Slashdot Mirror


The Lost 1984 Mac Video

An anonymous reader writes "Never seen video footage of the introduction of the Macintosh in January 1984 was published for the first time on the Internet today. Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years, and German media agency TextLab has unearthed this only surviving video tape of the launch." They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

119 of 636 comments (clear)

  1. Patience, honey. by maxdamage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Patience, honey.
    The next download slot will be free

    in 0 minutes und while(01); seconds

    1. Re:Patience, honey. by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie."

      I have 5 words to say about this statement:

      BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  2. Insult to injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Saying "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie." as you post it to Slashdot's frontpage mid-day is like walking up to a guy after a fight, knifing him in the stomach and saying "You could probably use more bandages for your wounds."

    Here are some magnet/edonkey mirror links:

    magnet:?xt=urn:bitprint:CGUXHDIRWXFK362VRT63RMU6VA ZJPNAS.VSUEDMAYUMKDSRKBIA6TDCW6DIZ5MTYD26FOONQ&dn= 1984macintro_2.mov

    ed2k://|file|1984macintro_2.mov|21939485|c72b7ecf8 d3dc495ee743d7c54f5e29e|/

    1. Re:Insult to injury by PktLoss · · Score: 4, Informative

      My attempt at a mirror:

      http://www.preinheimer.com/1984macintro.mov

      Decent box, I say odds are good it makes it, if not, no worries.

    2. Re:Insult to injury by Me-The-Person · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait for it.... Wait for it.... /.'d!!!!!!

  3. Hold Your Horses! by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    After Lord Of The Rings, I have learnt to wait for the extended director's platinum cut version before committing myself.

    Wait for the 33MB version!

    1. Re:Hold Your Horses! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, this is Apple. Wait for the Mini version.

    2. Re:Hold Your Horses! by techwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, I would have expected the i1984 version

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
  4. never seen? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never seen video footage [...] Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years

    And he never watched it?!?! What about the camera man? Was he blind?

    I'm afraid to watch this - I heard about that world's funniest joke. Sounds like they've taken special precautions here.

    1. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I imagine it's for the event at which the Mac was introduced; you know, "It sure is great to get out of that bag" and all that.

    2. Re:never seen? by syd2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:never seen? by neonstz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wenn ist das Nunstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beierhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

    4. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I distinctly remember seeing clips of this in the documentary Triumph of the Nerds.

    5. Re:never seen? by Milikki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do people go out of their way to make downloading these things so cryptic?

      Try this URL: http://www.uriah.com/apple-qt/movies/Apple.1984.mo v

      No worrying about dropout because of network traffic and even works with dialup.

      Kevin

  5. How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdotted in German?

    1. Re:How do you say... by phyruxus · · Score: 2, Funny

      fleigende kindersheisse!

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    2. Re:How do you say... by easter1916 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdotted in German... how about "upgefuckt"?

    3. Re:How do you say... by piquadratCH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Slashdotted in German?

      As the Heise Newsticker tends to have the same effect as Slashdot on linked sites, the term "geheised" is a accurate translation of "slashdotted".

    4. Re:How do you say... by coopaq · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Q: Wie sagen Sie Slashdotted auf Deutsch?

      A: Slashdotted

    5. Re:How do you say... by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, it's funnier when you only half-translate it, and poorly at that! I was in a Betriebsrat (worker's council) meeting one day at my former employer in Raunheim, Hesse, and the worker's council head (who spoke German only) used the word "ge-updated" in reference to a system we were rolling out... for some reason that Denglish word has just stuck with me ever since.

    6. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They must have hosted the site on the 1984 Mac!!!!1111

      LoLzors

    7. Re:How do you say... by hunterx11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy. Take the sentence, "This website no longer operates due to excessive traffic caused by being linked to from Slashdot." Translate it into German. Remove the spaces. You now have a valid German word.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    8. Re:How do you say... by funnyVegetable · · Score: 2, Informative

      no direct translation possible! Slash = [german]Schrägstrich Dot = [german]Punkt Germans (which are known worldwide, as native English speakers :) would say: "(ge)strichpunktet" --- Die Botschaft hör` ich wohl, allein mir fehlt der Glaube. (Goethe, "Faust I", Nacht, Vers 765)

    9. Re:How do you say... by 3dr · · Score: 2, Funny

      kaput?

    10. Re:How do you say... by Mike626 · · Score: 2, Informative

      slash = Schrägstrich

      dot = Punkt

      so...

      Schrägstrichpunkten?

      --
      http//injoke.org -- Culling The Interesting
    11. Re:How do you say... by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

      And to save work for people who will actually do this:

      DieseWebsiteläßtnichtmehrwegendesübermäßigenVerk eh rslaufendervonSlashdotdurchverbundenwerdenverursac htwird

  6. Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

    1. Re:Betamax? by stox · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    2. Re:Betamax? by Cowclops · · Score: 2, Informative

      525 scan lines = vertical. VHS very much uses all of it. Betamax has slightly more horizontal bandwidth than VHS, but its not night an day.

    3. Re:Betamax? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

      They likely mean Betacam not betamax. But who knows.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Betamax? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Time to switch to decaf, dude, or were you scared by a Beta camera at an early age?

    5. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're just inviting the ignoramous tools who don't know the difference between BetaMAX and BetaCAM.

    6. Re:Betamax? by yiantsbro · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you are just to young to remember. I remember having "our" side of the video rental store and looking over at all the rich kids on the Beta side. Of course, there were also the videodisk freaks in the middle.

    7. Re:Betamax? by SirWinston · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more
      > robust format.

      This is a common misconception, but no. The magnetic tape used is almost identical and will last roughly as long. VHS and Beta, using magnetic tape and analog formats, are very long-lasting and decay gracefully.

      You might see extra noise and dropouts on a 25-year-old VHS or Beta, but it will play perfectly fine as long as it wasn't stored in a hot or wet place. Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady, but not when you're storing media. ;-)

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    8. Re:Betamax? by EulerX07 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady, but not when you're storing media. ;-)

      I think you lost half of the /. audience at that sentence.

    9. Re:Betamax? by Patik · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady
      +1 Informative

  7. Oh man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple is really gonna sue him!

  8. Erm, Lost!? What!? by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know I've seen this video online a while back. I dont exactly remember it being 'lost' anywhere.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea. I've had a copy of it since 1995 actually that I found online somewhere.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    2. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by EricWright · · Score: 2, Informative

      This video is NOT the infamous 1984 commercial. This is Steve Jobs in a Macworld-like auditorium setting introducing the Macintosh to a cheering audience, then giving a small demo.

    3. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by nekonoko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Part of this same video is shown in the PBS presentation 'Triumph of the Nerds' from 1996. I can only image that if a documentarian was able to obtain the footage that it was never really lost.

  9. I can't believe I'm asking for this but ... by dcarey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe I'm asking for a mirror for a betamax tape ...

    --

    -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

  10. Mirror by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a mirror, hosted, appropriately, on an Apple Xserve and Xserve RAID:

    http://mirror.services.wisc.edu/mirrors/temp/1984m acintro.mov

    1. Re:Mirror by Kardnal · · Score: 3, Informative

      They got smart. Now they only have a link to the torrent there, instead of the full movie...

      --
      ------------------
      "Never Attribute to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity..."
    2. Re:Mirror by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because I made the torrent, I'm hosting the torrent, I'm providing the tracker for the torrent, and I'm seeding the torrent with three servers.

  11. BETAMAX by zenneth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years, and German media agency TextLab has unearthed this only surviving video tape of the launch.

    1984 called... it wants its technology back.

    --
    The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
  12. Thanks for the help by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

    You could do something useful and make a torrent before posting the story to slashdot.


    -Colin

  13. 22MB in 1984 by Hosting+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    That must of been the biggest file ever, how could they loose something so big?

    --
    For FREE NO ADS! 1GB/20GB PHP MySQL With a Control Panel Hosting
  14. Here we go... by byolinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thanks for checking for "The Lost 1984 Mac Video"

    You can try a time sliced download here, and if this is overloaded (it probably is), there are mirrors at macnews.de, php-schmiede.de, ppcnux.de, ftp.ppcnux.de, MacTechNews.de and elbewerk.

    And now that the US are with us, you guys could back us up with some mirrors. Thanks bunches to all the folks who are helping us out!

    1. Re:Here we go... by techathead · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or Here
      Just trying to help

    2. Re:Here we go... by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Got your US mirror here:

  15. Amazing... by angst7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is just a pathetic attempt to overshadow the *real* 20 year old mega-story: Bill Gate's 1983 Teen Beat Spread.

    --
    StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    1. Re:Amazing... by xorowo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to rain on anyone's parade, but this isn't actually a "Teen Beat" photo: http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/gates.asp. Not that it matters, it actually seems worse knowing that this was a publicity shot.

  16. Mirror by larry2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's another mirror: http://www.larry.org.mx/The_First_Mac.mov

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

  17. Not just "me too-ing"... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2, Informative

    The site's /.ed, but I remember seeing the video... our company Mac Dweeb (Hey, I liked him and called him that to his face, so no flamebaiting is going on... really) played that for me sometime in 1999 or 2000.

    So, add one more to the list of people who swear this is not quite a "first time ever"

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  18. http is such a great transfer mechanism by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although wouldn't it be a antastic revolution if we could download from people who had already dowloaded it, thus allowing us all to share bandwidth. The data would arrive at such a high speed that one might consider it a torrent. A bittorrent, one might say. If only such a technology existed...

    1. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      now just imagine if every major ISP in the US didn't give us all such rediculously low upload caps in hopes of making "businesses" pay more for the exact same line with an increased upload speed. The world may very well come to an end!

  19. Slashdotted? by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 5, Funny

    If der linken ist geslashdotted, relaxen und watchen der blinkenlights

  20. "Renowned Mac user" by Dr.+Dew · · Score: 2, Funny
    Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster

    I'm not arguing the accuracy of this description, but it's an odd turn of phrase. "Look at the way he presses that Apple command key! Astonishing!"

    Imagine instead "renowned spoon user Dr. Dew."

    "Renowned telephone user Mrs. Dew."

    Pithy enough to fit on a headstone, too.

  21. Mirror by kevinmf · · Score: 2, Informative

    A mirror set up on Case Western's network - should be able to handle a lot. http://dasystem.student.cwru.edu/1984macintro_2.mo v

  22. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by therevolution · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WTF? If you saw that in 1984, you'd be cheering too.

  23. BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:BitTorrent by Lucidwray · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same Torrent file, same tracker, different http server.

      http://www.keyholedesign.com/1984macintro.torrent

      What is the world coming too when even 7k text files get ./'ed and take 30 seconds to get a download slot.... sad..

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  24. North American Mirror by PktLoss · · Score: 4, Informative
  25. Stylish! by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve never should have given up the bow ties.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  26. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by lokedhs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, not corny at all. Remember that this was 1984. This was back when the C64 was considered state of the art. The PC programs were text only. Most people in the audience had never seen anything like that before.

  27. TORRENT by potuncle · · Score: 2, Informative
  28. Text described for the bandwidth impaired by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 4, Informative

    (Sometimes I wish others who downloaded a huge video or slashdotted site would bother to describe some of it so I will for the rest of y'all)

    Steve Jobs ca. 1984 is speaking on a stage in front of an audience, suit coat and bow tie, these are his pre-jeans-and-black-turtleneck days. He tells the audience "All of the images you about to see on the large screen will be generated by what's in that bag." The lifts the black bag to reveal a Mac on a table (applause) he inserts a diskette into the Mac and steps back. The word MACINTOSH slowly scrolls across the screen to the tune of "Chariots of Fire" (wild appluase) Screen shots of paint program, word processor and calculator, fonts, program editor, 3d chess (cheering, applause). Steve introduces Macintosh speaking for itself. A bad robotic voice reads a few paragraphs of text on the screen. (applause, cheering) (wide shot of audience appluading) (end)

    I do recall the days when PC DOS and the Apple II ruled the world and first time I saw a Mac in action was easy to recognize it was a big step forward.

    1. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by outZider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not blue. Just a video artifact. It was the Mac's "Grey", alternating white and black pixels to create a halftone.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
  29. Torrent by kss · · Score: 4, Informative
  30. NOT the 1984 Commercial by Agar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in case any one is confused, this is not the Big Brother ad that showed during the Super Bowl.

    It's a video of the actual introduction by Jobs at an Apple event.

    Screen shots, speech synthesis, Jobs in a bow tie.

    Interesting to see what geeks in 1984 cheered at, but that's about it.

    1. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by Agar · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you do want to see the 1984 commercial, you can find it here: http://www.apple-history.com/frames/body.php?page= gallery&model=1984&format=small

  31. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't find a more real computer that has aseperate video card, tiny form factor, rock solid OS, includes software to get productive, and comes with a warranty.

    If you really want to impress your wife, try listening to her.

    Yeah yeah, it's a troll. He posted a whole topic about it last week.

  32. 6th word? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exeem.

    1. Re:6th word? by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, I don't install spyware on my computer. (eXeem ships with Cydoor bundled.)

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  33. Yeah... by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The torrent" that I made, am hosting on that server, tracking on that server, and seeding on that server (as well as three others).

  34. OMG by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I WANT ONE!!!

  35. Man We were easily impressed back then. by barfy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    oohhhh... Rounded Rectangles! Wild Applause.
    And it took till the Ibook G4 before I bought another Apple (my first was a IIc).
    Seriously, the mac is back. OsX and Ilife, are as awe inspiring today as MacOS and MacWrite/MacPaint were back then...

    1. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since then, has there been anything else as revolutionary as the Mac was at the time? I can't think of any. It really *was* something to get excited about.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  36. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by valkraider · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most of Slashdot readers weren't born yet in 1984.

  37. Re:How about a bittorrent? by valkraider · · Score: 2, Informative

    do Macs support torrents natively

    Yes.

  38. Torrent mirror by NitroWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a torrent mirror: http://208.29.16.74/1984macintro.mov.torrent

  39. Corniest ever? Not hardly! by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Young one, obviously you've never seen the music video of "The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins".

  40. I was there... by sillivalley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seven or eight rows back, on the left side, wearing one of those red shirts

    hoping, praying, that everything would work

    that Andy got everything working (smooth horizontal scrolling was hard)

    what an incredible feeling, to be part of the family, the project, the revolution.

    Was it really that many years ago?

  41. applecare, laserwriter, hyperdrive videos by -DeeT · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still have my mid-1980s Apple videos about Applecare, Laserwriter repair, and Hyperdrive installation. I get no points for exoticness, though, because they're VHS, not beta.

    My favorite moment is in one of the repair videos, where it shows the technician crossing fingers behind the back before discharging the CRT anode.

    -DeeT

    --
    fghit entyrop
  42. bow tie by sometwo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm glad Steve doesn't wear bowties anymore.

  43. Try this by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try this. It should perform a lot better.

  44. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Funny

    About 15 years ago, I had a job as a PC repair monkey at the computer center at my university. As was often the case with student jobs, people came and went all the time. We were hiring new kids every couple of weeks.

    About halfway through my senior year, we hired this freshman. Nice kid, but a little on the clueless side. Not only had he never worked on a Mac before, he'd never even seen one in person.

    One day he had to go to one of the computer labs to pick up a Mac and bring it into the shop for service. (The analog board needed replacing, or something like that.) He hauled it in, set it on the bench, and proceeded to dig through all the bins in the shop.

    "What are you looking for?" I asked him.

    "A Mac power cord," he said. I just kinda stared for a minute. "What?" he demanded.

    Without saying anything, I reached down into the bin by my bench, grabbed a power cord, and threw it at him.

    "You mean Macs use regular power cords?" he asked.

    Your question wasn't quite that stupid. But man, was it ever close.

  45. No not so much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Betamax is the consumer format, Betacam is the pro format. Betacam SP was a tape enhancement on normal Betacam. Same size, better materials, higher bandwidth, more scanlines. Both are much larger than Betamax tape, and much higher res. Betamax died, Betacam has always been a success, and continues success now as Betacam Digital, though it's losing out to the various DV derivitives in many cases.

  46. Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thread? by Shag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When the Mac introduction happened in 1984, there was a lengthy, somewhat heated thread on the "SLASHDOT-L" BITNET Listserv. I foolishly didn't save a copy of it, but I'm sure someone out there has it and will post it in the next few days. From my recollections, people were of divided opinions.

    A small minority thought it was "insanely great," and I suppose they still do. Most readers, though, found flaws with it.

    Some viewed the Macintosh as "just a toy," and insisted that they were holding out for a real computer - the Lisa.

    Some thought it had promise, but wouldn't be truly useful until Apple added support for the Commodore-based SIDplayer music format.

    Quite a lot said it was too expensive. Some of these pointed out that there were any number of kit computers they could build for less, while others questioned having a screen built in - and a small one at that - when most people already had televisions.

    Purists were quick to point out that the Mac lacked features that had been developed years earlier by Douglas Engelbart and others. Why wasn't the keyboard more of a chording model? And why did the mouse have only one button? Even Engelbart's original patent drawings, they argued, had shown a multi-button mouse. What good was a single button?

    And of course, there were the hardcore geeks and techies, who were quick to point out that it wasn't any good if it couldn't run a real operating system, like VAX/VMS.

    Ah, the good old days. If anyone has a copy of the thread, please post it!

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  47. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    People are cheering on various screens shown on a Macintosh. Quite corny.

    Yeah, thank God nobody ever does that any more.

  48. Behold the speaking computer! by cioxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amazing how 21 years later MacOS still has the same crappy voice synthesizer. Why has the industry been so stagnant when the issue came to text-to-speech?

    I know there are solutions out there, among them AT&T Natural Voices (which I might add costs more than my computers put together), but generally, the speech thing didn't really take off.

    To be fair, Windows also ships with the most annoying text-to-speech engine which hasn't made any progress since Windows 95.

    What brings?

    1. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by zulux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Festival !!!!

      Festival speech

      75% as good at AT&T Natural Voices - and it's free, with a BSD like license.

      Quite good when set up properly.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

      All the free tts systems sound the same as they did since the early 80s. Because they all use the same algorithms and data generated by the Navy. The nicer sounding ones that have more complete data sets, improved algorithms and are computationally more intensive are only available through special licensing. (the algorithms have multiple patents, the data has copyrights, etc).

      Compare a public domain TTS like rsynth to a free, but commercial quality TTS like festival or Bell Lab's. It's funny how rsynth sounds a lot like the mac (although rsynth doesn't have a bunch of predefined settings to do different voices, you have to set all the parameters yourself to make it sound exactly like Bruce).

      TTS technology doesn't move terribly fast. the TTS that was in the Mac 21 years ago is basically the same technology 30 years ago. But that's no excuse for Apple not to have moved on to using diphonemes or triphonemes like other systems. Apple is behind, but in the TTS world, 20 years behind is not all that far behind. (unlike say the harddrive world, where 20 years behind is the difference between 100s of gigabytes to 10s of megabytes. ouch)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  49. Re:Lesson: by soft_guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    What master of business administration is going to go around (in the USA) using English that makes him look like a hillbilly

    You mean besides the Preseident?

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  50. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by binder520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Me, I'd prefer not to spend $500 for a machine whose specs are met by the three year old laptop I'm using right now." You have a 1.25 GHz G4 on your 3 year old laptop?

  51. Macintosh Folklore by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are interested by this video, check out Andy Hertzfeld's accounts of that presentation. (Andy was one of the developer of the Mac back then.) While you're they're, check out the rest of the Classic Macintosh section of that site. It's a lot of stories (mostly by Andy) of how the Mac came to be.

    (I'm not associated with folklore.org or Andy Hertzfeld or anything. I found the site a couple weeks ago while googling for little rubber feet, and got hooked.)

  52. Re:Funny... by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find it rather unsurprising that they wouldn't make a huge fuss about the 20th anniversary of the Mac. Why, you ask?

    The "old Apple" used to love to look backwards and do things like celebrate anniversaries (20th Anniversary Mac, many "special edition" products like the clear Newton 110, etc.). Unfortunately, I think looking at the past 20 years of the Mac, while there have been some great milestones, there have also been a lot of missed opportunities. I think the current management at Apple understands this better and is more focused on the next 20 years of the Mac.

    It's kind of ironic that Steve Jobs has much better business sense than the "business" people they put in charge of Apple originally because they didn't think Steve Jobs could really run Apple. Man, has he proven those folks wrong!

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  53. This was part of Cringely's excellent documentary by AgentCooper · · Score: 3, Informative
    Most of this footage has been available for years within Robert Cringely's excellent documentary, Triumph of the Nerds. No self-respecting geek or Apple fan should be without it! Three tapes' worth of interviews with industry pioneers, from Homebrew Computer Club to Microsoft. Steve Ballmer and Larry Ellison are fascinating, but Steve Jobs steals the show:
    The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste, they have absolutely no taste, and what that means is - I don't mean that in a small way I mean that in a big way. In the sense that they don't think of original ideas and they don't bring much culture into their product ehm and you say why is that important - well you know proportionally spaced fonts come from type setting and beautiful books, that's where one gets the idea - if it weren't for the Mac they would never have that in their products and ehm so I guess I am saddened, not by Microsoft's success - I have no problem with their success, they've earned their success. For the most part. I have a problem with the fact that they just make really third rate products. - Steve Jobs
  54. Mirror by `Sean · · Score: 3, Informative
  55. It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whole.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jobs was an asshole his entire life.

    The presentation wasn't about Macintosh, it was about Jobs. The pictures were of jobs, the digitized voice was about jobs.

    The guy never said "This was a team effort". Look at when the digitized mac voice say "he's been like a father", the guy grins like he really was a father.

    The only thing worse are the Mac fanboi's cheering every little... nothing. If jobs said "You guys should all be killed", they would have cheered him.

    No wonder he was fired. He deserved to be.

  56. Re:Wost encoding job EVER by DLWormwood · · Score: 4, Informative
    22 megabytes for a little 300x200 video that's mostly 4 minutes of still scenes?

    This movie was encoded using Sorenson Video and QDesign Music. They are both poorish choices for downloadable video nowadays, with MPEG-4 being preferred. The codecs used date back to the tail end of the era when QuickTime was mostly used for CD kiosks and presentations, and just when QT was starting to develop towards Internet streaming applications.

    At least it wasn't done in Cinepak and MACE...

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  57. Watch Out!!! by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

    And the VHS vs. Betamax wars begin. Keep it clean. Fight!!!

  58. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll always remember this:

    Apple's new Macintosh.

    Smaller than a PDP-11. No wireless. Lame.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  59. Australian mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  60. Oooh. That IS a good one. by ccmay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mod parent funny. I'm a Bush man, but I know when to say 'touché.'

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  61. Re:Betamax? -- The parent is flat out wrong by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

    This is a load of crap. My father, an engineer who was given the task of evaluating the formats for use in education, managed to get hold of a highly bootleg copy of Star Wars on VHS, in 1977.

    The JVC machine we played it on even had mechanical type buttons, none of this newfangled soft touch nonsense.

    Not robust...? I actually played this old 1977 VHS cassette just a month or two ago (2004) to compare against my recently purchased Star Wars trilogy DVD.

    It played just fine thank you, and this is after being originally played many, many times, a long time ago, as you can imagine a 7 year and all his friends would...

    I don't know which of the formats was actually this mythical more robust thing you speak of, but I can imagine if there was any difference, it would be beta that was weaker due to the continuous take up spooling to ensure a fast start playback.

  62. 3 1/2 inch floppies by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Mac was the first major computer with support for the 3 1/2 inch hard cased floppies. PCs continued to use the 5 1/4 inch soft floppies for years afterwards. I remember reading a magazine article where Jobs pulled a floppy out of his pocket and tossed it onto the table. Everyone gasped. They had learned how fragile floppy drives were and the importance of always carrying them careully and putting them promptly into the box (not only did the 5 1/4s bend, they had holes so dust could get onto the disk surfaces).

    That's why everyone claps right at the beginning, he pulls the floppy out of his pocket(!) and sticks it into the computer.

    People watching today might not realize that the Mac did not have a hard drive. One was later provided as an expensive extra option. But initially the Mac had only a floppy drive to boot from.

    Those were the days... I loved the Mac. I bought one back in 1984, the first GUI I'd ever used. Then a year later I laboriously unsoldered the memory chips and upgraded the system from 128K to a whole half a meg of memory. I can't count how many Macs I've bought over the years since then... we've got 7 right now, counting the 2 my kids in college have.

  63. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would probably agree with you, even those who know Jobs personally.

    And yet, without Jobs to goad people into stroking his ego, there would have been no Mac, no NeXTSTEP, no Apple post-1997, no iMac, no iPod, no standards of excellence in GUI computing.

    Sometimes it takes an asshole to make a dent in the universe.

  64. Re:Oooh. That IS a good one. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you know when to say 'sorry'?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  65. Robust? Simpler than that. by repetty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Robust" is pretty vague. You oughta seen me naked: I'm robust.

    Beta technology was gentler on tape than VHS. The transport system on a Beta deck pulled out a lot more tape than VHS did and was more sophisticated. The benefit was less stress on the tape -- really.

    A rewound Beta tape is less taut than a rewound VHS tape and for long term storage that counts for a lot.

    I have a related suggestion for any VHS users: when you are done watching your tape, don't rewind it. Let it sit and then rewind it right before you watch it again.

    The reason is that fast-rewinds really wrap the tape tightly onto the spindle, stretching it over time. When you watch a tape or fast-scan forward/backward, the tape remains pulled into the machine where it benefits from the relatively gentle handling of the pulleys and capstans.

    As an aside, I was an early video adopter, which is to say that I bought Beta. I used my Beta unit for years and then the VHS units began to include video filters for prettier pictures. I bought one of these nice new VHS units but the picture was not superior to my Beta unit.

    --Richard

  66. Amiga by Ostie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see what's amazing about Macintosh classic when 1 year later Amiga came with colorful graphics(up to 4096 colors), a real preemptive multitask OS and all the hot stuff. You could actualy format a disk drive while printing and doing some other stuff while on Mac you had to wait in front of a black & white screen.

    1. Re:Amiga by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Amiga's fate was probably sealed when Commodore bought out Amiga. The Mac had the charismatic Jobs and his trademark Reality Distortion Field, with serious attempts at making a business computer. And the Amiga had Commodore, who just kind of threw it out there, expected people to play games on it and otherwise treated it as a shiny toy.

      Another difference is that while Amiga focused on flashy hardware, Apple focused on a solid user interface. It's a lot easier to be backwards compatible with software than it is with hardware. Amiga was pretty much doomed to have to re-implement the same chipset and video modes in every future version, where Quickdraw on the Mac, and discouraging direct writes to the video hardware (which was just a simple bitmap to begin with), allowed Apple the flexibility to change the graphics hardware.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Amiga by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm aware of the continued OS development...but I have two questions:

      1. Where is Amiga OS now? Literally? It's changed hands so many times, it's becoming a bit of a joke.

      2. Who is actually developing software for Amiga OS? It seems that there must be some developer making something for it.

      My point is, just because it's still being developed doesn't mean that it outlasted MacOS. I think more people are running the GNU HURD than Amiga OS.
      I remember the first time I saw an Amiga computer--I thought it was the coolest thing ever. Then again, Beta was so much better than VHS.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  67. Another mirror by theunixman · · Score: 2, Informative
  68. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Shag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah... the fact that it got rated "insightful" is amusing in its own way.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  69. mac cost by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even in the 80's, Macintosh was (generally) only significantly more expensive than the cheap brands. If you compared it to the better built and more expensive brands fitted with comparable video and sound, there wasn't much difference (in most cases).

    The 5 year typical service life of a mac compared to 3 years for dos/windows typically made it less expensive than even the cheap brands over the long term.

    And once you factored in support costs in a business, the mac made up for the purchase price difference in the first year or two (there was about a 4:1 factor there!)

    hawk