Slashdot Mirror


Given Up to Spyware?

Khuffie writes "Wired has an interesting article about how some people have given up to spyware, knowing that the software they're installing virtually takes over their internet connection. What's even more ironic is that they claim it's a necessary evil for free software, when things like the Google Toolbar virtually replace Gator, and there are many spyware-free P2P programs available."

140 of 733 comments (clear)

  1. Link is incorrect by tmbg37 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The link in the summary is incorrect, the story is at http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,65906, 00.html.

    --
    This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    1. Re:Link is incorrect by tmbg37 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nevermind, something seems to have gone wrong at wired.com, but it's fixed now and both links are working. Ignore my post.

      --
      This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    2. Re:Link is incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Nevermind, something seems to have gone wrong at wired.com

      This phenomenon is known as slashdotting a site to death. You must be new here? ;)

  2. Download.Com by metlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll blame sites like Download.com that started this trend.

    Download software foo from us, but it would come with Gator and a whole shitload of spyware. And then, everyone else started following suit.

    I still remember times when spywares and trojans were hacker-only. Greedy corps brought it to the masses, and now it's become an accepted part of the "Internet experience."

    1. Re:Download.Com by wyldeone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Download.com is definitely a big problem.

      On their download page for Azureus there is an editor's note saying that it contains spyware, and about half of the comments say that it installed malware on their computers. Probably the half that actually downloaded it from CNet.

      --
      In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
    2. Re:Download.Com by Hesperides · · Score: 3, Funny

      "But it looked so good on paper!"

    3. Re:Download.Com by Bill_Royle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Download.com is part of CNET, but Slashdotters submit articles from News.com - also owned by CNET. If Download.com is so irresponsible, why then do we provide such a company with recognition and traffic?

      Sometime to think about the next time you consider going there.

    4. Re:Download.Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Working for an ISP, I get to see a lot of the effects of these fun programs. One of the trends that we've seen is the fact that spyware/adware/malware is unfortunately becoming more stable and able to interact with each other: passing information appropriately from layer to layer. Previously, a single spyware program on your Windows box meant constant IE lockups, incorrect URL parsing, or just general BSOD fun.

      Point being, now that this has become an apparently viable way of advertisement and data mining, developers of these types of programs are just becoming better at what they do, making the addition of a redirector plus various URL harvesting tools (etc) on your system not as much of a issue because you don't see the effects of such. (hows that for a run-on).

      These will also be the same people complaining that their internet connection is running slow.

      "I'm sorry sir, Yahoo.com isn't down, its the 14 other sites you have to connect to before getting there that are giving you trouble."

    5. Re:Download.Com by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This probably hurts open source software...

      Gator says "free", Firefox says "free". To someone without access to additional information, there's nothing to tell them apart. To people that are savvy enough to not just install ramdom crap, it probably holds back adoption.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    6. Re:Download.Com by jrschulz · · Score: 2

      I've never had a virus, worm, trojan, adware, or spyware, and I don't give a shit about Joe User.
      Guess what OS I'm useing.

      Mac OS X?

    7. Re:Download.Com by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, this is more like cigarettes being good for you and then the local convenience store putting all the arsenic and shit in it as an after-market addon.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:Download.Com by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the average Slashdotter uses what is the right tool for the right job. While Linux is cool for some things, Windows has its own set of advantages.

      Being a zealot about a thing is fine, but not at the cost of being pragmatic. A computer is just a tool, and sometimes Windows works and sometimes Linux works. As simple as that.

    9. Re:Download.Com by redJag · · Score: 2

      if Linux were user-friendly enough to migrate people from Windows to Linux, do you think spyware would be ineffective on Linux? Read the article, these people are WILLINGLY installing spyware to get that free weather program or file-sharing program that all their friends have. Is Linux going to protect the user from themselves? White-list accepted programs, or something along those lines? Haha..

    10. Re:Download.Com by Cylix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect they don't police their file integrity much at all.

      Try searching for software DVD player on cnet. (I don't believe such software truely exists in the windows world... at least not a free one)

      Anyhow, the cliprex player says it does play DVD's, but after downloading it... it was a different story.

      This sucker is packed with tons of great spyware and best all it... it never dared played dvd's. In fact, reading all of the reviews... it seemed only the astro-turfers were actually claiming it worked.

      Call it a night of drinking and gullibility. I thought I could just clean out the spyware and nab a free player for my system.

      I never did truely get it off the system until I reinstalled some time later.

      All in all this was a while ago, but I dare not dabble with that software again.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    11. Re:Download.Com by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I do support for a big pile of student laptops...I keep hearing

      "I need a new laptop."

      "Well, what do you do on it?"

      "Oh, just surf the web and word processing"

      I look at their 1.5 ghz machine with 256 Meg of Ram..."Tell you what, if you can arrange to leave it here for a couple hours, we'll make it run like a new machine.."

      Frequently the combination of Adaware, Spybot, HiJackThis and occasionally SpySweeper will remove well over 1000 non-trivial items (files'n'Reg keys). Makes a _huge_ difference.

      --
      Why?
    12. Re:Download.Com by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Try searching for software DVD player on cnet. (I don't believe such software truely exists in the windows world... at least not a free one)

      Have you tried Video Lan it works on any OS - Even Windows.

  3. For the uninitiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spybot
    Adaware

    Oh, and Linux.

    1. Re:For the uninitiated... by Nik13 · · Score: 2

      How could you forget about firefox?

      --
      ///<sig />
    2. Re:For the uninitiated... by l810c · · Score: 4, Informative
      I clean up PC's all the time for friends. Got one here just tonight. I charge one 12-pack of beer per 500 infections :)

      Now a couple of things about those programs. I do install each and most importantly Run Them For Each User account on a XP PC. Adaware I believe has a larger database/scope and catches more things. Spybot is able to get things running in memory by running first thing on reboot. One other free tool that I find very useful is this control panel applet that is what msconfig should be.

      There are Many things that these programs do Not catch even when updated. I ran into reaIplay.exe tonight. I had to boot into Safe Mode command line to manually delete it. A couple of weeks ago I had to delete a file from an alternate Windows file Stream. There exists this netherworld of alternate data in XP that is not accessable via any of the regular tolls.

      And the last thing I do is install Firefox and tell them to Use It Damnit or I'm upping the charge to a case per 500 infections.

    3. Re:For the uninitiated... by mankey+wanker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummm...what's wrong with using the registry instead? Try regedit, you'll like it...

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\C ur rentVersion\Run]
      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Mic rosoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunOnce]
      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software \Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunServices]
      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Soft ware\Microsoft\Windows\Cur rentVersion\RunServicesOnce]
      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\Userinit]

      [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Cu rr entVersion\Run]
      [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Micro soft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunOnce]
      [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\M icrosoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunServices]
      [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Softwa re\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunServicesOnce]
      [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\So ftware\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows]

    4. Re:For the uninitiated... by VanillaDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also do this a lot for people and tell them to run the apps once every one or two weeks, and sometimes when I go back to their house sometime later I discover they haven't been using the anti-spyware programs, so I run another check with the same results as the last.
      It appears many non-techies are afraid to get rid of things, even if they are bad, as they fear it will screw up their computer somehow. Either this, or they think running a scan once will fix things permanently.
      My girlfriend is tryng Firefox now, but there's very little chance her sister will want to try something new. Her parents use Ad-Aware (but I couldn't get it to initialize), I installed Spybot and it found 79 objects (apparently they haven't run Ad-Aware in a while).

      It's crazy how many visitors to a site I moderate have "FUNWEBPRODUCTS" in their user agent string, too.

      --
      - Wilson
    5. Re:For the uninitiated... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why sure, I would encourage someone who didn't even know how to use ad-aware to go anywhere NEAR regedit. That is, in the odd case that I really, really didn't like them but they still trusted my advice.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    6. Re:For the uninitiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      My girlfriend is tryng Firefox now, but there's very little chance her sister will want to try something new.

      I wish i could get my girlfriend and her sister to 'try something new'

    7. Re:For the uninitiated... by Bega · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It appears many non-techies are afraid to get rid of things, even if they are bad, as they fear it will screw up their computer somehow.
      I think this is part of the "Windows mentality", so to call it. This might be a bit off topic to the news post or even the parent comment, but it seems that all non-savvy computer users who run Windows seem to be afraid of doing anything, because it'll break. None of the people I know that run on either Linux or Mac, that are new to computers, seem to be complaining that their computer isn't working, whereas the Windows users solution to the problems that they face daily is "Maybe you should restart", "Have you cleaned your desktop from unnecessary icons?", hell, why not say "The moon's aligned in a wrong way relative to Pisces and Cancer, you should wait 42 days" while they're at it.
      --

      THIS IS THE INTERNET. PLEASE PICK UP YOUR SERIOUS BUSINESS SUIT AT THE FRONT COUNTER.
    8. Re:For the uninitiated... by ettlz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the love of old people in Korea, pre-empt!

      A friend recently brought around a new notebook for help with installing some office software. It had never been on-line, so was "clean". I took this opportunity to apply all the necessary XP updates, install Firefox, Spybot, Ad-Aware and an anti-virus package. I also made sure he knew never to do ordinary stuff with an administrative account (an all too common mistake on XP) and crippled Internet Explorer.

      It's a damn site easier to find out when a friend is getting a new PC and step in quickly to secure it before they can mess it, than to undo any damage.

      Of course, with my brother's machine I was slightly stricter. He knows what bad things will happen to him if I ever catch him using Internet Explorer.
    9. Re:For the uninitiated... by inquisitor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Basically, that's my disinfection routine for other people's PCs. I don't get spyware infestations either, but that's because I know about Windows Update and antivirus software.

      1. Run AdAware SE, updated to most recent definitions. Detect 400+ hits (my record so far).
      2. Run Spybot S&D, updated to most recent definitions. Detect 100+ hits AdAware missed, and reboot.
      3. Wait 30 minutes whilst Spybot scans again, and turns up a solitary bit of Gator. Go through Spybot's advanced mode settings and clear out their Run tools to dump all sorts of run-on-start crud that Compaq/Packard Bell etc. stuck on there - bloated keyboard-multimedia-button utilities et al.
      4. Run HijackThis! (which isn't really an antispyware tool, just a system startup editing tool with knowledge about really obscure system startup Registry keys and IE settings) and get rid of the really obscure spyware toolbars and other run-on-startup fun that AAW and Spybot missed.
      5. Go through the root, Program Files and Windows directories manually and delete the 10+ dialers and other unwanted crap that's made their way into the system, plus hosts file.

      No-one ever asked for this stuff to be installed on their system (and in case you're wondering why I believe them, take a look at this). I put it down to ActiveX exploits; inevitably, the worst infected systems I see are Win9x/Me systems which haven't ever had a Windows Update run. This routine - plus installing Firefox - usually helps fix their problems, but these shouldn't have happened in the first place. I don't blame Microsoft as much as I blame the prevaling culture that it is better to make more money than it is to have ethics - thus allowing for Gator/Claria, WhenU, 180solutions, all the fake 'anti-spyware' vendors et al. It's amazing that we can allow these people to go on.

  4. bad idea by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a horrible trend; it will reward the 'marketing' groups that dream this crap up. I've got my mom working against all this crap via GoogleToolbar, Spybot, etc. It's a joke that she has to do that, but on dial up a few well laid spyware apps make her system un-surfable.

    What will it take to break the back of Spyware? Spyassassin? ;)

    PCB@

    1. Re:bad idea by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google Toolbar itself is not much better than outright spyware - so you may want to rethink suggesting that one; Google corp is changing for the worse, so it's only a matter of time before they "enhance" their toolbar with more "features".

      Ron Bennett

    2. Re:bad idea by grozzie2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm torn between what's worse, spyware, or ponzi schemes trolling for free ipods...

    3. Re:bad idea by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Informative
      How does one offer 500 times more space than their closest competitor, and still manage to suck?
      I'm not the original poster but I'll give this a shot.

      How about not allowing me to mass-delete the 151,095 messages in my Spam folder? I'm sure as hell not going to manually delete them out of Gmail 100 at a time.

      How about keeping messages dating back to September in my Trash folder, and messages dating back to October in my Spam folder, despite clearly stating that "Spam messages more than 30 days old will be automatically deleted" and "Trashed messages more than 30 days old will be automatically deleted?" How about when the combined messages in Spam and Trash are using 906 MB (91%) of my Gmail storage?

      There's nothing I can do to purge them, unless I want to click through more than 1,500 pages worth of spam listings, waiting for each page of 100 spams to load, hitting Select All, and selecting Permanently Delete. It's not going to happen, and there's no reason anyone should have to do that. AOL's mail interface is more intuitive than this, for god's sake.

      At Yahoo Mail, I can empty the entire Bulk folder permanently with one click and the drive space is immediately credited back to me. Sure, I don't get a gig of storage there, but seeing as how I have control over what does and doesn't get stored, I don't need it. Gmail is unusable to me until there is a way to mass-delete the contents of the Spam folder all at once.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:bad idea by miley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, yahoo doesn't count the bulk folder against your disk space at all (nor the trash).

    5. Re:bad idea by nordicfrost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you notice what it said under the little logo in the upper left corner? Beta.

      B-E-T-A.

      Google adds stuff to gmail all the time, but whining about it on Slashdot gives little result. Drop them a mail.

      I did about POP and SMTP, and they served up secure POP and SMTP when enough people suggested it.

    6. Re:bad idea by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm, I'm sure it's possible that you could get that much spam it seems a little unbelievable to me that you've 906 MB worth of spam for 2 reasons:

      1) Most people already have an existing e-mail account and most of their spam is already in those accounts, leaving them to selectively give their gmail account out to only those people they trust.

      2) 906 MB worth of spam? DUDE WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING? I don't know what you do with your e-mail account, but I've been averaging about 1 spam mail every 3/4 days, if that.

      That being said, you're right, the 'select all' feature ain't implemented very correctly yet, thus as so many people before me have said the operative word is 'BETA'. All you have to do, is ask for that. Finally, gmail is also being opened selective for pop mail access. So quit your whining and use a regular mail client. Now even after all of this, I still don't see how anybody can objectively say that gmail sucks, considering what the competitiors offer. At worst, gmail is probably as good as the rest. Now I just have to figure out how I turned into a gmail fanboy, and we're done...

    7. Re:bad idea by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Informative

      At Yahoo Mail, the contents of your Bulk Mail folder do not count against your account limit.

  5. It's called apathy by lordkuri · · Score: 5, Informative

    People just don't care... they can't be bothered to think about it. I've talked to so many people, "yeah.. I need to get a new computer, this one's slow" their system gets hosed, they just get a new computer. wtf is with that?

    1. Re:It's called apathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's not apathy. It's more ignorance. People assume that their computer will work like a dishwasher or a vaccuum cleaner. No unwitting computer user actually thinks that there are things inside their computer that are actively destroying it.

    2. Re:It's called apathy by insomnyuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they just get a new computer. wtf is with that?

      People are rationally ignorant. They don't have time to fiddle with something they don't understand. I had to fix my grandparents computer once, and when I tried to explain what I was doing they just said, "honey, we don't care."

      As for people just getting new computers, at school I see far more students just put up with the spyware that debilitates their system. They'll bitch about it occasionally but they won't bother to do anything about it. Its amazing the threshold for bullshit some people put up with for computers.

    3. Re:It's called apathy by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Funny

      unlike you or me they don't have the technical know-how to fix their computer or the knowledge to know how easy it really is to do. So they think that they have to take it to $300/hr specialists to fix it. At those rates they decide its cheaper to order a cheap new dell. I have a friend who did this a couple weeks before meeting me a while ago and she explained the whole process to me after I fixed her machine with a combination of spyware balster, spybot, adaware, and a couple registry tweaks. I did it for a soda :-P

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    4. Re:It's called apathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Next time ask for...something a bit more personal

    5. Re:It's called apathy by deathazre · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think one of the best things to do is to just get this whole it's-not-that-hard-to-fix-and-we'll-do-it-for-chea p-or-free idea out to the masses.

      The computer club here at penn college does a 'windows cleanup' every sunday evening, and we usually pull around 15 student computers a night. On top of this, the college pays some of us to do the same during the week (I'm not sure how many they'll pull in a week as I'm not one of them, but there's always a few lying around in there). the usual stuff-- ad-aware, spybot, firefox, thunderbird, windows update, axe messenger, uPNP and such, and most importantly, teach them how to avoid getting more of the crap.
      Costs the students nothing. Well, unless you count the tuition.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    6. Re:It's called apathy by angrist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This reminds me of a story I heard from my mechanic (no this is NOT off-topic) about a woman that came into his shop one day. Apparently she bought a new car, and drove it around for about a year.. until one day the engine just started smoking, overheated and totally siezed up. When the car got towed in, there was nearly no oil left in the motor, and what was left was totally gunked up. When asked when she had last had her oil changed, the woman said that she "didn't know that it needed to be changed" So to relate that to computers, it's not always apathy, many people just simply don't know any better.

    7. Re:It's called apathy by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you just hit the real reason in that last sentence. People are used to putting up with computer related bullshit (crashing software, software/hardware incompatibilities, lost passwords, etc.) that they have conditioned themselves to the reality that computers aren't perfect. Those that don't understand how they work don't know what kinds of bullshit they have to put up with and what kinds can be fixed. They just put up with things as long as the computer is still usable. Kind of like driving a car with plastic bags in place of windows; it just doesn't bother some people enough to make them fix it.

    8. Re:It's called apathy by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I'm not stupid... I just don't care"

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    9. Re:It's called apathy by GospelHead821 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't yet had to fix my grandparents' computer. It helps that as soon as my grandfather's free two months with AOL expired, he decided the internet wasn't worth all that much to him. Not being online is like abstinence for computers, so their machine is clean. I've had several other people come to me for help though and their computers were simply filthy with junkware.

      Like your experience with your grandparents, when I started to explain to them what had gone wrong and what I had done to fix it, they wanted to tell me, "I don't really care." I'm sure it would be uncomfortable doing what I did to one's grandparents, but I let those people have it. I told them that they'd better start caring because the sorts of problems they were experiencing could be prevented with a little bit of due caution. Further, since I never demanded payment and actively tried to turn down compensation (since these people are friends of the family), I refuse to fall into the trap of being obligated to repair their computers when they break them. Obviously, I can't teach all of them everything there is to know about computer maintenence, but I've managed to train several of them on the use of Ad Aware and on responsible internet use.

      As an aside to that, I'd like to note that sometimes the problem isn't apathy, but nor is it strictly . I suppose it's a kind of ignorance, but it takes the form of naivety. These people don't realize that the offer for free games or assisted browsing aren't benevolent offers or even just benign advertisements. They trust that whomever has caused these offers to appear on their screen is dealing with them fairly. A little bit of cynicism is valuable in this case. The first thing I've taught my users is that if they haven't asked for something to appear on their screen, don't trust it; and if they haven't specifically sought a good or service, don't accept it.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    10. Re:It's called apathy by bnenning · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any maybe you, personally, do change your own oil and brakepads etc, but most geeks I would wager don't. How is it different?

      The difference is that cars inherently need periodic maintenance, whether you do it yourself or pay somebody else. Computers don't inherently get slower and less usable over time, and there are relatively simple ways to protect yourself from hostile software. I don't know much about cars, but if there were a way to eliminate the need for oil changes by slightly changing my driving habits, I'd certainly investigate it.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    11. Re:It's called apathy by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "People are rationally ignorant."

      There is a better word for it. Sucker!. People are suckers. Suckers are there to be fleeced. My friend had a poster that said "Life is tough, it's tougher if you are stupid".

      To be honest I love suckers. The world needs the suckers to click on ads, punch the monkey, don't mail in the rebate, buy the shiny objects next to the loss leaders, etc.

      The rest of us can take advantage of them getting fleeced by mailing in the rebates and only buying the loss leaders.

      The suckers click on ads so I get free internet content and filter the ads out.

      "Its amazing the threshold for bullshit some people put up with for computers."

      Life's tougher if you are stupid.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:It's called apathy by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But what I find truly amazing is the fact that people don't try to fix it, they just throw the thing out.

      I've seen people get infested with spyware or viruses...and rather than fix the computer they just throw it away and get a new one.

      Imagine if your car was running poorly... Had a flat tire, or the alternator was going... Rather than take the car to the mechanic (or fix it yourself) you just throw the thing away and buy a new one.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    13. Re:It's called apathy by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately it's become fashionable in the US to profess your ignorance and stupidity. Although most people would still be ashamed to admit it if they were illiterate they proudly proclaim that they "know nothing about computers" or "can't do math".

      Of course it does not help that the chattering classes continually sneer at the "intellectual elite" and bash the educated every opportunity they get. These days having an "east coast education" is out of fashion but listening to Toby Keith CDs all the rage.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    14. Re:It's called apathy by Omestes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And then there is the point where you realize that by helping them, your not. Like the silly old cliche "Give a man a fish, he has supper; Teach a man to fish, and he... er... knows how to fish." Cleaning off everyones computers once a month or so is really alturistic and all, but it really is futile. Sure, install FF, and hey sit around wondering what the silly red thing is doing to the earth, but they won't click it, no matter what you tell them.

      I finally had to install Netscape for my father, because he would have nothing to do with FF because some radio people said that FF is geek chic, and in his mind that meant complicated. But Netscape has name-recognition (albeit from 10 years ago). (And on my side, it is based on Moz, so I know it won't kill his sys, only slow it down further)

      Also, there comes a point in every geeks life, where we have to say enough is enough. I'm sick of doing the routine cleaning, and having some moron stand behind me either asking what I'm doing, and ignoring me, or telling me not to delete that little casino app. They ask for help, but take no advice. The only people I will help now are the people willing to LISTEN to me, and not just smile at my work, and come back a week later.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    15. Re:It's called apathy by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they just get a new computer. wtf is with that?

      People like to buy computers.

      They're fun purchases and whenever you buy one it's nicer than the last one you had. The spyware is just an excuse.

    16. Re:It's called apathy by laughingcoyote · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I had some mod points this one'd be at +5. It almost makes dealing with the masses of morons appear worthwhile.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    17. Re:It's called apathy by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you could buy a nice, brand-new car for under $1000, you would probably consider tossing it and buying a new one when something serious broke.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    18. Re:It's called apathy by nick+korma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ironic coming from somebody posting as an anonymous coward!

    19. Re:It's called apathy by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can list a huge ammount of stuff I don't care about and am happy to "outsource" to third parties. Gone are the days when I would have had to get fuel from for my fire and hunt my food, I use gas and electricity and buy food, I really couldn't care less about how the gas gets to my house nor how my gas boiler regulates the water temerature and pumps it around the house, OK I do know but I don't really want to learn anymore about it.

      Well, that's good that you're not interested in learning about these other things, because it's a waste of time. It's better to trust other people to worry about it, like me. I'm starting a new business with some innovative products that I think you really need for your gas supply. My premier product, "GasImprove", will improve the efficiency of the natural gas usage in your house by 214%. This will save you a lot of money in your gas bills. How does it work? Don't worry about that. Trust me, it works very well. Just give me a call, and have your credit card ready. I'm offering a limited-time offer of only $999.99, so get yours while you can!

      I also have a device for your car which will double your fuel efficiency. How does that work? Don't worry about it. You can trust me. It's only $499.99 if you call now!

  6. Marketscore by Kizzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even data entered on secure websites -- such as passwords, credit card numbers and bank account numbers, information that is supposed to be viewable only by the sender and the intended recipient -- is accessible to Marketscore, since the company has developed a method that allows it to view encrypted information.

    How does Marketscore view encrypted packets? Is it just monitoring your keystrokes? I doubt they are cracking all your traffic.

    1. Re:Marketscore by OldMiner · · Score: 5, Insightful
      How does Marketscore view encrypted packets? Is it just monitoring your keystrokes? I doubt they are cracking all your traffic.

      If they are indeed "routing all internet traffic" through them, they may be operating as your proxy for HTTP and HTTPS. When you try to make a secure connection to a site, you tell them. They make an HTTPS connection to the site, their connection is encrypted to the site. The make an HTTPS connection to you. The connection between you and them is encrypted. They see the unencrypted data. So do you.

      </wild speculation>.

      --
      You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
  7. But... by skyman8081 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But the intarweb told me that the Google Toolbar WAS spyware.

    --
    Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
  8. Somone get these ppl some free software! by Zeromous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know...what's disturbing about the theme of this article, is there is so much free software out there that doesn't require spyware, and all of these people are completely unaware.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    1. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by Apreche · · Score: 3, Interesting

      yes, it is disturbing. I imagine that a significantly large portion of the Internet is dedicated to free/open-source software. It completely boggles the mind how you can be on the net and not notice it. It's as if you went on a trip to New York City you stop in the middle of Times Square and ask someone "Do they have Taxis here?"

      Firefox is spreading well enough, but other things like aim clients amaze me. I use gaim, and some people say they prefer trillian or something else of that nature. But the number of people using the AOL AIM client is astounding. I mean, seriously.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by TheBurrito · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I tried to get my dad to switch to Firefox for months before he recently gave in. His reasoning: "I just don't trust it... They can't be up to any good if they're not asking for anything in return".

      He's actually demanding spyware, despite his constant paranoia that the boogeymen are invading his machine. The idea of good, free software is completely foreign to the majority of users (in my experience).

    3. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The disturbing part is that the article doesn't mention this is a Windows-only phenomenon. Nowhere does it mention that these problems don't exist on Mac and Linux.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    4. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is communication and perhaps marketing.

      How is Joe User supposed to know Bearshare is spyware but eMule isn't?

      Software writers need some sort of certification process with a familiar big ass logo that says "Spyware Free." Sort of how TrustE works, but you know, without all the sucking.

      The problem just keeps getting worse. Marketscore shoots all your traffic through their proxies. What the hell is that about? They can just sift through EVERYTHING. If their proxies are slow, then all that money spent on that fat bandwidth connection is wasted. Most trojans arent this nasty.

    5. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My mother thought the same thing. I didn't even deem to answer her though. I know if I told her that some people just enjoy the work, or do it to hone skills, or for common good, she would just give me a funny look. Perhaps we can compair it to art? Fine art is the art that you don't make for people, but for yourself, as compaired to kische, which is made for the people and your profit...

      Perhaps I should call my mom, and tell her either I rationalize free software, or she installs FF... Hmmmm....

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    6. Re:Somone get these ppl some free software! by bampot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a common misconception I've found trying to convert friends/family/colleagues to open source alternatives eg. Firefox when their machines are so rafted from spyware/adware/IE etc.

      It takes more time to convince them that there is no catch - "a better product for no money" seems too good to be true, so therefore it must be false.

      One time I spent 30 mins trying to explain to a friend how linux was "free" - "but I saw it for sale it a shop..."

      "you get nothing for nothing", except for open source!

  9. Education by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quite simply, this is a situation that can be addressed with education. Since we don't have access to big media, we have to do it by word-of-mouth. This means spreading Firefox and other crap-free alternatives, even free plugins for IE if someone chooses to use that browser. It's also important not to force things on people in our typically annoying geek ways. Educate people, so that they can decide for themselves and realize that there is a world of software in which this stuff is frowned upon and actively fought against. Someday with enough effort, spyware will become an amusing memory.

  10. Not a good sign by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh great so now these authors of these spyware programs are going to think that we don't actually mind about their takeover of our pc's.

    Spyware makers hear us - we do NOT like your damned "software".

    --
    In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
  11. There's a name for these people. by TheLoneIguana · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're called morons.

    1. Re:There's a name for these people. by miu · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They're called morons.

      Or shills.

      I'm reasonably certain that at least some of those people in forums chiding users that complain about spyware are not actual users. They'd probably be an employee of either the spyware firm, the software firm, or a PR firm hired by one or the other of them. One guy with multiple identities could put on quite a show of support for spyware being the price of "free" software, if the forum is operated by on behalf of the software company then admin and editorial access could easily make the messages more visible and easily quash any well spoken dissent.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  12. TCO by randmairs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't all this anti -virus, -spyware, -malware, etc. software be added to the TCO for a Windows license both in cost and time?

  13. It's the common-man's mentality by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Foolish notions are stated, repeated and believed. Things like "if you haven't done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear" and "you get what you pay for" ring through their heads. These faiths are unshakable... might be easier to convince them there is no god.

    I've had people swear up and down to me that I couldn't use OpenOffice.org in a business setting even when the software's license specifically states otherwise. People believe the craziest things. It will just take some getting used to... this whole free software thing.

  14. Formatting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Personally I just format my sister's comp every 3 months or so, I don't know how she does it, but she manages to fill it up with more spyware/adware/free smilies than I thought possible, so I just save her important data, and format. I used to try and stop it all, and try to educate my sister, but that didn't go too well.

    1. Re:Formatting.. by beejay54 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm no apple zealot, but seriously, get her a mac. It will save your life! Issues like viruses, spyware, and the like just aren't a serious issue with macs. Mostly because it's not the most popular system out there. During my summers I would work as a tech for a local government agency, trust me when I say way too much time is spent trying to support Windows as an non-technical end user OS. Don't get me wrong, I think Windows is a very decent OS. But the all-fixing 'lets just do a fresh OS install' just prolongs a problem that is really with educating the end user.

      --

      -- Bored? Check out my Portfolio
    2. Re:Formatting.. by unclethursday · · Score: 3, Interesting
      While I won't go so far as to say that Mac OS (especially OS X) is adware/spyware and virus free, I will say the chances of getting these things on a Mac are exponentionally less than with a Windows box.

      Listen to the parent of this post. Get her a iBook (the 14" ones are $1400 with a 1.33 GHz G4 and built in Airport Extreme), she'll be amazed at how little it slows down because there isn;t a bazillion malware programs hitting it at the same time. Just get her to at least 512 MB of RAM (I have 640 MB on my iBook), otherwise it could run a bit slow at times.

    3. Re:Formatting.. by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Mostly because it's not the most popular system out there."

      There is a strong possibility that the reason may actually be that the design of the system is inherently more secure. I believe this to be true of some of the Unix-likes, and that category includes MacOS.

      I don't believe at all that less popularity is responsible for the relative safety of the platform.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  15. Hidden vs. Visible Costs by Geckoman · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's not really a trade-off between privacy and free software, it's a trade-off between privacy and convenience. Many people have made the value judgment that the time and effort necessary to fight spyware and find non-treacherous alternatives is worth more to them than the privacy they give up.

    The cost of the privacy lost is invisible and (apparently) non-intrusive, while the cost of the time and effort is obvious and immediately quantifiable.

    Think about how many times you've heard someone say things along these lines: "Can you believe I spent 6 hours cleaning spyware off my system and had to reinstall Windows twice? Then I had to find new software with a privacy policy acceptible to me, and it took hours to download and install it all."

    Compare that to how many times you've heard someone say something like: "Wow! I had spyware all over my system. It was tracking my shopping and browsing habits, reporting my computer usage stats to ad agencies, and sending my IP and passwords to a scam company in Russia!"

    The cost former is obvious to even the most ignorant users, while the cost of the latter requires much more insight and knowledge.

  16. next time take a router, by way2trivial · · Score: 3, Informative
    or real hardware firewall, set to refuse all unasked for connections...

    open ports one at a time.....

    just having a 1 port router will keep most of the fresh install vulnerabilities off line to the net, and allow you to get what you need.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:next time take a router, by monkeymanatwork · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good idea, but many ISPs (Comcast) don't support routers. I have called Comcast when their crappy connection goes up and down (happens about once per week these days for a whole day). The first thing they ask is if you have a router. If you say yes, they tell you they do not support routers, and refuse to help you any further. I asked them if they sell a router solution, and the answer is "no." Apparently their solution to the problem is for you to use WinXP and enable firewalling, or buy ZoneAlarm (which they also don't sell).

      Comcast is a monopoly where I and many others live. Let's hope the Supremes force them to open their cable lines to competitors. The result of them forcing BellSouth to do so has resulted (finally) in my recent switch to an unlimited local and long distance provider for $45/month.

    2. Re:next time take a router, by Osty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good idea, but many ISPs (Comcast) don't support routers.

      They don't do tech support on the routers because they don't know how you've set them up. If your router is the cause of a problem (you've blocked all outgoing traffic, asked-for or otherwise, for example), they don't want to waste the time on you. That doesn't mean they don't support routers on their network (as in, routers won't work). They do. If you know your router is fine, next time lie to them. They can't tell.


      have called Comcast when their crappy connection goes up and down (happens about once per week these days for a whole day).

      I had a similar problem where my net connection would go down at night, and come back up during the day, making it completely useless to me (I'm at work during the day). After months of dealing with this and several technician visits, one finally decided to check the connections from the street to my house. Lo and behold, there was water damage at one of the connection points. During the day when it was warm, the connection would warm up and expand enough to work. At night when it cooled down, it would contract and lose signal. A 5 minute splice job later and everything worked perfectly. That was almost a year and a half ago, and I've not had any problems since.


      Comcast is a monopoly where I and many others live. Let's hope the Supremes force them to open their cable lines to competitors. The result of them forcing BellSouth to do so has resulted (finally) in my recent switch to an unlimited local and long distance provider for $45/month.

      I take it you've never had a DSL line. The infrastructure owners are required to allow others to sell their lines, but it results in no lower prices, no better service (tech support), and in fact causes even more problems by adding layers. When I was on DSL and had a problem, I first had to call my ISP (Speakeasy, who have some shady business practices regardless of the good geek press they get), who would then have to call my CLEC (Covad) if it wasn't Speakeasy's problem, and Covad would then have to call my ILEC (Verizon) if the problem was anything other than their DSLAM in the local CO. Verizon was quick enough to come out and solve any loop issues if it really was their problem, but you could literally spend days trying to figure out what was going on and where the problem was at (you're only allowed to contact your ISP directly; Covad and Verizon wouldn't even recognize me as a customer when I tried calling them directly). I'm not saying that the local monopoly of cable is any better, but in this one case I can know where the problem is -- if it's not my equipment, then it's Comcast.


      Of course, Comcast's tech support is pretty much teh suck, anyway. Their extent of knowledge doesn't go past, "Did you reboot your modem?" If that doesn't work, you have to schedule a technician visit, in 4 hour windows, during working hours (ie, if you work a normal day job, be prepared to call in sick or late while you wait for the Comcast van to show up, typically at the very end of their 4 hour window).

    3. Re:next time take a router, by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While your suggestion would fix the problem, widespread use of it as a cure for what's broken promotes acceptance of bad software.

      You shouldn't need to get another piece of hardware to protect a computer that's perfectly capable of protecting itself, running the right software.

      Performing workarounds for Windows is what leads to acceptance of worms (just buy a hardware firewall) what leads to acceptance of viruses (just buy an antivirus) and what leads to acceptance of spyware (just buy an antispyware) and what leads to acceptance of systems so bogged down by combinations of the above (just reinstall every 6 months).

      It's a bit like living in a really bad neighbourhood and denying it's a problem. "Oh we're OK, we live in a safe area. As long as you put bars on all your windows, don't leave the house when it's dark, put up bullet proof windows, and don't make eye contact with the neighbours you're perfectly safe"

      Apart from how it's broken, it works perfectly

  17. "Free software"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "a necessary evil for free software"? If I were RMS, I would be astounded. It is not "free" as we all here supposedly know (like GPL or Creative Commons free), but simply money free. So basically, the spyware is free as in beer, but Open Source/Free Software is free as in freedom (from beer and spyware!)

    1. Re:"Free software"? by AnotherFreakboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Woah, woah, woah.

      OSS has freedom from beer?

      Does this mean that I can't drink when working on open source software?

      --
      Why not get the real ultimate power?
  18. Someone needs to make spyware illegal by dangermen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone needs to make spyware illegal unless someone actively buys a PC sponsored with the crap. ie. those 'free' bannered PCs from years ago. The average computer user just is not capable of keeping this crap off of their computer. Windows is becoming more and more useless as a plaform because of this 'stuff'.

    All I can say is THANK YOU KDE for kiosk mode. I now have my parents surfing with a crap free computer, dynamic DNS, auto-updates, and has been running bug free for months now. 8)

    1. Re:Someone needs to make spyware illegal by skyman8081 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lets make spam illegal while we are at it.

      Wait...

      --
      Two Roommates and a Boyfriend, updates Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
    2. Re:Someone needs to make spyware illegal by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
      In the UK, spyware is illegal. From the Computer Misuse Act:
      1.--(1)A person is guilty of an offence if--

      (a)he causes a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access to any program or data held in any computer;

      (b)the access he intends to secure is unauthorised; and

      (c)he knows at the time when he causes the computer to perform the function that that is the case.

      Distributing spyware clearly breaches this since it accesses data on a computer on a computer without the owner's express permission.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Someone needs to make spyware illegal by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Funny
      I now have my parents surfing with a crap free computer

      So, don't leave us hanging ten. How are those PCB's holding up to the saltwater and wave action?

  19. Re:not me atleast! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zonealarm and Norton (the AV part at least) both have very little to do with spyware detection. I wonder what else you were doing differently?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  20. But for the Grace of Gabe... there go ye? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > What's even more ironic is that they claim it's a necessary evil for free software, when things like the Google Toolbar virtually replace Gator, and there are many spyware-free P2P programs available."

    To quote a few users from the article :

    "I had a good idea what the Marketscore software does, though I didn't read the entire user agreement"
    "I can't surf the web and I can't trade files if I uninstall the spyware."
    "I can't afford a subscription to keep my antivirus software updated. Marketscore doesn't charge any fees."
    "They said they'd opted to install it on their computers because they wanted the eWallet application that stores passwords and credit card numbers, entering them into web forms with one click. The users said you have to get the adware if you want the eWallet."
    "In Hungary, many people who grew up under communist rule came to accept government interference in every aspect of their lives as inescapable. They were too tired to fight anymore, so they convinced themselves that communism was OK and even a benefit."

    For those of you on the "Steam Rules" side of the debate: "Any of that sound familiar?"

    THIS is the reason those of us on the "Steam Sucks" side of the HL2 debate have taken the stand we've chosen to take. We're not warez d00dz. And we recognize that Vivendi are a bunch of middlemen who aren't worthy to fellate a goat. And we acknowledge that Valve has gone to the dark side (as Kazaa and the other P2P apps did) of spywaredom - at least not yet.

    But we see Valve's solution as a cure that's worse than the disease of piracy. And we see the main arguments of Steam's proponents as eerily reminiscent of the examples of clueless luserdom shown in the Wired article. And we ask: can your system's integrity be that easily sold?

    Every time a Steam defender speaks, he or she should take a very close look at his or her argument... and the arguments presented by the spyware defenders in the Wired article, and ask yourself: but for the grace of Gabe, there go ye?

    1. Re:But for the Grace of Gabe... there go ye? by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 4, Insightful


      And we ask: can your system's integrity be that easily sold?

      Oh fer $*#@ sake...

      Look, if you're running closed-source 3rd-party binaries you've already compromised your system integrity. Just because they're from a (currently) reputable company doesn't mean the danger is in any way less than running (say) Bonzi Buddy.

      Heck, it's the same even if you're running totally Open Source software! Unless _you personally_ have gone through every .c and .h file to verify the code, that latest version of BitchX you just installed (or even the latest source-based security patch!) has potentially compromised your system integrity.

      At the end of the day we live in the real world. Cliché's aside this means a level of trust _must_ exist between the end user and the software vendor. Even the most rabid OpenBSD security nuts (not that that's a bad thing) implicitly trust the OpenBSD developers in choosing to run their code.

      Steam is a different issue; it has nothing to do with "system integrity". Steam is useful from two perspectives:
      1. It reduces sofware piracy (online check and all)...
      2. It allows pre-loads and _instant purchase_ without the user ever having to leave their computer.
      While many of us may not be happy with the first feature (reference MS Windows activation), Valve clearly are. And dodgy contract dealings/lawsuits aside, I don't think anyone would argue the worth of being able to do instant purchase/play of new games.
      --
      Janie took my gun...
    2. Re:But for the Grace of Gabe... there go ye? by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except all of these people are giving up significantly more than steam asks. I think you're making false analogies.

      I personally don't mind the loss of privacy in steam because it means I don't have to worry about lost / scratched media ever again (and I ALWAYS forget to make backups). That alone is worth it to me. Plus, I hate draggin my ass out to the store to buy games.

      I compromise my system integrity regularly. When I patch the un-Steamed Unreal Tournament 2004 I don't dissasemble the binaries and make sure it's really not selling my computer's soul. When I go to windowsupdate.com I'm similarly compromising my security. Steam's fine, I don't mind a certain amount of privacy loss at all. But all these actions are no comparison to spyware.

      --
      Photos.
  21. What we need is a good hacking job by TheUnFounded · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What we need is a good hacking job on one of these companies. Every now and then we hear "Amazon.com/newegg.com/etc Hacked, millions of credit card numbers stolen". But Amazon.com has deals with Visa, Mastercard, etc. and they happily protect their customers. What would happen if a company like this was hacked, and tons of information was stolen? Maybe people would wise up to the fact that no, its not OK for these people to monitor your activities, even if "it's not like there's anything interesting or criminal in my e-mail.""

  22. "People are dumb" by wviperw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What these people who accept spyware don't seem to realize is just how much it screws with their computer. Even if they DON'T care that some random shady company is stealing their private information, the spyware can still bring their computer to a stand still.

    I work in the IT department at my college and 99% of the problems that students have in the dorms is spyware/adware related. I've seen brand new Dell computers literally slowed down to a halt as a result of the crap that has been installed on them within a few days. Students somehow manage to get used to the unbearably slow speed at which their 2-3ghz computers run at, never associating the slowness with the plethora of file-sharing programs, toolbars, and search tools they have installed on their computer.

    So yeah, I can't believe that some people actually think that spyware is a necessary evil of free software. That paints a sad picture of the current state of the Internet, IMO. I want to say "People are dumb," but that wouldn be neither fair nor valid. People are simply uneducated in these matters and do not care enough to become educated.

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
    1. Re:"People are dumb" by Schuler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't work in IT at my school but I feel your pain. Every other day last year I would get a knock on my door with someone needing "help" with their computer. I then had to take the painful process of trying to open up IE and get Ad-Aware and spybot. I also shudder when I see 'Kazaa Media Desktop' on people's computers.

      I honestly think that there should be a computer literacy course required. People are "dumb" only because they aren't educated about something that they use everyday. One core requirement that explains the basics of mal-ware, adaware, learning your way around windows, etc etc would drastically reduce the problems that plague the typical college campus. People are much more ignorant than they are stupid.

  23. Valid points by Donny+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As horrible as it may seem to some /.ers most people don't really care about their privacy - convenience is more important. Hence this acceptance of spyware and reluctance to switch from Windows to a less spyware-prone system.
    No wonder many prefer spyware-infested Windows box to a clean Linux system - it's more convenient that way.

    The other day I installed Firefox extension SearchStatus 1.0.4 - the main features being display of PageRan and Alexa rank of pages browsed. Of course soon afterwards I realized in order for it to work the extension sends all URL I visit to Alexa.com (and Google, which is indicated in their toolbar privacy-related help pages).
    This is how convenience wins over privacy (I disabled the Alexa Rank only).

    I've heard from several ISPs that some customers complain when all spam is blocked - they LIKE to receive spam because they're bored or like "specials".

  24. Demand spyware scanning in your virus scanner. by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't understand why spyware isn't seen for what it is -- a commercial take on malicious programming. Any virus scanner worth its salt should scan for and remove this stuff as it's often worse than the viruses one will encounter, but the only one I've seen that'll do it is Avast!'s antivirus software.

    There may be some question about what the user wants and doesn't want, but that doesn't excuse antivirus manufacturers from dodging the problem. If the ability to prevent spyware from installing was ubiquitous (as are virus scanners nowadays) we'd be winning the war. Nobody should have to accept this as an industry practice; things have been getting way too lax with EULAs and intrusive copy protection methods as it is, but this is over the line and we should treat the people who distribute it as we would those who distribute viruses or worms.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Demand spyware scanning in your virus scanner. by deaddeng · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's actually worse than you portray-- the worst spyway is not even a minimally legitimate commercial venture-- it is theft, run by international criminals and organized crime. So-called "legitimate" spyware and adware have conditioned people to think that a windows box encrusted with this shyte is normal.

      The newest stuff is delivered by a trojan downloader, that also installs a keylogger--or several. The browser hijackers they install do one--or several things--to send you to their fake websites so they can steal your credit card, or even your identity:

      -- They take over your HOSTS file so that legitimate urls are translated into THEIR IP addresses, not the real ones.

      -- They add THEIR fake banking, paypal, amazon, etc. sites to your "trusted sites" list.

      -- They may even change your proxy settings to accomplish or reinforce the same thing.

      If you try to clean this crap off with AdAware or Spybot S&D, the trojan downloader--which also disable your AV software and/or Spybot--will NOT detect the trojan downloader, and it will reinstall the malware faster than you can clean it.

      Some of these were spread the old fashioned way-- email attachments. Others used the Windows RPC 445/tpc buffer overflow exploit, or the latest IE IFRAME exploit, or one of the 16 other exploits out there for IE alone that MS has not patched.

      This shit crossed a line about six months ago from being a commercially-oriented nusiance to being outright theft, run by the same criminals that run phishing scams.

      I clean up PCs as a sideline, and the trend is very ominous-- the utility of the PC as a productive tool is threatened, as is the integrity and trust of the Internet.

      Thanks, Microsoft. I'd like to see the Dept. of Homeland security take your ass to court for criminal negligence.

      --
      --- .085 as cool; proving that a little knowledge is dangerous
  25. Spyware has ruined several apps for me by saskboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to use Bearshare, and still would today, if it weren't infested with things like NetDotNet.
    It would be so nice if Kazaa would just work, instead of clinging to kazaa lite k++.

    And I'd pay a one time fee for a product like MSN Messenger with working voice and camera functions, but they know they can make way more money long term by selling ads to me for the rest of my MSN-using-life.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  26. These people are why spyware exists by Barto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's people like those interviewed for the article that are the reason spyware and adware exist. People who are CLUELESS, in general and specifically with computers, that don't see the irony in installing a program that records your user/pass combinations and web history to get a "free" "antivirus" "scanner".

    Just like Nigerian scams, enlarge your penis spam, etc.

  27. SSL, man-in-the-middle, and admin access by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, SSL has provisions against such proxying, which it considers a man-in-the-middle attack, but after five seconds it came to me that if Marketscore's proxy installs stuff on your machine as administrator, it's probably installing Marketscore's root certificate as well.

  28. It's only strange to the Slashdot crowd... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...because we know a lot about tech, and most people don't. We don't tolerate our computers being screwed over with spyware. But - it's only because we know what it is, how bad it is, and what's at stake.

    But to put it in perspective - I'm sure a professional mechanic would think I'm exactly the same kind of lunatic if he were to have a look at the brakes on my van. I know there's a problem, and I haven't made it a priority to fix it. The mechanic (bein a pro and knowing what you can and can't get away with) would probably think I was insane.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  29. Hurts by gmerideth · · Score: 2, Funny

    It hurts my head to think down this level. There's plenty of examples to give where the same lack of understanding and ignorance would lead them into a ditch slowly filling in their car with sand but I'm to damm tired and frustrated after having removed fucking gator's calendar application from ... a damm windows 2003 server because the ass clown admin thought it was neat.

    These people are to damm stupid to use computers. I agree with the CIA guy; let them all take tests.

    "I'm sorry, your too fucking stupid to use Internet A, you get to use the Short Bus Internet where your system will regularly crash and you'll have to call your local nine year old to come fix it for you, here's your pass"...

    --
    Why do overlook and oversee mean opposite things?
  30. Spyware in Developing Countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just returned from Sierra Leone, likely the poorest country in the world.

    A good internet connection is 8kbs and that's when the power hasn't failed or you have petrol for your generator and the phone system delivers a dial tone.

    Even so, the 8kbps costs $200 a month in a country where an OK wage for a laborer is $2 a day -- when a job can be had at all.

    When time after time I see 30-50 percent of that 8kbs bandwidth wasted by spyware, it really makes me angry.

    Spyware hurts entire developing countries.

  31. Funny, but pertinent by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An additional problem is that there are too many loons on the internet screaming hysterically about Spyware at the slightest opportunity rather than helping people really understand the issues and make informed choices.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  32. For a view into the masochistic, check out.... by WD · · Score: 4, Funny

    alt.privacy.spyware

    It's like watching a group of people exchanging tips for what ointments work best for when they light themselves on fire. Over and over again.

  33. once more prooving by lordsid · · Score: 2, Funny

    that "Evil will always prevail over Good, because Good is dumb" - Lord Dark Helmet honestly i don't agree, but stupid people get what they deserve.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  34. May be a bit off topic, but... by jaeson · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here is an interesting article

    This is one of my two favorite parts from this article:
    "...a clause inserted by Claria about 3,000 words into a 5,936-word licensing agreement. It reads: 'You agree that you will not use, or encourage others to use, any unauthorized means for the removal of the GAIN Adserver, or any GAIN-supported software from a computer.'"

    Of course the only "supported" way is through Add/Remove Programs, and NOT through the use of Spybot, etc.

    And here is the second tidbit (also from the linked article):
    "Edelman also found that Claria's licensing agreement tries to prohibit users from deploying network monitors to inspect and report transmissions made between their computer, their local network, and the GAIN servers."

    Fucking Asshats.
  35. Re:Reep the benefits by linguae · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As a mac and linux user, I don't have to worry about this. The PC/Windows scenario will eventually be the death of its self.

    We Mac and *nix users should worry about this. The Internet has gotten much worse over the last five years. The sad thing is that users think that this is part of the normal computing experience. They believe that it is okay for strangers to steal their credit card information. They believe that it is okay for their computer to dial long distance to shady places. They believe that whenever they browse the Internet, hundreds of popups should suddenly appear on the screen, and that software magically installs itself. The worst thing is that people are now starting to distrust free software, which will further set back the deployment of free, open-source software in many places.

    It is sad and rediculous to see that the maker of the most common operating system in the world has failed at general security this badly. I would have never imagined a few years ago that Windows would get this bad. It's kind of like that Lion King scene (only analogy I can remember) when Simba returns to the Pride Land after leaving there for many years, watching the destruction of the land that he grew up in. Yet lots of users are still stuck in Windows land and don't have a clue about the outside world. They have been conditioned over the years, first to accept instability (2000 and XP fixed that), and now to accept insecurity. Something needs to change on the computing scene in the next year or so.

  36. You should see the joy on the faces... by domukun367 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...of the smacktards when you tell them that they don't need to replace their two year old computer because it is "too slow".

    A simple removal of the spyware and toolbars, banning of IE and OE, installation of Firefox and Thunderbird is all that is required. Oh, and you have to tell them not to install anything else - just use what you have.

    Always, the response to the question of what they use their computer for is: "web, email and word processing". A 5 year old computer will do that job with Win XP on it. Soon, a 10 year old computer will do it!

    --
    Please don't send a Word document when a text file will do the job.
  37. Hijacking Open Source with spyware by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the more disturbing trends I've seen out on the net, is the trend that malware people take to Open Source programs.

    In the case of Peer Guardian, they took the entire source code, and made a similar program loaded with spyware, and then dumped in on certain free/shareware sites.

    What's worse is the dreaded spyware that respawns itself. My PC caught a strain of that and even thourgh Ad-aware caught it and wiped it, somehow it just regenerated itself and continued to try reconnecting my PC to the net when I had pulled the ethernet plug on the system.

    You just about can't trust anything you put on your PC these days, and THAT is the real problem.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  38. Maybe it's someone else's fault... by A+Red+Pikmin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but it's still our problem. If people stopped using {spy,ad,mal}ware, those who make it would likewise stop. But while its true that uneducated people are the ones who truly perpetuate all this, it is the task of people who know more to try to educate the ignorant on alternatives. I mean, if we don't use it to help others, what's the point in having knowledge in the first place? So what we more technologically-minded folks can do to help is simply keep plugging away with the educational stuff. After all, community education is what got Open Source projects started in the first place. "There's a better way to do this..." has to be our motto if we want to contribute to fixing this problem. [My first Slashdot post, by the way. :^) ]

    1. Re:Maybe it's someone else's fault... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I mean, if we don't use it to help others, what's the point of having knowledge in the first place?"

      Umm.... I think that would be, "To hold it over them, and to profit off of it."

      Yup, I think this is your first Slashdot post. Welcome to Slashdot!

  39. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Funny

    But download.com puts spyware in it!

    I was wondering why perl had spyware by default and so did some html editors.

    Turned out I downloaded it from download.com.

    BASTARDS!

  40. How to support your ignorant friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, how many of you play the role of tech support for your ignorant friends and family members? I do it, and I hate it, as I'm sure many of you do also. So, here's what you do.

    First, compile a list of good books for beginners to teach them about their computer. Many of the Dummies books are good places to start. Just get your list together.

    Now, the next time that big support call comes...you know the one...the one where the computer is really hosed, take a copy of your list with you and present it to your ignorant user. Tell them that you're going to fix their computer for free one last time, and this is that time. If they want any more, and I mean any more support from you, they must get to work on your reading list the following day. Occasionally, you're going to check in with them and see what they've learned so far. If they stop educating themselves, the support stops, period. No more reformats, no more virus/spyware cleanups, no more help formatting a word processing document. Nothing.

    If they look at you dumbfounded, put it to them this way. Most likely, their biggest investment is their home, followed by their car, followed by their computer. There's no good reason that they shouldn't spend some of their time learning how the thing works, especially since you're spending your valuable time fixing it for them. They don't ask you to come over and change their oil, clean their gutters, or unclog their sink, so there's no reason to expect someone to continually fix their computer.

    If your plan works, you'll surely get some questions as the person starts to read, but at least they're starting to educate themselves. As for those who won't listen, a couple of trips to the local computer store, at $50 an hour, will sober them up.

  41. reap the benefits by NuShrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Americans live in a country that voted in the government that created DMCA, Patriot Act, Dubya and his 2nd Term.

    Looking at how people have willingly giving up their Bill of Rights rights for extra "comfort", purchasing a SUV for that extra comfort, etc. A country of fat, spoiled, ignorant fools.

    It's really not surprising how it's translating to rights on the computer and web.

  42. Downloading Debian right now by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2

    I'm downloading Debian right now. :)

    Still keeping Windows 2000 around though (for games, and possibly for the VS.NET development platform later on).

  43. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by wyldeone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Azureus. Though, to be fair, Download.com probably didn't add the spyware, but they are definitely distributing a version that has spyware. I mean, how difficult would it be for them to go the sourceforge page of azureus (I'll help them out: it's azureus.sourceforge.net) and serve a version directly from the makers.

    --
    In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
  44. ClamAV: Open Source Antivirus Scanner by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Informative
    I had the symantec antivirus product on my win98 box, but after the free trial expired I uninstalled it. Despite my best efforts to remove every trace of the program I couldn't find a way to keep it from showing a window at every login that tried to convince me to pay for a subscription.

    In the long run it stopped being a problem when the hard drive Symantec's adware was installed on dropped dead.

    Nowadays there's a much better virus scanner, very simple to use. For *nix boxes, for example to integrate with your email processing, there is Clam AntiVirus. It's GPLed Free Software, has a great mailing list, its virus database is updated regularly. There is an automated tool called "freshclam" that gets database updates.

    I use ClamAV when I download my mbox files from my hosting service. At one point I was getting 400 MB of email a day, almost entirely viruses, and clamav was very simple to use to delete the virus-infected messages, so the combination of legitimate mail and spam was just a couple meg each day.

    For scanning your hard drive under Windows, there is a GUI program called ClamWin, based on the clamav engine with the same virus database, and automatic updates. It's a very simple program, with a minimalist user interface. It's very easy to use and effective.

    What I can't figure out though, is how to satisfy WinXP SP2's insistence I get a virus checker. It doesn't recognize clamwin as being one. I would imagine all the virus scanner publishers had to pay microsoft for the privilege of being a recommended virus tool. Or maybe it's just that Microsoft doesn't want to admit a Free Software solution is superior to any of the proprietary ones.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  45. Re:It's called GET THE FUCK OFF ADMINISTRATOR by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Problem solved.

  46. Since people don't care... by antdude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it would be good for us who make money to fix their computers. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  47. Spyware-coding contract gigs on job boards by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Informative
    Every now and then I see consulting contract gigs offerred on the job boards (Hotjobs, Monster, Dice, etc.) where the deliverable is obviously a piece of spyware.

    One that I remember specifically was on guru.com, where the client was asking for a program that would set the, uh, "user's" homepage to a URL to be specified by the client, and then prevent the user from ever changing it to anything else.

    You would think the job board staff would forbid such contract offers from ever getting posted, but I'm pretty sure that once someone has paid for a recruiter account at one of the boards, that he can pretty much post anything he wants without ever having to get it reviewed or approved.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  48. You can supply GOOD free software to Windows users by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So it seems that people who use windows think they have to accept spyware in order to get free software. You can demonstrate to them that that doesn't have to be the case.

    What you do is buy one of those spindles of 50 blank CD-Rs, they'll cost you, what? 50 cents a disk or less.

    Download the ISO of TheOpenCD, and burn it onto some of those CD-Rs.

    Hand them out to all your Windows-using friends and relatives, pointing out that it's not only Free Software, it doesn't come with any spyware.

    Urge them all to duplicate the CD for all their friends and relatives, and point out that such copying is not only legal, but encouraged, as I'm sure is documented in ReadMe files on the CD.

    If you don't feel you can afford the cost of the blank CD-Rs, you can ask for a donation of a dollar or two to cover the media and your time.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  49. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by ZonaldRumzfeld · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got this warning too (and I'm using Gentoo, heh)
    Seems there were sites distributing a spy/malware version of Azureus to people (this includes download.com, shame on them). I hope people wise up.

    Just look at this user comment:
    "one of the worst bittorent program I ever had. yes, this program can download fast, but it's filled with so many spywares. This program will kill your computer! made my pc ran like turtle and had to reformat it."

    Have any of you had this problem? Not me.

    It's sad that people would do this with GPL opensource code in an attempt to spread more crap to everyone.

  50. How about signing blank checks for them? by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Insightful
    At least some of the spyware out there is not for marketing purposes, but to capture such things as your online banking password, your credit card number and so on.

    Somewhere recently I read (maybe it was here) that fraud resulting from phishing, spyware and the like was costing the credit card companies and banks ten billion dollars a year. That's pretty serious, much more serious than allowing a marketing agency to know what websites you like to visit.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  51. Downloading Spyware? by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's entirely possible that these people who are singing the praises of spyware on message boards are paid shills. "It's not so bad! Come and join us!" Somehow it makes me think of some evil character in a fairy tale, trying to persuade the protagonist to turn to sin.

    Of course it's perfectly possible to have Free Software without intrusive advertising. Ask Linus. Ask ESR. Ask RMS. Ask Vixie. Ask any of the millions of us around the world, who use and create Free Software! I don't see spyware in my kernel, my mail transport, my compiler, or my command scheduler. I don't see adware in my HTTP server, my FTP server or any of the clients I use with them. And if anyone tried to put it there, I'd just comment it right out of the source code -- and then post the diff files on the Internet, so other people could comment it out too. If I was feeling particularly bothered, I'd actually hack it right open, and make it post lots of bogus information to their servers. I'd post that hack far and wide, too -- and make sure the spyware authors knew I wrote it, so they would have proof of what I thought of them.

    Just how difficult is it to block out this spyware, anyway? Can't you just patch the source, or edit the Makefile or whatever Windows uses in place of that, so the spyware portions don't even get compiled? Or do Windows downloads work somehow totally different to Linux and BSD ones?

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  52. iMesh Forums by vistic · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I posted some noticed about iMesh's spyware, Marketscore, getting coverage here and in Wired... (iMesh Forums)

    and each time a moderator just deleted it...

    My last post read:

    The notice says that posts containing links to sites with "illegal content" will be removed... iMesh's spyware, Marketscore, has recently gotten coverage in Wired magazine, and on Slashdot.org (Dec 6, 9:34PM article)... neither of these sites contain illegal information. Wired's article is even pseudo-supporting iMesh's tactics (did you know that Marketscore can view your creditcard information even on secure websites? Wired magazine notes that it all your internet activity is routed through their servers and they have this ability, which you might not even know you agreed to in the License). However someone does not want you to even be aware that such a thing as Marketscore even exists... and so this post will be removed promptly as all the others have been which mention iMesh's little secret.

    I challenge a moderator to post a thoughtful reply to this instead of just removing it... this is certainly related to Security, General information, User Support, as well as iMesh's P2P Revolution


    And I wonder how long until they are deleted as well.

  53. A Bimodal Culture?? by hajihill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This brings up some really good points.

    I was recently in a situation where a guy I know, who actually makes money doing tech services by just consistently networking with people he knows, was working on a mutual friends computer while I was in the area. Kinda hanging around, only paying minimal attention (I don't like to advertise any skill with tech matters, it makes for boring conversation and tons of stupid requests) allowed me to see this guy make some serious errors and oversights, eventually ending with me having to fix the guy's computer so we could listen to this CD a friend brought over. (Somehow he borked it good.) This experience was enlightening for a few reasons:

    1) I normally assume people know how to use their computers. It isn't hard, I taught myself everything I know (including programming skills due to demand at previous employers), and wouldn't consider myself supremely educated in CS, but very literate, or versed if you will. Call it computer intuition, or just simply common sense and some experience.

    2) People really don't want to know. I hadn't realized this, but explaining things to my friend in very broad detail, after this other guy made some 'obvious' mistakes, only provoked the dullest interest, no real attention what so ever.... yeah, just happily oblivious.

    Basically, it is just odd how something so simple can be so flagrantly disregarded by a great majority of people, when the slightest bit research or inquiry on their part could save a ton of time and headaches. But people are just different. I, for one, and probably many of the people here, find it stimulating to do some research on an author when we have finished a book, or on the information contained in an article, or the history of some discovery. The internet and other mediums provide us with a hand-crafted Discovery Channel-style special on any given topic as we choose them. We find this stimulating and helpful in providing conversation fodder for the future. And then there are people that would rather have the Discovery Channel compose their special for them, or, worse yet, ABC or NBC educate them about the modes and methods of CSI or Law & Order.

    There is definitely an increasingly bimodal culture in this country (and possibly the world) along lines similar to these, the 'Tell Mes' and the 'Findout For Ourselves' or something similar to that. It is interesting, and should have increasing effects on politics and the economy. I am interested to see what develops.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
  54. You are obviously not married by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now, please understand that my wife understands very well why one should not use Windows, for both technical and moral reasons. But she took a long hard look at both Linux and Mac OS X, and decided against both, because she found each of them difficult to use. She doesn't like Microsoft, but she is very comfortable using Windows.

    At least she was willing to use Mozilla, so the problem was not as bad as it could have been, but when her WinXP laptop started crashing recently, I scanned it, and found a bunch of spyware. "WurldMedia" seemed to be the main problem.

    I asked her if she would scan the laptop herself once a week or so. "But that's your job" she said. "But..." I protested. "Who do you come crying to when you pop a button off your clothes?" she replied.

    So I have accepted the job as WindozeXP administrator for my wife.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  55. You need scare tactics by ReKleSS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the only way to get users to do anything about it. Scare them. Tell them that their credit card numbers, bank details, personal details, and the like could all be stolen if they're not careful. Instruct them how to protect themselves. If they still refuse to do anything after that, they're beyond help, Give up. It's not the most pleasant way to coerce people to action, but it's effective, and a few less zombie computers (well, close enough...) on the internet won't be doing any harm.
    -ReK

    --
    md5sum -c reality.md5
    reality: FAILED
    md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 computed checksum did NOT match
  56. Knowingly faulty brakes == Drink Driver by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But to put it in perspective - I'm sure a professional mechanic would think I'm exactly the same kind of lunatic if he were to have a look at the brakes on my van. I know there's a problem, and I haven't made it a priority to fix it.

    You know there's a problem with your brakes, and you choose to ignore it?

    This is *worse* than the people who have zombified PCs spewing spam, and don't care; it's on a par with drink-driving.

    It wouldn't be a problem if you were the only person at risk from such dangerous behaviour. Heck, some people might suggest it was a good way of cleaning up the gene pool. Unfortunately, like the drink-driver, you aren't alone on the road.

    Do us all a favour, and get your brakes fixed, or at least have the grace to wrap your van (and yourself) round a lamppost on some unused road in the middle of nowhere.

    (Okay, I'm aware that this probably sounds sanctimonious- my apologies for not phrasing it better).

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  57. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by goatan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering Reformatting can be easier and quicker than trying to hunt down all the spyware or your not certain you got all of it out. Then there is a good reson to format it is also easier for less computer literate people to do than go hunting around the registrey. There are plenty of times when it's worth reformatting because it is the quickest simpelest way especially when you don't have to worry about keeping any data. You don't have much experience of fixing problems and can be safley ignored

    --
    Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  58. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Assuming Azureus is GPL (too lazy to look) I wonder if those responsible for adding the spyware have GPled said spyware.

    If not, let the FSF sort it out.

    FSF versus scumbag malware distributors. Can't wait...

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.

  59. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by mrbcs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What's easier? hunting for 300+ keys in the registry and numerous hidden files (especially in xp)...

    Or just formatting and reinstalling behind a firewall till all the patches are in?

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  60. A New Law by Jameth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jame's Law of Good and Evil:

    If you believe an evil is necessary, you are an idiot.

  61. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For computers (like you pr0n loving uncle's) that are past the "critical point" of spyware programs (i.e. shitloads of the stuff), think of it like a Wack-A-Mole game. Now, in the case of spyware, think of it like a Wack-A-Mole game with 500, posessed, cracked out, hyperactive, mutant moles that have predator-like camo. Now, just you playing you have little chance of winning. Get your buddies Ad-Aware and Spybot and you have a better chance, but it still sucks. You could play for hours and you MIGHT win eventually. Reformatting is like taking 20 gallons (75.7 L) of gasoline (petrol), dousing the whole game, and having the immense satisfaction of torching the entire thing, moles and all.

    There may have been other ways, but the reformat is still the quickest and easiest in some cases. The people I feel real sorry for are the ones who don't even know how to reformat and end up buying another computer (yes, I have met people who have done this).

    --
    !hoD
  62. Re:Such smart users! by almostmanda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Weatherbug ITSELF is not spyware. But, for the longest time, Weatherbug came with Gator aka Claria upon install. I think being bundled with spyware is just as bad as being spyware. At this point, Weatherbug also defined itself as "Adware" on its site, because they gave you random popups. Type "spyware weatherbug" into any search engine, and you'll get an actual history instead of Weatherbug's site, which tends to leave things out. I have a sneaking suspicion that Weatherbug only got rid of the spyware in response to the bad publicity it has gotten lately.

  63. Intercept SSL? by Glock-40SW · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does this part bother anyone?

    "Even data entered on secure websites -- such as passwords, credit card numbers and bank account numbers, information that is supposed to be viewable only by the sender and the intended recipient -- is accessible to Marketscore, since the company has developed a method that allows it to view encrypted information."

    Any ideas what they might be doing? Or is it just BS?

  64. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by PaneerParantha · · Score: 5, Insightful
    People who end *any* mini review with "I had to reformat" are clearly people who are either too stupid or too lazy to try the simple things like system restore or just yanking the app off

    This statement is not founded upon facts.

    I work in tech support. These days spyware calls are the largest number of calls we get. Let me tell you a sampling of the problems we face:

    1. Customer's system is slow, gets loads of popups and shutting it down takes ages.

    2. We try starting it up in safe mode after shutting down non-essential services via msconfig. Many times, though not all, mouse and keyboard freeze and we are unable to proceed in that mode. (No I didn't stop MS services)

    3. We uninstall all suspicious programs from control panel (after researching and confirming they are indeed malware). Sometimes it takes the crap out, sometimes it just comes back.

    4. It is reported that (though I am not sure) that there is a symbiotic relationship between some spyware and trojans. So if you take a spyware out and the trojan is still present, the trojan pulls back the spyware the next time you go online and similarly spyware pulls back trojan if you take trojan out.

    5. Some customers lose internet connectivity. Depending upon the savvy-ness of the customer, we may sit from half-an-hour to 2 hours fixing their Winsock - walking them through registry settings, deleting winsock keys, adding TCP/IP protocol, etc.

    You can see that by this time, we have spent quite some time with the customer. And this assumes that everything has gone smoothly. However, in real life, what happens is:

    "Sir, please click your start button and then click run."

    "I can't find Start button. Oh there it is. Now what is it you wanted me to click?"

    and so on...

    6. Sometimes, spybot and adaware find hundreds of problems/critical objects (as they call them). You fix them. But the system is still slow. There are no popups but performance is still atrocious. What do you tell the customer now?

    7. Repair install or restore *does not* fix the problem. Spyware is insidious enough to remain there.

    At this point the customer gets very frustrated. He has typically spent several hours on the phone, first with his ISP and then with us spread over a period of several days sometimes.

    I would never call such a person lazy!

    So at this point he just wants the problem fixed. Throw the PC out the window or reformat. Clearly, reformat is much less painful than going through hours of registry cleanups, reboots, waits, frustration and lost productivity.

    Morever, these people aren't stupid, they just don't know about computers. Lack of knowledge of a particular field does not equal stupidity. For example, many of our customers are doctors, economists, journalists, etc. (One was a very nice old lady trying to get her email working so she could email her grandkid serving in Iraq).

    Hence it is my considered opinion that to call people stupid or lazy without having more information is incorrect.

  65. Re:not me atleast! by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
    Okay, first of all, zonealarm will not 'immediately delete' anything, it doesn't even have the ability to delete stuff. Hell, last I checked, it didn't have the ability to stop software, all it ever does it block internet access.

    Second, reporting back isn't the only issue with spyware. There's also pop-up ads, which just calls IE with a URL, and redirecting internet pages, as a proxy. A hell of a lot of report back software installs as part of IE, and thus if your firewall will let IE, it will let the spyware out.

    I'll admit all those are less likely under Firefox use, but nothing stops spyware from firing up a hidden IE instance to report back while you happily use Firefox.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  66. Re:Azureus doesn't.... by pen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Download.com charges hundreds of dollars for program listings. Azureus would not have ended up on Download.com if someone hadn't paid to get it listed. Being able to add the spyware was their motivation.

  67. Malware Primer by rinkjustice · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a great article at Arstechnica entitled Malware: what it is and how to prevent it . Good read, if not a little on the basic side. However, it did suggest a great anti-spyware app called SpywareBlaster which is seems effective at preventing spyware in the first place..

    That, couple with the Adaware and Spybot Search and Destroy, and I've had no problems whatsoever.

    P.S. And it helps if you don't visit porn sites and download wares too ;^)

  68. Sorry, Linux/OS X is a religious matter by onlyjoking · · Score: 2, Funny

    As these 2 publications indicate:

    OS X Bible (beware Slashdot's spaces added to URL)
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/076 4543997/qid=1102440464/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_2_1/202-626 1063-0197431

    Red Hat Linux Bible (beware Slashdot's spaces added to URL)
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/076 4543334/qid=1102440509/sr=2-3/ref=sr_2_11_3/202-62 61063-0197431

    .... Linux/OS X is a religious matter. Windoze is, after all, the mark of the Beast so anyone who does business with Billy has some explaining to do on the Day of Reckoning.