Slashdot Mirror


Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns from Carbon Nanotubes

neutron_p writes "Scientists at The UTD NanoTech Institute achieved a major technological breakthrough by spinning multi-walled carbon nanotube yarns that are strong, tough and extremely flexible, and are both electrically and thermally conducting. Among other things, the futuristic yarns could result in 'smart' clothing that stores electricity, provides ballistic protection and adjusts temperature and porosity to provide greater comfort. The breakthrough, made possible by, in effect, downsizing ancient technology used for wool and cotton spinning to the nanoscale, resulted from an unusual collaboration involving nanotechnologists and experts in wool spinning."

216 comments

  1. Knitting by Ironsides · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that grandma can now knit me a bullet proof vest?

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Knitting by oexeo · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Does this mean that grandma can now knit me a bullet proof vest?

      If your grandma is a scientist working in Nano technology, yes.

    2. Re:Knitting by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      I'm looking forward to my new bulletproof knitted suit.

    3. Re:Knitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if it's a few cm thick...

    4. Re:Knitting by Tkaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd imagine only if she's got some serious time on her hands. How long would it take to knit a vest with nanothread?

      --
      Create. Destroy. Enjoy.
    5. Re:Knitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as a matter of fact, she is!

    6. Re:Knitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Does this mean that grandma can now knit me a bullet proof
      > vest?

      Yes, and if it saves your life from bullets then you have to look forwards to a slow and painful death from all the numerous detrimental and very dangerous effects from exposure to carbon nanotubes.

      This is not safe stuff to just be casting around ideas of using in clothing. It's as irresponsible as the asbestos-impregnated children's clothing from the 1930s and 1940s.

    7. Re:Knitting by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Guess what I'm gettin' for Christmas!

      -Yndrd1984

    8. Re:Knitting by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Once spun into yarn- I'd imagine no more time than a similar quantity of regular yarn.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Knitting by sleepcountry · · Score: 1

      Would be fun when it explodes when you try to send her a picture.

    10. Re:Knitting by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And I'm sure you have links to back up that claim.

    11. Re:Knitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This assumes that the nanotubes become airborne particles. So long as they stay in the thread, they are safe. As usual, someone on slashdot forgets an important detail.

    12. Re:Knitting by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Check on the bullet resistance of tightly hand woven silk.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. I just upgraded my loom last month ... by 93,000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    and now they come out with this. I knew I should have waited.

    1. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I think you're safe. It doesn't seem that they're in any hurry to weave a microscopic carpet yet.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by Scutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It doesn't seem that they're in any hurry to weave a microscopic carpet yet.

      Can you imagine a self-cleaning carpet? You drop crumbs on it and the fibers work it cilia-like toward a vaccuum duct in the wall? Sweeeeet....

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by standsolid · · Score: 1

      Ah, you can get the new version of it at The Underdogs.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    4. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note to self: don't watch TV while laying on the floor.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by Infinityis · · Score: 0

      For that matter, you can make one of those flat escalator thingys or a highway out of that stuff...now that'd be pretty cool. Might tickle though

    6. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when all your furniture ends up in one corner of the room

    7. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by Audacious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can see it now.....

      "This is your TV rambling reporter live at Dave's house. Officer O'Reilly, what happened here?"

      "Well, we can't be certain ya know. We've never seen anything quite like this."

      "Oh? What do you mean?"

      "Well, from what we can tell, Dave came home after working hard all day and his clothes were all dusty and dirty. Like most people get if they work outside."

      "So he worked outside? Like a gardnerer or something?"

      "Well, a construction worker actually. Anyway, as I was saying, he came home and his house literally attacked him. It grabbed him, slamed him to the ground, and then stuffed him into the vacuum slot. It was quite grissly."

      "So what are you going to do?" (Sirens coming in the background.)

      "Well, we thought about it and, like any kind of rabid animal, we felt it best if we put the house down. So the firemen are on their way."

      "You mean you're going to burn the house down?"

      "Yes. It's the only way. We can't let the house run amok killing people ya know."

      "Seems a bit extreme officer. Shouldn't there be a trial or something?"

      "No-no. Two of my police officers had to be rescued too. When they entered the house to search the house attacked them and almost shoved them up the vacuum slot too. Seems one of them had stepped in some dog poo and well......the house didn't like that very much. It was how we figured out what happened to Dave."

      "Poor Dave. Done in by a house with an attitude. You just have to wonder at the irony of that. Makes you wonder if you could ever really have a truly clean house. Maybe dirt isn't so bad after all. Maybe we should all give dirt another chance."

      In the background you hear "Ok! Who took my jelly donuts? Whadda mean you thought it was blood on the donuts? Those were special cherry jelly donuts! What? Paul took them in to compare them with the blood in the house?! Paul! Paul! Can you hear me?"

      --
      Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
    8. Re:I just upgraded my loom last month ... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Yeh, I can imagine it. Of course, it would have to have some smarts as to what to clean and what not to clean. So, computer control is probably a given. Someone would then pretty quickly come up with ideas of automatically forming to feet or even putting spring in your steps. You could move furniture around with ease. Of course, as long as we're imagining we could just make the fibers controllable on a nano scale and start talking about taking the crumbs apart atom by atom. Maybe you could even use the material found in the crumbs to self repair damage. And imagine atomically decomposing pet waste. Of course, that will evolve to just decomposing the cat and the dog. And shortly thereafter you could decompose people you don't like along with all of the evidence. Hmmm. Maybe there is a limit to the technology we should have... at least widely available.

  3. Finally... by tokenhillbilly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now we can get to work on spinning the belt for the space elevator.

    1. Re:Finally... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's been established that single-walled carbon nanotube structures are the only viable candidate for making a tether with a sufficient strength/mass ratio.

      This spinning process seems to only apply to multi-walled nanotubes, at least according to what the submitter wrote.

      In other words, not quite.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  4. Say there... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Are you wearing one of them new carbon-acrylic dockers? Or are you just happy to see me?" :)

  5. Insertion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Insert romantic notions of nanotechnologists and wool clothiers bartering their skills in the art. At an SCA meeting.

    See? I can spin a pretty good one.

    1. Re:Insertion: by Bearpaw · · Score: 2, Funny
      Insert romantic notions of nanotechnologists and wool clothiers bartering their skills in the art. At an SCA meeting.

      No shit, there I was, making some chainmail at my boring security desk job at Carbon Nanotechnologies, when suddenly ...

  6. Too early in the morning for me.. by BarakMich · · Score: 1, Funny

    I read that as:

    Futuristic 'Smart' Yams From Carbon Nanotubes

    1. Re:Too early in the morning for me.. by krenshala · · Score: 1

      ok ... i feel better knowing i wasn't the *only* one that thought it said that ... ;)

      --

      krenshala

  7. Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by sw149 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lets see it will be silver, one piece and one size fits all.

    WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF TOMORROW

    1. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Funny

      And we will call it Mythril!

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by ilyanep · · Score: 0

      But seriously, sweaters that are one-size-fits-all. That'd be awesome! The only reason I get suits at Sears instead of Marshall Field's is because I know it'll be too small for me in a year or so. Ahh...sweet puberty.

      --
      ~Ilyanep
      To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    3. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You're obviously a 45 year old man pretending to be a teen, for whatever reason we don't know. A real teen would NEVER utter the words "sweet puberty".

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by zx75 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And somehow seem strangely baggy on overweight men, yet still fit skin tight on a thin, shapely female form.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    5. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      And somehow seem strangely baggy on overweight men, yet still fit skin tight on a thin, shapely female form.


      Apparently, it's not just "smart" yarn, it's also "heterosexual male" yarn.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:Futuristic 'Smart' Yarns by zx75 · · Score: 1

      All those futuristic documentaries that I've seen certainly seem to suggest so... that or "homosexual female" yarn, but either way, it works.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  8. First application likely to be... by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

    the chastity thong, a secure impenetrable and fashionable undergarment for young ladies concerned about fashion, and fathers concerned about young men.

    1. Re:First application likely to be... by fembots · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yes but security is only as good as its weakest link, in this case the daughther.

    2. Re:First application likely to be... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

      the chastity thong

      Ya know, you don't have to remove a thong for sex, right?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:First application likely to be... by mr_walrus · · Score: 1

      my tongue becomes a thore thong after too much sex...

    4. Re:First application likely to be... by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      You do if it's an electricity storing smart thong that shocks to death anyone other than the daughter who touches it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:First application likely to be... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You do if it's an electricity storing smart thong that shocks to death anyone other than the daughter who touches it.

      I pity your daughter. She's going to grow up with an unhealthy fear of toilets. If you're at all serious, I suggest you give her some condoms tell her that there's more if she wants them, and tell her dates that you have 60 acres and a backhoe.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:First application likely to be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Please develop a sense of humor. The idea of a chastity thong is funny, it seems ridiculous exactly because you can have sex while wearing one. The fact that you could actually make one that worked as a chastity belt by using smart clothing just makes it funnier. The point of the original post was not to promote the actual use of castity belts or any other similar measure of parental control. It was a joke.

    7. Re:First application likely to be... by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe condoms you'll really not know are there...

    8. Re:First application likely to be... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what if it's electrified?

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    9. Re:First application likely to be... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Bah just make the condoms out of carbon nanotubles.

      Mmm microscopically thin and blocks things smaller than a virus.

    10. Re:First application likely to be... by RsG · · Score: 2, Funny

      -Mmm microscopically thin and blocks things smaller than a virus.

      Angstrom ribbed... for atomic pleaure! :-)

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    11. Re:First application likely to be... by SurgeryByNumbers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Carbon nanotubes explode when exposed to a camera flash, right? Their conductivity is a bit too good. What an odd way of adding excitement to the bedroom.

    12. Re:First application likely to be... by tincho_uy · · Score: 1

      Even if you did, you'd just need to take a picture with flash, and POOF! no more thongs (http://pubs.acs.org/cen/topstory/8017/8017notw4.h tml)... _AND_ you get the picture!

  9. from the the-warmest-sweaters-every dept. by rdsmith4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    from the typing-too-fast dept

  10. Yes, but... by elid · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...does it repel stains?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about repelling stains? Does it attract women!?

    2. Re:Yes, but... by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have to, it conducts electrictiy. Just plug it into the wall and shock the everliving hell out of your Mithril garb... same principle as cleaning an oven but cooler.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
  11. Not only clothing by kusanagi374 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This kind of technology is not only useful in helping you wear your computer, which seems to be today's fetiche of every geek. Although that is, indeed, attractive, let us think for a while about the advantages of being able to have such small conductors. For example, we can have super computers that are roughly the same size of today's desktops.

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of nanocomputers inside your ATX case, and then you'll see what's a really good fetiche. It might even run Longhorn with Doom 3 and Duke Nukem Forever on dual monitors!

    1. Re:Not only clothing by irokie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      such small conductors

      Surely you mean semi-conductors...?
      explain to me how you'd make a computer out of conductors only

      i'm not being facetious, i'm genuinely interested...

      --
      and if you see me strut, remind me of what left this outlaw torn...
    2. Re:Not only clothing by kusanagi374 · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean semi-conductors...?

      Yes, indeed. My bad. But still, this tech is one step forward to what I described on my parent post.

    3. Re:Not only clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you honestly beleive this is even possible, you are in for some serious dissapointment. Duke Nukem Forver won't even be close to done by the time this technology develops that far.

    4. Re:Not only clothing by zx75 · · Score: 2, Funny

      See: Charles Babbage

      Fortunately, most metals are in fact, conductors. (Not that he used it in that way though...)

      --
      This is not a sig.
  12. Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by MasterC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Am I the only one who thought of Fountains of Paradise by Arthur C. Clarke when reading this?

    For those that don't know, Foutains of Paradise is where ACC first coined the idea of building an elevator into space which he later used in 3001: A Final Odyssey (The 3rd sequal to 2001: A Space Odyssey). To build the elevator a super-strength carbon string was bundled into three bundles and then attached to a giant mass in space to keep the tethers taught. At least if memory serves me correctly that's how it was done. If you're an ACC fan and haven't read Fountains of Paradise, I recommend it.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot.
      Carbon Nanotubes.

      No, you are not the first person who thought of a space elevator.

    2. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/first/only/

    3. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Jeremy+Singer · · Score: 1

      I wrote a story for my high school creative writing class in 1969 on this subject. I presented the idea in a speach competition that year.

    4. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Arthur C. Clarke an advocate of Man-Boy Love relationships

      No, that's John Varley.

    5. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by JoeD · · Score: 2, Informative

      This may have been the first time that Clarke wrote about a space elevator, but the concept was not original with him.

      Tsiolkovsky first proposed it in 1895.

      See http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/TETHER/spacet owers.html

    6. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know Arthur C Clarke likes #$%!ing kiddies?

    7. Re:Arthur C. Clarke's Fountain of Paradise by Desiderata · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I thought of Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars series... they fight a planetwide war over a space elevator. Let's hope politicians don't read that when they try to get space elevators going and read something by ACC instead.

  13. CARBON Nanotubes by freeze128 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But wouldn't the sweater cause all this black ugly carbon to rub off on you?

    1. Re:CARBON Nanotubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect the fibers to be coated... not simply bare to the elements, or your skin.

    2. Re:CARBON Nanotubes by drew · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, cause i know my wife has to be careful not to get any nasty black stuff on her from her diamond ring....

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    3. Re:CARBON Nanotubes by UWC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could ask the same question of diamond. It's all about the structure. If I remember a little piece from high school chemistry correctly, graphite's molecular structure is one of weakly bonded layers (I want to say that the layers are a hexagonal lattice, but I don't recall exactly) that are essentiallly scraped off in applications such as pencils.

      And I guess you were trying to be funny, which you were, but sometimes sarcastic tone doesn't travel well through text. Ah, well. Gave me a chance to flaunt my high school education.

    4. Re:CARBON Nanotubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Abspestos is carbon needles. I learned too.

    5. Re:CARBON Nanotubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I want to say that the layers are a hexagonal lattice, but I don't recall exactly)

      Good memory! Graphite is made of sheets of hexagons, with 2.2 Angstroms between the carbon atoms in-plane, and 3.4 Angstroms between planes. In diamond, they're arranged in tetrahedrons, and carbon nanotubes are essentially sheets of graphite curled into a tube.

      The grandparent is thinking of carbon soot, which is usually a mixture of small crystallites of graphite and amorphous crap. ;-)

  14. Wonderful world of Nanotubes by sameerdesai · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have always been fascinated by them that they have so many incredible applications and multiwalled carbon nanotubes is just one of its many possible ways of using it.

  15. Pressure tanks by Tap-Sa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Screw smart clothes... Hopefully this stuff can be made into next generation pressurised (200-300 atm) rocket fuel tanks. No turbopumps, reliable pressure fed engines without weight penalty in bulky tanks and cheap RLV is one important step closer to reality.

    1. Re:Pressure tanks by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, but how does this stuff react with LOX or LH? Cryogenic propellents do some funky things to materials. 200-300 atmospheres is a LOT of pressure to hold, you can't have the slightest flaw in the vessel. That would need to be some incredible tight knitting! Get a research grant from NASA and see if you can make your idea work!

    2. Re:Pressure tanks by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      Sort of like a giant whoopie cushion filled with rocket fuel? Sweeeet.

      --
      !hoD
    3. Re:Pressure tanks by SlashN · · Score: 1

      No turbopumps, reliable pressure fed engines And when they clog just stick in your NT-STP to clean em out! -Is the Wily Coyote trying to eat the Road Runner or just have sex with it?

    4. Re:Pressure tanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, carbon nanotubes might react themselves (violently oxidize (aka BURN)), but you could use a thin inside coating which you wrap with nanotubes (like they do now with carbonfibers already)

  16. Due to my Font by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I first read this as "Futuristic Smart Yams from Carbon Nanotubes." If ever any overlords ever needed welcoming, it'd be Smart Yam overlords. I wouldn't have to be the one to explain about Thanksgivings past. Hopefully they wouldn't demand to eat one human for every yam ever consumed...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Due to my Font by Surt · · Score: 1

      Only the first human ever to eat a yam, as caught on their yam nanny cams.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Due to my Font by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If ever any overlords ever needed welcoming, it'd be Smart Yam overlords

      Didn't Pak Protectors eat yams to reach that state? If anything is a smart yam, that would be.

    3. Re:Due to my Font by RsG · · Score: 1

      Well, they eat roots... I think the metamorphisis is supposed to be brought about by a symbiont that lives within the tree-of-life roots though, not the roots themselves (a virus if memory serves, but I could be mistaken). Oh, and the whatever it is that initiates the change requires Thallium Oxide as part of its ecology, so the plants need that in the soil to support a Pak population (and Earth is Thallium poor, which was a major plot point in the book).

      You may be thinking of Brenner in Protector, who grew terrestrial yams that had been bred to host the symbiont. He didn't have tree-of-life, so he needed a human alternative.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  17. obSimpsons by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new itchy sweater-wearing overlords.

    1. Re:obSimpsons by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      Itchy and Scratcy!

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
  18. Ob. Back To The Future II by datastalker · · Score: 1

    Jacket: Your jacket is drying... ::Air being blown in McFly's face::

    Jacket: Beep. Your jacket is dry.

    1. Re:Ob. Back To The Future II by fracai · · Score: 1

      I suppose I'll soon be seen as normal for wearing my pants inside out?

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  19. Not cool enough by qengho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Smart clothes," feh. Wake me up when they've developed mimetic polycarbon.

    1. Re:Not cool enough by Tap-Sa · · Score: 1

      Hope they don't develope mimetic polyalloy while you sleep...

    2. Re:Not cool enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart clothes could be cool if it's like the tux that Jackie Chan wore in the movie.

  20. What will we do with all the sheep? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Come up with your best punchline to this and win a g-mail invite! (No, not really)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:What will we do with all the sheep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Use them for wool.

    2. Re:What will we do with all the sheep? by UWC · · Score: 1

      Fur is murder! Oh, wait, nevermind.

    3. Re:What will we do with all the sheep? by Yankel · · Score: 1

      Put them out to pasture, of course!

      --
      --- Dan
    4. Re:What will we do with all the sheep? by greywar · · Score: 1

      The question almost answers itself. Oh wait....why are you all looking at me like that? Why yes I DO have a perverted mind. What do you mean YOU would have never thought of that?

    5. Re:What will we do with all the sheep? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Since they're microscopic (they have to be, in order to produce nanotube wool), perhaps they could be trained like circus fleas and sea monkeys.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  21. Just in Time for WTO textile liberalization by Donny+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's just in time (or just a bit too late?) to save many a developed country's ass - if I'm not mistaken in 2005 WTO members must abolish textile quotas and Chinese and Indian manufacturers are poised to make a killing.

    Products based on this technology will command premium prices (and have great features - I might finally become interested in shopping!).

    1. Re:Just in Time for WTO textile liberalization by drlake · · Score: 1

      About time they abolished those quotas. Given the dominance of imported textiles in the US already, it won't have that big an impact. If the remaining domestic producers want to stay viable, they can always shift to more boutique-style production touting the domestic nature of the product, and they'll still find buyers. Of course, it's easier to just bitch about foreign producers...

    2. Re:Just in Time for WTO textile liberalization by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Yes, China is about to drop their quota and most likely flood the market. This month's issue of the Economist has an excellent article on the topic.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  22. Ballistic protection by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Ontario, Canada the guvmnt wants to declare bullet proof vests against the law, just like weapons. Will clothes that provide ballistic protection as well as a range of other great features be against the law? I want my bullet-proof underwear, god-damnit!

    1. Re:Ballistic protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the cloth can change porosity depending on the heat, it might be developed to change whether or not it's bullet-proof. Then the government could have access to make them bullet proof or not via a wireless security code built into the tag. Peaceful consumers would have bullet proof clothing, and the government could turn the protection off if they wanted to shoot someone. Everybody wins!

    2. Re:Ballistic protection by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What a wonderful IDEA, how about transparency, will that change on the fly? In fact, if the government decides that you are a criminal, why, it could just send a signal to your clothes to electrecute you. If they decide you are dangerous the electric charge could somehow mystically be raised by a few billion volts, just blame it on the bad weather.

      I don't even want to know what script-kiddies will do if they get their hands on everyone's clothes.

    3. Re:Ballistic protection by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      If bullet-proof underwear is against the law, only criminals will have bullet-proof underwear.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    4. Re:Ballistic protection by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Banning bulletproof vests because of potential criminal use seems to be kind of silly. Would they be allowing exceptions for those who have recieved death threats? Will only politicians and law enforcement be allowed to use them?

    5. Re:Ballistic protection by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      OT:

      Wow... I can understand where people are coming from when they are against guns (especially automatic weaponry), but being against bullet proof vests? That's insane!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:Ballistic protection by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I want clothing with an adjustably transparent fly.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    7. Re:Ballistic protection by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      In Ontario, Canada the guvmnt wants to declare bullet proof vests against the law, just like weapons.

      I've been Googling various likely keywords, but I haven't been able to find anything...period.

      Have you got any sources for that statement? Was it the 'Government' or just a backbench (or Opposition?) MPP who proposed the policy?

      I know that some U.S. lawmakers (Senator Feinstein, D-CA, for example) have suggested banning the sale of bulletproof vests to the public, but I wasn't aware of similar moves in Canada.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:Ballistic protection by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      This month there was an arrest made, a guy with about 20 pieces, a bunch of fake guns and some bulletproof vests. So it's very very recent, I am now hearing it on the radio talk-shows, the police chief implied this is a possibility that bullet proof vests will be outlawed.

    9. Re:Ballistic protection by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Wow... I can understand where people are coming from when they are against guns (especially automatic weaponry), but being against bullet proof vests? That's insane!"
      Well not really. I mean think about this statement. I can understand people being against ICBMs but being against missile defense that is insane. Think about how many people a nutcase with a gun and a bullet proof vest could take out? I remember seeing pictures of some guys in LA that the cops just could not stop until they went to gun store and bought some higher power guns. While I am do not think banning bullet proof vests and I am for missile defense I have to say that it is not insane just a different opinion or viewpoint.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Ballistic protection by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Think about how many people a nutcase with a gun and a bullet proof vest could take out?

      That's a lousy argument. Any criminal who can get a gun can sure get a bullet proof vest. Criminals can get guns, no matter what. Speaking from experience, even in a country not sharing a border with the US, it's rediculously easy. Banning guns only stops accidents and "heat of the moment" crimes. Which is fair enough, but banning the law-abiding paranoid from bullet proof vests isn't going to help anyone.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    11. Re:Ballistic protection by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Umm I agree with you completely...

      Only in many places its already illegal to have a bulletproof vest without a permit. Or is that only rappers on parole?

      *moment of silece for ODB*

      I believe Canada is not an exception to this. But then again there could be some wierd law that bans them only in special cases.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    12. Re:Ballistic protection by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure, and EVERYONE knows that by making it illegal to have a bullet-proof vest, we can ensure that no criminal will EVER wear one...

      There's a bit of a flaw in your argument there...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:Ballistic protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They stopped them by shooting them in the knee's, the higher powered weapons didn't get there in time.

      Makes for an interesting thought, why didn't the cops try to just wound them? All that training on using lethal force lethaly sure backfired.

    14. Re:Ballistic protection by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Right, because people don't kill people, bullet-proof vests kill people. Sheesh, well, at least I don't feel like the US has the only dumbass government in the world.

      (No offense to you canadians, I'll probably be looking to move there soon if things keep going the way they are)

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    15. Re:Ballistic protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which begs the question: who actually does use them? I can't think of a legitimate reason for an ordinary Joe to need one.

  23. If you can guess my name... by johnashby · · Score: 1

    Well, all we have to do now is find a way to keep the old troll from taking our firstborn sons. If you need to ask, you were deprived as a child.

    1. Re:If you can guess my name... by UWC · · Score: 1

      Mxyzptlk! Or do i need to say it backwards? Kltpzyxm!

      Wrong story? Crap.

  24. The killer app by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is clearly cool. Temperature-sensitive clothing that adjusts to keep me comfortable over a range of conditions would be spectacular. Bullet resistance is a cool bonus. The potential exoskeletal applications are downright neat. And, personally, I would love to see this in wearable computing applications.

    But all that being said, what I want to see most is clothing that you can change the appearance of (color, pattern, even cut, if possible) at will. Not because I particularly want it, mind you, but because I'm quite certain that that's the feature that will drive adoption of this in the consumer space, which is what will cause all the actually cool applications to be available.

    Viva fashion, and whatnot.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:The killer app by HisMother · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now: you could walk up to any woman you see, clap twice, and turn her sweater into a bikini top.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    2. Re:The killer app by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      But all that being said, what I want to see most is clothing that you can change the appearance of (color, pattern, even cut, if possible) at will.

      Came and went as far back as the '80s, as clothing fashion is wont to do.
      A little biofeedback practice and you could make your hypercolor t-shirt change color from among 3 or more different colors (like, blue, pink and white).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:The killer app by CreatureComfort · · Score: 2, Funny

      change the appearance of (color, pattern, even cut, if possible) at will.
      It's called elastic, and it's brother spandex. One used by old ladies to "change the cut" as waistlines expand, the other used by young ladies to "change the cut" to achieve the tightest fit possible.

      Pray god you never see the two get mixed up.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    4. Re:The killer app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Temperature-sensitive clothing that adjusts to keep me comfortable over a range of conditions would be spectacular. Bullet resistance is a cool bonus.

      Yeah, paintball is for sissies. These clothes should come with a free gun or ammo.

  25. Progress got run over by Grandma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The breakthrough, made possible by, in effect, downsizing ancient technology used for wool and cotton spinning to the nanoscale, resulted from an unusual collaboration involving nanotechnologists and experts in wool spinning."

    Now just think what the car makers can learn from the buggy whip people?

  26. Not smart enough. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this "smart" yarn smart enough to stop people from wearing lime green paisley sweaters?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Not smart enough. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's worse than that: with the new smaart fabric, the paisley's swim around.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Not smart enough. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Is this "smart" yarn smart enough to stop people from wearing lime green paisley sweaters?

      Being carbon, all of the clothing will be black*.

      The future will be very, very hip...albeit a bit warm when out in the Sun.

      (*Yes, I know that not all carbon allotropes are black, and that it's likely possible to synthesize nanotubes with unusual optical properties. It's just a joke.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Not smart enough. by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      It's still worse than that: the new smart fabric is bullet proof so you can't even shoot the guy win the lime green swimming paisley sweater. *shudder*

      --
      !hoD
  27. No nanotube sweaters for Christmas this year by jackelfish · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would not get my hopes up for getting a carbon nanotube sweater for Christmas this year or next year or the year after that... In the foreseeable future these nanotube yarns would be used to replace metal wires in applications where increased flexibility and pliability are required they could also be used for such things as capacitors or batteries. The authors of the article (Mei Zhang, Ken R. Atkinson and Ray H. Baughman, Science, 306, 5700, p1358-1361, 19 November 2004) state that the small yarn diameters (about 20 micrometers for the four ply yarn), could eliminate the uncomfortable rigidity sometimes found for metal wire-containing conducting textiles that provide radio or microwave absorption, electrostatic discharge protection, textile heating, or wiring for electronic devices. Although a bulletproof, electrically conductive vest that could withstand temperature extremes from +450C to -196C does sound quite appealing.

    --
    "When Nature Calls We All Shall Drown" Johan Edlund
    1. Re:No nanotube sweaters for Christmas this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although a bulletproof, electrically conductive vest that could withstand temperature extremes from +450C to -196C does sound quite appealing.
      That's great for the bits of you that are under the vest, not so good for the bits that aren't.

    2. Re:No nanotube sweaters for Christmas this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "The authors of the article ... state that the small yarn diameters ... could eliminate the uncomfortable rigidity sometimes found for metal wire"

      At last, a new, more comfortable WonderBra! And no tricky clasps for the men...

    3. Re:No nanotube sweaters for Christmas this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > withstand temperature extremes from +450C to -196C

      Remember, it's both electrically AND heat conductive. So just because your sweater can stand being in a 450C kiln, it doesn't help you, the wearer!

    4. Re:No nanotube sweaters for Christmas this year by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      Oh sure, go ahead and actually READ the article and then post a summary thus bumming the bulletproof, electrically conducting, TEMPEST certified, smart carbon nanotube sweater for Christmas high of everyone who reads /.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  28. After cyberpunk, biopunk and nanopunk... by quamaretto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comes textile-punk, to be featured in Neal Stephenson's upcoming book, Sweater Crash. Meanwhile, the Wachowski brothers have a new movie in the making about about a futuristic society where all of humanity is entrapped in a large, controlling single piece of nano-fabric. Of course, this was all done 50 years ago in an Asimov book.

    --
    *is run over by rotten tomatoes*
    1. Re:After cyberpunk, biopunk and nanopunk... by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Of course, this was all done 50 years ago in an Asimov book.

      Actually, you remind me of _The Garments of Caean_ by Barrington J. Bayley, 1976 (link):

      Back on Old Earth there was a saying that clothes make the man. But on the world called Caean this became literally true. On that colonized planet there was a material called Prossim. If your body was in contact with Prossim your personality changed. You became handsome, you had vast charisma, you had total self-confidence - you were always the power center of every enterprise.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  29. The article by grungebox · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link is kind of crappy. It's sort of hype-ish without real science, which coincidentally is the name of the journal whose latest issue is mentioned in the link as containing the paper describing the breakthrough. What a sentence that was...anyways, here you go. You should be able to read it even if you aren't at a subscribing institution since it's the latest issue.

    It's worth noting that UTD has only been hard at work in CNT research for a few years. I was there in 2002 when the NanoTech institute was still being built. They had a bunch of Dells sitting outside the building with no one watching...but I guess they didn't worry. I mean, who steals a Dell?

    Other good links, mostly culled from the above Science article:
    Baughman's summary of nanotube work
    Smalley (the Nobel prize winner) and his CNT work:: He invented the HiPCO process for large-scale development of CNT's...from what I gather, fiber-spinning like the UTD method is a direct competitor.
    A really good (and 46 page!) discussion of nanotube work
    Strong Bad, in case you get tired of science.

  30. Canvas cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd just need high-strength steel or aluminium, and then stretch this stuff around the frame. Might be a little loud, but I'd bet the weight difference would make people give serious consideration to the designs. Same thing with airplanes and tents. Likely houses, as well.

    All kinds of uses. We just need people with the cash to get jiggy with it.

  31. Evaluation of Technology by ThosLives · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now, as can be demonstrated by many of my previous posts, I'm all for pure and applied science. However, lately, I've been thinking quite a lot on the question "what good is technology?". Yes, building a space elevator would be cool. Yes, having light bulletproof vests would be cool. But how does this science help mankind? Does it improve agriculture? Does it help provide things people need? Does it help the environment? Does it help people get along better?

    I know these are questions that don't have easy answers always, and I know that if people thought about these things in a literal sense then we probably would not have a lot of the technology we currently have.

    My question is more of this: what research is being done into pure sciences and technology that does work for agriculture, health, the environment, and those types of things directly. Some technology simply supports those things indirectly by providing jobs, new materials, etc.

    What is lacking in a lot of science, though, and much of life in general, is a lack of focus. Even in the pure sciences, what's the goal of a particular project? Sometimes it's "to see how things work". Sometimes it's "we would like a better way to do X". There is no overarching goal for a lot of modern technology though - mostly it's just "we want a profit!" (Reminds me of the line from Star Trek: First Contact where Zefram Cochrane says he wasn't in it for science but for profit!)

    I am by most measures a successful person, but I've had to ask myself: what good is it? Not from a depressed standpoint, but a "shouldn't I be doing more?" standpoint. Carbon nanotubes are great, but what do they really give us? The list goes on - what do Linux desktops give us? MP3 players (without DRM, of course!)? Wi-Fi? These are all neat things - but do we have a purpose behind our technical passions?

    </soapbox>

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    1. Re:Evaluation of Technology by Mirk · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --

      --
      What short sigs we have -
      One hundred and twenty chars!
      Too short for haiku.
    2. Re:Evaluation of Technology by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      It will help people to get alone better, especially if everyone know that the clothes are bulletproof. Bang. For a while I guess. Then we'll just make a better bullet.

    3. Re:Evaluation of Technology by grungebox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comparing Carbon nanotubes to MP3 players is like comparing the transistor to a Radio Flyer wagon.

      CNTs are like lasers. When the laser was invented in 1955 or so (someone correct me), it was billed as a "solution looking for a problem." No one knew what the hell to do with it. Naturally, it being the Cold War, most research money was pumped into Star Wars-style blasters...but now look at all the work done with lasers. Surgery, trace gas detection for pollution controls, CD players, DVD players, spectroscopy for materials science, the list goes on. The point is that CNT research is very early. Hell, nanotubes weren't known to exist until 1990 or so. This is one breakthrough out of about a billion or so possible with Carbon Nanotubes. Don't judge the technology based on the premise of "fancy clothing." Hell, the point of the link isn't the clothing part; it's the fact that a new fabrication method was invented that would improve production (and thus, deployment) of nanotubes by orders of magnitude. It's like finding a new way to make lasers on a broad scale instead of slowly making them by hand like in 1960. What you do with the plethora of nanotubes or lasers or what have you is up to you.

    4. Re:Evaluation of Technology by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      I think you need to read some other web sites, or something. ;-)

      Plenty of work being done in agriculture, for example, but it's being demonized by the Luddites. And health? Companies doing health and medical research have their own index on the stock market.

      Also, a society that works hard has earned the right to play, thus our MP3 players and Playstations serve a purpose. Complete selflessness can be wearying, especially when the recipients of that selflessness can be somewhat less than appreciative. It's human nature to need a break and some "me" time now and then. It allows the mind to run its cron scripts.

      And don't quote Star Trek characters. It diminishes your arguments. ;-)

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    5. Re:Evaluation of Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up the words pure, science, and technology. Your questions are tautological.

      You're asking "What's the usefulness of useful information? What's the application of a non-application driven investigation?"

    6. Re:Evaluation of Technology by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      I certainly would prefer science to directly enrich the human experience rather than be a constant search for profit. However, I must point out that the ability to conduct pure science on something "because it's there" is no longer completely possible. Of course, one can always hole oneself up in one's apartment with a pad of paper and a pencil to unearth the next mathematical discovery. To do Science, with all it's inferred experimental Goodness, however, is becoming increasingly hard as the frontiers of science move ever out of reach of Joe Scientist and His Garage Laboratory. These days cutting edge science is done with particle accelerators, creating micro-singularities, and number crunching with 512-node computer clusters. For this reason, I don't see how we can push back towards a time where a brilliant man invents something in his backyard. Perhaps a brilliant independently wealthy man, but not a brilliant commonly-wealthy man.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    7. Re:Evaluation of Technology by kieran · · Score: 1

      You dismiss space elevators as "cool", but they could allow us to send lightweight solar collectors into space, and help solve the ever-worsening energy crisis.

    8. Re:Evaluation of Technology by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Flash back a few thousand years, or maybe even one. Here we had a bunch of sailing vessels, with no real purpose other than exploration, naval defense, and the shipping of goods. Most goods shipped had a high profit density (and therefore not available to the masses) due to the risks and relatively small size of the ships used. On the face of it, these ships only helped the relatively wealthy. But they did increase the wealth of nations, the trasmission of ideas, and provide work for some segment of the unwashed masses, which improved the welfare of society as a whole. And although trickle-down theories don't work well in economics, they do in technology. for example, it's hard to find a house without indoor plumbing, and the sanitation improvements that entails, in most industrialized countries.

      And back to ships. Now that they've been around for so long, they've connected the world's markets, and allowed food to be shipped to where the people are, further increasing the quality of life and helping mankind (which still hasn't improved mankind's nature, nor is it likely to). But not bad for a thing whose biggest initial contribution was war medals and scurvey.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    9. Re:Evaluation of Technology by ThosLives · · Score: 1
      The example you give is exactly my point: lasers (nor CNTs) are not bad at all - they are great. However, how much more could we do if we focused on solving the problems rather than finding solutions and then problems that can be solved by them?

      Like I said, I don't want to knock science and technology at all - just tweak its focus a little bit. There's no reason we can't say, "hey, we have problem X. Let's throw research at it". This is generally not how the research institutions look at things - they are generally "let's poke around with stuff and hope we find a breakthrough!" (that's a gross generalization, I know).

      I think what's best is a good balance between the two, but companies now only throw money into "the next big thing" and that may or may not be something that matters.

      I know there are many brilliant folks out there who, if given focus to tackle any given existing technical problem, could find an elegant, efficient, profitable solution. The trouble is, there is usually little glory in solving such problems. After all, the biggest issues out there aren't technical anyway (those are generally political/social).

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    10. Re:Evaluation of Technology by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      It's like finding a new way to make lasers on a broad scale instead of slowly making them by hand like in 1960. What you do with the plethora of nanotubes or lasers or what have you is up to you.

      I don't know about you, but I'm going to take my plethora of lasers and mount them on the heads of some friggin sharks. And I'll use a carbon nanotube yarn strap to hold them on!

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  32. Body armor, and other thoughts by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope it comes with a grounding strap.

    I wonder if this would be a good material for microsurgical sutures.

    And now, we can construct the world's smallest violin for Ron Artest.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  33. Fly me to the moon by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Knit me a sweater that transforms into an orbital elevator.

    "Form of... Sky Hook!"

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  34. Missing the most important detail by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long is it? Lots of nanotube work has been done before, but at microscopic lengths. Nanotubes won't be practical for anything until they can be made at a useful size.

    1. Re:Missing the most important detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was a third of a millimetre. They could go longer by starting with a bigger "forest" of nanotubes to begin with.

    2. Re:Missing the most important detail by anum · · Score: 1

      For a lot of applications microsocpic lenghts ARE a useful size!

      --
      I don't think, Therefore I'm not.
  35. Thermally conductive sweaters? by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 1

    Thermally conductive sweaters? Great idea, guys, but why stop there? I propose oven mitts.

  36. Health concernes.. by lordsilence · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This may be a really stupid question. Related to a recent study concerning the replacements for asbestos. Back in the 80:ies when it was discovered that asbestos would cause lung-cancer or worse after repeated exposion to it, they replaced asbestos rather swiftly with materials like cheramic fibres. Now, recently they discovered that replacements like heat-resistant cheramics could also cause lung-cancer this. Perhaps just as dangerous as asbestos. The reason found, was because of the micro-fragments (dust) which would gather in the lungs and it's air-sacks (alveoli) and make them to swell abnormally and then risk causing cancer.
    Even building insolation materials have also been questioned.
    Now to my concern regarding carbon fibre.. has there been any studies on carbon tubes's affects on the human body? Carbon-fibre is an artificial material such as many insolations questioned. That is why I ask.
    Ten years, twenty years or more from now, will we notice the dangerious side-affects of materials we push out on the market?

    1. Re:Health concernes.. by drlake · · Score: 1

      Ten years, twenty years or more from now, will we notice the dangerious side-affects of materials we push out on the market?

      Yes.
    2. Re:Health concernes.. by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      A little googling and I got this, some studies on asbestos and it's replacement. (Oh and I noticed I misspelled ceramics as cheramics.) http://agency.osha.eu.int/publications/magazine/6/ en/index_14.htm

    3. Re:Health concernes.. by UDGags · · Score: 3, Informative

      There have been a few studies done by NIOSH sponsored by NASA. I have nice presentation of them but it is 100mbs so I can not put it up anywhere. Iwould check out there website because I believe the report is publicly available there. It basically says they are not sure and to take proper precautions. It explains the sizes of particles and what takes them out in the lungs and so forth. I work with carbon nanofibers daily in research and anytime we are hadnling dry fibers we wear respirators to be safe. Once it is in a polymer/resin then we do not have to worry about it. If you think about it everytime you go to the beach there are nano sand particles.

    4. Re:Health concernes.. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Google is your friend. Apparently, some negative side effects, but not to the degree of asbestos.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    5. Re:Health concernes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cheramic"? You might be interested to know the word is "ceramic", with a soft "c".

    6. Re:Health concernes.. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a study where mice exposed to NanoTubes were found to have them in there brains.

      Aparently the nanotubes are so small they are extreamly sharp.

      I know there was sum suspicion that the asbestosis didn't come from the material itself but from it's mechanical properties, where it forms a fine dust and becomes a extream irritant in the lungs.

      Could be that nanotubes are similar.

      I had the chance to experiment a bit with some, it's just like soot or carbon black! Think microscopic fiberglass.

      Mostly people seem to add it into epoxies, so it's a composite with very impressive properties. But without coating them in some way I'd be very uncomfortable with the thought it touching it.

      Having it pass right through my skin and floating around in my bloodstream.

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  37. Photoelectric? by mogrify · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe you could use this to create overlapping grids of nanoscale photoelectric cells and LEDs or similar, and create the effect of light being passed through your body to the other side... if not making you completely invisible, at least sort of ghostly or insubstantial-seeming. Or, alternately, an effect of reflecting all light that hits you, or any number of visual effects. Sort of like a walking Photoshop.

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
  38. Its an old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heinlein used it in 'Friday' and maybe other old novels. Remember the 'beanstalk' ?

    I think in Friday it was actually a tether all the way from Earth to the Moon. lol.

  39. Incredible? by John+Whorfin · · Score: 3, Funny

    So this is what the Incredable's suits are made out of... isn't it daaaaaahling!

  40. OK, I'll bite by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • [...] But how does this science help mankind? Does it improve agriculture? Does it help provide things people need? Does it help the environment? Does it help people get along better? [...]

    Eventually, we'll need thread for nanosurgical sutures.

    Farmers everywhere would appreciate weatherproof, pest-proof grain bins that breathe, but don't ever explode.

    If you can't get along with someone when you're both in bullet-proof underwear, you each deserve what you get. (Not sure I believe that, but it's worth thinking about anyway)

    Thin, strong twine could make for improved saws. A razor-thin ultrastrong wire with handles or a bow could slice through anything from a steel bar to a loaf of bread. The trick will be figuring out to make a band-saw shaped one.

    Then again, consider how easy a thread of this stuff would be to smuggle into prison.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:OK, I'll bite by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1
      Farmers everywhere would appreciate weatherproof, pest-proof grain bins that breathe, but don't ever explode.

      Just like farmers and consumers in Europe appreciate genectically modified Canola. Whoops, that was banned, umm ok, how about modern irragation methods.. err nope, that depleting the water table. Ok, on more factory style turkeys that can't even procreate by themselves. Well, thier pale white breates look nice and taste like ummm chicken? Maybe...

      Point: The lock step death march of science and technology is consuming and polluting the planet at an enormous rate. I am all for scientific understanding, but most technology is for profit. Not that I am against profit, but I would like it to be more ... sustainable.

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
  41. Re:Health concerns.. by andrewzx1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Carbon nanotubules have not been rigourously studied for health affects on humans. However, the same chemical attributes that make asbestos so toxic are not found in CNT's. In fact the affect of breathing in CNT's would be most like breathing in carbon soot. In fact, buckey balls and carbon fullerenes do exist naturally in soot. In short, CNT's are not thought to have especially toxic properties, but more studies are being performed.

  42. Has to be said ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Yams can cook?

    Or is that ...

    Yams can cook! (as in fire, lay off, dehire, make redundant ...)

    1. Re:Has to be said ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If yams can cook, so can stew.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. YES, Toxic by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently someone has already done some testing and concluded these things are extermely TOXIC. Clothing and other every-day things made of this stuff? You go first. OTOH, it might be just fine encased in resin. Carbon-nanotube-fiber constuction could be fantastic for everyone except the people who actually make the stuff...

  44. Carbon Nanofibers: The New Asbestos by MenTaLguY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somehow I have a feeling the ultrafine fiber fragments shed by these yarns or fabrics made from them with age and wear won't be so happy biologically.

    Generally small particles or fillaments of any material smaller than a certain size are bad for you if inhaled (i.e. Pneumoconiosis), regardless of their composition.

    Additionally, if fiber fragments are short and fine enough, you essentially have little needle-like objects that can do a lot of damage directly at the cellular level.

    So, not that I'm being pessimistic or anything, but in the long term I don't think it'll remain an everyday item. It might hit the open market for a while, but a few decades of cancer studies, toxicoligical studies and lawsuits would likely bring an end to that.

    While my guesses are just that, there are a few discouraging signs in research to date. Watch this area; we'll see whether further results warrant concern or not.

    To be clear, I think this technology should certainly be pursued, but we need to be guarded in our optimisim regarding its widespread applicability.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
    1. Re:Carbon Nanofibers: The New Asbestos by zmollusc · · Score: 0

      If the carbon nanotubes fragment then I shall be making my space elevator out of something else.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    2. Re:Carbon Nanofibers: The New Asbestos by cjameshuff · · Score: 1

      Similar scale needles, fibers, and grains already exist everywhere, and are constantly being inhaled and disposed of. In fact, carbon nanotubes and buckyballs occur naturally. Large exposures (notice that the study you referenced was of high doses of SWNTs instilled directly into the rats' lungs) can certainly cause problems, but there's no reason to think that carbon fullerenes will be any nastier than anything of similar scale already out there. In fact, they should be a bit more inert than most things. They're just carbon, basically the same structure as graphite. (Nanotubes with more reactive groups added to their structure, for better bonding with epoxy for example, might be a lot worse...or possibly better, if it helps the body detect and remove them.)

  45. Steel Wool by suso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and extremely flexible, and are both electrically and thermally conducting.

    Eh hem, everybody remember what happens to steel wool when you hook it up to a 9 volt battery in science class?

  46. ...How did that go again? by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 3, Funny
    Among other things, the futuristic yarns could result in 'smart' clothing that stores electricity...

    Okay, if the handkerchief's in the left pocket s/he's AC, and the right pocket for DC...or was it the other way around?...

    [BZZZAP!]

    Damn.

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  47. But you're Ironsides... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Does this mean that grandma can now knit me a bullet proof vest?

    I figured you wouldn't need one. Maybe you should have been Kevlarsides or possibly CarbonNanotubesYarnSides.

    :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  48. Re:Health concerns.. by freqres · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, so we won't get lung cancer, only black lung disease. I think I will just keep with smoking my cigarettes while working in a coal mine thank you.

    --
    Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
  49. How many times are we going to see this posted... by DigitalTechnic · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was posted in March and July See http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/1 2/1443253&tid=14 http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/0 8/1425203&tid=126&tid=14

  50. Everything old is new again... by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first airplanes, in particular, were often made with cloth stretched over a wooden or metal frame.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  51. The Tuxedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hook me up with one of them tux from the movie. Now that is cool.

  52. excellent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will it massage my testicles for me...

  53. Speaker wire by nokiator · · Score: 1

    Looks like yet another material for overpriced speaker wire to squeeze more cash out of audiophiles. Can't wait to see ads for "Monster Carbon Nanatube" for only $100/foot... And for home theater applications, you don't need speaker mounts any more, just hang your speakers down from the ceiling with carbon nanotubes...

  54. Um...wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Among other things, the futuristic yarns could result in 'smart' clothing that stores electricity...

    Boy, I can't count the number of times I've tried in vain to get my old fashioned clothing to store electricity. Because that would be so incredibly useful in my day to day life. Especially if it's going to rain...

  55. The Generation Gap Continues to Widen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when someone calls you "Smartypants", you don't know whether it's an insult or compliment. They'll be anarchy...

  56. Greatest American Hero by qray · · Score: 1

    So is this what his suit was made out of? I bet this "breakthrough" was created by stealing the technology from the very same aliens that gave the suit to school teacher turned super hero.

  57. Welcome... by l0b0 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the HEV hazardous environment suit...

  58. Rice did it first! by CompSurfer · · Score: 1

    The folks at Rice University did this first. (2-Sep-2004)

  59. Embedded sensors by chiph · · Score: 1

    Since the CNT fabric is conductive -- imagine if you could have a jersey for running or cycling that had an embedded heartrate monitor. No more stupid straps digging into your chest!

    Chip H.

  60. Whew! It's about time... by cogito+ergo+blog · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because these tinfoil underpants are getting seriously uncomfortable!

    --
    "There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
  61. Honey, Where's my supersuit? by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    -- obligatory quote from The Incredibles

  62. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No guns, and nothing even close to armor for the law abiding people? Absolutely fantastic!

    It's about time that the government did something to improve the safety and reduce risks in my line of work.

    Now they just need to make mandatory "sensitivity training" programs and "diversity awareness" programs and all sorts of the like for police departments. If the government does what they normally do, there'll be no extra funding for these programs, so the chiefs will have to cut back on things to fit within budget. Things like officers, or forensics, or vehicles.

    I'm entitled to three square meals a day, cable TV, a nice bed in a warm room, exercise facilities, the works... if only they'd catch me.

    Thank you, Ontario!

    Love,
    Your average everyday criminal

  63. Dangerous fashion by demigod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No photographs please.

    --
    "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
    Major Major
  64. Had it... by tgd · · Score: 1

    Mine used to do that, until the exterminator came.

  65. Nah... Laser Tag by INetEngineer · · Score: 1

    I think the next generation of Laser Tag will be the 1st application of this technology.

    --
    --I smoked my sig.
  66. Re:Charles Sheffield's "Web Between the Worlds" by pixelphsr · · Score: 1

    Web Between the Worlds is Charles Sheffield's take on the same concept. (That's where the "beanstalk" reference came from.)
    I used to work with Sheffield. The rumor at the office was that Clark was shown a manuscript for WBTW and managed to get his book to print first by some chicanery.

  67. Vest Survives, Wearer Doesn't by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
    Having materials that can withstand temperatures of +450C to -196C is all well and good, but in a garment this is of little value unless it can protect and insulate you from these temperatures. One thing about Carbon is that in its pure form it conducts heat very readily, so the extreme cold or heat will pass through to you quite quickly, a bit of a disadvantage even if the garment survives.

    Though I'm sure any real product would have an insulating lining.

  68. Wifi.... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Well, when wifi is pervasive and hotspots are one big free everywhere internet (Fast forward about 5 years from now), then we won't have the corporate controls and DRM and all the other draconian bullshit going on that is going on today, so imho, that is a "good thing". I submit that we need a different protocol specifically for this "freenet", and more software infrastructure for it. I like the IDEA of freenet the current one, but let's be honest. IT TOTALLY BLOWS AND NOBODY WILL EVER USE IT. It has a necessary niche that it is NOT filling, and will be MUCH MORE FILLED by some other system, particularly with the (i feel) inevitable advent of ubiquitous hot spots.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  69. Electrically conducting... by robbo · · Score: 1

    This is the first time I've seen it mentioned that carbon nanotubes are electrically conducting. That raises the question for me as to how the space elevator people intend to deal with what would essentially be the world's largest lightning rod, not to mention the effects of friction with the upper atmosphere as it rips past the cable.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the Phish
  70. How did they make it? by owlstead · · Score: 1

    A picture of a tiny imp with a even tinier spinning wheel comes to mind. Maybe I've been reading to much Discworld novels lately.

  71. Nanometer Knitting for Futuristic Clothing by rpiquepa · · Score: 1

    Both announcements from the UTD Nanotech Institute and the CSIRO in Australia give you only limited facts. If you're interested by this discovery, you really should read my overview, "Nanometer Knitting for Futuristic Clothing," which for example contains images not mentioned in the press releases.

  72. Not the first collaboration by Cyclotron_Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    between the textile industry and computing industry... In the late 60s, before bipolar transistor memory or MOS transistor memories were commonplace and practical, companies like Digital and IBM employed several textile company weaving-experts on the efficient weaving of core memory "ropes" and "cloths." Basically, the problems encountered in the fabrication of core memory on a large, complex scale had been solved, or at least examined, centuries before. see Rope memory and Apollo Guidance Computer rope memory. And of course, who could forget the original programmed computer, the Jacquard's punch-card loom?

  73. Breathless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gotta say that this article sounds pretty breathless to me.

    Ok, carbon nanotube wool. Cool, it's true. Didn't we read about carbon nanotubes tangled up into a longer fiber a while back on slashdot?

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07 /0 8/1425203&tid=126&tid=14
    http://science.slashdot. org/article.pl?sid=04/03/1 2/1443253&tid=14

    And weren't they actually not much stronger than regular fabric? Kudos on incrementing the tech if it's stronger, but bulletproof clothing? Hello, if the fabric is all flexable then the bullet will just go into you and take some portion of your sweater with it. You need some sort of force distributing hard surface.

    And then "However, the ability to incorporate electronic sensors and actuators into CNT yarn..." Um, placing electronic sensors and actuators into CNT yarn has been left as an exercise for the reader. This is non-trivial, yes?

  74. Clothing that stores electricity? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Hah, my old wooly sweater accumulates charge enough to kill small rodents!

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  75. Medical Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about treatment or research of cancer? Where fibers are spontaneously woven into tumors, following the tumors own microtubulous? A cancer to cancer one could call it.

  76. Edna says, by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    "Hmmm... this is megamesh, very sturdy, a useful feature, but hopelessly out of date dahling, a hobosuit."

    "But you designed it," says Mr Incredible.

    "I never look back, dahling, it distracts from the Now."

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  77. I swear people are just clueless by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I have to say that I did not say I agree with the banning of vests but just trying to bring understanding.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  78. Old News? by Evil+Butters · · Score: 1

    I thought this is what my "Light Speed briefs" were made of.

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  79. Yams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh YARNS.. I read this first as Yams. Thanksgiving is coming up and some smart yams would be perfect with the turkey.
    Mmmmmm, carbon nanotube yams... Taste good with gravy.

  80. Why the hell would you want one? by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Not that I'm arguing that they should be banned, but why the hell would you want one? Unless you're a soldier, cop, security guard, or some kind of "high-value target" (politician, judge in Columbia, in witness protection) I can't imagine a potential situation where you'd conceivably want one.

    Do any Slashdotters actually own such a garment, and have you ever worn the thing other than for show ?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  81. Breathing can be hard by AllanL5 · · Score: 1

    They've found with buckey-balls that breathing them in can be very bad to your lungs. Now they seem to have a way to mass-produce tubular carbon fibers. This may increase the danger to people. Remember Asbestos? I don't want to be too alarmist, here, they have found ways to coat the buckey-balls to make them less damaging. Just a thought.

  82. The claim doesn't need supporting... by israfil_kamana · · Score: 1

    ... rather it is the responsibility of someone creating a new product to demonstrate its safety. That's the point. If it's new, and its effects unknown, then you don't dress up little billy or sally in it.

    Are there links that show studies and theories as to why/how this would be safe as a material? No one thought asbestos was nasty until much later. How will we avoid the same mistake this time?

    --
    i - This sig provided by /dev/random and an infinite number of monkeys at keyboards.