Slashdot Mirror


Indian Moon Mission to Have Landing Component

Anil Kandangath writes "Last month, it was announced that the Indian moon mission Chandrayan I would have a component that would land on the moon to function as an impactor. For all those who complain about India spending big bucks on its space program, The Scientific Indian has a list of updates about the space program's plans for this year which includes two cartography satellites, a satellite based 'total disaster management system', a few communication satellites and a satellite launch for the European Union."

278 comments

  1. Lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Allow me to translate:

    [...] which includes two spy satellites, a satellite based 'total spy management system', a few spy satellites and a spy satellite launch for the European Union."

    1. Re:Lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny anti-islamic, anti-3rdworld website from Germany: www.fettemama.com (translated via Google)- 120 percent political incorrectness, automatic translation should be readable, pictures are priceless ;)

    2. Re:Lies... by goodzilla · · Score: 0

      India :) we too chilled about this stuff right now all we want to do is populate the world :)

    3. Re:Lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we really need casinos on the moon?

    4. Re:Lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very sorry... We did not say that! We said we are going to launch a new movie about the Moon!

  2. Wrong priorities by yelohbird · · Score: 0, Troll

    How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?

    --
    h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-slash-dot-dot-org
    1. Re:Wrong priorities by prodangle · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?

      Plenty of people in the US have no job, no home and no health insurance. One could use a similar argument to advocate shutting down NASA until all US citizens reach a decent standard of living.

      Personally I think space exploration is a worthy cause for mankind and see no wrong in diverting a reasonable level of funding toward it.

    2. Re:Wrong priorities by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting predicament: one of the things that makes America, America is the value we put on human life. For example, today, bridge building is so safe that to have a single life lost is considered hugely threatening to a project, and a huge tragety overall. Nary a hundred years ago, building a bridge could easily lose a hundred lives, and it would be considered "Average" or even "Expected".

      India is a country of billions of people, it's mostly pre-industrial, and can "afford" to expend lives on something like space travel, especially as it will bring up the morale and feeling of honor of the Indian people, and that it will help unify India with the European Union and the people within India (which are already quite fragmented via religion and language).

      In short, we are values and emotionally bias towards the loss of life on such projects because we have yet to lose a single human life in space, and we value human life much higher than we value the equipment that they ride upon to outer space, even if that equipment is worth multiples of billions of dollars (e.g. the Space Shuttles). A country like India will have the reverse value situation, as since those dollars can't easily be replaced, they must make the equipment work under any circumstances, even the loss of human lives.

      Just sit and think about it a little before you judge the Indians for the want to feel industrial verses the helping of their people..

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:Wrong priorities by AussieBastard · · Score: 1
      Personally I think space exploration is a worthy cause for mankind and see no wrong in diverting a reasonable level of funding toward it.
      Yeah, with the way things are going presently on this rock of ours, I'm all for hopping the next transport to Tatooine.
    4. Re:Wrong priorities by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

      "and that it will help unify India with the European Union..."

      Whaaa?

    5. Re:Wrong priorities by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      * Joint Project.
      * History of bad blood.

      When two people who have bad history's get together and agree to work on a project, it's embracing unity, even if it's on a very small level. Once we can overcome the past, the future is no longer such a hurdle.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    6. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      India (as with any country whose population is increasing) has far more younger people than older people. And their planned mission is unmanned, so where exactly do you see the risk to human life?

      Lay off the crack, you little cunt.

    7. Re:Wrong priorities by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply twice, but I felt the need to add something right as I hit submit; Think about the United States and Russia. We may be totally independent in space programs, but without each other, we are nowhere. Now we are very reliant on them in order to work with our astronauts on ISS, until the Shuttle fleet is back running. In our recent past, we haven't had a lot of trust of the Russians, but now, working together with them with to get to our people in space has really brought us together. More people in America know about things going on over there, and fewer people in America think of the Russians as "commie scum".

      Think about when the UK finally gave up India as a colony. This left India in a very hard way economically, and the relationship was tarnished. I couldn't imagine the feelings they must harbor towards the English now, after that event. Now, by the EU working with the Indian space agency to get their satellite into space, it's like saying "Hey, we're sorry about what happened and we want to make it up to you".

      It's all about getting that trust back.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    8. Re:Wrong priorities by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?"

      How about looking ahead a few years?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Wrong priorities by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      Man this rock around the ball of fire has gone to crap, invasions that make the Vicotrian era look like a bad 1980's video game. I am looking for the next Stargate out of here, what do you mean transport to Tatooine, I am looking for a wormhole, bet you that I will beat you to a Tatooine ( if there is one ) :) PS Star Wars is not real. but on the over all congrats to India and space exploration and landing on the moon. Maybe this will be a big step in moving sane/peaceful of this rock around the ball of fire. "Maybe I didn't really know you. Maybe you were just a mirage. Maybe the world is full of food and sex and spectacle and we're all just hurling towards an acropolis, in which case it's not your fault. I'm been thinking about all these things and....you're probably standing there monitoring. And one more thing -- about the letter. NUKE IT, FLAME IT, DESTROY IT -- it hurts me to know it's out there. Later." - Loyd Dobbler, Say Anything

    10. Re:Wrong priorities by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      The biggest risk of human life in the whole project is the development of the platform, which, from the sounds of it is pretty complete. We may never know how many lives were lost developing the hardware (mining the iron, making it steel, refining the chemicals used for propellants/oxidants, etc), but I can guarentee the process wasn't without its share of lost lives. Even our space program has lost its fair share of lives in development of the platform, and from failed launches/recoveries.

      The moot point is the fact that India's population is increasing. It really doesn't matter what the growth/decline of the population is, just that the value of the population is considered less when it comes to the cost of industrialization. It's cheaper to spend 20 lives to build something in a pre-industrialized society than it is to expend 2 lives in an industrialized society. Life just carries a higher value. That's all I ask you to think about.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    11. Re:Wrong priorities by a3217055 · · Score: 1
      Maybe, or maybe the EU was the cheapest bidder for the 270,000 parts that made the vehicle. Let me tell you one thing,

      No EU country gives announce of pity/history/love/loyalty/or your momma's fried chicken to India. Maybe India is a 'pre-Industralized' nation so what. And ciroknight I think you got it wrong, I don't think the EU is trying to make it up to them. if they are they are saying, "Hey you Brits, remember India well looks like we got Ikea ( I don't think there are any in India) and we got there space contract ...." And India is not about wasting lives, there are far few executions in India than maybe the _state_of_Texas_.... That is not a way to judgg industralized nations. the way to judge an indsutralized nation is far more deeper than the way a country may look at judging life.

      Sorry to say this, but there is more to life than living your life to buy your materialistic goods produced by an industralized nation.

    12. Re:Wrong priorities by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      This is helping.

      A space programme is an investment. Just like Apollo, there will be a lot of spin off technologies.

      A space programme is also a public works programme. It requires a very large staff. This means that most of the money invested will remain in India(I'm not totally sure about the economics of this. Ask an economist). The ent result is that they spend more money buying stuff (hopefully from other indians) increasing the overall wealth.

    13. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indiatimes is owned by TOI which loosely translates as Toilet Paper Of India.

    14. Re:Wrong priorities by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      india has much much larger problems in those reguards then the USA.
      how about BASIC emenities and such as clean drinking water and waste treament. you can't use the arguemen t that the space project generates jobs either, because building waste treatment plants does the same job and benifits the whole community.
      but then again india has nuclear weapons to, so their government clearly rates it's peoples needs a distance 6th or 7th on it's list...

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    15. Re:Wrong priorities by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with putting the big bucks to help everyone on Earth, which will benefit us (Indians included) for generations and generations?

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    16. Re:Wrong priorities by Trailwalker · · Score: 1, Insightful
      And India is not about wasting lives, there are far few executions in India than maybe the _state_of_Texas
      This is because The State Of Texas actually captures and tries criminals. This is a rarity in India.
    17. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as opposed to US government which is cutting funding to the respective school/local programs and diverting these funds to kill innocent people in iraq.

    18. Re:Wrong priorities by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the USA sent men to the moon in the middle of one of the most tumultuous decades in our nation's history.

    19. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RE: Maybe the world is full of food and sex and spectacle and we're all just hurling towards an acropolis

      quick, somebody call Athens, they need to be warned...

    20. Re:Wrong priorities by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      "America is the value we put on human life."

      Vietnam? Grenada? Iraq? Afghanistan? Guantanamo?

      "India is a country of billions of people"

      Nope.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    21. Re:Wrong priorities by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      on *american* life(life that has not been deemed a criminal).

      building the america wasn't that pretty(not that building any nation was..).

      statistics go a long way in showing the respect for human life... but pr doesn't have that much value in india as it does in usa where pr is everything and as such even a little tragedy can haunt projects if they make it to the social-porno news.

      havent lost a single life...? don't _going_ up there and coming down count? one of the reasons why usa took leaps in the moon race was that russians got really paranoid about safety after first problems..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    22. Re:Wrong priorities by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Think about when the UK finally gave up India as a colony. This left India in a very hard way economically"

      The relationship between Britain and India is SO much more complex than this it's laughable. There's virtually nothing that India cannot do alone if it wants to, but they are pragmatists above all.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    23. Re:Wrong priorities by Evil+Pete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure if you pose this as a straw man or not. But if NASA was closed down etc ,,, it would make NO difference. I don't know why people persist with this delusional thinking. That is not the way the world works, if you close down NASA the money will not go to social programs, and even if it did they would almost certainly be poorly thought out and be effectively useless. One could argue that these claims of mine are just supposition, but if you look at the last 50 years you see that it is pretty much the typical outcome. BTW, remember at the end of the Cold War and all the talk of the Peace Dividend? So were the 90s a golden age? Was world poverty cured? Q.E.D.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    24. Re:Wrong priorities by Aldric · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real reason people from the US complain about this is that Americans think they own space.

    25. Re:Wrong priorities by superyooser · · Score: 4, Informative
      I cannot believe you are comparing the richest country in the world to one of the poorest countries in the world.

      Unemployment in the U.S. holds at a steady 5% (give or take), which is far better than even in the EU. In India, by contrast about 300 million people, or 29% of the population, live on less than a dollar a day. (Note that the entire U.S. population is about 280 million.) These are the people who do have jobs. The government was able to count 40 million workers who cannot find jobs at all. While this makes for an impressive 3.8% unemployment rate, as mentioned above, many jobs pay very poorly. The conditions are so bad that as many as 3,000 Indian farmers in a single state (Andhra Pradesh) have killed themselves over the last six years because of debt and drought.

      This is not to say that India should not be building a space program. Indian universities produce more than 1.5 million graduates each year. There are nowhere near enough jobs to employ all these people entering the workforce. India's tech industry employs only 1 million people total. Industry and grand capitalistic vision will help to produce jobs.

      Capitalism is not a zero sum game. India's "pie" is increasing rapidly and will continue to get bigger. Its economy is forecast to grow 8 percent this year. India is already home to thousands of millionaires and nine of the world's richest billionaires. By the way, another name for rich people is "employers." That's good news for the lower classes.

      The sad reality is that there is no quick fix to India's massive poverty, space program or not. India has more people in poverty (we're talking literally dirt poor) than any other country. It's been that way a long time, and it's not going to get better by scrapping a space mission.

      If priorities are your concern, consider this: Indian teenagers spend $3 billion a year on fashion accessories. And you've heard of Bollywood, which churns out twice as many movies per year as Hollywood. But then again, if Indians were to restrain spending on fashion accessories and movies, those industries would shrink, and many Indians would lose their jobs. Consumerism is the engine of wealth.

      There are many things hindering India's progress. The people speak hundreds of languages; religions and customs also vary wildly by region. It is like several countries within a country. Its population of 1.07 billion is both a blessing and a curse; it is a reservoir of great potential, but right now, it is dragging the country down because most are uneducated (or undereducated) and poor.

      Source: "India Surprises," The Commission, November 2004, pp. 30-35. (printed magazine article contains more information)

    26. Re:Wrong priorities by g33ker · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Personally I think space exploration is a worthy cause for mankind and see no wrong in diverting a reasonable level of funding toward it

      I disagree a little with this; We know more about space that we do about the depths of our own oceans, and I think that some funding funding for space projects should be reduced a little, and we should put the same amount of effort into deep sea exploration.

      Saying that though, at the end of the day, I think that all research is good, no matter what it's about. The more we can do to expand out knowledge of the universe and our world, the better.
      Just my £0.02.

    27. Re:Wrong priorities by anand78 · · Score: 0

      Go troll some place else. In the name of technology transfers to even in the area of Water treatment, I doubt any Western country has helped us.

    28. Re:Wrong priorities by LucBorg · · Score: 1

      NONE of the work going to be done by indias satellites is going to help anyone in the world. I hope you realise that the west is far ahead of india in science and medicine. Therefore anything they "discover" will be old and nothing of significance. And the reason why the US sent men to the moon in the middle of the Cold War was because of the competition from the USSR. That was to do with national pride and prestige. However I will say again, both USSR and US were extremely developed industrially, technologically, scientifically, and economically. India is none of these things and should focus on them before trying to compete with CHINA and the US, EU, and former USSR nations.

    29. Re:Wrong priorities by Servo5678 · · Score: 1
      How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?
      I'm sure India can afford to do both thanks to all the money they've made from companies who have outsourced to India.
    30. Re:Wrong priorities by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow! All this concern for the welfare of the poor starving Indians on Slashdot! And yet, when an Indian programmer gets an outsourced tech job, supposedly "stealing" it from a good ol' American programmer who is thereby forced to live a slightly less affluent lifestyle, he's pure evil.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    31. Re:Wrong priorities by Ostie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only in Soviet Russia they own space.
      Also only old people in Korea don't launch their own satellites.

    32. Re:Wrong priorities by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Most of these people (the Grand Parent) dont seem to realise that Space rockets arent made from gold and loaded with bundles of cash that make up the projects budget. The money actually goes to the populous. Yeah, OK maybe not all of it, but it sure helps some of it.

      If India had spent the last 50 years spending all its budget on eliminating 'poor' or poverty from the populous by giving money to these people, it would still be doing it today, and it would STILL be exactly where it was 50 years ago. You dont give poor people money. You dont eliminate poverty by handing money to these people. You spend that money on education, betterment, you bribe people to make a little effort on their own behalf and further themselves.

      A Space program produces trained and educated people, people with goals and drive. It supports universities, and higher education, it produces whole new commercial sectors (where do you think all those people who have had US jobs outsourced to them got trained? They dont grow on trees.)

    33. Re:Wrong priorities by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      In India, by contrast about 300 million people, or 29% of the population, live on less than a dollar a day
      This kind of thing is often said, but I have a (genuine) quesiton about it? Aren't a lot of those people farmers, and don't a lot of those people have access to at least some farmable land? The value of the land alone would put their actual budget much higher, at least if we are fairly comparing it to western society, which I presume you are, since you quote their budget in dollar terms.

      Note, I'm not trying to make any point about how poor these people are, I know India has terrible problems, I am just querying whether the "dollar a day" thing really reflects reality. Is it really a dollar a day, the same value dollar as you get in a western city, or do they have the potential to get more bang for their buck so to speak.
    34. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that MOST of the population in India lives in abject poverty. "Hey, I know that most of our population is living hand-to-mouth, but let's go to the moon! Weeeee!"

    35. Re:Wrong priorities by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      So nobody should spend money on space until everyone has "enough"? So make this Internet thing illegal until everyone has "enough".

      ...and my "enough" requires I have a new car.

    36. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is another factor that contributues to the povety in India. The caste system is still entrenched into society. There is very few of the Bhramin class that are in poviety, the majority of the poor is of lower caste. Within the context of this system, the lower caste duty is to suffer, so to be born again in a higher caste. As such, many of the existing stratas do not see the importance of raising the standards of the poor.

    37. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're STILL missing the point! Read this next part slowly so that you may understand it: the number of people living in abject poverty in India is greater than the population of the ENTIRE United States. Do you understand, yet? While the U.S. certainly has its problems, most Americans actually CAN feed their families.

      The rest of the damned world whines about how rich and powerful and arrogant the U.S. is. But can you not see what your vision of America would look like? In order to accomplish the impossible task of a welfare state where a few wealthy elites subsidize the education, health care, housing, food, and other needs of the rest of the nation, we would have to end all foreign aid and close our borders to all immigrants. Would THAT stop you sniveling, self-righteous fucks from whining? I doubt it...

    38. Re:Wrong priorities by arodland · · Score: 1

      Because there's so much money to be had in space! I mean, with the asteroid mining, and I hear they've perfected a genetically-modified money tree that grows in microgravity and produces an extra abundance of $100s. Oh yeah, every launch some government makes is bringing in the moolah, even compared to the gojillion-dollar costs of launching in the first place. Right.

    39. Re:Wrong priorities by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yet, when an Indian programmer gets an outsourced tech job, supposedly "stealing" it from a good ol' American programmer who is thereby forced to live a slightly less affluent lifestyle, he's pure evil.

      No, it is the executive who pockets the difference in salaries who is pure evil. The American gets to live the "slightly less affluent lifestyle" of being unemployed, an Indian gets a well paying for India but not so great paying for here job, and some person who is already wealthy beyond either employee's dreams gets another million dollar bonus for saving the company money.

      My problem with outsourcing has nothing to do with Indians getting tech jobs. My problem with outsourcing is that it is just another way for money to be siphoned away from the lower classes into the hands of the extremely rich.

      Concentration of wealth is what is hurting us, not offshoring. Offshoring is just the symptom of a system that we know is killing us but we can't seem to do anything about. Getting mad at the cheaper labour that replaces us is just misplaced anger.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    40. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have some nerve making that argument when the United States has spent over $80b on the war and is asking for $80b more, when the social security system is going bankrupt :-) You don't wait for everything to get better before you develop your technology. It is called thinking ahead.

    41. Re:Wrong priorities by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      True.

      Also, people assume that since Britain ruled over India for 200 years and were driven out, Indians must somehow hate the English. This is simply not true. Remember that the freedom movement was largely a peaceful one thanks to the Mahatma and others. So when the British were finally 'driven out', it was not by war or revolutin - it was through discussions and negotiations (and many other things - I do not wish to over-simplify the whole freedom process).

      So today there are tons of Indians in Britain, and Indians study about colonial excesses and make films about 'those lousy bastards', but the average Indian does not hate the British. They just happen to be part of our history. As in, they really are a part of our history and culture. Like the zillion other invaders who came to India and became part of our culture. No hard feelings.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    42. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about not redirecting people to an evangelist website... I can bet a million dollars (if I had) that mostso called "geeks" of this slashdot crowd will be secrectly gleefully happy if the pagans turned into christianity.

    43. Re:Wrong priorities by XchristX · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the irony of the relationahsip between Great Britain and India. They conquered us in order to "civilize" us, and instead we wound up civilizing them :). In the final analysis, the British, for all their flaws, were a people who were amenable to reason and dialogue, and barring sociopathic extremes like the J.Baugh incident, the worst they ever did was beat people up and throw them in Ahmadnagar prison during the Quit India movement, that can be treated as a misunderstanding. The reason why our freedom struggle was nonviolent was because we did not want to just "throw the poms out", it was because we wanted to educate them as to the meaning of freedom, and ask them to leave of their own free will. This would not have worked against the Americans, for instance, to whom reason and logic are mortal sins in violation of their twisted brand of christian fanaticism. They would simply have massacred us all (as the Portuguese did in GOA, there we HAD to throw them out by military force) like they are doing to Muslims today.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    44. Re:Wrong priorities by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Playing devil's advocate. Your "executive" has provided someone in India with a well-paying job that didn't exist before. In the process, an American employee lost his job.

      Now why is that "pure evil"? Why shouldn't an executive be rewarded for helping out a developing economy like India's, even at the (relatively lesser) expense of an economy like ours?

    45. Re:Wrong priorities by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      I believe that figure is US$1/day at market exchange rates, as this is the international standard used by organizations like the UNDP. By purchasing power parity the poverty rate would be lower, but--it must be said--almost certainly still much higher than in the U.S. et al.

    46. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have an Orkut account and hate the TOI, join the "ToIlet Paper" community.

      TOI is also called "The Slimes Of India". Goddamned tabloid.

      Sincerely,
      A fan of The Hindu (pity it doesn't have a Bombay edition).

    47. Re:Wrong priorities by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Nah, people still die on construction projects all the time--right here in America--and nobody considers it "hugely threatening" to the project. In fact, a common superstition among construction workers is that a site isn't safe to work on until a death has occurred. The ground demands blood, or something like that.

      But yeah, it'd be weird nowadays if a bridge claimed upwards of 20 lives in its construction. OSHA and the unions would throw a fit, at the very least.

    48. Re:Wrong priorities by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      WTF? Are you for real?

      Were/are there no Indian equiv's of Rosa Parks, Malcom X, or Martin Luther King. Is there nobody in the lower caste that can say 'I have a dream'?

      I mean don't get me wrong - racism is fun and all but DAMN! To tell a quarter of a billion people 'whoops, you were born in the wrong caste so you are forever fucked and can never, ever dig your way out - and you have to accept that and be happy with it' ... that is pretty harsh.

      I say let India go for broke with their space program. What's the worst thing that could happen, assuming they build spaceships as good as they write computer code? A space program today is an incredible money pit that will consume as much money as possible and give absolutely no return whatsoever - but it will give the news agencies all kinds of fun things to report over the next few years.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    49. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to accomplish the impossible task of a welfare state where a few wealthy elites subsidize the education, health care, housing, food, and other needs of the rest of the nation, we would have to end all foreign aid and close our borders to all immigrants. Would THAT stop you sniveling, self-righteous fucks from whining? I doubt it...

      Wow!! Close your borders to immigrants!! Hey, this is the land of immigrants !! You must be living in a cave. All the low end jobs are taken by hispanics since white folks won't do such lowly jobs while they are not good enough for the high-end tech jobs which are taken by chinese, taiwanese, indians, and so on. You close ur borders you will go down like titanic.

    50. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many things hindering India's progress. The people speak hundreds of languages; religions and customs also vary wildly by region. It is like several countries within a country. Its population of 1.07 billion is both a blessing and a curse; it is a reservoir of great potential, but right now, it is dragging the country down because most are uneducated (or undereducated) and poor.

      Blaming it on languages won't do any good. You need to get rid of your caste system, you rfemale-infacticide/foeticide culture (that has sex-ratio dropping to 933 and AIDS blowing, see http://www.indiatogether.com/2004/apr/hlt-csratio. htm ), terrible social customs (arranged marriage, religious superstitions and so on), total lack of respect for hygiene (bad water, bad air, bad food), horrible preference for fair skin, no respect for birth control (which China has done right) and an oppressive culture which has no place for rights and freedoms. How did you miss all these ?

      And spending $3 billion on fashion won't do any good if all you do is drink dirty water. The body needs to survive first.

    51. Re:Wrong priorities by superyooser · · Score: 1
      How did you miss all these ?

      My post was not meant to give an exhaustive explanation for India's problems. I just listed a couple of things that came to mind first. I agree with the factors you listed.

    52. Re:Wrong priorities by Ikester8 · · Score: 1
      Space exploration is indeed worthy, but is it worth funding via theft? As big a fan as I am of astronomy and as much as I care about such research, I cannot justify robbing other people via taxation to pay for it.

      Besides, who determines what's a reasonable level of funding? You? The guy you sent to Washington to represent you? Some NASA bureaucrat? More likely it was some pork-barrel trading, and in the political process, untenable projects like the ISS get funded, which squeezes the relatively cost-effective stuff out of the budget.

      Will any space research be done in the absence of government funding? You bet there will. Enough people are interested in this stuff to at least pay for piggybacking some cool cameras on the next communications satellite.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    53. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    54. Re:Wrong priorities by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Now why is that "pure evil"? Why shouldn't an executive be rewarded for helping out a developing economy like India's, even at the (relatively lesser) expense of an economy like ours?

      If the executive cares to do that, he can hire an Indian employee, keep the American employee, and take a pay cut for himself. Nobody has lost their job, and he is still rich but with a soul -- everybody wins. Instead he makes more money for himself, and will ditch the employee from the "developing" country as soon as it "devlops" wages that are higher than somewhere else.

      I appreciate your devil's advocacy, but it's damned hard to sell greed with a circumstancial positive outcome as "good" when you could have no greed and better positive outcomes.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    55. Re:Wrong priorities by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

      Or we could just go socialist and make everyone's wages equal.

    56. Re:Wrong priorities by iamacat · · Score: 1

      no respect for birth control (which China has done right)

      I am really shocked at this line of thinking. Forced abortions/sterilization is "birth control done right"? How would you like for someone to cut open your belly just because you act like a normal human?

    57. Re:Wrong priorities by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      I'm all for hopping the next transport to Tatooine.

      Yeah? Who's gonna fly it kid, you?

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  3. The Gig is Up by MrAsstastic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hellooooo, the U.S. never landed on the moon. I strongly doubt India will ever have any success either.

    1. Re:The Gig is Up by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In a fit of irony, I hear they're outsourcing the stage and crew to America.

    2. Re:The Gig is Up by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bollywood would do it better.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:The Gig is Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You took the brown acid didn't you ? Tsk Tsk

    4. Re:The Gig is Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would YOU want to be in a closed-loop atmosphere like a spacecraft where the astronauts had been eating vindaloo curry all of their lives?

      POOOOOOOOT!

    5. Re:The Gig is Up by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

      Yup, as soon as the spaceship touches down, about fifty brightly costumed extras will jump out of the lander and perform an elaborately choreographed song-and-dance number while the astronauts (played by Shah Rukh Khan and Madhuri Dixit) profess their undying love for each other. I honestly can't wait.

    6. Re:The Gig is Up by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      Dummy, who has the largest movie industry on the planet?


      None of those stupid wooden actors who can't even remember their lines ("a small step", hah!) we want BIG MUSICAL NUMBERS ON THE MOON!

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  4. Competition by nnnneedles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is EU paying india to do it when they could use the Arianne rockets in france and keep the money at home..

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Competition by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Competition by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that ever since things have been sour between India and the European Union (specifically, UK), that now is the time for the two to make up and be friends again. Since India is one of the largest population groups on earth, it would do the European Union loads of good to have such a powerful ally on their hands. Plus, the Industrialization of India is far behind in some places, and this gives the chance for companies from the EU to come in, buy land, start producing things, and shipping them to the rest of the world. Kinda like the old colonization, but I think this time the European Union has good intentions on getting them back on their good side.

      Allies are a powerful weapon, even in peace time, and I think one thing that we need to remember is in order for their to be a lasting peace between us all, we need to all work together.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:Competition by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why is EU paying india to do it when they could use the Arianne rockets in france and keep the money at home..

      Believe it or not, it's cheaper, India is the outsourcing heaven. Seriously though, the reasons are political, EU vs. the US:

      Declining to make an India-specific statement, Juster said parties buying US-made satellites would in general not be allowed to get them launched by countries such as India.

    4. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't use Ariane rockets in France. No Ariane was ever launched in France ;)

      All Ariane rockets are launched in French Guyana, a french DOM (departement d'outre-mer, overseas district) on the coast of South America.

    5. Re:Competition by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      maybe they're overbooked.

      or it's just simply cheaper to use the indians for that particular launch. or it's a co-operative operation(indians footing part of the bill). or maybe just whatever.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Competition by Triskele · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Huh? In what sense are things sour between India and the EU? The UK in particular has a good relationship with India and always has done despite a rocky patch after Independence.


      And if you think India is under-industrialised and that this is an opportunity for the EU to buy cheap. India has far more wealth than you realise.

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    7. Re:Competition by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
      things have been sour between India and the European Union (specifically, UK)

      Not for a long time... India and the UK had a bit of a rocky divorce, true, especially with the whole partition thing, but they've got on very well since then. Have you seen how many fighter jets the Indians buy from the UK? And how many vindaloos the English devour?

      ESA is separate from Arianespace, so European missions fly on rockets of all nations. Mars Express was launched on a Russian rocket, Huygens piggybacked on an American probe... A lot of European satellites do fly on Ariane rockets, Ariane being a very cost-effective option, but there's no exclusive contract going on.

      You're probably right that the EU and India might be interested in closer cooperation, though... India wants to become rich, and an increase of trade with the EU would certainly help; meanwhile, the EU is already enormously rich, but doesn't have the global influence to go with it in the way the USA does. Alliance between Europe and India would certainly help both.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kinda like the old colonization, but I think this time the European Union has good intentions on getting them back on their good side.
      Firstly, even if the European Union had good intentions, that wouldn't matter: it would be European corporations, not the superstate that 'industrialised' the place. And corporations aren't well known for letting 'good intentions' cloud the issue. Secondly, global corporations are already 'industrialising' India, if by industrialisation you mean mass exploitation and environmental destruction. Best example is Coca-Cola, which has been systematically draining Indian water tables to the point that they become polluted with seawater and undrinkable, leaving communities without drinking water. Then they pipe toxic waste into the rivers... Industrialisation is nothing to look forward to, ESPECIALLY if it's industrialisation by foreign multinationals. And, as someone else said - incidentally - the British state is on very good terms with the indian one, authorising the sale of huge amounts of military technology to them every year.
    9. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Ariane Space != ESA != EU != European corporations. If it's cheaper to use Indian rockets, just do it!

      Despite US-FUD, Europe is actually _less_ protectice than the USA.

    10. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot had an article a short whlie ago, which amongst other things stated that India had given a substantial amount of money to the European Galileo GPS system. I can't remember how many sattelites are proposed, but if India is to be a partner, as they insist, maybe this is a trial and ISRO will be a major launcher.

    11. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India has far more wealth than you realise. Most of which is in the pocket of a few uppercaste upperclass nasty folks. Me having a billion dollars does not help my pauper neighbour. Having wealth does not mean most Indians are well-off. Who are you fooling anyway ?

    12. Re:Competition by stupidheaddorkus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we will be 'friends' with UK once they apologise and give us back what is ours. As for an industrial colonisation of India by the EU, what utter crap!!! No they don't have good intentions, India is one of the top countries in the way of doctors and compsci people. So I think we can actually become sufficiently industrialised on our own rather than sell out and be puppets of stupid people whose greater interest it is to ruin countries and screw people over. Sorry, but Indians think pretty strongly about this kind of thing. We are lucky that we haven't turned out worse, but almost every country that UK, Europe and the US have touched have ended up ravaged and they have nothing for their futures. So once they get over their need for power and for ruling things and countries that don't even belong to them, maybe people will be more forthcoming. Ta

  5. And the next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsourcing India's jobs to the moon ! I'm sure they already have that in mind...

    1. Re:And the next step... by A.Chwunbee · · Score: 0

      I was in meeting last week with some of the fine American programmers, who are kindly delaying their ambitions in restaurant working so that they can be explaining to us how their jolly old system is working. And how to do this "programming" thing, is wery wery hard. No wonder they are preferring to be waiters! One was saying: "What do you call three Indians on the moon? A start!" Oh dearie me, how I was laughing! Could someone please be explaining it? Thank you esteemed Sahbs.

      --
      select * from base where originalOwner = 'you' and currentOwner != 'us'.
      0 rows returned.
  6. On the plus side... by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even a failed mission can function as an impactor.

    1. Re:On the plus side... by benchbri · · Score: 0

      Especially when they seem to be sending something designed with MS Paint...

    2. Re:On the plus side... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Even a failed mission can function as an impactor.

      "This is mission control. Stop screaming and report everything you can right up to the last second. Sheesh."

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  7. New outsourcing ideas. by millwall · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure this is just the first step to outsource NASA to India.

    1. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It's about EU vs. the US.

    2. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I'm sure you're gonna be modded up for saying something as silly as this. Never underestimate a good conspiracy theory to get karma here...

      NASA won't "outsource" anything, they'll partner with India perhaps, like they partnered with Russia to have access to Baikonur. That means the US would have access to more space facilities at comparatively little extra cost, and on the political scale, India would become a closer US ally.

      But does it mean people in Houston or Cape Canaveral would get sacked because their jobs would be taken over by some Indian workers? of course not, silly. Especially since these guys are highly skilled, and because they're paid with tax dollars, which means they're kind of protected against the forces of free market. Not to mention the sensitive aspect of NASA politically.

      So stop your karma-whoring and go back into your troll box...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 0

      NASA won't "outsource" anything, they'll partner with India perhaps

      I seriously doubt there will ever be any kind of cooperation there, just read my reply to the grandparent post...

    4. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > NASA won't "outsource" anything, they'll
      > partner with India perhaps, like they
      > partnered with Russia to

      "Partnered with" as in "hemmoraghed cash to", to 1. keep Rooskie scientists with a good salary so they don't sell atom bombs to terrorists or 3rd world countries, and 2. allow the Rooskies to save face as their communist empire collapsed. "See? We are partnered with the world and produce valuable stuff for the international space program!"

      Which turned out to be useful with the recent shuttle problems. :(

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      "hemmoraghed cash to"

      More like, pay them out of your spare change, whilst USG haemorrhage cash to NASA.

      The entire Russian space program is a teeny, tiny fraction of the size of NASA.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      So stop your karma-whoring and go back into your troll box..

      It's a joke. Laugh.

      Seriously, get off your fucking high horse and quit trying to refute a point that wasn't even made. Look how many stories and discussions we have on slashdot about outsourcing to india. It's only natural to want to crack a joke about outsourcing to india in this article. If anyone is a karma whore or a troll here, it's you, for trying to start a big argument WHEN THERE ISN'T ONE. It's a joke for fuck's sake. Take your methadone and calm down.

    7. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of all the replies ... some of you might have noticed the first letter in ESA is "E" as in Europe and *_not_* NA as in "North America" or "US" as in "U Suck" ;)

    8. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure you're gonna be modded up for saying something as silly as this. Never underestimate a good conspiracy theory to get karma here...

      Are you really so fucking stupid that you couldn't recognize it as a joke?

    9. Re:New outsourcing ideas. by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      The "NA" in "NASA" stands for "National Aeronautics [and]," not "North America."

  8. Problems by wertarbyte · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Bangalore, we have a problem..." - "Please describe your problem." - "We are leaking oxygen" - "Try restarting your landing computer" (Yes, I know this mission is not manned)

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Yes, I know this mission is not manned)

      Then who are you talking to?

    2. Re:Problems by sch7572 · · Score: 1

      "Moscow, we have a problem..."
      "Please describe your problem."
      "Our landing shuttle blew up..."
      "Wait, we'll send you one of our soyuz capsules.." (Yes, I know they're made in Russia.)

    3. Re:Problems by Dabido · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Bangalore, we have a problem..." - "Please describe your problem." - "We are leaking oxygen" - "Try restarting your landing computer"

      Doesn't happen till Chandrayan XIII, (as you know) and it actually goes like this:
      "Bangalore, we have a problem..."
      "Please describe your problem."
      "We're leaking oxygen"
      "Okay, I am raising an incident number for you, please write this down. 9856134. If a service technician doesn't contact you within twenty four hours, please phone back quoting the incident number."
      "But, we're losing oxygen fast! We need assistance NOW!"
      "I will put it down as urgent, but our service level agreement did specify a twenty four hour turn around on any problem. If you need assistance badly, you will have to purchase Gold or Platinum support."
      "Can you put me through to your manager?"
      "I am sorry, he is in a meeting at the moment. You can call back in an hour when he will be available?"
      "Okay, I'll purchase the damn platinum support! How much is it?"
      "I do not know that answer. I will put you through to the sales team. Please hold. If you get cut off, you can phone back but press option two when you are asked for the department."

      CLICK RIIIIIIING RIIIIIIIING CLICK

      "Hello, this is the sales department. All our sales technicians are currently busy. You have been put in a priority queue. Your call is important to us, so please hold the line. At present the the waiting time is [Robotic voice] - TWO - HOURS [Human voice] ,so please stay on the line and a sales technician will be with you shortly."

      CLICK BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP

      [On the spaceship Chandrayan XIII]

      "So Captain, what do they say?"
      "They say we're gonna die!"

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  9. Congratulations to India by a3217055 · · Score: 0

    Congratulations to India,
    This is a great progress for Indian Space technology, maybe this will allow India to get recognition as a player in the so called space exploration, it is suprising to see a country with such a large portion of its population in poverty. How it will help the average man it will cause an economic boom / investment into a new field. I am very happy to see India move into this field it might cause the _caucasian_ western nations; which rather spend its money on coquering other nations and torture people for _intelligence_ and supporting puppet goverments rethink there roles and understand that the future of humanity lies in the stars. Even if they have done this before just because they are pioneers don't make it that they are the best. Even if the natives of America came from Asia/Europe/Africa/Australasia it really doesn't matter they never got to rule the land that they discovered.... ( I wonder what happened to the all the Native Americans /me looks around hoping to find a native american)

    Jai Hind

    1. Re:Congratulations to India by faragon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can not see any intelectual differences between a human from India and other from "western nations" or from any other point of the world. May be your intentions are good or enthusiastic, but your argumentation it is weak by design.

      My best wishes to every single human in the world. I hope some day we'll live as one ;-)

    2. Re:Congratulations to India by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      In terms of outdated racial types, India is also populated by Caucasians.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Congratulations to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, now when the _other world_ is getting up to the speed (and may overtake you), its time to talk about _every single human in the world_!

      (It goes like this: Holly shit! we tortured, tormented, murdered, raped every fucking human being from this arsehole third world countries, they should not even exist anymore! Fuck, LOOK!! They have got a space program???? JESUS... LOOK!!! They will land on the moon now!! FUCK! THEY HAVE TOO GOT NUCLEAR ARSENAL!!! What do we do now??? Okay, its time to have a common goal towards betterment of humanity! he he he...)

      this stinks with hypocrisy!

    4. Re:Congratulations to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also goes like this:

      Holly shit! we tortured, tormented, murdered, raped every low-caste and/or female human living in our own land for 4000+ years and reduced it into a third world country, they should not even exist anymore! God, LOOK!! They have 1.1 billion people now and are still rising. And most of them drink polluted water, breathe polluted air, either don't get to eat much or eat crappy, greasy contaminated food, don't have any rights, are mired in oppressive caste/sex/color/religion-discrimination based criminal "culture". Time to fool our own people with tales of "technological progress" and "space travel".

    5. Re:Congratulations to India by faragon · · Score: 1

      ?! Please, don't misunderstand me, my parents got me a humanistic education, then, for me, a human is a human, with paying no attention where he/she lives. I do not became "humanist" by fear, but by a clean -and I hope I'm honest with myself- desire for welfare and dignity for every single person, despite his color or religion (in case he/she has).

      Think about your second paragraph, still anonymous, I can feel hate in your words. Don't think other people as the "enemy", people is just people: feeling pain, fear, etc. just like you and I. Best regads.

    6. Re:Congratulations to India by changcho · · Score: 1

      Indeed, congratulations to India, and hoping for more Indian missions in the future...

  10. Who needs the Quik-E-Mart by AussieBastard · · Score: 3, Funny
    "How accurately the impactor will land could be a technological trial for future soft landings"
    In other words, the space equivalent of "thank you, come again"?
    1. Re:Who needs the Quik-E-Mart by scarish · · Score: 1

      When a huge meteoroid hits earth and US, UK and India will be leaving earth on their spacecrafts, aussies will be drinking tinnies in the outback getting ready for the fireworks!

  11. Priorities by talaphid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bleh. Why do people always argue the "big picture" concept against the allegedly "small picture" argument? It'll never get traction - it isn't ignorance stopping people from agreeing with you, it's indifference. How tangible is the notion of a "better" society? Bleh.

    No, the argument is people starving and money spent on a space program being wasteful so address it as such. A NASA engineer requires a lot of expertise, and is employed, therefore the Indian equivelent very likely requires a lot of expertise and is employed. Said expertise requires higher education - you've just employed a professor or five. Said expert's income can go towards housing and food - you've just employed a carpenter and a farmer... yes. Noone is going to eat a space module, but the persons responsible for mining the materials to construct it are, as are the people who constructed it, support it...

    Great Depression in the US was at an impasse because economic thinking before then was the immature cognitive process that produces the fallacy of immediate needs spending. Sometimes you gotta borrow money to make money ("You gotta spend money to make money." well if you've got no money...) - and on the scale of an economy, borrowing money is national jobs no matter how "crazy" - artists on government payroll, eccet.

    1. Re:Priorities by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      But if that same Indian engineer was building say better housing it would help more people. Or maybe some new farming equipment, etc.

      However, that same engineer would probably then just go to the US since while space work is interesting designing some farming equipment isn't (nor does it help India's morale) so he might as well get paid better.

      If I'm not mistaken once we start going down this line we get a static communist state where everyone is mostly happy however little goes forward.

      Everyone who bitches about the space program need to look at themselves and what "useless" things the government does and they enjoy. If you want to cut away useless funding that doesn't help people then I'd start by killing all government contribution to the arts (doesn't help anyone), then sports (same; I mean at all levels), etc.

    2. Re:Priorities by eraserewind · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A NASA engineer requires a lot of expertise, and is employed, therefore the Indian equivelent very likely requires a lot of expertise and is employed. Said expertise requires higher education - you've just employed a professor or five. Said expert's income can go towards housing and food - you've just employed a carpenter and a farmer... yes. Noone is going to eat a space module, but the persons responsible for mining the materials to construct it are, as are the people who constructed it, support it...
      I'm sorry, regardless of whether the Indian Space project is a good idea, your argument is no good. Everything you have said could equally be applied to building enormous statues of elephants (white ones perhaps). If you pump enough money into anything it will of course create a local support economy, but ultimately if it lacks a tangible return on investment, it will bankrupt you in the long run.

      Whatever national benefits an Indian space program are going to generate they are not going to come from the simple fact of pumping in money to the program. They might come form increased national pride, or from increased technical or manufacturing skills that others are willing to buy, or breakthroughs in research that are valuable in the real world, and so on. However there is a perfectly valid case to be made that expertise and those resources ought to be applied in more sensible areas of the economy.
    3. Re:Priorities by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1


      But if that same Indian engineer was building say better housing it would help more people. Or maybe some new farming equipment, etc.


      You want an rocket scientist designing houses?


      Sorry mr Jones, your wife and family died because a tile fell of your house.


      Let 'em build stuff for the cannon fodder^w^w cosmo/astro/spatio/taikonauts to use!

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:Priorities by clonan · · Score: 1

      There are LOTS of programs that were funded with no real anticipation of "tangible" returns.

      Radio for example. Early mechanical computers (which of course were later copied into electronic versions). Automobiles...etc

      Most of the really MAJOR technologies we use today were once pipedreams that a few people thought were neat but NEVER thought it would turn into anything.

      The advantage of BASIC RESEARCH (which is what space exploration is) is that it will ALWAYS produce results in the long run. The down side is that it might be 10-20-100 years away.

  12. Impactor.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't know what method they will be using to choose the impact spot for the impactor.. I hope they wait until the data has been gathered by the onboard instruments and choose a spot where there is likely some water-ice.

    This way when the impact happens hopefully their spectrometer would be able to detect the vapor and finally(hopefully) confirm that theory.

    -

  13. India is a attention seeker by Hosting+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    First it was the 2Mbit/s for $2.30USD now its the Moon landing Mission

    --
    For FREE NO ADS! 1GB/20GB PHP MySQL With a Control Panel Hosting
    1. Re:India is a attention seeker by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      an

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:India is a attention seeker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, insensitive cloUd ;-)

    3. Re:India is a attention seeker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray tell me where you heard of 2 Mbps @ US$2.30? Leased links in India still cost a HUGE amount of money (like .. 3000 US$ per month for a 2 Mbit pipe). I'll gladly buy a 2 Mbps pipe at 10$ per month also .. just tell me ;)

  14. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racist Troll :- Intersting that you may say that not once did the poster say that Indians were far superior than rest of the world because they were such a good group of people investing in space exploration than any other group or ethnic race of people. They rather spend there resources on something else, I believe this is known as opportunity cost. The Indian goverment chose to spend money on something else rather than something else such as irrigation for agricultural land, fighting disease, education etc. All I am saying is look at the facts did the post say something that might be racist and also if you thing that is so that I am being racist think again you might want to be me one day in Alabama.

  15. Telemedicine by muditgarg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article talks about plans to introduce telemedicine through satlellites. This move , if successful could have far-reaching effects in India , especially since even basic healthcare facilities are out of reach for many in rural India. What is also commendable is that organisations using this for social good would not be charged for the service

    1. Re:Telemedicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hospitals in India have already implemented TeleMedicine. Check out :
      Apollo
      If u r in America , might wanna check out the homepage, so u can reduce ur bills. ;)

  16. Nothing New!!!!!!!! by muditgarg · · Score: 0, Troll

    The specific areas of study for India's moon mission listed here seem not to be aiming to do anything that has not been attempted or studied in detail in the past.
    Therefore the arguement that the money being spent is for scientific advancement doesnt hold.

  17. Congratulations to your comment... by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    i normally wouldn't reply to obvious flamebait, but i can't help it on this one occasion. (feel free to mod this down as it's only half on topic and entirely a reply to the parent)

    yes it's nice that india is doing this sort of thing, though i would personally rather see them spend their money more of on the planet earth and developing their nation. this WONT help the majority of their population, at least not within the next 20+ years. space research and exploration is a field with no guarenteed profits and nor even guarenteed information gained, and typically programs end up deep in the red but with some decent amounts of good research gained. I personally think India should stick to satellites in relation to space as satellites can bring real profit and truly help the Indian economy (and slow down or stop the damnable IT outsourcing) but i'm also obviously not leading a nation.

    offtopic: as for the obvious hate rant at the United States and company. I won't say anyone is perfect, and most things in the united states are anything but perfect, but we could dish trash about any nation's past or even current policy, and native americans weren't mostly killed by US soldier's weapons, but instead by diseases (namely smallpox), the same way the aztecs and other centeral/south american natives were whiped out by spaniards and the other european nations exploring.
    the United States is not this big evil nation out to do everyone in and make itself godly. real people live there too, the same as you, they bleed, they work hard, they live life. we're just a nation working as a nation with a government that is working as it is, albeit not always as well as everyone hopes, but it still is the government we americans choose to use. if you truly believe that what a some people in a government, a very tiny percentage of a population, for a very shot period (4 to 8 years), do is a good reason to bad mouth, to practically hate, hundreds of millions of humans with different ideas and beliefs; then i feel sorry for you on so many levels it's not even funny.
    </rant>

    1. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by Triskele · · Score: 1
      I couldn't let this flamebait ride....
      he United States is not this big evil nation out to do everyone in and make itself godly. real people live there too, the same as you, they bleed, they work hard, they live life. we're just a nation working as a nation with a government that is working as it is, albeit not always as well as everyone hopes, but it still is the government we americans choose to use. if you truly believe that what a some people in a government, a very tiny percentage of a population, for a very shot period (4 to 8 years)
      Sorry mate, but that tiny percentage controls most of your wealth and power and is using it in very unpleasant ways round the rest of the globe. Sure most USAians just want the nice life but at what cost to everyone else? And at the end of the day you're a democracy. If you elect bastards be prepared to be judged as bastards.
      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    2. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we do some bad things, but we also invented the transistor and the microprocessor. We gave GPS and the internet to the world basically for free.

      And then there's always Paris Hilton, Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears, etc. I'm not particularly fond of them myself, but if the google zeitgeist is anything to go on, they are internationally quite popular.

    3. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by Ostie · · Score: 1

      You do realize that what pushed the advancement of these technologies in the US is the U.S. Army ? computers = Military calculation Internet = DARPA GPS = "on June 26, 1993, the U.S. Air Force launched the 24th Navstar satellite into orbit, completing a network of satellites known as the Global Positioning System"

    4. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by Ostie · · Score: 1

      Btw, I could add Paris Hilton, Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears as psychological war tools, they drive us nuts. :p

    5. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by lime1304 · · Score: 1

      The US Air Force also built the Titan IV that launched Cassini-Huygens to Saturn, just like it does every vehicle launched from Cape Canaveral. Does that make it a military project? Technical innovation has always piggybacked on military necessity, from radio, to ENIACS, to the global Internet. The US just happens to be better at it than just about anyone else. Most people just deal with it, or give it little thought.

    6. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by Ostie · · Score: 1

      Titan IV were developed to launch secret NRO cargos and other stuff by the military(last launch will be one btw http://spaceflightnow.com/titan/b30/040825rollout. html). It's less expensive for the NASA to have a deal with the U.S. Air Force than having to build 2 separate projects to do the same thing. It's just that it's less expensive to have 1 contract than 2 separate one for the governement.

    7. Re:Congratulations to your comment... by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      a little over a third of the US population voted and bush didn't win the popular vote the first term, and probably shouldn't have become president, but he did. That's how the system works, it's not perfect, but it gets it's job done usually.
      and the encumbent almost always wins the second term. (and still only around 51? 52% of popular vote iirc) [further proof the US is split right down the middle on most issues today]

      i'm not saying my nation is better than anyone elses nation (and there are some nations with a FAR worse moral past if i wanted to get into that), i'm just saying you guys give us a bum wrap and never look at the good we do too.
      i'm of the opinion the US should just become self-sufficient and leave the rest of the world alone, minus maybe some of our close allies like britain and such. no more aid. no more technology. no more help to developing nations. no more military aid to nations. if we can move away from an oil-based society we could do it rather easily too. hmph.

      and i'm curious about these unpleasant ways our resources are being used around the globe...besides the controversial war on iraq that i personally don't agree with, what are we doing bad out there at the moment?

  18. PostBlock censorship devise thwarted again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    it must have a humour componeNT?

    insidious whoreabully infactdead PostBlock censorship devise update (Score:mynuts won, post 'em if you gott 'em)
    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 30, @06:44AM (#11519131)

    not even politically motivated, robbIE MiSuses this junk just to protect his monIE supply (yet another example of how way too much is never enough), &/or his greed/fear/ego based felonious stock markup FraUD execrable cronIEs/sponsors.

    all in all, senseless greed motivated censorship could only delay the inevitable, which is freedom of speech, one of the mandates of the creators' wildly popular planet/population rescue initiative.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators, rebuilding declining civilizations since/until forever. see you there?

  19. At least we know by camcloud1 · · Score: 0

    that it will be manned 24/7, all the expiring space food will rotated to the front and if any of the astronauts need a break there will always be a family member ready to help out...

  20. from the cosmic-curry dept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does every comment about Indian or Chinese space mission really have to have comments about takeaways on the moon etc... ? It's offensive and juvenile, and it's sad Slashdot can't move beyond this.

  21. SABOTAGE! by Agret · · Score: 1

    If you never hear anything about this again don't worry about it the US have just eliminated the team so there is no evidence that they were never really on the moon.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:SABOTAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell are u talking about. the US landed on one moon. hell, if you have a good enough telescope, you can see where they left the bottom half of the landers

    2. Re:SABOTAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call your bluff. A url with clear images of said landers please. Thanks.

    3. Re:SABOTAGE! by calyxa · · Score: 1

      dunno about photos of the landers taken from Earth-based telescopes, but the experiments with the laser targets ought to count for something...

      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
  22. This'll never work we all know there is no moon by Agret · · Score: 1

    Everyone know that this mission will fail.
    Simply beacuse there is no moon

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  23. Re Spending Money on Poor People by anand78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait a second, this is 101% wrong. India does spend money on poor. But as you know for spending money you need to generate it first. And no indian satellite program is used for "educational" purposes unlike western countries.
    Now coming to Western countries, well in the name of free trade agreement all the western countries have done is to ensure that the latest technologies are so costly that developing countries are forced not to use it. The whole Drug patent thing that India had to subscribe to made our generic drugs costlier than what a person would earn in a whole months of work.
    In terms of technology transfers it is pathetic even mundane things like a microwave oven is a thing of luxury for many Indians.
    Talk about environment we have all the players like Mercedes, Chevvy, Hyundai, Toyota none of the companies give clean cars to India. If they do its cost is equal to 20 years of a common mans salary.
    Moral of the story If the western counrtries dont help us we help ourselves.

    1. Re:Re Spending Money on Poor People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      --- "Mercedes, Chevvy, Hyundai, T..."

      How is it you can spell Mercedes and Hyundi (huh?) but not Chevy?

    2. Re:Re Spending Money on Poor People by kaalamaadan · · Score: 1
      And no indian satellite program is used for "educational" purposes unlike western countries.

      I don't catch the point here, but EDUSAT is an Indian Educational Satellite.

  24. The Brazilian Spacial Program by michelcultivo · · Score: 2, Informative

    EUA has giving more attention to Brazil on the Satellite Vehicle Launching, because the base of Alcântara is so near the Equator line reducing the use of gas to launch the roquets.

  25. Funny! Dell is taking the Support Calls for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Funny that Dell is taking the Support Calls for this. What comes around goes around. Pretty soon, we'll all be speaking Hindi-apu and bowing to dancing elephants and 6-armed she-gods.

    I can't wait!

  26. Another Moon Landing? by thygrrr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Thank you, come again!"

  27. Biggest Problem by RequestTimedOut · · Score: 1

    The biggest hurdle is in keeping the camels oxygenated when pulling around the landing rover.

    1. Re:Biggest Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're getting your stereotypes mixed up. Camels are for Middle Eastern jokes.

    2. Re:Biggest Problem by acb · · Score: 1

      Camels? I think you're off by a few thousand miles.

      I know, all those damn furriners look the same...

    3. Re:Biggest Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and maybe an "exhaust" problem too!

  28. Just trying to add some credence... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ...to the oft heard comment, "Jeezus, where is your call center - on the MOON?!"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  29. Slashdot...for americans only ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm.... it seems that usa has got no poors. no one is poor in america.
    check this out buddy ....
    http://www.usccb.org/cchd/povertyusa/povfacts.htm

    i think usa has got its own shares of problems. After all, how many nations are there in this world where people are discriminated based on there _skin color_ ?

    skin color ?? HA HA HA....thats INSANE !!!

    When i was in high school, i read story about Muhammad Ali. It was shocking ! He had to throw away his olympic gold medal into a river because of rascism ( cant recall the name of that river).

    And this is the nation where people's favorite hobby is ridiculing others...atleast thats what i have seen at slashdot !

    they think that chinese people have pony tails, every indian wears a turban, and that every russian is a spy. but its not like that !

    I think, its time that slashdot should mention on there main page that this site is for americans only.

    1. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by j0e_average · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you'd post your rebuttal as AC.
      I assume the information contained in your link is accurate, and it's not surprising. However, I must point out that people living below the poverty line within the US are still far better off than impoverished citizens of third-world countries. Additionally, people are willing to risk life and limb just to get into the US to live and work illegally, even if it means living below the poverty line.
      Why? Because the US still offers one thing that you won't get in most other countries (including INDIA) -- opportunity to rise above your current status -- above the poverty line.

      It is this that makes the US great. Unfortunately, a lot of our own citizens and even members of the Congress have forgotten this fact.

    2. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by lime1304 · · Score: 1

      i think usa has got its own shares of problems. After all, how many nations are there in this world where people are discriminated based on there _skin color_ ?

      How many nations...besides ALL of them?
      http://www.adventuredivas.com/dispatches/ar ticle.v iew?page=225
      http://www.friesian.com/caste.htm

      The US has its set of unique problems due to its history. As difficult as it has been, the US has chosen to deal with them. Don't think for a minute those problems are indigenous to the US. There are plenty of racists to go around, especially from more "civilized" peoples in Europe and Asia.

    3. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I thought he threw his medal into the Ohio River to protest the Vietnam War.

    4. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by nbeharrytt · · Score: 1

      While i agree that being impoverished in a 'third world country' are opposed to impoverished in the US is different, the matter of if the person is far better off i disagree. The one main reason people are willing to risk life and limb to get in to the US to live and work is mostly due to the perceived imporovement in their life they hope to gain. For some it is ture and for others it is not. In which case the come back disgusted with the US way of life. As for rising above the poverty line it all depends on where you are here where i live it is possible to rise above the poverty line but what is lacking in most cases is a lack of will power to do so.

    5. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      No that was John Kerry :-)

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    6. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      americans dont know much about america .....

    7. Re:Slashdot...for americans only ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you still cannot accept africans as americans..can you ? ;)

      I often see songs on MTV etc and it seems that african people are really pissed off by white americans !

      I often get to hear "my black a**" etc etc ... :D
      atleast they dont look happy :D

      btw..where did you get that gita link ??? that stuff is weird. some kinda "hippy" version of gita i think ???

      americanized version of gita ?? :D

  30. You missed one by CmdrGravy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Treatment

  31. This is great news... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Once India has its space program up and running, we can outsource NASA to India. That'll save us a fortune! I'm sure those rocket scientists will be able to get work at their local Wal-Marts.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  32. Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next battleground will be space. India wants to have a space program so that they can wipe out Pakistan with spaceships and satellites.

  33. Indian priorities by afarhan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have had enough of crap about India.

    It is time you all woke up to and figured out that USA is as bad as any other country.

    We may have more illiterates than any other country in the world, but you forget that India also has the largest number of engineers. More Indians can speak English than there are people in the entire USA. Think about that.

    We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth. Then we were split up into two countries and made to go at each other's throat. The Indo-Pak cold war has cost us an entire civilization.

    Our political system is bankrupt. Most politicians are plain goons. But we also have the vision to elect a woman to rule us. Every second President of India is from the minorities. How many black presidents, how many women presidents has USA had? How about a Jew for the Prez?

    I find it very surprising that most of the posts talk about Indian Poverty. It certainly points to the assumption that money according to American values is what defines a person. That is simply not a simple truth for many places in the world.

    --
    The purpose of all philosophers was to impress women
    1. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up and get back to work. Some's calling for tech support on your line.

    2. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is time you all woke up to and figured out that USA is as bad as any other country.

      Of course it is. Every country works in its best interest.

      We may have more illiterates than any other country in the world, but you forget that India also has the largest number of engineers. More Indians can speak English than there are people in the entire USA. Think about that.

      That's not a very big feat when you consider that India breeds out of control and has the 2nd largest population on Earth. It is nobody else's responsibility to feed your children when you keep reproducing beyond your means.

      We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth.

      No you weren't.

      Then we were split up into two countries and made to go at each other's throat. The Indo-Pak cold war has cost us an entire civilization

      Yeah, the US has never had to deal with that... cough, Civil War, cough. That destroyed us, but we got back on our feet and were a major player in less than 30 years.

      Our political system is bankrupt. Most politicians are plain goons. But we also have the vision to elect a woman to rule us.

      So is ours. But in a democracy, you need to elect someone that can do the job. Just because you elected a woman doesn't mean that she's not a goon. Maybe you just elected a female goon.

      Every second President of India is from the minorities. How many black presidents, how many women presidents has USA had? How about a Jew for the Prez?

      That's nice, but electing a minority doesn't really address the problem that you have. You should concentrate instead on electing the best person, namely someone who isn't a goon. You guys are just voting for majority goons, minority goons, male goons, and female goons. It's not helping you.

      I'd vote for the best person for the job, regardless of what they look like. I'm not going to simply vote for a minority just because they're a minority, the "underdog".

    3. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More Indians can speak English than there are people in the entire USA. Think about that.

      Yeah, but your porn sucks.

    4. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      More Indians can speak English than there are people in the entire USA. Think about that.

      If you call that speaking English..

    5. Re:Indian priorities by AshuBhai · · Score: 1

      We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth.

      No you weren't.

      Well here's some food for thought:

      http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2003/10/21/the-fli ght-to-india/

    6. Re:Indian priorities by Alomex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We are not poor due to our stupidity.

      Of course, it is always someone else's fault: the jews, the immigrants, the bourgeois class, those cheap Indian laborers stealing our jobs, those prison camp Chinese working for free, the great satan, the Turks, the yankees.

      Oneself is always blameless, after all what control do we have over our own life and country?

    7. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      It isn't in the US's best interest to make India rich. As soon as the common US worker (voter) gets pissed off about what's going on, we're going to change the policies.

      We are the ones holding the purse strings so the decision is ours to make. India can cry foul, but all they can do is cry.

    8. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will see about that. In the mean time, all US can do is register meek protests to china about their grossly undervalued currency ;-)

      common voter in the US -my ass. Your politicians are sold out to special interests long ago. You let corruption as a part of the system without thinking what it wud do to undermine democracy... so there. :-)

    9. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When amerikish can pass off as English, Hinglish does handsomely too.

    10. Re:Indian priorities by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth.

      No you weren't.

      The point is exaggerated, but the importance of India around 1905 was certainly tremendous. Africa, the Americas, these were sidelines; the British Empire, when you get right down to it, was India. Indian natural resources, Indian agriculture, Indian manpower, Indian soldiers - we forget it, but the Empire depended on India as much as it did on the mother country.

      Perhaps two to three hundred years ago, before colonialism got going, India might well have been the richest country in the world. The civilisation the built the Taj Mahal was hardly backward and poor.

      And all these advantages that made old India so rich and powerful and such a valuable prize for the British are still there. India isn't a big player now, but if they play their cards right they definitely will be before long.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    11. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd vote for the best person for the job, regardless of ... Like whom?...like George (no brains) W. Bush and his sycophants? Good job :-)

    12. Re:Indian priorities by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      And India shall rise again.

      India is the world's largest democracy, far more an example of the difficulties and successes of democracy than the US.

      disclaimer: I'm not Indian. I have no relationship with India, but I do admire the country.

    13. Re:Indian priorities by ehiris · · Score: 1

      Our political system is bankrupt

      Wait up, we're catching up. The US deficit is now a sixth of the Indian GDP.

    14. Re:Indian priorities by XchristX · · Score: 0

      NOt 100 years ago, but more like 1000+. We did have the highest standrd of living in the world from the 3rd to the seventh centuries.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    15. Re:Indian priorities by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth. Then we were split up into two countries and made to go at each other's throat. The Indo-Pak cold war has cost us an entire civilization.
      >
      >Our political system is bankrupt. Most politicians are plain goons. But we also have the vision to elect a woman to rule us. Every second President of India is from the minorities. How many black presidents, how many women presidents has USA had? How about a Jew for the Prez?

      Apart from a Jewish guy as President, I'm confused. Were you talking about India or the US up there? We not only elected H.R. Clinton and Condi Rice as President, we re-elected both of 'em!

    16. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Perhaps two to three hundred years ago, before colonialism got going, India might well have been the richest country in the world. The civilisation the built the Taj Mahal was hardly backward and poor.

      The Indian civilization during that time was pretty backwards and poor.

      I think it escapes a lot of people that the civilization that built the Taj Mahal was not Indian. It was built by the Mughals, an Islamic civilization that had conquered India. The Taj Mahal is not Indian, it is Islamic.

    17. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 0, Troll

      Like whom?...like George (no brains) W. Bush and his sycophants? Good job :-)

      I just got done saying that I'd vote for the best person for the job. That means that I did not vote for Bush.

    18. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not a very big feat when you consider that India breeds out of control and has the 2nd largest population on Earth. It is nobody else's responsibility to feed your children when you keep reproducing beyond your means.


      Exactly. since you are not going to feed us ...why the fuc* are you people posting negative comments about india and telling us what to do ?

      And who cares about what you say btw ? This a democracy my dear. Nobody gives a fuckin damn what you think and how a nation has to be ruled. Let people speeek for themselves.

      I am sick and tired of some lamer posting about india and starting a flame war.

      Please! NO MORE POSTING ABOUT INDIA!
    19. Re:Indian priorities by dutt · · Score: 1
      I think it escapes a lot of people that the civilization that built the Taj Mahal was not Indian.

      You need to get your facts straight.

      The Taj Mahal is very Indian. By the way, did you look up Islamic in your atlas? You might have trouble finding that country there.

    20. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love american grannies sucking ***

    21. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      You need to get your facts straight.

      I do have my facts straight. As I stated in my post, the Taj Mahal was built by the Mughals.

      India was conquered, much from within, by the Mughals, who were descendents of Mongol, Turkic, Persian, and Afghan warriors.

    22. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have my facts straight. As I stated in my post, the Taj Mahal was built by the Mughals.

      Mughals are Indian. Why? Read-on. They might have come from neighboring regions (India was at one point at far on the west as Afganistan) and there was no international border like what is today. Mughals settled in India for centuries and made it their home just like Europeans (and others) settled in North America and made it their home. Mughals assimilated in Indian culture and Indian culture assimilated them. On the other hand, the British never made India theor home. India has one of the biggest muslim populations (exceprt countries like Indonesia) and they are Indian. India was rich before and during Mughal reign until British came, robbed and destroyed the natural resources....
      If you want, you can read the history of what the British saw when they first came to India to do trade. They were shocked the amount of wealth in India. Over 3 centuries, they along with other colonialists like french and portuguese divided and plundered India and caused extreme damage to environment. Mughals never did what British did to India and practically made India their home.

    23. Re:Indian priorities by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Better than you can speak Indianese.

    24. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got it right dude!!!!!!!

    25. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I'd vote for the best person for the job, regardless of what they look like.

      And you want me to believe that, it is just by chance that in 300 years or so, you did not find a single better person for the job who looks different.

    26. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for building Taj Mahal, they brought the money from Mongol, Turkey, Persia etc., right?

    27. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No amount of excuses is going to revise history and make Hindu Indians the builders of the Taj Mahal.

    28. Re:Indian priorities by jsantos · · Score: 1

      Hello, I'm curious about something about India and perhaps you could help me lessen my ignorance. Is there still a cast system in place in India? Please don't take offense in this question, if you answer it in good faith you will lessen my ignorance a bit. If there is still a cast system, does it play a role in Indian poverty?

      Thanks in advance,
      jorge

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    29. Re:Indian priorities by vistic · · Score: 1

      It doesn't officially exist... and as India becomes more "modern" (Westernized), it's becoming less and less... but the caste system is part of the culture, not law... and traditions don't just disappear overnight... caste can still play a role for example, in arranging marriages. And I guess the caste system is almost nonexistent in the cities... but in the small villages it may be a different matter entirely.

    30. Re:Indian priorities by jsantos · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for the answer. Discrimination is always a nasty burden for people and societies. I guess it will be present in India for a long time in one way or another (traditions thousands of years old don't die overnight), but the less there is of it, the better IMNSHO.

      Cheers,
      Jorge

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    31. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      And you want me to believe that, it is just by chance that in 300 years or so, you did not find a single better person for the job who looks different.

      I was not alive 300 years ago. How could that have been my responsibility? I've been a legal voter for the last 3 elections.

    32. Re:Indian priorities by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I have news for you dude, the US worker will soon be looking at the ass of India as it passes them by. As an American currently spending a month in India on business (my first visit), I have been struck by the work ethic, respect, and desire to get ahead these people have. None of that 'the government owes me' or 'the company owes me' BS that many US workers (especially union workers) espouse, but 'treat me right, or I'm outta here'. One of the largest problems companies have here is turnover rates, skilled and talented people move around like crazy if they aren't treated right.

      Hell, waiters at 5-start restaurants have 4 year degrees. They know they have to start at the bottom and work their way up, none of this 'I paid $100,000 for college, I deserve a job' crap I read here all the time. I had a very nice talk with the gentleman who services my room (and he was a true gentleman, not like the pissy US hotel staff) about his family and how proud he was that he had worked there for 18 years, starting at a very low, menial job and worked his way up. Yep...his job changing bed sheets he considered a great job, he was proud of it, and attacked it with the kind of attitude Americans could learn from, always a smile and eager to make my stay very pleasant. Know why?? The hotel recognizes good work and rewards the workers. It is very important if you ever visit here to tip the employees well that do a good job (they deserve a few rupees and you can afford it) and to know their name, and use it. Take the time to talk with them, say 'I don't understand' when you don't understand, they have the patience and courtesy (that many Americans lack) to help you learn. When you leave, be sure to fill out the comment form and put their name on it, that is how they get ahead, by doing their job well. Imagine that...just one of the many things both US employees and employers can learn from India. (Truth be told, I think Europe and Japan better start paying attention also.)

      Do I want to live here?? No, the infrastructure is not there and it is still a very volatile, sometimes dangerous country. But I plan on spending as much time here as possible, developing friendships and business relationships, and helping these people become an economic driving force in the world. They deserve it. And I plan to ride the wave and adapt instead of sitting back and whining.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    33. Re:Indian priorities by Muggermuch · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein of course, we must admit that there is no such thing as an American culture. The White House and all other symbols of American might were byproducts of British imperialism.

      The colonists were a mixture of Scots, Hibernians and Dutch, with a smattering of Britishers and French near the Atlantic coast.

      To repeat: The term "American culture" is a misnomer. It doesn't exist.
      Sorry folks, nothing to see here.

      Dude, besides getting your facts right, you also need to get a brain. It helps, sometimes. The gap between the Mughal invasion and the construction of the Taj Mahal was nearly a hundred years. If the American nation could be forged out of the disparate strands mentioned above in that same amount of time, the assimilation of the Mughals into a syncretic subcontinental Islamic culture would have taken much less time.

    34. Re:Indian priorities by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      Dude, the point is that India isn't just Hindus. We all know and admit that the Taj Mahal was comissioned by Shah Jahan in memoriam of his wife Mumtaz Mahal. The India that we talk about today is a secular state with a hugely diverse population coming from all sorts of different cultural and religious backgrounds. Indeed, the United States of America, self-proclaimed "melting pot of cultures" is, percentagewise, more Christian than India is Hindu!

    35. Re:Indian priorities by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      I do not think that afarhan was suggesting that it was "someone else's fault". Rather that society has allowed itself to be divided by a small minority (who happen to profit very well while everyone else is busy looking somewhere else).

      Somewhat like the situation in the US these past few years, yes?

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    36. Re:Indian priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he said that the USA was electing the best person for the job. Old white guys are the only ones with enough money to get elected here for some reason.

    37. Re:Indian priorities by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      You're quoting George Monbiot? The guy that thinks my sister-in-law is part of a commie conspiracy to destroy the world with global warming?

      (the fact that he's right(*) is not relevant, the guy's a fruitcake).

      ((*) both about my sister-in-law & outsourcing).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    38. Re:Indian priorities by acb · · Score: 1

      Mind you, in this case, he does have a point. The British Empire did cream off a lot of the wealth of India.

    39. Re:Indian priorities by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The British Empire did cream off a lot of the wealth of India.

      The same can be said about many other former colonies (Australia, Canada), yet those are back on their feet and doing quite well.

    40. Re:Indian priorities by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Somewhat like the situation in the US these past few years, yes?

      I don't think that is what he said. India, like the US, is a democracy. If Bush policies end up costing us our status as dominant power, then we all share the blame for that to a certain extent (some more than others).

    41. Re:Indian priorities by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the United States of America, self-proclaimed "melting pot of cultures" is, percentagewise, more Christian than India is Hindu!

      Really? Less than 49% of India is Hindu? I thought it would be higher than that.

    42. Re:Indian priorities by i41Overlord · · Score: 1


      Dude, besides getting your facts right, you also need to get a brain. It helps, sometimes.


      And nothing showcases your vast intelligence like an ad hominem attack.

      Well done.

    43. Re:Indian priorities by Muggermuch · · Score: 1

      And nothing showcases your vast intelligence like an ad hominem attack.
      Well done.

      Whoa! All of that, and no remarks about the point I made???
      Let me see now, let me see who's making the ad hominem attack.
      Oh, could it be poor lil' ol' me? :(

      Famous Last Words:
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.

      I rest my case.

    44. Re:Indian priorities by Vareck · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine a higher prioritie for India that to INVEST in the future of her own citizens. Eany space program will help India develop her economy, science and technology. So yes, its time for the Indian goverment to do something about the well-being of the Indian people, and starting a program that ensures a future input in both economic and human capital is the best anwser possible. Sacrifices will be made, but the end result will be a better India for the next generation. By the way, how about a little help getting the shuttle back in space?

      --
      Science, philosophy and wine, could there be eanything more human?
    45. Re:Indian priorities by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1
      "'Indeed, the United States of America, self-proclaimed "melting pot of cultures" is, percentagewise, more Christian than India is Hindu!'

      Really? Less than 49% of India is Hindu? I thought it would be higher than that."

      Where do you get that 49% number? People who voted for Bush? Last I checked, the U.S. was 84% Christian, while India was 81.3% Hindu. Upon re-checking the CIA World Fact Book, the new U.S. estimate is 76% or 78% (depending on whether you count Mormons as Christians) -- which makes my original claim wrong, but is still nowhere near your claim of 49%. Of course, this varies by region; where I live, it's probably more like 90-95% Christian (and they mostly voted for Democrats). If you want to go on an ethnic rather than religious basis, the largest group in India is Indo-Aryan, at 72%, while the largest group in the U.S. is white at 77.1%.

      All of this is not to say that any one place or group is better than another, but rather that they have more in common than one would like to think. If only we could understand this better, I think we could all be much better off. But until then, keep your guard up to avoid fervent irrationality in the name of race, religion or nationality.

    46. Re:Indian priorities by acb · · Score: 1

      The difference is that before the British arrived, India consisted of a number of wealthy kingdoms, which had a thriving trade-based economy. (Keep in mind that India is right in the centre of ancient east-west trade routes.) After the British came (well, some time into their stay), the wealth of a subjugated India was channelled back to London, and via there to building an empire. (Not that everything the British did was bad; for one, they did eliminate practices such as suttee and the thuggee cult. Though they did extract a hefty material price from India.)

      Australia, however, was predominantly nomadic hunter-gatherer societies, with little to plunder (not counting land); Australia has natural resources such as gold and iron ore, but the aborigines had not begun exploiting those. I'm not sure about Canada, though I doubt if the economic wealth of the Native American tribes would have been in the same league as the Mughals.

    47. Re:Indian priorities by Alomex · · Score: 1

      the wealth of a subjugated India was channelled back to London, and via there to building an empire.

      Sure they did, but that was almost 60 years ago. Moreover the wealth syphoned off was no larger than, say, the wealth syphoned off European countries by the destruction of World War II. The key difference was that those countries collectively set out to recover the lost wealth, while India collectively set out to establish a corrupt dynastic line of prime ministers that were unresponsive to the needs of the people.

  34. Re:I can see it now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn...

  35. Mission Norrath instead ? by Ostie · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/1899420. stm

    Norrath, the setting for the online game Everquest, has been found to be the 77th richest country in the world, sandwiched between Russia and Bulgaria.

    Online gaming has attracted millions of players and their rise in popularity in recent years is mainly down to improved graphics and more players to interact with.

    Research carried out in the United States shows that virtual internal markets, combined with illegal online trading on auction websites, mean that Norrath has a gross national product per capita of $2,266, bigger than China and India.

  36. What the...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't most discussions here offtopic? where are the mods?

  37. Re:Funny! Dell is taking the Support Calls for thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or continue praying to some old dude who loves you but sends floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, fire and brimstrone from time to time, while praying in God's language, English

  38. There is no ...? by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Simply beacuse there is no moon.

    Spoon, dude. There is no spoon .

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  39. Thank You for the Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?

    Thank you for putting some sanity and perspective back into the conversation. India has a number of hugely wasteful government programs: nuclear weapons, space program, etc. There is no way to defend the nuclear weapons program. The only way to defend the space program is by saying that it is turning a profit. Does anyone have a link to an article showing that it is turning a profit?

    Societies failed, are failing, or will fail for clearcut reasons. People in these societies make the wrong choices. There is no luck to success. It is merely hardwork and making the right choices.

    The best example to my mind is all the war-ravaged European countries after WWII and Japan. I am most familiar with Japan. It spent no money on a nuclear weapons program and almost no money on a space program. Virtually all the money spent by the government went to building the public infrastructure and industrial infrastructure of Japan.

    As for the mentality of the people, during 1945 - 1985, the majority of Japanese considered their own culture to be inferior to mainstream Western culture. Surprising? No. Admit the problem, and then you can solve it. Deny the problem, and it will never be solved. One characteristic of people in unsuccessful or poorly functioning societies is incredible, almost supremacist belief in the superiority of their cultures.

    Just look at all the defenders of Indian society on SlashDot. To them, Indians can do no wrong.

    Do you know what I admire most about Westerners (like Canadians, Japanese, etc.)? I often see them criticizing their own societies. Occasionally, there are huge protests. Martin Luther King is one of the best known protestors, and he was an awesome Westerner and rightly deserved his own holiday. Such criticism improves our Western societies in ways that a supremacist from India cannot understand.

    1. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did japanes became "Westerners"

      ha ha ..they will kick your shitty a** for calling them westerner !

    2. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way to defend the nuclear weapons program. The only way to defend the space program is by saying that it is turning a profit. Does anyone have a link to an article showing that it is turning a profit?

      then why is america doing the nuclear tests ?? AS far as i know they did the largest number of nuclear tests !

      nuclear tests do no good..you learn this after a thousand nuclear tests ???

      hilarious !!! lol.

    3. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many ills in India, just like in any society, but this time around the money is not wasteful and the criticism is grossly misplaced.

      If you consider that this is a supremist argument, god help you. I dont mind someone knowing enough about India (googling few articles doesnt help here -mind you) criticizing Indian policies, just like a westerner armed with sufficient knowledge of their society making criticism.
      But it is within reason to rubbish random arguments about spending money on wrong things, which you and your ilk of anti-India group is passing off here.
      India is making good progress in technology. It will be a technologically advanced nation in 20 yrs. This is just the waking of a slumbering giant. You better recognize that or you would be in the same mindset as people in the 60's about Japanese products. :-)

      Btw, Japan lost a war. They surrendered under the threat of obliteration. They were pretty well off technically otherwise. There was no problem there, except for the supremist part.

    4. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese are westerners in all but location.

      Look at their current popular culture for fuck's sake.

    5. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1


      There is no way to defend the nuclear weapons program.


      Welcome to our timline, stranger from an alternate reality. Here we have an interesting development, peace through MAD, that has prevented major war for over 50 years.


      The discovery for for the new millenium is that it works for everyone, not just members of the UN security council.


      Anyone who thinks nukes are a waste of money should ask Israel if it wants to give them up.


      Work for peace! Nukes for Iran now!

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Thank You for the Sanity by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      Rampant paedophilia is a sign of western culture?


      Hum, "Leon" was the only good film Portman was in, maybe you're right.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  40. Thank You for the Sanity by reporter · · Score: 0
    (Sorry for the duplicate articles. I did not intend to be anonymous for this particular article but accidentally hit the "submit" button before entering my username and password. I am getting old in years, so please give me a break.) How about putting the big bucks to help your own people?

    Thank you for putting sanity and perspective back into the conversation. India has a number of hugely wasteful government programs: nuclear weapons, space program, etc. There is no way to defend the nuclear weapons program. The only way to defend the space program is by saying that it is turning a profit. Does anyone have a link to an article showing that it is turning a profit?

    Societies failed, are failing, or will fail for clearcut reasons. People in these societies make the wrong choices. There is no luck to success. It is merely hardwork and making the right choices.

    The best example to my mind is all the war-ravaged European countries after WWII and Japan. I am most familiar with Japan. It spent no money on a nuclear weapons program and almost no money on a space program. Virtually all the money spent by the government went to building the public infrastructure and industrial infrastructure of Japan.

    As for the mentality of the people, during 1945 - 1985, the majority of Japanese considered their own culture to be inferior to mainstream Western culture. Surprising? No. Admit the problem, and then you can solve it. Deny the problem, and it will never be solved. One characteristic of people in unsuccessful or poorly functioning societies is incredible, almost supremacist belief in the superiority of their cultures.

    Just look at all the defenders of Indian society on SlashDot. To them, Indians can do no wrong.

    Do you know what I admire most about Westerners (like Canadians, Japanese, etc.)? I often see them criticizing their own societies. Occasionally, there are huge protests. Martin Luther King is one of the best known protestors, and he was an awesome Westerner and rightly deserved his own holiday. Such criticism improves our Western societies in ways that a supremacist from India cannot understand.

  41. Kudos India !!! by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's great news that India is developing the next stage of their space program beyond simple payload to orbit missions. Soon Iran, Brazil, Argentina, South Korea will cut the legs out of that sector of the business so NASA, the ESA, Japan, India and Russia will have to find new venues for their space programs. Scientific missions to the moon as proof of concept programs for new technology are a great first step.

  42. Space Program = tech advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't understand what the big deal is? So India is going to be a major player in the Space arena. Yes it would go head-to-head against NASA and would most likely build better/cheaper space related technologies as such an endeavor is bound to spur innovative ideas.

    You have to deal with this! It's called democracy!! If the Indian public are in favor of such and endeavor, then so be it. One could argue that the Apollo mission had no befits expect for national price. That's the bottom line. Sure it might have helped in building better weapon systems but one could also argue that this is a necessity for defending the nation. So such is the case for India as well! Every nation has the god given right to defend herself against any adversary be it legit or not. It was easier in the cold war era but in this day and age, proxy wars seems to be the norm. So by having advanced technologies in place, nations would think twice about engaging in illegal tactics (hint: US foreign policies).

    Sure India has a huge population living below the poverty line, but in the grand scheme of things does this population have any direct impact? A case in point is the block/hispanic population living in ghettos? Does the government actually care about the less privileges? Of course NOT!!

    Let's not get into endless debates about what's right for a country but rather focus on what benefits a country can derive from advanced in technology.

  43. A DOLLAR A DAY IS NOT CHEAP!!! by rkv · · Score: 1

    if u check the currency coversion a dollar is approximately 42 rupees. 42*31= 1302 which is more than enough for a farmer living in the outskirts to sruvive because of highly lowered rates and ration given by the government and that amount in the city is too low i agree but c'mon give them some credit all these things that India is doing will get them recognition from other counrties of the world and thats the main reason that their doin all this and too boost the already flourishing Indian economy.

  44. Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Indian infant mortality rate: 57.92 per 1000; US's: 6.63 per 1000.

    Indian life expectancy at birth: 63.99 years; US's: 77.43 years.

    Indian HIV's prevalence rate: 0.8%; US's: 0.6%.

    Indian literacy: Male: 70.2%, female: 48.3%; US's: Male: 97%, female: 97%.

    Indian GDP PPP: $2,900; US's: $37,800.

    Indian population below poverty line: 25%; US's: 12%.

    Indian household income share: Lowest 10%: 3.5%, highest 10%: 33.5%; US's: Lowest 10%: 1.8%, highest 10%: 30.5%.

    In light of these figures (taken from the CIA Worldbook,) in which India can be seen as a poor, illiterate, unjust, unhealthy, backward society, the superpower pissing contest that the Indian government has been involved in for years now is a pathetic moral perversion. Indian readers here would do well to feel ashamed to have a government even more embarrassing than that of the US.

    1. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It this the same CIA that claimed WMD in Iraq? Or is it the same CIA that created and support Saddam? Please clarify

      Hmm..

    2. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can verify the data from independent sources at your leisure.

    3. Re:Pathetic by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Indian infant mortality rate: 57.92 per 1000; World: 50.31 per 1000.

      Indian life expectancy at birth: 63.99 years; World: 64.05 years.

      Indian literacy: Male: 70.2%, female: 48.3%; World: Male: 83%, female: 71%.

      Indian GDP/capita (PPP): $2,900; World: $8,200.

      A pretty average place, bit low on the old GDP though. The 8% growth rate might help a bit.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  45. Re:Moon Cheese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "FEED YOUR PEOPLE", spake G_dbert1966 to Apu, "And then feed mine. Cuz they are screwing up the environment, mucking up with other people's countries and sooner or later the cycle will revolve".

  46. Re:Moon Cheese by shubert1966 · · Score: 1

    Feed, Clothe, House your people

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  47. Bush's Proclamation by twoes00 · · Score: 0

    So much for US President Bush's proclamation of man-on-the-moon in 2020 (or whenever). Looks like NASA has some competition, already ahead of the game that is...

  48. Rs 384 Crore? by p0 · · Score: 1

    From TFA

    Officially, this Rs 384-crore project is not a landing mission.

    WTF is a crore?

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Rs 384 Crore? by aalobode · · Score: 2, Informative

      p0 asks WTF is a crore?
      It's from the (older) Indian counting system, A crore equals 100 lakhs; a lakh equals 100,000. So a crore is 10,000,000. In dollar terms, a crore of rupees is approximately $233,000. So a 384-core project is around $90 million. Not a big chunk of change here, but pretty big in context.
      To get an idea of the purchasing power equivalent (not the rupee equivalent according to the conversion rate), just multiply a $ amount by 10. So, an outsource engineer earning $6000 per year in India can live like one earning $60,000 in the USA and possibly better.
      Thus a 384-crore project would be "equivalent" in cost to a $3.84 billion project here. But NASA would not be able to do a moonshot for that amount.

  49. Why the impactor? by adeydas · · Score: 1

    Why would they crash something on the moon's surface. They could easily collect rock samples by landing a probe.

  50. Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1

    While this is a great advancement for the Indians I just can't get excited. Been there, done that. Landers, orbiters, impacters... Who cares!!! We had PEOPLE on the moon 35 years ago!

    1. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Who cares!!! We had PEOPLE on the moon 35 years ago!
      Yeah, and after a handful of missions you shut up shop and never went back because you were too busy arming yourselves to the teeth. I don't see your lot making much progress in getting back to the moon.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 1
      While this is a great advancement for the Indians I just can't get excited. Been there, done that. Landers, orbiters, impacters... Who cares!!! We had PEOPLE on the moon 35 years ago!

      And the sad thing is that if the US, China and India all decided they wanted to do another manned moon-shot program, starting Right Now, I wouldn't know which one to bet on. Between a mix of apathy and atrophy, you might want to keep in mind that the US isn't terribly far ahead of other spacefaring countries anymore.

      Accomplishments are all well and good, but the US got dumped back into the sixties with regard to their space technology lately. The fact that the Apollo Program happened is rather outweighed by the fact that the capability to do that again no longer exists - so you're simply cutting another country down for doing something you guys threw away the skills for twenty years ago. Nice.

      -PS

      --
      "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > While this is a great advancement for the Indians I just can't get excited. Been there, done that. Landers, orbiters, impacters... Who cares!!! We had PEOPLE on the moon 35 years ago!

      The early bird gets the worm.
      The second mouse gets the cheese.

      You don't get bragging rights for flags and footprints. You get 'em for economic development. India and China have pwn3d our asses in that department for decades.

    4. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1
      Exactly! And we should be upset by this.

      Note that in my original post I didn't say YAY for the US. It sickens me to know the US got men on the moon and then got psyched about Clementine 30 years later. Again: WHO CARES!!!

      The science may be good but I don't see it moving us as a species forward in the kind of leaps and bounds that build on themselves. The kind of leaps and bounds that make the people witht he money want to continue.

      We could stop sending probes and the general public wouldn't give a damn. Put people on the moon and Mars and no one is going to say "It's getting too expensive, lets just stop sending them supplies."

    5. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, and after a handful of missions you shut up shop and never went back because you were too busy arming yourselves to the teeth.
      While it's certainly true that the US was "arming itself", you've conveniently forgotten that shortly after Moonshot NASA worked hand-in-hand with the old Soviet Union on different projects, launched the Voyager, Pioneer, and Skylab projects, and focused its efforts on building a fleet of re-usable spacecraft:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA#Other_early_miss ions
      I don't see your lot making much progress in getting back to the moon.
      The Moon?! Oh, please--been there, done that, bought the Tang. After Spirit sent back all those k3wl photos, we're just a little more interested in getting to Mars:

      http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/spce/bush-nasa-s pace-40185.html

      If all you believe that the US has done since Moonshot is arm itself; and if all you believe the US should do with its space program is go to the Moon, you have an amazing amount of ignorance about NASA. Do a little reading, and come back when you have an informed opinion.
    6. Re:Yay for them. Yawn for the world. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      f all you believe that the US has done since Moonshot is arm itself; and if all you believe the US should do with its space program is go to the Moon, you have an amazing amount of ignorance about NASA. Do a little reading, and come back when you have an informed opinion.
      I love it when AC trolls make fools of themselves. Space exploration budget was cut, defence budget was not. My original comment was correct.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  51. The real question is by Raven_Stark · · Score: 1

    will Chandrayan 1 make a decent slurpee?

    Sorry, I couldn't resist, nothing mean meant by it. Some of the nicest and brightest people I've met were from India.

    --
    http://www.marxist.com/
  52. Hassan ... not Bangalore by Vedanti · · Score: 1

    Thats where the ISRO control center is. Hassan is some 200 kms north west of B'lore.

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    1. Re:Hassan ... not Bangalore by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      They outsourced tech support. Hassan only does controlling.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  53. Far from it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    You have to have good income flow to help. India is just getting moving. I wish them well and hope that they help jump start american interest in really getting into space and staying there.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. Your sig is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans: back by computer commands.

  55. Yale university's origin tied to Indian money by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    "We are not poor due to our stupidity. We are poor by design. Just a 100 years ago, we were the richest nation on earth."
    No you weren't.


    Probably they weren't the richest but do you know that Dubya's Yale University is named after the guy (YALE, ELIHU) who robbed India in the name of Trade(as a governor of British East India Company in Madras, India around 1687) and donated a little bit of that robbed Indian money to the Collegiate School at Saybrook, Connecticut around 1718 and it was eventually renamed Yale University after this Mr Yale.

  56. Waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next in the news, India invents the wheel and axle?

    China and India, while floating huge populations of impoverished citizens, are spending enormous amounts of public money on re-doing science that's already in the books? Why?

    The only answers I've ever seen to that question are: "national pride" and "they want to militarize space". The first is simple emotionalism, and isn't defensible on grounds of reason, science, logic or pragmatism. The second is wishful thinking, as the USA has too much of a headstart to overcome.

    The best space science program I've seen outside the USA are the European Space Agency's, and Japan's - they explicitly strive not to duplicate what's already been done, and they don't have an emotional problem with using US technology to do new science. The ESA has never landed on the moon, but it has put robots and probes all over the solar system. And Japanese technology will be instrumental for the next generation of US spacecraft. Meanwhile, despite having space programs of similar funding and age, India and China are just recreating what the USSR and US did decades ago. It's not only a stupid use of the money, it's also arrogant, insular and selfish.

    1. Re:Waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's wrong if we reinvent the wheel and the axle. Its not as if you are giving us the technology to make the wheel and the axle. It is not as if the US is handing out the technology. So what would you have us do - just be left behind. What makes you so sure that in the process of reinventing that we will not come up with something new. And we would rather be doing that than have some westerner lecture us on how to spend our money.

      As for the Indian Nuke program ever noticed where India is located??

      And what's wrong with national pride? You think the US would be where it is today if people did not have national pride?

  57. Re:A DOLLAR A DAY IS NOT CHEAP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya right. Thats why tens of millions are starving http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/develop/2002/1 112starvation.htm .

  58. Re:Moon Cheese by codecracker007 · · Score: 1

    pull out of iraq, save yer social security system, maybe contribute more than the 70 millions tht yer benevolent dictator so generously contributed

    --
    7-8-9-10-0
  59. Macroeconomics, microeconomics ,etcetra, etcetra, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually a moon program is not like building white elephants, unless of course one picks really hard places to build the elephants in. A space program of any degree requires engineers to face and defeat some of the toughest environmental engineering challenges around. Said engineers are then the best and brightest at a lot of tasks that do make good money (like oh say, making commercial airliners, designing communications satellites, building better cell phones, etc. The design challenge of making an electrical device capable of providing high quality sensor data on a bitterly frugal power budget with a reliability capable of operating months or even years without service in an environment of high radiation, large temperature extremes, and total vacuum gives an engineer design tools he can employee forever. It provides a foundation of talented, trained technicians able to work to the most exacting standards which then can go on to design and build far more mundane objects with the object lessons learned. And the mechanical, electrical, chemical, and process information you learn or create from doing this kind of work can have serendipitous application as well (Teflon being one of those oft quoted examples) Plus the prestige contributes to national pride and self confidence which translates to a positive to the consumer confidence factor which leads to stimulation of the economy through more buying. Big, showy achievements tend to create better press then simple small advances regardless of the actual merit of the achievement (Call this the P.T. Barnum rule of economics) Bookkeepers and beancounters may quibble about the actual merit, but these classes can not lead a nation to greatness, they can only sustain the status quo. I congratulate India on their program and wish them the best of luck, perhaps the competition will push my own country to get serious again with it's space program. GO India!!

  60. UK-Indian culinary ties run deep by acb · · Score: 1

    Actually, the UK is a net exporter of curry to India; UK curry manufacturers (often founded by immigrants from the Indian subcontinent) now export curry paste/mix to the rest of the world, including India. Meanwhile, tikka masala recently was acknowledged as the English national dish.

    Going the other way, a few years ago, the Indian conglomerate Tata Group bought English tea company Tetley's.

  61. Begging your esteemed perusal by acb · · Score: 1

    And Hinglish has the added charm that anything written in it, even a bureaucratic form, will read like a P.G. Wodehouse novel.

  62. ... and 2 poppadoms please by Doctor+Crocodile · · Score: 1

    And the first settlers wil be an IBM call centre.

    Might finally get brits on the moon if they can get a decent curry..........

  63. just look at history by clonan · · Score: 1

    If there is ANYTHING history has shown us is that governments are usually pretty good at solving TECHNICAL problems and fatastically HORRIBLE at solving social problems.

  64. Indians could do better than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... by just trying to get to grips with overpopulation, poverty, backward castes, HIV, and bureaucracy (in no particular order) getting out of hand. How about spending resources on that, or is begging for foreign help just too convenient?

  65. Nehru and his daughter by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    ... dominated the political scene of India for more than 30 years. Both were "pro-soviets" in terms of economical policies, and I think it shows.

    And why exactly do you say that India was the richest nation 100 years ago ?? Or that's what you call an agricultural "paradise" ?

    --

    The Raven

  66. Is it normal? by marcus · · Score: 1

    For a human to have kids when they know that they cannot feed them? Is it "humane"? Or is it insane?

    The fact of the matter is, "world hunger" will not be solved without some form of population control. IF you were to snap your fingers and have enough food and health care instantly available for the current needy population, all you would do is double or triple the population in less than a generation.

    Most places that have pulled themselves out of the muck have solved this with education. The Chinese, recognizing that their situation was desperate, have solved it with force. Others have not tried to solve it at all, and so they are still poor, diseased, ignorant, and starving with no hope in sight.

    In the US, we have managed to pull most of our population out of the squalor by the sheer strength of our economy. Still we have problems that would be solved in a generation if we practiced some form of enforced birth control. Consider what would happen to our welfare system if every child was sterilized at birth and then as an adult had to pay for an operation to restore it to fertility.

    While I don't advocate this, I do think that there are some forms of behavior that ought to be criminal, that aren't. I also think that the sentances for some crimes should include sterilisation.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
    1. Re:Is it normal? by brpr · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is, "world hunger" will not be solved without some form of population control.

      Bullshit. There is enough food in the world to feed everyone. The problem is that much of it is wasted and it's distributed unevenly.

      Consider what would happen to our welfare system if every child was sterilized at birth and then as an adult had to pay for an operation to restore it to fertility.

      Consider what would happen to the economy if there was no minimum wage underclass to keep the country running. The cost saved in welfare (if any) would be no compensation.

      While I don't advocate this, I do think that there are some forms of behavior that ought to be criminal, that aren't. I also think that the sentances for some crimes should include sterilisation.

      So you're not really a very nice person, are you.

      --
      Freedom is not increased by mere diminuation of government. Anarchy is freedom for the strong and slavery for the weak.
    2. Re:Is it normal? by marcus · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. There is enough food in the world to feed everyone

      Can you read? Can you comprehend? If so, answer this question: Is there enough food for today's population plus another billion? How about two or three billion?

      So you're not really a very nice person, are you

      Irrelevant it might be, but it provides insight to your intellect or lack thereof. Someday, perhaps the day you die, you'll discover that the universe is not nice, and thinking "nice" does not solve nasty problems. One of those things that I consider criminal and worthy of sterilization is willful ignorance in the face of reality. For now, I can just hope we're lucky and you don't have any kids - naturally.

      --
      Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
      - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
    3. Re:Is it normal? by brpr · · Score: 1

      Can you read? Can you comprehend? If so, answer this question: Is there enough food for today's population plus another billion? How about two or three billion?

      The short answer is yes, if agriculture is managed properly.

      Someday, perhaps the day you die, you'll discover that the universe is not nice, and thinking "nice" does not solve nasty problems.

      Neither does being nasty. Being nice is preferable for independent reasons.

      One of those things that I consider criminal and worthy of sterilization is willful ignorance in the face of reality.

      Right. So let's get the government to round up all the people they think are ignorant and cut their balls off (or whatever). Sensible policy.

      For now, I can just hope we're lucky and you don't have any kids - naturally.

      See, you're just not nice at all.

      --
      Freedom is not increased by mere diminuation of government. Anarchy is freedom for the strong and slavery for the weak.