be hilarous if the poles flip about the time the Mayan calendar ends, hopefully it will go as gracefully as scientists have predicted.

      Unlikely, since a full flip takes a few hundred years; it is not a sudden, catastrophic effect.

      As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer, I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???

      Unlikely, since the seasons are defined by the orientation of the Earth's rotation axis to its Solar orbital axis; they have nothing whatsoever to do with the magnetic axis.

      I also wonder if the polar shift will effect magma flows ...

      Unlikely; the fields are far to weak, and get even weaker during a field reversal.

      I wonder if the magnetic field has any effect on plate tectonics too .

      Unlikely, for the reasons I give above.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer,
      I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???


      If it takes the physical poles along with it, yes.

      KFG

    4. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I'm not mistaken, didn't Nostradomus not predict anything beyond 2012 because the world/civilization was supposed to end?

      1999 and seven months, actually. His believers changed their tune to 1999 and nine months (September, right? Sept = seven) in August, and when 2000 dawned without disaster they started pushing 2012 along with the rest of the k00k brigade.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by sysopd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Unlikely, since a full flip takes a few hundred years; it is not a sudden, catastrophic effect."

      In one of the few observed magnetic field reversals, it took only a few years for the Sun's magnetic field to reverse. Actually this appears to happen every 11 years, corresponding to the sunspot cycle. The Sun's magnetic poles are different than our Earth's, since they are located on the surface at sunspots.

      Perhaps the earth could not flip-flop poles altogether. Instead, maybe we could have two north poles. NASA's Ulysses space probe observed the Sun with two north poles for a month during a flyby.

      An interesting note for the 2012 crowd, the Sun's next magnetic field reversal is set to happen in none other than, 2012.

      The Sun's magnetic poles will remain as they are now, with the north magnetic pole pointing through the Sun's southern hemisphere, until the year 2012 when they will reverse again.
  12. Will it really affect us? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2

    the impact on life may be significant but not catastrophic, including phenomena such as power-outages, satellite malfunctions and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles

    And just how would this be different to any other day.

    Apart from compasses pointing south and and increased demand for factor 500, we shouldn't all begin to panic needlessly.
    The compass was a pretty shoddy means of navigation anyway, with the movement of the poles and all. And sunbathing?! What kind of pasttime is that?!

    This could affect global warming though. Combined with the greenhouse effect we could all be fried little geeks.

    I wonder if it would be possible to set up a network of gigantic electromagnets and attempt to impede or even reverse the earths magnetic flip flop?

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  13. Time for the editor to RTFA by johnmig · · Score: 5, Informative

    It has to be pointed out that there is a significant difference between "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent." which is what the article says; and "the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago" which is what Timothy says. The former means that the field strength is still 85 to 90 percent of the original value (still nearly intact), while the latter means that it is only 10-15 percent of that value (nearly gone). This distiction not insignificant. That being said, it's still neat to follow (even though I don't think that I'll be around at the end).

    1. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just REDUCED by 10-15 percent? Aw man, I crapped my pants for nuthin'.

  14. Re:What by TheProcrastinatorTM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doh, stupid enter key....

    What I meant to say before bumping the enter key on an incomplete post was...

    In the summary, it says the field is at 10-15% of where it was 150 years ago, but the article says it has WANED 10-15%, which would actually make it 85-90% of where it was 150 years ago...

  15. Typical - So typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    As is the case with most /. posts, paying attention to detail gets thrown out the window.

    From the poster's text:

    "and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago"

    From the article itself:

    "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent, and the deterioration has accelerated of late"

    Those two quotes are not the same. The poster's lack of attention to detail has turned the articles 10 to 15 percent reduction (a relative value) into a 10 to 15 percent strength (an absolute value). The meaning is totally different, and the poster should apologize for spreading mis-information.

    1. Re:Typical - So typical by TolkiEinstein · · Score: 2

      You're correct sir, I'd mistakenly read the article originally as having "waned to 10 or 15 percent," but upon closer inspection the article does read "waned 10 to 15 percent." Not sure I'd have thought to post the article on /. for such a small wane. In any event, my apologies for the mistake.

    2. Re:Typical - So typical by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Poor editing, or should I say the apparent total lack of, is among the reasons Slashdot will always remain relegated to a novelty site of sorts; among the reasons I won't buy a membership here.

      I don't understand why the Slashdot staff doesn't at least briefly research considered submissions to ensure they're are not dups and, more importantly, are accurate; spell checking submissions before posting them would be helpful too.

      End of my rant ... now relaxing knowing the pole reversal is likely not going to happen anytime soon.

  16. PBS special on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They talked about global cancer rates rising from the years of diminished radiation protection. They also showed how during the transition period the magnetic "poles" will travel randomly around the globe, making random locations radiation hot spots.

  17. This would be good but by orin · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be good for Australia. No longer "down under" ... finally "on top".

    1. Re:This would be good but by feargal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Going OT, but you should check out the Gall-Peters projection which represents countries based on their land area, which produces strikingly different results than that of a conventional map.

      Of course, all 2D maps will be wrong in some aspects, and the Gall-Peters approach distorts the actual shape of the land-masses. You could do worse though for a wallchart sitting in a classroom though.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    2. Re:This would be good but by rossdee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to think of the other side as well. 180 degrees from the prime meridian is the international date line. Down the middle of the pacific is probably the best place to put this since it would be inconvenient to have it in the middle of some countries.

  18. Interesting Show by fdiskne1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had heard about this theory, but never believed it. Then I saw a Nova show on PBS called Magnetic Storm. It's very well made and very interesting. By the end of the show, I believed the poles are set to reverse and it's just a fact of nature. Nothing we can do about it except research and prepare our way of life so things don't go to Hell in a handbasket.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  19. Like in Rand McNally? by BearJ · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does this mean we'll all have to walk on our hands, and hamburgers will eat people?

    --
    Stand clear of the doors. The doors are now closing.
  20. Magnetic chaos by Nosher · · Score: 5, Informative

    Then real fun with the flipping of the magnetic field is not that it moves uniformly from one pole to another over time, but that as it breaks down, tens or hundreds of "north" and "south" poles can develop which are spread all over the planet - see this article in New Scientist. With any luck, maybe my house might end up at one of these new "North Poles" for a while, so at least I can say I've been there :-)

    --
    It's too late for me to die young
  21. Re:Bush's fault? No... by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I blame it on too many people walking around wearing tin foil hats.

  22. He'll have to add this one to his "Axis of evil." by b0r0din · · Score: 4, Funny

    "After careful consultation with my administration's junk scientists, we have expanded our Axis of Evil to include the earth's axis as well. This rogue, um, thingy is responsible for the destruction of...does this thing say turtles? But...we don't care about...oh...anyway, this rogue "magnetic thingy" can only be stopped by drilling in the Alaskan oil reserves, therefore stopping all magnetism from happening. These weapons of magnetic disruption must be stopped at all costs."

  23. Why read the Times for Science? by arrogance · · Score: 5, Informative
    How about Scientific American for how long the reversals take?
    the average duration of a reversal is close to 7,000 years. The analysis further suggests that the timescale of the transition differs at various latitudes. During the last polarity shift, approximately 790,000 years ago, sites close to the equator underwent the 180-degree change over the course of 2,000 years, but the process took closer to 10,000 years in midlatitude regions.
    There's also a good article on WHY the reversals take place by Gary A. Glatzmaier, the guru of terran magnetic reversals. You gotta specialize in something I guess.
  24. Less a flip and more a migration... by TheQuestion · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not a geologist, but don't things on this scale happen very slowly? You wouldn't go to sleep one night with your compass pointing north and suddenly have it point south when you woke up. This would happen gradually over hundreds or thousands of years. Although this is geologically overnight, the magnetic pole wouldn't move significantly during a person's, or turtle's, lifetime.

    Having said that, I doubt even the turtles that rely on the field for navigation would notice. They would adapt to sense the less powerful field over time or they would loose the need to use it. Navigation is done by point of reference. And since the navigational lines of force are moving so slowly, the turtles wouldn't care. The North Pole being 200 miles from where it was for the turtle's great grandparents really doesn't matter to today's turtle. He just wants to get back to where he started from a year or so ago. The shift should be slow enough for him to do this.

    The reduced magnetic field seems to be much more of a concern. But, again, we will adapt much like the turtles will. But instead of adapting our biology, we'll adapt our technology. It's not that we can't make a satellite or power grid that can handle solar wind and storms; it's just that we haven't done it. Why not? We haven't needed to. Think of the reduced magnetic field as job security.

    1. Re:Less a flip and more a migration... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You wouldn't go to sleep one night with your compass pointing north and suddenly have it point south when you woke up.

      No. In fact, frequently the opposite is what actually happens.

      ~Philly

  25. I knew a magnetic Pole once by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Evana Kiniski -- it was amazing. you couldn't take your eyes off her. She had huge....tracts of land.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  26. flushing ? by TTL0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    the impact on life may be significant

    i wonder if toilets will flush counter-clockwise ?

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
  27. What about Santa? by SkreamNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone thought of his relocation???

  28. Magnetic Reversals by JollyGreenLlama · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Geological Survey of Canada has a well written and informative article on this subject. Some basic findings from the article include:

    "Although fast by geological standards, reversals are by no means quick on the human time scale. They take roughly 5,000 years, with estimates ranging from 1,000 years and 8,000 years.

    Both the total magnetic field and its dipole component decrease substantially during a reversal to values that range from 10% to 25% of the pre-reversal strength.

    A reversal does not proceed in a uniform fashion. Large and rapid changes in direction and intensity are punctuated by periods of little change. During some transitions the field starts to change but then rebounds to near normal before the reversal finally goes to completion.

    The scarcity and ambiguity of observations have led to two competing theories explaining how the magnetic field pattern changes, and how the magnetic poles behave during a reversal. According to one theory, the magnetic field remains predominantly dipolar during a reversal, and the poles migrate along preferred paths from one hemisphere to the other. According to another theory, the dipole portion of the magnetic field shrinks to zero but then regrows with opposite polarity. During the interval during which there is no dipole, the non-dipole part of the field persists, and the magnetic poles would not migrate in a systematic fashion."

    While the article does little to posit the consequences of these competing theories, it does provide a good deal of insight as to why and when the changes occur. It does conclude, however, that "many investigators believe that the trend [magnetic pole weakening] will not continue and the field will regain its strength, as it has many times in the past."
  29. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by October_30th · · Score: 5, Interesting
    that the evidence is being picked and then editorially filtered by very biased men.

    As a Physicist I can tell you that that is exactly like science works and that it has worked well for centuries.

    There is a method that, when put bluntly, is like this: "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds". It all comes with the territory.

    I'm glad popular science mags like SA adhere to this standard.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  30. Ok, who did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a big "DO NOT PUSH" sign right next to the degauss button!

  31. Re:Bush's fault? No... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    you laugh at them now, but they'll be the only ones protecting their brains when the magnetic poles stop protecting us from deadly radiation.

  32. Re:A few months ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought it was dicovered by observation of the odd magnetic structure of ferritic magma flows on the ocean floor.

  33. Can humans sense magnetic fields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to think not, but since an event a few years ago, I'm at least willing to entertain the possibility that some basic form of magnetic field sensitivity, may exist.

    I've always had a reasonable sense of direction - and I have generally attributed it to a good spacial awareness - however, an incident that occurred while travelling made me reconsider what really contributes to this 'directional sense'.

    At the time, I was in an aircraft heading from the southern hemisphere to the north, and after crossing the equator (not immediately, but within a few hours), my body was absolutely certain that we were heading south towards Mexico... whereas the aircraft was actually going north towards Canada.

    Now, I would have thought that north was north, and crossing the equator wouldn't affect me (particularly since it wouldn't affect a compass) - but something wierd was certainly happening. The feeling faded after about 6 hours or so, and 'north' became 'north' again to my brain... but I'm really interested in any thoughts people have about what the cause might have been.

  34. Migratory Birds by FauxReal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow... I remember seeing a show in discovery about carrier pigeons using the magnetic pole to navigate... (or at least that was the theory)... How will this affect migratory birds at large?

  35. Re:Remember "Core"? by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please don't repeat this to anyone else; so, you don't look like a fool. Oops, too late (as millions of /.'ers read your post)

  36. Thank God by teebo80 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not a loggerhead turtle

  37. Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you noticed how many foolish ideas have flourished in this supposed hotbead of intellegence this morning? According to the last poll responses, I'm guessing the average IQ is above 130 here (and well above most of your bosses).

    Even if some posts are in jest, we've had folks questioning the results of a simple magnetic shift affecting the direction of the coreolis affect, (toilet flushes), tilt of the earth (seasons), loss of the atmosphere, and viability of all satellites in orbit.

    Even if it happened over a couple years (which it doesn't), the only affect I've seen which is certain to happen is that the Government will be blamed for it.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. Yet Another horribly inaccurate post!!! by nategasser · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When will Slashdot posters and editors learn to take their jobs seriously and spend a few minutes understanding what they're talking about!!!

    The poster says the article indicates the Earth's magnetic field is "about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago" while the article states "the field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent."

    This is a huge difference, and indicates utter carelessness on the part of the poster and editors. Please post a correction and own up to your mistates. Editors, please be more careful in the future.

  39. Ob Jack Handy -like quote by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I hope that when the Earth's magnetic fields flip and new north poles are created, that one happens to be at my house. That way, I can tell my kids that we live at the North Pole, and that Santa lives upstairs and really does see you when you're sleeping and know when you're awake."

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  40. No by tgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd get them everywhere. You only get them at the poles because the field shields the rest of the planet. During the period of largely no magnetic field of any significant organization (the 2000-8000 year "flipping" time people have commented on), you'd get them almost every night everywhere.

    Interestingly, although I can't find a link to it, I've seen estimates that the added solar radiation (NOT UV, so sunblock won't help) will cause 100,000 additional cases of cancer a year, but likely less than 5,000 additional deaths based on current cure rates. Given the increase in cancer treatment technology, the end result could be gorgeous nights and no signficant health impact on the developed world, and gorgeous nights and another health issue to raise money for, for the developing world.

    I'd personally worry more about a climatic flip to an ice age than a dramatic weakening/flip of the magnetic field. Its hard to grow food for ten billion people on half the land, after all.

  41. Bizarro World by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Funny

    So once the poles finish reversing, will I have to hack my GPS receiver and invert its display to make its compass point to the new "North" pole?

    And will we have to switch around all the highway signs so that I-95 North heads towards Mexico and I-95 South leads to Canda?

    And will we have to rename North and South Dakota, North and South Carolina, etc?

    The hell with the loggerhead turtles, I've got serious questions that need to be answered! :-)

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  42. CRTs will be obsolete by xyote · · Score: 3, Funny
    if they weren't already. What most people don't know is that CRT monitors come in northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere models due to the the effect of the vertical component of the magnetic field on the electron beam in the CRT.

    Same reason there are northern and southern hemisphere compasses except it's a needle balancing issue. In the northern hemisphere, the "north" end of the needle gets pulled down, and it gets pulled up in the southern hemisphere. There are global compasses that work by allowing you to readjust the balance or by using a gimbaled disk magnet.

  43. Speed 4. Compass Crazy by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hero: "If that compass (mounted to the mountain) changes direction by 180 degrees, we're all going to blow up!"
    Floozie: " But won't that take, like, hundreds of years."
    Cue the "exciting music" Hero: "Can't you see, we only have a few hundred years to defuse the bomb!!!!! or everyone within 1 acre of this part of the mountain is doomed!!!.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  44. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by taurec1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There is a method that, when put bluntly, is like this: "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds". It all comes with the territory.

    And how, exactly, is that helping science?

    The peer-review-process is badly broken. It only promotes ordodox science and the funding of already established old man.

    Currently it takes two generations to accept a paradigm shift, to accept off-mainstream theories as better approximations of Reality.

    Think were we could be if science would move forward much faster...

  45. Re:Loss of atmosphere by TheMeddler · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ice ages are closely correlated to changes in the earth's orbit, usually referred to as Milankovich Cycles in reference to the first proponent. These consist of a 21,000-year perihelion cycle, 41,000-year obliquity cycle, and a 100,000-year eccentricity cycle. Since they all overlap, the superimposed curve is a bit uneven, just like the climatic cycle. Slide The 100k cycle is thought to have the greatest impact on climate.

    Here's a brief overview of these cycles

    There are, of course, a host of other factors that influence climate - for example, episodes of warming related to methane releases.

    Thermal

    --
    90% Professional Slacker
  46. Please, not another pro-Kerry article! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know the New York Times is a blatantly left-slanted, Democrat-loving publication, but referring to John Kerry as "magnetic" is just too much.

    Oh well, at least they did have the decency to call him what he really is: a flip-flop.

    Moderators: Laugh. It's called political humor.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  47. Sun's field flips every 22 years by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One needs to look only a few million miles away for a spectacular example of what happens during a magnetic field flip. Our Sun has been flipping its field direction every 22 years. When its gets close to flipping its magnetic field lines sometimes break away from the main field and become localized loops in what we see are sunspots. A sunspot is a region of the surface through which a field loop passes and cools the temperature a few percent and appears less bright than the surround solar surface. Sunspots usually occur in pairs or groups of alternating polarity coresponding to the parts of the magentic field line loops either entering or exit the solar surface. Sun spots occur in patterns migrating fromt he equator to poles over the course of a flip cycle. Huge solar storms and explosions are associated with these solar magnetic disruptions.

  48. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The problem is no one has found a better alternative. If you take out all the conservative peer-review, then all kinds of kooks start getting publicity & funding. Think cargo cult stuff.

    Truth has a formidable way of eventually winning: it is the truth. No matter how derided were the people who proposed plate techtonics or quantum physics, it eventually won out because it worked better than anything else. If a result is reproducible then someone will reproduce it and confirm it. It doesn't then matter what high-ranked people in various department thought of the idea.

    This means that to be a successful scientist, you not only need to be creative, smart, inventive, patient and persistent, you also need to have balls of steel and a will of iron and prepare for the worst of injustice. Not only that, but when they do succeed after a hard slog, they often become the highly-ranked people who deride other people's ideas.

    A proper supervisor tells their student about all this during their PhDs. You soon find out if you are fit for the job.

  49. Public scientific literacy in pretty good shape? by chunderfest · · Score: 2, Insightful
    No one knows precisely why the field periodically reverses, but scientists say the responsibility probably lies with changes in the turbulent flows of molten iron, which they envision as similar to the churning gases that make up the clouds of Jupiter.
    I never thought I'd see the day when a mass-market publication, using analogy to explain a difficult scientific concept to the public, would invoke "the churning gases that make up the clouds of Jupiter" as the easy-to-understand common-knowledge side of the analogy.

    You go, NYT.

    --
    Ah, bitter dregs.
  50. ...this planet "might" be safe... by rootkill.za · · Score: 2, Interesting
    First of all can we really expect the GPS system still to function once the magnetic mantle is gone ? To get a understanding of how GPS receivers work look at, GPS-X-02007 (This is a mirror since the u-Blox site needs you to register before you can access their tutorials.) Basically the signal received on Earth at the GPS receiver's antenna is a few dB below the (Thermal) Noise Floor. My question is, once the magnetoshere is gone, what will the Noise Floor look like ? If they predict blackouts, etc it means pretty severe and thus I believe most GPS receivers will probably not get the fix. Then you are lost. Also GPS receivers needs to be updated frequently to compensate for drift in their location. In an more sever RF environment in space what will be the effects on these RF links ? I could easily conjure up a lot of unpredictable EMC related issues with Satellites due to Electromagnetic Winds.

    Once the GPS system fails it will have repercussions on everything that depends on it. Hmmm, NTP for one. Some utility companies even use it to monitor electric load on the powergrid, the mass movement of charge, etc. Most complex control systems are useless without accurate inputs. So how big was the "margin-of-error" people designed in that lowest-bidder control systems for that Nuclear Power Plants ? If you look at what happened at Chernobyl with un-self-sustained Nuclear Powerplants you have to start worrying.

    If that is not enough to worry about, what will the effects be on the worlds international food supply ? I think we have all started to notice the "Weird" weather. Zetatalk (of Planet X fame) has nice pictures correlating the changes in the magnetic field with changes in temperature. I mean evolution happens over millennia can a significant part of the Earth's food supply handle a severe step-function input, and what will the transient response be like ?

    Also have a look at these:
    http://www-ssg.sr.unh.edu/406/Review/rev6.html
    http://ds9.ssl.berkeley.edu/LWS_GEMS/movies/6magne t.mov
    http://ds9.ssl.berkeley.edu/LWS_GEMS/movies/6sec6. mov

  51. This happens frequently... not a reversal by goatbar · · Score: 5, Informative
    Okay yall... being a paleomagnetist and dealing with this topic all the time, I have to say that it is NOT LIKELY that this is the beginning of a reversal. The field goes up and down at all kinds of frequencies. If you look at a graph of the Sint 800 (sorry it's a tiny figure) you will see all sorts of ups and downs for the last 800000 years during the bruhnes normal period. The last big low is called the Laschamp and was about 35-40 thousand years ago. Today's field is so far above that.

    The magnetic field is a 'random process'. There is no real good statistical predictor of when the next reversal will happen.

  52. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by October_30th · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And how, exactly, is that helping science?

    As another poster pointed out, it keeps the kooks out by being so conservative that even some legitimate breakthroughs may be squashed in the process. Unorthodox ideas will resurface time after time and if they're really up to it, they will eventually be accepted.

    Yes, brilliant people will be ridiculed, careers will be wrecked and our understanding of the Nature grows painfully slowly. However, if it weren't so, in the end we wouldn't have science at all.

    It only promotes ordodox science and the funding of already established old man

    Orthodox science is well established, well tested and a robust foundation for new science. It should be protected at any cost. No new theory should dismantle an old theory that has stood . The new theory can only be accepted if it naturally incorporates the old theory at some limit (like Newtonian mechanics is a good approximation of relativistic mechanics at low speeds/weak gravity).

    Currently it takes two generations to accept a paradigm shift, to accept off-mainstream theories as better approximations of Reality.

    Indeed. What's the problem? You're going somewhere?

    science would move forward much faster...

    Yes. In the same way as a plane that falls apart at 30000 feet.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  53. Sure its true. by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple googling... shows it is

    Mainly it occurs on high end monitors. And they have sophisticated means built in to combat it.

    --

    -

  54. Re:Loss of atmosphere by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are, of course, a host of other factors that influence climate - for example, episodes of warming related to methane releases.

    [Indignant look] Well it wasn't me...

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  55. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Eivind · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm pretty sure you mean it rigth, but this came out a bit strange;

    No new theory should dismantle an old theory that has stood.

    I don't agree with that. Even a single reproducable counter-example is in principle enough to disprove a theory. Even in the absence of alternative theories.

    The moment you can experimentally show some effect of relativity, you know that Newton is wrong. Or more accurately, that Newton is only a good approximation for situations where the speed and distance is low.

    I do agree with what you're probably trying to say though; for a new theory to be anything worth, it must explain all the occurences that the old did, and then some. An experiment which the old theory could successfully predict, must still be predictable by the new theory.

  56. It's everyone's fault! by mveloso · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, it was the first Bush administration that caused this by failing to insert large, autonomous dynamos into the earth's crust. This would have stabilized the magnetic shift by generating huge electromagnetic fields.

    Likewise, by killing the Texan supercollider the government stopped all research into magnetic field movements. This research would not only have helped in our understanding of magnetic fields, but would also have helped in the current War on Terror by providing valuable information on how subatomic particles can affect semi-psychotic behaviors.

    And by ignoring the Kyoto protocols, the US has selfishly allowed its atmosphere to heat up, no doubt affecting the internal stability of the Earth's iron core, making the situation worse.

    Plus, clear-cut logging no doubt has caused rotational differentials across the US and the world (due to less air resistence), placing undue stress on the earth's core.

    Lastly, by killing millions, if not billions, of creatures, modern civilization has hastened the onset of this problem by robbing the world of counterbalancing "life" or "female" energy, energy that would have counteracted the obviously "male" and "destructive" magnetic shift.

  57. Ridicule has worked well for centuries. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As a Physicist I can tell you that that is exactly like science works and that it has worked well for centuries.

    I don't know whether to smile or frown at your statement. --The suppressive systems designed to keep people ill-evolved and ignorant certainly do work effectively, though primarily as population control measures rather than any sort of formula for attaining and sharing knowledge.

    "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds".

    Ridicule should be a part of mainstream science. . ?

    Hm. See. . . If enormous effort were not expended on instilling crippling thought patterns in people as they grew up, (largely through fear of rejection and being rewarded for punishing those who refuse to go along with the group, regardless of the inherent value of whatever the group happens to be doing). . , if the world was not thumb-pressed into submission through all manner of social and economic pressures, then the growth of knowledge through science would, I think, be truly astounding.

    Don't get me wrong. --I certainly adhere to, "I'll Believe it when I See it".

    But I also think just as often that, "I'll See it when I Believe it."

    --When I finally grew a spine and stopped fearing ridicule and punishment, (which, interestingly, are entirely harmless threats the instant you realize their nature), I discovered that there are fundamental forces in the universe which are keyed on and indeed, which are made from the stuff of consciousness itself. There is nothing but energy, after all; why is it such a leap for so many to take the next few steps?

    Science which is locked in the material boundaries of what has been deemed 'acceptable' is self-limiting to the point where it is nearly impossible to advance. Throw in a bushel or two of kooks and cultists, and the game is pretty much done for. --That is, when biased scientists affront the 'impossible' with nostril-flaring scepticism, they actually go a long way to preventing themselves from being able to register entire hosts of phenomenon. --As well as suppressing certain patterns of reality through the force of their own subconscious will and intent.

    As such, extraordinary evidence will never be found under such conditions. This is the paradox upon which Faith is based. (A dirty word, to be certain, largely thanks to the other massive mind-control project known as Christianity.)

    And that's just the way certain groups would like things to stay, and I don't see attitudes changing. It looks more and more like it will be a destructive and painful shifting of affairs after all. (More so for some than for others.)

    Ah well. Interesting times and all that. . !

    Cheers and good luck to you!


    -FL

  58. It does not point north! by Pu'be · · Score: 2, Insightful

    God damn it, I am tired of Jack Holes saying that a compass points north and when they flip it will point south.

    Hello, Earth to idiots...is it that hard to understand that a compass does NOT point north, but it aligns with magnetic north & SOUTH.

    If you want your compass right now to point south, paint the other end, and when they flip if you still want it to point to our current north, paint it's corresponding end.

    This aint rocket science for Christ sake. Anything that can distinguish "north & south" will work EXACTLY the same when the polls flip, as it will still be aligning with the magnetic polls, just like it always has and always will. Though your stupid little GPS programmed by stupid people who have stupidly programmed it to "point north" and not "align with the magnetic polls" as it does will probably not work right, but only because of the stupid programmers.

    Do not ask me why, but this crap really pisses me off, go figure.

  59. Man... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The east coast and west coast rappers will be all messed up once the flip occures and north is south. What does happen to east and west, seriously?

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  60. The Giant Binary Switch by ActionAL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Earth's pole is just gonna perform a binary switch in order to signify to aliens that it's time to invade.