Slashdot Mirror


Ask Director of 'Trekkies' Roger Nygard

When I was last in California, I had the good fortune to bump into Roger Nygard who agreed to be a Slashdot interview victim. He is the Director of Trekkies, 6 Days in Roswell and the recently released Trekkies 2. He's made quite a name for himself documenting some fairly extreme geek activity, and this is your chance to put him through the wringer. Standard interview rules apply: Post questions. Moderate them. We'll select the best and post Roger's answers in a few weeks.

190 comments

  1. At 73:45.03 in Trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was that a Vulcan or a Romulan?

  2. Is there a LAN Party documentary in the works? by b0r0din · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And if not, how do you establish what sort of cultural phenomena you want to document? What made you decide to make Trekkies, for instance?

  3. AD&D by krymsin01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever thought to do an AD&D documentary?

    --
    stuff
    1. Re:AD&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Have you ever thought to do an AD&D documentary?"

      I heard that he was going to but he failed the saving throw and took 3d6 fire damage instead.

    2. Re:AD&D by killmenow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt! Lightning bolt!

      But seriously, this was the first thing I thought of when I read "fairly extreme geek activity"

      So, why not a "gaming" documentary? From the LAN game perspective, the RPG-ers, the FRAGG-ers, etc. Then looking at the people who take it to the real world level (the "lightning bolt" folks).

      Are the people at the Renaissance Festivals the same folks playing EQ?

    3. Re:AD&D by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      I've actualy heard some fairly dark stuff about internal RF politics. Then again *shrug*

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:AD&D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      how about a slashdot documentary?

      film them running for hot grits to pour down natalie portmans pants, all done in a sith costume with a microsoft logo on the front, and if its a second thuesday in a month the google logo on the back, screamin its GNU/Linux because you wouldnt call its the 1701-D either, its the NCC 1701-D!

      Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

    5. Re:AD&D by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Why stop there!

      LARPers, furries, plushies, linux kernel hackers..

      Comedy goldmine!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:AD&D by runlvl0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, why not a "gaming" documentary?

      You know that one already exists, right?

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    7. Re:AD&D by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      Shillelagh! Shillelagh!

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    8. Re:AD&D by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Why stop there!

      LARPers, furries, plushies, linux kernel hackers..

      Comedy goldmine!


      He makes documentaries, not horror films.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    9. Re:AD&D by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why look to the so called 'fringes' of society. There are plenty of 'mainstream' people who are just as weird. How about sports fans, (e.g. NFL)? What about teenaged girls and boy bands?

    10. Re:AD&D by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Because that's not something I can identify with!

      --
      stuff
    11. Re:AD&D by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a great point. I firmly believe that everyone is a geek. Its just the flavor it takes. Think of how many uber macho types paint their bodies and stand in 30 degree weather to support their team. Or snobs who look down on such base fandom, but can tell you what year a wine was made by sniff. So why not a documentery about the "ordinary" geek in all of us?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    12. Re:AD&D by edrain · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Sport Center and TRL get wider distribution / audiences than a Trekkies-like documentary ever could. Why (as a management-type might ask) re-invent the wheel?

  4. ST or SW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask him if he prefers Star Trek or Star Wars.

  5. Fanatic fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not really a question, but I would like you to tell me about the most fanatic fan of Star Trek you have encountered.
    Thanks

    1. Re:Fanatic fan by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 1
      Not really a question, but I would like you to tell me about the most fanatic fan of Star Trek you have encountered.

      How about, "What was the most fanatic fan of Star Trek you have encountered?"

    2. Re:Fanatic fan by Om242 · · Score: 3, Funny



      I think the more appropriate question to him is:

      While interviewing someone, did you ever become afraid...

      :)

      ++Om242

  6. polarity by Fr05t · · Score: 5, Funny

    In your experiences, have you ever found a problem that couldn't be fixed by reversing the polarity of something?

    1. Re:polarity by zerblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Many times. However, adjusting the modulation will usually do the trick.

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
    2. Re:polarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when that's not enough, you add a layer of nutation.

    3. Re:polarity by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I usually start with a phase shift, as the last time I remodulated something, the captain ended up with hot earl grey in his lap and was quite upset.

      --
      Be relentless!
    4. Re:polarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had problems getting laid, so I reverse my polarity...

    5. Re:polarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wanted to know: can you feel it twitching?

    6. Re:polarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, once, when I was like, 14, I put this really big magnet next to the TV screen. Yeah, that pretty much destroyed the picture and my Dad was sure to literally kill me yet again. Out of sheer panic, I turned the magnet around approx 180 degrees and repeated my movements. It wasn't perfect, but Dad never noticed. Was that a reverse in polarity which saved my butt?

  7. Ringer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You mean 'wringer'. In the old days, washing machines didn't do the spin-dry thing. You had to take the wet clothes out of the barrel, and feed them through, you guessed it, a wringer, which was two motor-driven rubber rollers that squeezed the water out of the clothes. It was fairly powerful, and people got hurt.

    1. Re:Ringer? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      My grandmother had one when I was a kid, I stuck my hands in it a few times, it wasn't powerful enough to bruise or hurt you. Maybe some industrial ones were, I don't know.

      They actually work much better than the spin-dry cycle, and there are plenty still in use for that reason. It's more work, of course, but if you feed through your clothes properly, it basically presses your pants as you squeeze the water out, then you just hang it up to dry, with nice perfect creases.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Ringer? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
      My grandmother worked at a commercial laundry. She lost a finger in one of the wringers there. They were very powerful, and if there hadn't been someone else there to stop the machine she'd probably have lost an arm instead of just a finger.

      I think most places use centrifugal and tumble dryers now.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    3. Re:Ringer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend in college who played with a wringer when he was quite young -- consequently, the first joint of the index finger of his right hand was at a right angle to the rest of his finger (pointing to the adjacent finger). Very interesting to watch him play trumpet.

    4. Re:Ringer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Simplicity machine I remember had an adjustment for the release. The wringer would pop apart if it got too much clothes in it. I guess if you set it too hard, it would just suck you in and never pop.

    5. Re:Ringer? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing my...friend didn't have access to a wringer as a child. Something else would have been permanently bent at a right angle.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  8. Favorite Episode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you have a favorite Star Trek episode and a favorite series? If you say Voyager or Enterprise, you may be lynched.

    1. Re:Favorite Episode? by slavetrade55 · · Score: 1

      Favorite series: Deep Space 9
      Favorite episode: Improbable Cause / The Die is Cast (beats TNG's Best of Both Worlds, imo)

    2. Re:Favorite Episode? by rossy · · Score: 1

      What is Voyager or Enterprise... were those
      Trek Series?

      --
      Ross Youngblood
  9. A few Q's by aoasus · · Score: 1

    Who is more likely to strike out in anger, Trekkies or those who hate them? Have you been threatened for your work? Is the franchise dying a slow death?

    1. Re:A few Q's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      John de Lancie?

    2. Re:A few Q's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      One Q is already a pain in the ass.

  10. Shooting and Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What format are you using to shoot your documentaries (digital or film)? What workstations and applications do you use to edit your film?

    1. Re:Shooting and Editing by jimmytango829 · · Score: 1

      It says on the Six Days In Roswell homepage that he used 16mm film to shoot and converted it to 32mm for the final feature. I didn't check the Trekkies 2 site.

    2. Re:Shooting and Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      booooooooooooooring. Oh my god, do you want an interview or a sleeping pill.

  11. The ringer? by duvie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The little bell? The unrecognized pro who mops up the local opposition before anyone realizes who he is? Oh, no, you mean the WRINGER. -- People who don't understand metaphors shouldn't call the kettle by any other name.

  12. Re:polarity [OT] by Fr05t · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You should have reversed the polarity of the grill, which would have resulted in a tasty cheeze beef treat.

  13. Get a Life? by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The thing I mostly remember from the whole Trek phenomena, especially with Shatner, was when trekkies were told to get a life. It was fairly harsh as I remember, but those who were not Trekkies would always laugh whenever Shatner would say it. Trekkies on the other hand, simply took it in stride.

    What can you say about this kind of negative response to fan adoration and does it prove something about the whole Trek phenomena, the actors and fans, or does it detract from the experience?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Get a Life? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sheesh, it was an SNL sketch, not Shatners personal opinion or hatred.

      The original cast based their entire post-Trek careers on speaking engagements and Trek conventions. Except for Wil Wheaton, who's arrogance and habit of throwing feces at anyone who dares seek an autograph has turned more people off of the franchise than anything else.

      But Wheaton is the exception, as a rule, the cast members seem to love the fans. Why wouldnt they? There is no real "negative response".

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Get a Life? by rjelks · · Score: 1

      "Except for Wil Wheaton, who's arrogance and habit of throwing feces at anyone who dares seek an autograph..."

      When did this occur? I thought he was pretty good sport after the writers wrote him off the show. Doesn't he still do the cons?

    3. Re:Get a Life? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has read the Slashdot interview with Wil Wheaton may have noticed he has a sense of humour, and may in fact have a slashdot account. I think perhaps the grandparent post was jesting because it may actually have been Wil himself.

      Is "stratjakt" Wil Wheatons' Slashdot handle? Speculation abounds...

    4. Re:Get a Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's CleverNickName. But, knowing Wil, he's probably got a few Slashdot handles, depending on his mood (i.e. "dry days" and "heavy days").

    5. Re:Get a Life? by rjelks · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's CleverNickName...

    6. Re:Get a Life? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      depending on his mood (i.e. "dry days" and "heavy days").

      I believe they have products for those situations.

    7. Re:Get a Life? by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Ditto on the SNL sketch. Shatner does have a sense of humor, after all.

      As for Wil Wheaton, I confess to not liking his Wes Crusher character very much up until the last few episodes he appeared in. With the Traveller showing up, and the discovery that Wes had an incredible untapped potential wrt moving in spacetime, I thought that the character became a lot more interesting. I was hoping that he'd come back in a few episodes down the road, a la Q, but it never happened. I moved on and almost forgot about him until about a year ago, when ...

      I was having dinner with an old friend of mine, and perhaps because he knew that I was a Trekkie/Whovian that attended the cons every year while in high school, he asked me what I thought about Wil Wheaton. I related exactly what I did in the previous paragraph. He agreed with my assessment and we both came to the conclusion that for the most part the Wes Crusher character seemed a bit of a suckup and a goody-two-shoes. So I asked if he knew what Wil Wheaton was doing since leaving the show, and he said that he'd been spending time reading at Wil's website, http://www.wilwheaton.net/. My buddy suggested that I give it a visit and see what I thought.

      So I did, and I gotta say that whatever I've heard about him from others, or here at slashdot, he's actually a very funny and thought-provoking person to read. I suggest taking a spin through his FAQ. Thowing feces? I didn't read any of that. Sure he may have had a hard time as a young actor adjusting to the popularity of the show and the sometime dislike people had for his character, but who really ever handles fame like that with total poise and dignity ALL THE TIME. Very few people, I'd say.

      Anyhow, I'd write more, but I suggest that you give the man the benefit of the doubt and check out his blog and other tidbits on the site before characterizing him. I think that's fair, don't you?

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  14. Proposal for a new documentary by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Footies". Where we interview people who watch football all the time, dress in the kits, and go to these whacky "Games" where they get to see their stars performing, and meet up with other fans.

    We should concentrate on how obsessively sad these people are, and find people who have memorised entire games, and spend vast amounts of money collecting memorabilia and signed tat.

    1. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wouldn't be quite as interesting unless they were acne infested 30+ year old virgins who lived in their parents basements.

    2. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Football? American or European?

    3. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Replace football with almost most any other sport/singer/band/dead person/alive person and you'd still have pretty much the same film. Would you still consider these people 'obsessively sad' though?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      European, the African one is non migratory.

    5. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      To be honest, it wasn't really a well thought out rant.

      I don't think it's a good thing to be too single minded about any subject, whether its a TV show, a sport, a singer, or even non-hobby things, such as a job or a cause. What the measure of "too single minded" is is somewhat subjective.

      Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with being very enthusiastic about something. As long as it doesn't overtake your life. Some people simply take all of the above to insane levels.

    6. Re:Proposal for a new documentary by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

      So, you're like, British, right?

  15. The quintessential question: by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which captain do you think was the best?

    1. Re:The quintessential question: by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

      Silly question.

      Clearly it was Caveman.

    2. Re:The quintessential question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We all know it was Christopher Pike. You should see the tricks he can do in his hoverchair.

    3. Re:The quintessential question: by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      Picard, because he's obviously a vi user.

    4. Re:The quintessential question: by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Wrong! Picard wants options to choose from, as many as possible. Then he'd decide what to do from that.

      Obviously, he's an emacs user.

      --
      stuff
    5. Re:The quintessential question: by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      Lol I'm sorry, but how is Picard obviously a vi user? I was thinking more along the lines of vim.

    6. Re:The quintessential question: by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to say now that I posted this for its humourous value only. I never expected it to get to the +5, Interesting where it stands right now. If he responds and says "get a life" I will _not_ be held accountable.

    7. Re:The quintessential question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the funniest thing I have seen on slashdot in a long time.

  16. Here we go by Jeffery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    do you think the old or new trekkies are more fanatical?

    --
    President Bush Supporter
    1. Re:Here we go by faragon · · Score: 1

      That can be quantified but not qualitified, i.e., you can know the audiences for both cases, that could be the quantification point. For the quality approach, you have to trust in psychological data related to both time periods, which it's hard to get it as an objective fact when relationated to passions.

      May be the "fanatical" word may be an hyperbole, intended as the series bring happiness/joy to the observer, etc. There is, of course, other side, related to some near-religious interpretations, etc.

      Still Star Trek have tons of scientific fiascos, related to some sounds in space, humanoid extraterrestrials reaching the >90% of the known creatures, buggy paradoxes, and a large etcetera, it's quite fun and fairly well done.

      Anyway, I enjoied a lot more reading Isaac Asimov's, and other sci-fi writers, books from fifteen years ago.

      Enjoy sci-fi, but keep at least one foot on Earth ;-)

  17. A question by Lt+Cmdr+Tuvok · · Score: 2, Funny
    Dear Mr. Nygard, You are, of course, aware of the fact that 'Star Trek' is firmly grounded in reality, are you not? I myself am a living testament to that. This is why 'Star Trek' is so deeply respected by the intellectual people who are sometimes given the dubious and degrading title of 'geeks'. They know the real truth behind the alleged fiction.

    I myself am in correspondence with many of these people. In my view, these are some of the most interesting people in all of the particular segment of the spacetime continuum that I am able to project my signals to. Of course, the Prime Directive forbids me to reveal any of the technological details that many 'geeks' hunger for, but these discourses can nevertheless be quite rewarding, if they are confined to matters that are common to my time and theirs.

    I have put my point across. Tuvok Out.

    --
    Without the darkness, how would we recognize the light?
  18. point taken, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sports are a little more universal than sci-fi, check out recorded human history sometime.

    1. Re:point taken, but... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's a little harsh isn't it?

    2. Re:point taken, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone always got picked last at school...

    3. Re:point taken, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I just did, there are as many myths involving gods creating universes and having unlimited powers as there are sports.

    4. Re:point taken, but... by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      So, back when the neandrethals were wrestling in the mud, none of them were staring at the stars and the bubling brooks and imagining?

      Heck, there might have even been a Roman who preferred to stay home and tinker in his workshop than to attend the games!

  19. Extreme behavior by warrped · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you ever considered juxtaposing the extreme yet socially reviled behavior of the 'Trekkies' against the no less extreme but socially accepted behavior of (for example) sports fans? Is it the 'socially aberrant' element that draws you to the subject?

    --
    - Bachelorhood is the father of necessity.
    1. Re:Extreme behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish ACs had mod points: I'd love to see this one answered.

  20. Trekkie Questions by FerretFrottage · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Do most trekkies except the way Klingons have changes in appearance since the original series? Changes

    2. What type of car do most trekkies drive? SUV, hybrid, Dodge defiant?

    3. Do any of them buy the fact that even the slightest blast cases fires/sparks on the bridge? Do they hold the lowest price enterprise contractor responsible?

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    1. Re:Trekkie Questions by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      1. Do most trekkies except (accept) the way Klingons have changes in appearance since the original series? Changes

      2. What type of car do most trekkies drive? SUV, hybrid, Dodge defiant?

      3. Do any of them buy the fact that even the slightest blast cases fires/sparks on the bridge? Do they hold the lowest price enterprise contractor responsible


      1. Yes. As the sixties ended and the public was presented with characters such as Blackbelt Jones and Shaft, it was realized that a race of bad guys had to be more than simply black.

      2. Duh. Most trekkies are dropped off by their mothers.

      3. Yes. They also believe that when your space ship is hit with a phaser blast, it causes everyone in the bridge to grab the edges of their seats and lean back and forth and side to side in unison.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Trekkie Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>2. What type of car do most trekkies drive? SUV, hybrid, Dodge defiant?

      That's Dodge Reliant, the Chrysler K-car.

      And of course you must ask if it comes with fine Corinthian leather.

    3. Re:Trekkie Questions by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's spelled "accept"

      The people involved with Star Trek openly admit that there is no reasonable logical explanation for the difference. The audience is just asked to accept that the makeup needed to be changed.

      In an episode of DS9, Wharf was directly asked about it (in the trouble with tribbles remake). And he just avoided the question by saying it was a "long story". It's sort of a trekkie joke because trekkies and most humans know that there is no explanation.

      Why do you accept that the computer technology in old trek looks inferior to our current technology? Oh wait, I know why everyone accepts that. It's just a TV show and is for entertainment purposes only. If the writers, producers, etc could predict the future they would not be making low budget TV shows. That includes being able to predict the best way to do Klingon makeup.

      and no. I'm not a Trekkie.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Trekkie Questions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      As the sixties ended and the public was presented with characters such as Blackbelt Jones and Shaft, it was realized that a race of bad guys had to be more than simply black.
      I always thought the original Klingons looked more mongoloid, what with them Genghis Khan moustaches and all.

      They also believe that when your space ship is hit with a phaser blast, it causes everyone in the bridge to grab the edges of their seats and lean back and forth and side to side in unison.
      Quite. Maybe one day they should encounter someone from the (sorry, our) present who says "Huh? Where's the seatbelts?".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Trekkie Questions by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      It's sort of a trekkie joke because trekkies and most humans know that there is no explanation.

      "Most humans" neither know nor care about this.

    6. Re:Trekkie Questions by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

      It's spelled "Worf" :)

      --
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    7. Re:Trekkie Questions by David+M.+Sweeney · · Score: 1
      The people involved with Star Trek openly admit that there is no reasonable logical explanation for the difference. The audience is just asked to accept that the makeup needed to be changed.

      In an episode of DS9, Wharf was directly asked about it (in the trouble with tribbles remake). And he just avoided the question by saying it was a "long story". It's sort of a trekkie joke because trekkies and most humans know that there is no explanation.

      Lifted straight from the Deep Space 9 episode script for "Trials and Tribble-ations":

      62 RESUME ODO'S TABLE

      As the Waitress comes over.

      WAITRESS What'll it be, boys? And don't ask for raktajino -- if I have to say we don't have that one more time...

      ODO (suddenly very interested) Who ordered raktajino?

      WAITRESS The Klingons.

      Everyone except Worf looks around the room, mystified.

      ODO Klingons?

      WAITRESS Yes.

      They still don't see any. Worf is getting increasingly uncomfortable.

      WAITRESS (are you blind?) Right over there.

      She points to the nearby table Bashir and O'Brien passed earlier. They turn and look with some surprise at the original series-style Klingons, who do not have the typical forehead ridges they're accustomed to seeing. Worf studies his drink as the others turn one and look at him for explanation.

      BASHIR (to Worf) Those are Klingons?

      WAITRESS All right. You boys have had enough.

      The Waitress moves off.

      ODO Mister Worf... ?

      Worf looks up with discomfort at the three expectant faces.

      WORF They are Klingons.

      Three heads turn and look at the Klingons and then look back at Worf.

      WORF It is a... long story.

      O'BRIEN What happened? Some kind genetic engineering... ?

      BASHIR A viral mutation... ?

      WORF (defensive) We do not discuss it with outsiders.

      Read the original script here.

  21. Re:Schadenfreude? by Chundra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Similarly...

    Are you a Star Trek fan? If so, do you think your films make trekkies seem like bigger freaks than the average person already assumes them to be? If not, what was your motivation?

  22. Re:through the ringer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Pointing out that pointing out the illiteracy of editors is never offtopic on slashdot is never offtopic on slashdot!

    And neither is infinite regress.

  23. How to make a statement ... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    at a star trek con... three words. Babylon five uniform.

    Then when someone calls you stupid for dressing in the wrong get up point a mirror in their face and tell them their mother did a bad job with the uniform.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:How to make a statement ... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Then when someone calls you stupid for dressing in the wrong get up point a mirror in their face and tell them their mother did a bad job with the uniform.

      You've never been to a Star Trek convention then.

      Actually, neither have I, but I have been to a Buffy convention dressed as a Jedi. Nobody seemed to care.

    2. Re:How to make a statement ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then when someone calls you stupid for dressing in the wrong get up point a mirror in their face and tell them their mother did a bad job with the uniform.
      Dear Tom,

      Learn how to construct a sentence.

      Sincerely,
      One of the 2,684,993 people who understand English punctuation.

  24. Re:Schadenfreude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the hobby of people moore's ripping on is what? Killing people?

  25. Re:Schadenfreude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look, there are limits to everything, and when people push limits, it's either awe-inspiring or laughable.

  26. Re:gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a re-directing troll - nothing to see here folks...

  27. How many by frisbeeforfido · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trekkies are Slashdotties? If some Trekkies are Slashies and some Slashies are Trekkies which of the following is true: A. All Trekkies are Slashies B. All Slashies have pointy ears C. Some Trekkies are Slashies with reversed polarity

    --
    "If it wasn't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
    -Lewis Black
  28. More than just fandom with Trekkies? by notmikey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On the surface, it seems like Trekkies are just really big fans, and that fandom propels them to participate in the universe.

    It seems to me, however, that something different is going on. Fandom is often emulation--the Spock ears, the "Dammit Jim" variations, that sort of thing. But Trekkies take it a step farther: they create new material that is meant to merge with the pre-existing Trek world. In this way, Trekkie-ness is more like playing D&D than being in a Sci-Fi film club.

    What I wonder (and here's my question) is whether you've noticed some common ground that launches people to go past being a fan and becoming a Trekkie. Is it dissatisfaction with new series and recent movies being weaker than past ones? Possibly some other characteristic that fans tend to share that, when merged with fandom will lead into Trekkie-ness? Is there something inherent about the star trek world that encourages people to internalize their identification with the star trek world? Or is there nothing at all consistent about the way Trekkies enter that world?

    1. Re:More than just fandom with Trekkies? by Mant · · Score: 1

      But Trekkies take it a step farther: they create new material that is meant to merge with the pre-existing Trek world. In this way, Trekkie-ness is more like playing D&D than being in a Sci-Fi film club.

      This is hardly unique to Trek, all sorts of TV shows, comics, movies and books have fan fiction. These days quite a lot have fan films. A lot of it is very bad, but that is another issue.

    2. Re:More than just fandom with Trekkies? by notmikey · · Score: 1

      I don't think fan-fiction is unique, I agree, but the level at which Trekkies internalize and identify with the fan-fiction they create is almost certainly unique.

      Yes, there are very small numbers of those types for anything that can be fan-fic'ed, but I'm referring to Trekkie-ness as more of a social phenomenon, and not as isolated incidents.

    3. Re:More than just fandom with Trekkies? by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about fantasy football with regard to "fan fiction" in the trek universe. And I think there is a fantasy nascar league too but I'm not sure.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    4. Re:More than just fandom with Trekkies? by Mant · · Score: 1

      I've payed my geek dues and seen some fans of other sci-fi/fantasy/anime stuff take it very seriously indeed. The most extreme I've seen is Vampire LARPers, some are people who internalise and identify with fiction waaaay to much.

      Maybe it's the same proportion of people who get, um, carried away, as other stuff, just there are more Trekkies. Also, the public recognises them, so they get picked up on TV documentries and more mainstream stuff becuase you don't have to explain it.

      You'd probably need some serious study to know for sure. Someone doing their PHD in fandom or something :)

    5. Re:More than just fandom with Trekkies? by edrain · · Score: 1

      I just found out there's a WWE collectible card (ie Magic) game. Yikes.

  29. How is that possible? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    I can't quite put my finger on it, but there are probably reasons outside of these films, that people consider Trek fans to be ...freakish.

  30. Are you laughing at them or with them? by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't tell from watching the film

  31. It was Saavik: You decide. by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    Of course, then you have to decide was she trying for the Kirstie Alley Saavik or the Robin Curtis Saavik. Don't even get me started on that controversy.

    1. Re:It was Saavik: You decide. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Kirsty Alley as Saavik (especially the waist-length hair shot) is one of the two most gorgeous female moments in my mind in all of movie history. The other is Charlize Theron in certain scenes in Devil's Advocate.

      So when they replace her with an underfed school ma'arm, well, they should have just had a different character instead of just a different actress.

      She was hideous; not much of a controversy.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. Have you ever read by wiredog · · Score: 1

    "Bimbos of the Death Sun"?

    1. Re:Have you ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That book rocks, along with Zombies of the Gene Pool! I wish Sharryn McCrumb would write more of those -- although I like her other work too.

  33. Try Sailor Moon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been in a room with grown men watching sailor moon. That was the scariest moment of my life.

  34. He's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laughing all the way to the bank, much like the laughing Vulcan and his dog.

  35. If it weren't for all those ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    temporal anomalies, they wouldn't need to keep reversing the polarity.

    Of course, if you run into a temporal anolamy every freakin' week, it hardly seems anomalous any more, now does it? (Or did I watch Voyager for too long?)

    1. Re:If it weren't for all those ... by nyquil · · Score: 1

      You stopped after episode 5 too huh?

  36. Why does... by WoodenRobot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In your experience/opinion, why does Star Trek attract such a fanatical following, and why is there such ridicule directed towards those that consider themselves fans? It seems unique even among sci-fi franchises.

    --
    ---
    "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    1. Re:Why does... by notmikey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Star Trek is unique in that it does all of the things that Sci-Fi can do: it philosophizes about the future, it raises modern moral questions in a unique context, it has strong dramatic elements, it is occasionally action oriented, and it fills other traditional sci-fi roles as well. Furthermore, Star Trek is an entertainment empire, with TV series, movies, video games, RPG's, novels, comics, and more.

      The problem, then, is that Star Trek competes directly with all Sci-fi, thematically and on all mediums. To give other sci-fi personal market share is to deny Star Trek. This isn't necessarily true with other Sci-fi.

      People who are fanatical about Star Trek have no option then but to insulate themselves nationalistically within the Star Trek world, because there is no room to embrace other sci-fi without at least some internal perception of denigrating Star Trek. The cognitive dissonance that would be involved is probably enough to dissuade the fanatical trekkies from pursuing fandom in other sci-fi.

  37. Re:Schadenfreude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know when "schadenfreude" is the new buzzword when people start trying to force it into a post when another word would be more appropriate. Hint: schadenfreude means something more specific than the implication that the tables have turned on someone. Attempting to use it in such a general way is like trying to turn a torx head screw with an alan wrench.

  38. Direction of Star Trek? by darkcamel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who has been around the Star Trek community for a long time, what is your take on the direction of Star Trek in TV, and Movies? Follow-up: Do you think Star Trek should take some time off and regroup, or keep pushing thru the 'rut' some people think the series is in right now?

    --
    The Camel has Spoken!
  39. Shatner's new album by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    1. What do you think about Shatner's new album, Has Been?

    2. Do you think Shatner is a spokesman for All-Bran

    Eric
    JavaScript is not Java
  40. Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am curious about the audiences of your films. Were you intending for them to cater to the non-nerd community? Nerd community? Only hardcore fans of Star Trek, Alien Conspiracy Theorists, etc.? What audience did your films end up finding?

  41. Subject reaction? by yorgo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have your subjects been pleased or displeased with the way they were portrayed?

  42. Question by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why does root beer foam up a whole lot when you initially pour it over ice, but then subesequent pourings don't foam as much, even though it's fresh root beer hitting the same ice?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  43. your last name by latroM · · Score: 1

    Do you have Finnish or Swedish relatives? My surname is Nygård, so I'm quite interested.

  44. And if that fails by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Modulate the phasing of the tachychron particles.

  45. Your name by hyfe · · Score: 1

    Roger Nygård

    Are you aware of the fact that you've been mispelling your name your whole life?

    A norwegian.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Your name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may find that interesting. I think I speak for the other 787,342 slashdotters when I say we don't! :p

    2. Re:Your name by jthayden · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that Norwegian is not the root of all language? I believe it is heavily derived from Danish and Danish from German and German from Indo-European and so on ...

      By your logic, everything in the world is spelt wrong. Which would have made my spelling tests much more interesting.

    3. Re:Your name by hyfe · · Score: 1
      Are you aware that Norwegian is not the root of all language? I believe it is heavily derived from Danish and Danish from German and German from Indo-European and so on .

      It wasn't a particurarly serious comment.. There's no need for ill informed posts about the roots of my own language :-)

      Partly due to Danish/Norwegian union, written Norwegian and Danish are largely similar. Nygård means New Farm, and is the modern (ie: post-viking) spelling of Nygard. This holds for both Danish and Norwegian. The name is a regular name in Norway, while a fairly uncommon in Denmark. Most likely his family was named Nygård and it was Americanized and mispronounced to Nygard.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    4. Re:Your name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think grandparent's point was to correct the spelling, rather to ask in a funny way whether Roger Nygard has Norwegian ancestors. Not the world's greatest attempt perhaps, but still... I wouldn't be surprised if grandparent is right about his guess.

    5. Re:Your name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the risk of being off topic, what was ill informed about the previous post?

      I've never learned Norwegian or Danish otheer than basic phrases, but I do speak German fluently and was able to understand a large portion of written and a spoken Norwegian while there.

      I do have to give you guys props on your education system though, you guys speak english better than our president.

    6. Re:Your name by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Roger Nygård

      Are you aware of the fact that you've been mispelling your name your whole life?

      A norwegian.


      Go back to Norwegia!

  46. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    How long did it take for Hans Solo to make the Kessel run?

  47. Aging fanbase? by Darth23 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've seen both Trekkies and Trekkies 2 (thanks Dragon Con) and I've been to science fiction and genre conventions in the 70's and 80's and most recently the last 4 years at Dragon Con in Atlanta.

    It seems to me that the Star Trek fanbase is aging, and there aren't really a lot of new fans getting into it. I first became a serious Star Trek fan years after the show was cancelled, and continued to varying degrees throughout the years. Back in the 70's it seemed like there were some science fiction conventions (and conferences) and lots of Star Trek conventions.

    But with the popularity of so many other genre shows out there now, including Buffy/Angel, Farscape, Babylon 5, Stargate and others it seems that a lot of people who in the past would have gravitated towards Trek and many other shows to get fanatical about.

    The success of Star Trek in its many forms has helped to lay the groundwork for a lot of the fandom centered around other shows, but the Star Trek franchise itself might be suffering a bit because of this.

    My specific question is, during the filming of Trekkies 1 and 2, did you notice large numbers of younger fans, and did there seem to be around the same number when you filmed the sequel - or did you notice any decline in the numbers of younger fans?

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  48. Geek hierarchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you need to see this. You might find it useful...

  49. More geeks? by pdboddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ever thought about doing a movie on Slashdot, and Slashdot-like sites? You'll find the people just as rabid as the Trekkie fans. :P

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
  50. Cosplay by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

    It's the 'dressing up' and 'acting out' that the audience finds entertaining. The fact that some people can be so extroverted (or shameless) doing something most people would be so embarrassed to do. Infact I'd like to see a Cosplay documentary touching on everything from Civil War reenactors to Xena-philes.

    1. Re:Cosplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's "shameless". I'm extremely introverted (I'm posting AC, always do!), but I have no problem dressing as a viking, I mean, it's comfortable! If people wan't to wear suits and formal shoes and walk over concrete, it's their choice, I'd rather wear high quality fabrics in comfortable and durable outfits and walk on grass, or at least dirt.

    2. Re:Cosplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. I wasn't aware introverted people enjoyed being stared at, but maybe that's just me. Comfort aside, you'll hardly blend into the wall (unless you're at a trek-fest, is that what you were implying)?

  51. Director? by jimmytango829 · · Score: 1

    According to the Six Days In Roswell website, Roger Nygard didn't direct the film...Timothy B. Johnson did. Nygard produced it.

  52. Re:Schadenfreude? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    like trying to turn a torx head screw with an alan [sic] wrench
    When all you have is an Allen Wrench, everything looks like a Torx-headed screw.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  53. Evercrack by CharAznable · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, when is the documentary about the extreme activities of Everquest players coming?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:Evercrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are already on it, but there are only so many server downs and they can only interview one at a time it takes quite a bit to have enough footage for a documentary

  54. For the last time... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1

    I'm a Trek-KER you....*sigh* insensitive clod!!

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:For the last time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Granted I haven't been part of the ST fan scene for about 25 years, when did Trekker start being used?

      I mean Trekkie inplies you a fan if star-trek trekker implies that you are someone who treks someplace...beside to find the remote.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. A battle for Geekdom by DarthTeufel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who would win in an all out brawl between Trekkies led by Shatner and Star Wars fanbois led by Hamil? Would Renaissance Fair nerds be an appropiate referee?

    1. Re:A battle for Geekdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who would win in an all out brawl between Trekkies led by Shatner and Star Wars fanbois led by Hamil? Would Renaissance Fair nerds be an appropiate referee?


      Hazzah! And does Kiki Stockhammer get naked while playing with the Trek tribute band Warp 11?
  56. Re:Schadenfreude? by Gi77+B4t35 · · Score: 0
    And the hobby of people moore's ripping on is what?
    Juat a wild guess - Anything involving physical exercise?
  57. Taking advantage of Star Trek geeks..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some of the Star Trek "fans" in your movies, like the midget Daryl, clearly have mental health issues. Do you feel any need to get some of these people help or do you just profit from their stupidity like the people who make the Girls Gone Wild videos?

  58. Too Nerdy for The Movies by ThePolkapunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was there anything you shot or witnessed during the creation of your documentaries that was just too "hardcore" to put in? Were there things that were just so horrifically nerdy you had no choice but to leave them out? Anything that would alienate everyone except the heartiest star trek fans and alien conspiracy theorists? Was there anything that was just so scary you couldn't possibly put it on film?

    --
    Dear diary: Today I stuffed some dolls full of dead rats I put in the blender.
  59. Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sheesh, it was an SNL sketch, not Shatners personal opinion or hatred.

    Maybe Shatner has no outright hatred but I think it's also pretty sad that he doesn't seem to appreciate the fans. Neither Shatner nor Patrick Stewart agreed to be interviewed for Trekkies. I'm assuming the reason was money -- not enough of it. I, however, believe that since Star Trek made these guys so popular that they could afford to command high salaries, they should have agreed to be interviewed for Trekkies for a smaller-than-usual amount.

    My first question of the director is if he could verify my assumption: that Shatner and Stewart weren't interviewed for Trekkies because of money (as opposed to a conscious decision by the director to focus on the other actors). Second, if you did, indeed, want them in the film and they refused, did you work hard to get them? Did you try to negotiate their payment? Did they even consider your offer? Or did you simply get a letter from their agent saying, essentially, "Mr. Statner is too important to be interviewed in your two-bit documentary."

    I'm really dying to know. Shatner, I can believe being a dick. I was a little surprised not to see Stewart in Trekkies, however.

    Thanks,
    GMD

    1. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What he probably doesn't appreciate is being typecast. How many good jobs do you think he was offered in the few years right after the Trek series? As far as I know he had nothing till T.J. Hooker. And after that... only more Trek movies? No other characters. Until just now he's finally coming back on a law show.

      Being on Trek made him desirable at Trek conventions, but probably pretty much killed his career otherwise. Which do you think and actor would prefer, acting in movies and TV shows and being able to play a wide variety of characters, or going to Trek conventions and being surrounded by geeks? It wouldn't really be surprising if he was bitter, would it?

    2. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, however, believe that since Star Trek made these guys so popular that they could afford to command high salaries

      Patrick Stewart is a genuine actor. Star Trek did not make his career. Shatner is something else of course.

    3. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by lerxstz · · Score: 1

      Actually (believe it or not), Shatner was a successful and respected Shakespearean stage actor up in Stratford, Ontario (Canada), long before Star Trek ever came up. Don't mod this as funny, it's actually true!

      --
      I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
    4. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by Elizabeth007 · · Score: 1
      IMHO, I don't think Shatner (at least, in recent years) resents Star Trek. Heck, he has made a lot of $$$ because of it, and he only has a career because of it. He even got to direct (in that gawd-awful Star Trek V).

      And if we are honest, Shatner is not an Oscar-award winning actor. In fact, he is a pretty bad actor (if you read his biography, the guy couldn't get a job after "Star Trek"--he wrote that he was being "type-cast," but the guy can't get through a scene without overplaying it to save his life).

      As for Stewart, he is an actor far above Shatner. I don't think it was a money thing for him...I knew that around the time Trekkies was being shot he was doing some other project.

      Just my 2 cents. ;)

    5. Re:Why weren't Shatner or Stewart interviewed? by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      You should read "Get a Life" by Shatner (and a trusty ghostwriter, of course). It's a little about the sketch, but mostly about how he eventually had a change of heart towards the fans and conventions. He wore a mask in order to be able to walk around the floor without being recognized in order to interview and chat with conventioneers.

  60. Nygard vs. Triumph by kevincal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does he like being pooped on? http://www.milkandcookies.com/links/2536/

  61. Trekkies vs. Trekkers by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

    I know there are a lot of Trekkies out there that insist on being called "Trekkers". Do you ever get hard-core "Trekkers" insisting on calling your movie "Trekkers"? Does it bother you as much as it bothers them when we call them "Trekkies"?

  62. Wringer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Quasimodo was a "ringer".


    A professional athlete brought into amateur competition in order to gain an unfair advantage is a "ringer".


    You put something through a wringer.

  63. accusations by Savatte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do you respond to accusations that you condescended and were basically laughing at the subjects in Trekkies?

  64. Money Isn't a Factor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I'm assuming the reason was money -- not enough of it.
    We're not talking about Mel Gibson. These guys don't exactly have mansions littered with stacks of $100 bills. Did you consider the reason may have more to do with trying to distance themselves, professionally, from those series and their characters?

    And before you answer, "There's no such thing as bad publicity," read what Adam West had to say about his post-Batman experiences. It's not like Shatner's and Stewart's concern is totally unreasonable.

  65. Anime fans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any ideas on which nerdy fandom to hit next? I think at times Anime fans surpass trekkies in all out weirdness.

    Though noting surpasses the Furries in pure batshit insanity. But they've already been harvested quite nicely by shows like CSI.

  66. Wow, that last link not safe at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad so much, but loud if you don't lower your speakers.

  67. Objectivity by tommertron · · Score: 1
    Watching the movie, especially towards the end, it seemed to me that the standpoint was that Trekkies were just having fun, and that, really, it's because the Star Trek universe is so great and inspiring (a particularly schmaltzy note to end on, IMO.)

    Considering that "Trekkies" was released by Paramount, and had interviews with several of the stars of the various series, (even narrated by one) was there any concern that the movie would be seen as a little less than objective, and not touching on some of the more negative or depressing parts of some Trekkies' lifestyles?

    --
    Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
  68. What about a documentary on Slashdot? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering Slashdot can get up to half a million readers a day, and has a subculture of it's own, would you consider doing something like "Trekkies", but for this site... say "Slashdotters"? I wouldn't be surprised how many on this site could possibly be trekkies themselves. And, yes, I am guilty of collecting ST box sets.

  69. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refrigerate your damned root beer and glasses and maybe you won't have this problem, numbnuts.

  70. Re:through the ringer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I think of Slashdot I'm more apt to think of "infinite digress" :-).

  71. Cinematic influences and the future of documentary by insomnyuk · · Score: 1

    Where were you educated and where did you get your desire to be a film-maker? Since you've made a name for yourself in documentaries, what sort of films inspired you to take this route? What's your favorite documentary film? Finally, what do you think the impact the current crop of politically oriented documentary films, such as Fahrenheit 9/11 (and its antithesis, Fahrenhype 9/11), Super-Size Me, The Corporation, and so on, will have on the documentary film genre as a whole? There have always been well-made, politically oriented documentaries, but with these films making serious box office dollars, do you think documentary film-makers will be pressured into pigeonholing their art to serve a specific politically-oriented moviegoing demographic?

  72. Capt. Pike/Dr. Sphincter by Bigboote66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nygard included Rich Kronfeld in his movie "Trekkies" as the mega-fan who had built his own Captain Pike chair. Kronfeld was a comedian in Minneapolis with a public access show called "Dr. Sphincter", and although he did actually own the chair, his appearance in the film was clearly a fictional exaggeration.

    Here's my question:

    Were there any other people in Trekkies that were clearly "taking the piss", or does Kronfeld believe that the rest of the fans in it were more or less sincere in their devotion to chosen lifestyles?

    -BbT

  73. Trekkies want it to be real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have any trekkies tried to secede from their own government and start the Federation ?

    Earth nation-states working together, a global alliance - exploring new technology and space travel...

    Star Trek (TOS) was always hopeful for the future of humankind.

    But lately, the world is looking much more like
    'Mirror - Mirror' - with the Empire ruling over all, by force.

  74. Have you ever kissed a woman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if so, was to good or awesome? Family members don't count.

  75. Comic Book Stores by MrSin · · Score: 1

    I worked at ATOMIC COMICS in PHX (Metro Location) during the late 90's. If you EVER need an idea for a movie, just hang out there for a few months. I had an idea knocking' around called "TOY WHORES" about the collectible action figure secondary market. But there are the LARP-ers, the RPG-ers, the WARHAMMER nuts, the comic book porn aficionados, the FURRIES (all shaped like pears and have greasy long hair), the hordes of unshowered Magic Players ( you SMELL a Magic tourney before you see/hear it), the PRETENCIOUS ANIME NUTCASES ( ACTUALLY, we've already SEEN all of INUYASHA years ago...how about some UTINNI? Do you have any of that?) and the occasional hot girl (if you knew Denise, you'd know what I was talking about). So go get a job at a comic book store and you'll have more material then you'll know what do with.

    --
    It's a trick....get an axe.
  76. Correction to above question: by Bigboote66 · · Score: 1

    Should read "does Nygard believe"

    -BbT

  77. Sequel by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Trekkies 2? So, you gave up and just made a sequel, heh.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    1. Re:Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was hoping that because it was an even-numbered documentary that it might beat the curse...

  78. Probably a little of both by phorm · · Score: 1

    At some points one may be laughing at common idiosyncracies that one shares with the "obsessed," at other points it might be a case of saying "I'm bad, but this guy is worse"

  79. favorite moment by MasterRyu · · Score: 1

    What was your most memorable/strange(if any) moment when doing research for Trekkies 2?

  80. Are there new Trekkies? by edgarde · · Score: 1
    Aren't Trekkies an aging community?

    Current Trek probably doesn't provide a qualitatively strong experience to imprint its fandom on the young. It's hard to imagine a kid in 2004 looking at Star Trek and thinking it a great bandwagon on which to jump.

    Are my presumptions wrong here? Are teens really hot for Star Trek these days, or have they found something else? In my 40-ish ignorance, I imagine the trend might be something japanese, or out of video game culture