Slashdot Mirror


Outsourcing To Rural America

An anonymous reader writes "News.com is running a story about Rural Sourcing, a company attempting to make outsourcing to rural America as cost effective as sending jobs to India."

127 of 887 comments (clear)

  1. The Difference by techsoldaten · · Score: 5, Funny

    The difference between offshoring to India and insourcing to rural areas?

    Indians speak better English.

    M

    1. Re:The Difference by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having lived in Tennessee and Alabama for several years at a time, I must say this post is not funny. It's informative. There were people there that I simply could not understand, even after asking them to repeat themselves 5 times.

    2. Re:The Difference by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of us in the rural midwest speak perfectly good english.

      You can't always say that about the urban northeast ;-)

    3. Re:The Difference by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Compared to... New York? Hey youzz guyzzz got a problem with your computer?
      Or maybe Southern California. Dude your system has some seriously bad karma going on.

      Yea what ever. If you look at the school system ratings you will find that best schools tend to be in the more rural states. Here is the top ten by % of students that graduate. Only one state New Jersey could be called urban.

      1 NEW JERSEY 87%
      2 NORTH DAKOTA 86%
      3 UTAH 86%
      4 IOWA 85%
      5 NEBRASKA 84%
      6 SOUTH DAKOTA 83%
      7 WEST VIRGINIA 83%
      8 MONTANA 81%
      9 WISCONSIN 81%
      10 MINNESOTA 80%

      The big urban states of California and New York are ranked 35th and 39th.

      My home state is at the bottom of the list. Why? Our schools suck. Too many retired people that do not want to pay for good schools because "they already paid for their kids to go to school". Well when they get the snot beat out of them by roaming gangs of drop outs we will see. When will people learn that you will pay for schools or for prisons.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:The Difference by TamMan2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you look at the school system ratings you will find that best schools tend to be in the more rural states. Here is the top ten by % of students that graduate. Only one state New Jersey could be called urban.

      Graduating a higher percentage doesn't mean better schools. In fact, it could mean lower standards...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    5. Re:The Difference by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Having lived in Tennessee and Alabama for several years at a time, I must say this post is not funny. It's informative. There were people there that I simply could not understand, even after asking them to repeat themselves 5 times."

      Well, in our defense...our schools are a bit remiss in not teaching ebonics...and it does make it hard for us to talk to some of you NE urbanites...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:The Difference by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Informative

      His sentence is correct as it stands.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:The Difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope. Many of those same states also tend to have high ACT/SAT scores too. The schools are certainly not the giant kid warehouses that you'll find in many metro areas. It's not uncommon to have teachers that not only taught your older siblings, but probably taught or went to school with your parents (depending on the subject, with the same books - our algebra teacher didn't want to get new books. The 20-30 year old ones were still in good shape and had harder problems than any of the new ones). The good ones will use this knowledge to make sure the students do not slack off. If you don't pass a grade, they have no problem keeping you at that grade level until you do. There was a new kid from the east coast one year. He was 17, but had just been passed along from grade to grade. Once he got to our school, the teachers moved him back a grade level until he was actually competent with the subject matter. Sure, he was 6 years older than everyone else in the class, but for the first time anyone gave a damn that he actually learned something in school. Not to mention that in many rural areas, the students have a good motivation to study hard: not a lot of jobs.

      I never knew of anyone at home that couldn't read or write. It was unthinkable. I'm in a metro area now were at least 1/4 of the population is illiterate - and that's not counting the illegal immigrants.

    8. Re:The Difference by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, that's an interesting question. Let me give you what might be a relevant example.

      Some years ago, an auto parts manufacturing company that I did a lot of contract systems development for moved from Illinois' second largest city (Rockford, some sixty miles from Chicago) out to a completely rural area a hundred and twenty-odd miles even further away from Chicago. I mean, I had to drive out there a few times to upgrade some equipment and I was amazed at just how rural it was. I passed farmland, cows, grain silos ... and suddenly, there was this big manufacturing plant stuck in the middle of nowhere. Across the street was a grain storage operation, and next door was a tractor dealer. Interestingly, most of the workers were women: farm housewives for the most part that otherwise would have been sitting at home watching TV. They made less that comparable city workers but the cost of living was much less so that balanced out. These folks were highly motivated, and the company got much higher quality employees than they would have found anywhere near a big city, paid substantially less in property taxes. The company did spend a lot of money providing training for these people (some of the positions were pretty high-tech) but it paid off in a big way. In fact, one time I was there I heard an announcement over the PA system, "Notice to all employess ... there will not be any overtime this weekend." The chorus of "awwws" was deafening. The only drawback, I suppose, was the increased transport costs but since this outfit shipped parts worldwide it wasn't an issue.

      And believe me ... the Indians do not speak better English. At least not the ones I usually get on tech support lines. Not even close.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:The Difference by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can tell you from experience that our rural school is much better than the urban school our children used to attend. For instance, instead of doing everything they could do to avoid helping my son who has asparager's, the rural school (Pine River) is doing everything possible to help him -- and he's thriving. I just can't say enough good things about them. I wish I had gone there as a kid.

      By the way, accusing the rural schools of having lower standards is silly. The gummint works hard to keep standards uniform -- for better of for worse.

      In summary, the test sample I have seen supports the claim that rural schools are better. Your mileage may vary.

    10. Re:The Difference by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Graduating a higher percentage doesn't mean better schools. In fact, it could mean lower standards...

      Yeah California and New York have high education standards hehe.
      The mods take down the guy who posted facts (here they are btw) http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_31_tabl e_2.htm
      and mod +5 the guy with the "but, but..." retort that has absoultly no basis in fact. I'll ofcourse now be modded down for pointing this out. I love it

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    11. Re:The Difference by ashot · · Score: 3, Informative


      no, his/her sentence is correct, if you wanted to use well it would be:

      speaks English perfectly well

      as well is an adverb that should modify a verb, whereas in his sentence, good, an adjective, modifies the noun English.

      --
      -ashot
  2. Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    So rather than "Tank you vor calling Cisco, dis is Singh, how may I help you?" I'll hear "Thanks fer callin' Cis-coe, this is Billy-Joe Jim-Bob, what's yer malfunction?"

    It's a joke, lighten up.

    1. Re:Uhhh... by Abm0raz · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a Pennsylvania resident, I resemble that remark. We're sick of yins jaggovs talkin' poop about us, n'at. Yins need taught a lesson.

      Now I'm headin' dahntahn to da sowside. Gonna pound sum Ahrns and watch Cow-er and Da Stillers whup sum more arse this weekend.

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    2. Re:Uhhh... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 3, Informative

      Phillyspeak:

      Water is pronounced "wooder"

      With is pronounced "wit" ex: Gimme' 2 eggs wit scrapple

      Beautiful is pronounced "Beauty Full"

      Curb is pronounced "curve"

      "The Eagles" are "da' Iggles"

      "I'm goin down the shore this weekend" - Trip to Wildwood beach

      "Up the mountains" - Trip to the Pocanos

      Schuylkill is pronouced the "School Kill"

      "Widges" means With Us - ex: Yo, we're goin to the bar ... you commn' widges?

      Arthritis is pronounced "Author-Ritus"

      ACME is pronounced "Ack-A-Me"

      Bagel is pronounced "Beg'll"

      Meet You is "Meetcha"

      Vowels is pronounced Vails

  3. Count me in. by JavaLord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll move from Manhattan to somewhere in hicksville for a job in no time. Fresh air, no subways, no bums. I'm down. Where do I sign up?

    1. Re:Count me in. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.

      The commute sucks cause everyone has to drive to a subway station first. Then take a subway as the 2nd part of commute.

      Even if you want to drive, chances are you won't find parking.

      The office lease is far more expensive in the center of a city than some suburbs.

      The network speed is the same.

      The company may be in some skyscraper building sharing it with 50 companies. That means your company is on the 20th floor. Management gets all the window office, and everyone else cubes.

    2. Re:Count me in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas.
      ...
      The company may be in some skyscraper building sharing it with 50 companies. That means your company is on the 20th floor. Management gets all the window office, and everyone else cubes.

      You just answered your own question. Who do you think is making the decision to locate in the downtown skyscraper? The CEO of course. He's getting a nice window office, and probably chauffeur service.

    3. Re:Count me in. by macklin01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed!

      As stated below, the cost of living is fantastic. I grew up in Nebraska, and it's amazing what kind of a beautiful home and acreage you can get for $250,000. By contrast, it's amazing what you can't get for $1,000,000 in California.

      Also, this is a good thing (TM) for the region. The rural areas have been in decline for many decades, as agriculture has become so efficient that it can't support too many more people. So economic opportunity has been pretty poor. This has caused demographic problems, as the educated youth move to other regions where there are better (or existent) job opportunities. There isn't much call for research scientists in Wahoo, Nebraska.

      This is also good for the corps. relocating there. Not only is the work ethic a strong aspect of the Middle American culture, but the years of lacking opportunity might make for more motivated employees.

      Of course, then there's the reduced cost of labor, the lower utility rates, gasoline doesn't cost $2.50 a gallon, and lower tax rates. Not a bad package. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    4. Re:Count me in. by mikeswi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Greetings from Georgia.

      Actually, we call "bums" "homeless" or "vagrants".

      There are less of them, because the population is not as dense and because we tend to try putting them to work instead of propping them up forever. A lot of field and construction laborers are homeless men picked up on a corner and driven in the back of the boss's pickup truck to the job site. That doesn't happen up north because of all the labor unions.

      Rednecks typically work for a living, either at manual labor or one or two steps removed from it. They're usually the ones driving the pickup truck that carry the homeless to a job site. A lot of rednecks own small businesses, usually something to do with farming or construction. They have 2 or 3 kids, watch wrestling, football and nascar and drive pickup trucks. Rednecks tend to be conservative and listen to country music.

    5. Re:Count me in. by misleb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Simple. "Downtown" is central. As much of a pain as it might be to get downtown, it can be much more difficult to get from one suburb to another. Public transportation usually isn't even an option in this case. Also, don't forget about how many potential employees live in the city.

      That said, there is a trend, at least in the Chicago metro area for companies to put offices in suburbs. They got big high rises in the middle of nowhere. ANd i'll tell you... they SUCK as far as location goes. The only things they have going for them is a cheaper leases and parking. A reverse commute can be just as nasty and, again, public transporation is not an option. It is a car or nothing. It is also more difficult to carpool becuase the chances of a friend going to work in the same area as you is slim.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    6. Re:Count me in. by SiW · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a reason why the population is declining in rural areas -- people move out as a) its boring as hell and b) there's no jobs there.

      Yeah, but the crank is great!

    7. Re:Count me in. by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Typically downtown areas are centrally located which means that if your main concern is to attract "talent" from across a metro region, you have a good chance to make it possible for everyone to get to you.

      Second, I think there is a certain amount of cachet from being located downtown.

      Third, there are lots of good places to eat lunch.

      I used to work for a company in downtown Seattle that was pretty much like what you are describing. Management got the good window view of Elliot Bay and everyone else got cubes. Plus, I had to drive 30 minutes and then take a boat to work which took another 30 minutes. That said, I loved working downtown.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:Count me in. by jfruhlinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the part I never quite understood about companies that want to be built in downtown areas. The commute sucks cause everyone has to drive to a subway station first. Then take a subway as the 2nd part of commute.

      And THAT'S why oil costs so damn much and Americans are so damn fat, everybody!

      Hey, you know those buildings that the subway passes by on its way downtown? The ones that are within walking distance of the subway stops? People live in those buildings, and they don't need to drive to the subway station. In fact, often they don't need to own a car at all!

      Does the phrase "transit-oriented development" mean anything to you? No, I didn't think it did.

      jf

    9. Re:Count me in. by FCAdcock · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's boring as hell? not even close.

      In the country you can do the things you'd get arrested for in the city.

      Ever blow up your old tv instead of just throwing it away? How about doing 150mph on a dirt road?

      We also get to do a lot of the things y'all pay tons of money for when y'all come visit us, for free. Do you know what it costs to rent a 4-wheeler and go ATV riding? it's pretty bad. We grew up doing it. You like horses? There is a horse farm behind my house.

      And then there's the food. I have a garden with fresh vegtables in the spring and summer. We hunt wild animals in the fall-spring. And we have two things y'all only with you could have: Biscuts and Waffle Houses...

      Probably my favorite part of living inthe south/rural area is the fact that instead of living in an apartment, I have 2 acres of land. My neighbors never keep me awake at night. I don't have to park and then walk to my house. And I actually own oxygen producers (trees).

      Come visit the south, if you can get past the idiots, you should actually love it. There's nothing better than southern girls in the summer...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    10. Re:Count me in. by EvilNTUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that in civilized countries, "downtown" is a pleasant place to live, with lots of services and jobs close to popular apartments for both families and singles. No need for everyone to live in huge monotonous suburbs with one car per family member.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    11. Re:Count me in. by sugam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what is wrong with america.

      I work in the suburbs and HATE it. I HAVE to drive to work, there are no restaurants, there are no bars, there are no young people, I have to deal with traffic, I have to deal with sprawl and I have to deal with strip malls. Its terrible.

      MY ideal, wake up, get ready walk to the subway station take it to work. I'm there in 20 minutes without having to drive, and I got to read the newspaper (or a book) on they way in. Work and have a fantastic lunch in the thousands of restaurants around the city that I can WALK to. After work, WALK to a happy hour place with my co-workers, have dinner and some drinks, and take a taxi home. I can also walk to the hundreds of retail stores so If I need a new pair of jeans, i'm not stuck with just macy's. I can go umpteen different shows, concerts, restaurants, coffee shops everything is close and easy to get to.

      Now dont think that I'm one of those people that hate driving. I LOVE to drive, I hate HAVING to drive. Suburbs are evil, I applaud companies that stay in the cities.

      --
      read my blog
    12. Re:Count me in. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't have to park and then walk to my house."

      I don't have to park ... ever.

      You see, in the city, we can do without cars. How long does it take you to drive to the grocery store? I can WALK to it in thirty seconds.

      Never mind not needing a car, I usually don't even need a subway.

      Different strokes for different folks and all that shit.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    13. Re:Count me in. by furball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Concentrated business areas mean there are easy access to other businesses nearby. For my organization the fact that one of our possible software vendors being only 3 blocks away mean that we can walk a meeting and resolve issues. Don't underestimate the value of face to face meetings. Closer is better.

      The commute doesn't suck if you also live in the area. The general philosophy of zoning in the US is atrociously bad. By zoning large commercial areas away from large residential areas you create traffic. By putting businesses around residential areas you solve this. Doesn't anyone play SimCity?

      I happen to live 1 block away from work. Where I live in Chicago, I'm 2 blocks from 2 movie theaters, 3 blocks from major shopping, 1 block from groceries, pharmacy, dental services is downstairs in my building, dry cleanings in the same building. I live in the city. I work in the city. My dependency on public transportation or even my own car is minimal. What I need in a day to day living is entirely accessible via my two feet within 10 minutes. The longest walk in my month is to get my comic books which is less than 2 miles.

      That's the value of city living.

    14. Re:Count me in. by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just using this Salary Calculator here are some examples of what you would need to make if you were to move from Queens where you made $100K:

      Little Rock - $73,660
      Albuquerque - $83,996
      Durham, NC - $86,865
      New Orleans - $88,257
      Billings, MT - $71,391

      They come up with these by measureing five categories: housing costs (33%), utilities (8%), consumables (16%), transportation (10%), and other services (33%). Most of the savings you see are because of housing cost differences. I did rent for these comparisons because most people living in a large city like New York and don't own.

    15. Re:Count me in. by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, if you left work after dark, lots of people would try to sell you, uh, things on your way to your car.

      That's why people live and work in cities. Try getting that kind of convenience in a rural area.

    16. Re:Count me in. by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I grew up in a medium-small town, but have lived in the big apple for about 10 years. I don't know about you, but I definitely feel like I have more privacy in the city as a STRANGER among strangers VS a small town where everybody's business is known.

      It's quite liberating to be able to be car-free in the city. The suburban "american dream" with a status-symbol car and a useless lawn is BS. We need to counter that spawl with smarter New Urbanism.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  4. Good For America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hurray! As part of the Bush initiative to grow the job market in America, skilled, college educated professionals can now make as much money as their counterparts in third-world countries!

    America - I love this place!

    1. Re:Good For America! by New+Breeze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you can move to a rural area in the US, try moving to India. I moved from the Baltimore/DC area this year, and I got three times the house I could have afforded back there. Plus a laid back community instead of the uptight 'everyone must paint their homes one of the three approved colors' BS that was common there. People raise families here on 40k a year, you can't even keep a roof over your head on the coast for that, unless you're rooming with 3 other people.

      And don't kid yourself, about the only thing I don't have is a wide choice of brick and mortar shopping for PC stuff, and the bookstores around here don't have a ton of software books on the shelves. Since I bought most of that online for better prices before, it just means I can't waste time browsing on the weekend.

    2. Re:Good For America! by akajerry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, the BJP party lost to the Congress party in the last Indian election because the BJP party's slogan of a "bright shining India" didn't resonate all that well with the rural Indians who haven't actually seen all that much benefit from the tech boom in India.

      The vast majority of the tech jobs are in the cities in India for the same reason they are in the cities in the US. 1) The cities have better infrastructure by virtue of the simple fact that it's more cost effective to roll out new infrastructure where the population density is higher. 2) If you're a growing business and need to hire 3000 new employees you can't do that in a town of 10,000. 3) And if you need to hire for a very specific skill set you want to do that in an area that has a high concentration of that skill set. 4) If you're a technology professional and you're looking for a job, particularly in a slow economy, you go to where there are the most number of opportunities, the cities, less you find yourself relocating every time you change jobs.

      The rural US does have significantly better infrastructure than rural India, but still the closer you are to a major city the better the infrastructure. But how do you hire technology workers by the thousands in rural Arkansas. So replace the "inconvenience" expense of distance, language and culture for India with the "inconvenience" expense of having to manage a highly distributed work force.

      In retrospect, I'm not at all surprised the tech boom didn't help rural India that much. Most Indian tech companies completely ignore the Indian domestic market because there still isn't one to speak of. Compares to the US, European and Middle Eastern markets the Indian market is still insignificantly small and can't nearly support the pricing levels that the international markets can. $30/hr might seem cheap to a US CIO, but it's not at all cheap to an Indian CIO.

      As a result there isn't a lot of innovation going on inside India to develop products and services at a price point appropriate to the domestic Indian consumer or business. WWII and the rebuilding of Europe helped the US a lot on its path to becoming an economic superpower, but for the most part the US economy was built to satisfy a strong US domestic market; the same was true for Japan. That's not a justification for protectionism; it's just a lot easier to break new ground with innovative products in your own backyard before you try to sell them to the rest of the world.

      The US should really start worrying the day India figures out how to tap into its own domestic market of over a billion people and starts innovating. And at the same time the US need to remember that innovation is what made America strong not economics protectionism.

    3. Re:Good For America! by killjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A large influx of younger tech workers will probably turn those red states blue. It's already happening in Montana where the influx of people resulted in the election of a democratic governor and a 50/50 split in the state senate. Also states like new mexico and alabama were really close this year.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  5. Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by rackhamh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Somewhat appropriate for an article about rural America.

  6. Oh great by prostoalex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can stop worrying about my job going to India and start worrying about my job going to Indiana.

    1. Re:Oh great by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference? You can follow your job to Indiana. Even better is that rural areas have lower costs of living, thus making $50,000/yr a very good wage to have.

      Honestly, this isn't anything new. In Wisconsin, we had several big companies move (American Family Insurance, Lands End, etc.) because they could run their operations far cheaper while still being within driving distance of Chicago. It's really a win-win situation for everyone.

    2. Re:Oh great by AnonymousKev · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And I can finally stop female-dogging ...

      Look, I'm all for reducing the amount of profanity in the course of normal conversation, but if you mean bitch, then say bitch. Otherwise, use another, perfectly valid, word such as complain, gripe, whine, or even speaking in an extremely negative manner. Creating a klunky euphemism is just, well, klunky.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    3. Re:Oh great by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better is that rural areas have lower costs of living, thus making $50,000/yr a very good wage to have.

      Of course, those same jobs that paid $50,000 in the big city are only going to be offered for $40,000 in the rural areas.

      Sure, you'll be able to afford more housing for the buck, but lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products) cost about the same all over the country. You could actually end up with less buying power by following a job out to greener pastures.

    4. Re:Oh great by syrion · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm a little confused about where, exactly, you are thinking about. I'm a North Carolinian (from the rural back-country), and, well, none of it really applies.
      • Though you're not likely to find a small town with "world-class" healthcare providers, I live in a town of 200 within 50 miles of two pretty decent large hospitals, and within the helicopter radius of more. (Remember, since there is a lower population density, a hospital can serve a larger area.) In addition, private practice doctors really aren't that much different in small towns.
      • Local libraries and other cultural things do tend to suck. However, you can use interlibrary loan and the like to get items you want, and, in my case, Charlotte and Asheville both offer decent cultural experiences.
      • Shopping can be surprisingly varied. People come from all over the world to the furniture outlets in Morganton, North Carolina, for instance. Broyhill and the like. There are also good stationers' shops that I know of, some decent bookstores (though Barnes & Noble have killed most of them), and so forth. In addition, as always, there are cities of respectable size within an hour's travel.
      • In the South, at least, the minority population is significant. North Carolina is about 23% African-American, I believe. Don't judge the region by stereotypes, either; the communities are more integrated and comfortable than you might think.
      • No need to get stuck in traffic jams trying to get places, either. It takes 20 minutes to drive 20 miles, not an hour. You can get from my hometown to Charlotte in 45-60 minutes.
      The quality of life can be quite high in the country; don't underestimate it.
    5. Re:Oh great by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, you'll be able to afford more housing for the buck, but lifestyle items (cars, DVDs, even most food products

      That really depends on what you buy. While it is true that a car will be relativly more expensive with a lower cost of living, you must also factor in that insurance rates are consideably higher, and fuel is probably more expensive than rual areas. Also parking costs are either non existant or trivial. For the rest of the stuff, they purchasing power just does not offset how much you save in cost of living - unless you have very expensive taists or buy a LOT of shit.

      Probably the only thing to REALLY watch out for is debt. Moving from the big city with a lot of debt is not going to help much if you cut your pay. Suddenly college loans are the same, but you can't contribute as much money back. Unless of course you are aquiring debt because you happen to live in the city...

  7. Wahoo! by DaHat · · Score: 5, Funny

    South Dakota gladly welcomes it's new in-sourcing overlords!

    One hopes this expands my job prospects here... not that it matters too much, I love my job.

  8. Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    it will be good news for American techies-at least the ones in rural communities and those willing to move there

    But will they be able to survive without pizza deliveries?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by CommanderData · · Score: 4, Funny

      But will they be able to survive without pizza deliveries?

      No, they will not. But of course that means there will be even more rural jobs, as thousands of pizza delivery people migrate from NYC to service the IT boomtowns of the south :)

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    2. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      120 miles to Starbucks, 210 miles to Frys. Your neighbor in the cubicle next door keeps grousing about Sorgum Prices (whatever that is) and their dating prospects at the next Grange dance. The big local news is the John Deere dealership is expanding, and Billy Joe Bob's sister (yeah the one with THOSE teeth) is makin moon eyes at you when she visits at lunch. Makes me want to point my pickup truck towards Cupertino and GET OUT OF THERE!

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Get over it. Rural is not all that rural anymore. Most places will have pizza delivery, Chinese food, and Walmart. A large number of farmers are on line, have satellite TV and have been using GPS for years. What tends to be lacking is in some areas broadband and no you will not have 85 pizza places to choose from. I for one would love to move to a small rural town with clean air, not crowds, and home prices that are only in the 5 figure range.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Modern Techies Cut Off From Cycle Of Life by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you look hard enough I'll bet you could find a house in the 4 digit range. Well assuming you can afford the $35/month house payment.
      • Two story
      • 3 bedroom(s)
      • 1 bath
      • Approximately 1134 sq. ft.
      • Electric heating
      • 1 car garage
      • Approximately 1 acre(s)
      • Public sewer service
      • Public water supply
      • $7,500
  9. The other kinds of Indians by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why contract with South Asians when you can contract with businesses run by good old American Indians? I'm sure somebody on the reservation could help you admin your Apache server.

    1. Re:The other kinds of Indians by big-giant-head · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the self proclaimed slashdot rep from oklahoma, I would like to announce that Oklahoma gladly welcomes our Rural Insourcing Overlords.

      Dell just located a 700 person call center here and plans to double it's size...... Come on over...

      --

      So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
    2. Re:The other kinds of Indians by PenchantToLurk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh dear. Out-house-sourcing.

    3. Re:The other kinds of Indians by cmowire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the bigger point is that you are more than welcome to sue the ghosts of Infantry's pasts for delivering government-supported beatdowns and the ghosts of many now-dead politicians for their bad decisions. But your ability to compensate for past offenses decreases over time because everybody who was actually hurt as well as anybody related to decisions made is dead. Somebody probably got away with murdering one of my ancestors back in history. If I walk past their descendent now, am I entitled to any sort of compensation? Will I even be able to know that they killed my ancestor long ago?

    4. Re:The other kinds of Indians by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't even have to do that. A tribe north of where I used to live was paying it's members $1000 per adult and $250 per kid every month. Just for living inside the county. For the area that was a nice wage and if they were ambitious, they could get a job at the casino. Most didn't, so it was staffed mainly by caucasians.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    5. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Homology · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, why should the Indians be treated any different? Just because they were so weak militarily and behind the times in military technology doesn't mean they deserve protection from the rest of the world. They simply get what the rest of the world, or whoever conquers them, decides that they should get.

      And US citizens wonder why so many want to kill you, at whatever cost to themselves...

    6. Re:The other kinds of Indians by buysse · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, it's depleted uranium. Not as toxic as plutonium, but still not exactly pixie dust.

      It's used by the military for an unusual property -- when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      Unfortunately for anyone nearby, or living in the nation being attacked, when the DU vaporizes, it leaves an extremely fine radioactive dust in the air, which then settles and pollutes the area, as well as being inhaled by anyone nearby.

      Radiation levels in many parts of Iraq are way above normal background, and since the first Gulf War, the incidence of birth defects has risen dramatically. You can google for references yourself.

      --
      -30-
    7. Re:The other kinds of Indians by bleckywelcky · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I don't wonder why, I know why: they want what we have.

    8. Re:The other kinds of Indians by General+Alcazar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cool! I'll be by soon to shoot you and take your land. You might mind, but I don't care! Fuck you, you fucking fuck! It'll be mine soon, 'cuz whoever has the most guns wins! I'll also kill your whole family, just for kicks. Yeehaw!

    9. Re:The other kinds of Indians by ahodgson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell yeah. I want the land those damned Saxons stole from my Briton ancestors. Although, I'm torn, because I also want the land my Viking ancestors stole from everyone else and then lost again. It's so confusing.

    10. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Koatdus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd be willing to bet they can get better pay and job security running casinos.


      I live in the State of Washington where indian casinos are all over the place. I have to say that the casinos don't help the average indian very much.

      The tribal elders get a nice kick back from the big gaming companys ( Trump, etc.) but that doesn't pull the average indian up any. They may get a yearly profit sharing check but that just means that they can have a plasma screen and DirectTV in the single-wide. Few of the actual members of the tribe get good jobs out of the deal. You will see a few dealers that are indians and the pit boss may be an indian but those are not jobs with a future. Not jobs that are going to create a strong middle class in the tribe. Not jobs that are going get their kids interested in collage.

      I rarely gamble in them as I find them depressing.

      I think that the tribes would do much better for their people if they could get some kind of high tech industry to set up on their land. Some of them own very valuable land like big lots in the middle of Tacoma. (small city to the south)

      If the tribal elders could convice Dell or Google or Gateway or Intel or someone like that to lease a building and hire/train/educate the members of the tribe in exchage for a sweetheart deal they would be doing a lot more good for their people then just setting up another casino.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    11. Re:The other kinds of Indians by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If there aren't jobs on the Rez, why not move away?


      It's easy for you to say that -- you can move to any other town or state, and still remain in your own culture. Imagine if the situation was reversed, and you lived in a little pocket of European American culture, and 99.9% of the rest of the country was Native American. Would you still find moving away to be such an easy option?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    12. Re:The other kinds of Indians by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's used by the military for an unusual property -- when DU munitions strike armor or metal, they basically vaporize themselves in a heat flash, allowing DU shells to cut through tank armor.

      Actually, the reason why they went through tank armor was because, by volume, they're the heaviest thing you can throw at the enemy. High mass, small impact zone = massive penetrating power. Thus they can cut through armor not because they're on fire, but because they're bullets which are 15% heavier than lead, and about 63 times harder.

      The uranium burning is useful inside the tank, after the shell has been penetrated, where it burns like potassium and takes out whatever's inside. The burning doesn't help with the penetration as much as the density and hardness.

      But don't just take my word for it. Read this:

      How Stuff Works - Bunker Buster Bombs

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    13. Re:The other kinds of Indians by really? · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Left "my" country when I was just over 17. Knew nobody in the new world. Learned the lanuage and cultutre, went to Uni., etc. No problem.
      After a while I went to Japan; yet another "alien" culture. Learned the language and some of the culture, worked, etc. No problem.
      I am not special and nowhere near unique; there are millions of people who do this kind of stuff all the time ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  10. Inconvenience factor by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rural Sourcing's fees are about the same as the overall cost of using an Indian outsourcer, she said--if you consider factors such as communication costs, travel expenses and inconvenience.

    What I'd like to know is how much money the "inconvenience" factor counts for . . . Sounds like a catch-all category for costs that is used to magiacally make rural sourcing as cheap as outsourcing to India.

    1. Re:Inconvenience factor by Kogase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then there's the added PR benefit of hiring Americans rather than Indians. Of course, it still doesn't help Americans who are worth a damn, but it's all about the PR...

    2. Re:Inconvenience factor by winkydink · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's referred to as a "soft cost". They can be very difficult to quantify, so, yes, there is probably some fudging of the number to make it work. However, the "inconvenience factor" as well as cultural differences are two of the items you will see on almost every outsourcing pros & cons list.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    3. Re:Inconvenience factor by Quikah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been on several projects which involved business units on the other side of the world. There are times when you basically lose a day because you find something in the morning that needs the other team to fix. This can be mitigated by forcing one team or the other to shift their work schedule, but this can cause other problems for the team who are forced to change.

      Also if you are dealing with hardware it is a lot easier to get something overnighted in country than having to deal with customs.

      --
      Q.
    4. Re:Inconvenience factor by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      as cultural differences are two of the items you will see on almost every outsourcing pros & cons list. and there's no cultural differences between a former farm hand from Alambama and an investment banker from NYC. No sir...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  11. Just what we need... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet another language barrier to surmount.

    At least the guys in Mumbai are *trying* to enunciate.

    (I grew up somewhere that has a native accent thicker than Brooklyn's, and currently live in North Carolina, so I have a legal right to make these jokes)

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  12. Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by darth_MALL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not according to This. It appears the 'rural' states aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

    this post intended to be humerous and or ironic. please treat as such.

    1. Re:Are they the "smartest" place to outsource? by cmpalmer · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I understand the attempt at humor, it should be noted (to the humor and research impaired) that the data is this graph is completely made up...

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/stateiq.as p

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  13. Dont see how this would work... by Kenja · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the prices I've seen listed, it would be illigal to employ Americans (or even Amerucuns) for anything even close to the same amount.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Dont see how this would work... by Vicsun · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are supposedly also taking into account communication costs, travel expenses and inconveniences.

    2. Re:Dont see how this would work... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the idea is to pay Americans the same wage as Indians. I think the idea is to have the same effective cost per employee. The fact that Indians are half-way around the world tends to result in a lot of hidden costs. These hidden costs add up and make an Indian worker just as expensive as a cheap American worker.

    3. Re:Dont see how this would work... by hagbard5235 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually... the idea is to get the same cost per unit output. No one in business really cares how much they pay their employees (or at least no one with any brains). What they care about is what they have to pay per unit output. If hiring a rural-american to costs $30/hour, and they produce 10 widgets/hour, and hiring an Indian costs $5/hour and they produce 1 widget/hour, you'd have to be incredibly dim to hire the Indian ($5/widget) vs the rural-american ($3/widget). It's all about costs and productivity.

      Outsourcing can incur serious productivity losses due to time differences, distance, coordination difficulties etc.

      What's really killing a lot of states is business unfriendly laws and taxes. If you add costs to employeeing someone through taxes and regulation, then they either have to take a lower wage (thus bringing costs back down to parity) or have greater productivity (thus bringing cost/widget back in line). A lot of states seem to completely fail to realized this.

  14. Hacking inthe heartland by amightywind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I landed in the Kansas City area after the bubble burst in Boston. Living costs are quite modest here, and it is a pleasant place to live. The hacking is the same. That does not stop my company from outsourcing to India though. Slavery is very attractive to business.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Hacking inthe heartland by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kansas City is not rural. It may be a shade smaller than Boston, but if you've gotta drive more than 10-15 minutes to see farmland, you're not in a rural area. KC spans 2 friggin' states, has professional sports teams, and more than 1 Wal-Mart. Rural areas generally do none of those things.

  15. manuel castells arguably predicted this by mqx · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In his trilogy on "the information age", manuel castells looked at the evolving and future structure of current society. One of his suggestions, which I remember clearly, is to forget looking at first, second and third world as being rigidly defined around countries (i.e. the idea that some are "first", others are "second", etc).

    He suggests that the world is really becoming a patchwork of first, second and third - so that even so called advanced countries (on average) have third world areas, and even third world countries have first world areas. When you look at it this way, then it shouldn't be surprising about "outsourcing" from advanced economic zones (e.g. SF) to third world zones (e.g. places in the deep south).

    Either way, I found this conceptual idea of his to be a very powerful one.

    1. Re:manuel castells arguably predicted this by benhocking · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have not read the book, but it does sound interesting. However, comparing "places in the deep south" to third world countries either (a) overestimates poverty in the deep south (depth and breadth), (b) underestimates poverty in third world countries, or (c) both. I'm not saying poverty doesn't exist in the U.S. - it definitely does - but it does not compare to poverty in third world countries!

      --
      Ben Hocking
      Need a professional organizer?
  16. Funny, that... by Kronovohr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While in a manner of speaking I'm all for this, it's already been done to death.

    Throughout the last 100-someodd years, the rest of the US has looked to the South as "cheap labor" -- most of the factories that've closed here paid just at or barely above minimum wage, with no option for any real pay raises, and offer conditions that no state in the North would accept. Perhaps this is just a return to that trend. I can only hope that the trend of severe employee abuse won't carry over.

    1. Re:Funny, that... by Sammy76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Besides, the costs in India/China etc are lower because people are, by and large restricted to their countries of birth because of social ties and immigration laws. Thus, when a huge wage disparity exists betweens two countries for identical work, corporations can exploit this inequality for a signifigant period of time until migration and expectations in the cheaper country even out the cost.

      Here in the US, people will just move to wherever the jobs are. There are no political restrictions on this, and they are still less than a 6 hour plane flight from friends and family. Rural costs will quickly adapt to metropolitan costs. Plus, this plan will probably just lead to urban sprawl, with the rural areas tapping into the largest city for labor and encouraging a slow migration of the urban areas to the new sites.

  17. Re:any time by TykeClone · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are probably more people like you out there than most people would think. If this kind of thing took off, it would provide a decent job market for people like you and me who want to remain in rural areas. It's not the kind of life for everyone (but don't tell those people too much - I don't want it to get crowded).

    Like you, I am from the rural midwest, but was blessed with the opportunity to move back to my hometown and run a good sized network.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  18. Send em to Ohio by randomErr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send those jobs to Toledo. Our government is into massive deficit spending.

    We need work!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  19. New call-center hold music. by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some folks'lll never eat a skunk
    But then again, some folks'll
    Like Cletus, the slack-jawed yokel

    Most folks'll never lose a toe
    But then again, some folks'll
    Like Cletus, the slack-jawed yokel

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  20. Definite Selling Points by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've sold my company's services simply by pointing out that my rates (in Indiana) are much cheaper than similar firms in New York, California, or even nearby Chicago.

    You want to pay $150+ an hour for a Chicago guy to do the same thing that we'll do for $75 an hour?

    This can bite you when they find another firm offering $50/hour. At some point, it's just not cost effective to run a business that cheap... not to mention that you'll have a harder time finding qualified employees to work for so little.

    If I could make the salary of a comparable California worker, but live in Indiana, I'd be doing very well.

  21. Ob Troll by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it wasn't a good idea to do this with that ballot-counting contract...

    I keed!

  22. Wow by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny
    An actual attempt to keep jobs in America. Oh shit, chest pain...!!

    &$#%^% NO CARRIER

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  23. Could be a good idea by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've considered opening a call center in my hometown in Indiana on a number of occassions. It just makes more sense than sending the jobs to India.

  24. Re:What's better? by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe you mean "tech support what don't speak English."

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  25. Another two cents... by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    What would Brian Boitano do?

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  26. Why not? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And for all y'all "Oh, but I could never live in rural America. It's so boring! There's nothing to do! No culture out there..." types.

    Silicon Valley or Silicon Alley: Get paid $80K, pay 28% federal tax plus 9-10% state/city tax. House costs $500K-$1M.

    East Buttfuck, Wyoming: Get paid $50K. Pay 25% federal tax plus 0.0% state tax. House costs $60K-$100K.

    If you've saved enough money for a down payment in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can buy a house for cash in rural America. And if you've been there long enough that you actually own your house in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can sell it, buy a house and a Ferrari, and have change left over for a fucking Porsche in rural America. That's right.

    Wanna visit the opera? Hop in the Ferrari on Friday after work, tear up the asphalt (long live long straight highways featuring speed limits defined only by the words "reasonable and prudent" -- it's like the American Autobahn!), party your ass off all weekend, and come home on Sunday.

    One look at the horrible things he's done to a Ferrari should make any self-respecting geek aspire to make John Romero our bitch. The best part about rural America isn't that a middle-class IT geek can enjoy such a lifestyle -- it's that he or she can pay for it on the interest and tax savings alone.

    Who is John Galt? When you leave a high-tax state for rural America, you are.

    1. Re:Why not? by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "If you've saved enough money for a down payment in the People's Republic of Kalifornia, you can buy a house for cash in rural America."

      But then you'd own a house in rural America. There is a reason they cost less, fewer people want them. Simple economics.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Why not? by cduffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a middle way, too.

      Austin, Texas: Get paid $55K (if you could find a $50K job in East Buttfuck). Pay 25% federal tax plus 0.0% state tax. House costs $100K-$250K.

      It's still a huge improvement over thte PRK financially, and you still get to live somewhere with interesting people (who aren't rednecks or rabid Bush supporters) and interesting things to do.

      Plus, by moving here, you're increasing land values, and making my ($120K) house worth more. So everybody wins! :)

  27. Re:Rural America? by strict3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, land of the fundamentalist Christians. They all used to be Democrats!

    Yes, it's true, they used to be democrats, 40 or 50 years ago. But now that the Dems make their left wing social platform such a large part of their platform, they're becoming republicans.
    They're tired of hearing that America sucks and that people who still hold onto the idea of morals and values are a bunch of bigoted idiots.

    People who mock those in rural areas really need to get an f'en clue. Most of the idiots on the coasts have hardly been outside their metro areas, and when they do leave it's just to go to some other city. The people you mock are the most honest, real, hard working people in this country.

    --
    "If a frog had side pockets, he'd carry a hand gun" - Dan Rather
  28. I'd welcome this in my town by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in a small town of about 600 people. A small shop like this (even just 10 workers and a single support person) would make a big positive difference in our local economy.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  29. Face the facts! by asliarun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face the facts. If you say that India is a outsourcing success story, look at the reasons why. On average, goods in India, barring housing and cars, cost only 20% (or less) of what it costs here in USA. On top of it, the standards of a good life and luxury are far lower than in the US.

    In California, you call yourself middle-class if you have a 0.5 mil house, a boat, 2 cars etc. In India, most middle class folks consider a car with a boot as a luxury car (i'm not joking, Hyundai Accent, Ford Ikon, Fiat Siena etc. are considered high-end luxury cars). Even a person driving a small hatch-back considers himself/herself as having acheived something. This is why the big multinationals can afford to pay 10% of what they pay in the US, and still manage to retain a happy workforce!

    Add to that, an abundance of intelligent, hard-working, English speaking people, extremely willing to slog for 12 hours a day so that they can save enough over 3-5 years to afford a Maruti Suzuki 800 (yes, it's a ~780 cc car), who can compete with that? Yes, there's still issues, such as infrastructure, accents, timezone differences, etc. and lots of bad apples in the workforce too, but it still doesnt overpower the cost advantage.

    It's a bit like how the x86 architecture took over the computer world. People assumed initially, and rightly too, that x86 was inefficient and too cheap. What they didn't count on was that as x86 sold more and more, it also innovated and improved, and very soon, offered a double-whammy cost AND performance advantage over the other proprietary systems. Again, people pad up the costs by factoring communication cost, travel cost etc. What they don't realize is that these costs are firstly, marginal, and secondly, reducing over time.

    The cost of living in the midwest or in rural America might be somewhat less than the metros or the coasts, but it cannot compete with the cost advantage offered by countries like India, Taiwan, China etc.

    IMHO, rural america can compete effectively with other IT companies. Only, they need to sing a different song. They have to be flexible and play on their natural strengths and not on their weaknesses. For example, if a lot of techies in the small towns and villages got together, formed a virtual company or organization, and offered standardized software solutions to local businesses and institutions, there is NO way that the big city businesses or another country could compete with them. Don't compete on cost, compete on value.

    1. Re:Face the facts! by asliarun · · Score: 2, Informative

      1/5 = 20%. Are you saying something different?

      I agree that i was not entirely accurate in my figures. I do know that a person in India can have a decent meal in an average restaurant for about Rs. 50 (~$1), can buy a coke for Rs. 10 (20 cents), can buy decent shirts and trousers for about Rs. 500 each ($10). Yes, these figures vary according to quality, location, brand, etc. but it's still way cheaper than in the USA. For example, a movie ticket in a good theater costs about Rs. 50 - Rs. 100. That's $1-$2!

      Yes, certain things are expensive, like white goods for example. However, even these items are becoming cheaper, and not more expensive. Another thing is that the aspiration level is also much lower in India. A 25" TV is considered as an expensive, with 21" being status quo. Plasma and LCD is only affordable for politicians and government servants who take bribes.

  30. Re:WHITE IS RIGHT! by gears5665 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the word you want is pedantic.

  31. Re:Rural America? by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've lived in rural and I've lived in cities. I prefer cities. Rural people do, indeed, *tend* to be honest and real hard working. There are good reasons for this. They also tend to be bigoted and intolerant of strangers. (And there are good reasons for this.)

    City people *tend* to be different along those axii, and there are reasons for that. Good, logical reasons. (Like they encounter new people and ideas more frequently.)

    I like and admire honesty. I try to be honest. This doesn't cause me to admire bigotry. And I find bigotry too high a price to pay for achieving honesty. (Also an unnecessary price.)

    As for hard working...people who are desperate will work themselves to death. That's no moral good. People who are working for themselves will work quite hard for years on end. That may or may not be a moral good, but it's also enlightened self interest. People who are being taken advantage of will slack off whenever the slave master isn't looking. And I consider THIS to be a moral good.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  32. Re:The difference between India and rural US... by cmowire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, that's not necessarily the case.

    The thing to remember is that the best-and-brightest of India -- the IIT grads -- do not stay in India, most of them are able to grab green cards and work for even more in the US than they could in India.

    The current outsourcing population in India is the second tier. Which is still pretty decent, but there's a limited supply of them and eventually they will price themselves out of the market.

    The problem in India is that there's no good third tier. You either have at least bachleurs degree and probably a masters degree, or you are almost illiterate. This isn't any sort of bell-curve intellectual gap, it's mostly that the public pre-college education in India is awful. And there's a lot of waste there -- kids who might become great thinkers but because they are culturally expected to be lower class, they are. I used to think that a good way to disrupt the social order there would be to educate the poor, but it's a much more complicated problem than that.

    In the US, at least you still have a good population of folks to send to community college.

  33. Why not Appalachia?? by adachan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a topic which has been brought up on /. before, however, I think it is important as the US dollar is currently tanking. I always hear about sending jobs to China and India, but really, why not West Virginia.

    I am orignially from a medium town in WV. It is rather poor, but there is a University , we have highways and a small airport. Columbus, Cincinatti, Lexington, Pittsburgh, and a number or cities in North Carolina are not that far away.

    We have all the same stores in the Mall that bigger cities do, and we can get stuff shipped from newegg.com just as fast as anyone else. There are virtually NO taxes and the air is relatively clean. There is a low crime rate, you can build a mansion for the same price as a shack in larger cities, and you can camp in your back yard (literally depending on where you live). The water tastes good out of the faucet, the education system is decent (low numbers of students per teacher as well). You can even invest your money in the same stock market as people in larger metropolitian areas if you are so inclined.

    Sure you will make less money per hour, but who cares....In the end you will have more. I say tax the shit out of companies that outsource to other countries and even better make them pay American minimum wages to workers there. After all they are working for an American company, dont they deserve to make at least an American wage?

  34. Speaking from experience... by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked at a development shop in Little Rock, Arkansas for a couple of years before getting married and moving to a very large U.S. city (I think it is #4 currently) when my wife was accepted to medical school here, so I think I'm qualified to do a bit of comparison.

    I think that there are a lot of cities in the U.S. in the 100,000 - 200,000 population range that people don't really consider for whatever reason, either as places to live or for corporations. Little Rock, for example, had most of the shopping, dining, etc. of a larger city but without nearly as much pollution and traffic and with a lower cost of living to boot. To respond specifically to some of the comments I've seen in this thread so far: we had Starbucks, pizza delivery, clubs/raves (if that is your thing), a symphony orchestra, and a minor league baseball team (the only thing that I would miss if I moved back would be the professional sports).

    I think there is rural, as in one gas station, one stoplight, and a Sonic...and then there is "rural", as in "not one of the 50 largest cities in the US", and I think businesses would do well to look more closely at the latter.

  35. Re:Arkansas isn't so bad... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Well, gotta say, Arkansas isn't so bad. Think of the large amount of $$'s in the state. Heard of Wal-Mart? Started and still hq'ed there.

    Acxiom...one of the largest dealers and maintainers of 'people data' started in Conway, and has expanded into Little Rock. Trans-Union relies on them for data needs...so, they do indeed handle a lot of data.

    Alltel is based in Little Rock.

    Steven's corporation and many other financial houses are in AR. So...it isn't quite a po-dunk as you might think. Hell, in Little Rock..seems that most people there are Dr.'s or Lawyers...UAMS has one of the leading eye centers and cancer centers in the world.

    I did find the IT wages were a little low about 10 years ago...especially compared to TX. I'm wondering what bill rates are there? There is a lot of rural left in AR, but, Little Rock is nicely metropolitan. Not as much to do there as where I live now (New Orleans)....but, people are pretty nice...southern friendly...and a good place to raise a family.

    I wonder what their bill rates are there? Cost of living is pretty low...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  36. This has been coming. by CodeHog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been working with outsourcing for over a year and 1/2 now. We've been talking about how we should move to some rural area with low taxes, property values, and housing costs for a year now. It just makes sense IF you can get quality individuals working for you. And it will happen more frequently as fed up highly talented individuals get tired of the rat race and decide to move somewhere, uh, less rat racy. I know of one person on the team who now works from Idaho after moving from Chicago. Do the math, Idaho cost of living is < Chicago and they experienced no pay decreases! Another person moved from Chicago to rural Wisconsin and kept the same pay. If the company is willing, you'll see a migration from the cities to the small towns over the next few years. I personally think it's great. The 80's and 90's were an era of migration from these rural areas where the jobs had been drying up rapidly (I'm a case in point, couldn't get a job in my hometown doing what I do, still can't). Hopefully that trend will reverse somewhat. America is loosing it's small town / rural heritage and I believe that heritage is part of what made America a great place in the first place.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  37. Thinking in Hopi and Navajo languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why contract with South Asians when you can contract with businesses run by good old American Indians?

    This is not as funny as it seems. I often though Hopi would make excellent computer programmers. People who speak Hopi fluently can you tell you that the language does not support ambiguity.

    Navajo is another language that may be good for "thinking like a computer programmer". The language's grammar has something similar to the "type-safety" found in OO languages like C++ and Java. The type-safety comes from the verb-to-noun combinations. This forces speakers to be specific. They can use abstractions, but speaking vaguely is nearly impossible.

    I'm sure somebody on the reservation could help you admin your Apache server.

    Navajo is similar to the Apache language family. They should be able to talk to the Apache server easily.

  38. inner bigness by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is exactly what the country needs: "Blue" business/culture centers connecting directly with "Red" labor centers. More intercommunication is the only way to bridge the unsustainably deep divides between Blue/Red communities. American strength in diversity relies also on rural areas, perhaps homogenous internally, but part of the landscape that makes America a microcosm of the world. Why should American globalism rest on a hollow foundation, ignoring the interior solely to harness the exterior?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  39. Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad public schools are a myth. There are, of course, exceptions, but it is not the schools that are bad, but the parents.

    Private schools appear to be better than public schools simply because the parents care enough to pay for what they percieve to be better than what they could get for free. These parents that care take part in their child's education to a much greater extent.

    In my home town there were 4 large public high schools and 1 large private high school, all 5 about the same size (there were perhaps a half dozen small private high schools as well). The public high school in the nice part of town produced 12 national merit scholars the year I graduated, the private high school only produced 4, the other 3 public high schools combined to produce 6. The funding and administrators were the same for all 4 public schools. What could account for the difference in performance? I submit that it was the families. The well to do are more likely to be well educated, the well educated tend to care more about their kids education, those who care about education tend to have kids that do well in school, because they put an emphasis on it at home, they help their kids with their home work.

    Do you honestly think privitization will solve anything?

    Do you think kids who don't do their homework in public school will do it in private school?

    Do you think parents who don't go to public school PTA meetings, will go to private school ones?

    The only thing that will happen when we start sending kids who were failing in public school to private school in large numbers, is that the private schools will suck too.

    -Tamman2000, proud product of Peoria public schools, district 150.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Bad public schools are (mostly) a myth by antirename · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about the whole creation thing, as I'm not a teacher, but schools in south Georgia (if you live in a city, or even medium sized town) are just holding pens for juvenile criminals. Before I tell this story,let me just say that my teachers were good. I was also AP, in other words taking classes for college credits in high school, so my experience with teachers might not be representative. Anyway, school here is not intended to teach anyone anything, it just keeps the thugs off the street during the day, and that's all. And no, I'm not an old geezer here. But I did wind up in the hospital with a homicide detective busy taking polaroids when I woke up courtesy of those thugs that need an education (they thought I had lost too much blood to make it, so they called homicide to the hospital). The school told the news media that there had been "a minor scuffle between students", and that no one had been seriously injured. The news corrected the story about a week later when my family got pissed about the coverage, but all the school wanted to do was cover it up. Three surgeries later, I disagree on the amount of injury. 7 or 8 on one, you don't win, even if you're Bruce Lee, which I'm not. The thugs involved just wanted to beat someone down to intimidate everyone else, and I looked like an easy target. When it went to court their lawyers tried to claim that their clients should be let off because I had martial arts training and had mananged to break a few bones (ribs, that's all you can really kick for when you have a number of people pounding on you) before the aforementioned thugs ALL piled on top of me. That defense didn't work, a couple (who dindn't get charged as adults) got convicted and expelled, but... Fuck public schools in Georgia. If I ever have kids, I'll do whatever it takes to put them in private school. I'll live on Ramen when I'm 40 if that's what it takes to keep them out of the public school system. Oh yeah, since it was a race crime (I'm white, by the way... who cares as I've already probably already said enough to Google for) the only black detective in the city was given the case. Everyone involved who could be charged as adult, nothing. The detective told the judge in court, with a straight face, that the "records had been lost". The judge wasn't happy, but there wasn't much he could do either. Why do we keep people like this in school? Down south, you have to, or someone will pull the race card (happened in my case with the school board). I personally think that some problems are more associated to income and social status than race, and that some races in this area are lower income, if you look at the statistics. I will note, however, that the school board member who claimed racism was investigated a few years later for letting a crack dealer live with her (I think she got off). I'll also note that all of my attackers managed to get themselves killed in gang-related incidents, except the two that jumped me in the first place. They are in the Federal pen for dealing crack out of a housing project in Atlanta. Is that what you want your kids going to school with? In the same town, they found a 6th grader selling coke. I'll cough up the money for private school if I ever have to, even it means living in a duplex somewhere. I don't want my kids having a cop tell them when they are 15 (my father was military and deployed) "Have a gun? Let me see it. Ok, know how to use it? Good, it's loaded. Ignore Detective so-and-so. Don't worry too much about those death threats to your mother on the answering machine, you need to rest, but sleep with the gun. I'll be back tomorrow when the rest of the pictures get developed". If you can afford to send your kids to something other than the public meat grinder, and you live in south Georgia, none of this is exaggerated or made up. This shit happens, you just don't hear about it.

  40. If it was just about being conquered, then you... by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...would have a point. Unfortunately for your argument it isn't.

    It's true that the US and Canada did conquer many tribes and take away a lot of land, but most of the remaining tribes weren't conquered, rather they tended to settle with the US and agreed to a series of treaties. Eventually the US government decided to settle with the tribes uniformly so they could co-exist with the states, while being bound by federal law.

    Now, if I can address you last comment.

    Personally, I think the Indians should feel lucky that we gave them anything at all instead of just assimilating them into our society as just one more ethnic group in the already-growing melting pot.

    If you were an Indian, that statement would probably sound a lot like: Personally, I think the Jews should feel lucky we didn't gas and incinerate them all.

    While saying circumstances could always be worse is technically a valid point, it's appalling and bad form to use it to play down culpability for any atrocity.

  41. Re:The Difference (my experiences) by OoSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now, substitue that by income level of families and then we're talking.

    My basic point is that less-well-to-do families have a harder time producing children that do well in school. Economic health is a good indicator for many other problems that less able students face. Lack of proper nutrition, lack of proper materials (i.e., paper, pencils, clothes, shoes, coats, etc.), parents that are less able to spend quality time with the kids, kids from families with a poor social life together, stigmatization from their peers, and families that just resent the kid for ever being born.

    You can quibble with me on details and specific cases, but I've been there and seen all of it in action throughout my life. I was a poor kid, but my mother was smart and loving enough to do the right things to help me get ahead in life. She's now a teacher, teaching many children from the POOREST parts of southeast Georgia.

    Her kids are the poorest economically and educationally. She does her best, but there's no escaping the effects of simply being dirt poor.

    So, in a roundabout way, my point is that comparing performance by economic groups is probably a better way to compare school performance in each state. I don't have the data for this, but maybe I'll look into it.

    My suspicion (and I've been told by others that there is data to back this up, any pointers are helpful to confirm this), is that middle-class and up kids do quite damn good across the nation. Poor kids don't do so good across the nation. Differences in other states can probably be correlated to distribution of incomes among populations across the nation.

    In other words, poor-performing schools and states are more likely to be such because of a larger share of economically poor families (students) to better-off families.

    --

    I always get the shakes before a drop.
  42. Yes, it is a Smoke Screen by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You wrote:

    Anyone get the feeling the uber rich of the world are majorly screwing the middle-class and trying to make the divide bigger.

    Maybe come next election, the people should vote out all the corporate ho's in congress, senate and the white house. It's time the people get represented, instead of getting shafted. Most of the time projects fail because of bad managers. Who are the bad managers? The guys at the top define the culture and it goes down from there. Those people come from rich families with lots of inherited wealth. So while these idiot asswipes fire a bunch of workers for cheaper workers, they double their own salaries.

    throughout history, it's always been a struggle between the rich and poor. any pretense otherwise is wishful thinking. The uber rich can get richer by farming out the work to other countries. /rant.


    I think you have it exactly right. This article no doubt is a product conceived and created in some corporate think tank, designed to be a smoke screen, create some sort of wedge between sets of Americans. Just another foul product of the rightwing propaganda machine, funded by billions of dollars from billionaires and megacorporations. The rightwing propaganda machine consists mainly of think tanks and foundations (Heritage, Cato, American Enterprise Institute, et al.), and has thousands of scholars, writers, media consultants, etc, in its pay.

    What is really sad is that you seem to be the only one here who has seen this article for what it is.

    See my homepage (via my sig) for more on the rightwing propaganda machine.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  43. Outsourcing to Rural Australia by Chatz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked for an Australian company that with a bit of government funding and support from a major university setup a software engineering course in a rural city (100,000 people?), where they would complete their degree part time while working on real contracts.

    No where else other than the major cities could they hope to get a degree like that in Australia. And having the work experience behind them would have made them highly employable.

    I still believe the idea was good, but starting this just as the bubble burst meant that there was little work and after a couple of years it was closed down.

    There was a lot of difficulty in attracting work to the centre since there were always about their ability being junior engineers. So we had to attract some senior engineers there as well to lead the teams. That was harder than attracting contracts, since we were the only employer in the area looking for those skills. But fundamentally the inability of the company to attract work for itself let alone the training center was its downfall.

    What happened to the people that were there? Many have now moved to the cities to complete their degrees and get work.

    --
    There is folly and foolishness on the one side, and daring and calculation on the other. - Admiral Pellew, Hornblower
  44. Wait, you lost me. by sideshow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry I was busy surfing the chest high waves over at Zuma and enjoying the 70 degree mid November beach weather.

    Wait, why was East Buttfuck, Wyoming better then Southern California again?

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  45. It's about time! by beaststwo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why hasn't anyone noticed before that pay in an area is directly tied to housing costs, and therefore you can save money by moving jobs to rural areas? I guess that's why Dr. White will hopefully make the big bucks!

    Now if we can just change a few tax loopholes to make a Government incentive to move to the country instead of over seas? Who knows? We might start another Civil War!

    But really, as jobs move to rural areas, housing prices will increase there, and tech jobs will probably wind up moving from town to town, just as textile jobs used to when I was a kid in Alabama. A town would offer little better deal and the company would move a few miles to take advantage of it. I don't think anybody won in that game, except the lawyers of course.

  46. In fact... by Amata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "media standard" for how American is spoken is based off of the educated midwestern accent.

  47. If only Slashdot articles came true... by Beek · · Score: 2, Funny

    THIS IS MY DREAM. The only thing that has ever made me doubt my career choice has been my perception that I'd have to live in the city to be a software developer. If I could live in small town Alberta/Saskatchewan and write software, I'd be one step closer to living the dream.

    On that note, if anyone located in rural western Canada is looking for a developer, PLEASE EMAIL ME. MFJasonB-at-gmail.com

    PS - WTF is up with people talking about the suburbs as if they're rural areas?

  48. Why I came down from the hills by koreth · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I grew up in a semi-rural area in the mountains in California. The closest store was an hour and a half walk away. No food delivery, and there were power outages every winter and spring whenever it rained heavily for a few days in a row and a mudslide knocked out the power lines. Now I live in Silicon Valley, and other than visiting my parents or attending family get-togethers, I'm not heading back any time soon.

    For one thing, food. I'm a foodie and I love variety. In addition to burgers and sandwiches, I am walking distance from Philippine, Indian, Mexican, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Italian, and even Armenian food. If I want to cook something, I'm less than 10 minutes from Chinese, Mexican, Korean, and Indian supermarkets, as well as a couple of American ones and a fresh-produce store that acts as kind of a permanent farmer's market. Can I get a reliable supply of sumac or fenugreek, a durian, or fresh kaffir lime leaves in rural America?

    When a friend of mine who was going to grad school in Indiana came back here, the first thing she did was force me to take her out to eat because she hadn't been able to find Thai food for six months.

    A lot of midsize towns and cities have cineplexes and shopping malls. Catching "Revenge of the Sith" will be no problem anywhere in the country. But I also like to go see more obscure stuff like "Primer" -- hard enough to find even in a big city with lots of art houses. Short of waiting for the DVDs or pirating them over the Internet, I doubt I'd be able to find most of the cult films I've seen in nearby theaters if I lived in a rural area. (One theater in San Jose used to show Hong Kong action films and anime every Tuesday night, though it has since changed owners and now shows Bollywood musicals.)

    For exercise and socializing, I enjoy ballroom dance (the competition-style variety, more like figure skating than like Grandma and Grandpa at your sister's wedding). I am walking distance from a giant ballroom studio that gets a crowd of several hundred people four nights a week, and on any given Saturday night I'm twenty minutes' drive from at least four other ballroom venues, not to mention more salsa clubs than I can count.

    I like meeting people with all sorts of different backgrounds, and this area gives me that in spades. There is no ethnic majority in San Jose. Three of my last four girlfriends grew up in foreign countries (China, Australia, and Vietnam) which suits me fine -- I like hearing a completely different perspective on things I find familiar and commonplace. There are certainly immigrant communities elsewhere in the US, but only on the coasts, and pretty much only in the major urban areas on the coasts, do you find such a varied mix of people from all over the place, all getting along just fine most of the time.

    Yes, the traffic here can be annoying. But that's why we have telecommuting -- I work from home three out of five days most weeks, so my typical commute time is the 10 seconds it takes me to get from my bedroom to my home office.

    The economy here would have to get really bad before I'd consider moving back to a rural area. Urban areas with their melting-pot cultures and abundance of activities that are only economically viable with a certain population density suit me much, much better.

  49. Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I grew up in moderately rural Pennsylvania. In my late teens I moved to Florida. I moved to Massachusetts. I moved to New York City. I moved to California. I moved to Montana (and brought everyone in my company with me and bought them houses as a perk. :) I've spent considerable time in India, England, Spain, Japan, Korea (south) and China. Also quite a few tropical islands for a few weeks here and there. I speak fluent Korean, bad Japanese, even worse Chinese, decent Spanish and... uh... moderately understandable American, at least if you don't hail from a ghetto or a rez. :)

    A little more about me (there is actually a point to this, please bear with me): I'm 50 now, and I live about 20 miles from a major indian reservation in Montana. In my various travels, I have met many indians (both native Americans and "India"ns), Aussies, English folk, uncounted large numbers of Chinese, ditto South Americans (serious time in Florida, remember), quite a large number of Japanese, and lots of uprooted east coasters on the left coast and vice versa. Southerners up north, and northerners down south. I've been hanging with a girl from Kansas for about ten years.

    You know who the least respectable of the bunch are? The ones who never left home. That's right. The (American) indians I've met in the cities and the schools, those people are smart and interesting and looking to do something with themselves. The indians I've met here, however, are a whole 'nuther kettle of fish. They live off the dole, they drink like camels (if camels drank alchohol) and they don't do squat worth anything to either their little microcosm or American society at large (unless you count providing justificaiton for major amounts of employment in the FBI, the BIA, and several other large government operations.)

    In sharp contrast, the "furrin" folk I've met have been a delight to interact with, both personally and professionally. They, somehow, managed to drag themselves out of their "own cultures" without complete mental collapse, intolerable levels of angst, or having to scuttle back home to get that welfare/dole/tribal-residency check. I have noticed that in many cases, particularly Japanese and Chinese and Korean folk, they tend to turn their living spaces into little cultural "nodes" in a space made up of American culture. Seems to work very well, too - they have a place to go that is culturally "them", and they don't implode like postal workers.

    Now... you seriously think American indians are so involved with their culture, of all things, that they actually are so mentally disabled that they can't get out of an area about the size of a typical large state's county? If that's truly the case, then we should probably just toss the whole rez idea in the trash - because keeping their culture is too expensive for them.

    Now me, I don't think it is the culture, that is, the indian-ness of them. I think it is the welfare "we will reward you if you stay here" approach that we do to them. I think it is the "we will give you more for each baby you pop out" that we do to them. I think it is the "you can put casinos here, while folks outside the rez can't because mommy and daddy government say so" that we do to them. That's right. I don't blame them. I blame people like you, who, in their haste to be all touchy-feely, don't give minorities and the disadvantaged room to compete on an even playing field because you smother them with "aw gee, baby got a boo-boo? Lemme give you a check for that."

    I say, let them have the land. Let them celebrate whatever they think they have to celebrate. But make them compete on an even playing field with everyone else, and pretty soon, you'll see that they are like everyone else. The potential is there. I've seen it, and I am certain of it. First shoot the social workers. Then shoot the lawyers.

    <mutter>freaking psychobabbling social-worker morons...</mutter>

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Oh, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If everyone around you is on welfare and barely getting by, then how realistic are things like college going to seem?

      The welfare needs to be tapered off to zero, especially the "have a baby, get a dollar" welfare programs. Education must be imposed. Actual jobs created - even if they are artificially created - and those that do not work, like the rest of humanity, get to starve. Those that do low quality work, also get to starve, because they get fired.

      Our government is King Turd of Shit Hill when it comes to artificial job creation; "Pork" is the middle name of darned near every senator and congressman in Washington. Surely they could find a way to put some manufacturing into South Dakota, Montana, Arizona, Harlem, Watts, etc. It beats heck out of sending checks there for the welfare mommies to burn while the welfare daddies hawk drugs on the street corners.

      ...do you really think taking money away from them is going to get them more motivated?

      I absolutely do. There is a big difference in the level of motivation infused into someone who is waiting for this month's check to arrive, as compared to someone who is waiting for this month's bills to arrive. The TV goes off, the lights go off, the heat goes off, the water goes off... all very, very unpleasant. Guess what? Time to go to work!

      The "poor baby" approach doesn't work. We know it doesn't work, there isn't a welfare ghetto in the country that has turned into a half-decent success story without "urban renewal", AKA "we're throwing all you lowlives outa here." And all that does is move the problem somewhere else.

      Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish, he can feed his family forever. That's one hoary old saw indeed, but it is sharply on the mark.

      Welfare doesn't work.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Oh, please. by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like you must live between Billings and Hardin... when I lived in MT (20 years ago now), if you lived on that reservation you could not buy life insurance, because you could get someone offed for a measley five bucks, and it happened fairly often. So everyone there was considered too high-risk to insure.

      And I totally agree with you about the welfare system!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Oh, please. by stinkpad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in Lead, South Dakota, near Deadwood. Have seen firsthand the conditions of the "Native Americans" both on and off the res. I concur. Stop the welfare, and give these people a chance to solve their own problems. These are bright, intelligent people. But, welfare handouts seldom do anything other than enable them to fall into a lifestyle that is destructive and degenerative. Go to the Pine Ridge, the Rosebud, or other reservations and SEE what the conditions are. More "free" money is not going to make the lives of the people better, except perhaps enable some to buy a better quality of booze, and a nicer car to trash. All the damn do gooders who sincerely want to help think that they can solve these problems by giving more money.
      To say or imply that people can come to the United States from various third world repressive shitholes in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, and other parts of the globe, with no or limited english language skills, immigrate to the United States, and within several years be a functioning succsessful and contributing part of our culture, yet think that the Native Americans somehow need more "help" in order to succeed, is to denigrate their entire race. I am sure that there are some exceptions, as I have met and seen a few of them, but, overall, the results of government handouts is a failure.
      As for the rest of this tread, we moved here to get OUT of a big stinking, crime ridden metropolis of 2+ million. Cost of living is so much lower, and a traffic jam is what happens when a herd of deer of flock of wild turkeys need to cross the road... It was a total quality of life improvement, although if you measure the results in dollars, we are now down near poverty level income. It is amazing, however what so little money can do, when you are debt free and don't have a mortgage or car payment. No way I could have a semi retired lifestyle if I was still in the Denver Metro area. For an equivilent lifestyle, I would need to earn many times what I can get by on here, since I would still be trying to pay off a 200K+ mortgage. Instead, we have 3 houses, with 2 of them rented. We have found that living in a rural community gives us a life, and the big city was slavery, where you worked 60+ hours a week, just to pay for the basics. I have also noticed that many who have never been lived in a rural area think that what you have out here are just a bunch of dumb fsck hicks. I have found that a major portion of the residents are well educated, and a large percentage have moved here from the big cities for the same reasons we did. No, we don't have the opera, 12 screen theaters, 500 restraunts and clubs, and large shopping "mauls". But, that is something we didn't really care about since (because of working 60+ hours a week) we didnt have time for, or enjoy anyway. We have instead, clean air & water, no commute, happy safe children, decent neighbors, almost zero stress, bike and hiking trails, downhill and x-c skiing, hunting and fishing, and the time to enjoy it all.

  50. Good for U.S. and good for business, bad for techs by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rural outsourcing would help people living in rural areas get jobs. Because business looks at an areas pay scale before they decide what to offer the tech style jobs will be lower in rural America than in the cities and that will probably be good for business.

    The rural techs would "steal" jobs from their urban counterparts and would cheapen the overall value of technical jobs.

    The truth is there are already a lot of underpaid technical types in rural areas. Today you can consider mechanics technical types and people with these analytical skills do live in rural areas.

    I grew up in a small midwestern town. I left. I left because I like computers and I like being well paid. You don't find many computer jobs in small towns and you don't find hardly any decent paying jobs in small towns.

    Still keeping the jobs in the US is a boon to the country and getting rural areas jobs will help with the chronic unemployment in these towns. But there is nothing to stop these folks from gaining experience and moving to the city in search of better pay! If that happens there will be a larger surplus of us tech types in the city and our pay will slide closer to the rural folks. So for me, perhaps it is bad.

  51. I am sort of in a 'rural outsourcing' mode by MarkWatson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and I moved from the beach in San Diego to the mountains of Northern Arizona almost 7 years ago. We find the cost of living to be very much lower here (and with wilderness surrounding us for hiking and picnicking, the standard of living much better).

    We both work fewer hours per week and for usually lower pay, and much less stress. Anyway, it works for us.

    The internet and cheap flat rate long distance makes telecommuting possible, but still not as effective as being on site. I try to spend time on consulting, writing and developing a few (very much niche) software products.

  52. The Company Behind the Curtain by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Rural Sourcing began pitching its services this summer and can boast of five major customers, including a large telecommunications company, White said. She said the companies haven't given their permission to be named publicly.

    Though I don't have any inside information, I'd bet the unnamed company is Verizon.

    Call up their tech support number and you will hear an American on the other end. Several times, I've talked to someone with a southern accent.

    Most of all, it seems the most amaturish support center I've ever called. 9 problems out of 10, I'll get a completely different answer from each support person I talk to. They seem quite determined to pass the buck, giving me any answer they can make up that will require me to call back. You wouldn't believe how many times I've heard some lame answer, that all the problems will be magically fixed "tomorrow", even when they've gone on for weeks. And, of course, they NEVER fail to mark the issue as CLOSED, when they've never solved anything. This screws up the automated phone system, requiring me to call it a "NEW" issue every time I call in about the same thing.

    If you're wondering about the 10th time out of 10, I'll get the exact same response from 4 different people, but they'll all be COMPLETELY wrong.

    Anyhow, I never understood what was happening there, but this story seems to fit perfectly, and explain the issue.

    Of course, I certainly hope I'm wrong, and Verizon support just happens to be terrible. I'm the last person to advocate outsourcing, so I hope REALLY crappy American support isn't the only alternative.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  53. What a joke by arfuni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you really think of any of these call centers and server farms are going to stay in the sticks? This has been happening for years. Companies frequently take advantage of tax and free money perks and move on when the new VP or the like convinces enough shareholders or the CEO that slightly more profit could be made elsewhere and then again somewhere and then again somewhere... you get the point. Just ask Kalispell City. Four million in government incentives down the drain, an expensive upgraded infrastructure that no one is going to use, trashed wilderness from the sprawl that popped up and was abandoned, etc.

  54. No, thank you. by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The governments of small midwestern states have been pimping out their citizens to businesses as people who will work long and hard without complaining for minimum wage and few benefits. They turn around and tell those citizens they are working hard to bring quality, high-paying jobs.

    The citizens of these states, especially the "young" people between 18 and 35, have figured this out and are turning their backs on the government of their homes. The past decade has been characterized by a massive outmigration from rural states to Top 50 metropolises. It's a literal brain drain for the communities they leave.

    The community in which I live has a special economic development fund that has been an unmitigated disaster, taking tax dollars from our sales tax and giving it to companies who promise to bring in a certain amount of new jobs. There has been, in practice, no accountability and the jobs have sucked. Firms have closed overnight, taking millions of tax dollars with them and leaving hundreds of citizens unemployed with back pay due they'll never see.

    The largest employers in this village of ~40,000 people are (besides the air force base, hospital and school district) a technical help desk contractor, a hotel reservation phone pool, a airline reservation phone pool, an insurance agency phone pool, and an adult vocational training center. Despite the "success" of most of these businesses starting within the last 5 years, the median wage has stayed flat at around $25,000.

    There are some bright spots. A home that costs ~$150,000 dollars here would set you back ~$2,000,000 in Silicon Valley. Our arts culture here is very strong thanks to the local university, including our excellent volunteer symphony orchestra. I guess that's about it.

    Crime isn't low because of the meth epidemic. I have a buddy on the county's drug enforcement squad and the stories he can tell would make for a terrific Al Pacino movie. Except for our housing costs, our cost of living is comparable to the rest of the nation but the fresh produce isn't as fresh nor as diverse.

    Now a Super Wal*Mart is scheduled to open next year and our "civic leaders" are touting this as another economic development success. The truth is the citizens are tired of working two or three jobs to get in 40 hours a week and enough of a paycheck to support three kids in their 70's era trailer or trashy $600/month apartment.

    I'm lucky to have a great federal government job as a systems administrator. My wife is a dental hygienist with an almost unbelievably fantastic work and pay schedule. We are very lucky.

    But to those who would pimp out my neighbors or "outsource" more shitty jobs to communities like this I say go to hell. If the Indians or Chinese or Mexicans will take this shit they are welcome to it. That's not flamebait or nationalism or anything of the sort. It's the truth.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  55. Outsource to Okla. It's Like a 3rd World Country by Ranger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tulsa, Oklahoma is a call center mecca. There are 80 plus call centers here. Some are small but most employ hundreds. It's about the only thing left after all the other industries imploded (oil, aviation, telecommunications). These jobs typically pay $8-$10/hr which isn't a bad wage for someone with only a high school education. The work itself is another matter.

    They are cubicle sweathshops. Poor training coupled with the most micromanaged industry in the known Universe creates a highly stressed work environment where employment is measured in months. Turnover is high but they can always turn around and get a job at another call center for a few more months. With so many people out of work from formerly high paying jobs they have a ready supply of desperate workers.

    The best selling point for outsourcing to Oklahoma is that it's like an emerging third world country, but here at home. It's mostly rural with pockets of high technology. The cost of living is low. It's in the central time zone so they only have to get up an hour earlier to take calls from the East coast and stay two hours later to take calls from the West coast. And most people have a high school education. And best of all they speak English even if it has an Okie twang to it.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"