Slashdot Mirror


Indian Consortium To Offer 2 Mbps At $2.30/month

leoaugust writes "The State Govt of Andhra Pradesh in India, has awarded a contract for a fiber-optics based network to a consortium led by Aksh of India that aims to charge just Rs 100 (around US $2.30) a month for a domestic broadband connection. The project will provide services with a minimum bandwidth of 2Mbps. The execution of the project is scheduled to begin in April 2005 and will be completed by December 2006. The strength of the consortium is evident by the participation of top-notch Indian corporations which include Railtel Corporation India Limited, Tata Indicom, VSNL Limited, INcable Network (Andhra) Limited, Spectranet Limited and Nuziveedu Seeds Limited."

319 comments

  1. I know where I'm moving! by Dizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Manitoba. You didn't think I was going to say India by any chance, did you?

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    1. Re:I know where I'm moving! by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being from America, and having gone through the public school system, I simply assumed that Manitoba was in India... Ain't it?

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    2. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Manitoba is in Canada.

      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    3. Re:I know where I'm moving! by A.Chwunbee · · Score: 2, Funny

      So why are Indians living there?

      --
      select * from base where originalOwner = 'you' and currentOwner != 'us'.
      0 rows returned.
    4. Re:I know where I'm moving! by griff199 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Being from America, and having gone through the public school system...I invisioned 'Soaring Eagle Broadband' run out of a casino, until I realized I was being an insensitive clod and just plain wrong.

      Excuse me while I go self-flagellate. Spelling and grammar explained above.

    5. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your signature explains it all:

      select * from base where originalOwner = 'you' and currentOwner != 'us'.
      America returned.

    6. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong, instead of moving there, you could just get some datacenter service from there, start your pron site and spam business at low cost. //grin

    7. Re:I know where I'm moving! by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      Oops! Wrong Indians.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    8. Re:I know where I'm moving! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Oh Simon, anybody could miss Canada on a map, all tucked away down there.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:I know where I'm moving! by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought about Gomorrah...

      Jokes aside, the point is that having such high speed at home would benefit outsourcing to India _a lot_. I mean, it's like not having to build huge infrastructures to host even more outsourced workers... they only have to work at home.

      --

      Your head a splode
    10. Re:I know where I'm moving! by gmajor · · Score: 1

      Which would certainly be true if you lived in the Southern Hemisphere, or you were looking at a Northern Hemisphere map upside down :-p

    11. Re:I know where I'm moving! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      There is nothing intrinsically important about North being up. It is amazing how many people assume this must be the case.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    12. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to a cartographer.

    13. Re:I know where I'm moving! by SeXy_Red · · Score: 1

      What's India?

      --

      This sig was generated by a barrel of trained kittens for SeXy_Red (550409).

    14. Re:I know where I'm moving! by starrsoft · · Score: 1

      Being from America and having gone to a private institution, I can assure you that Manitoba is in Canada. Tsunami is in India.

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    15. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to Australia, I'll bet... Although the situation is *starting* to improve here, with some ISPs putting their own DSLAMS in the exchanges, we are still a 3rd / 4th world country when it comes to broadband.

      For eg. I pay $AUD65 a month for 1500/256 with 24Gb limit, and $0.03/Gb over my limit, with mignight to 8am not counting towards the limit.

      Many ISPs, like TPG, are offering "unlimited" access for around $30 a month, BUT after you go over your paltry 3Gb limit, they throttle you to betweek 28.8 and 64k for the remainder of the month. Not what I, or the ACCC, call "unlimited".

      There is talk of ADSL2+, offering 26Gb bandwidth to 15k from the exchange, but it's in very VERY limited testing by one or two ISPs.

      For SDSL, the fastest you'll get is 512/512 with a ridiculous data limit, and pay something like $AUD130 a month.

      So stop whinging, yanks - you have it pretty bloody good !!!

    16. Re:I know where I'm moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are "woowoowoowoo" (do the thing with your hand in front of the mouth) indians, not (put your hands together and nod you're head) "bud bud bud" indians, alias packie's.

  2. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now i can post my webcam videos of students giving oral sex at blazing speeds!

    1. Re:Sweet! by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now i can post my webcam videos of students giving oral sex at blazing speeds!

      Why would students be giving oral sex at blazing speeds anyway? It's not particularly good technique.... or is there some sort of competition to see who can give most blow jobs in an hour?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that as in delhi, wayyy up north. andhra pradesh is in the south. much more culture there.

    3. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch! Watch out for blisters!

    4. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this is in reference to This story.

    5. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looser looser looser!!!!

      I'm going to offer LIVE students oral video streaming!

      I just ordered my quad-AMD 64bits Opteron 128GB RAM with RAID 1TB for just Rs 100000 (around US $2300).

      For 1000$ US I'll sale you the link on eBay. I only accept Western Union money transfered to India.

    6. Re:Sweet! by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      So, they'll have better quality cameras then?

    7. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reference to this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4105753.stm

    8. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and they'll toss in some Anime on the side...but don't be too surprised if they break out into a song dance in the middle of the BJ....

    9. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those uninitiated,

      There was a recent furore over a short video clip showing a couple of students of a top Indian public school indulging in oral sex. The incident prompted the Press to crib about moral degradation.

      The clip was the talk of the town and an enterprising engineering student offered it at Baazee.com (a E-bay company). The police, arrested him and the CEO of baazee.com for commiting cybercrime. Unbelievable!

      Just shows how 'cyber laws' can be used to arrest anyone. And the Indian IT minister is rather proud that his country has 'cyber laws'.

    10. Re:Sweet! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Gives new meaning to that phrase Apu uses:

      "Thank you CUM again..."

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:sweet! by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I know you're just making a joke, but I get free dial-up from my university but I'd still pay for DSL. Once I move out of my shitty apartment, I most certainly will.

  3. Should be noted... by dj245 · · Score: 4, Informative
    That in India, money will buy you a lot more than the US. In India, 100 USD is a lot of money and could be a month's pay for an architect (my cousin thought about going there). Just like in downtown New York $5 won't buy you hardly anything to eat, in most parts of India small sums of money are plenty to live on.

    Based on the local economic conditions in India, $2.30 is probably totally reasonable.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, Rs 100 is a small sum. A meal at a cheap restaurant costs about Rs 30. Phone bills are much higher that Rs 100

    2. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm no, not really..

      though food and other things like say clothes and leather goods is cheaper here, electronics is not.

      An ipod costs upwards of $660, a decent entry level laptop costs $1200 and petrol (gas) costs about $1 per litre. Also cars are expensive.

      The bottomline being survival is cheap, luxury is not. and 'tronics and cars are still luxury here for most..

      - dhawal

    3. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Should be noted... by mallumax · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm from india.100 Rs is definitely very cheap. To put it in perspective
      --In Metros a movie ticket costs 70-200 Rs.(depends on the metro).
      --Landline rentals start at around 350 Rs.
      --Internet call rates (not the ISP charge) if you use the BSNL telephone network is more than 20 Rs an hour and around 7 Rs after 10.30pm till 8 am.ISP charges are extra.

      So at 100 Rs/month this is a steal !!

    5. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it is cheap even by indian standards,

      Compare with other services e.g
      local calls - 2Rs(4 cents)
      cable monthly charges - 200Rs($5)
      decent broadband monthly now - 500 ($11)

      the Rs 100/month for broadband is really cheap.

    6. Re:Should be noted... by dasunt · · Score: 1

      An ipod costs upwards of $660, a decent entry level laptop costs $1200 and petrol (gas) costs about $1 per litre. Also cars are expensive.

      Doesn't India have a high tarriff on all non-domestic vehicles? I believe they want to encourage their own domestic industry.

    7. Re:Should be noted... by Bhasin_N · · Score: 1

      It should also be noted, that since this IS India,
      1 or more of the following WILL happen -

      1)The final speed will be 1 bps, which will be described as amazing since villagers can now access bloomberg.

      2)Several officials will get bribed, (DEFINITELY going to happen)

      3)It will get delayed,

      4)It will cost FAR more than expected.

      5)The government will then arbitrarily reduce connection speeds,

      6)It will then be followed up by legislation to ensure the lesser common good.

      Jai Hind!

    8. Re:Should be noted... by asliarun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree with your point. One thing though. $100 = Rs. 4500 isn't that big a deal in India :-)

      Perhaps an architect could get by with $100 a month IF he/she lives alone or with their parents, has no loans, cooks at home, and takes the bus everyday. $100 is also roughly what a student (from a no-name college with no campus placements) would expect to get paid with 0 experience.

      A typical middle-class Indian would earn about $200-$300 a month, live in a 2BHK rental/govt flat (Bedroom, "Hall" aka living room, Kitchen), own a scooter or a 100cc motorbike (100cc bikes give insane mileage - 1 liter = 100km!), and have a 4-5 member family (husband, wife, 2 kids, grandma).

      I agree. $2.30 pm is quite reasonable. However, PC prices in India are exorbitant. Forget purchasing power parity. The same PC that costs $500 in the US would cost about $800 in India! This is the reason why the PC penetration in India is so low. To add to it, most Indians tend to buy stuff with cash after they've saved for it. Hence, they usually plan to save for about 2-4 years if they want to buy a PC for their kid.

    9. Re:Should be noted... by prash_n_rao · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I have subscribed to an always-on service now.

      I pay about $28 for download speeds of 64kbps to 128kbps. At this price, it is not worth the money for most people here.

      IMO, at $2.5 per month most people would go in for such an offer, considering we pay about $8 p.m. for cable TV.

      --
      This is not my sig.
    10. Re:Should be noted... by sgarg · · Score: 2, Informative

      BSNL has recently increased pulse rate for internet calls to 10 minutes (peak hour) and 15 minutes (non-peak). This works out to Rs. 8 and Rs. 5.30 per hour, including taxes. This is pretty cheap! I pay Rs. 500/= pm for 300 MB of download on a 64 kbps link in bangalore. So, this would be a great thing. If only we have it in Bangalore :(

    11. Re:Should be noted... by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      Hey hey hey. You can get a slice of pizza in New York for way less than $5. Probably TWO for the whole fiver.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    12. Re:Should be noted... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      This is my problem with the way the united states and australia are coming along.

      Sure it's fine and dandy for a 300gb hard disk to be 150$ or a new DVD player to be 39$ but medical costs, fuel, food etc skyrocket.

      Who cares if a brushed steel toaster is now 13.99$ pricematched at fucking walmart when you can't afford the 4$ a loaf (exaggeration I admit) bread to put in it....

      There's just something not right about that.

    13. Re:Should be noted... by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      The final speed will be 1 bps

      1 bit per second? Ouch.

    14. Re:Should be noted... by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

      I just watched a travel show about India. They showed some Sadus who sat around naked all day and smoked ganga and people just gave them money. Sounds like a good job to me. Combine that with $2.30 broadband and I'm gone. I just need to see how much plane tickets to India are. With the Tsunami travel is probably down, so flights may be cheap.

    15. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a $500 PC in the US would cost about $800 in India?

      sounds better than the pricing we get in the UK :)

    16. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting it in right perspective when someone can INR 20000+ ($500 or more) for buying a computer it is not a problem to pay 100 Rs to afford the internet.

    17. Re:Should be noted... by adeydas · · Score: 1

      Reasonable, are you kidding... I pay Rs. 600 per month for this 128 Kbps connection and they are gonna get 2Mbps for Rs. 100 only. This is not fair, crud, why don't they start this service all over India!!!

    18. Re:Should be noted... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      You're what might be called a typical cynical indian dolt. And it's people like you that hold out country back, and allow injustices to occur. Here, read this and STFU.

      That being said, I do feel that the prices being charged are a complete load of bullcrap...

    19. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, this is exactly what would happen in almost every other country on earth. In general, when new options for connecting to the internet are proposed, they are pitched as being blazingly fast, impossibly cheap, and available "very soon." In general, when new options for connecting to the internet are finally rolled out, they are pitched as "faster than dialup," cost double the initially advertised price, and became available only after long delays. "Legislation to ensure the lesser common good" is also to be expected.

    20. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true. 2.50$ in Indian money is just Rs 150ish. I've lived there for 22 years and I can tell you that is not a lot of money considering I paid Rs 15,000 for 500 hours of dialup internet.

    21. Re:Should be noted... by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      So, stupid question, but does that mean I could go to India with like $10,000 and basicaly live like a king?

    22. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the cars are made in india & not imports. It is just that they are taxed to death.
      They typically are double the cost of the same model in US. Imported cars are even more costly.

      Typical prices -
      Toyota corolla base model - Rs 900000($20,000)
      Honda Accord Rs 1,500,000 (~$33,000)

      Entry level cars models (no airbags, manual transmission, compact) like Tata Indica/Hyundai Santro/Suzuki Zen etc start around Rs. 400,000(~$10,000)

      But computer parts are relatively cheap, I can put together a decent Athlon system for about Rs 18,000($400).

    23. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, a link to this dorks blog! And a rather shitty one too.

      "...allow injustices to occur"

      Thats some pretty slanderous shit to say to someone who made a pretty funny observation. Maybe its people like you who are the problem? Smartass curry-eating bitches who thinks they are so woefully misunderstood and superior to other cultures.

      Nah, seen it before a million times, just another angry little powerless bitch screaming at the world.

    24. Re:Should be noted... by eonish · · Score: 2, Informative
      So, stupid question, but does that mean I could go to India with like $10,000 and basicaly live like a king?
      $10,000 is around Rs. 4,50,000 An avarage upper middle class 'matchbox' appartmant (far from king like) little away from 'happening places' costs Rs. 17,00,000.

      What most people dont realize is that india is divided economically into various classes. There are many people who earn less then $50/mo and support their family of 10. And there are those in equally large numbers who earn $1500/mo and have to support their family of 4. India is not as poor as official numbers dictate. That is because most people have double incomes. One white and one black (where taxes arent declared). Previous generation also didnt like to showoff much and their only purpose in life was to accumalte wealth. Thus adding to the image of poor indian.
    25. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that a $30/mo savings per month really is good.

    26. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSNL Bangalore is rolling out ADSL2+ from the 15th of this month... the Rs.500 for 300MB is definitely going to be history.

    27. Re:Should be noted... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Sure it's fine and dandy for a 300gb hard disk to be 150$ or a new DVD player to be 39$ but medical costs, fuel, food etc skyrocket."

      I don't find food or fuel costs to be expensive...pretty small part of my monthly bill. Why not have things that you use everyday or buy fairly often be inexpensive. It's not like I use money to spend on healthcare very often...maybe to a Dr. once a year if I get sick. $25 copay for that...$10 for drugs if needed...

      Sure, if you need surgery or major treatment, it gets $$ fast...but, its not like you do that very often in general, so, you save your money and take out insurance for when you do need it.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    28. Re:Should be noted... by sirdude · · Score: 1

      I think you're all getting excited over nothing..

      a)VSNL is already providing 512kbps lines right now at Rs.260/month.
      b)This service will not be out until early 2007
      c)There is no mention of unlimited data xfers or anything of the sort. Therefore, just like the above mentioned VSNL connection which offers something like a 100MB download cap per month, these guys will start charging people who go over the limit. If they are aiming for 2007, I don't see why-t-f they don't think bigger than 2MBPS

      Anyways, as to the current state of the Internet in India, the best plan available right now is:

      128kbps unlimited Hathway cable connection for Rs.810/month (about USD19 per month) - but the catch is that this is shared with other users in your apartment complex (which are the only establishments where this is available). So find a flat in a quiet neighbourhood with plenty of elderly neighbours and convince them to subscribe to it, and you're set :)

    29. Re:Should be noted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not just that. Since you have obviously never been to India, you have no idea about the poor conditions of Indian roads. Pot-holes, open manholes, places with no real road at all, dust...

      On a colloboration project with Indian Government, Suzuki tried road-testing their cars there. The cars on average, didn't last a month. They had to completely redesign the chasis for Indian conditions, considering that Indian roads demand something more in way of an ATV.

      As such, any imported cars are clearly a luxury item, to be shown off for the high price-tag, rather than meant for actual regular driving. Hence the high-tag.

      The most popular model in India is Maruti Suzuki btw. Suzuki is *not* an Indian company obviously. Usually the foreign car companies open up shop locally to redesign them for local conditions.

  4. Outsourcing-to-the-homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Callcenters in India are already feeling the pressure from independent remote maintenance specialists working from home...

  5. Not so many comments here.... by Metteyya · · Score: 4, Funny

    As I see, most Slashdotters - instead of commenting - decided to RTFA and check possibilites of emigrating to and working in India.

    OK, guys, if you've already checked it - how much does a plane ticket from Europe to India cost? And are there good employment perspectives?

    1. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Professeur+Shadoko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And are there good employment perspectives?
      It depends, are you ready to be paid like Indian workers ?

    2. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? With that kind of cheap bandwidth, there's no need to go out to do anything. Food is dirt cheap too. So is housing. What else does a /.er need?

    3. Re:Not so many comments here.... by javaguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would probably be a better idea is to save up a bit of cash then go live the good life in India for a while.

    4. Re:Not so many comments here.... by liangzai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, slashdotters see the low price on bandwidth, decide to go to India. Nevermind that they will hate many aspects of the local culture. Or that they will at best find a job for a monthly pay of a hundred bucks. Luckily, India is another former colony of the British Empire, so there won't be any language barriers.

      There are also tons of pretty girls, but then again, the culture will fuck up the regular slashdotter's plans. Then again, slashdotters mostly don't get laid, so it may not be counted as a minus.

      After just half a year, the regular slashdotter will probably miss the Patriot Act, Dick Cheney, Jack-in-the-Box, fraudulent ballots, terror hype, Dubya, his mother and his brother, and so return to his Homeland...

    5. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mistaken on this - Indian IT workers are very well paid compared to other professions here.

      The problem comes when you convert it to USD.

    6. Re:Not so many comments here.... by rcs1000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well you've raised the interesting question: how much is the cheapness of Indian programmers the result of an overly weak Rupee (read strong US dollar), and how much the fact that Indian programmers are just cheaper.

      If a programmer in India, earning $5,000 a year, can afford 2MB broadband, a nice appartment, food, etc. (i.e. as much as a programmer in the US), then who is to say that Indian programmers are underpaid. Perhaps the issue is solely one of the US dollar being too strong. As work moves offshore, the effect of this will be (in the long run) that money flows to India, the rupee rises, and US programmers become more competitive again.

      Just a thought...

      Cheers,

      Robert

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    7. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, the dollar is probably about as weak as it can get, right now, you know ...

    8. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Famous last words. Trust me, it'll get weaker yet.

    9. Re:Not so many comments here.... by rcs1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is it?

      In 1985 you got 11 rupees to the US Dollar. Now you get 44. That's a four fold *strengthening* of the dollar in the last 20 years.

      If we returned to 1985 exchange rates against the rupee, then Indian programmers would cost $20,000 a year to employ.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    10. Re:Not so many comments here.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      English speakers?

    11. Re:Not so many comments here.... by asliarun · · Score: 1

      Actually you're right. If you earn $5000 (considering, you're living alone) in India, you can have a ball. You can drive a hatchback (cars are expensive here, but then, the roads and the traffic is pretty bad anyway), live in a very nice part of the city, afford to party your ass every weekend, and take a quarterly vacation to Goa or to the Himalayas. Money talks here. If you've got the money here, everything works like a charm, and even the cops don't bother you (jump a red light, pay $1-2 bribe).

      The lifestyle that you can lead in India is perhaps a little bit of a downgrade vis a vis America, but not by much, especially if you're living in a big city. Perhaps, you can't afford an overseas vacation every year or drive a big car. But, that's about it. But hey, in which other country can you do an engineering degree from a top college for $1000 a year or an MBA for $2000 a year? Perhaps, one in a thousand go for a student loan here.

    12. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dream on. It'll get way lower. That's why all the big financiers are betting against the dollar, just like Soros did to the British pound.

    13. Re:Not so many comments here.... by will_die · · Score: 1

      With a fast enough network connection who cares about the local culture?
      Besides the food would be could and you could get take out.

    14. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In 1985 you got 11 rupees to the US Dollar. Now you get 44. That's a four fold *strengthening* of the dollar in the last 20 years.
      It could also mean that dollar has weakened, but the rupee has weakened by even more. Compare them both against some other currencies such as Sterling or the Euro.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "in which other country can you do an engineering degree from a top college for $1000 a year or an MBA for $2000 a year? Perhaps, one in a thousand go for a student loan here"

      Dude dude dude.

      Every indian who comes here has a Masters in Mathematics, which is not as rigorous as a basic engineering degree from a US university.

      Look, I'm not saying Indians are stupid, or have some basic inferiority. But in terms of basic education and infrastructure, Indian is 2-3 generations (yes, GENERATIONS) behind the US.

      A person who checks groceries for a living in the US does better than the professionals you mention in India.

      The fact that there are bunch of underemployed geeks here on slashdot tells you more about their motivation and willingness to work hard than it does about any underlying "flaw" in the U.S. economic system.

    16. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US dollar strong?

      Muhahahahahahahahahha!

    17. Re:Not so many comments here.... by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Funny
      Vacations? Cars? Parties?

      You must be new here. All we care about is broadband; the cheaper the better.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    18. Re:Not so many comments here.... by asliarun · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Every indian who comes here has a Masters in Mathematics, which is not as rigorous as a basic engineering degree from a US university."
      Dude, that's an anomaly. The best and the brightest Indians go for engineering and medicine. Mathematics is not even considered an employable profession in India. I didn't mean this to be a comparison contest, but was only saying that the top Indian engineering colleges are world class and cheap as hell to boot.

      "A person who checks groceries for a living in the US does better than the professionals you mention in India."
      Perhaps. However, that doesn't mean that the software professionals in the US are all millionaires either. I've been to Texas and California several times. Yes, the standard of living is definitely high in the US. However, and this may come as a surprise to you, i found that i lead an equally good life in India. The only difference is that in the US, even if you don't have skills or an education, you can life comfortably. In India, a person without a decent education gets plastered. However, a person with good skills leads a diametrically opposite lifestyle, and can live a very very decent life.

      To add, while the IITs may not be the best in the world, they're ranked 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 in Asia.
      Source: http://www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/features/universi ties2000/scitech/sci.overall.html

      "any underlying "flaw" in the U.S. economic system"
      You misunderstood. I never meant to say that the US economy is going down or whatever. In terms of education and technology, US is still miles ahead of anybody else. However, most people think that because Indian computer professionals get paid so cheaply in dollar terms, they must also be starving to death while elephants walk the road. What they don't realize that stuff in India, in most cases, is cheaper by a magnitude of 5 or more. I buy a movie ticket for $2. I get my car washed everyday, and i pay $4 a month for the service. You can get house-help for as little as $10 a month. A good chauffeur charges about $100 a month. Books are dirt cheap, and even cheaper if you buy them on the roadside.

      While the life may be bigger and better in the US, India pampers you, if you've got a little dough. There's no way i can afford all this in the US, even if i earn $100k.

    19. Re:Not so many comments here.... by narsiman · · Score: 1

      In 1985, India was ruled by a bunch of socialists who rated the rupee against a basket of currencies (whatever that means). The value was kept that way artificially. Since 1991 when (the now Prime Minister) the finance minister Manmohan singh introduced economic reforms and started gradually floating the currency feely (not fully free yet) the value started appreciating in rupee terms. The current downward trend is more due to (thank walmartization) the depreciation of dollar against all major currencies.

    20. Re:Not so many comments here.... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, you cannot get a job
      in India without a work permit/work visa.
      You must already have the job lined up in
      order to get that work visa.

      You might want to visit there as a tourist
      first to scope out the local conditions
      before packing up and moving there.

      Personally, there is nothing that could
      compell me to relocate to India, even
      2Mb broadband for Rs100. Besides, if you
      really don't mind getting paid like an
      Indian worker, just stick around the good
      old USA for another decade, 'cause that's
      where our pay scale are heading (but without
      the way cheaper infrastructure, IMHO).

    21. Re:Not so many comments here.... by etcpasswd · · Score: 1

      Slightly offtopic maybe, but Indian programmers get paid way too much (like 4-5 times) compared to professionals in other disciplines.

    22. Re:Not so many comments here.... by banausikos · · Score: 0

      But the dollar isn't controlled by the Stonecutters like the pound is!

    23. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I rented a person to clean my apartment in US, it costed me around 110$ for some two hours or so. But the money I spend for a servant maid, who comes daily to wash your clothes and dishes and cleans the house, for an entire year in India is 40$.

    24. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read strong US dollar

      Strong US dollar? Where? The US dollar is taking the shit kicking of a lifetime, and has been for at least 4 years (coincidence?). There is nothing strong about it, outside of statements like "strong downward trend". The greenback has lost over 30% vs the Euro since 2001, and is just as weak against most other major currencies.

      I have no idea if the Rupee is weak or not, but I damn sure know the US dollar is anything but strong at the moment, with no sign of improving.

      Thanks for the laugh though, I almost shot coffee out my nose when you suggested that the issue "is solely one of the US dollar being too strong". HAHAHAHAHA. Oh that is rich! There is no market on earth, where the US dollar is too strong. If there was, people would head there in droves with gunny sacks full of US dollars for conversion to a stable currency.

      Really though, thanks so much for the laugh! I was having a tough day until I read that! Now I feel, well, like laughing!

    25. Re:Not so many comments here.... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      You clearly no nothing about foreign exchange. From 2000
      through 2003, and peaking in mid 01, the USD was at levels
      not seen since the Plaza accord in 1985. In fact, the
      equivalent Usd/Dem rate was near 2.35. Usd/Jpy has been
      in the same 100-125 range since the blowout lows in late
      winter 1995 around 80. Funds (Usd/Cad) have swung from
      extreme lows in 02 of .62 (1.60+), through .74 (1.35) which
      was the level it spent the majority of the 90s to the
      current .82 (1.22). The early 90s saw it trading around
      about 0.80 so these levels are not new.

      Much of the recent and rapid decline in the Usd (and
      strength of Europe) is not because Euroland is 'better'. It
      is because many of the far east currencies are either fixed
      or pegged to the Usd. Consequently the adjustments are seen
      and accentuated through the floating pairs.

      I could go on, but /. is not an economics or trading forum.

  6. sweet! by wcitechnologies · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sweet, that means dial-up should only cost about 20 cents per month! where do I sign?

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
  7. yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, in india, US $2.30 buys you a call center rep for 4 weeks.

    "Good afternoon, this is Sanj--err, Jake."

  8. i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blow indian trolls for 2.99 fiber optic connectivity

  9. Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roll with the outsourcing trend! Simply put two servers into each home in the region, and share the bandwidth.

    Let the indian family use one, and sell the other as ultra-cheap hosting :-)

  10. Re:damnit by cybertears · · Score: 1

    what country are you in? I'm paying $20/month for 3mbit.

  11. better places for broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Such as japan , where you get ludicrous speeds for low cash. or Norway where its dirt cheat for fat pipes :)

    1. Re:better places for broadband by putaro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Strangely, AC is right. We're paying about $30/mo for 24Mbps here in Tokyo. In $/Mbps this is pretty close to Indian prices.

    2. Re:better places for broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap in Norway? Are you on crack? Nothing in this country is cheap. Certainly I don't consider 400kr (~$65) per month for 1MB downstream cheap.

      Beer here is close to $9 for a half liter (close to a pint) most places downtown. Cars are taxed at 100%, so they cost double what they do in many other countries. Even food is very expensive - in the grocery store (forget about restaurant prices). Every weekend hundreds of Norwegians drive to the Swedish border to buy food since it's almost half the price in some cases.

      How on earth you could consider anything cheap in this country, I can't imagine.

    3. Re:better places for broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. I'm in Tokyo, and hogging an entire 100Mbps fiberoptic line. It realistically gets over 50Mbps throughput at all times. (Usually maxes out at 75Mbps.) I pay about $55/mo for this. Better yet, when they say "unlimited", they mean it. I can use it to the max as much as I like, and no one's complaining. They're also cool with me setting up servers on that line. The only thing they AREN'T cool with, is re-selling the bandwidth to neighbors. (I can understand this.)

      Just yesterday I was thinking of B-day gifts for my mother who lives in Colorado Springs, and was looking at cable internet since she's still on dial-up. $45/mo for 3Mbps down, 256Kbps up. WTF!? That's pathetic. (I'm American, but last time I lived in the U.S. was prior to any form of broadband, for those that are wondering.)

      So while 100Rs for broadband in India is indeed cheap, I have to say that bandwidth in the U.S. is just insanely expensive and isn't really a good comparison point... At this rate, a good portion of India will have broadband before my Mom gets anything comparable!

    4. Re:better places for broadband by Pastis · · Score: 1

      Except that:
      - Japan is known to have some of the best deals on Earth when it comes to broadband. Huge number of people per km^2 is one point, plus a big penetration rate of technologies
      - really fast broadband services are usually better in terms or $/Mbps than 'slow' ones. I.e. you get more Mbps per $ is you take a 50Mbits than a 512ko one. 2 Mbits is in the slow category. (I have 0.5M in Norway, which I pay around 30-35 per month). And I got it at a 'discount' offer. Pathetic. In neighbour Sweeden, they have 26Mbits for the same price.

    5. Re:better places for broadband by Kn0xy · · Score: 0

      "...Norway where its dirt cheat for fat pipes.."

      You sure you weren't talking about Amsterdam? Wait, wrong pipes...

    6. Re:better places for broadband by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 1

      Broadband prices in the US might seem outrageous compared to other parts of the world, but consider this for a moment. This is probably a bit simplistic, but we have a significantly larger area of land to cover with fiber than Japan does.

      United States = 3,618,770 sq. miles Japan = 147,500 sq. miles

      3618770 / 147500 means the US is roughly 24.5 times larger than Japan

      I pay about $35 for 1.5Mbps

      24Mbps / 1.5Mbps = 16

      16 * $35 = $560

      $560 (what I'd theoretically pay for 24Mbps) / $30 (what Japan pays) = 18.7

      So although our area is 24.5 times greater, our prices in this undoubtedly wildly inaccurate calculation are only 18.7 times greater.

      Though the numbers no doubt could use a lot of work, I think the principle is solid. When I lived in the Chicago area, I paid about $30/mo. for very reliable electrical service. Now that I've moved back to the central region of the state (and thus far less densly populated), I pay 3-4 times that much for far less reliable service. It costs a lot of money to run cable, and the closer people are packed in, the easier and cheaper it is to get these types of services to them.

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    7. Re:better places for broadband by phaggood · · Score: 0

      Don't recall the link, but I read that 80% of the US populations lives about 20miles from a body of coast (i.e. large body of water, so I assume they included the great lakes)
      If so, this google reference says there is about 6,100 miles of lover 48 coastline. Would make then 122,000 sq miles vs Japan's 147K sq miles, thus smaller than Japan and so our broadband should be cheaper.

      This may seem at first glance hard to swallow, but I suggest you take a vacation drive going west from Desmoine, IA and drive to California. Take a notepad, count all the people you see. In fact, take a single sheet, or even a gum wrapper and a large crayon.

    8. Re:better places for broadband by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      In context, fiber outside of population centers is free. On the other hand, laying fiber in a city should become more expensive as the complexity of the city's utilities increases (similar but not the same as population).

      I think that if you went through all the nessisary effort and factored in everything, you'd discover that the japanese telcos are more efficient and useful than the ones in the USA.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    9. Re:better places for broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something in Japan... cheap??

      *brain explodes*

    10. Re:better places for broadband by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 1

      In context, fiber outside of population centers is free.

      I'm not quite sure how you're coming to that conclusion (by comparison, perhaps?). Fiber is never free. Laying fiber isn't free, and maintaining what must be hundreds of thousands of miles of fiber most certainly isn't free. Whether it's telephone, data, cable, or electricity, it costs vendors more per capita to serve smaller communities. There are far more smaller communities than there are large ones and they must be served, even though they aren't nearly as cost-effective.

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    11. Re:better places for broadband by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that 80% figure is correct, and there is no doubt that the majority of Americans live in densly populated areas. Nonetheless, as I mentioned in another reply, there are a far greater number of small communities than there are large ones.

      It's not about population, it's about surface area. Those smaller communities must be served as well, so fiber must be laid and maintained over great distances where, relatively speaking, no one lives to pay for it.

      In my electric company example, the exact same principle applies. You may live 20 miles from the nearest community, yet (at least here in Illinois) you must be served with electricity. It costs quite a lot to set up those lines and keep them maintained, therefore, *everyone* in the area pays more than they would in larger metropolitan areas.

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    12. Re:better places for broadband by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      By comparison is *exactly* what I mean.

      A couple of things that may offset my statement a bit:
      - In cities, the owners of buildings may pay for the in building wiring. This allows a utility company to get hundreds of people with one connection. This doesn't actually make it as cheap as one connection, it just makes it that cheap for the utility company. The actual cost to rewire a building may be as or more expensive than rewiring a similar sized section of a rural community - depending on how well designed the building is.
      - It's more likely for a city government to subsidise this sort of project. Again, just shifting the cost.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  12. True, but... by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    ... to me, it's the infrastructure of this project that's more notable than the price they plan to charge. I really wish we had more of this kind of stuff going on in the states. Other places like Japan have been doing "bigger, better" broadband for a while now, and the excuse over here was that Japan was such a small area, so it was easier to implement. But now, look at India.

    1. Re:True, but... by nbert · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not like they are planing to cover the entire country with this service. They "just" plan to operate in Andhra Pradesh.

    2. Re:True, but... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I believe Verizon is working on getting Fiber to the Curb right now in the US. It's even available in some places. Takes a while to roll these things out.

      I couldn't find any immediate links, but there was a /. story on it a while back.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  13. Just remeber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a difference between saying you're going to do something, and doing it.

    They haven't started yet. Lets congratulate when its finished.

  14. Re:damnit by jatin_suri · · Score: 1

    looking at ur level of dissatisfaction i think you should consider moving to India...! Im proud and satisfied at the progress

  15. Resell by gotpaint32 · · Score: 1

    Lay a big fiber optic cable, resell the bandwidth from india to somewhere else, profit!

    Yes I know... Its a pretty bad joke

    --
    Nuclear war would really set back cable. - Ted Turner
    1. Re:Resell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but your sig quote more than make's up for it.

    2. Re:Resell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you mean..

      1. Lay a big fiber optic cable
      2. Resell the bandwidth from india to somewhere else
      3. ???
      4. Profit

  16. Re:damnit by Horia · · Score: 1

    I'm paying 100$ for 50mbps (fiber optics). :->

  17. It's mainly because the article is shit by Polarism · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    my opinion anyway.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  18. Happy for them, sad for me. by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

    What more can I say? I - and probably everyone else here - am paying far more for far less.

    On the good side, it's probably an indication of future prices in the rest of the world - we probably won't get that low, but things should get at least a fair bit cheaper than they are now.

    I say that because if they can sell bandwith for that, it must be getting damn cheap.

    1. Re:Happy for them, sad for me. by flokemon · · Score: 1

      Are you in the UK?
      I moved to the UK from France a few years back, when France was far behind. Now for £20 a month you get 15mbs, free phone, and TV over ADSL.
      Meanwhile, I believe the UK is now the European country where the value for money of a broadband connection is the poorest. £20 a month: 512kbps, and only few ISPs will offer no download restriction for that price.

    2. Re:Happy for them, sad for me. by aldoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but you are forgetting a vital point that the UK has the worlds highest coverage of DSL broadband. It's nearly 99.5% now, and will be by the end of 2005.

      This, has of course, meant that money has been poured into upgrading the network for small villages instead of fiber optics and higher speed DSL.

      The French offer you are talking about is nowhere near 100% coverage and it's unsustainable at that price. Either they are going to go bankrupt or they will hike prices later on.

      Also, France Telecom is just starting privatisation. BT was privatised in 1985 or thereabouts and it's a very painful conversion, so expect France Telecom to suffer badly and be totally underfunded over the next few years as it cuts costs as much as possible and hikes prices to get in the black.

      BT is now starting to trial ADSL2 and Fibre to the Home, and they have pledged £billions into rolling it out, along with converting the entire phone network to use IP instead of being circuit switched. I'm sure in the next 5 years that the UK will have the best of both worlds, excellent coverage, stable pricing and good speeds.

    3. Re:Happy for them, sad for me. by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      Too true my friend , too true. Most of us are waiting for the prices to fall since OFCOM has forced BT to reduce its wholesale prices by as much as 70 % .Let 's see what the coming months bring us.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    4. Re:Happy for them, sad for me. by flokemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I understand, the reason why the current DSL offers are so cheap in France is because of the privatisation! Companies like Free.fr, 9 Telecom or Easynet are not just ISPs, they are full telecom operators. And that's why ADSL is so cheap. Those companies do not depend on France Telecom lines.

      In comparison, in the UK, you need a BT landline to get ADSL.

      I agree with your point relating to coverage though. Most places in France do not have "degroupage" yet - meaning they have to stick to the FT based ADSL solutions (capped at 2Mb and not always cheaper than the 15Mb), and even so general ADSL coverage is probably not as good as it is in the UK, but it's so much cheaper and faster. *jealous*

    5. Re:Happy for them, sad for me. by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Err. yes they do. They use local loop unbundling to put _THEIR_ DSLAMs into FT's exchanges and FTs local loop.

      The same situation exists in the UK, namely:

      UK Online - www.ukonline.net/8000 who offer 8mbit down, 512k up for £39.99/month (about $75/month?)
      BulldogDSL www.bulldogdsl.net who offer 4mbit/400k with phone line rental for £39.99 (but it's currently priced at £30/month for the first 12m), which is about $60/month.

      There is also more providers using LLU and the two above are looking into using ADSL2+ to provide the same speeds as glorious france. Of course, both of those two providers only cover a selected area, UK Online covering most of the big UK cities, and Bulldog covering London only.

  19. broadband in india by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good initiative but unless the operating system, office programs , games are translated into their local language it will not benefit much. In India still the internet and outsourcing are the possesion of a prized few who know english. There are many more analtycal minds tied up just for the lack of english knowledge. If only could the Indian government unshackle the internet and make it truly multilingual then it is true freedom for indians.

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
    1. Re:broadband in india by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      India was part of the British Empire. It means they speak english. (Britain is where english came from).

    2. Re:broadband in india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      english is one if the 23 official languages of India, translating english into 22 different languages for a country that has english as an official language seems stupid to me, its propably smarter to just teach every one english that cant speak it.

    3. Re:broadband in india by aalobode · · Score: 1
      but unless the operating system, office programs , games are translated into their local language it will not benefit much. In India still the internet and outsourcing are the possesion of a prized few who know english


      Partly true. Actually, some 350 million people in India (about 30% of the population) speak, read, and write English fluently. There will probably be the need to be some translations -- but that can be done on a demand basis. Cheap pipes are not the only thing Indians enjoy: they also get all our cable TV shows for a similar low price. There is plenty of English and plenty of regional content. And yes, they get Jerry Springer and they know about Paris Hilton.

      Another reason why this project is going forth is that India has had abyssmal telephone service -- a sluggish, thuggish central governmental monopoly for years, with little or no investment in modernization and infrastructure. Now, private firms are putting in new lines and the most modern technology. That's why India appears to be on a course to outrace the US.

      Finally, IBM's sale to Lenovo is relevant to this context: the customers in India are going to use cheap Wintel boxes with MS software. That is their world's definition of OS and accessories. The computers will be manufactured in India or imported from China. And they will be cheaper than what we pay for them here.
    4. Re:broadband in india by fbform · · Score: 1

      In India still the internet and outsourcing are the possesion of a prized few who know english. There are many more analtycal minds tied up just for the lack of english knowledge.

      Er, that is a somewhat misleading statement. There are *many* more people in India who speak English than those who use the internet regularly. The crunch point is penetration of cheap home computing and connectivity rather than the language barrier.

      Your other point about analytical minds hampered by not knowing English is true. However, that problem is easier to solve by teaching them English than by translating software and OS to Indian languages. It's the only viable link language for southern India anyway.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    5. Re:broadband in india by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 1

      "The crunch point is penetration of cheap home computing and connectivity rather than the language barrier" correct but I wish to again stress on the point that translating all o/s and related stuff to the mother tongue (however daunting the task may be !) is the only viable solution since teaching them english is one thing making them "think" in english is another.

      --
      Chris ,
      Php Programmers.
  20. I wish my government would take notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am from the neighbouring state karnataka (yes in Bangalore and yeah it is definitely true that I am taking american jobs, we don't have anything to eat so we don't need broadband and yeah I catch an elephant to work every morning).
    I definitely wish our chief minister takes notice, but I don't have much hope because of the deputy chief minister (who is like Sauron behind Saruman).
    Congrats to the telugu (APs language) guys, we have been beating them in everything (including letting them think that we actually wanted M$ to establish a center in bangalore...yeah like anyone would *want* that *evil grin*). But on a serious note it is a good thing, I hope they can really use this to reduce corruption in the state department.

    Anyway some random rant, why we need IT and internet in the government is to actually alleviate poverty. How that would happen (as I see it) would be that by automating mundance tasks like getting sites and homes approved, land for agriculture, eastablishing industries etc., it would take the power away from the government employees and reduce corruption (or atleast push corruption to higher echelons of power like in the US). This would mean that the politicians need to actually approve projects from companies to get money which would mean more power to us.

    Most moderators won't read till here so people
    observe I will be modded flamebait.

    1. Re:I wish my government would take notice by MHleads · · Score: 1

      IMO, Govt should not be in the business of running business. It should do only what it is supposed to - govern. That too as little as possible, since more governance means more red tape.

      Instead, Govt should adopt the policies (like reducing the license fees, various taxes, etc.) which make private operators offer cheap broadband.

    2. Re:I wish my government would take notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, this reminds me - Indians suck.

    3. Re:I wish my government would take notice by carlmenezes · · Score: 1, Funny

      Which elephant route do you take? Mine is 3A.

      --
      Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    4. Re:I wish my government would take notice by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      alleviating poverty is a very good thing. I sincerely hope and believe that high speed internet will raise the standard of living. about taking "american jobs"... what are you going to do when you become sick of low-paying american IT hand-me-downs only to discover they've all moved to China, SubSaharan Africa and other sh*tholes?

  21. No im staying by joe+six+pack+walmart · · Score: 0

    I would rather freeze my balls off here. Who needs nice weather and cheap internet.

    --
    Whats the point of a cure for cancer or aids? Most people who need it and dont have the money wont be able to afford it.
  22. Have to ask... by spamfiltertest · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the post...

    "The network will have optic fibre connectivity right up to the village level."

    From my understanding, India is a country of Very rich and Very poor. The middle class, if you would, is a newer concept (thanks to the tech boom).

    So, if these villages lean to the poor side (assuming if you had $ you would live in a city) would you even have a computer? If not, what good is broadband?

    1. Re:Have to ask... by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The middle class, if you would, is a newer concept (thanks to the tech boom).

      No, Middle Class is not a new concept here, in India. No, its not due to "the tech boom". And, No, all Indians definitely don't work for offshoring companies. Its a complete country with all kinds of jobs and economic classes and it has been like this for decades.

    2. Re:Have to ask... by spamfiltertest · · Score: 1

      There was no intended slap toward India, I'm sorry you took it that way.

      The reason I asked the question is based off of the press I have read in the last year or so. Basically, saying that India (for some time) has been a country of extremes. Extremely rich or extremely poor. While a middle class has always existed, according to what I have read, the tech "boom" has given more to add to a middle class and take away from such extremes. I'm not saying what I have read is correct, this is just my understanding - and also why i asked the question(s).

      While I've also read that poverty in India is declining, the main question still exists. If the poorest of poor villages have broadband - what is the point if they cannot use it?

      Being in India, what is your take on broadband for all?

    3. Re:Have to ask... by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Let me answer that..as another Indian. As noted by the AC who posted before this thread-automating common tasks like processing property deeds, taxes, enquiring about prices of foodgrains and agricultural products from other places, become easier if they can be computerized. Currently villagers have to deal with corrupt officials and middlemen, not to mention the redtape and bureaucracy with govt. departments. Some small projects of this kind are already underway-the Indian tobacco major ITC has a similar project in the eastern part of the country that allows farmers to compare prices of their cash crops with prevailing market rates across the world, and thus get a better deal (among other things). In all these cases-computers are not owned by each and every villager. Usualy some sort of community owned infrastructure is set up, and one computer with broadband connection suffices for the needs of the whole village. So, in this case, even if you deploy just one computer per village, it works out to be hugely beneficial. As for the point about the tech boom benefiting the middle class-it's explained like this-in earlier times, before India opened its economy for foreign investment, the people looked to the govt. as the provider of jobs. Public sector companies recruited people through an examination system. Now that the tech boom is on, the current generation has simply switched tracks; it's not as though there never was a middle class in India earlier.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    4. Re:Have to ask... by karvalo · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, India is a country of Very rich and Very poor. The middle class, if you would, is a newer concept (thanks to the tech boom).

      I don't know where you got this impression from. India has a huge middle class population (close to ~300 million). Even before the tech. boom, liberalization etc there existed a large bourgeois population. Middle class families were the one who benefitted the most from tech. boom and liberalization.

    5. Re:Have to ask... by spamfiltertest · · Score: 1

      Thanks for filling things in for me, a bit, Rexdude.

      I figured that some sort of community owned computing infrastructure was set up in the villages, and in that case, this is very helpful. I was unaware of the corruption issues as well.

      All the best.

    6. Re:Have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "tech boom" has actually given rise to a so-called "upper" middle class. I have ADSL at 512kbps with a data cap of 400MB per month at around Rs. 900. 256kbps with no data limit is at around Rs. 6000. I would jump at 2Mbps at even my existing 900 bucks - my company pays for my broadband at home :)

    7. Re:Have to ask... by yora · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, India is a country of Very rich and Very poor. The middle class, if you would, is a newer concept (thanks to the tech boom).



      There has been a big middle class in India. It is not like in the US, but still quite big. In a country of 1 billion+ residents, even if 10% form the middle class that is around 100 million people. And in India there are a lot more than 100 million in the middle class



      So, if these villages lean to the poor side (assuming if you had $ you would live in a city) would you even have a computer? If not, what good is broadband?



      While the average villager in India is poor. There are parts of the country where villagers do make good money. Farming is a profitable business in India for the landowners.

    8. Re:Have to ask... by Rexdude · · Score: 1

      Anytime! As for corruption..haha..we are probably only a step behind Nigeria.

      --
      "..One hosts to look them up, one DNS to find them, and in the darkness BIND them."
    9. Re:Have to ask... by northcat · · Score: 1

      Even the upper middle class existed before the tech boom. In a considerable size.

    10. Re:Have to ask... by MostlyHarmlessIndian · · Score: 1

      So, if these villages lean to the poor side (assuming if you had $ you would live in a city) would you even have a computer? If not, what good is broadband? Two things, The Indian viallages have a concept called the Panchayat. Under this system the government provides funds to a council of village elders elected ina aprty-less election. I know a lot of villages that have bought computers for the village school and a genral comp for the community use along with a television and all. The other point I would like to tell you is that rich villagers DO NOT neccessarily move to the city. Under our economic system, lots of subsidies are provided to the agriculture sector, both by the center and the state. For instance, farmers in Andhra Pradesh get electricity toally free. For a few villages this has brought quite some prosperity and Indian villagers no longer see any great economic or other benefits in moving to a city. Cities usually have a much higher cost of living compared to the villages!

    11. Re:Have to ask... by harisheldon · · Score: 1

      I have read newpapers here in the US which claim that. But you need to take that with a pinch of salt. Look at the gini index which is a measure of inequality. Gini Index of 0 => everyone has the same income. 1 => Only one guy (Bill Gates for eg) earns all the money.

      Mexico => 0.546
      China => 0.447
      USA => 0.408
      India => 0.325
      Germany => 0.283

      So no it's not true. India is fairly good about income distribution. I find American newpapers do very lousy research when it comes to India and probably other countries.

    12. Re:Have to ask... by cyrus007 · · Score: 1

      You are very wrong here. Lot of poor nations have such a devide but India has a very big middle class and it existed before the tech boom. It will goble the whole population of USA (350 million). They have the ability to pay their rents/own houses, have TVs, drive motorbikes, send their kids to school. The very rich are prob 5% and the very poor are about 20%.

    13. Re:Have to ask... by ColinD · · Score: 1

      Actually, India's Gini Index of 32.5 makes it less unequal than the USA, which has a Gini of 40.8 (see http://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/index_countrie s.cfm) Granted, average incomes in India buy less than average incomes in the U.S., but it's mistaken to say that there's no middle class or that this class is new -- it's not. And lots of people in India have computers or access to one. I'm sure there's data out there on that too.

    14. Re:Have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, India has a more even income distribution than the US as proved by other comments.

      But pulling a number out and comparing it to the US proves absolutely nothing. India has over 1 billion people, whereas the US has less than 400 million, so if India had the same distribution of middle class people as the US, it should have over twice as many middle class citizens as the US.

  23. IT SECTOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In terms of IT sector India is the best........ but in other matters...... its the worst.

  24. Keep in mind what it will be used for... by CFD339 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...Now, I can expect even more phone calls with even less customer service as the lowest end of the marketing and support business gets even lower end.

    While the best outsourcing phone banks do a reasonable job, the average ones are crap, and this will set the low end bar lower than ever.

    Fiarly soon, we can expect little differentiation between a call to a vendor for help with our firewall, and say....line noise. Oh, wait, I have a sonicwall. I've already passed that mark.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  25. A conundrum. by Frogmum · · Score: 1

    Its too bad that Americans that want cheaper broadband are too addicted to the internet to boycott the isps into giving us lower prices. It'd be nice though. We should find a rich friend who will let us stay in his/her house and borrow their connection until the ISPs lower their prices. Imagine the hardware you could buy if a connection costed $3 a month.

    1. Re:A conundrum. by myukew · · Score: 1

      I know people sharing a 3Mbit DSL connection through a wireless router and some repeaters (here in Germany though). That's neat, they're saving quite a bit every month.

    2. Re:A conundrum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 'borrow' my neighbors connection. I save $480 a year, and all I needed was a $70 wireless access point and a firmware upgrade.

      I also use the free access at coffee shops.

  26. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I am paying £20/month for 512kbps in the UK, and that is quite reasonable, for unlimited broadband... (makes it about $38 I think)

  27. Broadband and North America : A sad story by __aailob1448 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This friend of mine who lives in France was shocked when I told him that I pay $45 for 3Mbps/384 Kbps dsl. Over there, there are 2 Isps offering 8, 15 and 20 Mbps dsl for between 15 and 30 euros (all taxes included).

    Two years ago, the best you could get over there was 512 Kbps and they were starting to roll 1Mbps connections in select regions.

    Part of the reason why I came to the U.S in the first place were superior broadband speeds. I feel betrayed now.

    1. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      This is true about the French offering, but 8Mbits/s and above is not available everywhere, only close enough to the exchange.

      I'm only 30 minutes from downtown Paris and the best I can have is 2MBits/s, and the prices don't come down accordingly, it's still 30 Euros a months. In other words extra bandwidth comes for free if you are lucky or willing to pay much more for rent.

      Finally getting ADSL enabled on your line takes forever, up to 6 weeks, because it still has to be done by the old ex-state owned France Telecom, who leases the lines to the ISPs, and they have a huge backlog of people trying to get broadband.

    2. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually what should be noted is that french likes are almost ALL ADSL.
      Being ADSL, your speed depends of the distance between you and the exchange point with DSLAM's.
      ADSL speeds are almost all uncapped (max ADSL speed, beside ADSL2+ which is usually capped to 15mbits instead of 24)

      Average population gets 5-8mbits (2500-3000m line length)

      Everyone pays the same price, whichever service do they get.

    3. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Trust me when I say that the US has it good on EVERYTHING, including broadband.

      Try the UK... entry level broadband (256k down and 64k up) is about £20/month - thats nearly $40.

      I'm on 1.5mbit down and 256k up and thats costing me nearer $80/month.

      Makes your prices seem a bit more reasonable now, eh?

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by imroy · · Score: 1

      Bah! Luxury, luxury!

      Here in Australia we're paying $80/month for 256/64 unlimited ADSL. We're lucky though, because just about every ISP has dropped their true unlimited (volume) plans but we've been able to stay on the plan we signed up for. I've been keeping close tabs on our usage and we should be able to go to a 512/128 ADSL plan that's limited to 20G per month plus 20G "offpeak" (midnight to 7am). And it'll be slightly cheaper.

    5. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Part of the reason why I came to the U.S in the first place were superior broadband speeds."

      I salute you dedication for faster access to pr0n.

    6. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. When I was your age and lived in Tokyo, we used to pay $1.20/min to make international calls on our 1200Bps modems to connect to Compuserve. And we liked it!

      All jokes aside (although the $1.20/min calls to Compuserve are true), I guess you win some and lose some. Over here in Tokyo/Japan, our broadband is dirt cheap, and everywhere. On the other hand, rent is expensive as hell, small, and the insulation sucks dick. Commuting by train is hell in the mornings, and commuting by car is... well, you may have better luck making it on time if you walked rather than drove. (Not to mention you'll spend a quarter of your pay check on parking, if you're even lucky enough to find a parking spot!) Also our electricity is expensive as hell too, so if you're a geek running multiple machines, I suppose the power bill will offset the low cost of bandwidth.

      On the other hand, Americans and Australians have a better quality of life. (Not sure about Brits, never been to England.) So again, you win some and lose some. It tends to balance out. Which leaves me a bit puzzled about Scandinavian nations... they seem to have the best of all worlds, even if they tax you up the ass! (And there, I answered my own question.)

    7. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Strange. I'm on 512k down, 256k up for £12/month, I could upgrade to 1Mb down for £14/month, or 2Mb down for £20/month, but can't be bothered upgrading my old hardware. You need to look at changing providers. For £40 you should be getting 8Mb down.

    8. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by mansoft · · Score: 1

      In Spain we pay 45 EUR (about $60) for 512/128Kbps ADSL, altough the average income is considerably lower than in France. Not only do I find France's case shocking, but also yours. I haven't checked the exact numbers, but definitely the average income in the US is higher than in Spain, so in fact you are paying a smaller proportion of your money for 6 times our bandwidth.

      Something is going wrong here :(

      --

      Engage!

    9. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by little1973 · · Score: 1

      Here in Hungary we pay about $45 for 512/128 kbit per month due to the telco monopoly called MATAV.

      --
      Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
    10. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      80$ AUD (55+?$ US) for 512/512 dsl and a 20gb limit here..

    11. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Move to Portugal. 8Mbits for 80 Euros, or 4Mbits for 40... Not bad. A year ago I used to pay 240 Euros for a 1Mbit link, oh my how times have changed...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    12. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is your ISP? I'm very interested in that £20/month package!

    13. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Freedom2Surf, they used to be cheapest, but I don't think thats true anymore. Checking their pricing again, the £14 and £20 are for capped downloads (1GB and 5GB respectively), which might be another reason I chose to stick with my 512k unmetered. For 2Mbps uncapped, you're looking at £35, which isn't such a great deal compared with the 8Mbps for £40 I've seen advertised over the last couple of months for metro areas.

    14. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by yellowdragon · · Score: 1

      I am on 256k down/128k up and pay $39.99/month. Entry level DSL is 128k down/64k up for $24.95/month Only provider here is Verizon (PRTC) I live in Puerto Rico... But then, the climate more than makes for the high DSL price... :) Vive le monopoly!

    15. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      To be fair mine is uncapped and pretty much no nonsense - NTL! I think they have a not very hard enforced limit of 1GB a day.. but its pretty rare I ever exceed than and as an average there is no way I am touching on 31GB a month.

      I've had it for about 3 years and gradually bumped my speed up from base level to their top tier now. Its been supremely reliable!

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    16. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "Which leaves me a bit puzzled about Scandinavian nations... they seem to have the best of all worlds, even if they tax you up the ass! (And there, I answered my own question.)"

      That and their climate I suppose (though I never experienced first hand, the UK is bad enough as it is without going further north).

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    17. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just chiming in after reading this thread for a few posts...

      Anyone who seriously counts broadband speeds -vs- pricing as a significant reason to move, let alone to another COUNTRY with a totally different CULTURE...is either...

      1) A hermit with no family ties or personal relationships to consider whatsoever

      2) A uber geek of the most extreme level of "geekdom"

      3) Incredibly filty rich and carefree (count me silly but I doubt any slashdotters fall into this one)

      4) YOU ARE JUST INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Big deal Tokyo, Korea, France will give you 1000 gbps for .98 cents a month...(its called exaggeration folks) I'd still much prefer the lifestyle, culture and being with my family and loved ones than moving for something as pathetic as "great broadband connections".

      Keep in mind I'm a 10 year veteran in the IT field and a PC Gamer for over 20 years too and its even too geeky for me.

    18. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by geoff43230 · · Score: 1

      Yes, alas 3. profit! seems to hold much of a sway here in the US.

    19. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      Finally getting ADSL enabled on your line takes forever, up to 6 weeks, because it still has to be done by the old ex-state owned France Telecom, who leases the lines to the ISPs, and they have a huge backlog of people trying to get broadband.

      I was expecting this, but when I set up my ADSL line in Paris I walked into the France Telecom shop two doors down and walked out with a modem - the service was switched on the next afternoon...

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    20. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Korth · · Score: 1

      In Spain, Jazztel offers 1024/300/35, and ya.com offers 1024/300/34. Not available everywhere.

    21. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and their climate I suppose (though I never experienced first hand, the UK is bad enough as it is without going further north).

      Dunno, I guess different strokes for different folks, I actually like the freeze-your-ass-off-cold. More specifically, I like coming in from that weather to a nice warm house. It's just not the same when the outdoors are moderate temperatures. But then again that may have to do with the fact that I'm partially Scandinavian and was born and lived several years in Minnesota before moving to Tokyo. Can't stand the heat, but I'm still doing quite well at -20degreesC. ;-)

    22. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      You need to change your provider. I've got 4Mb from Bulldog fo UKP20-00/mth (Eur 30-00), my brother is on HomeChoice at 2MB plus 40channels of TV for about UKP15-00/mth (Eur 22-00)

      --
      Did he inhale?
    23. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by tenor_clef · · Score: 1

      You moved to the U.S. for broadband?

      Man, I have a bridge for sale you might find interesting. :)

    24. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by siphi · · Score: 0

      I get 9Mbps from my isp www.cablesurf.com for 40 a month.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    25. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I lived near San Francisco last year. I missed the Minneapolis winter, but now that I'm back I'm having some second thoughts. Maybe a mild winter wasn't so bad. If I wanted snow, I could drive to the mountains.

    26. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      Relax. As I said, it was just part of it. Think of it as the icing on the cake.

    27. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Well it has been 2 weeks for me. No news. I did receive the modem in the mail 2 days after asking for the service to be switched on, but so far nothing else, and I'm still on dialup.

      One colleague living in Paris didn't get his line enabled for 5 weeks. That was with free.fr mind you.

    28. Re:Broadband and North America : A sad story by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      I used Wanadoo.fr through France Telecom and as I said, we were on line the next afternoon. Others I spoke with when I lived there had experiences closer to yours. One difference, I set mine up in Feb 2002, I know there were fewer people doing it then.

      My neighbor got a cable modem from Noos and not only did it take months to set up, the service was out more often than it was on.

      Good luck!

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  28. Tunak Tunak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indian geeks everywhere are now dancing to this song: http://www.worth1000.com/satyr.asp?sid=83167/

    1. Re:Tunak Tunak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err delete the slash at the end...
      http://www.worth1000.com/satyr.asp?sid=831 67

    2. Re:Tunak Tunak by northcat · · Score: 1

      They are dancing to "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e14'" ? Hey, yes! That song is really good!!

    3. Re:Tunak Tunak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just delete the slash at the of the url.

    4. Re:Tunak Tunak by struct24 · · Score: 1

      OMFG, that is just sikh. Er, I mean, sick.

  29. Last mile has really improved in india by rjha94 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow! if this is implemented, this is simply wow!! Though promise of a really Fast pipe and ultra-blazig speeds are still not fulfilled, i can vouch for the temendous improvements in net connection speed/options that has happened in India,especially bangalore.
    I remember the times when I had to connect to my web server (verio) using modem/phone Lines, data actually used to come in trickles and any "work" was done during night only. The only good side effect was that you developed buddha-like patience.
    Now people are providing broadband over Cable wires/CDMA network/anything. Mobile network providers are into GPRS and now its actually possible to plug your mobile in LapTop and go net surfing.

    --
    No .sig
  30. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think that's bad? I'm paying $85/mo for 512/128, and I only get download rates of 50kb/s.

  31. Flatrate or not? by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

    I've seen similar offers even in Germany, but you usually only get the first 500 MBs included, after that they nickel and dime you. Since the article didn't mention it, does anybody know whether this includes flatrate service or not?

    Additionally, there might be an internal speed of 2Mbps, but isn't it the peering agreements that make or break the speed to the rest of the internet? Without disclosing them, it's easy to provide such fast lines little...

  32. The U.S. equivalent of this project... by uvsc_wolverine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just like this project is being done in only one state in India, I know of at least one state in the U.S. that is doing this. Utah. There is a fiber optic network known as UTOPIA that is being rolled out state wide...except where I live. I live in Provo, and the city planners decided to do it their own way. I will grant, however, that Provo's network is being rolled out a lot faster than UTOPIA is being done. There's already a significant portion of the city with access to iProvo (it's on the richer part of town, of course). But, I don't live in that area. I'm a student barely managing to survive on Top Ramen, and really crappy broadband.

    [RANT]The stupid ISP that handles the Internet access for my apartment complex doesn't know how to set up their network! They put idiotic bandwidth limits on users - you get 64 kbps for free, any faster and you have to pay more - and the lousy network they set up can't even handle a fifty percent load. I paid extra for 256K, and I only get that in the morning when everyone else is at school, or late at night when everyone else is asleep. Oh, and you're only allowed to use your internet connection for 5 hours a day. Any more than that and they charge you a dollar an hour. Not to mention how poor the installation was.[/RANT] O.K., now I feel better. Next semester I'm moving into a house and getting cable for my broadband.

    --
    This space for rent...
    1. Re:The U.S. equivalent of this project... by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      This is in the US? Mannnnn, I thought all the ISPs who operated like that went out of business a lonnnngggg time ago.

      FWIW, you have my sympathy!

  33. Effect on P2P by Gurezaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that we are going to see even more Bollywood movies on file sharing networks?

    1. Re:Effect on P2P by MHleads · · Score: 1

      Hindi movies are not so popular in Andhra. May be you will more Telugu movies.

    2. Re:Effect on P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think the question is whether bollywood would be for or against trading on p2p networks.

    3. Re:Effect on P2P by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Coming from a friend who is married to an Indian(native born), she tells me that because of its size, etc, Bollywood doesn't really care if you share movies online. It couldn't possibly try to sue you, besides, it makes their movies more popular for the Indians abroad.

  34. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh god. You thought you were paying for 512 kiloBYTES/sec? Sorry bro.

  35. Re:damnit by n0dalus · · Score: 1

    im paying 80 a month for 3mbit

    That's funny. I'm paying $80 / month for 512/128. Stop complaining.

  36. yea by techefnet · · Score: 0

    im paying $73 USD (448 NOK) for 1024/256 in norway :'(

    1. Re:yea by shimen · · Score: 0

      Thats cheap compard to what hell$$$ra's bigpond offers in australia but anyway i am with australia's cheapest isp ever exetel

    2. Re: yea by Reverant · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. 80euros/month for the provider + 64euros/month for the DSL landline (from the telco) for a 1024/256 dynamic IP DSL here in Greece. "Please to be feelink better" as Pitr (of User Friendly fame) would say.

  37. Politics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This looks like some sort of political move to reassure investors that the government is not going to be hostile to tech industries.

    Andhra Pradesh had a very progressive chief minister for the last two terms (Chandrababu Naidu). Many of his policies were technology centred, and he made massive improvements in the infrastructure. But it seemed to many that his improvements were only for the major cities, and the farmers in the villages were left out. This was partially true, but largely false.

    The most recent elections proved to be a monstrous defeat for his party and YS Rajasekhara Reddy was put in. YSR is seen to be a "farmer's CM", so to speak. His main issue was that the state ministry will focus more on the issues at the villages, and not solely on technology development.

    Recently, this has scared away a lot of big business from investing in AP. But AP is severly cash starved, thanks to tons of money grubbing politicos (just like any place else in teh world). Maybe you see the dilemma now. The government needs the money from them, but it cannot look like it is supporting them.

    If you ask me, this is just a political move to play both sides of the game. I do not believe it straight out. I have heard things like this being proposed for so many years now that it's made me quite cynical. The project will probably become another place to divert funds from.

    And yes, I was from AP. I've lived in both the cities and the villages. Now I live in bangalore.

  38. yes, but we still get ripped off here in N.A.!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that this article shows is that here in north america, we get ripped off because the perception is that we have more money and that we have no choice but to by that internet service for $40 US/month. Not true, in canada during the late 1980's, a community cable service was set up (in ontario) and the charged about $3.60/month and were proffitable!! But, the two big cable copanies in canada (rogers and shaw cable), got the govement to step in and raise the rates to "a normal" $26/month. This is a typical example of how corporations in N.A. have go us all trained to pay huge amounts of money to them and think this was normal. Just look around now, how long do you think this will happen, pretty soon, with china and india soon to be the new industialized 1st world superpowers, and here in North America, we will soon be a 3rd world power (tell me, how many items you buy are made here in N.A., how many in china?). The simple fact is that people must rise up and kick these companies in the ass, it it's proffitable to pay $3 for internet in india and slightly more in korea for fast internet, the let's kick the providers in the ass and demand better/cheaper service!

  39. Limit? by northcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the broadband services here (India) put unrelistically small download limits on their connections. However 'unlimited' download connections are popping up and with a speed of 2mbps there won't be, hopefully, any download limit.

    All I can say now is: Damn. I live in Bangalore which is supposed to be the Silicon Valley of India (but its not in Andhra Pradesh). Here the cheapest connection people can get is s 128kbps unlimited connection for Rs. 1,000 (about 20 USD) pm. (There are cheaper ISPs but they are not available in most places of the city or the customer should have a cable TV connection from them)

    1. Re:Limit? by jedZ · · Score: 1

      I live in Bangalore too and I recently signed up for a connection with Airtel that gives me unlimited downloads at night plus free phone service (limited) for about Rs. 700 ($ 15) a month. download speeds are pretty decent too.

  40. People must revolt!!! Demand better service!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demand our rights to low-cost internet!!!
    Revolutions occur for good reasons!!! Demand better service for your money, youu are not their slaves, remember that!!

  41. This is not a broadband service. by MHleads · · Score: 1

    Among other customers, the proposed broadband network will provide broadband services to 40,000 government offices across the state. This will enable the government departments to deliver various citizen services through eSeva centres, Rajiv Internet Village Kiosks and web-based online services. The network will also enable the rural folk to access video-conferencing, internet surfing among other facilities.

    This project seems to be a part of e-governance. The Govt is not starting a broadband service, like other telecom giants.

    I pay approx USD 21 per month for 64 kbps connection. Dial-up sucks and costs even more. People use it since broadband still not as pervasive as cable TV. Access to internet is *very expensive* in India. It is still considered a luxury. And to certain extent, it is!

  42. 10Mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Ontario I am paying $100 for a 10Mbps/1Mbps connection. Flatrate, basically static IP, have free reign to run what ever I want.

  43. One question. by shimen · · Score: 0

    Do they get access to the rest of the world? This maybe great for the india-wide-web and thats about it.

  44. Hmmm by phoenixius · · Score: 1

    Heh, I can pretty much bet that the Rs. 100 minimum package will be mega capped on downloads. BSNLs package which comes in at around Rs. 850 a month in another state in India has a 500MB cap per month after which you pay Rs.1 per MB downloaded... Well, the government here has big BroadBand plans and things seem to be moving in a lot of states here, but they're pushed by influential guys who want changes :) Personally, I tested for BSNLs nationwide broadband service 2 years back, which was 2x2MBps uncapped lines, and yes that service totally rocked...it was in collaboration with a private company called iSpatial, but for some reason they scrapped the actual rollout plans. But well 1yr of uncapped broadband with those speeds in India at that time was cool :)

  45. One day in Egypt.. by marafa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    256k dsl was set at 150LE or 12.5usd at the current black market rate of 6le/usd.
    this does not include the modem @ 430le (modem + 4 port switch + splitter)
    but it does include monthly adsl suscription cost to the telco

    currently, the ministry of interior has a deal for its officers for 80le/month and the army has one too for 75le/month.

    --
    go ahead its time to mod me a troll

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  46. And who says India is still a third-world country? by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, blow me down. Here in Poland, our monopolistic telco takes around 10% of the average income for a 512/128kbps line, and have outages of more than a month. You need to pay the bill for the time the line was down, of course -- unless you're willing to face a 5-10 years long legal battle for your money. Lost profits? Who cares.

    Thus, if India is a 3rd-world country, the US are 4th-world, Zambia 100th and Poland approximately 89th.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  47. So... by ravenlock · · Score: 1

    ... if you catch an elephant to work every morning, are you perhaps posting to Slashdot using IP-over-pigeons? :)

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No man, don't you know anything? Indians use IP-over-smoke signals.

      Indians are big on optical networking :-)

  48. Re:damnit by Technician · · Score: 1

    Stop complaining

    Why? I'm still on dial-up simply because the local broadband providers simply provide too little for too much. Someday I hope it will be priced so I can get off dial-up.

    What sucks is the cable operator thinking they can play the bundle card to keep people off Satelite TV. You can get broadband for less if you are also getting cable TV. I don't have cable TV. To me that means there is a $15/month penalty for not having cable TV. That runs the marginal price up out of reason. So yes, I'm still on dial-up and I'm still complaining.

    I do have excelent broadband at work. DSL reports makes makes broadband cable or DSL look like dial-up in comparison. I download my distro's, patches, and OSS software such as Mozilla, Firefox, and Open Office, at work.

    Dial-up is ok for posting on Slashdot at home and reading e-mail.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  49. "Limited" corporations by Trinition · · Score: 1

    Why is every corporation listed including "Limited" in its name? They're described as important companies, but if they are all truly "limited", why are they so? There are LLC (limited liability comapnies) in the U.S., but they tend to be smaller, and once you get bigger, you usually incorporate. So, what's the difference in India?

    1. Re:"Limited" corporations by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      "Limited" purely means the company in question has a limited liability of what each shareholder has invested into the business and nothing more.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  50. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im paying $70AUD a month for 512/128 with 40gig download limit... thats after the plan has been upgraded for free a few times.. i was on the same price with 6gig to start with only a year ago..

  51. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm paying 39 (Euro)/month for 1mbps/320kbps ADSL in spain (unlimited traffic).

  52. No thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet is bad for my Karma!

  53. In other news.. by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news, it was discovered today that people in India generally make far less than the average American/European and have a lower standard of living.

    It was also discovered that Slashdot editors know nothing about economics and that you can't just convert things to US dollars and declare "it's cheaper!".

    News at 11.

    1. Re:In other news.. by klang · · Score: 1

      According to CIA the GDP per capita in India is 2900$ whereas it is 37800$ in USA

      The $2.30 is the same as 29.98$

      Is that cheap?

    2. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, just because one dollar in the United States buys more in India than it does in the states doesn't make a difference when the quality of the goods purchased and the difference in standard of living is taken into account. Similarly since incomes are much lower over here, the conversion would actually be as much as a person in the United States pays for his/her own broadband connection. At the present moment most of India still uses a 56K dial-up connection to use the internet, broadband is becoming more prominent but at restricted speeds and bandwidth.
      A 128K ADSL connection costs about Rs. 1500 a month with unlimited bandwidth in New Delhi.

  54. Same goes for Sweden by StandardsSchmandards · · Score: 1

    I pay around USD 40/mo for a 24 Mbit connection. The same company forced me to "upgrade" my previous 8 Mbit connection which was USD 50/mo. Rates are certainly dropping.

  55. tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we know how the spent money from the tsunami victims are being used.. instead giving them food they bought cheap 3mbit lines to keep people calm...

    1. Re:tsunami by struct24 · · Score: 1

      Makes sense to me. Broadband is far more important than food.

    2. Re:tsunami by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 1

      now we know how the spent money from the tsunami victims are being used.. instead giving them food they bought cheap 3mbit lines to keep people calm...

      I know it is a flamebait, but I will bite. India has offered aid to Srilanka in the recent tsunami disaster -- the rationale being that India has enough resources to handle the disaster, *AND* be able to plan for long term things.

      Based on what you wrote, you seem to half expect that India would come to a standstill because of the Tsunami. You know, despite pandering/racist stereotypes, many countries do manage fine.

      S

    3. Re:tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  56. Re:damnit by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    You lucky, lucky bastard.

    I pay $60 a month for 512k

  57. Re:damnit by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    Let me guess...metropolitan Australia, with an
    Optus 512k unlimited plan?

    Those terms seem familiar...

  58. It's not the size of the pipe, it's how you use it by IndiJ · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    The network will also enable the rural folk to access video-conferencing

    One wonders what the average Indian hillbilly would need video-conferencing for.

    No one has mentioned it so I thought I should, but the thought having this much bandwidth for this little money available in villages in India is probably giving pirates wet dreams. I'm not familiar with how much pirated software/media or spam comes out of Andhra Pradesh (or all of India for that matter), or with how the authorities deal with it, but I'd be willing to bet no one will be jumping to honour a US court order based on a copyright violation.

    On the other hand maybe good will come out of it all. Maybe the spam czars and pirate groups will organize a program where they provide computers with internet access to schools and local businesses in exchange for allowing them to set up a porn/warez/spam server on their premises. That wouldn't be such a bad thing would it? Hell I'd sign up for it, but I'll be damned if I'm going to share my bandwidth with anyone.

    --
    It's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
  59. I just had to post this again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what Indian geeks are dancing to now! http://www.worth1000.com/satyr.asp?sid=83167

    1. Re:I just had to post this again... by struct24 · · Score: 1

      "Tunak Tunak Tun" must be Indian for "All Your Base Are Belong To Us"!

  60. In other news.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ...they're going to outsource the work to China.

  61. Indian broadband uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what Indians will be downloading:

  62. Re:US Broadband is worth the cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u talk about"shit hole" pal.. u live in a country that believes in sueing a gynec for pulling a wrong tooth!!

  63. Perhaps you use terms without understanding them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps the issue is solely one of the US dollar being too strong."

    I know that's what you wrote, perhaps you want to do 1/2 an hour of study and then come back with some words that have some meaning.

    As you've written them, this is just drivel.

  64. And of course.. by Almond+Paste · · Score: 0

    Bandwidth Limited Inc.

  65. Re:US Broadband is worth the cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I second that !!

  66. Here's an example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy's an example of what happens when you have a state-run monopoly on education.

  67. Lemon curry? by struct24 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ironically, technical support for the Indian broadband customers will be provided entirely by low-paid Americans.

  68. Re:And who says India is still a third-world count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thus, if India is a 3rd-world country, the US are 4th-world, Zambia 100th and Poland approximately 89th."

    Sure, because Internet download speeds are really what determine quality of line [rolling eyes]

  69. Wow it totally got Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, the power of slashdot!

    1/4/2005 - IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM THE WORTH1000 TEAM

    We are currently experiencing extremely high traffic levels and have disabled guest access to certain pages. We apologize for the inconvenience. Please try back later today or register an account here for immediate access (it's free).

  70. Not really by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Considering I get 3 MBps in Canada for $34.95 CDN, and judging form the US commercials I have seen, I would say it is about average.

  71. Re:damnit by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

    I pay $60AUD /month for 512k with a 16GB download limit :( After that I get throttled. I got throttled last month and it was *painful* downloading stuff at 6KB/second. Australia *sucks* for internet access.

    --
    -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
  72. Learned programming without a computer by VShael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was about 8 or 9 when I first got my hands on Usbourne Basic. I didn't have a computer, but I used the book to learn Basic commands, for next loops, goto, gosub, that sort of thing.

    Then I found a store about 20 minutes from school which had computers on display that the public could play around with. I spent weeks and weeks going to that store for about 20 minutes at a time, practicing my Basic skills.

    That Christmas, I demanded a spectrum 48K from Santa Claus.

    He's still alive today, so you know I got my hardware.

    1. Re:Learned programming without a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well aren't you a fucking genius!

  73. Swden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in sweden. I pay ~20-25 dollars/month for a 10/10 MBIT connection.
    I can upgrade that to 100/100 MBIT if i want to pay like 50-60 dollars a month, but I think that's a bit expensive ;P //Cray-on @ sweclockers.com

  74. Speed's great, but how much can you download? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    All this talk of Mbits isn't that useful if the company imposes a download quota on you. For example, my Dad was considering getting 'cheap' broadband for roughly the same cost as dial-up. Unfortunately, although you get roughly 750kbps (decent by UK standards), the quota is 1gig/month, which is useless unless you plan on just surfing the web, and downloading a few small items.

    I can, and have on occasion, downloaded almost to my limit of 1gig per *day*. Granted, he won't want that much, but speed isn't that meaningful if you can't download much.

    For such users, the biggest benefit is probably being 'always connected', which I must admit is at least half the appeal of broadband in the first place.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Speed's great, but how much can you download? by myukew · · Score: 1

      That's true. I switched to DSL a few months ago and it's awesome! With my modem I was online like half an hour per day paying ~15-20Euro/month. Now I have one gig/month and I'm online even if I'm not at home ^^ (btw it's 1024/128 :-P). Plus it's only 16Euro/month!
      It's not perfect but it is indeed much better than dial-up

  75. Re:And who says India is still a third-world count by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

    same thuff here in czech republic (but its getting better).

    35 $ per month for 800/100 kbit with unreliable speed, having to pay 150$ to get special (and) modem! well, its at least mobile (CDMA) ... did i mention that ports other than http/ftp/pop3 are throttled to maximum 5kbyte/s speed?

    and this is best service in area i live (50 km from capital) ... dialup is 50 cents per hour, gprs is 30$ monhtly... DSLs usualy have fair use limits ... like 500mbyte per month or they are overpriced ...

    --
    -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  76. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the indian middle class has more people than the entire populations of britain and france.

    umm yeah pretty big

  77. ObSmirnoff Joke by struct24 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, broadband pays $2.30 a month to rent YOU!

  78. Re:US Broadband is worth the cost. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    You sure??

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  79. I'm from India... by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and $100 is DEFINITELY NOT 1 month's pay for an architect. Why, fresh B.E.s start off at a minimum of around $400 a month. Architects make a lot more. The average salary here is above $1000 a month for a moderately experienced professional. So I'll take it you meant 1000 and not 100.

    Just to give you an idea of the living expenses, if you eat out every day, food can cost you between Rs. 100-300 a day in a good restaurant in the famous city of Bangalore - I'm not talking fastfood :) Apartment rentals start at around Rs.6000 a month. Movie tickets are around Rs. 150.

    To put the "broadband" rates here in perspective, the going rate now is about Rs.800 (less than $20) for a 256kbps connection with about a 500 MB traffic limit. So a 100 bucks for 2Mbps is an excellent deal.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  80. Re:US Broadband is worth the cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, here! I will happily try to live on minimum wage in the US before I sleep on a dirt floor in a one donkey villiage.

    It's a *third world* country - remember that!

  81. In South Africa by hexium · · Score: 1

    In South Africa you have to pay about 180 USD for 512k upstream 256k downstream capped at 3gig.

    We only have one Telecom called TELKOM and they are just about the most expensive telekom in the world. (http://www.hellkom.co.za/info.htm)

    Every time you enquire about why they are so expensive they give the excuse that people in other countries have lots of other hidden costs they have to pay (yea right).

    To get a 2.5 Mb fixed line from them would cost more per month then what I earn per year and I am not so unlucky with my salary then most in my country (third world)

  82. Re:damnit by JeffZakaib · · Score: 1

    Try $25/month for 9.6 - 14.4 dialup. Sprint wont fix bad lines if you can still talk on them...

  83. and across the straits by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    in sri lanka the government telco (Sri Lanka Telecom) is giving 2mbps/512kbps at USD80 per month. it is not widespread (i have it in my office but not at home) and is only given with new phone connections ..

    the fact of the matter is that the connection gives that speed only to the distribution point. iirc SLT only has an 80mbps uplink to the SEAMEWE cable, which means that EVERY user is competing for extremely limited bandwidth

    i would love to run an ISP, use a decent 802.11g wireless net and a phat pipe to provide service (iirc there was a wireless protocol that gave 5 mile range.. it was on slashdot a while back) for a fair rate, but the problem lies in the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission. you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy

    originally created to make sure that the people were getting a decent deal on telecom, the telcos have been paying them off to ensure that a. rates are kept artificially high, and b. keep anyone who offers lower rates off the market

    case in point: in 2000 there was a company trying to offer widespread VOIP based international calling for what was about 5% of what the SLT was charging. slt forced the trc to FORCE this guy to raise his prices until he was on par with them.. jsut so they could maintain dominance. there are other stories but you get the idea

    and the government is talking of doing an e-srilanka project.

    bah and humbug

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  84. hipcrime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is hipcrime going to cause even more havoc on usenet now?

  85. In Croatia... by Tempflux · · Score: 1

    Here in Croatia, due to Deutsche Telekom monopoly we pay 25$/month for 320/56 connection. And additional $3.5 for every 512 MB of traffic...

  86. Surfing in the dark???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India's had a reputation for spotty utility service. So have things improved enough that you'll be confident that the lights won't go out in the middle of the download? And how much is the monthly electric bill?

    If you can go for an entire week with only one 30-minute power outage, you're doing as good as around here.

    1. Re:Surfing in the dark???? by asliarun · · Score: 1

      Things have improved, but not by much. Bombay (Mumbai) is an exception, and in my 2 years there, we only had a power outage a couple of times. However, almost all the modern apartments come with 24x7 power backup. The monthly electric bill is about Rs.300 ($6), but can easily shoot up to about $20 if you use the airconditioning very heavily.

      Some cities are better than the others. Bangalore gets a power outage of about an hour, once a week. Delhi is pretty bad though. Most people fit their houses with an inverter.

    2. Re:Surfing in the dark???? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The monthly electric bill is about Rs.300 ($6), but can easily shoot up to about $20 if you use the airconditioning very heavily."

      Hmm...well, I'm guessing it gets about as hot there as it does in the deep southern US. Here in NOLA, I basically turn my AC on in May....and turn it off sometime in Nov. (although it has been warm here past couple days and is back on).

      During the summer, my power bill is avg. about $260, and in winter, about $120. Of course, I do have some servers on 24/7, and a deep freezer, and 2 refrigerators (one for homebrew).

      I can't imagine living where a power outtage is thought of as a norm, rather than an extreme exception to the rule. Especially during the hot, humid summers....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  87. ADSL in Moscow by chinhngt · · Score: 1

    We must pay about 24USD/month for an adsl 128/64kbps (unlimited) here in Moscow. And this is the cheapest price you can get here. For such megabit ADSL line, over 100USD/month is normal, and plus you have only some gigabytes of traffic included :(

    --
    MS-DOS since 6.0, Windows since 3.1, Novell Netware since 4.5 and FreeBSD since 4.5
  88. i'll take 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and need to find a multiplexer

  89. it's a lot of money? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    1. Not necessarily. It may be a lot of money for - say a locksmith in India, but not for somebody who is - say - using *new* (this is about India, please remember) technologies like internet, telephony etc. Even a basic internet connection (read NO Broadband) at home costs a lot more than 100Rs. So, in this perspective, 100Rs IS cheap.

    2. You CAN buy a plenty of chicken with rice/pita in 4$ in downtown NYC (5$ if you buy soda with that). Yeah, it wont be a restaurante, but it will still be good and plenty for lunch.

  90. So do I, and I live in California. by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 1

    Internet options:
    Dialup:
    26.4k on a good day, $15/mo for the ISP, $20 for the line.
    ISDN:
    128kpbs, something like $50/mo line+$50/mo ISP+per minute charges+hardware and setup.
    IDSL:
    144/144, DSL over ISDN, $100/mo+$300 setup
    Satalite:
    $70/mo+$300 setup or $100/mo. Anal terms of use, anything over 165MB slows back down to dialup speeds, that takes Windows Update out of the broadband arena.
    Next step:
    T1.

    Cable? Nope. Noone delivers to my area, and those that deliver near don't offer internet.

    ADSL? Our phone system is on the last line available, this would give me hope that they're going to upgrade soon, but neighboring areas actually have more lines in use than good lines. So a few bad lines get passed around to people that haven't complained for a while.

    Begging to the phone company to upgrade or put in a repeater or something?
    This didn't work when my dad tried it while he was a systems tech FOR the phone company. He's since retired from the phone company and is now working in other places in the field.

    Broadband is a no-show in my area. I'm about 30-40 miles away from the Governator.

    Often I feel like I'm using the demo version of the internet.
    -

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  91. Re:damnit by catch+MyExceptions · · Score: 1

    I'm paying 40 + taxes for 512/128. Also very funny. I hate european humour

  92. Why it cost more here in US ?? by m17p · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just a thought - if a developing country/state can afford to go that cheap, why here in US we have this rampant prices ?? Someone(Corporate world) out here is making big money. Isn't it time companies act in the interest of consumer rather than their own ??

    1. Re:Why it cost more here in US ?? by ericschoon · · Score: 1

      The cut-throat prices in India is brought around by the recently liberalized telecom sector. The article is a bit misleading becuase many of the partners in this venture are horizontal (ie, Tata Indicom owns VSNL which used to be the incumbent operator).

      They have to get in now becuase BSNL is quick on thier heels with cheap broadband and Reliance's purchase of FLAG is putting pressure on the IP circuit market. http://www.telecomasia.net/telecomasia/article/art icleDetail.jsp?id=141142 Reliance is currently after VSNL in other ways too.

      --
      --
    2. Re:Why it cost more here in US ?? by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... Just a thought - if a developing country/state can afford to go that cheap, why here in US we have this rampant prices ?? Someone(Corporate world) out here is making big money. Isn't it time companies act in the interest of consumer rather than their own ? ..."

      The local costs are lower in India. Now, that's not to say there's no possibility of state subsidy; India does a great deal of it now, and have since independence. And I'm sure we could agree that some companies are making big money.

      However, a large factor in comparing US and India's (or any delveloping country/state's) price structure is local costs. If they had to pay their IT staff 30 or 60K a year it would be more, but they don't have to because food, rents and clothing are much less there.

      That's just one example, but it's illustrative. You might just as easily have said "workers out here [are] making big money". If you had, you probably would have quickly seen many of the issues affecting consumer costs of broadband in the USA; after all once the bills are paid workers don't feel rich at all.

      Not all costs or pricing can move across borders like TV sets or a spool of optical cable. Rents are one common example. You can't move an acre of land from Idaho to New York City, so rents are stubbornly local, and significantly affect prevailing wages (and therefore costs) from one area to another.

      Since wages comprise a significant portion of every single item or service's cost, all your suppliers, all your maintenance, everything is lower (or higher, as the case may be) which compounds the differences.

      There are other factors, but that should get on your way to figuring it out. Some other factors would be regulatory issues (lots in the US, few in India), rights of way to lay cable (a major problem in the US), etc.

  93. Considering... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    That there are basically four primary dialects of the English language:

    British
    American
    Australian
    Indian

    I don't think they're going to have as much problems as you'd think. That, combined with the fact that a good portion of the actually usable functionality is available as Open Source code and has already been internationalized or is in the process thereof for India... Well, let's just day your argument kind of falls flat on it's face- hard.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  94. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At those speeds, and at that cost, I can afford to cancel my cable modem and buy a dial-up account with them!

  95. Andhra Pradesh !!? What about Bangalore? by devadutta · · Score: 1

    I am enjoying super bandwidth of 35kbps in the "Silicon city" of india, Bangalore. This remindes me of a proverb in kannada "yettige jora bandre, yemmege bare haakidru!" Meaning - "When a cow was dying of illness, they gave the medicine to a buffalo"

    1. Re:Andhra Pradesh !!? What about Bangalore? by SupremeTaco · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for many /. readers when I ask . .
      What???

      --
      You have a constitutionally protected right to be wrong, and I the right to ignore you.
  96. India and China will pass the US in technology by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The simple secret is that they value education and intellectual endeavors while US culture belittles it. So their kids will strive for higher education. These two countries start from incredible handicaps of poverty and bad political systems, despite some glorious periods of history. However they are improving, will catch up and exceed the lazy and bloated USA.

  97. More chances for spammers, zombies and the like? by Koos · · Score: 1
    I'll gladly assume most of those future broadband connections will have users behind it willing to use it for all kinds of legal uses and enjoy broadvand access but names like "VSNL" ring a bell with me for not having a working abuse-department and being a big source of spam.

    Just type VSNL into google groups and you'll see a strong relationship with newsgroups with abuse in their name (in the old google groups interface, you got this nice hint that 'news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting' was a relevant group for your query).

    I hope the 'new' network gets a better network operations center with a good abuse-department.

  98. At first I thought... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    ...They were going to compete directly with broadband services here. That would have been really cool.

    Finally, I would have gotten to do a little outsourcing of my own. Give the telecom companies here a taste of their own medicine. Free market and all that.

    (Then the drugs wore off...)

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  99. great.... by DeathByDuke · · Score: 0

    thats another 'poorer' country with faster and much cheaper internet than us Brits. *sobs*

  100. Its good in theory by shyampandit · · Score: 1

    Well, it sounds good in theory, but all isp's here are notorious for low download limits.
    Broadband Internet in India right now is much more expensive than other countries.

    The only decent connection in my area is Tata Indicom broadband which gives DSL connections. My DSL line which is 512/512 costs 6000 Rs. /- i.e. 140$ for a 6GB transfer limit..

    The so called unlimited cable isp's give very low speeds (lower than dialup) and have frequent outages.

  101. I've heard of cheaper by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Just set up a wireless NIC in your house (if you live in a neighborhood or apartment), I'm sure some gracious neighbor has set up an unencrypted AP. FREE.

  102. Related article to parent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent didn't mention the article that he is making a joke about. Here it is.

    Google search results

  103. Would never work here by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    Executive yacht payments are much lower in India than here.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  104. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I pay £23 for the same (Pipex), and I think it's disgusting.

  105. Better redo you rmath dude..... by heybo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    (read strong US dollar), and how much the fact that Indian programmers are just cheaper.

    Where do you get the idea that the US dollar is strong gout of this??? Lets say that a roll of Kodak film cost $3.50US in the USA that same roll of film in India cost $0.35US in India. The roll of film hasn't changed it is still the same roll of film. The only thing is that it cost you MORE in the US because the US dollar is WEAK!!!! it ain't worth as much as other people's money. The roll of film hasn't changed has it??? No the only diffenance is what you pay for it. Your buying power is not as great which means you money is no good!

    In 1972 I made 3.10 and hour here in the US. I had a nice house a car took trips and could afford to go our on the town every now and then. Now I make $20.00 per hour and I can't hardly afford to live. My life style hasn't changed except for the fact that a dollar will not buy what it would in 1972. Personally I would rather work for the $3.10 and be able to buy a loaf of bread for $0.35 and a gallon of gas for $0.50

    You have been buying into the media crap too much an not doing your own math. The reason labor is cheap there is not that their money is no good but that ours is no good. Labor is labor and has its own worth. What regulates worth is the value of the money. Not the value of the work.

    Buying Power = Money Value

    Yes I will work for $5000.00 a year if I can have a nice apartment, eat go out, go on a vacation, and be able to enjoy life. I'm sure not doing those things with the powerful US Dollar we have now!!!!!!!

    1. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Currency "strength" is a relative term. The US dollar compared to itself in 1972 may be weaker, but the US dollar compared to the Indian Rupee is strong. It has been "weakening" against the Rupee lately, but it is still "stronger."

      Just because the Dollar has been weaking doesn't mean it's "weak" people!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      In 1972 I made 3.10 and hour here in the US. I had a nice house a car took trips and could afford to go our on the town every now and then. Now I make $20.00 per hour and I can't hardly afford to live. My life style hasn't changed except for the fact that a dollar will not buy what it would in 1972. Personally I would rather work for the $3.10 and be able to buy a loaf of bread for $0.35 and a gallon of gas for $0.50

      Now that's some odd math.

      You'd be happy making 1/7 as much if you could purchase goods and services for 1/4 as much? Hmm. And this in a post called, "redo your math"? Whatever...

      I do agree with your other point that the dollar is currently far from strong, by the way. Just not your examples of countermath.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Things being more expensive here are a sign of our money's strength. Your'e looking at in from the wrong perspective. When looking at things like this look at it through a means of exchange. Lets assume that I decide to take a trip to India. I take $500. Now while I could have some fun with this in America, my money can now buy me a lot more, because our dollar is stronger. On the flip side, an Indian who could take $50 and have a good time in India, when he comes to the United States, that money isn't worth much, and his buying power is significantly reduced.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by heybo · · Score: 1
      You are right it is all relative. Say what you will but I would rather pay $0.35 for a roll of film instead of $3.50. When the something cost 10 times as much in one place as another I would say that is REAL weak!

      Guess you weren't having to make a living in 1972. Really it was a lot easier!

    5. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by heybo · · Score: 1
      I don't know where you got the 1/4 from. Things were WAY cheaper then. You could live a lot better on a lot less. The roll of film is a good example that you left out of you math. A friend was over seas not long ago. A roll of film costs him $0.35 that costs him $3.50 here. Now that is 10 times as much. Now if you look at the 1/7 amount in the earnings and things cost only 1/10th the amount that it does now you have a gain in your earnings.

      All I know is that I ate a lot more steak then and eat a lot more dried beans now!

    6. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by heybo · · Score: 1
      If it is so strong then why is it in 1972 I could take you $500.00 and but a really nice used car. Now I can't but a worn out piece of shit for that. Example. in 1974 I bought a brand new Toyota Land Crusier for $5,200.00 that same car now cost over $30,000.00. In 1974 I was working and could afford the new car. Now I do good to keep my poor old (used) pony on the road.

      NOW! tell me where the fucking strenght is in that!

      The truth is maybe we make a whole lot more now but the buying power of that is not what it used to be.

      Also I wasn't talking about visiting a country with the money I was talking about trying to make a living and the level of that living.

    7. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Then you're not comparing strength of money. The strength of money is measured vs the strength of other nation's money. Distribution of wealth (what you are talking about) is a completely different matter.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:Better redo you rmath dude..... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      don't know where you got the 1/4 from. Things were WAY cheaper then

      Actually, I took them from your previous post:

      Personally I would rather work for the $3.10 and be able to buy a loaf of bread for $0.35 and a gallon of gas for $0.50

      Bread now - $1.40/loaf is pretty reasonable. Gas - I'd say that $2.00 is above the national average at the moment, but not by a lot. That's all. I figured that using the examples that you gave was a pretty reasonable thing to do...

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  106. It doesn't read that way to me. by cduffy · · Score: 1

    Sure? "Among other customers" is, arguably, a rather key phrase, and implies strongly that the government offices are only a subset of those who will be connecting.

  107. Great, inside India by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Try to get from India to anywhere around the US and see what your latencies are? FLAG is starting to show its age, I think, or at least whatever they're using of it seems to be overburdoned.

    I've worked with remote offices in India, even with a 3Mbit link on their end, getting decent latency between us, or them and anywhere in this hemisphere was a challenge.

  108. Should I be happy? by maniac_inside · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if am really happy with this news because broadband in North India still costs a lot the last time I checked it it could cost easily Rs 600 p.m or $13 for 96 kbps and can only be used between 9PM and 9AM. This is even after the govt. has said that nothing less than 256kbps can be considered as broadband. Suck.

  109. Not quite... by eonish · · Score: 1
    In India, 100 USD is a lot of money and could be a month's pay for an architect
    Even students working part time in call centers earn more then that... True a lot of people have as low income as that, but they generally dont care about the internet. They dont even have computers at home. I am talking about rickshaw drivers and fruit sellers. Architects earn _way_ higher then that. You probably need to redo your research.
    Based on the local economic conditions in India, $2.30 is probably totally reasonable.
    Based on intended target, $2.30 is dirt cheap.


    That said, I cant fscking wait for this service to come out. I know infrastructure is going to be sloppy, but I can deal with that. Right now I pay aprox USD 22 (Rs 1000) for 128kbps cable connection. 512kbps dsl connection costs 4-5 times that. Which is reasonable for small businesses but not home users.
  110. Frigid vs Fetid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick your poison.

  111. Broadband in Argentina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The prices here are the worst...
    I pay 54 USD per month for 512/128 ADSL.
    And starting on june, I will be paying the same for 1024/256 with a 8gb per month cap.

    That is $ 140 (1 USD = $ 2.8) for a mediocre, capped connection.

    Another case of Telcos monopolizing the market and corruption of the communications regulatory comition, government, etc.

  112. DSL in India by vikramrn · · Score: 1

    I have a 128k no-download-limit DSL from Airtel which is costing me Rs.1000 per month (around...ummm $22?). With BSNL broadband coming out this month...prices may become cheaper...but Rs.100 p.m for 2 Mbps is highly unlikely to say the least.

  113. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  114. Guess Where Alan Ralsky's Next Host Will Be? by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless the Indian companies backing this project take a very hard-line anti-spam and anti-virus stance (anyone know what the market penetration of Windows vs. Linux/BSD/MacOS is in India?), I can see this turning into a giant clusterfuck for the rest of the Internet.

    You think the American zombie botnets are bad, wait 'till there are a couple hundred thousand Indian Windoze boxen all on 2-meg symmetric connections. This has the potential to bring an entire country to its knees if the virus authors co-ordinate properly and the Indian users are just as clueless as their American counterparts.

    Of course, if Linux/BSD/MacOS is significantly more popular there than Windows is, you can probably ignore most of this cynicism.

    p

  115. P2P via sandal-net? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously - at 100R/month, hosting is literally dirt cheap. So cheap in fact that it's probably as cheap to also hire someone to change a backup tape or DVD-Rs daily or weekly and mail them to you, as it is to host the line yourself in North America.

    Sounds like the ideal new wave of piracy!

  116. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    here, have a cookie!

    phpAds_blockView[2]1099956574127.0.0.1 /102416620674562967303974097705629672939*

  117. Re:damnit by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    You're on the same plan as me, aren't you ;)

    Internode has a good mirror though, most of my big downloads just get pulled down for free off of their mirror. Which saves a fair bit of the paid bandwidth.

  118. Tit for Tat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope all the jobs for it end up out of India.

  119. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reasonable for who, yeah in Europe I guess it's reasonable, but here in the US I'd scoff at such a price/speed ratio. I can get 3.0/768k for $30 (plus rape you in the ass charges), though it's only a special in the NY Metro area with Verizon, still a hell of a lot better than 512.

  120. At that price... by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    I'd buy 10 connections and still be paying less than I am now. It is so sad that the US cannot keep up with the technology far poorer countries.

  121. $2.30 not so cheap over there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Average Income Per Capita: US$350

    Source: LetsGo

  122. Re:More chances for spammers, zombies and the like by vivtho · · Score: 1

    That's quite likely, because for a long time VSNL was India's only ISP. So ANY India based spammer would have to use it.