Slashdot Mirror


419 Scammer Gets Scammed

johnduffell writes "There's a lot of awareness of 419 scams at the moment, including a report from the BBC of a baiter who managed to get $80 and a birthday card by courier! He did this by convincing the scammer that he was in the Church of the Painted Breast and there's even a photo of the scammer with his breast painted! Presumably the scammers are hoping that the scammees are as stupid as they are."

295 comments

  1. Two wrongs don't make a right! by beh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question now is just, whether the stupid idiot on the other hand might
    actually sue those who tricked him for having been scammed for US$80.

    There is not much chance he would get anything out of this, as he
    tried to scam people himself, nevertheless - it might keep the guy
    here quite busy for a while (because he might STILL have to appear
    in front of a court).

    Now - THAT would be interesting to see... ;-)

    Always remember - they might be on the "safe side", since THEIR
    judicial system doesn't care too much about them. But on the other
    hand, by tricking the 419 scammer out of his money, we are breaking
    OUR laws (be that in the US, Europe, or wherever you are - and our
    courts look very different on these issues!). Or - in simple
    terms: Two wrongs don't make a right!

    Also - in comparison, the guy in Nigeria is guilty of ATTEMPTED
    fraud, whereas the guy who tricked him out of his US$80 is guilty
    of ACTUAL fraud...

    Don't get me wrong - I'm all for making sure that this whole 419
    scam thing stops. But I don't think we should simply skip the
    principles of our 'western world' while doing it!

    1. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by sH4RD · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell that to the P-P-P-Powerbook scammer.

      --
      WASTE - The Secure P2P
    2. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's better than bombing the shit out of them, and frankly I don't see another way to make it stop.

    3. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

      Would the USA extradite to Nigeria over such a matter?

      --
      You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    4. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by OmniVector · · Score: 0

      oh pullllease. scamming these people should be a pastime.

      --
      - tristan
    5. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I rather doubt the US would extradite to Nigeria over anything

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by terraformer · · Score: 1
      Two wrongs don't make a right!
      Oh yeah it does when you can get a guy to paint his breast, take a picture of it and send that along with a birthday card and $80 to you. Fraternities need to fuel their pledges up on cheap beer to come even close to this. The only one better I have heard of is the powerbook scam from a few months back.
      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    7. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by NoData · · Score: 3, Funny

      But, two wrongs do make a funny!

    8. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Story of a successful scammer

      These people are worthless. They'll get no pity from me about being scammed.

    9. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you pull your head out of your ass and laugh a little bit. It's funny.

    10. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by beh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't matter - the 419scamee would only need extradition if we was after recovering his US$80 (and possible damanges).

      BUT - fraud is a punishable offence, and in this case it was committed IN a western country, and as such, it would probably be sufficient to tip off the local authorities (district attorney, or similar) about the scam. In countries like Switzerland or Germany (and I would suspect in most western countries) the district attorney would be OBLIGED to follow up on this, since it is a CRIMINAL offence.

      The Nigerian might probably not even have to come to the US as a witness (but just bear witness at an embassy) if he would face prosecution himself!

    11. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by dcocos · · Score: 3, Informative

      A I learned from the book "50 Things You Aren't Supposed to Know" and the Fully Informed Jury Association. Juries, while using the law as a guide, they may choose not convict even though the person may be guilty by the letter and even the spirit of the law. Jury nullification would be well warrented. (Now the people mentioned in the article are British and I am not familiar with British law, though I believe this right was developed based on the model laid out in the Magna Carta.)

      http://www.fija.org/

    12. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Phisbut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the scammer decides to sue the scambait, he'd have to do it on US (or Europe) territory, therefore exposing himself to a counter-sue (probably for attempted fraud). Both for the original suit defense and for the counter-suit, the scambait's party could require some financial records of the scammer to be examined. Those examinations could reveal the actual fraud on thousands of victims, thus enabling a major class-action suit from all the victims against the original scammer...

      I doubt the scammer will expose himself to that kind of risk...

      But then again... IANAL...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    13. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Two wrongs don't make a right!

      You've obviously never seen any of the Chuck Norris flicks from the late 70's and early 80's...

    14. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but three lefts do.

    15. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by yog · · Score: 5, Interesting
      But on the other hand, by tricking the 419 scammer out of his money, we are breaking OUR laws (be that in the US, Europe, or wherever you are...

      That's fuzzy thinking.

      What law did this fellow break, exactly? He asked someone to send him some money, they did, and he kept it. There was no legal, signed contract between them. There was no handshake or face-to-face meeting or phone call or anything. Just an unsolicited email requesting money that was answered with an equally unsolicited request for money.

      If someone walks up to you on the street and says, "Please give me your bank account number so that I can share millions of dollars with you" and you say "OK, but it will cost you $80" and they hand you $80, have you stolen their money if you then don't share your bank account number with them, which they want for obviously nefarious purposes? I know of no law that covers this sort of behavior between two private individuals.

      Morally speaking you have more of a point. The question is, is it immoral to steal from a thief, or rather in this case to trick a thief into giving you some of their ill-gotten gains? Questionable.
      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    16. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth does an "oh pullllease" comment get a +1, Interesting mod?

    17. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Two wrongs don't make a right, but sometimes two rights make a third right, and if you have three rights you've broken even and ended up in the same place you started. :-)

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not a scam if u scam a scammer. Thats totally legit to scam a scammer.

    19. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this 'reverse' scam was pulled off in the US.....I'd hope they'd put ME on the jury. No way I'd vote this guy guilty. In the US, the jury box is still the one place that any common citizen is as powerful as the President of the US.....at least as I understand it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I don;t think they'd sue. One of the issues is that these are usually headed by organized criminals, and I doubt that they would risk being charged with attempted fraud in a way which would require their financial records to be examined. Furthermore, since they use obvious subterfuge in their emails (fake identities, etc.) I think it would be pretty hard for them to gain any sort of sympathy from a jury.

      In the end, I think that when you figure the risk involved to them and the cost even for small claims court, there is very little they could justify doing.

      Come on, if you were in a crime syndicate, would YOU risk this sort of thing?

      If they do, great :-) Maybe we can help make this problem go away by making a few arrests.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    21. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by TastyWords · · Score: 1

      The scammee would have gotten more than $80 if it had been a "she" with a painted breast. I'm guessing the reason it was only $80 was because they were looking at a fuzzy picture and were only hoping it was a lady.

    22. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the statement says, "use 'em or lose 'em". They misfire (probably in other parts of their life) and are basically l0z3rs.

    23. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of "Jury Nullification"?

      I think that this case is a prime example of when it needs to be used. Sure this guy may have broken the letter of the law, but not the spirit of the law. The law exists to protect the innocent from predators and keep order. This reverse scam kept a predator too busy to exploit the innocent and thereby saved some other innocent person from falling victim.

      If I were on a jury hearing this man's case, chances are SLIM in the extreme that I would seriously consider voting to convict.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    24. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by TastyWords · · Score: 1

      "Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do."
      -Gallagher

    25. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also - in comparison, the guy in Nigeria is guilty of ATTEMPTED fraud, whereas the guy who tricked him out of his US$80 is guilty of ACTUAL fraud..."

      I've never understood why attempted crimes are sentenced less than that of the full crime.

      For instance, an attempted crime means whomever was incompetent. Those that attempt crimes without fully thinking them through are the ones that you need to watch out for and worry about...these are the ones without a real plan and that lack of a plan could end up hurting a lot more people.

      Now someone that actually succeeds at a crime? For instance, your girlfriend fucks you over and you decide to kill her at her new boyfriends house and you succeed. Good for you. More than likely, you had a plan and succeeded. No crime is perfect in the get away, but you did what you planned on doing and its over with.

      What further hurt can happen to her -- she's dead. If you only ATTEMPTED to kill her, now you might be able to come back at another attempt and finish it off, inflicting more pain overall in the meantime.

      As someone that has gotten away with a few crimes in his day, I can tell you I will never do any of them again -- I succeeded, so I find a new crime to commit. If I wanted to kill someone and fucked up, I'd keep trying until I got it right. Ruin a LOT of peoples lives in the process.

      So do me a favor next time, don't argue that attempted crimes are of a lesser type because these are the type of people that rob a KFC and freak out and end up locking everyone in a freezer before raping the manager and then putting a bullet in everyones head. I would just take your damn money and get the fuck out of there...

    26. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moderator thought he learned the correct way to spell please.

    27. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by canavan · · Score: 1

      You really have to look up what a contract is. Contracts do not require handshakes, face-to-face meeting, anything wirtten whasoever or whatever else you may associate with contracts. All that is required for a contract to form is that two parties agree to it. This can be done in written form, by phone, email signalling flags or whatever - the form doesn't matter, but one would probably prefer to have something in written, so as to be able to proove that the contract (and its exact conditions) has been formed. There are some more conditions (the parties must be adults, the matter of the contract must be legal, the parties must have had a choice to enter the contract etc..) for a contract to be binding. This is pretty much standard in legislatures all over the world.

      IMHO, the reason why no contract has been formed in this case is simply that the Nigerian had no intention to follow through with his part, but if he had, "Father Barnett" would be guilty of fraud.

      of couse, IANAL.

    28. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by igrp · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest 419 scam-related sites that, as far as I can see, hasn't been mentioned yet is Ebolamonkeyman. If you haven't seen it be sure to check it out (if you want to see your favorite porn starts, uh... I mean celebrities scam scammers, that is).

    29. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAL but this is how I understand it:

      A legal contract is defined by one party making an offer, including "consideration" - i.e. what each person agrees to do for the other - and the other party accepting it. As long as all parties are capable of making the transaction and the actions themselves are not illegal, both are legally bound to carry out their side of the agreement.

      Situation: the scammer asks you for your back account number. You say: "OK, but it will cost you $80." You've just made an offer which the scammer accepts by giving you the money. If you don't then give them your account number, they could sue you for breach of contract and get back at least their $80.

      On the other hand, a "bare promise" by one person is not a contract and not legally enforceable. In the scenario you gave, however, there was compensation by both sides.

      Bear in mind that this is how it's done in the Caribbean (and probably Britain), the system may be slightly different in the U.S.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    30. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that the decision of the jury just isn't something the justices can review (unless, perhaps, the jury was tampered with & there's a mistrial?). Your jury instructions, as I understand it, still tell you that you can't just decide anything you want, and I'm pretty sure the lawyers aren't allowed to try to get you to vote one way or another based on anything but the law...

      Of course, IANAL...

    31. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by dcocos · · Score: 1

      From reading the book and some websites, the jist is that it is the last stand for "the people" to protect themselves from over zealous prosecutors and from cases where the law is unfair. This right(?) has been used for evil as well, in the 50s sometimes juries would not convict white people of killing black people, even when the facts made it very clear that the white person was guilty. I'm also not sure it has to do with the laywers trying to remind you of that fact more more so for cases where the person doesn't deserve punish for a crime, even they would be guilty by the letter of the law.

    32. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by magefile · · Score: 1

      Dangit, hit enter. If you set someone up to do something and give them reasonable expectation that you will do something in return, that's legally binding.

      I realize the 419eater is a UK'ian, but I imagine the laws involved would be similar.

    33. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron.
      He is clearly guilty of the crime, even admitting it himself. Even if it did go to the jury, which it wouldn't since he would plead guilty, you have to ignore circumstance.

      The issue of the Nigerian scammer would simply affect the sentence, not his guilt of the crime.

    34. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by karlandtanya · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But three lefts do!

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    35. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yup...but, if he DID go to court....and plead innocent, and I was on the jury...there is absolutely nothing compelling me to vote guilty....

      I'd let him go free.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He probablly tried to make a $2000 claim with Fed-Ex. "Look what you guys did to my laptop!". Hehe

    37. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      The log says he planned to donate the money to charity.

      I read this thing last weekend - long read - and it's still in progress. A very funny story.

    38. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Rei · · Score: 1

      I had never read that before... too bad they never got pictures of who it was - it just kind of trails off :P

      --
      Very well; let this abomination unto the Lord begin!
    39. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Richard+Whittaker · · Score: 0

      So what if "two wrongs don't make a right?" Just because something is illegal doesn't make it 'wrong'. I enjoy these kinds of tales, and wish the scammers got scammed more often.

    40. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by CyberPhox · · Score: 1

      In the US, there is a tort called "Affirmative Misrepresentation", although it is not recognized in all states.

      Basically someone is guilty of the crime if he intentionally makes a fraudulent misrepresentation of fact, with the intention that the person he is defrauding will rely on the misrepresentation. If the defrauded party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation and can show an economic loss, the defrauder is guilty.

      Granted, a good lawyer would probably get this case thrown out before it ever went to trial- but, fraud is a crime.

      Although IANAL yet, I am taking the bar in two weeks

    41. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by piaqt · · Score: 1

      Or: Thank God the crooks are stupid. Karma. Don'cha love it?

      --
      --piaqt
    42. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      The jury's still out on where the law applies on email isn't it? I mean, has there been a case to decide on whether the contract is governed by US law or Nigerian law? I mean, they've figured this all out with snail mail (albeit with really odd reasoning). And the other poster's right -> you need consideration to have a contract. This was a donation. A good feeling isn't consideration.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    43. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Contracts, written or oral, cannot be used to facilitate illegal activity, and will have no standing in court if someone tries to do this.

    44. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      You've forgotten two important aspects:

      First of all, the scammer guy in Nigeria couldn't sue someone from outside Nigeria, and besides, I'd think they've have a clean hands doctrine that would prevent him from suing. The clean hands doctrine states that if you're throwing mud, you can't sue someone else because your shirt got dirty when they threw mud at you.

      Actual fraud? Hah! Frauding a fraudster is simply justice in my own viewpoint. I'd love to catch an American spammer using this same tactic.

    45. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by J+Nny · · Score: 1

      But wait, it is a past-time for me.

    46. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      Do you disapprove of them scamming scammers by wasting their time, but not actually taking any money off them?

      If you do agree to that, then what about when the recipients of these scams cause the scammer to hire out a hotel for a night for a visit they never intend to make? They didn't obtain any money from the scammer, but they did cause the scammer to waste both time and money.

      I tend to think that if the law cannot stop these people then it is our moral obligation to stop them. If I lived in a country where the government forces were insufficient to stop a murder, I would have absolutely no moral objections to lying and deceiving someone attempting murder in order to save the victim. I see these situations as comparable - with the murder being some other crime.

    47. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US law doesn't apply in the UK. Clown.

    48. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by rew · · Score: 1

      So he took a risk. His risk. His choice.

      The fun is to scam the scammer with EXACTLY the same trick as the scammer is using.

      The "gain to the world" is that the business of scamming is made less profitable for the scammers. On one side because the baiters use up the time of the scammers by baiting them, on the other hand by scamming them out of some hard-earned ....ehmm..... illegally gained dollars.

    49. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      They extradited a Canadian citizen to Syria the other year.

    50. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by vaepor · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. He lives in England, not the US. RTFA!!

    51. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      He'd have to do it in a court which has jurisdiction over his scamming (Nigeria or England), which means he'll get in trouble. I don't think he will :)

    52. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by canavan · · Score: 1

      From the article:
      "He then tried to hit me for $18,000 for processing fees for transferring millions," Mike says.

      He wrote back as Father Hector, saying that the church had plenty of money, but there was a withdrawal fee of $80.

      "I persuaded him to send me the $80, which he did, inside a birthday card, by courier," Mike says.

      It was not a donation. The expressed purpose of the US$ 80 was to pay for the withdrawal fee for the US$18000. Let's look up the definition of "consideration":

      7. Law. Something promised, given, or done that has the effect of making an agreement a legally enforceable contract.

      Now, US$18k have been promised, US$80 have been sent. No careful thought or good feelings needed, so where exactly is your lack of consideration? And from where did you get that "The jury's still out on where the law applies on email isn't it?" ? Contract law applies regardless of the form of communication, although a printout of an email or the mail as stored in your mbox may not be considered a proof in court. Admittedly, some contracts must be in writing to be valid, (depending on jurisdiction of course, over here one such case would be selling real estate), but I don't think it's the case here.

      The concept of "contract" and "fraud" seem to be quite similar in most jurisdiction, so this is probably frau, no matter whether the laws of Nigeria or the UK are applied.

      I didn't become a lawyer in the meantime.

    53. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that consideration is usually spelled out as funds achieved through fraudulent means. You cannot have an illegal item as consideration of a contract under common law. That could make the world of a difference. Again, I sell you a trunkfull of cocaine, and offer you Net 30 days to pay. You don't pay. I can't sue because the item in consideration is illegal.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    54. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by canavan · · Score: 1

      OK, time to dig out the wikipedia entry on contracts. Consideration is one point, "proper subject matter" is another and totally unrelated. Does a contract have to be enforcable for the defection of one party to become fraud? I don't think so, for the same reasons that stealing from a thief is illegal.

    55. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right! by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      You're right. I agree with you. However there's the cop who has to write the report, and the DA who desides if the state needs to bother with this.

      In this case, I think the DA would laugh it off and congratulate you if it made it that far.

      Look at it this way. A friend of mine walked up to someone trying to break into his car in a parking lot. Walks up, says "whatcha doin'?". Thief replies "Uh, locked my keys in the car". Friend drills thief numerous times. Beats the tar out of him. Cop arrives. Cop sees thief beaten up. Friend is telling his story "blah blah blah asked him what he was doing...." and then the cop interrups "and he fell down, right?" Friend replies "no....." cop repeats himself, while nodding rather suspiciously "and he fell down, RIGHT?"...

      The difference between the letter of the law and reality.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  2. simi-dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    This was on the page 419eater.com, which was linked by an artical about 419 scams step by step or something.

  3. This is funny but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't running a reverse scam like this one illegal? I mean, the nigerian scammer got what he deserved in every way, but isn't it kind of dangerous to do these kinds of reverse scams? I know the governments in the U.S. and UK might actually prosecute, which the nigerian scammers don't have to worry about from their govs.

    1. Re:This is funny but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forget to check the Post Anonymously box, asshat?

    2. Re:This is funny but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's not even the real Seth FINKELSTEIN either. Friggin' troll.

    3. Re:This is funny but, by nmk · · Score: 1

      Why is it always assumed that these Nigerian scams are necessarily run by Nigerians. It's become a pretty common scam format now. There's a good chance you could have a European or American running a Nigerian scam. Talk about globalization. Nigeria is just a convenient country to pick for the scam because in many peoples minds it's associated with political turmoil. I mean, I don't think it would make sense to pass yourself off as George W, trying to embezzle bribe money from oil companies. Nigeria is just more believable.

    4. Re:This is funny but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Congratulating yourself for your standup stance against fascist oppression. Thats pretty sweet! I think more /. trolls should

      Michael Sims > Bert Stanwick pretending to be "Seth Finklestein"

      Given the context of your comment, I assume that you are among the great unwashed who have no clue as to the actual definition of the word 'fascist'.

  4. Where do I join? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:
    If you're tempted, just remember Prince Joe who's still sending e-mails saying he's sticking to his promise and saying the daily prayer: "When all above seems a great test, Get on down with the Holy Red Breast."

    w00t! Where do I join?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Where do I join? by Gunfighter · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can join at the 419 Eater website.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    2. Re:Where do I join? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it is really worthy to join, man. I am a member since Nov'2003 ;)

    3. Re:Where do I join? by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      I would join. But, I can't pay the $80 dollar joining fee. They always make up some reason to they need the 80 bucks. But the HRB always wants their cut.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  5. Little Old by slashrogue · · Score: 2, Informative

    The story about the whole Church of the Painted Breast thing has been on 419eater.com for quite some time now. It's long, but certainly amusing.

  6. Holy Church of Fish, Bread and Wine by ajiva · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally I like this one better:

    http://www.419eater.com/html/kothapalli_rao.htm

    1. Re:Holy Church of Fish, Bread and Wine by Beolach · · Score: 1
      The best part -
      Pastor Rao, I have had a request made to me by me brother-in-law. He is the owner of a very large chain of seafood suppliers. His company is called 419 Eater Seafood Supplies. You can see his site at www.419eater.co.uk. My brother was extremely impressed by the excellent work that you did with the sign and he wondered if you would be willing to make a similar sign for him to use for his company? He would like to use it as a flag outside his company headquarters.
      Let's just tell him we know it's a 419 scam, think he'll get the clue?
      --
      Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
    2. Re:Holy Church of Fish, Bread and Wine by nkh · · Score: 1

      I may be redundant, but at Scam o Rama, you have a few stories (the red links) where scammers are baited and scammed (one baiter has won $100, and another story shows you pictures of a sexy male in female undies)

    3. Re:Holy Church of Fish, Bread and Wine by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      About 6 or 7 years ago I founded my own.

      "The Church of Pornography of Latter Day Saints"

      I haven't decided on whether to call members "Hormons", "Whormons" or something else.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  7. You know... by Otter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the first time one of these smarmy nerds gets his ass handed to him by a pissed-off criminal, I'll definitely be feeling the urge to laugh a bit...

    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...the first time one of these smarmy nerds gets his ass handed to him by a pissed-off criminal, I'll definitely be feeling the urge to laugh a bit...

      From all the way over in Nigeria? Must have really long arms...?

    2. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry i dont see much in the way of an international ass kicking.

      and remember the criminals are just the same as the nerds in a lot of cases. they are not all huge buff guys with scares and tattoos. besides the person has a chance of picking on a nerd that also is a rabid gun enthusiast.

      which i would find hilarious

    3. Re:You know... by king-manic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...the first time one of these smarmy nerds gets his ass handed to him by a pissed-off criminal, I'll definitely be feeling the urge to laugh a bit...

      Firstly, the only way this will happen if said nerd went to the criminals country. Which would be incredibly stupid. Secondly, most of these scammers are of relativly modest means. they couldn't scrounge up the cash to get a visa and fly into the states to do anything, their also pretty dumb. They might be able to track down the person via email and ip look ups and so on, but generally their too dumb for that. Maybe 1 in 100 scamemr could do that. If they were wealthy enough, and smart enough to track them down, find them, they'd also be smart enough to realise ti'd be difficult to get away with it on us soil.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    4. Re:You know... by gilgo_22 · · Score: 1

      What are the chances the scammer is not in Nigeria?

    5. Re:You know... by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you read the article and/or had ever read 419eater you'd know that this is an extensive international ring.

      As it happens they have confederates in London and Mike can be assumed to be in England given that it's a BBC story. Holland is also a big center of the "Nigerian" scam. They can afford all of this because, I'm afraid, the scam actually works.

      While the poor schlubs who actually work the scam in the initial phases are poor patsys the people actually working the scam are rich, powerful and often even Nigerian government and law enforcement officers, which is part of what makes prosecutions of the scammers a nonstarter in Nigeria.

      KFG

    6. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that these "people" are in most cases affiliated with international crime, drug and arms trafficking, prostitution, et c. It is not uncommon that they have affiliates in for example several European countries as well as have the financial means to travel most anywhere in the world to meet face to face with potential victims that they believe are worth the effort.

    7. Re:You know... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "...the first time one of these smarmy nerds gets his ass handed to him by a pissed-off criminal, I'll definitely be feeling the urge to laugh a bit..."

      Please, Brother Kothapalli Rao, don't be to upset. I am Father Dumb'en'dumber, and I have no idea what you're talking about.

    8. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they're going to afford to come over here to do that?

    9. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh! Bring it on. There are all kinds of fun things I'm allowed to do to someone who enters my house unbidden under TN state law (such as anything I deam neccessary to "disable" them).

    10. Re:You know... by shanen · · Score: 1
      We've been around this loop before:

      ...the first time one of these smarmy nerds gets his ass handed to him by a pissed-off criminal, I'll definitely be feeling the urge to laugh a bit...

      It won't be a simple case of "his ass handed to him". Rather these scammers didn't invest a nickle in him unless they think they have a way to make a profit on the deal, and they are the experienced professionals in this business. Yes, they'd be glad if he was just another stupid sucker trying to get rich, but if he wants to play some other games, the 419ers have already played and rigged a bunch of them. The silly picture was valueless bait, but if they put any cash into the deal, they must think something else is going on here. What? Well, that's for the pros to know and the amateur to find out--the hard way.

      These days the common secondary scam is some form of identity theft, and getting a valid name and address and maybe even a signature are all helpful step for the scammers--and you can never be sure what other kinds of information they may have collected or will collect. The thing about a "courier" even makes me wonder about a confederate with a camera copying the ID during the delivery. When the mystery bills start arriving, of course the scammers will be long gone, but in bad cases the victim will have to spend a lot of time cleaning up the mess.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Double ended Greed by Quirk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Greed is the common denominator whether it be the greed of the scamee or of the scamer. It goes way back to the old adage, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't. Couple greed to gulibility and you've got the wild west show that is the www.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Double ended Greed by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      right, it is true that most fraud scheme falls into the nature of human greed. however, although this is exploiting the bad side of human being, it doesn't meant that it should be done - it's just as if a server has a old copy of apache containg a root exploit you shouldn't make use of that...

      btw... if it sounds too good to be true, it probably _is_.

    2. Re:Double ended Greed by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      How very W.C. Fields.

    3. Re:Double ended Greed by indiechild · · Score: 1

      "You can't scam an honest man."

  10. Finna keep ge'in paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, seeing how successful the 419 scammers are, I dont think $80 is really going to put a dent in their budget.

    When they get counterscammed for a significant amount, let me know.

    1. Re:Finna keep ge'in paid by Unnngh! · · Score: 1

      Agreed...this has been done quite a bit. While it's impressive that they did get money out of the scammer, I'm assuming that lots of people do fall for these scams. If the only replies the scammers got were from other scammers, the scams would doubtfully continue.

    2. Re:Finna keep ge'in paid by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Funny

      $80 is nothing to them. It's the birthday card that really got them.

  11. Stupid.. by SlashDread · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Presumably the scammers are hoping that the scammees are as stupid as they are."

    Having met a decent slice of Human population, I can say that in fact that is the case.

    "/Dread"

    1. Re:Stupid.. by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      quite often criminals are in fact geniuses - it is easy to kill, to batter or to make an assault, but to fraud, you need to be smart.

      it is very simple logic, and from the rules of halves, that half of the people has less-than-average IQ and im sure that even if the 419eater.com crew try to fraud fellow citizens there would still be comparable success rate of being baited.....

    2. Re:Stupid.. by Blindman · · Score: 1

      you need to be smart.

      I think you mean smarter than your intended victim. You are also forgetting how many would-be fraud artist get caught.

      --
      I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
  12. There's no way they could really press charges. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they ever knocked on the 419 eater's door, all he'd have to say is, "Listen, I know what it looks like on the website, but it's all photoshopped and fake. I emailed the guy, but he never sent the money. It's my cash, a picture the guy sent, and a photoshopped photo of the envelope."

    They'd never get a conviction.

    I AM NOT A LAWYER, but if the guy ever gets that knock, the only thing he should say is, "I want a lawyer," over and over again until he gets one.

    You're correct, though: two wrongs don't make a right. There's no point in having a Criminal Justice system if we don't uphold our laws and lead by example. Rather than punish the scammer by ripping him off, he should have used the information he gathered to get charges pressed against him in Nigeria.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      What about if the government of nigeria doesn't give two dry rat turds about dealing with their scammer population?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by king-manic · · Score: 1, Troll

      What about if the government of nigeria doesn't give two dry rat turds about dealing with their scammer population?

      They actually do, since they represent a percentage of the GNP (no exact figures but a non 0 value), they want them to rbign in as much foreign currency as possibel. So they make it hard to extradite, hard to track, and support them so long as the heat is low and it costs nothing.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

      Didn't they arrest 500 people last month for running these scams? Ah, yes, here's the link:

      Scammers arrested.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by WEFUNK · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about if the government of nigeria doesn't give two dry rat turds about dealing with their scammer population?

      You've got a point. Especially considering that the Prince, Prime Minister, Sultanate, Head of State, Military Dictator, and Alien Overlord of Nigeria have each been killed, overthrown, or deposed in a series of bloody uprisings and coups that have apparently tied up millions and millions of that countries personal, palacial, and government assets in secret international banks! With such frequent turmoil I simply can't imagine the resulting state of their legal system...

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    5. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by stm2 · · Score: 1

      I made myself called by one of them (just to make them waste money on Int'l calls). The funny of this was a background noise, that sounded like another operator making the same scam. So I think they even have a call center for 419 scam :)

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    6. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      So your essentially saying that you should commit perjury? THAT's solid ground to be on.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    7. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Illegal "black market" transactions like these are not factored into GNP. The scam artists' operations have no effect on it.

    8. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's for a good cause, then it's fine. Remember, only the goal matters. How we get there is not interesting.

    9. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by dosius · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Macchiavelli?

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    10. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. That's Bill Clinton. :-)

    11. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by gmack · · Score: 1

      I have a Nigerian friend and his explanation is that the police don't want to be bothered with one crook ripping off another. Since everything the 419 folks ask you to help them with is a crime: your a crook if you fall for it.

      The police in Nigeria are also notoriously easy to bribe, in some situations you can be penalised for not bribing them so that makes them even less likely to help.

    12. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by gmack · · Score: 1

      None of those 500 people were in Nigeria. If you don't leave Nigeria your safe from prosicution.

    13. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are you under oath when answering questions at your front door? Absent the oath, where's the perjury? Wasn't the point being made that it would never get to court?

    14. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's no point in having a Criminal Justice system if we don't uphold our laws


      You know, there is "law" and there is "justice". Sometimes the 2 don't match up. This is one of those cases.
    15. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      So I think they even have a call center for 419 scam :)

      So now we are outsourcing scams, too? Great, now you can't even get ripped off without the guy having an accent so thick you can't understand him...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    16. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Lying to the police is illegal, too. You can plead the 5th here in the states and say nothing, but you can't lie to the cops. There are several laws covering this, from Making A False Report, to Obstruction of Justice. Ask Martha Stuart, its what she is about to be sentenced for.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    17. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if that's actually what he did, and was just lying to the media? =P

    18. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Just respond to the police in Elbonian.

    19. Re:There's no way they could really press charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try learning to read someday. Anyone with you a little reading comprehension can tell from the content of the article that you are wrong. Dumbass.

  13. As for nigerian scam... by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

    I always think that these sort of people should be punished for making use of people's greed. Granted, we all know that without the greedy evil mind of the mark they would never succeed and this would also serve as a good rule for natural selection, but then these kind of fraud should not be tolerated and should be terminated.

    as for how we should terminate these people - the easiest thing to do is to do a ye olde IP class BAN, which imposes ban on all IP that send nigerian 419 scams through - it is true that this would hurt more people than it should, but then this is far nicer than declaring nigeria as 'terrorist' nation and battering them with bombs.

    If we can make block list due to open relay, why can't we do the same for nigerian scam? they are readily identifiable even for computers and they are all from several country, if not one or two.

    1. Re:As for nigerian scam... by ROOK*CA · · Score: 1

      The problem with using IP blocking is that

      A.) Most of these scammers utilize cyber cafes to do their dirty work (thus you'd be cutting off net access to people who aren't scammers).
      B.) These scammers aren't exclusively in Nigeria, many specimens have been posted originating in various African and European countries.
      C.) Who would administer the blocks ? I would imagine ISP's don't want to get into this game, nor would the regional registries.

    2. Re:As for nigerian scam... by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      right, but then
      (A) if enough people get banned, they will be angry at those who are sending out nigerian spam - this is exactly how banning open relay works (open relay get banned, users complain, isp switch to closed mail service) and so on.
      (B) deny their whole domains altogether, as reasoned in (A)
      (C) or just do it as other block-lists, privately held.

    3. Re:As for nigerian scam... by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I wrote but never submitted an RFC for administering blocks....it was to be done at the backbone level, on the ordered authority of IANA or the IETF. (Explicitly *not* ICANN)

      That way the traffic never gets out of their continent. If they want to cross oceans, they're going to be doing it over leased lines, and those lines can have blacklists applied.

    4. Re:As for nigerian scam... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      What about the ham radio gateways for email? (don't know squat about ham or how it works...)

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:As for nigerian scam... by man_ls · · Score: 1

      It's gotta terminate somewhere on the Internet. That's the point where the blacklist would take effect. It might be data couldn't go out of the country the HAM terminator was, or couldn't get to the terminator to be transmitted via radio.

      The idea was to sectionalize the Internet so that it still worked inside the effected area, but it was totally cut off from the external networks.

      a "Data Embargo" type deal.

    6. Re:As for nigerian scam... by ROOK*CA · · Score: 1

      Believe me I share your disgust for these 419 scammers, but the issue I see with you're reasoning in A. & B. above is that by cutting off those blocks which are held by cyber cafes you knock off a lot of innocent people that don't have any other way to get Internet Access at a *reasonable* price.

      I'm thinking this would be tantamount to shutting down the phone system in order to get rid of telemarketers.

      Seems to me the best bet is end user education, ISP's, the media and informed users need to get the word out relative to these scams.

    7. Re:As for nigerian scam... by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      They don't know who the scammers are. They probably don't even know that's why they're banned. They get mad at the dumbasses who are banning them for no apparent reason. It's just like all the innocent people who get on blacklists for spamming. They're not mad at the spammers, they're mad at the people who wrongly blacklisted them.

  14. Membership by mfh · · Score: 1

    I want to join too. Maybe we should get a website together? It can be our very own -419 cult. :-)

    "Now you have to drink this koolaid we're shipping to you and sing around a fire." (too subtle?)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      joking:
      You racist bastard! All black people don't like kooaid, ok?

    2. Re:Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha... the reference, in case you were wondering.

    3. Re:Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya ya, I know.
      I watched the movie Friday the other day though, and thought of when smokey was like "you people ain't never got 2 or anything. got koolaid but no sugar, cerial but no milk..."

      I play the race card on EVERY hand. beat that.

  15. Ah, he beat me to it. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I have responded to the nigerian scams. Pretending to be a spy. I sighted specific locations and recent events that took place in the country. Never heard back from them.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      it would be better if you noted down the bank account they are using and notify the bank that these accounts are being used for fraud.

      this would help fellows that unfortunately falled into their trap.

    2. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      What needs to be done is a concerted effort with the US Treasury to create $100 bills with RFID tags inserted into them, and tell the 419'ers that you will pay in cash only. After the transaction is complete, literally follow the money trail. Should uncover a huge amount of the crime underworld that way.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      heh, standard /. joke? :p

      i personally think that it's usually not worth it to get to the touch. If it were for tracking, a neurotoxin-impregnated fake $100 bill that costs around $1 would do better.

      You may say i'm overaggressive, but that's the way people should do towards these scammers, who targets people's savings - these may be life or dead stuff...

    4. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      What needs to be done is a concerted effort with the US Treasury to create $100 bills with RFID tags inserted into them, and tell the 419'ers that you will pay in cash only. After the transaction is complete, literally follow the money trail. Should uncover a huge amount of the crime underworld that way.

      You would more then likly only find some dumb nigerian colledge student who's scamming his way to tuition or a small time crime ring consiting of 4 guys and their computer savy brother(ie he can turn it on and type). RFID tags are also short range so you are going to have to run around Africa with a reciever. Betetr idea, Don't give any info, or money and waste as much of their tiem as possible.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    5. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Ok, fair enough, but some sort of global tracking is what I'm looking for -- something like RFID that is small enough to be embedded, but remotely trackable. The kind of things the CIA is paid to research.

      And as far as finding some dumb kid or a small cadre, it's a start. Besides, the dumb kid will spill the beans, and you begin to be able to put the pieces together. You know, the kind of things the FBI is paid to research....

      Hmmmm.....

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    6. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      i personally think that it's usually not worth it to get to the touch. If it were for tracking, a neurotoxin-impregnated fake $100 bill that costs around $1 would do better.

      Ah, yes. The scammer is going to keep the $100 bill in his/her wallet for ever and ever and never spend it. Thus only the scammer gets hurt!

      You're a genius.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by JAD+lifter · · Score: 1


      neurotoxin-impregnated ??

      Me thinks you have been reading too much of ye olde William Gibson.

    8. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anthrax

    9. Re:Ah, he beat me to it. by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really do much, unless the scammers are morons. Most banks in which fraud is taking place openly like that don't much care about it. Either they're in a place where regulations can't touch them (a country that doesn't expedite and has very weak banking laws of its own), or they're getting kickbacks off the scams.

  16. Pit Nicking by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative

    "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is."

    1. Re:Pit Nicking by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You're binding "is" to "too good to be true". I've also heard "isn't" bound to "true".

      In other words, you're saying "if it sounds too be true, it probably is (too good to be true)". Other people have said "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't (true)".

      The statements mean the same thing and neither needs corrected.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  17. It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by cryptor3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Several commenters have expressed concern that what this guy is doing is equally wrong, and that he could risk getting sued.

    Besides the previously mentioned unlikeliness of any sort of extradition, the article made clear that all proceeds from these reverse scams go to a children's charity. Therefore he's clearly not doing this for personal gain.

    I'm would guess that as long as this type of thing doesn't become a serious epidemic, there's no reason the reverse scammers would receive an adverse judgement. Besides, someone has to lodge a complaint against this activity, and who's gonna do that?

    1. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by RetroGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Therefore he's clearly not doing this for personal gain.

      Seems to me there is a fairy tale about this...

      Oh yes, Robin Hood!

      Still, it does not make it right. Committing a crime is committing a crime. The ends do NOT justify the means, or else our society becomes lawless.

      Think of the terrorists. They commit crimes for their "justice". Your point of view may differ.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    2. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by iii_rjm · · Score: 1

      So it's ok to rob the bank as long as long as I give the money to charity?

    3. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Think of the terrorists. They commit crimes for their "justice".

      Argument flaw: the terrorists are unlikely to belong to your society (whatever that is- the US?). They are not necessarily breaking their laws, they are breaking *your* laws. So, the analogy is poor, because you're concerned with your society breaking its own laws.

      Would you care about breaking Nigerian laws? Probably not, you might think it's justified. You might be right. If their law system supports ripping you off, screw them and their law system, right? (*)

      Similarly, a "terrorist" from another country might (rightly or wrongly) consider that whilst the US is internally democratic (sort of...), it doesn't care about democracy outside its own borders *if* the undemocratic action is in its interests. So, they use the same reasoning as (*) above.

      I'm trying to make two points here; (a) Breaking your own laws isn't the same as breaking someone else's laws and (b) You breaking someone else's laws might also enter into the picture, even if you think those laws are against you.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by BTWR · · Score: 1

      yeah, and Hamas claims to be a charity organization too...

    5. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Actually, this case is fuzzy. IANAL, but I studied a bit of law. Let's say for example you're selling pot. And the buyer doesn't pay up. The drug dealer isn't entitled to restitution because they are engaged in criminal activity. However if the drug dealer is assaulted, the drug dealer IS entitled to press criminal charges for assault. However if this drug dealer seeks lost wages for the time he couldn't deal drugs, his case would most certainly be laughed out of court, and admitting your a drug dealer in open court is really, really stupid. Has there been any previous cases where a scammer's been scammed and has seeked restitution? In order to do so would only reveal their own criminal basis. I can see it in court now "your honor, while trying to explain to the defendant I had $15 bazillion in the bank that I wanted to funnel through his bank account... He took me for $80" As well, AFAIK in Canada, fraud $1,000 is not a criminal offence, it's only a civil offence. It's a waste of the penal system's time really. So really, why not scam the scammers?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Hamas does actually act as a charity. They provide things like free food and medicine for Palestinians, which is one of the reasons they have so much support.

      Of course, they also use a large portion of their funds to sponsor suicide-bombings, buy arms, and other sorts of nefarious things.

      It reminds me of a bit of the political machines in American cities in the late 19th century. Their primary purpose was to get their leaders elected to city governments, where they could wield power. They did this by providing support (housing, food, jobs connections, etc.) to arriving poor immigrants and by helping out immigrant and ethnic communities. The immigrants were in turn grateful and reciprocated by voting for the political machine's candidates.

      As long as these poor immigrant voters were getting charity, they looked aside when the political candidates used their offices for more nefarious purposes (embezzling, nepotism, etc.). Both gained from this arrangement

    7. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      Several commenters have expressed concern that what this guy is doing is equally wrong, and that he could risk getting sued.

      Sued by whom? The scammer? In what country? Nigeria?

      Think it through a little. Would someone who regularly scams people for thousands of dollars really bring attention to himself by suing? Probably not, for the same reason that if a drug-dealer's drugs are stolen, they probably won't call the cops about it.

      Lets say they sued in Nigeria. So what? Is the United Kingdom going to extradite this guy to Nigeria.

      Okay, now that you've (hopefully) stopped laughing, ya think he's gonna cross the ocean to sue the guy in Britain for $80?

      No, this guy has nothing to worry about.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    8. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Won't somebody think of the Terrorists?"

      sorry Maude

    9. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So I could go to BestBuy, drive a truck through the lobby, steal all the plasma screens they have and give them to a charity, and I'd be ok and the charity could keep the TVs?? nice!

    10. Re:It's a reverse scam, but not for personal gain by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

      If Best Buy tried to drive a truck through your living room and steal your TV, go for it. Best Buy may be trying to rip you off, but they sure as hell didn't drive a truck through your house on purpose.

      All of you guys are completely missing my point. It's not whether it's morally right, but that there will be no civil actions against the anti-419er because it is a waste of money and court time, as well as a stupid idea for the scammer, to prosecute any of the documented anti-scams.

      And for the issue of criminal charges, the anti-scammer hasn't committed any violent offenses, unlike the implied actions of suicide bombing, or assault that occurs during a bank robbery. It's an exaggeration to compare his crime to an actions involving violent offenses or forceful entry (breaking and entering).

      He's probably guilty of a few criminal offenses, but in light of the lack of personal gain I am willing to bet Mike's $80 that no district attorney (not because of any legal grounds, but because of their common sense) would prosecute this guy's offense(s).

      BTW, in Texas, it's only a Class B misdemeanor if he were convicted, as opposed to a felony as some of the above suggested actions are.

  18. Customs: by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

    Customs Agent: Reason for entering the country?

    Scammer: I'm here to beat the tar out of David Hyde Pierce of the Church of the Painted Breast, who stole $80 from me while I was trying to rip him off for $18,000.

    Customs Agent: *puts on gloves* Step into this room, sir.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  19. Artists Against 419 by Spazholio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you don't want to directly engage the scammers, but still want to hurt their cause, check out this site. All the images there are taken from the fake banking sites that the scammers set up. The pages refresh every 2 minutes to keep the bandwidth usage going. If you REALLY want to hurt them, and have bandwidth to spare, try going to this page. It will load 12 images, all from the aforementioned fake banking sites as fast as your connection will allow.

    1. Re:Artists Against 419 by ketamine-bp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      this would work wonder if you post it as a slashdot story. im not sure if it would go through the editor though - nice piece for signature anyway.

      hurting the scammers in this way (presumably slightly illegal) is good imho - make them costly. (just as spams)

    2. Re:Artists Against 419 by yarblek · · Score: 1

      after visiting a couple of the fake bank sites on this site, i am now convinced that whoever is dumb enough to mistake http://www.intercontbank.com/ for a real bank's site, or worse "One of UK's leading banking and financial services organization." deserve to be departed from his money for the good of society.

    3. Re:Artists Against 419 by nkh · · Score: 3, Informative

      This site has already been shown on /. before.

    4. Re:Artists Against 419 by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I think we slashdotted the bankers sites.. All I'm getting is load failures and 12 dead links.. =) Way to go!

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  20. Similiar site on 419 emails by Digital+Mage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The story reminded me of this site. I'm not sure if the responses are real but I particularly enjoyed reading the Cthulhu response to a 419.

  21. Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by GPLDAN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a very good reason that Mike didn't want to give the BBC his real name. These guys are like the mafia, I don't think they appreciate being made fools of. Many Nigerians believe in "Sharia" - or the death penalty for all kinds of transgressions. Source link

    Probably not good people to have your home address and phone.

    1. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by king-manic · · Score: 0


      There's a very good reason that Mike didn't want to give the BBC his real name. These guys are like the mafia, I don't think they appreciate being made fools of. Many Nigerians believe in "Sharia" - or the death penalty for all kinds of transgressions. Source link

      Probably not good people to have your home address and phone.


      Their like the cambodian mofia in a small city in canada. Dumb, Absurd and only dangerous in their turf. They problably couldn't hurt mike, but they could harass mike. So it's still prudent to keep low. But their hardly like the triads or the Yakusa. Sharia law doesn't apply in Canada.(unless the liberals are serious about letting Sharia law rule in Islamic families in civil law.... Thats rather regresive. Lets a oppressive cutural law have any sway in canada. Our politicians must be on crack.)

      It's exstremely unlikly any western nation will exstradite one of it's citizens to a foreign country to face persucution by a infintile set of degenerate laws.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you taken a look at the trophy pictures? Ever notice the scar on the forehead or on the cheeks. These scammers are criminals! They have been punished, under Sharia, for other crimes. Somehow I doubt Nigerians are going to get upset about these convicted criminals getting their due.

    3. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I don't think someone with mob connections is running these scams. Anyone with proper connections would be into money laundering, drug dealing, arms trade, etc. which would all be more lucrative then sending out spam and hoping to find some stupid person willing to send them a few thousand $.

    4. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by VdG · · Score: 1

      Even if this was true, Sharia law prescribes the death penalty for appostates. Even claiming to convert to the Church of the Red Breast would get the scammer a stoning so I doubt he'd try to use it.

    5. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      What people don't understand is that these people will try to make/steal money in any way they possibly can. And, let's face it, 419ing people is relatively low-risk compared to arms trading.

      I think "the mob" are more high tech than people believe.

    6. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by thatiger · · Score: 1

      The scars on their foreheads are not as a result of being punished for a crime. It is a tribal mark attributed to those from a certain tribe. The sharia law only applies to certain states within Nigeria that have adopted the law due to the overwhelming populations of muslims in the area. I am pretty sure those people would not want to be caught dead trying to pull a 419 scam on others. They could be punished severely for doing so.
      Please do your homework!

      --
      Nosce te ipsum! -- Know thyself.
    7. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      These guys are like the mafia

      The mafia has never been as stupid as the 419 scammers, and if the 419 scammers messed with the mafia in any way, I'm pretty sure of the end result.

      That being said, anyone wanting to toy with the 419 crowd *should* be careful.

    8. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      If it's the liberals in your country who want to allow Sharia law, I'd shudder to know what the conservatives want ... and I'm a conservative.

    9. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But sometimes liberals don't know what they are getting into. Most liberals are trying to be politically correct and assume, expect and prepare for the best. For them, allowing sharia probably akin to "respecting" a minority group. I was one of them, but I learn fast that while you expect the best, you should prepare for the worst and never asume anything. Liberals and shariah do not belong in the same sentence.

    10. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by king-manic · · Score: 1

      The liberals want it under the guise of "Tolerance" while they actually just want to have that particular lobby leave them alone. also they think it'll buy Muslim votes. It's will be used only in non-criminal family law. Personally I think it's going to set back Womens rights and Family law 300 years for a portion of our population. IT's volentary, but these women would be expelled formt heir community if they didn't use it durign a dispute, and Shaia law is heavily heavily slanted towards the Male/Fathers side.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    11. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Hmm, got mixed opinions. "Voluntary" is a magic word that can almost mean this could possibly be all right, but there are issues like minor children and such that complicate matters. Restricting it away from criminal law would at least mean there wouldn't be any removed hands or executions, right?

      As a thought experiment, wouldn't the explusion of women who refuse to live by sharia law from the community be a good thing, in your opinion? Don't you want that community to shrink? (Yes, it would have severe consequences for the women, but there is a larger community outside that should (presumably) be helping them.)

      No, I'm not defending sharia law, just trying to look at issues. (And educate myself ... I had no idea your country was even considering this possibility, and I'm still flabbergasted.)

    12. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Regaurding womesn rights. It goes like this. The father wants the divorce/custody trial to go by Sharia law. the mother may not want to, but some sects of Islam consider Sharia part of the religion. So if she refuses she may be considered to be a non-beleiver and be excummunicated. Thus theirs a cutural black mail. It's about as volentary as wearign a veil in Iran. Since Sharia favors the father/male, it'd be imposing a male friendly judgement onto these women.

      Basically they'd be forced to choose between staying a part of their culture or keeping their children and getting child support.

      Also I find it revolting because our concepts of equality and jsutice goes right out the window and some of our citizens are suject to another cultures laws. Even native self-rule/law that the Liberals support is revoltign to me. Why is one part of our cuture subject to different laws. Laws shoudl be universal.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    13. Re:Now, meet the Nigerian death squad by mateomiguel · · Score: 1
      Laws shoudl be universal.


      Wow, this is the single greatest argument for a United States conquest of the world that I have ever read.
  22. Is it just me? by hsoft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or these successful counter-scams (this one and the p-p-p-powerbook thing) sound too funny to be real? The more I think about it, the more I think these counter-scams are just hoax posted by some guys looking for cyber-attention. Well, the p-p-powerbook thing seemd to involve too many people not to be real, but this breast painting thing definately sounds like a hoax to me.

    --
    perception is reality
    1. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think you're overestimating the average scammer's intelligence. A few may be criminal masterminds-- especially the ones who actually dream up the scams-- but a far greater number are copycats going by-the-book. I mean, how many of them can't be bothered to find a proofreader who speaks English to correct their e-mails and dummy sites?

      Also, keep in mind how many hail from countries outside of North America and Europe. They may know how to run an out-of-the-box scam, but they probably don't understand our society and sense of humor (or at least, our geeks' sense of humor.) I would think it would be easy to get low-rent wannabe criminal from a third world country to go through hoops if he thinks he's landed a sucker.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      this breast painting thing definately sounds like a hoax to me
      Have a look at 419eater.com or a similar site. Photos of the scammers are valued trophies, so it's a case of working out a passable reason for needing a photo of the scammer. That's the whole point of the breast-painting thing, and in that light it becomes not merely plausible but elegant.
    3. Re:Is it just me? by plugger · · Score: 1

      Some of these look real enough. Not sure if it's on this site, but one account I read even used a couple of contacts to photograph the scammer waiting at an airport in Dubai, while the mark pretended to be stuck in customs with the cash.

  23. Do you part to fight scams, scam a scammer by king-manic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a statistics thing. If 50% of all their marks take 3 weeks to find out their some 13 year old playing a prank on their african ass, then it becoem 50% less profitable. IF we ensure the number of counter-scammers and time wasters is equal to or greater then the number of gullible fools then we're doing the fools a favor and reducing how many marks the scammers cand o. Also we might be savign lives. These scammer try to invite these people to their country, then rob/beat/kill them for their possesions. So I'l suggest all \.'s do what ever you can to help. Find a nigerian scam mail? reply and fake interest. At least waste their time.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:Do you part to fight scams, scam a scammer by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a similar tactic I use on telemarketers
      (and before you telemarketing /.-ers flame me out of karma, just think about your ratio of hangups/cussings -to- sells each day; NOBODY likes telemarketing except telemarketers -- and from what I gather even most of you would drop it like a bad habit if you felt like you had something else to fall back on...);
      Without ever actually buying anything, I take up as much of their time as I can so they can aggravate the fewest people (overall) at the highest expense and with the least payback possible. How does this "help"? By starving them (eventually) out of existence; they know there is only a certain amount of "gold" in them-thar hills, and their chosen method of retrieving it has shifted over just the last few years from the equivalent of "panning" a small stream to "sluice-mining" the entire mountain down to a puddle -- if it takes just as long for them to retrieve all the gold in the mountain using one method as the other, even they will eventually choose to use the least expensive method (and that business model isn't going to involve paying a ka-hundred college students, retirees, and bored housewives even minimum wage to sit in rented office space and use rented telephone lines to bother you and me, it's going to much more closely resemble doing some actual market research and targeting their customers -- think rifle -vs- shotgun.)

      --


      This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
    2. Re:Do you part to fight scams, scam a scammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its /., not \. what are you, some kind of fucking windows user?

  24. Why Not Say... by cynic10508 · · Score: 2, Funny

    convincing the scammer that he was in the Church of the Painted Breast

    I work for the Ministry of Silly Walks.

  25. But three lefts do! by Fizzl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Phasellus vel sem pharetra metus pharetra bibendum. Quisque ultrices, dolor non laoreet aliquam, arcu erat consequat wisi, vitae consequat leo ante non ante. Donec at nunc at tortor dapibus commodo. Integer dapibus tellus sit amet arcu. Nulla lobortis erat ac orci ultrices congue. Sed lacinia malesuada pede. Proin tempus. Fusce id augue. Donec sollicitudin. Suspendisse ante. Morbi sodales bibendum augue. Cras in ligula. Sed nonummy tristique lorem. Donec eu mauris. Nam dictum nonummy purus.

  26. illogical conclusions by ffoiii · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "This would all be funny if it wasn't for the millions of dollars being stolen and probably put into drugs or other criminal activities."

    Everything was fine in the article until this stupid line. It's just a scam, it's just someone trying to make some cash.

    THERE IS NO CORRELATION TO DRUGS OR SATAN OR PURPLE MUPPETS, WHAT WOULD MAKE YOU THINK THAT THERE IS?

    1. Re:illogical conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you a scammer or something?

  27. My favorite scambaiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is the Bush and Cheney scambait. Don't forget to click the links here and here for the trophies. That's a lot of trophy pictures for one scambait!

  28. Who would pursue it? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would the 419'er true and prosecute you for counterscamming? I think not.

    It's the old "you can't con an honest man" (not entirely true, but often enough so). People will be hooked in on something that doesn't sound legit, but they're too greedy for sound big-bucks or quick-cash that they fall for it. When they get scammed, they don't go to the police because to do so would be basically admitting they were duped while trying to circumvent the law.

    Of course, there are some notably stupid exceptions. I believe police once arrested a woman because she claimed she'd been sold sugar instead of cocaine. They arrested the dealer, and the woman (it was cocaine).

  29. My effort.... by spidergoat2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.scamorama.com/bigmac.html

    1. Re:My effort.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, I busted a gut laughing at this... thanx

  30. The moral difference: con vs countercon by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Con artists target the greedy and gulible... They target you and try to convince you that you can scam them.

    Conning a con artist is NOT equivalent - you're scamming a person who deliberately targeted you in hopes of stealing from you.

    As far as I'm concerned, conning a con artist is like beating the crap out of someone who tries to mug you - something that should be applauded.

    1. Re:The moral difference: con vs countercon by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Conning a con artist is NOT equivalent - you're scamming a person who deliberately targeted you in hopes of stealing from you.

      It is still a crime.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    2. Re:The moral difference: con vs countercon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it probably won't go to court.

    3. Re:The moral difference: con vs countercon by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If only you could provide some modicum of legal backup for your supposition.

    4. Re:The moral difference: con vs countercon by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      that reminds me of a Simpsons episode where Bart and Homer became grifters. They ended up grifting a bunch of money from retired seniors, only to have it all confiscated by a cop (who was a fake).

    5. Re:The moral difference: con vs countercon by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Are you a lawyer?

      If someone commits fraud, then that is a crime.

      If I commit fraud against the person who is committing the fraud, that that is a crime.

      Of course a lawyer could argue this to death. And that SHOULD be a crime.

      Life was a LOT simpler before lawyers appeared. Now everywhere you turn, simple things are being complicated because some lawyer is going WAY beyond being reasonable to get his client off. Common sense is dead in the legal proffession.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  31. Get a clue by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    You think that these scams are run by individuals trying to pull some cash? They're not. The average Nigerian citizen can't afford Internet access of any kind.

    The people running these scams are almost always associated with criminal gangs, and these gangs do pull in quite a bit from their acts of fraud, and they do funnel the money into criminal enterprises.

    No, they're not "terrorists", but they are hard-core criminals who will stop at nothing to rob anyone they can blind. They all deserve to die a horrible, painful death. Unfortunately, we don't have that power, so the best that we can do is utterly humiliate them by making them paint their body or getting them to dump water on their heads.

    1. Re:Get a clue by king-manic · · Score: 1

      You think that these scams are run by individuals trying to pull some cash? They're not. The average Nigerian citizen can't afford Internet access of any kind.

      The people running these scams are almost always associated with criminal gangs, and these gangs do pull in quite a bit from their acts of fraud, and they do funnel the money into criminal enterprises.

      No, they're not "terrorists", but they are hard-core criminals who will stop at nothing to rob anyone they can blind. They all deserve to die a horrible, painful death. Unfortunately, we don't have that power, so the best that we can do is utterly humiliate them by making them paint their body or getting them to dump water on their heads.


      You think criminal syndicates/gangs/the mob are like the movies? They tend to be a bunch of low intelegence thugs lead by a slightly higher integence boss. The Triads are the largest criminal syndicate on earth, and their mostly terroritorial, dumb, and run more profitable scams like protection schemes, prositution, and drugs. These penny antics of the 419 scammers would be nothing compared to the prostitution take in one area of chicago. These criminals are hard, and evil, but they don't have that much reach.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Get a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but you're forgetting, these criminals are in a third world country, taking money from dumbasses in the US. You think nigerian prostitution rings are making big bucks?

    3. Re:Get a clue by abrinton · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Nigerian human trafficers are making tons of money. This is so much worse than US prostitution rings.

    4. Re:Get a clue by ffoiii · · Score: 1

      I'm not disputing that it's fraud. I'm not disputing that these scams might be run by "hardened criminals". I am disputing the illogical conclusion that 419 scams, or any criminal activity is necessarily correlated to any other criminal activity. Yes, those individuals who choose to break the law often choose to break many laws, but just because I choose to break law X does not mean I will break law Y, and no, this does not mean that "I" broke law X and am a scammer. Additionally, I assume that "they all deserve to die a horrible, painful death" is just silly rhetoric. This is really just a simple breach of contract. When you enter into a contract, you should be reasonably certain that the other party will be able to fulfill it's obligations under the contract.

  32. Not All Nigerians are Scammers by frank249 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last fall I received an email from a Nigerian who identified himself as a psychologist and was interested in obtaining some stress management materials I referenced on my website. As soon as I read it I thought to myself that this was going to be the start of a 419 scam. I almost ignored it but then thought that I would play along. I told him that to mail the materials I would need $15US to cover the postage and to my surprise a couple weeks later a cheque arrived. I was sure it was going to bounce but when it didn't, I sent him what he asked for. The moral is that Nigeria is a big country and not everyone there is trying to run a scam.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by cherokee158 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's true, but Nigeria is alsoa country where people will deliberately block your car while a grease monkey crawls under it and wrecks your transmission...coincidently just a block down the street from a repair shop. (Source: The World's Most Dangerous Places)

      Nigeria is a cesspool of lawlessness and violence. Stereotyping isn't always fair, but it may just save your life.

    2. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by Capt_Troy · · Score: 0

      I used to work at a Mailbox place (no, not etc.). They would not allow Nigerians to open accounts and obtain mailboxes since every single Nigerian in the past used them for fraud. Of course, there was a Fake "Chief of Police" fraud based in Minnisota operating out of the store as well, they just needed an Oklahoma address (And the FBI wouldn't do anything about that either).

      But no, not all Nigerians are scammers, but many are... And thats a very sad thing.

      -troy

    3. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by painehope · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, I've only met one Nigerian that I ever respected, he was an ex-soldier for the Nigerian government, and even he was a bit weird.

      We have a fair amount of them in Houston, Texas, especially in the past 5 years. Every one of which is either arrogant and a liar, or just plain a liar. Cabbies trying to rip you off ( I've actually had an argument with a cabbie insisting he was taking me the short way when he was really going about 10 miles out of the way, he refused to go the way I told him until I offered to use that extra drive time to rearrange his face ), arrogant school counselors ( my girlfriend spent 2 weeks trying to get an appointment w/ a school counselor who had the nerve to tell her he was "an important man, and too busy to return calls" - c'mon, we're talking about a counselor for a small community college ), and arrogant parole officers ( one of my friends has one who never showed up for home visits, and then screamed at him when he had to be at work at a home visit time, another friend has had similar problems ).

      All in all, I am decidedly unimpressed w/ all of the Nigerians I have met. If I get to vote for where we start cleaning the gene pool, Nigeria will definitely be in the top of my list.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    4. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I only know one Nigerian. He's a co-worker, does motly VB work and other coding. He's hard to understand sometimes, but he's never struck me as a bad guy.

    5. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by Blindman · · Score: 1

      But no, not all Nigerians are scammers, but many are... And thats a very sad thing.

      Perhaps, scammers preferentially claim to be Nigerian. However, any reasonable scammer would claim something else to mix it up since the good name of Nigeria has been sullied.

      --
      I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    6. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it was a scammer...it is just that 419 scamming is stressful

    7. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Your Nigerian friend was definitely not typical, since illiteracy is very high there. He also is apparently very rich. But hey, as long as Nigeria remains a single-export economy (oil), it will remain as dangerous and as war torn as any other underdeveloped country being sucked dry of resources that the western powers crave.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    8. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by plugger · · Score: 1

      No everyone there is trying to run a scam, but the government is so corrupt that doing business there must be risky. Unless that is you're Shell Oil . For balance, here's their PR puff

    9. Re:Not All Nigerians are Scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but he's never struck me as a bad guy.

      Wow, and to imagine the Nigerians are not arrested for Assault or Battery when they strike you as a good guy; you are quite the massochist, Dimensio.

  33. The Church of the Painted Breast Is A SCAM!! by bfg9000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I were this guy, I'd forget about the spammers -- I'd be more worried about his involvement at the Church of the Painted Breast. I just asked my Most Holy Pastor here at the Church of Scientology, and he told me the Painted Breasters are a scam and just a "stupid made up religion to scam the weakminded out of their money". And my pastor isn't lying -- in fact, he *can't* lie, even if he wanted to. He cast out the demons of lying when that exorcism went on sale last fall. I wish I had the $23,500 required; all I had was $15,000, so I just exorcised the demons of disobedience and free thought.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  34. No mercy, eh? by LordKaT · · Score: 2, Funny
    Jesus guys, we JUST got his by the BBC flood of users not a few hours ago, and now you're slashdotting the site?

    C'mon guys, a server can only take so much abuse.

    1. Re:No mercy, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, but seriously. Who hit harder? Huh?

      C'mon, tell us it was Slashdot. You know you want to.

      Please?

  35. One of the more pleasant links from 419eater.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With clothes and without.

    (On topic, for once.)

  36. If you think that it's fake... by Dimensio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...try it yourself. Study the posted scam baiter correspondence and try to mimic it with a few pet mugus. You'll find that while some of them are wise, many of them will fall for quite a bit of bullshit.

    I've not yet conned money from anyone, but I have managed to get two scammers to be 'baptized' in the name of my church (the Church of the Golden Shower), and you can see the pics linked in a previous posting of mine (the pics are also in the 419eater.com Trophy Room, along with two other trophies that I received previously, one of them a Father's Day card for my dad, but right now the site is slashdotted). The "Golden Shower" baits are still ongoing, and I'm tempted to get the scammers to send me something via snail mail. Perhaps not money, but maybe hardcopies of the photos.

    At some point I plan to document the email exchanges that led up to me receiving the pictures. I'm not as funny in my presentation, but it would at least give other baiters who haven't had luck getting pics an idea of how to convince the scammers to send one (in my case, I played along until they asked for money, then confessed that I personally couldn't afford what they wanted, but I could appropriate church funds ONLY if they agreed to join the church).

    I have no reason to doubt the Church of the Painted Breast bait. The guy in the pic was successfully baited by others (note that one of the pics that Shiver/Mike/David sent is of a group of clowns with other pictures of "Joe" photoshopped in -- those came from other baiters, and you can see one where he's dumping water on his head and holding a sign that reads "SOAKED!") and Shiver is a resident expert amongst the baiting community.

  37. The Painted Breast was funny, but this... by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...wasn't even intentional. Guy asked a scammer to pose for a photo holding a sign with a company logo.

    Scammer didn't exactly pose with a sign. Scammer did something else, something that no one expected, and that now has the baiter being revered by other baiters as a god (this is not my work, I really envy this guy);

    Behold.

    1. Re:The Painted Breast was funny, but this... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Where can I read the story behind this?

    2. Re:The Painted Breast was funny, but this... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I thought that I'd replied earlier. My apologies.

      http://www.419eater.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12 54 0

      Baiter's first trophy. What a lucky guy.

  38. nigerian criminals have murdered over this scam. by bani · · Score: 2, Informative

    they have _murdered_ poor saps who came to nigeria to "collect" on their "deals".

    they even hired mafia to carry out a murder in north america, related to the scam.

  39. Damn you could have flashmobbed them instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
  40. Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    If the cops show up and you are kicking the mugger while he is on the ground in a fetal position, you will be arrested.

    If you cross the line between violence for the sake of defence and violence for the sake of punishment, you are no better the mugger and you will be dealt with accordingly.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Arrested, but not always convicted. Juries can be smarter than laws.

    2. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by radish · · Score: 1

      Why is it smarter? Who appointed you judge, jury and executioner? You are entitled to defend yourself, of course. But to go any further is to become a vigilante. We have a legal system for a reason, and it's so that everyone's case can be heard and tried fairly. As soon as people start to believe that they can take the law into their own hands the whole foundation of a (reasonably) civil society is at risk.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But to go any further is to become a vigilante. We have a legal system for a reason, and it's so that everyone's case can be heard and tried fairly. As soon as people start to believe that they can take the law into their own hands the whole foundation of a (reasonably) civil society is at risk.

      What's wrong with being a vigilante? The 419 scams are *not* being investigated properly. If you are contacted by someone attempting to scam you, you have two choices, you can either ignore/dismiss them, or you can go out of your way to mess with them.

      If you saw someone casing a house, asked them what they were doing, and they said they were casing the house. You called the police, and they said, "Well, you can tell the people that own the house to lock it up, but until he actually breaks in, we aren't even going to come out and check." What would you do? Would you try your best to prevent the burglary, or would you walk on and expect to read about the crime in the paper later?

      And why is it bad to be a vigilante? If you are actively being robbed, should you not try to protect your property? What about if you are obviously about to be robbed? How about if you suspect that you may be robbed?

      Despite the claims to the opposite on the cars, cops do not have to "protect" people. Their job is to arrest criminals only after a crime has been committed, not to prevent or reduce crime. If people aren't willing to take their safety (both personal safety and safety of their posessions) into their own hands, then the whole foundation of a civil society is at risk.

    4. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the statement you are disagreeing with, one would be on the jury. appointed to the jury by the state or governing authority. it the job of the jury to hand over a verdict of guilty or not guilty. what's the problem?

    5. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I would be willing to bet that the question a lawyer might bring up is whether or not it is worth the risk of being convicted.

      Is it worth the risk? In my opinion?

      Most definitely. Partly because there is something inherently funny about watching the scamee scamming the scammer. And partly because it is a great tradition in our society going back many hundreds of years. Don't believe me? Read the Grimm Brothers Fairy Tales. This is Doctor Knowall, not Robin Hood.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    6. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Really? Well here in Canada when I was 14 I got the tar kicked out of me by a 35 year old man while some others where firing bottle rockets at his house. I walked away. I had nothing to do with it. this guy tackled me to the ground, and started choking me. He then punched me so hard he broke my nose. Blood everywhere. Remember I waas only 14. The cop showed up. Told me that I was guilty because I was in the same age group as those firing the bottle rockets. Guilt by association (A fallacy learned in first year critical thinking classes). The cop told me and my folks he wouldn't proceed with this, and even if he did (remember cops aren't lawyers), that it wouldn't win in court (how the hell did he have a crystal ball? are the standard issue RCMP regalila?). Regardless, there's the book of the law and the law in practice, and not always do they match. Today, I suffer from intense allergies, probably as a result of my broken nose. And have no recourse or restitution because it's 15 years later.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got no recourse?

      Dude, you're 29, the bastard who beat you up is an unfit 50.

      Hunt the asshole down and give him a little payback. Hell, you're a geek. You can do heaps of stuff that'll never get traced back to you.

      -----
      (Disclaimer: Of course, advising violence is wrong. The above post does not constitute actual advice but is instead intended as satire to highlight the terrible social problem that is vigilantism, meeting the awful social problem that is the unfair legal system.
      Please do not take this post as a serious comment, but instead view it as unscripted humour of the sort that makes Baby Jesus cry. Remember, /. posts don't kill people. Anti-abortionists kill people.)

    8. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Defending yourself from attack, and tackling some 14yr old who is walking away is not synonymous. Your comparison is fallacious.

    9. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Since that would mean that you were kicking him some 15-30 minutes after the incident started. If, however, you kicked the holy hell out of him before exhaustion set in (1-3 minutes), you're pretty much in the clear (sans witnesses for the mugger).

      As for your second suppostion, it is wrong as well. The mugger *instigated* it all. You responded overtly. Temporary insanity. Get a grip.

    10. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're partially right... All i'm trying to demonstrate that law in practice and law in textbooks are different. Just because he committed fraud doesn't mean he's going to get charged. In my case, the guy took the law into his own hands (much like the 419 "victim" did). In both cases, they broke the law. In my case my assaulter wasn't punished (which he should have been). Same here. According to the letter of the law, he should be punished. In practice he won't.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:Applauded? maybe but you still go to jail. by slamb · · Score: 1
      If the cops show up and you are kicking the mugger while he is on the ground in a fetal position, you will be arrested.

      Actually, I'm not sure that's true. A friend took a self-defense class. Their standard advice was to beat the hell out of the guy, then stomp on his head until you're confident he won't move without serious medical help. It definitely wasn't a class about fighting fair or doing the minimum amount of damage. It was a class about feeling safe without crossing legal lines, and they advised you to leave the guy unconscious and bleeding.

      At the same time, they advised that if you disarm an attacker, you should never use the weapon. (I guess someone lost a court case due to that.) They also gave stuff like a script to use when calling the police. Weird class.

      (Of course, please don't consider the above legal advice. It's third-hand; there may be more subtleties I'm not aware of.)

  41. I know a law by coljac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the anti-fraud statute. I mean, duh - lying to get money from someone is the very definition of fraud.

    --
    Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
  42. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of... by enginuitor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Uh... never mind.

  43. Funniest part by far by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Joe already knew from Hector's increasingly eccentric e-mails that he had put the money into a business exporting snow to Siberia."

    That is purely classic.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  44. Re:Real Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the people who can't figure out how to spell ARTICLE be invited?

  45. Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut off by pchown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think the scammers are going to be complaining too loudly. 419 scams are a form of theft, and under Sharia law thieves have a hand cut off. Pretty barbaric, but these days liberal Muslims would much rather have a modern legal and penal system.

    Islam doesn't have a unique claim to this sort of barbarity. According to the Bible, if you find a thief breaking in, you can simply kill him. If he is caught later, and doesn't have sufficient funds to make restitution, he can be sold into slavery.

    The people the scambaiters need to fear are not the proponents of Sharia law, but the scammers themselves. The scammers are, after all, simply organised criminals.

  46. 3rd scamee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we know that the nigerian scammer didn't send a round of false emails to more unsuspeting victims promising millions for an 80 dollar fee to be sent to some guy in England. A third party might have been scammed to fulfill the scamness repsonsibility of scammer by reverse scamee.
    scam-a-rific

  47. Re:Failure by Zarquil · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you mean, scam?

    And, by the way, when do my concubines show up?

  48. Interesting experience by brendanoconnor · · Score: 1

    I remember a few years ago I had a run in with people like this. I was trying to sell my 91' corsica on autotrader.com. It was rather humorous. The guy sent me an email in incredibly broken english saying he wished to purchase my car and ship it back to Africa (forget what country). Considering the car was only worth about $2000 USD, and that the cost of shipping was more then the car's value, yeah. I probably played with this fool for 5 or 6 email transgressions. I was almost tempted to contact my bank and see about getting this guy busted, but decided that the bank just wants to do legit business, not fight crime and that I did not have the time anyway. Always good to keep these bastards occupied. Plus its fun!!!

    Brendan

  49. Spam for scammers by JKarp · · Score: 1

    I don't have the time to bait 419ers, so I do the next best thing - subscribe their reply-to addresses to several choice opt-in spam registries!

  50. 419 auto replies? by bro1 · · Score: 2

    Would it be possible to crate a script for writing auto replies to the scammers? You know, the one which says:

    Dear ,

    I am very interested in doing business with you. Can you send me more details?

    So that scammers waste their time on trying to write replies and at least lose some of their time?

    1. Re:419 auto replies? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Been done. Check the 419eater.com forums for some useful tips on such scripts.

  51. Just take the warning labels off everything by Espo_SHIZ · · Score: 1

    Let society sort itself out

  52. Don't be so sure by core+plexus · · Score: 1
    "In the US, the jury box is still the one place that any common citizen is as powerful as the President of the US.....at least as I understand it."

    You really do take your chances in front of a jury, or even a judge. You can make a solid argument, backed by the facts and the law, and still be ruled against. I know, I've seen it happen first hand. There are simply no assurances.

    -cp-

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

  53. They originate in Nigeria by Sindri · · Score: 1

    About 20 years ago my fathers company got a bunch of Nigerian scam mail (snail mail, not email). They were all actually posted in Nigeria. The name comes from the fact that this has been going on in Nigeria since way before email was popular.

    It's funny looking through these letters today, because they look almost exactly like the modern email version except they are usually typed and signed in an unreadable manner at the bottom.

  54. I really don't care by ACNiel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone that falls for these scams deserves what they get (ok, not all the scams, but most of them). The basic premise of these scams is that someone wants you to participate in a scam. Why doesn't anyone focus on this fact. These people are asked to help move money, merchandise, or something else, for larges sums of money, and none of them could even for a moment appear to be legitimate. No matter who gets taken for what, if they were trying to help somone spirit money away from the countrymen that it was stolen from, they deserve to lose it all. What about an 80 year old woman on a fixed income? Sure, she should lose it all, she should no better, but in her greed, she was blinded. If you get blinded to basic ethical living by a couple of dollar signs, you deserve to suffer.

    1. Re:I really don't care by Tyreth · · Score: 1
      Certainly not. There are countless reasons why your normal person would fall for this scam and not be getting what they deserve. Genuine desire to help, intense financial problems that cloud judgement (and most people have these at some time), etc.

      I think that you are being a heartless bastard with no understanding of the decision making processes behind everything we do in life. I think that educating people is a far better approach than telling them "they get what they deserve". These people are lying to them. Not everyone is adept at detecting lies.

  55. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by BarefootClown · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the Bible, if you find a thief breaking in, you can simply kill him.

    That's how it is according to Oklahoma law, too, and many other states.

    It's called the "make my day" law: if I find you breaking into my home (castle doctrine), you are presumed to be there with the capability and intent to do me harm. Accordingly, I can employ lethal force in my own defense. And, for the record, I don't consider this barbaric at all: if you're invading my home, why should I have to stand at grave disadvantage and risk of grievous bodily harm while determining what your plans are? Out on the street, in public, etc., yes--circumstances are open to interpretation, and I need to be sure that the threat actually exists. When you break into my home, though, you're explicitly demonstrating some threat, even unarmed. There is no confusion about your intent when you've broken into my home: you're there to break the law, and you've demonstrated that by doing so (B&E is illegal). How many more laws you're going to break, I don't know, but I'm not obliged to wait for you to start assaulting/killing/raping/etc. me/my family before I act defensively.

    Anyhow, no, Islam is not unique in how it deals with home invasion, but I don't consider that barbaric, just good defensive practice. As for hand-chopping, well, I don't care for the practice (I think it is barbaric), and I don't like the idea of selling him into slavery, either (though I'm quite fond of the idea of restitution), but I don't get to make those decisions (at least not until I take over the world).

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

  56. Not always... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    One of the baits I did had the scammer claiming that I really was the next of kin for the fictional "deceased" -- not that I'd be standing in as such, but that I really had been tracked down as a living relative of someone who died and left a lot of money in the bank. The name of the 'deceased' was even tailored to match my baiter identity's last name. You could get someone who was naieve fooled by that, even though they have no idea that they're participating in a scam. The lottery scammers also don't specifically state that they're running a scam, they're simply claiming that you've won a prize and there are people who might think that they simply entered without realising or forgot.

    Regardless of the circumstances, almost every scammer claims that the transaction is completely legal and 100% risk-free. Some of the phony documents that they send the victims are used to aid in sustaining this illusion.

  57. Shameless plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Captain Jean-Luc Picard and Ted Nugent as my aliases. Great fun!

    My favorite line: "You see you are not even interligent i did not told you that am a Lawyer."

    http://blake.prohosting.com/picard/

  58. Careful... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    I use Captain Jean-Luc Picard and Ted Nugent as my aliases. Great fun!

    At least one mugu is a TNG fan!.

    To boldy go where no mugu has gone before...

  59. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by radish · · Score: 1

    That's how it is according to Oklahoma law, too, and many other states.


    Well that's somewhere else to add to my list of "places I don't want to live". Somewhat contrived example: I live next door to you. My wife goes into labor, but the phone is out, so I can't call for an ambulance (my car's in the shop). So I run to your house and ring the door bell, bang on the door. Nothing. Wondering what to do, I see an open window and a phone just inside. Now of course I'm not rally thinking straight, the life of my wife and child are at risk right now, so what the hell, I jump in and pick up the phone. Then you come out from the shower where you were happily singing "The Star Spangled Banner" rather loudly (hence not hearing the door), grab your handy 9mm and shoot me dead.

    Reasonable?

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  60. Utter Rubbish by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Funny
    As someone noted eariler, these kinds of 2x matrices are extremely limiting in that they don't allow other possiblities. not only is that true for the realm of the possiblities that avail the dimension that the considered problem exists on, but 2x matrices also evacuate the possibility of other dimensions.

    Not only do fators for consideration work on the plane of a decision matrix, but the universe is sufficiently sadistic as to insist on things coming out of nowhere to provide a level of complexity that presently exceeds human understanding. This variability scales down, and that's why things don't always go as planned.

    People who buy these kinds of books are simply lackingthe level of imagination necessary to avoid getting caught in some corporate peter principle, and want quick answers as to how they can out-edge or out-compete their rivals.

    What the 2x matrix world view, in present contexts, fails to understand is that the challenges ahead are not of competition but of co-operation - not unipolar dominance but multipolar consensus - not an overpopulated mass of hungry people, but a vastly depopulated technologically productive species exploring the universe. There is nothing matrical about that - the vision is completely wrong and off - we need more nuanced and complex decisions aided by a technical offloading of horsepower to machines, not simpler faster ones based on the quarterly bottom line...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Utter Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whomever modded this post under the wrong discussion 'funny' deserves to be shot.

  61. Re:nigerian criminals have murdered over this scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How 'bout a reference? I'm dying to see where you got your information.

  62. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, how exactly was he to know the circumstances of your breaking and entering?

    The situation that you describe is incredibly far-fetched. How often do people break into the homes of others for benign purposes?

    If I catch an intruder in my home, I'm going to assume nefarious intent rather than that he simply needed to use the phone and didn't think to try a different house when no one answered after he knocked.

  63. Has to be said... by iiioxx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    including a report from the BBC of a baiter who managed to get $80 and a birthday card by courier!

    That Mike sure is a master baiter.

    1. Re:Has to be said... by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      whoever modded the above as flamebait needs a humor transplant.

      Quit taking lif so seriously, you won't survive it.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  64. The law is an ass, but lawyers are reptiles by abb3w · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know the governments in the U.S. and UK might actually prosecute

    True. However, at least in the US, the Bill of Rights, Article 6 says we have the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against" us. Which means not only do you have to find a prosecutor asinine enough to press charges against the counterscammer, but the original scammer has to SHOW UP in court to testify... and risk being arrested and charged in turn.

    Furthermore, I suspect (though IANAL) that $80 would not be enough to bring you to the felony level, but that the attempt at scamming $18,000 by the 419 fellow would be. And most prosecutors are quite willing to make deals with small time crooks in exchange for testimony to catch bigger ones.

    Plus, of course, "No jury would ever convict me!"

    No, the real risk here is that the big 419 crook finds the counterscammer's real name and address, and has connections enough to do something dreadfully violent.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  65. Purple Muppets by harborpirate · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean YELLOW MUPPETS? Or specifically, one particular yellow muppet, with a unibrow?

    http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/bert.htm

    Yeah, yeah - off topic, blah blah blah. But funny.

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    1. Re:Purple Muppets by mlk · · Score: 1

      Yellow muppets are the work of God.
      Purple muppets are SATANS puppets of DOOM!

      Fear the purple muppet.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  66. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference is, Christians do not take Bible as the literal words of God. They debate the meaning of parables and accounts endlessly. The Pope doesn't call for suicide bombings and tell everyone it's alright to kill infidels. There was Reformation for the Church, while Islam never goes under the period of self-inspection.

    Quran, however, is taken as the literal words of Allah. Noone can question it under the pain of death. I just learned that it's alright for muslims to lie and to do things for the benefit of Islam (taqiyya and kitman), so the next time your friend tell you Islam does not allow killings of infidel, he may just lied. That explains why those terrorists can shave their beards, go to dance clubs, drink alcohol and fuck western women. Even Arafat once said that he was willing to kill, why would he be opposed to lie?

  67. They can be suckered by sexual overtures, too... by jwpacker · · Score: 1
    There's a journaler, Dana, that's been playing cat and mouse with a 419er, she's had quite the number of exchanges, and documents them in her journal at www.bobofett.com (ignore the URL, I have no idea...)

    Jas

    --
    Software is like a goldfish - it'll grow to fit the size of it's bowl...
  68. Here's another artist at work! by John+Zebedee · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has mentioned this chap

    --
    The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. -- William Gibson
  69. Re:Failure by moitz · · Score: 1

    You must have *WAY* better looking inductees breasts to send them than those guys did.

    -moitz-

    --
    Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
  70. The funny thing by Dark+Bard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most interesting thing to me is none of the law enforcement agencies were interested in their information. Given the face this guy was stupid enough to send $80 the photo could have been of an actual scammer. The joke is law enforcement would be more likely to go after him for the $80 reverse scam than that didn't benefit him than the real thief that is stealing 18 grand a shot. I realize there is little they can do from England and the United States to a Nigeran scammer. Given the millions involved there should be pressure on Nigeria to prosecute these men. It may be bringing in millions to the local economy but the threat of a trade embargo from the US and Europe would scare them and could have an effect. Trust me, if Enron was being scammed out of hundreds of millions of dollars the government would be all over it. The fact it's mostly retired people and people who are stupid or desperate the government could care less.

  71. Stringing along 419ers. by muskr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is all well and good, but the problem with playing with 419'ers is that it takes a lot of one's personal time. It would be better if someone would write an automated script to make the letters for you. Apparently, it wouldn't take much A.I. to defeat most of these thieves.

  72. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by eaolson · · Score: 1
    The difference is, Christians do not take Bible as the literal words of God.

    Go tell that to the Young Earth Creationists. Most Christians in the USA believe (or at least claim to believe) in the Bible as the literal Word of God. 61% believe in creation from Genesis. 60% believe in Noah's Flood.

    Go look at the nutters at the Creation Science Fair, for example. (I was originally sure this site was a parody, but am becoming less and less convinced of that as time goes on.) Middle School level, 2nd place, "Women were designed for homemaking."

  73. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by pchown · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not aware of any Christian group who believe that the Bible was "dictated" by God, and that is the position of many Muslims. However, there are a lot of Christians who believe 2 Timothy 3:16; that is that all scripture is divinely inspired. The fact that the Bible's human authors were left to find their own words for God's thoughts is not, in the end, very different from dictation.

    What you say about "parables and accounts" is a slightly different issue. The Bible and the Koran both contain passages which are not intended to be taken literally, or where the meaning is just obscure. However, the examples I gave were taken from the books of law, which appear to be the Israelites' legal code. I'm not aware of any other way you can interpret these books. I would like to know about any interpretation which does not impart harshness to God in the way that comes over on a naive reading.

    What I was trying to show, though, was the danger of learning about Islam by reading pro-Christian blogs. I have noticed a process where some blogger decides to have a look at the Koran. He finds something that shows Islam in a bad light, so he posts it on his blog. Perhaps it sounds striking, and so it gets copied by lots of other people. Unfortunately no one bothers to ask a real Muslim how they actually interpret that part of the Koran.

    My quotes from the Bible were meant to highlight the fact that a similar process could be applied to Christianity. I don't know of any Christians who advocate slavery, whether or not for thieves. Yet it is there, in the Bible, and could give people a wrong idea about what Christians think.

  74. 4 box: keep us free: jury, cartridge, soap, ballot by DiveX · · Score: 1

    Fours boxes keep us free: Jusry, Cartridge, Soap, Ballot

    (*Yes I know the subject line was spelled poorly. I wanted to get that into the subject line since a lot of people wouldn't read the message body.)

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  75. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by king-manic · · Score: 1

    MY particular sect of Baptists believ the book was written by god himself. So don't generalize about christians.. .I however do nto beleive it's directly divine. I think it's almost idolatry to hold the book up so highly.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  76. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
    Well that's somewhere else to add to my list of "places I don't want to live". Somewhat contrived example: I live next door to you. My wife goes into labor, but the phone is out, so I can't call for an ambulance (my car's in the shop). So I run to your house and ring the door bell, bang on the door. Nothing. Wondering what to do, I see an open window and a phone just inside. Now of course I'm not rally thinking straight, the life of my wife and child are at risk right now, so what the hell, I jump in and pick up the phone. Then you come out from the shower where you were happily singing "The Star Spangled Banner" rather loudly (hence not hearing the door), grab your handy 9mm and shoot me dead.

    Boy, that's what you call a bad day. Good example. Now that you made up that story I'm pretty sure that people break and enter for benign purposes all the time.

    Getting back to reality, if someone breaks into your home, you probably have a better chance winning the lottery than of them being "benign". I personally wouldn't just up and shoot somebody I found in my home, but I can understand the reaction. What are you supposed to do? Make a citizen's arrest? If the law says you can't use lethal force against intruders in your own home, wouldn't it make the criminals more bold? They know you can't, so how do you make them stick around for the cops? If you just let them leave, how do you know they won't come back?

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  77. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    >Reasonable?

    No. If you lived in oklahoma, you probably know your next door neighbor well enough to have a key.
    One of my grand parents' houses never had a back *door*, let alone "locked."

  78. Scammer picture taken by cam payed by stolen cash by urbieta · · Score: 1

    I bet the camera used by the scammer to ID himbself is payed with cash he stole from careless non-slashdot readers heh

    So! does he get caught? Last time I have been to louisianna I saw that same guy 87 times in a week heh

  79. Clean hands by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
    For all the folks that are wondering aloud about whether or not the scambaiters are vulnerable to a lawsuit for taking the scammers' $80, you can rest easy.

    A court will not award damages to a party that has 'unclean hands'. The scammers are attempting to negotiate a contract by which they have no itention of abiding--indeed, by which they cannot abide (they don't have eighteen billion dollars, now do they?)--and which would be illegal even if they could carry through their promises. Loosely speaking, the terms: Scammer gives Baiter $80, Baiter gives Scammer $18000, Scammer gives Baiter $millions.

    Consequently, the doctrine of clean hands (Link, Link) would tend to preclude successful legal action by the scammers. No court would enforce the contract, and trying to get the original $80 back would expose the scammer to far more costs and probably criminal prosecution.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  80. Must be a nigerian thing. by desmogod · · Score: 0

    I recieved this..... Nasty! http://www.oilcareers.com/content/community/board/ view.asp?mode=viewtopic&topicID=1026

    1. Re:Must be a nigerian thing. by desmogod · · Score: 0

      I have the original email address etc etc... Anybody fancy some fun?

  81. Re:nigerian criminals have murdered over this scam by julesh · · Score: 1

    they even hired mafia to carry out a murder in north america, related to the scam.

    Really? I'm pretty sure the Mafia don't do contracts for other people. They have principles. Do you have any references?

  82. Re:Scammer picture taken by cam payed by stolen ca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "paid"

    dumbass. sheesh! kids today are fucking stupid.

  83. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by mlk · · Score: 1

    There is a masive difference between "simply kill" and "act defensively".

    A stranger in your own home, "act defensively" is a fair thing to do, "simply kill" is not.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  84. Re:Scammer picture taken by cam payed by stolen ca by desmogod · · Score: 0

    heh?

  85. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by mlk · · Score: 1

    Even as a none christian I beleive (to a degree) in Noah's Flood.
    The "world" was much smaller then.

    I wonder how many will make their wifes leave the village for a week during "that time of the month"?

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  86. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeehaw! Now that's a law I like, pardner.

  87. WTF! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What and do you think I'm going to let you Squat in my living room with your fscking horse, can of beans and frypan and make cook them on a fire you made out of our antique family footstool from the year 1699? And then do you think I'll stand idly when you make shiskabobs out of our pet parakeet, and annoint your urine unto our carpet and masturbate to goatse porn? And then you think I'll stand idly when you bring that evil television into our family room and kick out our family washpan and family sewing wheel thus corrupting our Amish way of life?

    You can get your pan-handling ass back in New Jersey you goddam queer; infadel!. I'm defendin' my-self from the likeness of you and your slashdot ID.

    w00t@DieRoxenBoxen3.andyweaverbarn.mil /w00t # userdel mlk; rm -rf /home/mlk ::Die mlk bit duh sausage with saurkraut

  88. No one will prosecute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in the fraud department of a major online vendor. We have tens of thousands of dollars in merchandise stolen from us every month. We do not attempt to prosecute those who were involved in the theft. It costs more to prosecute than the goods were worth. The authorities will not help in the cause. When we attempt to get the law behind us they pretty much laugh. This is from a very respected business. Unless we can provide hard evidence that a single person has done several thousand dollars worth of damage and have good evidence they don't even want to hear about it. If we did have incontrovertible evidence they might be interested. I am amazed at how people think the law is going to step in and prosecute this guy who no one is going to file a complaint against.

  89. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many will make their wifes leave the village for a week during "that time of the month"?

    Admit it - you would if you could :-)

    --
    You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  90. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by Inda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was burgled this year. The thief took some cigarettes, an old phone, a broken camera and helped himself to food in the fridge.

    The food bit was suprising to me. I wonder how we can live in a society where people must steal food in order to live. I felt sorry for him because worrying about eating has never been a problem for me.

    Does he deserve to die for a few crusty bit of bread? No. Death is not a suitable punishment.

    "Make my day"? I feel sorry for you too.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  91. .. as we're talking lawyers: English not British by fantomas · · Score: 1

    seeing as we're talking lawyer territory and boy do they like to argue minor points, that's probably 'English Law' - there's no such thing as 'British Law' (e.g. Scotland has different legal system). I believe the same is true on your side of the pond, no 'American law' but a separate 'USA law' 'Mexican law', 'Canadian law' etc :-)

  92. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by juhaz · · Score: 1

    I applaud you, sir.

    Bloodthirst of many folks sickens me, especially here, you wouldn't expect to find most barbaric rednecks among techies.

    How the values of americans (and sorry for generalization) can be so perverted and just plain WRONG I can't even begin to comprehend.

  93. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by dave420 · · Score: 1

    The person breaking into your house needs help, not a bullet.

  94. Re:Under Sharia law, the scammers get a hand cut o by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1


    Does anyone deserve death for eating your food? No.
    Does anyone deserve death for breaking into your house? No.
    Doed anyone deserve death for stealing your jewelry? No.
    Does anyone deserve death for waving a knife around threateningly? No.
    Does anyone deserve death for fantasizing about raping and killing your wife? No.
    For actually doing it? Yes.

    The point is, you don't know what their intentions are. I'd much rather have these kinds of laws than not. Yes, there will be some accidents. Do you have any idea how many people are killed in car accidents each year? Yet we as a society have determined that the benefits of being able to get from point A to point B in a short amount of time and in style and comfort far outweigh the risks associated with vehicular usage. If we can be that seemingly callous (when you consider the number of gruesome infant/children deaths), why should we be too worried about accidently killing a home intruder that was only going to steal most of our possessions and threaten to kill us, but not actually do it?

    I feel sorry for you.

    PS: And what makes you think he needed to steal you food in order to live. It's possible that he just wanted to grab something for the hell of it. There are some pople like that. I've had people ask me for money to eat because "they are pregnant and hungry," but when I offered to go inside (this was in a grocery-store parking lot) and purchase food for them, they quickly left and went on to the next car. The only reason I offered to do this is because the woman looked extremely strung-out, had track marks on her arms, and didn't appear the least bit pregnant. I know I may come off sounding like some hard-case, right-wing nut, but I do honestly care about people. It's just that some of them will try to take advantage of that, and you should be wary.