Slashdot Mirror


HDTV PC Capture Solutions?

Akai asks: "With HDTV DVR's costing upwards of a thousand US dollars or more, I was looking for a HiDef capture card that would work with Linux and an external HD receiver. The pchdtv card looks nice but it's RF input only for HiDef content, and only supports OTA at this point. Both DirecTV and DishNetwork HD STBs can be hacked with FireWire ports, but it's not cheap, so I was trying to find a capture card with either DVI or Component inputs, or a converter to take either of those to FireWire. The old Dish Network model 5000 receivers had an option to output HDTV RF but they are no longer compatible with Dish's current HDTV broadcasts. Google has not been helpful in this regard, and all I've found is professional (>$2000US) format conversion gear. Is there a PC (hopefully Linux) based video capture solution that can capture the output of a cable of DBS STB (RGBA, DVI, or Component out) without a significant loss of image fidelity?"

291 comments

  1. how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This or this???

    1. Re:how about by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      RTFA. He said he COULDN'T use the pcHDTV card. It does have an S-Video input, but can it take HDTV through that? Here's what the site says about HDTV input:

      One RF TV antenna coaxal reception port

      Also, the FAQ (which isn't quite up to date) mentions that it will ONLY work for terrestrial broadcasts, and that it's ONLY antenna.

    2. Re:how about by Forge · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Ask Slashdot". Where Slashdot Editors who don't read Slashdot help Slashdot "readers" who don't read Slashdot to ask questions that could be answerd by using Slashdot's search function. :)

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    3. Re:how about by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny! He thinks Slashdot's search function is worth a damn!

    4. Re:how about by Mattcelt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right. So the original question poster is looking for a linux-friendly HDTV PCI card with digital I/O and QAM decoding support, have I got that right?

      There seems to be some good information here. Ignore the "DVIco FusionHDTV DVB-T Digital TV Tuner Card"; it's composite and SVHS input only. The MyHD MPD-120 Tuner (actual MPD-120 mfg. product link here) has a DVI-in daughterboard, which is nice (though it doesn't have QAM decoding, apparently). It also outputs IEEE1394, but under Windows XP only, which sucks. But it does have component video analog output. So that might be useful, but doesn't seem to be the holy grail.

    5. Re:how about by Maznafein · · Score: 1
      Mod parent funny! He thinks Slashdot's search function is worth a damn!

      I hate the search feature on /. Searching with site:slashdot.org with google, but it's still a pain in the ass finding old articles.

      One day I'll rember to start book marking ones I want.
      --
      <happiness>beer</happiness>
    6. Re:how about by Chop · · Score: 1

      Since no one can seem to follow the link HD-3000 I will paste the relevent portion here:

      Q: Will the HD-3000 let me watch HD cable?

      A: Shortly yes, but right now no. pcHDTV has the micro code that is used
      for decode cable signals. This is what prevented the HD-2000 from
      allowing users to watch HD cable - the HD-2000 card does support QAM,
      but pcHDTV was not able to get the micro code, but this still could
      happen, but don't hold your breath. -- Someone could /guess/ the micro
      code but good luck because you'll need it.


      Also, just because you can decode the HD cable does not mean you can
      watch it. You can only watch unencrypted cable. If cable providers
      decide to encrypt signals and then sell special set top boxes that know
      how to decrypt that signal you'll not be able to watch it with the
      HD-3000 card. Whether your cable provider sends plan old QAM or
      encrypted QAM varries greatly. Call your cable provider to know for
      sure (But be aware that the customer service person may just tell you
      yes because that's what they would assume...) Also, only some channels
      could be encrypted and others may not be.

      In some markets you could have 0% encrypted, in others it could be 100%.
      Nation wide it's around 70% not 30% is from people I have spoken with.

      As for when the HD-3000 card will have QAM support, my personal
      guess (And it is a guess) would be 1-2 months.

      Chop

    7. Re:how about by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      There are reports that an upcoming driver release for the HD3000 will allow it to recieve unencrypted QAM (cable and satellite) signals. There are currently no plans for it to ever be able to handle encrypted QAM.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  2. Chances are... by VeneficusAcerbus · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... you won't be able to find anything like that anytime soon. Although VIA recently released an HDTV chip, but I'm not sure whether that will help or not.

    1. Re:Chances are... by Hinten · · Score: 1

      or pay $4.95 a month and get a HDTV DVR from Comcast.

      Who said you have to spend thousands $ ?

  3. One word by ObjetDart · · Score: 5, Funny

    BitTorrent. The world is my TiVo.

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azureus is better.

    2. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bit Torrent is the technology, Azureus is merely a client. I prefer Bit Tornado myself.

    3. Re:One word by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Just curious, how much HD content have you found on BitTorrent?

    4. Re:One word by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Real men don't do backups -- the upload their TV on p2p and let everyone else do the work"
      -- Linus T Farnsworth

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:One word by lyonsden · · Score: 1

      Actually, almost every show that I'm interested in (CSI's, JAG, NCIS, + more) is available in HD on Bittorrent.

    6. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you have the time to wait for a hundred year download to finish...

    7. Re:One word by AS400+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Then I have a question for you, or anyone else that uses bitTorrent to grab HD TV shows.

      Do you watch them on your monitor or do you have a way to get them to your TV?

      If you watch them on your TV can you explain how you set it up? I've found plenty of ways of getting a stream from my PC to my standard TV input (http://www.hauppauge.com/html/mediamvp_datasheet. htm this is the simplest solution I've found so far) but have not yet found a way to get one to my high-def input.

    8. Re:One word by bonzoesc · · Score: 1

      I use my Xbox to do normal-def content. I don't have the money for anything HD (my desktop's not even fast enough for it :( ) so I'll leave that answer to somebody made of benjamins.

    9. Re:One word by Raven15 · · Score: 1

      I occasionally use my modchipped Xbox. I've got an Xecuter3 modchip, and it allows me to run Xbox Media Center (XBMC). I just set up a Windows file share on my desktop, and the Xbox can browse the network and find it. Then it just streams it over the network and outputs it on my TV.

    10. Re:One word by ObjetDart · · Score: 1

      Well, for me personally, I have a DLP projector (NEC LT240K) in my home theater, connected to my HTPC, and the projector takes VGA in, so it's a no-brainer. Sorry, that's probably not a very helpful answer.

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    11. Re:One word by oldmankid · · Score: 0

      No fun downloading ~8GB for an hour of HDTV.

    12. Re:One word by multimed · · Score: 1

      VSO Software has a preview release of a program called DIVX to DVD which will astoninshingly enough, convert a DIVX AVI file to either DVD files or burn them directly if you have the right burning software. While there are still some little things, for the most part, I've been happy with it. Actually either impressively for the software or disappointingly for my the quality of my Time Warner cable, I've found that I can download the DIVX AVI, use the software to convert it to DVD and play it back on my set top DVD player and it looks much much better than if I watch it during it's original broadcast. And don't even get me started about how much the quality drops off when I record a broadcast to my Scientific Atlanta DVR.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    13. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Phillips DVP-642 DVD player, which will play the HDTV XviD avi files from BitTorrent.

      It costs around $69 retail.

      All I do is burn the avi files onto a Data DVD+RW (or if it's just one show, a CR-RW), insert and watch. The quality on my fairly old TV looks about the same as watching a DVD.

      I usually watch the shows I'm interested in (CSIs, Enterprise, Battlestar Galactica, SG Atlantis, Lost) a day after they were broadcast - I set up BT to get the files during the day when I'm at work and watch them when I get home.

      Of course, Battlestar Galactica isn't even shown in the US yet, the torrents I get are captured from Sky Satellite in the UK.

    14. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Um, guys? those BT shows marked HD aren't true HD, or at least not the level of HD that was broadcast (1080i for most, 720p for some) most BT shows are 480i, *SOME* might be 480p, but that can be argued if it's HD or not. Basically, if your download is less then a gig for an hour, it aint HD. There are *SOME* HD offerings, but those are fairly large, and won't play on an Xbox ;-)

      Watch one of these downloaded shows, then turn on the HD version of the show, if you can't tell a difference, you're fairly blind, or don't have a High Def compat. tv.

      The question was how could he record HDTV without losing quality. This is losing quality. It's nice to not have ads, but it's FAR from HD.

    15. Re:One word by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      They're mcuh better quality than my replaytv records (in Mpeg2). I downloaded Lost (ABC) last night in HD with 5.1 Surround even. My Computer is the only thing in my house that could even play 5.1 sound, and its own TV-card cannot capture it.

      It uses different compression, but the quality is great. I download shows all the time because they are great quality and have the commercials already removed.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    16. Re:One word by Disconnect · · Score: 1

      It's probably from a directivo. So its going to be identical to the stream DTV sent, which (for 99.9% of the users) is non-HD. (And comes up around 500M-1G per hour, depending on format/channel/etc.)

      --
      www.gotontheinter.net
      Updated vaguely once a whenever, maybe once a whenever-and-a-half.
    17. Re:One word by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      I threw together a pc with many spare parts (Duron 1.4Ghz, Onboard sound, onboard Lan, 20Gig HD) I had around, and bought a radeon video card with S-video out. It would probably cost under $150 to build.

      If you wanted High Def out of it, you can buy an adapter for the newer ATI cards.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    18. Re:One word by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      This one was in xvid format (mpeg4 variant?) it is 350M-ish for a 42 min episode.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    19. Re:One word by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      I was wrong, its the one here:
      http://www.tvtorrents.net/
      looks like 699M in size

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    20. Re:One word by Murrow · · Score: 1

      XBox Media Center does play the .ts High Def format. With a 100Mbit ethernet connection to the Win2K server these files are very watchable, with a tiny bit of jerkiness that may actually be an encoding issue. They look really nice on my High Def tv (the $700 32" Sanyo 4:3 tube from Walmart)

    21. Re:One word by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

      VGA in != HD.

      HDTV resolutions are either 1080i (1920x1080), 720p (1280x720), or 1080p (future). Some TVs / projectors vary slightly, such as they'll support 720p but have a 1024x720 pixel array or a 1024x768 pixel array.

      VGA resolutions are not the same. What you're probably getting is scaled and/or interpolated output via VGA. That projector has a native resolution of 1024x768, meaning you can dispaly 720 lines of progressive scan resolution without problem. The average human probably can't tell the difference, but technically it's not a true "HD" signal -- meaning it's not ATSC, QAM, or whatever the HD satellite signals are. I'm sure it looks great anyway.

    22. Re:One word by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
      OK, yes, technically it's true that 1024x768 != HD. For that matter, the "HD" material I am downloading from BT isn't really HD either (as others have pointed out here.) It's not even 720p, more like 960x528 or similar. But, it's a hell of a lot better than plain old TV, and when you watch a rip of an HD show like Lost on a 1024x768 projecter, compressed to a 700MB file and including the 5.1 digital audio track, it's mind blowing, "HD" or no.

      (Yes, I know Lost is lame, when I say mind blowing I'm talking about the image quality, not the show itself.)

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    23. Re:One word by AS400+Hacker · · Score: 1

      S-Video isn't the same has high-def, I have tried that setup in the past.

      I'll look for adapters. But it seems like the XBox Media Center might be the solution, since I already have an XBox I rarely use. I'd "just" have to mod it.

    24. Re:One word by AS400+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Hey this looks like it might do the trick! Luckily I already have an XBox I barely use.

      I have a friend who can help me mod it, it's not something I'd want to attempt myself. I can barely install a harddrive in a PC.

    25. Re:One word by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      "S-Video isn't the same has high-def, I have tried that setup in the past."

      Which is why I said: "If you wanted High Def out of it, you can buy an adapter for the newer ATI cards."

      like the one shown here: http://www.ati.com/products/hdtvadapter/

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    26. Re:One word by can-o-worms · · Score: 1

      I use a dual head matrox card(a g400 i think) with DirectFB, i had messed with nvidia TVout stuff before, and I always had to start another X server on the TVout, but with DirectFB there is nothing to do, mplayer handles everything. If you use windows, then too bad, you just miss out on all the great software once again.

    27. Re:One word by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      Um, guys? those BT shows marked HD aren't true HD, or at least not the level of HD that was broadcast (1080i for most, 720p for some) most BT shows are 480i, *SOME* might be 480p, but that can be argued if it's HD or not. Basically, if your download is less then a gig for an hour, it aint HD. There are *SOME* HD offerings, but those are fairly large, and won't play on an Xbox ;-)

      It's worth noting that the idea that those downloaded files are true HD is a misconception on the part of the downloaders. The "hdtv" part of the file name tells you that the SOURCE of the file is an HDTV feed, just like the ones marked "dvd.screener" tell you that the source is a screener DVD that was sent out by the production company, most likely in a press kit.

    28. Re:One word by nilenico · · Score: 1
      I use the S-video output from my PC and plug it into the TV.

      Sure, it's probably lossy and everything, but as long as the original source was HDTV it's still great. And no problems on expanding it to full size on my 37" screen.

      So, this probably doesn't answer you question...

      --
      .sig? No.
  4. Gotta pay to play HDTV by vision33r · · Score: 1

    Or wait til HDTV becomes proliferated across..

    1. Re:Gotta pay to play HDTV by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      The problem with waiting is the regulations may make it impossible by then.

  5. Cable by clinko · · Score: 5, Informative

    "With HDTV DVR's costing upwards of a thousand US dollars or more"

    It's $3 more a month than the normal DVR Time Warner offers.

    I know this might not be an option for you, but others might want to know that HD DVRs might just be $36/yr. away from them.

    1. Re:Cable by calibanDNS · · Score: 3, Informative

      In my area (central NC), Time Warner rents out the Scientific Atlanta 8300HD DVR which is pretty crappy compared to a MythTV box, Tivo, and ReplayTV. The SA8300HD box is buggy and routinely misses programs that I've scheduled for recording for no apparent reason other than it just isn't in the mood at the time.

      Also, when you're renting a box from your cable provider, they expect it to be returned in the same condition when you cancel your service. Hardly a hacker-friendly policy.

      If you want some basic (but flaky) recording capabilities without the hassle of a VCR, get the Time Warner-offered box. If you want reliability, flexibility, and the ability to hack it, I think you're SOL for now.

    2. Re:Cable by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's $3 more a month than the normal DVR Time Warner offers.

      I know this might not be an option for you, but others might want to know that HD DVRs might just be $36/yr. away from them."

      which is fine, if you like a buggy crashy DVR with a lousy interface and being locked out of doing anythign with the recorded programming. =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you encourage the proprietary hardware lock-ins used by cable companies to keep competitors out of the field and to milk your bank account on a recurring basis?

    4. Re:Cable by micky_ray · · Score: 1

      I just signed up with Comcast (I know, I sold my soul), and in the DFW area at least all of their HD boxes are DVRs. Interestingly they charge $5/month for the HD box, but if you want a standard definition box with DVR you have to pay $10/month. While the features and interface are not the greatest, it works well enough to record the shows I know I want to watch and still be able to FF through commercials.

    5. Re:Cable by rhombic · · Score: 1

      I have a SA DVR from Cox communications; while the interface isn't wonderful, the complete integration with Cox's digital cable is seamless, and since it has two tuners I can watch one show and record another, both off of the digital signal. It has yet to crash once on me (had it for ~ 9 months)

      A couple of months ago, a new entry showed up in the play menu of my DVR rented from Cox cable-- "Copy to VCR".

      They don't spend a lot of effort documenting it, but I can hit that, and the composite out on the DVR goes straight into my DVD recorder, no extra stuff from the DVR showing up on the screen.
      This feature doesn't eat up one of the tuners, so it's possible with my set-up to watch one show, record another to the HD, and backup another to DVD, all without any hacks or extra effort on my part. Total cost-- $12/month, no upfront hardware cost, no contracts, no mess.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    6. Re:Cable by Casca · · Score: 1

      The downside is that the DVRs that cable companies offer are gimped out pieces of dogshit. I have an old panasonic showstopper that works great, and my wife loves it. We just got an HDTV and I picked up a SA8000HD DVR from the cable company.
      The first thing my wife says after I show her how to use it is, "where is the skip forward button?".

      Her next question, "why does it keep showing channels we don't get?".

      Her third question, "Why can't we just use the showstopper?".

      So I'm trying to explain how now that we have this new improved HDTV we need a newer DVR that records at the higher resolution levels and so on. She's just shaking her head not understanding why the new stuff can't even do what the old stuff could do.

      Thats what is so damn frustrating about this whole DRM issue. Its like the policies are being made by a bunch of people that never knew any better, so they think what they're getting now is great. If you made them sit down and experience the way things should be, and then experience it the way the corporations want you to experience it, I think they're positions might be drastically different. If I just tried to explain the difference between what it could be and what corporations want it to be, she won't get it, but if she experiences it...

      --
      Casca
    7. Re:Cable by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      no upfront hardware costs... so the DVD recorder was free then?

      (just teasing) Sounds like you've got a pretty cool setup. The digital cable integration is a postive (dual tuners, no IR blaster needed)

      The cable company's DVR's i'm sure are servicable, but up until recently I'd rather (and do) have a TiVo... but the TiVo has it's own limitations/annoyances tha make me build my own PVR in addition to the TiVo.

      I want more control over my PVR/recorded content than TiVo/cable companys will allow (in general).

      What was my point again?

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  6. In the same boat by Serapth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been asking the exact same question... without much luck

    The way I understand it, DVI is encrypted, so your odds of finding anything in that regard are very low. Composit seems to be your best chance, but as of yet, I havent seen an affordable video capture card.

    ATI however, does make a HDTV card, but the problem with it is it only does broadcast free to air type HD, which is basically non existant in my area. If you are in New York, or a similar area, it may be feasible. The ATI card was about 400$ and included an antenna.

    Other then that, I think your SOL. Expressvu, rumour has it, is coming out with a 600 HDTV/PVR next year, but Ill believe it when I see it. Also, due to storage requirements, it will only record something in the neighbourhood of 8 hours at HD resolutions.

    1. RE: In the same boat by Fireye · · Score: 4, Informative

      DVI is not encrypted. There IS an extension to dvi, known as HDCP, which stands for High Deffinition Copy Protocol. I don't think there are any ways to decrypt HDCP, at least, that I know of.

      Just FYI, you can find a listing of HDTV broadcast stations in your area with: CheckHD

    2. Re: In the same boat by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link... sadly, its US only. Canada was supposed to be HDTV everywhere by 2006, but I think that dates been pushed back by the slow rate of adoption.

      As to DVI, your right, my mistake, DVI is not encrypted ( although it is compressed ), its HDMI, which is replacing DVI on newer HDTV's. So far as I know, HDMI = dvi + sound + encryption.

    3. Re: In the same boat by Fireye · · Score: 1

      HDMI.org doesn't mention any encryption, except for a fee (in the manufacturer faq) for licensing. I'm sure you could encrypt over HDMI, but I do not believe it's part of the standard. Soooo, as I see it:
      HDMI = DVI + Sound

    4. Re: In the same boat by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Well, unfortunatly, HDMI.org requires you to register to get the specifications, which is kinda cheese... anyways...

      Does HDMI provide a secure interface? While no security system is one hundred percent secure, HDMI, when used in combination with HDCP, provides an audio/video interface that meets the security requirements of content providers and systems operators.

      Im not really sure how to read that... is that saying that HDMI is compatible with HDCP, or that HDMI implements HDCP?

    5. Re: In the same boat by Fireye · · Score: 1

      I believe it means it's compatible. Sorry for not catching that! Anyway, I haven't seen any tv advertised as HDMI+HDCP, so it's either there and they aren't mentioning it, or they haven't implemented it yet.

    6. Re: In the same boat by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Well, if you think about it, nobody would want to advertise it. HDCP has absolutely ZERO advantage to the end consumer, and frankly limits their ability... that doesnt exactly make for good advertisement :)

      I have a feeling this is where the RIAA and MPAA are going to try to fight piracy. It leads into DRM products pretty well, but if you seal out the origional device/transmission from being copied, you are all but screwed of trying to make stand alone copies ( sorta why this whole thread exists, they make it hard enough now ).

      It would go a long way towards explaining why older PVR devices, such as Dishnets HD PVR have been pulled from the market. They had the ability to copy out via firewire, un-encrypted. The more ways they can close off access, the harder is is for people to copy. However, for that to be true, it basically means that device makers are being mandated to support the new interfaces, but that wouldnt shock me in the slightest.

    7. Re: In the same boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely incorrect. All HDMI interfaces support HDCP. There were some old (pre 2001) plasma's which had DVI without HDCP, but only a few.

      HDCP itself is quite weak encryption (there have been several published papers) but don't expect to see it cracked anytime soon due to the need for dedicated hardware. The vendors selling HDCP chips (Silicon Image) require you to sign a licensing agreement before you get them, and of course there is the DMCA.

      I think the original poster is a little confused. There are no HDTV capture devices that work on DVI or component inputs for good reason. They are full bandwidth uncompressed HDTV and compressing them in real time is no trivial task.

      www.avsforum.com is a much better source of info on this topic that /.

    8. Re: In the same boat by PorkNutz · · Score: 0

      Actually HDCP stands for High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection. It can be implemented over DVI, HDMI, Firewire or any other high-bandwidth pipe.

    9. Re: In the same boat by dvd_tude · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you are mistaken.

      HDCP can be applied to either DVI or HDCP. It is a standard on its own.

      As a practical matter, DVI-capable HD set-tops that are hooked to a "pay" source have latent HDCP, or if they don't have HDCP they (rude surprise) downgrade the output of protected source to 480p. This was a needed compromise to prevent Hollywood from having a conniption over the raw uncompressed digital output.

      Going forward, HDMI ready transmitters and receivers all include HDCP, even though it's not mandatory (but is strongly recommended) by the HDMI spec. For your trouble, you get a smaller connector and 8 channels of audio over the same skinny wire. HDMI is backwards and forwards compatable with DVI within the DTV range of picture formats.

    10. Re: In the same boat by dvd_tude · · Score: 1

      Make that "applied to either DVI or HDMI".

  7. Your Only Hope... by VE3ECM · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...is to wait and see if ATI gets considerable pressure to release a working Linux driver for it's HD-Wonder...

    That's a cheap, well-built solution that would suit your needs. Linux users really need to try harder to force ATI to create a small team for creating these drivers.

    1. Re:Your Only Hope... by dragon_imp · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have an encoder card that does it in hardware. For regular cable, I'm using Hauppauge PVR-250's and getting fantastic results. I could hardly watch a VCR-recorded show the other day -- much poorer quality (home VCR resolution is about 1/2 that of the normal TV's capability).

      My wife complained about the time and noise of fast-scanning through commercials. Much easier to just click on a "progress bar" in SageTV.

      She said that she was "spoiled." Must be time for a new computer toy.

    2. Re:Your Only Hope... by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

      the HDTV wonder isn't any better than the current linux solution that's already out there... both do (currently) OTA DTV only...

      Throw in the fact the ATI HDTV doesn't play well with any other cards except ATI, well they can keep it windoze only. =)

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  8. Bandwidth. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the reasons this is so expensive is that the amount of data coming in from an uncompressed source (like component cables or DVI) is immense. This is why the pcHDTV card only accepts compressed broadcast streams: it captures the already encoded video stream. A device that can capture raw video would have to compress it before it can be feed to the computer.

    1. Re:Bandwidth. by csp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true. DVS sell capture cards for uncompressed HDTV, which work with standard PCI slots and give you the raw video signal (at just over 1 gigabit per second). Not cheap - we paid $16k for ours, although they've gone down since then - but definitely possible.

      We use it for uncompressed HDTV video conferencing on Linux... The capture card isn't the expensive part :-(

    2. Re:Bandwidth. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I only see 64bit pci cards for hdtv and normal pci cards for normal tv on their site.
      Understandable, because your standart pci peaks at about 110-120MB/s, so its not even theoretically possible.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Bandwidth. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It's close. 120 MByte/sec is 0.96 Gbit/sec.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:Bandwidth. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

      "Standard" PCI has 1056Mbps of bandwith. According to the site he mentioned, they are using a machine that has a 64 bit bus at 66MHz, which yields 4224Mbps of bandwidth. So you'll need to spend at least $200 for a motherboard that can hold your $16k capture card. :^)

    5. Re:Bandwidth. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      But the nominal speed of pci is only reachable if you have only one device and can do maximum burst lenght, a thing that will never happen in the shared pci bus of a normal pc.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:Bandwidth. by csp · · Score: 1

      Sorry - my mistake. We have an HDstation OEM which is 64 bit PCI, but can run at either 33MHz or 66MHz. Standard PCI comes in many variants :)

    7. Re:Bandwidth. by Ogerman · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the reasons this is so expensive is that the amount of data coming in from an uncompressed source (like component cables or DVI) is immense.

      The video signal commonly referred to as "component" and having the 3 RCA connectors (Y,Pb,Pr) is analog, not digital. I can't tell you how many people are confused about this. (: Other than bandwidth and timing formats, it's not that much different than S-video, which is also a type of component signal and is sometimes written as (Y,Pb+Pr) or (Y,C).

      So if you're trying to bring an HDTV analog component source into your computer, you need some pretty darn fast and accurate analog to digital convertors before you even worry about re-compressing the digital signal. Not cheap.. yet! (Remember how much NTSC composite capture devices used to cost?)

    8. Re:Bandwidth. by csp · · Score: 1

      server motherboards have multiple PCI busses. Put the capture card in one, the gigabit ethernet or disk on the other...

    9. Re:Bandwidth. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Thats clear. But i also think that the notation of "hdtv card for pc" and "standart pci" should be a hint that its about non-servers.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    10. Re:Bandwidth. by nokiator · · Score: 1

      Good point. Even if the bandwidth problem is solved using 64-bit PCI, PCI-X or PCI-Express, you still have the problem of writing the data to a hard disk fast enough. Uncompressed 1080i signal transmits more than 60 million pixels worth of information every second. Even assuming a minimalistic 8-bits of color information per pixel, you have to write more than 60MB/s into the hard disks. This is a challange for most standard hard drives, so you would need some type of a RAID system to keep up. Even if you could write the data fast enough, you accumulate data at an alarming rate. At 60MB/s, you would generate 3.6GB per minute or about 216GB of data per hour of uncompressed HDTV signal with minimal color resolution. The only feasible solution to this problem would be to use a real-time MPEG2 encoder on the capture card that can reduce the data stream to somewhere around 20Mb/s. I am not aware of any commercially available such chips, though there is at least a couple of proprietary real time encoders used in JVC (720P) and Sony (1080i) HD camcorders.

    11. Re:Bandwidth. by nokiator · · Score: 1

      Three instances of a 62Msps A/D converter like the National ADC12L063 wouldbe sufficient to sample component video inputs. Feed these to an FPGA that sits on a 64-bit PCI or PCI-X card, and you have yourself a nice uncompressed HDTV capture card. For more enterprising (and cost sensitive) HW hackers, the ultimate geeky solution would be to use a Gigabit Ethernet PHY as a A/D front ent.

    12. Re:Bandwidth. by scheme · · Score: 1
      server motherboards have multiple PCI busses. Put the capture card in one, the gigabit ethernet or disk on the other...

      If you have a server board with multiple PCI buses then some of those buses are probably PCI-X 133Mhz or at the very least PCI 64bit/66Mhz slots with gets rid of the 32bit/33Mhz PCI bandwidth problems entirely.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    13. Re:Bandwidth. by sxpert · · Score: 1

      thanks for pointing this device... the datasheet will go in my library, to accompany the ones for the SDI stuff
      digikey will soon see my money sent their way...

  9. HDTV encoder cards by dragon_imp · · Score: 1

    So far, I haven't found any either that are designed for cable systems. From what I've read, the cards on the market now are designed for off-the-air recording. The problem seems to be a lack of a universal standard for HDTV encoding on the cable systems.

    For now, I'm extremely satisfied with my home made HTPC and non-HDTV cable broadcasts. I've retired my VCRs over quality, recording convenience and playback convenience issues. You can see my home theater PC on my site.

    1. Re:HDTV encoder cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your confusing "Digital Cable" with HDTV.

      HDTV is a standard like TCP/IP is a standard. It's designed to break the monopolies on set-top boxes that cable/sattalite companies have generated by using propriatory signals.

      "Digital Cable" is like "networking". They just make up variations of MPEG2 signals that only work with certain set top boxes.

      The HDTV standards break this.

      What the FCC wants is a unified way of doing this. That way you can now buy HDTV tv sets that use a tuner that can be hooked up to any HDTV cable broadcast, although the cable companies still pressure you to rent cable set top boxes for "value added" features like Pay Per View.

      To combat that FCC has made it mandatory that all HDTV sets over 3000 dollars or so come with a PCMCIA type slot. IN that slot you get a "cable card" for free from your cable company that can be used to decode the anti-theft encryption stuff.

      This is mandated by FCC law. You cable company HAS TO SUPPORT THE CABLE CARD.

      Now the reason that you don't see many HDTV cards is because there isn't enough demand yet.

      This generation of cards like the Linux PCHDTV only support over the air broadcasts because the cable card is something brand new.

      Eventually you should be able to buy a cable card enabled HDTV tuner for your computer that you can use to receive cable broadcasts without the set top box.

      I actually e-mailed the Linux-based PcHDTV folks about the cable card, and it's something they are very interested in but it's nothing that they can deal with at the time.

      Buy definition this is going to fuck with Linux because the FCC flag and such is going to have to be embedded in the firmware to disable you from recording any flag-enabled broadcasts. Which in Linux with open source drivers you simply will never be able to legally watch certain shows without some sort DRM enable software.

      The FCC did good because they required a standard signal protocol that generic HDTV tuners can recieve.

      The FCC did good because they required "cable card" support for all customers that don't want to pay for a set top box.

      The FCC did bad because they required the anti-record flag to be supported by all new hardware being sold.

      Remember that TV tuners don't differ much from the tuners you buy for the computer. The difference is that the turner in your TV takes the signals and encodes it into something that your TV can use, and the tuner in your computer card turns it into something that can be transmitted over the PCI buss.

      For example for Picture in Picture support in my MythTV setup requires 2 tuner cards (which I have). Also TV's with PiP support have 2 tuners, also.

    2. Re:HDTV encoder cards by thisisimpossible · · Score: 1

      Actually the cable card is not free. it comes with an install fee (self install is not allowed) and a monthly fee usually in the $3-$6 range.

  10. Was on /. before by rustamb · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html

    1. Re:Was on /. before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you even read the guy's question? He's not looking for a card to capture OTA ATSC, he wants something that will capture from his DBS STB via DVI, RGB, etc.

  11. Samsung SIR-T165 by Reeses · · Score: 5, Informative

    The samsung SIR-T165 can capture OTA HD broadcasts. It has firewire out ports.

    I've hooked it up to my Mac, with a piece of sofware called VirtualDVHS and captured HD streams off of the device.

    HD Streams gobble disk space like you wouldn't believe.

    I think they may even have made a model that does satellite feeds also, with firewire ports, but you'd have to check around, and maybe hit ebay.

    --
    Reeses
    1. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got this same setup.

      The SIR-T165 has DVI into my projector, and firewire into a mac
      for recording/playback. There are a couple of applescripts out
      there that let set up recordings using the iCal calendar app. I've only done that once when I wasn't going to be home for ABC's HD broadcast of "FOTR."

      Visit the AVSForum for all things cool in AV.

      The VirtualDVHS app for the mac is only supposed to be a demonstration of how to use the firewire SDK, but works darn well. Because of my pure-digital setup, I want to
      figure out how I can losslessly transform the mpeg2 stream of a DVD into an ATSC transport stream, so that I can stream DVD's (or any other VideoLAN content) through firewire to my setup. (VideoLAN to a unix pipe, and VirtualDVHS reading the unix pipe almost works!).

    2. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      On the same note, I have a modified version of VirtualDVHS (sans source, I deleted it all accidentally, oops) that has fast forward and rewind support. Although I captured the commands off a Mitsubishi HDTV (Mits sets with tuners have built-in FireWire - can't beat it), it should work with the 165. You can find it here.

      (I swear on my future children and a sacred monkey that I'll be working on it again soon! Updates are good...)

      --
      this is my sig
    3. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by numbski · · Score: 1

      Hey! I have that model, and here's no firewire out.

      You have a link to someone that sells the upgrade kit, or a link to one that has them?

      You're on DirecTV right?

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    4. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by numbski · · Score: 1

      I forgot! Our T165 burned out, and DirecTV charged us $150 to get a replacement, and sent us a TS-360. That's why there's no firewire.

      I guess try to sell this one on ebay and get a T-165 again, huh?

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    5. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by CompleteMoron · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that Samsung ever made a DirecTV decoder box with a firewire port. That's just not inline with their thinking. I do remember seeing a DBS model for the Euro market which had firewire and the OTA decoder has firewire but that's about it.

    6. Re:Samsung SIR-T165 by numbski · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. We had an SIR-TS160.

      I wish I could get the two side-by-side though. I would be surprised if the two weren't similar enough to where the firewire port couldn't be added.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  12. You should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your best bet right now (and probably forever) is to get one of the HD digital tuners that's available ASAP, because after the INDUCE act kicks in, they'll all have that nasty broadcast flag thingie. And then (not sure of the costs once HD proliferates) just get a regular ol' input card with component or VGA or DVI inputs or whatever. Basically, you'll have two separate cards if you want a full-featured HDTV capable PVR box.

    1. Re:You should by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      just get a regular ol' input card with component or VGA or DVI inputs or whatever.

      Yeah, that'll do it. Now, even if I could find one of those cards, I'd need to go drop three grand on a RAID array that could somehow handle the 1.5Gbps raw data rate coming off of that card. Either that or build a honkin' system to compress it in real time.

      I'm going to venture a guess that this won't be a viable sub-$1000 solution for several more years.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. Never mind about the chip by VeneficusAcerbus · · Score: 2

    Never mind about the VIA chip. It's the VT1625 and it's an encoder chip, so that won't help you unless you're connecting your computer to your HDTV.

  14. Hwho is your provider? by huber · · Score: 1

    Adelphia offers the scientific Atlanta 8000HD for $8 a month. Works very well too.

  15. Never, ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have I had the misfortune to see such a mess of un-explained acronyms. WTF?

    1. Re:Never, ever... by surfinbox · · Score: 1

      Your post is tongue-in-cheek, but honestly having tried to uncork the lingo of HDTV hardware hacking, you really do run into a lot of acronyms that take you nowhere if you can't find the glossary. Techies would benefit from remembering that their docs need to speak to someone who's learning the skill being describe, not proofing it.

  16. ATI has a HDTV card !!! by newnovice · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?p roduct_code=314569&pfp=cat3 It is 150$ after rebate, i do not know if you are going to build a PVR, if yes. this is what you want to be able to record HDTV on your PC and watch it back on the TV using Win MCE 2005, MythTV, FreeVo, and some more PVR software !!!!

    1. Re:ATI has a HDTV card !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:ATI has a HDTV card !!! by newnovice · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know if it has Hardware Encoders or Decoders like the PVR 250 and 350, and if it works with MCE and other PVR OS's and packages: MythTV, Freev ....and stuff ???

  17. Not anytime soon by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem with recording HDTV is that you have to generate a MPEG2 stream from the component or DVI signal. Real-time encoding of HDTV signals takes vastly more work than encoding NTSC signals, so you can't buy a consumer-priced card that does it.

    Fortunately, HDTV is broadcast as a MPEG2 stream to begin with (with additional error correction). So you can get a tuner card that simply saves the raw data that is broadcast. This works great for over-the-air signals. For satellite and cable, you need to get to the signal after it's been unencrypted, but before it's been decoded. Your two options are to use a decoder with firewire output, or to put your recorder into the decoder box (like TiVo does).

    1. Re:Not anytime soon by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      Ok this is what really gets me. OTA broadcasts are just mpeg2 and their are a handful of cards that allow you to do it. But for satellite you will need to set the system you need to decrypt the signal and then save it before being decoded. What do you mean by decoded, that is the MPEG-2 stream being played ? Now I don't get the firewire thing, what is the whole firewire buisness, do you just suck some of the hdtv broadcast out of the box using firewire and save that somwhere ?? thanks take care -A

    2. Re:Not anytime soon by crow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, the whole thing is rather confusing until you understand exactly what all is going on.

      Regular analog TV, whether broadcast NTSC/PAL/SECAM, older analog cable (for me, channels under 100), or regular VHS tapes, is a signal that is essentially fed directly to the electron beam in your traditional TV. There is some funky electronics magic going on, but essentially, each dot in each frame corresponds to a specific fraction of a millisecond of the signal. (Some analog cable channels are scrambled, and decoder boxes will correct the mangled signal. There was a project, fscktv, to do this with a video card, but I never saw it actually work.)

      To record an analog signal, you have two important steps. First, you need a TV tuner card that digitizes the signal. Second, you need to compress the video into something managable, such as MPEG-2. The PVR-250 cards are popular because they do both steps.

      Digital broadcast TV is simpler. You just need to extract the digital information from the broadcast, much like a modem gets the digital information encoded on a voice phone line. With digital broadcasts, the process of compressing the data is done by the broadcaster, so you don't need any extra work to get a MPEG-2 stream.

      Satellite and digital cable, whether HDTV or regular resolution, are sent as MPEG-2 streams, but the problem is that they are selling access to the channels, so they usually encrypt the streams. They assume you'll use their decoder boxes that do two things. First, they unencrypt the stream. Then they decode the stream. By "decode," I mean play the MPEG stream. That means you're back to an analog signal, whether you're using composite, s-video, or component outputs. Even if you use DVI or HDMI, which are digital, it's a decoded signal, not the MPEG stream.

      So to record digital cable or satellite broadcasts, you have to either re-encode the signal, which simply isn't feasible right now for HDTV, or you have to somehow get the signal before it's decoded. If your PVR is integrated with your cable or satellite box, it can get the original MPEG stream (which is how DirectTiVo works). The only other option is that some digital cable and satellite boxes have a firewire port that you can connect to your computer, where they send the MPEG stream. MythTV doesn't support that yet, but someone was working on it a while ago.

      In theory, you can get a smart card from your cable company that plugs into devices with digital tuners, which allows them to unencrypt channels that you are subscribed to. Some of the more expensive HDTVs accept them so you can use them without a cable box. There's nothing really stopping someone from building a card for your computer that uses the same card.

    3. Re:Not anytime soon by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying it up. Now I understand better. It will be a wicked day when we get HDTV cards to interface to our tvs. I also am making my own MythTV box using a PVR 250. Will not go HDTv for some time until we figure out what all the humdrum is about but yeah seriously this write up that you have here is pretty cool. Very informative and maybe someday we can get some sort of interface between a MythTV box and a cable/satellite HDTV box that will allow us to control channels and also save the HDTV stream. thanks so much take care PS I once downloaded a HDTV mpeg2 stream ( about 10 seconds ) and tried playing it on my computer and it was slow ( my cpu usage was at 100%) very choppy and also the sound was of sync. I can understand that HDTV sends out a lot of data and wether or not a normal computer can handle it. Thanks take care Good luck being Mayor :)

    4. Re:Not anytime soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cable card is something that cable companies are required to provide for, but I don't know of any TV tuners that would take a cable card.

      Pretty much standard PCMCIA type card, though.

  18. My research by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several months ago i spent time researching an HTPC (Home Theater PC) with the intent to have it do everything from HDTV, XM Radio, DVD Player, Music box w/ iTunes, etc.

    From my research, specifically, into HDTV, I discovered that all the cards only will decipher over the air (yes, with an antenna) HDTV signals and not HDTV from a cable or satelite provider. Highly disappointing. While I do live in the NYC area, I could have gotten an antenna and received NBC, CBS, ABC and Fox all in HDTV over the air, I could not receive HBO, Discovery HD, etc. Because of this current limitation, I temporarily gave up on the HTPC and am waiting for more reasonable resources.

    Oh, and something else I found, the FCC has declared that all cable providers MUST have firewire interfaces on their decoder devices as of May 2004. This would mean you could connect a PC to your cable HD converter in order to record programs, but it does not mean that once the programs are on your PC, you will be able to access them from anything other than your cable box.

    1. Re:My research by maggard · · Score: 1
      isa-kuruption posted on Thursday November 18, 2004 @10:20AM:
      Oh, and something else I found, the FCC has declared that all cable providers MUST have firewire interfaces on their decoder devices as of May 2004.
      Yeah, well, that time-machine you're posting through seems a little flaky so we'll hold off on tossing those universally available decoders with Firewire through 'till the wormhole event horizon has stabilized...

      In the meantime: Bush, Red Sox, and Google.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    2. Re:My research by strangel · · Score: 1

      I have the FusionHDTV3 card you're speaking of. It works great for both over-the-air and QAM in-the-clear broadcasts, but doesn't solve the original problem of being able to hook up a set top box.
      The reason for the disclaimer on the QAM ability is because earlier revisions of the card had many problems decoding QAM. The newest versions seem to work pretty flawlessly from what I've seen, as long as you have quality cable all the way to the card - QAM256 is so tightly compressed that it's especially sensitive to signal loss.

    3. Re:My research by sxpert · · Score: 1

      thing is, nothing says the video that is output by said firewire port has to be non-encrypted, recently a friend found out that the device had "5C content protection" enabled on the firewire port at all times... hardly useable

  19. $6.95/mo w/ TimeWarner by al701 · · Score: 1

    I hate to say anything good about TimeWarner, but for $6.95/mo they have given me their HD DVR. Works pretty well. Can record 2 channels at once, and supports HD recording as well.

    I tried getting a "Media Center" type device together. El Gato has a decent offering on the Mac, but short of that, there isn't much out there. I don't mind not owning the equipment cause it will probably be outdated when IPTV comes. For the price, it can't be beat.

  20. THE linux HDTV card by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    can be found here. It also gets regular TV signals. Dunno if it does HD over cable or not, but if you want linux support, this is It.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:THE linux HDTV card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno if it does HD over cable or not

      It does not.

    2. Re:THE linux HDTV card by kelnos · · Score: 1

      Did you even *read* the guy's post? I mean, I know a lot of people don't read the articles, and that's lame enough, but not even reading the *post*?

      "The pchdtv card looks nice but it's RF input only for HiDef content, and only supports OTA at this point."

      He knows about the pchdtv card, but would rather something with more features, and something that does cable.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    3. Re:THE linux HDTV card by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    4. Re:THE linux HDTV card by kelnos · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. Seriously though... While there are plenty of people who don't RTFA (which is somewhat understandable in some cases, what with the /. effect and all), it's just pathetic to post without reading Slashdot's article abstract. C'mon, that's just sad. Be ashamed, be very ashamed. ^_~

      At any rate, no, I'm not new here. This guy is ^_^.

      (Personally, I think the "you're new here, aren't you?" joke is getting pretty stale.)

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  21. sorry... here's what i got by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless i've totally missed it... there's not a good way to get HDTV content via cable onto the PC.

    There's the firewire pull content/control from the hdtv box. The mac folks seem to have the easiest time with this...

    There's OTA terrestial DTV cards (like the linux hdtv card mentioned, and ati's HDTV wonder)

    There's a QAM capable card out there Fusion III QAM HDTV Tuner Card(no idea on linux drivers), but that's only useful if your cable company does NOT encrypt their QAM signal...

    Ideally, IMHO... we need some sort of PCI CableCard docking device, but I doubt our content controlling masters will allow that. Although, the more CableCard ready HDTV sets I see, gives me hope that someone will take the chocolate and peanutbutter and come up with PC HDTV PVR reeces peanut butter cups...

    a PCI card that was CableCard ready would allow legitimate digital cable subscribers to watch digital cable on their PC/etc.

    You can get HD PBS for free with FTA DBA satellite cards.

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:sorry... here's what i got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pcHDTV 3000 is sold out right now and doesn't do Dolby sound, just stereo.

      Hauppauge's HDTV card claims QAM support. But their Linux support is nil for that card.

      The most universal solution is a cable box with firewire video out. You're at the mercy of the content providers as far as recordability though.

    2. Re:sorry... here's what i got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      After spending lots of time reading the CableCard specifications in particular the sections on encryption it seems unlikely that the CableCard group would license the decryption engine to a company wanting to make a PC based cable card system. They make it clear that the encryption part needs a license to implement. So anyone wanting to make a card based around the open specifications will probably get socked with some suit based on the patents this group has attained for the cablecard.

      To let you know the cablecard is similar to pcmcia type interface with embedded encryption, and there are two types of keys exchanged. One is a static key and the other is a dynamic key. The cable card though will only turn on encryption if the incoming signal is 'broadcast protected'. All other signals should proceed through without requiring any key passing.

      Now for consumers, it would be pretty hard to do the encryption exchange yourself. Though anything is possible with enough time. Hopefully broadcasters won't enable broadcast protection on all the content. Maybe they'll just do it for Pay-per-View

    3. Re:sorry... here's what i got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this is accurate.

      The DTV receiver card usually has nothing to do with sound output. It just receives the ATSC transport stream, with MPEG2 video data and AC3 audio data. It's pre-encoded as DD5.1, so it's up to the output software and audio hardware to handle the DD.

      It's very similar to DVD playback. The DVD has pre-encoded DD5.1 or DTS audio. The player just needs to pass the encoded data stream out the SPDIF connector of the audio card. No need for any complex encoding or exotic hardware. It's just pass through.

      This is what my FusionHDTV card does in Windows today.

    4. Re:sorry... here's what i got by Quickening · · Score: 1
      darn - can't comment and raise your score at the same time. I think you're heading in the right direction here.

      In fact many "pc based" cablecards with linux drivers already exist! They're just not available to consumers as such. I base this on the fact that many high-end hdtv's (like the RCA Scenium) offer internet access and cablecard slots. All of these sets run embedded linux! If you dig deep enough on the web, you will find SDK's and HDK's (Under NDA's!) with all these components. Then at least there is hope that some day in some place w/o IP encumbrances, these devices will be reverse engineered.

      --
      tcboo
    5. Re:sorry... here's what i got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and the pcHDTV card only has a stereo out, no SPDIF, no other fancy stuff.

  22. Uh, no. Sorry. by fellini8.5 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This comes up on AVSForum all the time. In a nutshell: the HDTV you get over-the-air, that gets beamed to your satellite box, or zapped to your cable box is a compressed transport stream that fits in the same bandwidth as an old-fashioned analog signal.

    The satellite/cable box then decodes that stream to produce the full HDTV-resolution signal, that gets delivered to your monitor (either via analog component or digital DVI/HDMI).

    That full-resolution bandwidth required to re-digitize/re-encode the full bandwidth signal to a recordable transport stream is currently beyond the capabilities of any pc-based solution under that $2000 price-point.

    There are only two close-to-usable solutions so far: IEEE-1394 keeps it's delivery from device to device as the compressed transport stream. The problem being that most transport streams from these devices are encrypted. Some aren't. You might get lucky. The other is to find a tuner tuner card that can decode the QAM signals that cable companies use. The problem being again, that most cable companies encrypt those signals (at least those you can't get over-the-air anyhow).

    Check back in about five years. :)

    --
    Kineska: Cinema, soapbox, music & musings
  23. How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Introducing Free* HDTV on your PC

    HDTV is the technology of the future. It offers much higher resolution and clarity than analog TV and over twice the resolution of DVDs. The FCC has mandated that Digital TV (DTV) replace analog TV. Broadcasters in the USA are well on their way to achieving this objective:

    * Over 50% of TV shows and growing are currently broadcast in HDTV
    * Over 80% of USA households get five or more DTV channels

    Until now, a special TV costing in excess of $ 1000. was required to receive HDTV (High Definition Television) signals. Thanks to the HDTV WONDER(TM), the PC is ready to become the home's first HDTV device. Now you can enjoy crystal clear HDTV broadcasts on your current PC monitor at a very affordable price.

    The HDTV WONDER(TM) is a PCI card for analog TV, free-to-air digital TV (DTV: SDTV and EDTV), and full quality free-to-air HDTV reception. It offers personal video recorder capabilities, with the controls to watch, pause and record all forms of TV to your system's hard disk, or to CD's and DVD's. In addition to analog cable support, the HDTV WONDER(TM) with an HDTV antenna allows consumers to experience free-to-air HDTV broadcasts without having to subscribe to potentially expensive cable or satellite service charges.

    Treat yourself to the fantastic image quality of HDTV on your PC today with the economical HDTV WONDER(TM) and expand your digital universe.

    1. Re:How about this? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Treat yourself to unending reinstalls of the software is more like it. And don't forget you need an ATI DX9 capable card. And it only gets OTA, no cable, no satellite. And it records in a proprietary format, not the transport stream. Oh, and don't try this with a AllInWonder graphics card - these specialty, high end graphics cards from ATI don't play nice together.

      It works, once you get it running, but it isn't what I'd call a "fun" weekend(or full-summer-break) project.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  24. acronymonious much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The DDA in USA has a UDFF AGBG standard that might UTFF when the FCC allows XYZ in 2005, _IF_, that is, the USDHS doesnt outlaw it due to new NCIC regs that will effect the UDFF and UFDDA of IOPPUOIN, otherwise they will have to create a new agency to monitor such HDDTV bandwidth (similar to the way they currently handle UHF and VHF)

    but then again , everybody knows that

    1. Re:acronymonious much? by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 2, Funny

      The DDA in USA has a UDFF AGBG standard that might UTFF when the FCC allows XYZ in 2005, _IF_, that is, the USDHS doesnt outlaw it due to new NCIC regs that will effect the UDFF and UFDDA of IOPPUOIN, otherwise they will have to create a new agency to monitor such HDDTV bandwidth (similar to the way they currently handle UHF and VHF) but then again , everybody knows that


      WTF?

  25. A total hack? by CoffeeBreath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's an idle thought I had. Probably more effort than it's worth, but an interesting exercise...

    Devise a circuit to take a 720p component signal, and convert it to 4 s-video feeds, one for each quadrant of the raster (top-left, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-right).

    Feed these to 4 standard def mpeg2 capture cards (PVR250, etc.).

    Do some mpeg processing magic to combine the 4 captures into one stream, handling frame synchronization and sound from one of the cards.

    I have NO idea if such a circuit is possible, and I don't know enough about mpeg2 to even suggest potential algorithms.

    I'll let those with a little more clue dismiss the idea or generate their own little light bulbs and start a project...

    Steve (CoffeeBreath!)

    --
    -- If you don't understand it, blame it!
    1. Re:A total hack? by Fireye · · Score: 1

      Maybe, and only maybe, might that work if you synched the b-frames. I doubt it's possible with any sort of good quality output.

  26. Re:Sorry... by swordboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree.

    But I would also like to point out that there is a *huge* market for a "wife proof" AV solution.

    Of course, when I say "wife proof", I mean "non techie" proof. The former certainly isn't politically correct. I realize that. However, in my case, it is what I'm seeking.

    Basically, the whole concept of multiple sources and multiple remotes has failed miserably. It is too wonderfully complicated. We shouldn't require a flow chart to operate the AV equipment. Here's what we need:

    1) A communication method for devices that does not rely on line of sight. My programmable Sony IR remote works great except for those cases when the sun is setting and interrupts a portion of a macro, etc. Then the whole system needs a technician.

    2) Discrete on and off codes for this system. See problem #1.

    3) No more AV component switching. Just daisy chain all the damn stuff and give each device a priority. If I want to watch a DVD, then I turn on the DVD player which has priority over television content. All devices recognize this priority and do their own switching accordingly. Additionally, a single box that does everything (TV, PVR, DVD and Media) would simplify greatly. I'm open for realistic alternatives.

    4) A friggin' industry standard. If everyone wasn't trying to make a buck for themselves, we'd be light years ahead.

    What am I missing here?

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  27. Not cheap? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait a year, and it'll be cheap. If you can't wait a year, then it's worth it to spend the money now.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Not cheap? by ddelrio · · Score: 1

      I think that solutions now don't have to worry about the broadcast flag--but, next year, I think that could present a problem.

    2. Re:Not cheap? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      The laws are chaning. In a year, it will be illegal to sell a device that does not block out certain broadcastss.

      But if you buy it now, it is legal and it will still be legal to own and use it after that year.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Not cheap? by sxpert · · Score: 1

      it may be illegal to SELL such a device. however... what prevents you from building one ?

    4. Re:Not cheap? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      The fact that they do not insist that the device come in a nice package.

      In other words, to build one you need the right conversion card and that card itself is considered such a device and would be illegal to sell.

      What, you think they are going to outlaw PDR but not allow the chips neccesary to make the PDR?

      It is even going to be illegal to buy a device and hack it's programming to let you ignore the law.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Not cheap? by sxpert · · Score: 1

      not if you design the receiver/decoder board out of chips available at digikey...

    6. Re:Not cheap? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      That might be possible. But I am a software guy, not a hardware guy so I don't know.

      Best of all, if you were to say figure out how to do that...

      And publish it on the web so that tech savvy non-hardware people could copy your design...

      People like me would flock to your website and spread the word of your genius...

      increasing your reputation...

      and possibly helping you get a better job the next time you go looking for one...

      hint hint, hint hint.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  28. Comcast DVR by Domino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The new Comcast DVR (Motorola 6208) allows capturing
    of the HDTV stream through FireWire. It's a little tricky to get it working. I needed to patch libavc1394 to recognize the device correctly. Once that works you just need to send it a signal to start sending the stream (dvcont record) and then you can capture it with ddr1394. The Comcast DVR is $9.99 a month here, so that's a cheap way of capturing HDTV.

    1. Re:Comcast DVR by mozumder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Recording from Motorola 6208 through firewire works great on MacOSX as well. I would say its the easiest way to record high-def so far, and you get the ability to record premium channels - Matrix trilogy was on in High Def this past weekend on Cinemax. You can use iCal to automatically schedule recordings, and set the firewire interface to capture.

      Now, if only I had a MPEG transport stream player that doesn't disrupt audio that VLC player does on my PowerMac..

    2. Re:Comcast DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you describe your setup a little more? I'm liking what I hear so far.

    3. Re:Comcast DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I find more info about this "libavc1394 patch"?

    4. Re:Comcast DVR by Blethrow · · Score: 1


      Thanks for the info. To your knowledge, can I capture/use the transport stream in XP? I have an Apple 30" cinema display on a box running XP and I'd love to use it as an HDTV. Any recommendations?

    5. Re:Comcast DVR by Domino · · Score: 1

      Yes, AFAIK it works fine on Windows, you need to install some Panasonic AVC driver. Check out the AV forums on the web, they have detailed instructions.

  29. Follow up survey for Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, this may be a bit "tin foil hat" ish, but it seems like this particular story is regurgitation-bait.

    In other words, is anyone else thinking that this story is maybe a "test" to see if we've remembered this Slashvertisement, from only 10 days ago?

    Wouldn't that be just a fantastic little bit of marketing? Buy an ad with Slashdot, and a week later, over 65% remember your product!

    Or... If you advertise, one week later, we'll post an additional story for you to astroturf!

    Yeah, maybe that's a bit too paranoid. But when you know that your news source accepts ads as editorial content... Why not follow-ups?

    1. Re:Follow up survey for Slashvertisement? by JWW · · Score: 1

      No this story is not regurgitation-bait!!!

      The pcHDTV card cannot do what this person is asking!! I too am looking for an answer to the question of capturing HDTV signal as component, or DVI.

      The reason this question needs asking is that a card capable of doing this represnets an "analog hole" for HDTV (I know its not technically really analog anymore, but it would still be a hole). A card capable of component capture would be able to "intercept" HDTV in between the cable box and the TV. Now with this type of card the broadcast flage MIGHT be able to be ignored. There would be a number of non-infrining potential uses for this card. If the INDUCE act is not passed a composite capture card would, in my opinion, be legal. If it is passed a consumer composite capture card will never be made.

      Basically the poster's looking for a pvr-250 with composite input instead of svideo input, that encodes to HD formats. The answer is one doesn't exist yet (outside of professional equipment), but I really hope one is made.

    2. Re:Follow up survey for Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh great nobody remembered it.

      So now u gave them extra exposure.

      Thanks a lot.

  30. Gotta use a Mac for this one by rogerborn · · Score: 1



    Whyeryeu muckin around wid Linux or Windows for dis?

    Macs been capable in video and HDTV for a while now. Sweet and simple.

    You could have a new iMac or PowerMac with the money and hours you
    spend getting Windows, let alone Linux to do your chore for you.

    Why use anything else?

    Regards,
    Roger Born
    writing.borngraphics.com
    "Sorry. No Refunds."

    1. Re:Gotta use a Mac for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? so tell me how to record the Discovery HD channel from cable tv.

      Oh BTW, the cable company DISABLED the firewire port citing "protection from piracy", and most other cable boxes do NOT have firewire out.

      so tell me how your magical iMac can recieve those signals....

      Or how about from my sattelite reciever that does not havea firewire out?

      huh? magical iMac! how do you do it??

    2. Re:Gotta use a Mac for this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with 1394 enabled, it's still no good. All the channels are becoming encrypted with 5C. So the port might as well be switched off for all its worth :(

    3. Re:Gotta use a Mac for this one by rogerborn · · Score: 1

      Yes, PowerMacs can do it out of the box. I admit the G5 iMac might be a stretch unless you load up first on RAM.

      If you live where they block the firewire out, and you can't use the firewire off your high definition TV, you can use this:

      http://www.elgato.com/index.php?file=products_eyet v500

      BTW, get your box before June, 2005, or it will be DRM'd.

      If you must use a PC running Linux, I recommend MYTHtv in client mode for your PVR.

      (This input advice was by way of my son Chris, who uses both the Mac and Linux PVR system throughout his house.)

      Regards,
      Roger Born
      writing.borngraphics.com

  31. AccessDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    accessdtv. I've been using it for OTA broadcasts for a few years now. Granted, it's windows only (and that's unlikely to change), but you want this.

    www.accessdtv.com

    $200 for the card, and the software is really stable, so long as you don't have a dual-proc machine. It works with guidetv and has several tivo-like features, like recording all instances of a particular program no matter when they are.

    cable recording is tricky because cable HDTV is encrypted, usually, or requires more RAM than is on the card (this card has 64mb of RAM, my understanding of QAM256 is that it requires more than that to work properly). This card handles some QAM signals (and all VSB signals), but not all, so it may or may not work with your cable provider; that has to do more with the provider than the card, since different providers have different broadcast standards.

    As for playback, use either the enclosed software or theatertek (www.theatertek.com).

  32. RF...? by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Informative

    A HD capture card where the signal is then transmitted through RF?

    At first sounds like someone recording a symphony for an eventual release on SACD but then using their mom's answering machine to record the concert.

    I looked into it a bit more. The RF is actually a coaxial input. Which means it's the same exact input you'd get from, say, Comcast or your local cable provider. I don't have time to do a lot of research but isn't this what you're looking for? Is there something I'm missing?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:RF...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I've found out, everything but over-the-air (OTA) HDTV is encrypted and there are HUGE fines for decrypting it. So you'd have a hard time getting anything but OTA HDTV using that card.

    2. Re:RF...? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "I looked into it a bit more. The RF is actually a coaxial input. Which means it's the same exact input you'd get from, say, Comcast or your local cable provider. I don't have time to do a lot of research but isn't this what you're looking for? Is there something I'm missing?"

      Well, it is... and coax is just an input plug type. You can put many different signals over a coax line (witness analog cable, digital cable, cable internet, etc)

      It is true that for analog video, coax is the least deisirable way to hook up peripherals. (dvi, component, svideo/scart, composite woudl all be better than coax)

      But the coax is just a way to hook up the external antenna for it to receive DTV terrerstial broadcast signals (just like the good old days of uhf/vhf)...

      The digital cable/HD content etc is generally encrypted so even if it will physically connect via coax, you'll most likely get no love that way.

      *shrug*

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:RF...? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there something I'm missing?

      Yes, QAM decoding capabilities. The PCHDTV only decodes raw OTA HD broadcasts, and that's what it assumes is on the coax input. Unfortunately, the raw cable signals sent by cable companies over their coax use QAM encoding, as well as encryption for premium channels. And none of the digital HD cable boxes they give you output an OTA-style signal, they output DVI, component or something similar (which is, I guess, uncompressed HD video).

      So in short, your method doesn't work and cannot work.

  33. FusionHDTV? by richardtallent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Probably not exactly what you are looking for, but I have a FusionHDTV3 HD tuner card and I'm pretty happy with it.

    Pros:
    - Supports OTA ATSC, as well as some support for QAM64 and QAM256 (unencrypted only).
    - No broadcast flag hoops to jump through.
    - Recorded DTV programming is saved directly to disk as non-DRM'd MPEG-2 TP files (with full AC3 audio) that are easily converted to MPEG-2 PS format.
    - Recorded NTSC (analog) programming is saved in MPEG-2 PS that could be transcoded easily for DVD.
    - Image captures are saved as TIFF at full
    resolution.
    - Cheap: ~$150

    Caveats:
    - Output is only via your video card (overlay). Works with DVI, but tweaking video card resolutions to those that "HDTV-ready" televisions like might be a pain.
    - Only RF inputs, no component/DVI
    - No Linux support that I'm aware of
    - Works best with ATi RADEON-based video cards (can offload more CPU work)
    - The recording scheduler is buggy--like first year compsci student buggy.
    - Slow tech support response
    - Haven't tried using it with any of the popular HTPC apps yet
    - Needs a decently-strong HD signal (18db+), a Radio Shack amplifier

    1. Re:FusionHDTV? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      See also the Fusion HDTV tuner; similar capabilities.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:FusionHDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some support for the analog (not HDTV) capabilities of this card in Linux 2.6.9. I know because I own a FusionHDTV3 Gold card and sent Gerd Knorr a patch that makes it work. It is currently only avalable in the bytesex.org CVS. You must also apply the OS patches available on the same site. You must also configure the kernel for hotplug firmware loading to get the CVS code to compile. Eventually all this will show up in the standard kernel, but it is not there yet.

      I am starting to work on the digital section of the card. I will work on the over-the-air portion. I don't have digital cable so I will not be able to test that capability.

    3. Re:FusionHDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already a driver for the DVB version of the FusionHDTV card: http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~chrisp/DVICO-Linux/

      It should have some common ground with the ATSC version..

    4. Re:FusionHDTV? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I have that card, or a similar version of it.

      I was kind of disappointed with it. It does work.

      I am under the impression that you still get best results with an exterior antenna. I have an exterior antenna, but in my attic.

    5. Re:FusionHDTV? by iantri · · Score: 1
      Something about amplifiers (it isn't clear from your post what way you are using one, so for the sake of others):

      They do not improve a bad signal.

      The signal must be amplified at a point where the signal is still strong.

      If, for example, you have a situation like I do and your signal goes through 75 feet of crappy cable from your basement to your second floor putting an amplifer at the source (basement) will bring the signal level up to a point where it will survive the trip upstairs intact.

      Sticking an amplifier right before the input into the card will do nothing (well, not true: it will boost the signal level, however at that point there is nothing but noise to boost).

    6. Re:FusionHDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for that info.

      How do you convert the HD Mpeg2 Transport Stream to DVD compliant program stream? I've tried HDTV2Mpeg2 but it converts the Transport stream to an mpeg2 stream that is 1920x1080!

      Only Windvd 6 does not freak out on that mpeg2 stream.

  34. there is an OS X solution..... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i don't know if it was based on anything else, but on some Mac site i read about a piece of software that used the firewire output on the back of digital cable boxes. you just connected it to your machine with a normal firewire cable and the software could capture HDTV. supposedly if you have digital cable and your box does not have a FW port you can demand one (some FCC rule because some HDTV ready TVs have firewire inputs?). it seems only the HDTV channels would come through the port though, so on my system that's maybe a dozen channels if you had the full subscription package.

    i realize you wanted a linux solution, but if there is this OS X solution that require no additional hardware, and some shareware software... maybe there is a Linux version? or could be? sorry i forget where i saw it and the name, i just stumbled across it a few months back. i dont have FW cable box and i am awaiting the PVR cable boxes to upgrade so i'll cope till then.

    1. Re:there is an OS X solution..... by tetsuotheironman · · Score: 2, Informative

      here is article with link to software from OSXhints..
      http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20040 426151111599&query=HDTV
      It'll work if you have a HDTV box with firewire outputs given MPEG TS stream is unencrypted.. I was able to get it to work with my tuner from Time Warner.

    2. Re:there is an OS X solution..... by tetsuotheironman · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW.. did I mention you'll need some disk space :) ?

    3. Re:there is an OS X solution..... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      8.12 gigs an hour. But you can always strip out the ads with a tool like MPEG Streamclip. Then your only problem is how to archive the still-massive file. =)

      Also: shameless plug for my HDTV recording page and VirtualDVHS.

      --
      this is my sig
    4. Re:there is an OS X solution..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What area are you in? TW encrypts 1394 streams here with 5C. I.e. it's unusable.

  35. Acronyms! by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Did you guys have some kind of critical acronym deficit this month? I can barely see any lowercase letters in there...

    1. Re:Acronyms! by Reeses · · Score: 2, Informative

      DBS = Digital Broadcast System

      Most satellite and digital cable systems are considered this.

      DVI = Digital Video Interface

      It's that new connector with lots of really small pins that connects monitors and HDTVs together digitally.

      DVR = Digital Video Recorder

      TiVo, ReplayTV, New cable/satellite boxes with built in hard drives, etc.

      HD = High Definition

      The new TV standard. 4x the resolution. Roughly 16x the color depth.

      HDTV = High Definition Television

      See above.

      OTA = Over The Air

      Sucked in with an antenna.

      PC = Personal Computer

      Linux/Mac/Windows using computer.

      PVR = Personal Video Recorder

      MythTV, ReplayTV, TiVo.

      RGBA = Red-Green-Blue Analog

      Old school video hookups. Also known as S-Video, RF, Component.

      STB = Set Top Box

      That little box that lives on top of your TV.

      US = United States

      The last remaining Superpower as of this writing.

      --
      Reeses
    2. Re:Acronyms! by borgasm · · Score: 1

      QAM = Quadrature Amplitude Modulator

      A cable company uses one of these to modulate a signal down your cable line.

    3. Re:Acronyms! by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      I thought the 'A' in RGBA stood for Alpha?

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
  36. It ain't cheap, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could always try Canopus' Edius system for all your HD/HDV needs. Although I'm sure this allows for much more than you require here, you might be able to get your hands on their HDRX-E1 Card which enables capture from many different input sources.

    I don't really know if they sell it separately or not. And if so, it probably isn't "linux" friendly at this point anyway. My point here was mainly to point out that the actual technology exists, it's just not available to the masses yet.

    Anyone know how large a 1-hour 1080i broadcast would be? I can't imagine trying to store all of this stuff for very long.

  37. Bah by poptones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had to go to the library to do some research last night. It bugged me that I wanted to watch "West Wing" and couldn't. So while I was there I hit up usenet to grab LAST week's show which I also missed.

    I was surprised to discover that, as of 7PM CST, last night's show (which would not be seen here for another hour) had been posted 11 hours earlier, most likely from an HD capture in euroupe. So, I got both shows. While I was at it I also grabbed the last couple Enterprise eps (620x320-ish avi), but I'm sure everyone here already knows about those.

    If I had been on a "real" computer instead of my underpowered laptop, I could have watched last night's west wing (hi-def cap, but 480x480 svcd) an hour before it even aired in the US. I thought about getting a tuner, too - but why bother to do it myself when I can get it from someone else even quicker?

    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the time discrepancies between shows airing in various countries are nice. For example, episodes 11 and 12 of Stargate Atlantis are up on Suprnova right now, because they aired in Canada, whereas they won't air in the US until like january or february. That'd be like 3 months of a wait if it weren't for the net.

  38. A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't record uncompressed HDTV signals on your PC without a really muscular hardware-based encoding system. The raw, uncompressed signal is too much bandwidth to put to disc and I'm unaware of any consumer-level MPEG chips capable of real-time encoding of an HD stream.

    The solution would be a CableCard based TV card. CavbleCard is the new standard for enabling digital/HD/premium cable tuning capabilities directly in TVs and other devices. Basically you get a smart card from the cable company that fits a slot in the device, providing the authentication and decoding capabilities otherwise provided by a cable box. You still can't do interactive stuff like PPV and some of the stop/start movie functions, but for HBO and digital tier channels you can finally ditch the cable box.

    With a CableCard based TV card, you'd be able to do what DirecTivo and cable-provided DVRs do -- take the *pre-compressed* signal off the cable line and write it to disc. No encoding required, no encoding hardware required. Playing these files just means pumping the data through the tuner portion of the card as if you were watching a live stream.

    The challenges for most would be (A) will they authorize CableCard for PC-based DVR setups and (B) would there be any easy way to transcode the files to open standards? My guess is "maybe" for (A) and "unlikely" for (B). I'd wager that "they" really, really don't want people getting even well-encrypted/encoded HD video on their hard disks.

    Slightly off topic: Why aren't there inexpensive real-time or faster MPEG encode/transcode boards for the PC? There are so many DVD recorders that use hardware encoding setups these days, that it would seem trivial to provide a hardware MPEG trans/encoding setup for PCs for a couple of hundred dollars. I hate spending .5-.75 real time encoding to MPEG. You can do it faster, but the quality sux0rs. And yes, there are pro boards that can do this, but for $$$$ and they're *only* real-time, not multiples of real time.

    1. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      The challenges for most would be (A) will they authorize CableCard for PC-based DVR setups

      No. The OpenCable spec is full of paranoia, like you can never allow an unencrypted version of the stream to exist outside a chip.

      Why aren't there inexpensive real-time or faster MPEG encode/transcode boards for the PC?

      Supply and demand? The cycle of reincarnation?

    2. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by swb · · Score: 1

      No. The OpenCable spec is full of paranoia, like you can never allow an unencrypted version of the stream to exist outside a chip.

      That still doesn't mean that the PC HDD couldn't be used for storing the encrypted data stream off the cable.

    3. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by Krehbiel · · Score: 1

      Assuming that there will NEVER be an OpenCable compliant CableCard slot in a Linux PC... What's the likelihood that a PCI-based HDTV capture card could *record* encrypted content, then play it back over FireWire to a CableCard-equipped TV?

    4. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Sure, but what good is that? You'd need some special hardware to play it back, you can't edit it, etc.

    5. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by swb · · Score: 1

      No, the idea would be that playback would just route this data back through the CableCard for decryption and decoding.

    6. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by swb · · Score: 1

      I don't know how the digital data is structured on cable.

      Is it one massive, encrypted stream encompassing the entire physical spectrum dedicated to digital channels that, once decrypted is a series of interleaved MPEG streams encompassing individual channels (think of an IPSec tunnel connecting two LANs, for example)? Tuning the cable box to a digital channel just means decrypting the meta-stream and then grabbing the substream for the particular channel you're looking for.

      Or is each digital channel allocated a physically distinct spectrum on the wire with its own individually encrypted stream? Tuning would mean focusing the cable box on an RF band and then decrypting.

      If it's the latter, then it would be technically possible to "tune" to the spectrum segment that had the channel you wanted, and that entire encrypted stream could go to disk and then playback would simply be presenting a cable-card compatible device the stream which it would then decode.

      If its the former, you'd be out of luck as you'd have to record pretty much everything at once, but playback would allow you to channel surf, since you'd have recorded literally every digital channel.

      Even if it was physically distinct bands you could tune to and dump to disk, the problem would be mapping cable spectrum to channels. I think that this is probably largely dynamic and arbitrary; a channel band could conceivably be widened or shrunk to accomodate changes in bitrate, and the spectrum->channel mapping might change as well, and you'd never know this unless you had access to unencrypted control bands.

    7. Re:A CableCard-based TV card is what you need by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Why not? How much bandwidth is it?

      The poster before you says 8.12 GB per hour, which boils down to 2.25 MB per second. Seems easily achievable to me.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  39. Cable HDTV - QAM Encoded by ludey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try this card from DVICO. As long as your provider doesn't encrypt the QAM signal (probably does for HBO, Showtime, & the like) you can capture HDTV in full quality.

    --
    --------------
    David O.
    1. Re:Cable HDTV - QAM Encoded by magicRob · · Score: 0

      there is a nice little forum for Digital TV Card owners which covers the DVICO etc...

      Follow the yellow brick road to --> http://forums.dvbowners.com

      - Rob

      --
      Join the Digital TV discussion @ http://forums.dvbowners.com
  40. Re:Sorry... by PornMaster · · Score: 2

    Well, it sure would be nice if everything were connected via some sort of GigE or faster switched interconnect, and only turned into an actual video signal at one point.

    Have one wire to each device. There's no reason I should have to worry about whether the VCR is before or after the digital cable tuner... or before or after the DVD player... or should be choosing channels with one remote, playing DVDs with another, and controlling volume with a third. Universal remotes are a bad hack... they either don't have all of the features needed, or are more complex than the bridge of the Starship Enterprise.

    I bought a Sony TV, Sony VCR, and Sony DVD player in hopes that the remote control situation would be mitigated a bit. The TV remote can be programmed to do either the VCR or the DVD player. It also inexplicably sometimes changes channels on the TV when it's set to change them on the VCR. Since I'm tuning through the VCR, changing the TV from one of its inputs to its tuner gets me a nice blast of static. The DVD remote can control the DVD player and the TV's volume, but not the TV channels.

    A switched digital media network would be sooooo much easier to have good integration. Menus could be cascading from a central device -- no more worrying that the stupid little feature button for one of the devices isn't on the other remote control.

    *sigh*

  41. Not Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best I've been able to find is frame grabbers like this one from unigraf. You need to find one with >30fps at 960x540 IIRC. You will then need software mpeg compression. There is also a mythtv based pc you can purchase for >6K, that does HDTV. The problem here is that all hdtv signals are coming in as MPEG-2, and then being decoded. All the HDTV capture gear is just extracting the mpeg-2 stream from the signal and saving it to a disk. Since you want to use an external box, you need a way of converting from the high resolution video back to mpeg-2, and the market for that is small since none of the commercial boxes need it.

  42. Scan converters by base_chakra · · Score: 2, Informative

    ATI however, does make a HDTV card, but the problem with it is it only does broadcast free to air type HD, which is basically non existant in my area.

    Since free-to-air decoders are all we're likely to see for awhile, it's probably best to offload decryption to your set-top receiver.

    Therefore, even though pcHDTV has no more stock of the HD-3000, and none are available on eBay, it's worth exploring. HDTV input support may be limited to RF, but one can circumvent this problem with nominal quality loss by using a (semi-)pro HDTV scan converter. Maybe this one is affordable? This one is probably much cheaper, but I don't know anything about it.

    Using a scan converter is a sub-optimal solution, but other than being useful gear in general, but it does allow you to get over both the adapter and decoder stumbling blocks.

    Quasi-related side note: as a PC-to-TV solution, scan converters have substantially better output than TV-out cards.

    1. Re:Scan converters by JianTian13 · · Score: 1

      No stock?

      Funny, I just ordered one yesterday.

    2. Re:Scan converters by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Well... you can order whatever you want... they dont need to have stock to take your money! ;)

      Once its in your hands, then you can easily say they are out of stock.

    3. Re:Scan converters by Golobulous · · Score: 1

      So you're saying a scan converter is the only way to get around the DRM stuff that DirecTV enforces? I don't know much about these devices, but I just read about what they actually are. I don't see how these are any different than a PC card with a TV tuner.

  43. STFU by dark-br · · Score: 2, Funny

    YHBT. YHL. HAND. :)

  44. I are confused... by jasoncc · · Score: 1

    Please help me to understand the problem.

    My understanding: Current HDTV cards can only receive Over-The-Air HDTV format. This means that they can't be used to capture HDTV signals from cable or satellite providers because cable and sat. use different encoding formats. The OTA format probably complies to some standard and the cable and sat. guys do their own thing? Is this true?

    So, basically, OTA/cable/satellite signals all need some kind of transcoding into the "real" HDTV format that your "HD-Ready" TV understands?

    Is the OTA format compressed? Would capturing the OTA signal require less bandwidth/storage than capturing the HD signal that goes from the receiver to your TV? If so, I've read that HDTV is about 25-27 Mbps. Is that for the compressed OTA or for the signal that hits your TV?

  45. Re:Sorry... by kfg · · Score: 1

    What am I missing here?

    The fact that IR is unregulated spectrum that doesn't interfere with regulated spectrum, and that if everyone wasn't out to make a buck for themselves they wouldn't bother going through all the trouble and exense of designing and manufacturing this stuff in the first place.

    In this regard, while I do have my problems with some of Chesterton's ideas, I think he was right. The issue isn't so much that people are trying to make a buck for themselves, but that for some reason attention has actually shifted away from making bucks to making sure the other guy doesn't make a buck.

    They're paying more attention to screwing the other guy's business than they are toward running their own.

    This is a result of confusing the idea of market share with profit, a confusion that ultimately lead the dot com bomb and other economic attrocities.

    KFG

  46. HD DVR from your cable provider by teshuvah · · Score: 1

    I get an HD DVR from my cable provider (Time Warner) for only $4.95 a month. They charge the same for the regular DVR. I can record 2 shows at once, or record one and watch another, and the drive will record 60 hours of regular TV or about 30 hours of HDTV, or somewhere in between if you have some of each. Considering I was paying $12.95 a month for my TiVo service that can't record HD nor 2 programs at once, this was a no-brainer to drop TiVo and get this.

    1. Re:HD DVR from your cable provider by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Is there a 30-second commercial skip button?

      That is the only reason at this point I don't ditch Tivo.

      As soon as Tivo fucks with that feature, I'm gone.

    2. Re:HD DVR from your cable provider by teshuvah · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't have that function. It has 3 speeds of fast forward, and I can get through commericals in about 5-7 seconds.

  47. Re:Why TV? by Mike+Farooki · · Score: 1

    ...say the Slashdotters as they goober in front of their computer monitors for the 18th hour in a row.

  48. Get a cable box with 1394 enabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Simply get a cable box with 1394 enabled, then download either of these depending on your needs.

    DVHSTOOL
    http://kgbird.com/DVHSTool/

    Or if you have a 1394 enabled TV /w HAVI support this software if great (and is only $99)

    Vividlogic's Firebus
    http://www.vividlogic.com/products/dtvr_o verview.h tml

    I have a TV with HAVI/1394 on it so I just used the vivid logic software. However I found it just as easy to get a Scientific Atlana 8000HD box from my cable provider (time warber). It cost me an extra $2.50 a month from the package I already had. And the unit came with a 160GB drive.

  49. Re:Sorry... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to be a "Me Too" voice, but...

    So, for various and assorted reasons, I have had to recently re-purchase the following items:

    1. HDTV : 2 Antennas, 2 HDTV 3 color inputs, DVI in, 2 Video in, 7 (SEVEN) inputs total
    2. Xbox : Video out OR HDTV Out
    3. DVD Player : DVI out, HDTV 3 color out, Video out
    4. GameCube : Video out
    5. Digital HDTV Cable box : HDTV 3 color out

    And I still had my 5.1 receiver.

    Between all the weirdness hooking everything up, and then configuring EACH unit, I must have spent a good 4 to 6 hours beating on this system to get it to work (Not to mention that my receiver forgot it had all 6 speakers, and needed to be reconfigured as well!)

    The AV Guys (TV/HDTV/DVD/Game Console makers) ALL need to come up with some sort of intelligent daisy chaining scheme. I mean, really, SCSI has worked for years, why can't they get it together for AV equipment. They can put a little push-button on the back of the equipment to select a priority number, and then when I decide to play on the GameCube, it would just automatically override whatever else I was watching, without having to make me select which stupid input I want.

    Really, having a printout on the side of my TV to remind me which TV input to use for each device is just silly, and is one of many reasons why grandma and grandpa won't spend money on any of these new gadgets.

  50. webcam by mikeee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Point a webcam at your TV and record it that way. Problem solved!

    (Seriously though, if you had multiple webcams aimed at different parts of the screen, and software to reintegrate the video streams... let's see them DRM that!)

  51. pchdtv by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

    Why wouldnt the pchdtv 3000 work?

    1. Re:pchdtv by tommck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't strain yourself by reading the second sentence of the posting or anything... :)

      the pchdtv card only supports RF input (which only works with over-the-air broadcasts). The guy wants to be able to record Dish & Cable HDTV, which you can't do with the PCHDTV card.

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  52. VDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can also record with VDR and normal budget DVB cards.

  53. What my current solution is by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a DVR/HDTV cable box from Comcast. It has a firewire out.

    I am able to send the MPEG2 Transport Stream down to my OS X machine via a couple of tools available on OS X (AVCBrowser, etc.), and then open it directly using VLC, and show it on my cinema display. Pretty neat stuff! I watched a recent Patriots game in HDTV with some friends this way.

    That stream eats gigs of HD space fast, though!

    And it's most definitely not "wife-proof"... yet

  54. Scientific Atlanta SA8000HD DVR by armentage · · Score: 1
    I use a SA8000HD DVR digital cable box. It's an HD DVR with a 120gig drive. My cable company (Time Warner Cable NYC) upgraded me to the HD box for free (there's a $6.95 a month DVR rental charge, $4 more than the monthly charge for a regular digital set-top box.)

    The SA8000HD isn't great, but it does HDTV. It isn't as smooth as a Tivo, and the software isn't fantastic. But it CAN record 2 channels in HD or SD at once, while I play back previously recorded content. It was FREE and in NYC you absolutely cannot watch cable without a set-top box (thanks to bitch cable pirates).

  55. DFG1394 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using this for a video capture device. It works in Linux using V4L2 and while I'm just getting started with it, I'm having good results. It takes S-video or Composite inputs and converts them to IEEE1394

  56. You can rent an HDTV PVR box by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    I'm renting my HDTV PVR box for $25 CAN/month. It has a built in 160GB SATA HD; it does program guides, etc, has HDMI (DVI+digital audio in one), component and firewire outputs (although I think the firmware I have disables firewire). Apparently, the box can be purchased for $500 CAN also.

  57. I disagree by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Look, I agree that it's a good idea to take yourself away from the TV and really read, or go out and get some air.

    But realistically, $2000 spent on entertainment equipment you can use for years probably is a better entertainment value than $2000 spent on a trip. It's something that will possibly enhance your day-to-day life more, depending on how much enjoyment you can derive from the content offered.

    Personally I don't like much TV, I have an HD receiver myself (on Dish) and while some things are pretty interesting to watch, I would say it's only just worth the cost of the HD receiver. But I would never claim anyone else was wasting money on same without knowing what they enjoy.

    I'm just saying keep an open mind and don't deride those that find enough entertainment in such things to make them worth the cost and effort.

    That said, I do think it would be a better world if more people were creaters of media rather than consumers. But that could be another good reason to put togeter a nice HD setup, if you can also generate HD...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. ATi helps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently installed an ATi X800 from http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?mode l=RX800XT-VTD256E&class=vga MSI and noticed it has component in - the site might be of help.

    1. Re:ATi helps? by chaotica1974 · · Score: 1

      I think you may be confusing Composite with component. The site states the card has composite video in. This is different than Component Video in. With Component Video you will have 3 RCA cables, composite has one.

  59. Not lack of a universal standard by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Lack of an actual market. The pcHDTV cards can support QAM in hardware, but they haven't bothered implementing it because nearly everything on cable systems is encrypted, so being able to demodulate the data doesn't help you at all.

    Thanks to the broadcast flag BS from the FCC, there will likely never be a solution for anything other than recording OTA HD, or at least not for a LONG time, because realtime compression of HDTV content into a usable format (MPEG-2 for example) at an economic price is a LONG way away. Encoding 1080i in realtime requires thousands of dollars worth of dedicated hardware. General-purpose processors are probably over a decade away from that goal.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  60. Re:Why TV? by kfg · · Score: 1

    ...say the Slashdotters as they goober in front of their computer monitors for the 18th hour in a row.

    Reading Cicero, Keats, Tennyson, Shakespeare and Burton's translation of the Thousand Nights and a Night; and between Shakespeare and Burton you have the essential plot of every fiction show that's ever appeared on television, only with better writing. Available for free download at Project Gutenberg.

    The net connected computer has been a Godsend for lovers of literature, and you can even get your exercise in at the same time if you power your rig with a bicycle driven generator.

    KFG

  61. I have the MDP-100 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work under Linux and likely never will (die TeraLogic die!) and from what I've heard its receiver is less sensitive than the MDP-120. (The 120 is also Linux-incompatible).

    The end result - after being in my comp for a few months, the MDP-100 now sits on a shelf and has for over a year.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:I have the MDP-100 by isa-kuruption · · Score: 1

      Linux compatibility is not a requirement for me, so I could really care less.

      It works under Windows, and windows is probably the best platform for doing this kind of stuff anyway. (Windows is closer to a multimedia platform than Linux is, even after the three months worth of work)

  62. Re:Why TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW-- The book title is Fahrenheit 451 (just a nitpick)

  63. Re:RF - yes, exactly! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I'd love a solution which lets me re-distibute HD signal all over my house.

    You see, with NTSC, this is a snap. Rack up your components, buy a frequency-agile modulator (multi-port or several singles, your choice), and some pass-band filters. Now, just take the output streams in baseband from your favorite components and remodulate them to free channels above your analog cable device or local OTA, and reinsert the signals on your CATV wiring in the house. In my house, that would be channel 70 for the DVD player, 80 for the main TiVo, and 90 for the main amplifier output (i.e.: whatever is playing in the living room). Now you can stroll to any TV and see regular TV/cable, or flip to the high channels and watch a DVD, or TiVo, or just put whatever's on the main system on (great for when you're cleaning up the house).

    Now, I can't do this with HD...yet. With the TS on a carrier signal, output over coaxial, I could have HD on any HD-enabled set, with no special QAM, cablecard, or sat receiver necessary at every TV. Simple, and just about impossible.

    Gotta love technology!

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  64. To TV or not to TV... by Wizzy+Wig · · Score: 1

    I found myself in the HDTV dilemma last month when the picture on our 17 yr old 27" Sony finally became too dim to even watch in a darkened room. AFAI was concerned, enen tho we're not big TV watchers, an HDTV was our only choice.


    We found a 27" CRT Samsung model [HDTV receiver built-in, TPX2775H] for $700 - so you don't necessarily need to spend $2000 for HDTV. It fit into the same space as the old Sony. I was blown away by the huge improvement in the OTA HD picture (vice digital cable).


    We just ordered the HDTV-DVR box from Comcast for an added $11 per month. I'm looking forward to investigating the possibilities regarding offloading the HD video via the FW port - but it'll have to be dirt-easy for me to bother with... TV just ain't that important to us... we'd just like to be able to snag some old movies when the mood hits us.

  65. DVB-S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most DVB-S satellite receiver cards will do the job, but that is for already compressed streams, of course. If your PC can handle the decompression, you can use it as a HDTV PVR for only about 60 Euro in additional hardware costs. Dvico sells a hard+software bundle called "Fusion". The decoder is excellent and works without a hitch on a measly 1.4 GHz AthlonXP with a Radeon graphics card (which has hardware decoding support), even with streams that crash all other decoders I've tried. They have a demo of the software which is time-limited to 3 minutes of consecutive playback. There are some demo streams on their website as well. Here is another demo stream recorded from the only European HDTV channel so far: 361MB.

  66. this is what you are looking for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.blackmagic-design.com/index.htm

    The prices had dropped since this spring..

    Of course this really wont work for a pvr beacuse, like stated before it records uncompressed HD, without converting it to mpeg 1 2 or 4. thats about 120 gigs an hour.

  67. Re:Sorry... by sxpert · · Score: 1

    What am I missing here?

    the hollywood idiots don't want that to ever happen

    See, as the boss of the most important TV channel in .fr would put it, the programs are designed to prepare your brain for the commercial breaks

  68. HDTV box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have built myself a machine with an AMD 2500+, 1GB ram, an ATI All-Wonder 9700, and lots and lots of hard drives, the ATI card has two options dongle component output, or an adapter that plugs into the dvi output of the card. This allows for 720 and 1080 output. then using the using the n***g****s I dowload everything from movies to tv episodes, and at resolutions of 1920x720 and 1920x1080, and bit rates to die for, their is also some websites around that explain the best players to use like zoom player, windows media classic, windvd 6.0, and so on, but considering they deal with the grey area illegal part of it I think it is best for you to find them, rather then me posting links, but they exsist ... one to mention that onyl deals with the how to setups is avsforum.

  69. all digital ... by sxpert · · Score: 1

    why the fascination with the "all digital" stuff that hollywood doesn't want anyone to have ?
    do like the pros do... use analog between stupidly locked up systems...

    1. Re:all digital ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reason you do anything digital. It's essentially lossless. Any D/A then A/D is going to introduce noise.

    2. Re:all digital ... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Great, show us a system that converts analog HD component to a usable digital signal. Oh wait, it costs $10,000...

    3. Re:all digital ... by sxpert · · Score: 1

      no it doesn't... the components from National Semiconductor that can do it are pretty cheap...
      you need to be somewhat proficient in electronics, but can come up easily with a working design for less than 500 USD...
      the 10000 USD stuff is priced that way because it says "professionnal" on the box, but inside, it's the same stuff

    4. Re:all digital ... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Being somewhat proficient in electronics won't get you real-time compression, which you need to make it feasible. (If you don't have compression, you need $10,000 of disks...)

  70. Quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quality my friend, quality. If you want HDTV, you want *HIGH DEF*.... Just be warned, if you're a videophile, you'll never want to go back.

    1. Re:Quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alt.binaries.hdtv

    2. Re:Quality! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice. Thanks for the tip.

  71. No, you don't - just use FireBus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FireBus has been around for quite some time and it will capture HDTV on a PC using the firewire out port on all manner of set top boxes and HDTV tuners.

  72. Re:Sorry... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    I thought if you bought all your kit from the same manufacturer, and wired it up with SCART leads, that was what happened anyway? There are standards for passing data over SCART (not sure if different manufacturers' kit works well together tho') so you can send your preset frequencies from the TV set to your VCR/DVDR, and many remotes can control another piece of kit {from the same manufacturer, naturally}.

    My DVD+RW recorder can do this when used with a Philips telly. Its remote will even control a Philips TV set -- or, by sheer good fortune, a Daewoo {which is what I have}.

    SCART has always included self-switching signals using analogue voltages, so that playing a cassette would switch the TV straight over to the VCR; but I think the newer stuff is a lot more sophisticated. Can't really comment, though, since I have no reason to replace my TV on account of the fact that it works.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  73. SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    The SA8300HD box is buggy and routinely misses programs that I've scheduled for recording for no apparent reason other than it just isn't in the mood at the time.

    As someone who works at Time Warner Cable, I can tell you exactly what the problem is. You have a poor signal going to the box. If your Tuner level is -10 dbmv or below (along with poor FDC and RCD signals), the box will not be able to lock onto that channel properly. Sometimes, it may have a good enough signal at the start of the recording but then drop off. This can be the primary reason for the effect of seeing the DVR record, but will not finilize the recording to the list when finished. If the tuner signal is really bad though, it wont even attempt to record even when scheduled to do so.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      So how come the box doesn't warn the user when this is the problem? And why did the guy need to hear from a TW insider to learn about the problem?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's a good suggestion. But the only way for the DVR to warn the customer of any signal issue to the box is if it's programmed to do so. I can only hope Scientific Atlanta implements this as a feature in the next firmware upgrade. Untill then, not much can be done about unless the customer calls in to report the problem and have the issue address by a cable technician.

      It's basic rule of thumb with any service based industry. We will not confont you with an issue you *might* be having. If you do not call in to report an issue, we will just assume one of two things.

      A. Your not having an on-going issue and thus not notice any problems.

      B. You just don't care that your having problems and will continue to pay for the service anyways.

      But if your a paying customer of TWC. You have the RIGHT to call in and have any cable related issue address by phone and to be provided with options. But you still have to make the initiative.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by Halo- · · Score: 1
      As a time-warner customer who has had a DVR since they first came out in my area (Austin, TX) I can certainly attest that the DVR software for the non-HD 2000 and 8300 IS buggy. At the same time, it's slowly getting better. Ever now and again the box upgrades itself and we get some new features and some bugs fixed.

      Some of the bugs are minor. For example, shows to be taped are highlighted in red, but when you scroll over them in a downward(?) direction the highlighting falls off until you scroll back the other way sometimes. Some are more major: I've had the box suddenly decide to reboot and wipe out everything it had stored.

      The biggest issue is not so much the "bugs" but missing or poorly conceived features. For example, if you are watching a show your are recording from an earlier point (timeshifting, for example a 15 minute delay) when the show ends, you jump to the end. As annoying as that is, the problem is compounded by the lack of a way to skip to arbitrary locations, so getting back were you were involves starting from the beginning, and then fast-forwarding to the point you missed. I'm not a sports fan, but my neighbor was pretty pissed when he was watching the Yankees in the playoffs delayed about an hour and a half, and he suddenly got switched to celebrating fans and post-game commentary. Pretty much ruined it for him.

      I could fill pages with gripes, expecially after reading the tech docs are the SciAtl site about what the box supposedly can do; however, I'm still reasonably happy with it. Not thrilled, but content.

    4. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      I've seen the non-HD version of this box do the exact same thing with absolutely no problems with signal strength.

      I've also heard TWC employees claim "It's a signal strength problem" over and over again until one of their techs comes out and discovers that, lo and behold, the signal strength is just fine. Of course, the problem magically goes away when the next software release gets pushed to the end users, which usually involves either a loss of all recorded shows or a loss of all future recording info, or both.

      I don't mean to bust your chops or anything, but those SA boxes are buggy plain and simple. If you'd like some real-world examples, check out the Explorer 8000 Yahoo Group. Lots of people have lots of problems with these boxes and very few of them are related to signal strengh.

    5. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Most if not all of the time the recording issue is to do with signal strength problems. I should know. I deal with technical problems 11 hours a day in Austin Texas. If anything, I'm a professional when it comes to this sort of stuff.

      Second, low signal levels (such as Tuner, FDC, RDC, and SNR levels) will cause blank channels and thus the box has nothing to tune into to record. Also, if you have excessive macroblocking issues and/or signs of CRC error; this too will cause the problem. And yes, blank screens due to poor signal happens on not just all of the Scientific Atlanta boxes, but also the Pace 550 as well.

      To check the status summery of your SA boxes, push and hold in the Select button untill you see a green flashing light (normally the message light). Next, let go of that button and then press the Info key. At this point you should be at the first page. Make sure your Tuner and FDC level is between -10 and 10 dbmv. The RDC should be between 30 to 50. On page 5, make sure the QAM SNR level is at least 30 db. Anything lower will be major issue.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Here in Austin, we had an issue were some of the 8000DVR boxes would reboot when recording. This fixed by SA after a week after a buggy firmware update. Likewise, the issue was delt with through another firmware push to tbe boxes a week or so later. This was an issue about a month ago. So you may or may not have been effected depending on the box revision you had.

      As for the "timeshifting" bug as you call it; that is most likely due to pausing the show, then resuming it later if you decide to pause it again and to NOT resume before the end of the scheduled program. If you leave it paused, it will just boot you back to live programming. I find this to be very annoying myself. But the pause feature will not commit the recording to be view later unless you actually press the record button durring the time of the sceduled program in progress. I wouldn't say this is a bug, but I agree that the consumer should be more aware of this intended effect.

      Also, all new SciAlt DVR boxes come ship with hardware features that are not turned on. Only later will they release firmware in the future to enable them. TWC has no control over this. For example, DVI connection on some models are not enabled even when it's physically available. Likewise, the SATA port on the back of the SA8300 boxes are also not enabled. I don't know why, but I'm willing to bet it has something to due with copywrite protection and all the legal red tape that goes into getting them activated. Same for the DVI as it's an encypted signal.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      That's pretty funny. I wonder if you've been out to my house on a dignostic run :).

      I, of course, will defer to your expertise in this area. I in fact had a similar problem with signal strength due to neighbohood squirrels really enjoying the flavor of our outdoor coax. However, I still have recurring issues with these boxes. In fact, mine is rebooting as I type. Channel changing and navigating the interface was incredibly slow (on the order of 30 sec. per channel), and eventually the box just crashed.

      The last time this happened, we lost all of our recorded shows as well as all of the scheduled recording data. It was like the machine was wiped clean. I hope that doesn't happen this time, because I really want to watch yesterday's Lost :). I do like the box and the service: I just wish they were more rock solid.

    8. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it's the signal to your box that is causing your problems with a delay in changing channels and the box rebooting. But what the hell do I know right? I mean, I MUST be telling you a bunch of BS. After all, I work for TWC.

      Go ahead and replace that box. Replace it 3, 4, 10 times. You will still have the same damn problem untill the issue is delt with by a cable technician.

      As for the box losing your recorded shows, that should not have happend, but your not the only one I've talked to that had this. I can only imagine that the file system got corrupted while in the middle of a read/write the moment it got rebooted. This doesn't suprise me as the file systems (ITFS and AVFS) is encrypted. And if the box cannot verify it's own data with the matching built-in serial number, it will not even attept to access the rest of the drive. At this point, the only way to repair it is to have the box reformat the drive.

      With the box turned off, press and hold down the Pause key untill you see the message light blink. Next, press the Page - key once. Now press the green list key three times. It should now say HDD- or HDD F and then reboot itself with the instructed process to rebuild a new file system.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      Man, I don't know what crawled up your ass and died, but I know I didn't put it there. You obviously know your stuff (like I said in my last post), but you've got a way with people that makes Archie Bunker look like freakin' Mother Theresa. Is there some sort of asshat qualification process at TWC or something? Do all the decent human beings get screened out by the interview process?

      Look, whether it's a weak signal or buggy firmware or freakin' sun spots, it's all the same to me. There are times when the DVR does not work the way it's supposed to. Some months those times never show up and some months I battle with this thing 2-3 times per week. The fact that I've tried to get this resolved through TWC support channels and failed miserably every time says loads to me about their customer service.

      And of course, after this conversation, I see why I have such difficulty getting a decent, rational person on the phone. It's apparently more important to TWC to be right than it is to actually help resolve the customer's problem.

    10. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's called conditioning I suppose. After working in customer service I get nothing but irate and angry customers that do NOT listen to what I tell them. But would rather bitch and moan about it. I alway start off the conversation being helpfull, but when someone start yanking my chain and telling me how to do my job...fuck it. No seriously! If I do not know what the issue is, I will say so. But I will not sit on the phone all damn day long and argue. My word is golden. If I'm unsure, I will say so. If I'm right, I will say so.

      Note: NEVER work in customer support for any telco company. Some people actually get death threats. And I've had someone personally on the phone tell me they would come up to the building to kick my ass just for being a rep to the company so he can "make his point accross". You gotta find humor in this or you will not last long on the job.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by Mandomania · · Score: 1

      Since you're from Austin, you might remember the local ISP Jump.net (once Jump Point Communications, then Jump.net, then Allegience/Hosting.com, then bankrupt). For about 2 terrible years, I was a frontline phone tech for dial up customers.

      My brother, I feel your pain and apologize for my tone and attitude :). I should have been a bit more understanding and reasonable.

    12. Re:SA8300HD box not buggy by megabeck42 · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, the parent and parent's parent interaction is one of the chief reasons why I love Slashdot comments.

      --
      fnord.
  74. sorry... here's what i got-Trust us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ideally, IMHO... we need some sort of PCI CableCard docking device, but I doubt our content controlling masters will allow that."

    Well, gee I can't imagine why. We've certainly shown how trustworthy we can be with other people's digital content.

  75. AJA Kona-2 by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

    Kona-2 card, by AJA
    http://www.aja.com/
    Works on a Apple G5

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  76. Re:Sorry... by sxpert · · Score: 1

    SCART is inherently a EU standard. Show me a US tv with a scart connector...

  77. are the signal fomat specs available? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is a Source Forge project that implements this on FPGA with VHDL or Varilog.

  78. Re:Sorry... by pgm · · Score: 1

    This is off-topic, but what the heck :)

    Modern AV receivers can help a lot with this since they can now "up-convert" signals from any video source and send them out via component. This means that you never have to change the video input on your HDTV. Note that manufacturers say "up-convert" but they really don't convert the signals.

    For example, my DirecTivo has SVideo out, plugs into my receiver, and it switches that signal over to the component out to my HDTV as a 480i signal. This means that your AV receiver is the only thing doing the switching (Provided that your display can accept 480i signals on it's component inputs, and you don't use DVI). I've got the Denon 3805 and this works great. This has recently been trickling down into lower priced receivers from Denon, Yamaha, and Pioneer. Maybe it's time to upgrade your older AV receiver :)

  79. This could be something by FuzzyDustBall · · Score: 1

    I found this in my research but I cant find any real specs about the thing: Pyro A/V Link

  80. Re:Sorry... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    Get a Pronto universal touch screen remote. Get the recharger base and an RF extender.

    Get someone who knows what they are doing to program it for you, unless you want to spend 4-8 hours doing it yourself. You can download other people's configs off the net, but no one is going to upload a config with the exact set of equipment that you have.

    In the end you'll have one remote that can control everything and uses RF so you don't need line of sight. It will also have one-button macros for whatever you want, like sending all the codes necessary for you to switch to a DVD, for example. You can program the touch screen to put whatever buttons or combination of buttons you want wherever you want, on multiple screens with custom graphics, even.

    There's your solution. The problem that hasn't been solved for the non-techies is having to pay someone else to set it all up for them.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  81. Re:ATI has a HDTV card (click-friendly + more) by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

    HDTV Wonder Remote Control Edition.
    Here is a review of the product and some reviews by users.

  82. NOT GONNA HAPPEN by Dorsai42 · · Score: 1

    This problem has been plaguing consumers for decades.

    The Consumer Electronics companies (you know who you are) do NOT want you to mix and match components from different manufacturers. One way, albiet a disruptive way, to enforce this is to make components interact with each other poorly. Aside from a few standards they can't get away from (like S-Video, RCA jack and the like), they go out of their way to make your life miserable.

    H. Gordon Selfridge is spinning in his grave.

    --
    If you forget about the future, the future will forget about you.
  83. Why not dvb-s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using a dvb-s with Dish network linux suppots the Hauppauge nova-s under the 2.6 kernel.

  84. Nothing for under $25,000 by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, you certainly can't build a good component analog HD capture system for a reasonable price. While there are lots of analog SD capture cards, since analog was around in SD for so long, professional HD has pretty much always been digital.

    I have a game company client who needed to be able to do real-time screen caps of game play at HD. What we did was have them do a VGA output at 1280x720 60 fps. We then ran that through a converter box to take the RGB VGA to a component digital HD-SDI signal. That went into a BOXX HD capture system, using the Cineform Prospect HD real-time wavelet codec.

    Works like a champ, but expect to pay at least $25K for that setup today. Probably half that next year. But there simply isn't a lot of demand for component analog HD capture, which means that's going to be a specialist, and expensive, part for a while. Moore's law doesn't quite apply to analog to digital conversion circuitry.

    Pretty cool to watch recorded game play at 2.5x the detail of a high-end DVD.

  85. You Need an HD Encoder by Xesdeeni · · Score: 1

    If you can intercept the digital stream, you can save it. The ATSC (OTA) tuner cards you mention, as well as the QAM ones do this.

    But once the video has been decoded, like on a DVI or component connection, you have to re-encode it. That means capturing about 62 MB/s and then encoding HD in real time.

    The codec doesn't matter, as long as you have a decoder, but candidates would include MPEG-2, MPEG-4, h.264, WMV9, etc. However, good luck finding a computer fast enough to encode any of these formats in real time. So you need dedicated hardware. But since the number of customers for such a device is limited (today it's TV broadcasters), the prices are extremely high.

    Xesdeeni

  86. ATSC & QAM, CableCard, FireWire by Krehbiel · · Score: 1

    Sigh. My wish is to be able to capture ANY HD content and play it back ANY number of times at ANY future date. I don't feel a need to be able to make any except backup copies, and possibly transfers to new types of media (HD-DVD).

    So, here we have Digital Cable, whose content is likely encrypted; and whose premium content is even MORE likely encrypted.

    BUT we also have the OpenCable spec, and the "CableCard," by which any DTV device can display encrypted cable content.

    Now, the CableCard spec itself is protected to the extent that it's likely no one will create an "open" CableCard interface, i.e. there will NEVER be a PCI-slot DTV tuner card which has a CableCard slot. (I could be wrong about this; someone could reverse-engineer the interface to CableCard, which looks susiciously like a regular PCMCIA/PC Card. However, the DMCA makes any such device illegal in the USA.)

    It looks like that spells the end of HD MythTV. :-(

    But, I wonder about one last possibility: Could a person save the encrypted content, and then serve it up later to a CableCard-equipped TV? Either by re-modulating a QAM signal, or perhaps over FireWire (if the encryption is compatible)? Does anyone know enough about CableCard to say whether that would work?

    (And then - I wonder how hard it would be to add FireWire as a video output device in MythTV?)

  87. PVR with Digital Cable by mcstout · · Score: 1

    Suggestion: Build a PC with an HD-3000 card and MythTV, use the "Video Out" from the cable box as the "Video In" to the HD-3000 card. Controlling, I have two possibilities. The easiest is to program the cable box to go to the channel you want at the time you want to view (actually record) the program, and program MythTV to record the "Video In" signal at that time. Two steps, but much easier than the remaining possibility, which is to: Have the MythTV PC run an infared transmitter that sends commands to the Digital Cable box. That isn't so hard, but the PC might need to know what's on the cable box's screen, and software to extract the on-screen text from the box's displayed menu and make sense of it would be a challenge to a funded team of programmers. I think that some work on this has been done (the commanding via a transmitter part, not the interpreting the cable box's on-screen display part).

    1. Re:PVR with Digital Cable by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      "and software to extract the on-screen text from the box's displayed menu and make sense of it would be a challenge to a funded team of programmers."

      What are you talking about? That content is already sitting in MySQL on any Mythtv installation.

      -psy

  88. Linux driver? (was:Your Only Hope...) by bwcbwc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heck ATI still doesn't have an acceptable Windows driver for that product.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  89. Re:Conspiracy buffs unite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow, all the tin foil hat people under one topic. Who the fuck really thinks there's a "conspiracy" to fuck the consumer by remote control (so to speak).

    There are plenty of "matrix" switchers in the pro-sumer price range that can take 8 or more AV inputs and direct them to 8 or more outputs. The problem for manufacturers arises because while YOU may want all your stuff daisy-chained and output to a single monitor, not everyone else does. There are folks who want all their equipment in one room, but want to distribute signals throughout the home (bedrooms, living room, kitchen, etc). At anyone time, they may want the DVD output going to the kid's room, but the HDTV signal going to the kitchen... and at the next hour, reverse it.

    There's also the price consideration. Component video is so much nicer than S-video which is nicer than composite and "RF". This doesn't even mention the digital stuff. All of these have various consumer costs with better pictures costing more. So how is the manufacturer supposed to figure out what you want/need ahead of time? At best, most VCR's/DVD's come with RF/Composite/Component video and leave the decision to you. If you're talking about a simple single room, single "stack" situation, almost any A/V receiver with multiple inputs/outputs will suffice for the masses. However, if you're looking for the absolute best picture and audio, then you're screwed. You can't have champagne tastes and a beer budget.

    Just to point out how idiotic some of the stuff being mentioned here is. "I put a dvd in and want its priority to override the vcr and display on the TV". Sorry, but what if I am watching OTA TV and want to record a DVD onto a blank videotape. I don't want the insertion of a DVD into the player to override my TV viewing. How are the TV/DVD/VCR supposed to figure out that you want to record the DVD onto tape, but continue watching normal TV? This is where the "switching boxes" become handy. Push the button at the intersection of DVD output and VCR input (of course you still have to push play on the DVD and record on the VCR). There are a couple switches that can feed a code to a serial port indicating what's been pushed. You could connect this to a PC/Laptop to send the appropriate IR commands to the DVD/VCR to initiate dubbing (this probably already exists, otherwise why have the serial port on the switch).

  90. Let me throw my hat in the ring. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    I have a site that I have been trying for some time to organize information on hdtv video recording. It's still not very well organized, but here it is.

    HDTVRecord.com

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  91. Depends on your definition of 'PC' by ikekrull · · Score: 1

    Buy an SGI Octane2 with the uncompressed HDTV option and youre good to go. This is a 'Personal Computer' which will do exactly what you ask.

    Nothing you can buy 'off the shelf at the mall' will do this however.

    The PCI bus is simply inadequate for this task, and even PCI Express etc. is probably inadequate too.

    Hopefully this kind of application will drive computer manufacturers to introduce faster interconnects, since the CPUs and memory busses are certainly fast enough these days.

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
  92. check out Elgato Systems... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... http://elgato.com/ for an outstanding array of HDTV to computer solutions.

    Of course there's a catch ... they are only aimed at Macs -- so it's not a bad catch unless you've adopted the x86 architecture or Microsoft operating systems as a religion.

    I'm delighted with my EyeTV 500, pulling in broadcast HDTV, MPEG2 encoding it, and passing it through Firewire to disk, with easy editing, scheduling future recordings, and export to Toast or iDVD.

    I'm sure that if you want to wait, Microsoft will eventually get their Media Entertainment Center to smoothly mesh and do all the things Macs will have been effortlessly doing in the interim, and in only a short time after that the Linux folks will have managed to adapt the Windows solution to their needs.

    I'm not trolling for flames here, just pointing out that this is an option. I believe you can run Yellow Dog Linux (or other PPC-flavored Linuxes) and use something like Mac-On-Linux to run OS X alongside Linux, if Linux is a personal must-have, but I wouldn't divide the computing resources between 2 systems without a fast dual processor, and I don't believe Mac-On-Linux supports the G5 yet.

  93. Very expensive by heroine · · Score: 1

    Forget about capturing the YUV output of your satellite box. Electronic components are extremely expensive and the kind of ADC you need to capture an analog HDTV signal is unaffordable.

    1. Re:Very expensive by sxpert · · Score: 1

      the appropriate ADC from National Semiconductor ADC12L066 are 20 USD a pop, not what I call super expensive...

      man, whatever happened to the garage tinkerer spirit from 10 years ago ?

  94. encryption by netfall · · Score: 1

    My understanding of why the PC cards don't support cable HD is that the cable providers encrypt their HD signals. It's really a way for them to get more money. If you want their HD, you either have to rent their digital cable box, or a CableCard. These let you plug your signal right into a CableCard supported TV with no box. I've heard mixed stuff about the cablecards - but it seems to me that one of the video card companies should come up with a tuner that takes the CableCard. You'd still have to rent it from the provider, but it would give us what we're looking for!

  95. $2000 cable box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "The satellite/cable box then decodes that stream to produce the full HDTV-resolution signal, that gets delivered to your monitor (either via analog component or digital DVI/HDMI).

    That full-resolution bandwidth required to re-digitize/re-encode the full bandwidth signal to a recordable transport stream is currently beyond the capabilities of any pc-based solution under that $2000 price-point."

    If the "satellite/cable box" can decode it, and doesn't cost $2000 why isnt there a card that can do the same thing?

    1. Re:$2000 cable box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for repeating the article's main question!

    2. Re:$2000 cable box? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the "satellite/cable box" can decode it, and doesn't cost $2000 why isnt there a card that can do the same thing?

      DRM.

  96. Very good Reply :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I actually understand what is happening now, which is actually remarkable since I was clueless just 10 minutes ago ;).

  97. Re:Conspiracy buffs unite... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    You know, that's REALLY interesting....

    Could you, maybe, provide a link to one of those "magic" boxes? All I've ever seen (and I HAVE looked) are switch boxes for cable/s-video/Left,right,picture. I have yet to find one that does that with an HD signal (Either DVI, or 9 RCA jacks at a time) (9 jacks=3 picture jacks+6 jacks for my 5.1 stereo)

  98. Motorola DCT6208 and DCT6400 can help by rbrander · · Score: 1
    In my area, the cable company is selling the Motorola DCT6208 at a loss ($500 Cdn = $400 US, even before rebates for first-time subscribers).

    Presumably they are happy to take a loss because the buyers can't then jump to satellite easily...

    Anyway, the 6208 (and presumably it's higher-end brother, the 6400 both allow direct recording to a firewire port, al though one reviewer said it just wouldn't work for PC, only Mac). of the post-decryption bitstream.

  99. Cable HDTV support (QAM) coming to the pcHDTV card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this post on the pcHDTV forums, the HD-3000 card is capable of decoding QAM. It's not supported yet, maybe because the driver can't do it?

  100. Huh!? by templest · · Score: 0
    from the dept.
    What?!
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  101. Upwards of... or more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >"...costing upwards of a thousand US dollars or more"

    What do you think "upwards of" means?

    Fucktard.

  102. Immersive holo3dgraph by dagyo · · Score: 1

    Some people have used the Immersive holo3graph II. It isn't marketed as a PVR-capable card, but it is rumored to work with certain Windows capture software - and it does support DVI input. They are a bit hard to come by, but you'll see them on ebay from time to time.

  103. Re:Sorry... by NorbMan · · Score: 1

    3) No more AV component switching.

    A year or two ago I bought an "intelligent" A/V switchbox that switched composite and s-video, and would even convert composite inputs to s-video outputs. But the great thing was it switched to whatever source you just turned on.

    I had DirecTV on #1, DVD on #2, VCR on #3, videogame on #4. While watching the Sat, turn on the DVD, poof! Turn off the DVD, and back to sat. Worked great. Unfortunately, I don't have it anymore, and can't find it online to give you a link.

  104. HDTV Linux based Capture Card by enigmasoldier · · Score: 1
  105. Re:Sorry... by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

    Continuing the off-topic trend, you can get a HDTV 3 color (also known as "component") video out for your Gamecube. Holding down the "B" button when you start a game will give you the option (if the game supports it) of 480p output. It does make a noticable difference.

    As for a component-capable A/V switch, I recently bought a Audio Authority 1154 HDTV Component Video Switcher. It is just great. Sadly it only has four inputs, and a single output, but it also switches optical digital, coax digital and RCA stereo sound. All automatically. Not a bad unit.

    I'm not the seller, and am not affiliated with the company in any way. I just like the product.

  106. Try the Nebula? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at the Nebula (www.nebula-electronics.com). It's a very nice, stable product.

  107. Two ideas for HDTV recording solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not an expert, but I have two ideas for you. They both seem to work with satellite. I dunno about Cable. http://www.nextcomwireless.com/r5000/news.htm http://www.169time.com/

  108. I was just researching this... by JediGrover · · Score: 1

    I wanted to do the same thing: Record Discovery HD and ESPN HD from my Dish 6000 to a MythTV box I'm planning. I would like *everything* in one box, a box that I control. The PVR 921 looks nice, but I'd like everything in one place. So I started thinking--how can I get that MPEG stream out of my 6000? I found 169time.com, but as mentioned, it is expensive. Another disadvantage is that it requires another PC to convert their proprietary 1394 stream into something that DVHS, PVR programs etc. can understand. Still another is that it won't record the SD satellite channels--just the HD sat & terrestrial channels. It occurred to me that they must be tapping the MPEG stream from the 8VSB/8PSK lines, before they reach whatever switch or buffer there is in front of the MPEG decoder. It certainly seems doable to me to improve on it by capturing the stream as it enters the decoder, with a clock to tell you what bandwidth is needed. However--this is not at all cheap! To get your full 1080i or 720p MPEG stream, you are going to need to capture and reframe and stream out the data at up to 80Mbps! So you need one of those ARM-core processors with a built in 1394 or USB2 controller; then you need to write the capture and framing software & a corresponding driver for your linux box on the other end (preferably as a plugin to MythTV). Is it possible? I think so. Is it worth spending the $$$$ on? Probably not--though it would get your around the broadcast flag for as long as your 6000 lasts & Dish sends signals it can understand.

  109. Re:Conspiracy buffs unite... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Here:

    This one has a lot of fancy features for video processing, but no audio switching.

    This one switches audio as well but it lacks support for DVI, and it doesn't convert digital analog on the audio. OTH it has 7 inputs...

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  110. Re:Sorry... by sydsavage · · Score: 1
    I bought a Sony TV, Sony VCR, and Sony DVD player in hopes that the remote control situation would be mitigated a bit.

    This is exactly the path that I've chosen as well, with almost good results.

    The remote that came with my STR-DE845 receiver would be the best remote ever, except for one or two fatal design flaws. See, on the surface, this is an extremely simple remote, with no more buttons than necessary. This makes it great for parents, wives/girlfriends and other non-techies to use. But it also has a flip-open feature, that reveals all the buttons a techno-geek could ask for. Unfortunately, DVD's were pretty new to the market when this remote was designed, and there is no way to navigate a DVD menu with the simple set of buttons. This would be acceptable, if you could simply flip open the cover, and use the cursor buttons found there to navigate menus. But when you flip open the panel, the remote assumes that you want to access features of the receiver, and not the current device. So, you have to do two more button presses to tell it you want it to send DVD signals instead of receiver signals. This is less than intuitive, and I myself sometimes forget this all important step. If you forget, and start hitting the cursor keys without switching modes, you end up adjusting critical receiver settings, such as front/rear/mid speaker volumes or balance, surround mode, and equalizer setttings. I've regretted to this day showing my girlfriend the flip open panel, because it's inevitable that she'll mess up these settings trying to get to some special features on a DVD.

    If it wasn't for this shortcoming, this remote would be the best designed remote, ever. I prefer it's ergonomic shape to that of any other remote I've ever used. It has a small LCD display to give the user some feedback (although they didn't do as much as they could have with it.) And the flip open panel lets you get down and dirty when you need to. If they simply would have set the default to the current device, rather than receiver, on opening the panel, I would be satisfied.

    It also inexplicably sometimes changes channels on the TV when it's set to change them on the VCR. Since I'm tuning through the VCR, changing the TV from one of its inputs to its tuner gets me a nice blast of static.

    Check the settings of your TV. You should be able to 'lock' it to one of the video inputs. The feature is called 'channel fix' on my Sony TV.

    Also, if you happen to go for Sony equipment that is one or two levels above the basic entry level models, they usually include a feature called S-Link. This will automate things a bit. For instance, switching the receiver or TV to the proper input when the DVD player is turned on, or play is started.

    Since I still use the TV's internal tuner, the TV needs to switch from tuner/S-Video input when changing between DVD's and television. The remote is smart enough to send the TV the proper command when necessary, but this is kind of a hack. Since the TV doesn't accept remote signals for about 10 seconds when it's first turned on, you need to reselect DVD after this 'warm-up' time. Again, this confuses the heck out of my girlfriend. (The remote sends all necessary power commands when you switch functions, so I've taught the g/f to just select DVD or TV or VCR or CD, and everything necessary gets the proper 'power on' command from the remote. But with the 'warm-up' delay, the TV doesn't receive the 'switch input' command also sent by the remote.) Also, since the TV and receiver are about three feet from each other, you need to have a good angle from the remote to get signals to both devices. Unfortunately, the TV was the first component I purchased, and I was unaware of S-Link, and went for the cheapest Sony TV that had S-Video input/output. Of course it lacks the S-Link. Had I gone for one model higher, I would have had it. Of course, this is only an issue with my setup, where I still use the TV's built-in tuner. If I were using a set-top box (or other external tuner), the T

  111. ATI Video Cards: Newsflash by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heck ATI still doesn't have an acceptable Windows driver for that product.

    Newsflash: ATI doesn't have an acceptable Windows driver for *any* product.

    How many times have you had ATI software lock up a machine? I've even had it trash partition tables on crash.

    Absolute garbage. Even though the hardware is good quality and theoretically does what I need, the cards are useless.

    At the very least, they should be open-sourcing drivers for obsolete products.

    Don't ask me about the time I installed over 150 ATI AIW Pros at a Toronto TV station... then had *no end* to the problems when Windows 2000 came out and they wanted to upgrade a year later.

    Unless they start to take their responsibilities to produce working (and free of silly UI "embellishments" which makes ATI's MultiMedia Center look like it was designed by a 14-year-old anime fan with Downs Syndrome) software for their hardware, their hardware shall remain utterly useless, and I shall continue to warn people away from it.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  112. About squirrels by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Please...please shoot them. We hate squirrels and it costs us money (and there are an endless supply of the bastards). They chew on the cable for one reason: to reduce the length of their front teeth year after year.

    Note: They love the feeling of gnawing on plasted and the metal braded shielding. Vile little creatures they are.

    Filthy fat squirrels. Get them we will!! Our *precious* cable.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  113. Re:Sorry... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    Wow, I wish somebody would mod the parent poster up, as I had not yet seen the "Audio Authority 1154 HDTV Component Video Switcher" that he managed to find.

    Thank you, Srvivn21.

  114. Recording OTA HDTV my experiences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MyHDp120 I own captures OTA hdtv stations as well as analog. Analog signals on this thing look ugly. You'd basically have to be two feet away from their broadcasting attannae to get a good picture on analog. Recording analog is a joke and I ignore it entirely. It does require you to pick a codec like huffyuv and your computer better be able to cope with that amout of disk writing.

    Not All HDTV stations actually broadcast HDTV content. Only a handful of content (i'm guessing here) 15% is actually made with HDTV equipment and broadcast in HDTV format. The majority of content is analog stuff broadcast on the HDTV signal.

    The analog material broadcast on HDTV looks mediocre. It's like a very clean analog reception. Sometimes the colors look washed out or the picture looks "old" if the stuff is reruns.

    The pure HDTV content is in full 1920x1080 and the card records it that way. A typical 1 hour program takes up 8.11 Gigabytes. This is actually more efficient than analog capture cards using HuffyUV (a lossless codec) and probably on par or better than Hardware Mpeg2 encoding cards. Which means you don't have to have a monster rig to capture smoothly (just plenty of disk space and a computer that has a Disk subsystem that can sustain 8.11 GB / hour). I can copy 1.4 GB to a external usb 2.0 IDE Hard drive enclosure in around 55 seconds so this seems trivial.

    The recorded Transport streams are way too high bitrate to play in windows media or most power dvd players that I've tried. Renaming to .m2v and playing in WindDVD 6 works. Ridiculously enough you cannot drag and drop the files to windvd and you can't view "all files" to select .tp or .ts files thus forcing you to change the file extension. The Dvico player is better than the myHDp120 player. Their picture is sharper and you can actually use the scroll bar to advance and back track. Too bad I can only use their 5 min. limit version.

    Sound is recorded as Ac3 streams. Most of the stuff is 2 channel. The pure HDTV programs do have 5 channel ac3 streams which you can easily use in your DVDs provided you want to take the time to re-encode the video to DVD format.

    AFAICT re-encoding is the only option to back up transport streams to DVD. That takes a lot of time and energy. I use HDTV2Mpeg2 to cut out commercials, a .tp aware DVD2Avi to create the .d2v file. Then use Avisynth to do any trimming of the picture, adding black bars on top and bottom, lancos resizing to 720x480, then use Cinema Craft Encoder to create a DVD compliant mpeg2 program stream. BBMpeg to remux with the AC3 file and Adobe Encore DVD to create menus and chapters.