Slashdot Mirror


Ceefax Turns 30

VirtualUK writes "Ceefax, the text information service from the BBC turns 30 today (just 3 days after myself)!! For those not lucky enough to have seen what Ceefax is about, it is text information pages sent in out-of-band data space of TV transmissions in Great Britain. What started off as a subtitling project evolved into a service still used by over 20 million viewers a week even in the face of the Internet revolution. It just goes to show that for a lot of people, the best source of sport results, last minute holiday bargains and horoscopes is still just a click away on their TV remote."

375 comments

  1. Information non-overload by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting


    One of the reasons Ceefax/Oracle was so popular was that it gave "just the facts, ma'am". It had to display on a 40x23 (ish) screen to work on the TV's of the time, and most pages used ZX81-style graphics (huge "pixels" :-) which reduced the content possibilities even more. Oh, it was free too :-)

    Curiously, this reduced content actually worked in its' favour - about all that could be put on a single page was the raw information, without political or other bias; there just wasn't the space for opinion. Even when they used linked pages (page displays, waits 30 secs, new page displays, repeat and loop) the real-estate was severely limited since each page had to stand alone.

    I clearly remember preferring the minimalist information from Ceefax over the long-form in a newspaper. If I wanted more about a story, I could listen to the news or buy a paper, but to get an overview it was ideal. A good example of 'less is more'. It helps that the Beeb has good journalists who can succinctly tell a story, of course...

    Simon (on-topic, for once :-)

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Information non-overload by alanxyzzy · · Score: 4, Informative
      and most pages used ZX81-style graphics (huge "pixels" :-)
      Telextext was exactly the same as the Acorn BBC microcomputer display mode 7.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_Micro
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext

    2. Re:Information non-overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Acorn BBC microcomputer display mode 7 was exactly the same as Teletext. The difference is important.

    3. Re:Information non-overload by mikael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      and most pages used ZX81-style graphics (huge "pixels" :-) which reduced the content possibilities even more. Oh, it was free too :-)

      It always amazed me to see how much they could do with those glyph blocks. Maps of the UK, Europe, the world for weather, traffic and airport news, even Snoopy. Undoubtably,ASCII art at it's finest. And they could manage to compress entire news stories into 400 characters or less, while still maintaining the reading level.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Information non-overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, the Acorn BBC microcomputer display mode 7 was exactly the same as Teletext.

      Teletext being 30, and the BBC Micro being 23 ...

    5. Re:Information non-overload by MarkGriz · · Score: 0

      "Oh, it was free too :-)"

      Since Brits have to pay an annual "TV tax" of 121 UKP (about $200 US), I'd hardly call it free :-(

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:Information non-overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much do you pay for cable?

    7. Re:Information non-overload by madprof · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BBC's mode 7 was put in there in the first place with teletext in mind.
      Teletext predates the BBC by some 8 years, the Beeb having launched in April '82.
      Your links probably say this but oooh I looove karma. ;-)

      Now I shall get redundantly modded to Hell.

    8. Re:Information non-overload by Vollernurd · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK I'll bite.

      It is true that we have to pay the Televison Licence every year and it's about £110-£120 (I have not checked). But look at all we get!

      7 national, commercial free radio stations giving high quality music, spoken word, and live event output (like One Big Sunday if that's your bag or BBC Proms); 6 or so digital national commercial free TV channels with some pretty good original programming (and not so good too); loads of regional TV and Radio of similar quality; BBC Online; and, er, we gave the Yanks The Office, didn't we?

      Sorry, I'm getting a lump in my throat here... Let me just step outside.

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    9. Re:Information non-overload by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wasn't trolling... just pointing out it isn't free.

      I wasn't aware that the TV license was more than just a "license to watch tv". That fact that you get what you do (ad free) makes it seem like a rather good deal. *jealous*

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    10. Re:Information non-overload by jb.hl.com · · Score: 0

      The BBC did NOT launch in 1982!!!

      Jesus christ...

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    11. Re:Information non-overload by rishistar · · Score: 5, Informative

      And here's how the money goes

      How your licence is spent
      Each household's colour TV licence cost £9.67 every month in 2003/2004. On average each month, this was how the BBC spent your money:
      Average monthly licence fee spend

      BBC One £3.37
      BBC Two £1.45
      Digital television channels £0.98
      Transmission and collection costs £0.98
      BBC Radio 1, 2, 3, 4 and Five Live £0.99
      Digital radio stations £0.08
      Nations & English Regions television £0.90
      Local radio £0.61
      bbc.co.uk £0.31

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    12. Re:Information non-overload by terrymr · · Score: 1

      The parent was referring to the BBC Computer sold by Acorn not the entire BBC

    13. Re:Information non-overload by madprof · · Score: 1

      Is this meant to be a joke?
      Or did you really not know I was talking about a home computer funded by, and named after, the BBC?
      Jesus Christ...

    14. Re:Information non-overload by n3k5 · · Score: 1
      It is true that we have to pay the Televison Licence every year and it's about £110-£120 (I have not checked). But look at all we get!
      In Austria, we get the best of both worlds. If you own just one device that can show/play the state-owned TV/radio stations -- even if you only use it to watch German and French stations over satellite -- you have to pay for a license, but all of the channels also air commercials. Not as many as the private stations, and they're in between programmes, not interrupting them, but still annoying considering we also pay for it.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    15. Re:Information non-overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curiously, this reduced content actually worked in its' favour

      This may be a universal truism.

    16. Re:Information non-overload by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Undoubtably,ASCII art at it's finest.

      Bearing in mind it had colours and simple graphical blocks obviously designed for graphics, I think calling it ASCII art (since ASCII *wasn't* designed for that) is stretching it. But it was still impressive use of the facilities.

      Well, up to a point...

      30 years old, though? They must have been planning ahead in 1974; I mean, that was the year the Altair came out! Okay, so it was simple text decoding circuitry that would have been needed, not a full microcomputer, but bear in mind that the ZX81 (Timex/Sinclair 1000) with inferior graphics to this was still several years in the future.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    17. Re:Information non-overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US TV advertising industry is about $40.10**9. That is about $200 per US person or $600 per household. About 5 times a UK license fee.

      I leave it to you to decide who gets the best deal.

    18. Re:Information non-overload by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      Yes it did. I've heard numerous stories about whether my mum's baby (me) or my dad's baby (the BBC) would arrive first. As it happened the BBC won and I dropped a few days later and started hacking it :) (And everything else in the house...)

  2. teletext by afd8856 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's called teletext in some countries. Didn't RTFA though :)

    --
    I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    1. Re:Teletext by Tanami · · Score: 1

      I the UK anyway, the non-BBC channels do refer to it as Teletext, so I suspect that is the generic term for the 'technology' (if you can call it that), while the BBC have named their own implementation Ceefax.

      It's not as useful as it sounds, in my opinion, as information on a given topic is paged and you have no mechanism to switch between pages other than waiting sometimes minutes for the info to come up.

    2. Re:teletext by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's called teletext here in the UK too. Ceefax is just the BBC's name for its teletext services.

      All four terrestrial analogue broadcasters have teletext services and the hundreds of terrestrial/cable/satellite broadcasters have similar digital services too.

      One interesting factoid about teletext is that, at one stage, over half the holidays in Britain were bought via teletext (ads on teletext, response by phone). Obviously, with the development of the Internet that's changed, but the teletext holiday market is still pretty big.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:teletext by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's actually called teletext just about everywhere. CeeFax is simply an example of a teletext service. According to Wikipedia, CeeFax (a.k.a. Teledata) was first, and was followed closely by ORACLE. Other services came later.

      Personally, I find this story very interesting. I had heard about teletext from one of those old Usborne books as a kid, but I'd never actually SEEN it. I'd always assumed that it was one of those little known services that really didn't go anywhere. It seems I was wrong. :-)

    4. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teletext is the UK equivalent of Ceefax on ITV and Channel 4.

      No matter what you say about being easy to use etc, their time is virtually gone. Within 5 years we will all be using digital TV, which doesnt accomodate the old style Ceefax services, instead we have BBCi which is much much better.

      Teletext is already dying, as we can see from their website.

    5. Re:teletext by Arleo · · Score: 1

      Yes, in The Netherlands it's called Teletekst. And it is still very popular these days. In fact people use it as the first source for information like latest news, weather, traffic information, TV and radio schedules. Dutch Teletekst on the web can be found here.
      BTW, you do not have it in the US? Didn't know that.

      Arleo

    6. Re:teletext by dago · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And for those who never saw it, SWISS TXT (the company behind teletext services of the 6 swiss public channels) put a nice online version.

      What you have on your TV monitor is the square in the middle : no graphic, just text (with colors).
      In real life, you naviguate using the pages numbers (and buttons 0-9) or with the colored buttons (on newer TV set).

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    7. Re:Teletext by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you don't
      More...(1/5)

      Like reading
      More...(2/5)

      information like
      More...(3/5)

      this? I can't
      More...(4/5)

      imagine why not.
      More...(5/5)

    8. Re:Teletext by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Uh, it may not seem as useful as it sounds today, because we're used to always-on broadband Internet connections that give us fast page loading, but in its day it was king. And, even today, it's a very useful service.

      I know that I'd rather have the option of finding out what's on TV later that day, or what the weather's going to be like, or how my team got on, via my remote control than being forced to get up and check it out on my PC, etc.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:teletext by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      All four terrestrial analogue broadcasters have teletext services and the hundreds of terrestrial/cable/satellite broadcasters have similar digital services too.

      Don't like to be picky but there are actually Five terrestial analogue broadcasters (although I personally can't get channel 5).

    10. Re:teletext by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's called teletext in the UK as well. It's just the BBC service that's called Ceefax (although the BBC teletext project was called Ceefax, and the ITV one was called Oracle, which both led to the names of the services). Oracle lost it's franchise in 1993, so Ceefax is the oldest teletext service in the UK, and probably the world. Oracle

      To confuse things the company who have the rights to broadcast teletext on ITV, Channel 4 and Five (the rights were sold separately from the rights for general TV broadcasting on the frequencies) are now held by a company called Teletext Ltd, or just Teletext for short.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    11. Re:teletext by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't like to be picky but there are actually Five terrestial analogue broadcasters (although I personally can't get channel 5).

      Don't like to be picky either (well, sometimes I do), but BBC1 and BBC2 are both BBC channels. That's one terrestrial broadcaster providing two channels. So the four terrestrial analogue broadcasters are the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and five.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    12. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the parent was correct - there are 4 broadcasters - BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Five. It's just that BBC happens to transmit 2 terrestrial channels (BBC1 & BBC2)

    13. Re:teletext by mirko · · Score: 1

      So dso they mention the Acorn computers which have always had a teletext video mode ?
      France 2 (formerly known as antenne 2, 2nd French TV Channel) had purchased many of these computers to equip their mounting service.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    14. Re:teletext by goetzAThome · · Score: 1

      Having used teletext systems on Mainland Europe I have to say one of the main attractions of the systems is that it is one-way downstream only, meaning you can get all this information from your rooftop antena (which we did). You tell your TV which page you want, and it waits for that one to be sent. This can result in high latency, but it's often easier to check on flight times by requsting page '236', or weather on '114' without geting up from the couch.

    15. Re:teletext by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Don't you know that a 'factoid' is an INCORRECT fact?
      Darn CNN: Here comes the science.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    16. Re:teletext by nkodengar · · Score: 1
      1. BBC
      2. ITV
      3. Channel Four
      4. Five
      5. ??
    17. Re:teletext by Billy69 · · Score: 1

      They don't, but as I mentioned above, the reason the Acorn computer had teletext modes was because of their involvement in the 1980's BBC computer literacy project.

      --
      #include "disclaimer.h"
    18. Re:teletext by leonscape · · Score: 1

      Also Sky has a Teletext service as well. most digital services, work so, so.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    19. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      6. PROFIT !!!

      Sorry, couldn't resist :)

    20. Re:Teletext by martinthebrit · · Score: 1

      Actually, technology came up with a way of switching between pages. I have a Philips telly, that has something like a 600 page ttext memory, and once a given page is loaded and the data carousel has gone its full course, you can flip between pages with cursor keys.

      Teletext (Ceefax) is still better than the more modern digital text IMHO; the ability to type in a page no. directly is a great boon

    21. Re:teletext by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

      It's called texttv in Denmark, and has a fairly long (don't know details) and successfull history. My parents, scared of the Net, still use it every day. I'd use it for occasional things when I still had a TV. It's simple. It's there. It's information.

      -Lars

    22. Re:teletext by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Confusingly, Teletext (with a capital 'T') is a commercial teletext service which runs on the non-BBC channels - this is the one with all the adverts.

      Teletext (with the 'T') was only really notable for Digitiser, anyway. :-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    23. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s4c.

    24. Re:Teletext by Mant · · Score: 1

      It is very useful if you are in front of the telly and what to find out something like sports results, or what is on now and next.

      Even waiting between pages is quicker than going to another room, starting the computer up, and looking it up on the web.

    25. Re:teletext by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1
      No matter what you say about being easy to use etc, their time is virtually gone. Within 5 years we will all be using digital TV, which doesnt accomodate the old style Ceefax services, instead we have BBCi which is much much better.

      It's certainly transmitted over digital cable (telewest) for BBC1/2, ITV1, C4 and C5, also I think on Sky 1 and some other channels. The fact that my VCR breaks it when connected via the same SCART socket as the decoder is another matter.

    26. Re:teletext by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      BBC 1 & BBC 2, they carry different versions, BBC 1 was meant to be the daily updated "newspaper", BBC 2 Ceefax was/is updated less frequently (weekly?) and has a lot more content (hence it's slower).

      --
      I am NaN
    27. Re:teletext by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      Take a look to an example of actual teletext service, widely used here in spain. Imagine that small image expanded to a 25" TV and you will catch the idea.

      --

      Your head a splode
    28. Re:teletext by csteinle · · Score: 1

      And the Welsh fourth channel, S4C, makes 5

    29. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey, they don't even have proper colour in the USA! Things on the TV screen appear in colours as opposed to shades of grey, but the colour of the TV image usually is not the same as the colour of the real thing. That's the disadvantage of NTSC {where DC offsets tend to cause cumulative errors thanks to parasitic capacitances behaving as integrators} versus PAL {where errors due to DC offsets tend to cancel one another out very quickly, because the signal is inverted on every other line}. Also, the higher frequency PAL colour carrier allows for more bandwidth.

      When we show the snooker on BBC2 -- and you have to watch the snooker if you've got a colour TV set, it's the law -- the table is green; there are fifteen red balls, and the coloured balls go: yellow, green, brown, blue, pink, black. In the States, to show a snooker match that anyone watching TV could understand, they would have to use a blue table, fifteen yellow balls, and the colours are orange, sky-blue, red, violet, creamy-white with little brown spots and black (which transmits fine). And there would be an advert break after every shot. Needless to say this does not help the players much. They tried showing pool on TV instead, but it was very disconcerting to be told the red player was winning when there appeared still to be seven reds on the table and the guy with the cue in his hand was taking aim at what appeared to be a yellow ball.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    30. Re:teletext by Malc · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be picky and split hairs, then you can't really list ITV as a broadcaster. You need to start talking about Central, Granada, etc (I don't know all the names these days as I emmigrated a few years ago).

    31. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tonto say : Oracle good name. Also take long time to return data.

    32. Re:teletext by jd678 · · Score: 1

      Makes little difference now. With all the various mergers, ITV1 has launched as a nationwide brand, and apart from the odd indie still remaining somewhere, there's hardly any regional differences, apart from local news. They don't even have their own idents any more, it's all a single ITV1 ident.

    33. Re:teletext by oddsheep · · Score: 1

      Five gave up on most of their teletext services a few years ago. At least, my reception of it is too poor to recieve anything other than random ASCII screen parties, so thats what I'm assuming.

    34. Re:teletext by Disc2 · · Score: 1

      are you joking? How else do you get the football scores without teletext?

    35. Re:teletext by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      We don't watch soccer.

    36. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I heard that, but my old Daewoo TV set doesn't like decoding text off my cable box {NTL, pace 4000 series}. It was never much cop decoding it off the air. I thought that could be to do with the fact that I live so far down in the bottom of a valley, I have to go uphill to get to the river!

      In the TV's defence, however, it does use the same codeset as a Philips telly, and therefore my DVD recorder remote lets me adjust my TV volume (text is all but unusable, picture is set right, cable box usually changes station unless recording a movie off Sky). So I'm half happy at least.

      About connecting two appliances to one SCART socket: it will only ever work if only one output device is ever switched on at a time. When an op-amp -- strictly, any class AB output stage -- is unpowered, its output is high-impedance {both transistors are off}. When it's powered and amplifying, its output is quite low-impedance and will happily sink any signal coming from the other output.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    37. Re:teletext by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1
      About connecting two appliances to one SCART socket: it will only ever work if only one output device is ever switched on at a time.

      Sorry, I over simplified - the telewest box is connected to the TV through the video. The video (phillips), even when switched off, monitors the teletext signal on the TV so that it can switch to the right channel immediately if you press the instant record button (according to the book that is). Text mode looks like mix (picture+text) mode with a green cast and is almost impossible to read. I could go on, but it's just one of those funny incompatabilities.

      Anyway, to get right on topic and as you're in the UK Ceefax has a page (190) on the anniversary.

    38. Re:teletext by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Google the word then click "definition" in the top right-hand corner. Then look at the second meaning of the word. In that respect, "factoid" works well here.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    39. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Sounds as though your cable box is putting out RGB. Is the VCR connected to the TV output of the cable box, rather than the VCR output? If so, you probably need to select composite video rather than RGB output. It will be somewhere in the set-top box set-up menu, maybe under something like 'advanced options' -- but the people on the hotline will know, if you can actually get through to then .....

      In both RGB and composite modes, there is a full picture signal on the video out/sync out pin {19}, so even on a non-RGB-capable set a picture will be seen. In composite video mode, pin 8 is energised to indicate to the TV set that an external signal is present, and the TV switches over to the picture signal derived from pin 19. In RGB mode, pins 8 and 16 are both energised, and the TV switches over to display the picture signal using the red, green and blue components from pins 15, 11 and 7 and obtaining the timing information from pin 19.

      Most VCRs can only handle composite signals, but it's conventional to wire unused pins through one-for-one between the Satellite and TV SCARTs. It's possible that the switching signal on pin 16 is confusing something, and the TV is ending up in some weird mode where it is using the wrong signals.

      If you switch the box to composite mode, there will be no voltage on pin 16. The picture will only be in composite mode, so there will be some loss of quality.

      Alternatively the cable box should have a VCR scart. This only ever carries a composite signal. But you'll need 3 scart leads: cable box VCR SCART to VCR's SAT SCART, cable box TV SCART to TV AV1 SCART, and VCR TV scart to TV AV2 SCART. {Conventionally, AV1 is RGB-capable and AV2 is composite-only or composite/SVHS, using pin 15 for colour and pin 19 for picture}. This method will give you an RGB picture when watching cable TV by selecting AV1.

      If you can't get a picture from your TV's internal tuner, you will need to cut the wire on pin 8 of the SCART lead between the cable box and the TV set.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    40. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ITV Teletext service ORACLE was actually an abbreviation for (Optional Reception of announcements
      by Coded Line Electronics) !

    41. Re:teletext by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Yup it's teletext in the UK as well, Ceefax is just the BBC branded version of it. The company I work for (The Press Association) does the teletext for most if not all UK terrestrial TV stations. Several of my colleagues have crappy portable tellys on their desks to view the pages they're working on.

    42. Re:teletext by Chris+Hodges · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm now getting somewhere. I now get teletext if I unplug the DVD player. The decoder was on composite, now it's on RGB with a noticeably better picture. I'll have to have a think, a google and a fiddle (not necessarily in that order!) still. In the mean time yours will have the honour of being the first /. post I've printed for reference (and I've only just fixed printing on Linux on this box anyway).

    43. Re:teletext by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1

      And I bet if you put a towel over your head, nobody can see you?

      --

      None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    44. Re:teletext by JacobO · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure it's NTSC that does it. Here in Canada we use NTSC but I find the colour on Canadian networks quite different than on American networks. This seems to be the case whether via cable or satellite. I am not close enough to the border to tell whether this occurs on terrestrial signals however.

      On a related note, with all the hype around digital signals these days, I was very surprised to see the quality difference between a good over-the-air signal and a good satellite signal. On a decent (but not HD) TV, I'd take the over-the-air signal any day, especially since the satellite and cable providers seem to be lowering their bit rates to get more channels on. Some channels show noticeable artifacts that you just don't get on analog signals.

    45. Re:teletext by nfms · · Score: 1

      In Portugal it's called "teletexto", and all terrestrial analog broadcasters have it. Its priceless, if you ask me -- checking programme schedules, weather forecast, football results, news, etc.

      In the later years other services have arised, like TVchat, which is nothing more than a SMS gateway. You send a text message from your mobile to a certain number and 'lo and behold, a few seconds later it appears on screen. Surprisingly people are willing to spend large sums of money on this, texting back and forth all night long, chatting to people via the TV. It's kinda insane, when you think about it.

      RTP's (the governmentally controlled brodcaster) teletext service is reachable through its web site, here.

      --
      Keep on rocking in the free world
    46. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Satellite and cable signals are digital, so there is really NO PAL or NTSC-ness to them -- they're effectively RGB {or, seeing as you're in Canada, RVB :) }. Also, some material broadcast in Canada may originate from digital, or PAL or SECAM analogue, master recordings, hence have better colour rendition in the first place.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    47. Re:teletext by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Are they not NTSC in as much as the TV still scans at 60Hz (interlaced)? Or am I bypassing that altogether when I send the signal to it via either S-Video or Component connections?

    48. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      NTSC or PAL is nothing to do with 60 or 50Hz -- the signal coming out of a VCR playing the "wrong" sort of tape {e.g. a PAL VCR playing an NTSC tape} is actually at the "wrong" picture rate, just with the "right" colour encoding.

      A PAL colour signal is similar to an NTSC colour signal, but the phase is inverted on alternate lines {hence Phase Alternation by Line}. This tends to cancel out any DC offset effects {which basically look as if the colour wheel has been rotated}.

      An RGB signal gives the best quality. This uses the red, green and blue on separate cables with a fourth for the timing signals. {This is usually a full composite picture signal; the same pin on the SCART is used for both functions. Some SCART sockets are fully wired and will accept an RGB signal, but even if it is only a partly-wired SCART [composite video and audio only] it will still display a picture.}

      An S-VHS signal has two cables: one for the picture {which is a full mono picture with timing; made by multiplying each of the red, green and blue channels by a fiddle factor and adding them together} and one for the colour, which may be NTSC {constant phase} or PAL {alternating phase}. Some equipment can auto-detect which. S-VHS signals can be sent over a SCART cable; in this case the "red" pin is used for the colour signal.

      A composite signal is made by modulating the colour signal onto a carrier {different for PAL and NTSC, google for the exact frequencies -- I'm too lazy} and mixing this with the mono video signal. It's possible that dark-light transitions in the picture signal can interfere with the colour carrier and produce unwanted artefacts.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    49. Re:teletext by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, forgot to mention: if your satellite receiver is connected to the TV with a fully-wired SCART {in the AV1 socket}, chances are it's an RGB connection and therefore there is NO NTSC-ness or PAL-ness ANYWHERE from the broadcast transmitter right downstream to the cathode ray tube! If it's connected by an SVHS cable {small round 4-pin plug for picture, separate audio plug[s]}, composite video and audio {2 or 3 x standard audio plugs} or {make a religious emblem of your choice now} RF, then there will be a colour encoding standard imposed upon it. But NTSC does actually work fine over short links {like the metre or so from SAT RX to telly}. It's only when transmission line phenomena kick in that it starts to suffer.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    50. Re:teletext by JacobO · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, thanks for the informative responses.

      I don't think I've ever seen a SCART socket/cable/plug. It seems that a fully-wired one would be the equivalent of a "component video", in that it sends the RGB signal without encoding into some composite form. I read after a little googling that SCART cannot carry component video signals as they are defined these days, so it must carry the RGB some other way.

      On the topic of teletext, back home in NZ the service is still being used also (as far as I know) and is still fairly useful.

  3. Pretty cool stuff by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's pretty cool! Here in the U.S., we had to pay per minute for contemporary services on Compuserve. With prices as high as $0.20 per minute, it's no wonder that Compuserve was primarily reserved for businesses! But to have hundreds of pages of text information pushed to your television set at no (excluding television tax) cost? That's amazing!

    Of course, the proliferation of U.S. BBSes started in the mid to late 80's and gained momentum right up until the Internet became popular in the mid-90's. Which makes me wonder. Is there a telnet machine somewhere where we can access the CeeFax info? It would be interesting to see what they're pushing over the airwaves.

    Ah memories. Sometimes I wonder if the tech of the 80's wasn't cooler than the tech we have today. Sure, we have Gooey interfaces and full color graphics, but what's that compared to the thrill of interfacing systems over a modem, cursing at natural language interfaces, designing BBS screens in TheDraw, and wowing at the amount of info that's (unknown to the general populace) being pushed over massive research networks and dial-up nodes? (3 days for an email? That's speedy, man!) Or maybe I'm just nostalgic. :-)

    1. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That's pretty cool! Here in the U.S., we had to pay per minute for contemporary services on Compuserve. With prices as high as $0.20 per minute, it's no wonder that Compu$erve was primarily reserved for businesses! But to have hundreds of pages of text information pushed to your television set at no (excluding television tax) cost? That's amazing!

      You see, public entreprises (that belong to the State) aren't always bad... Public service is exactly what it says: service for the public, and not a sinister plot by the Government to enslave the population, as you yankees seem to be happy to believe so easily...

      And where is Compu$erve, nowadays????
    2. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading your post I can see you didn't exactly benefit from your public education.

    3. Re:Pretty cool stuff by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      And where is Compu$erve, nowadays????

      They were bought out by AOL, upgraded to be fully Gooey compliant, then integrated into the AOL user-base. Now they exist only as a website with some news info. It's painful to look at, really.

      The same fate befell Prodigy, GoNetworks, and anyone else who DARED compete with AOL. :-(

    4. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      No UK broadcasters have online feeds, but the Teletext Now and Then site does have a couple of snapshots of Ceefax, one from the early 1980's, and a couple of current ones. The Irish broadcaster RTÉ has it's service, Aertel availible online however.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    5. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 1

      not a sinister plot by the Government to enslave the population, as you yankees seem to be happy to believe so easily.

      I'll try to remember that when they threaten to throw me in jail for not paying my taxes that pays for "services" I didn't ask for.

    6. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This page is also quite interesting: live teletext feeds around the world

    7. Re:Pretty cool stuff by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Ah memories. Sometimes I wonder if the tech of the 80's wasn't cooler than the tech we have today.

      Yeah, it wasn't as good as today's tech, but I'm sure it was cooler. Pretty much everyone who used a computer did so because they wanted to; people were pushing back the limits of the Commodore C64 (and still are); and BBSs were generally cheaper and easier to access than the internet, and had a quirky ANSI colour charm of their own (it helped that Xmodem over a direct connection was faster than TCP/IP using a dozen hops to get to the other computer).

    8. Re:Pretty cool stuff by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Yep. These days thinking about terms like Baud, Kermit, XModem, Acoustic Coupler, Carrier Signals, Parity Bits, Hardware Flow Control, etc, etc, etc all seem as ancient as terms like Superheterodyne, Dynamo, Diode, and Vacuum Tubes. We just take those concepts for granted any more.

      I guess that tech is always more exciting when it's in its prime.

    9. Re:Pretty cool stuff by michael+path · · Score: 2, Informative

      The same fate befell Prodigy, GoNetworks, and anyone else who DARED compete with AOL. :-(

      Actually:

      Prodigy first bought by SBC, and then rolled into the "SBC Yahoo" service when Yahoo's MCI partnership soured.

      Go was bought by Disney, and is a portal for all their owned companies (ABC, ESPN, et al.)

      Besides that, Mindspring and Earthlink are one company. Not EVERYONE was bought by AOL.

    10. Re:Pretty cool stuff by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      As an ex-ZX81 and ZX-Spectrum hacker (Timex machines to US Readers) there was a real challenge to make something work, often because of memory restrictions and lack of in-built functions.

      A friend of mine wrote a little address book app which did a search on names by basically storing it in a table with a hash key. These things weren't there, and so he had to write it.

      I remember the first time I moved a sprite by a pixel! Nowadays, you just tell the window to just do it.

      I think the 80s tech meant that you had to do a lot of thinking. It also teaches people a lot about the fundamentals of computing which is quite heavily abstracted now.

      Incidentally, there was a service in the UK run by British Telecom called Prestel which was designed for businesses and could get you things like flight times. I worked in a shoe sole company writing some modelling software during my college years on a BBC B with 32K of memory which had a prestel adaptor which they used for getting flight times.

    11. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Glen+Ponda · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder. Is there a telnet machine somewhere where we can access the CeeFax info? It would be interesting to see what they're pushing over the airwaves.

      Don't know about Ceefax, but Aertel (Ireland's equivalent) has a web interface: http://www.rte.ie.nyud.net:8090/aertel/index.html

    12. Re:Pretty cool stuff by aurelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah the idea is that you consent to the majority opinion about what services are necessary. If you persuade enough other people to agree with you, then things change accordingly. It's called democracy - one of those things you're supposed to have learnt while growing up.

    13. Re:Pretty cool stuff by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      not a sinister plot by the Government to enslave the population, as you yankees seem to be happy to believe so easily...

      To be fair, not even half of "us yankees" believe that public service funding is a sinister idea. While our conservatives tend to be more so than their counterparts in Great Britain and elsewhere, we also have our share of moderates and liberals who believe in the value of governmental spending for the public good, to varying extents.

    14. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      To be fair, not even half of "us yankees" believe that public service funding is a sinister idea. While our conservatives tend to be more so than their counterparts in Great Britain and elsewhere, we also have our share of moderates and liberals who believe in the value of governmental spending for the public good, to varying extents.
      Well, make sure they go vote in 6 weeks, then.
    15. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 1

      No, that's called "Tyrrany of the Majority", one of those things too few people learn while growing up.

    16. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irish rte tv has teletext and has it online

      i use it instead of their whizz bang graphics service as its fast and simple. also i use it at home on tv so i know all the page numbers by heart

      the section in the bottom right quarter is what is seen on tv. the page guide is just for web users

      http://www.rte.ie/aertel/p103.htm

    17. Re:Pretty cool stuff by arodland · · Score: 1

      So if the majority of slashdotters decide that everyone with an account named after a roman emperor is evil and should be banned, they're somehow right, because they're a majority, and you'll be happy to go along with it?

      If you had agreed to such when you joined slashdot, then you wouldn't have the right to argue, anyway. But most people who are citizens of these various governments, and therefore forced at gunpoint to obey the whims of "majorities", got that way not by choice, but by the accident of having been born on a particular piece of land.

      Why should they go along with their "democracy", then, if they never asked to be governed by it? Because the wonderful allure of the system is that it gives the illusion that if they become part of the majority, do their thing and vote, then they get to exercise power over the people they don't like.

    18. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's democracy. Deal with it, or move to North Korea.

    19. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Triskele · · Score: 1
      I'll try to remember that when they threaten to throw me in jail for not paying my taxes that pays for "services" I didn't ask for.

      Then if it doesn't tax you too much try remembering that you wouldn't have been thrown in jail if you hadn't used the services (no quotes necessary) you didn't "ask" for! (No TV, no Licence Fee needed)

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    20. Re:Pretty cool stuff by operagost · · Score: 1

      You are exaggerating somewhat, but I have heard that anyone in the U.K. who doesn't pay their TV fee gets harrassed mightily, even if they don't have a TV. The authorities just won't believe it. They do everything but search your house for the little portable set you hid in the closet.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:Pretty cool stuff by jcostantino · · Score: 1

      Ummm, hello!? Zmodem!!! Dude, you are so stone age! :) I miss my old USRobotics HST 14.4k modem... it was a black slab about 10x13x1 and it went fast as all hell (for the time).

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    22. Re:Pretty cool stuff by aurelian · · Score: 1
      illusion that if they become part of the majority, do their thing and vote, then they get to exercise power over the people they don't like

      It's not an illusion; that really is pretty much how it works (with the exception that voters don't excercise power themselves, the people they vote for do).

      But most people who are citizens of these various governments, and therefore forced at gunpoint to obey the whims of "majorities"

      Why the inverted commas? Are you suggesting that democratic majorities aren't real? Granted, corruption can occur, but in healthy democracies people generally get voted in because they were able to muster up more support, i.e. they had some form of real majority. (And obviously rare borderline cases like Bush/Gore are subject to noise.. every system has noise.)

    23. Re:Pretty cool stuff by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Ummm, hello!? Zmodem!!!

      Funny thing, that. I couldn't get *functional* terminal software with ZModem support until nearly the time I switched over to the Internet. If I downloaded a new terminal program from a BBS, it would invariably be too old, and running ZModem.exe as an external program never seemed to work right. I think I finally found a terminal program with built-in ZModem support, but man was it ever difficult to find!

      Hmm... I'd forgotten how hard it was to get software before the Internet.

    24. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      No, that's called "Tyrrany of the Majority", one of those things too few people learn while growing up.

      Isn't that what you end up with if you have raw democracy, without any safeguards anyway?

      Sure, the people can vote those safeguards into place. Or they can decide not to; generally speaking, most democracies include laws safeguarding the individual to some extent, but if you accept the definition that it is rule on behalf of the people then.... democracy does not come with 'batteries included'.

      Personally, I always understood democracy to mean the process of rule on behalf of the people; some of these definitions seem to imply otherwise, but aren't these idealistic and misled distortions of the original meaning?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    25. Re:Pretty cool stuff by arodland · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Looking back I don't know why that ended up scare-quoted. Completely not my point.

    26. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Xilman · · Score: 2, Informative
      You are exaggerating somewhat, but I have heard that anyone in the U.K. who doesn't pay their TV fee gets harrassed mightily, even if they don't have a TV.

      I live in the UK and I've heard that too. OTOH, I spent several years without a TV set and was not harassed, mightily or otherwise. Once a year or so a letter would arrive asking me whether I had a TV set and/or licence for it. I'd reply that I had a set, that it was broken and couldn't receive broadcasts and that therefore I didn't need a licence. No real hassle.

      To explain for the benefit of non-Brits: the licence is not for the set but for the ability to receive broadcasts. As my receiver was nonfunctional I didn't need the licence. I only kept the set in the house in order to screw with the brains of the bureaucrats. Eventually I got married, my wife had a fully functional TV set and I ditched the bureaucrat teaser.

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    27. Re:Pretty cool stuff by jcam2 · · Score: 1

      Interactive services like Compuserve are not comparable .. Teletext is read-only, there is no support for email, chat, newsgroups, downloading data or any of the other services a BBS can offer.

    28. Re:Pretty cool stuff by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      90% of what people did was the same stuff people did with CeeFax. Remember, Compuserve was per minute, so people were encouraged to get quick updates. Obviously, things like being able to schedule airline reservations were a big bonus over CeeFax.

    29. Re:Pretty cool stuff by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Crikes.

      Everyone knew YModem-G was the fastest that was available on most systems. Balls to the wall with almost no error correction, baby!

    30. Re:Pretty cool stuff by greenrd · · Score: 1
      So what would you propose as an alternative?

      Tyranny of the minority? Even less just.

      Libertarianism? Libertarianism if taken to its logical conclusion means that if you are an adult and you don't like the social contract, you should move to another country.

      You can't afford to move to another country? Guess what? Some property renters can't afford to move either. Hence, that argument that "people are not free when they cannot afford to do something" should be applied consistently. Which leads to socialism, not libertarianism. QED.

  4. Information by Megaweapon · · Score: 3, Funny

    not only wants to be free but aparently broadcasted in as many forms as possible

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  5. Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by mccalli · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Slashdot title length made me tell a slight falshood there - a number of franchise areas can receive this. But a large majority can't get hold of it, both Telewest and NTL areas (major UK cable suppliers).

    And yes, I'm in an NTL area that can't get it. And yes, I'm terribly annoyed - I used to use the subtitling quite often, even though I'm not deaf. Just wanted the volume off to listen to music, for instance, or needed to be quiet for some other reason.

    NTL, please sort out the broadcasting of teletext as you claimed you weere going to do more than three years ago.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by leonscape · · Score: 1

      Ceefax on Telewest works for me.

      Don't try and drag down Telewest with that mess called NTL.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    2. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yeah - and while they are at it can they sort out the `red button` digital access!

      If you are offering me sky news - i want to be able to press the red button and see what a sky viewer gets. They can do it for Olympics/world cup....

    3. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Sky News only offer there multiscreen thingy on Sky, I don't think they bother with competing platforms (this is the danger if your channel provider also owns a platform as well). It's up to Sky to provide them, but I don't think they would really want to bother with non-Sky platforms.

      The BBC try to offer equal / near equal services however, hence stuff like the World Cup being interactive on all platforms. Have you tried BBC News 24 instead? Maybe they have mutliscreens of some kind (they even have multiscreens on Digital Terrestrial, albeit a grand total of 2).

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    4. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Does NTL have digital box subtitles? Both Sky and Digital Terrestrial have non-teletext / page 888 subtitles (buried in the menus on Sky boxes however, the lack of a subtitles button on the Sky remote is annoying), or aren't they provided on cable either?

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    5. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have NTL's Analogue cable service and receive Teletext on channels that server it.

      Fewer do now, instead pusing you to their digital content. BBC1, BBC2, ITV, C4 and I think Five all offer teletext over NTL.

    6. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I think all analogue cable services still supply Teletext. Certainly Telewest's does. The problem with Teletext on digital cable is that usually the set-top box is connected to the TV via SCART and not RF, so sending the Teletext stuff to the TV to decode is more of a pain than it was for analogue cable, which just needed to provide the channel as it would have been sent over the airwaves.

      It's certainly not impossible, though, as several Sky Digital channels come with teletext attached. The other issue is that many broadcasters are only providing Teletext on their analogue transmissions, so NTL and Telewest digital cable can only provide you with teletext on such channels if they digitise and send the analogue signal, which would probably decrease quality.

    7. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      Teletext works via cable for me too but it's a bit flakey. I usually switch over to a terrestrial channel to use it.
      I think Telewest don't fix it because they want you to use their awful interactive services ('Loading data, please wait.......and wait......and wait.......') which appear to have been designed by someone who just loves the look of eye searing flash and banner filled websites.
      They really need to strip out all the unneeded graphical rubbish as it just slows everything down to the point of unusability and uses up screen space that could be put to better use.

    8. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Teletext over SCART is not a problem at all since the data is encoded in a few lines of the PAL signal. For teletext there is no difference from RF.
      The problem is that the digital decoders need to have a data feed to insert into these lines.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    9. Re:Yes, and cable companies -still- don't show it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NTL TV interface is a triumph of style over substance. S-l-o-w, unreliable, crashes every couple of days - it should never have been let loose as a consumer product. If you want to do the simplest of things like look up your local weather or check the lottery results, you've got to wade through tedious menus at a snail's pace, only to find that the whole UI has frozen.... I miss teletext so much...just a few keypresses & the page was there with no fannying around.

  6. An Example for us All by SlashdotMirrorer · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is a good example of how the BBC is on the forefront of journalistic technology compared to the majority of US news services. One can only hope that one day soon, the FoxNEWs of the US journalism "scene" will wake up and smell the coffee of pure information display in an easy and nonobtrusively readable manner.

  7. 3 days by dolmen.fr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ceefax [...] turns 30 today (just 3 days after myself) [...]

    And 12 after myself. So what ?

    1. Re:3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're very hasty to reveal your date of birth so soon.

      You'll be telling us your social security number and bank next.

    2. Re:3 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, happy belated birthday to you both, along with Ceefax, from a fellow Slashdotter.

    3. Re:3 days by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      The social security number is not important in France as it is in USA.
      Here, it is only used for health care related services. There is no universal number used by all government or private databases because our rights are protected by the CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés: Computer and Freedom National Commission) that exists since the 70's.

  8. Ceefax is cool but dated.... by tdvaughan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...and its days are numbered. The UK government's deadling for ceasing analogue transmissions is 2012, at which point we'll all have to use the richer digital content. The reason it's been so successful for so long is similar to fax's longevity: it just works, and everyone is familiar with it.

    1. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with "richer digital content" is that it takes frigging ages to load.


      If you want to look at the news headlines in Ceefax it'll take you a few seconds on a FastText TV. You'd be lucky for Sky News / BBC Interactive to even loaded after 30 seconds and then prepare to waste more time coping with the ever changing navigational controls scrolling through the headlines.


      At least the BBC try their best to keep their digital interactive service fast and useful. The Sky version is so laden with shite such as banner ads that it is pointless to even use it.


      But there is one 'feature' that absolutely kills my interest interactive content - that bloody red dot.

    2. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by _Laban_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Will have to use? Most Swedish channels that transmit teletext in the analogue network do it in the digital version too. The only difference is that it's a lot quicker in the digital version. It's the same chunky graphics, interface etc though. One example of this is SVT (I think it could be called the Swedish equivalent of BBC, http://www.svt.se).

    3. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with "richer digital content" is that it takes frigging ages to load.

      And it's a pain in the arse to navigate. For some reason the ("we're not dumbing down") BBC thing that the population can't handle typing something like "601" (it's got numbers in -- so it must be complicated, right?), so we have to press "down down down select down select right right right" instead.

    4. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      that bloody red dot.

      Amen!

      I've even gone as far as manually adding the main channels to the 'other channels' section of the receiver. When you watch them via this, none of the interactive stuff comes through.

      A bit ackward, but those red dots are sooo sooo annoying. I'm watching a TV show, I don't want to press the bloody red button to see 50% adverts and 50% utter meaningless crap.

      Grrrrrr.......

    5. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by Bazzargh · · Score: 1

      "richer digital content"

      I don't know if you've tried it but the digital content is *worse* than teletext, for subtitling. On a teletext enabled tv you just press the text button to surf to 888 for the subtitles. They appear pretty much instantaneously, and are easy to toggle on and off.

      On Sky (and apparently freeview) you have to:
      - press services, to get this menu
      - press 4 to get this menu
      - press 3 to get this menu
      - press down to select the subtitles
      - press right to change the language.

      And the menus are sloooooooooooow. While you're doing this the program you were watching is interrupted and some crappy background music plays. They're designed to be permanently on or permanently off. Believe it or not, this is putting me off switching to digital.

      Googling to see if anyone else has commented on the problem, I found it's actually in the Ofcom checklist for DTV equipement suppliers (see C.3)... which obviously none of them have read.

    6. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      so we have to press "down down down select down select right right right" instead.

      You're doing it wrong. You have to press "up", "up", "down", "down", "left", "right", "left", "right", "a", "b", "select", "start"!

      Ermm... what were we talking about again?

    7. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by shippo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The performance is far faster on DVB-T, at least on the lastest decoder boxes. I was shocked when I saw the performance on a friends Sky box a few months ago.

    8. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I have a Grundig Sky box and I was shocked when I saw the performance my Dad's terrestrial digital TV. He bought it soon after digital came out. While the picture is fine, the channel guide is a joke and interactive content is like watching a prestel page load on a 1200 modem. Even channel hopping takes 2 seconds between channels. I bought him a £65 standalone decoder for Christmas.


      I'm guessing later generations of boxes do things they should have done in the first place, such as caching data, and having the signal processors & CPU that actually cope with the content.


      I have no idea what the Sky+ boxes are like, but I hear they don't timeshift interactive content at all. That being the case they probably don't cache it either even if it would massively improve the perceived performance.

    9. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by danimrich · · Score: 1

      You can get Teletext (the german version) via digital satellite TV. I'd think that it'll also be possible to receive it via digital terrestrial television.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    10. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Relating to this, one UK blogger actually did do a speed comparison between Ceefax and BBCi. Ceefax won on just about every test sample used.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    11. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      The trouble is, "richer digital content" is really rubbis sometimes. It seems to mean that my TV times are in colour rather than B&W. Much slower, and I find, less reliable.

      I still find myself switching from freeview to TV tuner and putting old teletext on.

      Some content doesn't need to be richer, anyway.

    12. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Most Swedish channels that transmit teletext in the analogue network do it in the digital version too. The only difference is that it's a lot quicker in the digital version.

      The main reason Ceefax is quicker than Digital Text (AKA "Press the Red Button") in the UK is that the low numbered pages are broadcast more often. So pages in the 100-199 range come up almost instantly, 200-299 within a few seconds, and larger numbers take a long time. When I've browsed teletext in Scandinavia, it always seems like they give all pages the same priority, making the whole thing really slow.

    13. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      This is not true, DVB offers a fully compatible mode of transferring teletext pages.
      Unfortunately the BBC (unlike all other broadcasters on the European continent) fails to see this and does not broadcast their teletext service over DVB.
      That is a problem of the BBC, not of digital transmissions.

    14. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by Herz · · Score: 0

      SVT used to broadcast the pages with the news headlines and the TV listings twice. Maybe they have stopped that now. Teletext on TV3, TV4 and Kanal5 is bogged down with various commercial stuff and thus very slow. Thank god for page memory.

      --
      In vino vici
    15. Re:Ceefax is cool but dated.... by dgeezer · · Score: 1

      It's true. The direct link to my speed comparison is here.

  9. Dang... by dnno · · Score: 1

    Wow, I thought that they had discontinued that a while ago. That is interesting that, that many people still use it.

    "...I thought we were an autonomus autocracy!" --Monty Python and the Quest for the Holy Grail (for those who dont know!)

    --
    feh, lots of things are pointless, this one too
    1. Re:Dang... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITYM "autonomous collective".

      Philistine.

    2. Re:Dang... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually it's autonomous collective or Anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major--

      Hang on, someone calling himself my king is ordering me to be quiet.

      But you're fooling yourself. We're actually living in a dictatorship.

      Source

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  10. Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ....Mostly because here in the USA we have flat-rate unlimited local calling for telephone service, which resulted in people going online through modems using telephone lines. That's why online services proliferated, and the rise of the public Internet happened in the USA due to this factor and the arrival of V.34 (28.8 to 33.6Kbps download speeds) and V.90 (56 Kbps download speed) modems in the 1990's.

    1. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by ozric99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All of that is true, however it's largely unrelated - the rise of the public internet happened largely in the last decade, not 30 years ago.

    2. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      You know, we had BBSs here in Europe as well (although no flat rates)... but more to the point, they are different beasts altogether. Teletext isn't interactive in any way, it's just a handy way of retrieving small amounts of data with your remote. And for that purpose it actually works better than a terminal (accessible from your couch), and doesn't cost anything to the consumer.

    3. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure if the phone rates had anything to do with BBS proliferation. CeeFax was popular in the days when computers cost $3000 + $500 for a modem, and BBSes where long distance calls for 95% of the population.

      I'm guessing that the real reason has to do with the US's decentralized broadcast networks. When all the networks are owned and operated by the government, it's pretty easy to ensure that they conform. But in the US, we had tons of stations out in the country that survived on a shoestring budget. They probably saw little value in operating and maintaining Teletext services, so it never quite caught on.

      And since the cities tended to be the few places where Compuserve calls were local and BBSes existed, there was no incentive deploy the systems there.

    4. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by Dj · · Score: 1

      Phooey! You have interactivity on Ceefax. That's what the "Reveal" button was for. What you mean is that is didn't have upstream interactivity. :)

      --
      "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
    5. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by leonscape · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tell me do you always link completely separate things in bizarre twists of the Logic? or are you just stupid?

      Ceefax 1974, BBS mid to late 80's, Internet 90's. One did not affect the adoption of the other. Internet actually replaced BBS, and until the mid 90's 98% of the population wouldn't be able to tell you what the Internet was never mind what the hell BBS was.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    6. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      I agree, very largely unrelated. Modems, free local calls had nothing to do with Ceefax type service not taking off. Perhaps its the way the BBC was setup that helped Ceefax becomewhat it was.

      Non-free local calls in the UK could easily be argued to have stunted the growth and potential of the Internet in the UK though.

    7. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      Ummmm...and how did that help in the 70's and 80's?

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    8. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by ozric99 · · Score: 1
      I agree, very largely unrelated. Modems, free local calls had nothing to do with Ceefax type service not taking off. Perhaps its the way the BBC was setup that helped Ceefax becomewhat it was.

      I'm sure that had a large effect on the take-up of ceefax among UK viewers although without knowing a great deal about how the US TV system works (or worked) I couldn't give a definite answer.

      Non-free local calls in the UK could easily be argued to have stunted the growth and potential of the Internet in the UK though.

      Yes, I agree somewhat with that argument. Although, to turn it on its head, could the success of services like BBC's Ceefax and ITV's Teletext have caused such a slow initial rise in the acceptance of the internet in the UK?

      "Why should I go buy a computer and pay an ISP/telco to get the same information I can get for free sitting on my couch with the remote control in one hand and a cup of tea in t'other" ;-)

      I'm British and was using ceefax to get sports results, news and tv schedules up until the time I moved to Oklahoma earlier this year. I know I can get the same information on the internet via my computer or even my mobile phone but, for the same reason I still jot notes down on paper, sometimes the simple/oldest option is the best.

    9. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The BBS scene was also strong in Britain (local calls weren't exactly expensive) and not only did Britain have electricity in the 1990s, there were also V.90 modems too!

    10. Re:Teletext never really popular in the USA.... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      If you think that is true, why is RADIO popular in the USA? You could setup a flatrate call to the station instead of listening to AM radio, couldn't you?

      Similarly, there is a difference between broadcast teletext and flatrate Internet.
      I still read my news on teletext, not on Internet.

  11. DecimalHexi by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One "cool" thing about the teletext system was the little known fact that the page numbers are actually in HEX.

    The "public" pages only use hex numbers that consist only of numeric characters, but I once had a TV that allowed you to enter the hex numbers aswell, and you could find all sorts of cool stuff, including some kind of system to automatically set video-recorders etc.

    1. Re:DecimalHexi by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Some other stuff:

      The transmitted pages are 000-7ff but the user visible pages are 100-899
      The start page is 100 and not 000, pages 000-0ff are mapped to 800-8ff.

      Appearantly the general public will get confused when they have to punch in numbers starting with zero.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:DecimalHexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      including some kind of system to automatically set video-recorders etc.

      That would be the accursed "videoplus". I bought a VCR which had "videoplus+" listed on the box as a feature (I'd never heard of it) Nice VCR, too. But a year or so later, timer-programmed recordings started gettting screwed up. Why? Because UK stations had started transmitting those fscking videoplus codes, my VCR had it enabled by default, and videoplus overrode the timer settings if the VCR could detect a videoplus signal, even if no videoplus code had been programmed on the VCR.. And there was no way to permanently turn off that crap by default: EVERY time I wanted to record I had to make sure V+ was turned off, as it overrode any timer programming. If you actally did use that crap, it wasn't reliable: I know of people missing recording Babylon 5 in its uncut 1am broadcast because some engineer at Channel 4 couldn't be bothered to turn on the V+ signal when the program started, Fortunately I was using the timer. (I don't buy newspapers or listings magazines, and there was no way to get hold of the codes without paying somehow, the company pushing this shite charged for the privilege of printing the codes) At least they've atarted making Videoplus-free VCRs again; for a a while there they all had this crappy "feature"

    3. Re:DecimalHexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else has claimed that the numbers are actually BCD, so they clearly can't be both hexidecimal and BCD. Does anyone actually know what the truth is? With references?

    4. Re:DecimalHexi by leonscape · · Score: 1

      This was actually a real concern at the time. How to make sure people always punch the three buttons.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    5. Re:DecimalHexi by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "I know of people missing recording Babylon 5 in its uncut 1am broadcast because some engineer at Channel 4 couldn't be bothered to turn on the V+ signal when the program started"

      Yeah, I was one of those people: took me an age to figure out why my VCR wouldn't record the programs I told it to record...

    6. Re:DecimalHexi by mu22le · · Score: 0

      Cool (oh my god I'm so geek)... I wish I was able to look at them.

      Btw here in Italy teletext (aka "televideo") has been used to distibute software...
      pages under 100 were reserved to transmit data that could be received with a special pc card.
      I think the system is still working, broadcasting software utilities, novels and simple (at the time they were dos) games, and I think all that stuff was in the public domain, maybe even GPL.

    7. Re:DecimalHexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lots of the Teletext based quiz games used to exploit this feature in conjunction with "Fastext" (where your remote had 4 coloured buttons that jumped to related pages listed on screen).

      Each question was multiple choice and you used Fastext to answer. Obviously, useful page numbers like 123 couldn't be wasted on pages that just said "Sorry, wrong answer" so Fastext was used to send people to pages like 54B.

      Fastext got around the problem of people not having a "B", for instance, on their remote. More importantly, it stopped the viewer from noticing that three answers went to page 54B whilst one pointed to 54C...

    8. Re:DecimalHexi by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      I can't actually remember (and I used to work at the BBC as a transmitter engineer!), but I'm pretty certain that it was in hex. Here's a site for 'enthusiasts'. I'll leave you to wade through the details!

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    9. Re:DecimalHexi by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Both.... With BCD each digit takes up 4 bits.

      binary BCD HEX
      0000 0 0
      0001 1 1
      0010 2 2
      0011 3 3
      0100 4 4
      0101 5 5
      0110 6 6
      0111 7 7
      1000 8 8
      1001 9 9
      1010 - A
      1011 - B
      1100 - C
      1101 - D
      1110 - E
      1111 - F

      You see? BCD is the same as hex, but you simply don't use all available codes.
      Teletext/Ceefax uses the BCD subset of the total address space to make it easier to understand and use for its users.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    10. Re:DecimalHexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BCD gives me headaches at the best of times, and I have to admit I've never seen BCH but now you demonstrate it, it makes sense (As much sense as BCD can make to my binary adled brain). Funky. I should have expected such things from something like teletext..

    11. Re:DecimalHexi by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Yes, you could program a video recorder by navigating to one of the program pages, pressing a button and selecting the show you'd like to record. It was pretty simple and far more convenient than the "ShowView" system where you have to buy a TV guide and then punch in a long number. My video recorder is probably 15 years old, but this programming feature works very well. It doesn't have ShowView.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    12. Re:DecimalHexi by displaced80 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, it wasn't Gemstar's VideoPlus+ system that caused that problem -- it was Programme Direct Control (PDC) signals.

      VP+ was that system where a code was printed in TV listings magazines. You then entered that code into the remote of a VP+ capable VCR, and that code was translated into the channel, start and stop times for the programme to be recorded.

      PDC, similar to Teletext, embedded data in an unused area of the screen. The idea was that broadcasters could signal the precise start & stop times of their shows, allowing PDC-enabled VCR's to adjust their timer-recordings appropriately.

      Channel 4 was the only broadcaster to make a good attempt at PDC, and even then it was unreliable. There was a page on C4's Teletext service (p799 I think...) which let you view the PDC signal events in real-time. No idea if it's still working. Incidentally, Channel 4 were also the only broadcaster to implement PAL-Plus. The idea of PAL-Plus was to allow broadcasters to transmit shows in anamorphic widescreen, and the embedded P+ signal let a suitable TV automatically switch to the correct mode (adding vertical bars if the screen was 4:3, or leaving untouched if 16:9). All on standard analogue transmissions.

      This was all a good decade or so before digital services made this sort of thing commonplace.

      (who remembers playing Bamboozle on C4 teletext? Or what about Digitiser, the gaming and tech pages? Or, back in the early eighties, getting BBC Micro code from Ceefax? I gotta say, without the Beeb I wouldn't have ended up starting out in computing as early as I did)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    13. Re:DecimalHexi by shippo · · Score: 1

      Some commercial companies would rent pages of Oracle for display purposes, and these would have page numbers like these, inaccesible from most domestic handsets. I remember Dixons (a high street retailer, well known for their ignorant staff) having a custom page once that they'd show in their shops. I've no idea how they accessed it, though.

    14. Re:DecimalHexi by pobice · · Score: 1

      PDC worked pretty well for me. Don't think I ever had a case of a misssed program. Still works on the last few instances I used.

      I'm in the Emley Moor area just in case anyone was wondering.

    15. Re:DecimalHexi by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Good stuff.. glad it worked well for someone! :)

      I haven't tried it recently. Digital satellite, with its plethora of timeslip channels and 'Second Chance Sundays' sorta sidelined my VCR quite a few years ago. And once I got a HD-based PVR and standalone DVD recorder (Sky+ and a Toshiba DR-1), VCRs with PDC have found their way into the attic.

      I wouldn't be surprised if PDC is much more reliable these days. Having to provide EPG data for digital broadcasts has proably forced broadcasters to improve the IT side of their scheduling... and so maybe their PDC accuracy.

      My analogue's from the Crystal Palace transmitter. If that VCR was still hooked up, I'd give PDC a try :) (and that's another point -- PDC, like Teletext, needs a good signal. It's quite possible to have a fine TV picture, but still get garbled teletext/intermittent PDC)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    16. Re:DecimalHexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Dixons had a box with a rom type cartridge that contained the data hooked up to the instore aerial system, new cartridges would be sent from headoffice along with new point of sale material.

  12. Is it like the german videotext? by firefarter · · Score: 1

    Just had to think of my father-in-law, who recently got a laptop, DSL flatrate... and an USB tv tuner so he could watch his stocks and the football scores in four windows.

    I was just speechless! To go at such length and spend so much, just to replace the TV!

    1. Re:Is it like the german videotext? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

  13. Ceefax Slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not that slow. Some new TV's cache the pages so you can have a whole story at the touch of a button.

    And is the new digital text better? Well it has better graphics but there is actually far less information there and its far far slower!

    1. Re:Ceefax Slow? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Teletext and Digital text seem to take about the same time to load a page really (unless you're using an ex-ONdigital box). But digital services load all the multiple pages, you don't have to wait for each subpages to load.

      Teletext has more information, but it's harder to find, unless you memorise the index. Otherwise you have to look it up in the index, which is a mass of subpages, so you have to wait ages for the right pages to come around. With digital text services you can actually use a menu. which I like.

      Personally I think the main problem with digital text is that Ceefax has more information, I just wish they'd port it all to the digital service myself...

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
  14. Closer to a BBC Micro. by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The data presented by the Ceefax decoder in UK televisions appears to be closely related to the BBC Micro. In fact, if you directly compare an early BBC Micro display to teletext, you'd be pushed to spot a difference

    Most decoders fitted to UK TV's were actually simple TTL devices which just presented a 31 character set of glyphs to the screen.

    Indeed, in the early 80's, the BBC transmitted programs for the BBC Micro via teletext in a 'Telesoftware' service. This finally ended around 1989.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by Billy69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, when the BBC started the BBC literacy project in 1980, it was a requirement of the hardware that it would have a 'teletext' mode. This then became the BBC Micro's 'Mode 7' graphics.

      --
      #include "disclaimer.h"
    2. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because one of the BBC's design requirements for the BBC Micro was that it would be able to display Ceefax. Hence Mode 7 on the BBC Micro, which is a teletext display mode (there's a separate section the manual saying how to do graphics etc. in this mode, as it's a bit different from the way other modes work). AFAIK I think the BBC Micro has a separate chip just for that mode, which is why (AFAIK) it isn't available on the low cost Acorn Electron.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by Mant · · Score: 1

      The BBC had a number of display modes with different numbers of colours and resolutions.

      One of these was Mode 7, which displayed just like Teletext. You could even get a Teletext adapter for your Beeb, plug in a TV cable and view Teletext on your monitor.

    4. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by jantheman · · Score: 1

      you mean it had one of these in it.

      --
      -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
    5. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by Billy69 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed. This page makes interesting reading for any BBC micro fan. The paragraph after the first table mentions the use of Mode 7 and Teletext. It also mentions the BBC micro teletext adaptor

      --
      #include "disclaimer.h"
    6. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by doodlelogic · · Score: 1

      Indeed again - look at the lack of bloat in those days!

      "32K of ROM - by any standards, a huge quantity of ROM to devote to built-in functions and commands."

    7. Re:Closer to a BBC Micro. by madprof · · Score: 1

      An excellent piece. If I hadn't already posted to this story I'd have modded you up - thank for providing that link.
      Absolutely true as well, it was a really good unit for its day although ISTR we got an Intel processor with up to 1MB RAM instead of a National 16032 with 16MB RAM.
      I picked up 3 BBC Bs for free the other day plus a colour Cub monitor so I'm feeling pretty smug. ;-)

  15. Hellooo???? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Conservative leader Michael Howard said it was a first-class public service. Ceefax began as an experimental service of 30 pages but now has 1,000 pages.
    Something must be wrong with this guy. Conservatives always want to abolish public services...
    1. Re:Hellooo???? by MichiganDan · · Score: 1

      Conservatives just believe in a definition of public good and natural monopoly that is less comprehensive than what those of a more liberal bent tend to believe.

      You have to rememver that, by world standards, American conservatives aren't conservative -- they're full-fledged right-wingers who believe, in the words of Dick Armey, that "the purpose of government is to marshal an army, build roads, and I'm running out of reasons."

      In America, conservatives want to abolish NPR and PBS. In Britain, they want to simply want to reform the system, eliminate the television license fee (probably a good idea, given the high costs of enforcement), and force the Beeb to be more competitive with for-profit entities. There's a world of difference between Tories and Republicans.

  16. not to be confused with.. by dosle · · Score: 0
  17. Alevt by alanxyzzy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Alevt is the open source teletext player.

    It runs all the time on one of my desktops - IMHO it is the very best source of concise, up-to-date information.

    Here are some dumps of the current BBC front pages, courtesy of alevtd and w3m (some stuff snipped to avoid slashdot "junk" lameness filter).

    101.00 CEEFAX 2 101 Thu 23 Sep 14:46/55
    HOSTAGE'S RELEASE 'SABOTAGED BY US' 104
    Straw rules out Bigley negotiations 105

    BARRACKS Fresh abuses claims probed 113

    LIB DEM We're on the move Kennedy 115

    AIR BA taking on 200 Heathrow staff 110

    FBI Deported Cat Stevens back in UK 108

    SOCCER Keane denies assault charges 122

    HAITI Toll from flooding tops 1,000 114

    TRIBUTES Ceefax celebrates 30 years 111

    CATCH UP WITH YORKS & LINCS NEWS 160

    News index Top story TV/Radio Main menu

    << < o > >>
    100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 about
    Jump to page [ ] [ok]

    <hr>
    104.00 CEEFAX 2 104 Thu 23 Sep 14:48/20
    UK hostage's release 'sabotaged'
    The brother of British hostage Kenneth
    Bigley says the US has "sabotaged" his
    brother's release by refusing to free a
    detained woman scientist in Iraq.

    Paul Bigley told the BBC there had been
    "a shadow of light" when Iraqi
    ministers said the woman would go free.

    But the US ruled out freeing the woman
    one of two held in Iraq - saying it
    would not give in to the kidnappers.

    Kenneth Bigley was seen in a video
    appealing to UK Prime Minister Tony
    Blair to help save his life.

    Home news digest 141 World digest 142
    News Index 102 Flash 150 Regional 160
    Next News News Indx Headlines Main Menu

    << < o > >>
    100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 about
    Jump to page [ ] [ok]
    1. Re:Alevt by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I just wish there was a good way of overlaying teletext subtitles with tvtime. It's handy being able to watch tv without needing the sound on.

      It's amusing that tvtime with my nearly decade-old hauppauge tv card still gives a better picture quality than any TV I've seen.

    2. Re:Alevt by smurf975 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you are complaining about the quality of teletext subtitels or the lack of them. But on BBC 1 and 2 for most shows you just goto page 888.

      --
      -- I don't buy it, I grow it.
  18. TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by CvD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its called Teletekst here in the Netherlands and is still used quite a lot. The public broadcasting corporation even has a web gateway. Check it out here for those of you unfamiliar with the concept of teletekst:

    http://teletekst.nos.nl/

    So you basically see all the area in black on your TV screen... use your remote to search for the pages.

    I guess they have this service on the web because a lot of people, like another poster said, like the sparse/terse way of information presentation. I frequently visit the weather (page 702) and news page (page 101) for a quick overview. Very useful.

    Also used for TV program listings and stuff like that (page 201 usually).

    1. Re:TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by What'sInAName · · Score: 2, Funny



      That's great, but it doesn't seem very useful. All the text is garbled! Either that or someone cannot spell. nieuws? televisie? I don't get it!

      (Yes, for the humo(u)r impaired, I am joking!)

    2. Re:TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Here is Aertel (the one for Ireland).

    3. Re:TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by derekb · · Score: 1

      I just returned back to Canada after having lived in the Netherlands (Maastricht) for the last 3 years. Now I'm back to the 'tv guide channel' to find out what is on air, 4:3 tv, NTSC, $500k fines for exposed nipples AND MY GOD THE COMMERCIALS! Holy crap North American TV has a lot of commercials.

      Teletekst was fantastic for finding out what was on TV

      Of course without it, you haven't a chance in hell of remembering your weekly tv show starts at 6:18pm every second Tuesday. Programs start at seemingly random moments in the day.

    4. Re:TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by danimrich · · Score: 1

      The same for Austria:
      http://teletext.orf.at

      I find it particularly interesting that they also have arrivals and departure information from the main airports and some railway stations. Try pages 827-834, for example. An overview of these services is on page 825. I don't know whether there is a similar service on the web.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    5. Re:TeleTekst here in the Netherlands by ianezz · · Score: 1
      And in Italy it's Televideo. Here's the web gateway for the public channels.

      A curiosity: some pages (see page 781 and subsequent) are stil used today to broadcast data (mostly old MS-DOS binaries, and textfiles from the italian branch of project Gutemberg) to PC equipped with a special decoding card.

  19. Digitiser by SKicker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    anyone remember the computer game page on channel 4 teletext called digitiser? That was some weird stuff..

    http://www.lynn3686.freeserve.co.uk/digitiser.html
    http://www.mrbiffo.com/biffodigitiser.htm

    'The Man' and his column and all that 'press reveal' only to uncover a weird swan or something with flashing red eyes.

    I always wondered who was paying the wages of those crazy guys

    1. Re:Digitiser by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Look at the last picture on the page, from your first link.

      Is that what I think it is? It looks like a Commodore 64 era money shot!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Digitiser by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

      Digitiser was certainly one of the best things on Teletext. I think it ran for around 10 years before they decided to call it a day.

      Possibly what made Digitiser so popular was not so much the fact that they reviewed games, but the very surreal humour.

      The Man with the long chin and Mr T and his bins were certainly some of my favourite characters on the pages.

    3. Re:Digitiser by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I used to love digitiser. It never strayed away from providing absolutely top notch, quality content without any ego. The cult following and subtle but huge community spirit made it something quite amazing.

      It's sad to hear now, tha tit got wrapped up last year.

      Oh yeah, and digital services suck. They're slow, lacking in information, hard to read (how much can you anti-alias the text so its unreadable competitions must go on at press-red-button meetings) and have far too much eyecandy. id love a faster, cleaner teletex/ceefax please.

    4. Re:Digitiser by shish · · Score: 1
      Mr Biffo was the man! It actually brings a tear to my eye to remember he and his team (and his gin), and how they're no longer with us (especially the gin) :( (Although he still has an edge column)

      From what I can figure out Mr Biffo had a falling out with some people at C4, and generally disliked working for them. When digi was closed on teletext he turned it into a website, but there was no advertisment and nobody noticed until it was too late, so it closed from lack of funding :(

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    5. Re:Digitiser by netvoid · · Score: 0

      You might already know this, but Mr Biffo now writes for CBBC 'My parents are aliens' and 'Eastenders'! I keep waiting for Zombie Dave to appear on Eastenders MMMMPPHHHRCCCPPUUNGGNNTSS

  20. Taking it for granted by misterCRAP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being only 20 myself, I've grown up with Ceefax. (for those of you moaning "it's called teletext isnt it?"-- BBC were the first to come up with it and called it Ceefax, other people who then followed the idea called it teletext)

    It's therefore always been at hand and is still very useful till this day. I hadn't really ever thought of TV's without it.

    I wonder if the younger generations will one day take the internet for granted and not realise what a great technological advance it really was!

    --
    "Je suis sac du poubelle dans la jardin"-- RDC
  21. Pictures of CEEFAX pages by ultrasound · · Score: 3, Interesting
    For anyone interested there are so great photos of early Ceefax and Oracle pages as well some personal histories here and here

    I still use Ceefax a lot, especially as a news source and for sports scores.

  22. wait too long, Re:Teletext by samjam · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is also a source of grief to me that modern TV's don't cache the pages as they receive them so you always get the page you want instantly.
    Up to 799 pages (BCD with 3 bits for the top number) (yes 088 is the real page that is 888) at 1K each, thats less than 1MB uncompressed!

    I also remember that BBC used to distribute software over teletext which yu could pick up with your BBC Micro teletext decoder.

    Sam

    1. Re:wait too long, Re:Teletext by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      You used to get TVs that did this - I distinctly remember playing with a late 80s ITT that had a mass of 6116 memory chips and could cache something like 16 pages. The "Fastext" system (the four coloured buttons) was supposed to cache all the pages, including rolling pages. This ITT thing was like an early version of it.


      Thing is, you had to wait until all the pages in a carousel had loaded, but then you could flip backwards and forwards through them. It was even non-volatile.

    2. Re:wait too long, Re:Teletext by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Actually I find that the bigger the TV is, the more likely that it has teletext memory. My very cheap 6 year old 25" has a simple teletext memory - it stores around 3 pages next to the current one, and 3 pages before, along with the fastext pages, but yeah still poor. My fairly expensive 14" TV of around the same age didn't have any teletext memory not even for fastext. European TV's had much better teletext memory - I remember when I went to Sweden, the TV I watched there could store every page and subpages on the current magazine (i.e. 100-199, or 200-299 and so on) and you could select the subpage - and flip between them manually, and backwards too which was a godsend. I wish British TV's had that feature :/

  23. Re:Ugh, that looks horrible. by draevil · · Score: 1

    If you recall the first article, this is 30 years old!

    Furthermore, we do have interactive TV on the Digital broadcasts - e.g. Sky Digital, NTL (cable), Telewest (cable) and FreeView (a free terrestrial digital broadcast that has all of the BBC channels etc).

    The number of times I've watched my Dad flick from the digital broadcast of a channel to the analogue one just to use teletext/ceefax is remarkable. The digital is much more flashy with its multiscreen/in-screen news feeds etc but he just prefers the simpler analogue ceefax/teletext.

    Many people prefer the simple but fun quizes on ceefax etc than playing a graphical game over digital - especially since there is often a cost fo those games.

    A triumph of a simple system that does its job well over a more complex one it seems...

  24. Article error by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...it is text information pages sent in out-of-band data space of TV transmissions...

    No, it is not 'out of band'. The data is sent using parts of the signal that are not part of the picture. If you know what the vertical blanking interval is, you know what I mean. If you don't, go learn something.

    The submitter is no engineer. Par for the /. course, I guess.

    1. Re:Article error by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "not part of the picture" sounds like out of band to me. Or what would you consider out of band, something on a different channel altogether? Stop nit picking.

    2. Re:Article error by gellenburg · · Score: 1

      Out of band refers to any communication that happens outside normal channels.

      In this case, for the submitter (and for everyone else watching BBC TV) the normal channel would be the television program(me), ala BBC News, or information embedded in the actual image (ala CNN Headline News, etc.).

      So, while the submitter may not be an engineer, he certainly isn't incorrect, and the word usage is the same, and still applies, none the less.

    3. Re:Article error by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      "Out of band" would mean not within the bandwidth of the channel itself. SAP is broadcast "out of band", IIRC.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Article error by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stop nit picking.

      You must be new here.

    5. Re:Article error by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      In that case the submitter 'and everyone else' shouldn't try to sound like an engineer.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    6. Re:Article error by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      According to your logic, in a phone call, where voice is the normal channel, multifrequency tones would be out of band.

    7. Re:Article error by gellenburg · · Score: 1

      You are almost correct.

      You're over analyzing this. You're thinking of ths submitter in geek terms, and restricting your thinking to just the transport layer itself (the television broadcast).

      But OOB is not just a networking term, OOB is routinely used in cryptography, security, espionage, and in general day to day communication.

      One even communicates out of band with a spouse in front of a small child when saying, "I'm taking her to the d-e-n-t-i-s-t in an hour."

      OOB is simply any communication outside normal channels.

      Spooks use OOB communication to receive the secret keys for deciphering coded messages.

      In fact, OOB should even be used in day to day life when exchanging public PGP keys. You exchange the public PGP keys normally, but use OOB communication to verify those keys.

      It's actually quite simple, not really sure why you're making such a fuss over it all.

    8. Re:Article error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y-o-u a-r-e d-e-s-c-r-i-b-i-n-g e-n-c-r-y-p-t-e-d i-n-b-a-n-d s-i-g-n-a-l-l-i-n-g.

      Not out of band.

      Out of band would be handing your spouse a note.

  25. Re:Ugh, that looks horrible. by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

    Digital TV services do have better interactive functionality, although naturally Terrestrial, Cable and Satellite services all use different methods though. BBC, Teletext Ltd., and BSkyB all offer some form of general digital text service (rather than specialised interactive stuff like multi-angle sport, news multiscreens etc.), and a few other channels have more channel specific information services, like UKTV.

    I think all digital TV in the UK can theoretically carry old style subtitles as well (teletext is sent separate from the MPEG stream, and reinserted afterwards), although Digital Terrestrial doesn't usually carry it, and most channel don't offer services anyway (even the BBC, using teletext on digital just gives you a message saying you should use the BBCi Digital[1] Text service instead).

    [1] All teletext is digital, but the old style teletext is usually called analogue teletext to differentiate it from the versions on digital platforms.

    --
    10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
    20 GOTO 10
  26. The digital text services are a huge step back by goul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a football (soccer) fan ceefax is the fastest way to keep up to date. I don't know any football fan who hasn't at some time "watched" a match on ceefax.

    The 30 years of ceefax pages (p190 from memory) have quotes from several players and top managers (as well as David Moyes) saying pretty much the same.

    Interviews with players in the past have quotes where ceefax is often the first time they here about something happening at the club they play for.

    By comparison the digital services like "Sky Text" etc are slow and clunky. They don't allow the flexibility to show/hide information quickly and in my opinion are a huge step backwards for usability.

    1. Re:The digital text services are a huge step back by tcr · · Score: 1

      Heh... :-)

      Reminds me of something I read in a recent season.

      I think Saints had a good run of form early on, 3rd in the table I think, and Strachan was asked what he did immediately after the match. Apparently he rushed home, brought up teletext, and sat chuckling at the table on screen for hours... :-)

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  27. Ceefax is great by PorscheDriver · · Score: 2, Informative
    I currently have a digital STB here in the UK. If I want to look at the sports or news, I hit the 'Interactive' button, and then have to wait about a minute, whilst my Pace box downloads lots of adverts, and graphics, and all sorts of rubbish. Plus you have to navigate through lots of menus. (I would say about 6 steps, just to get to the football scores - each page taking anywhere between 10 seconds, and 60 seconds to download).

    In other words - It sucks! There's no 'direct access' to information.

    Ceefax is great for the footy scores - if you know the page number, you just type it in, and voila - you're on the current scores for the Premiership or whatever. Took about 10 seconds.

    Kind of like the latest version of Windows really - it's much newer, but it takes 10 times as long to do anything as it did 10 years ago on your 486 :-)

    --
    "This is your life, and it's ending one second at a time."
    1. Re:Ceefax is great by shippo · · Score: 1

      The Pace box is slower than some of the other DVB-T boxes out there, but even so getting to the right infomation can be tricky. Plus the football results don't seem to get updated whilst being viewed.

    2. Re:Ceefax is great by fremsley471 · · Score: 1
      Plus the football results don't seem to get updated whilst being viewed

      Ah..., how many penalty shoot-outs I've watched on Ceefax, as tense as watching it 'live'! Ceefax is quite wonderful and 2012 simply isn't going to happen- they only got rid of the last 425 line transmitter in the late eighties so our 625 is safe for some time.

  28. Ceeeeeeefax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well Ceefax used to be very important for me.

    I'm really sad about it :-(

    Joe
    ---
    My ceefax web : Carrefourtechno.com

  29. Ceefax by dj245 · · Score: 1
    Cee Fax.
    Cee Fax run.
    Run Fax run.

    Come on someone had to say it.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  30. For those who don't know what it looks like by vrt3 · · Score: 1

    VRT, the Flemish broadcasting corporation also has a teletext service, and has had for as long as I can remember. What's cool about it is that they also have a web interface to view it via their website. In the graphical view ('Grafisch'), the pages look very much like they do on TV (but on TV they are full screen of course).

    The three-digit numbers are links to other pages; in the web interface you can click on them, but on a TV-set you enter them using the remote control. The four colored links at the bottom are shortcuts that can be used by pressing the correspondingly colored button on the remote.

    --
    This sig under construction. Please check back later.
  31. And long may it continue by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahhh... good old MODE 7, aka Teletext. :-)

    One of the things I really miss about TV since moving to the USA is the various Teletext services. I've never understood why this system didn't catch on outside of Europe (maybe there's a technical reason, I dunno).

    Long before I had internet, I could spend literally hours reading Teletext pages and playing the really basic, but still entertaining games (remember Bamboozle?). We even had a Teletext reader on the old BBC Micros at my school, about 10 years before they got the JANET linkup :)

    The closest the US has is the information pages that DirecTV and some cable providers have. However, they're nowhere near as comprehensive.

    1. Re:And long may it continue by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The US never needed it. We've always had flat-rate local phone dialing, so modems took off here. There were plenty of services to dial into, many of them free. Some not, but the prices were never that high. Probably comparable to your "TV Tax".

      What was Commodores service called? Q-Link? Koala-Link? It was something like that. It was friggin cool, it was like the internet just for C-64s.

      So while UK'ers were glued to their CeeFax screens, I was dialing into various BBS's and information services.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:And long may it continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed there is a technical reason. The lines that are used for teletext in Europe are used for Closed Captioning (CC) in USA. CC is also more redundant/resistant to poor signal quality so it survives VHS recording, but teletext doesn't. (You can record teletext signals just fine on a SVHS set though.)

    3. Re:And long may it continue by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Q-Link. I still have the Q-Link coffee mug I bought years ago. Gets a lot of "Whats QLink" questions.

      Anyone remember PC Pursuit? The dial-in/dial-out service from Sprint(?)

    4. Re:And long may it continue by TheSync · · Score: 2, Informative

      CBS initially did not participate in EIA-608 (line 21) closed captioning because CBS wanted to use teletext technology instead of line 21 for captioning, which resulted in active protest against CBS by the deaf community. In 1984, CBS relented.

      PAL teletext data is digitally encoded in the VBI on lines 17 through 20 at 96 kbps.

      Evidently VHS users in Britain can obtain some VHS movies with line 21 captions re-encoded onto line 22 of the PAL VBI. But generally you need an add-on decoder.

      BTW, while NTSC line 21 field 1 is used for Closed Captions, line 21 field 2 is used for V-Chip and the XDS service that can automagically set your VCR clock.

    5. Re:And long may it continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood why this system didn't catch on outside of Europe (maybe there's a technical reason, I dunno).

      Technical reasons indeed - Teletext used a few of the TV scanlines to encode the info.

      Have you seen the resolution of NTSC? You really don't want to be wasting any of those lines if you can help it!

      Cue "Picture Always Lousy" jokes and flamebait moderation....

    6. Re:And long may it continue by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I wonder why nobody sticks utilities and simple games in Tivos and settop cable/satellite boxen? Wow, if that wouldn't invert the microsoft global-media-domination plan... start out for free, publish the API, sell better apps or secondary services (bill-pay, websurfing, chat, and snail-mail: upload it and we'll stamp and send it!), etc.

      Then again, MythTV allows games, web, news, slide-shows...

    7. Re:And long may it continue by phearlez · · Score: 1

      Hasn't DirecTV ditched that? It's a shame - the top 50 booksales was lame but the local weather one was great. Even cable subscribers have to wait for "on the 8s" but this was instant.

      --
      Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
  32. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by mikeplokta · · Score: 1

    20 million people would be about 40% of the TV-viewing population -- and that sounds quite plausible, it really is still very widely used, and virtually every TV set is capable of receiving it.

  33. Great for TV listings by brucmack · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's great for TV listings too... Long before anyone had satellite or digital cable, one could quickly load up a list of programming for the week, with info pages for all the major shows.

    1. Re:Great for TV listings by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      It's great for TV listings too...

      In fact it is/was better than I get on cable from Teleworst, who for some reason can't manage to show tomorrow's programmes, let alone anything from later in the week.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Great for TV listings by British · · Score: 1

      For as long as I remember, the "tv listings" channels(usually 3) were quite possibly the worst implementations ever. The top half was advertising, the bottom half slowly scrolled. I always had the worst luck tuning into it just after the channel I wanted to see has scrolled off.

  34. "Booked it,packed it,f**ked off!" by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    You don't wanna look ont tinternet for an oliday, you wanna look at ceefax.

    Two weeks in Benidorm, forty quid.

    Booked it, packed it, f**ked off.

    -- Peter Kay

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:"Booked it,packed it,f**ked off!" by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only a Brit could go to Benidorm and like it...:)

    2. Re:"Booked it,packed it,f**ked off!" by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

      >>Only a Brit could go to Benidorm and like it...:)

      You've nevver bloody been there have you mate? It's full of bloody germans.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    3. Re:"Booked it,packed it,f**ked off!" by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "You've nevver bloody been there have you mate? It's full of bloody germans."

      Yeah, but they don't like being there :).

    4. Re:"Booked it,packed it,f**ked off!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they don't like being there :).

      Yeah, too many Brits!

  35. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    About 60 million; probably about 55 million. Taking into account that Ceefax provides i) TV listings; and ii) subtitles it wouldn't surprise me that 1/3 of people who use a TV use it at least once a week.

  36. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by richy+freeway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd say that's pretty reasonable. The thing is it's just THERE. Instantly. If you wan't to see whats on TV next, just hit the text button and you've got it. Subtitles, blam, they're there!

    It's so simple and effective to use. I was hugely dissapointed when the text packed up on my TV recently. :(

  37. Teletext 1974 - wireless terminals 2004. Hmm... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Back in 1974 us Brits could buy a TV with
    effectively what was a built in wireless colour video terminal (something every geek should appreciate). Yet only in the last few years have big noises been made about wireless terminals in other arenas such as POS. Just goes to show that sometimes theres no such thing as a new idea!

  38. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by DZign · · Score: 1

    and why not ? a lot of information is on there..
    missed the news, want to know the headlines, sports, weather forcast, or even what's on tv tonight or the whole week with movie reviews of what's showing..

    I use it often, not daily but almost. Usually to check the weather forcast or to see what's on tv.

    I read some time ago that teletext usually is used much more when there's some sports event, like soccer championships or olympic games, as people then watch their tv and want to up-to-date information about scores.

  39. Favourite pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    606 on BBC1/2 and 120 on ITV/Ch4/5 brings up a "now and next" display for the 5 main channels. Very useful and much better than the similar offering on my FreeView box.

    I only wish that they had standardised on a particular number as they did with subtitling (888). I am forever typing the wrong one in for the currently selected channel.

  40. Teletext to HTTP gateways? by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any Teletext to HTTP gateways? It would seem a natural way to widen the exposure of the information.

    1. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Finnish Broadcasting Company has had their teletext service available on their website for years.

      I remember when they launched the web based teletext. The pages were basically screen captures. Made me laugh pretty hard.

      A few years later I worked on a project with FBC and figured out why. The technology behind the teletext service is some proprietary garbage that makes it nearly impossible to transfer the data in any other format.

      They have since launched an interface on the website that displays the teletext service in text only though.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    2. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by oojah · · Score: 1

      It would suprise me if there isn't.

      The Pinnacle PCTV card I have has a (windows) application for providing teletext via a webserver.

      Cheers,

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    3. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.textavarp.is/ is a gateway to the teletext service of RUV, the public tv station in Iceland.

    4. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by slim · · Score: 1

      I've seen a few unofficial teletext to HTTP gateways. I believe they were all shut down for redistributing copyrighted content.

    5. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia article on Teletext points to some:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext - just check at the bottom of the page.
      Notably, all the links point to the websites of public television networks... I think Teletext is really great for public information services - and this is the main reason it will eventually be written off. :-(

      --
      In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    6. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by nilenico · · Score: 1
      Here is the interface to NRK 's (Norwegian Broadcasting Corp.) teletext service.

      Still widely used to get news overviews, sports results, wheather information and tv guides.

      --
      .sig? No.
    7. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by morzel · · Score: 1
      Belgian Teletext.

      --
      Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
      [Zappa]
    8. Re:Teletext to HTTP gateways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. Television "tax" by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    Over here we pay £121 per year for a dozen or so advert-free TV channels, and five (again advert-free) radio stations. This also pays for the BBC websites, streamed versions of the radio programmes for international viewers and listeners, and of course maintenance of the infrastructure (although that cost is split with the independent TV companies, who share equipment costs). These stations are available on analogue or digital terrestrial signals, or digital satellite.


    What do you guys pay for basic cable? How many watchable channels do you get? When you consider that cable or satellite over here is just wall-to-wall shitey unfunny comedies (you know, obnoxious teenager says "wiener", cue 2 minutes of laugh track and then a 20-minute ad break) and costs more than £10 per month.

    1. Re:Television "tax" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What do you guys pay for basic cable? How many watchable channels do you get?

      You actually have to differentiate basic cable from public broadcasting. Your average television viewer will have about 5 channels or more available at no cost when he plugs in his TV. (NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, and PBS stations.) These networks are paid for by advertising only, save for PBS which runs with public funds.

      Now *basic* cable tends to be the same as the public channels for about $8.00/mo ($96.00/yr), but tends to include a few extra channels as a bonus. i.e. UPN, C-SPAN, etc. Anything above that is more expensive, but tends to contain at least 25-50 available channels. You can usually get this level of service for about $14.95/mo. Things really start getting expensive when you add premium channels like HBO.

      BTW, don't think that I was trying to poke at the UK tax on TVs. I have no issue with it. I only included it in my post because I figured that someone would decide to correct me if I didn't. Seems I can't win either way. :-/

    2. Re:Television "tax" by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      When you consider that cable or satellite over here is just wall-to-wall shitey unfunny comedies

      Not fair! You are forgetting the whole batch of channels devoted to replaying old BBC content, hence including good comedy. Of course they (UK*) are half owned by the Beeb.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:Television "tax" by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Well, over here we get free (ad supported)over-the-air television, and dozens of radio stations (ads also). The number of TV channels you get varies depending on your location, but most people in moderately populated areas probably get all 7 networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, WB, UPN, PBS) and maybe a few independant stations (are there any left?)

      You can move up to cheap cable (for about $15-20/month) and maybe get a few more channels (CNN, etc) with improved picture if your OTA signal isn't too good. In lots of cases, picture quality on cable sucks worse than OTA.

      Then, you can move up to Expanded cable or Satellite (in the $30-60/month range) and get about 50-100 channels (depends on your provider). There are 2 major satellite providers and lots of small, regional, and national cable providers. These channels are all ad-supported as well - you're just paying for the signal delivery.

      Beyond that there is Premium stations (movies, etc, like HBO, Cinemax) which are about $10/month each. There are no typical ads for products, but they still waste as much time advertising their own upcoming shows. At least there are no interruptions during a movie.

      Wow, after typing all that, I think I'd prefer to pay (how do make that damn L symbol)121 for a dozen ad-free channels. That's only about US $18/month. Seems like a much better deal.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:Television "tax" by egburr · · Score: 1

      The most *basic* cable package I can get is $25/month, and other than the regular broadcast channels, it's mainly a lot of home shopping channels. At least PBS is a decent strength here, so my kids have something to watch when I just can't stand the pokemon DVD anymore.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Television "tax" by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Ah, but he specified "watchable". Most of them are filled with utter shite.

      So, for "watchable" channels, probably 10. At most. On a good day.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    6. Re:Television "tax" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You usually have to ask for true basic cable. When I was in California, they were always trying to sell me the next package up when all I wanted was the local channels. (I had no reception and wanted to watch Star Trek.) The next level up was only $14.95, but didn't include all that much. (Cartoon Network, though!) To get channels like the Sci-Fi channel, I had to go up to the range of ~$25/mo.

      Now I'm in an apartment building in the midwest that includes cable as part of the rent. Life is good. :-)

    7. Re:Television "tax" by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      (how do make that damn L symbol)


      I type <SHIFT-3> on a UK keyboard. In HTML it's supposed to be &pound; but Slash has been so horribly broken by the /. janitors that it does not support standard HTML entities. Lame, isn't it?

    8. Re:Television "tax" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What, like this?

      £15

      Simple, I copied and pasted from a UK post! ;-) Actually, you can use the Windows Character Mapper to input it (U+00A3), or you can type Alt+0163 on Windows and Alt+3 on the Macintosh. I have no idea how you do it on Linux, and I'm nowhere near such a machine at the moment.

      Just for fun, let's see how many characters Slashdot will accept:

      £15
      22 (cents)
      To infinity and beyond!(TM)
      Yo Quiero, Taco Bell!
      3000¥
      © 2001 All ® reserved

      Hmm... not all that many it seems. Some of the characters work, some of them don't, and some are just invisible.

    9. Re:Television "tax" by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I think I'd prefer to pay (how do make that damn L symbol)121

      Alt-0163 (press the digits on your keypad while holding down Alt) produces "£"...and it's cross-platform, too.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:Television "tax" by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Simple, I copied and pasted from a UK post! ;-)

      Of course. *smacks head*

      Interesting, but on my keyboard Alt-163 gives an accented u (ú).

      Alt-156 gives the L symbol (£)

      Guess it probably depends on OS, or keyboard region settings

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    11. Re:Television "tax" by op00to · · Score: 1

      What platforms does it cross? Doesn't work on my x86 box running Linux.

    12. Re:Television "tax" by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Except it doesn't work on linux. Anyone have a compose key combo?

    13. Re:Television "tax" by egburr · · Score: 1
      Well, it looks like they've restructured since I last looked (2 years ago when I first moved here).

      Basic is "$10.25-$13.50" (they don't know!?) and has about 20 channels, mainly the broadcast, local access, and home shopping ones. The only other analog tier is Standard for $44.10 which has about 75 channels.

      The old "basic" used to be around $25 and offered about 30 channels, and was the lowest tier available. If there was a lower tier available then, the salesperson chose to lose the sale rather than offer it.

      I might consider going for basic cable now to get clearer pictures. For what I would watch, $10 is reasonable.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    14. Re:Television "tax" by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but on my keyboard Alt-163 gives an accented u (ú).

      You forgot the '0'. Alt-0163 gives £ while Alt-163 gives ú. :-)

      (For those who can't figure it out, you have to type the numbers in the keypad. Sorry laptop users!)

    15. Re:Television "tax" by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      What platforms does it cross? Doesn't work on my x86 box running Linux.

      I just fired up joe on one of my servers and tried it out...it works fine there. It's running a somewhat old version of Gentoo, and I haven't done anything weird with the setup that would be aimed at making this work.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  42. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by Nightwing · · Score: 1

    It's more likely than you think. I use Ceefax pretty much any time I use the TV, mainly to show the 'Now & Next' page, which shows the current and upcoming programmes on all the terrestrial channels.

  43. Skinternet by ChiefGeneralManager · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've spent many a happy hour browsing Ceefax, and this website about how it all fits together. As a youth it takes a lot of effort to work out how Ceefax sends the page you ask for, but there's no two-way communication -- Page Frame Relay comes to the rescue.

    Bit of trivia -- Ceefax is ocasionally known as in the UK as the Skinternet because of the relative cheapness of getting on to Ceefax as opposed to the internet.
    [ Skint + Internet ]

    1. Re:Skinternet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Maybe because I'm relatively young - but from North Yorkshire, to Lancashire to London.. I've never, ever heard that term.

  44. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Hint: amongst other things, Teletext lets people check the national lottery results after they get back from the pub on Saturday night :).

  45. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the latest census figures, the official UK population is just under 60 million.

    It's not hard to imagine that at least 90% of the population watching TV on a regular basis. Now, bear in mind that here in the UK, we're all familiar with Ceefax/Teletext as a quick and easy way of getting at useful information, such as...

    • TV listings
    • Football scores
    • Horoscopes (hehe)

    Personally, I can easily believe that 20 million figure. Especially as I contribute to it! :-)

  46. Why still ugly text? by sita · · Score: 1

    Is the font (glyph shapes) used for teletext also standardized at a 1974 level? They are horribly ugly, and difficult to read for some people. One would think that nicer looking teletext fonts would be a differentiator for tv manufacturers (well, if tv sets can have 0, 2, 10, 100 or several thousand page caches 2004, they can have blocky, halfblocky or smooth fonts as well).

    1. Re:Why still ugly text? by psmears · · Score: 1

      No, the font isn't standardised, just the character set - and indeed, some TVs do have better fonts than others. However, most seem to use the same few character sets; I suspect there are commodity chips to produce the display, and it's cheaper/easier for manufacturers to use them than roll their own...

    2. Re:Why still ugly text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The font and graphics for teletext were designed back in the seventies, when there were distinct limits on how much technology you could cram into a television.

      I remember running a teletext emulator on a BBC micro at school and writing my own set of pages. Huge amounts of fun:)

      However, there is an updated, improved version of the teletext decoder system, with higher resolution graphics. In a traditional chicken-and-egg way, the extra cost put off the tv manufacturers from adding it to new tvs, and tv companies never started using the new features, as would cost them too much resource for little gain...

    3. Re:Why still ugly text? by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

      My parent's first teletext capable TV had a lovely bold font that was really readable.

      The next TV had the skinny 'spectrum' style font that most screenshots you see use.

      You have to remember that in the UK, PAL has around 284 vertical lines of resolution, so a 40x25 screen only had around 10 pixels per character vertically to define stuff in. I think most TV sets use a standard ROM with the 256 8x10 pixel fonts stored within.

      One advantage to having teletext hardware in the TV however was that the TV itself could use them for its on-screen display functionality, e.g., to set up brightness, contrast, etc. That probably saved a chip or two inside the set.

      In comparison, the modern digital text services suck. They look nicer with the smoother fonts and stuff, but they are too clunky. It must be a failure of the digital receivers which are either only decoding the video part of the MPEG2 stream, OR the data part of the stream. So when you enter 'interactive' mode, you have to wait for the box to download the world and everything. Each time.

  47. teletext not everywhere by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    for example, when my gf came from Brazil, she was amazed by this technology. We mainly used it for the tv-guide, subtitles and the weather forecast. I always assumed that everyone had teletext, but us Europeans are lucky it seems :)

  48. Poland has something like this too by mzs · · Score: 1

    The last time I was in Warsaw there was something like an info button on the remote. I pressed it and I could 'change channels' to different pages of text. One page was a character graphics map of Poland with the weather forecast! I kid you not, there were characters on the map indicating clouds and rain too. It was like a flashback to the good old days of ANSI animation on the local BBS.

    Was this service the same a Ceefax?

    1. Re:Poland has something like this too by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "Was this service the same a Ceefax?"

      Sounds similar. I think the BBC weather maps use characters and block graphics, AFAIR there are special characters in the character set which have blocks in different places so you can effectively get 'hi-res' (probably something like 80x48) graphics for non-text use.

    2. Re:Poland has something like this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was Teletext. On public TV channels it is called Telegazeta (tele-newspaper) and has everything that was said about BBC service: news, TV schedule, advertisements, subtitles, etc. Almost all commercial TV channels provide this service too.

    3. Re:Poland has something like this too by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      The generic name is "Teletext", and I'm sure this is what you have seen in Poland. Almost every European PAL TV has it embedded, and most countries have this service. Each under their own brandname. Ceefax is just one of them.

  49. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by AVee · · Score: 1

    I guess, based on what I see around me here in Holland, about 90% of the television viewer will use Teletext/Ceefax. If only to see wich program is next, look up the weather forecast or sports results (during commercials) or simply to turn on subtitles when someone else if on the phone... The biggest power is that is just a button away when your watching TV anyway. It's a easier to use then the web but provides up to date information.

  50. Anyone remember AP news plus? by British · · Score: 1

    Back in around '85, we had Continental cablevision. There was an "AP News Plus" service, which had cheesy computer screens of news, that rotated every 30 minutes.

    I remember every few months the graphics would be completely messed up without anybody noticing, for a few days. Was funny to watch all the vector graphics mess up.

    I remember in Minneapolis there was a "children's stories" cable channel. All it consisted of were computer screens with cheesy(think MS Word clipart) graphics to children's stories. Nobody ever seems to remember these "off" cable channels available in the 80s.

    Also on that same Minneapolis cable provider(dont know which one), there was one channel that apparently was just a Commodore 64 reading out numbers. This was not to be confused with the 'local community channels' that used Amigas and such to read out school lunch menus.

    if I had more info on this, I'd make a web page about it. Wish we had Teletext in the USA.

  51. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by batemanm · · Score: 1
    I doubt that. How many people are there in the UK?

    Just under 60 million.

    How many watch television on a weekly basis

    Well around 98% of households have a TV set. So you could expect a large number of them.

    I find it hard to believe that any reasonably fraction of that group is actually using Ceefax on so regular a basis.

    Why? It is often faster than broadband in that you don't have to move from your seat in order to find things out. I use it most days as it has up to date TV listings. It is easy to get weather reports latest news etc and remember that it has been around for 30 years so it is much more familiar than the Internet for a large number of people.

  52. Re:Ugh, that looks horrible. by leonscape · · Score: 1

    Tell your Dad, if he's using Telewest, he doesn't have to flick. Ceefax is part of the broadcast.

    --


    If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
  53. Minitel in france by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In france you could get a Minitel device, like teletext but much more interactive
    Minitel.

  54. The style of an old home computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The layout and style of Ceefax was largely based around the text capabilities of the old Acorn BBC Micro (the name is, as far as I know, a coincidence) that was originally used to design and layout the pages. It had 32K of memory, as I remember, and was a marvellous machine.

    I'm a big cricket fan (this is relevant, honest, stick with it).I lived for a while in a basement flat so the radio didn't work. Rupert Murdoch's Sky had all the cricket for a bit and I refuse to give him money on the grounds that he is evil in a way that would Make even Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer blush. So I have occasionally been reduced to watching the test match on Ceefax. Not entirely satisfactory it has to be said.

  55. RTE (Irish State Broadcaster) version Aertel by ardmhacha · · Score: 1

    RTE have their version Aertel on the web.
    http://www.rte.ie/aertel/

    Looks fairly similar to Ceefax and other teletext services.

    Teletext is one of the reasons why internet usage is not as high in the UK or Ireland as it is in USA/Canada. News headlines and sports results or updates are very easy to get on teletext and would be one of the main things that I would use the web for.

  56. Interesting teletext demonstration by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    Go to CNN International's homepage, scroll to the bottom and click CNNtext for a good look at what Teletext is like.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Interesting teletext demonstration by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Arghh, a JAVA applet... try this instead: http://teletekst.nos.nl/

      Besides, it looks like CNN does some automatic processing of news texts into text pages. When I occasionally look at the service (on TV) I often notice text gets chopped off on the small pages, or is divided in two pages where the second has only one or two words.
      NOS teletekst (see above) still has dedicated editors that compose well-looking pages within the limitations of the system.

  57. Another thing missed.... by StarTux · · Score: 1

    After moving to the US, Ceefax, as well as better access to more exciting sports, plus better beer...What I don't miss, the East End accents, high tax rate and the weather :).

    1. Re:Another thing missed.... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I went to the US and lived there for 7 years. I had to move back because I missed the wind and the rain! (I live in the Isle of Man, we have LOTS of wind and rain in the winter. People moaned about the odd tropical storm once every few years in Houston, but we get three similar storms each winter!) Also, the sea crashing not only over the sea walls but going right over the roof of the pub.

  58. Re:Ugh, that looks horrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bamboozle!

    That thing rocks, what page was it again, I know it was on 4, but I cant find it now. :(

  59. Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by rpjs · · Score: 1

    instead we have BBCi which is much much better

    Slicker, yes; prettier, yes; but better? OK, maybe as we're on cable, which seems to be the poor relation in the UK interactive TV market, we're not getting as full an offering as people on satellite or terrestrial digital, but we find the BBC digital replacement for Ceefax to be rubbish in comparison to teletext - and teletext doesn't work on digital cable.

    It's slow (admittedly, Ceefax isn't exactly fast, especially if you don't have a Fastext telly, but digital is supposed to be better), it's much more difficult to use, as you have to negotiate menu after menu and page after page to get anywhere, whereas with Ceefax, you could just enter the page number you want. Most annoyingly though we don't get anything like as much content as with Ceefax - just news and sport really.

    Even then it doesn't always work properly. During the Olympics, BBCi had a theoretically great service where you could switch the live Olympic coverage to a different even than the "default" going out on the actual TV channel. Unfortunately, more often than not we found it simply wouldn't finish loading and we were stuck with no sound and four mini pictures, none of which we could select.

    1. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by tialaramex · · Score: 1

      There are three separate problems here, all of which can be fixed, and the result could be markedly better than Ceefax, although I grant that it isn't better yet.

      1. Content. The digital subtitles are good, the rest of the content is weak. This would be fixed by spending more on content provision, but the BBC is reluctant to do so while digital takeup is still relatively slow.

      2. Bandwidth. With the very restricted piece of radio spectrum assigned for digital TV it's hard to justify using more for rarely viewed digital interactive content, when it could be used to upgrade picture quality for millions of viewers. The easy way to fix this would be to kill Channel 5's analog slots and re-assign the frequencies, freeing up more space for BBCi and other low priority services. If C5 was appropriately compensated even their shareholders might support this idea.

      3. Low quality devices. Have you used a non-fasttext TV to view Ceefax lately? Not so great is it. Right now the relatively high cost & low demand means that you can't buy a freeview or cable box that delivers the intended experience. They don't keep enough data (especially images) in cache, and they crash too easily. Time will heal this one, just like today's web browsers are a lot better than those from a decade ago. For a while you'll be able to pay more for a better experience, and then, like fasttext it will just become a standard feature on a chip somewhere.

    2. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even then it doesn't always work properly. During the Olympics, BBCi had a theoretically great service where you could switch the live Olympic coverage to a different even than the "default" going out on the actual TV channel. Unfortunately, more often than not we found it simply wouldn't finish loading and we were stuck with no sound and four mini pictures, none of which we could select.

      Too true... why don't those gimps test this stuff before deploying it?

    3. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      The "sticking" problem with BBCi seems to be related to the set-top box, freeview telly or whatever you are using.

      My next door neighbour had the exact same problem during the Olympics while using a telly with built-in Freeview, while I had no problems at all with it while using a Pace STB for SKY Digital....

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
    4. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by rpjs · · Score: 1

      We're on Telewest digital cable, with a Pace STB. Part of the problem is that, AFAIK, each of the three digital TV platforms, Freeview, cable and satellite, have different standards for interactive TV (iTV). I think I'm right in stating that the Freeview and cable platforms are the most similar, and are quite different from Sky's satellite iTV platform. This might explain why both us on cable and your neighbour on Freeview experienced similar problems.

    5. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      My set top box had problems during the olympics too, so I could never get the multi-screen selection thing- but I could key in 701 and 702 to go directly to the two alternative streams.

      What pisses me off is that on digital sat viewers got 4 alternative streams compared to 2 on digital terrestrial and sports were not kept on a consistent channel, so you might be able to see the semis of some sport but not the final. grrrr.

      graspee

    6. Re:Down with BBCi - keep Ceefax! by TomV · · Score: 1

      On the slowness of Ceefax, it's speed is actually one of the reason's I'm a heavy user. I just did a little timing test, and admittedly it depends where your chosen page is on the carousel and whaere the carousel is when you request, but the BBC news headlines page (102) took all of 6 seconds to be on screen from the moment I switched on the set. From a powered-down state, my PC can't even get a game in the same park as that. Admittedly, the News Headlines are especially quick to 'load' as they're repeated several times throughout the carousel, but that's just good UI design.

      For quick access to certain limited kinds of information, teletext can be fantastic. Especially if, like me, you've got your 'favourites' burned into your brain - for me it's 102 news headlines, 606 what's on TV now and next, 302 football, 340 cricket, 360 motorsport (actually it's usually straight to the Formula 1 lead story which lives on 361)

      There's not much depth, but if you just want to SEE FACTS quickly, teletext is a very good thing.

  60. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

    I lived in the UK for a few years. I saw Ceefax used less than half a dozen times, always by me or my then-girlfriend (another American) checking it out for novelty's sake. I never saw my British housemates use it, or friends while I visited them, etc. I guess I just had a non-average experience.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  61. Here is another one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people are there in the UK?

    About 60 million.

    How many watch television on a weekly basis

    I remember reading somewhere that it's about 90-95%

    I find it hard to believe that any reasonably fraction of that group is actually using Ceefax on so regular a basis.

    I don't. It's just one of these ubiquitious services that people just take for granted. You get news, sport, weather, etc. a the touch of a button. Instantly. Free.
    For instance, the programme you're watching finishes and it'll be 60 sexconds before the next programme starts. Instead of watching some trailer for the next "exciting" episode of EastEnders, you can press the text button and get the news headlines, or check the weather or see how your team got on. When the theme music for the next programme starts, you press the text button again, and you're watching TV again.
    It's so quick and easy it's become second nature to most people.

  63. Teletext still better than 'interactive TV' by Cybertect · · Score: 1

    I dunno about everybody else, but I still prefer teletext services if I want to look up football results, quick scan of the headlines or find out what tomorrow's weather will be like.

    I have FreeView (terrestrial Digital TV) and I barely use the 'interactive' services available there. Despite 30 years of development it still seems relatively slow and cumbersome compared to being able to dial in page 102 and jump straight to the national news headlines, etc

    About the only advantage it has is Picture-in-Picture.

    1. Re:Teletext still better than 'interactive TV' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then you had 2 options with teletext if you wanted to keep watching your program. I'm not exactly up on the terminology, but there's a mode which overlays the text onto your picture sans background and another mode that lets you hide teletext and pop up a little icon in the corner when your page has loaded. Highly usable.

      Digital TVs efforts (in the UK anyway) are painfully slow and annoying as you say.

      SEoD

  64. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never used Ceefax - in the UK it's something which for the last 20-odd years has probably been used by anyone who has ever used a television. Pressing Text while watching TV (BBC) would simply bring up Ceefax and it's something which I'd actually say most TV viewers use on a daily basis.

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  65. Re:The style of an old home computer by psmears · · Score: 2, Informative

    The name isn't a coincidence - the computer was originally going to be called the Proton, but the BBC were looking for a computer for their BBC Computer Literacy Project - see here for more details.

    (And in fact, teletext came first - the BBC Micro came out in the early 80s, teletext in the 70s...)

  66. teletext through internet in other countries? by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    Here in holland (netherlands if you wish) we can check out some stations on the internet. Do other countries have a similar service?

  67. Question for Europeans by Improv · · Score: 1

    I'm curious how Ceefax compares to Minitel (France) -- I recall hearing from several sources that Minitel was a spiritual ancestor to the Internet, where a lot of information was available in the home starting in the mid-70s.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Question for Europeans by radish · · Score: 1

      Minitel is accessed over special terminals which are (IIRC) supplied by the local phone company. It's also interactive - there's a keyboard and you can send messages to people with it. Teletext (which is the generic name for the technology Ceefax uses) is push only, and uses your TV. You basically punch in a 3 digit page number, and a few seconds later it appears. There's no keyboard, no interactivity.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Question for Europeans by slim · · Score: 1

      Completely different. Minitel was like a BBS -- basically a TTY with a modem. Ceefax is teletext -- a set of pages, broadcast on a loop. The only interactivity is that you can tell your TV which of those pages to display.

    3. Re:Question for Europeans by gerbouille · · Score: 1

      It's hard to compare Teletext/Ceefax and Minitel. Minitel was a sort of BBS with a dedicated terminal and real keyboard and the service ran (well, it is still running) through telephone. Teletext is sent via TV signal in a non-interactive way and it's free.

      The only common point is that it's ugly by 2004 standards.

      Minitel has turned 20 recently and is still generating revenue (around 500 M euros in 2002) though decreasing smoothly.

      --
      This post is displayed with recycled electrons
    4. Re:Question for Europeans by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 1

      The key to success for Minitel in France was the business model. Quoting from the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minitel:
      -quote-
      Mi llions of terminals were handed out free to telephone subscribers, resulting in a high penetration rate among businesses and the public. In exchange for the terminal, the possessors of Minitel would not be given free "white page" directories, but only the yellow pages ; the white pages were accessible for free on Minitel.
      -end quote-
      I still wish they had done that in Italy as well... :-(

      --
      In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    5. Re:Question for Europeans by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      This is very true.
      Over here we had a comparable system, called Viditel. Equipment was either a high-end TV that supported both Teletext and Viditel, or an expensive dedicated terminal.
      It looked exactly like Teletext but Viditel was transferred over a phoneline using a modem at 1200 baud download (the upload was 75 baud).

      Because of these high prices, it was a complete flop.

    6. Re:Question for Europeans by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      In the UK the same 1200/75 service was called "Prestel" and run by the state Post Office (subsequently called British Telecom when sold).

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  68. Re:Ugh, that looks horrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because Teletext has the remarkably fast method of finding the page you want - you just remember the number and type it in. I will never ever forget that motorsport can be found on page 360, even though I haven't used it in years.

    The new fangled interactive service is fine, but it's all arranged in a hierarchy menu. Instead of dialling 360, you press 'down' a few times to get to 'Sport,' hit a button. Then 'up' on the next menu and select 'next page'. Then 'down' a couple of times to get to motorsport.

    It really feels like it takes longer, even though the load time of any one page is quicker.

  69. Telesoftware by cd-w · · Score: 1

    One thing that I haven't seen mentioned is that Ceefax at one time was used to distribute computer software, as a kind of poor-man's Internet/BBS (download only). The primary use was to freely distribute software associated with the educational programs on the BBC to schools around the country.

    A Teletext adapter was available for the BBC micro computer (Acorn) that would allow software to be downloaded from the Ceefax service. The concept was called Telesoftware, although the inherent limitations of teletext meant that it never really caught on.

  70. Teletext on the Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTE (Ireland) have their Teletext service online

  71. Telesoftware by RDW · · Score: 1
  72. Subtitling and language by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    British Teletext has always been pretty good in terms of subtitling even live
    broadcasts. Always on page 888 whichever provider.

    It would be nice if there was some conformity with TV guide pages, now and next
    is quite useful usually for answering the question " what the ... am I watching".

    I always thought that the subtitles should be extended to cover non English speakers maybe digital services might do so at some point.

    As an educational tool subtitles are very useful it is often easier to understand a broadcast in a non native language when it is written down.
    Do any of the satellite broadcasters provide subtitles on a standard channel?
    and or in more than one language.

    With the number of film releases available on dvd with multilingual subtitles I am surprised that the digital services do not appear to make available the other
    language content or do they use specially created mpeg streams?

    1. Re:Subtitling and language by Florian+H. · · Score: 1
      It would be nice if there was some conformity with TV guide pages, now and next is quite useful usually for answering the question " what the ... am I watching".
      In german teletext, "WTF am I watching" is the rightmost of the four colored buttons on your TV remote (I think it was blue when it still had some color on it). Don't know what will happen to it once the go digital in november, though.
    2. Re:Subtitling and language by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      You should have got modded up as informative, good system :)

      Incidently the subtitles on european tv should generally be found on 777
      from what I found on google

  73. UK - US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When I moved to the US six years ago the lack of "text" on the TVs was most upsetting. It is funny how much one misses "the poor man's internet" once it is unavailable.

  74. My memories of teletext by chiller2 · · Score: 1


    I remember sometimes waking very early in the morning before school. The morning news and cartoons weren't on yet, the sun was just coming up, only the sound of birds tweeting outside, and I'd switch the TV on to find a Ceefax page displayed with some quiet background music playing. I'd watch it for a minute or two, then grab a big bowl of Cornflakes and put the kettle on. It was always a nice way to start the day.

    I digress. The technology was teletext with which the BBC provided CeeFax. ITV provided Oracle. Channel 4 provided C4 teletext.

    Acorn added Teletext mode 7 to the BBC Microcomputer. It was great because it used just 1k of screen memory, thus many text adventures used it. With the addition of a teletext adapter such as those sold by Morley or Watford Electronics, you could take teletext transmissions and run them straight into your Beeb. The adapter also allowed for software to be downloaded from teletext pages, which given code size back in the day, was quite viable.

    For oodles of information on teletext take a look at http://teletext.mb21.co.uk/links.shtml.

    --
    --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  75. Teletext in the US by xjosh · · Score: 1

    I think Teletext was done in the US for a short period several years ago. There was a national news service called Elektra that carried news content updated by the staff of WKRC TV in Cincinnati OH. There were TV's and set top boxes capable of receiving the service, I think made by RCA. I seem to remember seeing some of this stuff demo'ed at a World's Fair and Exposition, so it must have been in 1982 or 1984, because those are the only two I've ever attended. But, I was fairly young then, so my memory may be incorrect.

  76. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extremely non average.

  77. Bamboozle by Nurgled · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, different television sets implemented "fasttext" in different ways, and also sometimes offered other features to "cheat" in this way. One easy one I remember was on my first fasttext set where it had buttons to increment and decrement the teletext search number. It'd wrap when it rolled from 9 to A, but if it was already on A it would happily increment B, C, D etc until it reached F and rolled back to 0.

    Another cool one was a TV set I had that would let you press another coloured button while the first one you pressed was still searching. If you were lucky with the transmission timings, you could press all of the buttons in turn and see which one was different to the other three which would be the right answer. Finally, last year I lived with a friend who had an old TV which was fancy for its time. It had cool features like teletext caching, bookmarks and all sorts. It would actually let you switch the fasttext display from the given names to the page numbers, making the cheating trivial. It would also let you enter full hex numbers into the bookmarks system by using increment/decrement as on the first TV I mentioned, but you couldn't enter them directly.

    Of course, cheating at a teletext game wasn't really the point, it was just interesting to play around with the teletext system and Bamboozle (a game which I believe is still broadcast today on Channel 4 Teletext) was one of the few things which used un-enterable numbers.

    Also interesting is that in the early days they had to limit the number of available pages so that the interval between a particular page being transmitted wasn't too high. I believe the transmission speed was increased at some point which allowed for more pages to be introduced. Also, since there's no rule that the pages must be transmitted in order, pages which must change often or oft-requested pages can be transmitted more frequently. The subtitles on "Page 888" are transmitted more frequently than other pages so that they can be updated in realtime as dialogue proceeds in the programme. I've often thought it'd be fun (although not particularly useful) to recreate something like the teletext system using multicast on the Internet.

  78. Re:Er... "20 Million users a week"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they were too polite to watch TV when you'd taken the trouble to visit them?

  79. Don't forget.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

    The format used by Teletext (Ceefax etc.) was also used by early online services such as Prestel and Micronet 800 - essentially BBC Micro MODE 7.

    I had Prestel/Micronet 800 as a young teenager (somehow I managed to convince my mother it'd be a good idea, god knows how) in 1986. They had a national network which had dialup POPs all over the British Isles. Prestel + Micronet cost around GBP 20 per quarter - or in real terms, a little less than broadband Internet costs these days (although there were telephone charges to add to that too). I had a Spectrum with a VTX-5000 modem which had a passable emulation of the BBC's MODE 7.

    Micronet even had a MUD called Shades (WHICH IS STILL GOING! - see http://games.world.co.uk/) which was ultimately my downfall when the GBP 200.00 telephone bill arrived. My father promptly banned me from going online. So what I did was get up at 6 am when the household was sleeping, and go on for half an hour a morning instead - that level of usage was lost amongst the normal phone bill, and since the local telephone exchange was still an electromechanical Strowger monster, there was no option for itemised billing :-)

    The modem was 1200/75 baud. Going through a Strowger exchange, line noise was common. However, it was good enough I could buy and download games for my Spectrum, as well as having email and a Micronet 'Gallery' (sort of like a web page, but teletext format) a decade before most people :-)

    Ironically, the TV my computer was connected to was an old valve (tube) colour set which was totally incapable of displaying Ceefax.

    1. Re:Don't forget.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you JB? This is ZH

    2. Re:Don't forget.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      No. Sorry.

  80. Teletext tuner built into a VCR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't some manufacturers sells VCRs with built-in teletext tuners?

    If I remember correctly, this was used on some machines as a rather nifty way to set the VCR timer to record a specific show. You would goto the teletext tv listings and just cursor down to the program you want to record. This was obviously a long time before any PVR appeared!

  81. Very compatible with the BBC Micro. by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
    Indeed, in the early 80's, the BBC transmitted programs for the BBC Micro via teletext in a 'Telesoftware' service. This finally ended around 1989.

    I used to have a teletext box for my BBC Model B (BBC Micro computer), this could be used to download celefax an oracle (itv's teletext service). But it's the ceefax software download area which was my first introduction to free software/open source, although I don't think every sent over ceefax was open source.

    I remember downloading my C compiler over ceefax, I think it was micro-C or mini-C. But a C compiler that would compile on a 64KB system. Knocked my socks off it did.

    There were also 'high res' (for the time) satelite weather imagines you could download via ceefax. Save them up for a few days and have your own animated weather charts.

    All in all, teletext services provided far more of a positive affect on my life than the TV signal it was piggy backed on.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Very compatible with the BBC Micro. by Vollernurd · · Score: 1

      All in all, teletext services provided far more of a positive affect on my life than the TV signal it was piggy backed on.

      What do you mean?! What was wrong with the testcard, transmissions starting at lunchtime,
      Crackerjack, Tizwas, and Tomrorow's World when it was good?

      --
      Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    2. Re:Very compatible with the BBC Micro. by terrymr · · Score: 1

      but now scientists have come up with this ... a pen with a watch in it.

    3. Re:Very compatible with the BBC Micro. by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      What do you mean?! What was wrong with the testcard, transmissions starting at lunchtime, Crackerjack, Tizwas, and Tomrorow's World when it was good?

      Ok, maybe Tomorrows World, and, alright, Monkey (AKA Monkey Magic) totally ruled.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  82. Weird fact about the original Ceefax font by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    It was duplicated on the BBC Micro as the default graphics mode.

    Some TVs substitute their own font these days, but the original one is quite recognisable.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  83. Interactive teletext in Belgium (and netherlands?) by fons · · Score: 1


    I'm not sure if this was a joint Belgian/Dutch project or not, but in the early 90ties we had Interactive Teletext here in Belgium.

    You could send email, lookup numbers in the Yellow Pages or send a Fax.

    It was called INFOGATE. It was a bit of a mix between Teletext/Ceefax and Minitel.

    This is how it worked:
    - call a toll-free number and get a pagenumber
    - Turn on your TV, switch to the INFOGATE-channel and go to to the teletext page you got over the phone
    - Leave your remote alone
    - Now use the phone-keypad as your keyboard!
    - So cool! I actually sent some email and some faxes through this system. And it worked.

    You could of course watch what other people were doing if you could find their "page". But you could not participate in their session.

    They cancelled it because it was too expensive and unpopular. It was unpopular because it was pretty complicated for the computer illeterate.

  84. Guardian article by emm-tee · · Score: 1

    There's a nice article about this in the Guardian, here.

  85. SwissText by cocotoni · · Score: 1
    In Switzerland we have SwissText. (Sorry, only in German/French/Italian)

    I kid you not, I sometimes use it to get the information. Though I'm on the net, the familiar simple interface and trustworthy information make it more compeling than going through "normal" web pages.

    Example - to get a weather bulliten I have a link in my bookmarks directly to the page 793 on TSR (Swiss French TV), with direct, no BS information, whereas look at the same info on their site: TSR Meteo. The info is the same, the source is the same, but to get the temperature for Geneva on next Monday I have to go through some flash menues...

  86. Software Downloads from Ceefax by ayjay29 · · Score: 1

    When I was a lad I saw a BBC Model B computer, which had a Ceefax decoder attached to it.

    This allowed you to browse ceefax on the computer, and also (this is cool) download software from Ceefax.

    The BBC put out a few "BASIC programmes" for the BBC computer in this way.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  87. teletext internet gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.rte.ie/aertel/

    for the irish rte teletext to internet gateway, for those of us who know all the important numbers off by heart... (180 is whats on now on all stations, probably the most popular!)

  88. I used to download the pages by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Especially the share price information, 15min delayed but also TV schedules, news, cinema timetables etc there was a lot of free information available on the various channels. I wrote some Unix/linux software for the OPT III external teletext decoder. It got fried during a storm and the company has gone out of business, these days it's easier to get the info from the Internet over DSL though there are still a number of teletext decoders out there.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  89. Mr Biffo by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    I believe Mr Biffo wrote a column called Biffovision in Edge, a UK industry Gaming magazine, up until recently.
    I call it an industry Gaming magazine because it contains more than just reviews, etc. It actually interviews developers and rates development tools. Oh, and it has a job section at the back!

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    1. Re:Mr Biffo by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      Yeah he wrote for Edge for a year or two, always came across as a poor Redeye with teletext graphics but hey.

      For those that dont know, Edge was/is a wierd hybrid of gdmag, cgw and wallpaper. It never really made up its mind whether to be a magazine about consumer gaming, working in the industry or a place to spooge about font design. Out of anything, its probably closest to Famitsu.

  90. Horses. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    My favourite use is to check football scores and horse races.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  91. My lifeline to the world by tomato · · Score: 1

    As a Deaf boy growing up isolated in the countryside in the 70s/80s, TV subtitles provided by the Ceefax service was my only gateway to learning about the wider world.

    >Ceefax was developed by BBC broadcast
    >engineers who were working on ways of
    >providing subtitles for the deaf.

    Many thanks.

    Curiously, in 1999, I worked for the BBC as a web interface programmer, and I was based at Kingswood Warren, which is their R&D dept. Looking back, I guess that's where they developed Ceefax.

    Wierd place, with its own vegetable gardens and croquet pitches.

    I nearly lost my job there due to reading Slashdot too much... (I was rubbish anyway) - Guess Ceefax was where I got the habit of staring at pages, waiting for them to update...

    Just as well I changed careers to becoming a playwriter now... see my sig

    +tomato+
    --
    See the new play by Deafinitely Theatre!
    'Children of a Greater God' by Tomato Lichy
    Jacksons Lane Theatre, London, Nov 3-13, 2004

    £10 / £7

    Box Office 020 8341 4421
    mail@jacksonslane.org.uk
    www.deafinitelythe atre.co.uk

  92. Me too by vrt3 · · Score: 1

    I would like some cache too... at today's memory prices, it would hardly have any effect on the price.

    I guess it just doesn't have enough marketing value.

    --
    This sig under construction. Please check back later.
  93. Teletext Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know if this is of interest but the new television at least panasonic ones now load all the pages of teletext in when you go to a page say its a 3 page article it loads the fist and then you can just flip through them using the channel changer button or volume buttons on the remote

  94. Ceefax? by Damek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I prefer Ceephax.

    1. Re:Ceefax? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Come on, that's just a blatant taking of an opportunity to show off the music you're in to...

      good man, anyways tho.. Ceephax is ace, and doesn't get nearly half the attention of his big bruv (who is also excellent)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    2. Re:Ceefax? by Damek · · Score: 1

      Be fair now, I didn't say I liked his music, I just said I prefer him to Ceefax. Which is a comment about Ceefax, and therefore on topic. What is Slashdot coming to these days? Sheesh! :P

  95. Oh Canada!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Am I the only one who remembers Telidon? I'm old, I know.

  96. My granny likes it... by trmcdougle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was talking to my grandmother sunday, they are getting a new TV and she mentioned that she made sure that it will have ceefax as she missed its absence on the tv that just died!

  97. Interactive Teletext by Cocodude · · Score: 2, Informative
    Many of you probably won't know this, but Sky (another provider in the UK who also have a teletext service) used to provide a form of interactive teletext.

    This required you to dial up a (typically premium rate) phone number and then access a specific teletext page. This was your page, and you could interact with it using the digits on the telephone keypad. I played many simple games, e.g. snake, and there were even ways to do online banking using this.

    If you knew how to, other people could also look at the same teletext page and see exactly what you were doing. Sky used to have a password system for some of their online games, so it used to be quite easy to figure out someone else's password by looking at it as it was typed in!

    Marc

    (who won a tenner by being one of the highest scores in one of the games)

  98. 9 terrestrial channels in UK by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    If you live in Northern Ireland you can get BBC1, BBC 2, ITV, Ch4, then the southern channels RTE1, RTE2, TV3, and TG4. Because you're in the north, you don't have to pay the license fee for the semi-state broadcaster RTE, but you do have to pay the license fee for the BBC. I also believe that people on the west coast of Wales can pick up the RTE signal.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  99. Software Distribution Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the software distribution part was for doing remote updates to outlying "branches" when Italian phones were either too slow or too noisy to do overnight software distrubution. Also I seem to remember that some of the BBC Tv shows that launched the BBC micro allowed you to downloads the "source" for some of their demos/games. Or am I bonkers?

  100. Pfff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got me all excited there, 3D Teletext would be cool!

    (or maybe not)

  101. SVT and TV4 in Sweden does that too by Herz · · Score: 0
    --
    In vino vici
  102. Use it every day by Herz · · Score: 0

    There can't be a more efficient way to get the most important news items than through a TV with a large page memory :)

    --
    In vino vici
  103. Ceefax has allways been the dogs boll()|(S by Stanneh · · Score: 0

    personally i wake up everyday and check the weather on ceefax i have done this for about 15 yrs since i was in school and still do it now it also has all the up to date tv listings and such to be honest all this suprised me to how proud i am of the service. Happy birthday Ceefax!!!

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  104. QLink... but now under a different name. by Otto · · Score: 1
    What was Commodores service called? Q-Link? Koala-Link? It was something like that. It was friggin cool, it was like the internet just for C-64s.

    It was Q-Link or Quantum Link, run by Quantum Computer Services. Later they added PCLink and AppleLink because they were hurting for cash. PCLink and AppleLink were basically the same as Q-Link and email could even be sent between the systems. Even later than that, they combined the PCLink and AppleLink services to form a now well known system: America Online.

    Yep, if you didn't know it already, Quantum Link is the direct predecesor to AOL. AOL discontinued the QLink service on November 1st, 1994.

    The death blow to QLink, delivered by none other than Steve Case:

    Dear Members,

    As you know, QLink was originally launched in November, 1985. In the years that followed you, as our loyal members, have helped us build a unique online community for Commodore computer users. I want to thank each of you for your contribution, your support and your feedback over the years.

    The computing industry has changed dramatically since those first days of online communications. Commodore ceased to produce Commodore brand computers in 1993. Sadly, the company has recently closed its doors entirely. The Commodore computer, once a leader in the industry, has been replaced by faster, more powerful systems. Many software vendors no longer support the Commodore operating system.

    Now we find, with great regret, that we simply can no longer support the QLink service. It has become impossible for us to maintain the product up to a standard of quality that we can be proud of. Many of you I'm sure have noticed a diminished level of product quality in the last few months due to these technical limitations. Without technical support from the industry, we are not able to add new services, fix existing problems, or prevent new ones. Therefore we have made the sad decision to discontinue QLink as of
    November 1, 1994.

    We would like to thank each of you for your long and continued support and, if at all possible, keep you as part of our online community.

    If you now have the ability to use America Online (PC-DOS, Windows or Macintosh), we invite you to convert your membership to one of these other systems. For details on what these versions have to offer and the system requirements needed to run them, see the document in this area entitled "Converting to America Online."

    For details on the last month of service for QLink, important dates and billing information, see the document in this area entitled "Your Final Bill."

    We have enjoyed serving you. Thanks again.

    Sincerely,
    Steve Case

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  105. Good human interface design by Cloud+K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think a large part of what makes Ceefax/Teletext so successful and why I still love it even with digital interactive stuff, internet etc is that it's just so nice to use.

    It's consistent - okay, sometimes consistently blocky with consistantly slow waits for the carousel, but it's just darn consistent dammit! Same "fonts", same styles, Page 100 is always the start, it always has the same features (hold/reveal/mix etc) from one TV to the next etc.

    The information you're most likely to want is shown immediately on page 100.

    For novice users there are helpful indexes and usually coloured hotkeys that take you to well chosen related pages.

    For more advanced users you can enter a page number directly and get to the information you want quicker.

    It's highly accessible - huge, clear text on a plain black background that practically anyone can read even if they're hard of sight etc.

    With such a low resolution you only get the information you want and can easily assimilate at one time instead of a huge screenful of ads and other garbage to wade through.

    It's fairly quick (as long as you aren't after page 101 when the carousel has just gone past 102)

    It's remarkably easy to use. My granny uses it.

    Now, is it me or did the BBC do their theory research wonderfully (as they always seem to do, who says the license is a waste of money when so many slashdot articles originate from them) and have followed HCI principles really rather nicely. This is what happens when you develop a system properly - 30 years later, people are still using it and still love it!

  106. Convenience + Website shrinkage by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    For us the best thing about this system is that you do not need to turn the computer on: eg you can get a quick weather forcast in only 30 seconds !!

    Also I notice that to celebrate 30 years they have dropped some of their *website* content: I had a script to pull and analysis the films-on-TV pages and the content disappeared a couple of weeks ago :-(
    (I am trying to get XMLTV working now)