Slashdot Mirror


Turn your iPod into a Universal Remote

no_demons writes "Some clever souls over at engadget.com have posted an excellent tutorial in turning your iPod into a IR remote control. You also need a Pocket PC, an IR gadget from Griffin and a bit of patience, but hey, it's still a cool hack."

202 comments

  1. Cool hack? Not in my book. by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For only the cost of a PocketPC, iPod, and Griffin IR gadget you too can iPod your Slashdot! To be fair, you might not have to pay the $17 for the IR gadget from Griffen... You could just buy a kit from Radio Shack and DIY for $5 less!

    This isn't a "cool hack" or even "news for nerds". This is incredibly lame, backwards, and expensive. Why bother to use all these devices when you could just use a $10 or less Universal Remote from Walmart with a lot less futzing?

    A cool hack would be controlling your iPod via a $10 universal remote from Walmart.

  2. YES! by djkoolaide · · Score: 0

    The ultimate in laziness. Now I can use my iPod and remote at the same time.

  3. I've got a really cool gadget... by AxB_teeth · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a pad of paper. To turn it into a remote control, all you need is the pad of paper (of course) and a remote control.

    --

    However,
    1. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

      also works with house pets, and, to a lesser degree, lions.

    2. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      I've also had good results with slices of cheese, but YMMV.

      --

      However,
    3. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny
      also works with house pets, and, to a lesser degree, lions.

      but only in Kenya.

    4. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by cygnus · · Score: 1

      dude, you forgot the duct tape!

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    5. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not with tigers...no sir, definitely not tigers.

    6. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by jregel · · Score: 1

      Forget Norway...

      http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/29/ for those who didn't get the parent post (also created by the www.badgerbadgerbadger.com people).

      Yeah, it's offtopic, but it's also funny.

    7. Re:I've got a really cool gadget... by Gorbag · · Score: 1

      Because anywhere else, it won't work on house pets.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself
  4. Great... by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now maybe my family won't fight for the remote so much, especially when I tell them that one wrong move turns it into a $300+ paperweight!

    1. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful... I want to cry now

  5. Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy? by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    That would cause all kinds of fun at your local sports bar.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  6. so, what does the iPod do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so you need a PocketPC to get your iPod to be a remote... does this basicly run as a UI for you PocketPC for your PocketPC to be the remote?

    i can run the mile at 65mph, i just need a car to do it with.

    1. Re:so, what does the iPod do? by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      RTFA - the pocket PC is used to GET the IR signals, not as the remote.

    2. Re:so, what does the iPod do? by Squirrley · · Score: 0

      From what I understand, after you record the signals as .mp3's, then you just have to plug the Griffin thing into the headphone port, and play the signals... right?

      --
      Go on, be afraid. Encourage the terrorists
    3. Re:so, what does the iPod do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > RTFA - the pocket PC is used to GET the IR signals, not as the remote.

      Which you can store and replay on the PocketPC. So again, what does the iPod do?

  7. Turn your iPod into a ... by Mignon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, that's cool. And with this, you can turn your iPod into a car.

  8. Yawn by SYFer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess "cool hack" is in the eyes of the beholder. To me, this sounds like a kludge (the Pocket PC, gadget and iPod). And all for what? That tired old, barely useful remote control "hack."

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:Yawn by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is pretty neat compared to most iPod text-file "hacks". They record little songs that are the IR waveforms, then play them from the headphone jack with the IR accessory. You only use the Pocket PC to record the initial IR waveforms. There's no reason you couldn't do a similar thing with a regular PC and IR detector, or possibly a laptop. There's also the possibility of making downloadable packs of audio files that could be traded for different remotes or audio equipment, so all you need is the iPod and IR accessory.

    2. Re:Yawn by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I guess "cool hack" is in the eyes of the beholder. To me, this sounds like a kludge (the Pocket PC, gadget and iPod). And all for what? That tired old, barely useful remote control "hack."

      Hardly. Did you see what they replaced with this 'tired hack'?

      From the article:
      for example in our place we have our iPod controlling our TV, DVD Player, Direct TV, Ultimate TV PVR, Media Center PC, Xbox, XM Satellite Radio, Roomba and a few other random things like a Robot.

      If you have access to a Pocket PC for awhile (the stickiest part), you can plunk down $16 and make your iPod a fantastic Universal Remote with nifty backlight and scrollwheel.

      I think that's pretty nifty myself. Really the best part about this is that someone will likely offer a proper iPod solution now, because of this hack.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    3. Re:Yawn by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I guess "cool hack" is in the eyes of the beholder. To me, this sounds like a kludge

      Ah, the many definitions of 'hack'.

      One accepted definition is 'making something do something it wasn't intended to do'. As in 'phreakers were early hackers'. In this case playing an audio file to transcieve it to IR easily qualifies.

      'Hack' can also mean kludge, crack, program, etc.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Griffin demoed the PodMate at the 2002 MacWorld Expo. They were controlling a Sony TV and Stereo at their booth with one of these devices. Apple asked them not to develop it further for some reason.

    They scrapped the plans and then made it part of their Griffin Mobile division - selling it for the iPaq originally.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PodMate Photo

    2. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > Apple asked them not to develop it further for some reason.

      Fuck Apple.

      Apple asked the hymn people to stop developing it, and they told Apple to fuck off. Much easier that way, really.

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple asked the hymn people to stop developing it, and they told Apple to fuck off. Much easier that way, really.
      And long before that, Apple asked VideoLAN to stop distributing the code that hymn depends on, and VideoLAN appearently told Apple to fuck off.
    4. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple probably had good reason to ask them not to develop it -- such as product research that said this isn't what folks wanted.

      They could have said fuck off, or said no thanks, or THANKS That was a stupid idea, but someone thought it would be great to do!!!

      Apple couldn't have stopped them, but they wouldn't have promoted it like they do everything else Griffin produces.

      As for Hymn -- they had every right to tell them to stop doing it, and legally if apple ever gets ahold of them, they can fuck them in the ass and skip the KY and be perfectly in the law. You know the law of fucking dumbasses in the ass and shit. You know the one. Its happened to you before hasn't it? Ya went screaming to a cop and he said boy you got a purty mouth, I might as well fuck your dumbass too and thus you cried to Aunt Momma and Uncle Daddy and they too took advantage of the situation now knowing full well of the law.

      Dumb fuck...someone please mod this po' troll as informative cause thats wut I is.

    5. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was this suppose to be something?

    6. Re:Griffin actually produced this for this purpose by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Apple asked the hymn people to stop developing it, and they told Apple to fuck off. Much easier that way, really.

      There are different ways to ask. Griffin has a good relationship with Apple. Maybe Apple asked nicely, with a fist full of Benjamins. Maybe the video iPod has an IR remote.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. Cool. by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not interested in the whole PocketPC process, but the fact that you can do it is awesome.

    Slap together an IR "microphone" and do it yourself if you don't like their process. I don't plan on rushing out to buy a PocketPC to try this, but that it can be done is worth noting.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Cool. by canavan · · Score: 1

      You really don't need the pocket PC. For many devices, the codes used to control them via infrared are available in "Pronto Raw Format" in places like remotecentral. In many cases, there are more codes than on the original remote control, i.e. a code to turn the device on and another one to turn it off instead of one that toggles between the two. Now, the "Pronto Raw Format" is really, really trivial, and it should be possible to turn it into a wav file with only minimal effort - resampling from the arbitrary frequency to 44.1 or 48kHz should be the hardest part, but I think sox should work.

  11. You can! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny
    A cool hack would be controlling your iPod via a $10 universal remote from Walmart.

    1. Buy iPod.

    2. But $10 universal remote from WalMart.

    3. Use corner of universal remote to push iPod buttons and rotate volume dealy-widget.

    So much more cool and high tech than using your primitve old finger.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:You can! by thebes · · Score: 0

      I believe the idea would be that you could plug your iPod into say, a home stereo system, and use it as an MP3 jukebox...not control it while it is tree inches from your hand anyways. I could be wrong though...this is slashdot.

    2. Re:You can! by Geldon · · Score: 1

      ...

      4. PROFIT!

    3. Re:You can! by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Get a moist piece of paper and put it on the corner of the remote, because the wheel of the iPod is still a "touch" device that works on the same principles as a computer touch pad.

    4. Re:You can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You just contraticted yourself. Of course he has to use a wet paper (or, I think, better some salty wet paper (no, not this salty)), to use the touchpad, since IT IS capacity based!

    5. Re:You can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that means the ipod has no capacity ?

    6. Re:You can! by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      So that's what things would be like if I'd invented the fing-longer.

    7. Re:You can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't work on a G3 iPod, they don't have pressure sensitive buttons. They rely on impedance changes instead.

  12. The cool thing about this.. by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is that you can, apparently, just hook up an infrared transceiver to a standard 3.5mm earphone/microphone plug..

    So really, you only need the infrared-tranceiver-plug and some software to record sound. You sample the "sound" that comes from the tranceiver, then plug it into lineout and play back..

    Of course, you can also hook up a microphone to your TVs tranceiver, and just play the recorded sounds out loud. Kind of like an old school "clicker" remote control that worked by audio. In fact, you could probably, with enough training, learn how to shriek directly in television-ese!

    Captain crunch would approve.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:The cool thing about this.. by arakon · · Score: 1

      It sounds kind of similar to an idea I cooked up late one night while doped up on too much caffiene.

      It involved wiring my Sony Mini-Disc deck to my PC and writing a program that converts data to blips, and a reader program that converts it back, so I could use all those mini-discs I had for something really cool.

      But then I thought how much a pain in the ass it would be to write the assembly code so that it was fast enough to even think about using it. I'm also unsure how fast the Sony MD-deck is capable of reading at.

      Once again I was pretty hopped up.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    2. Re:The cool thing about this.. by Gigahertz · · Score: 1

      thats actually a great idea.. do it.
      do it.

    3. Re:The cool thing about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's done. MD-DATA.

    4. Re:The cool thing about this.. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Uh, I hate to disappoint you, but that's been done before. On computers like the Commodore 64 and Sinclair Spectrum, this was the standard way to store data.
      I think the ATRAC encoding would play havoc with your data, and even if it didn't, unless you used some funky encoding scheme (e.g. QAM) you'd end up with at most 20 kbit/s.

  13. Good idea? by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 2, Funny

    The remote control perpetually wins the category of "most dropped electronic device in a typical home." Good way to scratch the iPod.

    --
    No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
  14. IPOD Articles by m1kesm1th · · Score: 2, Funny

    A) Connect Pocket PC
    B) Connect Other Device
    C) Figure Out How to Connect IPOD
    D) Write Slashdot Article

    1. Re:IPOD Articles by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to follow your directions, but I'm confused - in Step A, what do I connect the Pocket PC to?

    2. Re:IPOD Articles by matt_gaia · · Score: 1

      ObSlashdotPost:
      E) Profit?

    3. Re:IPOD Articles by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      C) Figure Out How to Connect IPOD ...a.k.a ????

      E) Microsoft Profits! for buying a pocket pc to do this lame hack.

    4. Re:IPOD Articles by okmnji · · Score: 1
      A) Connect Pocket PC
      B) Connect Other Device
      C) Figure Out How to Connect IPOD
      D) Write Slashdot Article

      E) ???
      F) Profit!?

    5. Re:IPOD Articles by Atario · · Score: 1

      E) Slashdot gets kickback from Apple -- Profit!

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  15. How to control your TV via your cellphone... by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a neat hack, but it's a neat hack that doesn't require an iPod or a Pocket PC... just a Griffin IR transceiver (or a handmade one, though you're unlikely to be able to make one as cheap and compact) and something to record and play back the 'sound' of the IR.

    Put the control signals in your ringtone, and turn your TV on by calling your cellphone. Use custom ringtones and call from different phones to change the channel, adjust the volume, ...

    1. Re:How to control your TV via your cellphone... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Put the control signals in your ringtone, and turn your TV on by calling your cellphone. Use custom ringtones and call from different phones to change the channel, adjust the volume, ...

      Cool idea, but doesn't this mean that your celphone is now restricted to being next to your TV, and you need to use your home phone to change channels (or another cel I guess), and that there's a multi-second lagtime? The whole IR->Sound concept does have a lot of intreguing hack possibilities to it though.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    2. Re:How to control your TV via your cellphone... by argent · · Score: 1

      Cool idea, but doesn't this mean that your celphone is now restricted to being next to your TV

      Sure, it's about as practical as the jet-powered beer cooler. It's 'geek performance art'. Putting an IR control on your iPod isn't that much more practical... I have a remote control package for my PDA that works great... but it's not practical if you don't keep your PDA by the TV.

      On the other hand, you can get a cheap flash-powered MP3 player for under $50 and make a 'stealth' IR control out of that... then walk past a bank of TVs blasting "Channel Up" at them.

  16. another subterfuge by klang · · Score: 0, Troll

    NO, the iPod is not turned into a universal remote .. the PocketPC is .. the iPod is just acting as an anoying chunk at the end of the damn PocketPC..

    1. Re:another subterfuge by brilinux · · Score: 1

      My universal remote is better than this: an HP-48gx graphing calculator. I would think that most pocket PCs could probably be used as a remote because of their IR ports without adding an iPod and an IR kit anyway. Well, I guess my UR hacks are just old-fashioned.

    2. Re:another subterfuge by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 0, Redundant

      RTFA. Please.

    3. Re:another subterfuge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPaq ppc already comes with universal remote control software. Why bother with any of this?

  17. A one-button remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that sounds really convenient...

  18. Price beats Sony by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 0

    Say what you will, this still beats Sony's latest entry. in the remote-control realm on price, if not on coolness, functionality, ease of use, form factor or support.

  19. Recipe: by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

    Let's see....

    Take a relatively expensive toy,

    Add a big ugly knob,

    Trade in a lot of your one-touch buttons for lots more scrolling.

    Surf for a while, simmer and search for proper recorder hacks. Cross fingers, will serve a few, frustrate many.

    But it's cool as hell. Looks like a headache, but I can't not try it.

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
  20. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This isn't a "cool hack" or even "news for nerds". This is incredibly lame, backwards, and expensive.

    I think someone here doesn't understand what a 'cool hack' is. One of the things that can define a 'cool hack' is going the long way around to make a peice of technology do something that it wasn't originally intended to do, i.e.: installing linux on a dreamcast or connecting a cuecat to amazon.com.

    Price never enters into it.

  21. Cool hack but pointless.. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    We have all heard of those "One For All" remote controls. Well if you need all these different devices to use it ; isnt it more of a "All For One" system?

    For some reason I'm thinking of the Dogtanian and the Three Muskehounds

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  22. But can it do windows ? by itsnotthenetwork · · Score: 1

    Now if they could only make your remote play MP3s....
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/27/025024 6&tid=159&tid=126&tid=129

  23. Do you even need the PocketPC? by FLEB · · Score: 1

    I'm not totally sure what this IR-to-audio device is, but couldn't you just line-in it to a regular PC (or a tape deck, even) and sound-record with that?

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  24. DMCA by bkruiser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you publish your IR commands are you violating DMCA? Who will be the first to have a catalogue of IR .mp3 files sued by Matsushita/Sony/JVC for DMCA violation? On the otherhand it could be another way for those companys to make money... charge a dollar per command?

    1. Re:DMCA by erotic_pie · · Score: 1

      sad thing is I could see this happening

  25. why? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just spend a few bucks on software and you can use the pocket PC as a remote control now..

    This 'make your ipod into a bla bla' is silly..

    Its like killing termites with a flame thrower..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Its like killing termites with a flame thrower..

      Hey, cool! Letsee, where did I leave my to-do list?

  26. Cooler Hack by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just plug the IR bit into my guitar - now I play 'Sweet Child o' Mine' to change channels to Adult Swim, and 'Devil Inside' to change to C-Span.

    It's really quite intuitive.

    1. Re:Cooler Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, what do you play to change to Fox News and CNN?

    2. Re:Cooler Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What song for Fox News? Purple Haze?

  27. Rather Clunky, BUT by grunt107 · · Score: 1

    The premise is valiant. It seems like itching your left ear w/your right hand by going over the top of your head - why not just use the PDA to play the "sounds"?
    I am waiting for the perfect convergence of all home electronics, appliances and climate/house controls "broadcasting" their capabilities (all with a lock-out, so my neighbor cannot turn on my stereo at 3am and play some Barry Manilow!) to a device (or PC), allowing a PDA-style remote to visually control them all (or even the web).

    There are some very high-end AV/home controllers that do some of this, but I want more choices!

  28. No subterfuge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool!

  29. how about developing an IR sound generator ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of requiring hardware to generate the sounds for you ? Sure it is lame enough that you can only store these generated pre-sets, but at least you can do away with the rest of the overhead. It would be a lot smarter to reprogram the ipod the generate the sounds instead of playing precorded sounds... that is all. :)
    ~ ddf ~

  30. iPod as the "Java Ring" ? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lots of interesting angles coming out for exploiting a wearable, portable data store. Seems like this was the proposition of the Java Ring, but that assumed too much bandwidth. People still need to carry their data with them until bigger pipes are easily available.

    Would be interested to see someone float a thin client based on using the iPod as the user identification/storage component. Lots of ideas come to mind once you assume the iPod is ubiquotous.

    1. Re:iPod as the "Java Ring" ? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Would be interested to see someone float a thin client based on using the iPod as the user identification/storage component. Lots of ideas come to mind once you assume the iPod is ubiquotous.

      USB mass storage is ubiquitous enough; from thumbdrives that store 128MB to usb harddrive based devices (not just the iPod). Only trouble is, why would you plug in your data in a machine you don't trust? And if you did, why bother with a thin client, you can just have apps on your hard drive (especially Mac apps, just drag and drop).

      For your ultimate customized experience, you could lug along a bootable linux live CD, like knoppix..

      As for authentication, you'd want/need some sort of challenge/response software on the device to do that. Which was the whole point of the Java ring.

      Lots of ideas come to mind once you assume the iPod is ubiquotous.

      Aaah, we can but dream for the day.. Lost of ideas come to minde once you assume the ubiquitousness of anything, really.

      (I don't really like the iPod though. It's very small, that's the biggest feature. But having to use the software just to copy some songs on it, even though it's just another USB mass storage device? That's brain-dead. Add to that ITMS DRM tactics (and pricing) and well.. It's the microsoft of MP3 players.)

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:iPod as the "Java Ring" ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Frankly I'm not really sure what the point of the Java iButton was/is. I remember someone telling me that the initial demo at some conference involved collaborative computing. What is this, wonder twin powers? If anything it would be useful for authentication. The thing doesn't have enough code storage at this point to do anything really useful, and it's better to just run java apps on your cellphone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think someone here doesn't understand what a 'cool hack' is. One of the things that can define a 'cool hack' is going the long way around to make a peice of technology do something that it wasn't originally intended to do, i.e.: installing linux on a dreamcast or connecting a cuecat to amazon.com.

    Installing Linux on a Dreamcast or connecting a CueCat to Amazon.com to link your personal collections (books, DVDs, whatever) is far more exciting than using existing pieces of technology to do something.

    This is a piece of PocketPC software that is talking to a Griffin IR gadget which the iPod is controlling. Woofuckinghoo.

    It is certainly not "cool" by any stretch of the imagination. All they did was use existing technology through several different hoops to get a simple task accomplished. I can't even fathom how you could place it in the same realm as the CueCat hacks or Linux running on hardware X.

  32. Turn your car into a TV remote! by Kenja · · Score: 1

    Since most PocketPC systems have IR built in you could just stop there. Or you coul just spend 20$ and buy a remote. Why the hell would you want to drag an iPod into this I dont know. You may as well turn your car, toaster oven, or microwave into a remote.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Turn your car into a TV remote! by DeckardJK · · Score: 1

      Careful what you wish for... some BMW execs might be lurking.

  33. just one more thing by azmatsci · · Score: 1

    Just one more thing to keep us fat americans from having to get up to change the chanel.

    --
    I stole this sig.
  34. PlocketPC by Space_Balls · · Score: 0

    Many IPAQs have a stronger then usual IR transmitter/receiver to be able to control your TV using the NEVO software, which comes with it. So I don't see the point of this!

    --
    this.showSig(false)
    1. Re:PlocketPC by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, you would see the point. Or even if you read one or two of the comments in this thread.

    2. Re:PlocketPC by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Many IPAQs have a stronger then usual IR transmitter/receiver to be able to control your TV using the NEVO software, which comes with it. So I don't see the point of this!"

      You don't think the process they used of converting IR to sound and back again is interesting? I really question the integrity of some of the nerds around here. How can they completely miss the point of something like this?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:PlocketPC by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The converting IR to sound is not that interesting....what they basically did was take the same soudns that the old clicker type remotes mad and digitixed it years ago and also replaced both transducers (dunno what you'd call those) with a transmiter for the remote and a reciever for the TV....both IR driven instead of Audio driven. Audio and Light, invisible or not are both wave forms in any case. They can both have a frequency as well as be turned on and off in a certain pattern. This Hack is STUPID beyond all belief. Just go by a friggin 4 in one remote or a 10 in one or even fancier (and stil cheaper then this "hack" to control your whole house.).

      --

      Gorkman

  35. Re:Why include the iPod by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    You went to the trouble of finding those links, but couldn't read the article to find out whether you were completely wrong about it?

  36. Dedicated devices are better, here. by alexatrit · · Score: 0

    First there's an article on a $700 Linux-based Remote Control, now this? Come on! The most expensive universal remotes seem to cost $250 - and I bet they work a lot better than this. Oh yeah, and you can replace the batteries in them too.

    --

    Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    1. Re:Dedicated devices are better, here. by egomaniac · · Score: 2, Informative

      The most expensive universal remotes seem to cost $250 - and I bet they work a lot better than this

      There are a number of remotes (well, the manufacturers refer to them as Home Automation Control Systems) costing WAAAAAY more than that. A friend of mine dumped $5,000 on Crestron automation.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:Dedicated devices are better, here. by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

      most expensive universal remotes seem to cost $250

      Nope.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    3. Re:Dedicated devices are better, here. by alexatrit · · Score: 1

      Precisely... once it's as big as a tablet PC, it's not a remote. If there's the word "system" in the product name, it's too big. Many of these automation systems have controls so large and powerful that they need constant 120V power, which means they're mounted somewhere or they're corded. Either way, we're stepping away from the remote aspect of control. Cool systems, yes... remote control... not really.

      --

      Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
  37. my pocketpc already has universal controller .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if involving a ppc it would be less expensive to simply install a pcmcia microdrive into your ppc and use a freeware mp3 player... it already comes with a pretty decent universal remote control application... um duh?
    ~ ddf ~

  38. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    I would guess Rube Goldberg isn't one your favorites?

    Really, simply taking the long way around to do something that could be done in a much simpler fashion is cool in itself. It's like climbing Mt. Everest "because it's there," but without the frostbite and risk of freezing to death. And maybe it's a little easier.

  39. Here's a clue gentlemen... by raytracer · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you take a $10 item, and modify it to replace a $1000 item, that's probably a good hack.

    If you take a $1000 item, and modify it to replace a $10 item, that's not a good hack. That's just stupidity.

    It takes no cleverness to waste money.

    There is much pleasure in useless information.
    1. Re:Here's a clue gentlemen... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It takes no cleverness to waste money."

      Perhaps not. But it does take a brain cell or two to look at this and go "Ah neat! So that's how they did that! I wonder what other applications I have for mucking with IR signals?"

      It takes no cleverness to put something down.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Here's a clue gentlemen... by theskeptic · · Score: 1

      Heh.. nicely said.

      Another point is that you can make the ipod a remote control but using it would be a different thing. I leave the remote control on the couch or a chair after seeing tv. It won't matter if somebody sat on it by mistake but I dare not leave my mp3 player there for the fear that if someone sits on it accidentally, it'll be toast. People take much more care of their ipods than their remote controls..

    3. Re:Here's a clue gentlemen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, two braincells is about what it takes to realize that electrical pulse to a speaker leads to sound and same electrical pulse to LED leads to a blink of light, and the same for recording things.

      Most people, however, have few billion of those things. Can you say OBVIOUS?

      There are folks who have been using soundcard input as a poor mans oscilloscope for years, and I'm sure someone has played signals back as well, though iPod probably wins the "most clumsy device you could possibly use as a remote" -award, there's nothing new here.

    4. Re:Here's a clue gentlemen... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Look at me! I have an opinion! I'm insulted by everybody's stupidity! I'm so elite!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  40. The PocketPC is a one time thing by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really, all you technically need to _buy_ is the griffin remote thingy, nothing else. The pocketPC is only a one time thing from which you record the signals of the remote. If you had read the whole article, you would find that you could have done this using a computer as well.

  41. Not that cool by stinkyfingers · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what would be REALLY cool? Turn my remote into an iPod. Now there's a mod I could get into.

    1. Re:Not that cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You know what would be REALLY cool? Turn my remote into an iPod. Now there's a mod I could get into.

      I have one. It requires a PocketPC, duct tape and ... an iPod. The PocketPC is optional though.

  42. whoosh [n/t] by Valar · · Score: 0

    ...

  43. There are better things to hack by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't imagine the combination of boredom and wealth that would lead me to want to do this to an iPod. If you want something useful to hack, reverse engineer a Garmin GPS receiver so that I can modify one to calculate and show the coordinates of the target of a laser range finder. I'd rather use an existing piece of equipment like that instead of having to design and build my own.

    1. Re:There are better things to hack by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      why would i want to do that? i had an ipod and pocket pc. i don't shoot guns, assuming that's what you want a gps laser targeting device for, but if it did, i would make that.

    2. Re:There are better things to hack by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
      i don't shoot guns, assuming that's what you want a gps laser targeting device for, but if it did, i would make that.

      It's not for killing Bambi. Search and rescue and fire fighting.

    3. Re:There are better things to hack by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      if i was in search and rescue i'd be working on that for sure.

  44. Apple Hacking by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it kind of comical that Apple, the company that revolutionized "easy computing", simple interfaces, simple industrial design, etc has become a geek's haven for hacking? OS X with their BSD underpinnings gives the UNIX geeks so much to play with. Newton diehards are hacking the crap out of it to keep it "alive". People are hacking iPods in so many different ways. All this for a company that takes pride in their "we make computing easy for you". I wonder what will be hacked next. Guesses anyone?

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Apple Hacking by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      On the face of it, it might seem ironic, but there is a long tradition of mac hacks of various mac technologies (res edit, for example). The difference today is that mac hackers and tweakers have much more to explore and much more potential power.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Apple Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "has become a geek's haven for hacking?"

      If it is such a haven for hacking then why do all of these hacks suck? Most of the people interested in hacking like this use Linux not OS X. Every single one of these Apple hacks that have been reported on slashdot (on a daily basis) are completely lame and utterly useless to anyone with a brain or a life. This is just another clear example.

  45. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's slashdot. Use the iPod anywhere, it gets front page status.

    Incidentally, I control my life with the iPod. See, some days I just don't want to get up in the morning. Playing the second Queens of the Stone Age album on my iPod every morning at 7:30 makes sure I get to to work on time. Wow, what an amazing hack!

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  46. How about?? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Replacing the iPod with a bowl of grits? Or ham and cheese sandwich bought at the gas station?

  47. Ummmm Ok.. by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Spend at least $249 for the Ipod, a couple of hundred for a pocket PC, etc. thats over $400 bucks for an IR only Universal, plus the time of putting it together. Not to mention the clunky interface, when you could buy THIS and controlly everything via RF + IR from anywhere in your house, plus a streamlined, easily programmable (from windows sorry) control interface (took me 10 minutes to set up DVD, Reciever, Cable BOX, and 3 TV's).

  48. Turn your iPod into a automobile. by Gannoc · · Score: 1


    All you need is an iPod, an automobile, and some crazy glue! I love my AppleCar, and hope that you can appreciate my hack!

  49. IR - Audio by Jadsky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This project describes the most interesting part of this hack... converting the IR into a waveform in the first place. That Griffin gadget is fascinating.

    The article talks about how you read off the IR codes in the first place, and convert them into usable waveforms. It uses C# targetted for PocketPC. I found the underpinnings of this hack far more interesting than the hack itself.

  50. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh, it's cool because it includes an iPod in the equation!

  51. Re:Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Why not put IR lasers on a Moon base and control all the sports bars? (It's what I like to call a "Death Star.")

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  52. Pocket PC and IR gadget? by moronga · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me of a Dale Gribble quote from King of the Hill:

    "If you want, I can show you how to make a bomb out of a roll of toilet paper and a stick of dynamite."

  53. iPod into a Universal remote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right... call me when I can turn a universal remote into an iPod.

  54. Hmm by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, it seems like it works by recording IR signals as audio, and then re-broadcasting by playing the sounds. Actually that's kind of interesting.

    But, it would work with any Mp3 player, so it's a little annoying that they focused on the iPod exclusively, when any digital audio player would work.

    It would also be a HUGE pain in the ass to actualy use, especialy if you've already got a pocket PC that could do all that already without all the work...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hmm by dema · · Score: 1

      But, it would work with any Mp3 player, so it's a little annoying that they focused on the iPod exclusively, when any digital audio player would work.

      Maybe because the person happen to have an iPod.....

      God forbid they don't write this blog entry for every type of musicald evice, PocketPC, and IR device combination and translate it into every language. Sheesh people.

    2. Re:Hmm by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      it seems like it works by recording IR signals as audio, and then re-broadcasting by playing the sounds. Actually that's kind of interesting.

      VERY interesting, as infrared wavelengths are a few orders of magnitude above Nyquist for even the most high-fidelity audio DAC.

      So how's it work?

    3. Re:Hmm by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

      it works because the infrared signals from a remote are fixed-frequency, amplitude modulated. the frequency of the IR carrier signal is high, but the frequency of the amplitude modulation is nice and low. the iPod (or other audio player, to be politically correct) just stores the amplitude envelope, which the IR device uses to modulate the IR signal.

    4. Re:Hmm by juhaz · · Score: 1

      It works the same way as your brain can sample someone sending morse-code with flashlight without needing to understand anything (color aside) about wavelength of visible light.

      Which is to say, IR phototransistor deals with receiving IR light, and the actual frequency of modulation on top of it is much lower, apparently under 44kHz.

  55. Recap? by Creamsickle · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA, could somebody quick recap how it is you can turn a PocketPC into an iPod? What is the point of doing this, exactly?

    --
    On the 0th day, God created C
    1. Re:Recap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  56. Re:Why include the iPod by RedX · · Score: 1

    I did read the article. You're using a Pocket PC (with remote control software loaded on it!) and using it to turn an iPod with the Griffin add-on into a remote control. I didn't bother to add the steps of also using a Mac/PC and iTunes. So you're right, I was wrong, I forgot to include an extra device and 2 more pieces of software.

  57. Re:Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy by swschrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    just teach a frog to sing "stairway to heaven" and take that to the sports bar.

    the problem is getting a brace of crickets to play guitars for realism.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  58. Another one. by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

    Great, another $700 remote control

  59. ultrasonic remote "hacks" by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Jingling a ring of keys or pouring a handful of change from one hand to the other would operate the TV.

  60. Re:Why include the iPod by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    They only used the Pocket PC to record the remote-control waveforms. It's not specifically required, and only the iPod with the little IR transmitter is needed to use the remote. If a database of IR waveforms was developed, you technically would only need the IR adapter and download the correct set of audio files.

  61. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by joeytmann · · Score: 1

    Yeah I tend to agree. It does have a neat concept to it, but definately more of a "some one has way to much free time" kinda thing...

    --
    Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
  62. iPod Remote Car Starter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so lazy, I use my iPod to start my call. Hell, it is going to have voice recognition and dial my cell for me soon!

  63. Reverse Engineering by sup191 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm still waiting for somebody to hack my remote control into a mp3 player...

  64. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I can't even fathom how you could place it in the same realm as the CueCat hacks or Linux running on hardware X.
    Two words: Apple zealots.
  65. Logitech Harmony by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    One of the comment posters on the site pointed to the Logitech Harmony universal remote which looks pretty neat.

    The poster claims its an XML compliant universal remote - although I couldn't find the information on the website (admitidally I only looked briefly).

    One downside is that it's very expensive ($299) but one cool thing is that it has support for TV channel guides built into the remote.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  66. Re:Depends on your house by theslashdude · · Score: 1

    I bought one of those and it works great if I'm in the next room, but is very unreliable once I went upstairs (this is in an all wood and drywall construction). I replaced it with a whole house ir distribution system that works like a champ with all the my original remotes.

  67. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Why bother to use all these devices when you could just use a $10 or less Universal Remote from Walmart with a lot less futzing?"

    To learn more about how the technology works?

    How can you call yourself a nerd if you don't find the 'convert the IR to sound and back' process interesting?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  68. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by luwain · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something, but if you're going to buy an Pocket PC, why do you need the IR Gadget? My iPaq PPC has IR built in, and it's trivial to write a remote control program in Embeddeded C++ (or just download one). Then you don't even need the iPod. By the way, I can play music (ogg or mp3s) on my iPaq, as well as do spreadsheets, read e-books, do horoscopes etc...

  69. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Black+Kitty · · Score: 1
    Mostly because Phil Torrone is so fricking full of himself that it's incredibly sad. I sometimes feel bad for the guy. I'm half surprised he didn't submit this story to /. himself. Anytime that bloke thinks it's high time to do some grandstanding because of some whacked gadget he ripped apart, he's first to post it HIMSELF to most any gadget site you can imagine.

    Get a life, mate.

  70. I'd prefer turning a remote in an iPod by brainnolo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok that's cool but when are you going to turn an universal remote controller in an iPod? THAT would impress me!

  71. Or use the Fing-longer! by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 1

    But I would rather turn my toaster into a racoon.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  72. Reverse engineered TV by Led+Head · · Score: 1

    A better idea is to reversee engineer the TV so that when you say "volume up" the volume would go up. I guess you could create a box that changes preprogrammed sound into a specific IR channel. i might try it...HMMM i wonder "Cat eat", "Cat change litter pan" thats what ill do, ill plug this griffin converter in to my cat!

    --
    "I think you know me, I think you like me"
  73. COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by ZackSchil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesus fucking christ, people. You're like a bunch of five-year-olds. Huhuhuhuh... let's read the misleading summary and make fun of it!

    The hack is to record the IR pulses as sound files and play them back with an IR LED connected to the iPod's headphone port. It's a really smart and cool idea but I guess you guys wouldn't know one of those if it bit you on your collective ass.

    The reason the article calls for a Pocket PC is because it can read ifrared signals and pass those to the headphone jack for output. If you just piped the IR port on a computer to the sound out device, you'd have the same solution, minus the Pocket PC. This is NOT like the stupid-ass iPod to iPod transfer "hack" from a while ago. This is an actual neat concept that I'd wish you'd stop shitting all over with your ignorance.

    Thank you.

  74. Playlists! by boygenius · · Score: 1

    Ok, the hack is pretty lame but the potential is cool.

    For instance, you could create a playlist that turned on/off all of your equipment in a certain order - add to that: volume, channel defaults, recording options, xbox setting, dvd setting...

    Add in a IR x10 system and you could Dim the lights, shut off the phone and load your pr0n DVD in one playlist.

    --
    The system is a pimp; and I refuse to be a whore -- Chuck D.
    1. Re:Playlists! by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      yah, that's what i did, it's works great.

    2. Re:Playlists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot the automated kleenex dispenser

  75. two steps to turn ipod into anything by timts · · Score: 0

    1. buy anything. 2. put ipod by it and claim it can do that with that stuff. come on, most palm/pocketpc can be easily turned into universal remote without the ipod.

  76. Re:Depends on your house by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    hmmm, I have one that is on the middle floor of my house - works on the floor below. I'm in a townhouse (about 1400 ft^2).

    I think you can also buy repeater modules,to extend the range, as well. What's the name of that IR distribution system? sounds cool.

    Nevertheless, I bought this system because I got tired of fumbling through 4 to 5 remotes, and wanted to be able to use it outside on my deck.

  77. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

    you want a cool hack? try http://www.pixell.net/newton/

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  78. Re:Depends on your house by theslashdude · · Score: 1

    I have 3 stories and around 3000 ft^2 with the receiver in the middle floor near the center of the house. It worked fine from the middle floor, but was very flaky on the other floors specially as I moved away from the center of the house. As linear distance goes, it wasn't even close to 50ft from the receiver when it fails.

    I replaced it with a home brew wired ir distribution that injects and extracts the ir signal on my home-run coax lines. I have receivers in each room injecting the signal into the coax and a trasmitter on my equipament rack receiving that signal and emitting the ir towards the equipament. The only problem with this is that now I now have DC current running through my coax lines and therefore need to be careful that the proper filter is in place before plugging in any equipament into the coax. www.smarthome.com has everything you need and decent descriptions, but not the best prices.

  79. IR Sound Database by webteeth · · Score: 0

    It would be cool if this were to take off, and someone created a database of the IR sounds for the most common remotes. Man, that would be cool.

  80. Smarthome is great by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    I just found them a couple of months ago, I located a Component Video Distribution Box for my HD sets.

  81. MOD MOTHERFUCKING PARENT UP!!! by javaxman · · Score: 1
    Although, I have to ask... how cool can something be which requires a PocketPC running WindowsCE ??

    Now, show me a version using a Linux handheld, or a cheaper IR-to-audio gizmo, then I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:MOD MOTHERFUCKING PARENT UP!!! by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

      Thank you for reading my post. I love how it got modded flamebait at first :)

      At the end of the article they offer instructions for a $6 DIY IR adaptor, though I think I'd buy the Griffin device because it's cheap enough and looks slick. I too would like instructions to do this without the PocketPC. I have an Apple Powerbook running Mac OS X with an IR port recognized by the system. I'll see if I can get that to record the sounds and write my own article on doing without the PocketPC.

    2. Re:MOD MOTHERFUCKING PARENT UP!!! by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I've noticed that some mod-nazis on /. are really language-sensitve. Protect the script kiddies from obscenity!!

      a shocking number of /.'ers view not reading the FA as a god-given right, too, I've seen plenty of 'please RTFA' articles get modded down.

      I should clarify that I was talking about an IR *reciever* IR-to-audio device, not something to replace the Griffin, though it is cool that they showed a DYI version of that gizmo. I'd want to do it without the pocketPC. I bet you could totally do it with your PowerBook's IR port! But it'd still be cool to build the direct IR-to-audio gizmo, for those of us without Powerbooks. Sigh. Some day...

  82. Write a story about me, too! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Funny

    I figured out a way to turn an Airport Extreme station into a dirt hauling and delivery system! You'll also need a dump truck, some super glue, and a back hoe!

    My next project involves making a blow torch into a toaster. Also required are an X-Y plotter, some hardware cloth, and a surveyor's transit.

    I'd like to tell more, but I have to go to the can. Normally, I'd use toilet paper, but I figured out this thing with a power drill and a corn cob...

  83. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by acro-god · · Score: 1

    Not to mention, instead of all that, if you had an IPAQ to begin with you wouldn't even need the ipod for a remote with http://www.mynevo.com/nevo_pda.htm

  84. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by javaxman · · Score: 1
    How cool can anything be that requires a PocketPC running WindowsCE ?
    Show me a version that uses a Linux-based device, or some cheaper IR-to-audio homebrew gadget, then I'll be impressed.

    Actually, that's what this screams for- an IR *reciever* device to match the Griffin IR gadget. Griffin, are you guys paying attention here ?

    I suppose it'd be even cooler if some enterprising EE type built a DYI IR send/recieve gadget for the iPod ( and provided me a schematic to copy ), now *that* would be cool. Still, you are using your iPod as a very, very expensive and not terribly intuitive remote, and can you listen to tunes while you do so ? Not unless your IR codes count as tunes... beep beepboopbop...

    Interesting, sure. Cool ? well, *maybe* on /.
    Practical or useful ? Uh... would you do it, or would you buy ( or build ) an actual programmable remote, so you could actually *use* your iPod ?

  85. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

    I think the problem is that for most people to consider a hack cool, it has to be more than making something do something new; It must also be useful. This, simply put, is not.

    --
    TIAEAE!
  86. Re:Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy by smatt-man · · Score: 0

    I thought frogs could only sign "Hello my darling, hello my baby, hello my ragtime gal?"

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  87. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    The hack is to record the IR pulses as sound files and play them back with an IR LED connected to the iPod's headphone port. It's a really smart and cool idea but I guess you guys wouldn't know one of those if it bit you on your collective ass.

    Maybe it was smart, but in the end, the summary is accurate: Take an iPod and an adapter and a Pocket PC and make something pedestrian out of it.

    The only way this is "cool" is if it's a way to test an idea that might have some rational use. That might be the case. Otherwise, no matter how cleverly done, they still have just taken 2 very expensive things and combined them to do the job of one very inexpensive thing. That's just begging to be ridiculed.

    Thank you.

    Back under your bridge, you!

  88. for the last god damn time by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    you CAN replace the battery on your iPod. If you couldn't, how would these guys be selling anything?

    Let the "you can't replace the battery so it sucks" statement die, please.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  89. Easy install...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that a company (hint..hint..Griffin) could do a lot of the work and record as many remotes as possible so that someone could go download the "playlist" for the remote they need and sync it with their iPod. Add the IR adaptor and be ready to go... no need for the PocketPC then. Not sure what the legality of this would be, any ideas?

  90. Re:and if you want the ipod for free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did your friend spam slashdot too?

  91. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by notyou2 · · Score: 1

    A cool hack would be controlling your iPod via a $10 universal remote from Walmart.

    Ask and ye shall receive: an IR remote for the iPod, whose commands any old learning remote can memorize.

  92. LINUX IS NOT AN OS, IT'S A WAY OF LIFE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eeehh lunix is teh whay of the lief. heh

  93. Why this is a BAD hack, surprise it even works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, this same thing can be done with any device able to play .wav or .mp3 files at equal sampling rates.

    Secondly, it is a coincidence the IR leds work on the audio output on this device, because it is propably designed to drive some high impedance loads such as headphones (around 600 ohms) or line level inputs in stereo systems (from 10 kohms to 100 kohms). And usually the IR leds are driven with 100 mA of current in order to have sufficient range, the iPod range will be quite limited compared to real remotes. And if the internal voltage of the iPod is 3 volts, the audio output has a theoretical maximum amplitude of 1.5 volts, and the forward voltage of IR leds is around 1.6 volts.

    Another thing that would prevent this from working is that the infrared signals usually have a carrier signal of around 30 to 40 kHz (32 kHz Denon,Panasonic,Philips, 40 kHz Sony, 38 kHz some manufacturers), and with a sampling rate of 44.1 kHz, the maximum frequency that a sampled signal can have is 22.05 kHz (see google for "Nyquist theorem" if you don't believe me). Many IR receivers are sensitive to this and don't work without the correct carrier frequency, at least the range is very limited then. Though not all systems use the carrier at all, so then this would work perfectly, but these are rare (some Finlux televisions).

    And the IR module you suggested is definitely a bad one, because it removes the carrier signal and only the baseband signal is on the output pin. The IR phototransistor will work fine, as long as the signal amplitude is good enough, maybe the microphone input has enough gain for this.

    Yet more problems lie when the audio is recorded.. The DC offset (and very low frequencies) should be removed.

    And for all you who are whining to get the prerecorded .wavs and remote specs:
    Go to the Linux Infrared Remote Control site LIRC and see the link "All supported config files". Sure, you need a converter to make your button information to .wav files. I don't care how or with programming languages you implement the LIRC2WAV converter, but just do it, it is not hard. Just make a wav file with a sampling rate of 44.1 or 48 kHz, and use a carrier frequency of exactly half of the sampling rate. Make silent parts to a sample value of 0, and the carrier to go from -100% to +100% sample values (-32768 and +32767 if 16-bit samples). Then perhaps encode it through LAME with extreme settings so that the high frequency parts are preserved and not filtered away like normal MP3 encoders do.

    There you have it. Sorry for being so pessimistic, but I am having a bad day, and I really am an university student majoring in electronics and my current employer wants me to research infrared data transmission and control so I think you will find these handy..

    - Jeppe Jääkarhu

  94. Re:Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy by sulli · · Score: 1

    And "For All You Do, This Bud's For You."

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  95. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by malfunct · · Score: 1

    The part of it that makes it not cool to me is that you need a PocketPC which we all know can act as an IR remote with the right software (and in this case I guess hardware). Would have looked way cooler if they had said "Use your ipod to control your pocketPC remotely" since thats the sort of interesting part of this. I don't know, I think I'm with you on the "big deal" front. Now if they had interfaced the IR directly with the ipod and hacked the ipod software to run it that would be far cooler in my book.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  96. sound capture for mac... by atheken · · Score: 1

    haven't tried it yet, but I am pretty sure you could record the IR using AUDACITY, a nice GPL'd sound editor. http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ - incidentally (and coincidentally) it's the SF.net project of the month for 7/2004.

  97. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't even get why the iPod is there, given that you have to buy another processor and the IR transceiver. Heck, I could duct tape this stuff to my car, or a broom, or my cat, and submit an article about hacking them into a remote. The iPod has nothing to do with it.

    Or flip it around, and submit articles about duct taping my iPod to a microwave (use hacked iPod to heat snacks!) or to the hood of a truck (use hacked iPod to tow boats!)

  98. Apple is dying: Sell stock now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Computer, Inc. (AAPL), beset by angry creditors and faced with severe G5 production problems, is on the verge of bankruptcy and total collapse. Apple continues to nosedive into oblivion, as confirmed by industry watchers, investors, and, most painfully, by customers themselves.

    As a recent study by Bank of America Securities puts it, Apple ekes out its small existence by peddling new hardware to its existing customers; once those customers are satisfied, Apple will run out of steam . If these disastrous financial forecasts aren't enough, one need only look to Netcraft for confirmation that Apple's market share among Web servers is slowly dwindling down to zero. The market share of Mac OS X is now eclipsed even by that of FreeBSD, another OS that is deeply imperiled.

    But the abysmal server presence of OS X is the least of Apple's worries. Apple's most recent quarterly report indicates a death spiral of cash loss. Indeed, Apple has hemorrhaged some $276 million in the last quarter, while racking up a dizzying $2.4 billion in debt. Revenue from sales of the iPod, the portable music player that is barely keeping Apple afloat in this shipwreck of fiscal woe, declined dramatically, threatening to shrink further an already miniscule lifeline.

    Likewise, sales of the eMac, iMac and Power Macintosh G5 lines continue to skid. Apple is unable to secure G5 processors in sufficient numbers tosupply its customers with Power Macintosh G5 and iMac computers, as Steve Jobs himself recently admitted. The staggering decline in sales numbers confirms it: there is no doubt that one-time Apple customers, dismayed with the floundering ineptitude of their favorite company, have begun turning away in droves, seeking cheaper, faster hardware from manufacturers such as Dell.

    Apple teeters on the precipice of doom, one step away from plummeting to its ultimate nadir of bankruptcy, chaos, and implosion. Wise investors will quickly dump AAPL stock and abandon the doomed company, now less than one year away from complete disintegration.

    It's time to move to a new platform: Apple is dead.

  99. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

    I agree that if it reqired the PocketPC, it would be stupid, but the PocketPC is just being used for the sake of making the task of recording IR easy with no software voodoo. I think the idea of using an iPod to control a lot of elements in a complex home entertainment setup is very cool and very useful.

  100. Share audio/IR files, iPod recording capability? by RemiT · · Score: 1

    If people were really interested in this functionality, they could share the library of IR control code audio files.

    General musings on iPod recording capabilities etc (from one successfully using an MD Walkman for years of pro audio recording):

    A) Wonder if the 8 Khz recording bandwidth of the iPod would be enough to record the IR pulses directly? (Lessee, I got a homebrew [Radio Shack plan and parts] IR detector around here, throw a 1/8" jack on the output and plug into the Belkin Universal Microphone Adapter for iPod....)

    B) Bug Steve-o about the wisdom allowing 44.1 Khz stereo recording on iPod. What the hell, I'm gonna buy a high-end Sony Hi-MD Walkman ANYWAY since he won't go for it....

    C) Four easy steps for making my professional school lectures available to students on-line: 1) Record lectures on iPod using lavalier mic; 2) Drop audio file and exported lecture Powerpoint JPEGs into iMovie; and 3) edit and export to CD or class Web server. 4) There is no step 4....

    D) Of course, at 8 KHz the iPod recorded audio won't be as crisp as what I get off my MD Walkman. On the other hand, I eliminate the step of importing narrative audio files through a pro MD deck with optical S/PDIF outputs.

    E) Yeah, Duke is SO lame for giving incoming students iPods ;-) (Wonder if the radiologists in their medical school use iPods for carrying medical image files like our radiologists do?).

    Hardware hacking 4 ever.

  101. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by DirePickle · · Score: 1

    *prepares to lose karma* *ahem* You must be new here. Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week.

  102. Not limited to the iPod by Brianwa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could use just about any device that can record and play back a sound wave to do this. I think now they mass-produce chips that let you record a short soundclip and play it back. You could use one of these (or any mp3 player, or even casette player, etc) to imitate a sequence of button-presses from multiple remotes. This could be useful for someone who just wants to watch a DVD rather than juggleing remotes so he can get to the correct screen.

  103. Re:Why include the iPod by Crazen · · Score: 1
    If for some bizzare reason you want to go past the first two steps of
    1. Aquite PocketPC
    2. Aquire Remote Control software for above PocketPC (the article listed a specific one that converts IR to audio, but you could have purchased any IR software and stopped at this stage with a far cleaner remote interface)

    Why not just use a $30 MP3 player instead of the "trendy" iPod? ... nevermind guess I answered my question.

  104. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    Good point. I guess the way I look at it is this: Doing something wacky with hardware is all OK by me, but if I were doing it, I'd expect to take some shit for it. :)

    I do think there's value in doing something just for the sake of doing it. I also think it's OK to like what someone does while also giving them a hard time about it. It still seems impractical to me.

  105. Could someone UNDERSTAND the article!? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    The hack is to record the IR pulses as sound files and play them back with an IR LED connected to the iPod's headphone port. It's a really smart and cool idea but I guess you guys wouldn't know one of those if it bit you on your collective ass.

    It was a cool and novel idea WHEN OTHER PEOPLE HAD IT BEFORE THEM.

    THE WHOLE AUDIO to IR THING IS WHAT'S ALREADY BEING DONE WITH THE POCKET PC.

    This "hack" is just plain lame. Griffin's stuff is doing all the work. The ipod is doing NOTHING useful in the equation. All the conversion is being done on the pocket pc. The "IR" signal is ALREADY coming out of the pocket pc's AUDIO port.

    This cool "hack" consists of nothing more than a guy going:
    "Hey I can record whatever's coming out of the audio port on my pocket pc with my ipod and play it back later!"
    To me, and I would bet a great many others, this is painfully obvious.

    I would much rather read something interesting, like how to replicate the frequency doubler inside the Griffin transmitter.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  106. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    The reason the article calls for a Pocket PC is because it can read ifrared signals and pass those to the headphone jack for output. If you just piped the IR port on a computer to the sound out device, you'd have the same solution, minus the Pocket PC. This is NOT like the stupid-ass iPod to iPod transfer "hack" from a while ago. This is an actual neat concept that I'd wish you'd stop shitting all over with your ignorance.
    What the article hasn't explained (and you haven't either) is why they'd want to bother with the iPod? I mean, you've got a PocketPC so why not use that as the remote? Or do they need to use the iPod as the remote because they're using the PocketPC to play music?
  107. Then Sell Me your AAPL stock at 5$/Share by eadint · · Score: 1

    If you believe that apple is doing so terribly i will buy all your stock in apple at 5$/Share. given that you believe that apple is in such terrible shape you should be overjoyed that someone would pay you soooo much money for a worthless stock. if you don't have any stock than you can just buy 500 shares at market price and i will gladly pay you 5$/Share also if you have a G5 or Imac ill buy that from your for 100.00$ that riiight 100.00$ American dollars, you should be overjoyed that someone would pay so much for such a worthless computer. funny though last i heard apple payed off all of its debts spent 2bln in research and still poses a 200mil+ profit for the year.

  108. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

    I did explain that you don't need the Pocket PC. I also said that if you did, then it would be very lame.

  109. Kinda useless by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

    Since you can use palm pilots as universal remotes already

  110. Re:Why include the iPod by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    The simple answer is that iPod owners all have a monster case of buyer's remorse, and eagery sieze upon things which might help them argue it was worth $400 when you can just buy a $40 CD Walkman and have as much music as you can listen to in a day, and batteries that last longer than 8 hours. I never said it was a worthwhile hack, I just thought it was interesting and a step above the typical "look I can put words on my iPod" style of hack. The iPod's still and overpriced hunk of yuppie bling.

  111. Re:Why not play Led Zeppelin through the IR thingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this plain racism?
    From a Québécois in Québec.

  112. halfbakery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like an implementation from some half-baked idea on halfbakery.com.

  113. Is the PocketPC needed? by gabebear · · Score: 1
    The hack seems like it should be able to be done with only an iPod and Griffin's remote thingy. You can record audio into 3rd gen iPods directly, you even record into the left earbud(channel) and the article says you need to mute the right channel.

    Anyone got a 3rd gen iPod to try this? I have a 2nd gen.

  114. I've got it! by rcha101 · · Score: 1

    I've done some research, now griffin were demonstrating this working on the ipod and its rather obvious that they have just taken the some technology and chucked it on a pocket pc rather than it write off. If someone could provide/leak/build the software there would be no reason to use a pocket pc at all!

  115. um, nice joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the "FreeBSD, another OS that is deeply imperiled" line makes me think you're joking, but the entire tone, and i doubt anybody is a freak enough to write out some long seriously-toned joke like this, makes me believe you're one of those windows users that hate macs "just cuz." idiot.

    or maybe you're one of those 40-somethings that haven't a clue about computers (everyone in it/tech support knows about 'em) but seems to think they have an opinion, telling people the 20-year-old phrase "ibm's are what's in the real world." but then again, i don't think a 40-year-old would have the energy to rant like this.

    apple is debt-free, made a heap of profits last quarter, and has upward of $4 billion in the bank. wtf are you talking about?

    1. Re:um, nice joke? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      c'mon dudes...this post is a JOKE! It's a parody of every other tech pundit over the last 20 years who's tried to make the dire prediction that Apple is dead. The irony of its success despite all the WinTel domination is the joy of the joke.

      On the off chance that the poster was totally serious, its obvious he has no clue and its not worth the keystrokes to tell him.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  116. Downloadable Signals by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    Hey, if enough people got together and traded signals for different remotes then you could have a website where you could just look up your remote model and then download the playlist for it. Kind of like a CDDB for remotes...

    All you would have to have then would be the $10 piece of hardware and no iPaq, etc.

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  117. Re:COULD SOMEONE READ THE MOTHERFUCKING ARTICLE?! by dissy · · Score: 1

    > Otherwise, no matter how cleverly done, they still have just taken 2 very expensive things and
    > combined them to do the job of one very inexpensive thing. That's just begging to be ridiculed.

    Yea your pretty much right.
    Apple took two very expesive things (A macintosh computer, and a custom hardware device called an iPod) and combined them to do the job of an inexpensive thing (walkman, discman, personal PC built with $50 of parts) and we all saw how rididculed the iPods were... Of course we see how well they sell too..

  118. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something, but if you're going to buy an Pocket PC, why do you need the IR Gadget?

    You don't.

    Usually, however, the IR gizmos built in to devices for communication purposes are rather limited in transmission power, and sometimes in what kind of waveform or frequency you can abuse them to outputting/reading, so the gadget is there mostly for extending the range.

    The iPod enters the equation only because it can, though IMHO is useless and stupid. iPod can play audio files? WOW, I'd never have guessed.

  119. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by juhaz · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's true.

    This, however, is not a cool hack even in that sense of the word. iPod doesn't do anything that it wasn't originally intended to do, it just plays audio files. IR gizmo doesn't do anything it wasn't intended to do, either. Considering neither of the devices used in this operation are doing anything else than they're supposed to do, it's not a hack at all.

    It would be a hack if they'd built the IR gizmo themselves, though even still it's so simple concept I would't call even that a cool hack.

  120. Re:Cool hack? Not in my book. by 5amTheButcher · · Score: 1

    You can get an IPod for free here, bringing it down to a reasonable level of expense - much cheaper that $50 Remote Commandors and the like.