Slashdot Mirror
George Lucas to Receive Lifetime Achievement Award
KefabiMe writes "George Lucas is receiving the AFI Lifetime Achievement award. I will make no other comment."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
To receive the Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition in 2005, and the Super Extended Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition Platinum in 2014.
I didn't know trashing the trilogy was an achievement... go figure... fp?
There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
Award win you shall!
Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?
I was unaware that giving birth to Jar-Jar Binks was considered as a "life achievement"...
Then again, everything depends on what you mean by "achievement".
Karma cannot be described by words alone.
Where is Jar Jar's award!?!?!?!
All we need, now he'll think he's good and remaster Indian jones... and Indie wont shoot first.
I like muppets.
I can't wait until 20 years down the road, when he releases the DVD of the AFI program, replacing a 60 year old Lucas with a virile 20 year old version of himself. There will be space battles, too.
400 Person LAN for Charity: Zion LAN 2005
that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.
For remastering dvd to show a puppet, now with more wrinkles!?
[ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
<Wilhelm-Scream>AHHHHHHHHH! AHHHHHHHH!</Wilhelm-Scream>
... he didn't really get this award for creating the character known as Jar Jar Binks.
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || http://AdTerrasPerAspera.com
Although I will say they have finally found a good character for his over-acting on Boston Legal.
This way to the egress...
The criteria stated that "the recipient should be one whose talent has in a fundamental way advanced the film art; whose accomplishment has been acknowledged by scholars, critics, professional peers and the general public; and whose work has stood the test of time." In 1993, AFI trustees extended the criteria to encompass individuals with active careers and work of significance yet to be accomplished. "
(From http://www.afi.com/tvevents/laa/laasite/)
Despite the debacles that are the 'new' trilogy, no fan could watch the extras DVD that came with Star Wars and deny that it brought a lump to the throat to see how the film that defined space adventure for a generation was literally dragged kicking and screaming to the screen, all despite incredible odds, horrendous bad luck and dumbass studio execs through the sheer force of will and unshakable self belief that the story he was telling had to be told. Much as I really dont like how he conducts himself these days, no-one could say the man hasn't earned his place in history and in the hearts and minds of thirtysomethings globally. I can't hear the opening bars of the John Williams theme without getting chills down my spine and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
Having the dumb luck to stumble into the greatest movie franchise in history, Lucas has taken that little bit of luck and transformed it into his vision of a complete alternate universe. Had he been any other short-sighted director (Spielberg, I'm looking right at you and your last half of A.I.) the Star Wars trilogy would have simply ended with the dance of the Ewoks. However, Lucas was able to transform that complete story into a more complete story by going back and fixing and editing and putting in scenes that were originally not his vision in the first place. I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
The problem is that most people cannot understand the mind of a visionary and it isn't until long after they fade into irrelevance that they truly become appreciated. So too it is with Lucas, I believe. Many people are so worried about their childhood memories that they cry wolf every time Lucas decides to change a scene. Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.
Lucas truly does deserve this award not only for what rich memories he brought to us when we were still kids, but also for the memories he gives kids of the future. When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.
If he won't make a comment, I will.
WHY!?!
By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
I will make no other comment
No comment is also a comment...
According to MSN Encarta (hey, it was the first one I found on a google search) these are the past winners of the AFI Lifetime achievement award.
1973 John Ford
1974 James Cagney
1975 Orson Welles
1976 William Wyler
1977 Bette Davis
1978 Henry Fonda
1979 Alfred Hitchcock
1980 James Stewart
1981 Fred Astaire
1982 Frank Capra
1983 John Huston
1984 Lillian Gish
1985 Gene Kelly
1986 Billy Wilder
1987 Barbara Stanwyck
1988 Jack Lemmon
1989 Gregory Peck
1990 Sir David Lean
1991 Kirk Douglas
1992 Sidney Poitier
1993 Elizabeth Taylor
1994 Jack Nicholson
1995 Steven Spielberg
1996 Clint Eastwood
1997 Martin Scorsese
1998 Robert Wise
1999 Dustin Hoffman
2000 Harrison Ford
2001 Barbra Streisand
2002 Tom Hanks
2003 Robert De Niro
2004 Meryl Streep
There are some pretty serious names on that list. My point is, why now? The nostalgia for the first trilogy of films is good and all, but really, they were only 3 movies.
----
Squirrel
Much as we all enjoy reading about how Lucus raped your childhood, his movies are probably only a small part of why he is getting this award. The man is directly responsible for much of the technology behind modern film making - nonlinear editing, sound post-production and reproduction, digital effects, virtual sets, virtual extras, and now he is a leading force in digital film. Not to mention the great strides he made in marketing and licensing :)
All these techniques were developed for his projects, and there is not a film made today that does not use them in some way.
He is certainly more deserving than 2001's winner - Barbra Streisand!
sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
Now he can quit.
I will make no other comment.
Now, isn't that a pretty clear comment?
Okay, okay, so why isn't it called the "shitload of money achievement" ? Would be more to the point, don't you think ? :)
Karma cannot be described by words alone.
...for besting luke skywalker in the whiny punk category
Beware the fury of a patient man
- John Dryden
but what have YOU done?
Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
I sense a disturbance in the force... as if millions of voices cried out in terror, and then were suddenly silenced.
Love the Third Amendment?
I'm constantly surprised that George Lucas was lucid and creative enough to create American Graffiti... it's a film that has not only withstood the test of time, quite an achievement for what could have easily been just a nostalgia piece, but has the perfect balance of comedy and drama, and manages to develop many different storylines (most multi-threaded films tend to skimp on any sort of real character and story development and the crossover between storylines is often very poor).
sig.
That's quite a successful run. Maybe not a "lifetime" of achievement, but a bunch of great and/or insanely popular movies in a short period of time.
It's unfortunate that the recent stuff sucks, but he's still got a pretty amazing record.
Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
"George Lucas is receiving the AFI Lifetime Achievement award. I will make no other comment."
Oh, c'mon, don't like that. You'll get yours too, eventually!
1)He created original trilogy. Those movies are one of the best movies ever.
;)
2)He destroyed it with Special Edition.
3)Then he created three crappy prequels*. (worst movies ever).
And now the conclusion:
Thats helluva lot of determinination and hard work. He deserves it.
* I never saw episode iii, but judging from i and ii, I'm almost certanly right
Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
Getting millions of people to pay bucks to watch Jar-Jar _IS_ an achievement.
As always a story brings out the most short sighted posters, upset over the treatment of Star Wars.
Lets not forget that the award is not for Star Wars but for his achievements to the industry.
Lucas helped found ILM which helped get special effects to the what they are today. Skywalker Sound has contributed to hundreds of films. THX certification got cinemas, film and DVD production quality up.
And personally, I loved Howard the Duck...
[)amien
Yet perhaps not so much for the art of movies. Alas, because I enjoyed the original trilogy so much in my childhood.
He created one of the greatest (and first, I believe) movie merchandizing businesses in history. I would question whether there would be so many "Power Ranger Toys" or "Barney" tie-ins if the Star Wars franchise hadn't done been so successful.
He has continually expanded the frontier of digital effects in film-making, and although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, etc.), I do believe that nevertheless he deserves credit for the push towards effective uses of digital imagery in cinema.
He has enhanced the audio experience in most large cinemas in operation today (at least in the US). I can't say how many times I've seen "THX-1138" digital surround sound by Dolby--that sound system was developed in conjunction with Lucas' team.
He was first to expand the idea of film sequels (and series) in modern cinema. Would we have had Die Hard, Die Harder were it not for Lucas? Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas? What about Star Trek the Movie I-IV? Back to the Future I-II? If the original trilogy had not been so popular with audiences, would subsequent sequels & series concepts have been developed other major film studios?
There may be other such achievements as well, but with the above I think there is a strong case that Lucas reshaped how the business of movies does it's business.
...the parts where he revolutionised film making (THX, Skywalker Sound, ILM, non-linear editing) and where he became the most successful independent film-maker of all time.
I mean think about it:
1. Industrial Light and Magic essentially pioneered the modern age of cinematic special effects. They took "traditional" special effects to new levels of excellence and helped pioneer CGI effects for movies.
2. Pixar pioneered much of what computer animation can do, and under subsequent leadership of Steve Jobs the company has produced several blockbuster hit movies.
3. Lucas Sound helped develop the THX certification for high quality movie presentation in the theaters, and it has extended that certification to DVD mastering, too. A THX-certified DVD tends to have high-quality picture and sound on average.
"George Lucas To Receive Liftime In Prison"
:P
I own a pump action golf ball cannon. I made it myself.
In that case Bill Gates would have been winning it every year, hands down. But since Bill Gates' lifetime achievement can be summed up in one word: "Windows", the statue or whatever goes to Lucas instead.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
I wonder how much he dislikes American Graffity. I bet he totally hates it.
But I think he should win for giving us the beloved Lucasarts company... :)
Well, up until the screwed up, and then canceled Sam and Max 2 and Full Throttle.
was a good movie.
THX1138 was an excellent movie.
The distributors spat on it at the time.
Considering his subsequent work, I've always figured you want the definition of "embittered cynic" you look up George Lucas.
That kind of monumental and over-composed style of music also gives me shakes. I guess that the music is OK, but I am very sick of it.
Boooooooooooo!
... as if millions of _real_, skilled directors cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced...
It's like telling him, until now, you've done everything worthy in your life, please, leave StarWars alone. Don't touch it anymore!
DON'T PANIC
... to get a lifetime achievement award if your constantly allowed to go back, digitially edit, and resubmit your life's work for approval until you get it write (or wrong i guess).
Do, or do not!
Hear, hear!!
'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
In Star Wars, Luke comes off as some petualant child who went to the sooky child school of acting. If was hard to get involved with his badly written character, and Han Solo come off as some sort of space hick. The only redeeming feature was a bra-less princess Laia.
Whilst watching the truly awful Return of the Jedi, I noticed that the characters seem to say all their actions and speak in pure exposition e.g. I'm going to go *there* and do *that*. This film is worse than pantomime.
Give George credit where credit is due, THX is great, the special effects are fab, but the acting, plot, and characters all stink.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Some folks around here have taken to hating Lucas with a sort of religious zeal and nothing you can say will change that. I grew up with Star Wars as a massive component of my life, and I think the new versions of the films kick the old versions' asses up and down the street a half-dozen times. But some people around here disagree and won't tolerate opposing points of view. Frankly, I think it's a little unhealthy to get so wrapped up in this stuff that you allow it to affect your emotions and judgment to that extent.
HarveyBirddman, if you want to engage in more mature and meaningful discourse about the films, go to The Force.net and try out their fan forums. Much more respectful and knowledgeable and level-headed group there and it's not as Lucas-worshipping as you might at first assume (plenty of valid critiques of Lucas there without the emotional outpouring and the wailing about ruined childhoods.)
Honestly, I don't know why Slashdot insists that this stuff should be posted here anymore. Clearly, the Slashdot crowd and the Star Wars fan do not overlap much nowadays.
--Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
Second. Scruffy's always wanted to see a hamster recognized by the AFI.
Look, I hated Jar Jar's pratfals in the first movie as much as the next guy.
But in the second movie the stupidity had a point - he was an easy to use pawn, one of the weak minded people that is so easily manipulted by force powers. I was actually quite happy with how Jar Jar was used in teh second, even though I thought they went way overboard with the physical comedy in the first.
The whole *point* is that he's stupid, not that he's hated. He'll end up being hated (or pitied) because he's so stupid.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Many of the editing techniques, and special effects done today are possible because of his drive and commentment.
you can say what you want about ther Star Wars series, but they did influence the industry. The way movie companies viewed sci-fi films after Star-Wars was a lot more seriously then before Star-Wars.
WOuld Alien as been as good if George hadn't proved there is a market for 'grity' sci-fi?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
So do people with malaria.
I think this achievement is more about its wallet than about its talent. The juges are Unitedstaters.
He'd stop making movies on par with the Cabage Patch Kids. I'm not worried about my childhood memories, I'd really like to see him make a movie with the imagination of an adult. These dumbed down Star Wars movies have been thinner then a childrens cartoon and all the while the real world has continued grow more complex. Give me a Star Wars with characters with flaws. Something to sink my teeth into.
Quack, quack.
ah, so Lea's line was suppsoed to be:
"You look like Scruffy, the nerf herder."
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
that a place that alledgedly devoted to 'News for Nerds' would appriacte this a lot more.
1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream
2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies
3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time.
4) Independant film maker
What's with the haters?
Quite frankly this 'it's big and worth a lot of money so lets hate it attitude has gotten old.' Except for Google. Speak bad about Google and you'll be moderated down to hell.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I can't believe how two or three little changes can "destroy" a movie. I enjoyed the original saga, and even if Greedo shoots a split-second earlier, I think the restoration and improvements that have been made to image quality (e.g. lightsabres) are worth it.
I think George Lucas deserves an award!
Some kind of one way ticket to hell seems like a most deserving reward for his... efforts.
Lifetime Achievement Award for Sodomizing Our Memories? Star Wars *used* to be good.
They should look at the new version of THX-1138. If there ever was an argument FOR making updates to older films, that one is it. Very nice "upgrades" in that one. Just enough to give a better sense of scale in a few scenes.
--- Ban humanity.
What can I say... That's just your opinion, and if you have a hard time accepting others, feeling the need to look down on others, you're just narrow-minded.
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
If you take a moment to remove the tinfoil hat and take a look at what Lucas has done... I'd say he deserves it. His methods as far as hollywood politics alone revolutionized the industry of movie-making.
Beside that, he's led development of some of the best industry departments and standards out there. He was largely responsible for Pixar!
So before you're too quick to bash him for the obvious blunders he's had, at least have the fairness to recognize what he has really done well.
I don't know. I really liked his segment in The Four Rooms.
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
"No! No, freakin' kids. I do not need this, I've got a masters degree in folklore mythology."
There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
...some of the events in his life will be altered so they more closely match the life George originally intended.
"We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
Anyway, we're right behind you. Lead us onward, HarveyBirdman, into the depths of Incorrectly Modded Flamebait Hell! BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
--Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
Years and years of producing films, not movies, and you want him judged for the last one that by all accounts was an honourable failure?
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
You do what you can in your context and circumstances.
There are people for which waking up every morning and managing to lead an almost normal life is an achievment that easily overshadows anything Lucas has ever done, but that naturally is not highligted since achieving this does not touch as many people as a film maker.
So stop the patronizing, we may be doing more things that you are obviously denying people credit for.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
I pity the moderator who worships George Lucas. Geez, you act like I killed your father or something.